HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Agenda 2018-04-18 TOWN OF TIBURON Tiburon Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall April 18,2018
s 1505
Tiburon boulevard
- Special Meeting–6:30 p.m.
Tiburon, CA 94920
Regular Meeting–7:30 p.m.
TIBURON
TOWN COUNCIL
AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING–6:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Councilmember Fredericks,Councilmember Thier,Councilmember Weiner,Vice Mayor Kulik, Mayor
Fraser
CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Government Code Section 54956.9(4)(1))
County of Marin vs.Martha Co.,et al.–United States District Court, Northern District of California-Case
No. C06 0200 SBA
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4)of subdivision(d) of Section 54956.9: (1 potential case)
ADJOURN– to.regularmeetzn
REGULAR MEETING–7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Councilmember Fredericks,Councilmember Thier,Councilmember Welner,Vice Mayor Kulik,Mayor
Fraser
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION IF ANY
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the To,,s n Council on subjects not on the agenda may do so at this time.
Please note however, that the Town Council is not able to undertake extended discussion or action on
items not on the agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to the appropriate Commission,Board,
Committee or staff for consideration or placed on a future Town Council meeting agenda. Please limit
your comments to three (3)minutes.
PRESENTATION
• Transportation Authority of Marin—"Renewing Transportation Sales Tax in 2018"
CONSENT CALENDAR
All items on the Consent Calendar may be approved by one motion of the Town Council unless a request
is made by a member of the Town Council,public or staff to remove an item for separate discussion and
consideration. If you wish to speak on a Consent Calendar item, please seek recognition by the Mayor
and do so at this time.
CC-1. Town Council Minutes —Adopt minutes of March 21, 2018 special and regular meetings (Town
Clerk Stefani)
CC-2. Town Council Minutes—Adopt minutes of April 4,2018 regular meeting (Town Clerk Stefani)
ACTION ITEMS
AI-1. Tiburon Boulevard Rule 20A Undergrounding Project — Receive update and consider
directing staff and PG& E to close down project (Office of the Town Manager/Department of
Public Works)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PH-1. Cypress Hollow Landscape &r Lighting District (LLD) — Hold annual protest hearing and
consider adoption of resolution to continue the LLD assessment for fiscal year 2018-2019
(Department of Public Works)
TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS
TOWN MANAGER REPORT
• Review of Upcoming Council and Subcommittee Meetings
WEEKLY DIGESTS
• Town Council Weekly Digests—April 6&r 13,2018
ADJOURNMENT
GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION
ASSISTANCE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if: you need special
assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the Town Cleric at (415) 435-
7377. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
Copies of all agenda reports and supporting data are available for vie"7ing and
inspection at Town Hall and at the Belvedere-Tiburon Library located adjacent to
Town Hall. Agendas and minutes are posted on the Town's website,
www.town oftiburon.org.
Upon request, the Town will provide written agenda materials in appropriate
alternative formats, or disability-related modification or accommodation, including
auxiliary aids or services, to enable individuals with disabilities to participate in
public meetings. Please send a written request, including your name, mailing
address,phone number and brief description of the requested materials and preferred
alternative format or auxiliary aid or service at least S days before the meeting.
Requests should be sent to the Office of the Town Clerk at the above address.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public Hearings provide the general public and interested parties an opportunity to
provide testimony on these items. If you challenge any proposed action(s) in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
Public Hearing(s) described later in this agenda, or in written correspondence
delivered to the Town Council at,or prior to,the Public Hearing(s).
TIMING OF ITEMS ON AGENDA
While the Town Council attempts to hear all items in order as stated on the agenda,
it reserves the right to take items out of order. No set times are assigned to items
appearing on the Town Council agenda.
April 11, 2018
Transportation Authority of Marin
900 F-ifth Avenue Mr. Greg Chanis
Suite 100
Sari Rafael Town Manager
California 94901 Town of Tiburon
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Rhone: 415/2.26-0815 Tiburon, CA 94920
Fax: 415/226-0€316
www.tam.ca.gov Dear Mr. Chanis:
Belvedere Please accept a request for a presentation to the Tiburon Town Council from the
.lames Campbell Transportation Authority of Marin(TAM)Executive Director for the purpose of discussing
information regarding the Measure A Transportation Sales Tax, the proposed Draft
Corte Madera Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan and recent public opinion poll results.
Diane Furst Considering an upcoming early renewal of the '/2 cent transportation sales tax, TAM is in
Fairfax the process of educational outreach to Cities and Towns to provide information on the draft
.john Reed proposal. TAM is seeking input on the Draft Plan, such as responses to the following:
Larkspur * Does this new Draft Expenditure Plan meet the needs of your jurisdiction?What are
Dan I-lillmer
your key priorities?
Mill /alley • What other information do you need to support the plan in the future?Details on trip
Stephanie Moulton-Peters reduction,greenhouse gas emissions reduction,travel time benefits and other metrics
Novato can all be made available for your assessment of whether to support.
Eric Gucan • What flexibility would you like to see in the program?Could you support a re-set of
the plan every 10 years, or more frequently? Staff at TAM can present examples on
Ross how that would be done.
P. Beach Kuhl . What additional organizations or local interests should be consulted regarding the
San Anselmo plan?
Brian Colbert
Background
San Rafael
Gary Phillips Measure A,Marin's '/2-cent Transportation Sales Tax,is a critical local funding source that
generates approximately $25 million each year to support our local transportation needs.
Ray Withy 5The Measure was passed by over 71% of Marin voters in 2004 and funds are spent in
Ray W
accordance with the 20-year Measure A Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan.
Tiburon
Alice Fredericks The expenditure plan is now nearly 15 years old and the TAM Board of Commissioners
has been considering early renewal of the sales tax measure to respond to current needs
County of Mann and adjusting how the funds can be spent moving forward. Renewing the transportation
Damon Connolly sales tax would create an ongoing reliable stream of revenue for much needed projects and
Katie Rice
Kathrin Sears programs.
Dennis Rodoni
Judy Arnold During the first quarter of last year,TAM visited local jurisdictions to provide educational
briefings to and introduce the idea of renewing and possibly increasing our county-wide
transportation sales tax. These briefings focused on providing information about the
projects and programs supported by the current sales tax and receiving feedback from
elected officials and residents on priorities and unmet needs. The idea of legislatively
increasing the statewide sales tax cap to enable an increase in the transportation sales tax
was initially discussed,then abandoned.
Making the Most of Marin County Transportation Dollars
Letter to Greg Chanis
April 11, 2018
A baseline poll was conducted in May 2017 to gauge public opinion on renewing the '/2-cent sales tax or
potentially increasing of the sales tax to 3/4-cent. The poll demonstrated considerably more support for
renewing the sales tax rather than increasing the sales tax,with 72%of likely 2018 voters supporting renewal
of the existing t/2-cent transportation sales tax and a range from 60.8%to 66.9% supporting an increase to 3/4-
cent.
In January 2018,a second poll was taken,specifically addressing a renewal of the current sales tax and testing
the features of a Draft Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan, along with supportive informational statements
and critical statements. The results of this second poll will be reviewed.
Proposal Overview
Back in June 2017, the TAM Board approved the formation and membership of a Transportation Sales Tax
Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC). The EPAC is comprised of 24 community members
representing a broad range of neighborhood, business, civic and advocacy interests in Marin County. The
EPAC met between June and December 2017 to develop a plan to renew the existing I/2-cent transportation
sales tax and consider expanding the sales tax to 3/4-cent. The membership of that Committee is attached.
The EPAC reviewed the baseline poll results, received broad education about the current 1/2-cent
transportation sales tax and learned from a variety of agencies about current transportation programs and
unmet transportation needs. Based on this information, the EPAC developed a draft expenditure a plan that
culminated with a consensus recommendation to pursue a 30-year extension of the current '/2-cent sales tax
to be placed on the ballot in November of 2018. The new Expenditure Plan would take effect immediately,
replacing the existing plan. A 2/3rds approval of those voting would be required.
A chart and factsheets detailing the committee recommendations are attached. Primary goals of the 1/2-cent
plan are to keep the core structure of the existing expenditure plan and expand much needed congestion relief
programs.
Although there were diverse interests represented by the EPAC, the committee reached consensus and
demonstrated a strong commitment to building from the current successful transportation sales tax measure,
keeping the core structure and maintaining the top-line funding percentages:
• 7.5%to Highway and Interchange Improvements
• 26.5 %to Local Streets and Roads
• 11%to Safe Routes to Schools, Education, Infrastructure and Crossing Guards
• 55%to Local, Rural, Student and Special Needs Transit
With No New Taxes the Proposal Would:
• Respond to current needs and adjust how the funds can be spent moving forward
• Continue a reliable stream of local revenue into the future to enable long-term planning
• Maintain and expand successful projects and programs, including the Safe Routes to Schools
programs, local road maintenance and local transit
• Expand school-related transit and yellow bus programs
• Prevent cuts in the current Crossing Guard program
• Provide a local funding source for key operational improvement projects including the Marin-
Sonoma Narrows and the Northbound US-101 to Eastbound I-580 Direct Connector
• Leverage other regional, state and federal funding for needed transportation improvements
• Provide seed funding for projects related to sea-level rise, innovative technologies and for support of
mobility concepts for first/last mile transit solutions and peak hour demand management
Letter to Greg Chanis
April 11, 2018
In addition to recognizing the importance of continuing this local funding source, the committee also
recognized the current tax-sensitive climate. To protect and maintain the existing sales tax and associated
programs,the committee did not think it was prudent to try to increase the tax. They recognized the changes
in our transportation environment and the need to adjust how funds are being spent. They also acknowledged
the rapidly changing landscape of transportation and mobility choices and therefore recommend having
milestone review opportunities every 10 years to adjust plan elements to address future conditions.
Follow-up Poll
A follow-up poll was conducted in January 2018. The follow-up poll explored renewing the existing
Transportation Sales Tax,testing over 750 likely voters for a November 2018 ballot measure in Marin County.
The 2018 follow-up poll confirmed that transportation issues and traffic congestion continue to be top
concerns of Marin County residents. There is great interest in transportation issues and solutions. The 2018
poll results show strong support for renewing the transportation sales tax with support from likely 2018 voters
at 77.9%, and after a series of critical statements were presented, 73.2%.
Next Steps
At this time,TAM is seeking additional input from TAM's member agencies-the cities,towns and county of
Marin- on the proposed Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan. Based on input from agencies
and residents from this ongoing outreach, TAM staff will write and refine a detailed Final Draft
Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan.
In April or early May, the TAM Board will consider voting on the Final Draft Transportation Sales Tax
Renewal Expenditure Plan and will decide whether to direct staff to seek approval from all 12 local
jurisdictions on the Final Draft Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan.
For the Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan to be placed on the ballot for consideration by
voters in November 2018, the 75-word ballot argument and Expenditure Plan must be submitted to the
Registrar of Voters no later than August 10,2018.The TAM Board would need to act no later than July 2018,
allowing time for the Marin County Board of Supervisors to make a final decision on whether to put the
measure on the November 2018 ballot.
TAM appreciates feedback from your council.
Sincerely,
Dianne Steinhauser
Executive Director
Transportation Authority of Marin
Attachments:
Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan
Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan—Factsheets
Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee membership
January 2018 Poll of likely November 2018 voters-Topline Results
Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Process—Likely Next Steps
Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Proposal to Renew the 1/2-cent Transportation Sales Tax
Goal: Reduce congestion, maintain and improve local transportation infrastructure and provide high quality transportation options for people of all ages who live, work and travel in Marin County
Strategy Descriptions ' , • • • •
-
7.5/ 7.5
® P W ® B @ @ @ B P @ B
1. Provide local matching funds to accelerate the completion of the Marin Sonoma Narrows, to reduce
impacts and enhance the facility for all users. 1.5% $ 12,405,000
2. Provide local matching funds to accelerate the completion of the 101-580 interchange direct
connector, including the development of local enhancements to reduce impacts and enhance the facility for 2% $ 16,540,000
all users.
