HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Digest 2014-08-29TOWN COUNCIL WEEKLY DIGEST
Week of August 25 - 29, 2014
Tiburon
1. Letter — Unsigned — Power Poles on Paradise Drive
2. Email — Leah Karp — School Traffic
Agendas & Minutes
3. Minutes — Design review Board — July 17, 2014
4. Minutes — Planning Commission — July 23, 2014
5. Action Minutes — Design Review Board — August 21, 2014
6. Action Minutes — Planning Commission —August 27, 2014
7. Agenda —Design Review Board —September 4, 2014
Regional
a) Bulletin — Stop the Closure — North Bay Processing & Distribution Center *
Agendas & Minutes
b) None
* Council Only
AUG 2 6 2014
TOWN MAiVAC,ER5 OFFICE
TOWN OF T1 R8F
August, 24, 2014
The Town of Tiburon
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
To Whom It May Concern:
In a technology- based, wireless world, it is disconcerting to see that Paradise Drive (one of the most
beautiful streets in the Bay Area) remains riddled with power poles and lines. As recently as two
weeks ago a truck driving along Paradise Drive between Pellegrinelli and Antillies Way struck an
overhead line and took down a power pole in the process. This has caused countless hours of repair
work and lane closures, and now two weeks later, the repairs still have not been completed.
Situated on Ring Mountain, from the Town of Tiburon boundary to Trestle Glen, Paradise Drive is
located in a particularly windy area. P G and E is dispatched numerous times a year due to storms in
this area from downed power lines to inoperable poles. While most of the rest of the Town of
Tiburon has lines underground, Paradise Drive remains a cobweb of lines and unsightly poles. All of
the above mentioned incidents and eventual costly repairs could have been completely alleviated
had the lines been underground.
Please consider saving time and future repair damages by improving our infrastructure and
concealing our power lines. Tiburon is a beautiful town, and so loved by all of its local residents.
Please let it reach its true beauty and potential while also protecting our environment.
Thank you for your consideration.
Peggy Curran DIGEST 0 ►
From: Leah karp <leah @sf2marin.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2014 2:29 PM
To: alITC (Tiburon Town Council)
Subject: fed up with the school traffic yet?
Town Council
Looking forward to working together to help alleviate the traffic for all residents, with and without children!
Now that everyone has had the experience of sitting in back to school traffic in the mornings and afternoons, can we agree
that DRIVING children to school and TOO many cars hauling too few kids is causing a major traffic jam? Perhaps now would
be a good time to discuss how the Yellow Bus Challenge would have removed 200 cars from the road during school commute
hours (and those were the folks that happened to be around mid summer to find out about it, imagine how many would have
joined if given more notice), yet, sadly, not a single new bus route was implemented. Even though there are SOLD out bus
routes with waiting lists, children who catch the bus as early as 7:10am to make a long commute winding through Tiburon,
and while the Town of Tiburon has millions of dollars, earning little or no interest sitting in its coffers with no plans (it was
surplus they were not expecting), there are no plans to help alleviate this real problem. While walking my child in on the first
day of school, I overheard mothers complaining of be on the bus waiting list and no bus servicing their neighborhoods. I hope
the nightmare traffic will encourage more people to speak up and demand more direct bus lines and more buses!
As a side note, my daughter spent 3 years riding the bus to Reed School, a 30-40 minute commute and frequently being late
for class, as the bus would be stuck in traffic. Money was never part of the equation for whether she would take the bus, it
was at the right thing to do. So although the subsidy would have been nice, it would not have made a difference in my
decision.
Sincerely,
Leah Karp
3.
MINUTES #12
TIBURON DESIGN REVEW BOARD DIGEST
MEETING OF JULY 17, 2014
The meeting was opened at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Chong.
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Chong, Vice Chair Cousins, Boardmembers Emberson and Kricensky
I_\.�if �:3.FM_R4ui: 30411iiS1
Ex- Officio: Planning Manager Watrous, Assistant Planner O'Malley and Minutes Clerk
Rusting
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
C. STAFF BRIEFING
Planning Manager Watrous stated the items for 8 Acela Drive and 118 Leland Way have been
continued to the August 21, 2014 meeting. Additionally, no items are scheduled for the August
7, 2014 meeting and it is likely to be cancelled.
D. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
ACTION: It was M/S (Kricensky/Emberson) to elect Vice Chair Cousins as Chair of the Design
Review Board. Vote: 4 -0.
ACTION: It was M/S (Emberson/Chong) to elect Boardmember Tollini as Vice Chair of the
Design Review Board. Vote: 4 -0.
E. OLD BUSINESS
1. 118 LELAND WAY: File No. 714024; Charles and Suzanne Fuery, Owners; Site Plan
and Architectural Review for construction of a detached guest cottage for an existing
single - family dwelling. The proposed 636 square foot guest cottage would include a
bedroom, bathroom, and sitting area with a wet bar. The proposal would result in a floor
area of 1,558 square feet and lot coverage of 1,928 square feet (24.1 %). Assessor's Parcel
No. 034 - 175 -04. CONTINUED TO AUGUST 21, 2014.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NEW BUSINESS
2. 1820 MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE: File No. 21408; Vuemont, Inc., Owner; Site Plan
and Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single - family
dwelling, with a variance for reduced front yard setback. The proposal would convert an
existing carport into an enclosed two -car garage and includes other minor site
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12
7/17/14
improvements. The proposal would result in a gross floor area of 3,937 square feet and
lot coverage of 4,021 square feet, or 17.5% of the site. The garage would extend to within
13 feet, 10 inches of the front property line in lieu of the minimum 30 foot front yard
setback for this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 059- 012 -02.
The applicant is requesting design review approval for the construction of additions to an
existing single - family dwelling, with a variance for reduced front yard setback, on property
located at 1820 Mountain View Drive. The proposal would demolish the existing carport and
construct a two -car garage in the same location has the carport, which would utilize the same
driveway. The proposed garage would be attached to the existing home through a new entry area.
The proposal would result in lot coverage of 4,021 square feet (17.5 %) which exceeds the
maximum permitted lot coverage in the RO -2 zone (15.0 %). However, the proposed
modifications would decrease the lot coverage by I% and would not require an excess lot
coverage variance. The proposal would result in a gross floor area of 3,937 square feet, which is
below the maximum permitted gross floor area ratio for the property (4,299 square feet).
A portion of the existing carport currently extends within 13 feet, 10 inches of the front property
line and the proposed garage would match the same encroachment into the required setback. As
a 30 foot front yard setback is required in the RO -2 zone, a variance is requested for reduced
front yard setback.
Marty Zwick, architect, said that they met with all of the neighbors and there have been no
objections to the project.
There were no public comments.
Boardmember Chong said he visited the site and felt that this was a straightforward project and
he agreed with stafFs findings supporting the variance. All other Boardmembers agreed.
ACTION: It was WS (Emberson/Kricensky) that the request for 1820 Mountain View Drive is
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and to approve the request, subject to the
attached conditions of approval. Vote: 4 -0.
3. 2300 VISTA DEL MAR LANE: File No. 21331; Shelley Brown, Owner; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single - family dwelling,
with a Variance for reduced side yard setback. The project would expand and reconfigure
the existing second floor to eliminate one bedroom and expand the master bedroom suite
by adding a library and study and a larger bathroom. A new family room, bathroom and
expanded kitchen are proposed on the first floor and a new storage room and slightly
expanded garage are proposed on the basement level. The proposal would increase the
floor area of the house by 736 square feet to 2,159 square feet and would increase the lot
coverage by 599 square feet to a total of 1,730 square feet (27.3 %). The house would
extend to within 4 feet, 1 inch of the west side property line in lieu of the minimum 8 foot
side yard setback for this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 059- 201 -11.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES 412 2
7/17/14
The applicant is requesting to construct additions to an existing single - family dwelling, with a
variance for reduced side yard setback, on property located at 2300 Vista Del Mar Lane. The
project would expand and reconfigure the existing second floor to eliminate one bedroom and
expand the master bedroom suite by adding a library and study and a larger bathroom. A new
family room, bathroom and expanded kitchen are proposed on the first floor and a new storage
room and slightly expanded garage are proposed on the basement level.
