The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTC Digest 2018-07-20 TOWN COUNCIL WEEKLY DIGEST July 16 - 20, 2018 TIBURON Correspondence 1. July 16 - Notice of Public Scoping Meeting—CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehab Agenda 1. Agenda -July 19 —Tiburon Design Review Board 2. Agenda —July 25 —Tiburon Planning Commission REGIONAL NOTICES & AGENDAS Agenda 1. Agenda —July 16 —Belvedere Tiburon Library Agency 2. Agenda—July 25 —Richradson's Bay Regional Agency e owl STATE OF CALIFORNIA—DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION EDMUND G.BROWN JR.,GOVERNOR FACILITY PLANNING, CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT P.O.Box 942883 Sacramento,CA 94283-0001 NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROPOSED CLIMATE ACTION PLAN GENERAL INFORMATION Date: July 16, 2018 To: Office of Planning and Research, Responsible Agencies, and Trustee Agencies Project Title: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Climate Action Plan Lead Agency: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Facility Planning, Construction and Management 9838 Old Placerville Road, Suite B Sacramento, CA 95827 Contact: Robert Sleppy (916) 255-1141 Purpose of Notice: In accordance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) is distributing a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to solicit.comments on the scope of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that is currently being prepared to serve as both a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction plan and a climate adaptation strategy for CDCR facilities, operations, and investment decisions. The CAP is being prepared to build on CDCR's sustainability achievements to date, pursuant to relevant Executive Orders (EOs) and legislation, and identify additional actions that would reduce GHG emissions and prepare CDCR facilities and operations for the impacts of climate change. This NOP is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA, (Public Resources Code, Division 13, Section 21000-21177), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000-15387). Project Location: The CAP would cover CDCR's 34 adult institutions, one leased adult correctional facility, three juvenile facilities, and owned and leased administrative and parole offices throughout California. Please see Exhibit 1 for facility locations and Table 1 below for a list of all facilities covered by the CAP. r, 3 CDCR CAP NOP Page 2 Table 1 CDCR Facilities Covered by CAP Facility Name Location(County) Year Activated' Avenal State Prison Avenal (Kings) 1987 California Correctional Center and High Susanville (Lassen) 1963-1987 Desert State Prison California City Correctional Facility California City (Kern) 2013 California Correctional Institution Tehachapi (Kern) 1933 CDCR Administrative Offices' Bakersfield (Kern), Chowchilla (Madera), Varies by Coalinga(Fresno), Corcoran (Kings), Covina facility (Los Angeles), Delano (Kern), EI Centro (Imperial), Elk Grove (Sacramento), Fresno (Fresno), Galt(Sacramento), Lancaster(Los Angeles), Paso Robles (San Luis Obispo), Rancho Cordova (Sacramento), Rancho Cucamonga(San Bernardino), Richmond (Contra Costa), Sacramento (Sacramento), San Diego (San Diego), San Quentin (Marin), Stockton (San Joaquin), Susanville (Lassen), West Covina(Los Angeles) California Health Care Facility Stockton (San Joaquin) 2014 Chaderjian Youth Correctional Facility and Stockton (San Joaquin) 1965 OH Close Youth Correctional Facility California Institution for Men, Chino Chino(San Bernardino) 1941 California Institution for Women Corona(Riverside) 1952 California Medical Facility Vacaville (Solano) 1955 California Men's Colony San Luis Obispo(San Luis Obispo) 1954 California Rehabilitation Center-Norco Norco(Riverside) 1962 California State Prison-Corcoran Corcoran (Kings) 1988 California State Prison-Sacramento Folsom (Sacramento) 1986 California State Prison-Los Angeles County Lancaster(Los Angeles) 1993 California State Prison-Solano Vacaville (Sel^no) 1986 California Substance Abuse Treatment Corcoran (Kings) 1997 Facility-Corcoran Calipatria State Prison - - - - Calipatria (Imperial) 1992 - Centinela State Prison Imperial (Imperial) 1993 Central California Women's Facility Chowchilla (Madera) 1995 Chuckawaiia Valley State Prison Blythe (Riverside) 1988 Correctional Training Facility Soledad (Monterey) 1946 Deuel Vocational Institution Tracy(San Joaquin) 1953 Division of Adult Parole Operations2 Anaheim(Orange), Auburn (Placer), Bakersfield Varies by (Kern), Berkeley(Alameda), Bermuda Dunes facility (Riverside), Ceres (Stanislaus), Chico (Butte), Chula Vista (San Diego), Compton (Los Angeles), Concord (Contra Costa), Diamond Bar (Los