3. Enhance local interchanges and freeway access routes to reduce congestion, improve local traffic flow,
improve access for all modes, and address flooding impacts throughout the County. 3% $ 24,810,000
4. Implement demand management strategies to increase vehicle occupancy and reduce peak hour 1% $ 270,000
congestion throughout the County.
P P B B O d B @ ' 0 0 P @ P'f d B P P W 'l B P ® @ ��• / 26.5/
@ S ® B 6
1. Maintain and manage local roads to provide safe and well-maintained streets for all users. Projects may
include paving and repairs, crosswalk and curb cut enhancements, bike lane and pathway construction (13.25%to
including closing gaps in the network to enhance connectivity, bus bulbs, safe pathways to transit and major Local Roads
generators, intersection improvements, pavement and drainage improvements, sidewalk repair as well as by Formula 22% $ 5,940,000
system enhancements to accommodate new technologies including autonomous vehicles and other
and
innovations such as signal coordination, real time information and other tools to maximize the efficiency, 13.25%to
effectiveness and resiliency of our transportation system.
Major Roads)
2. Provide safe pathways for safe walking and biking access to schools. 3% $ 810,000
3. Develop projects and programs to address sea level rise and resiliency 1% $ 270,000
4. Support capacity enhancements of local streets and roads through innovative technology 0.5% $ 135,000
Dollar amounts are based on 2018/19 annual revenue projections and are for illustrative purposes only.
EXHIBIT NO.
Page 1
Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Proposal to Renew the 1/2-cent Transportation Sales Tax - Page 2
Goal: Reduce congestion, maintain and improve local transportation infrastructure and provide high quality transportation options for people of all ages who live, work and travel in Marin County
Strategy Descriptions ' , Final ProposalOne time $ Amount
" �1
1. Maintain and expand the Safe Routes to Schools Education and Encouragement program. 3.3% 3.5% $ 945,000 4.2% 6.5%
2. Expand the crossing guard program, providing funding for up to 90 crossing guards throughout Marin $ 1,755,000
County
3. Capital funding for Safe Pathways projects (3%moved to Strategy 2, 1%new category below) 3.5% 0%
4. Capital funding for small safety related projects 0% 1% $ 270,000
.
a %
@ B@ ® 0 9 B ® ® G B B @ R B 6@ 0 B B @ 6 B
® 6 G & R ® 0 R b @ ® B B G k 8 R 8 B B B R
1. Maintain and improve existing levels of bus transit service in areas that can support productive fixed
route service throughout Marin County
i. Maintain a network of high productivity of bus service in high volume corridors
ii. Expand first-and-last-mile transit services for residents and workers 37% 33% $ 8,910,000
iii. Provide innovative services in communities that may not support traditional fixed route service
iv. Enhance public safety through Marin Transit's role in providing emergency mobility in the face of
natural disaster. 3% 3%
2. Maintain and expand the rural and recreational bus services including the West Marin Stagecoach and $ 810,000
Muir Woods shuttle system.
3. Maintain and expand transit services and programs for those with special needs—seniors, persons
with disabilities and low-income residents. 9% 9.5% $ 2,565,000
4. Provide transit services to schools in Marin County to reduce local congestion.
L Provide yellow bus services in partnership with local schools and parent organizations. 0% 5% $ 1,350,000
ii. Provide transit routes to schools where efficient and effective.
5. Invest in bus transit facilities for a clean and efficient transit system.
L Provide matching funds for the purchase of the green transit fleet.
ii. Support the development of a renewed/relocated Bettini Bus Hub 6% 4% $ 1,080,000
iii. Support the development of a local bus maintenance facility
iv. Improve passenger amenities at bus stops, including real-time transit information.
6. Expand access to ferries and regional transit.
mi
i. Expand and maintain connecting ferry shuttle services to address first and last mile connections.
ii. Expand and maintain remote parking locations and other strategies to expand regional transit access 0% 0.5% $ 135,000
for Marin's residents and commuters.
iii. Expand first and last mile access to regional transit services for access to jobs in Marin County.
Totals(Dollar amounts are based on 2018/19 annual revenue projections and are for illustrative purposes only.) $ ■ 27,000,000! 827,000,000
DRAFT EPAC F
. ...........
Ti
OVERVIEW
SUMMARY
4
a
w
a'
ti
k st
.P
ass k. ,.F •:} ,,,,
Safe Routes to Schools,
Education,Infrastructure
and Crossing Guards
Highway and
Interchanges
Improvements
0
11% The Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC) recommends a 30-year extension of
75�0 Local Streets the t/z-cent sales tax to be placed on the ballot in November of 2018.The proposal builds
and Roads on the success of the current transportation sales tax and maintains the core elements.
i
{ "f
2fi.�to° An extension does not propose any new taxes and generates a future funding stream for
r r �
major highway investments that are not currently funded, including Marin-Sonoma Narrows
2 and the NB US-101 to EB 1-580 direct connection. Future local funds can be advanced
immediately to attract regional,state and federal funding.
The proposal increases funding for local road improvements,senior mobility,school-related
transit and yellow bus programs.The extension proposal would provide more funding for
Safe Routes to Schools education, safe pathways programs and crossing guards, avoiding the
ocal,Rural,Student
need to cut 26 crossing guards in the fall of 2018.
"dL
�
and Special Needs Transit The proposal is forward thinking and provides seed funding for projects related to sea-level
rise, innovative technologies and supports future mobility concepts for first/last mile solutions
® and peak hour demand management.
B®w\v 4
F �
Transportation Authority of Marin :v._ v v ,
DRAFT EPAC PROPOSAL
f,
STRATEGY ONE:
HIGH11, AV IMPROVEME1111 TS
Reduce congestion on Highway 101 and Contribute matching funds to complete
adjacent roadways by leveraging non-local the Marin-Sonoma Narrows 1.5% Proposal $1240m One time amount
,
funds to assure completion of key multimodal /z cent Renewal . based on$827m
projects that provide congestion relief. i
f
Contribute matching funds to build a
i
2. Proposal One time amount 1
direct connector from N1312.0%101 to EB580 $16.54m
7 5% Current Q�U Proposal /z cent Renewal based on$827m
'/2 cent Renewal
The current expenditure was dedicated to the Highway 707
Carpool Lane Gap Closure Project that was successfully Improve Six Local Interchanges:
3.0% Proposal $24.81 m One time amount
completed in 2070. Tiburon/East Blithedale to Lucas Valley 1/z cent Renewal based on$827m
i
i
The sales tax must be renewed to create a
future funding stream for these new major Reduce Peak Hour Congestion with
projects.Funds can e advanced immediately. Demand Mana Management Pro rams 1.0a/p Proposal $270,000 Annual amount
i
g g h cent Renewal based on$27m
Transportation Authority of Marin
�f
l
DRAFT EPAC PROPOSAL
m" W
STRATEGY TWO:
� h� ROAD
LOCAL � Tr�E E� �:�a�� R OA D
Maintain, improve and manage Marin County's
13.25% Current 22% Proposal $5.94m Annual
local transportation infrastructure, including Local Local '/z cent amount based
roads, bikeways,sidewalks and pathways Maintain and manage local roads Renewal on$27m
to create a well maintained and resilient I to provide safe and well-maintained 13.25%
transportation system. streets for all users Major
r
p Current Final Provide safe pathways for safe
p 3.0% Proposal $810 000 Annual amount
26.5% 26.5 �0 Proposal walking and biking access to schools 1/z cent Renewal based on$27m
4
'/i cent
Renewal
E Develop projects and programs to 1.0% Proposal � Annual amount
i address sea level rise and resiliency 1/2 cent Renewal $27O 000 based on$27m
1
All existing Major Roads Projects will receive I
their currently programmed level of funding. Support capacity enhancements of
j local streets and roads through E O.SO�U Proposal $135 000 Annual amount
innovative technology '/i cent Renewal based on$27m
'transportation Authority of Marin
SFT EPAC PROPOSAL
STRATEGY THREE:
.a
a
ry
� t44
SAFE R$% Ua mss. SCHOOL .............. 3°
Reduce school-related congestion and provide E Maintain and expand the Safe
safer access to schools. Routes to Schools Education 3.3% Current 3.5% Proposal $945.000 Annual amount
and Encouragement program '/2 cent Renewal based on$27m
4
Expand the crossing guard
w program,provide funding
2
for up to 90 crossing guards 0 Current 0 Proposal Annual amount
p Current p Proposal throughout Marin Count 4.Z�0 6.5�0 '/2 cent Renewal $ •75m based on$27m
�0 �0 1h cent Renewal g
Provide capital funding 3.5% Current 0% Proposal (Moved to Strategy 2:
for Safe Pathways projects Moved '/z cent Renewal Local Street&Road Improvements]
Safe Routes education,Safe Pathways
projects and Crossing Guards will receive
more funding.Specifically,TAM will be able
to avoid cutting 26 crossing guards in the fall Capital funding for small 1% ProposalAnnual amount
of 2018. safety-related projects '/2 cent Renewal $270,000 based on$27m
Transportation Authority of Marin
5
�'i1ad'/%1 rr Cf y y h
J'*5wjn37 p jI:.
DRAFT EPAC PROPOSAL
x.
FOUR-
LOCALA l��.�x+.'✓aY>Tj' RS.�G;d C S d is L �
3,E E jj S. TRANSIT
Maintain and expand efficient and effective Maintain and improve existing
local transit services in Marin County to reduce levels of bus transit service in
areas that can support productive
congestion and meet community needs.This 6
initiative includes funding for a variety of local fixed route service throughout 37% current 33% Proposal $$.91 m Annual amount
transit services for mobility and congestion = Marin County '/z cent Renewal based on$27m
t
relief,specialized services for seniors and
a
persons with disabilities,school bus services
to relieve local congestion,and connections to Maintain and expand the rural
regional transit to reduce peak vehicle demand. I and recreational bus services
including the West Marin _
55% Current p Proposal Stagecoach and Muir Woods 3p�o Current 3p�o Proposal $$1 U 000 Annual amount
5 5 �0 �/z cent Renewal based on$27m
1/2 cent Renewal shuttle system
n
Transit will receive the same level of funds k Maintain and expand transit services
it receives now.Redirection within the 55% for those with special needs—
will allow fund to be dedicated to school seniors,persons with disabilities 9% Current 9.5% Proposal � Annual amount
and
bus services low-income residents 1/2 cent Renewal $2 56m based on$27m
Transportation Authority of Marin _ _ j _
D" RAFT EPAC PROPOSAL
a
...........
gg,;
STRATEGY FOUR.-
k F t
[CONT.]
IV
LOCAL All, 0 SPECIAL
NEEDS TRAv IT
Maintain and expand e'c=ent and effective Provide transit services to schools
local -ansit Services in ri ,n CSU r �t �= to reduce local congestion o Current o Proposal Annual amount
g 0% 5/o p $1.35m
GngC-rjor and nle- COn;rn��,tr 4 U� including yellowrbus service
'/z cent Renewal based on$27m
,,�i. c5 € iii, yr variety o.
t;rcnSit services
or I of-,i ty andl I—OrI'J C-fl,
ciao ,' r C is _ !
sur or5 v:I ,rr,, S cto o` n.L._ _.,
h rd Invest in bus transit facilities,
to :�i:eve ioca, u .,v,�n and c<0 ,ne,. rion,> 1 including greeningthefleet,
repo vial trans «; r ue -_ al`1 vehiicie den .. improving maintenance facilities 6% Current 4% Proposal $1.08 Annual amount
and providing passenger amenities 'h cent Renewal based on$27m
55% Current 55% Proposal
'/i cent Renewal
i -
Expand access to ferries and o Current o Proposal Annual amount
p 0/0 0.5/o p $135 000
regional transit '/z cent Renewal based on$27m
NAs - De: _
Transportation Authority of Marin �_
Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Meeting Membership List
Ref# Organization Select Individual
1 COC-Northern Planning V-Anne Chernock
2 COC-Central Planning Joy Dahlgren
3 COC-Ross Valley Planning Paul Roye
4 COC-Southern Planning Robert Burton
5 COC-West Marin Planning Area Scott Tye
6 COC-Major Marin Employers Peter Pelham
7 COC-Environmental Organizations- MCL Kate Powers
8 COC-Bicycle and Pedestrian Group Vince O'Brien
9 COC-Marin County Paratransit Coordinating Council Allan Bortel
10 COC-League of Women Voters Kevin Hagerty
11 COC-Taxpayer Group Paul Premo
12 North Bay Leadership Council Cynthia Murray
13 Chamber of Commerce Novato Coy Smith
14 Chamber of Commerce San Rafael Joanne Webster
15 Marin County Office of Education Ken Lippi
16 Student-College of Marin Jon Horinek
17 Transit Rider Lise) Blash
18 Marin Mobility Consortium -Seniors Lynn Von der Werth
19 Senior Living Resident/Pedestrian Sue Beittel
20 Equity/Marin City Monique Brown
21 Equity/Canal Neighborhood Roberto Hernandez
22 Labor Union/Building Trade Council Javier Flores
23 Bay Wave Rep-Sea Level Rise- Innovation/Resiliance Bill Carney
24 Safe Routes to School Representative Debbie Alley
EXHIBIT NO.
