The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTC Agd Pkt 2021-01-20 TOWN OF TIBURON Tiburon Town Hall 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Tiburon Town Council January 20, 2021 Regular Meeting 5:00 p.m. TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) ADVISORY NOTICE On May 18, 2020, the Marin County Public Health Officer issued a legal order directing residents to shelter at home until further notice. The order limits activity, travel and business functions to only the most essential needs. Additional information is available at https://coronavirus.marinhhs.org/ Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and No. N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California, the Town Council meeting will not be physically open to the public and all Council Members will be teleconferencing into the meeting. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can access the meeting by following the meeting live at: Audio/Video Webinar: https://zoom.us/j/92656693614 Webinar ID: 926 5669 3614 Call-in Number: +1 669 900 6833 Access Code: 926 5669 3614 Instructions for providing public comment live during the meeting using Zoom are linked on the Town’s website and to this agenda. Members of the public may provide public comment by sending comments to the Town Clerk by email at comments@townoftiburon.org. Comments received prior to the start of the Council meeting will be distributed electronically to the Town Council and posted on the Town’s website. Comments received after the start time of the Council meeting, but prior to the close of public comment period for an item, will then be read into the record, with a maximum allowance of 3 minutes per individual comment, subject to the Mayor’s discretion. All comments read into the record should be a maximum of 500 words, which corresponds to approximately 3 minutes of speaking time. If a comment is received after the agenda item is heard but before the close of the meeting, the comment will still be included as a part of the record of the meeting but will not be read into the record. Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email or call the Town Clerk who will use their best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the Town’s procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. All reasonable accommodations offered will be listed on the Town’s website at www.townoftiburon.org. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Councilmember Fredericks, Councilmember Kulik, Councilmember Ryan, Vice Mayor Welner, Mayor Thier ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION, IF ANY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Town Council on subjects not on the agenda may do so at this time. Please note however, that the Town Council is not able to undertake extended discussion or action on items not on the agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to the appropriate Commission, Board, Committee or staff for consideration or placed on a future Town Council meeting agenda. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes. CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the Consent Calendar may be approved by one motion of the Town Council unless a request is made by a member of the Town Council, public or staff to remove an item for separate discussion and consideration. If you wish to speak on a Consent Calendar item, please seek recognition by the Mayor and do so at this time. CC-1. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for September 2, 2020 special and regular meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-2. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for September 16, 2020 regular meeting (Department of Administrative Services) CC-3. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for October 7, 2020 regular meeting (Department of Administrative Services) CC-4. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for October 21, 2020 special and regular meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-5. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for November 4, 2020 regular meeting (Department of Administrative Services) CC-6. Annual Development Fee Report – Receive annual report on the status of Tiburon’s Development Impact Fees pursuant to California Government Code (Community Development Department) CC-7. Old Rail Trail Maintenance Project – Accept project as complete and direct staff to file a notice of completion (Department of Public Works) CC-8. Investment Summary – Adopt investment summary for month ending November 30, 2020 (Department of Administrative Services) CC-9. Vacancies on Town Boards, Commissions, and Committees – Announce pending vacancies for 2021 (Department of Administrative Services) CC-10. Heritage & Arts Commission Special Vacancy – Announce special vacancy on the Heritage & Arts Commission (Department of Administrative Services) ACTION ITEMS AI-1. Diversity Inclusion Task Force – Consider appointment of five at-large members to the Task Force and adoption of Task Force bylaws (Office of the Town Manager) AI-2. Town Council Committee Appointments – Review Town Council committee appointments lists and consider any changes for 2021, including the creation and appointment of two ad hoc subcommittees (Department of Administrative Services) PUBLIC HEARINGS PH-1. 545 Silverado Drive – Consider appeal of Design Review Board approval for construction of a new single-family residence at 545 Silverado Drive (Community Development Department) Owners/Applicant: Eric Nuttall/Equity Smart Investment LP Apellant(s): Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Address: 545 Silverado Drive Assessor Parcel No.: 055-082-023 DISCUSSION ITEMS DI-1. Blue & Gold Fleet – Discussion regarding Blue and Gold Fleet PUC application to discontinue service from San Francisco to Tiburon TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS TOWN MANAGER REPORT ADJOURNMENT GENERAL PUBLIC INFORMATION ASSISTANCE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Town Clerk at (415) 435- 7377. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION Copies of all agenda reports and supporting data are available for viewing and inspection at Town Hall and at the Belvedere-Tiburon Library located adjacent to Town Hall. Agendas and minutes are posted on the Town’s website, www.townoftiburon.org. Upon request, the Town will provide written agenda materials in appropriate alternative formats, or disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to enable individuals with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Please send a written request, including your name, mailing address, phone number and brief description of the requested materials and preferred alternative format or auxiliary aid or service at least 5 days before the meeting. Requests should be sent to the Office of the Town Clerk at the above address. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings provide the general public and interested parties an opportunity to provide testimony on these items. If you challenge any proposed action(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing(s) described later in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the Town Council at, or prior to, the Public Hearing(s). TIMING OF ITEMS ON AGENDA While the Town Council attempts to hear all items in order as stated on the agenda, it reserves the right to take items out of order. No set times are assigned to items appearing on the Town Council agenda. Page 1 of 3 Town Council Minutes #18-2020 September 2, 2020 TOWN COUNCIL SPECIAL & REGULAR MEETING DRAFT MINUTES Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California and the County Public Health Department’s May 18, 2020 Shelter in Place Order, councilmembers attended this meeting by teleconference. Members of the public were invited to participate in the meeting by live-streaming the meeting on the Town’s website and submitting comments to comments@townoftiburon.org to be included in the public record for the meeting. SPECIAL MEETING – 4:30 P.M. On September 2, 2020, the Town Council held a special meeting as follows: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Councilmember Kulik, Councilmember Ryan, Councilmember Welner, Vice Mayor Thier, Mayor Fredericks INTERVIEWS FOR VACANCIES ON TOWN BOARDS & COMMISSIONS •Christopher Murphy, Belvedere-Tiburon Disaster Advisory Council (1 vacancy) •David Barker, Belvedere-Tiburon Disaster Advisory Council (1 vacancy) REGULAR MEETING – 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock, Director of Administrative Services Creekmore, Director of Community Development Tasini, Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Palmer, Town Clerk Stefani ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Chelsea Waite asked whether follow up actions to the incident at Yema would be on this meeting’s agenda. Mayor Fredericks recommended a future agenda item to discuss a diversity and inclusion task force. Vice Mayor Thier requested a broader agenda item. Town Attorney Stock recommended the Council discuss the matter during the Town Council Reports section of the agenda. DR A F T CC-1 1/20/21 Page 2 of 3 Town Council Minutes #18-2020 September 2, 2020 CONSENT CALENDAR CC-1. Investment Summary – Adopt investment summary for month ending July 31, 2020 (Department of Administrative Services) CC-2. Municipal Code Amendments – Adopt Municipal Code amendments to Chapter 28 (Smoking and Tobacco Regulations) of the Tiburon Municipal Code that would ban the sale of flavored tobacco (Community Development Department) CC-3. Active Transportation Program Grants – Authorize the Town Manager to submit applications for the Active Transportation Grants for the Trestle Glen Boulevard Class II Bikeway Project (Department of Public Works) MOTION: To adopt Consent Calendar Items No. 1-3, as written. Moved: Ryan, seconded by Thier VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Ryan, Thier, Welner ACTION ITEMS AI-1. Appointments to Town Boards & Commissions – Consider appointment to the Belvedere-Tiburon Disaster Advisory Council (Department of Administrative Services) The Council discussed the merits of the applicants given the changing needs of the Advisory Council and the current landscape of disaster preparedness. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. There was none. MOTION: To appoint Christopher Murphy to the Belvedere-Tiburon Disaster Advisory Council. Moved: Welner, seconded by Thier VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Ryan, Thier, Welner PUBLIC HEARINGS PH-1. Tiburon Tourism Business Improvement District (“TTBID”) – Conduct public hearing to: a) Consider any protests to continue TTBID assessments as set forth in Resolution No. 38-2020; b) Consider adoption of Resolution to continue TTBID assessments as set forth in Resolution No. 38-2020 (Office of the Town Manager) Town Manager Chanis said that this in an annual agenda item at the time of fiscal year change to continue with the tax that is collected by the two local Tiburon hotels. He noted that the TTBID board recently approved usage of the funds, and there has been no public correspondence or protest on this item. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. There was none. DR A F T Page 3 of 3 Town Council Minutes #18-2020 September 2, 2020 MOTION: Adopt the resolution to continue to levy and collect Tiburon Tourism Business Improvement District assessments as set forth in Town Council Resolution No. 38-2020. Moved: Kulik, seconded by Ryan VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Ryan, Thier, Welner TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Ryan requested staff provide an update on local undergrounding projects. The Council also agreed to have a future agenda item relating to the possible creation of a task force, and an open discussion of other follow-up actions, stemming from the comments raised by the community during the August 27, 2020 community forum. TOWN MANAGER REPORT TM-1. Update on the Town’s response to COVID-19 emergency Town Manager Chanis said some further loosening of the Shelter-in-Place Public Health Order restrictions will allow additional business sectors to open. He also clarified the process of enforcement and follow-up of complaints for violating the Public Health Order. WEEKLY DIGESTS Received. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fredericks adjourned the meeting at 5:34 p.m. _________________________________ ALICE FREDERICKS, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________ LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK DR A F T Page 1 of 6 Town Council Minutes #19-2020 September 16, 2020 TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DRAFT MINUTES Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California and the County Public Health Department’s May 18, 2020 Shelter in Place Order, councilmembers attended this meeting by teleconference. Members of the public were invited to participate in the meeting by live-streaming the meeting on the Town’s website and submitting comments to comments@townoftiburon.org to be included in the public record for the meeting. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock, Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Palmer, Director Town Clerk Stefani ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Len Gellert asked the Council to get involved in an issue with Mill Valley Refuse Service picking up refuse from the dumpsters at the Cove Shopping Center prior to 7:00 a.m. Hawi Awash asked the Council to continue working towards an oversight committee for the hiring of the new Police Chief and adding a regular agenda item for discussion of diversity & inclusion to the Town Council meetings. Robbie Powelson from the Tam Equity Campaign spoke on behalf of the anchorage community of Richardson Bay regarding the removal of residents from their homes by the harbor master. Amy H. inquired how to learn more about what the Town Council will be doing with the police force in Tiburon and asked how members of the community can get more involved. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-1. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes of the April 10, 2020 special Town Council meeting (Department of Administrative Services) CC-2. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes of the April 15, 2020 special Town Council meeting (Department of Administrative Services) MOTION: Adopt Consent Calendar Items No. 1-2, as written. Moved: Thier, seconded by Ryan VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner DR A F T CC-2 1/20/21 Page 2 of 6 Town Council Minutes #19-2020 September 16, 2020 DISCUSSION ITEMS Councilmember Ryan recused himself from this item because the material being discussed could have a material financial effect on real property he owns. DI-1. Undergrounding Update – Staff will present an update on current utility undergrounding districts in Tiburon (Department of Public Works) Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Palmer briefed the Council on the three utility undergrounding projects in town; the Virginia Drive project, which was recently completed; the Hawthorne District project, which is still in the process of engineering design and preparation for bid; and the Tiburon Boulevard Rule 20A project, recently reapproved by the Council to preserve Rule 20A credits available to the Town. In response to Mayor Fredericks’ question about the PUC terminating Rule 20A subsidies, Director Palmer said that the risk of the Town’s credits being reallocated was addressed through the actions taken by Council at the August 5th meeting. In response to Vice Mayor Thier’s question about the costs of the Hawthorne Project, Director Palmer said that estimates and plans were still being reviewed and will be discussed at the next meeting along with the contingency amount. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. Lynn Feinerman said she would like to see underground utility poles come down all around Tiburon and inquired how undergrounding projects are financed. The Mayor referred her to staff. Elena Stevens asked how the costs of the Virginia Drive project compare to the costs of the Hawthorne District project. The Mayor also referred her to staff. No action taken. DI-2. Discuss possible creation and scope of a Diversity Inclusion Task Force, and other potential actions that were raised by the community stemming from the joint meeting held by the Tiburon Town Council and Belvedere City Council on August 27, 2020. Town Manager Chanis referred to the staff report which summarized some of the recurring themes raised by the community at the August 27 Belvedere-Tiburon joint community forum, which he said could provide a starting point for the Council’s discussion. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. Suzanne Kim supported efforts to create a Citizens Oversight Committee to review town policies and procedures to make improvement in regard to diversity and inclusion, to review historical and current complaints regarding hiring and training of police, and to establish mechanism to continually review policies and procedures. DR A F T Page 3 of 6 Town Council Minutes #19-2020 September 16, 2020 Amy H. felt community oversight is required in the hiring of members of the police force, referred to the “8 Can’t Wait campaign” and de-escalation training. She also inquired how members of the community will be kept informed. Lynne Feinerman asked for attention to be given to how law enforcement is presented to children in the schools. Felicia Gaston suggested law enforcement training to address structural and systemic issues, to forge new partnerships between police and communities. Molly Horan reiterated the importance of community involvement in hiring of new police chief. She stressed regular training in diversity and inclusion, increased diversity on the police force, and community policing. Sarah was grateful for the hard work done by the Councils at the August 27th meeting, stressed the importance of a citizen’s oversight committee and need to review the entire Police Department, not just the incident at Yema. Hawi Awash supported the formation of an oversight committee with community members who can bring their expertise to hire the next police chief, supported the creation a task force fully open to the community and without limit to the number of councilmembers on the task force. She also felt the task force report should have a report for council to review and share with the public every 2 weeks. Conor Flaherty said the task force should be highly diverse and inclusive, to give a true cross section of representation for the town. Chelsea Waite asked for full transparency of actions of the task force. Kyle Haimer reiterated the need for transparency in what the Town is going to be doing in the Police Department. William Brenner questioned whether the Council knows and understands the Police Department policies regarding use of force and firearm use, and encouraged frequent and ongoing training, and bringing forth new policies on policing. Robbie Powelson with the Tam Equity Campaign questioned Tiburon police involvement in the removal of homes and homeowners in Richardson Bay. Hilary Heaven supported transparency in the task force and supported a citizen’s oversight committee. The Council discussed what method would be most conducive to generation of ideas and solutions, be open to the public, and transparent. The Council discussed the mechanics of different types of bodies that could include both councilmembers and public members. Councilmembers discussed the need for structure, but also a more relaxed opportunity for DR A F T Page 4 of 6 Town Council Minutes #19-2020 September 16, 2020 dialogue with community members. They agreed on regular reporting to the Council, broad public participation, adherence to the Brown Act, and the initial broad topics of policing, and promotion of diversity and inclusion. The Council reached consensus to schedule a future agenda item to establish a committee to promote diversity and inclusion, would consist of all 5 Council members and 5 at-large members of the public, and would hold public meetings. Town Attorney Stock said that a resolution would be on the next agenda and, if necessary, could be further refined at that time. PUBLIC HEARINGS PH-1. Mill Valley Refuse Service Rate Increase Application – Consider adoption of a resolution that would approve a rate increase requested by Mill Valley Refuse Service, and consider options for switching from a tiered rate system to a blended rate system (Office of the Town Manager) Town Manager Chanis reviewed the rate increase request and reminded the Council that these requests are analyzed by an outside independent consultant for accuracy and validity. He spoke about increased refuse removal rates in the last several years and reviewed the rate structure in Tiburon. He said the current rate structure is based on whether a home is on a flat area or a hill area, which is antiquated and inaccurate, but has not been changed in part because an adjusted blended rate would increase rates for some residents, and lower rates for others. He explained the Town is under contract with Mill Valley Refuse Service until at least 2026. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. Conor Flaherty asked for a solution for refuse in the downtown commercial area because there is more garbage than can be well managed. David Barker requested the Council to provide strong oversight of this rate increase request, including delay pending further review and analysis. He said the Council should begin considering alternative refuse providers to Mill Valley Refuse Service soon. Vice Mayor Thier said that this situation exemplified the need to bid out all public contracts to ensure residents are getting the best price for services provided. She requested commercial pickup to start at 7:00 a.m. The Council expressed sensitivity to residents’ economic hardships due to the COVID-19 pandemic and stressed the need for a higher level of customer service. The Council deliberated the rate increase request. Mill Valley Refuse Service Managing Director Jim Iavarone explained the rationale behind the rate increase request and noted an independent audit found the rate increase appropriate. DR A F T Page 5 of 6 Town Council Minutes #19-2020 September 16, 2020 Mayor Fredericks noted that before the next possible renewal of the MVRS contract, residents may feel more reassured knowing that a comparative study would be done to look at other possible waste hauling providers. The Council discussed the cost and merits of conducting an independent audit of the contract now or waiting until the scheduled audit next year and sharing the cost with other jurisdictions. The Council decided conducting the audit now would add unnecessary costs to rate payers. Councilmember Welner said that the choices were difficult because either one, despite being within the realm of contractual allowance, would incur increased costs to residents. Councilmembers Ryan and Kulik said that while the increase is not ideal, it is within contact rates and supported approval, but both also supported further review of the contract prior to any renewal. Kulik recommended the pursuit of the bid process next Spring and Vice Mayor Thier requested that item be scheduled on a future Town Council agenda. Given the current economic climate, the Council agreed that the switch from the current tiered rate system to a blended rate system should not be pursued at this time due to the financial impact, particularly coupled with the current rate increase. MOTION: Approve the 7.02% increase in garbage rates for this year with the understanding that the contract will be evaluated before extension in 2026. Moved: Ryan, seconded by Kulik VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Ryan NAYS: Thier, Welner TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Ryan requested a future agenda item to consider moving the Council’s regular meeting time later in the afternoon or evening so more people could participate. Councilmember Welner requested an informational report on topics related to Richardson Bay. TOWN MANAGER REPORT TM-1. Update on the Town’s response to COVID-19 emergency Town Manager Chanis said Marin County has been moved to the less-restrictive Red Tier in the State’s Blueprint for a Safer Economy, which will allow further loosening of restrictions on indoor dining and retail. WEEKLY DIGESTS Received. DR A F T Page 6 of 6 Town Council Minutes #19-2020 September 16, 2020 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fredericks adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m. _________________________________ ALICE FREDERICKS, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________ LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK DR A F T Page 1 of 7 Town Council Minutes #20-2020 October 7, 2020 TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DRAFT MINUTES Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California and the County Public Health Department’s May 18, 2020 Shelter in Place Order, councilmembers attended this meeting by teleconference. Members of the public were invited to participate in the meeting by live-streaming the meeting on the Town’s website and submitting comments to comments@townoftiburon.org to be included in the public record for the meeting. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock, Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Palmer, Community Development Director Dina Tasini, Senior Planner Christy Fong, Jamie Scardina, Interim Chief of Police, Town Clerk Stefani ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Isaac Nikfar, Chair of Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission (POST) provided an update on a recent POST meeting and said the Commission would like to review the Integrated Pest Management Policy and to create a master plan for the Richardson Bay lineal park as part of the Town’s General Plan update process. PRESENTATION P-1. Introduction of New Town Staff Community Development Director Dina Tasini introduced new Senior Planner Christy Fong. Town Manager Greg Chanis introduced Jamie Scardina, Interim Chief of Police. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-1. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes of the May 6, 2020 special and regular Town Council meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-2. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes of the May 20, 2020 special and regular Town Council meetings (Department of Administrative Services) DR A F T CC-3 1/20/21 Page 2 of 7 Town Council Minutes #20-2020 October 7, 2020 CC-3. Investment Summary – Adopt investment summary for month ending August 31, 2020 (Department of Administrative Services) CC-4. Marin Emergency Radio Authority Governing Board – Consider adoption of resolution making appointment to the Marin Emergency Radio Authority Governing Board (Department of Administrative Services) MOTION: Approve Consent Calendar Items No. 1-4, as written. Moved: Thier, seconded by Ryan VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ACTION ITEMS AI-1. Diversity Inclusion Task Force – Consider adoption of a resolution that would establish a Diversity Inclusion Task Force (Office of the Town Manager) Town Attorney Stock said the proposed resolution states the qualifications sought in members of the Diversity Inclusion Task Force, a framework for determining the goals of the task force which are to be ratified by the Council, and appointment of a chair by members of the task force. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. Hawi Awash recommended the task force meet monthly before the first Council meeting, that the Mayor chair the task force, and that funding be allocated for task force use. Lynne Feinerman requested there be sufficient public notice of the application process for task force membership and task force meetings. Sara inquired about the application process for being on the task force. Chelsea W. recommended the majority of the community members on the task force be people of color, and that the task force be given authority to demand action and not just be limited to recommendations. Mayor Fredericks requested the following amendments to the resolution: • Section 1, line 3 – change “working to condemn racism, bias, & prejudice” to “working to identify and address racism, bias, and prejudice” • Section 3, line 5 – update to reflect qualified applicants should be full-time residents of Tiburon or Belvedere • Section 3, line 8 added – “Ideally possess some awareness of how the role of systemic racism produces the current inequities the task force will try to address” • Section 3 line 12 – change “oversee” to “provide recommendations to achieve” The Council discussed the composition of the task force, meeting scheduling, selection of a committee chair, and the procedure and timing of the application process. DR A F T Page 3 of 7 Town Council Minutes #20-2020 October 7, 2020 Councilmember Welner agreed with the Mayor’s suggested changes to the resolution wording and suggested adding language to the resolution reflecting the duties of the task force. He felt it was important to address policing directly. Mayor Fredericks felt that policing should not be singled out, but rather that it should be included as one of the issues within the broader topic of diversity and inclusion. The Council discussed the merits of both approaches. MOTION: To adopt the resolution, as amended, incorporating the following amendments: • Section 1, Line 3 – change “working to condemn racism…” to “working to identify and address racism…” • Section 3, Line 5 – Update to reflect that qualified applicants should be full- time residents of Tiburon or Belvedere • Add an additional bullet point to Section 3 stating applicants will “Ideally possess some awareness of how the role of systemic racism produces the current inequities the task force will try to address.” • Section 3, Line 12 – change “oversee” to “provide recommendations to achieve” • To replace the language of Section 5 to read as: “The charge of the committee is to: (1) Provide advice to the Council, Town Manager, and Police Chief regarding diversity and inclusion involving the Police force; (2) Provide advice to the Council regarding ways to improve diversity and inclusion generally in the town of Tiburon” Moved: Welner, seconded by Thier VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner Vice Mayor Thier noted her amendments were not considered as part of the previous motion. She moved to reconsider the previous motion. Councilmember Welner seconded the motion to reconsider, and the vote passed unanimously. MOTION: To further amend Section 6 to reflect that the task force will meet monthly, and to amend further Section 4 to reflect that the Mayor will serve as chair of the task force. Moved: Thier, seconded by Welner Councilmember Kulik requested additional discussion on the resolution expressly specifying the Mayor as chair of the task force. Town Attorney Stock said the original draft resolution originally intended for the Council to hold a separate discussion and appointment of a chair. Vice Mayor Thier believed a member of the Council should be chair and felt it should be the Mayor. Welner agreed that the Mayor seemed like an appropriate choice. Mayor Fredericks agreed that the Council should select the chair but thought the discussion and selection should take place at the first task force meeting. MOTION: To amend the motion on the floor to exclude the amendment that Section 4 be updated to reflect that the Mayor will serve as chair of the task force. Moved: Fredericks, seconded by Ryan DR A F T Page 4 of 7 Town Council Minutes #20-2020 October 7, 2020 VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Ryan NAYS: Thier, Welner MOTION: To further amend Section 6 to reflect that the task force will meet monthly. Moved: Thier, seconded by Ryan VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner AI-2. Fine Schedule – Consider adoption of a resolution that would establish administrative citation amounts for violation of Public Health Order (Office of the Town Manager) Town Attorney Stock presented the staff report regarding the July 21 urgency ordinance by the Marin County Board of Supervisors allowing cities to levy fines for violation of the mask ordinance in Marin County. He said the fine schedule has been amended to establish these fines. The Council discussed how the Town would apply these citations, and different options for fines such as a sliding scale or a range of fines, or warnings prior to issuance of fines. Town Manger Chanis stated the Town still promotes education as the primary form of enlisting compliance, but that the application of the fines would most likely be on a case by case basis. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. There was none. MOTION: Adopt a resolution that would establish administrative citation amounts for violation of Public Health Order. Moved: Ryan, seconded by Thier VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner AI-3. Regular Meeting Start Time – Consider adoption of resolution that would change the Town Council regular meeting start time while conducting virtual meetings Town Clerk Stefani said that after the Governor’s Executive Orders allowed for virtual meetings during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Council adjusted its regular meeting time from 7:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. while meeting virtually. The Council recently expressed desire to reconsider the meeting start time. The Council debated continuing with the 5:00 p.m. regular meeting start time or changing the time to start meeting later in the evening. Most agreed that the 5:00 p.m. meeting start time works well in the virtual environment. MOTION: To maintain the 5:00 p.m. start time for regularly scheduled Town Council meetings during the time of the Governor’s Executive Orders allowing for virtual meetings. Moved: Kulik, seconded by Thier VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Welner NAYES: Ryan DR A F T Page 5 of 7 Town Council Minutes #20-2020 October 7, 2020 AI-4. Hawthorne Undergrounding Assessment District – Consider approval of the Hawthorne Undergrounding Assessment District final plans, authorize staff to put the project out to bid, and set the construction contingency (Department of Public Works) Councilmember Ryan recused himself from this item because he has material property interest in the matter. Town Manager Chanis reviewed the composition and history of the Hawthorne Utility Undergrounding District and spoke about the various cost estimates of the project. He said PG&E costs have not been fully established yet. He presented different construction contingency options and spoke briefly about the procedures and chance of a supplemental assessment. Mayor Fredericks asked clarifying questions about the contingency amounts, and when an appropriate time to establish a construction contingency would be. Vice Mayor Thier also asked several clarifying questions about the cost estimates – including the difference in engineer’s cost estimates, PG&E costs, costs of trenching, and mobilization and traffic control. Councilmember Welner commented on the residents’ concerns that a high cost estimate might influence higher bids. He inquired about getting a second engineer’s cost estimate. The Council discussed the merits of seeking another estimate, including cost, scheduling, and how this may impact the timing of the project. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. Sara Klein said the project merits scrutiny from the Town due to its size and said there is mistrust of staff by residents. She stressed the importance of the Council aggressively reviewing the current engineer’s estimate because there seems to be a large discrepancy between the cost of this project and similar projects in Belvedere. Darrel Smith also expressed skepticism over the current engineer’s estimate based on other nearby projects and his personal experience. He requested additional review. Elena Stephens stressed the importance of this project for safety reasons and asked the Council to conduct a more thorough review of the current estimate, or seek another estimate, even if there is a time delay. She said she did not believe a supplement assessment would succeed. Ken Weil expressed frustration that the project could be further delayed, and said this project is necessary for the town residents as the neighborhood is a primary backup route and provides crucial access to Del Mar, churches, and preschools. Park Allen felt undergrounding for fire safety, falling electrical wires, and pole safety is critical. He expressed frustration with the lengthy process the project and the inflated estimate costs. DR A F T Page 6 of 7 Town Council Minutes #20-2020 October 7, 2020 Audrey Fancy said undergrounding is a safety issue and it is important for the Town to get powerlines underground. Bahram Seyedin-Noor appreciated efforts from staff but could not understand the lack of critical review of the cost estimate, particularly relative to the cost of similar projects in neighboring Belvedere. Councilmember Welner and Vice Mayor Their spoke about the mistrust of staff, and the final estimate, by the community and stressed the need to find remedy for this. Both suggested a second estimate by an independent body, with no reference to the current estimate, possibly using the same firm that estimated projects in Belvedere. Councilmember Kulik said that the results of a second estimate would coincide with the estimate from PG&E, which is beneficial to the whole process. In seeking a second estimate, the Council requested that staff work expeditiously, and communicate with the proponents of the Hawthorne undergrounding project regarding the vendor to be used to conduct the estimate. MOTION: Get a second independent estimate for the cost of the project from a credible certified cost estimating engineering firm. Moved: Welner, seconded by Thier VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Welner RECUSED: Ryan TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS There were none. TOWN MANAGER REPORT TM-1. Update on Town’s Response to COVID-19 Emergency Town Manager Chanis said schools have been given permission to start in person instruction. He said that the County may be moving into a less restrictive state tier in the future. TM-2. Update on recent Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission meeting and associated request Town Manager Chanis said the Parks, Open Space and Trails Commission has unanimously passed a motion requesting Council to direct the Commission to review the Integrated Pest Management policy. He said they also discussed their desire to be part of the master planning process for the lineal park system, and approved a motion requesting Council to direct POST to create that plan. DR A F T Page 7 of 7 Town Council Minutes #20-2020 October 7, 2020 Mayor Fredericks said the Integrated Pest Management policy has already been reviewed and approved by Council. She agreed that the involvement of POST in the planning of the lineal park system is a good idea, and should be considered in the context of working with the review and renewal of the Town’s Master Plan and the Recreation Plan. Councilmembers Welner and Kulik and Vice Mayor Thier encouraged the additional voices and ideas from POST for the lineal parks. Chanis suggested that Community Development Director Tasini be present at the next POST meeting to discuss the General Plan process. Mayor Fredericks opened the floor for public comment. Rika Gopinath offered to coordinate pest management volunteer efforts for the community. Park Allen spoke in support of the Commission’s desire to address the Council with ideas on broader subjects, particularly the parks. Chuck Hornbrook had questions about the process of reviewing and approving the Integrated Pest Management policy. Angela McInerney suggested more workshops on the Integrated Pest Management policy to allow for greater public input and comment. Regarding parks, she said that a more comprehensive plan would be better than small piecemeal projects. WEEKLY DIGESTS Received. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fredericks adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. _________________________________ ALICE FREDERICKS, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________ LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK DR A F T Page 1 of 3 Town Council Minutes #21-2020 October 21, 2020 TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR & SPECIAL MEETINGS DRAFT MINUTES Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California and the County Public Health Department’s May 18, 2020 Shelter in Place Order, councilmembers attended this meeting by teleconference. Members of the public were invited to participate in the meeting by live-streaming the meeting on the Town’s website and submitting comments to comments@townoftiburon.org to be included in the public record for the meeting. REGULAR MEETING – 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock, Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Palmer, Community Development Director Dina Tasini, Town Clerk Stefani ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-1. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for June 3, 2020 special and regular Town Council Meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-2. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for June 17, 2020 special and regular Town Council meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-3. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for July 1, 2020 special and regular Town Council meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-4. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for July 15, 2020 special and regular Town Council meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-5. Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year – Adopt resolution honoring Tiburon Peninsula Chamber of Commerce’s selection as Business of the Year (Department of Administrative Services) MOTION: Adopt Consent Calendar Items No. 1-5, as written. DR A F T CC-4 1/20/21 Page 2 of 3 Town Council Minutes #21-2020 October 21, 2020 Moved: Kulik, seconded by Thier VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Ryan, Thier, Welner DISCUSSION ITEMS DI-1. Discuss possible revision to Municipal Code regarding fence regulations Town Manager Chanis reminded the Council of two previous meetings where, during public comment, the Council heard about a spiked-top fence on that was causing injury to deer. Since those meetings, emails have been received by the Town on this matter, and Vice Mayor Thier suggested this be brought before Council for discussion. Vice Mayor Thier wanted to ensure there is a method in place to address the issue of safety to wildlife, or if the Town Municipal Code needed to be amended. Community Development Director Tasini affirmed that through the findings of the design review process, this can be, and is, addressed. The Council reviewed the Town’s design review process for fences, particularly in relation to danger to wildlife, and discussed fence material. Concluding the current design review process for fences was sound, the Council directed staff to ensure proper adherence to, and application of, the design review process. TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Ryan noted that the Slow Streets program is ending soon and suggested review of whether it should be extended and/or continued in the future. The Council discussed the viability of soliciting input from the community. Mayor Fredericks suggested the opportunity for public input, and Town Attorney Stock said this item should be placed on a future agenda. Council requested staff solicit community input, and if there is interest in continuing the program, to place the item on a future Council agenda. TOWN MANAGER REPORT TM-1. Update on Town’s Response to COVID-19 Emergency Town Manager Chanis said Marin County is on target to move into the Orange tier of the state’s Blueprint for a Safer Economy. He noted this is a less restrictive tier than the current Red tier but would not have a significant impact on Tiburon in terms of business sectors permitted to loosen restrictions. WEEKLY DIGESTS Received. ADJOURNMENT – to special meeting DR A F T Page 3 of 3 Town Council Minutes #21-2020 October 21, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING – 5:30 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Clerk Stefani INTERVIEWS FOR VACANCIES ON TOWN BOARDS & COMMISSIONS •Lynn Feinerman (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) •Lorraine Gemigniani (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) •Kathleen Burke (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) •Erin Accurso (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) •Diane Raleigh (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fredericks adjourned the meeting at 6:49 p.m. _________________________________ ALICE FREDERICKS, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________ LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK DR A F T Page 1 of 3 Town Council Minutes #24-2020 November 4, 2020 TOWN COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DRAFT MINUTES Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California and the County Public Health Department’s May 18, 2020 Shelter in Place Order, councilmembers attended this meeting by teleconference. Members of the public were invited to participate in the meeting by live-streaming the meeting on the Town’s website and submitting comments to comments@townoftiburon.org to be included in the public record for the meeting. REGULAR MEETING – 5:00 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Attorney Stock, Town Clerk Stefani ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. CONSENT CALENDAR CC-1. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for August 5, 2020 special and regular Town Council Meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-2. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for August 19, 2020 special and regular Town Council meetings (Department of Administrative Services) CC-3. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for August 27, 2020 special Town Council meeting (Department of Administrative Services) CC-4. Town Council Minutes – Adopt minutes for August 28, 2020 special Town Council meeting (Department of Administrative Services) CC-5. Marin County Major Crimes Task Force – Adopt resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the Dissolution Agreement (Office of the Town Manager) MOTION: Adopt Consent Calendar Items No. 1-5, as written. Moved: Ryan, seconded by Kulik VOTE: AYES: Fredericks, Kulik, Ryan, Thier, Welner DR A F T CC-5 1/20/21 Page 2 of 3 Town Council Minutes #24-2020 November 4, 2020 TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS There were none. TOWN MANAGER REPORT Town Manager Chanis said there would be an additional 12 candidates to interview after this meeting and asked for direction as to scheduling the interviews in relation to the regularly scheduled meetings. WEEKLY DIGESTS Received. ADJOURNMENT – to special meeting SPECIAL MEETING – 5:08 P.M. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Fredericks, Kulik, Thier, Ryan, Welner ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Chanis, Town Clerk Stefani INTERVIEWS FOR VACANCIES ON TOWN BOARDS & COMMISSIONS • Dan Schwager (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Carolyn Shadan (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Andrew Allen (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Leela Stake (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Hawi Awash (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Ruben Kalra (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Phillip Ellsworth (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Karen Rasmussen (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Colin O’Brien (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Lalita Waterman (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) • Karen Carrera (Diversity Inclusion Task Force) ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Fredericks adjourned the meeting at 7:43 p.m. DR A F T Page 3 of 3 Town Council Minutes #24-2020 November 4, 2020 _________________________________ ALICE FREDERICKS, MAYOR ATTEST: ___________________________________ LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK DR A F T STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Community Development Department Subject: Recommendation to Accept Annual Reporting of Development Impact Fees Pursuant to the California Government Code Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY The Town of Tiburon imposes three categories of fees that qualify as development fees. These categories are: 1) traffic impact fees; 2) street impact fees; and 3) stormwater runoff fees. State law requires end of year reporting of these development fees. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) 1. Staff recommends the Town Council accepts this annual report as part of the Consent Calendar. BACKGROUND Similar to most cities and counties in California, the Town of Tiburon imposes public facilities fees on development projects during the approval process. Certain of these fees are categorized as “development fees” under Section 66000 et seq. of the California Government Code. Section 66006 of that code requires specific data regarding development fees to be made available to the public within 180 days following the end of each fiscal year (i.e., by December 31), with a public meeting held on the matter at the next regularly scheduled meeting following release of the data. This report sets forth the required annual data reporting for the Town’s development fee accounts for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-2020, which closed on June 30, 2020. ANALYSIS The Town of Tiburon imposes three categories of fees that qualify as development fees. These categories are: 1) traffic impact fees; 2) street impact fees; and 3) stormwater runoff fees. Park and recreation in-lieu fees and affordable housing in-lieu fees, which the Town also collects, are not defined as development fees. Required reporting data for each of the Town’s three development fee categories is shown below. TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: CC-6 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 2 of 5 Traffic Mitigation Fees Traffic mitigation fees have been collected by Town since 1980; the two current fee accounts were established in 1996, each addressing different portions of the Tiburon Planning Area. The Town Council received a mandatory five-year report on these funds in January 2017 and made findings regarding the future use of unexpended funds in these accounts; the next five-year review would be scheduled for January 2022. In August 2017, the Town Council adopted updated traffic mitigation fees that consolidate the collection of newly-received traffic impact fees into a single account that also contains the prior fees collected for improvements within the Town’s corporate limits, which is called the Circulation System Improvement Fund. The pre- existing Planning Area Mitigation Fund will continue to exist, but will not receive any new contributions. Circulation System Improvement Fund (CSIF): This fund contains the collected exactions for construction of public traffic improvements in the incorporated portions of the Tiburon Planning Area prior to October 15, 2017 and all traffic mitigation fees subsequently collected. The fee varies depending on the location of the project in relation to intersections identified in the General Plan Circulation Element as requiring improvement. The fee is $7,174.76 per new PM peak hour trip generated. TIBURON CIRCULATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT FUND Fund Balance, June 2019 $132,337.12 Revenues: Fees Collected $ 5,276.00 Interest Income $2,154.28 TOTAL REVENUES $7,430.28 Expenditures: $(0) TOTAL EXPENDITURES $(0) Fund Balance, June 30, 2020 $139,767.40 In the adopted FY 2020-21 budget there are no planned expenditures identified from this account. No inter-fund loans or transfers occurred from this account for FY 2019-20 and no refunds from this account were issued in FY 2019-20. Planning Area Mitigation Fund (PAMF): This fund contains the collected exactions for public traffic improvements in portions of the Tiburon Planning Area outside of the Town’s corporate limits, all of which were collected prior to October 15, 2017. No new fees are collected into this account. Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 3 of 5 TIBURON PLANNING AREA MITIGATION FUND Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 194,473.78 Revenues: Fees Collected $0 Interest Income $3,169.48 TOTAL REVENUES $3,169.48 Expenditures: $(0) TOTAL EXPENDITURES $(0) Fund Balance, June 30, 2020 $197,643.26 The FY 2020-21 Town budget contains no budget allocations from this fund. Future projects to which these funds would be contributed include a merge/acceleration lane at the Tiburon Boulevard/Cecilia Way intersection and capacity improvements at the Tiburon Boulevard/Redwood Highway Frontage Road intersection. These improvements are set forth in the General Plan Circulation Element, but are likely to be at least five years away. The cost of these improvements will exceed funds available at this time. No inter-fund loans or transfers occurred in this account for FY 2019-2020 and no refunds from this account were issued in FY 2019-2020. Street Impact Fee The street impact fee went into effect in July 1999. This fee partially off-sets the Town’s costs of public roadway maintenance by assessing a fee of 1.0% (.01) on the valuation of all building permits issued by the Town. A project with a $100,000 building permit valuation would therefore be subject to a street impact fee of $1,000. TIBURON STREET IMPACT FUND Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $2,683,891.11 Revenues: Fees Collected $ 492,246.04 Interest Income Refund/Reimbursement $45,220.93 $0.00 TOTAL REVENUES $537,466.97 Expenditures: ($715,779.83) TOTAL EXPENDITURES ($715,779.83) Fund Balance, June 30, 2020 $2,505,578.25 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 4 of 5 For FY 2020-21, the Town has identified in its adopted budget $1,461,191 in planned street improvement projects to be funded by the Street Impact Fund. The Town maintains a Pavement Management Program (PMP), which analyzes the condition of the Town’s streets and suggests appropriate repair/replacement techniques based on this analysis. In 2006, the Town embarked on an aggressive program to eliminate its “failed” street segments, which has been successfully completed. According to the most recent Pavement Management Program (PMP) update report, the Town’s overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) now stands at 76 and up from a PCI of 66 in 2006. No refunds or transfers were issued from this account in FY 2019-2020. Stormwater Runoff Fee The Town began collecting stormwater runoff fees, also known as impervious surface fees, in 2005. The stormwater impact fee helps recover the costs of upgrading the Town’s public storm drain system to accommodate additional runoff caused by new construction. The fee is $1.00 per square foot of new impervious surface created by construction projects. The Town Council received a mandatory five-year report on these funds in January 2016 and made findings regarding the use of unexpended funds in this account. The next such report is due in January 2021. STORMWATER RUNOFF (DRAINAGE IMPACT) FUND Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 73,596.65 Revenues: Fees Collected $ 18,536.00 Interest Income $ 1,655.53 TOTAL REVENUES $20,191.53 Expenditures: $0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 Fund Balance, June 30, 2020 $93,788.18 For FY 2020-21 there are no planned expenditures from the Storm Water Runoff Fund. No inter- fund loans, transfers, or refunds were issued to or from this account in FY 2019-2020. FINANCIAL IMPACT The information provided is an annual report of development fees. There is no fiscal impact to accepting this report. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that adoption of this item is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it does not constitute a project under CEQA, and if it were found to constitute a project, it would be exempt pursuant to the general rule set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3). Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 5 of 5 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Town Council accepts this annual report as part of the Consent Calendar. Prepared By: Dina Tasini, Director of Community Development TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 2 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Public Works Subject: Accept the Old Rail Trail Maintenance Project as Complete and File a Notice of Completion with the County of Marin Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY MVC Enterprises Inc. completed the Old Rail Trail Maintenance Project on October 23, 2020. Staff has reviewed the work and determined that the contractor’s work is complete. Town Council needs to accept the work as complete and direct the Director of Public Works/Town Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Marin. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) Staff recommends that the Town Council: 1. Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Old Rail Trail Maintenance Project as Complete and Directing the Director of Public Works/Town Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Marin BACKGROUND The Old Rail Trail Maintenance Project (Project) involves the rehabilitation of all of the trails north of the Richardson Bay Sanitary District property (RBSD), seal coat of the trail between McKegney Green and Mar West Street, placement of decomposed granite along the edge of existing pavement, new shoulder backing and the complete rehabilitation of the path above and below RBSD and adjacent to McKegney Green Field. The Project was publicly bid following adopted Town procedures and the California Public Contract Code. On June 3, 2020, the Town Council authorized award of the contract to MVC Enterprises Inc. (MVC) in the amount of $546,271.83. ANALYSIS TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: CC-7 I I_ _J Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 2 MVC was issued a Notice to Proceed on July 29, 2020. On October 23, 2020, the work was substantially complete. The work has been inspected by Town staff and found to be acceptable. Exhibit 1 to this staff report includes photos of the completed work. There have been no change orders yet on this project. Staff anticipates issuing one final change order to make an adjustment for actual measured quantities. Closeout of the construction contract requires that the Town Council adopt a resolution (Exhibit 2) accepting the Project as complete and directing staff to file the Notice of Completion (Exhibit 3). FINANCIAL IMPACT Town Staff is currently working on issuing the final payment to MVC and closing out the project. The Project includes funding of $722,128 from Gas Tax and is anticipated to be completed for less than the budgeted amount. The savings will remain in the Gas Tax Fund. This fund is restricted for use on pavement rehabilitation and maintenance. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This Project is categorially exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301, Class 1 (c)) of the CEQA Guidelines. As specified in Section 15301, the project involves maintenance of existing roadways. The Project consists of the repair and maintenance of existing public facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination. This project consists of roadway and curb ramp repairs and maintenance. A Notice of Exemption was filed with the Marin County Recorder and State Clearing House. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council: 1. Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Old Rail Trail Maintenance Project as Complete and Directing the Director of Public Works/Town Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County of Marin. Exhibit(s): 1. Post Construction Photos 2. Draft Resolution for Notice of Completion 3. Notice of Completion Prepared By: David Eshoo, Associate Engineer Steven Palmer, Director of Public Works/Town Engineer EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 1 Town Council Resolution No. XX-2021 01/20/2021 DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. XX-2021 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ACCEPTING AS COMPLETE WORK UNDER A CONTRACT TO MVC ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR THE OLD RAIL TRAIL MAINTENANCE PROJECT; PROJECT NO. 20-PK-01 WHEREAS, the Town Manager of the Town of Tiburon did on June 3, 2020, award a contract to MVC Enterprises, Inc. for the Old Rail Trail Maintenance Project; and WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon has been advised that the work of construction under said contract has been completed; and WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon has been advised that the work was inspected by the Town and was found to be acceptable. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Tiburon Town Council, does resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: 1. The Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does hereby accept the work and improvements referred to in said contract, reserving however, all rights against the contractor, and the surety or sureties to any bond posted by them require full and complete performance of the contract, including corrections of any defective work which may appear in said work or improvement. 2. The Director of Public Works shall file a Notice of Completion with the County of Marin. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tiburon Town Council on January 20, 2021 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HOLLI P. THIER J.D., MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST: LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK EXHIBIT 3 1/2 When recorded mail to: Town of Tiburon Lea Stefani, Town Clerk 1505 Tiburon Blvd Tiburon, CA 94920 Record without fee per G.C. 27383 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Town of Tiburon NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENT TO ALL PERSONS WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN for and on behalf of the Town of Tiburon, County of Marin, State of California, that there has been a cessation of labor upon the work or improvement and that said work or improvement was completed upon the 23rd day of October 2020 and accepted the 20th day of January 2021; that the name, address and nature of the title of the party giving this notice is as follows: The Town of Tiburon, a municipal corporation, in the County of Marin, State of California, within the boundaries of which said work or improvement was made upon land owned by said Town and/or over which said Town has an easement; that said work or improvement is described as follows: OLD RAIL TRAIL MAINTENANCE PROJECT TIBURON, CA 94920 and reference is hereby made for a further description thereof to the contract approved for said work or improvements now on file in the office of the Town Clerk of said Town, and said contract is hereby incorporated herein by reference thereto; and that the name of the Contractor who contracted to perform said work and make such improvement is MVC Enterprises, Inc. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Tiburon, California, on _________________________, 20___. TOWN OF TIBURON By: ______________________________ A Municipal Corporation STEVEN PALMER Director of Public Works/Town Engineer 2/2 ****************************************************************************************** CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE Sec. 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. ******************************************************************************************* STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MARIN On this _______ day of ____________, 2021, before me, EMILY LEA STEFANI, Notary Public, personally appeared Steven Palmer, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature _________________________________ Emily Lea Stefani, Notary Public TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 2 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Administrative Services Subject: Recommendation to Accept the November 2020 Investment Summary Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY Staff provides the Town Council a monthly report on the Town’s investment activity. This report is for the month ended November 30, 2020. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) 1. Staff recommends that the Town Council: Move to accept the Investment Summary for November 2020 BACKGROUND Pursuant to Government Code Section 53601, staff is required to provide the Town Council with a report regarding the Town’s investment activities for the monthly period ended November 30, 2020. All of the funds listed below are on deposit with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). ANALYSIS November 2020 Agency Investment Amount Interest Rate Maturity Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) – Beginning Balance as of 11/01/2020 $20,612,329.41 0.576 % Liquid Deposits $0.00 Withdrawals ($1,400,000.00) Interest Earnings (Posted Quarterly) $0.00 TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: CC- 8 1-I I I I 7 - -- - L I I I I J Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 2 Total Ending Balance as of 11/30/2020 $19,212.329.41 The total invested at the end of the prior month was $20,612,329.41. Withdrawals in the amount of $400,000.00 and $1,000,000.00 were made on November 5 and 30, respectively. These withdrawals were made to support the Town’s ongoing operations, resulting in an ending balance of $19,212.329.41. Significant expenses for the month include a $713,000 payment to Ghilotti Construction for the Pavement Management Project as well as payments for Old Rail Trail repairs, annual Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program fees, and contractual Police Chief services from the County of Marin. Accrued interest is posted in the month following the end of each quarter, therefore no interest was credited in November 2020. In addition to the funds on deposit with LAIF, the Town invests funds in two Section 115 Irrevocable Trusts for Other Post-Employment Benefits and pension obligations. These trusts are administered by Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS). The PARS November 2020 Statement is attached to this report as Exhibit 1. FINANCIAL IMPACT No financial impact occurs by accepting this report. The Town continues to meet the priority principles of investing – safety, liquidity and yield in this respective order. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that acceptance of this investment summary is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it does not constitute a project under CEQA. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council: Move to accept the Investment Summary for November 2020 Exhibit(s): 1. PARS Section 115 Trust Account Summary for November 2020 Prepared By: Suzanne Creekmore, Director of Administrative Services EXHIBIT 1 PUBLIC AGENcy RETIREMENT SERVICES PARS TOWN OF TIBURON PARS Post-Employment Benefits Trust Greg Chanis Town Manager Town of Tiburon 1505 Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon, CA 94920 Account Summary Balance as of Source 11/1/2020 OPEB $2,595,966.15 PENSION $1,635 ,829.80 Totals $4,231,795.95 Investment Selection Source OPEB PENSION Balanced Index PLUS Moderately Conservative Index PLUS Investment Objective Source Account Report for the Period 11/1/2020 to 11/30/2020 Balance as of Contributions Earnings Expenses Distributions Transfers 11/30/2020 $0.00 $197,347.39 $540.82 $0.00 $0.00 $2,792,772.72 $0.00 $70,252.68 $340.80 $0.00 $0.00 $1,705,741.68 $0.00 $267,600.07 $881.62 $0.00 $0.00 $4,498,514.40 The dual goals of the Balanced Strategy are growth of principal and income. While dividend and interest income are an important component of the objective's total return, it is expected that capital appreciation will comprise a larger portion of the total return . The portfolio will be allocated between equity and fixed income investments . PENSION The dual goals of the Moderately Conservative Strategy are current income and moderate capital appreciation. The major portion of the assets is committed to income-producing securities. Market fluctuations should be expected. Investment Return Source OPEB PENSION I-Month 7.60% 4.29% 3-Months 4.33% 2.45% 1-Year 10.86% 9.13% 3-Years 7 .58% Information as provided by US Bank, Trustee for PARS ; Not FDIC Insured; No Bank Guarantee; May Lose Value Annualized Return 5-Years 10-Years Plan's Inception Dale 9/15/2016 7/10/2018 Past performance does not guarantee future results. Perfonnance returns may not reflect the deduction of applicable fees, which could reduce returns. Infonnation is deemed reliable but may be subject to change. Investment Return: Annualized rate of return is the return on an investment over a period other than one year multiplied or divided to give a comparable one-year return , Account balances are inclusive of Trust Administration. Trustee and Investment Management fees Headquarters -4350 Von Karman Ave., Suite JOO, Newport Beach, CA 92660 800.5 40.6369 Fax 949.250.1250 www.pars.org TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 2 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Administrative Services Subject: 2021 Vacancies on Town Boards, Commissions & Committees Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY At the first Town Council meeting each January, the Town Council formally announces the upcoming vacancies on Town boards and commissions and invites applicants to fill the positions. Most terms expire in February, and the Council makes the appointments or reappointments to new terms in early March. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) 1. Announce the pending vacancies in 2021 on Town boards, commissions and committees. BACKGROUND The Town Council makes appointments to the various boards, commissions and committees of the Town on an annual and as-needed basis. Most appointments are for staggered 4-year terms, regularly scheduled to expire at the end of February. At the beginning of each year, staff and the Council begin the process to refill the seats that are scheduled to expire, whether by reappointment of incumbent or new appointment. This process is governed by Town Council Resolution No. 16-2007 (Appointments Procedure), which requires that the Mayor announce the pending vacancies on Town boards, commissions and committees at the first Town Council meeting of the year. Additionally, the procedure requires the Town Clerk to publish the Notice of Pending Vacancies (Exhibit 1) in the Ark newspaper and post the notice at Town Hall and the Library for the purpose of informing the public of these vacancies, and to seek applicants to fill the positions. The deadline for new applications this year is February 11, 2021 at 5:00 P.M. Commissioners whose terms are expiring in 2021 will be notified by the Town Clerk of their term expirations and asked whether they are interested in seeking reappointment. Due consideration will be given to all incumbent commissioners; however, the Council is required to interview all new applicants. An exception to this rule is for commissioners who have served terms of less than two years in duration; the Council is not required to interview new applicants for these pending vacancies, if the incumbent seeks reappointment to the position. TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: CC-9 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 2 The attached Notice of Pending vacancies itemizes all known vacancies to which the Council will make appointments in 2021. ANALYSIS No further analysis provided. FINANCIAL IMPACT Staff anticipates no direct fiscal impact to the Town by adoption of this item. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that adoption of this item is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it does not constitute a project under CEQA. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council announce the pending vacancies in 2021 on Town boards, commissions and committees. Exhibit(s): 1. Notice of Pending Vacancies on Town Boards, Commissions & Committees, January 2021 Prepared By: Lea Stefani, Town Clerk EXHIBIT 1 TOWN OF TIBURON NOTICE OF CURRENT & PENDING VACANCIES on Town Boards, Commissions & Committees January 2021 BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD HERITAGE & ARTS COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION ******** The following vacancies on Town Boards, Commissions and Committees are current or pending in 2021. Pursuant to Resolution No. 16-2007, the Tiburon Town Council will conduct interviews of interested applicants beginning in February 2021. Current commissioners whose terms are expiring may seek reappointment for another term; commissioners who have served terms of less than two years are eligible for automatic re- appointment. Applicants should be residents of the Town of Tiburon and have the time, interest and desire to serve on the board or commission, including attendance at regular monthly meetings and other activities. Some commissions are comprised of residents of both Tiburon and Belvedere, or the Tiburon Peninsula. Applications can be obtained at www.townoftiburon.org. You may also contact Town Clerk Lea Stefani at lstefani@townoftiburon.org or (415)435-7377 for more information. Application Deadline: February 11, 2021 at 5:00 P.M. TOWN OF TIBURON NOTICE OF CURRENT & PENDING VACANCIES ON BOARDS, COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES JANUARY 2021 BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Appointee Appointed Term Expires Vacant since 2015 2/28/2025 Vacant since 2020 2/28/2021 Vacant since 2020 2/28/2021 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Appointee Appointed Term Expires Paolo Crescini* August 2019 2/28/2021 HERITAGE & ARTS COMMISSION Appointee Appointed Term Expires Vacant Since 2020 2/28/2024 PLANNING COMMISSION Appointee Appointed Term Expires Daniel Amir September 2017 2/28/2021 *Appointees who have served terms of 2 years or less are eligible for automatic reappointment **No set term limit Copies to: The Ark (for publication on 1/20, 1/27, and 2/3/2021) and Marin Independent Journal Notice Posted at Tiburon Town Hall TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 2 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Administrative Services Subject: Announcement of Special Vacancy on the Heritage & Arts Commission Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY Heritage & Arts Commissioner Kenna Norris submitted her resignation from the Heritage & Arts Commission on December 8, 2020. The Council will announce the special vacancy on the Commission and invite applications to fill the vacancy. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) 1. Announce the special vacancy on the Heritage & Arts Commission by adoption of this report on the Consent Calendar. BACKGROUND Town Council Resolution No. 16-2007 (Appointments Procedure) requires that the Mayor announce special vacancies that have occurred on Town boards, commissions and committees at the earliest possible Town Council meeting following the vacancy, and direct staff to publish a special vacancy notice in a newspaper of general circulation to inform the public of the vacancy and to seek applicants to fill the position. On December 8, 2020, Heritage & Arts Commissioner Kenna Norris submitted her resignation (Exhibit 1) from the Commission, effective immediately. The Notice of Special Vacancy (Exhibit 2) has been posted and staff is seeking applicants to serve out the remainder of Ms. Norris’ term until February 2024. The application period will run concurrently with the Town’s annual appointments process, in which the Council seeks new applicants to fill seats of appointed officials’ expiring terms, and will close on February 11, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. The Town Council will be required to interview all new applicants for this position before an appointment is made. ANALYSIS TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: CC-10 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 2 No additional analysis provided. FINANCIAL IMPACT Staff anticipates no direct fiscal impact to the Town by adoption of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that adoption of this item is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it does not constitute a project under CEQA, and if it were found to constitute a project, it would be exempt pursuant to the general rule set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council announce the special vacancy on the Heritage & Arts Commission by adoption of this report on the Consent Calendar. Exhibit(s): 1. Kenna Norris Resignation Letter 2. Special Vacancy Notice: Heritage & Arts Commission Prepared By: Lea Stefani, Town Clerk EXHIBIT 1 From:Kenna Norris To:Lea Stefani; Patti Pickett Cc:Leonor Noguez; (Tiburon H&A Commission) Victoria Fong Subject:Resignation from Heritage & Arts Commission Date:Tuesday, December 8, 2020 11:56:08 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Lea, This email serves as my resignation from the Tiburon Heritage & Arts Commission. I have enjoyed working with fellow Commissioners and serving my community for many years! At this time, I need to reprioritize my responsibilities and spend more time caring for my family. Thank you, Kenna Norris EXHIBIT 2 TOWN OF TIBURON SPECIAL VACANCY NOTICE On Town Boards, Commissions & Committees January 2021 HERITAGE & ARTS COMMISSION (Statutory Authority: Section 13B-2 of Tiburon Municipal Code) Purpose: The Heritage & Arts Commission works to preserve and protect those buildings, sites, works of art and other objects which have special historical, cultural or aesthetic character or interest to the Tiburon Peninsula. Appointees serve staggered, four-year terms. The Commission establishes educational programs and awards focusing on the unique history of the area. The Commission works on special community projects and events and is interested in planning events that would provide a forum for local artists to showcase their work. Qualifications: Town Council Resolution No. 29-2016 states that the commission shall be comprised of seven (7) members whose qualifications shall be as follows: Four (4) members must be residents of the Town of Tiburon at the time of appointment; Two (2) members may be residents of the City of Belvedere at the time of appointment; One (1) member may be a resident of the greater Tiburon peninsula (unincorporated territory) at the time of appointment. Applicants shall have the interest, desire, and time available to help promote projects related to the history and art of the Tiburon Peninsula. A formal art/history background is preferred but not required. A vacancy on the Heritage and Arts Commission has occurred as follows: Appointee Date Appointed Date Resigned Term Expires Kenna Norris July 2015 December 8, 2020 February 2024 ***************** Interested applicants can contact Tiburon Town Clerk Lea Stefani at (415)435-7377 or lstefani@townoftiburon.org for more information. Deadline for Applications: February 11, 2021 at 5PM Notice Posted at Town Hall Notice Published in The Ark on January 20, 2021 CC: Marin IJ TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 4 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Administrative Services Subject: Diversity and Inclusion Task Force: Consideration of Bylaws for Task Force and Possible Consideration of 5 At-Large Appointments Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY On October 7, 2020, the Town Council established the Diversity Inclusion Task Force and tonight the Council will consider adopting bylaws for the Task Force and consider making the five at-large appointments to the Task Force. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) 1. Consider adoption of the draft Resolution outlining the Task Force bylaws. 2. Consider making 5 at-large appointments to the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. BACKGROUND On October 7, 2020, the Town Council established the Diversity Inclusion Task Force, specifically charged to: 1. Provide advice to the Town Council, Town Manager, and Police Chief regarding issues of diversity and inclusion involving the Police force; and 2. Provide advice to the Town Council regarding ways to improve diversity and inclusion generally in the Town of Tiburon. The Task Force will be comprised of all 5 members of the Town Council and 5 at-large members of the public who are full-time residents of Tiburon or Belvedere, interested in the subject matter, and ideally possess some awareness of the impacts of systemic racism and the experience to provide recommendations to achieve diversity inclusion goals. Staff advertised the 5 vacancies on the Task Force in accordance with Town Appointments Policy, and at the close of the application period on October 27, received 29 applications for Council consideration. Since the close of the application period, 3 applicants withdrew their applications, leaving 26 applicants eligible for appointment to one of the 5 vacancies. TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: AI - 1 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 4 On December 2, 2020, after completion of the task force interviews, the Council agreed on a methodology to consider and make the five appointments to the task force and directed staff to present a draft set of bylaws for the Council’s review. Both items come before the Council tonight. ANALYSIS Draft Bylaws The Town Attorney has provided a draft Resolution outlining bylaw for the Task Force (Exhibit 1). During review and discussion of the bylaws, the Council should specify: 1) a regular meeting time; and 2) task force member term length. Staff has recommended the task force members be appointed to staggered terms, which will require the Council to specify to which term it is appointing each task force member. For example, if the Council were to decide the task force appointments shall be for four-year terms, the appointments could go as follows: a) Two members shall be appointed to terms that expire on the last day of February 2023. b) One member shall be appointed to a term that expires on the last day of February 2024. c) Two members shall be appointed to terms that expire on the last day of February 2025. This is simply an example based on a 4-year term. If the Council opts for 2- or 3-year terms, the five task force member terms could be staggered in a different way. Task Force Appointments The Council interviewed all 26 Diversity Inclusion Task Force candidates over the course of 5 meetings. The 26 applicants are listed below by interview date, and their applications are attached as Exhibits 2-27. Interviewed 10/21 2. Lynn Feinerman 3. Lorraine Gemigniani 4. Kathleen Burke 5. Erin Accurso 6. Diane Raleigh Interviewed 11/4 7. Dan Schwager 8. Carolyn Shadan 9. Andrew Allen 10. Leela Stake 11. Hawi Awash 12. Ruben Kalra 13. Phillip Ellsworth 14. Karen Rasmussen 15. Colin O’Brien Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 3 OF 4 16. Lalita Waterman 17. Karen Carrera Interviewed 11/18 18. Pam Bonnie 19. Noah Griffin 20. Erin Burns 21. Uma Lerner 22. Anh Sundstrom 23. Sara Maurer Interviewed 11/20 24. Anette Harris 25. Karla Burkitbayeva 26. Olivia Kress Interviewed 11/23 27. John Rodriguez Tonight, the Council is asked to consider making the 5 appointments to the Task Force. At the December 2, 2020 Town Council meeting, the Council discussed a methodology to efficiently evaluate a large pool of applicants for a limited number of seats. The Council agreed to the following approach: Round 1 1. Each councilmember will come to the meeting prepared with an unranked list of their top eight candidates. If Council chooses to move forward with appointments, the Mayor will call for a recess in the meeting. During the recess, councilmembers will provide their lists to the Town Clerk via email. 