Angeles), EI Centro(Imperial), EI Monte (Los Angeles), Escondido(San Diego), Eureka (Humboldt), Fresno (Fresno), Hanford (Kings), CDCR CAP NOP - Page 3 Table 1 CDCR Facilities Covered by CAP FacilrEy Name Location(County) Year Activated'_` Irvine (Orange), Los Angeles(Los Angeles), Merced (Merced), North Highlands (Sacramento), Oakland (Alameda), Oxnard (Ventura), Pomona (Los Angeles), Red Bluff (Tehama), Redding (Shasta), Redwood City (San Mateo), Riverside(Riverside), Sacramento (Sacramento), Salinas (Monterey), San Bernardino (San Bernardino), San Francisco (San Francisco), San Jose(Santa Clara), San Luis Obispo (San Luis Obispo), Santa Rosa (Sonoma), Stockton (San Joaquin), Susanville (Lassen), Ukiah (Mendocino), Vallejo (Solano), Van Nuys(Los Angeles), Victorville (San Bernardino), Weed (Siskiyou), Woodland (Yolo) Folsom State Prison Folsom (Sacramento) 1880 Ironwood State Prison Blythe (Riverside) 1994 Kern Valley State Prison Delano(Kern) 2005 Mule Creek State Prison Ione (Amador) 1987 North Kern State Prison Delano(Kern) 1993 Pelican Bay State Prison Crescent City(Del Norte) 1989 Pleasant Valley State Prison Coalinga(Fresno) 1994 R. A. McGee Correctional Training Center Galt(Sacramento) 1988 Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility San Diego (San Diego) 1987 Salinas Valley State Prison Soledad (Monterey) 1996 San Quentin State Prison San Quentin (Marin) 1852 Sierra Conservation Center Jamestown (Tuolumne) 1965 Valley State Prison Chowchilla (Madera) 2010 Ventura Youth Correctional Facility Camarillo (Ventura) 1942 Wasco State Prison Wasco(Kern) 1991 Notes.- Year'of oldest facility,listed Othe•lo`cation These facilities are administrative antl are,not shown m Ezh1 t7 tDACILIT 1 Avenal State Prison,Avenal 2 California City Correctional Facility,California City 3 California Correctional Center,Susanville 4 California Correctional Institution,Tehachapi $ Del 5 California Health Care Facility,Stockton Norte Siskiyou Modoc 6 California Institution for Men,Chino 7 California Institution for Women,Corona 8 California Men's Colony,San Luis Obispo 9 California Medical Facility,Vacaville 10 California Rehabilitation Center,Norco Humboldt Trinity Shasta Lassen 11 California State Prison,Corcoran 12 California State Prison,Los Angeles County 3 13 California State Prison,Sacramento Tehama 14 California State Prison,Solano Plumas 15 California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility/State Prison,Corcoran Mendocino Glenn Butte 16 Calipatria State Prison,Calipatria Serra 17 Centinela State Prison,Imperial 1 evada 18 Central Califomia Women's Facility,Chowchilla l Colusa utt Yuba Placer 19 Chuckawalla Valley State Prison,Blythe Lake 20 Correctional Training Facility,Soledad Yolo EI Dorado 21 Deuel Vocational Institution,Tracy Napa13 Alpine 22 Folsom State Prison,Represa Sonomano crament 23 High Desert State Prison,Susanville 9 6 24 Ironwood State Prison,Blythe arin 14 San Calaveras Tuolumne 25 Kern Valley State Prison,Delano 3 Comm Costa uin 33 Mono 26 Mule Creek State Prison,Ione Sanfranckm 38 37 27 North Kern State Prison,Delano _Alameda_ Stanl� Mariposa - -28 Pelican BayStale-Prison,-Crescent City-- - -- --- San Mateo 29 Pleasant Valley State Prison,Coalinga Santa Clara Merced 3 Madera 30 Richard J.Donovan Correctional Facility,San Diego 18 31 Salinas Valley State Prison,Soledad Santa ruz Fresno Imo 32 San Quentin State Prison,San Quentin 33 Sierra Conservation Center,Jamestown 0 Benito 34 Valley State Prison,Chowchilla 31 35 Wasco State Prison-Reception Center,Wasco Monterey 9 10rgs Tulare 36 Ventura Youth Correctional Facility,Camarillo 1 15 11 37 N.A.Chaderjian Youth Correctional Facility,Stockton 27 38 O.H.Close Youth Correctional facility,Stockton San LuisObapo 35 i 104 4 2 San Bernardino Santa Barbara 12 Ventura Los Angeles 36 7 lO Legend Orange Riverside 4 19 O CDCR Facilities CDCR Headquarters is ® San Diego _ Imperial 0 40 80 � 17 Miles - _ 30 Base:National Atias G1601009601002 Source:Adapted by Ascent Environmental 2017 Exhibit 1 CDCR Facilities (Not Including Parole or Administrative Offices) CDCR CAP NOP Page 5 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The CAP is intended to achieve the following additional objectives: • Continue greening CDCR's operations and reducing GHG emissions in conformance with various EOs and legislative requirements, including: • Assembly Bill (AB) 32, which established a statewide GHG reduction target of 1990 levels by 2020; • EO B-30-15, which established a mid-term statewide GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (subsequently codified into statute in Senate Bill [SB] 32); • EO S-3-05, which set a long-term GHG reduction goal of 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 (and was restated in EO B-30-15); EO B-18-12, which established the State's Green Buildings Action Plan and set forth reduction targets for GHG emissions, energy, and fuel usage reductions for all State agencies and set other goals to work towards sustainability; • EO B-16-12, which set forth zero-emission vehicle fleet purchasing requirements for State agencies; and • EO B-29-15, which set forth statewide water use reduction targets in response to prolonged drought. • Develop a GHG reduction plan that meets the requirements of Section 15183.