TR A N"S F"I RA 1"1 i'l 1-11JR, j
ARM
'D ILK-, N], fl k, f t"O `NA.1
plhne 'Ftepod(
nr=-7 9 4
Likely
GODBE RESEARCH 19. -liii i uit
larv,.iary 2 ')', 2018
wvvvv.r
j o d b -s eap re h.c-ova
Northern Cajifcvroa ancl corporate mlices
1575 Old Bi--i/shorn: Highway, 102
BurIingam(-,,,, (A 940,10
Nevada
59 [)amonte 1-,\'andi Parkvv ay, Suite F330")
Reno, NV 89521
Pacific Northwest
601 1081il Avenue NE., Suite? 1900
Bellevue,WA 98004
EXHIBITNO
Sample Universe:
-124,947 Likely November 2018 Voters
Sample Size:
n=794 Registered Voters
Data Collection Methodology:
n=120 Landline
n=77 Cell Phone
n=269 Online from email invitation
n=328 Online from text invitation
Marin of Error:
-Registered Voters+3.47%
Interview Dates:January 17 to January 23,2018
, ! �
OF L NFI, cog 5#1\ C FA T I N WRTH 7RAW01-51011- NON (1) PMONIZI
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Very satisfied 55.6% 442
Somewhat satisfied 34.7% 275
Somewhat dissatisfied 6.3% 50
1. Generally speaking,are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the Very dissatisfied 3.1% 25
overall quality of life in Marin County? DK/NA 0.3% 2
Total Satisfied 90.3% 717
Total Dissatisfied 9.4% 75
Ratio Sat to Dissat 9.6
Very satisfied 11.9% 94
Somewhat satisfied 35.8% 284
Somewhat dissatisfied 29.1% 231
2.Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the transportation Very dissatisfied 16.5% 131
options,facilities and services in Marin County? DK/NA 6.7% 53
Total Satisfied 47.7% 378
Total Dissatisfied 45.7% 363
Ratio Sat to Dissat 1.0
Topline Roport 1/2 /2018 Page 1
A INA :2o 1 1 t 0 j
q prfr�
pIl,, !L R
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
3. In order to: Definitely Yes 47.5% 377
•relieve traffic congestion on Highway101 and local roads; Probably Yes 30.4% 241
•fix potholes and maintain local roads; Probably No 6.9% 55
•improve interchanges and access on and off of Highway101; Definitely No 12.3% 98
•expand safe routes to schools,including school bus service, DK/NA 2.9% 23
relieving local congestion; and, Total Yes 77.9% 618
-provide local transit, including options for seniors and persons
with disabilities; Total No 19.2% 152
shall Marin County extend the existing half-cent,voter approved
sales tax without increasing the current rate, providing$25
million dollars annually for 30 years,with citizens'oversight,that
the State cannot take away?
F
oohll�'. I Zepolt U25/2 118 a 12
44-
'FEA1
TFURZ12
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Much more likely 54.9% 436 80.2%
Somewhat more likely 25.3% 201
No effect 12.1% 96
Q4A. Relieve traffic congestion on Highway 101 and local roads Somewhat less likely 3.2% 25
Much less likely 3.5% 28
DK/NA 1.0% 8
Much more likely 47.5% 377 80.0%
Somewhat more likely 32.5% 258
Q413.Fix potholes and maintain local roads No effect 15.5% 123
Somewhat less likely 1.8% 14
Much less likely 2.3% 18
DK/NA 0.4% 3
Much more likely 40.2% 319 68.8%
Somewhat more likely 28,6% 227
Q4C. Improve interchanges and access on and off of Highway No effect 20.8% 165
101 Somewhat less likely 4.5% 36
Much less likely 4.5% 36
DK/NA 1.4% 11
Much more likely 33.1% 263 65.9%
Somewhat more likely 32.8% 260
Q41D.Expand safe routes to schools, including school bus No effect 21.2% 169
service,relieving local congestion Somewhat less likely 5.8% 46
Much less likely 6.4% 51
DK/NA 0.7% 5
Much more likely 35.8% 284 67.3%
Somewhat more likely 31.5% 250
Q4E. Provide local transit,including options for seniors and No effect 22.4% 178
persons with disabilities Somewhat less likely 4.6% 36
Much less likely 5.2% 41
DK/NA 0.6% 4
Much more likely 45.7% 363 77.6%
Somewhat more likely 31.9% 254
04F.Relieve congestion by improving intersections and better No effect 15.1% 120
timing of signals Somewhat less likely 3.4% 27
Much less likely 3.6% 29
DK/NA 0.3% 2
Much more likely 47.6% 378 71.4%
Somewhat more likely 23.8% 189
Q4G.Provide matching funds to build a direct connector from No effect 15.0% 119
Highway 101 to 1-580 and the San Rafael-Richmond Bridge Somewhat less likely 4.7% 37
Much less likely 6.8% 54
DK/NA 2.2% 18
1/2612018
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Much more likely 26.1% 207 56.6%
Somewhat more likely 30.5% 242
Q4H. Fill in critical gaps in pedestrian pathways No effect 25.0% 199
Somewhat less likely 8.8% 70
Much less likely 8.4% 67
DK/NA 1.2% 10
Much more likely 25.8% 205 47.9%
Somewhat more likely 22.2% 176
No effect 25.6% 204
Q41. Fill in critical gaps in bike paths
Somewhat less likely 9.0% 71
Much less likely 16.1% 128
DK/NA 1.4% 11
Much more likely 32.6% 259 65.2%
Somewhat more likely 32.6% 259
No effect 22.0% 175
04J. Provide more local bus service to relieve traffic congestion
Somewhat less likely 5.7% 45
Much less likely 6.7% 53
DK/NA 0.4% 4
Much more likely 30.3% 241 65.3%
Somewhat more likely 35.0% 278
Q4K.Support door-to-door transit services for seniors and No effect 23.9% 190
people with disabilities such as Whistlestop Wheels Somewhat less likely 4.7% 38
Much less likely 5.4% 43
DK/NA 0.6% 5
Much more likely 31.8% 252 63.0%
Somewhat more likely 31.2% 248
Q4L. Provide matching funds to complete highway carpool lanes No effect 21.8% 173
and multi-use pathway improvements through the Marin Sonoma
Somewhat less likely 6.0% 48
Narrows
Much less likely 8.3% 66
DK/NA 0.8% 6
Much more likely 25.1% 199 52.9%
Somewhat more likely 27.9% 221
Q4M.Maintain and expand school crossing guards and the Safe No effect 30.6% 243
Routes to Schools and Pathways programs Somewhat less likely 7.5% 60
Much less likely 8.5% 68
DK/NA 0.5% 4
Much more likely 37.6% 299 70.6%
Somewhat more likely 33.0% 262
Q4N. Protect local roads and highways from flooding and sea No effect 17.2% 136
level rise Somewhat less likely 3.8% 30
Much less likely 7.6% 60
DK/NA 0.8% 6
loplmo Report 1/25/20 18
AM-2C i 9rui, on �,ue i��� pure �i<_i�<�Sm✓F�y
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Much more likely 24.5% 195 49.5%
Somewhat more likely 24.9% 198
Q4O.Increase incentives to use electric vehicles including No effect 27.2% 216
providing electric vehicle charging facilities Somewhat less likely 10.2% 81
Much less likely 12.5% 99
DK/NA 0.7% 5
Much more likely 41.8% 332 71.0%
Somewhat more likely 29.2% 232
Q4P.Provide options to get to and from work to relieve traffic No effect 17.3% 138
congestion Somewhat less likely 4.3% 34
Much less likely 5.3% 42
DK/NA 2.1% 16
F�LEEZ U E6 OF TR
R F MEASURE l K i?s BY MEAN COR
Tota
Column N% Count or
Mean
W.Relieve traffic congestion on Highway 101 and local roads 1.26
Q413.Fix potholes and maintain local roads 1.22
Q4F.Relieve congestion by improving intersections and better 1.13
timin of si nals
Q4G.Provide matching funds to build a direct connector from 1.03
Highway 101 to 1-580 and the San Rafael-Richmond Bridge
Q4P. Provide options to get to and from work to relieve traffic 1.00
congestion
Q4C.Improve interchanges and access on and off of Highway
0.97
101
Q4N.Protect local roads and highways from flooding and sea 0.90
level rise
Q4E.Provide local transit,including options for seniors and
0.89
ersons with disabilities
Q41).Expand safe routes to schools,including school bus
0.81
service,relieving local congestion
Q41K.Support door-to-door transit services for seniors and 0.80
people with disabilities such as Whistlestop Wheels
W.Provide more local bus service to relieve traffic congestion 0.79
Q4L.Provide matching funds to complete highway carpool lanes
and multi-use pathway improvements through the Marin Sonoma 0.73
Narrows
Q4H.Fill in critical gaps in pedestrian pathways 0.58
QW.Maintain and expand school crossing guards and the Safe 0.54
Routes to Schools and Pathways programs
Q4O.Increase incentives to use electric vehicles including
0.39
providing electric vehicle charaina facilities
Q41.Fill in critical gaps in bike paths 0.33
Topline Report1/95/`018 Page 5
NI 20 W Me J,
ARM 73"
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Much more likely to vote yes 41.2% 327 71.9%
Q6A.Our local streets and roads are falling apart,the measure Somewhat more likely to vote yes 30.7% 244
will help stop the deterioration and make repairs No effect 26.4% 210
DK/NA 1.7% 14
Much more likely to vote yes 51.8% 411 74.4%
Q613.The measure will allow Marin County to get millions of Somewhat more likely to vote yes 22.6% 179
dollars in State and regional matching funds. Without approval No effect 23.1% 183
of the measure,that money will go to other counties
DK/NA 2.5% 20
Much more likely to vote yes 54.3% 431 74.5%
Q5C.Every penny from this measure will benefit local Somewhat more likely to vote yes 20.2% 161
transportation projects and programs,and cannot be taken by No effect 23.4% 186
the State
DK/NA 2.1% 17
Much more likely to vote yes 53.4% 424 76.3%
Q6D.The measure will help relieve traffic congestion on Highway Somewhat more likely to vote yes 22.8% 181
101 No effect 21.3% 169
DK/NA 2.4% 19
Much more likely to vote yes 39.9% 317 66.7%
Q5E.The measure will make it safer to drive,bike on and walk Somewhat more likely to vote yes 26.8% 213
along local streets,and help relieve greenhouse gases and air No effect 31.6% 251
pollution
DK/NA 1.7% 14
Much more likely to vote yes 40.4% 321 67.6%
Q617.Safeguards to ensure accountability, including independent Somewhat more likely to vote yes 27.2% 216
citizens'oversight and annual audits,will ensure that the money No effect 29.6% 235
will be spent as promised
DK/NA 2.8% 22
Much more likely to vote yes 37.1% 294 67.5%