2. The Town Clerk will prepare a tally sheet combining all councilmember lists, which can be used to assess consensus amongst the Council. When the meeting reconvenes, the Town Clerk will display the completed tally sheet via the Zoom screen. 3. If any individual appears on all five councilmember lists, the Council could immediately vote on appointing that individual to the Task Force. Round 2 1. The Town Clerk will prepare a second tally table comprised of the individuals that received support from 3 or 4 councilmembers in Round 1. 2. Based on this smaller pool of applicants, Council will repeat the steps outlined in Round 1. For each subsequent round, the Council will decide at the time how many candidates to provide to the Town Clerk based on remaining applicant pool size and number of seats remaining. 3. The Town Clerk will prepare a Round 2 tally table combining all councilmember lists. 4. If any individual appears on all five councilmember lists, the Council could immediately vote on appointing that individual to the task force. Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 4 OF 4 The Council can run this methodology through as many rounds as is necessary or desired to fill all five seats. This methodology is meant to be a tool used to gauge consensus amongst the Council and to guide discussion. If any candidate does not progress through to the next round, that does not necessarily eliminate that candidate from eligibility to be appointed. FINANCIAL IMPACT Staff anticipates no direct fiscal impact to the Town by making appointments to the Task Force or adoption of the bylaws. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that adoption of this item is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it does not constitute a project under CEQA, and if it were found to constitute a project, it would be exempt pursuant to the general rule set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council: 1. Consider adoption of the draft Resolution outlining the Task Force bylaws. 2. Consider making 5 at-large appointments to the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. Exhibit(s): 1 DRAFT Resolution-Task Force Bylaws 2-27 Applicant materials Prepared By: Lea Stefani, Town Clerk EXHIBIT 1 Page 1 of 3 Town Council Resolution No. XX-2021 DRAFT 1/___/2021 DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. XX-2021 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ESTABLISHING PROTOCOLS AND PROCEDURES FOR THE TOWN OF TIBURON DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE WHEREAS, On October 7, 2020, the Town Council for the Town of Tiburon adopted Resolution No. 43-2020 establishing a Diversity Inclusion Task Force; WHEREAS, the Town Council for the Town of Tiburon now seeks to adopt implementing protocols and procedures for the orderly and effective operation of the Task Force. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon as follows: Section 1. Meetings of the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Diversity Inclusion Task Force of the Town of Tiburon (the “Task Force”) shall meet regularly on the 1st Wednesday of the month at _______ p.m. The Task Force shall either meet in the Town of Tiburon Council Chambers, 1505 Tiburon Blvd., or via Zoom pursuant to State law permitting a remote video platform during the pendency of the COVID 19 pandemic. All meetings of the Task Force shall occur at the regular meeting date and time, unless the meeting has been formally cancelled by staff due to a lack of business items or quorum, or due to the Task Force taking action to cancel or change a meeting date and/or time. Section 2. Public Meetings. The Task Force is a standing committee of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon and is subject to the Brown Act. (See Gov. Code § 54952(b).) As such, members of the public may attend and participate in all meetings of the Task Force. Section 3. Election of Chair and Vice-Chair. Following the first year in which the Task Force is established, the Task Force shall thereafter annually elect a Chair and a Vice Chair at the December Task Force meeting. The Chair shall be elected by being nominated by one or more sitting Task Force members. Once nominated, all Task Force members shall vote on said nomination and if the nominated member receives a majority vote of a quorum of members in attendance, the Chair shall be appointed immediately and shall take the seat of Chair at the next Task Force meeting following the meeting at which they were appointed. If there are multiple nominations for Chair, the current sitting Chair shall decide the order in which nominations are voted upon. The first member to receive a majority vote of a quorum of members in attendance shall be appointed Chair. Directly following appointment of the Chair, the Task Force shall utilize the same procedures for appointment of a Vice Chair. Page 2 of 3 Town Council Resolution No. XX-2021 DRAFT 1/___/2021 Section 4. Term and Appointment of Task Force Members. Task Force members shall serve for terms of ______ years, except that to promote continuity of experience and expertise, the initial appointments shall be staggered terms as follows: a. Two (2) members shall be appointed to terms that expire on the last day of February 20__ b. One (1) member shall be appointed to a term that expires on the last day of February 20__ c. Two (2) members shall be appointed to terms that expire on the last day of February, 20__ All subsequent appointments shall be for terms of ____ years, except that appointments to fill a vacancy where there is an unexpired term shall be for the balanced of the unexpired term only. Upon expiration of a member’s term, that member may be appointed for another term. There shall be no term limits for members of the Task Force. Where a scheduled or unscheduled vacancy on the Task Force occurs, the Town Clerk shall notice the vacancy, accept applications for the position, and place the submission of applications on a Town Council agenda in accordance with Town Council Resolution No. 16-2007 (“Town Appointments Procedure”). Members shall be appointed by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Town Council and may be removed by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Town Council. Section 5. Recusal from Agenda Items. A member of the Task Force shall immediately recuse themselves from items on a Task Force Agenda where they have a conflict of interest in serving on the Task Force. In addition to any and all conflicts established by State law, including but not limited to those subject to the Political Reform Act and/or Government Code 1090, a conflict of interest shall be presumed to exist where a Task Force member has a financial or other personal interest in items or subjects before the Task Force, which interest would render the member unable to fulfill their duties on the Task Force in an unbiased, balanced, and impartial manner. Section 6. Town Council Procedures Incorporated by Reference. Except where specific protocols, procedures and regulations have been adopted by this Resolution, the Task Force shall adhere to procedures of the most up-to-date version of the Town of Tiburon Newly Appointed Official Information and Orientation Memorandum (the “Memorandum”). Where there is a conflict between this Resolution, Resolution No. 43-2020 (Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon Establishing a Diversity Inclusion Task Force) and the Memorandum, this Resolution and Resolution No. 43-2020 shall govern. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon held on this 20th day of January, 2021, by the following vote: ■ ■ • ■■ ■ Page 3 of 3 Town Council Resolution No. XX-2021 DRAFT 1/___/2021 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HOLLI THIER, MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST: LEA STEFANI, TOWN CLERK Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone:Email: Lynn Feinerman Oct 12 2020 263 Diviso Street Tiburon CA 94920 4152463727 dvashah@yahoo.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. (Lynn Feinerman) I have lived in Tiburon for 28 years. I have a number of friends who are people of color. I am the person who, when I joined the first Zoom meeting on the incident with Verna and the police, expressed my concern about being able to host those friends safely in Tiburon. I have seen many traffic stops wherein police were pulling over people of color -and sometimes I have stopped my own vehicle to walk over and check on the situation. When anticipating hosting friends of color at my home place, I have been anxious -thinking that maybe I should meet those friends at highway 101 and escort them to my place, and then perhaps escort them back to the 101 so that the drivers might be assured safety. I want to feel safe and I want all others to feel safe living, working, playing, and visiting in Tiburon. And I am aware, as most of us are aware, that not only Tiburon, but the nation has some very serious issues to consider, with and about the police. Just recently, the FBI came out with a report (Christopher Wray) stating that there is an uncomfortable connection between police and right wing supremacist groups in the United States. Those right wing groups are armed, they are violent to people of color and to those with whom they disagree politically, and they are also religious bigots ("Jews will not replace us"). Above all, I am a democrat, with a small d, as in a person who favors and deeply believes in justice for all, and in the creative process of democracy. And lastly, but surely not least, I was deeply saddened and offended at the aggressive treatment of Verna and Hawi - two loving and creative people who honor Tiburon with their presence and their business. Diversity issues figure front and center in my work. As a media producer, I have chosen to create a radio series titled Women Rising Radio, profiling women worldwide in leadership for all the critical issues of today, including women's rights, diversity rights, voting rights, civil rights, etc. etc. In each program care is taken to profile women of divergent races, religions, ethnic backgrounds, and work perspectives. In a previous project, titled "EcoRap: Voices from the 'Hood" I chronicled a grassroots program featuring young rap artists of color learning about the ecological dangers and problems in their own communities ... and then creating rap music to highlight those issues. On a more personal level, I have always been friends and family with people of all races, religions, ethnic backgrounds and perspectives. Again on a professional level, I created and executive directed The Hebron Community Project, which brought together Israelis and Palestinians in the El Khalil/Hebron area to learn nonviolent communication and other peace building techniques -in an effort to defuse the tensions in a major flashpoint area between Israel and Palestine. Lynn Feinerman Short Work History Associate Director “Broken Rainbow” (Academy Award) Producer/Director “EcoRap: Voices from the ‘Hood” Producer/Director “If You Make it Possible” Producer/Director “Send Word, Bear Mother” Executive Director “The Hebron CommUnity Project” Producer “Women Rising Radio” http://www.womenrisingradio.com Lynn Feinerman is an independent media activist. She has also developed community projects designed to teach and use practices that bring together disparate, often conflicting groups to work through controversial issues. Lynn has also been a free lance writer and journalist for many newspapers and magazines, and has also performed as an actor and professional story teller. I U Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Council members and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Full Name: Lorraine Gemigniani Date: 10/12/2020 Applicant Information Address: 55 Red Hill Circle E Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon CA 94920 City State Zip Phone: 415-246-8611 Email: missgemigniani@gmail.com Page 1 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Tiburon is a lovely place to live and I feel fortunate to call it my home. However, there is a lack of diversity in our community and in Marin in general. While there are very few residents in Tiburon/Belvedere that could be considered "people of color", we should strive to insure that our neighbors and visitors to our community, are welcomed with open arms. Personally, I have witnessed too many times, people of color while driving late model cars, being pulled over by our police. This became a hot topic on our local NextDoor after the incident at Verna's boutique. Other residents voiced their concerns regarding what appears to be "ethnic profiling" at the hands of our police officers. I fully support our local police, but there is always room for positive change. It would not need to be a huge undertaking to improve the "policing culture" of our officers. A little diversity training would go a long way and I am ready to be an active participant. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? I am a person of color. My father is Italian but my mother is Mexican and French. I was raised in the Central Valley among people of all ethnic backgrounds. My neighbors and classmates were Chinese, Mexican, Caucasian, Filipino, Italian, Portuguse, Native American, Romanian, Japanese, African American, and more. As a child, these were my friends. Until the Civil Rights movement of the 60's, it never occured to us that having friends of all nationalities was unusual. I am proud to say that when it became an issue in other parts of the country, we organized and marched for civil rights. I was 10 years old, carrying a sign half my size. I am a Realtor by profession, going on my 34th year in business. I deal with clients from all walks of life and ethnic backgrounds. Most are born in America but many are from other countries. They bring the colors of their nationalities to the U.S. and enhance our collective American quilt. Our "welcome mat" should be on display at all times so that everyone feels a sense of inclusion in our wonderful community of Tibruon. I would embrace an opportunity to help in this regard. Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Page 2 of 2 Lorraine Gemigniani Work Experience 1980- 1989 Obtained a Real Estate License from the State of Hawaii and began selling real estate with Coldwell Banker. I sold homes, condominiums, and vacant land. Land sales became my specialty. 1985-1988 I started a garment business in Hong Kong. It was very popular.Then I moved production into mainland China.The Tiananmen Square massacre occurred and China closed its doors to foreign trade effectively ending the business. 1990- present: Returned to California and obtained my Real Estate License from the State of California. I began with Coldwell Banker, then moved to Bradley Real Estate, then to Frank Howard Allen Real Estate, then back to Bradley Real Estate. I am now with Berkshire Hathaway Home Services. 1992-2001 In addition to real estate sales, I performed forensic accounting services as an independent contractor on a per-assignment basis with Chek Tan, CPA in San Francisco. Education Amos Alonzo Stagg High School: 1972 Graduate City College of San Francisco: 1973-1978 Accounting, Painting, Sculpture University of Hawaii: 1981-1983 Accounting, Conversational Japanese Hobbies Large format oil painting, sculpture in lost wax, (bronze), photography, gardening, cooking, hiking, swimming, scuba diving. I have lived in California, Hawaii, and France. I have travelled extensively to many remote parts of the world. I have been actively involved with a movement to gain independence for West Papua from Indonesia for the past 25 years. Every year I run a One Warm Coat drive and have single handedly collected over 7500 warm coats for our citizens in need. I distribute the coats to homeless shelters in Marin and Sonoma. It is a labor of love. From:Lorraine Gemigniani To:Lea Stefani Subject:Town of Tiburon Diversity Inclusion Task Force Application Date:Monday, October 12, 2020 1:13:12 PM Attachments:Town of Tiburon Diversity Task Force pg 1.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Lea, Attached, please find my application for the Tiburon Diversity Inclusion Task Force. I should have added that in addition to my qualifications, I have held a One Warm Coat drive in Marin for the past 11 years and have single handedly collected over 7500 warm coats for those of our community who are in need. If you would like me to edit my second page and add this, just let me know. Please reply here with any questions or comments. Thank you. Best, Lorraine B Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications - Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies - Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address - Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings - Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion - Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone: Email: Kathleen Burke October 15, 2020 320 Blackfield Drive Tiburon CA 94920 (415) 435-4167 kathijburke@gmail.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Kathleen Burke I have lived in Tiburon with my husband Ralph Davis since 1994. I would be honored to serve as a community member of the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. As detailed below, I have worked to advance diversity and inclusion during my professional career and now in retirement as a community volunteer on nonprofit boards. The incident that occurred at Yema on August 21 stood out to me in stark relief against the backdrop of current racial tensions throughout America. During the subsequent Community Forum, I heard a diverse range of opinions from our community members regarding the nature and severity of that incident. I am encouraged by the actions that have been taken to conduct independent investigations and to establish the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. I would like to be part of a transparent, action-oriented process to create and implement Town policies regarding diversity and inclusion and condemning racism, bias, and prejudice. I will bring a passion for the issues, leadership and governance experience in both corporate and nonprofit sectors (including Brown Act compliance), and a commitment to continuous learning to inform the work. I have a blend of business, nonprofit, human resources, and legal experience. I led the original initiative to improve diversity and inclusion at Bank of America, serving as Vice Chairman from 1992 – 1998 on the 7-member policy committee responsible for the Bank’s strategic direction, as head of the Corporate Human Resources and Corporate Diversity Development groups. From 1999 – 2006, I was the Executive Director of the Stupski Foundation, then located in Mill Valley, CA, focused on K-12 public education reform to improve access and equity for low-income children and children of color. My volunteer nonprofit board activities continue to focus on educational equity and excellence. I am currently a director of Envision Education, having served as Board Chair from 2017 to 2019. Envision’s Board has worked with the National Equity Project to deepen our understanding of systemic racism and how to address it in our work. I am also an honorary trustee of Mills College, having served as Board Chair from 2009 to 2016. As part of my continuing education on race in America, I traveled last October to Montgomery and Selma, Alabama with a Mills class on civil rights, visiting the National Memorial for Peace and Justice and other historic sites. Kathleen Burke Community Volunteer 320 Blackfield Drive Tiburon, CA 94920 kathijburke@gmail.com 415.435.4167 (home) 415.378.4202 (mobile) Kathleen Burke is a graduate of Washington State University (B.A., Political Science, 1973) and of Georgetown University Law Center (J.D., 1977). From 1999 to 2006, she was the Executive Director of the Stupski Foundation, a private operating foundation in Mill Valley, CA, focused on K-12 public education reform. During that time, the Foundation’s primary program was the District Alliance, providing onsite management assistance, grants, leadership development, and networking programs for leaders of districts around the country. Previously Ms. Burke spent 20 years in the financial services industry, blending legal, human resources, and executive management experience. Her private sector career began in 1977 as an attorney in the Legal Department of Security Pacific National Bank in Los Angeles, and culminated as Vice Chairman of Bank of America in San Francisco, CA, serving on the 7-member policy committee responsible for the Bank’s strategic direction, operating plans, and performance, and head of the Corporate Human Resources and Corporate Diversity Development groups. Ms. Burke has served on numerous nonprofit boards in the Bay Area. She is currently a director of Envision Education (having served as Board Chair from 2017 to 2019) and an honorary trustee of Mills College (having served as Board Chair from 2009 to 2016). Ms. Burke is also a member of the Human Capital and Talent Management Committee of the Board of Directors of Beneficial State Bank and of the Panel of Advisors of RENEW. She serves as Vice President of the Board of Directors of the IWF Northern California Legacy Foundation. She has been a member of the International Women’s Forum since 1994. October 2020 Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone: Email: Erin C. Accurso 10/15/2020 85 Geldert Drive Tiburon CA 94920 415-435-3032 erin.accurso@ucsf.edu Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are core to my personal and professional values. After learning of the interaction that happened at Yema and watching the video-recording of the interaction, my family participated in the town hall that was held. I appreciated the openness and humility that many community members brought to this discussion. At the same time, it was clear that our community has some work to do. The Tiburon community may not be fully aware of the ways in which they hold privilege. This privilege impacts the extent to which our community has had to grapple with racial equity issues on a personal level, leading to difficulty with valuing a diversity of perspectives and less awareness of how systemic racism has impacted the lived experiences of different community members. At a time of racial reckoning and increased awareness about racism in our country, I appreciate Tiburon’s proactive stance to combat racism. We have all made mistakes in acting on biases, often without intending to do so. Identifying and repairing ruptures to move forward productively will require greater collective awareness of these issues and cultural humility. While police behavior is just one issue that impacts equity and inclusion in our community, it does provide a clear example of how concrete steps can be taken to promote an inclusive culture. I would very much like to contribute to our community moving forward with the goal of increasing community awareness of issues related to equity and inclusion, identifying policies and practices that might not promote these values, and generally advising the Council on broader issues to help build a more inclusive environment in Tiburon-Belvedere. As a bicultural community member, I also hope to leverage my personal experience navigating different cultural frameworks in order to communicate effectively with people from all different backgrounds. I am Assistant Professor at UCSF in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Clinical Director of the UCSF Eating Disorders Program. My clinical training in cultural competence, cultural sensitivity, and cultural humility has provided me with a strong foundation of the types of issues that can often be overlooked in developing and sustaining an inclusive environment. As a clinical psychologist, I also have extensive background and training on health disparities, implicit bias, and microaggressions. I also engage in regular DEI trainings to improve my self-awareness of implicit bias, identifying and managing microaggressions, and fostering a culture of inclusion for our patient population, faculty, staff, and trainees. Professionally, my research seeks to improve publicly-funded treatment for underserved minority youth with eating disorders, including Spanish-speaking Latino youth who are particularly impacted by eating disorders in California. I have also served on my department’s Diversity Committee for the past five years, where I help to develop strategies and implement solutions improve recruiting practices and ensure that diverse candidates are actively sought out and bias is minimized in hiring practices. Outside of UCSF, I have served on the Dartmouth Alumni Council as a representative for the Dartmouth Alumni Latino Association (2016-2020), which promotes the recruitment of Latino students to Dartmouth College and a culture of inclusion for all students on campus. As a member of the Council, I served as a liaison between students/alumni and the Board of Trustees at Dartmouth College. ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 1 E RIN C . A CCURSO, Ph.D . UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY • UCSF WEILL INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCES 401 PARNASSUS AVENUE • ROOM LP-166, BOX F-0984 • SAN FRANCISCO, CA • 94143-0984 PHONE: 415.476.5139 • FAX: 415.502.6361 • E -MAIL: erin.accurso@ucsf.edu PERSONAL INFORMATION Citizenship: U.S.A. and Mexico EDUCATION 2002 - 2006 B.A., Psychology with High Honors, magna cum laude Dartmouth College 2006 - 2012 Ph.D., Clinical Psychology San Diego State University / University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program (JDP) 2011 - 2012 Internship, Clinical Psychology University of Illinois at Chicago, Institute for Juvenile Research 2012 - 2015 Postdoctoral Fellow, NIMH-Funded T32 in Eating Disorders Research University of Chicago, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2015 - present Assistant Professor University of California, San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry 2017 - present Clinical Director, UCSF Eating Disorders Program University of California, San Francisco, Department of Psychiatry LICENSURE 2015 - present Clinical Psychologist, State of California (PSY 27511) HONORS & AWARDS 2003 - 2006 Presidential Research Scholar, Dartmouth College 2004 National Society of Collegiate Scholars Award, Dartmouth College 2004 - 2005 Presidential Scholar Research Assistantship, Dartmouth College 2005 Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback Foundation Student Scholarship 2006 Magna Cum Laude, Dartmouth College 2006 High Honors in Psychology, Dartmouth College 2006 Escobosa Prize for the best honors thesis in Psychology, Dartmouth College 2006 Dartmouth General Fellowship 2006 Rufus Choate Scholar, Dartmouth College 2008 Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society, San Diego State University 2009 Scholars without Borders Honor Society, San Diego State University 2010 - 2011 Outstanding Doctoral Teaching Award in Psychology, San Diego State University 2011 Curran-Bauer Analytics Student Tuition Fellowship 2011 Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology Minority Travel Fellowship 2013 Excellence in Patient Care Award Finalist, University of Chicago Medical Center ED Program 2013 - 2016 Clinical Research Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Award, National Institutes of Health ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 2 2014 Child Intervention and Prevention Services (CHIPS) Fellow, National Institutes of Mental Health 2015 Early Career Investigator Award, Academy for Eating Disorders (AED) 2015 - 2017 Science Program for Excellence in Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 2019-present Faculty, Training Institute for Child & Adolescent Eating Disorders PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 2007 - 2015 American Psychological Association (APA) 2009 - present Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT) 2011 - present Academy for Eating Disorders (AED) 2016 - present Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) RESEARCH GRANTS 2008 - 2011 Child-therapist and caregiver-therapist alliance in usual care psychotherapy. NIMH F31MH083399, Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award. Role: PI. 2008 - 2011 Optimizing fidelity to FBT for adolescent anorexia nervosa. PI: James Lock. NIMH R33MH096779. Role: Co-Investigator. 2012 - 2015 Regional postdoctoral training grant in eating disorders research. PI: Scott Crow. NIMH T32MH082761. Role: Postdoctoral Trainee. 2017 - 2019 Confirming the efficacy/mechanism of an adaptive treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa. PI: James Lock. NIMH R01MH110538. Role: Study therapist. 2019 - 2023 Adapting and implementing family-based treatment for youth with anorexia nervosa in publicly- funded settings. NIMH K23MH120347. Role: PI. JOURNAL ARTICLES 1. Chavira, D. A., Accurso, E. C., Garland, A. F., & Hough, R. (2010). Suicidal behavior among youth in five public sectors of care. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 15, 44-51. PMCID: PMC2835344 2. Garland, A. F., Hurlburt, M. S., Brookman-Frazee, L., Taylor, R. M., & Accurso, E. C. (2010). Methodological challenges of characterizing usual care psychotherapeutic practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 37, 208-220. PMCID: PMC2877339 3. Garland, A. F., Brookman-Frazee, L., Hurlburt, M. S., Accurso, E. C., Zoffness, R., Haine-Schlagel, R., & Ganger, W. (2010). Mental health care for children with disruptive behavior problems: A view inside therapists’ offices. Psychiatric Services, 61, 788-795. PMCID: PMC3019612 4. Accurso, E. C., Taylor, R. M., & Garland, A. F. (2011). Evidence-based practices addressed in community- based children’s mental health clinical supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 5, 88-96. PMCID: PMC3992485 5. Garland, A. F., Haine-Schlagel, R., Accurso, E. C., Baker-Ericzén, M. J., & Brookman-Frazee, L. (2012). Exploring the effect of therapists’ treatment practices on client attendance in community-based care for children. Psychological Services, 9, 74-88. PMCID: PMC3436117 6. Accurso, E. C., Hawley, K. M., & Garland, A. F. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Caregivers and Parents. Psychological Assessment, 25, 244-252. PMCID: PMC3647370 7. Garland, A. F., Accurso, E. C., Haine-Schlagel, R., Brookman-Frazee, L., Roesch, S., & Zhang, J. J. (2014). Searching for elements of evidence-based practices in children’s usual care and examining their impact. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43, 201-215. PMCID: PMC4041606 ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 3 8. Le Grange, D., Accurso, E. C., Lock, J., Agras, S., & Bryson, S. W. (2014). Early weight gain predicts outcome in two treatments for adolescent anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 124-129. PMCID: PMC4341963 9. Accurso, E. C., Ciao, A. C., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E., Lock, J., & Le Grange, D. (2014). Is weight gain really a catalyst for broader recovery?: The impact of weight gain on psychological symptoms in the treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 56, 1-6. PMCID: PMC4019781 10. Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Ciao, A. C., Accurso, E. C., Pisetsky, E. M., Peterson, C. B., Byrne, C. E., & Le Grange, D. (2014). Subjective and objective binge eating in relation to eating disorder symptomatology, depressive symptoms, and self-esteem among treatment-seeking adolescents with bulimia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 22, 230-236. PMCID: PMC4085792 11. Mann, A., Accurso, E. C., Stiles-Shields, C., Capra, L., Labuschagne, Z., & Karnik, N. S., & Le Grange, D. (2014). Factors associated with substance use in adolescents with eating disorders. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 182-187. PMCID: PMC4108497 12. Accurso, E. C., Crow, S., Norman, G. J., Rock, C., & Boutelle, K. N. (2014). The role of motivation in family- based guided self-help treatment for childhood obesity. Childhood Obesity, 10, 392-399. PMCID: PMC4195249 13. Le Grange, D., Lock, J., Accurso, E. C., Agras, W. S., Darcy, A., Forsberg, S., & Bryson, S. W. (2014). Relapse from remission at two- to four-year follow-up in two treatments for adolescent anorexia nervosa. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53, 1162-1167. PMCID: PMC4254507 14. Elran-Barak, R., Accurso, E. C., Goldschmidt, A., Sztainer, M., Byrne, C. E., & Le Grange, D. (2014). Eating patterns in youth with restricting and binge eating/purging type anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 878-883. PMCID: PMC4337799 15. Ciao, A. C., Accurso, E. C., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Lock, J., & Le Grange, D. (2015). Family functioning in two treatments for adolescent anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 81-90. PMCID: PMC4382801 16. Forsberg, S., Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., Aspen, V., Accurso, E. C., Bryson, S., Agras, S., Arnow, K. D., Le Grange, D., & Lock, J. (2015). Development and evaluation of a treatment fidelity instrument for family- based treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 91-99. PMCID: PMC4349507 17. Accurso, E. C., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Ciao, A. C., & Le Grange, D. (2015). From efficacy to effectiveness: Comparing outcomes for youth with anorexia nervosa treated in research trials versus clinical care. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 65, 36-41. PMCID: PMC4306615 18. Accurso, E. C., & Garland, A. F. (2015). Child, caregiver, and therapist perspectives on therapeutic alliance in usual care child psychotherapy. Psychological Assessment, 27, 347-352. PMCID: PMC4355327 19. Goldschmidt, A. B, Accurso, E. C., Schreiber-Gregory, D. N., Crosby, R. D., Cao, L., Engel, S. G., Mitchell, J. E., Crow, S. J., Peterson, C. B., Le Grange, D., & Wonderlich, S. A. (2015). Behavioral, emotional, and situational context of purging episodes in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 341-344. PMCID: PMC4535345 20. Accurso, E. C., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E., Ciao, A., Cao, L., Crosby, R. D., Smith, T. L., Klein, M. H., Mitchell, J. E., Crow, S. J., Wonderlich, S. A., & Peterson, C. B. (2015). Therapeutic alliance in two treatments for bulimia nervosa. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 637-642. PMCID: PMC4446165 21. Ciao, A. C., Accurso, E. C., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., & Le Grange, D. (2015). Predictors and moderators of psychological changes during the treatment of adolescent bulimia nervosa. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 69, 48-53. PMCID: PMC4382801 22. Accurso, E. C., Garland, A. F., Haine-Schlagel, R., Brookman-Frazee, L., & Baker-Ericzén, M. J. (2015). Factors contributing to reduced caregiver strain in a publicly-funded child mental health system. Journal of ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 4 Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 23, 131-143. PMCID: PMC4562689 23. Lock, J., Le Grange, D., Agras, W. S., Fitzpatrick, K. K., Jo, B., Accurso, E., Forsberg, S., Anderson, K., Arnow, K., & Sztainer, M. (2015). Can adaptive treatment improve outcomes in family-based therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa?: Feasibility and treatment effects of a multi-site treatment study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 73, 90-95. PMCID: PMC4573312 24. Byrne, C. E., Accurso, E. C., Arnow, K., Lock, J., & Le Grange, D. (2015). An exploratory examination of patient and parental self-efficacy as predictors of weight gain in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 883-888. PMCID: PMC4845658 25. Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Accurso, E. C., Ciao, A. C., Crosby, R. D., Cao, L., Pisetsky, E. M., Le Grange, D., Peterson, C. B., Crow, S., Engel, S. G., Mitchell, J. E., & Wonderlich, S. A. (2015). Restrictive eating in anorexia nervosa: Examining maintenance and consequences in the natural environment. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 923-931. PMCID: PMC4618028 26. Byrne, C. E., Kass, A. E., Accurso, E. C., Fischer, S., O’Brien, S., Goodyear, A., Lock, J., & Le Grange, D. (2015). Overvaluation of shape and weight in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: Does shape concern or weight concern matter more for treatment outcome?. Journal of Eating Disorders, 3, 1-5. PMCID: PMC4681038 27. Kass, A. K., Accurso, E. C., Goldschmidt, A., Anam, S., Byrne, C. E., Kinasz, K., Goodyear, A., O’Brien, S., & Le Grange, D. (2015). Picking and nibbling in children and adolescents with eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48, 1102-1105. PMCID: PMC4754954 28. Rienecke, R., Accurso, E. C., Lock, J., & Le Grange, D. (2016). Expressed emotion, family functioning, and treatment outcome for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 24, 43-51. PMCID: PMC4962527 29. Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Ciao, A. C., & Accurso, E. C. (2016). A naturalistic examination of social comparisons and disordered eating thoughts, urges, and behaviors in college women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49, 143-152. PMCID: PMC4733430 30. Accurso, E. C., Wonderlich, S. A., Crosby, R. D., Smith, T. L., Klein, M. H., Mitchell, J. E., Crow, S. J., Berg, K. C., & Peterson, C. B. (2016). Predictors and moderators of treatment outcome in a randomized clinical trial for adults with symptoms of bulimia nervosa. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 178-184. PMCID: PMC4738019 31. Goldschmidt, A. B., Accurso, E. C., O’Brien, S., Fitzpatrick, K. K., Lock, J. D., & Le Grange, D. (2016). The importance of loss of control while eating in adolescents with purging disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49, 801-804. PMCID: PMC5318997 32. Kinasz, K., Accurso, E. C., Kass, A. E., & Le Grange, D. (2016). Does sex matter in the clinical presentation of eating disorders in youth?. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58, 410-416. PMCID: PMC4808325 33. Mak, G. Z., Lucchetti, A. R., Drossos, T., Fitzsimmons-Craft, E. E., Accurso, E. C., Stiles-Shields, C., Newman, E. A., & Skelly, C. L. (2016). Pediatric chronic abdominal pain and median arcuate ligament syndrome: A review and psychosocial comparison. Pediatric Annals, 45(7), e257-e264. 34. Accurso, E. C., Lebow, J., Murray, S. B., Kass, A. E., & Le Grange, D. (2016). The relation of weight suppression and BMIz to bulimic symptoms in youth with bulimia nervosa. Journal of Eating Disorders, 4, 1- 6. PMCID: PMC4962363 35. Goldschmidt, A. B., Accurso, E. C., Crosby, R. D., Cao, L., Ellison, J., Smith, T. L., Klein, M. H., Mitchell, J. E., Crow, S. J., Wonderlich, S. A., & Peterson, C. B. (2016). Association between objective and subjective binge eating and psychopathology during a psychological treatment trial for bulimic symptoms. Appetite, 107, 471-477. PMCID: PMC5457535 36. Vo, M., Accurso, E. C., Goldschmidt, A. B., & Le Grange, D. (2017). The impact of DSM-5 on eating disorder diagnoses. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50, 578-581. 37. Anderson, K. E., Accurso, E. C., Kinasz, K. R., & Le Grange, D. (2017). Residents’ and fellows’ knowledge and ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 5 attitudes about eating disorders at an academic medical center. Academic Psychiatry, 41, 381-384. 38. Peterson, C. B., Berg, K. C., Crosby, R. D., Lavender, J. M., Accurso, E. C., Ciao, A. C., Smith, T. L., Klein, M., Mitchell, J. E., Crow, S. J., & Wonderlich, S. A. (2017). The effects of psychotherapy treatment on outcome in bulimia nervosa: Examining indirect effects through emotion regulation, self-directed behavior, and self- discrepancy within the mediation model. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50, 636-647. PMCID: PMC5459657 39. Boyd, H. K., Kass, A. E., Accurso, E. C., Goldschmidt, A. B., Wildes, J. E., & Le Grange, D. (2017). Relationship between desired weight and eating disorder pathology in youth. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50, 963-969. PMCID: PMC5545974 40. Darrow, S. M., Accurso, E. C., Nauman, E. R., Goldschmidt, A. B., & Le Grange, D. (2017). Exploring types of family environments in youth with eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review, 25, 389-396. PMCID: PMC5568961 41. Accurso, E. C., Astrachan-Fletcher, E., O’Brien, S., McClanahan, S., & Le Grange, D. (2018). Adaptation and implementation of family-based treatment enhanced with dialectical behavior therapy skills for anorexia nervosa in community-based specialist clinics. Eating Disorders, DOI: 10.1080/10640266.2017.1330319 42. Lebow, J., Sim, L. A., & Accurso, E. C. (2018). Is there clinical consensus in defining weight restoration for adolescents with anorexia nervosa? Eating Disorders, 26(3), 270-277, DOI: 10.1080/10640266.2017.1388664 43. Astrachan-Fletcher, E., Accurso, E. C., Rossman, S., McClanahan, S. F., Dimitropoulos, G. & Le Grange, D. (2018). An exploratory study of challenges and successes in implementing adapted family-based treatment in a community setting. Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-018-0228-9 44. Murray, S. B., Accurso, E. C., Griffiths, S., & Nagata, J. M. (2018). Boys, biceps and bradycardia: The hidden dangers of muscularity-oriented disordered eating. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62, 352-355. 45. Lebow, J., Sim, L., Crosby, R. D., Goldschmidt, A. B., Le Grange, D., & Accurso, E. C. (2019). Weight gain trajectories during outpatient family-based treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 52, 88-94. DOI: 10.1002/eat.23000 46. Goldschmidt, A. B., Crosby, R. D., Cao, L., Moessner, M., Forbush, K. T., Accurso, E. C., & Le Grange, D. (2018). Network analysis of pediatric eating disorder symptoms in a treatment-seeking, transdiagnostic sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127, 251-264. PMCID: PMC5851474 47. Riano, N. S., Linos, E., Accurso, E. C., Sung, D., Linos, E., Simard, J. F., & Mangurian, C. (2018). Paid family and childbearing leave policies at top us medical schools. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 319, 611-614. 48. Singh, S., Accurso, E. C., Hail, L., Goldschmidt, A. B., & Le Grange, D. (2018). Outcome parameters associated with perceived helpfulness of family-based treatment for adolescent eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51, 574-578. DOI: 10.1002/eat.22863 49. Hughes, E. K., Sawyer, S. M., Accurso, E. C., Singh, S., & Le Grange, D. (2019). Predictors of early response in conjoint and separated models of family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 27, 283-294. 50. Garber, A. K., Cheng, J., Accurso, E. C., Adams, S. H., Buckelew S. M., Kapphahn, C. J., Kreiter, A., Le Grange, D., Machen, V. I., Moscicki, A., Saffran, K., Sy, A., Wilson, L., & Golden, N. H. (2019). Weight loss and illness severity in adolescents with atypical anorexia nervosa. Pediatrics, 144, 1-11. 51. Accurso, E.C., Sim, L., Mulheim, L., & Lebow, J. (2019). Parents know best: Caregiver perspectives on eating disorder recovery. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 1-9. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1002/eat.23200 52. Le Grange, D., Gorrell, S., Hughes, E. K., Accurso, E. C., Yeo, M., Pradel, M., & Sawyer, S. M. (2020). Delivery of family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia nervosa in a public health care setting: research versus ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 6 non-research specialty care. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 1001. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01001 53. Accurso, E.C., Le Grange, D., & Graham, A. K. (2020). Attitudes towards family-based treatment impact therapists’ intent to change their therapeutic practice for adolescent anorexia nervosa. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 305. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00305 54. Lock, J., Le Grange, D., Accurso, E.C., Welch, H., Mondal, S., & Agras, W. S. (2020). Is online training in family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa feasible and can it improve fidelity to key components affecting outcome?. Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 30, 75-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbct.2020.03.002 55. Garber, A. K., Cheng, J., Accurso, E. C., Adams, S. H., Buckelew, S. M., Kapphahn, C. J., Kreiter, A., Le Grange, D., Machen, V. I., Moscicki, A., Sy, A., Wilson, L., Golden, N. H. (2020). Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of refeeding in anorexia nervosa: The Study of Refeeding to Optimize iNpatient Gains. JAMA Pediatrics. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3359 56. Gorrell, S., Lebow, J., Kinasz, K., Mitchell, J. E., Goldschmidt, A. B., Le Grange, D., & Accurso, E. C. (in press). Psychotropic medication use in treatment-seeking youth with eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review. DOI: 10.1002/erv.2788 INVITED BOOK CHAPTERS 1. Accurso, E. C., & Sánchez-Johnsen, L. (2013). Behavioral weight loss. In J. Alexander, A. Goldschmidt, & D. Le Grange (Eds.), A clinician's guide to binge eating disorder (pp. 193-204). London: Routledge. 2. Fitzpatrick, K. K., Accurso, E. C., Aspen, V., Forsberg, S. E., Le Grange, D., & Lock, J. (2015). Conceptualizing fidelity in FBT as the field moves forward: How do we know when we’re doing it right?. In K. L. Loeb, D. Le Grange, & J. Lock (Eds.), Family therapy for adolescent eating and weight disorders: New applications (pp. 418-439). New York: Routledge. 3. Accurso, E. C., & Goodyear, A. M. (2015). Key therapeutic role of nutrition across therapies and settings. In T. Wade (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Feeding and Eating Disorders (pp. 1-6). Singapore: Springer Science. 4. Ciao, A. C., Accurso, E. C., & Wonderlich, S. A. (2015). What do we know about severe and enduring anorexia nervosa?. In S. Touyz, D. Le Grange, P. Hay, & H. Lacey (Eds.), Managing severe and enduring anorexia nervosa: A clinician’s guide. New York: Routledge. 5. Accurso, E. C., & Goodyear, A. M. (2017). Key therapeutic role of nutrition across therapies and settings. Encyclopedia of Feeding and Eating Disorders (pp. 479-484). Singapore: Springer Science. 6. Accurso, E. C., & Forsberg, S. (2020). Eating disorders. In M. D. Feldman & J. F. Christensen (Eds.), Behavioral medicine: A guide for clinical practice, fifth edition (pp. 224-232). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. SELECTED PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS June 2008 Stuck Cases: Generating New Perspectives. Workshop presented at the Collaborative Expo: Practice and Research in Community Mental Health Services with Barry Hill, LCSW and Rosemarie Campus, LCSW organized by the Therapists and Researchers: Advancing Collaboration group, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA. Mar 2012 Behavioral interventions for insomnia and nightmares. Grand Rounds, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago. Apr 2012 Evidence-based assessment. Workshop for community-based clinicians across Illinois as part of a state-wide dissemination effort, University of Illinois at Chicago. May 2012 Helping the non-compliant child: Adaptations for immigrant Latino families. Workshop, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago. ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 7 Aug 2012 Professional issues seminar: Obtaining a postdoctoral fellowship. Invited lecture, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago. Feb - Mar 2014 Dialectical behavior therapy: Applications to patients with eating disorders. Workshop, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Eating Disorders Program, University of Chicago. May 2014 Psychiatric management of adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Invited lecture, School of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago. Jan 2016 Clinical licensure for psychologists. Invited panel, Clinical Psychology Training Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. Feb 2016 The pay-offs and perils of investigating usual care psychotherapy for youth. Invited lecture, Clifford Attkisson Clinical Services Research Training Program (CSRTP), Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. Feb 2016 Body image and disordered eating in the LBGTQI community. Invited workshop, 8th Annual LGBTQI Health Forum, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Mar 2016 Stronger than stigma: How to increase mental health awareness and combat stigma on your campus… and beyond. Invited keynote, 1st Annual Mental Health Conference, Associated Students of California, Office of the Academic Affairs, University of California, Berkeley. April 2016 Treatment of anorexia nervosa. Invited lecture, Department of Educational Psychology Training Program, The College of Education, University of Texas, Austin. May 2016 Dissemination and implementation of family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa. Invited research seminar, Adolescent Medicine Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco. June 2017 Family-based treatment: From the ivory tower to the real world, at all levels of care. Invited workshop with Ellen Astrachan-Fletcher, PhD, and Daniel Le Grange, PhD, at the AED International Conference on Eating Disorders, Prague, Czech Republic. Feb 2019 Family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa. Co-led two-day training with Jim Lock, MD, PhD, Training Institute for Child & Adolescent Eating Disorders, San Francisco. March 2019 Let’s Get Things Straight, I’m Not: Eating Disorders in the LGBTQ+ Community. Co-chaired plenary with Kelly Bhatnagar, PhD, AED International Conference on Eating Disorders, New York, NY. Jan 2020 Evidence-based assessment and treatment of eating disorders. Invited plenary at annual retreat for physicians and other prescribers, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco. March 2018 Lecture, Adolescent Medicine Division Trainee Seminar Series, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco. Aug 2018 Food is the Best Medicine: Understanding Patients and Care Provided in the UCSF Eating Disorders Program. Frontline Education Series for Behavioral Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. July 2018 Lecture, Eating Disorders Program “Bootcamp” for Trainees and Affiliate Care Providers, Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. March 2019 Family-based treatment for anorexia nervosa. Co-led two-day training with Jim Lock, MD, PhD, Training Institute for Child & Adolescent Eating Disorders, San Francisco. March 2019 Let’s Get Things Straight, I’m Not: Eating Disorders in the LGBTQ+ Community. Co-chaired plenary with Kelly Bhatnagar, PhD, AED International Conference on Eating Disorders, New York, NY. May 2019 Lecture, Adolescent Medicine Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San ERIN C. ACCURSO, Ph.D. Page 8 Francisco. July 2019 Lecture, Eating Disorders, Department of Psychiatry residents, University of California, San Francisco. Sept 2019 Family-based treatment of eating disorders. Invited two-day training for psychotherapy providers, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco. Oct 2019 Family-based treatment of eating disorders. Invited one-day training for psychiatrists and WRAP providers, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco. Jan 2020 Evidence-based assessment and treatment of eating disorders. Invited plenary at annual retreat for physicians and other prescribers, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco. Feb 2020 Lecture, Adolescent Medicine Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco. March 2020 Lecture, Clifford Attkisson Clinical Services Research Training Program (CSRTP), Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco. EDITORIAL POSITIONS 2019 - present Editor: Journal of Eating Disorders 2014 - present Ad hoc reviewer: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Psychological Assessment, Childhood Obesity, Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Current Psychiatry Reviews, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, BMC Health Services Research, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, Child and Adolescent Mental Health GOVERNMENT AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE Oct 2015 Grant reviewer, RBC-Brain Canada Research Partnership in Mental Health Services for Children and Youth Multi-Investigator Research Initiative (MIRI) 2016 - 2017 UCSF Department of Psychiatry, Child and Adolescent Division, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Assessment Committee 2016 - 2017 UCSF Department of Psychiatry, Child and Adolescent Division, Clinical Rotations Task Force 2016 - present UCSF Department of Psychiatry, Diversity Committee, Recruitment and Retention Task Force 2016 - 2019 Dartmouth College, Dartmouth Alumni Council, Academic Affairs Committee, Representative for the Dartmouth Association of Latino Alumni 2018-2020 Planning Committee, International Conference on Eating Disorders 2019 and 2020, Academy for Eating Disorders (AED) 2019-present Consultant, Partnership HealthPlan of California Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Cl e rk Lea Stefan i 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Full Name : Diane L Raleigh, PhD Date: 10/19/20 Applicant Information Address: 1960 Centro West St. ---------------------------------Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon CA 94920 City State Zip Phone: 650-862-7800 Email: dlraleigh@yahoo.com Page 1 of2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Why would you like to serve on the task force? My years of experience working within multicultural and multiracial populations have given me a strong desire to contribute to the community's understanding of how the complex weaving together our diversities -racial, cultural , religious, gender or economic -can result in a truly just society. By broadening this understanding, significant steps can be taken to rewrite the societal rules that have enabled discrimination for so long. I would like to serve on the task force to help bring about change that leads to a more inclusive community. Prior to my career as a psychologist, I served as a social worker in the underclass of black Newark, New Jersey, and with the Latino community in San Jose. These years along with my professional background as a clinical psychologist have given be a broad understand ing of human behavior. Each client has taught me the importance of understanding how an individual ' s experiences shapes that person's behavior and world-view. As a task force member, I would like to bring this knowledge to bear on the issues confronting the community. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? I have a broad understanding of different cultures. I have studied in Italy and worked in France. I have spent two years also working at a community level in Somalia and Nigeria as a Peace Corps volunteer. In Nigeria I established a Motherless Baby Home which continues today to serve the population. Eleven years ago I sought a project in Africa. While traveling in a remote area in Tanzania a Maasai midwife pleaded for my help to establish a clinic as no medical care was available. I was not only able to build a Health Center meeting the medical needs of over 4,000 people, but also built a primary school system. To enhance the project, I brought in water, electricity, and solar power. Today the Olmoti community is self-sustainable. Without learning the thinking, the customs, values, and world view of these different cultures, I would not have succeeded. It is this acquired knowledge that I would like to share. Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted appli cat ion m aterials con stitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Page 2 of2 Diane L. Raleigh, Ph.D. CA License: PSY 22262 1960 Centro West St., Tiburon, CA 94920 650-862-7800 dlraleigh@yahoo.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1990-present Clinical Psychologist, Private Practice, Palo Alto, CA 2008-present; Honolulu, HI 1990-2007 • Psychotherapeutic treatment of adults, adolescents and couples • Conflict resolution, mediation, marital counseling • Personal coaching • Professional supervision and consultation 1983-1989 Private Practice, Palisades, NY Particular areas of focus: Adults and adolescents, marital counseling, sexual abuse 1989-1990 Student Health Services, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI • Supervised Ph.D. candidates in theory and practice of psychotherapy • Provided psychotherapy for multi-cultural college student population • Developed vocational counseling programs • Professional consultation 1980-1982 Psychological Assistant, Institute for the Advancement of Human Behavior, Portola Valley, CA Provided supervised psychotherapy to individuals and couples 2000-2001 Consultant, HumanBasics.com, Sunnyvale, CA Served as an initial team member of an internet company focused on health and relationships. Participated in the development of market strategy. Produced written materials providing guidance on issues common to human relationships. 1973-1975. Assistant Director, Pathway Drug Abuse Council, San Jose, CA Responsible for development and implementation of drug abuse strategies for largely Hispanic, inner-city population. Instituted staff development programs. Recruited, trained, and supervised multi-ethnic volunteers. Provided leadership for alcoholic women's groups. 1972-1973 Coordinator of Services, Family Service Association, Palo Alto, CA Recruited, trained, and supervised counselors. Developed community outreach program. 1966-1968 Caseworker, Santa Clara County Foster Placem ent Unit, San Jose, CA Responsible for placement and monitoring of children in foster care. Prov ided comprehensive casework services for natural parents. Counseled teens and pregnant 1964-1966 girls. Provided court liaison services. Provided extensive counseling for foster parents. Caseworker, Child Service Association, Newark, New Jersey. Provided intensive casework services to disorganized, multi-problem families of neglected and abused children. Educated families in the use of social services. Supervised VISTA volunteers. Acted as liaison to court. COMMUNITY SERVICE 2009-Present Our One Community/ Olmoti Clinic, Tanzania Founder and CEO 1963-1964 1962-1963 Established medical and educational facilities in a remote Maasai village Providing comprehensive medical care and education to a community of 3,900 people. Supplied water, electricity, solar and staff housing which resulted in the transformation of the community . United States Peace Corps, Eastern Nigeria, West Africa, Founded the Owerri Baby Home for motherless infants, comprising extensive community organization, fund-raising, counseling, and staff supervision. Functioned as UNESCO supervisor and teacher trainer. Mogadishu, Somalia Taught English to Somalis in elementary school. Served as a liaison to the greater expatriate community. Consulted with Somalis to be placed overseas. Member of the Board of Directors of the following: • Hawaii Children's Trust Fund, Honolulu, Hawaii • Parents and Children Together (PACT), Honolulu, Hawaii • Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California • Family Service Association, Palo Alto, California • Children's Home Society, San Jose, California • Pajaro Dunes Association, Watsonville, California EDUCATION 1983 Ph.D ., Clinical Psychology, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA 1982 Internship in Clinical Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA Undergraduate work: B.S., Political Science/ International Relations: Bridgeport University, Bridgeport, CT, 1960-61 ; Maxwell School of Citizenship, Syracuse University, NY, 1957-60 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Council members and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Full Name: Dan Schwager Date: 1 0/09/20 Applicant Information Address: 38 Claire Way ------------------------------- Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon CA 94920 City State Zip Phone: 415-272-4942 Email: dan.schwager@sfdph.org Page 1 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Dan Schwager Why would you like to serve on the task force? The issue of equity and diversity are extremely important to me and I want to dedicate my time for this task force as a public service contribution. As the child of holocaust survivors, this issue s also very personal to me and I am very invested in being a part of this time in history where change needs to occur. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? My qualidfic~tions and professional experience are perfectly matched to serving on this task force. In addition to my JD law degree (Jurisdoctorate) from Golden Gate University, I also hold a Master's degree in Education administration (M.Ed.) from the University of Massachusetts. Most importantly, for the past 15 years, I have served in a leadership position in the Department of Public Health in San Francisco, working as the Director of Medical Staff Services at San Francisco General Hospital. Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Page 2 of 2 Dan Schwager, JD, M.Ed, CPMSM 38 Claire Way Tiburon, CA 94920 (415) 272-4942 Dan.Schwager@sfdph.org Education JD - Jurisdoctorate School of Law - Golden Gate University Law School, San Francisco Masters - M.Ed. (Education Administration) University of Massachusetts, Amherst Bachelor's -BS (Political Science) State University of Binghamton, New York Professional Certification CPMSM – Certified Professional in Medical Services Management Professional Experience Director, Medical Staff Services February 2005 - Present San Francisco General Hospital Medical Center Department of Public Health, City and County of San Francisco Responsible for the planning, development and implementation of standards, policies and procedures relating to Medical Staff credentialing, quality improvement, and administrative functions at SFGHMC and directing the MSSD within the SFGHMC, including the medical administrative and medico-legal aspects of the Medical Staff Organization. Serves as a liaison between UC San Francisco, San Francisco City and County Department of Public Health, and the SFGHMC Medical Staff, to promote and enhance communication and an effective working relationship. Manage and supervise the work of certified and non-certified personnel engaged in the duties and responsibilities of the MSSD. Implement approved Governing Body credentialing actions and finalized resolutions for triaged applications, ensuring that issues and actions are appropriately documented. Create correspondence and reports to formally document governance actions. Research and report legal requirements in the development of Bylaws, policies and procedures. Maintain compliance with JCAHO and NCQA requirements. Senior Governance Analyst March 2001 – February 2005 Medical Staff Services UCSF Medical Center Senior assistant to the Director of Medical Staff Services and acting Director in the absence of the Director. For a Medical Staff of nearly 2000 providers (physicians and allied health practitioners), implemented UCSF Medical Staff personnel policies and governance structure as mandated by UCSF bylaws and policy and procedures. Managed investigation and disciplinary processes as stipulated by California statute and UCSF by-laws. Administered and implemented Committee business, meeting agenda requirements and resolution of Committee actions. Administered suspension and disciplinary processes as necessary for delinquencies or other corrective actions according to the Medical Staff by-laws. Professional Experience (prior to 2001) IRC Institutional Review Board Consultant - Assistant Director Maintained statutory compliance with FDA and NIH regulations. Consulted in the development of clinical research protocols in the areas of pharmaceuticals, vaccines, biologics, diagnostics and non-significant risk devices. Prudential/Aetna Health Care Plan Provider Network Manager Management and administration of Managed Care operations regarding benefits, claims, practitioner credentialing, eligibility, grievances and appeals. Administered monthly budget reviews and corrections applicable to capitation and deduction reports. Provided legal analysis regarding statutory and contractual compliance. Marin IPA Provider Relations Analyst Administered implementation of all Health Plan contracts to assure operational compliance. Recruited and credentialed new providers and maintained credentialing and recredentialing documentation. Research and analysis of legal issues related to statutory and contractual compliance. Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone:Email: Carolyn Shadan Oct 14,20 279 Cecilia Way Tiburon CA 94920 41 5-51 9-3444 Carolyn.shadan@gmail.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. I believe the events with the Verna store owner and the resulting Diversity Inclusion Task Force are an opportunity to come together and advise the Town Council, Manager and Police Chief on creating a more diverse and inclusive environment. Through this task force everyone will be able to be heard, including our Police force. This is Task Force seems to be an opportunity to step away from blaming and finger pointing, to listen and acknowledge each other and move towards reconciliation through recommending constructive changes. My children attended the Reed Union School District. During their attendance, an anti-bullying program was implemented and I witnessed first hand how seemingly opposing ideas and people can come together in a positive way. As a practicing engineer working for a Utility in Oakland, I enjoy working with a diverse workforce. I am a member of the Black History Month committee and in that capacity volunteer on a variety of task force and event planning committees to celebrate Black History Month. At work, we have a book club and read books on this topic as well as organizational sociology. Our most recent book was one called Biased by a Stanford professor, Dr Jennifer Eberhardt concerning inherent bias. I served for many years on my professional technical committee, IEEE-IAS, as chair, vice chair, publicity chair, treasurer, secretary and member at large. I understand the work involved in engaging and answering to a diverse group. As publicity chair I was responsible for identifying technical topics and speakers for our monthly meetings to keep our 2K members aware of technical changes in our industry. In my personal life I grew up in a bi-racial family and witnessed first hand how prevalent inherent bias is, how it can hurt even when it wasn't meant to, and how we can overcome it through various means like constructive conversations and conscious behavior change. In my lifetime I have witnessed the changes we are still in the process of making towards a more inclusive society towards a more perfect union. Carolyn Shadan 279 Cecilia Way Tiburon, CA 94920 415-519-3444 As a resident of Tiburon since 1990 I am seeking a position on the Tiburon Diversity Task Force. BS in Electrical Engineering, SFSU 1/18/18- Present: EBMUD 375 Eleventh Street, Oakland, CA 94607-4240 • As part of the Water Distribution Planning Division, I implement Master Plans and set priorities in the Operating Budget Process, manage construction projects and budgets, review and complete CEQA documents, and complete hydraulic analysis of the water distribution system using an Innovyze software package. 7/14/14-1/181/18: EBMUD 375 Eleventh Street, Oakland, CA 94607-4240 • As part of the Facilities Engineering group, I manage projects for District occupied facilities which includes budget preparation, contract preparation and management, and construction management, inspection and close out. 1/20/04-7/14/14: EBMUD 375 Eleventh Street, Oakland, CA 94607-4240 • As a member of the Design Divisions electrical engineering section I was responsible for the electrical & controls design, specifications and construction drawings on a variety of projects including low and medium voltage systems, security systems, telecommunication systems, and load flow/short circuit/arc flash studies 1989-1998: CH2M Hill 9191 S Jamaica St, Englewood, CO • As a member of CH2M Hill’s electrical engineering department in Emeryville, I was involved in the electrical, instrumentation & controls design on a variety of municipal and industrial projects. 1987-1989 Kennedy Jenks Chilton, 3030 Second St, San Francisco, CA • As a member of the electrical engineering department, I was involved in the electrical, instrumentation & controls design on a variety of municipal and industrial projects. Professional Society Affiliations: IEEE-IAS, ISA, SWE Volunteer Experience: Reed Union School District • Room Parent • Mathlete Grade Leader • School Play Coordinator/Seamstress Our Lady of Mt Carmel Parish • Holiday Seamstress for Youth Pageants EBMUD • Black History Month Committee • Holiday Family Fund Town of Tiburon Commiss'ion, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Cle:rik 'L:ea .Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd ., Tiburo:tl, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion App licant Name Andrew Allen Oct 12, 2020:,, Full Name: Date: Applicant Information 340 Golden Gate Ave. Address: ----------------------------------Street Apartment/Unit Belvedere California 94920 City State Zip 415 435-2439 Merlin299@aol.com Phone: Email: Page 1 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the me address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Andrew Allen. ISi W hy would you like to serve on the task force? I believe that the largest barrier to diversity in the Belvedereffiburon Peninsula is lack of workforce affordable housing. If the community is really serious about developing diversity it needs to create affordable housing What are your appl icable qualifications and experiences? I have successfully developed affordable live/work housing in Benicia, California. I believe we can do the same thing here in the Peninsula. See attached article for my experience and qualifications https://www.beniciamagazine.com/interview-with-andrew-allen/ I am also president of the Belvedere Land Company. Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Page 2 of 2 Resume- Born San Francisco 1951-Moved to 88 Beach Road, Belvedere at 5 days. Residence. 340 Golden Gate Avenue, Belvedere. Member of California and 9th Circuit Bar Licensed Real Estate Broker Volunteer Fireman. Belvedere and then Belvedere/Tiburon Departments 18 years. The following article concerns my work creating affordable live/work spaces. Contact-415-435-2439. Merlin299@aol.com Interview w ith Andrew All en ay ~ 2010 Sue Sumner-Moore The masswe r.,n,r,~m ,rtgS re but :llllhf:t'f'lfriln'r,,e<i ~ ~ ra fiitst saw , m in the late 19i'Os. The w · ings oog Tyler Street in the Ben.1Cia _,:sJHT,.,,,., ~ undeNti!Jzed nd in poor~ SfJJilf:!11 !hte lt¥/ketl !Emm' is -Ts a grea Uocatkbrn,, YJ ffJhT& U.~ Be~r.e !fes1die1n{t ~ - and his · 1y trust bou t the buidirtg at 990 Tyler Street itn 1979. ~ the ro!.'Jowing ten yea the mJSt pu~ addiliooaf buii ngs 1MYd now owns 12iJ~OOO s;rpare "feet iin the Alf'SemiL Tlhe fa'nmrJy tJruJtstr; otl!mr Sri~ Ccilll.nrJy lmildfin,gs re a tmld'll:flil b · ''llifTnr!J on Rose Om7e in icia d a ~~,ng center on Se1eoo rive in · The cha1.lenge 20 years ago was to 'lffnd the right use for tJhe fornmtN m' · r,y tore~ Amdrew errrrltrrac.edl tilfll iitJleJll. o.ffferer.8 by Ars&JmiJ ~ aThd lfd!Q'fMiLy owner Gordon Potter. Create rtist fhle..WO/fk ~ Gord urged. Andlew~s u~ had de~ a si · project in San~ "'Yoo see~ that are~~ ~ for '8hl!iir O'fiigmJtil 1U1S1e bflJlt 8/tr,ey fat:e #Jhte 51001flhu:est, tJmey get 'H.ltrits ~'lb}le Ii' t YJ he says. "'So these two had the . , d the bu. ngs ~ were right for lhatuse..YJ • IT8 arn:11 •P ~ tfhe )•ttt/J,1Jst1rti' 1 res mto a~ folr ~ He renovated the bu~ ir,gs bebJleen 1992 1994,, am:i today his fam}¥ trust ow.ns abt:xut 35 lh?e-wod< ~ Mihm sight of the Stra l. The is TTldhOl!edl by Am ~ a prof!U: ~ttl T1I ht pror,oott.es Ben'tdia arfJffsts artd /hJas a ry;;,,, #fttte ~ cJf '#lttte thm?ffrtg art 00 ·,y. 'Andrew · ¥ was the that rmtde this happen~ YI~ Joo Garcia, ~nt of #Jhte AlrtJs Bsnikiia IIYISTd from 1989 lo 19941.. "'He 'b.rlght 1Tolr 'dfhlis ~~rm,enrlt oori made it easy for Arts Ben· · to have ifs own s,pace. YJ llllh,od, did 1heA/r$.anal bUildill!IS ..... ~ you ~ t? Junk. Garbage. Exxon had used one of the build' gs for the torage of shi ' parts. But that was · of cool because 1here were these huge chors d gi it l"'hl!:~·w 1~ and parts of the Enon V~ There w«e 1he Nl'rMtlJ~~ that Si "'Enon \Q~, (l) One of the build' t had a crazed lady wffll an axe who chased pea la. ... It was 01.'d-~bledl ~ed use wlllEffl we got it A oo· on Jackso Street was used as mo · d :torase,, and you had people who wanted to sell auto parts and open karate studios · ttle area But thought at 1hat po ·nt was to go fnf artist live- ~k spaces. So now we ha\le new mixed use: artist stud~ a museu some office space. cld Vo'l ma1te 1he 1ransbmation ftom industrial use to work space? It came about bee.a.use Bentcia.~ go~ at the ti was be' ~ forward- thm ·ng and ~ wti\9a I think INe-work is a very good · ea for city p , n · • Marilyn o~~-e tfum8' ma~.-) was VMY h fW and ~ffl6a Bu {form.er • dirootQf) wias as wet. Benicia was one of 1he 1irst cities to pass an d'nance to al INe-W'Of ~ I f8llG . to be mMle befi the blaldhlS CCWICI be occupied? One of 1he key ideas came from Gordon Potter~ who owned the Blacksmittl eu· · --~ a d r~ted h' bui g with interior h.vay and ended p with -wasted ~ for · He smt:t~ "'Why not hang a ban yon 1he outside craam some great space · · ~,,, So we have these huge,, solidly constructed buildings, We saw that we could cut big doors,, VJe1Y USi!I~ for :y type of artist. You hang 'W81et sa et~ on the outsfda separate the utilities so e'6eryone has · own mater put in double-insulated walls for We got the property '6ery' ~ d ~ were sepa,ale it for 0#.GVIUII. square foot · 1994 tars.. It was very econ • we tried to be We put 100 afflf)S to e the srn9.l units so e\-..,J;nn enou power no imattef ~ 'l}lpe of theyre -We Cfea ~ · the renovation? We had 120~ sq feet. a large~ p,o:fed: wmh lots of d@lails that was doing~ like the shaetrock. You mean o~? ~ I was d · it -I was hanging sheetrock. -~ the ArSenart t. was the ~~:;-:spe.ce~s~.~~~~~~:'-;;,i:3ght~=:.i=~~~~:;;~;:;s~still a lot 1hat ooulfJbe~ So wv..i~ to do more· Arsenal? I · n~s uwmo part of Bemda. The City of Be.mda o a lot fl1Q(e do'Ml there than roost people know. Most peo don"t know that the City hash df8ds of acres (that it teases to others} that are co • g up for renewal. Wbat -~....... ke to see next· this area? I would like to see more · ed use~ live--work art spaoos. ~ 20 fflOfe.. I 1hmk Ber, ·a is perf@ctty suited for it. You have a great mix of phistica1i . and practicality .. I W01J low to~ things rm.Doon to B nicia I 'WOQ1:td ove to do ~- You describe Art:s Benicia as a tremend asset for Beni H w so? Firstly I beliew that art is one of those 1h-gs that h a oornrnunily togeth&f,, like food and raisi g kids d having good restaurants. These 1hi gs hold a o nily together-malls don"t. Seoo lyh rt brings~· . 1-b.~ng msts ~ Mamieil · a I~ Bob A.meson before he passed~ and you have other names that are devet p · ~ p us the glass artis • Peop come to see · works. and rt of the Genera Pia is to ~ too . ' Do you ect rt? Of course. rve gotten so many unpaid rent checks . art Oaugh. g). I have a rath eclectic collecti . IN!hfle ~ ·nrg m71/ftIJ H~ Benlida,, tJ/111 'l'tJis1J: ~r.s AmJ,rew 3 tl'litfiftfh& and i~ herself as of his current tenan"ts.. She · iles h-to come by and see 'I/Im~ A bit IJater,, former Benicia pUaoomg commissr7ooer Bob Bemmn to,ps to~ .A/f1ltJrew. 7/7hrey '3iilik ~ the ~ of the lt'iwl--~rk ~ -You know whats n ce? They're~ to tent,,,, ndrew says. "'That what f(es it~,,, Bob says. "We'\4elfmt:.i .~azero~ffad.orCNelr#lhtefPSSil:15~•~~ Ami.m'(1fl was a m ar frigurre d Benias · the 1990s. In addition to his tll70'fk on the artiist IA?e-work llJnJs., he c:ampa!igrrerll &!JB. • ta JPlfO}ect that proposer/J buifi!fdmig * ,~ oo'ke domes iirn '8/tr,e Port off !Eferl/lm to~ rii!t miff~ in ttfh1e Say~ One proposed site was nee; the Qloddow~ oolher was across Tyler Stte&t fm.rn Amire>tl's lf9'(;;6rdly reno'l?at.ed buf.tr:lmgs. He also p,mitjpsted · ~ that resu¥/ted k8 a lf»eW Gerrteral A'/tm -for the dl.y fJfhst was ~fed aft #JhTe eTlrd of t/W~ Why buikfi the coke do ~en:~~.::~ V9 hntnNQ . 'cia, They WOO.id ~ 8000 \lle1y g • wew,,~7'111:11 iffwn.ril'nl!lllh f Qf , gmb~e nd ~ ' that we y to store it here.. They would have ru· ed e . perty value,, not just m ttm rougoout the city. H much time were yo ~ in Benicia then? I was here 3 or 4 days week. Cs) Mer /BlaJrtrrJ iirtJ 119511,, ~ /Jltters W1'/fllt1J Ns faJfJrri1Jp it» Ns 'ff'Nt-gmw:J'rrraoflhw: HwJJ.use.. He am /his rNile,, Alrrne Godefroy, ~ six ch.iitdten, ~ frt1tn 16 to 30 yea,s okL AtrrK/.'faN!II is a lf&3i estate attomey who now spends most of his TNork hours at his 1y 1/l{JJ.~ the &i!t:edere /J.iJJrrd C-Ompsm,y.. The Al.'M f(iJIJ7fridlyt foom,J.ed tJhe ~ ~y ('(f1J(),ffi f/f1.an 120 ago,. and AAdraw and his brofiler ate the tl1ftd gene,aoon of his "ialnfl to lfft8NJ.ge the ffnn. Their fa " Howard. is stll acti in the /tJJJ.J.(S~ What is ycMll" eat Belvedere . Company? My job is to make sure peopte have a safe,, h If: warm place-thats my seN-~ that"s what I do. NrflJfe!((Q its as a ~ /f/OOfflflJbelr for~ IMJairt C@J.r1171f/y !JlfCIJJf)S tJltrat ~tt lhiis i'nit/.&Jfesffs. He ~ on M1!e txJ,affil of a pri/11ate San Anselmo schc,ol/ that~ l.Vls~ 1eJl 00 --fhet l!ioafdtfa: ~to p,ese,vi -a hiisttilic Mit, IA -¥ffif.1eat Qfl/flf~ 8lf1Kil oo #he LwJrtg Hmsto,y Silciety /limJrdJ. "'1/frey ~ to l{l(lJJft oo ~ RenmJ.~ ~ · e diow;n in Los~ and up here They/'re a fun gt'(lUP ""Andff!NI says. 111&.ut~ a.is,o Mlle a sch fly sfKiie.."" Hts ~oo ~ ~ iis lhelJplmtJ an ~ in i&J.lfftf1fla Andrew /flef::,aJfme lntelres'd.ed in /Btu/ffl1lll. at 1Jm //Jf9.• of fnefltis he met wh • ~with~ issues t 'Utte 1960s.. He seIVes on the ooatd of the Burma Al tio.n arid has made two ftips to tJ1tte Sooitheast Asl& al ftfyl. Hs CUMJJflt goal is to get solar pene/)s SO the ~ witi ha\1e I f at n1.ght ~,. dll'awlS JOU to ftll'n~tc:, i? Burma is a beautiful country,, such beautiful peopte. But it has a horn corru :t,, inefficient bad ~t We help this r le oqmanage school in lower Bu,~ in the Moo :tale ·ea. Thity need e~· 'ffi cha}; to chal'........,,.,, .• n,ds to nw.d1 biQger ttems.. How has the · helped the orphanage? We send cioth · -,, medr suflf}I~ We b 'It a llnttge to d. We sct 1hem the only \'IQOfki ~ on the island. ey have so little,, d suddenly they have something oool. But you ha~ to be carefu that whate'tf~ you get isn"t too cool. We got them a truck,, and it was taken by the police. --.-would dream -? We~re uy-to get solar panels to the orphanage.. There·s no erectricity on the island. They use ~ and that"s expensi'Ve. We got them sofar Ii ts,, but solar panels would let them have lights later at night. Just ha · · ights at night is a really cool thing. We take so ch for granted: hot water light at nig~ being abJe to go to school. So we~re g ~ to gat the sob: panels at the mph nage., Mway or ootltlet. What motivates you to do so mudl for o-·-- My wife! Shem-kes me want to do good. This artide appears in the March 201') issue of Be · ta Magazine. RfES:: MISCELLANE:OUS CsJ Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications - Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies - Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address - Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings - Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion - Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone: Email: Leela Stake 10/20/20 1673 Mar West Street Tiburon CA 94920 415-513-9991 leela.stake@gmail.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Leela Stake Having lived here and raised my children here for more than a decade, my love for Tiburon as home is undeniable. Diversity, equity and inclusion is an area of expertise and passion. I want to be an engaged citizen and give back to the place that's given so much to me. We all benefit from a community that is diverse and inclusive. I would be honored to play a role in helping to move this important work forward. I have two decades of experience as a trusted counselor to many of the world's leading companies, foundations and nonprofit organizations on diversity, equity and inclusion. I currently serve on my company's Diversity, Equity and Inclusion task force and lead FH4Inclusion -- two pillars of our work to become the world's most inclusive global communications agency. Through FH4Inclusion, our award-winning pro bono initiative, we've donated more than 20,000 hours and the equivalent of $5M in pro bono and volunteer time to nonprofit organizations around the world advancing inclusion. My experience includes: -Overseeing a leading Bay Area biotechnology company's health equity and educational equity work -Working with one of San Francisco's largest employers on their equality portfolio -Developing a $100 million women's economic empowerment initiative -Helping a leading sports brand develop and launch its work to invest in adolescent girls -Supporting the launch of Lean In In addition to my professional experience, I have lived experience as a multiracial woman. LEELA STAKE leela.stake@gmail.com; (415) 513-9991 Trusted advisor to many of the world’s most influential businesses and foundations. Multiracial senior executive with a two-decade track record of delivering results, empowering teams, and helping companies and organizations achieve greater purpose. 2015-present Senior Partner, FleishmanHillard • Leads FleishmanHillard’s global corporate responsibility, impact, and purpose practice. Exceptional programmatic and strategic consulting expertise. Oversees multimillion portfolio of clients focusing on education, environment, equity, responsible tech, women’s empowerment, and workforce development. • Leads global teams spanning Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America, and the United States. • Regularly interviewed and speaks on shared value, corporate sustainability & responsibility, and global impact. • Developed and supports Genentech’s health equity and STEM education initiatives. • Launched the Catalytic Capital Consortium for the MacArthur Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation. • Served as in-house communications lead for Omidyar Network’s beneficial tech, education and impact investing teams. • Global Diversity, Equity and Inclusion leadership team and head of FH4Inclusion, the award-winning pro-bono initiative that has contributed 20,000+ hours and the equivalent of $5 million in time to nonprofit partners. • Awarded 2020 Team Player award, our office’s highest annual honor. 