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, which will provide for tiering and streamlining analysis of GHG emissions of future projects undertaken by CDCR which are consistent with the GHG reduction plan. • Develop a Department-wide climate adaptation strategy, which will include an analysis of the effects of climate change as they relate to CDCR facilities and operations, along with potential climate adaptation strategies to reduce climate-related risk and improve CDCR's resilience. • Identify and provide programmatic CEQA coverage for various projects and actions, including installation of infrastructure and modification of facilities, to facilitate GHG reduction- and climate adaptation-related infrastructure at CDCR facilities throughout the state. PROJECT BACKGROUND.. In order to understand CDCR's objectives.for the CAP and the Department's overall sustainability goals, it is important to understand the history and development pattern of state correctional facilities throughout California and also the extent to which CDCR currently conserves and produces energy at its facilities. CDCR's correctional facilities generally fall into generally three categories: the original 12 prisons, which were mostly constructed between 1852 and 1970; the 22 contemporary facilities, which were constructed after 1980; and, most recently, an existing leased adult correctional facility operated by the Department. (Table 1 shows the year of activation for the oldest facility at each location.) At the time they were built, the original prisons were located away from population centers in rural areas and near military bases (now closed). For example, when it was constructed in 1852 prior to the construction of the Golden Gate Bridge, San Quentin was extremely remote and difficult to reach. When the need arose to construct new prisons in the 1980s, CDCR either located new facilities next to existing facilities, where infrastructure was already available, or they sited new facilities based on requests by cities and counties. Accommodating these requests generally resulted in development of CDCR CAP NOP Page 6 prisons in rural agricultural areas, such as the San Joaquin Valley (e.g., Delano, Wasco, Corcoran, Avenal, etc., or in desert regions, such as eastern Riverside County (e.g., Chuckawalla and Ironwood) and the Imperial Valley (e.g., Calipatria and Centinela). As noted, above, CDCR now leases one adult correctional facility in California City. This facility is fully operated by the Department. CDCR has prioritized efficient use of State-owned land. Over the past 15 years, CDCR has primarily built new facilities where there is sufficient State-owned land adjacent to an existing correctional facility and where utilities and infrastructure are generally available to support a new facility. Examples include the second prison at Chowchilla, the second Kern facility, and Ironwood; and construction of new"infill" prison expansions such as the recently completed Level II facilities at RJ Donovan Correctional Facility and Mule Creek State Prison. More recently, CDCR has used redevelopment opportunities at closed facilities such as the construction of the California Health Care Facility south of Stockton at the site of two former youth correctional facilities. CDCR is a leader among State agencies in the development of alternative energy sources. To date, CDCR has completed 16 on-site renewable solar generation projects at 12 existing institutions totaling 34 megawatts (MW) in electrical generation capacity, using third-party power purchase agreements (PPA's). CDCR recently awarded or will soon award an additional 19 solar PPA projects, along with 3 new wind turbine projects, for a total of 62 MW in generation capacity at existing facilities. CDCR is also currently studying the potential for an additional 25 MW worth of renewable energy systems at existing facilities. In total, CDCR's statewide on-site renewable energy portfolio is positioned to exceed 100 MW L' 'L. L.. LL- .J L nnn in generation capacity uy t e end of LVLC. CDCR has also been a leader in sustainable design and construction, including meeting and exceeding energy-conservation-standardsin-new construction and-on-renovation-o#existing-facili ies.