06G.The measure will preserve and expand bus service to help Somewhat more likely to vote yes 30.5% 242
relieve traffic congestion No effect 30.5% 243
DK/NA 1.9% 15
Much more likely to vote yes 41.4% 329 70.3%
Q511.The measure would help relieve traffic congestion on Somewhat more likely to vote yes 28.9% 230 -
roadways in Marin County,reducing critical emergency response No effect 27�5% 218
times
DK/NA 2.2% 18
Much more likely to vote yes 44.3% 352 72.6%
Q51.The measure will help relieve traffic congestion on local Somewhat more likely to vote yes 28.3% 225
streets and roads No effect 25.7% 204
DK/NA 1.7% 13
Much more likely to vote yes 47.5% 377 74.3%
QW.The measure will help make connections to regional transit Somewhat more likely to vote yes 26.8% 213
like the Ferry,SMART and Golden Gate Transit No effect 23.4% 186
DK/NA 2.3% 18
Much more likely to vote yes 38.7% 307 67.8%
Q51K.The proposed regional and State efforts do not cover all the Somewhat more likely to vote yes 29.1
.1% 231
Marin County needs,but this measure will ensure that Marin gets No effect 28.3% 225
its fair share of State and regional funds
DK/NA 3.9% 31
l of lint (?ecx>rt 1/25/20 181 Page 6
VkjaSUr�. W�"< li) :U(VF?y
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Much more likely to vote yes 52.8% 419 73.0%
Q5L.The measure will address urgent traffic and transportation Somewhat more likely to vote yes 20.2% 160
needs,but does not increase taxes No effect 24.1% 191
DK/NA 2.9% 23
Much more likely to vote yes 50.9% 404 70.5%
QSM.The measure will not be used for administrator salaries or Somewhat more likely to vote yes 19.6% 156
government employee pension relief No effect 26.1% 207
DK/NA 3.3% 27
Much more likely to vote yes 34.6% 275 65.1%
Q5N.The measure will prevent substantial cuts in local transit Somewhat more likely to vote yes 30.5% 242
programs No effect 30.9% 246
DK/NA 4.0% 32
Much more likely to vote yes 21.4% 170 45.0%
Q5O.The measure will prevent substantial cuts to crossing Somewhat more likely to vote yes 23.6% 187
guard programs No effect 50.5% 401
DK/NA 4.5% 36
Iopline Report 1/25/2018 Page 7
NI 20 11�) Atioi i me,-I� I ,t if !,;!,I lII,-V
0 A,A
L WIT 0111116 11 I-I�NII"111`11-11TB MIF f IFE 7 11"1 511, "RE
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Q6D.The measure will help relieve traffic congestion on Highway 1.33
101
Q6C.Every penny from this measure will benefit local
transportation projects and programs,and cannot be taken by 1.32
the State
Q5L.The measure will address urgent traffic and transportation 1.30
needs,but does not increase taxes
Q5B.The measure will allow Marin County to get millions of
dollars in State and regional matching funds. Without approval 1.29
of the measure,that money will go to other counties
Q6M.The measure will not be used for administrator salaries or 1.26
government employee pension relief
Q6J.The measure will help make connections to regional transit 1.25
like the Ferry,SMART and Golden Gate Transit
Q61.The measure will help relieve traffic congestion on local 1.19
streets and roads
Q6A.Our local streets and roads are failing apart,the measure 1.15
will help stop the deterioration and make repairs
Q5H.The measure would help relieve traffic congestion on
roadways in Marin County,reducing critical emergency response 1.14
times
QSF.Safeguards to ensure accountability, including independent
citizens'oversight and annual audits,will ensure that the money 1.11
will be spent as promised
QSK The proposed regional and State efforts do not cover all the
Marin County needs, but this measure will ensure that Marin gets 1.11
its fair share of State and regional funds
Q5E.The measure will make it safer to drive,bike on and walk
along local streets,and help relieve greenhouse gases and air 1.08
pollution
Q6G.The measure will preserve and expand bus service to help 1.07
relieve traffic congestion
Q6N.The measure will prevent substantial cuts in local transit 1.04
ro rams
Q50.The measure will prevent substantial cuts to crossing 0.70
guard programs
Topline Repofi 112512018,
c1-2018 rst uon _ri�s�> \1e'siII vey
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Much more likely to vote no 25.8% 205 41.5%
Q6A.Marin County has asked taxpayers to approve sales tax Somewhat more likely to vote no 15.7% 124
measures for transportation,the SMART rail system and county
parks. Enough is enough,we can't afford another tax increase No effect 53.7% 426
DK/NA 4.8% 38
Q613.The State is increasing gas taxes and vehicle registration Much more likely to vote no 31.9% 254 56.0%
fees,and the Bay Area regional government wants to increase Somewhat more likely to vote no 24.0% 191
bridge tolls.Instead of asking for more taxes,the State and
County need to cut waste and do a better job with taxpayer No effect 40.6% 323
money DK/NA 3.4% 27
Q6C.Since 2005 TAM has spent$250 million dollars, but traffic is Much more likely to vote no 29.2% 232 52.0%
even worse than before. Now they want to renew their special Somewhat more likely to vote no 22.7% 180
tax 6 years before it expires. We should not give them more No effect 41.6% 330
taxpayer money to waste DK/NA 6.4% 51
Much more likely to vote no 28.8% 229 50.4%
Q6D.If government agencies managed their budgets more Somewhat more likely to vote no 21.6% 171
efficiently and reformed out of control pension and benefit
programs,we would not have to pay more in taxes No effect 44.7% 355
DK/NA 4.9% 39
Much more likely to vote no 22.1% 175 44.2%
Q6E.Sales taxes are the most regressive form of taxation, Somewhat more likely to vote no 22.2% 176
hurting low income and senior citizens the most No effect 51.2% 407
DK/NA 4.6% 36
Q6F.This sales tax measure will result in Marin County having Much more likely to vote no 22.7% 180 43.1%
one of the highest sales tax rates in the state,and sales taxes Somewhat more likely to vote no 20.4% 162
rob consumers of purchasing power,ultimately costing jobs. No effect 53.4% 424
People will go elsewhere to buy goods and services DK/NA 3.5% 28
Much more likely to vote no 23.6% 188 41.3%
Q6G.The measure is growth inducing and will increase the Somewhat more likely to vote no 17.7% 140
pressure exerted by the State for more subsidized low-income
high density housing to be placed in small Marin neighborhoods No effect 51.9% 412
DK/NA 6.8% 54
Much more likely to vote no 25.7% 204 47.9%
Q6H.With high State and local taxes no longer being deductible Somewhat more likely to vote no 22.2% 177
under new federal tax law,we can't afford another local tax
No effect 46.8% 371
extension
DK/NA 5.4% 42
Much more likely to vote no 11.0% 87 29.2%
Q61.Other proposed ballot measures are more important Somewhat more likely to vote no 18.2% 144
including sales tax increases for early childhood education and
parks and open space No effect 63.4% 504
DK/NA 7.4% 59
I oplille Roporl C?:5,"?O 13 Page 9
34
E
r
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Q613.The State is increasing gas taxes and vehicle registration
fees,and the Bay Area regional government wants to increase
bridge tolls. Instead of asking for more taxes,the State and 0.91
County need to cut waste and do a better job with taxpayer
money
Q6C.Since 2005 TAM has spent$260 million dollars,but traffic is
even worse than before. Now they want to renew their special 0.87
tax 6 years before it expires. We should not give them more
taxpayer money to waste
Q61). If government agencies managed their budgets more
efficiently and reformed out of control pension and benefit 0.83
programs,we would not have to pay more in taxes
Q6H.With high State and local taxes no longer being deductible
under new federal tax law,we can't afford another local tax 0.78
extension
Q6A. Marin County has asked taxpayers to approve sales tax
measures for transportation,the SMART rail system and county 0.71
oarks.Enouah is enouqh,we can't afford another tax increase
Q6G.The measure is growth inducing and will increase the
pressure exerted by the State for more subsidized low-income 0.70
high density housing to be placed in small Marin neighborhoods
Q6E.Sales taxes are the most regressive form of taxation, 0.69
hurting low income and senior citizens the most
06F.This sales tax measure will result in Marin County having
one of the highest sales tax rates in the state,and sales taxes 0.68
rob consumers of purchasing power,ultimately costing jobs.
PeoDle will qq elsewhere to buv 000ds and services
Q61.Other proposed ballot measures are more important
including sales tax increases for early childhood education and 0.43
parks and open space
1-ophile Report J/26120 13 Pngc, 10
AM Ii a I I ipoi ,w.,, !V,;nlo
FF M A L BALLOT TEVISS",7T
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
7. In order to: Definitely Yes 39.7% 315
•relieve traffic congestion on Highway101 and local roads; Probably Yes 33.5% 266
•fix potholes and maintain local roads; Probably No 7.3% 58
•improve interchanges and access on and off of Highway101; Definitely No 14.3% 114
•expand safe routes to schools,including school bus service, DK/NA 5.2% 41
relieving local congestion;and, Total Yes 73.2% 581
-provide local transit, including options for seniors and persons
with disabilities; Total No 21.6% 172
shall Marin County extend the existing half-cent,voter approved
sales tax without increasing the current rate,providing$26
million dollars annually for 30 years,with citizens'oversight,that
the State cannot take away?