The proposal would increase the floor area of the house by 736 square feet to 2,159 square feet,
which is 58 square feet less than the 2,217 square foot floor area ratio for the property. The
proposal would increase the lot coverage by 599 square feet to a total of 1,730 square feet
(27.3 %) which is less than the 35.0 % maximum permitted lot coverage in the R -2 zone.
The proposed addition would extend to within 4 feet, 1 inch of the western (left) side property
line. As an 8 foot side yard setback is required in the R -2 zone, a variance has been requested for
reduced side yard setback.
Albert Delamo, with Hank Bruce architects, stated that this was a modest addition and the area
for which they were seeking a variance is currently an outside deck. He said that they agreed
with the staff report and felt that when completed this would be a modest house in relation to
others in the neighborhood. He said that the project would be in conformance with all zoning
requirements except for the side yard setback. He said that they requested the variance in order to
keep the size of the addition as small as possible and keep the rest of the project within the
Town's requirements.
The public hearing was opened.
Malcolm Wittenberg said that he and his wife recently purchased their home and they were
struck by how convoluted the property lines are in this area, which makes it difficult to make any
improvements without affecting neighbors. He stated that he viewed the plans and story poles
and it was clear to him that the applicants went out of their way to have a minimal effect on his
property, so he and his wife support the project.
Jerome Bernal said that the house is set very far forward on the lot and that allows views from
his house in the back of the property. He was concerned that the addition would cut off views of
the East Bay from his property. He said that he would like to see the height reduced so that they
could still have privacy and maintain views of the East Bay.
Mr. Delamo stated that he did not believe that the view across the back yard is a primary view
for Mr. Bernal, but he deferred to the DRB's judgment to determine what is fair. He stated that
the view toward the proposed addition from Mr. Bernal's house is from a kitchen window and
the addition would be no taller than the existing building. He stated that they worked very hard to
keep everything as low and minimally intrusive as possible.
The public hearing was closed.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES 912
7/17/14
Boardmember Kricensky said that his initial reaction was that the applicants did a good job
incorporating the addition into the existing architecture of the building and the project would not
bother anyone. He said that he did not see the email from Mr. Bernal until later and he was
therefore unable to personally see if there was any view blockage from his home.
Boardmember Chong said that this was a good design that would blend with the house. He said
that he visited Mr. Bernal's home and trees have grown up into the view of the proposed
addition. He said that this was clearly not a primary view, as the front of the home has beautiful
bay views and the East Bay view is a secondary view. He said that if he had to weigh between
the views that would be lost and responsible development of the site, he generally falls more on
the side of the applicant. He pointed out that it will always be hard to protect that view across the
hillside and there are several other properties in between Mr. Bernal's house and the view.
Boardmember Emberson agreed with Boardmember Chong and noted that Mr. Bernal's main
view is out of the front windows and the East Bay is not the primary view. She said that the
shape of the lot restricts where an addition could be placed and this was the least impactful
location for an addition.
Chair Cousins agreed with the other Boardmembers. He stated that he visited Mr. Bernal's home
and the dining room views are secondary. He stated that the views toward the subject property
are across the site and he believed that the Hillside Design Guidelines focus more on downhill
views. He felt that adding to the rear was the best solution and if the addition was built on the
other side of the house it would impact more people. He also believed that the design would be
in keeping with the character of the house.
Boardmember Kricensky stated that looking across the side of a lot is often considered to be a
borrowed view. He noted that the project was not requesting a lot coverage variance or a floor
area exception and he felt that this was the logical place for the addition.
Boardmember Chong said that if this was an application for a new house he felt that the Board
would still support something this far to the rear of the site.
ACTION: It was M/S (Emberson/Kricensky) that the request for 2300 Vista Del Mar Lane is
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and to approve the request, subject to the
attached conditions of approval. Vote: 4 -0.