--Over-the past - six years, every new CDCR facility has received either Gold or Silver certification in the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green buildings rating program, and has typically exceeded the Title 24 Part 6 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This-includes the construction of 60 new LEED-certified buildings, and the achievement of 7 LEED- certified leased buildings. CDCR has identified an additional eight projects that would be designed to meet or exceed LEED Silver certification requirements. There are also over 150 Health Care Facility Improvement Program (HCFIP) sub-projects (primarily support facilities) currently in construction that are designed to meet or exceed California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) requirements. Finally, CDCR has identified several potential zero net energy (ZNE) building projects that are currently in design and/or under construction or are in the certification process. Since 2008, CDCR has engaged in a collaborative effort through the California Investor Owned Utilities Energy Efficiency Partnership Program (administered by individual utility providers) to improve energy efficiency in its existing facilities. As of July 2017, CDCR completed 97 energy efficiency projects that have yielded a combined GHG emissions reduction of 64,866 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year. Looking forward to 2018 and beyond, CDCR has identified at least three additional energy efficiency projects that are expected to result in an additional GHG emissions reduction of over 10.000 metric tons per year. These programs, partnerships, and overall CDCR efforts have led to a decrease in total grid-based energy purchases of 11 percent and a 24 percent decrease in CDCR's total energy use intensity (EUI) rate since 2003, despite a 17 percent increase of CDCR's total institutional footprint by square footage. CDCR has exceeded the 10 percent entity-wide GHG emissions reduction goal by 2015 set by Governor Brown in 2012 and is on track to meet the Governor's goal of a 20 percent GHG emissions reduction below 2010 levels by 2020. CDCR CAP NOP Page 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN The CAP is being developed in response to State legislation and policies that are aimed at reducing Statewide GHG emissions. These include AB 32, which tasked the California Air Resources Board (CARB) with developing a Climate Change Scoping Plan to establish an interim target to achieve 1990 levels of GHG emissions by 2020 and provide a path for local governments and State agencies to contribute their fair share of the GHG reductions necessary to achieve the target; and, SB 32, which requires a Statewide GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Both AB 32 and SB 32 set specific and increasingly-stringent statewide GHG emission reduction targets designed to be consistent with EO S-3-05, which calls for a long-term Statewide GHG reduction goal,of 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. This longer-term 2050 emissions reduction goal for California is based on substantial scientific evidence that calls for global GHG emissions reductions of this magnitude in order to avoid the most catastrophic effects of global climate change. Both the AB 32 and SB 32 targets are designed to put the State on a pathway toward reaching the stated 2050 goal. The CAP will include a summary of baseline GHG emissions from CDCR operations and potential changes in these emissions in 2020 and 2030. Based on CDCR's preliminary emissions inventory, CDCR's total annual emissions in 2015 were an estimated 823,800 MTCO2e. This represents a 17 percent decrease from 2010 levels when CDCR's total annual emissions were approximately 988,200 MTCO2e. The CAP will identify specific measures and actions designed to achieve GHG reductions needed to meet CDCR's fair share of the State's 2020 and 2030.targets. The measures will build on the successes already achieved by CDCR, but the CAP will also identify new GHG reduction measures not previously implemented that would be required to meet the 2030 target. It is anticipated the CAP will consider GHG reduction strategies and implementing actions for the following sectors: • Transportation (On-Road Transportation and Off-Road Transportation), • Energy (Electricity and Natural Gas), • Solid Waste, • Water, and • Wastewater. GHG reductions from these sectors could be derived from actions such as increased renewable energy development, ZNE facilities, electric vehicle charging stations, zero emission vehicles, and water conservation and recycling. Examples of actions CDCR is considering