Topline Report 1/25/2018 Page I I
113 I , 1Ilol1C l: Ml,.asuro I i q Utvey
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
Bike 2.5% 20
Carpool or vanpool 4.6% 36
Drive car or truck alone 59.2% 470
Drive motorcycle or scooter 0.7% 5
A.What type of transportation do you typically use to go to work Public transit(bus, rail or shuttle) 7.6% 60
or school? Walk 2.4% 19
Work from home/Don't work 14.9% 119
outside the home
Other(SPECIFY) 6.7% 53
DK/NA 1.4% 11
Yes 26.9% 214
B. Do any children under the age of 18 live in your household? No 72.8% 578
DK/NA 0.3% 3
Male 44.7% 355
C. Respondent's Gender Female 53.9% 428
Other 1.4% 11
18-29 6.8% 54
30-39 7.8% 62
D.Age 40-49 14.9% 118
50-64 32.9% 261
65+ 37.7% 299
Not coded 0.0% 0
Japanese 0.2% 2
Chinese 0.7% 6
Hispanic 3.6% 29
Jewish 5.0% 40
Armenian 0.1% 1
E.Ethnic Surname
Vietnamese 0.5% 4
Italian 4.4% 35
Korean 0.0% 0
African American 0.0% 0
Not Coded 85.4% 678
Owner 68.1% 541
F.Homeownership Status
Renter 31.9% 253
Democrat 58.8% 467
G.Party Republican 17.8% 141
Other 3.4% 27
DTS 20.0% 159
topline flepo;t 10 51,2018 F'?i)B 12
:r
2C� I , . xtation � r: &Mf King ',LW V
Total
Column N% Count 10
Mean
Dem 1 31.5% 250
Dem 2+ 18.4% 146
Rep 1 6.8% 54
Rep 2+ 5.9% 47
Other 1 11.1% 88
H. Household Party Type
Other 2+ 5.2% 41
Dem&Rep 4.8% 38
Dem&Other 10.7% 85
Rep&Other 4.2% 33
Dem, Rep&Other 1.5% 12
2017 to 2018 0.0% 0
2013 to 2016 34.9% 277
2009 to 2012 12.9% 102
2005 to 2008 16.8% 133
2001 to 2004 8.6% 68
I.Registration Date
1997 to 2000 6.6% 52
1993 to 1996 4.5% 36
1981 to 1992 9.1% 72
1980 or before 6.8% 54
Not Coded 0.0% 0
J.Voting History see detailed crosstabs
1 6.6% 53
2 4.6% 36
3 4.7% 37
4 6.0% 47
5 4.9% 39
6 3.8% 30
7 4.3% 34
8 4.1% 32
K.Times Voted in Last Elections
9 5.7% 45
10 4.8% 38
11 6.2% 49
12 6.5% 51
13 6.5% 52
14 7.1% 56
15 9.5% 75
16 14.8% 118
l o Niru P ',ort 1/25/2018 F'<ge'13
!AM ns„u 3iior uu, �i4. . �;n �ckinl .v-r,
Total
Column N% Count or
Mean
0 21.0% 166
1 11.6% 92
2 7.2% 57
3 5.9% 47
4 4.9% 39
5 3.2% 25
6 3.7% 30
7 2.8% 22
L.Absentee Voter 8 4.5% 36
9 2.5% 20
10 3.3% 27
11 3.0% 24
12 3.4% 27
13 3.4% 27
14 5.8% 46
15 7.0% 56
16 6.8% 54
Yes 73.8% 586
M. Permanent Absentee Voter
No 26.2% 208
Yes 74.3% 590
N. Likely Absentee Voter
No 25.7% 204
Yes 100.0% 794
O. Likely November 2018 Voter
No 0.0% 0
District 1 20.9% 166
District 2 22.7% 180
P.Supervisorial District District 3 21.5% 171
District 4 16.0% 127
District 5 18.9% 150
Belvedere 0.4% 3
Corte Madera 5.2% 41
Fairfax 3.9% 31
Larkspur 4.7% 37
Mill Valley 5.8% 46
Novato 18.4% 146
Q.City
Ross 1.1% 9
San Anselmo 3.9% 31
San Rafael 21.6% 171
Sausalito 3.5% 27
Tiburon 4.2% 33
Unincorporated 27.5% 218
Land 15.0% 119
R. Interview Type Cell 10.4% 82
Online 32.5% 258
Text 42.2% 335
1 opline R,=port 1,''25/2018 aiJc> 14
Transportation Authority of Marin
SCHEDULE OF LIKELY STEPS- February 2018
Target
Topic Dates Complete
2017
1. Introduction and Initial Feedback from Local Jurisdictions Feb-Apr ✓
2. Baseline Polling- TAM Board approval of polling effort Feb ✓
3. TAM Ad Hoc Committee guides poll -poll conducted
Mar-Apr ✓
4. TAM Board considers initial input from Local Jurisdictions and Polling and Apr- May ✓
determines whether to proceed to next step of forming an Expenditure Plan
Advisory Committee(Go/No Go)
5. TAM Board establishes membership of Advisory Committee Apr- May ✓
6. Kickoff of Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee Process June ✓
7. Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee meets to develop options for renewing June- Dec ✓
transportation sales tax, for increasing transportation sales tax, or both
8. Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee engages in public outreach June- Dec ✓
9. TAM Board reviews activity of Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee and Dec 11 ✓
determines whether to proceed to next step of briefing stakeholders and local
councils on status and conducting a public opinion poll of draft Expenditure
Plan Elements(Go/No Go)
2018
10. TAM Ad Hoc Committee guides poll and the poll is conducted Feb ✓
11. TAM briefs stakeholders and local jurisdiction councils on status of
Expenditure Plan development—seeks and receives input Feb - Mar
12. TAM Board considers input from stakeholders, local jurisdictions and polling April
results, and votes on Final Draft Sales Tax Expenditure Plan(Go/No Go)
13. TAM Board directs staff to seek approval from all 12 local jurisdictions on May-July
Final Draft Sales Tax Expenditure Plan
14. Final approval by TAM to request the Board of Supervisors to put the
transportation sales tax renewal on the November 2018 ballot. Board of July
Supervisors approves.
15. Expenditure plan and ballot argument (75 words) deadline for submission to August 10
registrar for November 2018 ballot.
EXHIBIT NO.
Making the Most of Marin County Transportation dollars
y.
TOWN COUNCIL
SPECIAL & REGULAR MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
AME ED SPECIAL MEETING —6:15 P.M.
( n March 21, 2018, the C ncil held a special meeting as follows:
LL TO O
Councilmember Fredericks, Councilmember Thier, Vice Mayor Kulik, Mayor Fraser;
Councilmember Welner was absent.
INTERVIEWS FOR VACANCIES ON TOWN BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
(Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission— 1 vacancy)
(Planning Commission—2 vacancies)
• Peter Brooks
• Kristina Wollan
• Roy Crumrine
• Valerie Montague
• Kathleen Defever
ADJOURNMENT—to regular meeting
REGULAR MEETING—7:30 P.M.
Mayor Fraser called the regular meeting of the Tiburon Town Council to order at 7:35 p.m.
on Wednesday, March 21, 2018, in Town Council Chambers, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon,
California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Welner
PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock.
Director of Community Development Anderson,
Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Barnes,
Director of Administrative Services Bigall, Chief of
Police Cronin, Town Clerk Stefani
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Toren Council Minutes 807-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page I
Pamela McConnell-Douglass said she was being treated poorly at two local restaurants and
expressed sadness that the police were called, and they asked her to leave.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW TOWN STAFF
• Ken Lehr, IT Coordinator
Director of Administrative Services Bigall introduced new IT Coordinator Ken Lehr.He said he was
happy to be here.
RECOGNITION OF TOWN SERVICES
Dan Watrous, Planning Manager, 21 years of service
Mayor Fraser presented Planning Manager Watrous with a framed copy of Resolution No. 12-2018,
and thanked him for his service to the Town of Tiburon.
MOTION: To approve Resolution No. 12-2018.
Moved: Fraser, seconded by Fredericks
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Welner
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-l. Town Council Minutes—Adopt minutes of March 2,2018 special meeting(Town Clerk
Stefani)
CC-2. Town Council Minutes—Adopt minutes of March 7,2018 special and regular meetings
(Town Clerk Stefani)
CC-3. Storm Drain Project Contract Award—Authorize Town manager to execute contract
for a portion of the Storm Drain Restoration Project (Department of Public Works)
CC-4. Hawthorne Design Contract Award —Authorize Town Manager to execute contract
with Harris and Associates for completing Plans and Specifications for Hawthorne
Undergrounding Project,and authorize related budget amendment(Department of Public
Works)
CC-5. Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB 1) Funds — Approve allocation of SB 1
funds to fund resurfacing of certain roadways during undergrounding district construction
(Department of Public Works)
CC-6. Investment Summary — Adopt investment summary for month ending February 28.
2018 (Director of Administrative Services Bigall)
Town Council Minutes 907-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page 2
CC-7. Construction Management—Award construction management contracts to GI-ID Inc.
and authorize budget amendment of$175,000 (Department of Public Works)
Councilmember Thier requested Item No. CC-7 be removed, Councilmember Fredericks requested
Item No. CC-1 be removed, and Town Manager Chanis requested Item No. CC-4 be removed and
continued to a future meeting due to lack of a quorum for this item.
MOTION: To adopt Consent Calendar Item Nos. 2-3 and 5-6, as written.
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Thier
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Welner
CC-1. Town Council Minutes—Adopt minutes of March 2,2018 special meeting(Town Clerk
Stefam)
Councilmember Fredericks made the following changes:
• Page 3, Paragraph 1, Line 2 to read: "...and the concern of losing transportation
funding..."
• Page 3, Paragraph 5, Line 2: "...wondered how the Richardson Bay Sanitation District
felt about the proposed use of their ponds."
• Page 3, Paragraph 6, Line 4: "...would gladly use recycled water, if it were cleaner. Fle
said this water may not be able to be used on a public area in the future".
MOTION: To approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1, as amended.
Moved: Kulik, seconded by Fredericks
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Welner
CC-7. Construction Management—Award construction management contracts to GHD Inc.
and authorize budget amendment of$175,000 (Department of Public Works)
Councilmember Thier said she had a conflict of interest on this item, and left the room.
MOTION: To approve Consent Calendar Item No. 7, as written.
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Kulik
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik
ABSENT: Welner
DISQUALIFIED: Thier
ACTION ITEMS
AI-1. . Reappointments/Appointments to Town Boards & Commissions — Consider
reappointment of commissioners whose terms have expired or appointment of new
7'ol4)n Council Minutes #07-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page 3
members to boards & commissions (Town Clerk Stefani)
Town Clerk Stefani said the terms of eight existing board and commission members had expired at
the end of February,and all but three individuals have indicated they would like to be reappointed to
another term. She said Jerry Thompson (Building Code Appeals Board) and Vince De Quattro
(Heritage & Arts Commission) are not seeking an additional term, and the resignation of
Councilmember Jon Weiner from the Planning Commission also created an additional vacancy on
the Planning Commission.
She said the Council had also interviewed four new applicants for two open seats on the Planning
Commission, and one new applicant for one open seat on the Parks, Open Space and Trails
Commission.
She recommended the Council first consider reappointments of existing board and commission
members whose terms have expired and seek reappointment, and then consider making any new
appointments to the Planning Commission or Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission.
MOTION: To reappoint the following commissioners whose terms expired on February 28, 2018:
Fran Hall (Heritage & Arts Commission), Azita de Mujica-Beavers (Heritage & Arts
Commission), Isaac Nikfar (Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission), Park Allen
(Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission), and John Corcoran (Planning
Commission); and to direct staff to continue to advertise to fill the remaining vacancies
on Town Boards and Commissions.
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Thier
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Weiner
The Council moved on to discuss filling the single vacancy left on the Planning Commission,and a
discussion about the attributes of the four new applicants followed. Councilmember Fredericks said
all applicants had unique attributes,and believed Kathleen Defever to be uniquely qualified listening
to individuals' needs. She nominated Kathleen Defever to the Planning Commission.
Mayor Fraser echoed Councilmember Fredericks' comments, and seconded the nomination for
Kathleen Defever.
Councilmember Thier thanked the applicants and encouraged anyone not appointed to stay involved.
Vice Mayor Kulik also spoke to the attributes of each applicant. He believed Kristina Wollan's
application to be compelling, and asked the rest of the Council for their opinion. Councilmember
Thier agreed that Kristina Wollan would be an excellent Planning Commissioner due to her unique
perspective from her professional life.
Councilmember Fredericks agreed,but said she would vote for Kathleen Defever.Ma}or Fraser then
called for a roll call vote.
Toivn Council Minutes #07-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Purge 4
MOTION: To appoint Kathleen Defever to the Planning Commission.
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Fraser
ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Weiner
AI-2. Town Council Committee Assignments—Creation of and appointment to Technology
ad hoc subcommittee (Town Clerk Stefani)
Town Clerk Stefani said Councilmember Weiner had expressed interest in forming an ad hoc
subcommittee to study the "Town's use of technology, and this matter had been discussed at the
annual Town Council retreat in early March.
Mayor Fraser nominated Councilmember Weiner, and Councilmember Thier also volunteered.
MOTION: To create an ad hoc subcommittee entitled Use of Technology, and appoint
Councilmembers Weiner and Thier to the ad hoc subcommittee.
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Kulik
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Weiner
AI-3. Town Manager Employment Agreement—Consider approval of amendment to Town
Manager's Employment Agreement (Town Attorney Stock)
Town Attorney Stock said the 'Town Council had completed the Town Manager's annual
performance evaluation,and was satisfied with his performance. Stock said the ad hoc subcommittee
created for the performance evaluation had recommended several salary adjustments including a
salary and merit increase, an increase in housing allowance and a retention incentive.
Mayor Fraser opened the floor for public comment.
Ron Zimmerman asked what a retention incentive is. Stock explained it is similar to a "bonus",
meant to be competitive with other city managers in the area.
MOTION: To approve the draft Resolution Approving the Second Amendment to the Town
Manager's Employment Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute it on behalf of
the Town.
Moved: Thier, seconded by Fredericks
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Wehner
AI-4. McKegney Green Project — Discuss bids received on McKegney Green Restoration
Project and provide staff direction on how to proceed (Department of Public Works)
Town Council Minutes#07-2018 DRAFT Allarch 21, 2018 Page 5
Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Barnes said the Council had discussed the best design for
McKegney Green over several Town Council meetings, and after much discussion, decided on a
design with an estimated cost of$1.8 million.
