Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TC Agenda 2018-10-17
TOWN OF ,I IBURON Tiburon Town Council Tiburon Town Hall >� October 17,2018 1.505 Tiburon Boulevard Regular Meeting ` y� �' Tiburon CA 94920 7:30 P.M. y TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Councilmember Fredericks,Councilmember Thier,Councilmember Weiner,Vice Mayor Kulik, Mayor Fraser ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION IF ANY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Town Council on subjects not on the agenda may do so at this time. Please note however, that the Town Council is not able to undertake extended discussion or action on items not on the agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to the appropriate Commission,Board, Committee or staff for consideration or placed on a future Town Council mecting agenda. Please limit your comments to three(3)minutes. PRESENTATION • 221"'Annual Heritage Preservation Award--Joan Palmcro, Recipient CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the Consent Calendar may be approved by one motion of the Town Council unless a request is made by a member of the Town Council,public or staff to remove an item for separate discussion and consideration. If you wish to speak on a Consent Calenclar .item, please seek recognition by the Mayor and do so at this time. CC-1. Town Council Minutes - Adopt minutes of October 3, 2018 regular meeting (Town Clerk Stefani) CC-2. Measures on November 2018 Ballot - Adopt resolution in support of Measure AA and resolution in opposition to Proposition 6 (Department of Public Works) CC-3. 2018 Ferry Dock Pile Repair Project - A\vard hid to DRS '1arinc Inc. and authorize Town Manager to increase construction contract amount (Department of Public Works) ACTION ITEMS AI-1. Accessory Dwelling Units - Consider adoption of revised standards to accessory dwelling units standards to reflect latest state laws (Conununity Development Department) AI-2. Elephant Rock - Receive update on reliabilitation project and provide direction on next steps, including consideration of establishing a reserve account for reconstruction (Department of Public Works) AI-3. Capital Improvement Projects for Energy Savings - Consider authorization of a Power Purchase Agreement for solar parking shade structure on Police Station and budget amendment to fund LED streetlight conversion (Department of Public Works) AI-4. Stewart Drive Intersection - ,Receive report on safety study and consider authorization of safety measures (Department of Public Works) PUBLIC HEARINGS PH-1. Municipal Code Amendments - Consider amendments to Chapter 2 (Administration) of the Tiburon Municipal Code Correcting Certain References and Clarifying Provisions of the Planning Commission, Design Review Board and Planning Agency- Introduction and first reading of ordinance TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS TOWN MANAGER REPORT WEEKLY DIGESTS • Town Council Weekly Digests—October 5 c',-- 12,2018 ADJOURNMENT GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION ASSISTANCE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the To«-n Clerk at (415) 435- 7377. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to maize reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION Copies of all agenda reports and supporting data are available for viewing and inspection at Town Hall and at the Belved ere Library located adjacent to Town Hall. Agendas and minutes are posted on the Town's vvebsitC, www.townoftiburon.org. Upon request, the Town will provide written agenda materials in appropriate alternative formats, or disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to enable individuals with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Please send a ti,,,ritten request, including your name, mailing address,phone number and brief description of the requested materials and preferred alternative format or auxiliary aid or service at least 5 days before the meeting. Requests should be sent to the Office of the Town Clerk at the above address. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings provide the general public and interested parties an opportunity to provide testimony on these items. If you challenge any proposed action(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing(s) described later in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the Town Council at, or prior to, the Public Hearing(s). TIMING OF ITEMS ON AGENDA While the Town Council attempts to hear all items in order as stated on the agenda, it reserves the right to take items out of order. No set times are assigned to items appearing on the Town Council agenda. CC .� TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DRAFT MINUTES Mayor Fraser-called t-ltt-3-c--g4ar meeting of the Tiburon Town Council to order at 7:30 p.m. on Wedn�esay, October 3, 201 , iown Coun n Town Chambers, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, Califorma.'- -- ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fraser, Fredericks, Kulik, Their, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock, Director of Administrative Services Bigall, Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Barnes,Management Analyst Creekmore, Town Clerk Stefani ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-1. Town Council Minutes — Adopt minutes of September 5, 2018 special and regular meetings (Town Clerk Stefani) CC-2. Investment Summary-Adopt investment summary for month ending August 31,2018 (Department of Administrative Services) CC-3. Resolution-Adopt resolution honoring 2018 Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the Year (Town Clerk Stefani) CC-4. Municipal Code Amendments - Adopt Ordinance making amendments to Title 1, Chapter 3 (Personnel) of the Tiburon Municipal Code relating to the appointment of Level I Reserve Police Officers (Police Department) CC-5. Accounting-Finance Manager Position - Consider approval of Accounting-Finance Manager Position and related job description MOTION: To approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-5, as written. Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Welner VOTE: AYES: Unanimous Town CO2111cil AIM77aes 921-2018 October 3, 2018 Page 1 ACTION ITEMS AI-1. Staff update on Town Fund Reserves and Current Capital Projects Town Manager Chanis provided an update for the Council on the Town's fund reserves and a portion of the current Capital Improvement Projects. He showed an overview of the FY 2018-19 operating budget (as of 9/30/18), fund reserves and long-term liabilities. Mayor Fraser asked about the purpose of the self-insurance reserve fund.Director of Administrative Services Bigall explained this fund was for a possible legal settlement or unusual claim that was not budgeted for. Councilmember Fredericks asked if the discretionary set-aside fund reserve is funded by general fund monies.Director Bigall confirmed that these funds are all general fund monies and this reserve is not funded by any grants. She said the Council can reallocate these funds to other line items in the budget. Fredericks suggested expanding the budget tables to show the source of the monies that make up each fund. Councilmember Thier asked if the operating reserve fund would cover payroll if ever necessary. Director Bigall confirmed this point. Chanis then reviewed the historical trend of the balance of the various fund reserves, and what the balances are expected to be at the end of the current fiscal year. Fredericks asked if the amount of capital projects the Town has coming up would justify keeping the balance of the unallocated fund reserves higher. Chanis confirmed this point, and added that uncertainty in the economy would be another reason to do that. Chanis added that the combined general fund reserves balance has decreased dramatically this year due to the large amount of capital improvement projects undertaken, and a large allocation toward paying down long-term liabilities. Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Barnes then provided an update on current capital improvement projects. Chanis added that this presentation would be an update only,and staff would be returning to the Council at the next meeting seeking direction on a number of these projects. Director Barnes reported that the McKegney Field project is within budget and is now in the maintenance period, and will be opened in March. He said the South Knoll tree removal is nearly complete, and the remainder has been delayed until more advantageous weather. He said the Trestle Trail picnic area is now under construction. Director Barnes also provided updates on the Shoreline Park pathway lighting project, the Hawthorne and Virginia undergrounding districts, the New Morning Cafe project, storm drain rehabilitation project, and said the Corporation Yard scoping study is in the beginning stages. Barnes said staff would return to the Council at the next meeting to discuss and seek direction on additional current projects. Toren Council Minutes #21-2018 October•3, 2018 Page 2 A conversation about the possibility of losing SBI funds due to Proposition 6 on the November ballot followed. The Council was in agreement to discuss the opposition of Proposition 6 and the support of Measure AA (both on the upcoming November ballot) at the next meeting. Thier asked about the timeline for the Corporation Yard scoping study. Staff confirmed that the study was still in the beginning stages, and completion could be several months away. Report received. TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Thier reported on the recent Del Mar Leadership Day field trip to Town Hall and thanked everyone that had been involved. Councilmember Fredericks said the Metropolitan Transportation Commission had released a report on potholes and she would make her copy available if any other councilmembers would like to review it. TOWN MANAGER REPORT None. WEEKLY DIGESTS Received. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fraser adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. JIM FRASER, MAYOR ATTEST: LEA STEFANI. TOWN CLERK Town Council Minuses 921-2018 October 31, 2018 Page 3 N.\ TOWN OF TIBURON Town Council \fleeting t 1 Octobcr l7, 2018 1505 Tiburon Poulcvard =� C Tiburon, A 94920 Agenda Item: C(�'� 1, STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Public Works Subject: Resolution Against Proposition 6 and in Favor of Measure AA Reviewed By: /Z 6 ,® BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Proposition 6 The Town of Tiburon has steadily worked to increase the condition of the Town's Roadways. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the Town's Roads have slowly but steadily increased from 64 in 2006 to 76 in 2018. During the part few years, as construction prices have continued to rise, the improvements have slowed. From 1994 to 2017, the California Gas Tax remained fixed while the cost of construction tripled (Caltrans index 46.7 in 1994 and 145 in 2017). In 2017, Senate Bill 1 (SB-1) provided for an increase in gas tax funding that partially made up for the many years without an increase. In 2018, the Town of Tiburon received a partial year of funding from SB-1. This funding was used to pave one of the Town's failed streets. SB-1 will provide over $177,000 per year to maintain Tiburon's streets in the future. However, even with SB-1, the value of the gas tax, adjusted for inflation, is only 46% of what it was in 1963. An initiative to repeal SB-1 via a constitutional amendment will be on the November 2018 ballot as Proposition 6. If this proposition is successful, state handing for road repair projects in Tiburon will be reduced by nearly 50%, with no plans for replacement funds. Measure AA In 2004, Marin County voters approved a half-cent sales tax (Measure A) to fund county-wide transportation projects and address a severe funding shortfall. Over the last 14 years, Measure A has: • Provided over $1.2 million to Tiburon to help meet our transportation infrastructure needs. • Provided $25 million for congestion relief on Highway 101 including the HOV lanes through San Rafael. • Doubled transit services including new services for seniors and the disabled. • Built nearly $20 million in safe pathway improvements around schools TOWN OF TiBu oN PAGE 1. w: 2 Measure A included a specific expenditure plan. That plan is now 15 years old and the needs of Tiburon and the County have changed. Measure AA extends the sales tax, providing a reliable funding stream and allows for an updated expenditure plan. Measure AA will provide $183.000 per year to Tiburon for transportation infrastructure. FINANCIAL IMPACT As noted above Measure AA and SB-1 combined provide $360,000 per year of funding directly to Tiburon for our projects. Without this funding, the Town will need to find alternate sources of funding for transportation projects, as well as for funding projects that in the past were funded through Measure A. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Support a resolution opposed to Proposition 6, and 2. Support a resolution in support of Measure AA Prepared by: Patrick Barnes, Director of Public Works Exhibits: 1. Resolution opposed to Proposition 6 2. Resolution supporting Measure A DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. xx- 2018 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL. OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON OPPOSING PROPOSITION 6 WHEREAS, cities and counties own and operate more than 81 percent of streets and roads in California, and from the moment we open our front door to drive to work, bike to school, or walk to the bus station, people are dependent upon a safe, reliable local transportation network; and WHEREAS. the 2016 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment. which provides critical analysis and information on the local transportation network's condition and funding needs, indicates that the condition of the local transportation network is deteriorating at an increasing rate; and WHEREAS, California has more than 1,600 bridges and overpasses that are structurally deficient and unsafe and 89% of counties have roads that are in `poor' or `at risk' condition.,, and WHEREAS, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Association, there were more than 3,600 fatalities on California roads in 2016, with poor road conditions as a major factor in vehicle collisions and accidents; and WHEREAS, Prop 6 would eliminate more than $52 billion over the next 10 years in existing transportation funding. including the $15 billion in direct apportionments, and $11 billion in available competitive grant finding, to cities and counties statewide; and WHEREAS, Prop 6 would stop funding for more than 6,500 transportation improvement projects currently underway or planned in every California community; and WHEREAS, Prop 6 would jeopardize public safety by eliminating thousands of projects to fix unsafe bridges and overpasses, repair crumbling and unsafe roads, and enhance pedestrian safety; and WHEREAS, Prop 6 would eliminate approximately $177,000 annually dedicated to the Town of Tiburon, and delay critical investments in road maintenance; and WHEREAS, Voters ov erwhelmingly passed Prop 69 in June thereby ensuring transportation funds can only be used for transportation purposes and the State and local governments are accountable to taxpayers. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does hereby oppose Proposition 6 on the November 2018 ballot; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town of Tiburon can be listed as a member of the No on Prop 6 coalition, a diverse coalition of local governments, public safety organizations, business, labor, environmental leaders, transportation advocates and other organizations throughout the state. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Town of Tiburon of Marin County at a regular meeting thereof held on October 17, 2018, to wit: EXI-IMT N0a Page 1 qf2 Tolvii Council Resolulion No. Ys-2010/17/2018 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JIM FRASER, MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST: LES STEFANI, TOWN CLERK Page 2 of 2 Town Council Resolution Ni. xx-2018 1011712018 DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. xx-2018 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ENDORSING MEASURE AA THE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN RENEWAL OF RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE (SALES) TAX WHEREAS, the Town Council of Tiburon approved the '/2-cent Transportation Sales Tax Renewal Expenditure Plan on June 20, 2018-1 and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2018, the Transportation Authority of Marin's Board of Commissioners unanimously approved the placement of the '/2-cent Transportation Sales Tax renewal on the ballot in November 2018; and WHEREAS, the County Registrar assigned the Yz-cent Transportation Sales Tax renewal as Measure AA which will be before voters on November 6, 2018; and WHEREAS, the people of Town of Tiburon directly benefit from the '/2-cent Transportation sales tax through less congestion on I-lighway 101, improved transportation infrastructure in Tiburon and safety programs such as school crossing guards; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council hereby endorses Measure AA the Transportation Authority of Marin Renewal of Retail 'Transactions and Use(Sales)Tax. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on this 17`x'day of October, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JIM FRASER, MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST: LES STEFANI, TOWN CLERK EXHIBIT N®. �- Page I of 1 Toivn Council Resolution No. xx-2018 10/1712018 TOWN OI' IBURON Town Council \electing ISOS Tiburon Poulc\°ard October 1/, 201 Tiburon, CA 94920 Ac;cnda Item: cc STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Public Works Subject: Recommendation to Award the 2018 Ferry Dock Pile Repair Project to DRS Marine Inc. Reviewed By: Greg Chams, "Lown Manager BACKGROUND During the Ferry Dock Decking Replacement and Accessibility Improvement project, completed in August 2017, it was discovered that several of the ferry dock piles have substantially deteriorated and require repair. On January 17, 2018, the Town Council authorized the award of the engineering, design and permitting services to Moffatt and Nichol. Moffat and Nic.hol's exploratory work determined that six of the piles had as much as 90% loss of cross sectional area due to rotting. Photographs of the piles are shown in Exhibit 1. All six of the piles are located in the lower portion of the walkway that provides a view corridor to the adjacent patio decks. The deterioration is due to cuts that were made in the pile tops to accommodate fastener connections between the piles and the beams. These cuts exposed the wood beneath the chemical treatment to saltwater which resulted in deterioration of the pile section. The design plans for repairs has been completed (Exhibit 2) and required permits from regulatory agencies haN e been obtained. The project was advertised for bid in accordance with the public contracts code requirements, and the Town received the following three bids: 1. DRS Marine Inc. - $49,795.00 2. Valentine Group - $188;369.00 3. Dutra Group - $127;340.00 ANALYSIS DRS Marine Inc. (DRS) was deemed to be a responsive and responsible bidder. The three bids were examined, and DRS was found to be the most competitive by a substantial margin in all areas of the bid. Due to the large disparity in bids, and subsequent to the bid opening, staff took the following additional steps to assess the viability of the DRS bid: • Communicated directly with DRS to confirm no errors were made in their bid package. TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE I OF 2 • The DesWner/F.ni71neer on the nroiect (Moffat ind Nichol-0 communicated dircelly with DRS to ensure the project scope was clear in the bid documents and that DRS's approach to the work was appropriate for the project. • Contacted references provided by DRS as part of the bid package. Based on the analysis ofthe bids as well as information gathered during the steps described above, staff believes DRS is qualified to efficiently complete the proposed work at a lower cost, as they specialize in diving and marine construction. The other firms that bid the project provide a wider range of services, and therefore, may be less competitive on smaller diving and pile repair projects. Staff is recommending that Council authorize the Town Manager to execute a contract for this project to DRS in the amount of$49,750.00. hn addition, staff is recommending that Council authorize the Town Manger to increase the contract amount an additional $15,000, as a contingency for unforeseen conditions that may only become apparent after work begins. FINANCIAL IMPACT The Ferry Dock Pile Replacement project was funded in Fiscal Year 2018-19 CIP, with a $180,000 allocation. Currently, there is $155,000 remaining in the project budget after design and engineering construction support costs. The budgeted funding for the project is from two sources: The County Measure A (Transportation) Reserve Fund ($114,000), and the State Gas Tax Reserve Fund ($66,000). Staff currently estimates the total project cost at $90,000. Any surplus funds after project close out will be returned to the original funding sources in the proportion they were budgeted. RECOMMENDATION t I. Authorize the Town Manager to award a contract for the 2018 Ferry Dock Pile Repair Project to DRS Marine Inc for $49,795.00 2. Authorize the Town Manager to increase the construction contract amount by $15,000, for a total contract maximum of$64,795, as a contingency to cover any design or construction issues that occur after the work has started. Exhibits 1. Photographs of the rotted piles 2. Project Plans Prepared by: Patrick Barnes, "Town Engineer TOWN OF TIRURON PAGE 2 OF 2 �L< r , .it 1 ; 9 r Y i I P - ,, ti ;"JJ EXH Y }, �8 n IB �0 i7 r y C 4 4 � � Y r �IJ� y Y Al . 'U." ;4,o rs "r a s` rte ry A } c F ' eu Y i t k TIBURON FERRY DK WALKWAY PILES REPAIR TIBURON , CALIFORNIA ► 1, c BENICIAH, INDEX OF DRAWINGS SHEET DRAWING MARLINE P TTSBURG a - "� TITLE SAN � �� r '��« „.-•: .� � � _ NUMBER NUMBER RAFA L e0 TO1 TITLE SHEET RICHMOND CONCORD 2 G01 STRUCTURAL NOTES PROJECT I; �� ,�� , � � ' �, PLAN. ELEVATION AND DETAIL LOCATION 4 SO2 PILE REPAIR DETAILS BERKELEY WALNUT CREEK 24 OAKLAND N F . 