2005-2015 Chair, Global Sustainable Growth & Corporate Responsibility Practice, APCO Worldwide Managing Director, San Francisco Office • Led APCO’s Sustainable Growth & Corporate Responsibility practice of 50+ people globally. • Led the San Francisco office with responsibility for business and staff management. • Exceptional record of business, staff, financial and project management for a multimillion portfolio of FORTUNE 500, foundation and nonprofit clients. • Led UPS work to create business-aligned initiatives, engage employees, develop global programs, and earn recognition including Best Corporate Steward by the U.S. Chamber Foundation. • Developed $100M program for Fortune 10 company’s foundation aimed at improving women’s economic advancement globally by crafting strategy, developing partnerships, and leading communications. • Supported development of The Nike Foundation’s Girl Effect and launch of Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In. 2003-2005 Ford Fellow and Consultant, The Asia Foundation • Awarded highly competitive post-graduate Stanford fellowship. Completed economic development and environmental assignments in Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Nepal and the Philippines. STANFORD UNIVERSITY M.A., GPA: 4.00. Coursework included classes in corporate responsibility, social entrepreneurship and women’s leadership from Graduate School of Business B.A. with honors and distinction. Honors thesis in Ethics in Society program. Stanford in Washington, DC and Stanford in Chile • Established Stanford’s social entrepreneurship introductory course series and led courses for 150+ students • Received James W. Lyons Award for unique and lasting contributions to Stanford University OTHER LEADERSHIP AND RECOGNITION • Recognized as a Most Purposeful Agency Pro in 2020 by PR Week • Board Member, Stanford University Haas Center for Public Service National Advisory Board (appointed by Provost) • Board Member, Vice Chair and Finance Committee Member, Conservation Corps of the North Bay • Advisory Council Member, REDF • Board Member, Belvedere Tiburon Child Care Center, 2015-2017 • Certified Consultant, Shared Value Initiative Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone:Email: Hawi Awash 10/16/2020 295 Diviso St Tiburon CA 94920 6513076863 hawiawash@gmail.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Hawi Awash As the co-owner of YEMA and a young woman of color who resides in Tiburon, I would like to participate in this task force to ensure that no other person of color feels unsafe, criminalized, profiled, or questioned within their community. Becoming a part of this task force will ensure the execution of the various recommendations that were made to the town council during the 1st form discussion after the YEMA store incident. I am motivated to dedicate my time to perform the necessary research and advocacy work to keep our police force accountable, increase diversity and inclusion. I want to be a part of a positive change that will last generations to come and make our town a beacon of hope. "I have walked that long road to freedom. I have tried not to falter; I have made missteps along the way. But I have discovered the secret that after climbing a great hill, one only finds that there are many more hills to climb. I have taken a moment here to rest, to steal a view of the glorious vista that surrounds me, to look back on the distance I have come. But I can only rest for a moment, for with freedom come responsibilities, and I dare not linger, for my long walk is not ended." -Nelson Mandela As a business owner and a university student I have dedicated my time volunteering in various diversity based initiatives. I have worked with kids from Marin City Hanna Project providing after school tutoring and mentoring services, organized a poverty simulation event in San Rafael to educate the local community about the impact of economic disparities, and worked as a program manager for the San Francisco YMCA after school program. Additionally.I was president of the Black student union at Dominican University of California leading events and advocacy work to diversify our programs and educate our student population. HAWI AWASH EDUCATION Highland Park Senior High School International Baccalaureate Diploma: June 2013 1015 South Snelling Avenue Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 Maastricht University Study Abroad Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Course: Design of Man Maastricht, Netherlands December 2015-July 2016 Dominican University of California Bachelor's degree: Interdisciplinary Studies 50 Acacia Avenue Focus: Biology, Humanities, & Public Health San Rafael, CA 94901 August 2013-May 2017 WORK EXPERIENCE YEMA, LLC August 2016- Present  Co-Founder & CFO San Francisco Otolaryngology Medical Group & San Francisco Audiology July 2016- Present  Developing and coordinating patient care programs  Managing and preparing public relations information  Assisting in opening a new clinic in Marin  Handling and preparing hearing aids for patients Maastricht University Student Service Center January 2016-June 2016  Assisted students with attaining student IDs  Facilitated Friday event and activities international students  Managing student panel Dominican University Library Front desk Receptionist September 2014-January 2016  Greet visitors warmly and make sure they are comfortable  Answer phones and route calls to specific people  Perform other clerical receptionist duties such as filing, photocopying, collating, faxing etc. EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES Destination Tiburon August 2020- Present  Board Member Global Ambassadors January 2016 – May 2017  Organize globally focused programs/activities  Encourage and coordinate participation at on-campus events such as cultural, social, or sporting events  Plan the end of the year International Celebration Black Student Union January 2014 - January 2016  President of Black Student Union at Dominican University of California  Organize a fundraising events, and participate in a community development projects  Lead Poverty Simulations in collaboration with Downtown Streets teams  Collaborated with Charity Waters, H2O, and Life’s Second Chance Foundation Marin City – Hanna Project November 2013 - January 2018  Provide guidance to middle and high school students by coordinating mentorship programs  Tutoring in Math and Science VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE Feed My Starving Children September 2010 – January 2018  Collect money and donate to the organization  Plan volunteering days with my friends and family  Participate in packing food Current Address: 1550 G Tiburon Blvd #702 Tiburon, CA 94920 (651) 307 -6863 hawiawash@gmail.com hawi.awash@students.dominican.edu Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 ,, ,,, lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCJOBER 28 AT .5:00 P.M,. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity lnclu~ion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Council members and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one ·of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, -qualifications, · and knowledge e,ither in your professional , career, volunteer work, or personal capaciti~s to ~ngage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and polides -Have the time and schedule -flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident oJ Tiburon or B¢1vedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of . systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding · diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Full Name: Ruben Kalra Date: 10/20/2020 Applicant Information Address: Street Be ·lvedere CA City State Phone: Page 1 of 2 Why would you like to serve on the t ask force? ' J ff ~ (i f } 1 want to help build a more inclusi ye, posit1~e~ an~ ?ive.r~e commu~ity here in ~ibu~o~/Belvedere so that children of color including my Africa ·n-Amer1can daughter will be more readily Judged by the content of their cha~acter ; rather than the, color of ~heir skin : ,/ I '' I was fortunate to listen and partake in the ,recent ca.11 ,:or) fibur,on Police & Yen:,a and Was kindly , invited by Mayor Kemnitzer of ' Belve,~er~ 't9 disou,ss diversity ar,d inclusion at', ~e,r, ho~e wher~, she encouraged me to apply 'to serve .on the tas~ force. · ~ I I : ·1 1 f I ' While I am also a doctor here 1n Marin antf cd~fduhder of a ve ·nture-f,i.Jnded start1:.1p · tac issues such a's chronic p~in ,and {<the opi~t~ ep1d~;m · . rn passibnate i apout what Ma Gandhi describes as 11 being 1t~e change' you ' in the wprld." I want to help ·, beautiful community here ,in .Tiburot:1/B~elve beautiful for generation 1 I said on the call, darkness can.· ' ' · I H ht can do it. Let's tb shine on our oommu,nit · · · r f I 1 / JI i' 1 f : 1• r ' I ' I I \ Attitude: Optimistic with 'lsh t of ex ' erience '1runnin'g organizati ' participating in ta1sk to · · 1 · J , .. ' ' l 1• ,, S ' Life experience:)ndian ~. me.no n married td a .'Bulgar,ian irn rh .l1g:, African-American daughter and mixed son-ages 8 & 4 i ~ ' ' I 1 / I I i ' Educaton: BA Psychol bg'/UC Be f kel ~y/MD Uriiversit .of So . AU Southern Calif9rnia/ ~ondon Bl:J~in~ss Sq~bol/Med!s al iolo:gy ~_&, Pain ~,a:nag~ment at ,Harvard's a~i,gharo t&: Wprt)en's ~~s'pi I· ' ( / l I E~per!erice: Started a~ ·innovat\'{e & 'dive rse J!)ai,n prac' 1ce 1 ,I ar1n, · a~d t e ~ . has_ now gro'y\'n to seeing over 30,00Q patient yis'i~s/y~ar forirh,er,.Chairman John pain .man~gement .2010-2015, wh'~te our ,team of, 30 1s·L,1 oc $edea 11n reducing ho , overdoses by 1 °o in 1 year , · · , 1 • · , · • , · • CURRICULUM VITAE NAME: Ruben Kalra EDUCATION: M.D. Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90033 August 1997 – December 2002 M.B.A Marshall School of Business University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089 August 2000 – May 2002 M.B.A. London Business School London NW1 United Kingdom September 2001 – December 2001 B.A. Psychology University of California Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 August 1993 – May 1997 POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING Brigham and Women’s Hospital-an affiliate of Harvard Medical School Boston, MA Interventional Pain Fellow July 2007- July 2008 • Selected to participate in the Harvard Longwood Fellowship providing 3 months of training with Boston Children’s Hospital Pain Treatment Service and Beth Israel Deaconess Pain Management • Developed and conducted operations study to understand and enhance efficiency of patient flow at Brigham and Women’s Pain Center • Moonlighting Attending Anesthesiologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Sturdy Memorial Hospital in Attleboro, MA Brigham and Women’s Hospital-an affiliate of Harvard Medical School Boston, MA Anesthesia Resident 2004-2007 • Paid Moonlighter in the Medical ICU and Main Operating Room • Led efforts in integrating use of a survey tool for quality improvement for the department that has since been adopted throughout the hospital St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital-an affiliate of Columbia Medical School New York, NY Medical Intern 2003-2004 • Helped develop an Intern’s Survival Guide for future interns WORK EXPERIENCE Pain Medicine Consultants July 2008-present President of the Board & Pain Medicine Doctor Corte Madera & Pleasant Hill, CA • Chairman - Pain Management Team-John Muir Walnut Creek & Concord Hospitals 2010- 2015 • Board Member- California Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (CASIPP) 2010- present • John Muir Medical Center & Novato Community Hospital Staff • Negotiated buyout of practice to avoid being consolidated by a private equity fund • Led growth and expansion to 4 offices and 50 employees including a buildout of a state of the art 7000 sq. foot flagship office in Pleasant Hill WellBrain July 2014- present Chief Medical Officer/Chairman of the Board Pleasant Hill, CA • Leading efforts to combat the opiate epidemic through a digital addiction prevention & chronic pain management platform used by providers and patients Medical Anesthesia Consultants July 2008- July 2013 Anesthesiologist Novato & Pleasant Hill, CA • Chairman of the Pain Management team from 2010-2015 helping lead efforts in • Developed & established one of California’s first inpatient pain teams at John Muir Hospital • Introduced & implemented intravenous ketamine infusion protocol at John Muir Hospital • Staff Privileges at John Muir Medical Center, Novato Community Hospital, San Ramon Regional Medical Center, and Valleycare • Inpatient Pain Physician at John Muir Hospitals & Novato Community Hospital University of California San Francisco/ SF Veterans Affairs Medical Center San Francisco, CA Manager of Clinical Trials - Cardiac Engineering Group November 2002-June 2003 • Worked directly with cardiac anesthesiologist, Dr. Arthur Wallace M.D., PhD • Drafted protocol for audiovisual distraction trial approved by IRB • Managed trials ensuring integrity of data collection and structure analysis • Led efforts to reengineer structure of group and improve productivity • Wrote papers, abstracts, and presented at conferences JCAHO (Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations) Chicago, IL Summer Associate Summer 2002 • Worked with Executive Vice-President of Accreditation, Dr. Russell Massaro • Led project in drafting educational curriculum for the 500+ surveyors including education for the annual Surveyor Conference and distance learning • Conducted a skill sets assessment and needs analysis of surveyors • Served as Chief Liaison between JCAHO and Kellogg School of Management for the purpose of developing surveyor curriculum • Participated in the daily activities of the Executive Management Team including attending board, budget, and staff meetings • Observed a hospital survey, actively interacting with surveyors for the purpose of understanding the survey process and assessing surveyor educational needs • Commended on strong interpersonal skills and ability to perform well under time pressure and subsequently offered open invitation to work at JCAHO Credit Suisse First Boston New York, NY Equity Research Summer Associate – Specialty Pharmaceuticals Summer 2001 • Worked with #1 ranked Specialty Pharmaceuticals analyst, David Maris • Initiated Coverage on two companies • Constructed several financial models with thorough analysis of financial statements utilizing EVA, DCF, and multiple valuation methods • Served as the point person in understanding and communicating clinical trial data • Drafted two unique value-added industry reports • Represented group at medical conferences, analyst meetings, and client events • Wrote numerous First Call Notes and contributed periodic research pieces • Appreciated by analyst for superior analytical, communication, and writing skills and invited to work full-time on the team Fischer Healthcare Partners Marina Del Rey, CA Medical Devices & Life Sciences Practice Intern Summer 2000 • Led presentations on biotechnology and emerging industry trends for colleagues and clients helping the $10 million annual firm launch a biotechnology consulting/P.R. practice • Conducted SWOT analysis of NYSE member client resulting in 100% revenue increase in client business and use of analysis by firm as a practice model LEADERSHIP/PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS • Board Member California Society of Interventional Pain Physicians 2010-present • American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians 2008-present • American Academy of Pain Medicine 2008-present • American Pain Foundation 2009-present • Marin Medical Society 2009-present • President- Massachusetts Society of Anesthesia-CORA (Residents’ section) 2006-2007 o Led resident delegation in Capitol Hill visits • President-Elect- Massachusetts Society of Anesthesia-CORA 2005-2006 o Developed and implemented resident demographic assessment tool utilized by Massachusetts Society of Anesthesia • ANS Spinal Cord Stimulator Course Participant October 2006 • Advanced Bionics Spinal Cord Stimulator Course Participant June 2006 • Brigham and Women’s 5th Annual Pain Management Conference March 2006 • American Society of Anesthesia 2002-present o ASA Annual Conference 2005 o ASA Legislative Conference 2006 • Project Leader-Jordan Hospital Anesthesia Services Assessment 2004-2005 o Drafted and presented detailed anesthesia services request for proposal to Jordan Hospital executive committee • St. Luke’s-Roosevelt- Helped draft program’s first internship survival guide 2003-2004 • American College of Executive Physicians 2002-2003 • USC joint MD/MBA Program Founder & Club President 1997-2002 • American Association for the Advancement of Science 1997-2002 • Graduate Technology Alliance President , Vice-President of Biotechnology, 2000-2002 Pharmaceutical Discovery, and Medical Devices- an organization dedicated to commercializing university-based technologies from USC and Caltech • Phi Delta Epsilon President 1998-1999 • Intramural Softball Team Captain 1996-1997 • Sigma Alpha Mu Fraternity President, Head of Finance 1993-1997 • Screen Actor’s Guild 1977-1978 HONORS AND AWARDS • USC Marshall School of Business- Price Institute Fellowship 2002 for Entrepreneurship • London Business School exchange programme selection 2001 (one Marshall student selected annually) • American Heart Association Fellowship 1996 • UC Berkeley Alpha Tau Omega Leadership Award 1996 • UC Berkeley Alumni Association Fritz Erdmann Award for Leadership 1996 • Golden Key National Honor Society 1996 • Dean’s Honors List 1993-1996 • Fraternity Brother of the Year 1996 • USC Medical School Early Decision Program Acceptance 1996 • U.S National Champion-Constitution/Bill of Rights 1993 RESEARCH/ABSTRACTS/PUBLICATIONS • “Do we start when we say we start?” An analysis of discrepancies between nurse 2006-2007 inputted times and automated time-stamps for “Room Ready” (RR) and its impact on late-starts for the 1st case of the day, Brigham and Women’s Hospital , Department of Anesthesia, Dr. Hugh Flanagan and Dr. Sunny Eappen • Pain Clinic Operational Efficiency Analysis- Led a survey and analysis 2008 on operational flow at Brigham and Women’s Hospital Pain Clinic for the purpose of identifying areas of improvement and improving patient flow • “Audiovisual Distraction in Patients Undergoing Surgery with Regional Anesthesia” 2004 Abstract -American Society of Anesthesia Annual Meeting 2004 <abstract accepted>  Discussed in SAMBA newsletter, pg. 13, January 2005 • “Effect of Clonidine on Heart Rate Variability, Serum Catecholamine Levels, 2003 and Survival in a Long-Term Prospective Trial”- Abstract/Poster presentation American Society of Anesthesia Annual Meeting 2003 <abstract accepted> • Lead article, Anesthesiology News, pg. 1, July 2004 • Hypertension Opinion Leader Survey, Credit Suisse First Boston 2001 • Depression Opinion Leader Survey, Credit Suisse First Boston 2001 • Studied the relationship between smoking-related illnesses and smoking cessation 1996 Student Research Fellow American Heart Association, School of Public Health, UC Berkeley, Dr. David Ragland • Tested the effects of a potential reverse transcriptase inhibitor against HIV-1 Summer 1995 Huntington Memorial Hospital- Pasadena, Dr. Zaki Salahuddin ACTIVITIES • NorCal Surfing Docs 2008-present • Harvard Doctors’ Weekend Flag Football 2004-2007 • East Harlem All Wood Bat Baseball League 2004 • Challenge 4 Charity Volunteer 2002 • Mens Adult League Baseball 1998-1999 • Bravo High School Mentor 1997 • Viva La Salud Health clinic volunteer 1997 • USC Club Basketball 1996 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • Proficient in Spanish, conversational in Hindi, Punjabi, Bulgarian, Italian, and Mandarin Chinese • Former internet entrepreneur and founder of the now defunct EZCampus.com • Interests include traveling, cooking, surfing, and playing tennis Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon .org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Phillip C Ellsworth Jr 10/21/2020 Full Name: Date: Applicant Information 7 Sierra Court Address: Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon CA 94920 City State Zip 301-367-3820 fr.ellsworth@ststephenschurch.org Phone : Email : Page 1 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Phillip C Ellsworth Jr Signature: -------------------------------- Why would you like to serve on the task force? We're going through a national and local reckoning on race. The problem is that it is not a very good or constructive reckoning. I grew up in Texas and New Mexico during the Civil Rights era and what happened there and then has left a permanent mark on me. My vocation as an Episcopal priest has had me addressing the issue off and on my entire career, and expect that I will continue to do so. I don't believe matters of race are any less fraught in America 2020 than they were in America 1968. As a resident of Tiburon, and as Rector of St Stephen's Church, Belvedere, I want to be part of strengthening our community by bridging the divides that, left unattended, keep us from respecting the dignity of every human being. The problem doesn't really lie with what we say. Most public statements paint the situation with far too broad and coarse a brush. For instance, consider the several statements that denounce white supremacy. I think white supremacy exists and is demonic, but there's a big difference between white supremacy and garden-variety racial prejudice -which is more destructive, overall, but less wicked. Whites who are bigete<:I against Blacks aren't on those grounds white supremacists, any more than Christians who sin habitually are on those grounds Satanists. I want to help us understand and address and alleviate the structural factors that contribute to the kind of confusion and heartache that we saw in our community this summer. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? As Rector of St Stephen's Church, I hold an office which is something of an embassy of a broad swath of citizens in our community. My vocation puts me in a position to know Tiburon well and, from that vantage, to try to communicate constructively with townsfolk. People confide in clergy, and look to them to be agents of reconciliation. I am of mixed race. My father is from Michigan. My mother is Japanese, born and raised in Yokohama, Japan. I grew up an Army brat; the Army was more racially integrated than most civilian communities were. This military rearing also inculcated in me an affinity for public servants, firefighters, police officers, and military. Below are two speech acts addressing racism. The first is my August 28th JAFT (Just a Few Thoughts), a response to what happened here in Tiburon on Main Street. The second is the sermon I preached after the death George Floyd. https://youtu.be/9iodQRBAKAs https://youtu.be/griNjE3-m20 https ://ststephensbel vedere. squares pace. com/b log/2020/6/8/ u2evvww0cl5vuc16f1 m8qpd72wcrzu Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Page 2 of 2 THE REV'D PHILLIP CHANNING ELLSWORTH, JR. Rector, St Stephen's Church, Belvedere 3 Bayview Avenue, Belvedere, CA 94920 0 1.415.435.4501; C 1.301.367.3820 • fr.ellsworth@ststephenschurch.org BIOGRAPHY Father Ellsworth is the Rector of St Stephen's Church, Belvedere, CA. He came to this position from St Francis Episcopal Church, Potomac, Maryland, and St Bartholomew's Church in the City of New York. He was ordained a priest at St Bartholomew's on the Feast of the Epiphany, 1996. His wife Victoria was born in Brussels, Belgium, and was raised in the Congo, the daughter of medical missionaries. A teacher and cellist, she was the Founder and Director of the Middle School String Orchestra at Norwood School, Bethesda, MD. Their children are Evan (an investment banker in Los Angeles, CA); Gabriel (a Baker Scholar graduate of Harvard Business School); Gillian Messer (a teacher in South Bend, IN); and Aaron (an IT professional in the DC area). PROFESSIONAL Rector, St Stephen's Church, Belvedere, CA, 20I6 - My primary responsibility to the people of St Stephen's is to be faithful in prayer and in the study of Holy Scripture; to celebrate with them the Sacraments of our redemption; to nourish them, as a preacher and a teacher, from the riches of God's grace; to pray for them without ceasing; to shepherd them from birth to death; and to encourage and support them in their gifts and ministries. St Stephen's is a parish of the Diocese of California. Associate Rector, St Francis Episcopal Church, Potomac, MD, 1998 -2016 Retreat Speaker, IVCF, Cedar Campus Family Camp, Cedarville, MI, 2014, 2015 Occasional Vicar, St John's Episcopal Church, Harbor Springs, Ml, 2003 -20IO Board Member, St Francis Episcopal Day School, 1998 -2008 Acting Headmaster, St Francis Episcopal Day School, 2001 Associate Rector, St Bartholomew's Church, The City of New York, March 1995 -August 1998 Chaplain & Religion Teacher, St Thomas's Episcopal Day School, New Haven, CT, 1993 -1995 EDUCATION/HONORS Resident Scholar, Pusey House, Oxford University, Oxford, UK. Theology, Patristics, and Biblical Interpretation, at the invitation of Graham Ward, Carol Harrison, and Markus Bockmuehl, Trinity Term, April -June, 2016 MDivinity, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 1995. MA, Theology/Religion & Literature, Wheaton College, (IL), 1987 BA, Biblical Literature, Wheaton College (IL), 1982 Diploma, Anglican Studies, Berkeley Divinity School at Yale, New Haven, CT, 1995 Wolcott Calkins Prize for Excellence in Preaching, Awarded by the President & Fellows of Yale University, 1995 Fr Ellsworth is a Confrere of the The Most Venerable Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem. Subject to and sanctioned by HM The Queen, St John is a working Order of Chivalry and a modern organisation delivering first aid, healthcare, and support services around the world. Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications - Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies - Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address - Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings - Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion - Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone: Email: Karen Rasmussen 10/24/20 2 Greenwood Court Tiburon CA 94920 6503035358 raskarenras@gmail.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. I love this town, and I would like everyone, EVERYONE, who lives here to be able to enjoy it fully. Currently, that is not the case. There are many who feel marginalized and disregarded simply because they do not fit the stereotypical Tiburon resident profile. We can do better. I am a trained Transformation Coach who works in the space of DEI&B every day. Currently, I serve on a D&I taskforce at work. In my previous job I was the Co-chair of the D&I group for our field sales organization. I am also a member of a marginalized group, and have personally experienced bias and discrimination throughout my life, including as a resident of Tiburon. KAREN (Ras) RASMUSSEN Summary  Experienced leader with expertise in transformational coaching, marketing, sales & advertising  Competency strengths: inspiring & influencing, strategic agility, communication and teamwork & collaboration, coaching/feedback  Strengths Finder: achiever, relator, responsibility, developer, input  Insights colors: red, blue, green, yellow Genentech experience Transformation Coach: current role  Coaching leaders, teams and individuals to adopt new ways of working in pursuit of CMG Vision Division Sales Manager, RA Franchise  Led a team of 8 CSs, mix of tenured & new to sales  Two CSs achieved excellence in 2016 and 2015; CS of the year in 2014  Workstream lead for competitive excellence/leadership development; represented RALLY on GIO Field Input Team Associate Director, Strategy & Med Marketing, Rituxan Immunology  Led brand plan process and development  Brand access lead  Main contact between marketing team & TLLs  Day-to-day contact for co-promotion with Biogen Group Product Manager, Strategy, Promo & KCT, Pegasys  Represented brand at Governance for payer contracts  Liaison between brand and Managed Care Marketing  Worked with Global to develop HBV initiative Other related healthcare experience Sixteen years of healthcare strategy, communications and advertising experience: Med-IQ (formerly MESG) Vice President, Business Development Torre Lazur Communications (a McCann Healthcare agency) Vice President, Management Supervisor Personal and references Speak Danish and German Member International Federation of Coaches Adrienne Donley, Director CMG Coaching donleya@gene.com Nitin Beri, Associate Director, US Field Team Lead berin@gene.com Angie Wilson, Director Alliance Advocacy Rel. wilsona6@gene.com Contact me raskarenras@gmail.com 650-303-5358 Education -Co-active Training Institute, CTI coaching curriculum -University of Pennsylvania BA, Pre-med curriculum -USC, Healthcare Management Development Program -Amos Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Management Development -Wharton Executive Education, Strategic Thinking and Management for Competitive Advantage -Certified Scrum Master Awards & recognition  Applause recognitions: inspiring & influencing, teamwork & collaboration, achieving results and feedback & coaching  GWP Professional Development Award, nominee  DM MVP, Western Union  TLS collaborator of the year; nominee  Special recognition award: outstanding leadership  Marketing excellence award: strategy  Passion, innovation & creativity Leadership & service  Member CMG D&I Work Product Team  GEM advisor  ASCEND Training advisor  MLD Management Essentials, advisor and panelist  GIO D&I field team co-lead  HBA member  GWP member and past officer  Green Genes Green Guide  Arthritis Foundation charity ride, Genentech team captain  SF-Marin Food Bank volunteer  ExtraFood.org volunteer Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone:Email: Colin O'Brien 10-28-20 249 Diviso Street Tiburon CA 94920 415.937.5473 colin.c.obrien@gmail.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Isl Colin O'Brien As a newer member of the Tiburon community, I am eager to make meaningful connections with my neighbors and contribute to the development of policies and practices that will foster a diverse, inclusive, and welcoming environment for residents and visitors. I am also applying with a sense of somberness, however, knowing that systemic racism is not only pervasive across the country but is fully present and causing harm here in Tiburon as well. I was and continue to be very troubled by the police incident at Yema in August. To me, the video footage revealed police officers who, giving them the benefit of the doubt, seemed wholly unaware of their bias, along with a valued neighbor who understandably expressed exasperation in the face of yet another indignity at the hands of the police. I know many others viewed the footage similarly, though many did not. Consequently, I think there is a need to address bias and discrimination not only within Tiburon governance and policing, but within the community as well. I recognize my perspective is limited in some ways because I am a white, cisgender male with privilege. Still, I aspire to be an ally to people of color, and I take to heart the advice that allyship is not a state of mind but something one demonstrates with action. Further, I believe that white people must hold one another accountable and share in the labor of improving diversity and inclusion, especially when people of color are already so heavily burdened by systemic racism. - I am a public interest environmental lawyer at a non-profit organization. Much of my current work is for, or in partnership with, frontline communities of color. -Further, in my work, I have seen how-despite good intentions-organizations still often fail to recruit, retain, and promote the success of people of color internally, and also fail to establish truly respectful and collaborative relationships working across difference externally. -For three years, I served on a workgroup at my current employer to develop diverse, equitable, and inclusive hiring practices that reduce bias and value candidates' cultural competency. -At work, I attend regular internal trainings on diversity, equity, and inclusion; I also participate in an "aspiring white allies" group where we educate ourselves about racism. -Through work, I attended two external, multi-day trainings by VISIONS, Inc. to learn how to identify unconscious biases; recognize personal, interpersonal, institutional and cultural barriers to inclusion; and understand the influence of historical and contemporary oppression. Colin C. O’Brien 249 Diviso St., Tiburon, CA 94920 • colin.c.obrien@gmail.com • 415.937.5473 (h) EXPERIENCE Earthjustice, San Francisco, CA (2015 to present); Anchorage, AK (2011 to 2015) Deputy Managing Attorney – August 2020 to Present; Staff Attorney – April 2011 to August 2020. Litigate as lead counsel federal and state lawsuits seeking to enforce environmental protections. Develop legal claims and litigation strategy; draft briefs and other pleadings; argue before state and federal courts. Prepare detailed legal and technical comments on government proposals. Coordinate with diverse clients, co-counsel, and external partners on courtroom and public advocacy. Supervise and support internal case team members. Contribute to institutional strategy and management, as well as communications, development, and lobbying efforts. Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC (2007 to 2011) Staff Attorney, Clean Air Project. Reviewed proposed federal clean air regulations, especially those pertaining to national ambient air quality standards, air toxics, and greenhouse gases, and prepared detailed legal and technical comments. Petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and other federal circuit courts to review deficient regulations. Intervened on behalf of EPA to defend protective regulations. Conducted legal and legislative history research and drafted briefs and other filings. Presented oral argument. Addressed congressional and media inquiries. Supervised legal fellow and summer law clerks. Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY (Summer 2000; 2003 to 2007) Associate, Environmental Practice Group. In federal Superfund and other environmental litigation: conducted legal research; drafted pleadings, discovery requests, motions, and briefs; managed document review; assisted with expert preparation and deposition of adverse experts. Addressed environmental aspects of financial transactions: conducted due diligence; drafted contract provisions; negotiated insurance coverage. Coordinated pro bono asylum law program for summer associates and represented victims of persecution. Hon. Richard J. Cardamone, U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Utica, NY (2002-03) Law Clerk. Reviewed briefs, researched legal issues, and prepared memoranda recommending outcomes in civil and criminal cases. Drafted, revised, and cite-checked judicial opinions. ADMISSIONS Admitted to the state bars of California, District of Columbia, New York, and Alaska (inactive). EDUCATION Yale Law School, J.D., 2003 Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, M.E.M., 2002 The Ohio State University, B.A., summa cum laude in Political Science, 1998 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 ls tefa ni@townoft iburon .o rg (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Council members and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name FullName: Lalita H. Waterman Date: 1 0/21 /20 Applicant Information Address: 36 Southridge West -------------------------------Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon CA 94920 City State Zip Phone : 415-381-4467 Email: Lalita.Waterman@gmail.com Page 1 of2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: -------------------------------- Why would you like to serve on the task force? I would like to help my community be perceived as being welcoming of all people, regardless of their color, national origin, disability status, age or religion. Having been paralyzed with polio when I was two years old, and having had to struggle with residual mobility impairments all my life, I am empathetic towards people who face exceptional challenges. As a brown woman, I have been touched by institutional racism, and understand the challenges faced by people of color. At the same time, having lived in various parts of the world, and having seen first-hand how undemocratic and flawed many societies are, I am deeply respectful of the law and system of justice in the United States. I firmly believe that, despite shortcomings, we have the best in the world. My profound respect for the law is reflected in the fact that I have never had a brush with the criminal justice system (not even a parking ticket). I believe that my broad background and wealth of life's experiences will bring a valuable perspective to the table. If selected to serve on the Diversity Inclusion Task Force, I promise to work hard, patiently hear all sides of an issue, be thoughtful, and try to recommend solutions that reflect the fundamental decency of our community and its institutions. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Please see my attached four-page resume . Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Page 2 of2 RESUME OF LALITA H. WATERMAN PERSONAL: Date of Birth: November 1, 1948 Marital Status: Married to Rick T. Waterman for almost 50 years. One daughter: Tara Ann Waterman M.D., J.D. Occupation: Attorney; Community Volunteer. EDUCATION: McGeorge School of Law, Sacramento, California -J.D. (June 1977). Member of the California Bar since 1977. Member of the Florida Bar from 1993 to 2020. Comparative/International Legal Institutions and Jurisprudence, Austro-American Institute of Education, Vienna (Austria), in co-ordination with Schiller College Europe University, Heidelberg (Germany) -Summer 1976. Trinity College of Music, London, England -Licentiate in Piano, 1972. Ranked #1 in piano performance. University of the Pacific, Stockton, California -M.S. in Biological Sciences, December 1971. Sweet Briar College, Virginia -A.B. in Biology, June 1970. Princeton University, New Jersey (Spring 1969) -Pilot Program for admission of women to their undergraduate program. Convent of Jesus & Mary -graduated high school with honors in 1965. Trinity College of Music, London, England -Grade V in Speech and Elocution, 1964. Nritya Kala Shala Academy, Bombay, India -Diploma in Classical Indian Dance, 1964. Ranked #1 in performance. Trinity College of Music, London, England -Grade IV in Choral Singing, 1962. 1 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Private practice of law -1978 to present. Law Clerk, Public Defender's Office, Sacramento County -1976 through 1977. Staff Research Associate, Department of Neonatology, University of California Medical Center, Sacramento -1972 to 1976. HONORS: Redwood Empire Trial Lawyers Association award for record jury verdict -February 1982. Member, National Advisory Council for South Asian Affairs, a non-statutory body working with the U.S. Department of State, under President Jimmie Carter -1978 to 1981. ALI-ABA Scholarship, Environmental Law -1976. President, freshman class, McGeorge School of Law -1973. Graduate student fellowship at University of the Pacific, Stockton, California (August 1970 through May 1972). Full scholarship and Solos Alumnae Award, junior and senior undergraduate years, Sweet Briar College, Virginia -August 1968 through May 1970. President, sophomore undergraduate class, St. Xavier's College -1967. Student President ("Prefect"), Convent of Jesus & Mary -1965. SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION: Waterman, Lalita & A.S. Hunter, Studies of Reproduction in Drosophila immigrans, Drosophila Information Service (November, 1972). LANGUAGES SPOKEN: French, Hindi, Spanish & a smattering of Italian. EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES & HOBBIES: While in middle school and high school, I excelled in horseback riding (many prizes at shows and competitions), swimming (high school team), badminton (high school team) and basketball (center on high school team). Throughout my life, I have enjoyed the opera, symphony, and ballet as well as exploring all the continents (except Antarctica), especially UNESCO World Heritage Sites. I enjoy reading and belong to a couple of book- groups. I also have a keen interest in fine wines and foods, and have visited practically every critically-acclaimed viticultural region in the world. 2 MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: Marin County Bar Association; Marin Trial Lawyers Association VOLUNTEER SERVICE: a) My life's greatest volunteer effort has been the parenting of our daughter and being her "momma". While her accomplishments as a physician and an attorney are impressive, it is her character, decency, and empathy that are the source of greatest pride. b) 2001 to present: In 2001, I was appointed Vice-President & Treasurer of the Vintners Club, the oldest and largest private wine education organization in the United States. I have served this nonprofit public-benefit corporation for almost 20 years. The appointment was accepted by me on the understanding that the then- president, Paul Rehs, and the rest of the board of directors would support my efforts to recruit women and people of color into the organization, which had historically been an all-white, well-heeled-male enclave. Today, membership as well as the board of directors is almost half-female. I am also proud of having established an Outreach Program with scholarship opportunities for students over the age of 21. Approximately 15 years ago, through liaison with the deans of various educational institutions, I established this Program for the Vintners Club; student-scholarships have consistently been awarded since then. c) 2017 to 2019: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) - Member of UCSF Patient-Family Advisory Council, San Francisco. d) In the late 1990s, I served on the board of Women Lawyers of Marin County. e) In the late 1990s, I served on the board of the Newcomers Club of Tiburon. f) I served as a parent-volunteer throughout my daughter's years in high school (Pine View School for the Gifted), middle school (Comstock), and elementary school (Mark West) -early 1980s to 1995. g) I have performed volunteer services at my churches---St. Hilary Church (Tiburon) and St. Stephen's Church (Belvedere). h) As a polio-survivor who is now a senior citizen, I am sensitive to the vulnerabilities of the elderly and the disabled. I have provided numerous hours of pro bono legal services to people of modest means who fall into those categories. My pro bono clients have also included disadvantaged learning-disabled students at Bayside Martin Luther King Jr. Academy, Sausalito. i) During my 43 years as an attorney, I have served as a court-appointed arbitrator and mediator. These experiences have further trained me to keep an open mind, to look at issues from all parties' viewpoints, and to facilitate 3 compromise. j) Over the years, I have received awards and recognition from several community organizations for my volunteer work. Examples include the School Board of Sarasota County and the Lions Club of Madison Heights. FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF ORGANIZATIONS OVER THE PAST DECADE: -Significant sums to San Francisco Opera Association, San Francisco Symphony, San Francisco Ballet, San Francisco Heritage Foundation, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, Asian Art Museum Foundation, Tiburon Library, Central Coast Wine Classic, American Heart Association, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, Taylor Family Foundation (children with life-threatening illnesses and developmental disabilities), Convent of Jesus & Mary, St. Xavier's College, Sweet Briar College, St. Hilary Church, St. Stephen's Church. -Modest sums to Belvedere Concerts-in-the-Park. I believe that the insights gained through these charitable endeavors will be a benefit to the Diversity Inclusion Task Force, and that none of them will present a conflict of interest. 4 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefan i 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowl edge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organ ize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Full Name : Karen Carrera Date: 1 0/28/2020 Applicant Information Address: 22 Apollo Rd. Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon Ca 94920 City State Zip Phone: 415-272-1244 Email: karen@vcworkplacesolutions .com Page 1 of2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature~~ 0. ~ Why would you like to serve on the task force? Please see attached. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Please see attached . Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Page 2 of 2 Tiburon Town Counsel Diversity Inclusion Task Force Application for Karen C. Carrera Why would you like to serve on the task force? It would be my honor to serve on the Tiburon Town Council Diversity Inclusion Task Force. As a Latina, I would like to serve to help my community. As a lawyer with a specialty in employment law, I have expertise in unconscious bias and also conduct diversity and inclusion trainings. I have devoted my life and career to serving my community and sincerely wish to continue to help the Town of Tiburon in a meaningful way. My involvement in Tiburon is another reason I want to serve. I love living in Tiburon and my family is an important part of this community. I moved to Tiburon with my husband in 2001, when my children were just babies. My children attended the schools in the Reed School District then attended Redwood and Tamalpais High Schools. I am deeply entrenched in my community. My dearest friends live in Tiburon, I visit the Tiburon Peninsula Club daily, and have my office in Downtown. My office is located across from the Tiburon library. I volunteered for the Reed schools, shop locally, and eat at the local restaurants. I previously served as General Counsel for the Reed Schools and President of the Belveron Homeowner's Association. Now that my kids are in college and out of the house, I definitely have time to serve on the Task Force. The other reason I want to serve on the Task Force is because of who I am. I am Peruvian American, born in Lima-Peru, and brought to the U.S. by my single mom in the 70's. I identify as a Latina and speak Spanish fluently. My entire career has been devoted to public service and to serving my community. My ethnic background uniquely qualifies me to serve on the Task Force and helps diversify it. As women of color, my Peruvian mother, sister and I experienced bias throughout our lives but overcame it and became successful members of society. I witnessed my mother experiencing workplace discrimination and feeling "less than." My own experiences with unconscious bias included not being taken seriously, not being included and microaggressions. I want to bring my unique perspective to the Task Force and truly believe that my perspective will help. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? My career experience gives me a unique perspective I can bring to the Task Force. In my job as an attorney, investigator and trainer, I am uniquely qualified to serve on the Task Force. As a lawyer, I train corporations and businesses on unconscious bias and inclusion. As a neutral investigator I conduct workplace investigations for both public and private employers. I have conducted numerous investigations of employee complaints of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, bullying and other alleged employee misconduct. I also draft policies and procedures for employers to assist them in responding and investigating complaints. My previous experience as an employment litigator also qualifies me to serve on the Task Force. Prior to becoming an investigator and trainer, I was a Plaintiffs' side employment law litigator. This uniquely qualifies me to determine risk and see where employers are vulnerable to being sued by employees. My job as an employment litigator helped me see the employees' perspective and their experience with discrimination, harassment and unconscious bias. Through my clients' eyes, I witnessed evidence of bias, lack of inclusion, discrimination, harassment and its damaging effects. 1 My other career experiences also qualify me for the Task Force. As a San Francisco County Deputy City Attorney, I filed lawsuits against property owners who violated San Francisco's housing, health, fire and police codes. I facilitated meetings with City departments, community groups and service agencies to solve issues of code enforcement, public nuisance, blight, and quality of life crimes. As a supervising attorney at Legal Aid of Marin and La Raza Centro Legal I litigated employment and housing cases, and managed a diverse staff, including volunteers. I facilitated community outreach meetings with the Latino community and services agencies. I also conducted bilingual trainings and drafted Spanish and English self-help manuals. Community Involvement & Awards My previous and current community involvement also qualifies me for the Task Force . I currently serve as General Counsel, and I am a former board member, of Canal Alliance, a non-profit organization assisting immigrant communities in Marin County by providing access to education, youth programs, family counseling and immigration services. I was recognized as Business Professional of the Year in 2015 by the Marin Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. I am also a member of ALMA-the Association of Latino Marin Attorneys. Part of ALMA's work is to provide mentors for Latino law students to help them navigate the challenges of law school. I have served on many boards including, the ACLU, Equal Rights Advocates, Bay Area Legal Aid, and La Raza Centro Legal. Please see my attached resume for a list of community awards I have received for assistance to my community. 2 KAREN C. CARRERA, ESQ., A WI-CH Villegas Carrera Workplace Solutions 1110 Mar West, Suite K Professional Experience Tiburon, CA 94920 415-272-1244 (cell) 415-989-8000 (office) karen@vcworkplacesolutions.com www.vcworkplacesolutions.com VC Workplace Solutions, May 2019-present. Bilingual Investigator & Trainer. Conduct investigations for both public and private employers in response to employee complaints of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, bullying, and other alleged employee misconduct. I also specialize in conducting investigations with Spanish speaking employees and witnesses. Conduct diversity and inclusion trainings for corporations, government agencies and individuals, in both English and Spanish. Association of Workplace Investigators Certificate Holder, February 2020. Website: www.vcworkplacesolutions.com. Emtrain, September 2020-present. Expert & Trainer. Conduct unconscious bias, diversity and inclusion, workplace culture and harassment prevention trainings for Bay Area companies. Villegas/Carrera, Inc., July 2003-2019. Attorney at Law/Owner. Formerly litigated and provided legal strategy on complex employment law and discrimination cases and supervised junior attorneys, paralegals and law clerks. Conducted neutral fact-finding workplace investigations for hourly clients. Martinez, et al. v Apio, et al., Supreme Court of Cal ifornia, appellant representing the Plaintiffs. 40 Cal.4tt 35, (2010). Landmark employment law decision in which the California Supreme Court broadened the protections afforded California low wage workers. My firm and California Rural Legal Assistance, Inc. filed this lawsuit on behalf of six farm workers who picked strawberries in Santa Barbara County during the 2000 growing season. Hastings College of the Law, University of California, September 2009-present. Adjunct Professor. Classes taught: Representing Spanish Speaking C lients in Employment Law; Interviewing and Counseling Clients; Negotiation and Mediation Strategies, Legal Writing and Research. Berkeley School of Law, University of California, August -November 2018 Lecturer in Law. Legal Research & Writing, L.L.M. Legal Research and Writing Department. 1 Legal Aid of Marin, February 2010-March 2013. Supervising Attorney. Supervised attorneys, paralegals and law clerks in all aspects of litigation. Managed a staff, including volunteers. Specialty areas included low employment law and civil rights. Conducted community outreach and participated in community outreach meetings. San Francisco City Attorney's Office, March 1996-July 2003. Deputy City Attorney. Prosecuted property and business owners who violated the City's codes. Conducted all facets of litigation including discovery, mediation, law and motion and trials. Facilitated meetings with City departments, community groups and service agencies to solve issues of code enforcement, public nuisance, blight, and quality of life crimes. Supervised junior attorneys and law clerks. • Trial counsel in City and County of San Francisco v. Sainez (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1302. I was trial counsel in this lawsuit which resulted in this published decision determining that by enacting the San Francisco Housing Code, the Board of Supervisors acted with in its police power goals of "ensuring the health and safety of its residents and preserving its housing stock," that the Board of Supervisors recognized the public's undeniable right to be free from properties which pose a health or safety risk, and that large penalties may be assessed against landlords who violate the City 's codes. I assisted the City and County of San Francisco in obtaining over $1.5 million in penalties and attorneys' fees as part of this case. La Raza Centro Legal, Inc., San Francisco, CA. February 1994-March 1996 . Supervising Attorney . Litigated employment, housing and immigration cases. Conducted bilingual trainings and drafted Spanish and English self-help manuals. Supervised junior attorneys and law clerks. Facilitated community meetings with immigrant workers, tenants, service agencies and community groups. A wards and Honors 1. Association of Workplace Investigators Certificate Holder, February 2020 2. Profile of Karen Carrera, Plaintiff Magazine, November 2017 3. Certificate of Special Congressional Recognition to Karen C. Carrera, The Hon. Jared Huffm an , in honor of ongoing comm itment to the Latino population in Marin County, 2015. 4. State of California Senate, Certificate of Recognition to Karen C. Carrera, The Hon. Mike McGuire, State Senator, for outstanding leadership and professional skills, 2015. 5. Hispanic Business Professional of the Year, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, for outstanding leadership, commitment, and professional skills in representing Latino immigrants, 2015 2 6. Legal Services Corporation, Certificate of Appreciation, for extraordinary commitment to providing equal access to justice through pro bono work with California Rural Legal Assistance, 2015. 7. Community Service Award Recipient and 2013 Graduation Keynote Speaker-Hastings College of the Law, La Raza Law Student's Assoc. May 2013. 8. Outstanding Benefactor Award, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, Sacramento, California, ''for providing access to justice to low income workers in California". September 2008 . 9. California Assembly, Certificate of Recognition for providing volunteer legal services to low income people in Marin, May 2006. 10. Wiley E. Manual Award from the State Bar of California in recognition of pro bono work. 2004. 11 . San Francisco Minority Bar Coalition, recipient of the Unity Award, for "Outstanding Service to the Legal Community". May 2004. 12. Certificate of Appreciation, City of San Francisco, Hon. Willie Brown, for prosecuting slumlords on behalf of the City. May 2002. Community Involvement 1. California Women Lawyers -Board Member, Board of Directors, January 1, 2020 to present. 2. Marin County Women Lawyer's Association -Board Member, Board of Directors, April 10, 2019 to present. 3. Association of Workplace Investigators-Member, June 2019-present. 4 . Marin Trial Lawyers Association -Former President, Board of Directors, June 2018-present; now serving as Secretary to the Board. 5. Canal Alliance -General Counsel-March 2020 to present; Board Member, Board of Directors, Jan. 2014-February 2019. Canal Alliance is a non-profit organization assisting immigrant communities in Marin County by providing access to education, youth programs, fami ly counseling and immigration services. 6. Association of Latino Marin Attorneys (ALMA) -Member, 2016-present 7. Equal Rights Advocates (ERA)-Board of Directors (2008 -2014) ERA represents women and girls in high impact civil rights litigation nationwide. 8. Aids Legal Referral Panel (ALRP) -Volunteer Attorney, 2005-present. 9. ACLU of Northern California, Board of Directors (2006-2008) 10. La Raza Centro Legal, Board of Directors, (2000-2003) 11. Bay Area Legal Aid, Board of Directors (1999-2000) 3 12. General Counsel -Reed Schools Foundation, Tiburon, CA, June 2004-June 2006. Presentations & Publications • Monthly Newsletter & Blog, VC Workplace Solutions, www.vcworkplacesolutions.com/B log. 2019-present. • Wage & Hour Law and the Immigrant Low Wage Worker, Marin Trial Lawyer's Association, 2015 • Work Life Law for Women in Tech, Google, 2015 • Representing Immigrant Clients in Class Actions, S.F. Trial Lawyers Association, 2014 • U -Visas and Immigrant Clients in Employment Law, Marin Trial Lawyers, 2013 • Employment Law Overview, Legal Aid of Marin, 2010 • Wage & Hour Law and the Immigrant Low Wage Worker, PLUS Conference, 2009 Education University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, 1992 Student Body President, Associated Students of Hastings, 1991 -1992. Political Chairperson, La Raza Law Students Association, 1990-1991. Best Brief, Moot Court Competition nominee, 1990-1991. Clara Foltz Feminist Association, 1989-1992 Hastings Public Interest Law Foundation , 1989-1992 Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA; Cum Laude, B.A., 1988 College of Fine and Communications Arts, Political Science (minor) Dean's List 1984-1988 Alpha Sigma Nu (The National Jesuit Honor Society) 4 Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications - Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies - Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address - Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings - Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion - Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone: Email: Pamela Joy Bonnie 10/28/2020 24 Southridge Rd West Tiburon CA 94920 415.652.8219 pambonnie@comcast.net Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Pamela Joy Bonnie I would like to serve on this task force because I am passionate about diversity, equity and inclusion and would like to help make our town a better place for everyone. As a resident of Tiburon for 22 years, I have been an active volunteer in the community. My unique personal story and skills that I cultivated through volunteer positions and leadership coursework would enable me to be a strong advisor to the Town/Committee. It is important to give back to the place I live, and I can provide the perspective of the underrepresented groups well in a way that the majority can understand. My unusual and diverse family background gives me insight and empathy into the experience that people of color encounter in Tiburon. I am half Asian (Chinese/Hawaiian) and half Caucasian – and I identify strongly with the Asian half of my racial identity. My extended family is diverse. Through my family, I have a deep understanding of the systemic obstacles that people of color face in town (and in the world). While to some people, they may see me as “white passing,” I know how to navigate the Marin community. Most importantly, I can help people understand why having a diverse and equitable community is in everyone’s best interest. My volunteer experience and education will enable me to help the Town of Tiburon Diversity Inclusion Task Force Committee refine and develop inclusion policies, evaluate best practices, and create guidelines and goals. At my children’s schools, I served on the Diversity Committee of the Board of Trustees and on the Parents Association at Marin Country Day School (MCDS) and Marin Academy. My involvement on the Diversity Committee of MCDS included a multi-year full review of the school’s operations, activities and culture and the follow-through of making recommendations and helping to implement the initiatives. I led the MCDS Parents Association’s efforts to engage and recruit/encourage a wider range of volunteers and ensure that all families feel welcome. As a Coro Northern California Women in Leadership Fellow, I studied with a racially and professionally diverse group of women to develop leadership skills relevant to community building in the workplace. We learned to support and foster a thriving democracy, to collaborate in the public, private and non-profit sectors and to work on change to strengthen our democratic systems. Pamela J. Bonnie www.linkedin.com/in/pamela-bonnie-612ba311 • 415-652-8219 • pambonnie@comcast.net OBJECTIVE: To combine my investing, research and analytical corporate experience with my non-profit management and diversity communication skills to obtain a position in the public policy arena. WORK EXPERIENCE: TM CAPITAL LLC. Tiburon, CA Equity Analyst/Consultant -- Electric, Gas and Power Utility Hedge Fund – 2001 - 2002 ● Fundamental analysis and research for the generation sector: Performed fundamental equity analysis as part of a 4-person team managing a $500 million utility hedge fund based in Tarrytown, New York. Interviewed corporate management teams for the purpose of financial analysis and strategic evaluation of publicly traded companies. Created and maintained financial models. Valued generation facilities. Analyzed impact of new power generation development activities on electric utilities’ stocks. Tracked power prices. Attended analyst meetings and conferences. Tracked legislative developments in California during the power crisis of 2001-2. Met with legislative staff and attended public hearings at the California state capitol. CITIGROUP/SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC. San Francisco, CA Vice President --- United States Electric Utilities Equity Research – 1996 - 2000 ● Lead electric utility and independent power analyst for Salomon Smith Barney. Ranked number one stock picker in the Wall Street Journal All Star Analysts Survey in 1998. Ranked number one in Greenwich 1998-9 survey for Non-Regulated Power Producers. ● Fundamental analysis: Engaged with electric utility management teams for the purpose of financial analysis and strategic evaluation. Researched and analyzed 20 United States public companies. Created and maintained financial models. Analyzed impact of new power generation development activities on electric utilities’ stocks. Research publications: Wrote research reports to evaluate opportunities and risks of electric utilities’ stocks. Marketing: Marketed research publications and ideas to institutional investors in the US, Europe and Asia. Management: Managed a team of 5 analysts and one assistant. Transactions: Lead managed equity offerings for AES Corporation and Northern States Power. Co-lead manager for AES Corporation, CMS Energy and Calpine Corporation. Advisory: Advised investment bankers on the equity market implications of Unicom and PECO (Excelon). SALOMON BROTHERS INC. Hong Kong Vice-President -- Asia Pacific Electric and Gas Utilities and Independent Power Equity Research – 1993 - 1996 ● Lead electric utility and independent power analyst for Salomon Brothers Asia Limited Inc. Ranked number one Asian Utilities Analyst for 1995 and 1996 by Institutional Investor. ● Fundamental analysis: Engaged with electric utility management teams for the purpose of financial analysis and strategic evaluation. Researched and analyzed 10 Asia-Pacific public companies, including KEPCO, Tenaga Nasional, Meralco, Hong Kong & China Gas, Hong Kong Electric, China Light & Power and Chinese power companies. Created and maintained financial models and was instrumental in the use of break-up valuation analysis. Analyzed impacts of new power generation development activities on electric utilities’ stocks. Performed power generation market research on Thailand and Indonesia. Research publications: Wrote research reports for international institutional client base. Reviewed investment opportunities on a cross-border basis. Marketing: Marketed research publications and ideas to institutional investors in the US, Europe and Asia. Management: Managed a team of analysts and assistants. Transactions: Lead managed privatization of Beijing Datang, a $300 million equity offering. Lead managed Consolidated Electric Power Asia (CEPA) $800 million equity offering, co-lead managed offerings for KEPCO. BARCLAYS De ZOETE WEDD Hong Kong Analyst -- Hong Kong Equity Research - Conglomerates Sector --- 1991 - 1992 ● Fundamental analysis: Created and maintained financial models on the Hong Kong Conglomerates: Hutchison Whampoa and Jardine Strategic Holdings Group. Research publications: Wrote research reports for international institutional client base. Wrote reports on China’s Most Favored Nation trading status with the US. Marketing: Marketed research publications and ideas to institutional investors in Europe and Asia. ELDERS ROACH ASIA LIMITED Hong Kong Analyst -- Hong Kong Equity Research -- Manufacturing Sector – 1989 - 1991 ● Fundamental analysis: Created and maintained financial models on the toys and electronic sector. Research publications: Wrote research reports for international institutional client base. VOLUNTEER WORK EXPERIENCE: MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL Corte Madera, CA Trustee and Parents Association President, Past President – 2014-2016 ● Served as liaison to the Board of Trustees, Administration and parents of the school community. Built community through recruiting volunteers and promoting events. Manages 44 volunteers. Served in other volunteer roles. Significant work on the Board of Trustees Committee on Diversity and Inclusion. BELVEDERE-HAWTHORNE NURSERY SCHOOL Belvedere, CA President of Belvedere Nursery School Inc. – 2008-2009 ● Established goals for board of directors and set agenda. Responsible for oversight of financial, operational, facilities and fundraising activities of school. Financial: Restructured school’s financial functions, hired new accountant, implemented proper controls and adopted an investment policy. Operational: Identified areas for operational improvements in the areas of human resources, facilities management and implemented the solutions. Management: Implemented new teacher training programs and seminars. Governance: Rewrote by-laws. Established committees for oversight in numerous functions TOWN OF TIBURON Tiburon, CA South of Knoll Playground Renovation Project -- 2004-2009 ● Led a 5-person team to raise $140,000 in 2-phases for the renovation of the Tot- Lot and school-aged children’s playground at South of Knoll Park in Tiburon, California. Fundraising: Solicited donations from private individuals and foundations in the community of Tiburon and Belvedere. Publicity: Wrote press releases advertising events and progress, created a website. Event planning: Orchestrated two family fundraising events. Design: Liaised with playground manufacturers and selected equipment for the site. Worked with Department of Public-Works to finalize design plans and site layout. EDUCATION: Lake Forest College–1989 Lake Forest, IL B.A. in Economics and Politics – with Honors in Politics • Academic honors: Omicron Delta Epsilon. Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon .org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSlON TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Full Name: Noah Webster Griffin Date : 10/28/20 Applicant Information Address : 10 Circle Drive Apartment C Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon CA 94921 City State Zip Phone: 1415 756-3933 Email : noahg rifi n I ifeforce@g mail. com Page 1 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature : Noah Griffin Why would you like to serve on the task force? Having spent a lifetime engaged in social justice issues from a very young age, I feel my lived experience as well as professional responsibities have contributed to a broad range of knowledge that would be helpful in not only furthering Tiburon's goals of diveristy and inclusion but of racial understanding. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? My educational background is as follows: Fisk University BA, Summer Fellowship Yale, JD Harvard Law School, CORO Foundation Public Affairs Fellowship, Phelps Stokes History Fellowship. Full time resident of Tiburon for the past 16 years 8 years prior. Two of my grown children matriculated here K through 8. I helped recalibrate rac ial curriculum issue in their school. I helped drive the campaign to remove black jockeys from the streets of Tiburon and also helped lead the campaign to change the name of the Dixie School District. I was a legal editor for Commerce Clearing House for 3 years in the area of Title VII employment discrimination. II have given a Title VII seminar for the town of Mill Valley and this year conducted race seminars for Marin's DA's and Probation Department. Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meetir.ig materials. Page 2 of 2 From:Noah Griffin To:Lea Stefani Subject:Diversity Inclusion Task Force Date:Thursday, October 22, 2020 11:17:27 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Noah W. Griffin 10 Circle Drive Apt. C Tiburon, Ca 94920 1(415) 756-3933 Please accept my formal application to be part of the Tiburon/ Belvedere Diversity Inclusion Task Force. Qualifications: I am a full-time resident of Tiburon and have been so for the last 16 years. I have made my home here for half of the 45 years I’ve lived in Marin. My two older sons now 38 and 36 matriculated through the Tiburon K through 8 school system and played on the soccer and baseball teams. Over the years I have: taken an interest in influencing the local school curriculum making it more racially relevant to mounting a campaign to remove black jockeys from the streets of Tiburon: and most recently moderating the Town Forum on the recent Main Street Store controversy. On general Marin issues, I helped spearhead the 22-year successful Dixie School District name change effort. I have given race relations seminars for the County DA’s office and Probation Department as well as conducted Title VII seminars for the town of Mill Valley. Beyond that I have sat as a citizen member of the Marin IJ editorial board, written on social justice and other Marin County issues for more than 20 years for the newspaper. My Marin board involvements include the Buck Family Fund, the Redwoods, the Marin Theater Company, the Lark Theater. I am also a member of the Marin Forum. The scope of my background is further included in my CV which is included. Thank you, Noah Griffin NOAH W. GRIFFIN 10 Circle Drive, Ste C Tiburon, CA 94940 415/756-3933 Email noahgriffinlfieforce@gmail.com Summary of Experience Public Affairs Consultant Columnist San Francisco Independent Newspaper Clinton/Gore '96 Deputy Campaign Coordinator State of California Director of Public Affairs and Government Relations Press Secretary to Mayor of San Francisco Press Spokesperson and Community Relations Outreach Manager Political and Legislative Liaison Major Media Talk Show Host Public Speaker and University Lecturer Educated at Harvard Law, Yale, and Fisk Universities CORO Fellow in Public Affairs Recipient of Phelps Stokes History Fellowship Professional Background Public Affairs Consultant, 1999 to present Represent a number of public and private organizations providing strategic planning and tactical management. Projects include issues management, government relations on a local to national scale, media relations and reputation building. Columnist San Francisco Independent Newspaper 1997 - 1999 As a man about town columnist covered a variety of issues from politics, public affairs to restaurant reviews, plays, art openings, exhibits SF history and general commentary. Deputy Political Director, State of California/Clinton Gore '96 Coordinated Campaign, Los Angeles, September 1996 through November election Helped form and communicate message and outreach to the African American voter for the state of California. Assisted in coordinating visits by the President, Vice President and First Lady to events in San Diego, Los Angeles, Sacramento and Oakland. Oversaw outreach efforts in major urban areas thought the state. Served as liaison to African American elected officials and offices of United States Senators Feinstein and Boxer as well as Congresspersons and community leaders. Arranged President's telephone conference call to black leadership in major California cities. Helped field representatives coordinate get- out-the-vote efforts. Assisted in print and broadcast media outreach. Director of Public Affairs, Charles Schwab & Company., Inc. San Francisco, 1995 to 1996 Established Department of Public Affairs and Government Relations, writing mission statement and goals. Developed Departmental budget. Spearheaded community and public affairs outreach. Initiated contact with potential Washington D.C. lobbyists, which have since been retained by Schwab. Oversaw political donations and safeguarded integrity of political contributions by strict observance of federal, state and local regulations. Authored revised political contribution form with appropriate sign-offs. Wrote Job description for position of Jobs for California Graduates. Raised funds for Jobs for California Graduates' first annual Washington D.C. luncheon. Arranged meeting with Charles Schwab and Ambassador of England. as well as meeting between Schwab’s Vice-Chair and the head of the Securities Industry Association. Renewed previously stalled efforts to open a Schwab branch office at West Portal with Mayor Willie Brown. Served as company liaison with National Employment Leadership Coalition and San Francisco Committee on Jobs. Responsible for Editorial coverage on company projects including Mayor's Summer Jobs for Youth Program. Fulfilled numerous speaking engagements on behalf of the company and emceed civic luncheons. Op-Ed Page contributor. Press Secretary to Mayor Frank Jordan of San Francisco, 1993 - 1996 Oversaw the press operations of the mayor's office. Developed and coordinated press strategy. Dealt with print and electronic media. Provided informational link to other city departments. Prior to hiring a speech writer, wrote all speeches for the mayor. Served as spokesperson to the media, made substitute appearances for mayor. Interfaced with offices of Senators Feinstein and Boxer as well as Representatives Pelosi and Lantos and then Speaker of the California State Assembly and now Mayor Willie Brown. Director of Public Information, City College of San Francisco, 1992 - 1993 Under Chancellor Evan Dobelle (now Chancellor Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut) directed this major institutions external and internal public information activities, serving a population of 90,000 and 140 sites. Worked with Chancellor's Office and members of the Community College Board in developing outreach activities. Served as spokesperson for the college and the Chancellor. Wrote press materials. Member of marketing team spearheaded by the GAP to develop new image for the college. Managed publication of college newsletter, course catalogue and numerous brochures for the school. Columnist, Opinion Page, San Francisco Examiner, June 1989-1992 Wrote weekly commentary for this major city daily newspaper. Contributing writer for book reviews and special features in Image magazine, the then Sunday publication and other sections oft he newspaper. Winner of the 1990 Eugene Block Award for excellence in journalism. Column often syndicated in the Scripps Howard news wire service. Published in such publications as the Boston Globe and San Francisco Magazine. Interviewer/Host KMPT, Channel 32, San Francisco, 1992 - 1993 Produced and hosted this weekly public affairs show on public television station KMPT Talk Show Host, K-101, San Francisco 1993 Produced and hosted weekly public affairs interview show. Talk Show Host KFRC, San Francisco 1992 Produced and hosted weekly interview show. Executive Assistant to the General Manager, Department of Social Services San Francisco, 1985 - 1990 Press spokesperson and community outreach manager for this large city department. Oversaw production of film about fragile infants, securing Danny Glover as host and narrator. Produced audio tape of Christmas reading benefiting the Black Foster Children Fund. Talk Show Host, KGO AM Radio, ABC Owned and Operated, San Francisco, 1980 - 1985 Public Affairs Director/Talk Show Host and Morning Drive D.J. /KYA Radio, 1978 - 1980 Law Editor, Employment Discrimination Law, Employment Practices Decisions Guide, Commerce Clearing House, San Rafael, 1975 to 1978 Legislative Aide, Supervisor now U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, City Hall San Francisco, 1973 Deputy Political Coordinator, McGovern for President, Northern California 1971 Related Experience · Appeared twice on The Jim Lehrer News Hours · Wrote and narrated for George Lucas Educational Foundation Films · Selected as one of 22 people nationally for press fellowship to England, 1993 · Traveling Press Secretary, NAACP 1989 Japan Trip. · Democratic Party Advisors trip to Taiwan, February 1993 · Member African American Heritage Trip to Brazil · Organized PR Seminar "Beyond the Press Release" · Taught broadcast management course at University of San Francisco · Wrote Preface to book "Who Killed Martin Luther King" · Cited in 10 books · Singer Walt Tolleson Big Band Community Involvement and Awards · Former Board Member Commonwealth Club of San Francisco · Former Board Member World Affairs Council · Former Board Member Howard Thurman Educational Trust Fund · Former Board Member Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice · Former Member Juvenile Delinquency Commission · 1994 NAACP Regional Challenge Award · Caring For Children Award 1992 · Black Foster Children's Fund Award · Boys and Girls Club Award 1987 · Current Member Buck Family Fund · Current Board Member of the Redwoods · Current Board Member of the Marin Theater Company · Current Board Member of the Lark Theater · Current Member of the Marin Forum Education _ Recipient Phelps-Stokes History Fellowship, 1991 _ -CORO Foundation Fellowship in Public Affairs, San Francisco, CA. 1972-1973 _ Yale Summer Fellowship in History, New Haven Connecticut, 1966 _ Harvard Law School, J. D., Cambridge Massachusetts, 1970 _ Fisk University, B.A. History, Nashville Tennessee, 1967. Musical Resume Noah Griffin has sung professionally since the age of seven. As a soloist for the San Francisco Boy’s Chorus, he performed in La Boheme, Turandot, Carmen and Bor Gudenov, He also appeared with Leontyne Price, Paul Robeson, Nat “King” Cole, Johnny Ray, Eddie Fisher and the Shirelles He has sung with Eugene Ormandy and the Philadelphia Philharmonic, the Fisk Jubilee Singers, the Nashville Symphony, the Harvard University Choir and soloed with Duke Ellington. He has performed in Boston, New He has performed in Boston, New York and Los Angeles. Locally he has sung at the Plush Room, the Purple Onion and the Hungry I, and performed with the late Vernon Alley, Allen Smith and the Walt Tolleson Big Band. He has composed and sung the original official Ballad of the Golden Gate Bridge and co-composed the song for the Giants’ on Opening Day at Pac Bell Park. Founder and Artistic Director of the Cole Porter Society. Noah Griffin The Cole Porter Society Opera Plaza 601 Van Ness Ave. Ste. E428 San Francisco, CA 94102 415-888-8975 (p) 415-756-3933 (c) www.thecoleportersociety.org noah@thecoleportersociety.org. Virus-free. www.avast.comI g I 45 #+"#)&#" #!!''#"/#&/#!!(($$ (#" %$$,'" $ 5949%"&-+%"+;8;64 #$3$'$%"-" 18592879/:7:: 0/ 57603311 $":+6464+$'%"$$&"#$) %##"-#"' % 54&%#0&'%"#&"#$# $)$%- )"$#$#$#"+ ##%$$# $"$$'" '$"#%-)%")%"'##$#"&$%"%$)- *&'(-" )'#"'#&) (#"' / #### $ ( "+ !%$#+ ' $" )%" "## ""+ &%$"'"+" "# $#$+ "*+ "& "$# $ &&"#$)%## # / #### '"## %$ ' $ " #)#$ "# "%# !%$# $ $# "'$$ $$"## /&$$#%($)$$$ $)$# /&$"#$'" #"" &"#$)%# /%/$"#$%""&" 1 ""#)"!%"2 $$ "(! %,$, $$ "("#&!(#" "##, $"$ "$$.