at various facilities and will evaluate in the EIR include (but are not limited to): • Continue to install onsite renewable energy facilities (e.g., solar photovoltaic arrays, wind turbines); • Continue to upgrade HVAC and evaporative cooling systems with energy-efficient equipment; • Upgrade outdoor and indoor lighting to incorporate LED technology; • Replace natural gas boilers and water heating systems with electric or renewable energy-powered equipment; • Incorporate recycled water infrastructure to reduce use of potable water; • Incorporate composting programs to reduce landfilled waste; • Increase water conservation; and • Upgrade diesel-and liquid-natural-gas- (LNG) powered vehicles to models that use renewable fuels. CDCR CAP NOP Page 8 The CAP will also include climate adaptation measures that would help to prepare CDCR facilities and operations for the adverse effects of climate change, such as extreme heat, increased flooding due to sea-level rise and changing precipitation patterns, increased wildfire risk, and other related impacts. Some of the measures identified for GHG reduction will also function as adaptation measures, including increased water conservation and incorporation of recycled water infrastructure. Additional adaptation measures will be considered as needed. The CAP and CAP EIR will be prepared consistent with the tiering and streamlining provisions of Section 15183.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The CAP EIR will provide the appropriate level of environmental review to allow future projects to tier from and streamline their analysis of GHG emissions pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b)(2). POTENTIAL APPROVALS AND PERMITS REQUIRED CDCR has approval authority over the CAP and, to approve the CAP, must adopt environmental findings and mitigation measures, and, if necessary, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. No other agency has discretionary or other approval authority over the proposed CAP. Future CDCR projects identified in the CAP may require permits from other agencies, such as California Department of Fish and Wildlife. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Environmental issues that are not likely to result in significant impacts to the environment will be fully addressed in the introduction to the EIR (Effects Found Not to Be Significant). Issues expected to be ----- - elimInated-for-analysis in-the-EIR-through the scoping-process-are expected-to-include-aest-hetics,— geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, traffic and transportation, and utilities. The EIR is expected to focus on agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, and cultural and historical resources. Below is a brief discussion for each of these environmental issue areas. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES The CAP may identify GHG reduction and climate adaptation measures that require placement of structures or other facilities., (incl'. ding r.�ne—able energy fa..vilities, such as 3^viar photovoltaic panels or windmills) on parcels that contain Important Farmland. The EIR will evaluate impacts associated with the potential conversion of important Farmland to nonagricuiturai use. - AIR QUALITY - GHG reduction and climate adaptation measures identified in the CAP, such as installation of renewable energy facilities and ;Incorporation of recycled water infrastructure may require construction activities that would emit air pollutants. The EIR will evaluate the potential for implementation of these measures to result in emission of air pollutants that exceed applicable air district thresholds. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Measures included in the CAP to reduce CDCR's overall GHG emissions and help CDCR facilities adapt to climate change effects may require construction and placement of facilities in areas that contain sensitive habitat or that may adversely affect special-status plant or wildlife species. The EIR will evaluate potential biological-resource impacts associated with implementation of the CAP measures. CDCR CAP NOP Page 9 CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES The CAP may identify GHG reduction and climate adaptation measures that would require construction or placement of facilities on vacant land or other land that may contain archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. The measures also may include equipment upgrades or installation, or other construction activities that could potentially affect historic structures. The EIR will evaluate the potential for implementation of the CAP measures to result in impacts on historic and prehistoric archaeological and structural features. The EIR will also describe potential impacts to any tribal cultural resources identified during AB 52 consultation. ALTERNATIVES TO BE EVALUATED IN THE EIR In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the EIR will describe a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project that are capable of meeting most of the project's objectives, but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project. The EIR will also identify any alternatives that were considered but rejected by the lead agency as infeasible and briefly explain the reasons why. The EIR will also provide an analysis of the No Project Alternative. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Interested individuals, groups, and agencies may provide CDCR with written comments on topics to be addressed in the EIR for the project. In accordance with time limits mandated by State law(e.g., minimum 30-day public review of a NOP), comments should be provided no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 14, 2018. Please send all comments to: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Facility Planning, Construction and Management Attention: Robert Sleppy P.O. Box 942833 Sacramento, California 94283-0001 Email: CDCR-CAP@ascentenvironmental.com Contact: Robert Sleppy at (916) 255-1141 Copies of the NOP will also be available for review at the above address during the public review period, as well as on CDCR's website at https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/FPCM/Environmental.htm1. PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING: Consistent with Section 21083.9 of the CEQA Statutes, two public scoping meetings will be held to solicit comments regarding the scope and analysis of the CDCR CAP EIR, one in Northern California and one in Southern California. The meeting information is provided below. Northern California Scoping Meeting: Tuesday,July 24, 2018 from 1:00—3:00 PM at the East End Complex, Training Rooms A& B, located at 1500 Capitol Avenue, Sacramento, CA, 95814. Southern California Scoping Meeting: Thursday July 26, from 11:00 AM— 1:00 PM at the Ronald Reagan State Building, located at 300 S. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90013. TA SON i TOWN OF TIBURON Regular Meeting r I I- "`� �� Tiburon Town Hall Design Review Board � 1505 Tiburon Boulevard July 19, 2018. �= Tiburon; CA 94920 7:00 PM AGENDA TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Emberson, Vice Chair Chong; Boardmernbers Cousins, Kim and Kricensky ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Design Review Board on any subject not on the agenda may do so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Design Review Board is not able to undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Design Review Board agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Any communications regarding an item not on the agenda will not be considered part of the administrative record for that item. STAFF BRIEFING ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 136 SUGARLOAF DRIVE: File Nos. DR2018-053, VAR2018-011, & VAR2018-016; Michael Sillman & Pat Skipper, Owners; Site Plan and Architectural Review and Variances to allow 1) the proposed garage addition to be located 3 feet, 9.75 inches from the side property line where 15 feet is required (eaves proposed to be 1.5 feet from the property line where 3 feet is required.) and 2) the proposed garage to have a height of 37 feet where 30 feet is allowed. Assessor's Parcel No. 058-311-10. [SK] (Continue to August 16, 2018, PSA Extension Granted) 2. 16 APOLLO ROAD: File Nos. DR2018-004 & VAR2018-001; Pia & Alexander Thomas, Owners; Site Plan and Architectural Review and Variance for an addition that would result in a lot coverage of 31.09% where 30% is allowed. Assessor's Parcel No. 034-271-08. [SK] (Continue to August 2, 2018) 3. 22 CORTE SAN FERNANDO: File Nos. DR2017138 & VAR2018006; Todd & Erica Chapman, Owners; Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a 2,802 square foot addition to single-family dwelling and a 479 square foot pool house/gym with a Variance for excess building height to allow a height of 16 feet for an accessory structure, which is greater than the 15 feet maximum height is permitted in the R-1 zone. Assessor's Parcel No. 038-322-16. [SK] (Continued from .June 21, 2018) Design Review Board Agenda July 19. 2018 Page 1 4. 40 PAMELA COURT: File Nos. DR2018-063 & VAR2018-017; Marina Gleyzer, Owner; Site Plan and Architectural Review and a Variance for fence height in the rear setback (8 feet in lieu of the maximum 6 feet). Assessor's Parcel No. 034-211-27. [SK] 5. 