80 SAN q Fpq GENERAL NOTES: FRANCISCO S 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN COMPLIANCE c , WITH THE CONDITIONS OF THE PERMITS ISSUED p BY REGULATORY AGENCIES (BCDC, RWQCB, ARMY 920'111-0 :` CORPS). SO HAYWARD PACIFIC O 2. PILE INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED BY M&N IN JANUARY 2018. j- -e S MATE OSTER CIT C UNT 84 01y� - HALF MOON EDWOOD CIT f BAY VICINITY MAP 5 0 5 10 s Scale in Miles OVERALL SITE PLAN 20 0 20 40 a g� g��gTy�T a Scale: 1" = 20' 3�X1 iIBI A NO. i U 3 Town of Tiburon ' DATE 6JUN 2018 'C'�� ,� moffatt & nichol TIBURON FERRY DOCK ACCESS 'ff 2185 N.California Blvd.,Suite 500 WALKWAY PILE REPAIRS I_, ro \ r PUBLIC WORKS Walnut Creek,California 94596 SHEET 1 OF 4 1505 TIBURON BLVD TIBURON,CA94920C1Y1__ }l il_ � DSGN DR CITY ENGINEERCHK q eP PH TITLE SHEET T01 a t� SIGNATURE CITY APPROVAL DATE JOB NO. SUBMITTED BY TITLE 10074 B PORTER PROJ PRINCIPAL GENERAL LUMBER 1. EXISTING SITE FEATURES BASED UPON SITE VISIT CONDUCTED BY MOFFATT & NICHOL FEBRUARY 28 2018 AND DRAWINGS BY 1. STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR—LARCH NO. 1 OR BETTER AS NOBLE ENGINEERS DATED AUGUST 6, 2001. SPECIFIED IN THE WEST COAST LUMBER INSPECTION BUREAU, VISUALY 2. PROJECT VERTICAL DATUM IS MEAN LOWER LOW WATER TIDAL GRADED LUMBER. RANGE AT SAUSALITO IS AS FOLLOW: 2. PILE TOP REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR ROUND TIMBER (FT) PILES CONFORMING TO ASTM D25. TREATMENT SHALL BE FOR SALTWATER 10 HIGHEST OBSERVED WATER LEVEL(01/09/1978) 8.29 SEVERE BORER HAZARD TO A MINIMUM NET RETEN11ON OF 2.5 PCF. u —HOWL MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER (MHHW) 5.69 MHHW MEAN HIGH WATER(MHW) 5.09 3. STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE CHEMICALLY TREATED WITH ACZA FOR Z5 MHW o MTL MEAN TIDE LEVEL(MTL) 3.12 MARINE EXPOSURE, SALTWATER SPLASH PER AWPA STANDARD 4B, 4C. MLW MEAN LOW WATER(MLW) 1.14 LUMBER SHALL BE COATED WITH A 250 MIL THICK MARINE GRADE POLYUREA W 0 MEAN LOWER LOW WATER(MLLW) 0 COATING. w —LOWL LOWEST OBSERVED WATER LEVEL(05/05/1977) —2.71 —5— PILE REPAIR 3. PROTECT ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES NOT CALLED OUT TO BE 1. TIMBER PILINGS INDICATED SHALL BE REPAIRED WITH A STRUCTURAL REPAIR: DEMOLISHED. REPAIR ANY DAMAGE DONE TO EXISTING FEATURES FIBERGLASS JACKET ENCASING A STEEL REINFORCED EPDXY GROUT FILL, TO REMAIN. SIMPSON FX-70 SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4. DIMENSIONS NOTED AS PLUS OR MINUS (t) OR 'REF" INDICATE UNVERIFIED DIMENSIONS AND ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. HARDWARE 5. VERIFY ALL LEVELS, DIMENSIONS, AND EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD BEFORE PROCEEDING. NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY 1. ALL STEEL PLATES, ANGLES, BOLTS, LAG BOLTS, NUTS AND WASHERS SHALL DISCREPANCIES OR FIELD CHANGES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED. BOLTS SHALL HAVE FLAT WASHERS AT THE NUT FABRICATION. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE EXISTING AND HEAD. CONDITIONS AND THE DRAWINGS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN DIRECTION FROM OWNER BEFORE PROCEEDING. NOTED 2. BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A307A. DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS — DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 6. PROVIDE CATCHMENT TO PREVENT ANY MATERIAL FROM FALLING INTO THE WATER DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION. 7. WHERE REFERENCE IS MADE TO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, REFERENCE SHALL MEAN STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST EDITION EXCLUDING MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT ITEMS. CODES AND STANDARDS 1. STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL FABRICATION AND ERECTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE AISC CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL BUILDINGS AND BRIDGES 2005. 2. WELDING OF STRUCTURAL AND MISCELLANEOUS STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE AWS D1.1, 3. WELDING OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE AWS D1.4. 4. ACI 318-08, BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. PERMITS 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATORY WORK WINDOWS AND PERMIT CONDITIONS PER PERMITS FROM THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES: • US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS • REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD 0 • BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (BCDC) s 0 U 3 ;R Town of Tiburon 0 =� f moffatt & nichol TIBURON FERRY DOCK ACCESS DATE sJUN zo,s 2185 N.California Blvd.,Suite 500 WALKWAY PILE REPAIRS Walnut Creek,California 94596 SHEET2 OF 4 1505 TIBURON BLVD PUBLIC WORKS _ TIBURON,CA 94920 Jfw 6ry11 DSGN 8P DR PH °"" STRUCTURAL NOTES G01 3 Fc _ CITY ENGINEER "'�� f,tlt� ,11V" JOB NO. SUBMITTED BY TITLE 0 SIGNATURE CITY APPROVAL DATE 10074 B PORTER PROJ PRINCIPAL „ I 6” 6" 6" 6" GUAYMAS BRIDGE -�' 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 z 2 1 -v Ni N' I I i I I _ I I DECK REPAIR TYPE B L - - - - ®e. m —� - - - - - J A — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1/2"SPLICE B PLATE(BEHIND) — TIMBER PILE 20 TOTAL EDGE OF DECK CAP DAMAGED PILE IN NEED STEEL PLATE DECK OF REPAIR-TYP 6,_6„ 8'-0" 12'-9"TYP 127'-3" I CAP io N A PILE PLAN SHAVED PILE SCALE: 1"=10'—O" 1"0 DRIFT PIN PILE EL=10.5' EL=8.5' DECK 15 — RAILING NOT — 15 SHOWN 10 — — 10 1"OJ BOLT I I I = MHHW 1 I THRU 5 I I 1 I 1 0 — y MLLW I I I — EL=-5't 0 VARIES I I I I I _ i U L1 1 DETAIL—EXISTING PILE CONNECTION - SCALE: 1"=5'-0" I 1 I I I a I I I I I O 5' 0 5' 10' SCALE:V=5'-0" B PIER ELEVATION 10' 0 10' 20' S01 SCALE:1"=10'-0'- S SCALE:1"=10'-0" 3 pp vtn Town of Tiburon � i , ' moffaff & nichol TIBURON FERRY DOCK ACCESS DATE 6JUN 2018 2185 N.California Blvd.,Suite 500 WALKWAY PILE REPAIRS r Walnut Creek,California 94596 SHEET n 3 OF4 PUBLIC WORKS 1505 TIBURON BLVD - t*;. CIYII DSGN DR TIBURON,CA 94920 cHK. 3 CITY ENGINEER 8P PH PIER PLAN, ELEVATION S01 ty SIGNATURE CITYAPPROVAL DATE JOB NO. SUBMITTED BY TITLE AND DETAIL 10074 B PORTER PROJ PRINCIPAL NOTES NOTES ORDER OF WORK: ORDER OF WORK: 1. CLEAN PILE VOIDS REMOVE DETEROIORATED 1. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SUPPORT TO DECK STRUCTURE TIMBER TO SOUND TIMBER. AND CUT UPPER SECTION OF DETERIORATED PILE AT 2. REMOVE EXISTING METAL PILE TO CAP COMPETENT TIMBER BELOW--"FRESH HEAD" PILE. CONNECTORS 2. REMOVE EXISTING PILE TO CAP METAL CONNECTORS 3. INSTALL FIBERGLASS JACKET AROUND PILE WITH 3. INSTALL PILE SEGMENT ABOVE AND BOTTLE JACK (8 REBAR IN ANNULUS. GROUT SOLID. TON HYDRAULIC, MCMASTER CARR 8803T15 OR 4. FURNISH NEW METAL PILE TO CAP CONNECTIONS EQUAL) BELOW TO RESTORE LOAD BEARING. ON EXTERIOR OF PILE JACKET. 4. INSTALL FIBERGLASS JACKET AROUND PILE WITH 5. PROVIDE BLOCKING IN GAP AT CAP TO METAL REBAR IN ANNULUS, GROUT SOLID WITH JACK CONNECTOR INSIDE 5. FURNISH NEW METAL PILE TO CAP CONNECTIONS ON EXTERIOR OF PILE JACKET. 6. PROVIDE 2X12 NOMINAL TIMBER BLOCKING IN GAP AT CAP TO METAL CONNECTOR 8 FT(MLLW)— fV PLATE 6" \ - 5TOP SEAL LOW-MOD - 6 TROWEL EPDXY 2 2 io SPACER AND MARINE - I-- 6— 4 EPDXY GROUT I 5 ILr 1 o LU a �— 1 -- — LUW �— -- — a j �� 4 4— rn W J 1 UNDER ROUT 3 LuZ REINFORCEMENT ' 2 METAL PILE TO CAP CONNECTION DETAIL a Z /� 1 SOl SCALE: 1"=V-0" N I r�✓/ FIBERGLASS JACKET 1 _ � W FL W 1 j j SPACER AND MARINE I V 2— W I EPDXY GROUT BOTTOM SEAL SEE TYPE B DETAIL FOR MATERIAL CALLOUT NOTES C�>j TYPE A TYPE B 0 �11 PILE REPAIR SYSTEM DETAILS SO7 SCALE: 1"=V-0" 1' 0 1' 2' i SCALE:1"=V-0" U Town of Tiburon TIBURON FERRY DOCK ACCESS DATE 6JUN 2018 t� moffatt & nichol INK 2185 N.California Blvd.,Suite 500 WALKWAY PILE REPAIRS c �G , '= Walnut Creek,California 94596 SHEET 4 OF4 1505 TIBURON BLVD PUBLIC WORKS %w•` <� TIBURON,CA94920C1Y1 SON � * DDa CHK clrvENGI"EER a eR PH PILE REPAIR DETAILS S02 SIGNATURE CITY APPROVAL DATE JOB No. SUBMITTED BV TITLE 10074 B PORTER PROJ PRINCIPAL Town Council Meeting TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard October 17,2018 Agenda Item: Tiburon, CA 94920 STAFF OR To: Mayor & Members of the Town Council From: Community Development Department Subject: Amend ents to Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards to Reflect Latest State ws (Consider Adoption of Resolution) Reviewed by: BACKGROUND In recent years, the California State Legislature has made numerous amendments to accessory dwelling unit statutes that have substantially altered the regulatory framework for those land uses. Legislation that became effective in 2017 had caused the Town to undertake a significant re-write of its accessory dwelling unit ordinance and the standards applied during review. Subsequent State legislation that became effective earlier this year is causing additional revisions to the Town's accessory dwelling unit standards. Additional modifications to accessory dwelling unit laws by the State Legislature can be expected in future years, as this is an evolving area of state regulation and local agency preemption. The Town's separately-adopted standards for 'u� nior accessory dwelling units do not require any revisions at this time. ANALYSIS A redline copy of the proposed amendments to the Town's Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards ("Standards") is attached as Exhibit 1. Compared with the revisions required in 2017, the currently proposed revisions for this year are less comprehensive, but still significant, especially with respect to parking. The new state laws specify that only"one parking space per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less,"may be required. The Town had previously been able to require one space per bedroom. Note that under state law, certain accessory dwelling units do not need to provide any parking at all. Also, the State has newly defined "tandem parking" as "two or more vehicles that are parked in a driveway or in any other location on a lot, lined up behind one another." Tandem parking must be allowed to count as parking for accessory dwelling units, so the new definition expands the opportunities to create accessory dwelling units by making it easier to meet the already minimal parking requirements for an accessory dwelling unit. Staff concludes the other amendments to the Town's Standards caused by changes in State law are more clarification-oriented than substantive. Staff has also proposed several minor clean-up Town Council.Meeting October 17,2018 amendments to the Standards that are unrelated to State law changes. A "clean" version of the proposed Standards is attached to the draft resolution contained in Exhibit 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed revisions to the Standards are statutorily exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15282, subsection (h) of the CEQA Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Hear any public comment on the item. 2. Discuss the proposed revisions. 3. Move to adopt the resolution adopting revised Standards. EXHIBITS 1. Redline document depicting proposed amendments to the Standards. 2. Draft Resolution adopting revised Standards. Prepared by: Scott Anderson,Director of Community Development TowN OF TIM IRON Page 2 of 2 REDLINE COPY RESOLUTION NO. XX-2018 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ADOPTING REVISED "STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS" WHEREAS, on January 18, 2017,the Town Council adopted a comprehensively revised set of standards to be used in the review of accessory dwelling unit applications by approving Resolution No. 04-2017; and WHEREAS, the standards require amendment following the passage of subsequent state legislation; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the revised standards are consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the Tiburon General Plan, specifically with Housing Element Policy H-D9 and Program H-ee; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that adoption of the revised standards is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15282(h) and 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council hereby adopts revised standards, entitled"Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units (Revised 10/17/2018'), as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on , 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JIM FRASER, MAYOR ATTEST: LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK Attachment: Exhibit A; Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units (Revised 10/17/2018) Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.XX-2018 --1--/2018 Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT A Standardsfor Accessory Dwelling Units (Revised 10/17/2018) TYPE l: When the unites is created through construction of or additions to a D_detached A_uccessory Bhuilding or by construction of or additions to a single- family dwelling 1. Zones. The proposed unit would be located on a lot that is zoned for single-family use (R-1, R-1-B, RO, or RPD only) and includes^tains a proposed or existing single- family dwelling._located in one orthezollewaei4ial zone-s! R 1,R 1 B,RO,o= RPD, and eannot be loeated on a lot that eetAains more than one unit. 2. One per Llot. The proposed unit would be the only Accessory Dwelling Unit on the lot and there would be no Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit on the lot. 3. Rental. The Accessory Dwelling Unit may be rented separate from the Primary Unit, but may not be rented for a period of less than 30 consecutive days or used as a Vacation Rental. The Accessory Dwelling Unit may not be sold separately from the Primary Unit. 4. Owner Oeccupancy. One of the dwelling units on the site shall be owner-occupied. For purposes of this standard, "ownership" is defined as a majority(i.e., fifty-one percent or greater) interest in the property in question. Property owned in joint tenancy shall be considered a single ownership for any party named. Property owned in tenancy in common shall be considered a single ownership for the party named, unless shares are specified, in which case ownership requires a majority interest. 5. Location on Llot. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall either be attached to the exist �n dwellingor located within the Living Area of the proposed or existing Primar Un.dwelling, or shall be detached from the proposed or existing Primary Unitdwelling and located on the same lot as the proposed or existing Primary UnLtdwelling. If detached, the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be separated from the Primary Unit and any Detached Accessory Building a minimum of three Meet, or as ma, be required by the building cg ode. 6. Zoning Development Standards. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unitun-it shall comply with development standards for the"zone in which it is located, specifically., standards for Llot_Ceoverage, Ssetback, H_#eight, and Floor Aarea Rratio, except as explicitly set forth herein. 7. Separate Kitchen and Bathroom. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit shall contain a separate kitchen and bathroom; both the Primary Unit and the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall comply at a minimum with all requirements of the current residential code; and the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall comply with the building code at the time it was constructed. 8. Size. The total area of FlooLspacoinereased floor are of an Attached Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the proposed (if part of a new Primary Unit) or existing Living Area (if an addition to an existing Primary Unit), or 1,000 square feet whichever is less, provided that at a minimum an efficiency-size unit shall allowed notwithstandingthe he 50 percent limit.with a mffldmum allowable inefease in floc area of 1,000 r,,, a fe feet-. The total area of Floorspace for a newly-constructed Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 4--/2018 Page 2 of 5 Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. 9. Passageway. No Passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction or establishment of an Accessory Dwelling Unit. 10. Setback Exceptions. No Ssetback shall be required for a lawfully-constructed garage in existence prior to January 1, 2017 that is converted in whole or part to an Accessory Dwelling Unit, and a Ssetback of no more than five (5) feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an Accessory Dwelling Unit that is constructed above a garage. 11. Parking. The application shall comply with parking provisions of Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16, including parking setback and parking surface limitations, except as may be set forth below.: A. One on-site parking space shall be required for each unit or each bedroom of the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit, whichever is less, subject to the exemptions provided in paragraph (F) below. in addition to those required for-the Pr;m ar ): Unit.The required parking may be provided as tandem parking on a driveway. Tandem parking means that two or more automobiles are parked in a driveway or in any other allowable location on a lot, lined up behind one another. No Aeeessory 11.....11ing Unit shall be deemed to ha3,e less than one bedroom_ B. Required parking for the Accessory Dwelling Unit may be uncovered. C. Off-street parking for an Accessory Dwelling Unit may be in tandem with parking for the Primary Unit or may be allowed in the front Ssetback, unless specific findings are made that such is not feasible based on specific site or regional topographical topographical or fire and life safety conditions. All parking spaces shall be on an Improved Parking Surface. D. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an Accessory Dwelling Unit, or converted to an Accessory Dwellinm Unit, and the Town requires that those parking spaces be replaced,the replacement spaces may be located in any configuration on the same lot as the Accessory Dwelling Unit, including, but not limited to, as covered spaces, uncovered spaces, tandem spaces, or by the use of mechanical automobile parking lifts. E. Subsections A through D of this Standard 11 shall not apply to a unit described in subsection 11 F below. F. On-site parking is not required for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in any of the following circumstances: (1) The unit is located within one-half mile of Public Transit. (2) The unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. (3) The unit is ,...,rt of the existing Primary Unit or a Aeeess .�n R�.1ldYn.. � -uiz z�a,a,way.y Lwcoaseies. (34) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the unit. (4-5) When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the unit. 12. Architectural Compatibility. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall comply with the following architectural review standards: Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 --1--/2018 Page 3 of 5 A. Architectural Style and Form. Architectural style and building form shall match the style and form of the Primary Unit. B. Architectural Details. Architectural details, including but not limited to windows, roof pitch, and trim shall match the Primary Unit. C. Color and Materials. The color and materials of the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall match the Primary Unit. D. Lighting. Lighting shall be shielded and/or directed sucho that it does not produce glare visible from off-site or illuminate onto adjacent or nearby property. E. Privacy. Windows shall be located to avoid line of sight to windows onf adjacent or nearby property. Obscured glass and other techniques may be used to address line--of--sight issues. 13. Landscaping. Landscaping, including trees and shrubs as necessary, would be installed and maintained as part of the project to minimize the visual impacts of the project, including the screening of parking areas;to provide shade; and to provide a visual buffer between the Accessory Dwelling Unit and its surroundings. Proposed trees would comply with provisions of Chapter 15A of the Tiburon Municipal Code. Any tree over 30 inches in circumference, removed in conjunction with the construction of an Accessory Dwelling Unit, shall be replaced by a 24 inch box tree in the general area from which it was removed. 14. Feasibility Inspection. Unless the project constitutes new construction, a building inspection shall be performed by the Town's Building Division at applicant's cost, and a report establishing the feasibility of the project to meet applicable building and residential codes shall be provided to the Director of Community Development prior to approval of an Accessory Dwelling Unit permit. 15. Sanitary Service. Adequate sanitary service capacity for the additional increment of effluent resulting from the Accessory Dwelling Unit would be available. If the lot is connected to the public sewer system, the applicant has submitted a letter from the appropriate Sanitary District to that effect. If the lot is not connected to the public sewer system,the applicant has submitted a letter from the County of Marin Environmental Health Department confirming that the individual or alternative sewage disposal system serving the lot has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit. 16. Fire District Regulations. The Accessory Dwelling Unit would comply with all applicable Fire District regulations, subject to provisions and limitations set forth in Government Code Section 65852.2. 17. Water District Regulations. The Accessory Dwelling Unit would comply with all applicable Water District regulations, subject to provisions and limitations set forth in Government Code Section 65852.2. NOTE: Bold and italics indicates a term defined in Title IV, Chapter 16 (Zoning) of the Tiburon Municipal Code. TYPE 2: When the unitADU is created exclusively through conversion of existing floorspace in a single-family dwelling or a Ddetached Aaccessory Bbuilding Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 4--/2018 Page 4 of 5 I. Location. The unit shall be located in a zone for single-family usesingle f mi'y zene and shall not exceed 800 square feet in floor area. These zones are the R- 1, R-1-B, RO, and RPD zones only. 2. Pre-existing Legal Structure. The unit shall be created within an existing legal structure includin a single-family dwelling.,or a Detached Accessory Building.,which can be a studio, pool house or other similar structure, appurtenant to a single-family dwelling). 3 Independent Exterior Access. The unit shall provide independent exterior access from the Primary Unit. 4. Side and Rear Setbacks. The unit has sufficient side and rear Ssetbacks to meet fire safety requirements. 5. One per Lot. There shall be no more than one Accessory Dwelling Unit on the lot. 6. Rental. The unit may be rented but may not be rented for a period less than 30 consecutive days or used as a Vacation Rental. 7. Owner Occupancy. One of the dwelling units on the site (either the Primary Unit or the Accessory Dwelling Unit) shall be owner-occupied. For purposes of this standard, "ownership" is defined as a majority (i.e., fifty-one percent or greater) interest in the property in question. Property owned in joint tenancy shall be considered a single ownership for any party named. Property owned in tenancy in common shall be considered a single ownership for the party named, unless shares are specified, in which case ownership requires a majority interest. 8. Feasibility Inspection. A building inspection shall be performed by the Town's Building Division at applicant's cost, and a memo establishing the feasibility of the project to meet applicable building and residential codes shall be provided to the Director of Community Development prior to approval of an Accessory Dwelling Unit permit. NOTE: Bold and italics indicates a term defined in Title IV, Chapter 16(Zoning) of the Tiburon Municipal Code. Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 --1--/2018 Page 5 of 5 CLEAN COPY RESOLUTION NO. XX-2018 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ADOPTING REVISED "STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS" WHEREAS, on January 18, 2017, the Town Council adopted a comprehensively revised set of standards to be used in the review of accessory dwelling unit applications by approving Resolution No. 04-2017; and WHEREAS, the standards require amendment following the passage of subsequent state legislation; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that the revised standards are consistent with the goals,policies, and programs of the Tiburon General Plan, specifically with Housing Element Policy H-D9 and Program H-ee; and WHEREAS, the Town Council finds that adoption of the revised standards is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15282(h) and 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council hereby adopts revised standards, entitled"Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units (Revised 10/17/2018'), as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on , 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JIM FRASER, MAYOR ATTEST: LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK Attachment: Exhibit A; Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units (Revised 10/17/2018) Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.XX-2018 --/--/2018 Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT A Standardsfor Accessory Dwelling Units(Revised 10/17/2018) TYPE 1: When the unit is created through construction of or additions to a Detached Accessory Building or by construction of or additions to a single-family dwelling 1. Zones. The proposed unit would be located on a lot that is zoned for single-family use (R-1, R-1-B, RO, or RPD only) and includes a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. 2. One per Lot. The proposed unit would be the only Accessory Dwelling Unit on the lot and there would be no Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit on the lot. 3. Rental. The Accessory Dwelling Unit may be rented separate from the Primary Unit, but may not be rented for a period of less than 30 consecutive days or used as a Vacation Rental. The Accessory Dwelling Unit may not be sold separately from the Primary Unit. 4. Owner Occupancy. One of the dwelling units on the site shall be owner-occupied. For purposes of this standard, "ownership" is defined as a majority (i.e., fifty-one percent or greater) interest in the property in question. Property owned in joint tenancy shall be considered a single ownership for any party named. Property owned in tenancy in common shall be considered a single ownership for the parry named, unless shares are specified, in which case ownership requires a majority interest. 5. Location on Lot. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall either be attached or located within the Living Area of the proposed or existing Primary Unit, or shall be detached from the proposed or existing Primary Unit and located on the same lot as the proposed or existing Primary Unit. If detached,the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be separated from the Primary Unit and any Detached Accessory Building a minimum of three (3) feet, or as may be required by the building code. 6. Zoning Development Standards. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit shall comply with development standards for the zone in which it is located, specifically, standards for Lot Coverage, Setback,Height, and Floor Area Ratio, except as explicitly set forth herein. 7. Separate Kitchen and Bathroom. The proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit shall contain a separate kitchen and bathroom; both the Primary Unit and the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall comply at a minimum with all requirements of the current residential code; and the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall comply with the building code at the time it was constructed. 8. Size. The total area of Floorspace of an Attached Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the proposed (if part of a new Primary Unit) or existing Living Area (if an addition to an existing Primary Unit), or 1,000 square feet, whichever is less, provided that at a minimum an efficiency-size unit shall allowed notwithstanding the 50 percent limit. The total area of Floorspace for a newly-constructed Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. 9. Passageway. No Passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction or establishment of an Accessory Dwelling Unit. 10. Setback Exceptions. No Setback shall be required for a lawfully-constructed garage in Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 4--/2018 Page 2 of 5 existence prior to January 1, 2017 that is converted in whole or part to an Accessory Dwelling Unit, and a Setback of no more than five (5) feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an Accessory Dwelling Unit that is constructed above a garage. 11. Parking. The application shall comply with parking provisions of Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16, including parking setback and parking surface limitations, except as may be set forth below. A. One on-site parking space shall be required for each unit or each bedroom of the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit, whichever is less, subject to the exemptions provided in paragraph(F) below. The required parking may be provided as tandem parking on a driveway. Tandem parking means that two or more automobiles are parked in a driveway or in any other allowable location on a lot, lined up behind one another. B. Required parking for the Accessory Dwelling Unit may be uncovered. C. Off-street parking for an Accessory Dwelling Unit may be in tandem with parking for the Primary Unit or may be allowed in the front Setback, unless specific findings are made that such is not feasible based on specific site or regional topographical topographical or fire and life safety conditions. All parking spaces shall be on an Improved Parking Surface. D. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an Accessory Dwelling Unit, or converted to an Accessory Dwelling Unit, and the Town requires that those parking spaces be replaced, the replacement spaces may be located in any configuration on the same lot as the Accessory Dwelling Unit, including, but not limited to, as covered spaces, uncovered spaces, tandem spaces, or by the use of mechanical automobile parking lifts. E. Subsections A through D of this Standard 11 shall not apply to a unit described in subsection 11 F below. F. On-site parking is not required for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in any of the following circumstances: (1) The unit is located within one-half mile of Public Transit. (2) The unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. (3) When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the unit. (4) When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the unit. 12. Architectural Compatibility. The Accessory Dwelling Unit shall comply with the following architectural review standards: A. Architectural Style and Form. Architectural style and building form shall match the style and form of the Primary Unit. B. Architectural Details. Architectural details, including but not limited to windows, roof pitch, and trim shall match the Primary Unit. C. Color and Materials. The color and materials of the Accessory Dwelling Unit shall match the Primary Unit. D. Lighting. Lighting shall be shielded and/or directed such that it does not produce Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 --1--/2018 Page 3 of 5 glare visible from off-site or illuminate adjacent or nearby property. E. Privacy. Windows shall be located to avoid line of sight to windows on adjacent or nearby property. Obscured glass and other techniques may be used to address line of sight issues. 13. Landscaping. Landscaping, including trees and shrubs as necessary, would be installed and maintained as part of the project to minimize the visual impacts of the project, including the screening of parking areas; to provide shade; and to provide a visual buffer between the Accessory Dwelling Unit and its surroundings. Proposed trees would comply with provisions of Chapter 15A of the Tiburon Municipal Code. Any tree over 30 inches in circumference, removed in conjunction with the construction of an Accessory Dwelling Unit, shall be replaced by a 24 inch box tree in the general area from which it was removed. 14. Feasibility Inspection. Unless the project constitutes new construction, a building inspection shall be performed by the Town's Building Division at applicant's cost, and a report establishing the feasibility of the project to meet applicable building and residential codes shall be provided to the Director of Community Development prior to approval of an Accessory Dwelling Unit permit. 15. Sanitary Service. Adequate sanitary service capacity for the additional increment of effluent resulting from the Accessory Dwelling Unit would be available. If the lot is connected to the public sewer system,the applicant has submitted a letter from the appropriate Sanitary District to that effect. If the lot is not connected to the public sewer system, the applicant has submitted a letter from the County of Marin Environmental Health Department confirming that the individual or alternative sewage disposal system serving the lot has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit. 16. Fire District Regulations. The Accessory Dwelling Unit would comply with all applicable Fire District regulations, subject to provisions and limitations set forth in Government Code Section 65852.2. 17. Water District Regulations. The Accessory Dwelling Unit would comply with all applicable Water District regulations, subject to provisions and limitations set forth in Government Code Section 65852.2. NOTE: Bold and italics indicates a term defined in Title IV, Chapter 16(Zoning) of the Tiburon Municipal Code. TYPE 2: When the unit is created exclusively through conversion of existing Floorspace in a single-family dwelling or a Detached Accessory Building 1. Location. The unit shall be located in a zone for single-family use and shall not exceed 800 square feet in floor area. These zones are the R-1, R-1-13, RO, and RPD zones only. 2. Pre-existing Legal Structure. The unit shall be created within an existing legal structure (including a single-family dwelling, or a Detached Accessory Building, which can be a studio,pool house or other similar structure, Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 4--/2018 Page 4 of 5 appurtenant to a single-family dwelling). 3 Independent Exterior Access. The unit shall provide independent exterior access from the Primary Unit. 4. Side and Rear Setbacks. The unit has sufficient side and rear Setbacks to meet fire safety requirements. 5. One per Lot. There shall be no more than one Accessory Dwelling Unit on the lot. 6. Rental. The unit may be rented but may not be rented for a period less than 30 consecutive days or used as a Vacation Rental. 7. Owner Occupancy. One of the dwelling units on the site (either the Primary Unit or the Accessory Dwelling Unit) shall be owner-occupied. For purposes of this standard, "ownership" is defined as a majority (i.e., fifty-one percent or greater) interest in the property in question. Property owned in joint tenancy shall be considered a single ownership for any party named. Property owned in tenancy in common shall be considered a single ownership for the party named, unless shares are specified, in which case ownership requires a majority interest. 8. Feasibility Inspection. A building inspection shall be performed by the Town's Building Division at applicant's cost, and a memo establishing the feasibility of the project to meet applicable building and residential codes shall be provided to the Director of Community Development prior to approval of an Accessory Dwelling Unit permit. NOTE: Bold and italics indicates a term defined in Title IV, Chapter 16 (Zoning) of the Tiburon Municipal Code. Tiburon Town Council Resolution No.xx-2018 --1--/2018 Page 5 of X TOWN OF I IBURON 7 own Council �9eetii�; 1505 Tiburon Boulevard October ll, 2018 Tiburon, CA 94920 Agenda Item: ,F At L REPORTSTAFF To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Public Works Subject: Elephant Rock Pier Update Reviewed By: BACKGROUND The pier at Elephant Rock was built in 1961. In 1985, after 24 years of use, it was declared structurally unsafe. The pier was then rehabilitated in 1986. On December 11, 1995, the pier was damaged in a storm. Efforts to rebuild began in 1996, with an estimated cost of$80,000. The project took significantly longer to design, permit and fund than originally projected. Construction started in January 1999 with an award price of$145,000, well above the original $80,000 estimate. BN- 2004, corrosion affected the handrails installed in 1999 as well as the surrounding concrete. Rough estimates to replace the handrails and repair the concrete ranged from $55,000 to $105,000 (construction costs). Given this cost, the decision was made to instead paint the existing handrails and repair the concrete. This project was completed in 2006 for $36,000. It has now been 19 years since the last major rehabilitation (80% of the original projected lifespan, before the original pier was declared structurally unsafe). Some elements of the standing structure date back to the 1986 rehabilitation. In 2016, Coastland Civil Engineering evaluated the structure and provide some guidance for rehabilitation of the structure. That report is attached as Exhibit 1. In the 2018/19 CIP budget, Council allocated funds for a design to rehabilitate the structure. As the first part of the design, staff entered into a contract with Moffat and Nichols for a pre-design study. That pre-design study included evaluation and testing well beyond the 2016 Coastland scope of work. The pre-design report is now complete and is included as Exhibit 2. This staff report updates Council on the Elephant Rock project and seeks direction from Council. ANALYSIS The Moffat and Nichols report notes that, although there has been some deterioration in various members, timbers appear in good condition except for some splitting in the outriggers. Steel To' N OF TIBURON R uc I OF 3 connectors for the bridge have about 60% to 80% of the section remaininl.?. Anchor bolts into the rock have 50% oftheir section remaining. The cantilevered steel sections supporting the main structure are deteriorated. but Moffat and Nichols agrees with Coastland that these members still have residual capacity. Further the consultant notes that there is redundancy in the structure. Given the residual capacity and redundancy in the structure, there is no immediate need to do anything over the next few years. However, the structure is nearing the end of its useful life and as deterioration continues, it will present a hazard at some point, likely in the next five to ten years. The structure should be evaluated on an annual basis. The pre-design report presents two basic approaches to rehabilitating Elephant Rock. The first approach would be to do the maintenance work listed in the 2016 Coastland Civil Engineering Report. To be beneficial, this work would need to be done now, and if done now, the life of the structure until replacement would be extended an additional five to ten years, delaying full replacement until ten to 20 years from today. This work would cost $250,000 to $450,000, nearly half the replacement cost. Part of this work includes painting the cantilevered steel support members to protect them from corrosion. Based on consultation with a coating's expert in 2016, such painting may provide little benefit in the salt water splash zone unless extensive cleaning and surface preparation is done. The second approach would be to completely replace the structure. This work can be deferred five to ten years. Complete replacement is estimated in today's dollars at $600,000 to $900,000. It also would be possible to split the reconstruction into two projects, working on the rock portion as one project and the ramp for a second project, but it is likely that splitting the project in this way will increase total cost. From a life-cycle cost standpoint, the lowest cost option is to wait and complete one major project to reconstruct Elephant Rock in five to ten years. Staff agrees with the recommendation to inspect the Elephant Rock Pier annually and plan to reconstruct the facility in five to ten years based on the results of those inspections. In the 11MA 1111, 11111MI "work would be 1Jer111r111ed by 111-11ULIse staff to Iupalr dalllageCl ai7d work areas of the superstructure. FINANCIAL IMPACT The estimated cost to reconstruct Elephant Rock is $600,000 to $900,000. The Town should plan for this expenditure in five to ten years. For the 1999 rehabilitation of Elephant Rock, the Town secured a HUD Special Purpose Grant, funding from the County of Marin through Supervisor Rose and donations from private parties. The grant funding environment has changed since 1999. Staff was able to find one grant program for which this project might qualify, the Public Access Program of the Wildlife Conservation Board. Funds are limited and the grants few; only three grants were awarded state-wide in FY 2017-18. Solicitations are generally published in June with pre-applications due the same month and final applications due in August and funds available in December. Solicitations have closed for this year. Looking at the scoring criteria for this year, staff does not believe this project TOWN OF TiBURON PAGE 2 OF 3 would be competitive. The scoring had conservation goals, equal access goals and disadvantaged community goals. A match is generally required to be competitive under this program. Given the limited grant opportunities available; Council should assume that the cost will be borne by the Town. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Hear the staff report. 2. Consider establishing a reserve account (Discretionary Set Aside) to build reserves for the eventual reconstruction Elephant Rock Pier. Exhibits: 1. Coastland Elephant Rock Evaluation letter May 2016 2. Elephant Rocl< pre-design study from Moffat Nichols October 2018 Prepared by: Patrick Barnes,Director of Public Works TOWN OF TiBURON — -- PAGE 3 of 3 STRUCTURAL EVALUATION Of ELEPHANT ROCK ''WHARF Prepared for THE TOWN OF TIBURON Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. (CCE Job # 90-3343) MAY 197 2016 FES 10 S. uovo u� 0,� w No.C 043095 x m xlr lVII. Michael S. Unsworth, P.E. EXHIBIT INTO. t Table of Contents 1.0 Reference Documents ...................................................................I......... 1 2.0 Review of the As-Built Drawings............................................ 1 3.0 Site Observations............................................................... 2 4.0 Analysis Performed..................................................<.......... 2 5.0 Interim Recommendations.................................................... 3 6.0 Arial View....................................................................... 4 7.0 Photographic Documentation............................................. 5-15 COABTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING DEPARTMENT SERVICES May 19,2016 Mr. Patrick Barnes, P.E. Town Engineer/Public Works Director Town of Tiburon 1505 Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon,CA 94920 biect: Structural Evaluation Letter Elephant Rock Timber Wharf-Town of Tiburon 1.0 Reference Documents: • Site Photographs • As-Built Drawings prepared by Buel Engineering (Sheets A1.7/1198;C1. 8/28/96; S1. 7/1/98; S2,9/1/98;S3, 7/1/98) Dear Mr. Barnes: At your request,Coastland Engineering made a site visit on April 1, 2016 to perform a structural evaluation of an existing timber wharf known as Elephant Rock.The purpose of the site visit was to make a visual inspection to determine the adequacy of the structural members and connections for providing a safe platform for the use of the public. 2.0 Review of the As-Built Drawin;as It was noted that the concrete was a typical 5-1/2 sack(2500 p.s.i.)mix which would not provide any special protection to the salt environment; however,the reinforcing steel was specified to have a"Green Epoxy Coating" for corrosion resistance. As indicated in the general notes on sheet S 1 cracking of the concrete will occur and continuous maintenance will be required by the City to seal the cracks against moisture intrusion. Detail 12/S3 shows the supporting bracket of the cantilevered tube steel being epoxy doweled beyond the concrete ring directly into the rock formation providing a more positive connection than if only anchored into the ring. All timber was specified to be"Marine Grade Pressure-Treated Douglas Fir#1". It is unclear what type and amount of treatment was applied at the time of construction. It appeared visually to be the typical in-ground pressure-treated lumber that can be obtained in any lumber supply store. Santa Rosa Auburn 1400 Neotomas Avenue 11865 Edgewood Road Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Auburn, CA 95603 www.coastiandelvii.com Page 1 3.0 Site Observations The following aspects were observed which in time could be a hazard if there is continual use of the structure: • Deteriorating wood members;especially the posts supported by concrete footing. Photos#1  • Corroding post and beam brackets. Photos#1,#3  • Corroding fasteners. Photos#1,#4,#5,#6,#7 ® Cantilevered tube steel and supported bracket with extensive corrosion. Photos#5,#9,#10,#11,#12,#13,#14,#15,#17 e Improper joist hangers for skewed conditions and improper protective finish. Photo#13  • Spalling concrete with exposed reinforcing steel at the rock formation. Photo#16,#17,#18  4.0 Analysis Performed An analysis was performed on the cantilevered tube steel (TS 6x4x1/2)beams that were exhibiting substantial deterioration to rusting from the salt air environment.The beams themselves were found reserve capacity despite the reduced section to the rusting at the time of our field observation.The quality of the embedded epoxy anchors could not be determined with a visual observation. 5.0 Interim Recommendations: In lieu of the reconstructed the wharf as a whole, some intermediated repairs could be made to prolong the function of the structure and improve its safety to the public.We suggest the following: "Pension test the supporting bolts of the caritilevered beam moment connection. • Clean and apply a protected coating to the cantilevered steel beams. Replace all metal supporting hardware with alloys or coatings appropriate for the salt air environment. Shore up and replace all supporting posts that are treated for salt air and splash. • Replace all fasteners with stainless steel. Where anchors are epoxied into the rock thoughly clean and apply a protected coating. Patch the cracked and spaliing concrete to ensure exposed reinforcing steel is protected. Page 2 We hope that this written evaluation serves your needs for now. If more detail is needed of the findings observed during our site visit, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely, , Michael S. Unsworth, P.E. Coastland Engineering S'T'RUCTURAL EVALUATION Page 3 •c .s.. .