Director Barnes said that given the cost of the project,the Council decided to utilize private funds to
pay for a portion of the project, and agreed on a $400,000 private contribution. At the Town
Council's most recent meeting on this matter,the Tiburon Peninsula Soccer Club(TPSC)guaranteed
they had raised the $400,000, and the project was put out to bid.
Barnes said bids all came in over estimate. He said the second highest bidder had an error in their
bid, and when the error was corrected, that contractor became the low bidder. He said the original
low bidder then filed a bid protest. Barnes explained that after analysis, staff made the determination
to uphold the bid protest, and recommended Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc., as contractor.
Barnes said the other factor to consider tonight was that the project came in over budget, and to
move forward,the Town Council will need to allocate an additional $245,000 to the project,and the
TPSC will need to provide the agreed-upon $400,000. He said the Town has received $200,000 to
date from the TPSC. Barnes also reminded the Council of the maintenance costs of the field.
He said the Council had three options to consider: award the project,put the project back out to bid,
or redesign the project.He said if the Council opts for a redesign,staff recommends appointed an ad
hoc subcommittee to discuss the matter fully.
Councilmember Fredericks asked about the legal ramifications of the bid protest. Town Attorney
Stock said the issued had been analyzed, and staff believes the bid protest should be upheld. He said
however, the Council may choose to reject all bids to avoid risk entirely.
Vice Mayor Kulik asked if there was any chance the project could be completed this construction
season if it were to be rebid or redesigned. Barnes said if the project was rebid,it would probably be
completed this year,but there would likely be no fall play. He said if the project were redesigned, it
would be difficult to complete this construction season.
Councilmember Thier and Director Barnes discussed the details of the bid protest, and Director
Barnes confirmed the contract award is to Suarez & Munoz Construction, the original low bidder.
Fredericks asked about the impact of having a less of a crown reduction on the playability of the
field. Director Barnes said the current slope of the field is 4-5%, and the ideal maximum crown of a
field is 2% slope for player benefit and better drainage.
Mayor Fraser asked why the TPSC had only provided $200,000 of the agreed-upon $400,000, and
asked staff to elaborate on the agreement that had been made.
Town Council Minutes #07-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page 6
Town Manager Chanis said there had been no written agreement with the TPSC, but the Council's
direction and communication had been clear that the full $400,000 needed to be in hand prior to the
Council awarding the construction contract, as is standard procedure for funding a project.
Fredericks said the TPSC had agreed to the Council's proposal to fundraise$400,000,and there had
been no change in terms of the agreement. Chanis agreed. He said staff had requested assurance that
the TPSC was able to raise the full $400,000 before putting the project out to bid, and based on that
assurance, the Council had directed staff to bid the project.
Fraser said staff had done a thorough review of the project, and found ways to save money. He
suggested a reserve account to put money aside every year to fund the maintenance. Chanis agreed.
Mayor Fraser opened the floor for public comment.
Roy Crumrine questioned if removing the crown on the field would be worth the extra cost.
Vicki Sodaro, Vice President of the TPSC, said the soccer club did not understand they were
supposed to raise the full $400,000, and expressed concern about what would happen to the private
funds if the project doesn't move forward.
Mayor Fraser closed the floor.
Fredericks asked if the existing field had always been a sand-based field with the crown. Barnes
clarified that there is a much smaller sand-based area there now, but it has never been properly
maintained, and confirmed the crown has always been there.
Kulik asked if the additional allocation will be funded out of the unallocated general fund reserve.
Chanis said that was the most likely source of the funds,and a discussion about utilizing those funds
followed. Fredericks commented that this fund serves as a"safety net"for the Town for unexpected
expenses, and Chanis also explained that the original $1.4 million expenditure had already been
accounted for in the budget.
Thier asked the Town Manager about his conversations with the TPSC about fundraising the agreed-
upon $400,000. Chanis explained his surprise that there was a misunderstanding, and said staff and
the Council had been clear that prior to the execution of the project, all funds, including the TPSC's
contribution,had to be received. Chanis clarified that if the Town was to receive private donations,
and the project didn't go forward, the money would be returned to the entity that provided it.
Mayor Fraser agreed, and asked the Council to consider a conditional approval that would require the
$400,000 to be in hand before proceeding further. Chanis said the Council can conditionally approve
the project contingent upon the full funding being provided by the TPSC.He said the Council should
consider the fact that the bids will expire in May when crafting a deadline.
Town Council Minutes 907-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page 7
Fredericks and the Town had been helpful in trying to move this project forward, and had
communicated their expectations about having the $400,000 contribution in hand. She wondered if
the failure to deliver the funds signified a lack of community support that would justify the
expenditure of a more-expensive sand-based field. She expressed certainty that the contribution
needs to be delivered before the Council awards any bids or moves forward with the project.
Thier commented that if the Council decides to not move forward to with the project tonight and fall
play on the field is at risk, she could advocate for throwing out the bids due to increased liability
from the bid protest.
Kulik said the land is meant to be enjoyed as recreation space, and believed the Council should
ensure the best use of it. He said many Council meetings have passed and agreements and decisions
have been made, and the Council should follow through on its promise to fix the field. He said the
project will never be cheaper than it is right now, and to delay any further would continue to delay
play on the field, but any approval should be contingent on the private funds in hand.
Fraser said the field stands out as a landmark in Tiburon. He agreed with the Vice Mayor that the
project will never be cheaper than it is now,and said the Council and staff have done a thorough and
financially responsible review. The Mayor expressed disappointment there had been confusion about
the private fundraising expectations, and agreed that approval should be contingent on the full
funding amount in hand. Fraser felt the Town Attorney had properly handled the bid protest issue,
and supported moving the project forward contingent on the money coming in immediately.
Thier agreed, and spoke in support of"doing the field right this time".
Fredericks agreed,and said the Town's commitment was clearly contingent on a private contribution.
Town Attorney Stock suggested imposing a hard deadline for the TPSC to provide the funds,prior to
the date of the bids expiring in May.
Fredericks asked what the next step would be if the promised $400,000 is not delivered and the
Council does not award the bid. Director Barnes said the Council had previously discussed this
scenario, and decided that the field would be made into a dirt-based field.
Kulik wondered what deadline should be imposed to guarantee fall play on the field.Barnes said the
timeline is already extremely tight, and fall play on the field cannot be guaranteed even now.
A discussion on the best deadline to impose,with or without imposing on fall play,followed.He said
the other factor to consider is the existing bids expire on May 8, 2018.
The Council discussed requiring the fiends to be delivered to the Town as early as the following week
to begin construction on the field as soon as possible, or giving the soccer club an extra several
weeks which would very likely result in no fall play on the field.
Town Attorney Stock advised that if the soccer club is provided a later deadline,it is likely that their
Town Council Minutes 907-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page 8
representative present tonight wi 11 pass on the information that any delay of delivery of the promised
funds will continue to put fall play at risk.
The Council agreed, and Mayor Fraser said this decision should be clearly memorialized and a
written agreement be made. Town Manager Chanis recommended an April 20 deadline, and the
Council agreed.
MOTION: To award the project to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, Suarez&Munoz
Construction, Inc., contingent on the Tiburon Peninsula Soccer Club providing the frill
$400,000 fundraising amount, on or before April 20, 2018, and authorize a budget
amendment in the amount of$245,000; if the Tiburon Peninsula Soccer Club is unable to
deliver full $400,000 fundraising amount by the April 20,2018 deadline,the Council will
hear this item again on May 2, 2018 to consider rejecting all bids.
Moved: Thier, seconded by Fredericks
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Welner
PUBLIC HEARINGS [taken out of order]
PH-2. "Social Host" Ordinance — Consider amendments to the Tiburon Municipal Code to
update the Town's existing regulations regarding parties or gatherings at which alcohol,
marijuana, or other controlled substances are served to persons under 21 years of age—
Introduction and first reading of ordinance
Chief of Police Cronin asked the Council to consider repealing and replacing two ordinances relating
to "social host"laws and consolidate them into a single chapter in the Municipal Code. He said the
existing ordinances are out of date and difficult to enforce, and the new ordinances are
comprehensive and consistent with other social host ordinances throughout Marin County.
He said the most significant update is that the update includes substances other than alcohol, and
expands the defined gathering locations to rental runts,party buses,and other conveyances.He said
the new ordinance also increases some penalties. and the remedies for violation have also been
updated to include a referral to a restorative justice program.
Chief Cronin also recommended the Council add an amendment to their motion to include
watercrafts as a place for juvenile gatherings.
Mayor Fraser opened the floor for public comment.
Laurie Dubin,founder of Be the Influence,spoke in support of the proposed ordinance and making it
more comprehensive. She said her nonprofit tries to tackle the problem from the parental side, but
needs additional help from law enforcement. She suggested the Police Department issue press
releases of social host violations to show the seriousness of enforcement.
Town Council Minutes #07-2018 DRAFT Allarch 21, 201S Page 9
Mayor Fraser closed the floor.
Councilmember Thier made the following amendments to the ordinance:
• Section 22-30,Line 146 to read: "...provisions of this section do not apply when the Minor is
emancipated within the meaning of the California Family Code..."
• Section 22-30, Line 150 to read: "...returning directly home from an educational or school-
related activity, a recreational, religious, political, or cultural activity..."
• Section 22-70, Line 183 to remove `'guilty of..."
• Section 22-80 in its entirety to read: "Any person assisting, aiding, abetting, permitting or
encouraging any Minor to violate any of the provisions of this article is guilty of a violation
of this Code." The rest of the paragraph will be deleted.
Vice Mayor Kulik made a grammatical correction to the ordinance, and suggested the relevant
references to the word "City" be changed to "Town".
Kulik also asked if the fines are increasing as a deterrent or as a result of the increasing cost of police
services. Chief Cronin said the fines are punitive and are not related to the cost of police services.
MOTION: To introduce the ordinance and read by title only, waiving further reading, schedule for
adoption at the next regular meeting and motion to hold a roll call vote on the
introduction of the ordinance, as amended by recommendations of Councilmember Thier
and Chief of Police Cronin.
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Thier
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Welner
Mayor Fraser read"An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon Repealing Portions
of Chapter 25 `Offenses — Miscellaneous', Repealing Chapter 22 `Minors', and Adopting a New
Chapter 22 `Minors and Social Host Accountability' of the Tiburon Municipal Code".
ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Thier
ABSENT: Welner
PH-1. Virginia Undergrounding District—Conduct public hearing,count ballots and consider
adoption of resolution confirming assessments or abandoning proceedings(Office of the
Town Manager)
The Town Manager said the Council will hold a Public Hearing on this item tonight. He said the
Mayor will clearly indicate when the Public Hearing is closed, and only ballots received prior to the
closure of the Public Hearing will be counted. He said property owners may change their vote prior
to the end of the Public Hearing if they wish,
Town Council Minutes 1107-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page 10
Chanis said the Town Council will recess for the vote tabulation, which will occur in the adjoining
conference room. He said the district engineer and staff will conduct the vote count, and the Town
Attorney will observe. He said the vote count will be available for view in real time on the screen in
the Council Chambers for everyone to follow along.
After the vote count is complete,the Council will reconvene and staff will report the vote results,and
the Council will have the opportunity to deliberate and consider the appropriate resolution based on
the result of the vote. Finally, Chanis showed a simplified project timeline if there is not a majority
protest and the Council proceeds with the project, and briefly reviewed financing information :for
property owners. He also reminded property owners of their responsibility to install the lateral
connections before the poles are removed.
Mayor Fraser opened the Public Hearing.
Ron Zimmerman asked if property owners that have already had their connections undergrounded as
part of a construction project will have satisfied the lateral requirement.Chanis confirmed this point,
as long as electric, telephone and cable lines were all undergrounded.
Paras Fancy, Virginia Drive, spoke in support of the safety benefits of the project, and encouraged
the Town Council to consider policy revisions to help neighborhoods get past initial hurdles of
forming an undergrounding district.
Mayor Fraser closed the Public Hearing, and the Town Council went into recess for the vote
tabulation at 9:55 p.m.