239 ROUND HILL ROAD: File Nos. DR2018-045, VAR2018-008, VAR2018-009, VAR2018-010, & VAR2018-012; Peter & Suzannah Scully, Owners; Site Plan and Architectural Review and Variances allow 1) the garage to be 20' — 1" from the front property line where 30' is required, 2) the addition to be 13' — 8" from the west property line where 15' is required, 3) the addition to be 10' - 1" from the east property line where 15' is required, and 4) an increase of lot coverage from 23.4% to 27.4% where 15% is allowed. Assessor's Parcel No. 239-201-02. [SK] 6. 6 GILMARTIN COURT: File Nos. DR2018-057 & VAR2018-014; Christina & Chris Kitze, Owners; Site Plan and Architectural Review (for an addition and an expansion of a deck) and a Variance to allow an increase of lot coverage from 16% to 17.4% where 15% is allowed. Assessor's Parcel No. 039-191-07. [SK] ACTION ITEMS 7. MINUTES: Consider adoption of minutes of meeting of June 21, 2018 ADJOURNMENT GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION ASSISTANCE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at(415)435-7390. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION Copies of Design Review Board Agendas, Staff Reports,project files and other supporting data are available for viewing and inspection at Town Hall during business hours. Agendas and Staff Reports are also available at the Belvedere-Tiburon Public Library and on the Town of Tiburon website (www.townoftiburon.org)no later than 5:00 PM on the Friday prior to the regularly scheduled meeting. Any documents produced by the Town and distributed to a majority of the Design Review Board regarding any item on this agenda, including agenda-related documents produced by the Town after distribution of the agenda packet at least 72 hours in advance of the Board meeting, will be available for public inspection at Town Hall, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard,Tiburon,CA 94920. Upon request, the Town will provide written agenda materials in appropriate alternative formats, or disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to enable individuals with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Please deliver or cause to be delivered a written request (including your name, mailing address, phone number and brief description of the requested materials and preferred alternative format or auxiliary aid or service) at least five (5) days before the meeting to the Planning Division at the above address. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS AND ACTION ITEMS Public Hearing items and Action Items provide the general public and interested parties an opportunity to speak regarding items that typically involve an action or decision made by the Board. If you challenge any Design Review Board Agenda July 19,2018 Page 2 A so 2oo /• "TOWN Ol= "TIBL1}ZON Regular Meeting • \• Tiburon Town Nall Tiburon Planning Commission t 1505 Tiburon Boulevard July 25, 2018—7:30 PM ' Tiburon. CA 94920 AGENDA TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Williams, Vice Chair Amir, Commissioners Corcoran; Defever, and Tsai ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Plamiing Commission on any subject not on the agenda may do so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Planning Commission is not able to undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Planning Commission agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Testimony regarding matters not on the agenda will not be considered part of the administrative record. COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING Commission and Committee Reports/Director's Report PUBLIC HEARINGS PH-1 1620 Tiburon Boulevard: Dile #CUP2018-004; Conditional Use Permit Amendment to Modify and Renew an Existing Wireless Communications Facility; ACV-Argo Tiburon LP, Owner; Town Consulting on behalf of AT&T Wireless, Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 059-101-03 (Continued From July 11, 2018) [SA] ACTION ITEM AI-1 Planning Commission Minutes Regular Meeting of July 11, 2018 ADJOURNMENT Future Agenda Items: 1600 Mar West Sweet: Public Meeting to Consider Whether Recirculation is required for the DEIR for the Tiburon Peninsula Club Junior Tennis Center and Court Lighting Project(TBD) Tiburon Planning Commission Agenda July 25, 2018 Page 1 If WA Owl AGENDA BELVEDERE TIBURON LIBRARY AGENCY Monday, July 16, 2018, 6:15pm Belvedere Tiburon Library 1501 Tiburon Blvd, Tiburon, California CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL OPEN FORUM This is an opportunity for any citizen to briefly address the Board of Trustees on any matter that does not appear on this agenda. Upon being recognized by the Chair, please state your name, address, and limit your oral statement to no more than three minutes. Matters that appear to warrant a lengthier presentation