�, � ` •Y' .r<^ _ "" .� s,w, :ry �,� rev 1«. .���{ 7 r � r, 't S ,Y,��';"� "_..-,.•�^"" .✓' ' K.�;-.; � !rte` � 2 �s�r`�`��-5�"�< ���'..,4'3�`: L,� s }a � K .n 2 e♦ �t Zs v".,y��'zn�'k� f �>xJ�� / -^<..r�,>, r tile;e;�A♦.°17ryxt �L��,� �,h 'y�„ '. r L a's � � r ,si-�. ,�r� ✓� y'. e.;:y^Y7���,f .• 4'!'" 1�� n Y. «'W� .��"€.i� ,'�:� h.z� "s`�f =��"����� �� `�ai ar`' '�r�;� ,x '''�` �a� �,'`'` r�s,-�r'�yea r'! �� 4i ♦.� .�`" q A� z, z,'�.3 3> m.�" x'n. t�"% f sx�, f r .: fD L,..'T,,/t� t-, ha' y. ��",n 4 2�` `�✓' .1^ ..:F �`M»32�Cl� 'a`3 7. �' +., � N� N F �`� stir,1 ��� �, -:2 a, � Q„digs r��'"'�"z'i ,r: € �`r v : ✓' ,r�z £s r � r t t s*a F� .�.s � �->�, r:s � a•4 ��' -��...s�?3'' fi s;��-rz,� '' � cr r� z m.rz �a.' nc ,� �`., > �.y i� .: � .+,. ♦. �„a' df yes �'�zx` a��2 �"� S �: '�a ✓ s'� i., �' ��,.. x"�,t`; T �S!� P � ��.,:t: � a S-x =a�.. ��€c'.,.✓c�'>1 ..a""�' �'r'yrx y;r�3' r '� "'1�'��r,� � � sr€-". `�N. „,�,%'�°v�i', ✓ �� { �� .��,�1fi�,s"✓�3�'�`�' ��ryx �,. ",.,ir�,'rEr,Fx.� 'rs`.J'r`�',s".� �.�T��'x s p�>" .r k%r c�%'��se'�1��,��x-�'.3yr` y,:� �',z "'. i .m"" ✓�✓�,a4a�,r� '`r ''-� tt'k; ��^/C'r3 �.y��' �"P , .;.=��y"`s?�"t:��'f�x����¢."..!' `sX�€� ~>me� �?? ... s..5°'t�,�.s, v� �y��t£�i i Ta.'. "`y=5rrras`'3 f `�'c, .�`r-'�,.`'',.sL� 2Y ��T�:2 r n`o'r �,�''a' s` ,'�� � �', h .a `i7,��.."�"ir..F-���"'�-''s''',,;:�S'��,`:-".�-e�:�:..' ✓r��:'�.;;: s��� 4�,.r ��r £�g?��� �� ��' ��'�'Fx Cif.�� x l �:��^�. � �,.rr � .``'"�.."� ,��rpt r," � v'-z'' - � �%"�i a:�• �"' - � �• E �` z. "c ,. -� ,.<,,:�E �c' x,�'�`�' .�z f?;r �..'s.�x-<=� ^S'�. a ter;'.�,,.� "��,:rz;,"_ :o��✓* �'",^r.� r A;���. �, a."..Z �?,.f�'2 ��� � ax.,���f JS>'�=. F '�-�� �.. ...;� E;. .�-"a ,��v -'�"�p�`T?;e �'z�F��. �..,.,a,�>���c� k'�z€�S�;:x.:. & F� ..`C,F £K'fiiC" f� z� f�'S�� .,�Y<'�,'..� ''fit�} ?�:✓ �s<� ,-�� x fir...Z� �^x .,�:-1�,�"a..�',`� t, �:�r 9 3�"y ..�w�"�`�"s3r, w✓^n2 ��� t '"� ,.-;.,�.,,"w '°�""� � :: � „� �.�'° � rz<JF'<d'r�&:3#�.`�`ti¢''.g '�"? <£a.�`�:9€ ..0 w�,z� �- s { u ear100 m�+ rrntnwcf yn 6.0 Aerial View Plage 4 7.0 Photographic Documentation Page 5 F:;F C�OCnd %ffmwpa 0 A 8 T L A IN 0 CIVIL ENGINEERING-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING DEPARTMENT SERVICES S �,r the z „a kwo 1� Photo#1 s WXr 3 " 4 Photo#2 Santa Rosa Auburn 1400 Neotomas Avenue 11855 Edgewood Road Santa Rosa, CA 95400 Auburn, CA 95603 www.constiandeivii.com Page 6 r x J y K a 41, Photo#3 pff d,4 ?d .�a s d Photo#4 Page 7 > ' Al t. a } Ar Photo#5 af Photo#6 Page 8 KUM 4SO D � a Photo#7 RN ig p 4 A `l A RK x a Photo#6 Page 9 ail 4 �2 5 n xF� f �s Photo#9 �` >s,. { ,� 5 ?-� •� SYN d ,'� ��•'� IN { g.° Photo#10 Page 10 Sz Y I r 32G i �L w �g¢ Photo#11 ••e a 3 ti fv 33,461, sF �� . d Photo#12 Page Y 1 .tny mX` t ® Photo#13 Ai K gg Asa � ri � � z i raTMr I Photo#14 Page 12 7 � x q� L r Photo#15 M. ll XL EJ s F,. Photo#16 Page 13 - � z 0 a^-4 co R sem' OS c s � f � S ;a i P M: i a Pt,Otfl Page 1 2185 N California Blvd,Suite#500 Walnut Creek,CA 94596 m o f f a P i & n i c h o l (925)944-5411 Fax:(925)544-4732 To: Patrick Barnes, P.E. Town of Tiburon From: Brad Porter, P.E. Sam Tooley, P.E. Date: October 11,2018 Subject: Elephant Rock Pier Condition Assessment and ConceptAlternatives Job Number: 10074-01 1. Executive Summary The purpose of this memo is to present the results of our recent site investigation of the condition of the Elephant Rock Pier(the Pier-see Figures 1 and 2) including preliminary recommendations. This investigation is performed as an update to the previous assessment(Coastland Engineering, May 19, 2016)of the now 57-year-old Pier— originally constructed in 1961, Due to exposure in the harsh marine environment(waves break on the rock and shore line constantly wetting the structure)there has been ongoing deterioration of structural members. Repairs were performed in 1988(27 years old) and 1999(38 years old)to extend the Pier's life. During the site visits, observations were made of the structure from above deck, below deck and from the water by boat. From these observations,we confirmed that the structure has continued to deteriorate since the 2016 Condition Assessment. In its present condition the Pier can remain open. However periodic(at least annual) inspections should be performed until corrective measures(repair or replacement)are taken,which will likely be required within 5 years. Based upon the site investigation we have developed conceptual repair or replacement concepts and associated costs/benefits.The repair recommendations presented in the 2016 assessment are still valid and form the basis for that alternative. The second alternative would be to replace the Pier in its entirety.Although feasible to perform repairs, it may be more beneficial to plan to replace the Pier within 5 years and perform inspections in the interim to keep the Pier open. Alternative Useful Life Project Considerations Projects (from Const) Likely Cost Range Safety ADA Seismic Sea Level Rise 1. Repair/Restoration 5 to 10 years $250,000 to$450,000 yes limited no no 2. Replacement 25 to 50 years $600,000 to$900,000 yes yes yes yes EXHIBIT rf)o f f a t'r & n i c h o I Crorxtive People,Practical Solutions,' M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum Town of Tiburon Elephant Rock Project Alternatives x� u "d y a � �, Figure I. Elephant Rock Pier 2, Background The Pier was constructed in 1961 (57 years old), rehabilitated in 1986(32 years ago)and most recently had repairs performed in 1999(now 19 years ago). The previous report identifies a number of elements that have significantly deteriorated and makes recommendations for further testing and repairs to the structure including: • Walkway Framing • Concrete at Rock Outcropping • Cantilevered Steel Brackets • Pier Timber Walkway-Column Steel Connectors o Il_ n�, w a 1 I { a /1dYtA-fl ru RE13UlLp FISHING 11ER PROPOSED PLAN I I Figure 2.Plan View of C'xisfing Pier 3, Observations Our site observations confirm that the previously identified deterioration has continued since 2016 as further described below. 31 Walkway Framinq A. The walkway timber framing has some deterioration,All timber members are treated with preservative-originally identified as"pressure treated". Some of the smaller members have some softening in the top Y4 inch of the 2 M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum(Town of Tiburon I Elephant Rock Project Alternatives surface. The larger heavy timber members were in good condition. No significant fungal rot through any member was observed. B. The steel angles providing support to the walking surface are small and have minimal hardware connecting to the timber members(see Figure 3).Although they have supported the grating over time,they will be analyzed for their capacity and adequacy to support the imposed load. C, The steel hanger at the intermediate 4x4 is corroding. It was previously noted that these connectors are not intended for"skewed"installation and that the coating is not suitable for long-term exposure in the marine environment. D, There is a noted vertical deflection(sag) in the walkway where the pier walkway bridge meets the platform at the rock outcropping(see Figure 4). This may indicate the onset of significant deterioration and should be monitored regularly. 3 M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum Town of Tiburon Elephant Rock Project Alternatives a k F Figore 3. Walkway framing at flock Outcropping f A i H^Y E � Figaro 4,Noted Vertical Neffection(Sag) I zii�� .. Pl 10I 4 M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum I Town of Tiburon I Elephant Rock Project Alternatives 3.2 Concrete at Rock Outcropping A. As noted in the 2016 assessment, some of the concrete is severely spalled,with exposed reinforcing, and is in need of repair/replacement.The concrete has continued to deteriorate, as shown on Figure 5. B, The epoxy coated bars have begun to experience corrosion and will continue to deteriorate at a faster rate without the protective coating. e 11 a // •. •� ®� 1 1 k Figur 5. Concrete at Rock Outcropping �<<, ; 5 M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum I Town of Tiburon I Elephant Rock Project Alternatives 3.3 Cantilevered Steel Brackets A. The cantilever steel brackets have continued to deteriorate/rust. The brackets are in varying condition,with the most severe section loss due to rust occurring in varied locations around the rock.. B. As shown in the available drawings,the steel stiffeners were originally''/2-inch thick.One stiffener was measured to have 0.2-inch thickness remaining(60%loss of thickness)—see Figures 6 and 7. Other plates had more competent section remaining (10-20%loss of thickness). On average,these members have at least 50%of their section remaining of competent(not rusted)steel. C. The thickness of the steel tube sections was not directly measured as in interior of the tube is sealed off. However, it is likely that the deterioration on the exterior of the tube is similar to that of the plates. Because the tube is sealed the interior would not be exposed to the elements and would likely have little significant deterioration.Accordingly, if the exterior wall had lost 60%(measure to the wall centerline)of its section,the overall loss of section would be on the order of 30%. D. As noted in the 2016 Report,the epoxy anchor bolts supporting the cantilever brackets are not visible, and therefore cannot be assessed. In order to confirm the epoxy anchor bolts maintain sufficient capacity, an in- situ testing program should be undertaken. z y, r i 0.2 in Remaining 0.5 in c Figure,6. Steel Cantilever Bracket Figure%.AppraximatelyU Inches Steel Remaining M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum I Town of Tiburon I Elephant Rock Project Alternatives 3.4 Pier Timber Walkway-Column Steel Connectors A. The steel connector bracket between the Pier Walkway timber framing and the timber column is significantly corroded. No excessive deflections or other signs of overstress damage were observed at the columns, and the column connector bracket may be sufficient to transfer vertical(gravity)loads. However,the current connection would likely be highly susceptible to seismic loads(or other eccentric loads),which may not have been considered in the original design. B. The timber column posts,though stained by rust product from corroding steel, were not observed to have significant section loss—see Figure 8. f w r z u jL4s z st$9 t' f 'r p LL Figure B,Pior Walkway Support n:> �c . 1 1 1.;h1_. 7 M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum I Town of Tiburon I Elephant Rock Project Alternatives 4. Recommendations In its present condition the existing structure does not pose an immediate safety hazard and can remain open, However,the Pier is now over 55 years old and has been repaired twice since construction ,with the last repair performed almost 20 years ago. It is nearing the end of its useful life and as deterioration continues it will present a hazard at some point, likely in the next 5-10 years.Accordingly, regular inspections(at least annual and after major events: storm/earthquake)should be performed to assess its condition and to identify deflections indicating onset of failure. Corrective measures should be planned for implementation within 5 years. Possible corrective measures include: 1. Repair/Restoration(Recommendations from 2016 Report) Repairs as described below will slow the deterioration and replace some of the structure, but would not replace the primary members. Further, because they only slow deterioration to the existing members but do not replace the primary members,the repairs would be better performed sooner than later. If performed today the repairs would add an additional 5 to 10 years of useful life to the structure(i.e.a total life of 10-20 years from today). If the repairs were delayed until the structure becomes a hazard (in 5-10 years as noted in the paragraph above)there would be little benefit as some of the members would have deteriorated to the point of near total section loss, Considering this, if the repairs were performed at this time, the recommendations from the 2016 assessment are still applicable including: • Tension test the supporting bolts of the cantilevered beam moment connection. • Clean and apply a protected coating to the cantilevered steel beams. • Replace all metal supporting hardware with alloys or coatings appropriate for the salt air environment. • Replace all fasteners with stainless steel. Where anchors are epoxied into the rock thoroughly clean and apply a protected coating. • Patch the cracked and spalling concrete to ensure exposed reinforcing steel is protected. • Evaluate and modify supporting posts that are treated for salt air and splash. • Evaluate the structure for gravity loads. 2, Replacement To extend the useful life 25 to 50 years(if performed in 5 years,then 30-55 years from today),we recommend: • Replacement to provide a fully code compliant structure(including ADA, Seismic Demands,and Sea Level Rise). 5, Project Alternatives The conceptual project alternatives include: Alternative Useful Life Project Considerations Projects (from Const) Likely Cost Range Safety ADA Seismic Sea Level Rise 1. Repair/Restoration 5 to 10 years $250,000 to$450,000 yes limited no no 2. Replacement 25 to 50 years $600,000 to$900,000 yes yes yes yes The useful life represents time-frame before a repair/restoration episode will likely be required. Repair/restoration is a viable option to allow the current pier to remain in-use and extend its life for an additional 5 to 10 years(10-20 years total from today). 8 M&N#10074-01 October 12,2018 Memorandum I Town of Tiburon I Elephant Rock Project Alternatives Although feasible to perform structural repairs, it may be more beneficial over the life cycle to allow the existing structure to remain in-service with regular inspections, until the Pier can be fully replaced (within 5 years for planning). All project alternatives should include provisions for regular ongoing maintenance after construction and periodic inspections. 9 1{ Town Council Meeting TOWN OF TIBURON p 1505 Tiburon Boulevard October 17, 2015 Tiburon, CA 94920 Agenda ltem: E / Al 3 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Public Works Subject: Update on Projects to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and/or Reduce TovVA Energy Expenditures Reviewed By: BACKGROUND On October 4, 2017, staff brought an item to Council to discuss projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Two of these projects were: 1. Installation of photovoltaic solar array located at the Police Station. 2. Retrofitting cobra head streetlights to LED. This staff report provides an update on these two projects. SOLAR ARRAY AT THE POLICE STATION Staff originally considered solar arrays on the Police Station roof, similar to the array on Town Hall. Howev er, staff identified several issues with placing solar power on the Police Station roof, including: 1. The roofing material on the Police Station is very brittle, and is no longer produced. While we are not experiencing problems with the current roof, placing a solar array on the roof could cause unforeseen problems in the future. 2. The size of the roof limits the solar array to a size smaller than needed for optimal offset of electricity use. A carport array would produce over twice the electricity compared to a rooftop system, covering an estimated 91% of the annual cost,of electricity for the Police Station. Council subsequently reviewed preliminary designs for a carport style array using a cantilevered steel structure, and funded this approach in the Fiscal Year 2018-19 CIP, with an allocation of $260,000. This option was projected to produce a simple payback of about eleven years and generate about $840K in cost savings over 30 years. The project scope and estimate were developed with Cooperative Community Energy (CCE), a firm the To\'v n worked with on the solar array on Town Hall. As part of that process, the Planning 3'vr ,fir= Tli-s ' (1� !�Gc o 4 ,)ctt)hC1 : . 2018 Division completed a Site Plan and Architectural Review_ anprovim) the protect effect;ve Nmmry 30. 2018. This review included a glare analysis done by CCE to address q„ectinns regarding potential glare into nearby residences. As the Town and CCE began reviewing draft technical specifications, and contract documents, it became apparent that CCE envisioned completing the work as a design build project, an approach staff believes would be prohibited under public contract code. Given this determination, there are 2 approaches to move forward with this project: Option 1 Proceed with the project using our standard contract form, and the typical design, bid, build approach -- Staff currently estimates the total project cost for this approach at $330,000, which would increase the estimated simple payback period to approximately 15 years. The Police Station solar project was funded in the FY 2018-19 CIP, with an allocation of$260,000 from the Infrastructure & Facility Replacement Reserve Fund. If Council wishes to proceed with the project in this manner, an additional allocation of approximately $70,000 would be necessary. Option 2 The second option would be to enter into a solar power purchase agreement (PPA) -- This is a financial agreement where a developer arranges for the design, permitting, financing and installation of a solar energy system on a customer's property at little to no cost. The customer pays for the system by purchasing the power it generates at a pre-determined rate over time. According to a JPA that coordinates large installations for schools and municipalities, 95% of government solar power is done this way. Staff has received an estimate for a PPA from CCE. This would be for the same system already approved by Council and Planning Commission. The cost analysis is attached as Exhibit 1. In this scenario, at the end of ten years the Town would own the facility. The simple payback is 15 years. CCE has checked with a second source for the PPA and the analysis was similar. If the project were to be completed using a PPA, the $260,000 allocated in the FY2018-19 budget would not be expended now, as payments for the system would occur over a 10 year period and would be included in future budgets as required. Staff continues to believe a solar carport project makes sense, but would recommend focusing on further developing a project through a FPA, as opposed to the traditional design, bid, build procurement method. The payback is about the same for both options, but through a PPA, the project could be developed in a more streamlined approach, reducing both risks, and the number of unknowns associated with the project. If Council agrees with this recommendation, staff would work to identify the most suitable PPA agreement, and return to Council for authorization to proceed at a future Council meeting. LED STREETLIGHT CONVERSION The Town of Tiburon has 129 cobrahead streetlight fixtures throughout the Town that could be converted to LED. A map showing the approximate location of the existing lights is attached as Exhibit 2. A list of locations is provided as Exhibit 3. Assuming that the Town would replace the existing lights with lights of similar intensity; the change out would be the following: Towi4 )F TiBUROrV -- ---- - PAGE OF 4 t':; ok f l;. ;118 • 116 of the 129 fixtures are currently 70W NPS Cobra and would be converted to 24W LED • 10 of the 129 fixtures are currently l OOW NPS Cobra and would be converted to 38W LED • 3 of the 129 fixtures are currently 20OW HPS Cobra and would be converted to 88W LED There are per fixture rebates currently available from PG&E for this conversion. After rebate, the cost of converting all of these streetlights is estimated at $38,625.30. This is higher than the $30,000 cost quoted a year ago as the LED costs have increased and the PG&E rebates have decreased. The cost proposal for this project is attached as Exhibit 4. This would result in a savings of about 23,000 KWh per year and $5,500 per year in electrical costs. This is about a 7-year payback. To test the proposed new lighting, twelve LED cobrahead lights were installed on Mar West and Blackfield Drive in March 2018. Additionally, in August 2018, four of the decorative lights on Tiburon Blvd were converted to LED. The lights were of various intensities and two colors, 4,000K and 3,000K. The public was made aware of this effort through Tib Talk and an article which appeared in the Ark newspaper. To date staff has received only two comments on these LED lights one by phone and one by e-mail. Both were received before we actually retrofitted the lights. Based on the test lights, staff recommends proceeding with the project, installing 3,000K lights on all residential roads and 4,000K lights on arterials and intersections with arterials and collector to collector intersections. Some studies indicate better visibility with 4,000K streetlights, increasing safety. LED light conversions were included in the FY 2018-19 CIP budget, with an allocation of $30,000. Council would need to allocate $9,000 in additional funds for a complete retrofit, for a total project cost of approximately $39,000. The proposal attached as Exhibit 4 assumes 5% of the lights are shielded. Should Council decide in advance to shield all lights, an additional $9,200 would need to be allocated, for a total project cost of approximately $48,200. hh this scenario, the simple project payback period would be approximately 9 years. Funding for this project would come from the State Gas Tax Reserve Fund. Additionally, staff has received an estimate for converting the remainder of decorative lights on Tiburon Blvd. to LED. This was not part of the original project funded in this fiscal year. This would convert 33 lights along Tiburon Blvd. to LED. As this is an arterial the color would be 4,000K. The additional cost of this work is $20,909.00. These lights are more expensive to retrofit and the simple payback is about 13 years. The proposal is attached as Exhibit 5. Please note the supplier is extending to us the cost used for the recent test retrofits, but anticipates the cost will increase in the near future. TOWN OF TIBURON —— PAGE 3 OF 4 RF.0 OMMENDA'I'i"N Staff recommends that Council: 1. Authorize staff to continue developing a solar carport project through the use of a Power Purchase Agreement, and return to Council for consideration of an agreement once finalized. 2. Approve a budget amendment to fund a capital improvement project to convert all cobra head streetlights to LED. If all lights were to include shields, the budget amendment would need to be for $18,200. If we assume only 5% of the lights would include shields, the amendment would need to be $9,000. In either scenario, the funding would come from the State Gas Tax Reserve Fund. Exhibits: 1. Cost estimate for PPA for Solar at Police Station 2. Map of existing streetlight locations 3. List of locations of existing cobrahead streetlights 4. Quote from DC Electric for cobrahead streetlight LED conversions 5. Quote fi-om DC Electric for decorative streetlight LED conversions Prepared by: Patrick Barnes, Director of Public Works TOWN OF'6 IBURON _..