4. 8 ACELA DRIVE: File No. 21414; Tom and Carol 011endorff, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single - family dwelling,
with a Variance for excess lot coverage. The project would expand the existing master
bedroom suite on the second floor and extend an existing deck along the front of the
house. The first floor garage and office would be expanded and reconfigured to include a
new two -car garage, a playroom, bedroom, bathroom, storage room, wine room and
laundry room. The proposal would result in a gross floor area of 3,836 square feet and lot
coverage of 3,772 square feet (20.5 %), which exceeds the 15.0 % maximum permitted lot
coverage in the RO -2 zone. Assessor's Parcel No. 058- 231 -11. CONTINUED TO
AUGUST 21, 2014.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 4
7/17/14
G. APPROVAL OF MINUTES #11 OF THE NNE 19, 2014 DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD MEETING
Boardmember Emberson requested the following corrections to the minutes:
Page 2, second to last paragraph: Change "...the applicants he did a great job..." to
"...the applicants did a great job...
Page 2, last paragraph: Change "Elena Stephens said she that the project..." to "Elena
Stephens said that the project..."
Page 3, third paragraph: Change "He noted the request from the letter from the
owners..." to "He noted the request in the letter from the owner..."
Page 4, second paragraph: Change "...this application to requires..." to "...this
application requires"
Page 4, second paragraph: Change "...they not have piano lessons..." to "...they will not
have piano lessons..."
Page 5, second paragraph: "...often used in turnarounds..." to "...often used as
turnarounds..."
Page 8, fifth paragraph: "...would be being retained..." to "...would be retained..."
ACTION: It was WS (Emberson/Kricensky) to approve the minutes of the June 19, 2014
meeting, as amended. Vote: 4 -0.
1; �� IaZ61U "W13 1001
The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12
7/17/14
ye
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DIGEST
MINUTES NO. 1047
July 23, 2014
Regular Meeting
Town of Tiburon Council Chambers
1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:
Chair Weller called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
Present: Vice Chair Welner, Commissioners Corcoran and Williams
Absent: Chair Weller and Commissioner Kulik
Staff Present: Director of Community Development Anderson
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
Mon,
COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING:
Director of Community Development Anderson reported that there are no items scheduled for
the August 13`s meeting which will likely be canceled, but there are a few items for the August
27a' meeting.
ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
ACTION: It was M/S (Corcoran/Williams) to nominate and elect Vice Chair Welner as Chair.
Motion carried: 3 -0.
ACTION: It was M/S (Corcoran/Williams) to nominate and elect Commissioner Kulik as Vice
Chair. Motion carried: 3 -0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE: PUBLIC HEARING TO
ACCEPT PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE DRAFT UPDATED HOUSING
ELEMENT AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE TOWN COUNCIL
REGARDING ADOPTION
Director of Community Development Anderson stated that the Town is nearing completion of its
Housing Element Update process for the fifth cycle of mandated Housing Element updates. This
covers the year 2015 through 2023, an 8 year cycle. He said that the Housing Element has
changed very little from what the Commission reviewed in March and that the Council did not
make substantive changes before they directed staff to forward the element to HCD in April.
TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES — JULY 23, 2014 - MINUTES NO. 1047 PAGE I
HCD reviewed the draft, sent comments via a telephone call and the comments have been
incorporated into the revised draft document.
Director Anderson summarized the changes, many of which focused on particular types of
special needs housing which HCD suggested needed additional references, including transitional
and supportive housing and developmentally disabled person housing, and a program to consider
junior second units. Staff considers all the HCD revisions to be minor and has no objections to
any of them.
Commissioner Corcoran asked if the guidelines on the junior second units came from an external
source and whether this has become standard in other Housing Elements. Mr. Anderson said that
the parameters for junior second units are fairly common among other communities. He noted
that the Town already has a 500 square foot maximum size for detached secondary dwelling
units, as well as standards for wet bars and other limitations.