The Town Council reconvened at 10:10 p.m., and the Town Clerk reported the results of the vote _
tabulation as follows: 21 ballots were tabulated, representing a total assessment amount of
$1,576,578.70. 17 ballots were counted in favor, representing a total assessment amount of
$1,305,364.46 and 82.8%. 4 ballots were counted in opposition, representing a total assessment
amount of$271,214.24 and 17.2%. There was not a majority protest.
The Mayor called for a motion.
MOTION: Adopt the Resolution Making Determinations, Confirming Assessments and
Proceedings and Designating the Superintendent of Streets to Collect and Receive
Assessments and to Establish a Special Fund for Town of Tiburon Assessment
District No. 2017-2 (Virginia Undergrounding District).
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Kulik
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik
ABSENT: Wehner
DISQUALIFIED: Thier
TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS
Town Council Minutes #07-2018 DRAFT Marcia 21, 2018 Page I I
Councilmember Fredericks said a meeting had been held with CalTrans,Transportation Authority of
Marin, City and Transit Agency staff to update on the first phase of ramp metering in Marin. She
said the first phase will install meters on NB Hwy. 101 on-ramps at Monte Mar Drive to Sir Francis
Drake Boulevard, and construction is expected to begin in early 2019.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT
None.
WEEKLY DIGESTS
Received.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fraser
adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m.
JIM FRASER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK
Town Council Minutes 1107-2018 DRAFT March 21, 2018 Page 12
TOWN COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
-ayoi Fraser called thegu Meeting of the Tiburon Town Council to order at 7:30 p.m.
on Wl T
ednesday, April 4, 2018, inown Council Chambers, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon.
California. ��
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Thier, Welner
PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock,
Director of Community Development Anderson.
Planning Manager Kwon, Town Clerk Stefani
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW TOWN STAFF
• Sung Kwon, Planning Manager
Director of Community Development Anderson introduced Planning Manager Sung Kwon.He said
he was pleased to be here, and the Council welcomed him.
PRESENTATION
• Sue Kwentus, Tiburon representative to the Marin Commission on Aging
"Age Friendly Cities"
Commissioner on Aging Sue Kwentus said it had been approximately a year since the Town Council
appointed her to the Commission on Aging, and she reported on some of the normal business of the
Commission:monthly informational speakers,an annual senior fair,weekday lunches overseen by a
nutrition and health committee, and encouraging the cities in Marin to become "age-friendly".
She said many cities in Marin County are becoming "age-friendly" and becoming certified by the
World Health Organization, and to do so,the Town must do an assessment of their local community
and take into account several different factors. These factors include: outdoor spaces,transportation.
housing, social participation, respect and social inclusion, civic participation and employment.
communication and information, and community support and health services. .
Commissioner Kwentus concluded her presentation by reviewing the steps taken by several other
cities in Marin County to become age-friendly,and encouraged the Council to begin the assessment.
Totivn Council Miniaes #09-2018 DRAFT April#, 2018 Page 1
Mayor Fraser asked for clarification about the assessment process.Commissioner Kwentus explained
that the evaluation process could be as involved as an intensive survey of local seniors. or the
Council could create a working group to analyze the required factors.
Vice Mayor Kulik asked Commissioner Kwentus if she believed there was a specific factor that she
believed Tiburon needed to improve. Kwentus said one prominent issue in the community is
breaking down some of the barriers for seniors to encourage them to participate in the events that are
already available.
CONSENT CALENDAR
CC-1. Town Council Minutes — Adopt minutes of March 29, 2018 special meeting Town
Clerk Stefani)
CC-2. Municipal Code Amendments—Adopt ordinance making amendments to Chapter 25 of
the Tiburon Municipal Code Regarding Unlawful Juvenile Gatherings and Chapter 22
(Minors and Social Host Accountability)(Police Department/Community Development
Department)
CC-3. 2017 Storm Drain Lining Project—Award contract to Miksis Services and authorize
Town Manager to increase design contract contingency (Department of Public Works)
CC-4. 2017 Storm Drain Rehabilitation Project—Award contractto Oak Grove Construction
and authorize Town Manager to increase design contract contingency (Department of
Public Works)
MOTION: To approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4, as written.
Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Kulik
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik
ABSENT: Thier, Welner
ACTION ITEMS
AI-1. Tiburon Peninsula Traffic Relief Joint Powers Authority — Discussion regarding
possible modified contract with First Student and potential increased cost to Town(Town
Manager Chanis)
Town Manager Chanis explained the Town's partnership with the City of Belvedere and the Reed
Union School District to create the Yellow Bus Challenge, with the goal to reduce traffic during
school times and provide safe and reliable transportation to school.
He said the contract with First Student to provide bus service has several years remaining, but the
JPA Board would like to explore the possibility of modifying, extending or starting a new contract
that would include stronger penalties for service disruptions and new buses for the next school year.
He said potential benefits include a decrease in service disruptions,enhanced safety with seatbelts on
all the new buses, and potential increase in pass sales. He said this new contract would require a
Town Council Minutes 409-2018 DRAFT April 4, 2018 Page 2
significant increase in subsidy from the Town in the FYI 8-19 budget.
Councilmember Fredericks and Chanis discussed the new penalties for service disruptions, and
Chanis made several clarifications about incentivizing driver attendance and the cost of the
contractor ensuring substitute drivers are available or to minimize service disruptions.
Vice Mayor Kulik commented that the biggest hurdle for the Yellow Bus Challenge seems to be the
reliability of buses, and asked if there was another dedicated use for the proposed funds. Chanis
agreed, and further clarified that the reason for having this discussion now would be to ensure the
new buses are ordered and ready for the new school year. Chanis also confirmed there was no stated
purpose for the reserve funds in question.
Mayor Fraser opened the floor for public comment. There was none.
Mayor Fraser said spoke in support of the work the JPA has done on the Yellow Bus Challenge. He
said the community has benefited from reduced congestion, and the bus has created another
opportunity for community socialization. He said the Town has much to be proud of with this
program, including a good relationship with the bus provider.Fraser believed new buses will create a
safer ride for school children and a sense of pride for bus drivers. He said this expenditure would
help to build a better program, and was in support.
Fredericks expressed reservations about subsidizing the bus service to such an extent (because the
bus service benefits the entire community)and the assumption that new buses will increase ridership.
She said she would be in favor of further exploration about whether the community would be willing
to help pay for the program, or if new buses would actually increase ridership.
Kulik spoke to the benefits of socialization for children on buses,and said there is a potential for an
increase in sense of enthusiasm about "riding the bus". He said the seatbelts will make the
experience safer for riders and drivers.He shared Fredericks' concerns about cost,but believed there
could be a correlation between improving the bus program and reducing traffic in Tiburon.
Fredericks said she understood the time constraint on this decision, but expressed the desire to
survey community members to confirm that this improvement actually would increase ridership.
Chanis said the timing would be difficult to conduct a valid survey at this stage.
Fredericks inquired further about different contract options. Chanis explained that the bus company
has indicated preference for a longer term contract before investing the capital in the new buses,but
said the existing contract is still valid for several more years. He clarified that the purpose for this
change now would be to order the new buses and have them ready for the new school year.
Mayor Fraser believed the pricing of the bus contracts will continue to rise, so it would be wise to
take action now. He said the contract would have been renegotiated to consider other safety and
reliability factors, so the timing is right to make this improvement.
Town Council A4inzites#09-2018 DRAFT April 4, 2018 Page 3
Fredericks said she would like to see the JPA consider the possibility that the rest of the community
would be willing to contribute financially to the bus program, as the costs to the Town likely will
continue to rise. She suggested a conditional approval that the JPA conduct this research.
The Mayor said he would not support a conditional approval, and called for a motion.
MOTION: To provide direction to staff and the Tiburon Peninsula"Traffic Relief JPA Board that the
Town Council of the Town of Tiburon is in support of the additional subsidy and
modified contract with First Student.
Moved: Kulik, seconded by Fraser
VOTE: AYES: Fraser, Kulik
NAYS: Fredericks
ABSENT: Thier, Welner
TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Fredericks gave a report on a new bill that would propose all members of a joint
powers authority will be jointly liable for all debt of the joint powers authority,and suggested the
Council oppose this bill.
TOWN MANAGER REPORT
Town Manager Chanis said he would be out of the office for the next several days.
WEEKLY DIGESTS
Received.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fraser
adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
JIM FRASER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK
Tot,i,n Council A4inuies #U9-2018 DRAFT Apri14, 2018 Page 4
TOWN OF TIBURON Town Council Meeting
1505 Tiburon Boulevard April 18, 2018
Tiburon,CA 94920 n
Agenda Item: A ',I,
STAFF REPORT
To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council
From: Department of Public Works
Office of the Town Manager
Subject: StaV update on Rule 20A/B Undergrounding Project between Lyford and
N Way
Reviewed By:
BACKGROUND
In September 2005, Council confirmed that Tiburon Boulevard continues to be the Town's Rule
20A funding priority and that the next project priorities would be (a) Mar West to Ned's Way, (b)
Ned's Way to San Rafael Avenue, and(c) Reed Ranch Road to Trestle Glen Boulevard.
Responding to this priority list,the Town undergrounded overhead lines along Tiburon
Boulevard from Lyford Drive to roughly 750 feet west of the intersection in conjunction with the
construction of the new parking lot. Another project was completed in 2015 that undergrounded
the south side of Tiburon Boulevard from the Lyford parking lot to Mar West.
Since 2014, staff has been working with PG&E to underground the utilities between Lyford and
Ned's Way using the Town's rule 20A funds. This project would underground Tiburon
Boulevard from Lyford Drive to about 880 feet west. It also includes about 250 feet of
undergrounding on Lyford Drive.
The project boundary includes a utility running through the school property. As this property is
within the undergrounding district boundary it must be undergrounded. This significantly
increased the estimated cost of construction. The undergrounding district includes approximately
1,781 feet of main trenching, 25 feet of service lateral trenching (trenching from property line to
the panel on the property), and one panel conversion. In 2014,the ball-park planning level
estimate for the project provided by PG&E was $925,980 of Rule 20A credits.
The Town entered into an agreement with PG&E for them to do the design of the project, and in
the FY 2017-18 budget, Council allocated$500,000 to the project to cover additional costs above
the Town's Rule 20A balance of$910,000. This balance includes borrowing ahead against the
next five years of allocations,the maximum borrow ahead allowed.
In late December 2018, PG&E provided updated cost estimates based on 100%design. The
estimated cost of the project, including contingency, was $2,493,673 of 20A credits.
On January 17, 2018, Council directed the Town Manager to negotiate with other jurisdictions to
obtain approximately$1,424,000 in Rule 20A. At that time staff estimated that credits could be
purchased for approximately $0.50/credit.
ToWN OF T nRUR.o PAGE 1 egg'.;4
Town Council Niceting
Aril 18,20W
On February 21, 2018, Council authorized the Town Manager to execute a Memorandum of
Understanding with the City of Rocklin to purchase $438,000 of PG&E Rule 20A credits for
$109,000. That agreement has been executed.
On March 7, 2018, Council authorized the Town Manager to execute the attached Memorandum
of Understanding with the County of Trinity to purchase PG&E Rule 20A credits. The MOU
with the County of Trinity consists of the following two components:
• An agreement to purchase $700,000 worth of credits now, at a cost of.50/credit: and,
• An option to purchase up to an additional $345,000 of Rule 20A credits, at a cost of
$.50/credit. The option to purchase additional credits would expire on June 30, 2019.
Staff has not yet executed this agreement.
Recently, PG&E received bids for the project from contractors. The bids are well over the PG&E
estimate. The total cost of the project, including contingency is now$3,744,556. Table 1 below
summarizes the cost estimate history for the project.