$ $) $$ , , Erin Burns 10/22/20 406 Neds Way Tiburon CA 94920 415-900-6962 Erinburns520@gmail.com 55 )#%$$$# $+ "$)$$$"## &#$&#) "")%/$ "#- $%", -+#) -#) (#'&*#"(('#&. (&-#)&$$ %) (#"'",$&"'. ) ' #')&#(,%$$ $$"##$$%$ %"") %*# "$'%$$"#- Erin Burns I want to be part of a task force where people want to learn and think deeply about social, econo mic and racial justice issues and who are motivated by an attitude of cultural humility towards the experiences of people of color and low income people. The ability to self reflect and to cultivate i nsight is important in this work; as a white mother raising two children of color, I have to constantly be aware of my own racial privilege when trying to understand my children's experien ces. I want to work with community stakeholders who can check their own privilege and those of their peers and who want to make lasting changes in our community that are grounded in social and racial justice principles in order to address the insidiousness of institutionalized racism that happens everyday. I am a single mom raising two children of color in Tiburon. I live and work in Tiburon and have been active in economic, social and racial justice issues affecting Tiburon and Southern Marin residents for the past several years. In response to these issues, we co-founded a non-profit organization called ALL IN that serves low-income families in Tiburon, which I am currently serving as Co-President. The purpose of our organization is to engage residents and local agencies in addressing the economic and racial disparity experienced by low-income families who live in Tiburon. We have worked hard to develop working relationships with the Reed School District, Tiburon Police Department, Tiburon Community Foundation,The Ranch and The Marin Food Bank. Some of our accomplishments include: 1) Provided scholarships for over 30 children to attend summer camp; 2) In partnership with the Tiburon Police Dept, RUSD PTA and local residents, every year we collect and donate 50 + new school shoes for low income families every year. 3. We are currently in the process of setting up a learning hub for high school students with accessible internet service in partnership with Tamalpais Unified School District and EAH Housing. We have worked hard to cultivate a positive working relationship with the members of the Tiburon Police Department and they have supported all of the community projects that ALL IN has done over the years for low-income families. I look forward to working together with them to address these very important community issues. Erin Burns 406 Ned's Way Tiburon, Belvedere Tiburon, CA 94920 Home: (415) 900 -6962 - erinburns520@gmail.com Professional Summary Dedicated, accomplished and energetic teacher with over ten years’ experience in preschool instruction, parent engagement and early childhood curriculum development. Motivated, approachable leader with strong organizational and prioritization abilities and a proven ability to problem-solve, effectively communicate and work collaboratively with others. Skills • Current California Site Supervisor Permit • Responsible for the supervision and training of twelve teachers • Recipient of 2016 Grinspoon Steinhardt Award for Excellence in Jewish Education • Current certification in First Aid/CPR • Completed specialized training as an Emergency Medical Technician and Firefighter Experience JCC Preschool Tiburon Site Director 8/2 014 to present Osher Bernard Jewish Community Preschool - Tiburon, CA Fostered an environment that feels welcoming and promotes a sense of belonging: greet children and families upon arrival and departure and facilitate relationships between families. Be available as a resource for consultation and guidance regarding parenting, chil d development and education. Maintain clear and open communication, including daily interactions, contribution to school’s weekly newsletter, website communications and oversight of all teacher-parent communications. Responsible for supporting the work of the Parents Association. Recruit staff and maintain all aspects of personnel management for preschool, extended care, specialists, optional child care, enrichment and summer program staff. Preschool Teacher 08/2010 to Present Osher Bernard Jewish Community Preschool - Tiburon, CA Planned and implemented early childhood education curriculum. Supervised an assistant and assigned tasks, held monthly meetings. Consulted with specialists to complete developmental and educational assessments for children and implement individualized learning plans. Weekly blogs, portfolios, and documentation. Promoted social/ emotional development in children. Conducted parent teacher conferences and home visits. Collaborated with other teachers and administrators in the development, evaluation, and revision of Jewish preschool programs. Head Teacher 08/2006 to 06/2010 Camelot Preschool - Castro Valley, CA Planned and implemented early childhood education curriculum consistent with the philosophy and practice of the Reggio-inspired school. Responsible for the morning opening and supervision of the classrooms. Served as the head teacher in the two year old classroom; supervised and trained two teachers and a classroom aide in addition to training new staff. Coordinated the daily delegation of tasks to staff, supervised and facilitated the implementation of the daily Reggio-based curriculum. Produced and wrote the monthly newsletter and quarterly assessments for the classroom. Facilitated monthly staff meetings and conducted regular parent/teacher conferences. Teacher 09/2005 to 06/2006 Belvedere-Tiburon Preschool - Tiburon, CA Planned and implemented an early childhood education curriculum consistent with the policies and philosophy of the center. Supervised teaching assistants, communicated with parents on an ongoing basis regarding their children's care. Facilitated parent/teacher conferences. Worked to provide a safe and nurturing educational environment to encourage the children to explore freely. Counselor 01/2002 to 05/2005 San Francisco Boy's & Girl's Home - San Francisco, CA Performed counseling and childcare duties in a residential, therapeutic setting for high-risk, court dependent youth aged 13-18 years old. Assigned shift leader responsibilities that included training new staff, delegating tasks to staff and residents, pl anned meals, managed budget and spending for activities and household expenses. Updated written record on resident's daily progress on identified behavior treatment goals. Participated in regular training on utilizing conflict management skills and behavioral intervention techniques to promote pro-social behaviors and positive cognitive and emotional growth in residents. Education Associate of Arts: Liberal Arts 06/2017 College of Marin - Kentfield, CA Degree in progress. (Current California Site Supervisor Permit) Town of Tiburon Commi ssion, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd ., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefa n i@townoftiburon.org {415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSI TY I N CLUSION TAS K FO RCE A PPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2 8 AT 5 :0 0 P.M. On Octob er 7, 2020, the Town Coun cil created the Di v ersi t y Inclu si on Task Fo rce . The Task Force will be m ad e up of 10 individuals -fiv e To wn Councilmembers and fiv e r es idents ap po i nted by the Council. To appl y for one of the seats on the Task Force , please submit th is co m p leted fo r m t o t he Town Clerk with a res ume . Thank you for your willingness to se rve the Tiburon commun ity. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Pos sess the experience, qua l ification s, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to e ngage, orga nize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and pol icies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belveder e {proof of r es idency required) -Po ss es s awaren ess ab out how the role of systemic racism produces i n eq uities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding divers it y and inclu sion Applicant Name Uma Lerner 10/25/20 Full Name: Date: Address: Phon e: Applicant Information 6 Venus Court ----------------------------------Stree t Tiburon City ( 4 15) 2 18-06 84 Emai l : ----------- Apartment/Unit CA St ate uma.lerner @gmail .com 9 4920 Zip Page 1 o f 2 By submitta l of this applicati o n, I certi fy that t he home address I have liste d above i s my primary full -time r esi d ence. Signature: --'l::e:c:s?::::::===~===;;;;;;;;:;:=----==--c::>-=------------------ Why would you like to serve on the task force? I love Tiburon . I love the close knit communi ty, th e international popul ation , the gre at sch ool district, the multitude of activities , and ease of communication with the Tow n. I have bee n proud of Tiburon leadership's and much of the community's response to COVID , SIP, a nd BLM. My desire in serving on the task force is to protect the small town f eel t hat makes Ti buron so special , while expanding people's idea of wh at Tiburon looks like and doe s. I think of it as having an honest a nd fully inclusive "WE" when w e say "We Ti b uron ." Tiburon is more di v erse than people realize. One way to address that is by makin g o ur com m unity's cultural programming truly reflective of our community. The Diversity and Inclusion Task Force can be an important vehicle in ex pandi ng Ti buron 's cultural activities to reflect the true diversity that is present in Tiburon . We can a lso p ri orit ize and assist t he Town's leadership, police force , and community organization in getting to know o ur residents even better. Building and strengthening community in these ways is a sign ifican t challenge today because of COVID and shelter in place . I believe that we have good optio n s , even under these circumstances , to get to know our residents better and provid e cultu ral/ community activities. I am excited to have an opportunity be able to brainstorm a nd lau nch t hose new programs to build an inclusive community where everyone is seen , heard, an d ce l ebrated . What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? I have liv ed in Ti bu ron for th e past 8 years, and have been involved in the com mun ity at va rious levels via my neighborhood board , Reed School District, t he library, th e Chamber, Southe rn Mari n Mothers Club, and other g roups a nd even ts. I am a practicing psych iatrist, now mostly working and seeing pat ie nt vi a Zo om. My pro fess ional e xpertise is in faci litating deep and difficult co nversations and managing and promoting me nt al hea lth and well ness. In addi tion to cli nical work , I also teach on the top ic of mental health to medical students , psy chiatry resi de n ts , an d p sycholog y inte rn s and to the general public v ia articles , lectures, and di scussions . I have experie nce in organi zational leadershi p though th e various boards and committee s I have served on (s ee bel ow) and current ly I am serving as an ad v isor to a s mal l online medica l company. I have spec ifi ca ll y writte n about a nd taug ht o n w omen and cross cultural perspectives . I have expe ri en ce serv ing on community board s a nd communities. Be lv eron East Neighborhood Associa tion Bo ard Osher Marin Jewish Commu nity Center Exec utive Bo ard Osher Ma rin J ewish Commun ity Center Deve lop me nt Committ ee Kuttie Library Founder and Executive Board Reed Sc hool Stra tegic Pl ann ing Collaborative Kol Shofar Fam ily Engagem ent Co mm ittee Nort hern Ca lifornia Psych iatri c Society Pu blic Di sclosu re Not ice : Submitted applica tion m at eria ls const i tute a p u blic reco r d and m ay be p ublicized as part of Town Council m ee ting m at eri als. Page 2 o f 2 Uma Lerner, MD page 1 of 8 Uma Lerner, M.D. 3653 Buchanan St., Unit A San Francisco, CA 94123 (415) 561-9930 uma@umalernermd.com www.umalernermd.com EDUCATION 2005 – 2008 University of California, San Francisco Residency, General Adult Psychiatry 2004 – 2005 Menninger Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Internship 2000 – 2004 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas M.D. 1996 – 2000 Rice University, Houston, Texas B.A., Major: Sociology ADDITIONAL TRAINING 2014 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Forensic Psychiatry Review Course 2012 American College of Physician Executives Hospital Management Courses 2011 San Francisco Veterans Affairs Hospital, UCSF ECT Clinical Training 2011 International Society for ECT and Neurostimulation ECT Certification Course 2009 San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis Foundations of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy Course LICENSURE AND BOARD CERTIFICATION 2009 – present Psychiatry, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology 2005 – present Physician and Surgeon, Medical Board of California 2005 – present Controlled Substances Registration Certificate, DEA ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2009 – present Assistant Clinical Professor Department of Psychiatry, UC San Francisco School of Medicine 2008 – 2009 Clinical Instructor Department of Psychiatry, UC San Francisco School of Medicine Uma Lerner, MD page 2 of 8 HOSPITAL PRIVILEGES 2013 – 2014 California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco 2011 – present Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco 2009 – 2013 Marin General Hospital, Greenbrae PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT 2019 – present Advisor AAVIA Advising start up on medical questions and women’s health issues. Write blog posts for company blog and Medium.com on women’s health topics and create short videos for company material and TikTok. Assist company employees on the medical aspects of their job tasks. Advise potential investors and company board on clinical aspects of company product and audience. 2014 – present Private Practice Psychiatrist San Francisco Focusing on women’s lives. Examining the contribution of hormones on mood and anxiety through the years and during life transitions. Addressing family-work-life balance and the presence of gender preconceptions in a changing social landscape. Clinical specialties include management of psychiatric illness during fertility treatment, pregnancy, and during the post-partum phase, and ADHD in women. 2013 – 2014 Assistant Medical Director of Inpatient Psychiatry Service California Pacific Medical Center • Direct supervision and teaching of a team of two residents, one psychology intern, and one medical student. • Worked with Medical Director to create PGY-1 Orientation curriculum. • Active role in Department Chair/ Training Director search. Composed letter to search committee on behalf on department and spoke to search committee directly. • Active role in resident interview and recruitment process. • Mentored residents on quality improvement projects, grand rounds presentations, and evidence based medicine presentations. 2013 – 2014 Assistant Medical Director of Consult Liaison Service California Pacific Medical Center • Direct supervision and teaching of residents. 2013 Acting Chief of Psychiatric Emergency Services California Pacific Medical Center • Negotiated agreement for psychiatry department to support St Luke's ER without an increase in workload or cost. • Liaisoned between CPMC Departments of Psychiatry and Emergency Services. • Oversaw psychiatric services at Davis and Pacific Campus Emergency Departments. • Served on root cause analysis committee to address an emergency room red event. • Supervised resident psychiatrists in provision of emergency services. • Educated resident psychiatrists in evaluation, triage, and management of psychiatric emergencies. 2011 – 2013 Psychiatry Department Chair Marin General Hospital Uma Lerner, MD page 3 of 8 • Supervised and supported psychiatrists and psychologists in clinical work and professional behavior. • Recruited psychiatrists and neuropsychologists. • Served on the hospital Medical Executive Committee, Computer Physician Order Entry Steering Committee, and Spine & Brain Institute. • Collaborated with department and hospital leadership across disciplines in improving clinical process, continuing education, and professional development. • Created a monthly department update, which facilitated communication and improves teamwork amongst physicians, nurses, social workers, and other staff. • Led the department in revising admission order set, medication consent process, and bylaws regarding ECT. • Supported department members in providing the highest standard of patient care; review ethics and risk management issues; liaison with quality improvement and risk management. • Implemented hospital and department bylaws, state and federal regulations, and JCAHO and CMS standards. • Liaised with county, courts, and, conservatorship systems. 2009 – 2013 Staff Psychiatrist Marin General Hospital Evaluated and treated patients on adult inpatient psychiatric, medical, and surgical units. Patient diagnoses were mostly schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, borderline personality, and co- occurring substance abuse/ dependence. Patient population was culturally diverse and included geriatric patients with co-morbid medical diagnoses. Provided psychiatric treatment in Spanish for monolingual Spanish speakers. Collaborated with social work and nursing around treatment of patients’ psychiatric illness and social needs. Collaborated with patients, families, Marin and Sonoma counties, and outside providers to ensure continuity of care and wrap around services as needed. 2008 – 2013 Private Practice Psychiatrist Tiburon Provided psychotherapy and medication management, including the treatment of mental illness in the context of substance abuse. Worked with adults, adolescents, families, and couples. Specialized in pregnancy and post-partum mood disturbances, grief and mourning, and treatment resistant disorders. Worked closely with other psychotherapy professionals in split-treatment for mood and thought disorders. NOTABLE CLINICAL EXPERIENCE 2008 Senior Resident, Infant-Parent Program San Francisco General Hospital, UCSF Provided clinical work for parents and infants after a family experience of trauma. Supervised by Alicia Lieberman, Ph.D. 2006 – 2007 Resident, Women, Mood, and Hormone Clinic Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, UCSF Evaluated psychiatric and sexual issues in women related to hormonal changes or imbalances as well as psychodynamic issues. Supervised by Louann Brizendine, M.D. TEACHING EXPERIENCES 2013 – present Psychotherapy Supervisor, Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute UCSF Psychiatry Residency Program Psychotherapy supervisor for 3rd and 4th year psychiatry residents. Modalities include psychodynamic psychotherapy, CBT, DBT, and IPT. Uma Lerner, MD page 4 of 8 2013 – 2014 Teacher, PGY-1 Orientation to Law and Ethics Curriculum CPMC Psychiatry Residency Program 2013 – 2014 Teacher, PGY-3 Brief Psychotherapy Course CPMC Psychiatry Residency Program 2013 – 2014 Teacher, PGY-1 Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Course CPMC Psychiatry Residency Program 2013 – 2014 Teacher, PGY-2 Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Course CPMC Psychiatry Residency Program 2013 – 2014 Psychotherapy Supervisor, CPMC CPMC Psychiatry Residency Program Psychotherapy supervisor for 3rd year psychiatry residents. Modalities include psychodynamic psychotherapy, CBT, DBT, and IPT. Member of psychotherapy supervisors group. 2011 – 2015 Attending Psychiatrist, Mood Clinic San Francisco VA Medical Center, UCSF Provided clinical supervision of second-year psychiatry residents, medical students, and psychology and social work trainees with an emphasis on cultural competency and working collaboratively within a multidisciplinary team of providers. Patient population included primarily depression, bipolar disorder, borderline personality, and co-occurring substance use disorders. 2008 – 2013 Attending Psychiatrist, Brain, Mind, and Behavior Course UCSF School of Medicine Instructed first year medical students in basic psychiatric diagnoses and concepts, including the psychiatric interview, mental status examination, oral presentations, and legal holds. 2008 – 2010 Attending Psychiatrist, Psychotherapy Second Opinion Clinic UCSF Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute Provided a tertiary referral service for complex psychotherapy cases. Co-taught with Mardi Horowitz, M.D. This included teaching of advanced psychotherapy concepts, clinical supervision, and mentorship of residents’ senior projects. 2006 – 2008 Small Group Leader, Brain, Mind, and Behavior Course UCSF School of Medicine Co-taught introductory psychiatric concepts to pre-clinical medical students in a small group setting. 2005 – 2006 Lecturer, Psychiatry Clerkship Curriculum UCSF School of Medicine Co-taught third year clinical medical student lectures. Topics ranged from personality disorders to legal issues to pharmacologic treatments. 2003 – 2005 Teaching Assistant, Menninger Department of Psychiatry Baylor College of Medicine Led psychiatry clerkship review course to prepare 3rd and 4th year medical students for psychiatry shelf exam. 1999 - 2000 Teaching Assistant, Department of Sociology Rice University Organized and lead tutorial sessions for two upper-level sociology classes. Graded class papers. Uma Lerner, MD page 5 of 8 1998 – 1999 Teaching Assistant, Department of Biology Rice University Organized and taught Introductory Biology tutorial sessions; graded homework and exams. 1998, 1999 Teacher, 6th and 8th Grade Summerbridge Houston Taught math and conflict resolution classes to inner-city students. TEACHING AIDS AND CURRICULA 2013 – 2014 PGY-3 Brief Psychotherapy Curriculum, CPMC CPMC Psychiatry Residency Program Created Brief Psychotherapy Course curriculum along with Jeremy Bornstein, Ph.D. for 3rd year psychiatry residents. 2013 – 2014 PGY-1 Orientation to Law and Ethics Curriculum, CPMC Proposed and created overall PGY-1 orientation curriculum with Inpatient Medical Director. Created and taught PGY-1 Orientation to Law and Ethics Curriculum. 2006 - 2010 Clinicians Coping with Suicide Curriculum, Department of Psychiatry, UCSF Created a curriculum to teach clinicians to manage medical, legal, and emotional ramifications of a patient suicide. Also created a format in which an institution can provide support and guidance for residents and other clinicians after a patient suicide. Curriculum continues to be taught to entire UCSF psychiatry residency every other year. 2006 - 2007 Psychiatry Board Study Guide, Educational Testing and Assessment Systems Served on the Resident Review Board to review and revise Psychiatry Board Study Guide. 2003 - 2004 Mental Health Track Curriculum, Baylor College of Medicine Co-wrote and submitted proposal for a new mental health track for third year medical school Longitudinal Ambulatory Care Experience Course, which is now a part of the school’s standard curriculum. 1997 – 1998 Curriculum Coordinator, Religious Studies Department Rice University Wrote and submitted proposal for Hinduism 101 class to address a lack of Hindu study curricula in the Rice religion department. After the proposal was accepted, conducted a nationwide search for a professor and secured funding for the class. The Hinduism curriculum continues to be an integral aspect of the religious studies education. SERVICE TO PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS 2009 – 2016 Reviewer, Academic Psychiatry Review submitted articles in areas of cultural psychiatry, student support and mentorship, and medico- legal issues. SERVICE TO PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 2011 – 2013 Founder and Coordinator Bay Area Inpatient Psychiatry Directors’ Work Group Uma Lerner, MD page 6 of 8 Created a forum to bring together the psychiatry inpatient leadership from all major Bay Area hospitals to increase and improve communication and cooperation. 2010 – 2013 Member, Budget and Finance Committee Northern California Psychiatric Society Manage the organization’s yearly budget and investments. 2008 – 2013 Co-Chair, Professional Education Committee Northern California Psychiatric Society • Increased the organization’s CME offerings to address a diversity of professional interests. Programming included a conference on the interface between neurology and psychiatry and another on complex psychopharmacology. • Initiated collaboration with UCSF and local community organizations. • Engaged psychologists, social workers, and nurses in CME programs and increased outreach to NAMI and other patient groups. • Work closely with Treasurer and Budget and Finance committee to manage a large and complex budget, as Professional Education Committee generates a large portion of organization’s income. 2009 – 2010 Councilor at Large Northern California Psychiatric Society • Developed resources for member recruitment and retention. • Refocused programming to increase member collaboration and fellowship. • Developed programs for residents and early career members to strengthen the future of the organization. 2008 Resident Representative, Strategic Planning Committee Northern California Psychiatric Society Refocused the organization’s direction to ensure longevity by revising the mission statement, creating strategies for recruitment and relevance to members, and increasing revenue. HONORS & AWARDS 2014 Foundation Grant for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy training, CPMC 2011 Committee Person of the Year (Professional Education Chair), NCPS 2008 Creative Activity Award, Department of Psychiatry, UCSF 2008 Spiegel Fellowship, Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture 2007 Resident Teaching Fellowship, UCSF 2001 Medical Education Cooperation with Cuba Program, Havana, Cuba POSTERS Jessica Ellinoy, Sally Ryan, Prapti Mehta, and Uma Lerner. “Assessment of Resident Satisfaction in the Process of Selecting a New Residency Director.” Association for Academic Psychiatry. 2014 Iljie Fitzgerald, Kristen Brooks, Matt Fitzpatrick, Uma Lerner, Ellen Haller. "Coping with Patient Suicide" Curriculum. University of California, San Francisco Education Day. 2009. Uma Lerner, MD page 7 of 8 PRESENTATIONS September 2020 Chronic Menstrual Pain and Mental Health Mental Health America, Webinar March 2018 Fostering Resiliency in Ourselves and our Patients San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group December 2017 Psychological Effects of Sexism and Gender Stereotyping San Francisco Psychotherapy Research Group November 2014 Mental Health and the Asylum Seeking Process Tahirih Justice Center, Houston, TX November 2014 Psychological Effects of Trauma Tahirih Justice Center, Houston, TX November 2013 Coping with Suicide CPMC, Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds September 2012 SSRI’s in Pregnancy Marin General Hospital Grand Rounds April 2012 OB Crisis in a Patient with Schizophrenia Marin General Hospital Grand Rounds July 2011 Depression and Stress Tiburon-Belvedere Rotary Club, Tiburon, California March 2011 Cultural Competency Guidelines: A New Look Northern California Psychiatric Society, Monterey, California May 2010 Adopting Cultural Competency Guidelines to Consider Intra-ethnic Oppression Affecting Disenfranchised Subgroups, International Conference on Sociology, Athens, Greece June 2008 The Culturally Sensitive Therapist and Identity Conflict within a Patient Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture Annual Conference, San Francisco, California May 2008 Supporting Residents after a Patient Suicide San Francisco General Hospital Grand Rounds March 2008 When a Resident has a Patient Suicide: Reactions, Implications, & Training Program Response American Association of Directors of Psychiatry Residency Training Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana March 2008 When a Psychiatrist has a Patient Suicide: Reactions, Implications, & Training Program Responses Northern California Psychiatric Society, Monterey, California P EER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS Uma Lerner, MD page 8 of 8 Lerner, U, Brooks, K, McNiel, D, Cramer, R, and Haller, E. Coping with Patient Suicide: A Curriculum for Psychiatry Residency Training Programs. Academic Psychiatry 2012 Jan 1;36(1):29-33. Horowitz, Mardi J and Lerner, U (2010). Treatment of Histrionic Personality Disorder in Clarkin, Fonagy, and Gabbard (Eds), Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders (pg 323- 348) American Psychiatric Association Press. Thirugnanasampanthan U, Foster A, Rauch RA. Reversible cerebral atrophy: a case report and literature review. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2006; 28(5):458-462. NON-PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS Lerner, U. What are Hormones. Medium. Aug 2020. Lerner, U. Do Oral Contraceptives Affect Fertility. Medium. Jan 2020. Lerner, U. Making the Pill Work for You. Medium. Jul 2019. Lerner, U. A Dog in the Office. The SMMC Crier. May 2017. Lerner, U. A Dog in the Office. The SMMC Crier. Oct 2016. Lerner, U. A Dog in the Office. The SMMC Crier. Apr 2016. Lerner, U. A Dog in the Office. The SMMC Crier. Nov 2015. Lerner, U. A Dog in the Office. San Francisco Medicine. Jan 2010. Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications - Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies - Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address - Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings - Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion - Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone: Email: Anh Sundstrom 10/23/2020 48 Red Hill Circle Tiburon CA 94920 415-963-2204 aqsundstrom@gmail.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. Anh Sundstrom Back in June, in the wake of our nation's much-needed difficult conversations about race and policing, I started a personal research project. Feeding on curiosity that came from that research, I turned and looked at our town with fresh eyes. Many policy ideas were out there, they've *been* out there for years, studied by researchers who have been doing this work for a long time. But not all were relevant to our town. We have such unique circumstances and I wanted to compile a list of recommendations that honored that. I outlined these ideas in a document that I shared with several councilmembers after the Town Forum. These are not my ideas, and they are not new ideas. But they are actionable ideas. I am passionate about doing my part to help bring about positive changes in our community and would love to see progress made on the ideas presented in that document. I am a first-generation Vietnamese-American and my first language was Vietnamese. I feel that my experiences have helped me become especially sensitive and empathetic to issues around race and diversity. Education: Bachelor of Science, Psychology (BioPsychology) at UC San Diego Work experience: 14 years of experience in Marketing (medical devices, consulting, content creator) Volunteer experience: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Nor-Cal Advisory Council member & Volunteer Urban Ed Academy, Volunteer Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani @townoftiburon .org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUN CIL DIVERSITY INCLU SION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M . On October 7, 2020, the Town Counci l created the Diversity Inclusion Tas k Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Counci l members and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume . Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professiona l career, volunteer wo rk, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedu le flexibility to attend monthly meeti ngs -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Be lvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism p rod uces inequities the task force wi ll attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Sara Maurer 10/26/20 Full Name: Date: Applicant Information 39 Lagoon Vista Rd Address: -------------------------------- Street Apartment/Unit Tiburon CA 94920 City State Zip (415) 2 18-1427 saragrahammaurer@me.com Phone: Ema il: ----------- Page 1 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Sara Maurer Signature:-------------------------------- Why would you like to serve on the task force? I have been defendi ng the rights of others for decades. It is my passion and purpose in life. I cannot tolerate any form of discrimination and believe we all have an obligation to stand up when we witness such acts. I became friends w ith Hawi and Verna right after they opened thier store. I met them the way I wish our police had; I went i nto their store, introduced myself and had a wonderful conversation with them. I was excited to meet such an inspiring couple who brought new life and passion in to our town. I believe that there is an obligation as community members to welcome newcomers with open arms. I wanted them to feel supported; they bring a new perspective and energy to Tiburon that is essential in our continued growth as a viberant community. I was heartbroken at what happened to them in August and immediately raced over to their store with the invitation to call any time, day or night if they needed me. Since the incident, I have paid even more attention to the voices of those who have felt discriminated against in our communty. I am semi-retired and have the time, energy and strong desire to serve our town in this important endevor. I hope to help make this wonderful community more welcoming and i nclusive for all. What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? -Attorney with over 40 years of experience representing people who have sustained harm from all forms of discrimi nation, including: race, gender, age, orientation , employment and disability. -Producer, Exile Nation: The Plastic People; a documentary about the horror of Latinx Dreamers and undocumented people who were dumped at the Mexican Border (Tijuana) by ICE. -Child Abuse Prevention Society (Safe & Sound); Vice Preisdent 3 years, member 20 years. CAPS aims to break the cycle of generational child abuse by supporting the vicitms while also teaching parents and guardians who have been abusive the skills needed to be loving and effective parents. -Volunteer and Lecturer with Dr. Jerry Jampolski of The Center for Attitundinal Healing. We held seminars about affective ways to remove aggression from trial advocacy. -I am skilled at bringing people together to seek meaningful solutions while respecting differing perspectives and experiences. Pub lic Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part ofTown Council meeting materials. Page 2 of 2 PROFILE An attorney with 40 years of experience in civil litigation, employment law, sexual harassment, catastrophic injuries, wrongful death and real estate transactions. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE PRO BONO ATTORNEY , Mill Valley and Tiburon, CA. 2006- 2020. Work included wrongful death, wrongful termination, employment law, ADA discrimination, age discrimination and real estate litigation. LAW OFFICES OF MAURER AND MANOS. San Francisco and Mill Valley CA. 2000- 2006. Complex litigation, including sexual harassment, employment law, personal injury, including wrongful death, contract law and real estate law. Tried, mediated, arbitrated, or settled hundreds of cases. LAW OFFICES OF SARA G. MAURER, San Francisco and Mill Valley, CA 1989- 2000. Managed a team of attorneys pursuing hundreds of civil litigation cases involving wrongful death, employment law, sexual harassment and personal injury. Carried out depositions, expert witness analysis, mediations, arbitrations, trials and settlements. ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY, DEBEVOISE AND PLYMPTON, New York City, 1985- 1989. Handled complex international real estate transactions. ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY, ROPES AND GRAY, Boston, Mass. 1983-1985. Handled complex real estate transactions. LAW CLERK TO MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT JUSTICE WILLIAM I. RANDALL, Boston, Mass. 1980-1983. Member of Massachusetts, New York and California Bars. California Bar Number: 147839. OTHER ACTIVITIES Producer of Exile Nation: The Plastic People. Vice President, San Francisco Child Abuse Prevention Society. Lecturer and member, California Consumer Attorneys Association. Conversational Spanish. EDUCATION Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY. B.A. 1977: Phi Beta Kappa, Omicron Delta Epsilon, International Economics Honor Society, all college highest honors. Suffolk Law School, Boston, Mass, J.D., 1977-1980: Prizes for: best oral advocate , and best brief writer, International Moot Court, clerkship for the Chief Justice of South Boston District Court. Sara Graham Maurer 39 LAGOON VISTA, TIBURON, CA. 94920. 415- 218 1427. SARAGRAHAMMAURER@ME.COM Attorney at Law Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefan!@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Council members and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion Applicant Name Full Name : Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit /,' b u rz__o r1 } City State I\p Page 1 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature:~~ -~ ---Why would you like to-serve on the-task force? ---- Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials . Page 2 of 2 ,v-PR.... "' Anette L. Harris, Tiburon, CA (elected 2009): is the 2010 and 2011 Chair of the Circle of Red for the American Heart Association's "Go Red for Women" event in San Francisco. She is currently a member of the Board of Governors of the San Francisco Symphony, where she serves on the Youth Orchestra, Com·mittee on Governors and Planned Giving Committees. She has also served as co-chair and honorary co-chair of the San Francisco Symphony's signature fundraising event. the Black and White Ball. During 2006-2007, Anette served a two-year term as the second President of the newly organized Bay Area Arthritis Auxiliary, the first of its kind in the Uni ted States. In addition to fundraising, she laun.ched the Salon Seminar. an educationally-oriented group to expand the knowledge of its members and provide outreach to the loca l community. In late 2007, Anette was named Volunteer of the Year by the Arthritis Founda Ion ot Northern California. In 2-000, Anette was the first African-American to be elected President of the. Junior League of San Francisco in its 89-year history. Subsequent to 2001 Anette j0ined the Board of Directors of Edgewood Center for Children and Families and the Advisory Board of Beating ·the Odds/Students Rising Above. In 2005, she was the chair and founder of the first major fundraising event for Studen t s Rising Above. an organization which identifies and funds academically gifted students who have overcome in c redible odds to succeed. Additionally, Anette has served as a volunteer for the Museum of the African Diaspora in San Francisco (opening gala co-chair), Macy's Passport (2005 dinner co-chair) which raises funds for HIV/ AIDS education and awareness, City College-of San Francisco, Booker T. Washington's after school program, The Family School, a welfare-to-work program, and Canal Community Alliance in Marin County. Anette assumed the re s ponsibility of service on the Board of Trustees of her alma mater, the University of Dallas for five years and currently serves as an advisor to the recently developed College of Pediatric Medicine of Western University. Other volunteer interests have included the Women 's Political Fund, the International Museum of Women and Worn-en Entrepreneurs. Professionally, she was the principal and owner of Loupe & Associate, a small public rel atio ns firm in San Francisco for 20 years. Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon .org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNC IL DIVERS ITY INCLUS ION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity lndusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals -five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications -Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies -Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings -Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) -Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address -Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion A pp licant Name Full Name: Karel!ffJ a>L ( Ka!V a,.) BuRk i+b fy_f .B,(,f Cl..-, Date: 10/,2 3 / £V I ' Applicant Information Address: r{ ~ k/ Street Apartment/Unit ca qlf9dD City State Zip Phone: $°D 8 -d 6 c;-S-t;"8r Email: Page1of2 ::s:~:::~al of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time Signature: -tt~~~#----------- KARLYGASH (KARLA) BURKITBAYEVA 6 Buckeye Rd, Belvedere, CA 94920 · 508-265-5587 · kburk:it:@gmail.com Entrepreneur and business operator passionate about education, diversity and inclusion Education Stanfonl University Master of Business Administration Master of Arts, Education University of Pennsylvania Bachelor of Science in Engineering, Systems Engineering Bachelor of Arts, Economics Expaiau:e Product School, Inc COO and Board Member • Responsible for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion initiatives • Member of the leadership and executive teams • Manage Business Operations, Finance & Accounting, Compliance and HR teams WestwanlLeaning, Inc Board Member Co-Founder and COO • Responsible for all back office operations, including Finance and HR • Built out supply chain across three countries The Boston Consulting Group Consultant • Strategic due diligence for phannaceutical MNC • Strategy development for nuclear energy company Orleu Holding Deputy Director General. Business .Development and Finance Additional Stanford, CA 2009-2011 Philadelphia, PA 2000-2005 San Francisco, CA 2015-Present San Francisco, CA 2011-Presenl 2011-2015 Moscow, Russia 2010 Almaty, Kazakhstan 2006-2010 • Languages: Russian (native); English (fluent); Spanish, French and Turkish (proficient); Arabic (elementary) • Other Experience: Student council member (International representative), coached Kazakhstani teenagers for US college entrance with 80% success rate, mentored East Palo Alto high school students 45 #+"#)&#" #!!''#"/#&/#!!(($$ (#" %$$,'" $ 5949%"&-+%"+;8;64 #$3$'$%"-" 18592879/:7:: 0/ 57603311 $":+6464+$'%"$$&"#$) %##"-#"' % 54&%#0&'%"#&"#$# $)$%- )"$#$#$#"+ ##%$$# $"$$'" '$"#%-)%")%"'##$#"&$%"%$)- *&'(-" )'#"'#&) (#"' / #### $ ( "+ !%$#+ ' $" )%" "## ""+ &%$"'"+" "# $#$+ "*+ "& "$# $ &&"#$)%## # / #### '"## %$ ' $ " #)#$ "# "%# !%$# $ $# "'$$ $$"## /&$$#%($)$$$ $)$# /&$"#$'" #"" &"#$)%# /%/$"#$%""&" 1 ""#)"!%"2 $$ "(! %,$, $$ "("#&!(#" "##, $"$ "$$.$ $) $$ , , Olivia Cervantes Kress 10/28/2020 11 West Shore Road Belvedere CA 94920 415-828-5928 okress@sbcglobal.net 55 )#%$$$# $+ "$)$$$"## &#$&#) "")%/$ "#- $%", -+#) -#) (#'&*#"(('#&. (&-#)&$$ %) (#"'",$&"'. ) ' #')&#(,%$$ $$"##$$%$ %"") %*# "$'%$$"#- Olivia Cervantes Kress I would like to serve on this task force because I believe its a long overdue initiative to help the entire community learn more about what the rest of the world has learned. I feel I can bring a different perspective to what diversity is all about and how important inclusion is, especially when people are not even aware that you are there. I am a minority female that has made her way through the hardships of being excluded for many things in life. I have found a way to survive and thrive and provide for my family. I have raised four children in Tiburon over the past 23 years and they have had their fair share of feeling a bit outcast. We have never given up and have been able to open others eyes to being inclusive and caring and empathetic. My children are grown now, but they have created a positive reputation for themselves and for our family. They love this community and all it has to offer, but also have genuine empathy for people of color. I can bring my open and caring perspective to this task force as a communications professional. Currently I work on the California High-Speed Rail project in California. As a communications professional, I do public relations and outreach to communities impacted by the project, providing education and information about the program. I am bilingual and able to reach out to a variety of stakeholders to inform them about the high-speed rail project and the benefits it can bring to their community. Olivia Cervantes Kress 11 West Shore Road Belvedere CA 94920 (415) 828-5928 Email: okress@sbcglobal.net Experience: WSP USA, Los Angeles May, 2016 – Present Senior Communications/Outreach Manager: Responsible for managing public relations and communications on four project sections of the California High-Speed Rail Program. Manage regional consultants; develop strategy and implementation of outreach plans and activities; conduct public meetings; stakeholder engagement; legislative briefings; manage media relations and work closely with project managers and team members to deliver effective outreach to the community. Deliver public presentations as a spokesperson for high-speed rail, craft talking points, respond to stakeholder and media inquiries. Collaborate with Sacramento headquarters to ensure public outreach and communications follow mandates for the high-speed rail program. Develop and implement programs and activities for environmental justice communities and monitor the effectiveness of the programs. Develop and maintain relationships with media representatives from English and Spanish language media outlets, providing resources and information, as necessary. Work with a team of professionals to engage the public in their communities, gather feedback on the project and create awareness of the high-speed rail program throughout the state. Consultant, Los Angeles May, 2009 – August, 2014 Communications Consultant: Consulting for restaurant group in Southern California. Duties included strategic marketing to corporate clients and community organizations. Public relations for three restaurants, including queries regarding community and cultural events, donations to Los Angeles arts programs, and fundraising events for non-profit organizations. Developed strategies to attract and retain new customers. Executed special promotions and managed special events. Collaborated with managing partners and provided guidance to managers in various restaurant locations. Public relations lead for launch of new venues, creating campaigns to increase brand awareness. Developed creative communications plans to ensure positive customer experience. Managed queries from the media and specialized groups and community organizations. KPMG LLP, San Francisco August, 1997 – August, 2001 Western Region Manager: Public Relations/Marketing: Oversee and manage region-wide communications; develop and implement a comprehensive public relations program to enhance image in the marketplace, ensure consistency of messaging to the media and the public, and generate publicity for KPMG partners and professionals. Manage a regional team of professionals; respond to online and traditional press; develop briefing documents; prepare executives for interviews; area media relations and issues management. Contribute to annual report and major event planning. Development and execution of events to attract new business. Additionally, execute strategic communications, including writing and editing documents, internal and external announcements, partner speeches, talking points and news releases. Participate in the development of program budgets and advise executives and other members of the organization regarding public relations activities. Bechtel Corporation, San Francisco January, 1993 – August, 1997 Senior Public Relations Specialist: Responsibilities included research and writing for various internal and external company publications. Managing and responding to media inquiries and arranging interviews of key executives, coordinating message development and serving as spokesperson, as necessary. Working with project managers and executives to manage public relations and communications in San Francisco office and groundbreaking events for new offices in Sao Paolo, Brazil and Latin America. Rollout of crisis communications plans, developing relationships with local and international media. Worked closely with project managers on community relations for Navy Clean Program in San Diego, providing updates to the community and collaborating with Naval Station, San Diego. Served as company representative for various community and local groups. Other duties included development and implementation of strategies to heighten company image, and promote an understanding of the organization. University of California, Los Angeles June, 1989 – December, 1992 Public Information Officer: Responsibilities included coordinating outreach communications to news media serving diverse and mainstream audiences. Development of short and long term communications programs, writing news releases, and developing English and Spanish language press kits, responding to a high volume of media inquiries from local and international press and arranging media coverage of programs and events. Served as point-of-contact for crisis communications and issues management. Contributed to University publications, established relationships with reporters from ethnic media outlets. Member of the Chancellor’s Community Advisory Commission and the Chancellor’s Council on Diversity. Participation in overall University Communications activities and served as liaison and spokesperson on University matters. Education: University of Southern California Bachelor of Arts Degree, English Emergency Teaching Credential Languages: Fluent Spanish Conversational ability in French Page 1 of 2 Town of Tiburon Commission, Board, Committee Application Submit to: Town Clerk Lea Stefani 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, CA 94920 lstefani@townoftiburon.org (415)435-7377 TOWN COUNCIL DIVERSITY INCLUSION TASK FORCE APPLICATION DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 28 AT 5:00 P.M. On October 7, 2020, the Town Council created the Diversity Inclusion Task Force. The Task Force will be made up of 10 individuals – five Town Councilmembers and five residents appointed by the Council. To apply for one of the seats on the Task Force, please submit this completed form to the Town Clerk with a resume. Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community. Diversity Inclusion Task Force Qualifications - Possess the experience, qualifications, and knowledge either in your professional career, volunteer work, or personal capacities to engage, organize, and provide recommendations to achieve diversity and inclusion goals and policies - Possess awareness about how the role of systemic racism produces inequities the task force will attempt to address - Have the time and schedule flexibility to attend monthly meetings - Have interest in working on policies regarding diversity and inclusion - Be a full-time resident of Tiburon or Belvedere (proof of residency required) Applicant Name Full Name: Date: Applicant Information Address: Street Apartment/Unit City State Zip Phone: Email: John Charles Rodriguez (J-Ro)10/28/20 1842 Vistazo West St Tiburon CA 94920 512-748-6175 john@stagetwo.com Page 2 of 2 By submittal of this application, I certify that the home address I have listed above is my primary full-time residence. Signature: Why would you like to serve on the task force? What are your applicable qualifications and experiences? Public Disclosure Notice: Submitted application materials constitute a public record and may be publicized as part of Town Council meeting materials. See email See email. From:John Rodriguez To:Lea Stefani Subject:For your consideration - Tiburon Diversity Inclusion Task Force Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 5:02:53 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi there! Having some trouble with the form. Why would you like to serve on the task force? Hello, my name is John Charles Rodriguez, but you can call me J-Ro. I live on the hillside on Vistazo West with my wife Laura and two year old daughter, Rio. We love Tiburon and look forward to raising our growing family here. I want to actively participate in the Tiburon community by serving on the newly formed Diversity Inclusion Task Force. With the amalgamation of our country’s largely unresolved history, the events of the past few years, and the current global pandemic, I believe we stand at a cultural precipice in how we look at, interact, and work with one another in our increasingly connected society. It’s rare when a large group of people is affected by the same thing at the same time, but the pressure to enact change, while it may seem like it has recently increased, has been brewing for quite some time. It’s well understood and established that generations of systemic and discriminatory practices in banking, real estate, education, and public policy has eroded a significant amount of trust in the public systems we all rely on. However, those systems don’t actually reflect the day to day reality of what it’s like to be a modern American citizen. A quick observation of the modern American experience as well as widespread cultural touch points like sports, music, and filmed entertainment reflects an entirely diverse and complex population. We have never been more of a cultural melting pot than we are, right here, right now. I believe that people are generally good and want to belong to a tight knit group that accepts them as they are. I believe that too often in the past, cultural norms have been difficult to break from, and have often suppressed opportunities to show one another how things actually are. Take the recently announced story behind the origins of the classic children’s book, “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.” Charlie Bucket, the underdog, the dreamer of dreams, the one whose good deed shined in a weary world, was originally written as an African American boy. Author Roald Dahl wrote the original draft as an allegory of race and privilege titled, “Charlie and the Chocolate Boy.” Looking back, it becomes clear what the other spoiled children represent, from Veruca Salt’s incessant whining to Augustus Gloop’s gluttony. Their characters remained, largely untouched, while Charlie was changed to the character we know today. Why? Because it was not the cultural norm and not being the cultural norm at that time was not good for business. Published as planned, and emerging from the era of the civil rights movement, it would be an entirely different story today. More likely, we would never have even heard of it to begin with. Today, that story is well within the cultural norm. We have diverse protagonists, heroes from all nationalities, creed, sex, and backgrounds. Time and technology has pushed aside the veiled injustice and abuse that stem from years of doing things a certain way. For the last generation, we’ve increasingly accepted new heroes and figureheads that look nothing like the majority of us. Today, Charlie Bucket could be any color. That would be totally normal. As normal as a latino from Texas on the hillside in Marin. As a latino in disguise, (people are often surprised by my surname) I understand what it’s like to see a real time shift in how people act when they determine my heritage. I also understand both the benefit and struggles of a rich cultural background. I use this self awareness to provide value in my business. My marketing consultancy, Stage Two, works with varied consumer technologies, from set top entertainment devices, to social media applications. Our job is to stay on the pulse of popular culture, so that we may help our portfolio brands shape their way into the ebb and flow of consumer and investor mindshare. I’ve hired and managed diverse teams that have gone on to source and run diversified focus and test groups to help inform systems, product planning and design. We take great pride in helping shape great internal and consumer experiences in this way. I believe that constant awareness around normalizing equal behavior is the best way to ensure that inclusion for all is part of the culture, and part of the public policy. We have to be active in boosting under appreciated perspectives and amplifying them so that they are not only heard, but that they are considered and vetted appropriately. Everyone appreciates and deserves the respect of being heard by their peers. We’ve got to work to continue to normalize racial and viewpoint diversity in everything we do. Everything we build together. And everything we leave behind. Credentials Being in consumer products, we know quite a bit about Gen Z. Today’s Generation Z, people born between 1996 and 2010, are the most racially and ethnically diverse generation ever. They are the most highly educated, the most outspoken, most vulnerable, and interestingly enough, the most tolerant of societal change. They think less and less of political party and more and more about social justice. They want the comfort of knowing they will be treated the way they intend to treat others. In this way, it’s larger than a generational shift, it’s an idealogical one. We should look for helpful, meaningful, and constructive ways that our leadership can seed what will enable this generation to make the societal changes that they so desperately want and deserve to pass on. In closing, it’s clear that the populace is ready for the logical next steps in our progressive growth. It’s time for public policy and services to reflect the community at large. But large, difficult changes are brought on by smaller, more manageable, and more local ones. As a democratic society, our ultimate goal should be to create the ideal conditions where a group can outperform their individual members. It would be an honor to work on this with Tiburon’s Diversity Inclusion Task Force. For early stage brands and nascent experiences, brand, public and community relations efforts are good things to invest in. I’ve taken great pride in creating inclusive work environments by hiring and leading teams to ensure the greatest range of cultural inputs and influence within the organization. That, in turn, benefits clients and brands by ensuring they are well represented in their respected marketplaces. Here are some examples - At Grande Communications in Austin, I served on the board of the Passion and Commitment club. An employee run PAC that worked with the community to help provide support for organizations like the following. Latinitas Girlstart Austin Parks Foundation Knowbility At the South By Southwest Music, Film and Interactive Festival, or SXSW, I served in multiple executive level roles that were tied to the brands interaction with the community. I’ve served on the SXSW advisory board for over 13 years where I am responsible for ensuring that topics surrounding early stage tech, entrepreneurship, venture capital, brand and product marketing, and design are represented evenly with at least one culturally diverse person, and at least one woman. I’ve also run campaigns for Austin Music Foundation, promoting urban hip-hop and diverse music acts with the Mayor of Austin, Texas. Recently, at SAP.io as Entrepreneur in residence. I was responsible for mentoring female and ethnically diverse tech founders into the next stage of their corporate evolution. John C. Rodriguez (J-Ro) Stage Two 512-748-6175 @johnrodriguez • • • • 1842 Vistazo West Tiburon, CA 94920 c 512.748.6175 t @johnrodriguez e john@stagetwo.com I have branded, communicated and marketed new products and services through unique positioning, creative experiences, and meaningful partnerships for over twenty years. I’m passionate about the interchange between technology and humanity, and the opportunity that exists to deﬁne the future between them. COMMUNICATIONS PROFILE PRODUCT MARKETING | BRAND COMMUNICATIONS Drove product marketing and GTM for startups and brands incl. Mozilla and LG Developed user journeys and feasibility studies for consumer products Managed internal teams and creative agencies through asset production DIRECT MARKETING | CAMPAIGN MANAGEMENT Launched PLAiR streaming device two years before Google Chromecast Responsible for dozens of product launches including driving 1M+ in pre-orders Coordinated a B2B media buying campaign for 20K MIPCOM registrants EVENT MARKETING | BRAND EXPERIENCES Created and produced an innovative technology and music tour, DELL Lounge Founded perennial startup networking events - Hardware House and ATX Crawl Negotiated and curated branded entertainment and music content w/ DIRECTV BUSINESS STRATEGY | PARTNER DEVELOPMENT Cultivated early venture and PR opportunities including pitch, demos, and intros Activated a multi-year Grande broadband technology partnership with SXSW Launched an email marketing product with Yahoo, Groupon, AOL. 500K+ MRR PROFESSIONAL HISTORY President, Stage Two - San Francisco, CA Sep ’14 - Present Communications and marketing strategy for brands, founders, and venture Director, Stage Two - San Francisco, CA Sep ’11 - Sep ’14 Launched Sonos, Sphero, Dropcam, Magisto, and more. Made partner in 2013 Head Of Marketing, OtherInbox - Austin, TX Sep ’09 - Sep ’11 Email optimized for users and made proﬁtable for brands. Acq. by Return Path Marketing / PR Lead, SXSW - Austin, TX Jul ’07 - Apr ’09 Brand steward, content strategy, and strategic partnerships. Advisor since 2007 Marketing Dir, Super Pal Universe - Austin, TX May ’07 - Nov ’08 Executive producer, branding, and marketing for a teen pop band TV pilot (PBS) Executive Producer, DELL - Austin, TX Jun ’07 - Mar ’08 Created and managed a music and technology activation, the DELL Lounge Marketing Director, ME Television - Austin, TX Aug ’06 - May ’07 Launched a cable music video channel in the “Live Music Capital of the World” Marketing, Grande Communications - Austin, TX Aug ’01 - Dec ’06 Introduced FTTH (ﬁber to the home) broadband years before FiOS and Google Marketing / Research, Netpliance - Austin, TX Sep ’98 - Aug ’01 Championed everyday internet and email via the i-Opener internet appliance EDUCATION Texas State University - RTF. Marketing and advertising coursework John Charles Rodriguez TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 2 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Department of Administrative Services Subject: Town Council Committee Appointments Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY Town Councilmembers are appointed to serve on local and regional boards and committees, joint powers authorities, and Town subcommittees. The Council conducts annual and as-needed reviews of the list to make any necessary updates or changes. Staff has provided several recommendations regarding time- sensitive appointments. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) 1. Create the 2021 Budget/Finance ad hoc subcommittee and appoint membership. 2. Create the 2021 Town Manager Performance Evaluation ad hoc subcommittee and appoint membership. 3. Consider additional updates, if desired. BACKGROUND Members of the Town Council are appointed to serve on a variety of local and regional boards and committees and as the Town representatives on a number of joint powers authorities. They also serve on Town standing and ad hoc committees to study issues or projects in town. It is regular practice for the Council to conduct an annual review of the list of appointments (Exhibit 1) at the beginning of each year, following the reorganization of the Town Council in December, to make any changes or new appointments for the new year. ANALYSIS In addition to general review and potential revisions to the list of appointments, staff specifically recommends the Council consider the following appointments tonight: • Create the 2021 Budget/Finance ad hoc subcommittee and appoint membership. The 2020 Budget/Finance ad hoc subcommittee was made up of Alice Fredericks and Holli TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: AI -2 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 2 Thier and dissolved on 12/31/2020. The 2021 Budget/Finance ad hoc subcommittee will dissolve on 12/31/2021. • Create the 2021 Town Manager Performance Evaluation ad hoc subcommittee and appoint membership. The 2020 ad hoc subcommittee was made up of Alice Fredericks and David Kulik and dissolved after the completion of the performance evaluation. The 2021 subcommittee will also dissolve after the completion of the performance evaluation. FINANCIAL IMPACT Staff anticipates no direct fiscal impact to the Town by adoption of this item. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that adoption of this item is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines in that it does not constitute a project under CEQA. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Town Council: 1. Create the 2021 Budget/Finance ad hoc subcommittee and appoint membership. 2. Create the 2021 Town Manager Performance Evaluation ad hoc subcommittee and appoint membership. 3. Consider additional updates, if desired. Exhibit(s): 1. Town Council Committee Appointments List Prepared By: Lea Stefani, Town Clerk EXHIBIT 1 DRAFT 2021 Town Council Committee Appointments List Page 1 of 4 TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS 2021 I. STATE & REGIONAL AGENCIES 1. ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS (General Assembly meets in April and October) Jack Ryan, Delegate Jon Welner, Alternate 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PRIORITY-SETTING COMMITTEE (CDBG) (Meets twice a year in Marin City and at Civic Center) Holli Thier, Delegate Jack Ryan, Alternate 3. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (Meets quarterly and at the Annual Conference in September; other events as published) Alice Fredericks • Voting Delegate for Town of Tiburon o Alternate: Holli Thier • Transportation, Communication & Public Works State Policy Committee - (Appointment by League President) 4. MARIN CLEAN ENERGY BOARD OF DIRECTORS (Meets 1st Thursday from 7–9 p.m. at 1 McGinnis Parkway, San Rafael) Holli Thier, Delegate David Kulik, Alternate 5. MARIN CLIMATE AND ENERGY PARTNERSHIP (MCEP) Local Governments for Sustainability (Meets 1st Thursday, San Rafael City Hall) Samantha Bonifacio (Assistant Planner), Staff Liaison & voting board member 6. MARIN EMERGENCY RADIO AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS (Meetings scheduled as needed) Interim Police Chief Jamie Scardina, Delegate Holli Thier, Alternate 7. RICHARDSON BAY REGIONAL AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS (Meets monthly on 2nd Wednesday at 6:00 p.m. - Sausalito City Hall) David Kulik, Delegate Alice Fredericks, Alternate DRAFT 2021 Town Council Committee Appointments List Page 2 of 4 8. TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (Meets monthly on 4th Thursday at 7:30 p.m. - Board of Supervisors Chambers, Civic Center) Alice Fredericks, Board member and Vice Chair [Term = 1/1/2020 – 12/31/2023] • Fredericks serves on the Human Resources Ad Hoc Committee, and Administration Projects Planning Executive Committee (Chair) • Fredericks is MCCMC liaison to TAM and reports monthly at MCCMC Jack Ryan, Alternate II. LOCAL AGENCIES/COMMITTEES 1. BELVEDERE-TIBURON JOINT DISASTER ADVISORY COUNCIL (Meets bi-monthly on 2nd Tuesday from 4:00 - 5:30 p.m. in the Town Council Chambers) Holli Thier, Town Council Representative 2. BELVEDERE-TIBURON JOINT RECREATION COMMITTEE (The Ranch) (Meets bi-monthly on 3rd Monday in the Town Hall Community Room) Jon Welner, Town Council Voting Member 3. TIBURON PENINSULA TRAFFIC RELIEF JOINT POWERS AGENCY (formed 3/16/16) [JPA members include Town of Tiburon, City of Belvedere, RUSD] Holli Thier – Primary Director Jack Ryan – Primary Director 4. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LOCAL BUSINESS TASK FORCE [Task Force members include Chamber Exec. Director, Tiburon Town Manager, Destination Tiburon member, and two retail representatives] David Kulik Jack Ryan III. TOWN STANDING COMMITTEES 1. AFFORDABLE HOUSING • Jack Ryan • Alice Fredericks 2. DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION • David Kulik • Holli Thier 3. LEGISLATIVE ACTION • David Kulik • Alice Fredericks DRAFT 2021 Town Council Committee Appointments List Page 3 of 4 4. MARTHA PROPERTY APPLICATIONS • Jon Welner • Alice Fredericks 5. PATHS AND OPEN SPACE ACCESS • Alice Fredericks • Holli Thier 6. USE OF TECHNOLOGY • Holli Thier • Jon Welner IV. TOWN AD HOC COMMITTEES 1. SUSTAINABILITY • Alice Fredericks • Jon Welner 2. UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT POLICY • Alice Fredericks • David Kulik 3. 2021 TOWN MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION • • 4. 2021 BUDGET FINANCE • • V. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPOINTMENTS Nominated by MCCMC and appointed by Board of Supervisors GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS (Meets 2nd & 4th Fridays at 10 a.m., GGBHTD offices) Alice Fredericks [current term = 1/2020 – 1/2022] Fredericks GGBHTD Committee Appointments: Building and Operating Committee; Transportation Committee; Finance Committee (Vice Chair); OPEB Committee (Vice Chair); Labor Relations Advisory Committee (Chair) Fredericks is also District representative to and Chair of the GGB/Amalgamated DRAFT 2021 Town Council Committee Appointments List Page 4 of 4 Transit Union Pension Board of Trustees VI. MCCMC COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS 1. Legislative Committee [a Standing Committee per MCCMC Bylaws] (Meets4thd Monday at 8:00 a.m., San Rafael City Hall) Alice Fredericks (also serves as Chair) No alternate 2. JPA Oversight Ad Hoc Committee (Meetings scheduled as needed) Jack Ryan, delegate No alternate 3. Climate Change and Sea Level Rise – Ad Hoc Committee (Meetings scheduled as needed) Jon Welner, delegate Alice Fredericks, alternate 4. Pension and OPEB Reform Committee Holli Thier, Delegate David Kulik, Delegate VACANT, Alternate 5. Disaster Preparedness Committee Jack Ryan, Delegate Holli Thier, Alternate 6. Marin County Bay Waterfront Adaptations Vulnerability Evaluation *(Bay WAVE) Policy Group Alice Fredericks’ appointment affirmed by Town Council on April 20, 2016 7. HOMELESS POLICY STEERING COMMITTEE (HPSC) (Under auspices of County Dept. of Health Human Services) Holli Thier, Town representative VII. TOWN APPOINTMENTS IN OTHER AREAS OF INTEREST MarinMap Steering Committee (Meetings scheduled as needed) Steven Palmer Marin County Hazardous & Solid Waste JPA (Meets quarterly) Greg Chanis TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 13 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and Members of the Town Council From: Community Development Department Subject: 545 Silverado Drive: Appeal of Site Plan and Architectural Review approval for the Construction of a new single-family residence on a vacant property in the R-1 zone; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Christopher and Jennifer Hartung, Appellants; File No. DR2019-119; Assessor Parcel No. 055-082-23. Reviewed By: _________ Greg Chanis, Town Manager ________ Benjamin Stock, Town Attorney SUMMARY Council is considering an appeal of the Design Review Board’s approval of the proposed project located at 545 Silverado Drive. RECOMMENDED ACTION(S) Staff recommends the Town Council hold a public hearing and take testimony on the appeal in accordance with the Town’s adopted procedure, close the public hearing, deliberate and consider adopting one of the following options: 1) Deny the appeal, upholding the approval made by the Design Review Board and direct Staff to return with an appropriate resolution for consideration of adoption at the next meeting. 2) Grant the appeal, denying the application, and direct Staff to return with an appropriate resolution for consideration of adoption at the next meeting. 3) Partially grant the appeal by making revisions or adding conditions to the Design Review Board’s approval, and direct Staff to return with an appropriate resolution for consideration of adoption at the next meeting. 4) Alternatively, remand the item to the Design Review Board with specific direction regarding any aspect of the project needing further review and deliberation. The Board’s decision on remand would again be appealable to the Council. PROJECT DATA Address: 545 Silverado Drive Owner: Equity Smart Investments LP Applicant: Eric Nuttall Appellants: Christopher and Jennifer Hartung (541 Silverado Drive) Assessor’s Parcel: 055-082-23 File Numbers: DR2019-119 TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 Agenda Item: PH - 1 Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 13 Lot Area: 10,627 square Feet Zoning: R-1 (Single-family Residential Zone) General Plan: MH (Medium High Density Residential) Flood Zone: X (Outside 500-year flood zone) SUMMARY On November 5, 2020, the Design Review Board voted 4-1 to conditionally approve a Site Plan and Architectural Review application for the construction of a new single-family residence on a vacant property located at 545 Silverado Drive. The owners of the property at 541 Silverado Drive, Christopher and Jennifer Hartung (hereafter referred to as “appellants”), have filed a timely appeal of the Board’s decision. The basis of the appeal request prepared by the appellants is attached in Exhibit 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Design Review Board has conditionally approved a Site Plan and Architectural Review for the construction of a single-family residence on an R-1 zoned property located at 545 Silverado Drive. The subject property is currently vacant, the previous home was demolished in 2016. The proposed 3,043 square feet two-story single-family home will include a 469 square foot two- car attached garage, where the maximum of 3,062.7 square feet is permitted for a lot of this size in the R-1 zone. On the main floor, the applicant proposes a main entry/ foyer, great room, dining room, kitchen, powder room, office and an ensuite bedroom. The second story includes an open loft area, master ensuite bedroom, two bedrooms, bathroom and a laundry room. The project proposes numerous outdoor spaces, including two new patios on the main floor, a backyard patio and an upper-floor deck immediately above the main front entryway. The project, along with the exterior improvements, covers approximately 22.2% (2,354 square feet), where the maximum of 30% of lot coverage is permitted. The proposed height of the residence is calculated at 24’-4” measuring from the existing natural grade, when a maximum height of 30’ is permitted. The project will be built within the building envelope and is in compliance with the development standards prescribed for properties in the R- 1 zone district. REVIEW BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Design Review Board held two separate hearings on the application. The staff reports and minutes of those meetings are attached as Exhibits 3-6. A brief summary of each meeting is as follows: Design Review Board meeting on October 1, 2020 The application was first reviewed at the October 1, 2020, Design Review Board meeting. During the meeting, numerous neighbors stated their opposition to the height, massing and bulk of the proposed residence. In particular, the abutting neighbors at 541 (appellants) and 549 Silverado Drive voiced concerns over noise, privacy, light/shade and drainage impacts that the Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 3 OF 13 project could potentially bring to their properties. The Design Review Board determined that a two-story development is reasonable for this vacant site. However, the Board agreed that some design modifications would support the project design’s conformance with the Hillside Design Guideline. The recommendations made by the Board included: step back the mass of the proposed building, relocate noise-producing equipment, re-evaluate roof pitch, ensure privacy and view impacts are addressed on the upper-floor deck by relocating the deck and/or re- evaluating screening and window placement, re-consider material and mass to avoid uniform appearance on side elevations, propose lighting that would reduce light glare potentials, improve landscape plan and ensure no drainage onto adjacent sites. The application was continued to the October 15, 2020, meeting to allow the applicant time to revise the project design. Since project revisions were not received in time for preparation of the packet, the project was subsequently continued to the November 5, 2020 meeting. Design Review Board meeting on November 5, 2020 The revised project plans were reviewed by the Design Review Board at the November 5, 2020, meeting. An overview of the modifications in the revised project plan provided by the applicant was outlined in the staff report as follows: 1. Push out the main level by a foot to create greater step back at the northwest corner. 2. Lower entry roof by a foot to create a consistent roof height on the main level. 3. Provide a 6’ tall screen enclosure for the A/C unit. 4. Lower the roof pitch and reduce the overall building’s height from 25’-9” to 24’-4”. 5. Include screening details for the upper deck with 2” wide boards in 45 degrees angle with 2” gap. 6. Add stone veneer on the sides of the main level. 7. Add privacy windows on the sides of the upper level. 8. Ensure window on the left side in the loft area is obscure. 9. Revise the color of stucco siding from Iceberg (off-white) to Stone Age (light gray). 10. Remove recessed lights and use sconce lighting throughout the project. 11. Revise landscape plan to: - Relocate stairs along at the right (south) side leading to the back yard 2’-6” from the side property line. - Remove sitting area from the backyard. - Add five Indian Hawthorn shrubs along the left (north) side toward the front. - Add two Sweet Osmanthus trees on right (south) side to provide additional screening for the A/C unit. - Add Birds of Paradise and Jasmine ground cover between the driveway and main entry. - Create a 3’ tall retaining wall along the street locating 3’ from the front property line. - Include details of guardrail with black metal railing along the stairs and at the top of back patio. - Provide details for retaining wall and trellis. Prior to the November 5, 2020, Design Review Board meeting, the applicant and the abutting neighbors discussed the revised project plan. The applicant was willing to make additional Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 4 OF 13 concessions and presented additional potential modifications to the Design Review Board for their consideration at the public meeting on November 5, 2020. The Design Review Board reviewed the revised project plan (Exhibit 9), along with all reports and data submitted, supplemented by public comments, and conducted on-site inspections as appropriate. On November 5, 2020, after receiving public testimony and making deliberation at the public meeting, the Design Review Board voted four to one to approve the revised project plan, as amended by the following conditions that are specified in the adopted resolution (Exhibit 2): a. Relocate AC unit to patio 2 under the exterior stair as detailed in Exhibit B b. Locate a permanent and solid 6’ tall fence at the end of the driveway with the length as detailed in Exhibit B c. Add a ‘belly band’ on the south (right) elevation to be in “up-in smoke” color (same color as the trim) d. Reduce the overhang for the upper deck to 6’ e. Use 2 x12 roof pitch [consistent with revised project plan] f. Select exterior downlight fixtures with more shielded source (long shield cone) to be approved by staff g. Revise landscape plan to include the following to be approved by staff: i. Replace proposed Pampas Grass with non-invasive species at similar size ii. Add two 24-gallon mature trees, at the minimum initial height of 8’ tall, at the rear side along the right property line iii. Include Sweet Osmanthus as landscape material along the proposed trellis On November 16, 2020, the appellants filed a timely appeal of this decision (Exhibit 1). GUIDING PRINCIPLES The Town Council may wish to review this project with respect to Zoning Ordinance Sections 16-52.020 (H) (Guiding Principles). 1. Site plan adequacy. Proper relation of a project to its site, including that it promotes orderly development of the community, provides safe and reasonable access, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. 2. Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions. 3. Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second-story additions shall be discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood. Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 5 OF 13 4. Floor area ratio. The relationship between the size and scale of improvements and the size of the property on which the improvements are proposed. This concept is known as floor area ratio. 5. Grading and tree removal. The extent to which the site plan reasonably minimizes grading and/or removal of trees, significant vegetation, or other natural features of the site such as rock outcroppings or watercourses. 6. Compatibility of architectural style and exterior finish. The architectural style and exterior finish are harmonious with existing development in the vicinity and will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. 7. Landscaping. Proposed landscaping, insofar as it is used appropriately to prevent erosion; to protect the privacy of adjoining sites; and to mitigate the visual and noise impacts of the proposed project. Applicants are encouraged to use native and drought-resistant landscaping. Proposed landscaping shall be used which will, at maturity, minimize primary view obstruction from other buildings. A cash deposit or other monetary security may be required to ensure the installation and/or maintenance for a one-year period of any and all landscaping. Projects that are subject to provisions of title IV, chapter 13E (water efficient landscape) of the Tiburon Municipal Code shall comply with the Marin Municipal Water District regulations regarding water-efficient landscaping adopted by reference therein. 8. Lighting. Proposed lighting, insofar as it should not invade the privacy of other properties, or produce glare or light pollution; yet provide adequate illumination for safety and security purposes. All proposed exterior lighting shall be shielded downlighting. 9. Overall property improvement. In order to allow the gradual upgrading of existing improvements, upgrades may be required to be made to existing buildings and the site as a whole. The review of applications for additions or modifications to existing development may include conditions requiring changes and/or modifications to existing buildings and site improvements for the entire property to the extent that there is a reasonable relationship between the requested project and the changes and/or modifications required. 10. Appropriate use of building envelope. In planned residential (RPD and RMP) zones, building envelopes are generally intended to provide a larger-than-needed area for flexibility in the appropriate siting of a main structure and its accessory structures. The building envelope should not generally be interpreted as an area intended to be filled by a main structure and its accessory structures. 11. Green building. The project design includes features that foster renewable energy and/or resource conservation. 12. Conformance with zoning requirements. All modifications and site improvements shall conform with the setback, parking, and height requirements established for each zone by article II (zones and allowable land uses), and with any special requirements including recycling (see Municipal Code chapter 16C [recyclables collection area]) and screening guidelines established for specific uses by this zoning ordinance. HILLSIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES The Town Council should also review this project with respect to Zoning Ordinance Sections 16- 52.020 (J). Design review guidelines. In reviewing applications for site plan and architectural review, the review authority shall also apply goals and principles, as appropriate to the project, Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 6 OF 13 set forth in the Hillside Design Guidelines, Downtown Tiburon Design Handbook, and any other guidelines adopted by Council, copies of which are available from the planning division. BASIS FOR THE APPEAL There are six (6) grounds upon which the appeal (Exhibit 1) is based: Ground #1: Appeal on Error/Abuse of Discretion as the majority of Design Review Boardmembers did not visit the appellants’ property at 541 Silverado Drive to assess the development impact made by the project Staff Response: Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16-52.020 (E) (2) states that, ‘the review authority [Design Review Board] shall determine the reports and data submitted, supplemented by public comments and on-site inspections as the review authority may deem appropriate, whether the proposed use and structures will further the purpose set forth in subsection 16-52.020A, and satisfy the applicable criteria of subsection 16-52.020H., and shall, upon making affirmative findings, approve the application.’ When granting approval for Site Plan and Architectural Review applications, the Design Review Board had reviewed the application based on project plan and other supplemental information as outlined in the reports. For this application, the majority of the Design Review Boardmembers visited the subject property and evaluated the project based on observation of the story poles onsite. Two of the Boardmembers and staff had visited the appellants’ property at 541 Silverado Drive. The appellants had submitted a written letter and had made presentation with images to visually demonstrate the potential impact of the project from their vantage point at the first Design Review Board meeting. At the second Design Review Board meeting, the appellants had submitted a written letter and made presentation with images to visually demonstrate the revised project and its potential impact to their property. The Design Review Boardmembers have consistently conducted site visits, evaluated the project based on information in the record and considered public testimony. The Design Review Board may act on an application when they find that the evidence presented in the record is sufficient to make affirmative findings. Ground #2: Appeal on Error/Claims as the decision is not supported by evidence in the record or is otherwise improper Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 7 OF 13 Staff Response: The appellants raise concerns over the Boards assessment of the project in regard to massing. Those concerns were discussed by the Design Review Board during public meetings. In the staff report to the Design Review Board at the October 1, 2020, meeting, staff noted that the proposed project would have potential impact to the residence at 541 Silverado Drive. An excerpt of the staff report is outlined as follows: ‘Currently, the neighbor at 541 Silverado Drive, has windows from the living room, dining room and kitchen above the sink with existing views of the water. Since the proposed structure is designed to setback from the front and step down at the northwest corner, view impact to the living room window appears to be insignificant. The view access from the dining room will be partially impacted and the window in the kitchen will be blocked by the proposed structure. No other view impact is expected to other uphill neighbors due to natural topography. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed design can reasonably preserve the neighbors’ access to view from the kitchen and dining room.’ In both public meetings, the appellant had provided images with perspectives from the living room, dining room and kitchen at the appellants’ property to illustrate these descriptions to the Design Review Board for their consideration. In the revised project plan that was reviewed by the Design Review Board at the November 5, 2020, meeting, it is noted that the upper-floor mass is stepped back from the first-floor mass on the left (north) elevation. The upper-floor mass is proposed to setback from the left side property line facing the appellants’ property in a range of 9’-2” toward the back and over 23’ toward the front. Part of the overhang eaves on the lower and upper floor will be located within the left-side setback for no more than 3’, which is within the limits that are set forth for allowable projection into setbacks as prescribed in the Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16-30.030 (F). During the Board’s deliberation at the second Design Review Board meeting on November 5, 2020, Boardmember Kim suggested that the proposed massing can be reduced by shifting two bedrooms over a hallway on the upper floor and relocating access to the backyard, removing the roof over the upper deck at the front, as well as reducing size of large window facing the appellants’ property. Boardmember Berger concurred with the suggestions and drafted a motion to continue the application by redesigning the project as per the suggestions and memorializing the changes presented by the applicant at the meeting. The drafted motion did not pass by a vote of two to three (Barringer, Crescini and Chong voted no). Chair Barringer explained that the drafted motion was a bit restrictive and did not think that a complete removal of roof overhang over the upper floor deck Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 8 OF 13 could address massing issue. Chair Barringer pointed out that if the Board potentially reduced the screen and roof over the deck, then the privacy impact toward the appellants’ property may not be adequately addressed. Instead, Chair Barringer and Boardmember Crescini agreed that mass would be broken up by pulling back the roof above the upper-floor deck. During deliberation, Chair Barringer assessed the second-floor plan and explored potential modifications on the second floor massing. He understood the appellants’ issue as more of the deck spaces than the bathroom and other things. Boardmember Crescini noted that he visited the site and observed the story poles onsite and found that they were aligned with other homes. He did not have concern on the project’s massing except its visibility from the street, which could be addressed by landscape screening. Vice Chair Chong included quantitative descriptions and explained that the project is proposing the front left corner with an at-grade patio to be 6’-10” from the side setback line and is approximately 14’ from the side property line and indicated that the proposed residence is orientated far enough away from the appellants’ property. Vice Chair Chong took notes and drafted the motion to approve the project with conditions, as described above, which was passed by a majority vote of four to one (Boardmember Kim voted no). When considering the application, the Design Review Board had reviewed evidence in record and supplemented with on-site inspection as appropriate. The appellants claimed that the three minutes speaking time is a limitation for public members to comment on a project in a virtual meeting environment. The conduct of public testimony period of having three minutes speaking time per individual is a common practice, regardless of in-person or virtual meeting environment. It should be noted that the Board had considered late mail submitted prior to the hearings as well as other relevant information provided by the appellants at the public meetings. Consideration of such material was conducted in the same manner as provided by other public members, and as consistently provided at Design Review Board meetings. Ground #3: Appeal on inconsistency with applicable provisions of this chapter [Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16-52.020] or of other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code or other laws or regulations • Contention 1: Proposed second-level deck imposes privacy intrusion to the appellants’ living space, which is inconsistent with the Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16-52.020 (H) Guiding Principle (2), ‘Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions.’ Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 9 OF 13 Staff Response: The project plan was reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board on November 5, 2020. The proposed second-level deck will be screened by a privacy screen with 2 x 6 horizontal wooden slats placed at a 45-degree angle with 2” spacing between the slats. The applicant returned to the Design Review Board meeting with revisions, the Board had a detailed discussion of the upper deck and attempted to achieve the goal of reducing massing while balancing the desire to preserve privacy and minimize visual impacts on the left (north) elevation facing the appellants’ property. The Board acknowledged the proposed upper-floor deck is oriented toward the view of the Bay and has been designed with sufficient setback from the appellants’ property. After deliberation, the Board concluded to retain the wood privacy screen as proposed and impose a condition to reduce the roof overhang over the deck to 6’, such that the mass of the home will be reduced while maintaining privacy to address appellants’ concerns. • Contention 2: Proposed residence is the only exception in the neighborhood that is not visually ‘stepping down’ and is ‘looking out’ to its uphill neighbor, which is inconsistent with the Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16-52.020 (H) Guiding Principle (3), ‘Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second- story additions shall be discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood.’ Staff Response: During the Design Review Board meeting on October 1, 2020, Boardmember Kim stated that the Hillside Design Guideline supports tiered buildings on the hillside and noted that the proposed structure will have the same height as the uphill neighbor (the appellants’ property) on the left. All Boardmembers concurred with this observation and noted that on a steep hill such as the one at the subject property it is proper and acceptable to tier the proposed home down the slope. Vice Chair Chong further noted the existing pad is set up higher on the hill to create the existing site condition. Vice Chair Chong then stated that the proposed two-story building design is reasonable at this site since other existing two-story houses are found in the vicinity. All Boardmembers then assessed whether the proposed structure at its location and selected distance is reasonable to the appellants’ residence and concluded that some design changes would help to address massing. The Board decided to continue the project by providing recommendations to modify the design, which included increase stepping for massing breakup and revise roof pitch for height reduction. Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 10 OF 13 On November 5, 2020, the applicant returned to the Design Review Board with a revised design. The revised design “pushed out” the main level one foot to create a tier effect at the northwest corner and revise the roof pitch to 2:12. Lowering the roof pitch resulted in the lowering of the overall building height from 25’9” to 24’4”. During deliberation, Boardmember Berger said that the proposed 2:12 roof is as gentle a slope as feasible. He then noted the proposed structure is pushed back into the rear corner within the building envelope and is set far back from other houses along the street. Boardmember Crescini agreed and believed the project is designed appropriately to preserve the appellants’ side views. Chair Barringer found that the project is fair in how far it is pulled back in comparison to some of other homes on the street. While Boardmembers Kim and Berger thought that more tier and further stepping back can be achieved by shifting the bedrooms on the upper floor, the majority of Boardmembers found that the height, size and bulk of the project as proposed bears a reasonable relationship to existing buildings in the vicinity. • Contention 3: Proposed residence is not tiered when the Design Review Board instructed the applicant to come back with (1) step back in upper-level mass and (2) further breaking up the mass in conformance to the Hillside Design Guidelines, which is inconsistent with the Tiburon Municipal Code Chapter 16-52.020 (J), ‘Design review guidelines. In reviewing applications for site plan and architectural review, the review authority shall also apply goals and principles, as appropriate to the project, set forth in the Hillside Design Guidelines, Downtown Tiburon Design Handbook, and any other guidelines adopted by council, copies of which are available from the planning division.’ Staff Response: As noted above, the applicant proposed to push out the main level to increase stepping from the upper-level mass in the revised project plan. The main entry porch is also lower to create a consistent roofline that helps to reduce perceived massing from the front. In the second Design Review Board meeting, Boardmembers Kim and Berger suggested to redesign the project by shifting the bedrooms to further step back the upper-level mass facing the appellants’ property. Though, the draft motion to redesign the bedrooms did not pass as the majority of Boardmembers supported the various changes in the revised project plan. The Board opined the project as conditioned would collectively reduce the perceived mass for general conformance with the Hillside Design Guidelines. Ground #4: Appeal on application incompleteness when the Design Review Board had insufficient time to review the proposed modifications when rendering a decision Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 11 OF 13 Staff Response: The Design Review Board had reviewed evidence in the record and received testimony at two public meetings. After deliberation, the Board may continue, approve, approve with conditions or deny the Site Plan and Architectural Review application. As standard conditions of approval, the applicant shall submit construction drawings at the building permit stage that are in substantial conformance to the Design Review drawings as approved by the Design Review Board and as amended by conditions of approval. The appellant expressed the need to review the reduced overhang above the upper-floor deck in order to assess its potential privacy impact. As noted above, the Design Review Board imposed the condition to reduce the roof overhang above the upper-floor deck in respond to the appellants’ concern on massing and view. The privacy wooden screen will remain as shown on the approved project plan. Ground #5: Appeal on due process when physical copies of plans were not made available in public meetings Staff Response: Public comments received prior to the start of the Design Review Board meeting are distributed electronically to the Board and posted on the Town’s website as late mail. Consistent with in-person meetings, the applicant and public members may choose different formats in presenting relevant information to the Design Review Board for their consideration during public meetings. For this application, the applicant had consistently worked with the appellant, and adjacent neighbors prior to public meetings. The modifications proposed by the applicant at the public meeting were solely based on the consultation with relative neighbors. As noted above, the Design Review Board has the discretion to continue an application or impose conditions to approve an application and not require further review. Ground #6: Appeal on past precedence/ inconsistency of Code and Guideline application Staff Response: Each application is reviewed on its own merit and not based upon previous design proposals or applications on the same site. The current project involves a new residence on a vacant lot and the proposed project was publicly reviewed twice before the Design Review Board. During the first public meeting, recommendations were given to the applicant, the applicant attempted to redesign the project to reflect those comments. The proposed revisions were presented at the second public meeting for the Design Review Board’s consideration. At the same time, the applicant communicated with concerned Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 12 OF 13 neighbors outside of public meetings with the objective of producing a better project design that would address potential concerns. CONCLUSION The Design Review Board issued their findings as described in TMC 16-52.020(E) and reviewed the project to determine whether the proposed use and structure furthered the purposes and satisfied the guiding principles for Site Plan and Architectural Review, the Hillside Design Guidelines, and other relevant provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in its review of this project. In reaching their conclusion to approve the project, the Design Review Board imposed reasonable conditions it determined necessary in order to make the findings required by the municipal code. FINANCIAL IMPACT Staff anticipates no direct fiscal impact to the Town. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Staff has preliminarily determined that adoption of this item is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On the November 5, 2020 Design Review Board, as part of its review of the project and approval of the construction of a new single-family dwelling, deemed the project to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Class 3 categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). To the extent further analysis is required, staff recommends that the Town Council similarly determine that with respect to the limited Site Plan and Architectural Review approval at issue the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the same Class 3 categorical exemptions, and that no exceptions to the exemptions apply. Class 3 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines § 15303 – New Construction/Conversion of Small Structures) The proposed project consists of construction of a new single-family residence in a residential zone and in an urbanized area. Categorical Exemption Exceptions (CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2) Further, none of the exceptions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. There is no evidence that the Project will result in any adverse environmental impacts and the Project does not involve any unusual circumstances or historical resources. Indeed, the proposed project would not significantly impact any environmental resource. In addition, there is no evidence that any significant cumulative impacts would occur. Specific supporting details regarding the project site include the following: Town Council Meeting January 20, 2021 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 13 OF 13 1) The property is located within a residential zone with single-family dwellings surrounding the property on all sides. 2) According to the California Department of Transportation, there are no scenic highways in Marin County. 3) According to the California Department of Toxic Substance Control, there are no hazardous waste sites in the Town of Tiburon. 4) The property and original home is not on the Town’s List of History Properties because 1) the previous structure is not listed on the Town’s Local Historic Landmarks list; 2) the previous structure is not listed on the California Historic Resources list; 3) the previous structure is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and 4) there is no evidence that the property meets any of the criteria for the listing. It is a common practice for the Town of Tiburon’s Design Review Board approve new homes on vacant properties in an established residential neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Town Council conduct a public hearing on this matter, deliberate and then consider adopting one of the following options: 1) Deny the appeal, upholding the approval made by the Design Review Board and direct Staff to return with an appropriate resolution for consideration of adoption at the next meeting. 2) Grant the appeal, denying the application, and direct Staff to return with an appropriate resolution for consideration of adoption at the next meeting. 3) Partially grant the appeal by making revisions or adding conditions to the Design Review Board’s approval, and direct Staff to return with an appropriate resolution for consideration of adoption at the next meeting. 4) Alternatively, remand the item to the Design Review Board with specific direction regarding any aspect of the project needing further review and deliberation. The Board’s decision on remand would again be appealable to the Council. EXHIBITS 1. Notice of Appeal. 2. Design Review Board action letter with final conditions of approval. 3. November 5, 2020 Design Review Board staff report with attachments and late mail. 4. October 1, 2020 Design Review Board Staff Report with attachments and late mail. 5. Minutes of the November 5, 2020 Design Review Board meeting. 6. Minutes of the October 1, 2020 Design Review Board meeting. 7. Resolution 17-2010 Appeal procedures. 8. Appellants’ letter, received on January 15, 2021. 9. Approved site plan and architectural drawings reviewed by the Design Review Board on November 5, 2020. EXHIBIT 1 Exhibit 1 APPELLANT(S) (Attach additional pages if necessary) PLJ\NNING DIVISION TOWN OF TIBURON NOTICE OF APPEAL Town of Tiburon 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Phone 415-435-7373 www.town.ofliburon.org Name:Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Mailing Address: 541 Silverado Drive Telephone: 415-299-2096 (Work) 415-435-3322 (Home) FAX and/or e-mail (optional): _____________________ _ ACTION BEING APPEALED Review Authority Whose Decision is Being Appealed: Design Review Board Date of Action or Decision Being Appealed: November 5, 2020 NameofApplicant:Eric Nuttall/Equity Smart Investment LP T f A Ii . . . New Single Family Residence Approval with Conditions ype o pp cation or Dec1s10n: --------------------- GROUNDS FOR APPEAL (Attach additional pages if necessary) N Please see attached memo. Grounds include Appeal dl,__Error, Inconsistency with applicable provisions, as well as Appeal on Completeness, Process, and Past Precedence. ****************************************************************************** STAFF USE ONLY BELOW THIS LINE Last Day to File Appeal: ________ _ Date Appeal Filed: _______ _ Fee Paid: ____ Receipt No. __ _ Date of Appeal Hearing: ______ _ NOTE: Current Filing Fee is $500 initial deposit for applicant and $300 flat fee for non-applicant S:\Administration\FormsWotice of Appeal form revised 3-9-2010.doc Revised March 2010 To: Town of Tiburon From: Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Owners of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004 Date: November 16, 2020 Re: Notice of Appeal on the action by the Design Review Board on November 5, 2020 concerning the development at 545 Silverado Drive Per the actions of the Tiburon Design Review Board (DRB) on November 5, 2020 concerning the development at 545 Silverado Drive and applicant Eric Nuttall/Equity Smart Investments LP, we are appealing the decision on multiple grounds: 1) Appeal on Error/Abuse of discretion Town code, 16-52.020, Section E, Part 2: 11 ••• The review authority shall determine from the reports and data submitted, supplemented by public comment and on-site inspections as the review authority may deem appropriate ... " • It is an abuse of discretion to base judgement of the development's impact when there was an unequal application of diligence. Four of the five DRB members have publicly stated they visited the development property during the application time. Yet only two DRB members visited our property, and only one of those two visited our property to assess the massing impact change on the reduced roof slope from the first DRB meeting to the second DRB meeting. Therefore, a majority of the DRB board members did NOT choose to visit our property at 541 Silverado Drive to assess the proposed development's impact on our property. By negation therefore, two of the four that publicly visited the development property did not give equal time to the parties concerned with the development. • The unequal application of diligence is not due to limitations imposed by us. To help facilitate viewing of the proposed development from our property, we offered six different "open house" times (for one to 1 ½ hours each time) and offered up the ability for additional scheduling. Mindful of health guidelines based on Covid-19, we offered these visitations with a touchless environment, masking, and the restriction of our family members presence in the main living area during the "open house" times. 2) Appeal on Error/Claims that the decision is not supported by evidence in the record or is otherwise improper • Since the majority of DRB members did NOT visit our property while the story poles were erected, they therefore had no direct physical assessment of massing impact from our perspective. As such, any decision based on statements on the project's impact on our property is improper and not based on direct observation. In addition, while we presented views from our property to try and capture the massing impact, DRB members were not provided the presentation prior to the meeting, nor did they have the opportunity to "study" the presented material due to the strict three-minute time limitations for public comment using Zoom. llPage • The DRB mentioned that our property is "four feet from the property line", not within the setback, and noted that windows or views were created "when we developed." The proximity of our South elevation wall to the property line has existed since it was originally built in the 1950s and is NOT four feet. The property was also developed before Town setback requirements existed. In addition, the subsequent original house at 545 Silverado (which was built after 541 Silverado) was built in relation to the then original house at 541 Silverado. To suggest that somehow our house was pushing the boundaries does not appreciate the historical context of the neighborhood nor that we inherited the house footprint which is therefore a legacy condition, as well as the setback. Lastly, the general position of our windows on that Southern wall is consistent with many of the houses in the neighborhood and. as with the proximity to the property line, has existed since the house was built in the early 1950s, unlike the comments made by some DRB members. • One DRB member judged the "impact'' of the development on our property based on a prior visit to our home a number of years ago and therefore was not judging based on current "facts". He did not visit our property with the current story poles in place. • During the November 5th meeting, another DRB member commented "Our job is to state what we feel is the impact for neighbors." This member did not visit our property. Therefore, how can he properly fulfill his role per his description? • The planning department mentioned that "we've come here 4 to 5 times with this project", suggesting that the project was well hashed out. This is incorrect, as the November 5th meeting was only the second time the project was presented to the DRB. • Since there were so many changes to digest during the discussion period, the DRB began using neighbor Margarita Perry's email (which was included in late mail) as a "punch list'' (as described by one DRB member). Ms. Perry's "punch list'' was from her perspective and was not meant to address our concerns. As an example, the added windows facing her side were addressed by the DRB, but not commented on regarding the wall on our side even though we brought up that concern in our presentation. We believe that since our presentation was not included in materials to the DRB, and our comments on such a significant project were limited to three minutes with no questions or clarification points asked by the DRB, we were at a structural disadvantage to have our concerns addressed, especially in a virtual Zoom environment. 3) Appeal on Inconsistency with applicable provisions of this chapter or of other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code or other laws or regulations • Town Code 16-52.020, Section H, Part 2: Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions. The DRB neglected to address the privacy intrusion from the second level deck. Only our garage, laundry room and storage are located on our "1st floor". Therefore, ALL our living space is orientated to the main floor, and this looks directly into our living spaces and down our main hallway off which three bedrooms and two bathrooms are directly situated. Even a 30% open 21Page screen (which is an improvement on the 50% open in the prior plan) allows direct viewing. We believe the applicant is changing this, but due to the hasty wrap-up of the DRB meeting, this privacy issue was not addressed, nor was making it a permanent and required condition of the development to protect our privacy. In addition, we like the reduction of some massing at the front corner of the property, but we have not had the opportunity to understand the privacy impact of the conditions set by the DRB, especially if the deck width remains the same as in the plans. Due to this, we believe our privacy concerns could become more acute due to a mis-match between the requirement of a 6' roof line over the second floor deck as compared to a 7' wide deck that ultimately widens further to 10'. This could potentially allow 4' of unobstructed deck looking directly (at approximately waist height) into our primary living space and down our main hallway referenced above. On both the above, because we have not had a chance to see if these items were addressed prior to the appeal period, we feel no choice but to appeal to insure our privacy. • Town Code 16-52.020, Section H, Part 3: Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second-story additions shall be discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood. As mentioned in our materials presented at the meetings, the proposed house is the only exception to the neighborhood around visual massing impact on its uphill neighbor. The DRB's primary focus was around the setback of the development, which while important, should not be the only determinant. Of importance, the DRB members that were focused on setback rather than the visual impact of the massing were the ones that did NOT visit our property thereby denying the us the opportunity to show our perspective. However, the majority of DRB members DID choose to visit the applicant's property. Our neighborhood consists of houses where, according to the applicant, "every house is looking down on the other house" and "the homes are looking out over their neighbors". As such, where there are two stories to a house, it is set back substantially from the first level, exist primarily on the downhill side of the lot, and does not look directly into uphill neighbor primary living areas. As commented on by a few DRB members, this project does not maintain the visual "stepping down" of the neighborhood. This can specifically be seen in the relationship of our house to our uphill neighbor at 539 Silverado, 539 Silverado's relationship to 535 Silverado, 535 Silverado's relationship to 533 Silverado, 533 Silverado's relationship to 531 Silverado. This relationship also extends to the other side of our street (546 Silverado, 544 Silverado, 540 Silverado, 538 Silverado, 534 Silverado, and 532 Silverado). 3IPage • Town Code 16-52.020, Section J: Design review guidelines. In reviewing applications for site plan and architectural review, the review authority shall also apply goals and principles, as appropriate to the project, set forth in the Hillside Design Guidelines, Downtown Tiburon Design Handbook, and any other guidelines adopted by council, copies of which are available from the planning division. As one ORB member stated, "the hillside guidelines refer to tiered building ... the massing of buildings respects the line of the hillside and this one does not do that ... " In addition, the ORB recognized the need to adhere to the Hillside Design Guidelines by instructed the applicant to come back with 1) a step back in the upper-level mass and 2) a further breaking up of the mass for Hillside Design Guidelines conformance. When viewed side-by-side, there is little noticeable change between the original submitted plan and the October 27th plan. 4) Appeal on Application Completeness Per one ORB member, "There's a lot of changes that happen that have not been memorialized in the plans." The Conditional approval of the project at 545 Silverado was made with incomplete designs and with inadequate advance time for the ORB to process and opine on the project changes. Further, this limited the ability of neighbors to properly assess the change's impact. To our knowledge, the first visual communication of some of the changes were only presented in the applicant's presentation which is not available as a document for review outside of the Zoom presentation. As of Monday, November 16th {the last day for an appeal), there were no revised plans posted to the Planning or ORB websites to allow for review. Hence why, again, we feel compelled to appeal. S) Appeal on Due Process Partially because of the need to conduct proceedings via Zoom, the process disadvantages neighbors relative to in-person meetings where physical copies of plans would have been made available. a) The only time to see applicant's late proposed changes was in the presentation on-screen. b) The ORB was not given our presentation prior to the meeting, thereby the only time they had to visually assess our concerns was during our three-minute presentation. c) There is no ability to see actual items integrated into the plans prior to the end of the appeal period, so our only avenue to protect our interests is to appeal. 6) Appeal on Past Precedence/Inconsistency of Code and Guideline Application We believe the ORB is applying its judgement and power inconsistently: a) As stated in our remarks at the November 5th meeting, there were numerous (and very consequential) recommendations voted on unanimously by the ORB that were not incorporated in the November 5th changes yet the ORB chose to approve the project with conditions even though many of the original recommendations were not addressed. b) In a prior application for a new house at 545 Silverado {with another owner in 2014), the ORB voted unanimously against a proposal with less massing impact on our property. The ORB subsequently approved (and we also supported) a design which reduced that impact. 41Page EXHIBIT 3 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 4 STAFF REPORT To: Members of the Design Review Board From: Christy Fong, Senior Planner Subject: 545 Silverado Drive; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-23; File No. DR2019- 119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,043 square feet of floor area and cover 2,354 square feet (22.2%) of the lot. Continued from October 15, 2020 Design Review Board Meeting. PROJECT DATA ADDRESS: 545 SILVERADO DRIVE OWNER: EQUITY SMART INVESTMENTS LP APPLICANT: ERIC NUTTALL ASSESSOR’S PARCEL: 055-082-23 FILE NUMBERS: DR2019-119 LOT SIZE: 10,627 square feet ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE) GENERAL PLAN: MH (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) FLOOD ZONE: X DATE COMPLETE: JUNE 26, 2020 PSA DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 23, 2020 (EXTENDED) BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for the construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling on an R-1 zoned property located at 545 Silverado Drive. The subject property is currently vacant. This application was first reviewed at the October 1, 2020 Design Review Board meeting. At that meeting, the adjoining neighbors residing at 541 and 549 Silverado Drive were both concerned about the height, massing, and bulk of the proposed residence. Both neighbors also voiced concerns over noise, privacy and drainage impacts that the project could potentially bring. The excerpt of meeting minutes is included as Attachment 4 of this staff report. TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Design Review Board Meeting November 5, 2020 Agenda Item: PH-1 Exhibit 3 Design Review Board Meeting November 5, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 2 OF 4 The Design Review Board received public testimony, discussed with the project plans, and stated that a two-story development is reasonable for this vacant site. However, the Board agreed some modifications would support the project design’s conformance with the Hillside Design Guideline. The recommendations made by the Board including, but not limited to: step back the mass of proposed building, relocate noise-producing equipment, re-evaluate roof pitch, ensure privacy and view impacts are addressed on the upper-floor deck by relocating the deck and/or re- evaluating the screen, re-consider material and mass to avoid uniform appearance on side elevations, propose lighting that would reduce light glare potentials, improve landscape plan and ensure no drainage onto adjacent sites. Consideration by the DRB was continued to the October 15, 2020 meeting. Project revision were not received in time for preparation of the packet, the project was subsequently continued to the November 5, 2020 meeting. The applicant has submitted a revised plan with proposed project changes (Attachment 5). An overview of the applicant’s proposed modifications to the project design is outlined as follows: 1. Push out the main level by a foot to create greater step back at the northwest corner. 2.Lower entry roof by a foot to create a consistent roof height on the main level. 3. Provide a 6’ tall screen enclosure for the A/C unit. 4.Lower the roof pitch and reduce the overall building’s height from 25’-9” to 24’-4”. 5.Include screening details for the upper deck with 2” wide boards in 45 degrees angle with 2” gap. 6. Add stone veneer on the sides of the main level. 7. Add privacy windows on the sides of the upper level. 8. Ensure window on the left side in the loft area is obscure. 9.Revise the color of stucco siding from Iceberg (off-white) to Stone Age (light gray). 10.Remove recessed lights and use sconce lighting throughout the project. 11. Revise landscape plan to: -Relocate stairs along at the right (south) side leading to the back yard 2’-6” from the side property line. -Remove sitting area from the backyard. -Add five Indian Hawthorn shrubs along the left (north) side toward the front. -Add two Sweet Osmanthus trees on right (south) side to provide additional screening for the A/C unit. -Add Birds of Paradise and Jasmine ground cover between the driveway and main entry. -Create a 3’ tall retaining wall along the street locating 3’ from the front property line. -Include details of guardrail with black metal railing along the stairs and at the top of back patio. -Provide details for retaining wall and trellis Due to adjustment on floor plan, the revised project would result in minor changes with respect to floor area and lot coverage from the original proposal. The newly proposed gross floor area is 3,043 square feet (previous proposal was 3,032 square feet), when the maximum of 3,062.7 square feet is permitted. The newly proposed lot coverage is 2,354 square feet, 22.2% (previous proposal was 2,365 square feet, 22.3%), when the maximum of 30% is allowed. Design Review Board Meeting November 5, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 3 OF 4 ANALYSIS Design Issues The revised project design appears to be generally responsive to the direction from the Design Review Board. The overall height of the building and the main foyer feature is reduced. By pushing out the mass from the lower level, the upper floor mass has greater stepped back from the front that is visible from the street level. Screening details are proposed for the upper floor deck to address potential privacy and light issues. Additional screening, both structural and landscape, are proposed to mitigate noise from the AC unit that is located within the buildable area. Outdoor stairs are relocated further away from the right-side property line to reduce potential noise and privacy impacts to nearby neighbor. While the existing fence would remain, the landscape plan is revised by adding more plant materials near the proposed residence. In respond to the comments relating to uniform appearance on the side elevations, the applicant proposes to continue the stone veneer band at the lower floor on the sides and add two 4’ wide x 1’ tall windows on the upper floor on each side with high sill height to soften the blank façades. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed modifications will achieve this goal. The Design Review Board is encouraged to discuss and/or impose other conditions as deem necessary to ensure the proposed project will be in conformance with the Hillside Design Guidelines and other applicable standards as a whole. Zoning Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that it is in general conformance with the development standards for the R-1 zone. A full discussion of the design and zoning issues was included in the October 1, 2020 staff report (see Attachment 2). PUBLIC COMMENT As of the date of this report, the Town has not received letters regarding the subject application since the October 1, 2020 meeting. Comments received prior to the October 1, 2020 meeting are included in Attachment 3. PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff recommends that the Design Review Board determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Class 3 categorical exemptions. Class 3 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303-New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) The proposed project consists of demolition of an existing single-family residence and construction of a new single-family residence in a residential zone and in an urbanized area. Design Review Board Meeting November 5, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 4 OF 4 Categorical Exemption Exceptions (CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2) Further, none of the exceptions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. There is no evidence that the Project will result in any adverse environmental impacts and the Project does not involve any unusual circumstances or historical resources. Indeed, the proposed project would not significantly impact any environmental resource. In addition, there is no evidence that any significant cumulative impacts would occur. Specific supporting details regarding the project site include the following: 1) The property is located within a residential zone with single-family dwelling surrounding the property on all sides. 2) According to the California Department of Transportation, there are no scenic highways in Marin County. 3) According to the California Department of Toxic Substance Control, there are no hazardous waste sites in the Town of Tiburon. 4)The existing home is not on the Town’s List of History Properties. The existing home has gone through modifications throughout the years. It is a common practice for the Town of Tiburon’s Design Review Board to approve new homes on vacant properties in an established residential neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION The Design Review Board should review this project, along with all reports and data submitted, supplemented by public comments and on-site inspections as appropriate, and determine whether the project will further the purposes set forth in Zoning Ordinance subsections 16.52.020 (A) (Purpose) and satisfy the criteria of Zoning Ordinance Sections 16-52.020 (H) (Guiding Principles) and determine that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the Board wishes to approval the application as submitted, it is recommended that the attached draft resolution with conditions of approval be adopted. ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution with conditions of approval 2.October 1, 2020 Design Review Board staff report 3.Late mail received for the October 1, 2020 Design Review Board meeting 4. Excerpt of October 1, 2020 Design Review Board meeting minutes 5.Submitted plans, color and material board by Tangent Design & Engineering, received on October 27, 2020 Attachment 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XX (Draft) A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 3,043 SQUARE FOOT NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A 496 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE, AND OTHER ACCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS IN A R-1 ZONED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 545 SILVERADO DRIVE ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 055-082-023 WHEREAS, the Design Review Board of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows: Section 1. Findings A.The Town of Tiburon received an application for Site Plan and Architectural Review (File #DR2019-119) for construction of an approximately 3,043 square foot single-family residence with a 496 square foot attached garage and improvements that include new driveway, retaining walls, exterior stairs and landing and landscape features. The application consists of the following: 1.Application form and supplemental materials received on December 19, 2019; and 2.Site plan, elevations and materials board prepared by Tangent Design & Engineering received on October 27, 2020 B.The Design Review Board held a duly noticed public hearing on this project on October 1, 2020 and November 5, 2020. The Board reviewed plans for the proposed project in accordance with Section 16-52.020 (H) of the Tiburon Zoning Code (Guiding Principles in the Review of Site Plan and Architectural Review Applications). C.The Design Review Board finds, based upon application materials and analysis presented in the October 1, 2020 and November 5, 2020 staff reports, public testimony, as well as visits to the site, that the proposed project and improvements would be consistent with the existing home and surrounding properties. D.The Design Review Board finds that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the Class 3 categorical exemptions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15303. The Design Review Board further finds that that none of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 apply, as there is no evidence that the project will result in DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 2 Attachment 1 any significant adverse environmental impacts, presents unusual circumstances or involves an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, a hazardous waste site, damage to a scenic highway, or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. E.The Design Review Board further finds, based upon the application materials and analysis provided in the October 1, 2020 and November 5, 2020, staff reports and the attachment thereto, as well as the data submitted, supplemented by public comment and on-site inspections, and deliberations at the meeting, that the project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Tiburon General Plan and is in compliance with the applicable sections of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance, and thus will further the purpose set forth in subsection 16-52.020(A), and satisfy the applicable criteria of subsection 16-52.020(H). 16-52.020(A) Purposes •Ensure that new uses and structures enhance their sites and are compatible with the highest standards of improvement in the surrounding neighborhood. The project site will be occupied by a new single-family residence that is consistent with previous land use. The new residence and landscape improvements are compatible with other existing homes in the surrounding neighborhood. The project is designed to be consistent with the standards of other recently updated single-family homes in the surrounding neighborhood. •Retains and strengthens the visual quality of an attractive character of the town. The project is designed with materials and finishes that are commonly found in current development trends. The proposed design and architectural style are in keeping with the area and is common for single-family residences. The proposed residence and exterior improvement will retain the visual quality and attractive character of the Town. •Ensures that landscaping emphasizes drought tolerant native species and protects mature vegetation. The proposed project involves addition of shrubs and trees within the front yard and side yards. Majority of front and rear yards will retain its natural state with native shrubs. Most of the existing landscaping in the rear yard will be maintained, with the exception of four trees which will be removed to create more functional outdoor space. •Recognizes the interdependence of land uses and circulation and provides for an efficient and interconnected system of streets and pedestrian ways through town. The proposed project will utilize the existing driveway and the access from the street will remain the same. The street system will not be negatively impacted. •Assists project developers in understanding the town’s concerns for the aesthetics of construction. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 3 Attachment 1 The proposed materials and finishes will blend with the hillside surrounding. The proposed architectural style and form is compatible with other residences in the neighborhood that is varied in styles. The project will address the Town’s concern for aesthetics of construction. •Ensures that construction complies with all applicable town standards and guidelines, and does not adversely affect community health, safety, aesthetics, or natural resources. As conditioned, the proposed project would comply with all required developments standards and would be in conformance with the Hillside Design Guidelines as a whole. The project would not appear to affect the community health, safety, aesthetics, or natural resources for the neighborhood. 16-52.020(H) Guiding Principles •Site plan adequacy. Proper relation of a project to its site, including that it promotes orderly development of the community, provides safe and reasonable access, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is located on an existing 10,627 square foot vacant lot. The lot has been vacant since 2016 and was previously occupied by a single-family residence. The proposed residence will be located toward the rear side of the site to allow view access of adjoining property. The proposed location will setback from the downhill neighbor on the right (south) and through careful design and discussions with the neighbor to the left (north) many changes have been made to preserve as much of the privacy and views. The project has proper relation to the site, which would not appear to create detrimental impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. •Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions. Locating on an uphill parcel from the street, the proposed residence is oriented to take advantage of the view shared by other neighbors. Light and air is provided by adequate setbacks on the sides. Noise-generating equipment will be screened and located within the building envelope. Proposed second-floor windows will respect privacy as they are either obscure or with high sill height. The project appears to work appropriately with its topographic constraints and will relate to the existing developments on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view, privacy, noise, light and air. •Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second-story additions shall be DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 4 Attachment 1 discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood. The homes in the neighborhood along Silverado Drive vary in size, height and style, but are primarily two-story homes and many homes have outdoor decks facing toward the views. The design of the proposed residence and other improvements would appear to be compatible with other homes in the vicinity and maintain a good relationship with its surrounding. •Floor area ratio. The relationship between the size and scale of improvements and the size of the property on which the improvements are proposed. This concept is known as floor area ratio. The project would include 3,043 square feet of floor area, which would be 19.7 square feet below the permitted floor area (3,062.7 square feet) for a lot of this size in the R-1 zone district. •Grading and tree removal. The extent to which the site plan reasonably minimizes grading and/or removal of trees, significant vegetation, or other natural features of the site such as rock outcroppings or watercourses. The project will remove four trees located in the rear yard and will replace existing shrubs. Three new trees will be planted by the end of driveway within the right-side yard. Two new trees will be planted within the right-side yard by the location of proposed AC unit. A row of hedge will be planted on the left-side yard in front of the proposed residence. Approximately 123 cubic yard of soil will be exported from the site in order to accommodate the new residence and exterior improvements. The project includes swale and French drains that connect to the street as storm water management. •Compatibility of architectural style and exterior finish. The architectural style and exterior finish are harmonious with existing development in the vicinity and will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. The proposed exterior finishes include various shades of gray and off-white colors for the exterior walls and other features. The façades are proposed to be in stucco, accented with stone and wood siding. The proposed architectural style and exterior finish will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. •Landscaping. Proposed landscaping, insofar as it is used appropriately to prevent erosion; to protect the privacy of adjoining sites; and to mitigate the visual and noise impacts of the proposed project. Applicants are encouraged to use native and drought- resistant landscaping. Proposed landscaping shall be used which will, at maturity, minimize primary view obstruction from other buildings. A cash deposit or other monetary security may be required to ensure the installation and/or maintenance for a one-year period of any and all landscaping. Projects that are subject to provisions of title IV, chapter 13E (water efficient landscape) of the Tiburon Municipal Code shall comply with the Marin Municipal Water District regulations regarding water-efficient landscaping adopted by reference therein. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 5 Attachment 1 As noted above, the landscape plan will maintain the existing native shrubs at the front and rear yards in its natural state, will remove four trees in the rear yard and includes new trees and shrubs in front of and along the side of the proposed residence. An exterior stair will be replaced to provide access to the rear yard. The proposed landscape changes will prevent erosion and mitigate visual impacts of the proposed project. The project will include new landscape that would improve the site’s outdoor space while respecting the existing vegetation condition. •Lighting. Proposed lighting, insofar as it should not invade the privacy of other properties, or produce glare or light pollution; yet provide adequate illumination for safety and security purposes. All proposed exterior lighting shall be shielded downlighting. New exterior lighting will be installed throughout the exterior of the home. All lights will be shielded downlighting with no clear glass. •Overall property improvement. In order to allow the gradual upgrading of existing improvements, upgrades may be required to be made to existing buildings and the site as a whole. The review of applications for additions or modifications to existing development may include conditions requiring changes and/or modifications to existing buildings and site improvements for the entire property to the extent that there is a reasonable relationship between the requested project and the changes and/or modifications required. The vacant property is not on the Town’s list of historic properties. The proposed project will utilize and expand on the existing building foundation. As conditioned, the new home would have a proper relationship with the existing conditions of the site. •Appropriate use of building envelope. In planned residential (RPD and RMP) zones, building envelopes are generally intended to provide a larger-than-needed area for flexibility in the appropriate siting of a main structure and its accessory structures. The building envelope should not generally be interpreted as an area intended to be filled by a main structure and its accessory structures. The proposal is not located in an RPD and or RMP zone. The building envelope is established by height, setbacks and other limits as specified in the development standards. •Green building. The project design includes features that foster renewable energy and/or resource conservation. This project is characterized as a new single-family dwelling; therefore, solar panels would be required. The new home would have to comply with Tier 1 of the CalGreen Building Code requirements. •Conformance with zoning requirements. All modifications and site improvements shall conform with the setback, parking, and height requirements established for each zone by article II (zones and allowable land uses), and with any special requirements including DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 6 Attachment 1 recycling (see Municipal Code chapter 16C [recyclables collection area]) and screening guidelines established for specific uses by this zoning ordinance. The project is located in the R-1 zone. The proposed structures would comply with all zoning requirements. Section 2. Approval. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Design Review Board of the Town of Tiburon does hereby approve the application for Site Plan and Architectural Review (File No. DR2019-119) for the reasons set forth above, subject to the conditions of approval listed in the attached Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review Board of the Town of Tiburon on October 1, 2020 and November 5, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: _______________________________ CEDRIC BARRINGER, CHAIR TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ATTEST: ______________________________ DINA TASINI, SECRETARY Attachment 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 7 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (DRAFT) 545 Silverado Drive File # DR2019-119 Community Development Department 1. This approval shall be used within three (3) years of the approval date and shall become null and void unless a building permit has been issued. 3. The owner and/or applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the Town harmless along with the Town Council, commissions, boards, agents, officers, employees, and consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding (“action”), against the Town, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, employees, and consultants attacking or seeking to set aside, declare void, or annul the approval(s) of the project or alleging any other liability or damages based upon, caused by, or related to the approval of the project. The Town shall promptly notify the owner and/or applicant of any action. The Town, in its sole discretion, may tender the defense of the action to the owners and/or applicants or the Town may defend the action with its attorneys with all attorney’s fees and litigation costs incurred by the Town in either case paid for by the owner and/or applicant 4. The construction of this project shall substantially conform to the application as approved by the Design Review Board on October 1, 2020 and November 5, 2020, as may be amended by these conditions of approval. Any substantial modification to the drawings dated October 27, 2020, stamped “Approved by Design Review Board November 5, 2020”, as determined in the discretion of the Director of Community Development or his/her designee, shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 5.Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a construction management plan that addresses, parking, traffic control, construction management, construction staging, scheduling, construction equipment, washout, road/access maintenance and repair and other concerns to the satisfaction of the Building Official and Community Development Director. 6. Construction drawings submitted to the Building Division for plan check shall be materially identical to those approved by the Design Review Board. If any changes are made to the approved Design Review drawings, the permit holder is responsible for clearly identifying all such changes when construction drawings are submitted to the Building Division for plan check. For Planning Division conformance check purposes, such changes must be clearly highlighted (with a “bubble” or “cloud”) on the submitted construction drawings. A list describing in detail all such changes shall be submitted and attached to the construction drawing set, with a signature block to be signed by the Planning Division Staff member indicating that these changes have been reviewed and are approved, or will require separate Design Review approval. All changes to a project that have not been explicitly approved by Planning Division Staff as part of the Building DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 8 Attachment 1 Division Plan Check process are not approved. Construction that does not have Planning Division approval is not valid and shall be subject to stop work orders and may require removal. 7. At the time of building permit submittal, construction drawings for building permit shall demonstrate that all exterior lighting fixtures, other than those specifically approved by the Design Review Board to be otherwise, must be down-light type fixtures with shielding where appropriate. 8.At the time of building permit submittal, a photovoltaic energy system shall be shown on the drawings in compliance with the requirements of Section 16-40.080 of the Tiburon Municipal Code and shall be installed and operational prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building permit final sign-off. 9.At the time of building permit submittal/planning conformance check, it shall be confirmed that all skylights will be bronzed or tinted in a non-reflective manner (minimum 25%), and no lights shall be placed in the wells of the skylights. Installation in accordance with the approved plans shall be documented prior to final building inspection sign-off. 10.At the time of building permit submittal, a copy of the Planning Division’s “Notice of Action”, including the attached “Conditions of Approval” for this project, shall be copied onto a sheet near the front of each set of construction drawings. 11.All exterior HVAC units and generators shall comply with the Town’s Noise Standards Policy for Air Conditioning Units. www.townoftiburon.org/DocumentCenter/View/1050/HVAC-and-Similar-Mechanical- Equipment-Noise-Policy. If the units exceed this noise standards at the property line, noise baffles or other sound reduction shall be required to reduce the sound levels at the property lines and may require a separate Design Review application. 12. Any structures located within a required setback shall not exceed three (3) feet in height at any point. 13. Any new fencing and/or walls located within a required setback shall not exceed six feet (6’) in height at any point, measured from grade on both sides of the fence/wall. All new fencing, walls and footings shall be located entirely on the subject property. 14. Prior to commencement of construction, a construction information sign shall be posted on the site during construction of the project, in a location plainly visible to the public. The sign shall be 24” x 24” in size and shall be made of durable, weather-resistant materials intended to survive the life of the construction period. The sign shall contain the following information: job street address; work hours allowed per Chapter 13 of the Tiburon Municipal Code; builder (company name, city, state, ZIP code); project manager DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 9 Attachment 1 (name and phone number); and emergency contact (name and phone number reachable at all times). The sign shall remain posted until the contractor has vacated the site. 15.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or final building inspection sign-off, all landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans. The installation of plantings and irrigation shall be verified by a Planning Division field inspection prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. 16. Prior to under-floor inspection, a survey prepared by a licensed surveyor of the structure foundation is required to be submitted to the Building Division. Required documents shall include: 1) graphic documentation accurately locating the building on a site plan; 2) specific distances from property lines and other reference points to the foundation as appropriate; and 3) elevations relative to mean sea level of the foundation walls and slabs. No additional inspections will be provided until the confirming survey results have been submitted. 17.If any existing landscaping that is not proposed to be removed is subsequently removed during construction, the applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan to Planning Division staff for review and approval of additional adequate landscaping, prior to a Final Inspection. The Planning Division staff may refer any subsequent landscaping plan to the Design Review Board. Public Works Department 18.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall incorporate into construction documents measures for site design, source control, run-off reduction and stormwater treatment as found in the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agency Association (BASMAA) Post-Construction Manual available at the Planning Division or online at the Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (MCSTOPPP) website at www.mcstoppp.org. Prior to commencement of grading/building work on the site, the applicant shall implement the measures as shown on the construction documents. 19.An Encroachment Permit from DPW is required for any work within the Town’s road right-of way, including, but not limited to, utility trenching, installation of new utility connections, and modifications to the driveway apron. The plans shall clearly identify all proposed work in the right of way and an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to conducting such work. 20.All work shall comply with Best Management Practices to prevent storm water contamination 21. Throughout project construction, all requirements of the Town Engineer shall be met, including, but not limited to, the following, which shall be noted on Building Division drawings submitted for plan check: Attachment 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 10 a.This project is creating and replacing 2,500 square feet or more impervious surface area, the site must implement at least one Post Construction mitigation in accordance with E.12 of the Town’s Municipal Stormwater Permit and the BASMAA Post-Construction Manual Design Guidance for Stormwater Treatment and Control for Projects in Marin, Sonoma, Napa, and Solano Counties. There are two runoff requirements: one Town requirement to reduce the peak flow rate to pre-development conditions which has been met, and a separate BASMAA requirement to reduce the total volume of runoff from the site. Since the project is creating or replacing more than 2,500 sf of impervious area, it will need to do something to reduce the total volume of the runoff (not just reduce the peak flow rate). The acceptable options may include a Bioretention facility or you could also sheet flow the drainage across vegetated areas, but the areas need to have slopes, soil types, and vegetation that are conducive to allowing an inch of rainfall to infiltrate without eroding the soil. A final grading and drainage plan is required prior to building permit issuance implementing the BASMAA requirement. b.Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building permit final sign-off, a licensed land surveyor shall verify that fencing, walls, footings and building foundations are entirely within the subject property. If it is found that any portion of the structure(s) were placed outside of the property, that portion of the structure shall be removed and relocated to be entirely within the property boundaries. A certification letter, stamped and signed by the surveyor shall be provided as documentation. The letter is required to state that the licensed professional surveyor located the property boundary of the subject property and “certifies” that all structures, including fencing and foundations are located entirely within the subject property and do not encroach beyond it. The certification letter shall reference the building permit number, provide the date when the surveyor performed their services and must reference the property address and assessor’s parcel number. c.This project involves displacement of over 50 cubic yards of earth (including cut, fill, displacement, import and/or export) and the following are required: Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall complete the Construction Erosion and Sediment Control Applicant Package that can be found in the helpful forms and documents section of the Town’s website. Link: http://townoftiburon.org/156/Helpful-Forms-Documents. Please note that projects with over 50 cubic yards of earth movement shall also be subject to post-rain-event erosion control inspections. 22. Prior to issuance of a building permit, review and acceptance of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Town Engineer is required. Attachment 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 11 23. Provide a final grading and drainage plan along with drainage calculations to support the drainage system design prior to building permit issuance. 24. Show sizes, materials, alignment (vertical and horizontal) of all pipes, as well as details of outlets on the plans. All drainpipes shall be SDR.35 minimum. Flex pipe is not permitted. 25.Specify types and sizes of turning structures, catch basins, clean outs and other drainage structures. 26. Drainage structures, cleanouts or "y" connections shall be used as appropriate at storm drain alignment deflections or junctions of intersecting drain lines to facilitate maintenance. 27. Subdrainage must be shown, not only on the structural cross-sections, but also on the plans including alignment and discharge locations. 28. All retaining walls shall be backdrained. 29. All paved and unpaved finished surfaces shall be positively drained. Finished slopes and elevations shall be shown on the plans. 30. Steep driveways shall be designed to direct drainage such that water will not flush the pavement of intersecting streets. 31.Show details of dissipater systems. 32. The grade around the perimeter foundation of the home shall be sloped away from the foundation. 33. On hillside foundations, provide underfloor drainage/weep holes (minimum 2") to prevent moisture buildup Tiburon Fire Protection District (TFPD) 34. Throughout the duration of project construction, all requirements of the Tiburon Fire Protection District shall be met. 35.An irrigated greenbelt Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) Fuels Management Plan conforming to the standards of the Tiburon Fire Protection District shall be prepared and implemented at the site. The VMP-Fuels Management Plan shall conform to Marin County Fire Prevention Officer's Standard #220 and Fire Safe Marin principles. The plan shall be incorporated into the landscape plan for the project and submitted to the Fire Marshal for review prior to implementation. A Vegetation Management In non-WUI DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft November 5, 2020 12 Attachment 1 areas shall be prepared in accordance with TFPD Code Section 435.5 directly to the TFPD. The submission shall be email to mlantier@tiburonfire.org Other Agencies 36. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain required permits from the Sanitary District and comply with applicable Sanitary District regulations. 37.Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building Division, applicant shall submit documentation from the Sanitary District confirming that all applicable requirements of the District have been satisfied for occupancy. 38.Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall submit written documentation that the final landscape and irrigation drawings would comply with current water efficient landscape requirements of Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD). 39.Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building Division, applicant shall submit documentation from MMWD confirming that all applicable requirements of MMWD have been satisfied for occupancy. --End of Conditions of Approval-- TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 10 TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 Agenda Item: AI-1 STAFF REPORT To: From: Subject: Members of the Design Review Board Christy Fong, Senior Planner 545 Silverado Drive; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-23; File No. DR2019-119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, fence, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,032 square feet of floor area and cover 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot. PROJECT DATA ADDRESS: 545 SILVERADO DRIVE OWNER: EQUITY SMART INVESTMENTS LP APPLICANT: ERIC NUTTALL ASSESSOR’S PARCEL: 055-082-23 FILE NUMBERS: DR2019-119 LOT SIZE: 10,627 square feet ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE) GENERAL PLAN: MH (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) FLOOD ZONE: X DATE COMPLETE: JUNE 26, 2020 PSA DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 23, 2020 (EXTENDED) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting design review for construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling on an R-1 zoned property located at 545 Silverado Drive in the Little Reed Heights neighborhood. The property is vacant and was originally occupied by a single-family home that was constructed in the 1950’s. In 2014, a design review application (File No. 714046) was approved by the Design Review Board for construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling. The project was not fully constructed due to a legal dispute, the incomplete building was fully demolished for safety in 2016 and the site is vacant. The applicant submitted plans on December 19, 2019 to construct a new single-family home on the vacant parcel. Attachment 2 Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 2 of 10 The proposed 3,032 square foot two-story single-family home will include a 496 square foot two- car attached garage. On main floor, the applicant proposes a main entry/ foyer, great room, dining room, kitchen, powder room, office and an ensuite bedroom. The second story includes an open loft area, master ensuite bedroom, two bedrooms, bathroom and a laundry room. The project proposes numerous outdoor spaces, including two new patios on the main floor, a backyard patio and an upper-floor deck immediately above the main front entryway. The proposed project includes the replacement of the existing perimeter fence, exterior stairs and landings, as well as adding new retaining walls at various locations throughout the site. The project is designed to integrate with the hillside contour. The proposed residence will have a two-story form at the front, left (north) and right (south) elevations. The rear elevation will have a one-story form. The project will replace the existing driveway at similar location and will extend toward the south end of the driveway for a new parking pad. The project, along with the exterior improvements, covers approximately 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot, when a maximum of 30% lot coverage is allowed. The proposed height of the residence is calculated at 25’-9” measuring from the existing natural grade, when a maximum height of 30’ is permitted. The project will be built within the building envelope and is in compliance with the development standards prescribed for properties in the R-1 zone district. The proposed colors and materials include a combination of off-white siding and stucco walls, accented with dark gray stone veneer and ash gray metal seam roof. The design includes dark iron entry door and off-white garage door with glass lite. A color and material board has been included in attached plans provided for the Board review (Attachment 3). PROJECT SETTING Source: Marin Map and Google Map, accessed on September 17, 2020 The property is located on a trapezoid shaped 10,627 square foot lot on Silverado Drive. The lot width is wider at the front and getting narrower toward the rear. The lot has an average slope of 27.74%, sloping up from Silverado Drive toward the east and north. The subject property, along with nearby properties have the views of other homes in Tiburon and the Richardson Bay in the southwest direction. The properties to the west across Silverado Drive from the subject property are located in the downhill. The adjoining neighbor to the left (north), 541 Silverado Drive, is locating slightly uphill and the neighbor on the right, 549 Silverado Drive, is locating downhill. N Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 3 of 10 ANALYSIS The following sections are outlined to facilitate the Board when evaluating the project: Design Issues View Access The proposed main structure is designed utilizing the similar footprint of the demolished residence. The proposed structure will be placed toward the rear side of the property within the building envelope to preserve as much as possible the view for the neighbor to the left (north). Currently, the neighbor at 541 Silverado Drive, has windows from the living room, dining room and kitchen above the sink with existing views of the water. Since the proposed structure is designed to setback from the front and step down at the northwest corner, view impact to the living room window appears to be insignificant. The view access from the dining room will be partially impacted and the window in the kitchen will be blocked by the proposed structure. No other view impact is expected to other uphill neighbors due to natural topography. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed design can reasonably preserve the neighbors’ access to view from the kitchen and dining room. Privacy As noted above, proposed structure is placed toward the rear side of the property. One upper-level window is found on each side elevation. On the left (north) side, a window is proposed from the loft area. As conditioned, this window is required to be frosted for the lifetime of this structure with no clear glazing. Another upper-level window is found by the hallway on the left elevation. Privacy impact from this window is limited as it is setback away from the side property line and is not oriented to any structure or view. The project also includes a deck on the upper level. This deck is recessed from the first-floor mass on the front elevation. The applicant initially proposed to screen the deck with solid walls on both sides to relief privacy concerns. Since the proposed deck is covered by solid roof and at least fifty percent of the vertical area around the space is closed, the deck area in its original design will contribute toward floor area. To ensure the project is in compliance with the development standards, the applicant proposes to replace the solid wall with a privacy screen that is fifty percent open on the left (north) elevation. As the result, the exterior fireplace at the upper-floor deck will be relocated from the left (north) elevation to the wall by the master bedroom. Sheet A3.1, A3.2, A5 and A12 are updated to reflect the current design as attached in Attachment 4 in the staff report. Massing and Bulk The proposed design is consistent with the forms and massing found in nearby residences with a two-story massing on the uphill slope. The new residence will not be highly visible from the street level as the front yard is sloped upward with naturalized landscape. The proposed residence is pushed into the hillside from the existing footprint to reduce the visual impact of massing. Though, staff found that the typical eave width proposed in the project can be further reduced to improve the visual bulk and avoid view obstructions to the neighbors. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed roof form and the maximum ridge height of 25’-9” is appropriate with consideration of the site context. Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 4 of 10 Hillside Design Guidelines The following principles of the Hillside Design Guidelines may be used in evaluating the characteristics of the property: Goal 1, Principle 5 of the Hillside Design Guidelines encourages applicants to “follow hillside contours with horizontal building elements to increase integration of dwelling unit and site.” (See below illustrations). The proposed second-floor mass is setback from the front property line and is stepped back from the first story. The proposed structure will follow the contour of the site with some horizontal articulation. Vertical articulation is visible from the side elevations as the structure follows the contour of the hill. Goal 1, Principle 8 of the Hillside Design Guidelines states that “use changes of material to soften large elevations of building and blend into hillside”. The project proposes to have various types of material, including stone veneer, stucco and siding to soften the building elevation and blend into hillside. To preserve privacy, the proposed structure has minimal amount of glazing on the side elevations, particularly on the upper floor when the blank wall will be visible to nearby neighbors. Staff recommends the project to utilize at least two types of material, particularly on the side elevations, to avoid large span of uniform walls. The Board may want to discuss whether changes of material is an appropriate measure to soften the large side elevations of the building. HQ Ho • LAl<?q e. FAt-t>-0 1':. OF i.lt:lJFOr2 AA ""-"T e.r21.._:.. 16 l.tFe.L.e~~. \ '\ " ~~ ',, ""-~ '-, -" ' "'~ ' ' ~ ~. < ' ' --- Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 5 of 10 Goal 3, Principle 3 of the Hillside Design Guidelines states that “views should be preserved as much as possible within reason. However, not everyone can have a panoramic view. The neighborhood and the development and architect of the new dwelling must work together to obtain the best solution between slot views, view corridors and panoramic views.” The project is proposed to step back at the northwest corner on the second level to preserve the view of adjoining neighbor. Ideally, the upper floor deck should be more open on the sides to further preserve the neighbor’s view corridor; however, the current design includes screening to reduce privacy concerns raised by nearby neighbors. The Board may wish to comment whether the project can preserve views to the most possible extent. The Design Review Board is encouraged to view the story poles and determine if the proposed residence would create any visual, privacy or view impacts on the adjacent neighbors. Zoning The Board should consider whether the proposed project will further the purpose set forth in Zoning Ordinance Section 16-52.020(A). The Purpose of site plan and architectural review is to ensure that the design of proposed construction and use assist in maintaining and enhancing the town’s distinctive character. Purposes 1.Ensure that new uses and structures enhance their sites and are compatible with the highest standards of improvement in the surrounding neighborhood. The project site will be occupied by a new single-family residence that is consistent with previous land use. The new residence and landscape improvements are compatible with other existing homes in the surrounding neighborhood. The project is designed to be consistent with the standards of other recently updated single-family homes in the surrounding neighborhood. 2.Retains and strengthens the visual quality of and attractive character of the town. The project is designed with materials and finishes that are commonly found in current development trends. The proposed design and architectural style are in keeping with the • 6 111~"1 TH:;. f;J~::..0 11'7'-'! L'..'.1~11:L.l .... :-,E:A!<' -;"H~ E.:-:.ll;Si lHl; rJY.jE:l...l'H &, 'NIL L 0.,. o p_,~·n2Ll t.-:" MO•!f'( h-:'</ OF YI e.'·N FOl2 /)PH ;U.. r.>c l-k?~~e . • A i?OIZ TIO~ OF v:ew ' I":> LOl;,T Vv'He':~ ~!:.'N OWE:L.'-l~l; I~ '6l1E') IH F-~OHT OF eXl-':ii'iHo, HO/J-eie. Y l.eV.'--• . ;.;,,.r,~ . ' , -b lTH··k:, 7He ~iw t. ov,.·e~L\Ht., ~.,. DOWN HILL ~ W iLLl-:ZE.A;=-~%,., Y lE:.W ('..O~t{ll?Ot<~ _ -.Jie~ 6E:TWE:~rl e x J".;ifl HC.,, HOL.l 6 ~-!). 1.J(-1 \-IJLL HOU".::>E': ~E:TA1t4".:i -?'MlLP-i< Vli=.W~, -• P,,'( 'l-!:,Lic'.-'HC:1 OF'F'l u A C::,O~H e t2 OF r!~W HOd ~E: 7 ,.\;\o"'.,T oi:=- V! i::Vl F f<'O/v\. Al?JAC..E:M"f ~O~':>E: I? t<'E:7Aii-1 S.i?. r-l e;w V le!W · ;,.,2e,.,., • APPROV£0 11 1:1se: Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 6 of 10 area and is common for single-family residences. The proposed residence and exterior improvement will retain the visual quality and attractive character of the Town. 3.Ensures that landscaping emphasizes drought tolerant native species and protects mature vegetation. The proposed project involves addition of shrubs within the front yard and side yards. The rear side and the frontage along Silverado Drive will retain its natural state with native brush. Most of the existing landscaping in the rear yard will be maintained, with the exception of four trees which will be removed to create more functional outdoor space. With the goal to minimize change in existing landscape, staff recommends the Board to require at least two trees, at the minimum initial height of 8’ tall to be planted in the rear side of the property along the southern property line. 4.Recognizes the interdependence of land uses and circulation and provides for an efficient and interconnected system of streets and pedestrian ways through town. The proposed project will utilize the existing driveway and the access from the street will remain the same. The street system will not be negatively impacted. 