— --- --- PAGE 4 OF 4 ® ® M 's �5�.�x✓"f. 'd l.0 �' . THE SYSTEM OVERALL FINANCIAL BENEFIT CASH FLOW w System parameters provided by CCEoergy utility donor 8 debt balloon other cash ending year savings rebates payments financing costs flow cash System price $265,000 start` Estimated construction interest $3,313 25 year savings $719,125 1 18,512 (32,532) (14,020) (14,020) Total price $268,313 2 19,156 (33,168) (14,012) (28,032) Rebates None 3` 19,823 . (33,840 (14,017) (42,049) System size DC(kW) 53.900 4 20,513 (34,524) (14,011) (56,060) istyearoutput(kwh) 73,362 Financing payments ($357,120) 5 21,227 (35,244) (14,017) (70,078) Annual.degradation 0.50% 6 21,965 (35,976) (14,011) (84,088) Other costs None 7 22,730 (36,744) (14,014) (98,103) 1st year electricity savings $18;5121 8 23,521 (37,536) (14,015) (112,118) Annual utility inflation rate 4.00% 9 24,339 (38,352) (14,013) (126,131) Front-end rebate$amount None Total Benefit $362,005 10 25,18639,204 ( ) (14,018) (140,149) Monthly,rebate rate None 11' 26,063 26,063 (114,086) F M 12 26,970 26,970 (87,117) SOLAR FINANCING s >� 13 27,908 27,908 (59,209) Based on currentcost of funds,subject to e chao ��x,. �' ,''•" 9 � 14 28,879 28,879 (30,330) * w , 15 29,884 29,884 (445) Customer type Government 16 30,924 30,924 30,479 Financing term' 120 months " �- 17 32,000 32,000 62,480 18 33,114 33,114 95,594 Customer contribution None , , 19 34,266 34,266 129,860 Donor contribution None 20, 35,459 35,459 165,319 OtlteC AdVatltageS21 36,693 36,693 202,012 Payments increase as available cash flow increases. 22 37,970 37,970 239,982 AIOWfBX;BX2ll7j7tlllfBr@St cIf@ 23 39,291 39,291 279,273 1"OOI fl/ 24 40,658 40,658 319,931 ,Systemownershfpxrn l0 years Fy 25 42,073 42,073 362,005 `h;dagainst utr(kty cosi fntlatron 4 ;� gQodfiar the eCiUlrORmer)t r a 3 x? rx 719.125 357,120 362,005 �naTysis Prep ared;Septernber 20, 2"018 b''Belvedere Solar Finance tis analysis has been prepared for the sole use of Town of Tiburon-Police Station and its financial advisors.Please do not distribute to others without Belvedere's permission )Ivedere makes no representations as to the accuracy of the system projections which were calculated by CCEnergy. Tiburon LED SL Retrofit(Cobra Fixtures) 129 EA _ _ ___ — _ ___. __.._. .... ._....__ r{r�,Pres..�va soh° v o (gyp h d _ ei Rd Im i5 Ln J M^ U ♦ � �4'C*Y K ��,.,4 © _���iF t e6�t^gl.d P iyI$ Y�wjT,I .,I m Fvci- y t - el Campo Strewbe'rry LITTLEREED' ��Or °o HEIGHTS ° it � - ':: •'A' .f intermediate School � Farestrse Beach < nr F,fctCe0ey w` CovntyFark FsePd \ i � krambruu t w Ntti v i ippre Tree 0 H 'norv� llbwoa uptdrrds y0 ;•,sk.„ �; e +c �,.; C t ¢ o Preserve v p��5:{va lsfarrd ,y0 9 Old St Hilary"s t E n�2 t in ,z U,: Qpen Space 4 iYD - C °t\ Old S�st� q'a Chapel SEC-VEDE E �� t TIBUR6� no a > Pill- wv �� � _ fla(vedere o o Rl hoc S{ _ -�i0agl¢ Marin City: �rmcaazan 17Go ii, zwmTI—IfU1e aeon rI=D-I, DC Electric Group, Inc. Town of Tibruon 9/28/17 LED Streetlight Retrofit (Cobra Fixtures) - EXHIBIT 3 - List of Locations Customer SL# Location Existing Fixture Type &Wattage LED Fixture Type&Wattage Fixture Quantity Fixture Description Latitude Longitude Notes Town of Tiburon 100T 118 JEFFERSON DR&TIBURON BLVD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8998333 -122.48966 Town of Tiburon 101T 480 END WASHINGTON CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8976633 -122.4900817 Town of Tiburon 1029T TIBURON BLVD&BLACKFIELD DR HPS 200W LED 76W 1 Cobra 37.898903 122.501542 Town of Tiburon 1027 484 IRVING CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8984733 -122.490175 Town of Tiburon 10307 BLACKFIELD DR&TIBURON BLVD 150'N/0 HPS 200W LED 76W 1 Cobra 37.899173 -122.50093 Town of Tiburon 1031T BLACKFIELD DR&CECELIA WY 100'S/O HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.899715 122.50076 Town of Tiburon 1032T PAMELA CT&BLACKFIELD DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899895 -122.501197 Town of Tiburon 1033T 30 PAMELA CT HPS 70WLED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899175 122.50176 Town of Tiburon 10347 BLACKFIELD DR&CECELIA WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.9003 -122.501157 Town of Tiburon 1035T 266 CECILIA WY&BLACKFIELD DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900063 -122.500002 Town of Tiburon 1036T 283 CECILIA WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899915 -122.499172 Town of Tiburon 1037T 95 HARRIET WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899557 -122.499007 Town of Tiburon 1038T 50 HARRIET WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.89919 -122.499103 Town of Tiburon 1039T LELAND WY&CECILIA WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899763 -122.498365 Town of Tiburon 103T TRESTLE GLEN BLVD&MERCURY AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.898452 -122.487898 Town of Tiburon 1040T 127 LELAND WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900543 -122.497857 Town of Tiburon 1041T 157 LELAND WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901505 -122.497248 Town of Tiburon 1042T 122 BLACKFIELD DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.90111 -122.500788 Town of Tiburon 1043T 146 BLACKFIELD DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901772 -122.50073 Town of Tiburon 1044T 173 BLACKFIELD DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.90235 -122.500803 Town of Tiburon 1045T 191 BLACKFIELD DR&KAREN WY A/F HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.903097 -122.500815 Town of Tiburon 1046T 261 KAREN WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.902432 -122.499568 Town of Tiburon 1047T 266 KAREN WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.902242 -122.499092 Town of Tiburon 1048T 275 KAREN WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.902088 -122.498102 Town of Tiburon 1049T 94 CLAIRE WY HPS 70W LED 26W122.498383 37.901762 122.498383 Town of Tiburon 104T 13 MERCURY AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899533 -122.488277 Town of Tiburon 1050T 82 CLAIRE WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901088 -122.498597 Town of Tiburon 1051T 66 CLAIRE WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900558 -122.498822 Town of Tiburon 1052T 38 CLAIRE WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 1 -122.499945 Cobra 37.9008 Town of Tiburon 1053T 14 CLAIRE WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.9008 5 122.4998 Town of Tiburon 1054T 283 KAREN WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.9020251 22.497247 Town of Tiburon 1055T 314 KAREN WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901963 -122.496385 Town of Tiburon 1056T 329 KAREN WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901947 -122.49556 Town of Tiburon 1057T CAYFORD DR&CECILIA WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.898107 -122.496158 Town of Tiburon 1058T CIRCLE DR&CAYFORD DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.898268 -122.496415 Town of Tiburon 1059T 8 CIRCLE DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.898867 -122.496793 Town of Tiburon 105T 27 MERCURY AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900627 -122.488553 Town of Tiburon 1060T 15 CIRCLE DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.898873 -122.498005 Town of Tiburon 10617 20 CIRCLE DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.898483 -122.49844 Town of Tiburon 1062T 26 CIRCLE DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.898148 -122.498087 Town of Tiburon 1063T 30 CIRCLE DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.897905 -122.49718 Town of Tiburon 1064T 358 KAREN WY HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901913 -122.494655 Town of Tiburon 106T 37 MERCURY AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.90126 -122.48732 Town of Tiburon 107T 51 MERCURY AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901855 -122.485978 Town of Tiburon 108T 59 MERCURY AV&APOLLO DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901965 -122.485143 Town of Tiburon 109T 65 MERCURY AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901497 -122.484543 Town of Tiburon 10T 1781 MAR WEST ST&RACOON LN HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.876275 -122.455313 Town of Tiburon 1107 25 APOLLO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901293 -122.485413 Town of Tiburon 111T 13 APOLLO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900768 -122.486777 Town of Tiburon 112T 5 APOLLO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900337 122.487762 Town of Tiburon 113T 4 JUNO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899142 -122.487762 Town of Tiburon 114T 12 JUNO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899777 -122.487025 Town of Tiburon 115T 20 JUNO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900263 122.486125 Town of Tiburon 116T 26 JUNO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.900437 -122.485157 Cobra Town of Tiburon 117T 38 JUNO RD&VENUS CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 37.900862 -122.484017 Town of Tiburon 118T 6 VENUS CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901445 122.483417 Town of Tiburon 119T 22 VENUS CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.902247 -122.483798 Town of Tiburon 11T 1827 MAR WEST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.87547 122.454928 DC Electric Group, Inc. Town of Tibruon 9/28/17 LED Streetlight Retrofit (Cobra Fixtures) - EXHIBIT 3 - List of Locations Customer SL# Location Existing Fixture Type &Wattage LED Fixture Type&Wattage Fixture Quantity Fixture Description Latitude Longitude Notes Town of Tiburon 12T 1853 MAR WEST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.874913 -122.454787 Town of Tiburon 13T 1859 MAR WEST ST&LAS LOMAS LN HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.874258 -122.453935 Town of Tiburon 148T VIA LOS ALTOS&BLACKFIELD DR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.9034517 -122.5006817 Town of Tiburon 14T MAR WEST ST&LAS LOMAS LN HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.874067 -122.452958 Town of Tiburon 152T REED RANCH RD&VIA CAPISTRANO HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.904613 -122.492955 Town of Tiburon 153T 94 REED RANCH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.904157 -122.492663 Town of Tiburon 154T 88 REED RANCH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.903648 -122.492647 Town of Tiburon 155T REED RANCH RD&CORTE LAS CASAS HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.903173 -122.492633 Town of Tiburon 156T 75 REED RANCH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.902848 -122.492113 Town of Tiburon 157T 67 REED RANCH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.902555 -122.491282 Town of Tiburon 158T 4 CORTE PALOS VERDES HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.903523 -122.493423 Town of Tiburon 159T 5 CORTE PALOS VERDES HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.90308 -122.493825 Town of Tiburon 160T 11 CORTE PALOS VERDES HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.902838 -122.494462 Town of Tiburon 161T 61 REED RANCH RD&INDIAN ROCK CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901373 -122.49041 Town of Tiburon 162T 63 REED RANCH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901997 -122.490778 Town of Tiburon 163T 1 VIA CAPISTRANO HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.904492 -122.49349 Town of Tiburon 164T 9 VIA CAPISTRANO HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.90431 -122.494198 Town of Tiburon 166T 10 VIA CAPISTRANO HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.904533 -122.494678 Town of Tiburon 174T 102 REED RANCH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.905172 -122.493035 Town of Tiburon 176T MCCART CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.891342 -122.481873 Town of Tiburon 181T 17 APOLLO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.901 -122.486317 Town of Tiburon 23T 110 LAS LOMAS LN HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.874468 -122.452285 Town of Tiburon 27T 81 EAST VIEW AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.87322 -122.4580483 Town of Tiburon 2T 108 MAIN ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.87387 -122.458597 Town of Tiburon 34T 1888 CENTRO WEST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.875062 -122.453473 Town of Tiburon 35T 1898 CENTRO WEST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.875275 -122.452087 Town of Tiburon 36T INTERS VISTAZO WEST ST&DIVISO ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.876282 -122.451782 Town of Tiburon 37T 240 DIVISO ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.875322 -122.451213 Town of Tiburon 38T CENTRO EAST ST&DIVISO ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.873855 -122.450437 Town of Tiburon 3T 80 MAIN ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.873555 -122.45786 Town of Tiburon 4300T RANCHO DR&CYPRESS HOLLOW DR HPS 10OW LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.901742 -122.50193 Town of Tiburon 4301T CYPRESS HOLLOW DR&BACCHARIS PL HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.901575 -122.503092 Town of Tiburon 4302T END RANCHO DR&CECILIA WY HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.902982 -122.501813 Town of Tiburon 4303T CYPRESS HOLLOW DR&BAYVISTA DR HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.900655 -122.504373 Town of Tiburon 4304T CYPRESS HOLLOW DR&MONTEREY DR HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.9011 -122.503877 Town of Tiburon 4305T END MONTEREY DR&CYPRESS HOLLOW DR HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.902983 122.502807 Town of Tiburon 49T 2140 VISTAZO EAST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.87723 -122.450472 Town of Tiburon 4T END PINE TER HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.891707 122.482443 Town of Tiburon 518T 636 TIBURON BLVD HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.890913 -122.48128 Town of Tiburon 56T 1834 CENTRO WEST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.875962 -122.453978 Town of Tiburon 57T 1685 MAR WEST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.876743 -122.457733 Town of Tiburon 58T MAR WEST ST&MARINER WY 1000'E/O HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8784 -122.459667 Town of Tiburon 59T MAR WEST ST&MARINER WY 1250'E/0 HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.878722 -122.459127 Town of Tiburon 60T 1600 MAR WEST ST&MARINER WY 1450'E/O HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.87898 -122.458545 Town of Tiburon 61T MAR WEST ST&MARINER WY 1800'E/O HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.87863 -122.45774 Town of Tiburon 65T 2490 SPANISH TRAIL RD&CENTRO EAST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.878975 -122.446707 Town of Tiburon 66T 76 EAST VIEW AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8729283 -122.4577283 Town of Tiburon 67T 386 GREENWOOD BEACH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.894442 -122.495377 Town of Tiburon 68T 402 GREENWOOD BEACH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.893978 -122.494108 Town of Tiburon 69T 418 GREENWOOD BEACH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.894153 -122.493222 Town of Tiburon 6T 90 EAST VIEW AV&ALCATRAZ AV HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8735933 -122.4586767 Town of Tiburon 70T 428 GREENWOOD BEACH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.89459 -122.492683 Town of Tiburon 71T 442 GREENWOOD BEACH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.895492 -122.492045 Town of Tiburon 72T 448 GREENWOOD BEACH RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8958 -122.491535 Town of Tiburon 78T RED HILL CIR&LYFORD DR 200'S/O HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8816933 -122.461255 Town of Tiburon 79T 15 RED HILL CIR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8815817 -122.4616683 Town of Tiburon 7T 1693 MAR WEST ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.876593 -122.457267 Town of Tiburon 80T 40 RED HILL CIR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.88115 -122.4618667 DC Electric Group, Inc. Town of Tibruon 9/28/17 LED Streetlight Retrofit (Cobra Fixtures) - EXHIBIT 3 - List of Locations Customer SL# Location Existing Fixture Type &Wattage LED Fixture Type&Wattage Fixture Quantity Fixture Description Latitude Longitude Notes Town of Tiburon 81T 50 RED HILL CIR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8804733 -122.4622383 Town of Tiburon 82T 60 RED HILL CIR HPS 70W LED 26W 1Cobra 37.8798917 122.461865 Town of Tiburon 83T 80 RED HILL CIR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.880255 -122.4612583 Town of Tiburon 84T 96 RED HILL CIR HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8805817 -122.4607583 Town of Tiburon 85T MAR WEST ST&TIBURON BLVD HPS 200W LED 76W 1 Cobra 37.8772967 -122.4622333 Town of Tiburon 881T 1175 KLEINERT WY&NEDS WAY HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.8823067 -122.4649417 Town of Tiburon 8T CENTRO WEST ST&ESPERANZA ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.87719 -122.456463 Town of Tiburon 960T 55 PINE TER HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.892015 -122.4825267 Town of Tiburon 97T JEFFERSON DR&TIBURON BLVD HPS 100W LED 33W 1 Cobra 37.89784 -122.4891283 Town of Tiburon 98T 104 JEFFERSON DR&WASHINGTON CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.8983467 122.48905 Town of Tiburon 99T 110 JEFFERSON DR&IRVING CT HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.89906 -122.4893617 Town of Tiburon 9T MAR WEST ST&ESPERANZA ST HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.876443 -122.456403 Town of Tiburon No# 19 MERCURY AV&APOLLO RD HPS 70W LED 26W 1 Cobra 37.899998 -122.488358 4 ELECTRIC ® C Group, lnc. October 10, 2018 Town of Tiburon Attn: Patrick Barnes Department of Public Works 1505 Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon, CA 94920 EXHIBIT 2 —PROPOSED COSTS Job Description: LED StreetlightRetroft (Cobra Fixtures) Job Location: Various Locations,Tiburon, CA Installation Cost (Includes Labor, Material, and Equipment) • 70 Watt HPS Cobra to 26W LED Cobra Fixture... 116 EA x $292.00 EA = $ 33,872.00 • 100 Watt HPS Cobra to 33W LED Cobra Fixture... 10 EA x $306.00 EA = $ 3,060.00 • 200 Watt HPS Cobra to 76W LED Cobra Fixture... 3 EA x$395.00 EA = $ 1,185.00 Total (Labor, Material, & Equipment)... $ 38,117.00 PG&E Rebates • $10 rebate per fixture for the 70W HPS to 26W LED... 116 EA x ($10.00 EA)_ ($ 1,160.00) • $12 rebate per fixture for the I OOW IIPS to 33W LED... 10 EA x($12.00 EA) _ ($ 120.00) • $17 rebate per fixture for the 20OW HPS to 76W LED... 3 EA x ($17.00 EA) _ ($ 51.00) Total PG&E Rebate... ($ 1,331.00) Total Project Cost(Including PG&E Rebates )... $36,786.00 Contingency of 5% nzcommended for shielding* requests... $ 1,839.30 Total Project Cost (Including 5% Contingency)... S38,625.30 *Shielding installed(at the time of retrofit _ $75.00 EA. **Shielding installed after retrofit is cony)1ete (return trij)) S200.00 EA. This price is valid for 90 days. Price excludes bonds or any potential costs for Caltrans and/or Town permits/fees or any additional traffic control requirements (refer to Exhibit 1, Scope of Work). This offer is hereby accepted on this _ day ol'__ 12018. TOWN OF TIBURON DC ELECTRIC GROUP,INC. By: Randy Vignola Title: _ Project Manager/l.;stimator Page 1 of 1 DC Electric Group, Inc. 8023 Gravenstein Hwy S., Cotati,CA 94931 t: (707)992-0141 f: (888) 525-8419 Lic. H949934 DIR 01000003395 SBE 01748848 EXHIBIT NO. ELECTRIC C..._ -, L;P, October 11, 2018 Town of Tiburon Attn: Patrick Barnes Department of Public Works 1505 Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon, CA 94920 Job Name: Retrofit (33) 15OW HPS Lumec Deco Streetlights to LED. Job Location: All Lumec Deco Streetlights on Tiburon Blvd— Mar West to Mar West Mr. Barnes: We offer to perform the following work on our standard terms and conditions as follows: Remove and dispose of the HID internals from thirty-three (33) existing deco post top streetlights along Tiburon Blvd Between Mar West and Mar West. Furnish and install (33) Xtralight 105W LED (approx. 13,000 lumens) in the empty fixture housing. Connect to the streetlight circuit, energize and confirm operation. The LED retrofit kits will be furnished in the 4000 Kelvin color temperature range. The streetlights will continue to operate on existing controls. The new Xtralight LED retrofit kits come with a 1-year installation (labor) warranty and a 10-year manufacturer's limited warranty on the kits. Lead-time on the kits is 3-4 weeks from the date of order. TOTAL LABOR, MATERIALS&EQUIPMENT...$ 21,569.00 REBATES- $20 PER RETROFIT X 33 RETROFITS= ($660.00) TOYTAL PROEJCT COST (INCLUDING REBATES)...$20,909.00 The proposed price is valid for 90 days,permit and inspection fees are not included. The foregoing offer is hereby accepted this_ day of . 2018. TOWN OF TIBURON DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC. By: Randy A Vignola Jr. Title: Project Manager/Estimator Page 1 of 1 DC Electric Group, Inc. 8023 Gravenstein Hwy S., Cotati,CA 94931 t: (707) 992-0141 f: (888) 525-8419 Lic. #949934 DIR#1000003395 SBE #1748848 EXIiIBI T NO. �. TOWN OF TI13URON TMVIA Council Meeting 1505 Tiburon Boulevard October l 1, 2018 Tiburon, CA 94920 Agenda Item: Al -4 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Public Works Subject: Stewart Drive Intersection Reviewed By: BACKGROUND The crossing of Tiburon Blvd. at Stewart Drive has been a concern of residents since at least 1978. A chronology is attached as Exhibit 1. During discussions, engineers from both the Town and Caltrans noted that installing a signal at this location would potentially increase rear-end collisions. Further, Caltrans noted that a pedestrian crossing was not warranted at this location, as there is no record of a pedestrian ever having been involved in an accident at this crossing. Ultimately, the Town persuaded Caltrans to install a pedestrian crossing with partial funding from the Town. This project was completed around 2011. Since the project was completed many people believe that rear-end accidents have increased at this intersection. In a recent safety analysis of Tiburon intersections Parisi and Associates notes that the Stewart Drive/131 intersection does have greatest number of reported injury accidents of any intersection in Tiburon. However, the total number of reported accidents from 2013 to present is relatively low, totaling nine accidents with no fatalities or severe injuries. Based on continued concern over this intersection, Council provided funds for a traffic engineering study of the intersection in the FY2018/19 CIP. This staff report discusses the preliminary recommendations from that study, which is attached as Exhibit 2. ANALYSIS Has there been an increase in accidents since 2011? Staff questions whether there has been an increase in accidents at Stewart Drive since the installation of the crossing beacons. The following analysis is based on Police reports some of which may not have been significant enough to put into the Statewide hntegrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). TOWN OF TIBURON -- PAGE 1 OF v The project was constructed in 2011, there was construction that SUMInCr. so we can look at the years before 201 1 and after 2011 . Comparing the period (2008-2010) to the period (2012-2017) with change in accidents calculated as (x-y)/x): 1. Before 2011, Trestle Glen was #1 accident area. After. Stewart is #1 accident area. 2. But that is in part because Trestle Glen accidents dropped by 50% - in half. 3. Town wide accidents dropped by 10% during this time period. But this was largely due to the drop at Trestle Glen. Omitting both Stewart Drive and Trestle Glen the accident rate Town wide went up 4%. 