Table 1 - Cost Estimate istory Rule 20A Project
2014 2018 2018
no design 100% design Bid
Base Estimate $1,931,665 $3,002,466
Contingency $561,972 $742,111
Total $925,980 $2,493,673 $3,744,566
Before the project can continue, the Town must secure sufficient Rule 20A credits to cover the
base estimate, $3,002,466. In addition,there is a potential need to expend additional funds for
contingency expenses totaling $742,111 credits. Assuming a cost of$0.50/credit, the total
expenditure from General funds is shown in Table 2.
Table 2 -Funds Needed for Rule 20A credits
Rule 20A credits General Fund Cost
Current Estimate w/o Contingency $3,002,446
Current Rule 20A Credit Balance $910,000
Purchased from City of Rocklin $438,000 $109,000
Available from Trinity County $1,045,000 $522,500
Additional Credits to Continue $609,446 $304,723
Subtotal $3,002,446 $936,223
Possible contingency $742,111 $371,056
Total Potential Project Cost $1,307,279
Staff has previously been told that the funding and property requirements for the project needed
to be completed two months before construction. Construction must occur during the school
summer recess beginning June 18th. Starting construction any later than June 18th risks
Town Council Mee¢:in
April 18,20tS
construction near the school after school starts in the fall. Given this, April 18th is the drop-dead
date for securing the necessary credits and for resolution of the property issues for construction to
occur during 2018. In addition to the funding situation, both the Town and the Reed School
District are waiting for PG&E to respond to comments on proposed easements documents
required for the project to move forward.
ANALYSIS
The current cost of the project with contingency is now over four times the no-design ball park
cost estimate,provided to the Town by PG&E in 2014 when Council decided to proceed with the
project. It is 50%more than the cost presented to Council in January 2018. While this project
has been a priority since 2005,the costs are more than anticipated due to the requirement to
underground the wires over the school and,probably,the current bidding environment.
PG&E solicited bids from four pre-qualified contractors. Two declined to put in bids, stating
they were too busy with other work. The other two were very close, only about 6%percent apart.
PG&E has not shared the bids, so staff cannot provide further analysis.
Given the project schedule and the requirement to do the project during the school summer break,
Staff believes it is virtually impossible to construct the project this summer. Therefore, if Council
wishes to continue moving forward on this project, construction would occur no earlier than
Summer 2019. In this scenario, PG&E would rebid the project in Spring 2019.
We currently have a 100%design. This design will stay viable for a few years although changes
may need to be made as new equipment standards are developed by the utilities. PG&E will
continue to charge against the project as long as the project remains open. The only way to avoid
these continuing charges is to close the project down. Currently, PG&E has expended about
$140,000 in Rule 20A credits.
Regarding Rule 20A in general, as noted above,the Town currently has $910,000 in credits
(including borrow ahead)plus the $438,000 in credits purchased from Rocklin, for a total of
$1,348,000 in credits. The Town receives just under$30,000 per year in additional credits. Over
the past ten years Rule 20A costs have risen faster than general construction costs. Over the long
term, general construction costs rise by about 3.5%per year. The amount Tiburon receives
annually is insufficient to cover the cost of inflation for the amount of credits already owned.
Therefore, it makes sense to use the credits soon. However, given the results on this project, it is
uncertain that the Town can find a project that we can complete for under$1.4M.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The FY 2017/18 CIP budget included $500,000 for this project in addition to the Town's
$910,000 of available Rule 20A credits.
To continue forward Council would need to allocate an additional $440,000 to the Rule 20A/2013
undergrounding project from the General Fund Infrastructure. This assumes additional credits are
available at $0.50/credit.
Town Comwil Meeting
April 18,20f8
It is entirely possible that there will be contingency expenses on this project and this could
require additional funding of$371,056 at a later date. Again,this assumes additional credits are
available at $0.50/credit.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Town Council:
1. Receive staff report on status of Rule 20A/2013 project.
2. Direct staff to continue work on the project, or,
3. Direct staff to cease work on the project and ask PG&E to close the project down.
Prepared by: Patrick Barnes,Director of Public Works
Greg Chanis,Town Manager
TOWN OF TIBURON Town Council Meeting
Aril 18, 2018
1505 Tiburon Boulevard p
Agenda Item:
Tiburon, CA 94920 u
'�I
STAFF PO .
To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council
From: Department of Public Works
Subject: Recommendation to Approve a Resolution Continuing the Cypress Hollow
Lightipg & Landscaping District Assessment for FY 2018/19
Reviewed By:
BACKGROUND
In 1998, the residents of Cypress Hollow petitioned and received approval from the Local
Agency Formation Commission for annexation from unincorporated Marin County into the
Tiburon Town Limits. Since 1990, the County of Marin had maintained and operated a
Landscaping and Lighting District in Cypress Hollow.
In 1998, the Tiburon Town Council and the Marin County Board of Supervisors passed a joint
resolution transferring jurisdiction of the Cypress Hollow Landscape and Lighting District to the
Town of Tiburon. The resolution also transferred the financial resources and documentation
associated with operation, maintenance and funding to the Town.
Based on this resolution, the Town of Tiburon has maintenance responsibility for:
1. The 25 foot sanitary sewer easement landscape and irrigation on the east boundary;
2. Entry landscaping and the 30 foot storm drainage easement on the southwesterly
boundary and irrigation system; and
3. Ownership and maintenance of the park site.
Since 1998, the Town of Tiburon has continued the operation and maintenance activities of the
Cypress Hollow Landscaping and Lighting District and assessed the residents the cost thereof.
ANALYSIS
The California Streets and Highways Code requires the Town to publicly notice the affected
residents annually in order to continue the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District. The
Town must provide the residents an opportunity to submit either written or oral protests. On
March 27, 2018, the residents of Cypress Hollow were sent a notice of this evening's public
hearing via U.S. Mail. As of the writing of this report, the Town has not received any inquiries
on the proposed assessment. From the date of the Town's incorporation through present day the
assessment amount has not been changed. The assessment amount is presently $378 per property
per year.
TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 3
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The Cypress Hollow Landscape and Lighting District generates about $16,632 per year.
The table below shows past year expenditures and the budget for next year.
Cypress Hollow Expenditures
2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19
Actual Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted
Contractual Services (Cost Recovery) $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000
Landscape Grounds & Materials $6,450 $537 $2,495 $1,600 $8,000
Water-MMWD $1,918 $837 $606 $500 $1,000
TOTAL DEPARTMENT $22,368 $15,374 $17,101 $16,100 $23,000
Note that there is a small surplus in most years. This has generated a reserve of about$30,000,
which is used for larger projects. Special trimming is needed about every four years and is
estimated to cost $8,000 in the upcoming fiscal year. The last time this was done was in 2014/15.
The additional $6,368 needed to perform this work will be levied from the above-mentioned
reserve. ($16,632 Generated Funds - $23,000 Expenditures = $6,368 From Reserve)
Additionally, the park infrastructure needs renewal about every 20 years. In 2009,the Town
spent $40,000 rehabilitating the park area.
The $14,000 cost recovery is an average of about 5 hours per week for a Parks Maintenance
employee. The total time spent in the three areas totals an average of 4.8 to 7.8 hours per week.
The total budget for FY 2018/19 compares favorably with the Marin County budget from Fiscal
Year 1996/97, eleven years ago. For FY 1996/97, the assessment report from Marin County
estimated the following costs for the maintenance and operation of Cypress Hollow LLD:
Miscellaneous Maintenance $2,500
Miscellaneous Fees $88
Contractual Services, Monthly Maintenance $8,728
Water $2,300
Indirect County Overhead $5,733
Contingencies (carry over) $8,564
Total Expenditure $27,913
Staff believes that the Cypress Hollow development is receiving a good value from the Town of
Tiburon.
Cypress Hollow Park is unique among neighborhood parks in Tiburon. It is the only
neighborhood park that is manicured. It is the only neighborhood park with a play set for
children. The park is a well-used amenity benefitting the residents of Cypress Hollow.
Four years ago, one resident spoke against the assessment at the Town Council meeting. Prior to
that, no resident had ever spoken or written in protest to the assessment. There are 44 parcels in
i.11\11 t ;;illi A�i;C i
the LLD and the LLD has been in the Town since 1998, 20 years. That is a(1/(20*44)) = 0.11%
protest rate.
The resident who spoke against the LLD assessment four years ago said that he had been told by
the developer that the assessment would be paid for in a few years and then disappear. A
disappearing assessment would normally be to fund the cost of initial construction. It is clear
from 1997 Marin County documents that the assessment is for"landscape services" for the
"operation and maintenance" of these areas, not initial construction.
The levy of the annual lighting and landscaping assessment provides a funding source for the cost
of Town maintenance of the park and any required improvements. Without this source of
funding, these costs would be paid for from the General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Town Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing to hear any protests on the intent to levy the annual
assessment, and
2. Move to adopt the resolution continuing the Cypress Hollow Lighting and
Landscaping District for FY 2018-19
Exhibits: Draft Resolution continuing the maintenance and operation of
the Landscape and Lighting District in the Cypress Hollow
Subdivision for Fiscal Year 2018-19
Prepared By: Dmitriy Lashkevich, Associate Engineer
RESOLUTION NO.##-2018
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF
THE TOWN OF TIBURON CONTINUING
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE LANDSCAPE
AND LIGHTING DISTRICT IN THE CYPRESS HOLLOW SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS,the County of Marin has maintained and operated a Landscape and Lighting District
in Cypress Hollow, and received assessments from the parcels therein for the purpose of operating and
maintaining the following areas: (1) landscaping and irrigation of the sewer sanitary easement on the east
boundary, (2) entry landscaping and irrigation of the 30' storm drainage easement in the southwest
boundary area,and(3)ownership and maintenance of the park site, all as part of the Cypress Hollow
Development; and
WHEREAS, in December 1998 the Town of Tiburon annexed the Cypress Hollow Area, and in
April 1.999 accepted the Grant Deed from the County of Marin for the Cypress Hollow Public Park; and
WHEREAS,the Town of Tiburon, having completed annexation of the parcels in the Cypress
Hollow District, herein states its intention to continue the operation and maintenance activities of the
Cypress Hollow Landscape and Lighting District heretofore the responsibility of the County of Marin.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED, as follows:
Section 1. The special assessment levy for the District is established as follows, for
continued operation and maintenance District:
034.012.56220 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.01 10 Monterey Dr. $378.00
03 4.012.5 7110 Monterey Dr. $378.00 034.394.02 20 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0210 Cypress Hollow. $378.00 034.394.03 30 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0320 Cypress Hollow $378.00 034.394.04 40 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0430 Cypress Hollow $378.00 034.394.05 50 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0540 Cypress Hollow $378.00 034.394.06 60 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0650 Cypress Hollow $378.00 034.394.07 70 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0760 Cypress Hollow $378.00 034.394.08 80 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0870 Cypress Hollow $378.00 034.394.09 90 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.0980 Cypress Hollow $378.00 034.394.10 100 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.392.10145 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.11 60 Baccharis Pl. $378.00
034.393.01110 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.12 50 Baccharis Pl. $378.00
034.393.02120 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.13 40 Baccharis Pl. $378.00
034.393.03130 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.14 30 Baccharis Pl. $378.00
034.393.04140 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.15 20 Baccharis Pl. $378.00
034.393.05150 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.16 10 Baccharis Pl. $378.00
034.393.06160 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.394.18 185 Rancho Dr. $378.00
034.393.07170 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.395.01 35 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.393.08180 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.395.02 45 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.393.09190 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.395.03 55 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.393.10200 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.395.04 65 Monterey Dr. $378.00
034.393.11210 Rancho Dr. $378.00 034.395.05 75 Monterey Dr. $378.00
Total assessment charge to the parcels of the District: $ 16,632.00.
Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 0-2018 04/18/2018 1
Section 2. The estimated District budget for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 provides for continuing
operating functions, and reserves funds for capital maintenance:
Amount
Contractual Services $14,000
Materials & Supplies 8,000
Water 1,000
Total Estimated Budget: $23,000
From reserves $6,368
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon,on
April 18, 2018,by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
JIM FRASER, MAYOR
TOWN OF TIBURON
ATTEST:
LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK
Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 0-2018 04/18/2018 2