Commissioner Williams asked how progress is monitored and recorded for the annual reviews of
the Housing Element. Mr. Anderson stated that every year by April 1", counties and cities in
California are required to send a general plan implementation program report to the state. He
said that this normally comes to the Commission as an agenda item in February or March and
then goes to the Town Council. This review examines all policies and programs in the General
Plan and monitors progress.
Commissioner Williams stated that the Housing Element is fascinating and asked if the in lieu
and impact fee account balances are published on the Town website. Mr. Anderson said most of
this information is located in the Town's municipal budget and the types of programs and
incentives the Town offers are contained in the zoning ordinance. Commissioner Williams asked
and confirmed that the annual reports sent to HCD are available as public documents.
Commissioner Williams asked whether condominium conversions are encouraged or
discouraged by the Town. Mr. Anderson said that such conversions are strongly discouraged and
virtually prohibited for multi - family buildings, but duplexes are a different subject and such
conversions are not discouraged. He noted that junior second units and second units stand to be
among the Town's major sources for creation of new affordable housing units.
Chair Welner opened the public comment hearing. As there were no public comments, the public
hearing was closed.
ACTION: It was M/S (Williams /Corcoran) to adopt the resolution recommending adoption of
the Housing Element to the Town Council. Motion carried: 3 -0.
TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JULY 23, 2014 - MINUTES NO. 1047 PAGE 2
2. 110 SOLANO STREET: REVIEW OF SEASONAL RENTAL UNIT PERMIT TO
OPERATE A PORTION OF AN EXISTING TWO - FAMILY DWELLING AS A
SEASONAL RENTAL UNIT; FILE #SRU 2013 -01; Courtney and Sandy Anderson,
Owners and Applicants; Joe and Cathy Haraburda, Appellants; Assessor's Parcel
Number 054 - 143 -35
This item was continued without discussion to August 27, 2014.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 25, 2014
Chair Welner requested the following amendment:
Page 4, first paragraph: "Commissioner Welner said that Ms. Danforth has done an
excellent job of fixing the definition €er the ptffpeses to achieve the stated og als of the
Town Council. as conveyed to the Commission bYstaff. • °°-'tee. However, he
personally thought that it was inappropriate to extend the ordinance beyond what is
currently legal. He stated that when the Commission previously discussed this item, one
of the stated rationales for passing this ordinance was that the Commission was told that
many of the other municipalities in Marin had passed bans and Tiburon did not want to
be one of the few places with availability. He thinks that it was k4eresling si iitg ficant that
all the other municipalities have banned medical marijuana dispensaries that are currently
legal in California and he was willing to support that, but said that he would vote against
a broader zoning ordinance that speculates about possible future new state regulations.
He thought that the Town would have plenty of time to adapt its zoning ordinance if there
is a change at the state_ level and he - - to be athe most anti eatmabis
judsdiefien in . He said that he would be willing to support an amended version
that uses the medical marijuana definition but opposed a broader ordinance."
ACTION: It was M/S (Williams/Corcoran) to approve the minutes of the June 25, 2014 meeting,
as amended. Motion carried: 3 -0.
ADJOURNMENT:
The Planning Commission adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. to the August 27, 2014 regular
meeting.
JON WEINER, CHAIR
Tiburon Planning Commission
0400119
SCOTT ANDERSON, SECRETARY
TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -JULY 23,2014- MINUTES NO. 1047 PAGE 3
TOWN OF TIBURON Action Minutes - Regular Meeting 50
Tiburon Town Hall Design Review Board
1505 Tiburon Boulevard August 21, 2014
Tiburon, CA 94920 7:00 P.M.