4. Stewart drive increased by 13%. 5. If you take the 3 _years from 2015-17 and compare them to the three years from 2008- 2010, the accident rate at Stewart decreased by 27%. 6. Comparing the period (2008-2010) to the period (2012-2017), the accident rate at Lyford doubled. Both in percentage and absolute numbers the increase at Lyford is greater than at Stewart. This indicates a certain level of variability in the system not attributable to the new crossing. Based on this, we cannot be certain that the new crossing signal actually resulted in increased accidents. Wliat might be causing the accidents? The Stewart Drive intersection has a limited sight distance. The sight d-istance from the west is about 260 feet and is limited by a vertical curve, a hill. There is a debate whether this is a sufficient sight distance. At the posted speed limit, the sight distance is not sufficient. However, there is a speed warning sign on the hill due to the curves and limited sight distance. This speed warning sign is for 30 mph, and at that speed the sight distance is sufficient. Accidents reports to SWITRS from January 2013 to mid-2018 are shown on Sheet P-2 of Exhibit 2. This indicates there were nine total accidents during this period. Two of these seem to have occurred at one time, perhaps when a driver westbound saw an accident in the eastbound direction and was distracted and hit a parked car. We might treat this as one accident. Regardless, the vast majority (2/3 to 3/4) of the reported accidents occur on weekends. This may indicate the accidents are visitors to Tiburon who are not familiar with the roadway or the intersection and are caught by surprise by a car stopped for a pedestrian. Parisi also noted in their study that there is a collection of signs along this stretch of roadway that may distract drivers from looking at the road. In addition. there is a pod view of Richardson ZD Bay in this area which may also distract drivers. What are possible solutions? We have noted three potential problems above. 1. People may not be travelling at the recommended speed of 30 mph around the curves 2. Drivers may be distracted by signs or views 3. Drivers may not be farniliar with the intersection TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 4 Recommendations for the intersection respond to these potential problems. The least costly and simplest solution includes: 1. Light the 30-mph warning sign with a flashing light. 2. Remove unnecessary signs 3. Change overhead lights to rapid flashing beacons 4. Eliminate in pavement lights (due to the vertical curve these are not visible where they are needed) 5. Add an advance rapid flashing beacon that is tied to the overhead rapid flashing beacons Staff believes implementing these measures, particularly item 5, may help reduce accidents at this intersection. As noted by staff before we installed the crossing at Ned's Way, rapid flashing beacons have a high compliance rate. The advance beacon will help alert motorists ahead of the intersection. The cost estimate for this system is $166,000. A more advanced, and more costly solution would involve installing a HAWK beacon rather than the rapid flashing beacons at the crossing. A HAWK signal is essentially a stop light that is pedestrian activated. With this there would be a yellow light, then a full red stop light and a pedestrian flashing head. It is uncertain what affect the full stop might have on the traffic flow between Rock Hill and Trestle Glen, but staff notes it would only be activated by pedestrians. The estimated cost for this system is $365,000. Staff notes the accident rate for Stewart Drive relatively low. There have been multiple studies in the past that have shown that no crossing signal is warranted at this location. Caltrans installed the current crossing in 2011 only after repeated requests from the Town, and with significant financial assistance from the Town. Regarding funding from Caltrans, it is useful to compare this project to Ned's Way. In April 2014, Caltrans stated that the crossing at Ned's Way, unlike the crossing at Stewart, met warrants for an enhanced pedestrian crossing. Later that year the second pedestrian in a year was struck and severely injured at that crosswalk. We asked Caltrans when they could get the enhanced crossing completed and were told that the earliest was ''018/19, "pending available resources and allocation of future funding." Based on this, the Town chose to fund the project, which was completed in 2015. Recently, due to maintenance problems with the existing in-pavement flashing lights at Stewart, staff suggested replacing the in-ground system with rapid flashing beacons on poles, which would be a portion of the recommended system. Caltrans responded as follows: • The in-roadway warning lights (IRWLs) were installed by Caltrans and we (Caltrans) are responsible for their maintenance. • Like similar systems elsewhere, these IRWLs create maintenance hassles and Office of Traffic Safety will replace them by either Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) or Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHB) wherever possible. This may take several years to program such a project especially there are many other locations throughout the Bay Area that have more urgent need. TOWN OF T IBURON PAGE 3 OF 4 • In tha in?antm7e_ 1?%e I:avC' Ilo ChO1C: but to nIamtam ill ';;;. lT,`.vever. we would welcome the Town of Tiburon's help to upgrade the system to RRFB through an encroachment permit. The good news is that eventually Caltrans will replace this system with a portion of the recommended RFB system above. The ']'own may be able to work with them at that time to get some of the other enhancements recommended. I lowever. it is likely that Caltrans will take several years to do this work. Staff believes that Caltrans is unlikely to prioritize this intersection over other priorities because: 1. They have already expended funds less than a decade earlier 2. There is no warrant for such a crossing at this intersection 3. There has never been a pedestrian hit at this intersection Staff could look for grants as we did for the Ned-s Way and Blackfield intersection projects, but we are not confident that the fact pattern above will allow us to be competitive. Therefore, if Council would like to pursue this project; Council should assume at the outset that the cost will be borne by the Town. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council: 1. Hear the staff report, discuss the findings and provide direction to staff. Exhibits: I. Stewart Drive Chronology 2. Stewart Drive Conceptual Plan from Parisi and Associates Prepared by: Patrick Barnes, Director of Public Works TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 4 OF 4 Stewart Drive Chronology 1971 - City of Tiburon requested CALTRANS to construct realignment of Route 131 near Trestle Glen Boulevard 1977-03-23 EIR Caltrans: • Proposed project area: 0.6 mile segment from 4 lane road from Reed Ranch Road to easterly of Stewart Drive. Would solve traffic congestion at Trestle Glen, reduce curves and grade problems and increase safety throughout the segment including Stewart Drive. • Existing road: o Sharp curve and steep grades.. contribute to a high accident rate o Speed limit 35 mph and warning signs of 25 mph due to curve. 1978-03-27 Council Motion: That the City of Tiburon advise CAL/TRANS officials in San Francisco that the City does not wish to proceed with the BC Realignment Plan; and that the City would like to meet with CAL/TRANS representatives from both San Francisco and Sacramento, along with our legislators, to request a road design substantially within the alignment of Tiburon Boulevard as currently exists between Reed Ranch Road and Stewart Drive; and to present Plan n- 2A, illustrative only of what the community desires in the way of an acceptable solution; and further, that the EIS processing be suspended until such a meeting is held." 1978-10-18 Council minutes: CAL/TRANS still is not convinced that improvements in the Stewart Drive intersection vicinity are cost effective, and a recent warrant study indicates signalization is not warranted at this intersection. 1978-09-06 Council meeting minutes: CAL/TRANS will proceed with a signal study at Stewart Drive during the week after school begins. 1986-08-01 letter from Caltrans: • A 1985 study indicated one signal warrant was met • Accident rates provided. Rate = 0.15. Expected = 0.26 • "Since the installation of traffic signals may increase certain types of collisions especially the rear-end type and increase delay, the decision to install signals is not based solely upon traffic signal warrants but other factors are also considered. Therefore, although an intersection may meet signal warrants, we would not install or approved traffic signals if the installation of signals would result in an increase in accidents." 1993-05-17 letter from Stan Bala, Town engineer: • In 1980 the following improvements to Stewart/131 intersection were recommended and adopted: EXHIBIT NO. o Upgrade intersection including correction of sight distance. This is complete. o Signalize intersection. Permit from Caltrans was denied due to lack of warrants o Bus stop. Financing was secured but project abandoned after public hearings. • My concerns differ from those of CALTRANS. It appears to me that there is an insufficient stopping sight distance for cars on Tiburon Boulevard approaching Stewart Drive from Trestle Glen. This is because of the vertical sharp curve. Consequently, traffic signals may cause rear end collisions for cars approaching from Trestle Glen. The f 1 correction of this vertical curve would be very difficult and costly. The traffic signals would resolve the Stewart Drive problem, but it would add to the existing congestion on Tiburon Boulevard, in both directions. • To my knowledge, there have been no accidents at the Stewart Drive Intersection 1994-06-21 memo re meeting with Caltrans: • Line of sight from Stewart to the west is within legal limits • Traffic signal would be very expensive and require warrants o According to Stan Bala (Town Engineer) and Caltrans "Traffic signals could also have a detrimental effect as they could cause cars to stack up on Tiburon Blvd., thus, elevating the problem of r ear-end accidl-nt " U. ��,u�„��. 1995-08-15 letter from Assembly Member Kerry Mazzoni to Reed Heights/Tiburon Knolls HOA: • Town is aware of concerns • Intersection does not meet warrants for a signal • "The truly workable solution would seem to be restructuring and regrading the embankment" to improve visibility. This would be very expensive and unlikely to be funded. 1996-06-11: Letter from Caltrans noting that a signal is not warranted and therefore would not be prioritized for funding by Caltrans, but given sight distance problems, Caltrans would agree to have the Town install a signal at Town's expense. 1997-05-21: Letter from Reed Heights/Tiburon Knolls HOA Traffic Chair commenting on a proposal to signalize the Stewart Drive/131 intersection. Letter notes, "we have been requesting relief in resolving this problem for over ten years". 1999-Tree removal along Tiburon Blvd to increase sight distance. 1999-12-22 Caltrans Itr: • The signal warrants study indicates that none of the warrants is met. • Regarding the Minimum Pedestrian Volume Warrant, one of the requirements is that 100 pedestrians or more crossing the major street for each of any four hours; or 190 or more during any one hour. However, per our observation there were a total of 67 pedestrians crossing Tiburon Boulevard at this intersection during the 12-hour period from 6:30 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. The highest pedestrian volume was only 12 between 3:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. 2001-04-25: Tiburon Blvd Traffic Operation Report treats Stewart Drive as if it was going to have a signal. Study notes: • Korve Engineering Study showed signal warrants were not met but concluded that due to limited sight distance and difficulty exiting Stewart for a left turn, the Town should consider the installation of a signal. • Stewart left turn merge lane was short but as long as could be accommodated given geometry of road 2001-05-29 Korve Traffic Signal Study: • 11 warrants for a signal looked at. None were met • approximately 200-250 feet of sight distance is available to the west for a stopped vehicle on Stewart Drive waiting to turn onto Tiburon Boulevard. • According to Table 405.1 A of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, a minimum corner sight distance of 440 feet is needed for a design speed of 40 miles per hour (Tiburon Boulevard). 2001-06-04 Staff Report: • In August 1999, the Town Council requested that Caltrans remove numerous trees in the vicinity of the intersection to improve pedestrian and vehicular safety. The work was completed later that year. • Late in 1999, Caltrans also conducted a "warrants" review to determine if the intersection qualified for a traffic signal. Caltrans uses eleven (11) different warrants, or criteria, to determine whether an intersection should be signalized. The Caltrans review concluded that no warrants were met. • in 2000, the Town Council authorized a traffic study to independently assess the signal warrant situation. • The study, prepared by Korve Engineering, concludes that none of the Caltrans warrants are met. • For the most part, the intersection was not close to meeting any of the warrants. • Nor does it appear likely that the intersection would meet any of the warrants in the foreseeable future. 2002-02-06: Memo to Council discusses recommendations by the Traffic Safety Committee and notes toward the end the possibility of future consideration of a traffic signal at Stewart and Tiburon Blvd. 2003-04 SWITRS data indicates no injury accidents over 5 years at this intersection from any direction. 2004-03-24: letter to Caltrans from Town notes: • Stewart crossing remains a concern based on the poor sight distance for eastbound motorists approaching the intersection, lack of a traffic signal, and lack of street lighting. • The concept of a traffic signal has been studied at this location; it does not meet Caltrans warrants. • Some recommendations had been completed but the need for lighting and advance flashing warning device(s) remained 2004-04-14: application for MTC's 2004 Traffic Engineering Technical Assistance Program (TETAP) notes uncontrolled crossings of Tiburon Blvd are a problem that needs to be looked at. The list included Stewart Drive. 2004-09-08: proposal from Kimley Horn for traffic study focusing on area around Reed Ranch (this indicates that the TETAP study was not funded). The proposal did not include work at Stewart Drive. 2004-11-19 letter from Caltrans: • There is an existing curve warning sign with an advisory speed of 30 mph for eastbound Route 131 traffic approaching the curve just before Stewart Drive. The existing sight distance for eastbound traffic approaching the crosswalk at Stewart Drive is 240 feet, which is sufficient for a vehicle traveling at 34 mph to stop. There is also an advance pedestrian warning sign (W54A) for eastbound traffic approaching Stewart Drive. • Accident history for this intersection shows that there have been no accidents involving pedestrians for the last five years and all vehicular accidents happened during the daytime. • In December 1999, the Department performed a signal warrants study that indicated that none of the warrants was satisfied. • On October 9, 2004, the Department installed a flashing beacon at the location of the eastbound advance pedestrian warning sign (W54A) to alert motorists about the presence of the crosswalk. • Your letter also mentioned warning devices such as flashing LED's embedded in the pavement or illuminated warning signs. This location does not meet the required criteria for installation of such device (reference: Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices). 2007-03-22: letter received from Caltrans agreeing to the project with partial funding from the Town. 2007-04-07: A memo to Council notes that: • since a 2001 traffic circulation study was conducted for Tiburon Blvd, the intersection of Tiburon Blvd and Stewart Drive has been identified as an opportunity for traffic and pedestrian safety improvement. • because the intersection does not meet certain traffic safety warrants and thresholds, it has been difficult to get Caltrans to take action • after a recent meeting with Caltrans and its senior staff, Caltrans has chosen to re- prioritize this improvement project with 1/3 funding coming from the Town. 2007-04-12: Letter to Caltrans committing the Town to help fund the project. 2007-05-25: e-mail from Caltrans states that the design includes "overhead flashing beacons" in conjunction with pedestrian activated in-roadway warning lights and ladder markings at the crosswalk per their 3/22/07 letter. 2011-01-25: Plans are completed. 2011-07-13: Change orders indicate the project is being constructed. 2014: Crossing Guard data indicates that about 24 total students are using this during the school commute, counting both morning and afternoon crossings. 2018/03: Crossing Guard data indicates that about 34 total students are using this during the school commute, counting both morning and afternoon crossings. Maximum hour crossing is 33. 2018/03 Berkley TIMS data indicates from 2011 through 2016 there were five accidents at this intersection were a victim report a "complaint of pain" but no visible injuries. These occurred in 2012 (1), 2013 (1), 2014 (2) and 2016 (1). All but one of these occurred within 100 feet of the intersection. Two involved motorcycles. None involved pedestrians. From Jan 2005 through the end of 2010 the number of accidents with reported a victim report a "complaint of pain" was six. 2018-03-12: County-wide Systemic Safety Analysis Research initial meeting with Parisi. They note that in Tiburon Stewart and 131 has the greatest number of reported injury accidents of any intersection in Tiburon. To: Patrick Barnes, Town of Tiburon From: David Parisi and Ramin Nikoui, Parisi Transportation Consulting Date: September 14, 2018 Subject: Route 131 (Tiburon Boulevard) & Stewart Drive Safety Enhancements Parisi Transportation Consulting (Parisi) performed an audit at the intersection of Tiburon Boulevard and Stewart Drive to assess existing conditions (infrastructure, past collisions, and sight distance) and to provide short-term and long-term recommendations that may address some of the potential hazards. This memorandum details existing conditions and potential measures that can be taken to enhance safety at and near the intersection of Tiburon Boulevard and Stewart Drive. The full plan set of recommended safet;/ enhancements, inCliuding the estimates, Can he found in Ar,r enclix `NN`" A. FIELD REVIEW Parisi staff visited Tiburon Boulevard and Stewart Drive on July 6, 2018 to perform a safety audit and observe the existing conditions of the intersection. Existing traffic control devices and motorist and pedestrian behav!or and operations were observed. The existing stopping sight distances were also measured in the field. Parisi staff observed the following conditions during the audit,which are further illustrated in Figures 1 and 2: • There is an existing 40-mph posted speed limit on Tiburon Boulevard. In the eastbound direction in advance of Stewart Drive there is a 30-mph advisory speed assembly. • Eastbound Tibu!on Boulevard has an advance yellow flashing beacon paired with a "Pedestrian Crossing" sign. The flashing beacons are always flashing and are not synchronized wi?h the pedestrian activated beacons at the intersection.Thus, they appear to be largely ignored by most motorists. • Existing sign pollution as well as scenic views of the bay may distract eastbound motorists as they approach the intersection of Stewart Drive. • The horizontal and vertical curvature of Tiburon Boulevard limits sight distance towards the pedestrian crossing at Stewart Drive. There is roughly 260 feet of existing stopping sight distance. The vertical curvature of Tiburon Boulevard visually obstructs the crosswalk EXHIBIT NO. markings and in-roadway lights for eastbound motorists until roughly 125 feet upstream of the crossing. • Existing overgrown landscaping limits sight distance and needs to be removed or trimmed and maintained. • During pedestrian actuations of the yellow flashing beacons, it was observed that many motorists within the required stopping sight distance zone did not know where to stop or if they should stop due to the fear of being rear-ended. �Yy iuJ rr L•,,.. ,iA� ^'C P n'ti uti ....,,.� ti�S`r.f'+ wXTR, W,1RN\0 SojfS ANO SAY VJ-z: 34AY C.STRAC 08fV':.,'Z.. CROSS` ...< :v.e J—. EAST) w Y At PRELIMINARY REVIVONb ,.. . TOWN OF TIBURON - ROUTE 139&STEVJART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - -- - ... EXISTING CONDITIONS EC-1 5 OF 11 Figure 1: Existing Conditions at Tiburon Boulevard and Stewart Drive eptembc-,r 2018 �£ ,,��.,cad o- :"v"4 s ✓ � �91,�g� a ea � gs�� �r �- p S`�., ` "� say :,;�.. r. k ✓ n ✓ /,��,�`"`":,. b � � t f �`sr;� �-nr ,,sv� .�gid '^vy �X � � ��"'`�✓������'d��� ".�r} � •.�� /� ivy.} ,��v^_ � 3°'�,r� Y) yp r d ��a 7y, �°' ��3'.°?�S k�' vd�w.z.� � �f � £��fig•�,aa„-a C'�r Y"LIMV 3EAOON', A:^ k. te5= o rS :;S St � c u t' y( � v < t15 :., 'K NG 'V1,� j .O, {7 .>�i3��:u tr,.S;, A,E *,C" aW r r. rta�v • s : �' e9 rs� x�,�,si �r f� r v �: ? .'�3XN, PRELIMINARY REVISIONS ..w �.... TOWN OF TIBllRON , NEI• ('Yx' e4 •.:. �..�.._.__.. ROUTE 131&STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS - - .. _. EXISTING CONDITIONS EC-2 6 OF 11 Figure 2: Existing Conditions at Tiburon Boulevard and Stewart Drive September 2018 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING SPEEDS AND STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE Parisi staff took 150 independent speed measurements during the off-peak period. These measurements have been recorded and are shown in Figure 3 below. The speeds range from 28 mph to 44 mph. Figure s: Observed Speeds for Eastbound Tiburon Boulevard 45 44 1 43 1 42 2 41 4 40 2 39 g a 38 1 5 E 37 ' 18 a 36 13 v 35 19 a 34 15 a 33 17 32 18 v 31 11 .a 30 11 0 29 3 28 2 27 26 25 Of the 150 speeds, the 85'" percentile speed is 38 mph which is within the 40-mph posted speed imit. According to the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, 300 feet of stopping sight distance is required at a design speed of 40 mph. While measuring the stopping sight distance in the field, "arisi staff determined that the existing stopping sight distance is 260 feet. The sight distance is nainly limited due to the geometry of the roadway. COLLISION ANALYSIS �'arisi staff performed a collision analysis for the intersection of Tiburon Boulevard and Stewart Drive. Collision data was obtained from the Internet Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System SWITRS) and UC Berkeley's Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) for 2013 to 2018. During -his period, nine collisions were reported. Of these, seven were rear-end collisions and one eptember 2018 Page s involved a pedestrian. Figure 4 shows the distribution of collisions for each day of the week during this period. Figure 4: Collision Distribution by Day of Week 3 V!