or Board consideration may be placed on the agenda for further discussion at a later meeting. STAFF BOARD AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Chair's Report—Jeff Foran, Agency Chair (2 minutes) 2. Library Director's Report— Deborah Mazzolini, Library Director (5 minutes) 3. Belvedere Tiburon Library Foundation Report (5 minutes) 4. Report on Financial Statements, June and July, 2018 5 minutes) 5. Committee Reports (5 minutes) CONSENT CALENDAR— 2 MINUTES The purpose of the Consent Calendar is to group items together which generally do not require discussion and which will probably be approved by one motion unless separate action is required on a particular item. Any member of the Agency may request removal of an item for discussion. 6. Approval of minutes of June 25 and July 6, 2018 7. Approval of warrants dated June, 2018 TRUSTEE CONSIDERATIONS The purpose of Trustee Considerations is to list items for discussion and potential action. 8. Consideration of adoption of Resolution No. 242-2018 — Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2018/2019 Gann Appropriations Limit for the Belvedere Tiburon Library Aqencv 9. Consideration of adoption of Resolution No. 243-2018 — Resolution Adopting the Fiscal Year 2018/2019 Gann Appropriations Limit for the Belvedere Tiburon Library Agency Community Facilities District# 1995-1 10. Consideration of adoption of Resolution No. 244-2018— Resolution Expending and Funding Reserves COMMUNICATIONS & ANNOUNCEMENTS 11. Monthly calendar 12. Schedule of 2018 meeting dates NOTICE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The following accommodations will be provided, upon request; to persons with a disability. ages das and/or agenda packet materials in alternate formats; special assistance needed to attend or participate in this meeting Please make your request at the office of the Administrative Assistant or by calling (415) 789-2660. Whenever possible, please make your request three days in advance. ot, RICHARDSON'S BAY REGIONAL AGENCY Board of Directors Special Meeting Agenda Wednesday,July 25,2018 5:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. Belvedere City Hall,450 San Rafael Avenue,Belvedere The Richardson's Bay Regional Agency Board of Directors encourages a respectful dialogue that supports freedom of speech and values diversity of opinion. The Board, staff and the public are expected to be polite and courteous, and refrain from questioning the character or motives of others. Please help create an atmosphere of respect by not booing, whistling or clapping; by adhering to speaking time limits; and by silencing your cell phone. PUBLIC COMMENT IS INVITED CONCERNING EACH AGENDIZED ITEM PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE(3)MINUTES. 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER-ROLL CALL 1. Approval of minutes,June 14, 2018. 2. Information: Community Outreach Subcommittee report and presentation regarding Community Efforts 3. Follow up actions to Board's April 2018 direction: (a)Direct staff to engage professional services to advise on location,mooring type/technique, capacity, and accessing the shore, contingent upon identifying a source of funds for these services. (b)Direct staff to draft ordinance amendments to incorporate new requirements for vessels on Richardson's Bay. (c)Direct staff to collect information from mooring programs in other anchorages to advise the Board on establishing and managing moorings. (d)Designate two Board members to serve on an ad-hoc finance subcommittee to explore costs and funding opportunities. 4. Resolution No 07-18 supporting AB 2441, State funding to abate abandoned commercial vessels in the Delta counties. Staff recommendation: Approve. 5. Open time for public expression. Members of the public are welcome to address the Board for up to three minutes per speaker on matters not on the agenda. Under the state Brown Act,Board members may not deliberate or take action on items not on the agenda,and generally only may listen. 6. Comments: a) Staff; b)Board Members matters 7. Adjourn to closed session,pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1),public employee performance evaluation.Position: Executive Director. NEXT MEETING: September 13,2018 A COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET IS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE SAUSALITO CITY LIBRARY AND ON THE RBRA WEBSITE http://rbra.cu.,aov„ WHERE WRITTEN COMMENTS MAYBE SUBMITTED. TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC MEETING NOTICE, PLEASE EMAIL REQUEST TO DON ALLEE AT dalleeCa�inarincounty.o Marin County Community Development Agency,3501 Civic Center Dr. Rm. 308,San Rafael,CA 94903 510-812-6284 bethapollard@gmaiL.com