ACTION MINUTES #13
TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DIGEST
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL At 7:00 PM
Present: Chair Cousins, Vice Chair Tollini, Boardmembers Chong, Emberson and Kricensky
Absent: None
Ex- Officio: Planning Manager Watrous, Assistant Planner O'Malley and Minutes Clerk Rusting
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None
STAFF BRIEFING (if any)
OLD BUSINESS
118 LELAND WAY: File No. 714024; Charles and Suzanne Fuerry, Owners; Site Plan
and Architectural Review for construction of a detached guest cottage for an existing
single - family dwelling. The proposed 636 square foot guest cottage would include a
bedroom, bathroom, and sitting area with a wet bar. The proposal would result in a floor
area of 1,558 square feet and lot coverage of 1,928 square feet (24.1 %). Assessor's Parcel
No. 034 - 175 -04. Continued to 914114
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NEW BUSINESS
2. 8 ACELA DRIVE: File No. 21414; Tom and Carol 011endorff, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single - family dwelling,
with a Variance for excess lot coverage. The project would expand the existing master
bedroom suite on the second floor and extend an existing deck along the front of the
house. The first floor garage and office would be expanded and reconfigured to include a
new two -car garage, a playroom, bedroom, bathroom, storage room, wine room and
laundry room. The proposal would result in a gross floor area of 3,836 square feet and lot
coverage of 3,772 square feet (20.5 %), which exceeds the 15.0 % maximum permitted lot
coverage in the RO -2 zone. Assessor's Parcel No. 058- 231 -11. Continued to 914114
3. 123 ROUND HILL ROAD: File No. 21416; Paul Yroz, Owner; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of a new single- family dwelling, with a Variance for
excess building height. The proposal would result in a gross floor area of 5,503 square
feet, with a 676 square foot garage and lot coverage of 3,488 square feet, or 7.7% of the
site. The proposed house would have a maximum height of 41 feet, 11 inches in lieu of the
30 foot maximum building height for this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 058- 141 -15.
Approved 5 -0
Design Review Board Action Minutes August 21, 2014
Page 1
4. 4388 PARADISE DRIVE: File No. 21417; Colin and Jennifer Probert, Owners; Site Plan
and Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single - family
dwelling, with Variances for reduced side yard setback and excess lot coverage. The
project would convert and expand the existing guest bedroom and attached garage to create
three bedrooms and two bathrooms, expand the existing master bathroom and add a new
detached two -car garage. The proposal would increase the floor area of the house to 2,725
square feet and would increase the lot coverage to a total of 4,039 square feet (17.9 %)
which is greater than the 15.0 % maximum permitted lot coverage for this property. The
project would extend to within 3 feet, 3 inches of the side property line in lieu of the
minimum 15 foot front yard setback for this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 038 - 162 -52.
.Approved 4 -0 -1 6kikensky recused)
5. 20 SOUTBRIDGE WEST: File No. 21418; Darrell and Theresa Coleman, Owners; Site
Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a swimming pool and retaining walls for
an existing single- family dwelling, with a Variance for excess lot coverage. The proposal
would expand an existing patio and add a new swimming pool, safety railings, retaining
walls and new landscaping. The proposal would result in lot coverage of 3,480 square feet,
or 22.0% of the site, which is greater than the 15.0 % maximum permitted lot coverage for
this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 034 - 311 -07. Approved 5 -0
6. 4 MARAVISTA COURT: File No. 21419; Linda and Marcus Beisel, Owners; Site Plan
and Architectural Review for construction of a fence for an existing single- family dwelling,
with a Variance for excess fence height. The proposal involve the construction of a 7 foot
tall redwood fence on the rear property line in lieu of the maximum fence height of 6 feet
for this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 055 - 183 -25. Approved 4 -0 -1 (Emberson recused)
20 MATEO DRIVE: File No. 21421; Suzanne Kim and Eric Neis, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single - family dwelling,
with a Variance for excess building height. The proposal would add 22 square feet floor area
to an existing bedroom with two new windows and includes other minor site improvements.
The proposal would result in a gross floor area of 3,798 square feet. The proposed additions
would have a maximum height of 38 feet, 9 inches in lieu of the 30 foot maximum building
height for this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 038- 381 -02. Approved 5 -0
MINUTES
8. Regular Meeting of July 17, 2014 Approved 4 -0 -1 (Tollini abstained)
ADJOURNMENTAt 7:55 PM
Design Review Board Action Minutes August 21, 2014 Page 2
4
TOWN OF TIBURON Action Minutes - Regular Meeting
Tiburon Town Hall Tiburon Planning Commission
1505 Tiburon Boulevard August 27, 2014 — 7:30 PM
Tiburon, CA 94920
ACTION MINUTES
TIBURON PLANNING CONIlVIISSION
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL At 7:30 PM
Chair Welner, Vice Chair Kulik, Commissioner Corcoran, Commissioner Weller, Commissioner
Williams All Commissioners Present
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There Were None
Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission on any subject not on the agenda may do so
under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Planning Commission is not able to undertake
extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring
action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Planning
Commission agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Testimony
regarding matters not on the agenda will not be considered part of the administrative record.
COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING
Commission and Committee Reports
Director's Report
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 110 SOLANO STREET: REVIEW OF SEASONAL RENTAL UNIT PERMIT TO OPERATE
A PORTION OF AN EXISTING TWO -FAMILY DWELLING AS A SEASONAL RENTAL
UNIT; FILE #SRU 2013 -01; Courtney and Sandy Anderson, Owners and Applicants;
Assessor's Parcel Number 059- 143 -35 [DW] Found in Substantial Compliance 2 -0 -1 -2
(Williams Abstained, Corcoran and Kulik Recused)
2. 2070 PARADISE DRIVE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A FLOATING
DOCK; FILE #11404; Caroline Mead, Owner and Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 059- 181 -85
[DW] Continued to 9124114
3. 1 BLACKFIELD DRIVE, SUITE Ar CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXPAND AN
EXISTING WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY; FILE 411403; Cove Shopping
Center, Inc., Owner; Sprint Wireless, Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 034 - 212 -18 [KO]
Approved 5-0
Tiburon Planning Commission Action Minutes August 27, 2014 Page 1
MINUTES
4. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES —Regular Meeting of July 23, 2014 Approved 5 -0
ADJOURNMENT At 9:50 PM a082714
Tiburon Planning Commission Action Minutes August 27, 2014 Page 2
TOWN OF TIBURON Regular Meeting
Tiburon Town Hall Design Review Board
1505 Tiburon Boulevard September 4, 2014
Tiburon, CA 94920 7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Cousins, Vice Chair Tollini, Boardmembers Chong, Emberson and Kricensky
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the Design Review Board on any subject not on the agenda may do so under
this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Design Review Board is not able to undertake extended
discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring action will be
referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Design Review Board agenda. Please
limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Any communications regarding an item not on
the agenda will not be considered part of the administrative record for that item.
STAFF BRIEFING (if any)
OLD BUSINESS
1. 118 LELAND WAY: File No. 714024; Charles and Suzanne Fuery, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of a detached guest cottage for an existing single -
family dwelling. The proposed 636 square foot guest cottage would include a bedroom,
bathroom, and sitting area with a wet bar. The proposal would result in a floor area of
1,558 square feet and lot coverage of 1,928 square feet (24.1 %). Assessor's Parcel No. 034-
175-04. [KO] CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 18, 2014
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NEW BUSINESS
2. 8 ACELA DRIVE: File No. 21414; Tom and Carol 011endorff, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single - family dwelling,
with a Variance for excess lot coverage. The project would expand the existing master
bedroom suite on the second floor and extend an existing deck along the front of the
house. The first floor garage and office would be expanded and reconfigured to include a
new two -car garage, a playroom, bedroom, bathroom, storage room, wine room and
laundry room. The proposal would result in a gross floor area of 3,836 square feet and lot
coverage of 3,772 square feet (20.5 %), which exceeds the 15.0 % maximum permitted lot
coverage in the RO -2 zone. Assessor's Parcel No. 058- 231 -11. [DW]
Design Review Board
September 4, 2014 Page 1
7.
4 JUNO ROAD: File No. 21420; Linda and Francis Hevem, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of a fence for an existing single - family dwelling,
with a Variance for excess fence height. The proposal involves the construction of an 8 foot
tall wooden fence near the rear property line in lieu of the maximum fence height of 6 feet
for this property. Assessor's Parcel No. 034 - 272 -03. [KO]
II
4. Regular Meeting of August 21, 2014
ADJOURNMENT
Design Review Board September 4, 2014 Page 2