� ! l 1} ' I j .. £ £ y It is apparent that the majority of the collisions occurred during the weekend. This implies the possibility that the parties involved are not locals or commuters but rather represent a population that are not familiar with the area and the existing conditions near this intersection.Thus, measures to increase awareness in advance of the intersection for those not familiar with this corridor may help reduce the potential and frequency of collisions. September 2n18 Page 6 POTENTIAL SAFETY ENHANCEtAENTS SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE TOOLKIT The Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon's (RRFB) use LED flashing lights in combination with pedestrian � r - warning signs to create a high-visibility strobe-like warning to drivers when pedestrians are in the crosswalk.They have been shown to be more effective than standard yellow flashing beacons and haveqf : shown to increase compliance of yielding. Installing synchronized upstream RRFB's warn motorists in advance that a pedestrian is crossing which may reduce the occurrence of sudden braking. � Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (HAWK) consist of two red lenses above a single yellow lens. The lenses remain "dark" until a pedestrian pushes the call button to activate the beacon.The signal initiates a yellow to red lighting sequence consisting of steady and flashing s f lights that direct motorists to slow and come to a stop. The pedestrian signal then flashes a WALK display to the pedestrian. Once the pedestrian has safely crossed, the hybrid beacon again goes dark. f. l � I-ly hrld beacons, hC`.NeV�r may require ins tallatlOn Of new signal mast arm poles and are a more expensive and longer-term solution. September 2018 page 7 Yield lines provide motorists with an indication of where : they should stop to yield to crossing pedestrians and z cyclists.Their presence allows motorists to better gauge whether or not they can stop in time, which may : reduce sudden braking and thus can lead to a reduction in rear-end collisions. a, Radar Feedback Signs (RFS) provide motorists with real- i time visual confirmation of their current travel speeds. These RFS signs may be used with speed limit signs but may also be used with advisory speed signs so that motorists can adjust their speeds to what is 1201 recommended for the existing roadway conditions. Untrimmed and unmaintained landscaping can x visually obstruct sight lines and reduce the existing : stopping sight distance. Because shrubbery grows back over time, some considerations should be given to complete removal of certain landscaping elements. Septer ber20?8 Fage 8 SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATION The short-term concept plan and preliminary cost estimate can be found in Appendix A of this report. The short-term recommendations include some of the following from the above toolkit: • Installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons • Installation of advance Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons • Relocation of southern pedestrian push button assembly post • Striping yield lines • Trimming/removal of obstructive landscaping LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATION The long-term concept plan and preliminary cost estimate can be found in Appendix A of this report. The long-term recommendations include the following from the above toolkit: • Installation of new signal mast arm poles • Installation of Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons • Installation of advance yellow flashing beacons coordinated with the proposed HAWK at the intersection • Relocation of southern pedestrian push button assembly post • Striping stop lines for Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons • Trimming/removal of obstructive landscaping NEXT STEPS Parisi staff assessed the existing conditions at the intersection of Tiburon Boulevard and Stewart Drive and provided a short-term and long-term conceptual plan set and cost estimate. The next steps, which include Caltrans coordination and review processes, involve the development of a detailed engineering design plan, the compilation of front-matter and technical specifications, and engineers cost estimate in preparation for Notice Inviting Bids. September 20 118 Pooe 9 APPENDIX A TOWN OF TIBURON ROUTE 131 & STEWART DRIVE SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS SEPTEMBER 2018 INDEX OF SHEETS OREGON CALIFORNIA } ! r SHEET DRAWING DESCRIPTION � t t � t T-1 TITLE SHEET r a 2P-1 EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ' t + PROJECT �� ���� ;; ' ( `i ` _ 3 P-2 COLLISION DIAGRAM SITE T ' 11 ,ii� r I {�ti + 1 (` )I 4 ��' 4 P-3 EXISTING SIGHT DISTANCE IBURON — ` � s ` k\ ,�D7c z} } �i r it'_ '� 5 EC-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 'A0 q� etc 6 EC-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS T� 0R9 '� BI fir' �, ''� �t �' � ;ry f 9 �la 'j 1- 7 C-1 CONCEPTUAL PLAN — SHORT TERM On ""A�� 1 I i t Si,,rl �� ���-� ' 8 C-2 CONCEPTUAL PLAN — LONG TERM a 9 CD-1 SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 10 CD-2 LONG TERM CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ROUTE 131 & ; 11 E-1 CONCEPTUAL PLAN ESTIMATES STEWART DR fr mi v i lirl ;1ti{1 4 .. fllj' f/ 4 A t / LOCATION MAP PROJECT SITE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE PRELIMINARY 0 1750 Bndgeway, I' Suite 8208 REVISIONS D" 1 8 9/07/18 NTS Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TI B U RO N RTD RRDADi ND. w ® TRhNSPORTATION[ONSUITIN6 (415)649-6000 18041ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 6 DRA%ND DRAWN: OHEC . RN DP Q T-1 TITLE SHEET Q SXEfi NO. DE9CNED: - APPROKD: RN DP N0. DESCRIPTION 1 OF 11 x r; x„ s � �.. S V n d.> R€, Am >w R r r - ' OsIA y n, z ,t mss; VIR Aimv » f: , t „, ": .-i ....mss , 4?`....a. R�, ,i•'C >\„ >.",X;„v u:„T.. ,.,r..a,:s?FaJ ..r 'Y,v� ^.s k'. ..v. c -. ., :..,> n .� s= -rv'+. ....:,, �,•§R,,:: R:., ,f :: c. ,.,...,...., ✓!, §... , :..n ,. "2. „'tkr,, , 4A ...,:.�, _..,...,,. ,-2,: s I. - � ,." .- . 9 :. ,... ., :. ,. .r3e xx: ., u"5 „Z,'', x -r.>• ` e a > �+.s- k ., +.e. t:,. ,,.»- 'G> a, ' e ,--r, ,..a , . „> s s•x n� If -�c.–� Vii:: �>..-w. Y" a Qe ; „ r a .,� r .... „ .,'... ?� .5{� v, ,. r < ..� ,. `.,a'„ 2:: w sr END x �a a ..,�E k d"::,y_ ti. •:<-. :... X rl"v,e ,. .. :. �,., ',. m .. $, _ ;5 ..<', r „ „: s f s , t v ., ,t, ..::EXISTING#W11. ir ",< IGN M . -.. r z, »;. l. EXISTING,WtI 2.:SIGN WITH > � � ,r� ...,, ,�,x ��� - x a YELLOW PUSHING BEACONS IN . 2 , EASTBOUN DIRECTION N ROUTE 131 (TIBURON BLVD) — EXISTING W1 1-2 EXISTING R2-1 N x (40 MPH) SIGN EXISTING Il 2' IGN EXISTING W11-2: : M ,. - ' ".,. 't-m;duv:•Hw+'uw/m>XS^`H„w+a,m;<�.?. .e n:.F ,,..Jy v,,> ... <,v.^ - .:: ,-5»i:, J" ern W2-2 SIGN �i ,:'.v, -, ., •i,.:. ":: ~3. EXISTING, , s, b+ Y u. n n + u BUSSTO P EXISTING G7-1 do : EXISTING W16-7P >" G33-1"SIGN >x. PLAQUE a 'g, MCKEGNEY FIELD LOOP TRAIL r f P a� i\ of � { N< L w,r»<,. ::fid• k �, 5 `l r 711 r � . ia PRELIMINARY REVISIONS ,E ISCACE � 1750 Bndgeway,Suite 6208 DA 9/07/18 1"=30' Sausalito,CA 94965 PTC P—CT (415)649-6000 TOWNOF TI B U RO N No. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING 16041 DRA NG ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 6 DRAwN: RN aiEC!(ED: DP Q _ OESICNED: -1 VED APPRO : EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE .11T N0. RN DP NQ 0. DESCRIPTION 2 OF 11 - 144 Wit,. c.. ' na` ,,.,, ,r.El:: ryry ,. ... ,... .u...F. ,_ 'R -., .a. �n,3�,:>,w:., •, ^ ,.„ , s .,s'�`, :z A,.a,a�. , ,. :. .,', }` _ ?a-r-,&n yr f r ,:, ., .e..,,. + .,.- Y '.>r« .. :v: -::t. > :, , r? Y'... ,... ,�. „ .. ..S„.,wx. .,.,„z` Y :..::+,e ::a :: e+r .. 'h ,..,. ,J7� n v ,. , >. ""a :....,.,, e s,... , s,:,,.,. ,,a1,., r : ..,: .., � �.a ,.. . _ .....- .. .;�^ �. v, �,. :. _ y�.c <�<.._ ..r. .,`�c'.rr. �a, ,.... x Lax ��:, 1 ,f .. x ., , nU ' Fg >� ." tg x x �'"' .,. r .. y :t ., t; :> . v ry € , ,. T , , r�, ,s 'x' 4F. ,'x, ,, ;��" 4 ,yrs a :.? a €sk,>k,� .. '.,.>.:... r: .i v .< I . .,v:.a^.?✓:;. + .,va, ,`,, �, .,...t^,., _ s , an.(, ,. cv,: � <r n .w- �. a -, ,� .,.. au 3 ... ... ..� ,_,. a :.,>3-�„;tea a. PED F , ,.. «. a , n : q : > x " . > ; a ROUTE 131 (TIBURON BLVD) SUN 3/5/17, 11:36 PARWLVEHICLE SAT 10/25/1,4, 12.48 FRI 9/18/15, 13.21 k' �s SUN 8/18/13, 11,:27 SUN 3/4/18, 9.26 SqT, 10/04/14 i2. 5/25/13, ffir24 —�� r-O--� -i.-0— y—ll WED x/25/14 _15 10 , .u, 4 „f X19 .xq < r >•Y, y, X k rmgg k / 'v's n „ h 4 , � L �I�QKEGNEY FIELD LOOP TRAIL f F N „Ae x . t sa n' r E,< -«5 �fm n 3 unm „ 4 } 3 3 U w C3 w 2 2 1 T-- PRELIMINARY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY °" r 1750 Bridgeway,Suite B208 REVISIONS 9/07/18 NTS Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TIBURON a 1111-ITNo, (415)6496000 ---- 18041 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING ® oaevnxc ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 6 P-2 °anmc caeo: Q _ .p°"`°` RN ccH^° M DP COLLISION DIAGRAM, 2013-2018 Al ~EE N0. DESCRIPTION 3 OF 11 z z t , z � a �s R : D, s 0 1,w <,.ini.'. 1k. .,rn'", .a..r.:,: . .... ..:. •..Y ;. z r ...5.:.{S' _ n �r5x:5.,., ' ..:�.,.> .,;~-<. � ,'>„o ••bF e -, RG _ r=r = iNl A a c05 , 1' . tr „ ,. ., r .^:"< .:.�:-,. .i...aN•=` z � •- „: > qq�=,,Y _..... a t Hfr�fe,,yy., � ....., wrw, nn��,, -:. ...-:.: a'a,,. '...,M,. 3.. ,. .: ,..m x. ..,.n,c s,J,...•.y. ,, a...., :. d ..,., ,..,: , ::r..,: . r ».,....aa , -.,,< s � ..,, <; ,.. . � .. � ,.. ...�,, :. ...-cis .. ..,., aT . _, 5 f v ry r� F f:: � �, S � t, ...r=., _-.. , �e;�.. .... y_• � wr < .�"x n,:, :b.<�:. >, °� 'ra•;r '•!• s �;', .:,> >c.. � ,. , .,, .. �., n.a ,,.,, .� ,ats:Y. u. �/ �C �.,k- ,.-.:un ,. .. .,,: fir . .k .,�. .<a,a,`5 ....�,. .: _ , .. < <..'. `.,w _. , NY-C, <,f ,.:vim a `4 =au vi s %, my 4. '�' �_ ..<... .,,>. ,,,.r.,.. ami. ,:.;s, ,•?.. 3.>. ,.v ... ., & ,`.rcFs s .,,. h-, ., 7i"' , ....... :1 .. ,� v. ,.. `,. i2}a,#:., -ggs;�y l L £ v< 9 :... . .#.,,, ,. >.w.. ,_... rv,Zx-:... az+M„n., t• �4 .. .": .. 5 ,.., ., t"i ,t.Ys' �^ .-. - .v<.. a., ., , ....>:. ,,. .z;. ,.. , a.< _fin v i r y « : ROUTE 131 (TIBURON BLVD) xi STOPPING SIGHT'DISTANCE TOWARDS PEDESTR CROSSIANS STAGED, SOUTH OF THE ING IS U Y VERTICAL CURVA 260' TURE OF;#2flADlNA�! SEE (HIBIT -A- .a.^.^ .. ,..r ca ti fig' � x c r�a �v �,• ;t''e'Fl, P• �`r iy 260' STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE 5z.� t z t F yzt s s # , P>*�w GKEGNEY FIELD, LOOP TRAIL AiR 25,"-. �. . r ' A , r m> fie., � r, o R' Fa i�`:<..,w.;S "". }Y. i 0 tR�v ,s-T '�s.��k� �� `�'Z*,` � ziY �,`2�.,��'•� rY2rj$i IN If 45 EXISTING CONDITIONS - SPEEDS a 44 17L �,� 43 i �� A ERAGE SPEED: 35 MPH � '� 42 2 4 85th PERCENTILE: 38 MPH EXHIBIT "A" 39 z EXISTING POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH V) s a 3' 10 REQUIRED STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE (40 MPH): 300 FT Li 36 N 35 19 p -14 $5 33 17 32 1x v 31 11 m 30 11 0 29 'a zs z 27 26 j PRELIMINARY z� REVISIONS °" p' 1750 Bridgeway,Suite 8208 9/07/18 V.=30' Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TIBURON 6 _ ...PR-- TRANSPORTATION(ON iULTIN6 `4'5'6496°°° 18041 ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS °RANK: RN ateaceo: DP oa"vnRc o °escsen: RN "°RR°'�°: DP EXISTING SIGHT DISTANCE —T— P-3 NO. DESCRIPTION 4 OF 11 z _ ; Y, .i ti r . 3 , ADVANCE WARNING BEACON CONTINUOUSLY FLASHING EXTRA WARNING SIGNS AND BAY VIEW MAY DISTRACT DRIVERS CROSSWALK NOT FULLY VISIBLE IN THE EASTBOUND DIRECTION (LOOKING EAST) (LOOKING EAST) (LOOKING EAST) ? h .? f r YY ,�Y>;.:, .: .x, ; w k (p� ��Iti� t�+I Vi i' Ilil l{V•II a 2 a y , f z I K Y VERTICAL CURVE OF ROADWAY LIMITS SIGHT DISTANCE CROSSWALK CONNECTS TO MCKEGNEY FIELD LOOP TRAIL CROSSWALK CONNECTS TO BUS STOP (LOOKING WEST) (LOOKING WEST) (LOOKING EAST) PRELIMINARY ! REVISIONS Dp9/07/18 scA�NTS 1750 lito,CA94Suite8208 TOWN OF TIBURON Sausalito,CA 94965 8 O ® PTC PROJECT N0. (415)649-6000 -- 18041 TRANSPORTATION(ONSUCTING ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS DR— cNEncEo: —..— EC-1 RN DP EXISTING CONDITIONS OE9CNED: APPROVED: Q _— S4EET N0. RN DP5 OF 11 NO. DESCRIPTION v , s, a f fk !I YELLOW BEACONS INSTALLED ON MAST ARM POLES SHRUBBERY LIMITS SIGHT DISTANCE FADED CROSSWALK STRIPING AND IN—ROADWAY LIGHTS (LOOKING WEST) (LOOKING WEST) ARE NOT VISIBLE IN THE EASTBOUND DIRECTION (LOOKING EAST) n, rx,. I max. r ; T a r 5 i t ti r SHRUBS AND TREES MAY LIMIT SIGHT DISTANCE OVERHANGING TREES LIMIT SIGHT LINES IF NOT MAINTAINED BUSES PULLED INTO THE BUS STOP MAY BLOCK SIGHT LINES TOWARDS PEDESTRIANS AT THE CORNER (LOOKING EAST) (LOOKING WEST) (LOOKING WEST) PRELIMINARY 1750 Bridgeway,Suite 6208REVISIONS .11107/18SCANTS Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TIBURON e PMPR CT NO. TRANSPORTATIONCONSUITING "'5'6496°°°RN ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 18041 oxavm: cxecxEo: ocax,xc EXISTING CONDITIONS .111 NO. RN DP -0- RN DP NO. DESCRIPTION (�V OF 11 -- " a jt, �e s a I sE 3 I DR 3111, ,� A F x S, 5 "s i , a V I a NIA � � r ., > , r , h ..__ _ s s, io ,..:. ..-2. x). :,.. ., ,r .,.,.;.. ,a", + r . _': ., � .x„s rr` ��f�,,�� ' - �,.. „ .x x., r s , z a. .,. E ,.,..,.. ;.- .r..>t. ., , .,�:,.T�,:,`ar_..., ,.. �, a�. `r"��,.,.. ..,,<> :: .. »-.:.,,,... ...,tom x 'f .>. `= - :. ; ...-:, ,' „--::. «•« f""." <`,e.:: ., <9 x# i C z w;iss,x':,uun : .u., t' yAv. ::.,'.e, L. *5 .,,�� " .5 <_ ,,... 5 w.,< P'...,.. .. w ,v .. .r. ,.... •.y �", . - vn 3 •-v., r...., ..,.y v.`,i-, r...., y+v., v,.%...;•.: C,t, .ww , w ..j , J,,:=:,: �` .,: sn 3i' �„>x, s) 'x -'� ," :2 ..'..: .:.w,.. >. Y.,. v <,:s,, >. .,<�, , �, K^i ,.. -'„ .e.:. i .., .. ,. � .?.... � ani '::tis?;•k ,".,`�#. � �< e �,., > NTAIN TRIM �;� t � r, � MAINT AND .,. 3 AND_ ,µ , TR. w u 3 ,' IN „ Y, S BS r . ., ? s A ,< . TREE A EXIST) G. > VE SHRUB r , W,<e w ' MARKI t� s x ., MOYZ« ,> ..". 7` J 3r STRIPE *PED XING" PAVEMENT MnRKIN ROUTE 131 (TIBURON BLVD) I 250.0 ' 32,0 `'T.. REMOVE EXISTING W11-2'SIG N AN *< • FLASHING BEACONS FOR EASTBOUND �,-fes �.>. .. �,. TI O STI r I t�•�-'r..'„.,,..... :sa _ .. N'j ,. , t- {. - t.""a �a >�_:. ,.. r E XING" _ „ . .„ > . .. F F o MARKINGS Al > �^, E (± REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE-EXISTIN ADVISORY " x W2-2 SIGN AND POST ,,w, ., ,. SPEED SIGNS AND POST AND INSTALL ADVANCE RRFB ASSEM64Y. ,. x.:< ,. ,NSTALL' RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN SEE SHEET CD-1 SEE INSET A"' I;M SEE EE SHEET CD-2 ——————— S 1 , t„ x. +' ` � _ ;. �,: `a�> � sz ,.•, � =. � <::<��KEGNEY FIELD LOOP TRAIL _�..- REA�01/E� STING`W11� •� 7P`SIGN, x � - „,! ' > ., ry `z va r �Y ' L�1 •/ x , .h -e A ROUTE 131 (TIBURON BLVD) REFRESH HIGH—VISIBILITY LADDER CROSSWALK r 35.0 35.0 71 STRIPE YIELD LINE T REPLACE EXISTING FLASHING YELLOW BEACONS t YP) t' AND W112 SIGN ON MAST ARM WITH RRFB . , I ASSEMBLY (Typ). SEE SHEEP CD-1 µ'UPGRADE TO LED LUMINAIRE HEAD ?.��� , `� -SCF • I � = '�,�f�-€a �'�~�` wk„i Fr � "�„ . T RELOCATE USH BUTTON 1NSTA =5"1IE `HERE O 7717 T,0 PEDESTRIANS"'SIGN (Typ) � �' � � rh. I . 1 s ` ". REMGVE EXISTING INSTAdRRFB ASSEMBl x (TYp)• W18-S71P SIGN SEE SHE 'D-1 >� INSET "A" INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY SCALE: 1"=10' ® 1750 Bridgeway,Suite B208 REVISIONS °"TE 9/07/18 SEE E SHEET Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TIBURON A _ RTC PR CT NO. 1415,6496909 ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 18041 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING DRA�xNo DNA- CNECKEO: RN DP -1 CONCEPTUAL PLAN — SHORT TERM ENHANCEMENTS A SHEENe. DESIGNED: RN APPROVED: ■DP N0. DESCRIPTION TNOF 11 „s I d� i 'a s� g r4 .a „ '7� s >, �, > R :h >. „ S } *c y ) S. 4 ”, c,..: ,'tir ,> $ -¢h „ , w^?>'.nfc :, -e._ SF:: 3„`,+, ,v'"+` ^ ,., ,,:,z:„ N"v.",r xa .,. h ::. 'Il :., .; e y< 3, .z,t,. 'a. ., v R fi. �,.,,r , ... ,.... :;.., .... .., .._. :,,.. ate.-, ... w:t.. ._ .> ..„.. .�. ::<a ..... ..; >. kl ,:..... ., ,s .. ,ear: -. .+ ,,; :... ... .v, :,:ai?ai}<, w..,W.,- ..,,. , 9'. # .... �,. xl .. ., ...,.,.,.,. , ., .,.,.. .. x..a.J,,mss ':.v:ro,.c2,w ..... S, , ,r„` , "N-..:. , .-✓:...t:... ,z .. .$ nW- t. ., '.`• u'.`> n S ... §`.,v. aoft.> , ,', -St ...,.,.F.3.x l"rv.4r. _. t ,g .,:..$t.: :...,... c,.:ii ...,,..f.ck ,. ^>:k .ra*x .�. g 1 :.: :, ,`+`. y+' ,.r..,a. ag w,>, R„ ,.. y s >� <,_� �.. ._ � �a ;� .� �. :;: ,v - ,,., ;5 � �_\ < �, � sty x ».2. - u s „. _ x,v,',., �” �%f.z.., , r, �,.,��.`:....'.. ,�• , > k`.. ..,.,: n✓y _ ,.�`.w,� �: ,3 � .F >"-tom„ .. , , \c<•L,,,,... ... ...:. :a.:: x,>r>- G" l>�, C � ,:: en., Sa„`., a ?, Y,. .i;... +\E-'_.a ,� `,zi.,, `#,• :s Q ,a,. a z?rs:, > 7., - .T ' � l .: ._,, ,, ,.a' :? „ .... "~?e..x >#� , '� *.� .,.3 =i " 'v s -.. �^,. ,,,,.: t, -, ,�., ' t. x �, �, �.Q '✓� NTAIN TRI T' M ., , x < x 2 MAINT :AND ,n rTREw; AND' ., s+r= `�,� � ..r,,, _ „- a.,. � 4 bE �..,, SEER GING �.,ate E. �W .... >. -,, ,. ,r ,. , '' i ,1 x,�' w ',,.. ��` < �, �.� ...,. ^ � 3 � rr, �` � tet �-,`' ^� HA(} �ax _,_.,. � , ', .;. z� � � ��; OVE,EXISTING P e. a �> ,, , .. �.zwf �, >.. R VE SHRUB TREE <� ENT MARKT,. d �.^ : . .. ,� M , . D PQS7 � STRIPE PED XING" PAVEMENT,MARKT (TYP) " ROUTE 131 (TIBURON BLVD) `: k� 250.0 �" �32.0 ^ REMOVE EXISTING W11-2 SIG FLASHING BEACONS FOR EASTBOUND 32.0 j lRECTIO N mar:; , ,,. ($0^0.. _ �> �.,� � w �� �R#�0 ,:�(ISTING "PEO XING" T3 AiIEME o KIN �MAR GS , REMOVE EXISTING x s, REMOVE EXISTINGADVISORY r,. ,,» /. SPEED SIGNS AND POST AND W2-2 SIGN AND POST INSTALL ADVANCE,IYARNING,BEACON �" '>=� j STALL`RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN ASSEMBLY. SEE,S —' �''. ;. $EE,INSET A. ,.; ,< Y „_� Af :; ^" 'ASSEMBLY. SEE SHEET CD-2 —— — ' Y a ? INSTAL Ew �, °PO r EGNEY FIELD 0 „M r WOK LOP TRAIL z F CIL WITH LU`I RE:IN i t;` c L . M.. A . �v OVERAD:PEESTRIANHYBRID �: 3 vC� s 0.1z BLY N ASS � O EJd EE LLJ G REMOVE EXISTING POLE I „ AND MAST ARM xI este / 45.0 REFRESH HIGH—VISIBILITY _ ' LADDER CROSSWALK t A �< ' ROUTE 131 (TIBURON BLVD) I"`'"` e �.. H r- I--1 NI STRIPE 1" WHITE I OPTIONAL REMOVE ACCELERATION/LEFT TURN STAGING'LANE AND CONSTRUCT STOP UNE (Typ) "" I� A RAISED MEDIAN FOR PEDESTRIAN REFUGIt < f INSTALL COUNTDOWN PEDESTRIAN 0 20 l a 5 - a' -INSTAL t" IEW MAST ARM \ ' PULE WITH LED LUMINAIRE INSTALL R10-6 'STOP HERE ON RED" SIGN (Typ) OkEMOYE^'EXtsm' l0 ? wrs POLE AND MAST.ARM RELOCATE PUSH BUTTON INSET "A" INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PRE LI M S IN' A R SCALE: 1"=10' wDA 1750 Bridgeway,Suite B208 REVISIONS 9/07/18 SEE SHEET " Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TIBURON X PTC 11-IT ND. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING `415'649000 ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 6 8041 DRAWN: RN CHECKED: DP _ — — DRAYANC CONCEPTUAL PLAN - LONG TERM ENHANCEMENTS 6 —ET ND. DE9cxED: APPROVED: 'RN DP 8 OF 11 N0. DESCRIPTION W1-2A(L) (36") RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN i YOUR SPEEU! 2" GALVANIZED STEEL SIGN POST W11-15 (36") W11-15 (36") RRFB LIGHT BAR EXISTING MAST ARM POLE AND LUMINAIRE RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN ASSEMBLY J VRRFB LIGHT BAR NTS W11-15P (30"X24") W11-15 (36") (BOTH SIDES) NOTE: TOP—MOST SIGN SHALL BE W1-2A(L) AND BE RETROFLECTIVE RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING AC POWER �W16-91` (30"X18") RRFB LIGHT BAR (BOTH SIDES) TYPE 1—B POLE __�W16-71` (30"X18") (BOTH SIDES) � -- --.�R1-5 SIGN (36") o j MERE • bell Ill l UADVANCE RRFB ASSEMBLY (ON TYPE 1-13 POLE) URRFB ASSEMBLY ON EXISTING POLE) 4 REGULATOR_Y SIGN (R1-6) NTS NTS NTS NOTE: W11-15, W11-15P, AND W16-9P SHALL BE NOTE: DETAIL SHOWS ONLY 1 SIDE OF ASSEMBLY. SIDE MOUNTED SIGNS AND RETROFLECTIVE AND FLUORESCENT YELLOW—GREEN. RRFB BAR SHALL BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES. ADVANCE RRFB ASSEMBLY TO BE SYNCHRONIZED WITH RRFB W11-15 AND W16-7P SHALL BE RETROFLECTIVE AND FLUORESCENT ASSEMBLY AT THE INTERSECTION. YELLOW—GREEN. PRELIMINARY s IDe 9/07/18 ""NTS 1750 Bridgeway,Suite B208 REVISIONS Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TIBURON 7RR- N0. TRANSVORTATIONtONSULTING oRnvm: `475'6496°°° ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS CD-1 18041 RN cwEaccD: DP DRnwnc INIO). RNDPSHORT TERM CONSTRUCTIONDETAILS DESCRIPTION 9 OF 11 W1-2A(L) (36") RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN YOUR SPEED 2" GALVANIZED STEEL SIGN POST NEW MAST ARM AND LED LUMINAIRE o W11-15 SIGN (36") CIRCULAR YELLOW FLASHING BEACON CROSSWALK STOP ON REO . z Ail W11-15 SIGN (36") ., O RIO-23 RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN ASSEMBLY J NTS PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON WITH NOTE: TOP—MOST SIGN SHALL BE W1-2A(L) AND BE RETROFLECTIVE —BACKPLATE (Typ) RADAR FEEDBACK SIGN SHALL BE CONNECTED TO EXISTING AC POWER O W11-15P (30"X24") W11-15 SIGN (36") (BOTH SIDES) �W16-9P (30"X18") �W16-7P 30"X18" BOTH SIDES R10-6 SIGN (36") TYPE 1—B POLE ( ) ( ) � STO P HERE ON i RED o ADVANCE WARNING BEACON ASSEMBLY G� OVERHEAD PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON ASSEMBLY REGULATORY SIGN (R10-6) NTS U NTS NTS NOTE: W11-15, W11-15P, AND W16-9P SHALL BE NOTE: DETAIL SHOWS ONLY 1 SIDE OF SIDE MOUNTED SIGNS. RETROFLECTIVE AND FLUORESCENT YELLOW—GREEN. DETAIL DOES NOT SHOW PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL HEAD. WARNING BEACON TO BE COORDINATED TO FLASH ONLY WHEN OVERHEAD BEACON ASSEMBLY AT THE INTERSECTION IS W11-15 AND W16-7P SHALL BE RETROFLECTIVE AND FLUORESCENT ACTIVATED. YELLOW—GREEN. PRELIMINARY 1750 Badgeway,Suite 8208 REVISIONS " °"` Sausalito,CA 94965 PLC TOWN OF TIBURON 6 9 PROJECT CT N0. NTS (4,5,649-6000 18041 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS oRAwNc DRAWN: CHECKED: CD-2 RN DP LONG TERM CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OE9CNE➢: APPROVED: Q SHEET N0. RN DP NO. DESCRIPTION 1O OF 11 SHORT TERM CONCEPT ESTIMATE LONG TERM CONCEPT ESTIMATE ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT COST AMOUNT 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 3 Remove Existing Pavement Markings SF 80 $ 5 $ 400 3 Remove Existing Pavement Markings SF 80 $ 5 $ 400 4 Remove Existing Flashing Beacon EA 5 $ 2,000 $ 10,000 4 Remove Existing Flashing Beacon EA 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 5 Remove Existing Sign and Post EA 2 $ 500 $ 1,000 5 Remove Existing Sign and Post EA 2 $ 500 $ 1,000 6 Remove Existing Sign EA 5 $ 250 $ 1,250 6 Remove Existing Signal Pole EA 2 $ 5,000 $ 10,00 7 Stripe"PED XING" Pavement Markings SF 80 $ 5 $ 400 7 Remove and Relocate Push Button EA 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 8 Refresh High-Visibility Ladder Crosswalk SF 300 $ 5 $ 1,500 8 Stripe"PED XING" Pavement Markings SF 80 $ 5 $ 400 9 Stripe Yield Line SF 24 $ 5 $ 120 9 Refresh High-Visibility Ladder Crosswalk SF 300 $ 5 $ 1,500 10 Install RRFB Assembly EA 6 $ 3,500 $ 21,000 10 Stripe 1' White Stop Line LF 25 $ 5 $ 125 11 Install Advance RRFB Assembly EA 2 $ 4,000 $ 8,000 11 Install R10-6 Sign, Pole, and Foundation EA 2 $ 500 $ 1,000 12 Install Radar Feedback Sign EA 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 12 Install New Mast Arm Pole and Foundation EA 2 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 13 Install Type 1-B Pole & Foundation EA 2 $ 3,500 $ 7,000 13 Install Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Signal Head EA 6 $ 2,000 $ 12,000 14 Install 2"Galvanized Steel Post EA 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 14 Install Pedestrian Countdown Signal EA 2 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 15 Install Pull Box EA 3 $ 1,000 $ 3,000 15 Reconstruct Curb Ramp/Sidewalk LS 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 16 Relocate Push Button EA 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 16 Install Pull Box EA 3 $ 1,000 $ 3,000 17 Upgrade Existing Luminare Head to LED EA 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 17 Relocate Push Button EA 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 18 Install R1-5 Sign, Pole, and Foundation EA 2 $ 500 $ 1,000 18 Install Type 1-B Pole and Foundation EA 2 $ 3,500 $ 7,000 19 Trim Trees/Shrubs LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 19 Install 2"Galvanized Steel Post EA 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Construction Subtotal $ 102,170 20 Install Advance Warning Beacon Assembly EA 2 $ 4,000 $ 8,000 Contingency (25%) $ 25,500 21 Install LED Luminaire Head EA 2 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 Construction Total $ 127,670 22 Trim Trees/Shrubs LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 *Optional raised median not Included In estimate Construction Subtotal $ 224,425 PS&E (20%) $ 25,500 Contingency (25%) $ 56,100 CALTRANS Coordination (5%) $ 6,400 Construction Total $ 280,525 Construction Management (10%p) $ 12,800 Project Total $ 165,970 PS&E (20%) $ 56,100 CALTRANS Coordination (5%) $ 14,000 Construction Management (10%p) $ 28,100 Project Total $ 364,725 PRELIMINARY 9/07/18 1750 Bridgeway,Suite 8208 REVISIONS D"" ""NTS Sausalito,CA 94965 TOWN OF TI B U RO N t� PTC PROJECT NO. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING `415'649°°° ROUTE 131 & STEWART DR SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS 6 18°41 DRAM NC CHECREO: -- -- DRAwN. RN DP CONCEPTUAL PLAN COST ESTIMATES SNEET NO, OE9CNED: APPROVED: RN DP N0. DESCRIPTION 11 OF 11 Town Council Meeting TOWN OF TIBURON g k 1505 Tiburon Boulevard October 17,2018 :It Agenda em Tiburon,CA 94920 T STAFF REPORT To: Mayor& Members of the Town Council From: Community Development Department Subject: Municipal Code Amendment to Modify Chapter 2 (Administration) to Correct Certain References and Clarify Certain Provisions of the Planning Commission, Design Review Board, and Planning Agency (Ord in ce--°-First Reading) Reviewed by: BACKGROUND The purpose of these amendments is to correct outdated references within the Municipal Code and to clarify certain provisions regarding the establishment of the planning agency of the Town of Tiburon. Chapter 2 (Administration) of the Municipal Code contains certain outdated (and now inaccurate) references to Chapter 16 (Zoning) when addressing where to locate a listing of duties of the Planning Commission and the Design Review Board. That same section also includes designation of the Planning Agency for the town, which is also recommended for updating in line with modern practices. ANALYSIS The California Government Code requires that counties and municipalities designate a"planning agency"that has the authority to perform certain responsibilities spelled out in state statutes (see Exhibit 1). This is a long-standing provision of state law, created many decades ago and last amended nearly 35 years ago. Over time, and as professional staff have assumed many of the day-to-day responsibilities of municipal government, some local agencies have broadened the definition of the "planning agency"to include more than a city council, planning commission and/or board of supervisors. For example, the County of Marin includes its Planning Commission, Zoning Administrator, Community Development Agency, and Director of Community Development in its "planning agency" designation. Currently in Tiburon, the Planning Commission is the only designated "planning agency". Under the proposed ordinance, this designation would be broadened to include the Community Development Department and the Director of Community Development, for use in those instances where a particular duty or function is more appropriately performed by staff rather than by referral to the Commission. Town Council Meeting October 17,2018 The draft ordinance would also replace obsolete references in the municipal code with current ones. Redline and "clean" copies of the ordinance provisions are attached as Exhibit 2 and 3. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that adoption of this ordinance is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it does not constitute a project under CEQA, and if it were found to constitute a project, it would be exempt pursuant to the general rule set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council hold first reading of the proposed ordinance after making any desired revisions to the document. The procedure would be as follows: 1. The Town Council should hold a public hearing and consider any testimony. 2. If appropriate, make any modifications, move to read by title only and carry the motion; then read the title and hold a roll call vote to pass first reading, waiving any additional readings. 3. If passed for first reading, the ordinance will be scheduled for adoption at the next regular meeting of the Council. EXHIBITS 1. Government Code provisions regarding a"planning agency". 2. Redline document showing proposed municipal code amendments. 3. Draft Ordinance. Prepared by: Scott Anderson,Director of Community Development _ TOU%N OF TIBI!RON Page 2 of 2 Planning and'Zoning Haw (b)The notice shall include the information specified in (Added by Stats..1984, Cla, 1009.) Section 65094. (c) In addition to the notice required by this section, 65096. Cemeteries a local agency may give notice of the hearing in any other (a)Notwithstanding any other provision oflaw,whenever manner it deems necessary or desirable. a person applies to a city,including a charter city;county,or (d)Whenever a hearing is held regarding a permit for a city and county; for a zoning variance, special use permit, drive-through facility, or modification of an existing drive- conditional use permit, zoning ordinance amendment, through facility permit, the local agency shall incorporate, general or specific plan amendment, or any entitlement for where necessary, notice procedures to the blind, aged, and use which would permit all or any part of a cemetery to be disabled communities in order to facilitate their participation used for other than cemetery purposes, the city; county, or in any hearing on,or appeal of the denial of,a drive-through city and county shall give notice pursuant to Sections 65091, facility permit.The Legislature finds that access restrictions 65092,65093,and 65094, to commercial establishments affecting the blind, aged, (b)'Ihose requesting notice shall be notified by the local or disabled, is a critical statewide problem; therefore, this agency at the address provided at the time of the request. subdivision shall be applicable to charter cities. (c)Notwithstanding Section 65092,a local agency shall (Added by Stats. 2000, Ch. 785;Amended by Stats.2006, not require a request made pursuant to this section to be Ch.363.) annually renewed. (d) "Cemetery," as used in this section, has the same 65092. Request for notification meaning as that word is defined in Section 8100 of the (a) When a provision of this title requires notice of a Health and Safety Code. public hearing to be given pursuant to Section 65090 or (Added by Stats.1988, Ch.1440.) 65091,the notice shall also be mailed or delivered at least 10 days prior to the hearing to any person who has filed a writtenr100. Chapter 3. Local Planning request for notice with either the clerk of the governing body or with any other person designated by the governing bodyArticle 1. Local Planning to receive these requests.The local agency may charge a fee which is reasonably related to the costs of providing thisation of Planning agency service and the local agency may require each request to beis in each city and county a planning agency annually renewed. owers necessary to carry out the purposes of this (b)As used in this chapter,"person"includes a Californiaegislative body of each city and county shall by Native American tribe that is on the contact list maintainedassign the functions of the planning agency to a by the Native American Heritage Commission. epartment, one or more planning commissions, (Added by Stats. 1984, Ch.1009;Amended by Stats.1985, administrative bodies or hearing officers,the legislative body Ch.1199;1 mended by Stats.2004, Ch. 905.) itself, or any combination thereof, as it deems appropriate and necessary.In the absence of an assignment,the legislative 65093. Failure to receive notice body shall carry out all the functions of the planning agency. Mie failure of any person or entity to receive notice (Repealed andldded by Stats.1984, Ch. 690.) given pursuant to this title, or pursuant to the procedures established by a chartered city, shall not constitute grounds 65101. Creation of planning commission for any court to invalidate the actions of a local agency for (a) The legislative body may create one or more which the notice was given. planning commissions each of which shall report directly (Added by Stats.1984, Ch.1009.) to the legislative body.The legislative body shall specify the membership of the commission or commissions. In any 65094. Definition: Notice of public hearing event, each planning commission shall consist of at least As used in this title,"notice of a public hearing"means five members, all of whom shall act in the public interest. a notice that includes the date, time, and place of a public If it creates more than one planning commission, the hearing,the identity of the hearing body or officer,a general legislative body shall prescribe the issues, responsibilities, explanation of the matter to be considered, and a general or geographic jurisdiction assigned to each commission.If a description,in text or by diagram,of the location of the real. development project affects the jurisdiction of more than one property,if any,that is the subject of the hearing. planning commission,the legislative body shall designate the (lidded by Stats. 1984, Cli.1009.) commission which shall hear the entire development project. (b)Two or more legislative bodies may: 65095. Hearing continuation (1) Create a joint area planning agency; planning Any public hearing conducted under this title may be commission,or advisory agency for all or prescribed portions continued.from time to time. of their cities or counties which shall exercise those powers Planting,Zoning and Developnient Laws 41 Planning and Zoning Law and perform those duties under this title that the legislative 65104. Appropriations for planning agency bodies delegate to it. The legislative body.shall provide the funds,equipment, (2)Authorize their planning agencies,or any components and accommodations necessary or appropriate for the work of them, to meet jointly to coordinate their work, conduct of the planning agency.If the legislative body,including that studies,develop plans,hold hearings, or jointly exercise any of a charter city,establishes any fees to support the work of power or perform any duty common to them. the planning agency,the fees shall not exceed the reasonable (Repealed and Added by Stats. 1984, Ch. 690;Amended by cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged. Stats.1985, Ch. 617.) The legislative body shall impose the fees pursuant to Section 66016. 65101.1. Hoopa Valley Business Council (Repealed and Added by Stats.1984, Ch. 690;Amended by The Hoopa Valley Business Council, as the governing Stats.1990, Ch.1572.) body of the Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe,may participate as a legislative body,pursuant to subdivision(b)of Section 65101 65105. Authority to perforin functions:entry onto private on the Humboldt County Association of Governments and land for that purpose may enter into a joint powers agreement with In the performance of their fimctions,planning agency the parties thereto and shall be deemed to be a public agency personnel may enter upon. any land and make examinations for purposes of Article 1 (commencing with Section 6500)of and surveys, provided that the entries, examinations, and Chapter 5 of Division.7 of Title 1.The Legislature finds and surveys do not interfere with the use of the land by those declares that the unique circumstances of Humboldt County persons lawfully entitled to the possession thereof: necessitate this special law: (Added by Stats.1984, Ch. 690.) (Added by Stats.1987. Ch. 73.) 65106. Public officials to furnish planning agency with 65101 Local rules and procedures available information A legislative body may establish for its planning agency Upon request all public officials shall furnish to the any rules,procedures,or standards which do not conflict with planning agency within a reasonable time any available state or federal laws. information as may be required for the work of the planning (Repealed andfldded by Stats.1984, Ch. 690;) agency. (Added by Stats.1985, Ch. 617.) F65103. nning agency functions lanning agency shall perform all ofthe follow=ingArticle 4. Long Range Planning Trust Fnnd 65250. Long range planning trust fund pare,periodically review,and revise,as necessary,, the general plan. (a) A city with a population in excess of three million may establish a Long Range Planning Trust Fund in (b) Implement the general plan through actions accordance with subdivision (b) to consist of those moneys including,but not limited to,the administration of specific that are voluntarily paid by an assessee of real, property on plans and zoning and subdivision ordinances. the property tax bill in an amount equal to one dollar (81) (c)Annually review the capital improvement program of for each parcel of assessed real property of one acre or less,or the city or county and the local.public works projects of other one dollar($1)per acre,and any additional.fractional portion local agencies for their consistency with the general plan, thereof, for each parcel of assessed real property of more pursuant to Article 7(commencing with Section 6.5400). than one acre,and are collected and deposited pursuant to an (d) Endeavor to promote public interest in, comment agreement as described in subdivision(d). on, and understanding of the general plan, and regulations relatingto it. (b)A city as described in subdivision(a)shall establish a Long Range Planning Trust Fund by a resolution,adopted by Lu ' Consult and advise with public officials and agencies, a majority vote of the city's governing body.That resolution tility companies, civic, educational, professional., shall require that moneys in the fund shall be expended upon er organizations, and citizens generally concerning the vote of that city's governing body= only for purposes of ntation of the general plan. long-term land use planning and general plan revisions. romote the coordination of local plans and programs (c)Upon adoption of a resolution pursuant to subdivision plans and programs of other public agencl.es. (b),a city may solicit voluntary contributions as described in Perform other functions as the legislative body subdivision(a),and upon receiving authorization to collect a , including conducting studies and preparing plans contribution by an assessee of real ro er may transmit to an those required or authorized by this title. P p ty'the county assessor,county auditor,and county tax collector ealed and fldded by Stats.1984, C.h. 690.) any information regarding the assessee that may be necessary to collect the contribution pursuant to an agreement as 42 Planning,Zoning and Developrneni Laws LX111BI p._2 Ol_ REDLINE COPY ORDINANCE NO. XXX N. S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON AMENDING TITLE I, CHAPTER 2, SECTIONS 2-16 AND 2-19 OF THE TIBURON MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING REFERENCES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DUTIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS. A. The Town Council seeks to update obsolete references to the Town's zoning regulations in its Municipal Code chapter regarding administration with respect to the Planning Commission and Design Review Board. B. The Town Council held a duly noticed public hearing on , 2018 and has heard and considered all public testimony on the proposed Ordinance. C. The Town Council finds that all notices and procedures required by law attendant to the adoption of this Ordinance have been followed. D. The Town Council finds that adoption of this amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Tiburon General Plan. E. The Town Council finds that adoption of this ordinance is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)pursuant to Section 15378 in that the amendment does not constitute a project under CEQA, and if it were found to constitute a project, it would be exempt per Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as it can be seen with certainty that the proposed amendment will have no significant adverse effect on the environment. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. (A)The text of Title I, Chapter 2, Section 2-16 of the Tiburon Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) There shall be established a planning agency and a planning commission for the town. (b) The planning agency of the town shall be the planning commission o *�f awn Puties of the planning eemmission shall be as set feAh in subehapter 3 of the Tibufen zoning or-dinanee and as may be speeffied elsewhere in the Tibur-en Munieipal Code. the director of community development, and the community development department or their equivalent, of the town. Town of Tiburon Ordinance No.XXXN.S. Effective--1--/2118 Page I I Ak �a`i f (c) Duties of the planning commission shall be as set forth in Title IV, Chanter 16 (Zoning) of this code, and as may be specified elsewhere in this code. (B)The text of Title I, Chapter 2, Section 2-19 of the Tiburon Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: There is established a design review board of the town. Duties of the design review board shall be as set forth in subehapter 3 of the T;btffo '7^,,ing n,-4ina ee Title IV, Chapter 16 (Zoning) of this code, and as may be specified elsewhere in this code. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The Town Council of the Town of Tiburon hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after the date of passage, and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after passage by the Town Council, a copy of the ordinance shall be published with the names of the members voting for and against it at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published in the Town of Tiburon. This ordinance was read and introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, held on , 2018, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, held on , 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JIM FRASER, MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST: LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK Town of Tiburon Ordinance No.XXXN.S. Effective--/--/2418 Page 12 EXHIBIT p. .1 of ORDINANCE NO. XXX N. S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON AMENDING TITLE I, CHAPTER 2, SECTIONS 2-16 AND 2-19 OF THE TIBURON MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDING REFERENCES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING THE DUTIES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS. A. The Town Council seeks to update obsolete references to the Town's zoning regulations in its Municipal Code chapter regarding administration with respect to the Planning Commission and Design Review Board. B. The Town Council held a duly noticed public hearing on , 2018 and has heard and considered all public testimony on the proposed Ordinance. C. The Town Council finds that all notices and procedures required by law attendant to the adoption of this Ordinance have been followed. D. The Town Council finds that adoption of this amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Tiburon General Plan. E. The Town Council finds that adoption of this ordinance is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to Section 15378 in that the amendment does not constitute a project under CEQA, and if it were found to constitute a project, it would be exempt per Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as it can be seen with certainty that the proposed amendment will have no significant adverse effect on the environment. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. (A)The text of Title I, Chapter 2, Section 2-16 of the Tiburon Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) There shall be established a planning agency and a planning commission for the town. (b) The planning agency of the town shall be the planning commission, the director of community development, and the community development department, or their equivalent, of the town. (c) Duties of the planning commission shall be as set forth in Title IV, Chapter 16 (Zoning) of this code, and as may be specified elsewhere in this code. Town of Tiburon Ordinance No.XXX N.S. Effective--1--12V8 Page I 1 (B)The text of Title I, Chapter 2, Section 2-19 of the Tiburon Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: There is established a design review board of the town. Duties of the design review board shall be as set forth in Title IV, Chapter 16 (Zoning) of this code, and as may be specified elsewhere in this code. SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The Town Council of the Town of Tiburon hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after the date of passage, and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after passage by the Town Council, a copy of the ordinance shall be published with the names of the members voting for and against it at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published in the Town of Tiburon. This ordinance was read and introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, held on , 2018, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, held on , 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JIM FRASER, MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST: LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK Town of Tiburon Ordinance No.XXXN.S. Effective—1-1208 Page 12 EXHIBIT 3 p. I of d.