5.Assists project developers in understanding the town’s concerns for the aesthetics of construction. The proposed materials and finishes are in natural palettes that will blend with the hillside surrounding. The proposed architectural style and form is compatible with other residences in the neighborhood that is varied in styles. The project will address the Town’s concern for aesthetics of construction. 6.Ensures that construction complies with all applicable town standards and guidelines, and does not adversely affect community health, safety, aesthetics, or natural resources. As conditioned, the proposed project would comply with all required developments standards and would be in conformance with the Hillside Design Guidelines as a whole. The project would not appear to affect the community health, safety, aesthetics or natural resources for the neighborhood. The Board should review this project with respect to Zoning Ordinance Sections 16-52.020 (H) (Guiding Principles). Staff’s analysis of the proposed project’s conformance with the guiding principles are provided below: 1.Site plan adequacy. Proper relation of a project to its site, including that it promotes orderly development of the community, provides safe and reasonable access, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is located on an existing 10,627 square foot vacant lot. The lot has been vacant since 2016 and was previously occupied by a two-story single-family residence prior to the residence being demolished. The proposed residence will follow similar footprint as the previous structure and will be located toward the rear side of the site to allow view access of adjoining property. The proposed location will setback from the downhill neighbor on the right (south) and through careful design and discussions with the neighbor to the left (north) many changes have been made to preserve as much of the privacy and views. The project has proper relation to the site, which would not appear to create detrimental impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 7 of 10 2.Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions. Locating on an uphill parcel from the street, the proposed residence is oriented to take advantage of the view shared by other neighbors. Light and air is provided by adequate setbacks on the sides. Noise-generating equipment will be located within the building envelope. As conditioned, the proposed second-floor windows will respect privacy. The project appears to work appropriately with its topographic constraints and will relate to the existing developments on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view, privacy, noise, light and air. 3. Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second-story additions shall be discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood. The homes in the neighborhood along Silverado Drive vary in size, height and style, but are primarily two-story homes and many homes have outdoor decks facing toward the views. The design of the proposed residence and other improvements would appear to be compatible with other homes in the vicinity and maintain a good relationship with its surrounding. Though, the Board may wish to discuss whether the visual bulk of the proposed project can be further reduced to enhance the project’s compatibility with the existing residences immediately adjacent to the proposed residence. Staff recommends to the Board to reduce the typical width of eaves from 2’-6” to 2’ throughout the building and to lower the overall height of main entry to be consistent with the garage at 10’-6” in order to reduce the massing and avoid potential view obstruction. 4. Floor area ratio. The relationship between the size and scale of improvements and the size of the property on which the improvements are proposed. This concept is known as floor area ratio. The project would include 3,032 square feet of floor area, which would be 30.7 square feet below the permitted floor area (3,062.7 square feet) for a lot of this size in the R-1 zone district. 5. Grading and tree removal. The extent to which the site plan reasonably minimizes grading and/or removal of trees, significant vegetation, or other natural features of the site such as rock outcroppings or watercourses. The project will remove four trees located in the rear yard and will replace existing shrubs. Three new trees will be planted by the end of driveway within the side yard. Approximately 138 cubic yard of soil will be exported from the site in order to accommodate the new residence and exterior improvements. The project includes swale and French drains that connect to the street as storm water management. 6.Compatibility of architectural style and exterior finish. The architectural style and exterior finish are harmonious with existing development in the vicinity and will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 8 of 10 The proposed exterior finishes include various shades of gray and off-white colors for the exterior walls and features. The façades are proposed to be in stucco, accented with stone and siding. The proposed architectural style and exterior finish will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. 7. Landscaping. Proposed landscaping, insofar as it is used appropriately to prevent erosion; to protect the privacy of adjoining sites; and to mitigate the visual and noise impacts of the proposed project. Applicants are encouraged to use native and drought- resistant landscaping. Proposed landscaping shall be used which will, at maturity, minimize primary view obstruction from other buildings. A cash deposit or other monetary security may be required to ensure the installation and/or maintenance for a one-year period of any and all landscaping. Projects that are subject to provisions of title IV, chapter 13E (water efficient landscape) of the Tiburon Municipal Code shall comply with the Marin Municipal Water District regulations regarding water-efficient landscaping adopted by reference therein. As noted above, the landscape plan will maintain the existing native brushes at the front and rear yards in its natural state, remove four trees in the rear yard and include new trees and shrubs in front of the proposed residence. An exterior stair will be replaced to provide access to the rear yard. The proposed landscape changes will prevent erosion and mitigate visual impacts of the proposed project. In addition, staff recommends the Board to require two new trees to be planted in the rear yard along the southern property line. As conditioned, the project will include new landscape that would improve the site’s outdoor space while respecting the existing vegetation condition. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed landscape changes with proposed condition would appropriately address privacy impact to adjoining sites. 8.Lighting. Proposed lighting, insofar as it should not invade the privacy of other properties or produce glare or light pollution; yet provide adequate illumination for safety and security purposes. All proposed exterior lighting shall be shielded downlighting. New exterior lighting will be installed throughout the exterior of the home. All lights will be shielded downlighting with no clear glass. 9.Overall property improvement. In order to allow the gradual upgrading of existing improvements, upgrades may be required to be made to existing buildings and the site as a whole. The review of applications for additions or modifications to existing development may include conditions requiring changes and/or modifications to existing buildings and site improvements for the entire property to the extent that there is a reasonable relationship between the requested project and the changes and/or modifications required. The vacant property is not on the Town’s list of historic properties. The proposed project will utilize and expand on the existing building foundation. Since the proposed project will be built on a vacant lot, the Board may add any conditions that they determine would be appropriate to ensure the new home has a proper relationship with the existing conditions of the site. 10. Appropriate use of building envelope. In planned residential (RPD and RMP) zones, building envelopes are generally intended to provide a larger-than-needed area for flexibility in the appropriate siting of a main structure and its accessory structures. The Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 9 of 10 building envelope should not generally be interpreted as an area intended to be filled by a main structure and its accessory structures. The proposal is not located in an RPD and or RMP zone. The building envelope is established by height, setbacks and other limits as specified in the development standards. 11.Green building. The project design includes features that foster renewable energy and/or resource conservation. This project is characterized as a new single-family dwelling; therefore, solar panels would be required. The new home would have to comply with Tier 1 of the CalGreen Building Code requirements. 12. Conformance with zoning requirements. All modifications and site improvements shall conform with the setback, parking, and height requirements established for each zone by article II (zones and allowable land uses), and with any special requirements including recycling (see Municipal Code Chapter 16C [recyclables collection area]) and screening guidelines established for specific uses by this zoning ordinance. The project is located in the R-1 zone. The proposed structures would comply with all zoning requirements. In conclusion, the proposed residence does not appear to be detrimental to the character, privacy and safety within the neighborhood. As conditioned, the project appears to further the purposes of site plan and architectural review and comply with many of the guiding principles. Staff has recommended various conditions, as noted in Attachment 1, to further enhance the project’s conformance with the purposes and guiding principles. The Design Review Board may wish to determine if the project would be in substantial conformance with the applicable criteria. PUBLIC COMMENT As of the date of this report, staff had received verbal communication from the neighbor residing at 541 Silverado Drive concerning the proposed second-floor massing and eaves projection that could contribute to visual bulk. In addition, this neighbor is also concerned about the blank wall on the side elevation that will be highly visible from the windows of their existing dwelling. The neighbor, residing at 549 Silverado Drive, has expressed concerns about the proposed second- floor massing and height, lack of replacement landscape and potential shade impact toward the backyard of the said property. PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff recommends that the Design Review Board determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Class 3 categorical exemptions. Class 3 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303-New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) The proposed project consists of demolition of an existing single-family residence and construction of a new single-family residence in a residential zone and in an urbanized area. Categorical Exemption Exceptions (CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2) Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 10 of 10 Further, none of the exceptions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. There is no evidence that the Project will result in any adverse environmental impacts and the Project does not involve any unusual circumstances or historical resources. Indeed, the proposed project would not significantly impact any environmental resource. In addition, there is no evidence that any significant cumulative impacts would occur. Specific supporting details regarding the project site include the following: 1) The property is located within a residential zone with single-family dwelling surrounding the property on all sides. 2) According to the California Department of Transportation, there are no scenic highways in Marin County. 3) According to the California Department of Toxic Substance Control, there are no hazardous waste sites in the Town of Tiburon. 4)The existing home is not on the Town’s List of History Properties. The existing home has gone through modifications throughout the years. It is a common practice for the Town of Tiburon’s Design Review Board to approve new homes on vacant properties in an established residential neighborhood. Other examples include 9 Via Paraiso West Street, 21 and 25 Gilmartin Drive and 835 Stony Hill Road. RECOMMENDATION The Design Review Board should review this project, along with all reports and data submitted, supplemented by public comments and on-site inspections as appropriate, and determine whether the project will further the purposes set forth in Zoning Ordinance subsections 16.52.020 (A) (Purpose) and satisfy the criteria of Zoning Ordinance Sections 16-52.020 (H) (Guiding Principles) and determine that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff recommends the Board to adopt the following conditions: (1) to include change of materials use on the exterior walls at the upper floor, particularly on the side elevations, (2)to reduce the eaves width from 2’-6” to 2’, (3) to reduce the height of main entry by approximately a foot, (4) to frost upper-floor window on the left elevation, (5) to add two trees at the minimum initial height of 8’ tall by the rear side of the property and (6) to adopt the revised design of upper-floor deck as attached in Attachment 4. If the Board wishes to approve the project as submitted, the Board may adopt or amend the draft resolution to include conditions that would ensure the project to be in substantial conformance with the applicable standards as noted above. ATTACHMENTS 1.Draft Resolution for Approval with Conditions 2.Application and supplemental materials, received on December 18, 2019 3.Plans and materials board prepared by Tangent Design and Engineering as received on September 10, 2020 4.Revised plan sheets A3.1, A3.2, A5 and A12 for upper-floor deck To: Design Review Board September 25, 2020 Town of Tiburon Re: proposed new house at 545 Silverado As a 44 year resident of our neighborhood and former homeowners' association board member, I take an interest in new construction/remodels in our neighborhood. I found a couple of things on the drawings: Sheet A-1: "Lightning Plan" good luck planning where lightning will strike.... Sheet GP-1: On the map in the corner, there is no "Marin Soccer Academy" on Virginia Drive. Someone who lives there may be affiliated, but that's all. Sheet A-2: "Construction trucks shall not park on the street for security reasons" Hmmm, where do you think they will park? Also, where will the porta potty be located? Silverado is a really narrow street. Sheet A-4: Front elevation, can't find #27 "solar invertor" Sheet A-6: The highest point of the roof is 24 10", which exceeds the max height of most of the surrounding homes which are 22 feet, even the ones with a second story. New construction should be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Sheet A-7: Landscaping. We are in Sunset's Zone 17 and plants that do well in Sacramento are not necessarily going to do well here. Cortaderia Selloana: According to the Sunset book, these plants are to be avoided because they "send seeds to germinate and grow wherever they land", i.e. open space, where they crowd out native vegetation. Sunset says "horticulturalists recommend against landscaping with C. Selloana and suggest removing it from gardens..." Also, the existing plantings along the street side are unsightly and overgrown. Sheet A-8: "Erosion control is in accordance with City of Folsom and County of Sacramento " The Town on Tiburon has Hillside Guidelines, they should be followed. Also, if excavation is planned for the toe of the steep slope at the back of the property, that portion of the neighborhood will be at risk for mudslides. Drainage is a huge issue off that steep bare hill. The existing trees should be retained to stabilize the slope. A-10: Again, reference to “lightning”... Lights should be down only, not shine out. There is no reason to have outdoor lighting that blazes all night, they should be on a timer or motion- activated. Were low-voltage lights on the ground rather than hanging off the house considered? A-11: The driveway, which is not proposed to be changed, is so awkward that I wonder who would want to pay $3 million for a house where you have to hang a u-turn just to get into your steep driveway. Sincerely, Lee Darby 543 Comstock Drive, Tiburon, CA 94920 Late Mail #1 for 10/1/2020 DRB Attachment 3 To: Members of the Design Review Board From: Christopher and Lyndsey Child, 546 Silverado Drive Subject: 545 Silverado Drive, Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 Date: September 25, 2020 To Whom it May Concern: We have lived at 546 Silverado Drive for the past 4 years. We are excited to see the empty lot directly across the street from us developed, and to eventually see a new family join our wonderful neighborhood. In general, we're supportive of the plans that we've seen. We do have several concerns that we'd like the board to consider. The first is the overall height and bulk of the house. Give the steep hillside on which the house will be constructed, there's a chance that the house will tower over the street (and thereby our house). We haven't been able to get a good sense of how much it will do so from the plans, but the height of 25' 9" when looking at the already very steep grade to the house from the street will likely feel much taller than that. Relatedly, out house is currently well shielded from the site by the natural vegetation at the front, street-side of the lot. The plans discuss keeping the trees and vegtation intact, but the site plan renderings show all new vegetation. We would prefer that the trees and large shrubs that currently fill the front of the site remain. One of our favorite parts of the neighborhood is how much it feels like you are surrounded by vegetation and greenery, and we would prefer to keep that character. Finally, our neighborhood has almost no nighttime artifical lighting, which makes for a very calm and rural feeling. This is due to both very few external lights, and also most homes not having large windows that pollute light. We'd also like to keep that part of the neighborhood character intact to the extent possible by minimizing both external lighting that may not be necessary, and also make sure there aren't large interior lighting fixtures that will shine directly into our home. Thank you for your consideration. Chris and Lyndsey Late Mail #2 for 10/1/2020 DRB To: Tiburon Design Review Board From: Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Residents and owners of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004 Date: September 28, 2020 RE: Concerns regarding proposed development at 545 Silverado Drive SUMMARY Our primary issue with the 545 Silverado Drive project is its massing impact on our everyday living spaces. We appreciate the desire of the developer to try and maximize profits and build on a property that has been an eyesore for years. In addition, we recognize that the property needs to be developed. As such, we have been supportive of past redevelopment attempts that were less intrusive. We want to improve the neighborhood, but no redevelopment should be at the expense of long-term community members, nor one that creates housing inconsistent with the neighborhood where homes work in concert with each other rather than in conflict. Also, the change from the September 10th submission to replace a second-floor wall with a 7-foot-wide/9-foot-high, 50% screen may create privacy and light intrusion issues directly into our dining room, kitchen, and living room from the deck area. The impact, while difficult to assess from the drawings, could be significant. SOLUTIONS We believe there are many ways to address our concerns that would, importantly, not materially change the overall design. For example: 1)The first-floor clear height is 10’ across the whole space. This is generous, especially for a dense neighborhood such as ours, and could be reduced to 9’. 2)The second-floor clear height is 9’. As with the first-floor height, this is generous, and could be reduced to 8’. 3)Reduce the roof pitch from 3:12 to 1:12. This still allows for water drainage but reduces the project’s height. Of note, on prior occasions the developer stated that he was reducing the slope from 3:12. 4)With some slope to the roof, the second floor could take advantage of the natural vaulting to create more volume with reduced slide walls. 5)2.5’ eves are substantial, adding to the project’s protrusion past the setback and adding to the massing. 18” eves still provide balance to the house but would reduce its intrusion by a full foot. 6)Finally, protect our privacy and light intrusion by putting back the solid wall on the deck, or assure that it will block light and keep privacy. In addition, mandate that it is a “permanent” part of the house. RESULT The above would bring the project’s height down, create massing more in-line with what had been previously approved by the town, be more consistent with the neighborhood, and keep the project from impeding on our family privacy. The current design has more massing impact than prior designs that were unanimously rejected by the Design Review Board. Late Mail #3 for 10/1/2020 DRB ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS/CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROJECT In addition to our primary concerns, there are additional items that we believe should be addressed prior to the project moving forward: Characterization of project as “utilizing the similar footprint of the demolished residence” is very misleading: Per the plans, the existing pad from the demolished house is 1,328 sf. The total lot coverage of the current planned house (not included patio and driveway, etc.) is 2,013 sf, or an increase of 51%. The plan also moves the house wall facing us approximately 6 ½ feet closer to our property than has ever existed previously on the property, and certainly since we purchased the property in 2004. With the old house having approximate 6” roof overhang on the sides, the total shift including eves is 8 ½ feet closer to us. Tenor of the Project: This is a dense, modest neighborhood. With the prospect of many older homes needing redevelopment over the next decade, this development changes the tone and character of the neighborhood, giving runway to others to build “big boxes” without long-term consideration on neighborhood impact. As one developer said when reviewing the project, “It is built to minimize development costs and maximize views, rather than built for the site.” In addition, as a prominent real estate agent commented when we asked them to physically assess the proposed development on our property’s value, “Wow. That’s a big impact.” Lighting: The plans call for “dusk to dawn” photovoltaic lighting that automatically go on at night and stay on throughout the night. This is inconsistent with our neighborhood and would create additional light pollution marring our views. Perimeter Fence: There is mention of a new perimeter fence, but it is unclear which portions of the plan are new fence. We need clarification where the new fence is proposed and that our current fence is not impacted. Protection of Privacy Hedge: With the construction of a drainage swale so close to our current privacy hedge, what are the methods that will be taken to ensure those are not damaged. CONTEXT AND PRECEDENT We, and the neighborhood, have been wanting this property to be redeveloped since Dorothy Gallot, a long-time community owner and advocate, sold the property in 2013 due to ill health. Unfortunately, the prior owner had a conflict with his contractor which led to the site sitting vacant for several years. The vacancy, and subsequent lack of structure, on the site may be viewed as a reason for our opposition to the current proposal, but this is far from the truth. We were on-record as supportive of the prior design, where we worked with the prior owner to create a development more consistent with the neighborhood and, of course, less impactful to our house. To give the Design Review Board a sense of this history, the enclosed attachment (and apologies to our limited tech prowess) attempts to compare the current design to the design that was UNANMOUSLY VOTED AGAINST by the Design Review Board in 2013. As you can see from the photos in the embedded PDF, the current proposal has much more massing impact to our property than a past proposal which was rejected unanimously. We would ask that the current Board take into account past official actions when contemplating the current proposal, especially when there are a number of ways in which the proposed development could be adapted without significant impact. Further, there have been similar sized windows on the south side of our house taking advantage of water and hill views since our property (and the original house located at 545 Silverado) was originally developed in the mid-1950s, and since we purchased the property in 2004. Section 15.1 of the Town Code covers Tree Obstruction Guidelines and contends that there is an established right to preserve views and sunlight that have been in existence since the ownership of the property. Specifically, 15 (a) 1. states that the purpose of the chapter is to “Establish the right of persons to preserve views or sunlight which existed at any time since they purchased or occupied a property from unreasonable obstruction by the growth of trees .” So, why wouldn’t a permanent obstruction (in this case the proposed development) be viewed in the same context? If not, would this view not be in contradiction to the town code and therefore question which perspective is superior? We welcome the discussion of this with the Design Review Board and the Town, if needed. WHY All THIS MATTERS TO US For context, we have been living at 541 Silverado since January 2004 when we purchased the home from the original owners. The ability to move to Marin was fantastic, especially since Jennifer grew up in Kentfield, graduated from Redwood, and is a fifth generation Californian. Since moving here, we have been Soccer, Baseball, and Lacrosse coaches, members of the PTA, on the planning committees of community fundraising events such as Blackie’s Hay Day and St. Stephen’s Art Angels, worked for the Tiburon-Belvedere Landmarks Society, and have been leaders in local Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts. Our boys have been in the Reed School District since Kindergarten, with one now in 8th grade at DelMar and our oldest a Sophomore at Redwood. Our perspective is long-term, not short-term. THANK YOU FOR THE CONSIDERATION Thank you for listening to our perspective on this project. While we have commented on several points, we reiterate that we want a house at 545 Silverado that not only upgrades the neighborhood, but Tiburon as well. We believe the proposed project can achieve that goal if it slightly moderates in size to limit its massing impact on our property, to protect our privacy, and to conform more to our neighborhood. Current Proposal View from Front Door Entry Late Mail #4 for 10/1/2020 DRB Current Proposal View from Front Door Entry – Shaded Prior Design Proposal June 2013 View from Kitchen Sink RESULT: Unanimous 5-0 DRB Vote Against Proposal Current Proposal View from Kitchen Sink Current Proposal View from Kitchen Sink -Shaded Prior Design Proposal June 2013 View from End of Dining Table RESULT: Unanimous 5-0 DRB Vote Against Proposal Current Proposal View from End of Dining Table Current Proposal View from End of Dining Table -Shaded From:rebecca pringle To:Christy Fong; dinatasani@townoftiburon.org; Kris Bernard Cc:jkhartung@gmail.com; margarita.perry@rbc.com; chrishartung@hotmail.com; rebecca pringle Subject:Proposed House Plans at 545 Silverado Drive Date:Monday, September 28, 2020 3:41:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. TO:TIburon Design Review Board staff: Christy Fong, Dina Tasani, Kris Bernard and Design Review Board Members RE: Proposed plans for new house at 545 Silverado Drive, Tiburon FROM: Rebecca Pringle, 530 Comstock Drive, Tiburon DATE: September 28, 2020 Dear Staff and Board members: I had noticed the story poles for the new residence at 545 Silverado because they are just around the corner from my home on Comstock Drive. I was able to review the plans. I was struck by the following simple thought: THE HOUSE IS OUT OF CHARACTER FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD: In several ways. -the house plan ignores the up-stepping plot plan for the Little Reed Heights hillside neighborhood. The walls and roof of this house rise up to the same height of the house ABOVE it at 541 Silverado. The walls and roof should be below those of the uphill neighbor. - the block shape and bulk of the house affect both the house above and below it, with huge walls, and eaves that stretch out. - although planned for one of the largest lots on this street, it is jammed as close as possible to the house next to it (541), which is on possibly the smallest lot on the street. This is called “neighbor jamming”, which should be avoided where possible. It looks bad, and in this case it just looks crowded. -the square and blocky design combined with charmless building materials (iceberg white stucco with gray corrugated metal roof) make this house perfect for a mass home development on the flat in Sacramento, but not for the hills in Tiburon. - the plans call for “dawn to dusk” lighting. This is absolutely impossible in this area of hills and gullies where anyone who leaves anything but the smallest down light on all night is basically shining a floodlight out on a great many neighbors. SUGGESTIONS for improving the design: - reduce the square footage a bit so the walls can be pulled back from the edge of the property, especially on the uphill side. - reduce the height of the roof, at least down to 22’. - reduce the eaves on the north side...the non-weather side. - reduce the second floor or set it back farther into the uphill side of the property so there is a step feeling to the house that fits with the hillside. - eliminate the dawn to dusk lighting...this is unfair to whole neighborhood. -ask for a composition roof, more in keeping with the neighborhood. -ask for a colored window trim treatment to give some warmth and character to the house, so the whole thing is not iceberg white. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Pringle 530 Comstock Drive Late Mail #5 for 10/1/2020 DRB Late Mail #6 for 10/1/2020 DRB Kris Bernard From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Perry, Margarita < margarita_perry@rbc.com > Monday, September 28, 2020 7:11 PM Christy Fong; Dina Tasini; Kris Bernard Christopher Hartung Proposed development of 545 Silverado Drive H PSCAN _20200929011631109_2020-09-29_011805489 .pdf; IMG_6078.jpg; IMG_ 6080jpg Ci\Ul JON : This email originated from outside of-the organization_ Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe_ Dear Design Review Board_ My name is Margarita Perry and I reside at 549 Silverado Drive for the las! 24 yems_ l am the do\.vnhill neighbor to the proposed project. I look forward to a new house built at 545 Silverado Drive , the vacant lot nexl door l1as been neglected for many years. J have had a couple of meetings with the developer and I look fonvard to con1im1ing to work with him and !he Town on this project. 1 encourzige the DRB members to review the previous plans for this property zincl look at DRB members comments on past designs. Previous Board members were in unanimous agreement in denying the 2013 plans clue to the mass and scale of the past project which were much less intrusive than this current design. Since 2013_ my neighbors and I have been to DRB several times regarding this properly_ in 2014 the plans were approved on this lot which all neighbors supported_ At no time was this house a two story home, the original l 950's Kott home that was demolished in 2013 was a parti,1I two story home with the master bedroom on the second floor on the uphill side, on the southern side - my side of the property it was only one story (see enclosure l )-At the time the DRB members were very concerned about the mass and bulk of the design. It blocked vieYvs on the uphill side and the mass. privacy and lighting issues on my side, this ,:vas without a full second story_ Per the staff report_ it stales that'-1hc main structure is designed utilizing the similc1r footprint of the demolished n::-sidcncc--this is 1101 accurall' there wc1s never a 11-ill two story building_ See enclosed photos_ Unfortum1tely_ I did not hzive the pleasure of lrnving Dena or Christy come to 111) home to see first hc1ncl the chalkngcs 1ha1 I foce with the proposed nC\.\ build_ We did have a phone convers;nion \\·here I expressed my concerns_ I) The current proposed pl:111s call for a massive two story structure right on the 8 foot set back line: -This structure will be approxinrntely 26 feel high c1!ld 34 lee! long ,vith a blank \\all looming over the majority of 111) property_ I am 5 feet below grade which will exacerbate the ma s s of this building lo over 31 leet_ -The l\\ o story structure is not stepped bc1ck from the first story on the southern side ( 111} side) as i he srnff report suggcs1s. -The structure is not in keeping with the Hillside Design Guidelines. The house does not step back into the hillside. It is a two story box house, not situated towards the rear of the property, not stair stepped into the contours of the hillside to minimize mass and bulk. The back corner line is 57.9 feet from the rear property line and 42 feet from the front corner line -the house is closer to front of the house than the back . If it \\ as recessed back into the hillside -it ,vmild reduce the mass and the impact for the entire neighborhood. See enclosed renderings. -The massive blank wall on my side ,vill impact the light and sun on my shrubs, trees and garden due to the south west positioning of my home and the sun patterns. The hedge that I have along the fence line is starting to fail and needs direct sun. This is the founh time in 24 years that I have had to replant along the fence. Screening with plants sounds great but in reality plants grow slow and have a limited life span. Trying to mask a permanent 31 foot wall can take decades and may never happen with limitations on what ,vill be able to grow here. -In addition to the lack of light on my property, the massive water and drainage issues from the entire hillside has been an ongoing problem for 545 Silverado as well as my property which has impacted the gro,,1h of many shrubs along the fence line. The water issues on the hillside has been well documented with the town ( see attached letter from the tovl°l1). On an average year four million gallons of water comes off the abow hillside and neighboring properties dO\vn to the storm drain on my property. Traditional french drains cannot handle the capacity. -All homes in Reed heights per our CC& R · s are 22 feet, this proposed build is not in keeping with the integrity of the neighborhood. 2) Expanded driveway and headlight impact: -The location of the drive·way pad and the \\ idening of the area will add a tremendous amount of light pollution to my home. My home is angled south west -the headlights coming up the driveway will shine directly into my main living area. The original home had a garage where the proposed driveway site currently is located. This has been addressed with DRB in previous plans and the recommendation from the board was to build a 5 foot retaining wall to mitigate some the light pollution. 3) Outdoor stairs : -The proposed stairs are right on the fence line, inside the 8 foot setback which cause me great concern. l have major privacy and safety issues as well as Cl1ncerns that the deer will now have an easy passage into my yard with the removal of all of the existing trees. The current plans call for an 11 foot retaining wall at the rear of the property next to the stairs -\Vhich is a massi, e ,val] 15 feet long. This is higher than the first floor ceiling of the house. What is not shown on the plans is how are they going to address the 15 feet railing over the retaining wall? With the trees removed. 1 will see the railing all the way across and anyone standing in the rear yard will look right into my property. ls there railings on both sides of the stairs? This retaining wall will create a very dark and shaded area outside the do\vnstairs office/bedroom . This patio area may become unusable and will be at risk for flooding and pooling of water. 1 ,, otdd like to know what the full impact would be of the stairs and retaining wall. -To reduce some of my concerns_ moving tht stairs away from my fence line into the unusable patio area would make more sense. My safety concerns are a hig issue -properties on both sides of me have had attempted burglaries over the last few years. this is an t.'asy passage for someone to enter my property. 4) Air conditioning unit: 2 -The Developer told me twice that he \\,ould move the AC unit to the back or the house.\\ hich he did not do ,1cco1·ding lo the plans. The AC unit will be right in the rniclclle of my main outdoor living area. As past President 01· the Homeowners association this was one of the main complaints I heard from neighbors of the noise from the AC units. l have looked up the specs on the proposed unit and it says that it has 5 levels. lf you c1rc on level one. the lowest level it could be at is 56 decibels. to cool ,m entire home, the website says you will need to have it at level 5, which is significantly louder. Having ,l p,trti,11 ,val! around the unit will have mininwl impact since sound travels up and this unit is so close to Ill) main living ,irea. l'v1o\ ing it the exterior of the house, as was discussed ,vith the developer. \;,,,.,ill dampen the ll()isc especially \\ith the l l x l 5 foot retaining '"il I. .'i) Jncompletc l:1ndsc:1ping plans: -The proposed project calls for the removal of several trees in the back. It states that the front and rear yards will be kept in its native state. I \Vas told by the developer that the l"ront ,1rea of the house'" 1th all of the brush ,md overgrown plants would be removed. This is not shO\vn on the plans. The area is severL'ly overgrO\vn -I am hard pressed to imagine the Develpers flipping a multi million dollar home with such an l1gly curb appeal. In the staff report it states "the new residence \vill not be highly visible from the strL'et level as the front yard is sloped upvvard vv·ith naturalized landscape". The main living area and patio of this house overlooks this overgrown brush , which blocks their main view of tl1e water. if this remains any new homeowner \\'ill immediately landscape and terrace the front and the house, which will make the house highly visible and i111p,1ctful to the ncighborl1ood. See enclosed renderings . -With the expanded driveway, some of the shrubs along our sl1ared frnce line will have to go because of a retaining wall to support the driveway clue to the steep slope and drop off of the hill. 1 noticed that there was no mention of a retaining wall on the plans. -As mentioned above. the removal of the shrubs will exacerbate the light pollution from the headlights up the driveway. Some possible solutions: l) Stair step the entire second story of the house back into the hillside 2) Relocate the Jaundr) room to the bottom floor behind the kitchen in the unused cr~l\\ l S/Jcll'C below bedroom 3) Move the waik-in cioset to where the laundry room \\as ,mci 1110,c the master b~ith lo \,h.:re the walk-in closet w,1s located . This will set the house back from my fence line ~md 1educc the 111c1ss on rny sicle. Jn addition. it will reduce the mass on the front exterior and balance the front focacle \\ ith then, >rth side elevation . 4) Bring the roof line clown -ancl height of floors. Is it neccsscir) to ht1, e 9 J'oot CL'il ings in ,1 \\J.lk in closet and laundr1 room'? 5) Put a 5 foot retaini11g wall on the backside of the clriH'.\\Zl) to rnitig:11c the light pollution 1:110 my property (this was approved b~ DRL3 on the last plans). 6) J\ilovc the outdoor ---wirs O\Tr in the unusable patio area or allcrn an 8 root fence . 7) Move the ;\C unit 10 the back l1fthe house where the 11 x 1.5 foot n't,1ini11g \\all is luc~lle,: tn mute the AC noise for all neighbor,, .. 3 I am looking forward to having the DRB board over to my home to view these plans from my perspective. I am totally flexible on the timing of your visit I ask that you give me a heads up so I can be at home. I have enclosed some renderings of the proposed plans to show the impact to my home, the Hartung·s and the neighborhood for your review. In closing, I would like to say that I welcome a ne\\i home next door and I feel that significantly reducing the mass and height of the original design will bring the house more in line \,Vith the neighborhood and \,Viii allow the developer to build a beautiful home and still maximize their profits. Sincerely. Margarita Perry 549 Silverado Dr Tiburon. Ca. 94920 415-515-5709 cell RBC Wealth Management was ranked "Highest in Investor Satisfaction with Full-Service Brokerage Firms" in the J.D. Power 2020 Full-Service Investor Satisfaction Study. We believe this achievement reflects our firm's strong commitment to putting client interests first and carefully managing the wealth that clients entrust to our care. For more information, view the LD . Puwer pn•ss re.lcnsc. RBC Wealth Management does not accept buy, sell, or cancel orders by email, or any instructions by email that would require your signature. Please visit l~BC w .. alrl , \1,11w r;cme nr Em:.11I Di sclo sure's for material details about our products and accounts, as well as for other important information. Investment and insurance products offered through RBC Wealth Management are not insured by the FDIC or any other federal government agency, are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank or any bank affiliate, and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal amount invested. Disclosure information regarding potential conflicts of interest on the part of RBC Capital Markets, LLC in connection with companies that are the subject of any third-party research report included in this email message may be found at T hircl-P.ir rv Rt•s~J 1·c li IJ 1s rl ogm~:;. RBC Wealth Management, a division of RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Member NYSE/FINRA/SIPC. 4 From:Fr. Phillip Ellsworth To:Lea Stefani Cc:Kris Bernard Subject:Re: For the Design Review Board, 545 Silverado Date:Thursday, October 01, 2020 8:06:14 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Lea. And I apologize for using your last name as if it were your first! Get Outlook for iOS From: Lea Stefani <lstefani@townoftiburon.org> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 8:05:09 AM To: Fr. Phillip Ellsworth <Fr.Ellsworth@StStephensChurch.org> Cc: Kris Bernard <kbernard@townoftiburon.org> Subject: RE: For the Design Review Board, 545 Silverado Hi Phil, I am forwarding your message on to Kris in Planning for distribution to the Design Review Board. Lea Stefani Town Clerk | Town of Tiburon (415)435-7377 lstefani@townoftiburon.org From: Fr. Phillip Ellsworth <Fr.Ellsworth@StStephensChurch.org> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 7:44 AM To: Lea Stefani <lstefani@townoftiburon.org> Subject: For the Design Review Board, 545 Silverado CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Stefani, I am the Rector of St Stephen’s Church, Belvedere, and I live in the home (it’s called a Rectory) which St Stephen’s provides me at 7 Sierra Court, Tiburon. I write because 545 Silverado is a home not directly below us (549 Silverado is directly below us) but on the lot adjacent to that just below us. I’ve looked at the site plan provided on the Town Council’s web site and I’ve looked at the story poles. I’m concerned that the home planned for 545 Silverado seems rather outsized for the neighborhood. I write not so much to protect the church’s interest but Late Mail #7 for 10/1/2020 DRB because I share my neighbor Margarette’s concern—Margarette is the owner of 549 Silverado—that the design plans for the home planned for 545 might cause it to loom a bit large over the 549 Silverado property. Also, trees number 7 and 8. What kind of trees are they and have they reached mature height? If not, they might eventually reach a height tall enough to obstruct the views from the Rectory toward Mt Tam. Stefani, Do I need to hand deliver a hard copy of the above at the Town Hall this morning, or can you make this message available to Design Review Board for me? Please let me know. Thank you, Phil The Rev’d Phillip C Ellsworth, Jr Rector St Stephen’s Church Belvedere, CA 94920 Occupant of 7 Sierra Court, Tiburon. 545 SILVERADO; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-33; File No. DR2019-119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, fence, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,032 square feet of floor area and cover 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot. Get Outlook for iOS From:Christy Fong To:Kris Bernard; Dina Tasini Subject:RE: Date:Thursday, October 01, 2020 3:54:12 PM Hi Kris. Please include below correspondence as late mail. Thanks. Regards, Christy From: salvador barajas <maringreenland@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 3:52 PM To: Christy Fong <cfong@townoftiburon.org> Subject: Fwd: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Perry, Margarita" <margarita.perry@rbc.com> Date: October 1, 2020 at 12:28:53 PM PDT To: "maringreenland@gmail.com" <maringreenland@gmail.com> Dear Design Review Board, My name is Sal Barajas. I am the Owner of Sal Barajas Landscaping . I have been a landscaper and consultant for many homeowners in the Tiburon and Belvedere area for the last 27 years. I was responsible for the landscaping plan for Margarita and my crew and I have maintained her garden for over 20 Years. I am very familiar with the challenges of Margarita’s garden with the significant amount of water coming off the hillside and how it has impacted her plants. Especially along the shared fence line with the next door Neighbor. We have planted a variety of shrubs along the fence line 4 times over the last 20 years. Unfortunately, the plants along the fence line have not Late Mail #8 for 10/1/2020 DRB lasted very long. That is why Margarita is so concerned about how massive the proposed house is and how it will look with very little screening - it will be a huge 26 foot blank wall, shading her property. Margarita and I have had soil tests done and have consulted with several specialist to figure out the problem of why plants keep dying on her fence line. Too much water seems to be only part of the issue. Soil contamination may be an issue as well. Plants don’t live forever and are greatly impacted by their location to the sun. The plants that are currently located on the fence line require direct sun. The laurels are already showing signs of stress and are starting to fail. I am very concerned by the two story house going up next door and the loss of direct sunlight and their growth. Margarita’s house is facing southwest so the house will block the majority of the afternoon sun on her shrubs, trees and garden. According to the plans - the removal of the trees In the rear of the property will greatly affect Margarita’s privacy. Anyone standing on the new stairs - right on the fence line - will look right into her yard and home, and have easy access into her property as well. The deer are all over - the removal of the trees will allow the deer to easily hop into Margarita’s garden. We have worked hard to protect her garden from the deer. Plants that grow in Sacramento, do not necessarily work here with the climate in Tiburon. I am very familiar with what will grow on Margarita’s property and next door. I went up to a Sebastopol farm to see what trees were available and what the cost of an 8 foot mature tree would be as a proper screen. Margarita shared this information with the developer. But, when I saw the landscaping plans I noticed that none of my recommendations were listed. The landscaping plans look very incomplete. There is no landscaping plan for the front of the house which I am sure has to be addressed before this property can be sold. Once the overgrown brush in the front is removed it will show how large this house is in comparison to the neighborhood. I would be more than happy to work with the developer and the town to come up with some landscaping suggestions and solutions. Sincerely, Sal Barajas 415-602-9304 Sent from my iPad RBC Wealth Management was ranked “Highest in Investor Satisfaction with Full-Service Brokerage Firms” in the J.D. Power 2020 Full-Service Investor Satisfaction Study. We believe this achievement reflects our firm’s strong commitment to putting client interests first and carefully managing the wealth that clients entrust to our care. For more information, view the J.D. Power press release. <https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2020-us-full-service-investor- satisfaction-study> RBC Wealth Management does not accept buy, sell, or cancel orders by email, or any instructions by email that would require your signature. Please visit RBC Wealth Management Email Disclosures <https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/usa/legal/cid-277586.html> for material details about our products and accounts, as well as for other important information. Investment and insurance products offered through RBC Wealth Management are not insured by the FDIC or any other federal government agency, are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank or any bank affiliate, and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal amount invested. Disclosure information regarding potential conflicts of interest on the part of RBC Capital Markets, LLC in connection with companies that are the subject of any third- party research report included in this email message may be found at Third-Party Research Disclosures <https://www.rbccm.com/GLDisclosure/PublicWeb/DisclosureLookup.aspx? EntityID=2>. RBC Wealth Management, a division of RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Member NYSE/FINRA/SIPC. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 1 10/1/20 MINUTES #10 (EXCERPT) TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF OCTOBER 1, 2020 On May 18, 2020, the Marin County Public Health Officer issued a legal order directing residents to shelter at home until further notice. The order limits activity, travel and business functions to only the most essential needs. Additional information is available at https://coronavirus.marinhhs.org/ Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and No. N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California, the Design Review Board meeting will not be physically open to the public and all Board members will be teleconferencing into the meeting. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can access the meeting by following the meeting live at: Please click the link below to join the webinar: Audio/Video Webinar: https://zoom.us/j/92125666504 Webinar ID: 921 2566 6504 Call-in Number: +1 669 900 6833 Access Code: 921 2566 6504 Instructions for providing public comment live during the meeting are available on the Town’s website. Members of the public may provide public comment by sending comments to the Town Clerk by email at comments@townoftiburon.org. Comments received prior to the start of the Board meeting will be distributed electronically to the Board and posted on the Town’s website. Comments received after the start time of the Board meeting, but prior to the close of public comment period for an item, will then be read into the record, with a maximum allowance of 3 minutes per individual comment, subject to the Chair’s discretion. All comments read into the record should be a maximum of 500 words, which corresponds to approximately 3 minutes of speaking time. If a comment is received after the agenda item is heard but before the close of the meeting, the comment will still be included as a part of the record of the meeting but will not be read into the record. Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email or call the Town Clerk who will use their best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the Town’s procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. All reasonable accommodations offered will be listed on the Town’s website at www.townoftiburon.org. The meeting was opened at 6:00 p.m. by Chair Cedric Barringer. A. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Cedric Barringer, Vice Chair Bryan Chong; Boardmember Miles Berger, Paolo Crescini and Suzanne Kim Absent: None Staff: Director of Community Development Dina Tasini; Senior Planner Christy Fong, and Community Development Aid Kris Bernard ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None Attachment 4 TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 2 10/1/20 ACTION ITEMS AI-1 545 SILVERADO; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-23; File No. DR2019-119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, fence, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,032 square feet of floor area and cover 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot. Director of Community Development Dina Tasini introduced the item and announced that staff knows there was a history of this site and they look at this as a separate project regardless of what was approved in the past. They must review the development standards and how they review a project as seen today in 2020. Ms Fong was asked to provide a brief synopsis of the history at the site since 2013. Senior Planner Christy Fong stated in 2013 the DRB reviewed and approved a design review application for construction of additions to the existing home and the project made it to the building permit stage. During construction, it was found that more than 50% of the existing structure had been demolished. Since the zoning code would classify demolitions of more than 50% of an existing home as a new home, the project went back to the DRB in 2014. The DRB reviewed the project at that time as a new two-story single-family home at a height of 21’6” with a total floor area of approximately 1,800 s.f. and lot coverage of 14.5%. The project was never fully constructed due to a dispute between the property owner at that time and the contractor. The incomplete structure was demolished due to safety concerns. Therefore, the site has been vacant since 2016 and a new application was submitted in 2020 which is now presented before the Board. Boardmember Berger disclosed for the record that after the previous work he was asked to review the site in 2014 and prepare some sketches for what might be constructed there. He also met with some of the neighbors, but he did not believe an application was ever made, and the owners at the time decided to hold off. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 3 10/1/20 Ms. Tasini added that since 2014 the property was sold and the owner is now the current applicant. Eric Nuttall, Applicant, gave a PowerPoint presentation which displayed the pie-shaped lot, which has restrictions as to where to place a house, as well as the hillside and amount of water coming down. He spoke of how they designed the house to accommodate the views of the water as much as possible, presented the owners’ vision of the future home and said they tried to minimize windows on the sides of the house and especially on the second floor. Mr. Nuttall then presented the entrance of the home, views, and backyard. They met with the neighbors who were not excited about the style of the project. In going through the street relating to setbacks and other design considerations, every house, with exception to the proposed project, is built right on the 8 foot setback. He presented photos showing every house which looks down on the other house in attempts to capture views of the water. The other concern that was brought up was how large their plan was. In looking at the rest of the neighborhood, he presented two homes down from the proposed project that is a somewhat block building with lots of glazing and close to the street. The neighbor next door built his home as close to the street as they could get with many windows and not much variation. He then presented a photo of their story poles which show how far away they are from the neighbor’s property as compared to other homes built next to each other and believes there is already a lot of blocking and mass in the neighborhood. After talking with the neighbors, they came up with a second rendition. To create privacy for 549 Silverado Drive they removed the corner deck and moved it just in front of the mass. It is setback far into the house so there will be walls there. To ensure they did not block views of the water from the neighbor to the left they re-arranged the house. They replaced the bedroom with a deck so they could still capitalize on the views, but they would not block views from their home. They moved the loft from the back of the house to the front of the house and in the backyard they put a door to get to it around the bedrooms as they re-arranged those as well. He then presented the new second story floor plan and side view with the deck, views to the water, and addition of one window which is in the middle of the house for the hallway to let light in. He displayed the new floor plan with the former bedroom in the corner, moving it to the back, said they rearranged the bathrooms to create more space on the corner, removed the deck in the front right and minimized it to just a master bedroom slider, and then created the loft area in the front. There is still an open area below to create the entry they were looking for initially but they minimized that dramatically. The neighbors still had concerns with this plan and they again went back to revise it but really liked rendition #2 of all renditions. They then revised the plan and believe they have come up with a solid compromise on the next rendition #3 wherein they eliminated the deck off of the master entirely, eliminated the deck entirely on the left hand side and pushed it to the middle TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 4 10/1/20 given the privacy concerns of both neighbors, took the left side which steps in 3 ½ feet and on the right side it steps in 2 ½ feet. They took the entire house and pushed it all the way into the hillside, citing added building costs in doing this. They also would lose a lot of usable backyard space by doing this and therefore were not thrilled with this rendition but were willing to make many compromises. He then presented the house pushed all the way back into the hillside. They no longer have a deck and they would walk out on grade. They added a window in the loft but after speaking with Ms. Fong they would glaze the window to ensure there are no privacy concerns. He then presented their final rendition #4 which was developed after they identified a small issue with the deck. He pointed to the stairway going up to the backyard which will begin at grade. The railing exists here because of the retaining wall on the other side. There is a patio in the back corner they will be able to come out onto from their office on the first floor. Mr. Nuttall then presented their new floor plan and said they put both bedrooms into the back to allow them to step the house in on the second story as much as they could, created the deck off of the middle, and squeezed over the master bedroom over 2 feet which really shrinks a lot of the upstairs living space. They think it is still a usable floor plan and something that will show and do well. They also have the reduced backyard in terms of usable space. He noted there are only a couple of spots where they are actually touching the 8-foot setback. Because of the way they have the home positioned on the lot the structure is more than 8 feet on both sides almost entirely. They are just less than 14 feet on the front corner from the property line to the front of the house and are roughly 13 feet to the front right corner of their property off of the property. So, in terms of setbacks and comparing it to the rest of the neighborhood they have made a significant effort to stay off of the property line as much as they can in what is a pie-shaped lot. Mr. Nuttall then presented a photo showing the story poles and said they are as far back as they can get the house, are further back than both of their neighbors to the right and left, and are doing the best they can to accommodate everyone knowing they will not please everyone 100%. He then pointed to the right front corner and neighbor’s house to show they have a lot of hedging and said they plan to add more hedging at the front of the property to allow for privacy. However, they are pretty far off of the property line for most of the house except the back-right corner at 8 feet. He then presented a photo showing the distance from the street and the comparison to many other homes in the neighborhood. They will maintain as many trees in the back as they can to provide privacy to neighbors behind them. Lastly, Ms. Fong told them that the deck with the three solid walls and the roof covering would be considered potential living space and would count against their square feet. Knowing the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 5 10/1/20 neighbors want privacy, they removed the wall and have added a screen. They also moved the gas fireplace to the master bedroom side of the house. He then presented a rendition of what the home will look like, said they are proud of what they have put together and was anxious for the Board’s comments. Boardmember Berger said the drawing showed a 50-foot line to the back of the property. He asked if this responds to any easement or setback or was it just to show the Board what the space would look like. Mr. Nuttall said he drew it in simply as a distance marker. Chair Barringer questioned fencing, noting there is a fence detail, but it is not clear and the site plan does not show fences on it. Mr. Nuttall deferred to Paul Khochay, their architect. Paul Khochay, Tangent Design and Engineering, stated the fence detail was put in there and there was nothing determined yet as to whether any of the fencing would be replaced until they determine if it is damaged or needs replacement. The detail was there just to provide that, and further discussion will be needed for this. Chair Barringer said on the materials board on page 8 shows a pre-fab retaining wall large block in a pecan color but he did not see the call out of where the walls might be. Mr. Khochay stated he does not have the material board in front of him. He asked for a moment to look at the plan set and respond. Mr. Nuttall explained that typically on other projects they use a keystone retaining wall. Much of it will be concrete as construction retaining walls but those visible will be more aesthetically pleasing. Chair Barringer referred to Sheet A-3.2 and said he assumes for the Building Code there is a railing on top of the retaining wall from the yard. He thinks it is helpful to show the rooflines below on a second-floor plan to give context on where there is mass below the volume. He asked if the railing was glass or other material. Mr. Khochay said they will probably do the same thing they do for the right-side stairs to move across the back which is a powder coated steel. Chair Barringer asked for a description of the landscape plan in the front. Shown is a smattering of shrubs on the north side and remaining natural vegetation on the street side to the right of the driveway. He asked if this is the intention to keep the forest. Mr. Khochay said they will definitely maintain, trim and beautify the existing landscaping on the right side of the driveway but they like it as a screening from the street as well as lighting TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 6 10/1/20 screening. If they come in and trim that they will use bark or another groundcover. The idea is to ensure it remains. In talking to some of the neighbors, they really like having the screening there as well so they plan to maintain it. Chair Barringer opened the public comment period. Christopher Hartung presented a series of slides showing their perspective from their house. He introduced his wife, Jennifer and said they have been residents of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004. They completely understand that Eric Nuttall wants to build something more than what was there before. They publicly voiced support of other projects that would impair their view more than they had when the prior house was there, so they are focusing on two primary issues— the massing impact on their everyday living space which is their living room, dining room, kitchen and family room area, as well as getting clarity on the privacy screen to the deck. It is a 50% screen which can mean a lot of things and it would look right into their dining room, kitchen and living area. There are also secondary concerns but the primary concern would be the tenor of the house. He stated Mr. Nuttall mentioned that every house in the neighborhood is looking down on the other. Except if this project is approved they would be looking into their house and therefore the only house in the neighborhood where houses are looking into each other from primary living spaces. He then presented views from inside their home, from the front door entry, a line drawn from the story poles showing the representation of what a 50% screen could look like from the deck giving them complete views into the deck, light and the fireplace there. He presented a view when walking through their primary living space into the dining room, what it looks like from a massing perspective, what they see from the sole window in the kitchen, additional perspectives of the project which they had a graphic artist draw showing the upper right hand side and representation of the grey which is the massing and blockage from their main windows. This house has existed since the mid-1950’s. The glazing on the side of the house is very similar to what the house was when it was originally built and the wall is exactly at the same point at the property line where it was originally built in the 1950’s. When he did his development, they did not expand any of the side walls. Lastly, he believes there are good solutions to reduce the massing. Margarita Perry said she lives at 549 Silverado Drive and is next door to the proposed project. She wanted to focus on pictures on slides 3, 4, 6, 8, 11 and 12 and presented slide 3 which is the original house on the upper left which was there since the 1950’s. It was torn down in 2013 and is 1 ½ stories. There was never a second story on her side of the property but just a master bedroom on the uphill side. On the right-hand top corner, it shows her hedge and story poles and these hedges are starting to fail. She said a couple of Boardmembers came to her home and this is the fourth time she has had to replant in 24 years. There is a tremendous amount of water and contamination that has been on that side of the hill. They have had numerous specialists, horticulturalists out to identify the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 7 10/1/20 problems. With this house going up which is massive and 26 feet high, 34 feet wide, it will loom over her house. While plants sound great, they grow slow and have a lifespan, but the building is permanent. The new house will loom over her property because she is 5 feet below grade and has major privacy and safety concerns regarding this structure. The Board will see the stairs going up along the fence line. At the top of the stairs all of the trees on the upper right-hand corner are all going to be removed. The owners will be able to see right into her main bedroom, kitchen, living room and family room. It will be easy access for anyone to jump into her property and deer are all over the neighborhood. She presented Slide 4 which is a letter to the Town wherein water and drainage issues have been well documented and has impacted plants on her property for years. She presented Slide 6 showing the driveway, and the location of where the expanded driveway pad is to be is where there was a garage. She never had any light or headlights coming into her living space. Her home has not changed other than filling in the front of her deck. The previous approved plans called for a 5-foot retaining wall with shrubs above it to try and mitigate some of the light impacts. Ms. Perry then displayed Slide 8 which shows the massive retaining wall and stairs which are right on the 8-foot setback. This retaining wall is 11 feet tall and 15 feet long. Anyone standing on the stairs or rear garden will view right into her home. The AC unit is right in the middle of her main outdoor living space where she spends most of her time. She then displayed Slide 11 and said Mr. Nuttall said he would be removing the shrubs in the front and anyone who purchases this home will no doubt remove all of the shrubs and put something else there. The homes in the neighborhood are 22 feet in height per the CC&Rs. There are houses that look bigger but even the house next door is not over 22 feet. So, the mass and size of this home is not in keeping with the neighborhood. Sal Verahas said he has been the landscaper of the property of Ms. Perry for over 20 years and over this time they have replaced plants along the wall 4 times. There is a drainage issue along the property line and they wind up doing a retaining wall to get the water runoff and are still having problems. Therefore, he asked that the Board take this under consideration and work with them in planting something on the applicant’s side that will screen the property better than the laurels that currently exist. Boardmember Berger asked what solution or suggestion he had to remedy drainage along the property line. Mr. Verahas said they did a retaining wall and raised the roots of the trees. Boardmember Berger asked for suggestions for a remedy from the subject property the Board is reviewing tonight. Mr. Verahas said he believes they can be individual boxes with 24” trees or hedges that will grow from top to bottom instead of individuals. Then, they get together along their sides at some point. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 8 10/1/20 Boardmember Berger asked for his comments from a drainage point of view. Mr. Verahas said they have done what they could at this time without ruining their property, but he asked the Board to consider requiring double privacy for the applicant as well as for them of something that will not die off in 2-3 years. Rebuttal – Applicant Mr. Nuttall asked to review the slides from Ms. Perry, stating he did not think the renderings were fair or accurate. First, he never wanted to take away the front trees and never said he would. The project will be made to look very nice and he will take the risk on whether he can sell the house based on the existing hedges. But, he thinks the screening adds a lot to the property and is important. He asked staff to display Slide 3 and stated the neighbor will never see the stairs because they are at grade and the fence is built on top of that same grade. There are currently stairs there and these will follow the same exact path. They are also not removing all of the trees in the back but just a couple of them. The large tree on the right will remain and the one closest to the house will be removed as it impedes on the home. There will still be a lot of privacy there. They will not even see the window shown in the rendering because there will be a fence and Ms. Perry is 5 feet below grade. He also noted that her rendering is not accurate. They have pushed the home as far back and away as they can. He is further off the property line and further back from the street than almost every other home in the neighborhood. They have less windows and glazing than any other home. In terms of privacy on Mr. and Mrs. Hartung’s side, they are doing their best to respect that and are open to other screening ideas. But, frustrating is being the last house. He feels they are being forced to build to an extremely high standard than every other house in the neighborhood. They all get to enjoy views and have windows on the sides of their homes and now he is being forced not to have this. This does not seem fair. They are also not asking for any exceptions on the project and everything they are doing fits within the Town’s guidelines. He recognized there are privacy concerns but are doing their best to maintain privacy, are happy to plant screening along Ms. Perry’s side, would plant on the Hartung’s side but it will block water views for them, and they are open to other suggestions. They have spent countless hours, money, care and cost to try to get to this stage. They have made reasonable concessions and think they should not be required to give more if asked. Chair Barringer returned to the Board for deliberation. Boardmember Kim said she does not feel this property respects the site. It is like a tract home that was plopped onto the site. The hillside guidelines refer to tiered building, and in terms of the height, when going up the street it steps down. The massing of buildings respects the line of the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 9 10/1/20 hillside and this one does not do that, so there is a grade change yet it is about the same height as the adjacent neighbors to the left. The character also does not seem to fit in with what exists in the neighborhood and she said she was struggling with this plan. The way the building is in the site is like taking a building and trying to maneuver the edges but not really looking at how the site works. She agreed it is a triangular site but there are plenty in Tiburon where they have a smaller backyard and a larger front yard and the Board has seen effective ways of massing buildings in a site like this. She was not necessarily having issues with the square footage but was having major issues with the character and massing of the building. She was not sure changing the eaves from 2 ½ to 1 ½ or moving down a foot here or there on the ceiling heights is not the issue. She just does not see it stepping, so she was not inclined to approve the project. Boardmember Berger said the applicant has done a good job in most cases, but the Board’s job is to look at compatibility with the neighborhood more than style, per se. It is a 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s style neighborhood and this is reasonably within the same style. He agrees that the stepping back would be helpful with this design because the only thing that strikes him as an issue is the corner where the screening is. It seems if the back was to move back more or that corner were to get shaved back and another method used besides blocking it off with a screen is used, it would improve the views out for the Hartungs. At the same time, this is a view from someone’s back kitchen window across another person’s property. This is not a view everybody is entitled to such that they must be pushed back. The Hartungs have spectacular views out their front windows. Normally, he would not make this request but in this case, a relatively modest change or revisit to do a stepping even if the far side does not, this side could step and it would have terrific benefits for the neighbors without really losing anything for the applicant. Therefore, he would suggest this be done if it returns for further review. Regarding drainage, the applicant is going to plant additional screening which is a good idea, but he asked if there is water infusion coming in from the other side. This should be specifically addressed through design of the drainage. Chair Barringer said the standards from the Building Department on civil engineering on a sloped site are pretty stringent, so it will be much better drainage. Boardmember Berger agreed and thought the DRB should indicate that attention should be paid in the development so there will be no drainage from this site to the adjacent site. He thinks the height of the house vis-a-vis the eastern home is pretty good. As long as he has seen the property it has always had these large hedges and with additional planting there, the massing will be in good shape. That does not worry him except for the question of the corner nearest to the Hartungs which could be modified and improved without a major detriment to the applicant. It would be to take the plan as is and take the side next to the Hartungs and push the bedroom back further to open that corner up so they have a better view across it, and try to do it in a way that will not require a screen. But, he would say it is not realistic to assume a house can be built TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 10 10/1/20 on a site with absolute blank walls on either side and to provide views across this property in all cases at all times where neighbors’ views are not towards the side but out. He said he thinks the AC unit should be moved to the back yard or implement better sound and screening because they can be annoying if not handled properly. Ms. Perry might be in her backyard when the AC starts and this would be disturbing. He stated he likes the eaves the way they are and would not reduce them at all. A one foot eave on this house would make them appear more boxy and all the more cube-like. He would like to see it return with revisions by the architect to improve the southwest corner so it does not have the barbecue there, screen and quite the projection out towards the view that it does. Boardmember Kim clarified that her objection from the Hartungs residence is not the view issue but the light quality because the windows would be in front of a tunnel. This is why she felt the massing needs to address that in a major way. Boardmember Berger said he agreed and said pushing it back and stepping will give the opportunity to take care of both of them, but homes that have only their windows on the front and then blank on the sides is extremely odd. Hopefully, there can be some windows on the sides of the house possibly higher as well as additional planting which will improve that aspect. Vice Chair Chong said when he first saw the plans you do not get the real perspective until you go out and see the story poles. His first reaction was not necessarily the height of the house itself but how high it was in comparison to the neighbor to the left. There are almost the same roof lines and on a steep hill like that the proper way to develop it would be to tier everything down, but that is not what happened here. He thinks it is because the existing pad is set up higher on the hill. But, then he looks at the existing pad as a bit of an existing condition. He then questions whether the applicant is entitled to build a two-story house in a neighborhood of many two-story houses, and he believes they are. In going to Sheet A-2, most telling was the neighbor to the left where the house goes front to back. Assuming the existing building is correctly located it looks like it is within 4 feet of the property line and built windows all along that side. So, he looks at the designs and believes the applicant has been more than accommodating as far as the location, the distance they chose, and the applicant could have built from the same distance 4 feet off of the property line and do the house front to back and put the same amount of glazing as his next door neighbor, and it would be a legitimate argument. Therefore, he thinks it is a very reasonable proposal. He agrees there could be some work on the corner that could provide privacy and be some changes so it does not negatively impact the applicant’s desire to have the patio there. He also agrees the AC unit should be relocated or enclosed to address sound impacts. To say to fix it would be to drop the pad 4 or 5 feet. He does not know by doing that it would improve anything for anybody as the house is still there. It still looks out a kitchen window and sees a house but maybe just a different part of the house. So, he did not think by fixing the pad they would really fix the fact that a house is going to go into what is clearly an empty lot now. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 11 10/1/20 He also agrees it is very hard going in as a last house in a neighborhood especially after everyone has gotten used to looking across an empty lot or much smaller house. He would not support the project tonight, but with some minor modifications and a continuance, he could support it. Boardmember Berger said he would concur. Boardmember Crescini said he tends to agree with Boardmember Kim. It is basically a big box with some appendixes going out left and right. He really would like to see a design where the house steps back more in the first and second level. He thinks it would be beneficial because this would create a line that contributes towards perceiving the house as less than towering. Also, he thinks there could be some improvement in placing the house on the lot. He suggested rotating the house a bit to see if they can gain some space in the back. He thought the applicant could rotate the house more than where the garage is and open up the view from the living room of the neighbor. Or, if they pulled back the second floor, it is mostly what is important. In reality, on the front of the lot there is room for development, and any volume there would not be a problem for neighbors. He also was not thrilled with the materials and the colors. He referred to the metal roof and asked for something more residential as a material. If they put a metal roof they probably cannot lower the roof, but if they choose another kind of roofing, they might get away with a lower slope. Boardmember Berger said it is the opposite—a metal roof can sustain a much lower pitch than is recommended for an asphalt shingle or other roof. Boardmember Crescini questioned if aesthetically this would be compatible with the neighbors, and Boardmember Berger stated yes. Chair Barringer said the elevations show a 3 foot wide seam on the roof and he believes an 18” or 24” seam is much more residential in scale. Boardmember Crescini then referred to the color and suggested a darker color while blending the house and landscaping. He also said the lighting fixtures they chose should provide more screening when looking from down below. He also thinks there should be more discussion about screening on the two sides and especially on the back. They are removing two trees and he agrees with the suggestion from staff about having to replace them, and possibly those could be the ones that screen their backyard area from the neighbors to the left and downhill. He also agrees with Boardmember Berger about the eaves as proposed. He asked to lower the entry, and lastly, he thinks putting a deck next to the living room of the neighbors is not a good idea. He suggested reshuffling the layout and put the master bedroom back in a more centralized position so it does not bother either of the neighbors. Chair Barringer said he is a little surprised that no one has mentioned the landscaping which is very undeveloped. He appreciates the process and communications the applicant has had with TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 12 10/1/20 the neighbors, agrees with Boardmembers that a 3,000 square foot house on a 10,000 square foot site is appropriate for today’s family needs. He thinks concessions have been made which have resulted in a fair proposal, such as the lack of windows on either side. On Ms. Perry’s side, it is a bit of a blank wall but also not a wall of windows which is on the other side and looking down on this property. He thinks the design could step back a bit on Ms. Perry’s side. He does not love the color and thinks it could be toned down as a light grey or just less glaring. He agreed with Boardmember Crescini’s point about the light fixtures was also good, and a condition of not putting can lights in the upper deck would help the view from below. But, if they had a couple of wall scones pointing down, this would provide plenty of light hanging out on the deck and would also be much less intrusive for neighbors and those on the street. He referred to the front landscaping on the downhill side that currently exists and asked to see a more developed landscape plan. Personally, he did not like the landscaping there which he thinks is sloppy and nothing prevents a future owner from tearing everything out and putting in some lavender. He would prefer to see a more developed landscape plan where the applicant would remove all of the existing planting and plant something that screens and provides a more design-minded plan. He would like to see the landscape walls remain where they are and fences where they are being proposed, did not see any reason why the concrete staircase could not be pulled off from the property line and providing a room for a planter or screening shrubs that could be maintained on the applicant’s side of the fence. Vice Chair Chong said he would support landscaping on the front hillside in front of the driveway and also planting from a more developed landscape plan by the applicant on their property side. Boardmember Berger said it seems to him that because the house is up and one drives up to it, some substantial trees and other things could be planted in the front which would make an interesting impact on the street without blocking views. Chair Barringer said the only other architectural comment is that the front entry being a foot or so higher than the roof next to it does not add to the design. In general, while the house has a presence, he feels that in comparison to some of the houses on the street, it has been pushed back fairly considerably. The question about the second floor is a good one as well. Boardmember Berger said it seems to him that there was more variety of materials used on the front elevation but the side elevations were scarce with one kind of material used. Adding more materials on the sides could soften the sense of the massing. Boardmember Kim said she did not think it was just material. It could be hodgepodge which concerns her. There was only articulation of the massing on one place on the right side. Her objection was not where the line of the garage or entry was. It is the second floor. By pushing that back could solve a number of issues while providing the desired square footage. This would address the blank wall issue and break up the volume in such a way that on the left and right hand sides there is not a towering wall above. She thinks it will solve a number of issues. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 13 10/1/20 In terms of the roof pitch, she did not like it and asked to soften it. This could help in making the structure not feel so large on a number of different levels. She thinks the eaves are a design decision for the architect, but she cannot get behind the massing. She also thinks the articulation and description of landscaping needs to be better defined and sensitive from preventing future owners from removing it all. Regarding the materials, hardy board is great and lasts forever, but it might be the color that is off. It does not seem like it is the right set or not in the family in the existing neighborhood. Boardmember Crescini said the material board besides the stone, concrete and veneer below is all very light. There is light grey metal, light gutters and light stucco. He suggested the applicant create a little contrast or use a lighter fascia for the trim and gutters and use a different palette for the house. He commented that no one spoke about the height of the building which was an issue that came from the neighbors. Usually, the ceilings are 8 feet and now there are 9 and 10 foot ceiling heights. Vice Chair Chong said in going back to comments made by Boardmembers, he thinks the application is very accommodating as far as the height. He does not think it needs to be pushed back any more. Realistically, the application that could have come through could have been one that pushed the front setbacks as far as possible or minimally in line with the corners of the left and right neighbor and they could have even pushed the height further. He thinks 10 foot ceilings are typical now and he thinks given the relationship to the house next door and what is in the neighborhood, he just does not think this is overdevelopment of the project. Anything to push back is asking the applicant for more than needed. Boardmember Kim clarified that she was not talking about pushing back the entire building. She would like the second floor pushed back to create a massing which is more in line with the design guidelines; where the contours of the hill is more respected. Vice Chair Chong said they could look at it two ways—push the top floor back or the bottom floor forward. There is plenty of room to move the bottom floor, and he does not think it is fair to ask an applicant to push their top floor so much further back than all the other top floors along the street. Everybody wants to capture views as best as possible. He agrees they could offset the top and the bottom level to break up the front mass, but they could also do this by pushing the bottom floor forward. Boardmember Crescini said the neighbors cannot keep the views across the property given something must be built. He recommended the applicant consider pushing back the corner where the impact on the living room is and thinks there is more room below on the south side. He thought the garage could move forward. Additionally, for the back big blank wall he suggested going 10 to 12 feet and then scaling it down. If the house is a corner with a setback, he asked to scale it down which allows them to have more room without the sensation of a corridor. Chair Barringer cited the good feedback given to the applicant and sensed the Board was leaning towards continuance. He summarized the main points as reviewing some of the massing, stepping back of the first and second floor, landscape development with some actual developed plans and legend, potential lighting considerations and potential color considerations. Boardmember Berger noted he wrote down the comments as they were said, as follows: 1.No drainage onto the adjacent site. 2.Request to increase the stepping or the back southwest corner or stepping in general to improve massing breakup to conform to the hillside guidelines. 3. Move the AC unit. 4.Do not necessarily make smaller eaves. 5.Replace the trees for screening as mentioned by staff. 6.Re-evaluate the location of the grill and the screen both to improve views from the Hartungs and privacy. 7. Move the deck to the center for more privacy. 8.Implement a better screened light fixture for those attached to the wall and consider not using cans on the second floor eave. 9.More specific developed landscape plans with species and sizes of trees to be identified. 10. Revise roof pitch. 11.Add more articulation in mass and materials on the elevations. 12.Chair Barringer added the request to pull the staircase away from the property line to allow some planting. Ms. Tasini said if the Board was leaning towards a continuance, she suggested asking the applicant if they would be prepared to be ready with changes for the next meeting on October 5th or the meeting thereafter on November 5th. Vice Chair Chong recommended continuing the project to the October 15th meeting, and if the applicant is not ready, they could work with staff to meet on November 5th. It was M/S (Chong/Berger) to continue the application to October 15, 2020 DRB meeting. Roll Call Vote: 5-0. DEVELOPER TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING 660 AUBURN -FOLSOM ROAD SUITE 204 AUBURN, CA 95603 (916) 5 7 2 -5955ARCHITECTSTRUCTURAL TI T L E -24 TR U S S M F G . FI R E P R O T E C T I O N LOT COVERAGE DIAGRAM 1,513 SQ -FT 65 SQ -FT GARAGE64 SQ -FT 496 SQ -FT111 SQ -FTLIVING AREA 1ST FLOOR PATIO #1 PATIO #2 PORCH LOT SIZE LOT COVERAGE %10,627 SQ -FT 22.15%TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,354 SQ -FTPROPOSEDBACK YARD PATIO 105 SQ -FTF.A.R.:LOT SIZETOTAL FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO10,627 SQ -FT3,043 SQ -FT 28.63%1,530 SQ -FTLIVING AREA 1ST FLOOR 1,513 SQ -FT LIVING AREA 2ND FLOOR GARAGE 496 SQ -FT THIS PLAN SET IS DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH 20 19, CRC, CBC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CA FIRE CODE AND 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMPLIANCE OF TITLE 24. CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE & 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE BELVEDERE TIBURON CITY OCCUPANCY R -3, U TYPE OF CONST.V -B NO. OF STORIES 2 NO. OF BEDROOMS 4 NO. OF UNITS 1 FIRE SPRINKLERS YESENERGY COMPLIANCE:WALL INSULATION = R21 CEILING INSULATION = R38 AC DUCT = R8 HVAC = 15 SEER WINDOW U VALUE = .32 SHGC = 0.25 HOT WATER SYSTEM = TANKLESS GAS 1. NE W C U S T O M H O M E C O N S T R U C T I O N 2. DR I V E W A Y I N S T A L L A T I O N SC O P E O F W O R K : TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:05 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 COVER SHEET RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A1545 SILVERADO DR. PARCEL 42, CA 94920 UNITED STATES APN: 055 -082 -023CUSTOM HOME N VI C I N I T Y M A P T i b u r o n B l v d 54 5 S i l v e r a d o D r i v e S ilv e r a d o D r . C o m s t o c k D r . S t e w a rt D r . S t e w a r t D r . T r e s t l e G l e n B l v d T r e s t l e G l e n B l v d Vi r g i ni a D r.T ibur o n Blvd A v e n d i a M i r a f l o r e s H i l a r y D r. SHEET INDEX A1 COVER SHEET GP1 GRADING PLAN A2 SITE PLAN A3 FLOOR PLAN A3.1 FLOOR PLAN A3.2 2ND FLOOR OVERLAY TO 1ST FLOOR A4 ELEVATIONS A5 ELEVATIONS A6 ROOF/STORY POLE PLAN A7 LANDSCAPE PLAN A8 IRRIGATION PLAN A9 SECTIONS A10 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN A11 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE A12 VISUALIZATION T1 TOPOGRAPHY MAPOctober 2 7 , 2020Attachment 5 -~ -'= ' 1 r n 1 · / .· . ·· . ·; 5 . ,· -5 . . ,• .. . □ : . . .. . . -. , ' - . ,_ - , : ,, · .. .. . .. ,. - • . ,- . ' . . ,· ' - ' - . , - ,- , _ . . - . . - : c . . . . .. .. , . . - " , _ ·, . ' . . . . . . - ' - ' . . , . . .. ,, •- . . - - ' . •, . , . , • . • - . , ' ' .. . •, . . ' . . - , ' , . • · . . . . . . ,, .. . • - ' .. , _ ' ' •· , , .. ' C • ~ ~ ,. . . . .. ·> .. .. . . . , .. ., .. . , , - . , , . . , . . . ' . . . , ' " \ - ,, .. .. . ·. . , • ·, · , , ·. ' . , 0 . , . . . ' - ' 0 ' ' . . . . ., . , ' ? J - _ $ ~ .. 0 0 •· ;1 / , . ·. .. . . . .. . ·. . . 21 . . , . ' . , , · ,- , - ' , , - ·- <" , ; / '. , . , . , •, , • , , . .. . , .. .. . .. . .. .. , .. : .. ; f .. . . . . . ' • · . . .. ·- ' ' ' . ·. .. .. .. - . -· ' r ~ -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - , . .. . '' · , . .. ·1 ~ -- - - '- - J . . . _ _ _ _ _ -- - - - - - - , _ ~ . . ' w .. ' ' .. ' . L J , .. ' ~ - . -~ ~ - · ~, -, -' ·> - , . ; .. I ,✓] .- ' ' · \ , ., . , ' .. I I I I I I 11 I I I I I 11 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I . . : µ " • , . ; ~- ~ <.: · ' ' . . • , I / I . 54 5 : .. . , . , , , . . ; p• , ; . ·, , : , \ . - . / ' • - . 1 . ' • / DO D D D O D D DO D D DO D D - t: } ( { i • , r I . , , ' , .. - - . ' ' ' , , ~ ' ~ . er: . : : : : : . I' .... , 1· • • . , , . .. ,, ' ' ' DO D D DO D D DO D D D O D D . . . .. . . I I 1 ·· , ·. · :} i i . \ }, i { I ', J . . , ' . ·- "" : " ' . _ - '- - " - ' :: ' , I I. } , ; : ' : : , ) •. , , ' ~ .· _ ·: - ·, : . ' ' _. · .. - : lo . ' ,. .. 1:· , • > , -" , . . - ... . . ·, ~1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - : 1 I 1 - : 1 1 1 - : 1 I 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1- : 1 1 1 - I - 11 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - : 1 1 1 - : 1 I 1 - - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - : I 11 - : 1 I 1- : 1 I 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 _: 1 1 1 - : 1 I _: 1 -1 1 1 - ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l ll l l 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II I I I I II I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ll l l l l 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 11 1 1 - I I II I I_ I I II I I_ I I I 111 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 i' I 11- 1 1 1 1 1 i' I I I 1_1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 I :1 11-1 1 1 : 1 1_11 1 : 1 I 1_1 1 1 1 1 _1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 I I I I _I I I I I I_ I I I 111 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 :1 11- 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 I I I_ I I II I I_ I I I I I I_ I I I 111 - 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 I I_ I I l: 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 111 1 1 1 1 11_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 11_ 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 I_ I I l1 1 1 L J PLANNING DIVISION W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' P L R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 P R O P O S E D H O U S E O N P A D P A D . : 1 2 7 ' - 4 " F . F . : 1 2 8 ' - 0 " P R O P O S E D G A R A G E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 ' - 6 " P A D . : 1 2 6 ' - 1 0 " GU E S T PA R K I N G P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y P R O P O S E D P A T I O DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . SL O P E 6 " I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M HO U S E M I N . 2 % S L O P E A W A Y DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E MI N . S L O P E 6 " I N T H E F I R S T 10 ' F R O M H O U S E T. O . W . : 1 3 8 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 3 4 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 5 ' -6" T. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -6" B. O . W . : 1 2 3 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -9" B. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -6" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NE W A C U N I T CA R R I E R I N F I N I T Y 1 9 V S 2 4 V N A 9 (5 6 D E C I B E L S ) TR A S H E N C L O S U R E W I T H O U T R O O F T. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -5" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 3 0 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G WA L L ST A N D A R T D R A I N A G E S W A L E SL O P E D T O S T R E E T J D I T C H D R A I N SL O P E D T O S T R E E T FR E N C H D R A I N P R O P O S E D P A T I O T. O . W . : 1 3 8 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" FR E N C H D R A I N T O C O N N E C T TO D R A I N A G E S W A L E A N D DR A I N S T O W A R D T O S T R E E T WM GP 1 2 P R O P O S E D P A T I O MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L 3 ' - 0 " FR E N C H D R A I N MA X . 1 0 . 7 5 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L MA X . 7 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L MA X . 7 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L T. O . W . : 1 3 2 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 3 0 ' -9" B. O . W . : 1 2 8 ' -0" T. O . W . : 1 3 7 ' -6" B. O . W . : 1 3 6 ' -0" T. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -6" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" MA X . 1 0 . 7 5 ' CO N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G WA L L MA X . 3 . 5 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L LE G E N D MA J O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MA J O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) FI B E R R O L L FI N I S H E D F L O O R RE T A I N I N G W A L L FF RW98 0 ' 99 0 ' TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E DR A I N A G E D I T C H D I R E C T I O N DO W N S P O U T D R A I N SE T B A C K L I N E SW A L E D R A I N FR E N C H D R A I N PR O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L ENGINEER NOTES ESTIMATED CUT = 164 C.Y., ESTIMATED FILL = 41 C.Y., EXPORT = 123 C.Y.FOLLOWING SITE CLEARING AND STRIPPING OPERATIONS, ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 INCHES, MOISTURE CONDITIONED AS NECESSARY AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY BASED ON THE ASTM D1557 TEST METHOD. THE FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 6 INCHES. THE FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED AS NECESSARY AND COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTI ON OF NOT LESS THAN 90%. DRIVEWAYS COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTION OF NOT LESS THAN 90%.THE TYPE, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABILITY. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLY ACTUAL EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND UTILITIES. HOWEVER, THE DESIGNER, CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER BURIED OBJECTS OR UTILITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, BUT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E N O T E S : 1. EA C H T R E E O R G R O U P O F T R E E S T O B E P R E S E R V E D S H A L L B E EN C L O S E D W I T H 4 ’HIGH -VISIBILITY FENCING ON 5 ’T -STAKES SET A MA X I M U M O F 1 0 ’APART. INSPECTION BY THE CITY ARBORIST IS RE Q U I R E D P R I O R T O A N Y G R A D I N G , G R U B B I N G , T R E N C H I N G , MO V E M E N T O F H E A V Y E Q U I P M E N T , O R O T H E R C O N S T R U C T I O N AC T I V I T Y . 2. WE A T H E R P R O O F S I G N S 1 1 ”X17 ”SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 50 ’APART SH A L L B E P O S T E D O N A L L S I D E S O F F E N C E S S U R R O U N D I N G E A C H TR E E O R T R E E S S T A T I N G T H A T E N C L O S E D T R E E S A R E T O B E PR E S E R V E D . 3. PA R K I N G O F V E H I C L E S , E Q U I P M E N T , O R S T O R A G E O F M A T E R I A L W I T H I N T H E P R O T E C T E D Z O N E O F T R E E S I S P R O H I B I T E D A T A L L TI M E S . TREE SCHEDULE TREE NUMBER SIZE & DESCRIPTION PRESERVE/REMOVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 912"PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE REMOVE REMOVE18"14"14"19"10"8"13"22"REMOVE REMOVEPRESERVE LO T C O V E R A G E D I A G R A M 1, 5 1 3 S Q -FT 65 S Q -FT GA R A G E 64 S Q -FT 49 6 S Q -FT 11 1 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R PA T I O # 1 PA T I O # 2 PO R C H LO T S I Z E LO T C O V E R A G E % 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 22 . 1 5 % TO T A L B U I L D I N G A R E A 2, 3 5 4 S Q -FT PR O P O S E D BA C K Y A R D P A T I O 10 5 S Q -FT 1. ER O S I O N C O N T R O L B M P ' S S H A L L B E I N P L A C E P R I O R T O A N Y S T O R M E V E N T S . 2. BM P ' S S H A L L B E P R O J E C T S P E C I F I C A N D A R E N O T L I M I T E D T O T H E M I N I M U M RE Q U I R E M E N T S S H O W N I N T H E A B O V E T A B L E . T H E A B O V E B M P ' S S H O U L D B E IN S P E C T E D W E E K L Y , B E F O R E A N D A F T E R S I G N I F I C A N T R A I N F A L L . V E G E T A T I O N MU L C H E S A R E N O T I N T E N D E D T O B E P E R M A N E N T A N D O N C E P L A N T G R O W T H I S ST A B L E , I T D O E S N O T H A V E T O B E M A I N T A I N E D . 1 -PE R I M E T E R P R O T E C T I O N 2 -IN C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H S E C O N D A R Y M E A S U R E A F T E R S E P T E M B E R 1 5 T H NO T E S : CO N S T R U C T I O N P H A S E BM P S C H E D U L E W E T S E A S O N DR Y S E A S O N ON -SI T E E A R T H W O R K FI B E R RO L L S ST O R M D R A I N IM P R O V E M E N T S CU R B A N D G U T T E R PA V E O U T PO S T -CO N S T R U C T I O N HY D R O S E E D I N G ST R A W MU L C H I N G & TA C T I F I E R PE R S E R V A T I O N OF E X I S T I N G VE G I T A T I O N DU S T CO N T R O L SA N D / G R A V E L BA G S BA R R I E R S ST O R M D R A I N IN L E T PR O T E C T I O N SE D I M E N T TR A P S DE W A T E R I N G DI ST E N C I L I N G ST A B I L I Z E D CO N S T R U C T I O N EN T R A N C E MA T E R I A L & WA S T E DI S P O S A L LO C A T I O N 1 - BM P ' S P R O V I D E D O N P L A N M U S T B E U T I L I Z E D A S S H O W N O N P L A N . A D D I TI O N A L B M P ' S L I S T E D I N T H I S S CH E D U L E A R E O P T I O N A L A N D C A N B E U S ED T O F U R T H E R E S T A B L I S H E R O S I O N C O N T R O L . 2 - FO R P A V E D A R E A ' S , U S E G R A V E L B A G S I N S T E A D O F F I B E R R O L L S . 3 - W A T E R T R U C K T O B E A V A I L A B L E O N S I T E D U R I N G G R A D I N G . S I T E T O B E W A T E R E D T O M I N I M I Z E D U S T L E V E L S . TH E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E Q U I R E D T O T A K E D U E P R E C A U T I O N A R Y M E A S U R E S TO P R O T E C T T H E U T I L I T Y L I N E S S H O W N O N T H E S E D R A W I N G S , T H E CO N T R A C T O R F U R T H E R A S S U M E S A L L L I A B I L I T Y A N D R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R TH E U T I L I T Y P I P E S , C O N D U I T S O R S T R U C T U R E S S H O W N O R N O T S H O W N ON T H E S E D R A W I N G S . T H E C O N T R A C T O R A G R E E S T H A T H E S H A L L A S S U M E SO L E A N D C O M P L E T E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R J O B S I T E C O N D I T I O N S D U R I N G TH E C O U R S E O F C O N S T R U C T I O N O F T H I S P R O J E C T . I N C L U D I N G S A F E T Y O F AL L P E R S O N S A N D P R O P E R T Y A N D T H A T T H I S R E Q U I R E M E N T S H A L L A P P L Y CO N T I N U O U S L Y A N D N O T B E L I M I T E D T O N O R M A L W O R K I N G H O U R S ; A N D TH A T T H E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L D E F E N D , I N D E M N I F Y A N D H O L D T H E O W N E R AN D E N G I N E E R H A R M L E S S F R O M A N Y A N D A L L L I A B I L I T Y A R I S I N G F R O M TH E S O L E N E G L I G E N C E O F T H E O W N E R O R E N G I N E E R CO N T R A C T O R ' S R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y N O T E 24" CULVERT GALVANIZEDCLEAN CRUSHED GRAVEL FILL &COMPACTED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY MIN 1'MIN 90% COMPACTIONTDETANGENTDESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:43:41 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 GRADING PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PZ PZ GP1 N VI C I N I T Y M A P 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N N1/4" = 1'-0"2 Culvert Section View 54 5 S I L V E R A D O D R I V E 2 2 2 2 0 0 Ma t i n So c c e r Ac a d e m y Te m p o r . - , l y c l o ~ ~ f t ', - .. . . ~0 ", 4 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A I • I 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - .. T ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - = ~ /l ; / \ \ - \/ -. ' . . . ' / r . , , / . ,. . . , . ·- 0 0 0 0 0 ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ / I , =,i: : : , , ' I -- - 4 - \ '- - . ' / / / / \ / \ v ¢ " "~ ..__ _~ . J . - \ /__ _ > - , - - - I I - - - - - - - - •• • • • • • • • • • • ~ - - - - - - - - - - - I / V ' v ' v V ' v l I 7 / / 7 , ' ] I .. . . 1 . [' . 1 / _ § ., 0 - " _ § ./ 2 ' . J \ - - , - - - , / - . . - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -" ~ .- : : 9 ~ ~ ; - ~ - . ; ; ; _ . ~ ~ ~ ; . , . . . ; ~ ~ f - = - - : : . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ IICTES 7 1 rr Tr 7 111 •· 1_1rr -rr -7w 1---111 ''-II-I-I ~ NDS, INC 851 NORTH HARVARD Al/£. LINDSAY. CA 93247 TOLL FREE 1-800-726-1994 PHONE: (559) 56Nl888 FAX: (559) 562-4488 www.ndopro.Grni IICSPC·LYO.mt! P0° UP ~RI.INA~r r\'ITr~ ','lnll U.'.'. NHIETOR IICS l.'LECf,[• SE\\'ER I. ltl~T.~LJ.•TIO!i TO ~= '.XlM'L.l:"l:D ll ACC•:JF:DANCC .-,11 I -~;.·icr ;,~-u 0 J:R'$ :,P[Cl,l~.~Tlc-N~ 2 CC ,01 SCil_[ Cf\il'/, IK 3 THIS Df',\'!~IK ISIWENDEJFOR LSC :;y ~RCHITEC-S E'l31flEE'lS C•'CR.~CC-RS. COtlSULTAWS.~flD CEJUl FR·}"'2SIOII'.l_S FOR FLIJ\llltlG PIJRO{)SE2 OI-IL\" ~ ;c NI 0-:M.'.ll~'N L~'lll,~NL~ I L-,LI~ ·1,,~ CJHfUI I .',I II L ll'<L (!I ~-\UJ.;~MU. I UL I l,1U~I UL fU'IL~,rn ,'/,L\ilf'l-'HC';LJ PY THF Pf'nn.lCT ·~Mll..lFACTIIP.FP. TC RF GlJflS r."P.Fl ACfllP./, TF DRAINAGE EMITTER @NDS ,:-4""" ~ KJ-Yc·, .. ,,)\-,i ,...,,.j"~·"'"'; G G GWWW E E E S S S CATV CATV CATV W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' 1 0 7 ' 1 0 8 ' 1 0 9 ' 1 1 0 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 2 ' 1 1 3 ' 1 1 4 ' 1 1 5 ' 1 1 6 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 8 ' 1 1 9 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 127' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 13 7' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' LO T C O V E R A G E D I A G R A M 1, 5 1 3 S Q -FT 65 S Q -FT GA R A G E 64 S Q -FT 49 6 S Q -FT 11 1 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R PA T I O # 1 PA T I O # 2 PO R C H LO T S I Z E LO T C O V E R A G E % 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 22 . 1 5 % TO T A L B U I L D I N G A R E A 2, 3 5 4 S Q -FT PR O P O S E D BA C K Y A R D P A T I O 10 5 S Q -FT LEGEND DIMENSION POINT SET -BACK LINE PROPERTY LINE DRIVEWAY WATER LINE GAS LINE ELECTRICAL LINE SEWER LINE PROPOSED FENCE LINEPROPOSED DRIVEWAYPAD LINE M.U.S.D.A. INTERNET AND TV LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DIRECTIONEWXISTING RETAINING WALL N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 .7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 P R O P O S E D H O U S E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 8 ' P R O P O S E D G A R A G E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 . 5 ' P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G 3 4 ' - 0 " LO T 4 1 LO T 3 1 LO T 3 0 P R O P O S E D P A T I O F . F . : 1 3 8 . 9 ' TR A S H E N C L O S U R E WI T H O U T R O O F P R O P O S E D P A T I O R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) P R O P O S E D P A T I O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . S L O P E 6" I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M H O U S E MI N . 2 % S L O P E AW A Y DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . S L O P E 6" I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M H O U S E NE W A C U N I T CA R R I E R I N F I N I T Y 1 9 V S 2 4 V N A 9 UP T O 1 9 S E E R (5 6 D E C I B E L S ) WM 0 ' - 3 " 1 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1' - 2 1 / 2 " 0' - 0 3 / 4 " 3 4 ' - 4 " 6' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 2 1 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 2 ' - 6 " EX I S T I N G F E N C E (5 ' H E I G H T ) MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L EN G I N E E R N O T E S ES T I M A T E D C U T = 1 6 4 C . Y . , E S T I M A T E D FILL = 41 C.Y., EXPORT = 123 C.Y. FO L L O W I N G S I T E C L E A R I N G A N D S T R I P P I N G O P E R A T I O N S , A L L A R E A S T O R E C E I V E F I L L SH A L L B E S C A R I F I E D T O A M I N I M U M D E P T H O F 8 I N C H E S , M O I S T U R E C O N D I T I O N E D A S NE C E S S A R Y A N D C O M P A C T E D T O A T L E A S T 9 0 % O F T H E M A X I M U M D R Y D E N S I T Y BA S E D O N T H E A S T M D 1 5 5 7 T E S T M E T H O D . T H E F I L L S H A L L B E P L A C E D I N L I F T S N O T EX C E E D I N G 6 I N C H E S . T H E F I L L S H A L L B E M O I S T U R E C O N D I T I O N E D A S N E C E S S A R Y AN D C O M P A C T E D T O A R E L A T I V E C O M P A C T I ON OF NOT LESS THAN 90%. DRIVEWAYS CO M P A C T E D T O A R E L A T I V E C O M P A C T I O N O F N O T L E S S T H A N 9 0 % . TH E T Y P E , L O C A T I O N S , S I Z E S A N D / O R D E P T H S O F E X I S T I N G U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S AS S H O W N O N T H E S E P L A N S W E R E O B T A I N E D F R O M S O U R C E S O F V A R Y I N G RE L I A B I L I T Y . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S C A U T I O N E D T H A T O N L Y A C T U A L E X C A V A T I O N W I L L RE V E A L T H E T Y P E S , E X T E N T , S I Z E S , L O C A T I O N S , A N D U T I L I T I E S . H O W E V E R , T H E DE S I G N E R , C A N A S S U M E N O R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C O M P L E T E N E S S O R AC C U R A C Y O F T H E D E L I N E A T I O N O F S U C H U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S , N O R F O R T H E EX I S T E N C E O F O T H E R B U R I E D O B J E C T S O R U T I L I T I E S W H I C H M A Y B E E N C O U N T E R E D , BU T W H I C H A R E N O T S H O W N O N T H E S E D R A W I N G S . TREE SCHEDULE TREE NUMBER SIZE & DESCRIPTION PRESERVE/REMOVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 912"PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE REMOVE REMOVE18"14"14"19"10"8"13"22"REMOVE REMOVEPRESERVE TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E N O T E S : 1. EA C H T R E E O R G R O U P O F T R E E S T O B E P R E S E R V E D S H A L L B E EN C L O S E D W I T H 4 ’HIGH -VISIBILITY FENCING ON 5 ’T -STAKES SET A MA X I M U M O F 1 0 ’APART. INSPECTION BY THE CITY ARBORIST IS RE Q U I R E D P R I O R T O A N Y G R A D I N G , G R U B B I N G , T R E N C H I N G , MO V E M E N T O F H E A V Y E Q U I P M E N T , O R O T H E R C O N S T R U C T I O N AC T I V I T Y . 2. WE A T H E R P R O O F S I G N S 1 1 ”X17 ”SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 50 ’APART SH A L L B E P O S T E D O N A L L S I D E S O F F E N C E S S U R R O U N D I N G E A C H TR E E O R T R E E S S T A T I N G T H A T E N C L O S E D T R E E S A R E T O B E PR E S E R V E D . 3. PA R K I N G O F V E H I C L E S , E Q U I P M E N T , O R S T O R A G E O F M A T E R I A L W I T H I N T H E P R O T E C T E D Z O N E O F T R E E S I S P R O H I B I T E D A T A L L TI M E S . GR A D I N G L E G E N D MA J O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MA J O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) FI B E R R O L L FI N I S H E D F L O O R RE T A I N I N G W A L L FF RW98 0 ' 99 0 ' TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E DR A I N A G E D I T C H D I R E C T I O N DO W N S P O U T D R A I N F. A . R . : LO T S I Z E TO T A L F L O O R A R E A FL O O R A R E A R A T I O 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 3, 0 4 3 S Q -FT 28 . 6 3 % 1, 5 3 0 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R 1, 5 1 3 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 2 N D F L O O R GA R A G E 49 6 S Q -FT D1' - 0"WHORIZONTAL TOE REINFORCEMENT (T)OPTIONAL CONST JOINT. ROUGHEN SURFACTE TO 1/4" AMPLITUDEHORIZONTAL HEEL REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)HORIZONTAL FOOTING REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)MIN. 3" COVERNATIVE SOIL COMPACTED TO 90%"FILTER FABRIC" LAYER WRAPPED AROUND DRAIN MATERIAL (MIRAFI 140 N OR EQUIVALENT)4" MIN.4" MIN.4" MIN.4" ABS PERFORATED PIPE MIN 2% SLOPE TOWARD OUTLET DIAMETER 4"VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)6" CONCRETE WALL (MAX 3' HEIGHT)HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)COMPACTED FILL OR UNDISTURBED SOIL3' MAX.STUCCO FINISH TO BE CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.CONCRETE RETAINING WALL CAP BY OTHER.12" MIN.0' - 9"0' - 6"TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:07 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 SITE PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A2 N 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N VE G E T A T I O N M A N A G E M E N T P L A N : ZO N E 1 ( I M M E D I A T E ) Th e I m m e d i a t e Z o n e e x t e n d s 0 - 5 ′ fr o m y o u r h o u s e . It ’ s t h e a r e a c l o s e s t t o y o u r ho u s e , i n c l u d i n g p l a n t s , d e c k s , ou t d o o r f u r n i t u r e , a n d t h e o u t s i d e w a l l s a n d c o v e r i n g s . Th i s a r e a i s m o s t v u l n e r a b l e , a n d s h o u l d b e m o s t a g g r e s s i v e l y ma i n t a i n e d f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e . -R e m o v e a n y c o m b u s t i b l e o u t d o o r f u r n i t u r e . -R e p l a c e j u t e o r f i b e r d o o r m a t s w i t h f i r e r e s i s t a n t m a t e r i a l s . -C l e a n a l l f a l l e n l e a v e s a n d n ee d l e s r e g u l a r l y . R e p e a t o f t e n du r i n g f i r e s e a s o n . -R e m o v e A L L f i r e - p r o n e p l a n t s , a n d c h o o s e o n l y f i r e - r e s i s t a n t va r i e t i e s . I r r i g a t e r e g u l a r l y . -R e m o v e t r e e l i m b s t h a t e x t e n d i n t o t h i s z o n e . Fi r e - p r o n e t r e e s s h o u l d b e a g g r e s si v e l y p r u n e d o r i d e a l l y , r e m o v e d . -P r o v i d e a d e q u a t e s p a c in g b e t w e e n a l l p l a n t s . -D o n o t s t o r e f i r e w o o d , l u m b e r , o r c o m b u s t i b l e s h e r e , e v e n (e s p e c i a l l y ) u n d e r d e c k s o r o v e r h a n g s . M o v e s t o r e d co m b u s t i b l e s i n s i d e , o r a t l e a s t 3 0 ′ aw a y f r o m s t r u c t u r e s . -U s e o n l y f i r e r e s i s t a n t m u l c h e s . ‘ G o r i l l a H a i r ” o r si m i l a r s h r e d d e d b a r k s h o u l d b e r e m o v e d i n t h i s z o n e . Co m p o s t e d m u l c h a n d l a r g e b a rk a n d c h i p s m a y b e O K . ZO N E 1 ( I N T E R M E D I A T E ) Th e I n t e r m e d i a t e Z o n e f r o m 5 ′ to 3 0 ′ ou t f r o m b u i l d i n g s , s t r u c t u r e s , de c k s , e t c . - R e m o v e a l l d e a d p l a n t s , g r a ss , a n d w e e d s ( v e g e t a t i o n ) . - R e m o v e d e a d o r d r y l e a v e s an d p i n e n e e d l e s f r o m y o u r y a rd , r o o f a n d r a i n g u t t e r s . - T r i m t r e e s r e g u l a r l y t o k e e p b r a n c h e s a m i n i m u m o f 1 0 f e e t f r o m o t h e r t r e e s . - R e m o v e b r a n c h e s t h a t h a n g o v e r y o u r r o o f a n d k e e p d e a d b r a n c h e s 1 0 f e e t a w a y f r o m y o u r c h i m n e y . - R e l o c a t e w o o d p il e s i n t o Z o n e 2 . - R e m o v e o r p r u n e f l a m m a b l e p l a n ts a n d s h r u b s n e a r w i n d o w s . - R e m o v e v e g e t a t i o n a n d i t e m s t h a t c o u l d c a t c h f i r e f r o m a r o u n d a n d u n d e r d e c k s . - C r e a t e a d d i t i o n a l s e p a r a ti o n b e t w e e n t r e e s , s h r u bs a n d i t e m s t h a t c o u l d c a t c h f i r e , s u c h a s p a t i o f u r n i t ur e , w o o d p i l e s , s w i n g s e t s , e t c . ZO N E 2 ( E X T E N D E D ) Ex t e n d i n g f r o m 3 0 ′ to 1 0 0 ′ (o r m o r e , i f r e q u i r e d du e t o s t e e p s l o p e s , ne a r b y v e g e t a t i o n c o n d i t i o n s , a n d / or y o u r l o c a l f i r e d e p a r t m e n t ) , th i s z o n e s h o u l d i n cl u d e a t a m i n i m u m : - C u t o r m o w a n n u a l g r a s s d o w n t o a m a x i m u m h e i g h t o f 4 i n c h e s . - C r e a t e h o r i z o n t a l s p a c i n g b e t w e e n sh r u b s a n d t r e e s . ( S e e d i a g r a m ) - C r e a t e v e r t i c a l s p a c i n g b e t w e e n g r a s s, s h r u b s a n d t r e e s . ( S e e d i a g r a m ) - R e m o v e f a l l e n l e a v e s , n e e d l e s , t w i g s , b a r k , c o n e s , a n d s m a l l b r a n c h e s . H o w e v e r , t h e y m a y b e p e r m i t t e d t o a d e p t h of 3 i n c h e s i f e r o s i o n c o n t r o l i s a n i s s u e . 3/4" = 1'-0"2 RETAINING WALL AT FRONT YARD •• • •• • • • • • • • ► - - - - - - - - , I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - ~ - - - \ \ \ ~ I I / 1 ~ X ~~ J ~ + , I ·, ~ ~ ~ I ' . I ' / \ / I \ I r " . I \ ii t >; i ; ; , ~ · : - - 1 !1 '. , . I \ ,I ,,_ ' 1 - - £/ Y , ' I I \ \ ""· -', , ~~~ "' - \ " A ~ 1 / A • ~~ , L , , " ' ' ~ , - - - - - - \ ' - , •, . .. . . . . , _ _'. _ ~ - -, I \ - - , - - 7 I I I I I - - - - r - I =I I I I I _Ill : I I I 11 -, ' 'I,· -,,,-, L 1 -1 =Ill= 111-1 0 )E )E ► D W R E F . PA N T R Y DI N I N G R O O M GR E A T R O O M 2 C A R G A R A G E AC 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 1 A9 W. I . C . JR . S U I T E OF F I C E 4' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 2' - 8 3 / 4 " 3' - 2 1 / 2 " BA T H HA L F B A T H C L O S E T PA T I O # 1 PO R C H 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T UN D E R S T A I R S PA T I O # 2 ST O R A G E TA N K L E S S W H T R A S H E N C L O S U R E KI T C H E N 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 1 0 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 9 1 / 4 " WO O D ST O V E F I R E P L A C E 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G FO Y E R 2 A9 2 ' - 0 " 2' - 0 " W2 W3 W2 D8 W6 D4 D7 W5 D5 D5D3 D3 D5 D9 D5 D3 D3 D1 D1 0 W9 W9 D2 D6 3' - 0 3 / 4 " 3' - 0 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 22 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 6 " 3 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1' - 6 " 4' - 6 1 / 2 " 1' - 6 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 3 ' - 3 " 2 ' - 9 " 0 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1' - 9 " 2' - 6 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 1' - 9 " 2' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 7' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 7 " 1' - 7 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 2 " 1 3 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 20 ' - 1 1 " 14 ' - 9 " 7' - 1 1 / 4 " 48 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 2' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 9 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 5' - 6 " 4' - 2 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 3 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 1 6 ' - 6 " 1 0 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 21 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 9 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 3 " 1 3 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4' - 1 " 4' - 1 " 4 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 6' - 1 1 / 4 " 3 ' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 6 " CR A W L S P A C E 3' - 0 " 5' - 2 " 0 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 1 1 " PO N Y W A L L 6 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 0 " D1 2W1 1 33 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 3 2 ' - 5 " 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G PR O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PR O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L P R O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L WALL LEGEND 2" x 4" WALL (MEASURED 3 1/2")2" x 6" WALL (MEASURED 5 1/2")TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:08 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 FLOOR PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A3 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 1S T F L O O R Area Schedule Area N a m e 111 SF P A T I O # 2 496 SF G A R A G E 1513 SF 1 S T F L O O R L I V I N G A R E A 64 SF P O R C H 65 SF P A T I O # 1 Window Schedu le 1st Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t W i n d o w T y p e W2 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W3 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Casement W5 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W6 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W9 4 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 9 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W11 1 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Door Schedule 1st Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t D o o r T y p e D1 1 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 6 " 1 G a r a g e D2 3 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 E n t r y D3 3 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 4 F l u s h S w i n g D4 2 ' - 4 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D5 2 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 4 F l u s h S w i n g D6 2 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D7 5 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g D8 1 0 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F o l d i n g D o o r D9 2 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D10 6 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 1 T r a s h E n c l o s u r e D12 2 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g G l a s s WINDOW NOTE: ALL WINDOWS TO BE TEMPERED WINDOWS 2Fixed . I ' • ' , . . '; 0 0 ~ oo v , , - - - I ( I / , , r - - - / V -, V I' - - ' I ' -C ~ c-~ c- ., ' ' I ' . V V V il ,, v V / L / ,. l ., ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' . z . . I - - 1 - - I - - = - L _ ) • '. . II l . ' ' I • , '. ,, . ·- -- .. ~-v ,, , . . , , . , , L . , , , , . . , , L _ . , , / / / L / / L \: ' . I r - - .. \ l . ) 0 '. ' i I I L 1 • 1 11 II I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 \ . _ _ _ _ J - - - - - . 11 II II '/ 1 1 1 1 1 II 11 L ~ II ' " LI -I I - II J, , • C J ., l I • ' l g ~ "' . . l ' ii II II II II " ~ ' i, II II II II II II " I , ·1 V f' - : L . / / L L II I ii i II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I . ' q - ~ : , ] . · ~ - q ' i .. . . "/ _ L _ . . , ; _ . L _ / / / / / / / / _ £ _ / / / ii ! ! \ : !' :: :: DJ ~ :1 II I I II I II I I II jl 1 1 jl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,1 1 , . ., I • ., . 0 - < 1 , " V t: V ' ., , . , , , , L L , • l' ~-= - - u -1 ' uz z - , , . / / ~ . / . . . , £ Q V V V V V V I' - I I I I I I I I J V V V V V V V V V V V V " V V V V V V V V V V V . ' I • -- o \ F , = / / / / L. . . . £ . . . / ' ,, / / . -~ - - ~ · c - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 · , . ,. r ' . V r _. f- 0 • I • 11 1 1 _, fU _ J v . ' V ' V , - V . '. V r- .. V V V " ' V A " . 0 / 0 ' ' ' 6 " L , u ,, , , , , , , _ . , L , . I • , . r V / V V , . V V L / / , / / . _. ' . . I ~ I ~ D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G 1 A9 BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T 2 A9 DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E 12 ' - 9 " 11 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 4' - 4 " 5' - 1 1 / 2 " 0' - 6 " 0' - 6 " 1' - 7 1 / 2 " 1' - 7 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 8' - 4 3 / 4 " 3' - 6 " 3' - 6 " 9' - 3 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 4' - 6 " 1 2 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 8 3 / 4 " D1 D1 0 W4 W4 W6 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 W7 W8 W9 D1 1 D1 1 W1 0 D1 W6 D5 D9 W1 3 D8 D5 0' - 5 1 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 7 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4 2 ' - 6 " 2 6 ' - 1 1 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 0 " 7' - 8 1 / 2 " 20 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 7 " 8' - 6 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 50 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 1 0 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 14 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 19 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 1 2 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 1 0 " 2' - 8 1 / 2 " 7' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 7 3 / 4 " 2' - 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 6' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 7' - 7 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 5' - 1 " 2' - 3 " 1 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 2' - 0 " 13 ' - 5 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 14 ' - 9 " 4' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 5 1 / 4 " BA T H 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 6 " 3' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1 5 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " HO R I Z O N T A L W O O D E N S L A T S . RE F E R T O D E T A I L 4 / A 5 9' - 5 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 2 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 " 9 ' - 6 " W1 2 W1 2 1 ' - 4 1 / 4 " 0 ' - 6 " 1 7 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 1 1 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 " W1 2 W1 2 1 ' - 8 " 1 1 ' - 3 3 / 4 " WALL LEGEND 2" x 4" WALL (MEASURED 3 1/2")2" x 6" WALL (MEASURED 5 1/2")TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:09 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 FLOOR PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A3.1 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R Door Schedule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t D o o r T y p e D1 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 F l u s h S w i n g D2 2 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D3 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g - C l o s e t D5 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g S i n g l e P a n e l D6 2 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 4 F l u s h S w i n g D8 2 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 G l a s s D o o r D9 2 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D10 5 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g D11 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g Area Schedule 2nd Floor Area N a m e 105 SF B A C K Y A R D P A T I O 173 SF 2 N D F L O O R D E C K 1530 SF 2 N D F L O O R L I V I N G A R E A Window Sche dule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t W i n d o w T y p e W4 2 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W6 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 2 Slide W7 3 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W8 3 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Fixed W9 4 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W10 4 ' - 6 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 F r o s t e d / P r i v a c y W12 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 4 C l e a r S t o r y W i n d o w W13 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide Privacy on the bottom and clear on the top halfWINDOW NOTE: ALL WINDOWS TO BE TEMPERED WINDOWS 2 2 ~> • ,. '. ,. ' , 1 " ' .I . " ' 0 ?_ l , r : : : : , .- . / - . - . , , , - . - • • -_- 1 - - - - - , f J l • 0- - r r .. Q - 0 ~ '. '. Q 1 ~ ~ ·1 Q ' 1 - - ,, I / I , f J "- - ' c-- ; - i " " ~ ' - ,. r, r I . 0 I , r, I , I , ,. , . • • B r, I , 0 I / I/ r, " 7 [ 7 ' I I I :1 :1 :1 ' I I I I :1 :1 ! I I I I I : :1 ' - , I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I rh I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I '1 '1 '1 I I I I I I I ,, 'I I I I I 'I 'I ,, I I I !1 '1 I I I 'I I , l b I . , . I . I , " ~ I , r, ,. r , 0 ~ I I , I , , , I , ' . 0 ' 1 l I , , I . I , ,. ,. ,. ~ ' I I . I , I , I- ' ~ r I . I , • ' . , . , k ) r. . 'i s - r, I , L e , I ,~ - . , ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ J , . - ,. y ,, r, r. ~ ' r. . ~ ' ? 'I < " \, - la C? r I ) .. . , 6 I , ,, • r , r ; r ; • • Q I I I I I I I ,, ' ,, ' ' -· " -, f ; . / / r; - - 0 I , • ', • I , , . r ; " ~ I. • - - ' ~ f- 0 I , -' ' I - ,. V, ' I . I , I , I , I . I I . I , I , r, I . I , I , I , .~ I . r. I. f; . . ' n • . , .. / " I I I ~ ' - I . _., , _ 1 / I , 1/ . ' . . 0 " " " " '1 . I , ' I l D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E D1 D1 0 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 D1 1 D1 1 D1 D5 D9 D8 D5 BA T H 8 ' - 3 " 9 ' - 2 1 /2 " 8 ' - 0 3 /4 " N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L 50 ' F R O M R E A R P L 3 0 ' F R O M F R O N T P L 2' - 0 " 3' - 3 1 / 2 " 9' - 8 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 1 1 3 /4 " 1 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 1 / 2 " 1 9 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 6 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 1 " 1 1 ' - 9 " 1 ' - 0 " LEGEND 2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM 1ST FLOOR TO 2ND FLOOR WALLS2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM WALLS TO PROPERTY LINE TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:11 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 2ND FLOOR OVERLAY TO 1ST FLOOR RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PZ PZ A3.2 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R O V E R L A Y T O 1 S T F L O O R I I I L I - - - - I - - / - - - - - - - - I - - - I - - - / -- - - -- - I I I (/ I I I I I : I u /l If ' I I I I I I I I I I I I ,_ - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. _IJ - • I - - - - - - - I - - - ' - -- -- - -- I , r , ,, - ,. : I , CJ 0 / - I - - - ' -- CJ I i r, -- Q I E ~ 1-.i : - [ I , I , I , I , '" L // 7'• ~ I . -- I , r , I • - - - - cs - - - " \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I - - -- \ - - - - \ ' - -, .. . . . G) r . r. r . r , r , , - - - - - - - - - 1 7 I I I I I I , L f ~ ] L ] r . I I I I ;; ] ! I =J . . . ,- - . - _ J □ - r . r , r , I , I , 8 / / / T T T / / ' / T T ; \ ~,. . r , . / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 '\ . ·_ - . :' .. _ , -· .- -~ \ .. . , .· - ~ ,~ · - - -~ - . : - ~ , : ~ - - . .. . 1i \ . ' . ~ - \I _, , - · - ~ - ,. ,. , 7 , , ,, . . ' cs T \ \ \ \ \ \ I I ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I - - - - - I - - - ' - -- / - -- - -- -- - - - -- -- -- - - - -- - ,/ - ,- . . , __ _ -- - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS NOTES: 1.ALL OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MIN. 1/16" AND MAX. 1/8" METAL MESH.VENTILATOR TYPE NET AREA QUANTITY AREA VENTILATED 98.75 SQ -IN 395 SQ -IN 395 SQ -INMODEL LOW PROFILE VENT O'HAGIN FLATAREA VENTILATED VENTILATION RATE REQUIRED AREA (AREA VENTILATED/300) x 144 = SQ.IN.1542 SQ.FT 300 TH 741 SQ.INVENTILATION REQUIRED VENTILATION PROVIDED VENT LOCATION TOTAL 790 SQ -INUPPER HALF LOWER HALF4 4 98.75 SQ -IN LOW PROFILE VENT O'HAGIN FLAT ST U C C O W A T E R R E S I S T A N T BA R R I E R S ( S ) L A P O V E R SC R E E D F L A N G E BO T T O M O F F L A N G E SE T B E L O W T O P O F FO U N D A T I O N A N D PL A T E L I N E SH E A T H I N G FR A M I N G M E M B E R 26 G A G E C O R R O S I O N R E S I S T A N T OR P L A S T I C W E E P S C R E E D M I N . A B O V E E A R T H M I N . F L A N G E 2" A B O V E P A V E D A R E A S 1. M E T A L R O O F B Y M E T A L R O O F I N G C A L I F O R N I A S T A N D I N G S E A M A S K G R E Y ( K Y N A R ) . ROOF PITCH 3:12. OVERHANG: 2'-6'2. S T O N E V E N E E R B Y C U L T U R E D S T O N E ( P R O - F I T M O D E R A L E D G E S T O N E I N T A G L I O ) . INSTALL STONE OVER 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER, METAL LATH, SCRATCH COAT AND MORTAR SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.3. S I N G L E C O A T S T U C C O ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A , P L Y W O O D S H E A T H I N G U N D E R T W O LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER.4. F A S C I A B O A R D ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).5. G A R A G E D O O R B Y C L O P A Y . D E S I G N R E C 1 4 C O L O N I A L L I F T H A N D L E S (COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4).6. E X T E R I O R W A L L L E D L I G H T I N G ( D A N B U R Y 6 " HIGH BLACK DUSK TO DAWN - S T Y L E # 5 Y 0 8 8 ) . WALL SCONE LIGHT. PLEASE REFER TO SP EC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.7. F R O N T D O O R B Y I W A N T T H A T D O O R . P R O D U C T I D : T H E B E S T S Q U A R E T O P SINGLE ENTRY IRON DOORS, COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4. 8. 1 0 0 S E R I E S W I N D O W S A N D S L I D I N G D O O R S B Y A N D E R S E N ( C O L O R B L A C K ) 9. W I N D O W , D O O R T R I M C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 . 10. A C S C R E E N I N G ( S T U C C O F I N I S H 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G B Y O M E G A ) 11. A C U N I T S H A L L B E L O C A T E D A N D S E C U RED TO A MINIMUM 3-INCH THICK SLAB OR APPROVED PLATFORM.12. G U T T E R ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).13. T H E A P P R O V E D A D D R E S S N U M B E R S S H A L L B E P L A I N L Y L E G I B L E A N D V I S I B L E F R O M THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A MINIMUM ½" WIDE STROKE. CFC 505, CRC R319 , FMCB.36.080 THE NUMBERS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT NIGHT. WHEN EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED THE FACE OF THE SIGN SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 5.0 FOOT CANDLES. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT ILLUMINATION. FMC 8.36.080.14. MODERN HANDRAIL 15. I P E S I D I N G B Y J A M E S H A R D I E C O L O R : P E G A S U S B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 1 .16. D O W N S P O U T ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 17. ROOF VENTS (COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).18. F L U E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 19. ELECTRICAL METER.20. WATER METER.21. G A S M E T E R . 22. INTERNET AND PHONE OUTLET.23. TANKLESS WATER HEATER.24. TRASH CAN ENCLOSURE STUCCO FINISH (9205 ICEBERG) BY OMEGA TO BE CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.25. H A R T F O R D L E D O U T D O R P E N D A N T B Y K U Z C O LIGHTING (PRODUCT ID: KUZP266178) PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET. 26. SOLAR PANEL.27. S O L A R I N V E R T O R . 28. BAND ACCROSS THE TOP BEFORE THE SOFFIT AND GARAGE ( COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).29. WOODEN HORIZONTAL SLATS (COLOR: JARRAH BROWN BY CABOT).30. M E T A L R A I L I N G - B L A C K P O W D E R C O A T . 31. C O N C R E T E R E T A I N I N G W A L L W I T H S T U C C O F I N I S H ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A T O B E CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.KEY NOTES 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 1 8 14 2 5 4 6 7 9 13 12 15 16 17 18 24 26 28 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 24 ' - 9 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " ON L Y A F T E R C L A R I F I C A T I O N W I T H A ST R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R A B O U T T H E CO N S T R U C T A B I L I T Y O F T H I S C O N N E C T I O N . EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 3 31 25 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1 3 4 6 8 9 12 16 17 18 24 28 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 30 CENTER TO CENTER POST SPACING HEIGHT POST BASE PLATE4' - 0"4' - 0"0' - 2 1/2"3' - 6"0' - 1"0' - 4"0' - 4"BLACK POWDER COATTDETANGENTDESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:14 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ELEVATIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A4 1" = 1 ' - 0 " 3 A_ W E E P S C R E E D 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 Fr o n t E l e v a t i o n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 Re a r E l e v a t i o n NTS 4 GUARDRAIL - - - - - - - - - - - t - - I I ,. V - - ' - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - j - - - - - - - ' ! < - - - ' I ' - - - - - - - - ~ ' , - - - - - - - - t - - - ' r l - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - t - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - t - t - - - - - - t - - - ~ ! - - - - - - - t - - - - - M - - t - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - / ~ - - - " .· □ . . = _ c j = = = = l . . ~ . -. -.· e .. ,. , . . . ' . .. •, ' . . :- •. - . - . ' . - .. ·; . - ·- ~. - . . ~ ,- .. ~ .. . . - . . ' •" - ~ - - - - - - 1 1 1 .. .. ~ '• .. •,-',~ t- - ;• : : ••, _;_:_ ' • r , , ; • • • ; ~ . - ' . : . . . - . . • , . . . . .. . . -· ·- ;; ; 0 ;: : ;: : . ~ ~ _ , - - - 'I " ~ I I : \ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - s I ' . I ' . I - - - ' ' , ~ I l ' ' I JJ ~ _. , . ; , .. . . _ . . . . .. . . _ •, . . . . . LJ ·• ~~ ·~ , . - . .. . . . . / . .. -. . . ' ' . . '· .. . .. ' ' . .. ., .. . • ' ·. . . . ·' . - .. , . ·- . ' .. . . . , · .. ,. . • ·- · . . ' • " .. .. . . . , . . . .. ' ' '• . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . -. . ' ' . . -· .. •, . .. • < < .. . . . ' , . . .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ~ • . .. .. ' . .. . ,i : . . .. ' . - .. . / ; -. . . . . . ._ . ' . . . . / . . _, _ ·. 1 1 _ ' / ' . . . . . -. . . . " . .. . . . -. .. -· •- =· / .. •. .- ' - - - . .. = / .. . . . ' . .- . = . _- _ · · a > .. . $ . / . .- .. - . , • .. -. . • . .. / •. ' , . -.· . . ' .- . . ' . .. . . . < .. . . •· .. .. / .. . .. .. ' = .. .. ·• .. - .. . . .. • .. - ~ ·. -.• = , .. - . - -• .. - - _· . .. - ·- •- . 1 : . . ·_ - . . . • . . . . -- . . -· .. -· _· .. I . : .. - . - . _- . . . , I .' 1 - 1 . ·-i ---1 I -I _:_ _ - -I I I . . -I I . I I· .- ,- . . - ,- . -. - , . _, - - , .; ~ . . - . . - · , . . . .. _ _:._ , ·- -1 • ' : I I 1· _ 1 _ J J · 1 I I l l l ' ' ' I l l , , · I I I l l ' ' , I l l I l l 11 1 ~ 1 1 1 Il l II Il l II Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l I l l I l l Il l Il l Il l Il l 11 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ - 11 ~ - 111 f +1 l 1 ~ ~ l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ I T l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l ~ l l l ~ l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ I I I ! =1 I 1= I 1= 1 I 1= I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1 = 1 1 1 - - : : :- : : :- : I -1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I =1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 11 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 11 II 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 11 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 11 1 I i ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i ' 1 1 1 1 1 II I II 111 Ii ' 111 I II I 11 i' 111 I II 111 Ii ' 111 I II 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 I II 111 Ii ' -1 1 1 111 -1 1 1 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 i' 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 I I l- 1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 I i-1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' - - -3 1 1 = 1 E l 11 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 c u 1 = 1 1 E l 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 c u 1 = 1 1 E l 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 EU l = l l E l 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 IE U l = f - - - - - - + - - ~ I nl 7r 1 1 m 7 1 wr r r r t i 1 1 n r 1 nl Wfi r 1 1 m W f f i 1 wr r r r t i l lf f i W - 1 nl Wfi r 1 nW f f i l wr r r r y i 1 1 f i r 1 nl Wfi r 1 1 m W f f i 1 wr r r r t i l 1f i r 1 nl T 11 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I - 1 I 1 - 1 I - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1- - - ~ I - ~ - -\ ~ , ( ~ I, I, ' I '1 '1 I' I I I I I I I ' : ' • ·_ 4 ·s : - . ·: • • _. , _ C _ 4 " - - - . . . _ I ' \ ~i --' I ' . . . . . _ .< I · . . . . - ~ :} : i , 11 I I ~ -; -~ 111 11 ~ ,~ I I 1 11 11 1i ' 11 11 i ' 11 11 i ' 1 11 I I I I ,. I I I 1. M E T A L R O O F B Y M E T A L R O O F I N G C A L I F O R N I A S T A N D I N G S E A M A S K G R E Y ( K Y N A R ) . ROOF PITCH 3:12. OVERHANG: 2'-6'2. S T O N E V E N E E R B Y C U L T U R E D S T O N E ( P R O - F I T M O D E R A L E D G E S T O N E I N T A G L I O ) . INSTALL STONE OVER 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER, METAL LATH, SCRATCH COAT AND MORTAR SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.3. S I N G L E C O A T S T U C C O ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A , P L Y W O O D S H E A T H I N G U N D E R T W O LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER.4. F A S C I A B O A R D ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).5. G A R A G E D O O R B Y C L O P A Y . D E S I G N R E C 1 4 C O L O N I A L L I F T H A N D L E S (COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4).6. E X T E R I O R W A L L L E D L I G H T I N G ( D A N B U R Y 6 " HIGH BLACK DUSK TO DA WN - S T Y L E # 5 Y 0 8 8 ) . WALL SCONE LIGHT. PLEASE REFER TO SP EC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.7. F R O N T D O O R B Y I W A N T T H A T D O O R . P R O D U C T I D : T H E B E S T S Q U A R E T O P SINGLE ENTRY IRON DOORS, COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4. 8. 1 0 0 S E R I E S W I N D O W S A N D S L I D I N G D O O R S B Y A N D E R S E N ( C O L O R B L A C K ) 9. W I N D O W , D O O R T R I M C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 . 10. A C S C R E E N I N G ( S T U C C O F I N I S H 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G B Y O M E G A ) 11. A C U N I T S H A L L B E L O C A T E D A N D S E C U RED TO A MINIMUM 3-INCH THICK SLAB OR APPROVED PLATFORM.12. G U T T E R ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 13. T H E A P P R O V E D A D D R E S S N U M B E R S S H A L L B E P L A I N L Y L E G I B L E A N D V I S I B L E F R O M THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A MINIMUM ½" WIDE STROKE. CFC 505, CRC R319 , FMCB.36.080 THE NUMBERS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT NIGHT. WHEN EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED THE FACE OF THE SIGN SHALL BE AT A MINI MUM OF 5.0 FOOT CANDLES. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT ILLUMINATION. FMC 8.36.080.14. MODERN HANDRAIL 15. I P E S I D I N G B Y J A M E S H A R D I E C O L O R : P E G A S U S B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 1 .16. D O W N S P O U T ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 17. ROOF VENTS (COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).18. F L U E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 19. ELECTRICAL METER.20. WATER METER.21. G A S M E T E R . 22. INTERNET AND PHONE OUTLET.23. TANKLESS WATER HEATER.24. TRASH CAN ENCLOSURE STUCCO FINISH (9205 ICEBERG) BY OMEGA TO BE CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.25. H A R T F O R D L E D O U T D O R P E N D A N T B Y K U Z C O LIGHTING (PRODUCT ID: KUZP266178) PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET. 26. SOLAR PANEL.27. S O L A R I N V E R T O R . 28. BAND ACCROSS THE TOP BEFORE THE SOFFIT AND GARAGE ( COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).29. WOODEN HORIZONTAL SLATS (COLOR: JARRAH BROWN BY CABOT).30. M E T A L R A I L I N G - B L A C K P O W D E R C O A T . 31. C O N C R E T E R E T A I N I N G W A L L W I T H S T U C C O F I N I S H ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A T O B E CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.KEY NOTES 0' - 3 1/2"4' - 0"4' - 0"TOP VIEWHOUSE STRUCTURE 3' PONY WALL WRAPPING UNIT HOUSE STRUCTURE3' - 8 1/2"0' - 3 1/2"AC AC2X4 3' PONY W/STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH THE HOUSESIDE VIEW 0' - 1 1/2"3' - 0"0' - 5 1/2"2x6 CAP4' - 0"3' - 1 1/2"0' - 4"CONCRETE PAD 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 3 1 4 8 2 6 9 12 17 18 28 13 16 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 29 EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 31 25 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 1 8 14 3 2 4 6 9 12 13 10 16 17 18 24 23 26 28 19 22 21 20 27 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 30 M I N . 6 ' - 0 " 31 TYP.0' - 7"DECKINGSUPPORT BLOCK2X6 TOP FRAME 2X6 BOTTOM FRAMEBEAM ABOVE 2X6 WOODEN SLAT SET INTO VERTICAL FRAME PRESSURE -TREATED TIMBER.EXTERIOR PATIO MIN.0' - 4"0' - 2"0' - 2"0' - 2"4 5 °TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:18 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ELEVATIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A51/2" = 1'-0"3 A- A C S c r e e n D e t a i l 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 Le f t E l e v a t i o n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 Ri g h t E l e v a t o n 1" = 1'-0"4 A - W O O D E N S L A T S S E C T I O N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I -' '- I " ' . - - - - - + - ~ - - - - + - - 0 - - + - - - - - - - + - - I . - . . - . . - '. ' ~ '_ • . + - - + - - 1 - - - - + - - - - - ~ -- = - - - - ~ - j - - - - - " " ~ . ,, I I I ' .~~ I I V I I Iv I I ~-~I ~---------_J I ~ - - - - - - - --- _ Jj ·,, ' " x•.+----- - - - -= - - - - - l~I I I ~ ~:1 I l~I ~ I I 1 A9 R O O F V E N T S FL U E S O L A R P A N E L S S T O R Y P O L E # 1 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 1 S T O R Y P O L E #3 S T O R Y P O L E #4 S T O R Y P O L E #5 S T O R Y P O L E #6 S T O R Y P O L E #7 S T O R Y P O L E #1 6 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 2 S T O R Y P O L E #1 5 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 0 S T O R Y P O L E # 9 5 0 ' F R O M R E A R P L 3 0 ' F R OM F R ON T P L S T O R Y P O L E # 1 0 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 4 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 3 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 8 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 9 2 A9 8' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 "S T O R Y P O L E #8 S T O R Y P O L E #1 7 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 1 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 "3 ' - 6 " S T O R Y P O L E # 2 2 1 3 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1 2 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 2 7 ' - 1 1 /2 "2 ' - 0 " 3 5 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 1 4 ' - 9 " 7 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 3 " 5 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 5 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 6 " 1 0 ' - 9 3 /4 "4 ' - 1 0 1 /2 "5 ' - 4 "2 1 ' - 7 1 /2 "1 7 ' - 0 "8 ' - 6 1 /2 " 4 ' - 6 " 1 8 ' - 1 " 2 0 ' - 2 " 1 1 ' - 9 " 2 ' - 6 " 3 " / 1 2 " 2 2 2 2 2 2 ST O R Y P O L E L E G E N D ST O R E Y P O L E BA S E E L E V A T I O N EX I S T I N G G R A D E FI N I S H E D F L O O R (F F ) E L E V A T I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 7 . 2 5 ' 12 8 ' 10 13 8 . 7 3 ' 13 6 . 9 6 13 2 . 8 3 ' 13 2 . 0 0 ' 12 6 . 8 8 ' 12 6 . 9 0 ' 12 7 . 1 6 ' 12 6 . 8 1 ' 12 7 . 3 9 ' 11 13 0 . 4 1 ' 12 8 ' 12 12 7 . 1 8 ' 12 8 ' 13 12 7 . 2 5 ' 14 12 7 . 0 4 ' 15 12 7 . 9 5 ' 12 8 ' 16 12 7 . 4 3 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' TO 1 S T F L O O R CE I L I N G H E I G H T 10 . 7 5 ' -0. 7 3 ' 1. 0 4 ' 5. 1 7 ' 6. 0 0 ' 11 . 1 2 ' 11 . 1 ' 10 . 8 4 ' 11 . 1 9 ' 10 . 6 1 ' 10 . 6 5 ' 10 . 8 3 ' 10 . 7 5 ' 10 . 9 6 ' 10 . 0 5 ' ST O R Y P O L E HE I G H T 20 . 9 ' 9. 4 2 ' 11 . 1 9 ' 15 . 3 2 ' 16 . 1 5 21 . 2 7 ' 21 . 2 5 ' 20 . 9 9 ' 21 . 3 4 20 . 7 6 ' 20 . 4 0 ' 23 . 3 0 ' 24 . 1 5 ' 24 . 3 6 ' 22 . 0 3 ' 10 . 2 9 ' RO O F E L E V A T I O N 14 8 . 1 5 ' 15 0 . 8 1 ' 15 0 . 4 8 ' 14 9 . 9 8 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 15 1 . 4 0 ' 15 1 . 4 0 ' TO 2 N D F I N I S H E D FL O O R ( F F ) H E I G H T 11 . 9 8 ' 0. 5 ' 2. 2 7 ' 6. 4 ' 7. 2 3 ' 12 . 3 5 ' 12 . 3 3 ' 12 . 0 7 ' 12 . 4 2 ' 11 . 8 4 ' 11 . 8 8 ' 12 . 0 6 ' 11 . 9 8 ' 12 . 1 9 ' 11 . 2 8 ' 17 12 7 . 1 4 ' 12 8 ' 10 . 5 8 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' 18 12 7 . 2 9 ' 12 8 ' 10 . 4 3 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' 19 12 7 . 1 0 ' 12 8 ' NA 10 . 6 2 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' NA 20 12 7 . 3 3 ' 12 8 ' NA 11 . 9 6 ' 13 9 . 2 9 ' NA 21 12 6 . 9 1 ' 12 8 ' NA 10 . 8 1 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' NA 22 13 5 . 6 6 ' 12 8 ' NA 2. 0 6 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PL E A S E N O T E , A L L S T O R Y P O L E W E R E U P D A T E D . 22 S T O R Y P O L E H E I G H T 2 0 . 0 8 ' . EG : 1 2 7 . 8 7 ' FF E L E V A T I O N : 1 2 8 ' 1S T F L O O R C E I L I N G EL E V A T I O N : 1 3 8 ' RO O F E L E V A T I O N : 1 4 7 . 9 5 ' H E I G H T T O 1 S T F L O O R C E I L I N G 1 0 . 1 3 ' . ST O R Y P O L E # 1 2N D F I N I S H E D F L O O R EL E V A T I O N : 1 3 9 . 2 3 ' 2 N D F I N I S H E D F L O O R H E I G H T 1 1 . 3 6 ' . TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:19 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ROOF PLAN/STORY POLE RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PZ PK A6 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 RO O F / S T O R Y P O L E P L A N NT S 2 C_ S T O R Y P O L E E X A M P L E I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - \ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - \ 0 " - - 0 - j \\ \ \ \ l \ \ 1 1 1 1 \\ l l l l l l \ \ 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ----?\\11 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -----\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------, \ \ \ UP PARKING NATIVE BRUSH TO BE TRIMMED AND CLEAN OUT OVERGROWTHDRIVEWAY IN D I A N H A W T H O R N 3 - 6 F T FU L L S U N , PA R T I A L S U N LO W , AV E R A G E W O R K S WE L L T O FO R M A HE D G E 3 - 6 F T AN Y S O I L B U T PR E F E R S MO I S T W E L L - DR A I N I N G S O I L RH A P H I O L E P I S IN D I C A LO W 0. 2 - 0. 3 PE N N I S E T U M AL O P E C U R O I D E S 'H A M E L N ' DW A R F H A M E L N FO U N T A I N G R A S S 2 - 3 F T 2 - 4 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L LO W SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N E D S O I L 36 " - 48 " L 0. 2 - 0. 3 PI T T O S P O R U M WH E E L E R ' S D W A R F PI T T O S P O R U M 3 - 3 1 / 2 F T 3 - 4 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L MO D E R A T E AV E R A G E - MO I S T / W E L L - DR A I N E D 3 F T A P A R T 1 - 1/ 2 F O R HE D G E M 0. 4 - 0. 6 'H I D C O T E ' L A V E N D E R 1 - 3 F T FU L L S U N LO W CH A L K , L O A M , SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N I N G LA V A N D U L A AN G U S T I F O L I A 36 " 1 - 3 F T L 0. 2 - 0. 3 CO M M O N N A M E SC I E N T I F I C NA M E HE I G H T WI D T H MI N I M U M P L A N T I N G DI S T A N C E S / S O I L C O N D . WA T E R NE E D S WU C O L S PL A N T F A C T O R QU A N T I T Y 2 7 3 6 8 CO R T A D E R I A SE L L O A N A ' P U M I L A ' 4 - 6 F T 3 - 4 F T FU L L S U N MO D E R A T E SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N E D S O I L 36 " - 48 " M 0. 4 - 0. 6 EX I S T I N G T R E E S LA N D S C A P E A R E A 3 5 9 0 S Q F T LA N D S C A P I N G T Y P E A SH R E D D E D C E D A R B CO B B L E S T O N E C NA T I V E B R U S H & T R E E S 3 ' P L A N T E R 8 -10 F T 6 -8 F T MO D E R A T E 5 M 0. 4 - 0. 6 1. " I N C O R P O R A T E C O M P O S T A T A R A T E O F A T L E A S T F O U R C U B I C Y A R D S P E R 1 0 0 0 S Q U A R E FE E T T O A D E P T H O F S I X I N C H E S I N T O T H E L A N D S C A P E A R E A E X C E P T W I T H I N T H E D R I P L I N E OF P R O T E C T E D T R E E S ( U N L E S S C O N T R A -IN D I C A T E D B Y A S O I L S T E S T ) . " 2. " A M I N I M I U M T H R E E I N C H L A Y E R O F M U LC H S H A L L B E A P P L I E D O N A L L E X P O S E D SU R F A C E S O F P L A N T I N G A R E A S E X C E P T I N T U R F A R E A S , C R E E P I N G O R R O O T I N G GR O U N D C O V E R S , O R D I R E C T S E E D I N G A P P L I C A T I O N S W H E R E M U L C H I S C O N T R A I N D I C A T E D . " 3. " C L E A R O U T D E A D B R U S H A N D W E E D S F R O M T H E N A T I V E B R U S H A R E A S " LA N D S C A P E N O T E S : P R O P O S E D B U I L D I N G P A T I O P O R C H G A R A G E P A T I O AC T R A S H E N C L O S U R E C B A SW E E T O S M A N T H U S OS M A N T H U S FR A G R A N S P A T I O NA T I V E B R U S H TO B E T R I M M E D AN D C L E A N O U T O V E R G R O W T H D GR A S S D 7 ' - 1 0 " ST R E L I T Z I A RE G I N A E BI R D O F P A R A D I S E 3 - 5 F T 3 - 5 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L MO D E R A T E AV E R A G E - MO I S T / W E L L - DR A I N E D 3 F T A P A R T 1 - 1/ 2 F O R HE D G E M 0. 4 - 0. 6 3 3 ' - 0 " EXISTING FENCE (5' HEIGHT)EE E JA S M I N E PROVIDE 6FT TALL TRELLIS THE ENTIRE LENGHT OF THE STAIRS TOP TO BOTTOM.MAX. 3' CONCRETE RETAINING WALLGUARDRAIL REFER TO DETAIL 4/S4 SU N EX P O S U R E PA M P A S G R A S S FU L L S U N , PA R T I A L S U N PR O V I D E EN R I C H E D , M O I S T , WE L L -DR A I N E D SO I L . C3" ROUND OR SQUARE STEEL POST WITH POST CAP, TYP.3" THICK GREENSCREEN #5104 CHANNEL TRIM OR #5105 STEEL EDGE TRIM, RECOMMENDED AT THE TOP EDGE OF PANEL, TYP.3" THINK GREENSCREEN PANEL, TYP.#5133X SNAP CLIPS WITH STEEL SCREW, TYP.#5133X SNAP CLIPS WITH STAINLESS STAINLESS STEEL SCREW, TYP.#5131 FLEX "C" RINGS AT PANEL TO PANEL SEAM AT 12" O.C.#5105 STEEL EDGE TRIM OPTIONAL AT THE BOTTOM EDGE OF PANEL FINISH GRADE POST EMBED DEPTH AND FOOTING SIZE SHOULD BE VERIFIED BASED ON OVERALL HEIGHT, WIND LOAD AND SOIL CONDITIONS. SITE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING MAY BE REQUIRED.VERIFY V.I.F.APPROX. 6 INCH.MAX. HEIGHT 6' - 0"(WHEN USING 3" POSTS)POST TO POST CENTERS = PANEL LENGHT + 4", TYP.POST TO POST CLEAR =PANEL LENGHT + 1", TYP.HORIZONTAL PANEL 96" MAX IN 2" INCREMENTS PANEL HEIGHT UP TO 48" IN 2" INCREMENTSPANEL HEIGHT UP TO 48" IN 2" INCREMENTSCLCLPLAN VIEW TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:51 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 LANDSCAPEPLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PK A7 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N NTS 2 TRELLIS I 1 1 = I 1 1 0 0 f l ~ () r - -- - - ' I I I I I I I I I I I - - . ;, , , i l ) l ;; . \ s . _ ~ •. . · · . ; ; I ,t / • i , ··•. •·• Y$.f '~ ... ~ - · . ~ - :'\ 1 . ! - r . . ; - . •· \ , S. E , r : • ·. : . 1 · . • . ·. . - - - '. \ ' .' \ \ -, - o' \ l g ' oo ~ -") f _ - - -· · - - , ;: c . . - , -_, -,,,-, i ~ - - " - ' .. . _ :- ,:: ' _, ,l ! ,- . - \, ; 1 /. ' - '. '! : } ~ /. \1 ·1--,--. \ L -:~ •-__ _.__ --...: ---r◊OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~ 00000001 I A G R E E T O C O M P L Y W I T H T H E R E Q U I R E M E N T S O F T H E P R E S C R I P T I V E CO M P L I A N C E O P T I O N T O T H E M W E L O . FE B 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 PR E S S U R E R E G U L A T O R S S H A L L B E I N S T A L L E D O N T H E I R R I G A T I O N SY S T E M T O E N S U R E T H E D Y N A M I C PR E S S U R E O F T H E S Y S T E M I S W I T H I N T H E M A N U F A T U R E R S R E C O M M E N D E D P R E S S U R E R A N G E . MA N U A L S H U T -OF F V A L V E S ( S U C H A S A G A T E V A L V E , B A L L V A L V E , OR B U T T E R F L Y V A L V E ) S H A L L B E IN S T A L L E D A S C L O S E A S P O S S I B L E TO T H E P O I N T O F C O N N E C T I O N O F T H E W A T E R S U P P L Y . "U N L E S S C O N T R A D I C T E D B Y A S O I L S T E S T , C O M P O S T A T A R A T E O F A MI N I M U M O F F O U R C U B I C Y A R D S P E R 1 0 0 0 S Q U A R E F E E T O F PE R M E A B L E A R E A S H A L L B E I N C O RP O R A T E D T O A D E P T H O F S I X IN C H E S I N T O T H E S O I L E X C E P T W I T H I N T H E T P Z O F P R O T E C T E D TR E E S , W H I C H S H A L L R E C I E V E 4 -6" O F H A R D W O O D C H I P M U L C H . " "A T T H E T I M E O F F I N A L I N S P E C T I O N , T H E P E R M I T A P P L I C A N T S H A L L PR O V I D E T H E O W N E R O F T H E P R O P E R T Y W I T H A C E R T I F I C A T E O F CO M P L E T I O N , C E R T I F I C A T E O F I N S T A L L A T I O N , I R R I G A T I O N S C H E D U L E " IR R I G A T I O N N O T E S 1- 2 5 - 1 0 XA C Z - 0 7 5 - P R F O p t i o n 1. D W G N. T . S . D XA C Z - 0 7 5 - P R F 3 / 4 " L O W F L O W CO N T R O L Z O N E K I T OP T I O N 1 12 3 4 10 1189567 6- I N MI N . IN S T A L L M I N 6 " AB O V E H I G H E S T P O I N T OF D I S C H A R G E 1. 3 0 -IN C H L I N E A R L E N G T H O F W I R E , C O I L D E D 2. W A T E R P R O O F C O N N E C T I O N : RA I N B I R D D B S E R I E S ( 1 O F 2 ) 4. L O W F L O W A N T I -SI P H O N V A L V E : RA I N B I R D A S V - LF - 07 5 V A L V E (I N C L U D E D I N X A C Z -07 5 -PR F = K I T ) 8. U V R A D I A T I O N R E S I S T A N T P V C S C H 4 0 P I P E ( 1 O F 2 ) 9. F I N I S H G R A D E / T O P O F M U L C H 11 . P V C L A T E R A L P I P E ( 1 O F 2 ) 3. I D T A G 5. P R E S S U R E R E G U L A T I N G F I L T E R : RA I N B I R D P R F -07 5 -RB Y 6. P V C S C H 8 0 U N I O N 7. P V C S C H 4 0 M A L E A D A P T E R 10 . P V C S C H 4 0 E L L ( 1 O F 2 ) IR R I G A T I O N L E G E N D LI N E VA L V E # SI Z E TY P E 1 -2 1/ 2 " DR I P S Y S T E M MA N U F A C T U R E R PR O D U C T M O D E L & I D RA I N B I R D ST A R T K T C S A5 0 8 5 3 CO N T R O L L E R M O D E L & I D ST 8 O -WI F I MA N U A L S H U T -OF F V A L V E MO D E L & I D T -60 0 20 3 5 8 1 0 4 1 B0 1 L Y K Z O L 0 PR E S S U R E R E G U L A T O R S MO D E L & I D #7 1 0 1 #2 0 3 7 1 6 4 1 4 RA I N S E N S O R M O D E L & I D A6 1 2 0 0 PA R K I N G NA T I V E B R U S H TO B E T R I M M E D AN D C L E A N O U T O V E R G R O W T H DR I V E W A Y LA N D S C A P E A R E A 1 3 9 0 S Q F T 3 ' P L A N T E R 3 V A L V E S P E R D E T A I L IR R I G A T I O N C O N T R O L L E R 1 I N C H P V C W A T E R SO U R C E F O R I R R I G A T I O N W/ 1 -IN C H S H U T -OF F V A L V E EX I S T I N G F E N C E (5 ' H E I G H T ) NA T I V E B R U S H TO B E T R I M M E D AN D C L E A N O U T O V E R G R O W T H MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:54 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 IRRIGATIONPLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 Designer Author A8 N ER O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T A T I O N C O N T R O L N O T E S : 3/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 4 1- 3 / 4 L O W F L O W C O N T R O L Z O N E K I T 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N ER O S I O N C O N T R O L B M P s BM P GENEREAL DISCRIPTION SC H E D U L I N G A PLAN THE PROJECT AND DEVELOP A SCHEDULE SHOWING EACH PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO REDUCE EROSION POTENTIAL, SUCH AS SCHEDULING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES DURING THE SUMMER AND PHASING PROJECTS TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF AREA DISTURBED. CASQA: EC-1; OR CALTRANS: SS-1 PR E S E R V E E X I S T I N G VE G E T A T I O N A N D C R E E K SE T B A C K S B PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION TO THE EX TENT POSSIBLE, ESPE CIALLY ALONG CREEK BUFFERS. SHOW CREEK BUFFERS ON MAPS AND IDENTIFY AREAS TO BE PRESERVED IN THE FIELD WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. CHECK WITH THE LOCAL PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS FOR SPECIFIC CREEK SET BACK REQUIREMENTS.CASQA: EC-2; OR CALTRANS: SS-2. SO I L C O V E R C O V E R C ALL EXPOSED SOIL WITH STRAW MULCH AND TACK IFIER (OR EQUIVALENT). CASQA: EC-3, EC-5, EC-6, EC-7, EC-8, EC-14, AND EC-16. CALT RANS: SS-2, SS-4, SS-5, SS-6, SS-7, SS-8. SO I L P R E P A R A T I O N / RO U G H E N I N G D SOIL PREPARATION IS ESSENTIAL TO VEGETATI ON ESTABLISHMENT AND BMP INSTALLATION. IT INCLUDES SOIL TESTING AND AMENDMENTS TO PROMOTE VEGETATION GROWTH AS WELL AS ROUGHENING SURFACE SOILS BY MECHANICAL METHODS (DECOMPACTING, SCARIFYING, STAIR STEPPING, ETC.).CASQA: EC-15. ER O S I O N C O N T R O L B L A N K E T S E INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS (OR EQUIVALENT) ON ANY DISTURBED SITE WITH 3:1 SLOPES OR STEEPER, KEYED INTO THE GROUND AT LEAST 3 INCHES. USE WILDLIFE-FRIENDLY BLANKETS MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE NATURAL MATERIALS. AVOID USING BLANKETS MADE WITH PLASTIC NETTING OR FIXED APERTURE NETTING. RE V E G E T A T I O N F RE-VEGETATE AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL ORVEGE TATION AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. CASQA: EC-4. CALTRANS: SS-4. SE D I M E N T C O N T R O L B M P s TR A C K I N G C O N T R O L S G STABILIZE SITE ENTRANCE TO PREVENT TRACKING SOIL OFFSITE. INSPECT STREETS DAILY AND SWEEP STREET AS NEEDED. REQUIRE VE HICLES AND WORKERS TO USE STABILIZED ENTRANCE. PLACE CRUSHED ROCK 12-INCHES DEEP OVER A GEOTEXTILE, USING ANGULAR ROCK BETWEEN 4 AND 6-IN. MAKE THE ENTRAN CE AS LONG AS CAN BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE SITE, IDEALLY LONG ENOUGH FOR 2 REVOLUTI ONS OF THE MAXIMUM TIRE SIZE (16-20 FEET LONG FOR MOST LIGHT TRUCKS). MAKE THE ENTRANCE WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE LARGEST VEHICLE THAT WILL ACCESS THE SITE, IDEALLY 10 FEET WIDE WITH SUFFICIENT RADII FOR TURNING IN AND OUT OF THE SITE. RUMBLE PADS OR RUMBLE RACKS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH ROCK ENTRANCES. WHEEL WASHES MAY BE NEEDED WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED OR WHERE THE SITE ENTRANCE AND SWEEPING IS NOT EFFECTIVE. CASQA: TC-1; TC-3; OR CALTRANS: TC-1; TC-3. FI B E R R O L L S H USE FIBER ROLLS AS A PERIMETER CONTROL MEASURE, ALONG CONTOURS OF SLOPES, AND AROUND SOIL STOCKPILES. ON SLOPES SPACE RO LLS 10 TO 20 FEET APART (USING CLOSER SPACING ON STEEPER SLOPES). INSTALL PARALLEL TO CONTOUR. IF MORE THAN ONE ROLL IS USED IN A ROW OVERLAP ROLL DO NOT ABUT. J-HOOK END OF ROLL UPSLOPE. INSTALL ROLLS PER EITHER TYPE 1 (STAKE ROLLS INTO SMALL TRENCHES) OR TYPE 2 (STAKE IN FRONT AND BEHIND ROLL AND LASH WITH ROPE). USE WILDLIFE-FRIENDLY FIBER ROLLS MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE NATURAL MATERIALS. AVOID USING FIBER ROLLS MADE WITH PLASTIC NETTING OR FIXED APERTURE NETTING. SEE: HTTP://WWW.COASTAL.CA.GOV/NPS/WILDLIFE-FRIENDLY_PRODUCTS.PDF. MANUFACTURED LINEAR SEDIMENT CONTROL OR COMPOST SOCKS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF FIBER ROLLS. CASQA: SE-5 (TYPE 1); SE-12, SE-1 3; OR CALTRANS: SC-5 (TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2). SI L T F E N C E I USE SILT FENCE AS A PERIMETER CONTROL MEASURE, AND AROUND SOIL STOCKPILES. INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG CONTOURS. KEY SILT FENCE INTO THE SOIL AND STAKE. DO NOT USE SILT FENCE FOR CONCENTRATED WATER FLOWS. INSTALL FENCE AT LEAST 3 FEET BACK FROM THE SLOPE TO ALLOW FOR SEDIMENT STORAGE. WIRE BACKED FENCE CAN BE USED FOR EXTRA STRENGTH. AVOID INSTALLING SILT FENCE ON SLOPES BECAUSE THEY ARE HARD TO MAINTAIN. MANUFACTURED LINEAR SEDIMENT CONTROL CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF SILT FENCES. CASQA: SE-1; SE-12; OR CALTRANS: SC-1. DR A I N I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N J USE GRAVEL BAGS, (OR SIMILAR PRODUCT) AROUND DRAIN INLETS LOCATED BOTH ONSITE AND IN GUTTER AS A LAST LINE OF DEFENSE. BAGS SHOULD BE MADE OF A WOVEN FABRIC RESISTANT TO PHOTO-DEGRADATION FILLED WITH 0.5-1-IN WASHED CRUSHED ROCK. DO NOT USE SAND BAGS OR SILT FENCE FABRIC FOR DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. CASQA: SE-10; OR. CALTRANS: SC-10. TR E N C H D E W A T E R I N G K FOLLOW MCSTOPPP BMPS FOR TRENCH DEWATERING.HTTP://WWW.MARINCOUNTY.ORG/DEPTS/PW/DIVISIONS/MCSTOPPP/DEVELOPMENT/~/MEDIA/FILES/DEPARTMENTS/PW/MCSTOPPP/DEVELOPMENT/TRENCHINGSWREQMCSTOPPPFI NA L6_09.PDF. CASQA: NS-2. CALTRANS: NS-2. GO O D H O U S E K E E P I N G B M P s CO N C R E T E W A S H O U T L CONSTRUCT A LINED CONCRETE WASHOUT SITE AWAY FROM STORM DRAINS, WATERBODIES, OR OTHER DRAINAGES. IDEALLY, PLACE ADJACE NT TO STABILIZED ENTRANCE. CLEAN AS NEEDED AND REMOVE AT END OF PROJECT. CASQA: WM-8. CALTRANS: WM-8. ST O C K P I L E M A N A G E M E N T M COVER ALL STOCKPILES AND LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND BERM PROPERLY WITH FIBER ROLLS OR SAND BAGS. KEEP BEHIND THE SITE PERIMETER CONTROL AND AWAY FROM WATERBODIES.CASQA: WM-3. CALTRANS: WM-3. HA Z A R D O U S M A T E R I A L MA N A G E M E N T N HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE KEPT IN CL OSED CONTAINERS THAT ARE COVERED AND WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, DO NOT PLACE CONTAINERS DIRECTLY ON SOIL.CASQA: WM-6. CALTRANS: WM-6. SA N I T A R Y W A S T E MA N A G E M E N T O PLACE PORTABLE TOILETS NEAR STABILIZED SITE ENTRANCE, BEHIND THE CURB AND AWAY FROM GUTTERS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND WATE RBODIES. TIE OR STAKE PORTABLE TOILETS TO PREVENT TIPPING AND EQUIP UNITS WITH OVERFLOW PAN/TRAY (MOST VENDORS PROVIDE THESE).CASQA: WM-9. CALTRANS: WM-9. P PREVENT EQUIPMENT FLUID LEAKS ONTO GROUND BY PLACING DRIP PANS OR PLASTIC TARPS UNDER EQUIPMENT. IMMEDIATELY CLEAN UP ANY SPILLS OR DRIPS.CASQA: NS-8, NS-9, AND NS-10. CALTRANS: NS-8, NS-9, AND NS-10. EQ U I P M E N T A N D V E H I C L E MA I N T E N A N C E Q DESIGNATE WASTE COLLECTION AREAS ON SITE. USE WATERTIGHT DUMPSTERS AND TRASH CANS; INSPECT FOR LEAKS. COVER AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY AND WHEN IT IS RAINING OR WINDY. ARRANGE FOR REGULAR WASTE COLLECTION. PICK UP SITE LITTER DAILY. CASQA: WM-5; OR CALTRANS: WM-5. LI T T E R A N D W A S T E MA N A G E M E N T -- - - - - - _,, , , . - - I __ _ ... -- - ' -- - ' I -- - - - - - -- - r - - I I I I I I I I I I I I ... -- ' I ' 1 . . . - - \ .J - - - - -- - - - .a . - - - 0 - - - .. . . . / ' ' I I a5 _ 1 - - - - - - - - I 1ST FLOOR 0' -0"ROOF 20' -2 3/4"2ND FLOOR 11' -2 3/4" EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E PR E -MA N U F A C T U R E T R U S S E S PA N T R Y R -38 BA T H GR E A T R O O M DE C K BE D R O O M LO F T A R E A MAX HEIGHT 23' -4 3/4"MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT 30' - 0" PO R C H 0" -4 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " CL O S E T UN D E R ST A I R S RE T A I N I N G W A L L EXIST. GRADE -0' -11 1/4" 9 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 1ST FLOOR 0' -0"ROOF 20' -2 3/4"1ST FLOOR T.O.P.10' -0"2ND FLOOR 11' -2 3/4" PR E -MA N U F A C T U R E D T R U S S E S R -38 BA T H R O O M HA L L W A Y MA S T E R W . I . C KI T C H E N GR E A T R O O M OF F I C E R -21 MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT 30' - 0" EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E MAX HEIGHT 23' -4 3/4" 9 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " EXIST. GRADE -0' -11 1/4"TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:36:00 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 SECTIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A9 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 SE C T I O N C U T 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 SE C T I O N C U T - - - - - - - - - ~ I / _J I / I / V ,,. . ~ V I / I / V V V V I I - - -- - .- - . ' , . , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ 1 1~ 1 i 1 11 i" ' 1 11 T 1 : im 1 11 -11 11 1 m 1 1 1 n i u 1 n i 1 1 1 11 11 1 n i 1 1 ~ 1 i i - 11 i' 11 m ~ :: : - f :- : _ ~ = = ; l ~=J - - -= = - __,= : ~ = ; 1 - - - - ; --- - • - - - - • 1 1\ ·~·- ~ ~ ~ - II Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l ll l = l l l = l l f ~ I = .:- -:~ ~~- , I ~ r, ~ = = = : I ~ -- - - .. - - - - - - - - ~ rr ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m = m ~ · ~ / [ -----_-__ \, \ ~ --.-_ \, \ : - _ i :1 =1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 =1 1 1 = 1 1 =1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 11 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = m ~ _-: ~ \ r: •. _ ___ _ _ _ _ \ --- = ~ ~m w m w n = w m w n = w m w m w m w = n w m k - 1 1 1 1 : : L : L - 1 1 1 ~ m l l i r r ·'.; . ~ I ~ i - _ - ,,, . : • - ~ II I I i' II I I I I II I I I II I I i' II I I I II I I i' I I I I I I I I I I i' II 111 1 I I I II II i i I I I I 11 i' I lr r i ½ m ~-· ~ ~ _. i ; /, / , • ~ , ,r ; ~ , ~ - ~ . 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 1 = _ 1 I l= _ I I I - _I I 1 - _1 1 1 - _ I I 1- - ~ . - : ~ -_ - -- -- _ - · · -_ - - _ , ___ --_ ~ -~ - - ·- ·_ - - ·, _ - - ~ _-- · · _ _ -- - - _- _-- ._ - _ "_ -f= t - 11 · _ · _ - _ - - -_ , _ , . _ _ _ _ - - ___: : : _ - -= - - . --//"• ... _ ~ TT ~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - 1 1 1 ~ m ~ - 1 1 1 ~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ I I = · = I 1J J m l l i m i l l m i l l m i l l m i l l r r k 1 I dm k J m ~ - 1 1 1 ~ m ~ - 1 1 1 ~ m i l l m i l l m l l i m i l l m i l l m l l : 1 ~m l l i m i l l - 1 1 1 M : - 1 1 1 ~ - I I l~ - I l~ - I I l~ - 1 1 1 ~ m i l l - 1 1 :~ m ~ ---. ~~,~ [j l I Im ' I Im ' I ff i l l Im ' I IT T ' I Im ' 1 lf f i l l lf f i I Im ' I Im ' 1 lf f i l I Im ' I Im ' 11 ~ 1 I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 1 lj f l 1ff i 1 I Im ' Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I IT T ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 11 f f i 1 I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 11 [ 7 1 I Im ' 1 lf f i I Im ' 1 lj f l I Im ' 1-111:\..lllwl 11, _111_111 :~,~,-- -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1-111-111-111-1 I -111-111-___:___ 11 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 I I I 11111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 I 1 111 111 111 1 1 111 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 1 1 111 111 111 111 11111 111 11 111 111 1 1 111 111111 111111 111111 11 111 111111 111111 11111 I I I I I I 1 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -111-11 -1 - ,, l l l , , , l l l , , , l l ,, , l l l , , , l l ,, , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , ll , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l ,, l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , I I I , , I l, , , l l l , , , l l, , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l ,, , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , ,1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , 11 , , , 1 1 1 , , ll l , , , l l,,,111,,,111,,,lll,,,ll ,,,lll,,,lll,,,III,, 111,,,111,, lll,,,111,,,- / / / / / / / ~ ~ i i i n n n n i i i n n n n ~ ' i n n n r r i ~ r r i ? I ' '-. --------"'-<::-----'-. '-. S T U C C O F I N I S H E D 5 ' W A L L FR O N T V I E W 5 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " WO O D S T A I N E D DO O R S MA T C H I N G HO U S E C O L O R RI M J O I S T W O O D B L O C K I N G DE C K I N G MA T E R I A L 2 -3/ 8 " S Q U A R E P O S T 5" S Q U A R E BA S E P L A T E CO L O R M A T C H E D VI N Y L C A P S C O N C E A L AT T A C H M E N T H A R D W A R E WALL PER PLAN STEEL PLATE PER STRUCT. -PROVIDE OPENING FOR J -BOX LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS -INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS J -BOX PER ELEC.PLYWOOD BACKING FOR LIGHT FIXTURE PLATE BOLTS SEALANT AND BACKER ROD ALL AROUND AT PLATE STUD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPE STONE VENEER EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER PLYWOOD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPEMAINTAIN CONSISTENT VENEER THICKNESS ALL AROUND AT LIGHT FIXTUREELECTRICAL CONDUIT SEALANT ALL AROUND WALL PER PLAN PLYWOOD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPE WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER CEMENT BOARD FLANGE SET IN SEALANTCASING BEAD STUCCO BY OMEGALIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS -INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS 3/ 4 " - 1" THICK VENEER STONE SET IN T O M O R T A R B E D A T T A C H E D T O DURAROCK BACKER DU R A R O C K A T T A C H E D T O P R E S S U R E TR E A T E D F R A M I N G W I T H S T A I N L E S S STEEL SCREWS SO L D E R E D L E A D C O A T E D C O P P E R FL A S H I N G B E L O W G R A N I T E S I L L SPLIT -FACE GRANITE SILL MITERED AT CORNERS AND SLOPED AWAY FROM COLUMN 3' - 0"10' - 0"2X6 STUD2X4 STUD N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 PR O P O S E D H O U S E ON P A D F . F . : 1 2 8 ' PR O P O S E D G A R A G E ON P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 . 5 ' GU E S T PA R K I N G P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y EXISTING BUILDING TR A S H E N C L O S U R E W I T H O U T R O O F P R O P O S E D P A T I O P R O P O S E D P A T I O NE W A C U N I T 2N D F L O O R LA Y O U T 1/ 4 " O R 3 / 8 " F U L L Y T E M P E R E D G L A S S PE N C I L P O L I S H F L A T C O R N E R S MA X . 5' - 0 " DE C K B Y O T H E R S 1. 3 7 5 " x 1 . 5 0 " x 0 . 1 2 5 " B O T T O M R A I L 3 ' - 0 " 0 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 2. 3 7 5 " x 2 . 3 7 5 " x 0 . 1 2 5 " A L U M I N U M P O S T 80 0 S E R I E S T O P R A I L 3/ 8 " D O M E D C A P 3/ 8 " T H R U B O L T , 4 " L G 3/ 8 " S C R E W B A S E 3/ 8 " S L E E V E BA S E P L A T E P A D DE C K TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:36:00 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A10 1/ 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 GA R B A G E E N C L O S U R E 1/ 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 4 A - R A I L I N G 3/4" = 1'-0"7 A - L I G H T F I X T U R E A T S T O N E V E N E E R 3/4" = 1'-0"6 A - T Y P A C A L L I G H T F I X T U R E D E T A I L 3/4" = 1'-0"5 R- P O R C H C O L U M N 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 EX T E R I O R L I G H T I N H G P L A N NT S 3 A - G L A S S G U A R D R A I L 'i ' / 1/ / ½ / I / I I I L _ _ _ _ _ I' - . . r I I -" s - - J J ~ i / / I ½ I / I I I / / : I / : / / J I \= ~ ~ r I J j - I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · · · · / ' ~;. , < : .. . . . . . . . / . · · ' - , ' ,. - ( , - - ' ' '7 , : .. . -- / ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - / I I - .. . . I / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ / I \ I \ ~ , , I I I ·. _·•,, ~ ·-,-, ~ ·,; _,,,_ .. ', ~ ~ .,, , , ' 'LJ ( -'----' ,1,------1W.ll..L...l---=----~-0 N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 .7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 FI R S T F L O O R (1 5 1 3 s f ) N E W G A R A G E ( 4 9 6 s f ) GU E S T P A R K I N G (2 7 9 s f ) NE W D R I V E W A Y (8 5 9 s f ) N E W P A T I O ( 6 5 s f ) N E W P A T I O ( 1 1 1 s f ) R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) E X I S T I N G D R I V E W A Y ( 7 1 8 s f ) TR A S H E N C L O S U R E (3 2 s f ) EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L EX I S T I N G RE T A I N I N G WA L L EX I S T I N G RE T A I N I N G WA L L S NE W A C U N I T (1 6 s f ) AD D I T I O N A L D R I V E W A Y (1 4 0 s f ) N E W P O R C H ( 6 4 s f ) S E C O N D F L O O R L A Y O U T ( 1 4 5 s f ) C R A W L S P A C E B A C K Y A R D P A T I O ( 1 0 5 s f ) LO T S I Z E TO T A L I N C R E A S E 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 5. 1 % EX I S T I N G I M P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E C A L C U L A T I O N : 2, 4 3 5 S Q U A R E F E E T ( S F ) PR O P O S E D N E T I N C R E A S E I N I M P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E : 53 8 S F (D R I V E W A Y , S T R U C T U R E S , P A T I O , T R A S H E N C L O S U R E , P A R K I N G ) FI N I S H E D C O N D I T I O N F E E C A L C U L A T I O N : $5 3 8 TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:36:01 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 IMPERVIOUSSURFACE RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A11 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 IM P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E C A L C U L A T I O N S - - - - - I .6 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cu - - - - - - 1 0 I I I I I I L I I I \. . - - - - - - .6 . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - I - - - __ _ _ _ _ / I \ \ \ \ ,1 I I I ~ I ~ ~ - ~ --= = = - - - - = ~=- ~ - ~- ~ ~ - ~ ~~== = =~~=-= - = - = ~ - - - - 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' 1 0 5 ' 1 0 6 ' 1 0 7 ' 1 0 8 ' 1 0 9 ' 1 1 0 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 2 ' 1 1 3 ' 1 1 4 ' 1 1 5 ' 1 1 6 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 8 ' 1 1 9 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 127' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49 ° 3 4 ' E 1 44 .2 8 ' PL N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' PL S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G LO T 4 1 LO T 3 1 LO T 3 0 R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) 10 0 MO C P 12 0 . 4 2 CP 12 5 . 9 3 CP 13 7 . 8 4 CP 15 1 . 7 9 PC C P 15 0 . 4 4 CP 14 5 . 6 4 FL 14 9 . 6 4 FL 14 6 . 8 5 EG 14 8 . 7 2 EG 14 1 9 5 EG 13 9 . 2 7 EG 13 8 . 0 6 EG 13 7 . 6 1 EG 13 3 . 1 9 EG 13 6 . 1 5 EG 13 8 . 3 8 EG 13 3 . 7 1 EG 13 3 . 5 9 EG 12 6 . 8 EG 12 6 . 4 3 EG 12 7 . 4 LS 12 7 . 5 LS 12 7 . 4 9 LS 12 7 . 4 8 LS 12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 2 3 LS 12 7 . 2 LS12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 3 2 LS 12 7 . 2 5 LS 12 3 . 8 7 EG 12 2 . 7 5 EG 10 7 . 4 EG 12 1 . 4 9 GT T 11 8 . 3 9 DW E 12 0 . 7 1 DW E 12 3 . 5 6 DW E 12 5 . 8 8 DW E 12 6 . 4 9 DW E 11 9 . 9 9 RW B 11 9 . 9 9 RW B 12 3 . 4 6 RW T 12 2 . 9 6 RW T 12 1 . 3 2 RW B 12 4 . 5 3 RW T 12 2 . 5 9 RW B 12 3 . 7 7 RW B 12 5 . 6 3 RW B 12 7 . 7 3 RW T 12 8 . 2 2 RW T 12 6 . 7 RW B 12 8 . 1 4 RW T 12 6 . 6 7 RW B 12 5 . 4 RW T 12 6 . 5 7 RW B 12 7 . 9 6 RW T 12 6 . 9 6 EG 12 6 . 9 3 RW B 12 9 . 6 9 RW T 12 9 . 4 6 EG 12 7 . 1 4 RW B 12 9 . 6 9 RW T 12 7 . 3 EG 12 7 . 5 7 RW B 13 0 . 5 2 RW T 12 8 . 2 2 RW B 13 0 . 2 4 RW T 12 7 . 1 9 RW B 13 0 . 1 5 RW T 12 6 . 8 2 RW B 12 9 . 6 2 RW T 12 7 . 0 1 RW B 13 9 . 0 1 TR 13 8 . 2 9 TR 13 7 . 6 TR 13 7 . 5 4 TR 13 6 . 8 9 TR 14 0 . 6 6 TR 14 5 . 8 3 TR 14 9 . 1 5 TR 14 3 . 6 TR 13 7 . 1 4 SW F L 13 6 . 7 7 SW F L 13 6 . 3 5 SW F L 13 7 . 5 9 RW 13 8 . 1 4 RW 13 8 . 5 RW 11 2 . 2 9 WM 10 8 . 7 5 EB 10 8 . 4 6 EB 12 1 . 5 7 GT B 11 5 . 9 5 GT T 11 3 . 7 GT B 11 2 . 7 3 EG 10 7 . 0 8 GT B 12 7 . 3 6 GS 12 6 . 9 1 GS 12 7 . 4 5 GS LE G E N D EX I S T I N G G R A D E E L E V A T I O N NO T F O U N D P R O P E R T Y C O R N E R CO N T R O L P O I N T W A T E R M E T E R FO U N D P R O P E R T Y M A R K I N G N E E D VE R I F I C A T I O N MO N U M E N T ℄ CE N T E R L I N E FE N C E L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E 11 0 ' 11 1 ' MA J O R C O N T O U R L I N E S MI N O R C O N T O U R L I N E S 12 1 . 0 1 EG SW A L E F L O W L I N E GU T T E R F L O W L I N E ℄ ℄ SI L V E R A D O D R I V E S H R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y 12 6 . 3 4 DW E S H R U B B E R Y EX I S T I N G P A D EX I S T I N G D R I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L 13 1 . 0 1 EG 13 6 . 7 4 EG EX I S T I N G S T A I R S TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:12/20/2019 6:02:11 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE BELVEDERE TIBURON,CA 94920 TOPOGRAPHYMAP RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 A.L.A.L.T1 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N EG TR EB LS WM GSEXISTING GRADE TREE ELECTRICAL BOX LIVING SLAB WATER METER GARAGE SLABABBREVIATIONS CP CONTROL POINT PC PROPERTY CORNER BO U N D A R Y I N F O R M A T I O N BO U N D A R Y ' S S HO W N O N S HE E T A RE S HO W N F R O M MA R I N C O U N T Y , C A S U B D I V I S I O N M A P B O O K 7 P A G E 4 8 . NO B O U N D A R Y S UR V E Y W AS P ER F O M E D AN D T H E P RO P E R T Y L I NE S A ND F E N C E S S HO W N A R E NO T T O B E T AK E N A S R E CO R D . E A SE M E N T S AD D I T I O N A L E A SE M E N T S M AY E X I S T F O R T H IS PA R C E L , A S R E CO R D E D W I T H T HE C O U N T Y. RE F E R E N C E T ITLE RE PO R T F OR A L L P E R T A I N I N G EA S E M E N T S . BU I L D I N G S ET B A C K TO B E C O N F IR M E D B Y C L I EN T . NO T E S 1. TH E P U R P O S E O F T H I S D R A W I N G I S TO P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y F O R S I T E D E S I G N . PR I O R T O A N Y C O N S T R U C T I O N , B O U N D A R Y LI N E S A N D C O R N E R P O I N T S S H O U L D B E VE R I F I E D A N D D O C U M E N T E D . 2. TH E A R E A O F S U R V E Y W A S D E L I N E A T E D B Y CL I E N T . 3. CO N T O U R S A R E C O M P U T E R G E N E R A T E D , F R O M SP O T E L E V A T I O N S . E X A C T S U R F A C E UN D U L A T I O N W A S N O T D E T E R M I N E D , CA L C U L A T E D O R L O C A T E D . 4. SU B J E C T T O A L L E A S E M E N T S , R E C O R D E D O R NO T . T H I S S U R V E Y I S N O T A B O U N D A R Y SU R V E Y A N D D O E S N O T R E F L E C T T H O S E I T E M S TH A T M A Y B E L I S T E D I N A T I T L E R E P O R T , IN C L U D I N G C O V E N A N T S A N D R E S T R I C T I O N S . BENCHMARK INFORMATION UTILIZED TWO MONUMENTS ON STEWART DRIVE, REF E RENCING MARIN COUNTY, CA SUBDIVISION MAP BOOK 7 PAGE 48.ASSUMED EL EVATION AT M ONUMENT CONTROL PO INT O NE SET AT 1 00 F EET.RWT RWB DWE GTE GTFL SWFL RW FL FENCE LINERETAINING WALLSWAIL FLOW LINEGUTTER FLOW LINEGUTTER EDGEDRIVE WAY EDGERETAINING WALL BOTTOMRETAINING WALL TOP MO MONUMENT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / / / / / / / / / I / / / _ / / / / / / / - - ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ; - 7 ~ / __ _ , ,_ _ ___ , _ - \ - - ~ - \ \ \ f:: : , , . \ \ \ \ \ I / \ I - - ,, , ,, , _ /c_ _ _ _. : , . _ s f y c_ - - - - - - ' ' y - -< / _ _ _ I I \ \ I I \ I I I I - ·-, - _ L . -- - 1 - - - I - 7 - - I - - 'i - - , - \ I I I I / I I I I / I I I I I \ \ \ / / \ \ \ I I I -$ - f: : : , , . ~ t> < ] 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 545 Silverado Tiburon Color and Material Selections 2 Index Entry Door -3 Garage Door -4 Exterior Lighting - 5 Stucco Acrylic Finish - 6 Stone Veneer -6 Metal Roof - 7 Accent Color - 7 9-10 - 11 Gutter - 8 Window/Sliding Door - Drive & Sidewalk Finish Exterior Wall Siding -4 3 Product Placement: Entry Door Product By: IWANTTHATDOOR Product ID: The Beast Square Top Single Entry Iron Doors 4 Product Placement: Single & Double Car Garage Door Product By: Clopay Product ID: Design Rec 14 Colonial Lift Handles (Color: Stepping Stone) Product Placement: Exterior Wall Siding Product By: James Hardie Product ID: Color Pegasus 0 0 Pegasus PPG1010-1 5 Product Placement: Exterior Lighting Product By: JohnTimberland Product ID: Danbury 6" High Black Dusk To Dawn - Style # 5y088 6 Product Placement: Exterior Stucco Color Product By: Omega Product ID: 9228 Stone Age Product Placement: Exterior Stone Veneer Product By: Cultured Stone Product ID: Pro-Fit Modera Ledgestone (Intaglio) Pro-Fit® Modera™ Ledgestone Pro-Fit Modern Ledgestone is classic contemporary. Create a tailored look w ith easily insta lled. meti:u!ously bundled modular components of equal height. Dimensions (approx): 4" H x a· L 4" H x 12· L. and 4· H x 20" L 7 Product Placement: Roof Product By: Metal Roofing California Product ID: Standing Seam Ash Gray (Kynar) Product Placement: Doors, Garage Door (PPG1010-4) Product Placement: Trims, Fascia, Gutter, Downspout, Band before the soffit (PPG1010-6) Product By: PPG Paints Product ID: Stepping Stone (PPG1010-4), Up In Smoke (PPG1010-6) STANDING SEAM -ASH GRAY (KYNAR) Stepping Stone PPG1010-4 Up In Smoke PPG1010-6 8 Product Placement: Roof Gutter Product ID: K-Style Gutter 9 Product Placement: Windows Product By: Anderson Product Description: Anderson 100 series (Black) CHOOSE THE WINDOWS, DOORS & OPTIONS THAT ARE RIGHT FOR YOU . WINDOW & DOOR TYPES ..... _,, ...... , _____ "_ ....... ...................... _ . ._ ...... _ .. _ I, .. ,. .... ,._I n. ....... -.---........... --·-........ l"W._ ·-- -t!MW..N ......... N"M,- ........... i...,W,,., ........ ......... ""--·----··--,..""" ..... _,,.,_,.,,_ ... ......................... .,.. ..... ,--·· ... ........... ~ .. ..... ,._, ... ... ...,_ ..... ""_ ..., ... _ .. . -- . -... -'~ ... ----.................... ................. -,w _,.,._....,. ... .... ..,..,...,. .... ............ ..,._..., __ _ __ .. .......... _ ·-·---------..,,.,.. GLASS ~, ........ ,. ......... ........... .,.. ______ ..,, ............... -~ ,.,., ______ _ ..... .,,. ...... ; .... _ ....... 1a,,-... ....................... ........ .-..... .... ....... _...., ..... _____ ..,._..,... ........ ,1 .. 1,- Or, ..... alflC.---...--.. ....... --........... , ....... .. ...... , ___ ,. Wlll..fl ..... _. .... .............. 11,.--u.111111•-·----'GI'--... 0.-... .-... 111--.,.. ___ _ -i-....-~-··"'-·-----i-• _,. .. (1,1 ............. ..... ...,..,.._. ..... __ ,._i_.,...,_ ... _ ....... _ . ..,.._ ·~ ......... . .., .. ._. ..... l,llt,( -- GRILLES COLOR o.... ... ,,.,.___ ... ~ .. ..,.,, .... _ ..... ..... ~ ..._ ---· ... ..-4-... ... ,,. .,. __ ...,...... ___ .... ,.. .. ... ~r~~-J ■I■ ■■I @-~-... ~ ... -~---~--___ ,.. :...;.~ - ~: ~:-:! ~ ~~DWA!E ___ ,. ' .................. ~ =:..? ~:::~----·------·---~·--· -~--IIM ..... ::--=..:..-=. _,.., __ _ ___ .. ..,. ---- ... _,.. __ .., ..-.. " ... -· .-~------·----• ---~1 -.. 1 -:.-M--== --------:..=-:.:.::.:=:::..:== , ....-..--.... -_ .. __ 10 Product Placement: Sliding Door Product By: Allside __ Sliding and Hinged Patio Doors _______ _ With their pristh,e appeara11u, Slidi11g a,ul Hhzged Patio nnnr:f mill ~,u, " stylish entry far your home. ____.j-- A ,...,IU,uil, patio de.or inVTW tbt-bnu,y of ouidoon inside, ~ik pn,viding .,n mcrgy-dttci,:nt b..nic r .ag.tin:A i..dcmcnl -..,1,n. Sliding Patio Door • 1-"usion....ddnl 01H1JlruC1ion ddiva:s lcng-1:a>Ung Hn::ngth .and d..,-.,b.lit)" • Smrdy41d fnnxd.pd,andl"wid.- intc:i;~ n.ai1ing tin with I~" SCI bad.. for added strucnm.l imcgriry. • Srnuo lin orion is al.o ;w.oil.i,bl.,_ • I" thid. in.,,J.md glu.,wi,h w:i.rm.....dg,: ,.,,du,ology. • Adjwubl<' du.J undem roller >p<O'rn onast:'inka.,,.,.lu.ad:. .. ruu...,.C'a'}' op,,r·ar,on • Anibbk in whi, .. , "-lmo..d o r ~ day; a brorw, ntuior with~ whii .. inrnior alsoisoK.:rul.. • K.cyal bndk loclr. ~ fuo, lode op1ions. • Two,1hn:r,and"'1r-p.,nda.,Jigumioru ani~c. a I ~ ---- n,,, & ... Ii. ~W l,,11vfW' aa,f PJM""-s lllill i,{i- ,_., ,,._ .,;,J, W ...mruh.,.,J M>UJl!f" iunual Jid,,. Hi11ged Patio Door • Fwion-...:ldcd c:omuuakH'I ddinn long-U.ting ,1 f1'ngi.h anJ durabi.l:i,y. • cJ..oc,..,from4'M'o.-6""4" fumc: dqnh, both with l" wick in,q:nl nailini; fln for ad.k.J struaur::J intq;,,il}·• . !:a::.~-:;;:1.;. with • liavy-d,uy ,,i/fai,cr in .JI fnnx utd pand mc,mlxn,_ • Thn:t:?>irit locking sptan fur a tii;hl .. J a..d ..ddc:d wmfon. • 8...,.. ha,dw,u-i: ...id. ..dj,uublce whil<'hing<"". • Anil..bk in ..inr;k, doubk or fund,..yl,doon , ...... wdalmond. 11 Product Placement: Concrete Color Finish Product By: Davis Colors Product ID: Dune 6058 Number: 6058 Nam e: Dune Hex: 8d8o6b Description: Li g uid Dose Ra te: 0.61 lbs per 94 lb sack of cement Powder Dose Rate: 0.5 l bs per 94 lb sack of cement To view or order an actual concrete sampl e. cLick here. To: Tiburon Design Review Board From: Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Residents and owners of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004 Date: November 1, 2020 RE: Continued concerns regarding proposed development at 545 Silverado Drive By implementing a bare minimum of changes, we believe the revised plan submitted for the 545 Silverado Drive Project neglects in both principle and practice the recommendations suggested by the Design Review Board at the October 1, 2020. It also has not materially addressed the concerns we raised at that meeting and in our previously submitted correspondence (attached). In no uncertain terms, we recognize the property needs to be developed, and that we have always recognized that some blockage of our light and window framing was going to happen. As such, we have been supportive (and on the record with the DRB) of past redevelopment attempts that were less intrusive. However, as even the developer stated in his commentary and showed pictures of (and is exemplified by the Hillside Design Guidelines), our neighborhood consists of houses that look “down” and “over” other houses. This has created houses that work with the contours of the topography allowing the homes to be in concert with each other rather than in conflict (As our house did with the original house at 545 Silverado Drive for over 50 years.). With this project as is, we will be the only uphill house that looks “at” and “into” our downhill neighbor from our primary living spaces in the neighborhood. This said, we are not taking issue with the general house aesthetics, the color palette, the footprint of the first floor (even the extension of the first floor by another foot on the side facing us), or the overall house square footage. Our focus is on creating a massing impact more in-line with projects previously approved by the town, keeping the project from impeding on our family privacy, and being more consistent with the neighborhood. How? At a minimum, it seems straight forward – Further reduce the roof pitch, actually push the second floor back, and add some surface articulation that is visible. None of these would change the view capture of the new house. Since the majority of the Design Review Board has not yet viewed this from our perspective, we hope they will take the opportunity to do so prior to Thursday’s meeting. Of note, the current design continues to have more massing impact than prior designs, where, when all the board members were able to visually see the impact from our property they subsequently unanimously rejected. Included is a pdf that adds some additional context to our perspective. Thank you for the consideration. 1 for 11/5/2020 DRB LATE MAIL# Hi Christy, Thank you for sending over the info for the upcoming DRB meeting. Unfortunately, I had no idea that the DRB meeting would be continued to Nov. 5th and I am on vacation. As Chris Hartung mentioned – he will have access to my backyard for any DRB members that would like to see the impact from my property. Unfortunately, the board will not have access into my house, which is problematic since the Board cannot see the proposed light impact from the oncoming headlights up the new expanded driveway into my property. Primary Concerns: 1)The expansion of the driveway is not fully marked on the site to give the DRB members a clear understanding of the impact of the oncoming headlights into my property as well as adjacent neighbors. Several of the “native plantings” that the developer proposes to keep are along the fence that provide minimal screening will have to be removed to accommodate the new expanded pad and build out of the retaining wall. The expanded driveway on the front right corner, along my fence line is approximately 8 feet above grade of my property. With the forced removal of shrubs to make room for the new pad and space for the retaining wall and no 6 foot retaining (which past DRB members on this same project felt the need for and approved) will cause a significant light impact on my property. The developer and architect failed to properly map out the location of my home on the submitted plans. They have the original 1972 home layout not my new remodeled home which was completed several years ago. All of my main living areas- kitchen, living room, dining room and family room will have major light impact from the oncoming headlights because of my southwest angle of my house. See enclosed drawing. The old home at 545 Silverado drive had a garage at the end of the driveway which blocked the headlights coming into my home as well as adjacent neighbors. I ask that the applicant build a 6 foot retaining wall along the back pad of the driveway to mitigate the flood of light into my home. 2)Several Board Members recommended that the A/C unit be moved to the back, which was not done. The 6 foot open screening will have minimal impact on the noise from the A/C unit. This A/C unit is right on my fence line and in the middle of my main outdoor living area. Moving it to the back of the house will dampen the continuous noise impact. As we all know – global warming is here to stay everyone has their A/C units on a lot more than in the past. 3)The addition of windows to soften the blank walls – does nothing but add light pollution and glare onto my property and neighbors. Adding some textual interest to break up the walls makes more sense – some siding or color changes on the second floor would help, not adding windows that would add glare and light pollution to neighbors and my property. I ask that they be removed. 4)The landscaping plans are not complete and very limited and do not address the screening issues at all, nor address the front curb appeal. As mentioned above, numerous shrubs will have to be removed. I did not see on the plans staff’s recommendation of adding two additional trees at the top of the stairs along my fence line. The current plant selection does not reflect what will grow in our climate and the soil conditions at 545 Silverado drive. Sal Barajas – my Landscaper 2 for 11/5/2020 DRB LATE M·Atl# has offered to work with the applicant to suggest proper screenings and plantings. Sal can provide numerous examples how the proposed trees have not worked well in Tiburon, they are slow growers, temperamental and get woody after a few years and had to be removed. I ask as a condition of approval that the applicant work with my landscaper to select proper mature trees that would work on this site to provide proper screening that will last and not die prematurely. Secondary Concerns: 1)I have concerns over where the story poles are located for the proposed house on our shared property line. On the plans – pages A7, A8 and T1. The property line is off my fence line by at least two feet yet, I believe the story poles and house are measured from my fence line. I would like to get this clarified. 2)As discussed, the water issues from the hillside are significant, I do not see any additional measures made to protect the house for the new homeowners or for my property. This could open up future litigation as a known and well documented issue. 3)The exterior lighting plan was not changed or addressed. The exterior lighting sconce they propose is a dusk to dawn light – a continuous large radius of light which will have massive glare to my property and the entire neighborhood. Per our CC& R’s we do not have any street lights- specifically to protect out nighttime view. Having significant light pollution from exterior lights is not in keeping with the Towns guidelines. Sincerely, Margarita Perry dated 11/3/2020 Hello DRB Board, I wanted to share with you that Chris & Jen Hartung and I have had some constructive calls with Eric Nuttall regarding the project at 545 Silverado drive. Based on our discussions, we believe the neighbors and Eric are in agreement with the below changes in principal - subject to conditions of approval and final plans with full details. We have worked thru several points of concern regarding the proposed project and my property. 1) The expanded driveway and the light intrusion into my dwelling. - Eric has suggested a 6 foot permanent fence located on the expanded driveway. See enclosure. The fence will be a solid fence with no open slats with mature trees/ hedge in front of it along the perimeter. The fence will expand the entire length of the driveway and the retaining wall. The permanent fence facing my property will be constructed at grade level of the garage. There are still details that need to be sorted out. The landscaping plan will be made with my landscaper Sal Barajas. I ask that the DRB board make this a deed restriction so no new homeowner will remove this structure which will impact my property in the future. 2)The A/C unit. - Eric is proposing moving the A/C unit. The unit will be tucked back into the stairs on patio 2 which I am in agreement with. 3)Eric mentioned that the added windows on the north & south elevation will be removed. We feel that with a belly band around the second floor, and/ or some siding/ texture will make a difference and will soften the blank wall. 4)Eric has agreed to consult and use my landscaper - Sal Barajas for the landscaping plans to ensure that we have the proper mature trees and plants that will work with the property and terrain. We will be using two 24 gallon mature trees along the fence line as a screening for my property. In addition, per Staff’s recommendation on October 1st by” adding two trees at a minimum of initial height of 8 feet tall by the rear side of the property.” 5)Eric will be working with Chris and I on solutions to mitigate drainage and water issues from the hillside on to our respective properties. 6)We are working together on exterior downlight lighting solutions that are less intrusive to both Chris Hartung and my property as well as the neighborhood. As I have mentioned in past meetings - I welcome a new home next door. I am looking forward to working with Eric and his crew to build this home. I appreciate his willingness to work with me on solutions that will create a beautiful home that is sensitive to the neighbors. I ask the board to approve our collaborative and thoughtful recommendations. Sincerely, Margarita Perry 3 for 11/5/2020 DRB dated 11/5/2020 LATE MAIL#_ .,. .. \ .,. ,. ... ,. ,..{ ,.... ' ... -.,.. . ... ~ ... " ' \ \ ' \ ( ' \. ,, ..,. \ \ > .,. ' \ \ ' ' \ \ EXHIBIT 4 TOWN OF TIBURON PAGE 1 OF 10 TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 Agenda Item: AI-1 STAFF REPORT To: From: Subject: Members of the Design Review Board Christy Fong, Senior Planner 545 Silverado Drive; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-23; File No. DR2019-119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, fence, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,032 square feet of floor area and cover 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot. PROJECT DATA ADDRESS: 545 SILVERADO DRIVE OWNER: EQUITY SMART INVESTMENTS LP APPLICANT: ERIC NUTTALL ASSESSOR’S PARCEL: 055-082-23 FILE NUMBERS: DR2019-119 LOT SIZE: 10,627 square feet ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE) GENERAL PLAN: MH (MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) FLOOD ZONE: X DATE COMPLETE: JUNE 26, 2020 PSA DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 23, 2020 (EXTENDED) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting design review for construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling on an R-1 zoned property located at 545 Silverado Drive in the Little Reed Heights neighborhood. The property is vacant and was originally occupied by a single-family home that was constructed in the 1950’s. In 2014, a design review application (File No. 714046) was approved by the Design Review Board for construction of a new two-story single-family dwelling. The project was not fully constructed due to a legal dispute, the incomplete building was fully demolished for safety in 2016 and the site is vacant. The applicant submitted plans on December 19, 2019 to construct a new single-family home on the vacant parcel. Exhibit 4 Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 2 of 10 The proposed 3,032 square foot two-story single-family home will include a 496 square foot two- car attached garage. On main floor, the applicant proposes a main entry/ foyer, great room, dining room, kitchen, powder room, office and an ensuite bedroom. The second story includes an open loft area, master ensuite bedroom, two bedrooms, bathroom and a laundry room. The project proposes numerous outdoor spaces, including two new patios on the main floor, a backyard patio and an upper-floor deck immediately above the main front entryway. The proposed project includes the replacement of the existing perimeter fence, exterior stairs and landings, as well as adding new retaining walls at various locations throughout the site. The project is designed to integrate with the hillside contour. The proposed residence will have a two-story form at the front, left (north) and right (south) elevations. The rear elevation will have a one-story form. The project will replace the existing driveway at similar location and will extend toward the south end of the driveway for a new parking pad. The project, along with the exterior improvements, covers approximately 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot, when a maximum of 30% lot coverage is allowed. The proposed height of the residence is calculated at 25’-9” measuring from the existing natural grade, when a maximum height of 30’ is permitted. The project will be built within the building envelope and is in compliance with the development standards prescribed for properties in the R-1 zone district. The proposed colors and materials include a combination of off-white siding and stucco walls, accented with dark gray stone veneer and ash gray metal seam roof. The design includes dark iron entry door and off-white garage door with glass lite. A color and material board has been included in attached plans provided for the Board review (Attachment 3). PROJECT SETTING Source: Marin Map and Google Map, accessed on September 17, 2020 The property is located on a trapezoid shaped 10,627 square foot lot on Silverado Drive. The lot width is wider at the front and getting narrower toward the rear. The lot has an average slope of 27.74%, sloping up from Silverado Drive toward the east and north. The subject property, along with nearby properties have the views of other homes in Tiburon and the Richardson Bay in the southwest direction. The properties to the west across Silverado Drive from the subject property are located in the downhill. The adjoining neighbor to the left (north), 541 Silverado Drive, is locating slightly uphill and the neighbor on the right, 549 Silverado Drive, is locating downhill. N Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 3 of 10 ANALYSIS The following sections are outlined to facilitate the Board when evaluating the project: Design Issues View Access The proposed main structure is designed utilizing the similar footprint of the demolished residence. The proposed structure will be placed toward the rear side of the property within the building envelope to preserve as much as possible the view for the neighbor to the left (north). Currently, the neighbor at 541 Silverado Drive, has windows from the living room, dining room and kitchen above the sink with existing views of the water. Since the proposed structure is designed to setback from the front and step down at the northwest corner, view impact to the living room window appears to be insignificant. The view access from the dining room will be partially impacted and the window in the kitchen will be blocked by the proposed structure. No other view impact is expected to other uphill neighbors due to natural topography. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed design can reasonably preserve the neighbors’ access to view from the kitchen and dining room. Privacy As noted above, proposed structure is placed toward the rear side of the property. One upper-level window is found on each side elevation. On the left (north) side, a window is proposed from the loft area. As conditioned, this window is required to be frosted for the lifetime of this structure with no clear glazing. Another upper-level window is found by the hallway on the left elevation. Privacy impact from this window is limited as it is setback away from the side property line and is not oriented to any structure or view. The project also includes a deck on the upper level. This deck is recessed from the first-floor mass on the front elevation. The applicant initially proposed to screen the deck with solid walls on both sides to relief privacy concerns. Since the proposed deck is covered by solid roof and at least fifty percent of the vertical area around the space is closed, the deck area in its original design will contribute toward floor area. To ensure the project is in compliance with the development standards, the applicant proposes to replace the solid wall with a privacy screen that is fifty percent open on the left (north) elevation. As the result, the exterior fireplace at the upper-floor deck will be relocated from the left (north) elevation to the wall by the master bedroom. Sheet A3.1, A3.2, A5 and A12 are updated to reflect the current design as attached in Attachment 4 in the staff report. Massing and Bulk The proposed design is consistent with the forms and massing found in nearby residences with a two-story massing on the uphill slope. The new residence will not be highly visible from the street level as the front yard is sloped upward with naturalized landscape. The proposed residence is pushed into the hillside from the existing footprint to reduce the visual impact of massing. Though, staff found that the typical eave width proposed in the project can be further reduced to improve the visual bulk and avoid view obstructions to the neighbors. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed roof form and the maximum ridge height of 25’-9” is appropriate with consideration of the site context. Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 4 of 10 Hillside Design Guidelines The following principles of the Hillside Design Guidelines may be used in evaluating the characteristics of the property: Goal 1, Principle 5 of the Hillside Design Guidelines encourages applicants to “follow hillside contours with horizontal building elements to increase integration of dwelling unit and site.” (See below illustrations). The proposed second-floor mass is setback from the front property line and is stepped back from the first story. The proposed structure will follow the contour of the site with some horizontal articulation. Vertical articulation is visible from the side elevations as the structure follows the contour of the hill. Goal 1, Principle 8 of the Hillside Design Guidelines states that “use changes of material to soften large elevations of building and blend into hillside”. The project proposes to have various types of material, including stone veneer, stucco and siding to soften the building elevation and blend into hillside. To preserve privacy, the proposed structure has minimal amount of glazing on the side elevations, particularly on the upper floor when the blank wall will be visible to nearby neighbors. Staff recommends the project to utilize at least two types of material, particularly on the side elevations, to avoid large span of uniform walls. The Board may want to discuss whether changes of material is an appropriate measure to soften the large side elevations of the building. HQ Ho • LAl<?q e. FAt-t>-0 1':. OF i.lt:lJFOr2 AA ""-"T e.r21.._:.. 16 l.tFe.L.e~~. \ '\ " ~~ ',, ""-~ '-, -" ' "'~ ' ' ~ ~. < ' ' --- Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 5 of 10 Goal 3, Principle 3 of the Hillside Design Guidelines states that “views should be preserved as much as possible within reason. However, not everyone can have a panoramic view. The neighborhood and the development and architect of the new dwelling must work together to obtain the best solution between slot views, view corridors and panoramic views.” The project is proposed to step back at the northwest corner on the second level to preserve the view of adjoining neighbor. Ideally, the upper floor deck should be more open on the sides to further preserve the neighbor’s view corridor; however, the current design includes screening to reduce privacy concerns raised by nearby neighbors. The Board may wish to comment whether the project can preserve views to the most possible extent. The Design Review Board is encouraged to view the story poles and determine if the proposed residence would create any visual, privacy or view impacts on the adjacent neighbors. Zoning The Board should consider whether the proposed project will further the purpose set forth in Zoning Ordinance Section 16-52.020(A). The Purpose of site plan and architectural review is to ensure that the design of proposed construction and use assist in maintaining and enhancing the town’s distinctive character. Purposes 1.Ensure that new uses and structures enhance their sites and are compatible with the highest standards of improvement in the surrounding neighborhood. The project site will be occupied by a new single-family residence that is consistent with previous land use. The new residence and landscape improvements are compatible with other existing homes in the surrounding neighborhood. The project is designed to be consistent with the standards of other recently updated single-family homes in the surrounding neighborhood. 2.Retains and strengthens the visual quality of and attractive character of the town. The project is designed with materials and finishes that are commonly found in current development trends. The proposed design and architectural style are in keeping with the • 6 111~"1 TH:;. f;J~::..0 11'7'-'! L'..'.1~11:L.l .... :-,E:A!<' -;"H~ E.:-:.ll;Si lHl; rJY.jE:l...l'H &, 'NIL L 0.,. o p_,~·n2Ll t.-:" MO•!f'( h-:'</ OF YI e.'·N FOl2 /)PH ;U.. r.>c l-k?~~e . • A i?OIZ TIO~ OF v:ew ' I":> LOl;,T Vv'He':~ ~!:.'N OWE:L.'-l~l; I~ '6l1E') IH F-~OHT OF eXl-':ii'iHo, HO/J-eie. Y l.eV.'--• . ;.;,,.r,~ . ' , -b lTH··k:, 7He ~iw t. ov,.·e~L\Ht., ~.,. DOWN HILL ~ W iLLl-:ZE.A;=-~%,., Y lE:.W ('..O~t{ll?Ot<~ _ -.Jie~ 6E:TWE:~rl e x J".;ifl HC.,, HOL.l 6 ~-!). 1.J(-1 \-IJLL HOU".::>E': ~E:TA1t4".:i -?'MlLP-i< Vli=.W~, -• P,,'( 'l-!:,Lic'.-'HC:1 OF'F'l u A C::,O~H e t2 OF r!~W HOd ~E: 7 ,.\;\o"'.,T oi:=- V! i::Vl F f<'O/v\. Al?JAC..E:M"f ~O~':>E: I? t<'E:7Aii-1 S.i?. r-l e;w V le!W · ;,.,2e,.,., • APPROV£0 11 1:1se: Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 6 of 10 area and is common for single-family residences. The proposed residence and exterior improvement will retain the visual quality and attractive character of the Town. 3.Ensures that landscaping emphasizes drought tolerant native species and protects mature vegetation. The proposed project involves addition of shrubs within the front yard and side yards. The rear side and the frontage along Silverado Drive will retain its natural state with native brush. Most of the existing landscaping in the rear yard will be maintained, with the exception of four trees which will be removed to create more functional outdoor space. With the goal to minimize change in existing landscape, staff recommends the Board to require at least two trees, at the minimum initial height of 8’ tall to be planted in the rear side of the property along the southern property line. 4.Recognizes the interdependence of land uses and circulation and provides for an efficient and interconnected system of streets and pedestrian ways through town. The proposed project will utilize the existing driveway and the access from the street will remain the same. The street system will not be negatively impacted. 5.Assists project developers in understanding the town’s concerns for the aesthetics of construction. The proposed materials and finishes are in natural palettes that will blend with the hillside surrounding. The proposed architectural style and form is compatible with other residences in the neighborhood that is varied in styles. The project will address the Town’s concern for aesthetics of construction. 6.Ensures that construction complies with all applicable town standards and guidelines, and does not adversely affect community health, safety, aesthetics, or natural resources. As conditioned, the proposed project would comply with all required developments standards and would be in conformance with the Hillside Design Guidelines as a whole. The project would not appear to affect the community health, safety, aesthetics or natural resources for the neighborhood. The Board should review this project with respect to Zoning Ordinance Sections 16-52.020 (H) (Guiding Principles). Staff’s analysis of the proposed project’s conformance with the guiding principles are provided below: 1.Site plan adequacy. Proper relation of a project to its site, including that it promotes orderly development of the community, provides safe and reasonable access, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is located on an existing 10,627 square foot vacant lot. The lot has been vacant since 2016 and was previously occupied by a two-story single-family residence prior to the residence being demolished. The proposed residence will follow similar footprint as the previous structure and will be located toward the rear side of the site to allow view access of adjoining property. The proposed location will setback from the downhill neighbor on the right (south) and through careful design and discussions with the neighbor to the left (north) many changes have been made to preserve as much of the privacy and views. The project has proper relation to the site, which would not appear to create detrimental impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 7 of 10 2.Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions. Locating on an uphill parcel from the street, the proposed residence is oriented to take advantage of the view shared by other neighbors. Light and air is provided by adequate setbacks on the sides. Noise-generating equipment will be located within the building envelope. As conditioned, the proposed second-floor windows will respect privacy. The project appears to work appropriately with its topographic constraints and will relate to the existing developments on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view, privacy, noise, light and air. 3. Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second-story additions shall be discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood. The homes in the neighborhood along Silverado Drive vary in size, height and style, but are primarily two-story homes and many homes have outdoor decks facing toward the views. The design of the proposed residence and other improvements would appear to be compatible with other homes in the vicinity and maintain a good relationship with its surrounding. Though, the Board may wish to discuss whether the visual bulk of the proposed project can be further reduced to enhance the project’s compatibility with the existing residences immediately adjacent to the proposed residence. Staff recommends to the Board to reduce the typical width of eaves from 2’-6” to 2’ throughout the building and to lower the overall height of main entry to be consistent with the garage at 10’-6” in order to reduce the massing and avoid potential view obstruction. 4. Floor area ratio. The relationship between the size and scale of improvements and the size of the property on which the improvements are proposed. This concept is known as floor area ratio. The project would include 3,032 square feet of floor area, which would be 30.7 square feet below the permitted floor area (3,062.7 square feet) for a lot of this size in the R-1 zone district. 5. Grading and tree removal. The extent to which the site plan reasonably minimizes grading and/or removal of trees, significant vegetation, or other natural features of the site such as rock outcroppings or watercourses. The project will remove four trees located in the rear yard and will replace existing shrubs. Three new trees will be planted by the end of driveway within the side yard. Approximately 138 cubic yard of soil will be exported from the site in order to accommodate the new residence and exterior improvements. The project includes swale and French drains that connect to the street as storm water management. 6.Compatibility of architectural style and exterior finish. The architectural style and exterior finish are harmonious with existing development in the vicinity and will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 8 of 10 The proposed exterior finishes include various shades of gray and off-white colors for the exterior walls and features. The façades are proposed to be in stucco, accented with stone and siding. The proposed architectural style and exterior finish will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. 7. Landscaping. Proposed landscaping, insofar as it is used appropriately to prevent erosion; to protect the privacy of adjoining sites; and to mitigate the visual and noise impacts of the proposed project. Applicants are encouraged to use native and drought- resistant landscaping. Proposed landscaping shall be used which will, at maturity, minimize primary view obstruction from other buildings. A cash deposit or other monetary security may be required to ensure the installation and/or maintenance for a one-year period of any and all landscaping. Projects that are subject to provisions of title IV, chapter 13E (water efficient landscape) of the Tiburon Municipal Code shall comply with the Marin Municipal Water District regulations regarding water-efficient landscaping adopted by reference therein. As noted above, the landscape plan will maintain the existing native brushes at the front and rear yards in its natural state, remove four trees in the rear yard and include new trees and shrubs in front of the proposed residence. An exterior stair will be replaced to provide access to the rear yard. The proposed landscape changes will prevent erosion and mitigate visual impacts of the proposed project. In addition, staff recommends the Board to require two new trees to be planted in the rear yard along the southern property line. As conditioned, the project will include new landscape that would improve the site’s outdoor space while respecting the existing vegetation condition. The Board may wish to comment on whether the proposed landscape changes with proposed condition would appropriately address privacy impact to adjoining sites. 8.Lighting. Proposed lighting, insofar as it should not invade the privacy of other properties or produce glare or light pollution; yet provide adequate illumination for safety and security purposes. All proposed exterior lighting shall be shielded downlighting. New exterior lighting will be installed throughout the exterior of the home. All lights will be shielded downlighting with no clear glass. 9.Overall property improvement. In order to allow the gradual upgrading of existing improvements, upgrades may be required to be made to existing buildings and the site as a whole. The review of applications for additions or modifications to existing development may include conditions requiring changes and/or modifications to existing buildings and site improvements for the entire property to the extent that there is a reasonable relationship between the requested project and the changes and/or modifications required. The vacant property is not on the Town’s list of historic properties. The proposed project will utilize and expand on the existing building foundation. Since the proposed project will be built on a vacant lot, the Board may add any conditions that they determine would be appropriate to ensure the new home has a proper relationship with the existing conditions of the site. 10. Appropriate use of building envelope. In planned residential (RPD and RMP) zones, building envelopes are generally intended to provide a larger-than-needed area for flexibility in the appropriate siting of a main structure and its accessory structures. The Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 9 of 10 building envelope should not generally be interpreted as an area intended to be filled by a main structure and its accessory structures. The proposal is not located in an RPD and or RMP zone. The building envelope is established by height, setbacks and other limits as specified in the development standards. 11.Green building. The project design includes features that foster renewable energy and/or resource conservation. This project is characterized as a new single-family dwelling; therefore, solar panels would be required. The new home would have to comply with Tier 1 of the CalGreen Building Code requirements. 12. Conformance with zoning requirements. All modifications and site improvements shall conform with the setback, parking, and height requirements established for each zone by article II (zones and allowable land uses), and with any special requirements including recycling (see Municipal Code Chapter 16C [recyclables collection area]) and screening guidelines established for specific uses by this zoning ordinance. The project is located in the R-1 zone. The proposed structures would comply with all zoning requirements. In conclusion, the proposed residence does not appear to be detrimental to the character, privacy and safety within the neighborhood. As conditioned, the project appears to further the purposes of site plan and architectural review and comply with many of the guiding principles. Staff has recommended various conditions, as noted in Attachment 1, to further enhance the project’s conformance with the purposes and guiding principles. The Design Review Board may wish to determine if the project would be in substantial conformance with the applicable criteria. PUBLIC COMMENT As of the date of this report, staff had received verbal communication from the neighbor residing at 541 Silverado Drive concerning the proposed second-floor massing and eaves projection that could contribute to visual bulk. In addition, this neighbor is also concerned about the blank wall on the side elevation that will be highly visible from the windows of their existing dwelling. The neighbor, residing at 549 Silverado Drive, has expressed concerns about the proposed second- floor massing and height, lack of replacement landscape and potential shade impact toward the backyard of the said property. PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff recommends that the Design Review Board determine that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Class 3 categorical exemptions. Class 3 Categorical Exemption (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303-New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) The proposed project consists of demolition of an existing single-family residence and construction of a new single-family residence in a residential zone and in an urbanized area. Categorical Exemption Exceptions (CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2) Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 TOWN OF TIBURON Page 10 of 10 Further, none of the exceptions listed in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. There is no evidence that the Project will result in any adverse environmental impacts and the Project does not involve any unusual circumstances or historical resources. Indeed, the proposed project would not significantly impact any environmental resource. In addition, there is no evidence that any significant cumulative impacts would occur. Specific supporting details regarding the project site include the following: 1) The property is located within a residential zone with single-family dwelling surrounding the property on all sides. 2) According to the California Department of Transportation, there are no scenic highways in Marin County. 3) According to the California Department of Toxic Substance Control, there are no hazardous waste sites in the Town of Tiburon. 4)The existing home is not on the Town’s List of History Properties. The existing home has gone through modifications throughout the years. It is a common practice for the Town of Tiburon’s Design Review Board to approve new homes on vacant properties in an established residential neighborhood. Other examples include 9 Via Paraiso West Street, 21 and 25 Gilmartin Drive and 835 Stony Hill Road. RECOMMENDATION The Design Review Board should review this project, along with all reports and data submitted, supplemented by public comments and on-site inspections as appropriate, and determine whether the project will further the purposes set forth in Zoning Ordinance subsections 16.52.020 (A) (Purpose) and satisfy the criteria of Zoning Ordinance Sections 16-52.020 (H) (Guiding Principles) and determine that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff recommends the Board to adopt the following conditions: (1) to include change of materials use on the exterior walls at the upper floor, particularly on the side elevations, (2)to reduce the eaves width from 2’-6” to 2’, (3) to reduce the height of main entry by approximately a foot, (4) to frost upper-floor window on the left elevation, (5) to add two trees at the minimum initial height of 8’ tall by the rear side of the property and (6) to adopt the revised design of upper-floor deck as attached in Attachment 4. If the Board wishes to approve the project as submitted, the Board may adopt or amend the draft resolution to include conditions that would ensure the project to be in substantial conformance with the applicable standards as noted above. ATTACHMENTS 1.Draft Resolution for Approval with Conditions 2.Application and supplemental materials, received on December 18, 2019 3.Plans and materials board prepared by Tangent Design and Engineering as received on September 10, 2020 4.Revised plan sheets A3.1, A3.2, A5 and A12 for upper-floor deck ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XX (Draft) A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY 3,032 SQUARE NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A 496 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE, AND OTHER ACCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS IN A R-1 ZONED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 545 SILVERADO DRIVE ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 055-082-023 WHEREAS, the Design Review Board of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows: Section 1. Findings A.The Town of Tiburon received an application for Site Plan and Architectural Review (File #DR2019-119) for construction of an approximately 3,032 square foot single-family residence with a 496 square foot attached garage and improvements that include new driveway, retaining walls, exterior stairs and landing and landscape features. The application consists of the following: 1.Application form and supplemental materials received on December 19, 2019; and 2.Site plan, elevations and materials board prepared by Tangent Design & Engineering received on September 10, 2020 3.Revised plan sheets A3.1, A.3.2, A5 and A12 for upper-floor deck, prepared by Tangent Design & Engineering B.The Design Review Board held a duly noticed public hearing on this project on October 1, 2020. The Board reviewed plans for the proposed project in accordance with Section 16-52.020 (H) of the Tiburon Zoning Code (Guiding Principles in the Review of Site Plan and Architectural Review Applications). C.The Design Review Board finds, based upon application materials and analysis presented in the October 1, 2020 staff reports, public testimony, as well as visits to the site, that the proposed additions and improvements would be consistent with the existing home and surrounding properties. D.The Design Review Board finds that the project is exempt from the requirements of the ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 2 California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the Class 3 categorical exemptions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15303. The Design Review Board further finds that that none of the exceptions in Section 15300.2 apply, as there is no evidence that the project will result in any significant adverse environmental impacts, presents unusual circumstances or involves an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, a hazardous waste site, damage to a scenic highway, or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. E.The Design Review Board further finds, based upon the application materials and analysis provided in the October 1, 2020, staff reports and the attachment thereto, as well as the data submitted, supplemented by public comment and on-site inspections, and deliberations at the meeting, that the project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Tiburon General Plan and is in compliance with the applicable sections of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance, and thus will further the purpose set forth in subsection 16-52.020(A), and satisfy the applicable criteria of subsection 16-52.020(H). 16-52.020(A) Purposes •Ensure that new uses and structures enhance their sites and are compatible with the highest standards of improvement in the surrounding neighborhood. The project site will be occupied by a new single-family residence that is consistent with previous land use. The new residence and landscape improvements are compatible with other existing homes in the surrounding neighborhood. The project is designed to be consistent with the standards of other recently updated single-family homes in the surrounding neighborhood. •Retains and strengthens the visual quality of an attractive character of the town. The project is designed with materials and finishes that are commonly found in current development trends. The proposed design and architectural style are in keeping with the area and is common for single-family residences. The proposed residence and exterior improvement will retain the visual quality and attractive character of the Town •Ensures that landscaping emphasizes drought tolerant native species and protects mature vegetation. The proposed project involves addition of shrubs within the front yard and side yards. The rear side and the frontage along Silverado Drive will retain its natural state with native brush. Most of the existing landscaping in the rear yard will be maintained, with the exception of four trees which will be removed to create more functional outdoor space. With the goal to minimize change in existing landscape, at least two trees, at the minimum initial height of 8’ tall will be planted in the rear side of the property along the southern property line. ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 3 •Recognizes the interdependence of land uses and circulation and provides for an efficient and interconnected system of streets and pedestrian ways through town. The proposed project will utilize the existing driveway and the access from the street will remain the same. The street system will not be negatively impacted. •Assists project developers in understanding the town’s concerns for the aesthetics of construction. The proposed materials and finishes are in natural palettes that will blend with the hillside surrounding. The proposed architectural style and form is compatible with other residences in the neighborhood that is varied in styles. The project will address the Town’s concern for aesthetics of construction. •Ensures that construction complies with all applicable town standards and guidelines, and does not adversely affect community health, safety, aesthetics, or natural resources. As conditioned, the proposed project would comply with all required developments standards and would be in conformance with the Hillside Design Guidelines as a whole. The project would not appear to affect the community health, safety, aesthetics or natural resources for the neighborhood. 16-52.020(H) Guiding Principles •Site plan adequacy. Proper relation of a project to its site, including that it promotes orderly development of the community, provides safe and reasonable access, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is located on an existing 10,627 square foot vacant lot. The lot has been vacant since 2016 and was previously occupied by a two-story single-family residence prior to the residence being demolished. The proposed residence will follow similar footprint as the previous structure and will be located toward the rear side of the site to allow view access of adjoining property. The proposed location will setback from the downhill neighbor on the right (south) and through careful design and discussions with the neighbor to the left (north) many changes have been made to preserve as much of the privacy and views. The project has proper relation to the site, which would not appear to create detrimental impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. •Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions. Locating on an uphill parcel from the street, the proposed residence is oriented to take advantage of the view shared by other neighbors. Light and air is provided by adequate setbacks on the sides. Noise-generating equipment will be located within the building ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 4 envelope. As conditioned, the proposed second-floor windows will respect privacy. The project appears to work appropriately with its topographic constraints and will relate to the existing developments on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view, privacy, noise, light and air. •Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second-story additions shall be discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood. The homes in the neighborhood along Silverado Drive vary in size, height and style, but are primarily two-story homes and many homes have outdoor decks facing toward the views. The design of the proposed residence and other improvements would appear to be compatible with other homes in the vicinity and maintain a good relationship with its surrounding. As conditioned, the Board found that the visual bulk of the proposed project would enhance the project’s compatibility with the existing residences immediately adjacent to the proposed residence. •Floor area ratio. The relationship between the size and scale of improvements and the size of the property on which the improvements are proposed. This concept is known as floor area ratio. The project would include 3,032 square feet of floor area, which would be 30.7 square feet below the permitted floor area (3,062.7 square feet) for a lot of this size in the R-1 zone district. •Grading and tree removal. The extent to which the site plan reasonably minimizes grading and/or removal of trees, significant vegetation, or other natural features of the site such as rock outcroppings or watercourses. The project will remove four trees located in the rear yard and will replace existing shrubs. Three new trees will be planted by the end of driveway within the side yard. Approximately 138 cubic yard of soil will be exported from the site in order to accommodate the new residence and exterior improvements. The project includes swale and French drains that connect to the street as storm water management. •Compatibility of architectural style and exterior finish. The architectural style and exterior finish are harmonious with existing development in the vicinity and will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. The proposed exterior finishes include various shades of gray and off-white colors for the exterior walls and features. The façades are proposed to be in stucco, accented with stone and siding. The proposed architectural style and exterior finish will not be in stark contrast with its surroundings. ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 5 •Landscaping. Proposed landscaping, insofar as it is used appropriately to prevent erosion; to protect the privacy of adjoining sites; and to mitigate the visual and noise impacts of the proposed project. Applicants are encouraged to use native and drought- resistant landscaping. Proposed landscaping shall be used which will, at maturity, minimize primary view obstruction from other buildings. A cash deposit or other monetary security may be required to ensure the installation and/or maintenance for a one-year period of any and all landscaping. Projects that are subject to provisions of title IV, chapter 13E (water efficient landscape) of the Tiburon Municipal Code shall comply with the Marin Municipal Water District regulations regarding water-efficient landscaping adopted by reference therein. As noted above, the landscape plan will maintain the existing native brushes at the front and rear yards in its natural state, will remove four trees in the rear yard and includes new trees and shrubs in front of the proposed residence. An exterior stair will be replaced to provide access to the rear yard. The proposed landscape changes will prevent erosion and mitigate visual impacts of the proposed project. As conditioned, the project will include new landscape that would improve the site’s outdoor space while respecting the existing vegetation condition. •Lighting. Proposed lighting, insofar as it should not invade the privacy of other properties, or produce glare or light pollution; yet provide adequate illumination for safety and security purposes. All proposed exterior lighting shall be shielded downlighting. New exterior lighting will be installed throughout the exterior of the home. All lights will be shielded downlighting with no clear glass. •Overall property improvement. In order to allow the gradual upgrading of existing improvements, upgrades may be required to be made to existing buildings and the site as a whole. The review of applications for additions or modifications to existing development may include conditions requiring changes and/or modifications to existing buildings and site improvements for the entire property to the extent that there is a reasonable relationship between the requested project and the changes and/or modifications required. The vacant property is not on the Town’s list of historic properties. The proposed project will utilize and expand on the existing building foundation. As conditioned, the new home would have a proper relationship with the existing conditions of the site. •Appropriate use of building envelope. In planned residential (RPD and RMP) zones, building envelopes are generally intended to provide a larger-than-needed area for flexibility in the appropriate siting of a main structure and its accessory structures. The building envelope should not generally be interpreted as an area intended to be filled by a main structure and its accessory structures. The proposal is not located in an RPD and or RMP zone. The building envelope is established by height, setbacks and other limits as specified in the development standards. ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 6 •Green building. The project design includes features that foster renewable energy and/or resource conservation. This project is characterized as a new single-family dwelling; therefore, solar panels would be required. The new home would have to comply with Tier 1 of the CalGreen Building Code requirements. •Conformance with zoning requirements. All modifications and site improvements shall conform with the setback, parking, and height requirements established for each zone by article II (zones and allowable land uses), and with any special requirements including recycling (see Municipal Code chapter 16C [recyclables collection area]) and screening guidelines established for specific uses by this zoning ordinance. The project is located in the R-1 zone. The proposed structures would comply with all zoning requirements. Section 2. Approval. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Design Review Board of the Town of Tiburon does hereby approve the application for Site Plan and Architectural Review (File Nos. DR2019-119) for the reasons set forth above, subject to the conditions of approval listed in the attached Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review Board of the Town of Tiburon on October 1, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARDMEMBERS: _______________________________ CEDRIC BARRINGER, CHAIR TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ATTEST: ______________________________ DINA TASINI, SECRETARY ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 7 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (DRAFT) 545 Silverado Drive File # DR2019-119 Community Development Department 1. This approval shall be used within three (3) years of the approval date and shall become null and void unless a building permit has been issued. 3. The owner and/or applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the Town harmless along with the Town Council, commissions, boards, agents, officers, employees, and consultants from any claim, action, or proceeding (“action”), against the Town, its boards, commissions, agents, officers, employees, and consultants attacking or seeking to set aside, declare void, or annul the approval(s) of the project or alleging any other liability or damages based upon, caused by, or related to the approval of the project. The Town shall promptly notify the owner and/or applicant of any action. The Town, in its sole discretion, may tender the defense of the action to the owners and/or applicants or the Town may defend the action with its attorneys with all attorney’s fees and litigation costs incurred by the Town in either case paid for by the owner and/or applicant 4. The construction of this project shall substantially conform to the application as approved by the Design Review Board on October 1, 2020, as may be amended by these conditions of approval. Any substantial modification to the drawings dated September 10, 2020, stamped “Approved by Design Review Board October 1, 2020”, as determined in the discretion of the Director of Community Development or his/her designee, shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a construction management plan that addresses, parking, traffic control, construction management, construction staging, scheduling, construction equipment, washout, road/access maintenance and repair and other concerns to the satisfaction of the Building Official and Community Development Director. 6. Construction drawings submitted to the Building Division for plan check shall be materially identical to those approved by the Design Review Board. If any changes are made to the approved Design Review drawings, the permit holder is responsible for clearly identifying all such changes when construction drawings are submitted to the Building Division for plan check. For Planning Division conformance check purposes, such changes must be clearly highlighted (with a “bubble” or “cloud”) on the submitted construction drawings. A list describing in detail all such changes shall be submitted and attached to the construction drawing set, with a signature block to be signed by the Planning Division Staff member indicating that these changes have been reviewed and are approved, or will require separate Design Review approval. All changes to a project that have not been explicitly approved by Planning Division Staff as part of the Building ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 8 Division Plan Check process are not approved. Construction that does not have Planning Division approval is not valid and shall be subject to stop work orders and may require removal. 7. At the time of building permit submittal, construction drawings for building permit shall demonstrate that all exterior lighting fixtures, other than those specifically approved by the Design Review Board to be otherwise, must be down-light type fixtures with shielding where appropriate. 8.At the time of building permit submittal, a photovoltaic energy system shall be shown on the drawings in compliance with the requirements of Section 16-40.080 of the Tiburon Municipal Code and shall be installed and operational prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building permit final sign-off. 9.At the time of building permit submittal/planning conformance check, it shall be confirmed that all skylights will be bronzed or tinted in a non-reflective manner (minimum 25%), and no lights shall be placed in the wells of the skylights. Installation in accordance with the approved plans shall be documented prior to final building inspection sign-off. 10.At the time of building permit submittal, a copy of the Planning Division’s “Notice of Action”, including the attached “Conditions of Approval” for this project, shall be copied onto a sheet near the front of each set of construction drawings. 11.All exterior HVAC units and generators shall comply with the Town’s Noise Standards Policy for Air Conditioning Units. www.townoftiburon.org/DocumentCenter/View/1050/HVAC-and-Similar-Mechanical- Equipment-Noise-Policy. If the units exceed this noise standards at the property line, noise baffles or other sound reduction shall be required to reduce the sound levels at the property lines and may require a separate Design Review application. 12. Any structures located within a required setback shall not exceed three (3) feet in height at any point. 13. Any new fencing and/or walls located within a required setback shall not exceed six feet (6’) in height at any point, measured from grade on both sides of the fence/wall. All new fencing, walls and footings shall be located entirely on the subject property. 14. Prior to commencement of construction, a construction information sign shall be posted on the site during construction of the project, in a location plainly visible to the public. The sign shall be 24” x 24” in size and shall be made of durable, weather-resistant materials intended to survive the life of the construction period. The sign shall contain the following information: job street address; work hours allowed per Chapter 13 of the Tiburon Municipal Code; builder (company name, city, state, ZIP code); project manager ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 9 (name and phone number); and emergency contact (name and phone number reachable at all times). The sign shall remain posted until the contractor has vacated the site. 15.Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or final building inspection sign-off, all landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans. The installation of plantings and irrigation shall be verified by a Planning Division field inspection prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. 16. Prior to under-floor inspection, a survey prepared by a licensed surveyor of the structure foundation is required to be submitted to the Building Division. Required documents shall include: 1) graphic documentation accurately locating the building on a site plan; 2) specific distances from property lines and other reference points to the foundation as appropriate; and 3) elevations relative to mean sea level of the foundation walls and slabs. No additional inspections will be provided until the confirming survey results have been submitted. 17.If any existing landscaping that is not proposed to be removed is subsequently removed during construction, the applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan to Planning Division staff for review and approval of additional adequate landscaping, prior to a Final Inspection. The Planning Division staff may refer any subsequent landscaping plan to the Design Review Board. 18.At least two type of materials shall be used on the exterior walls of the upper floor to soften the large walls on the side elevations of the building. 19. Typical eave width shall be reduced from 2’-6”to 2’ wide throughout the building to reduce the masses and obstruction of views for the neighbor to the north. 20. The roof height of main entry shall be lowered by approximately one foot to a maximum height of 10’-6”. 21.All north-facing (left) windows shall be frosted with no clear glass for the lifetime of the structure. 22.Two trees, at the minimum initial height of 8’ tall, shall be planted on the rear side of the property along the southern (right) fence line to provide sufficient screening between neighbors. 23.The upper-floor deck shall have at least fifty percent of the vertical area to be open, as shown in revised plan sheets A3.1, A.3.2, A5 and A12 that were adopted by the Design Review Board on October 1, 2020. ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 10 Public Works Department 24.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall incorporate into construction documents measures for site design, source control, run-off reduction and stormwater treatment as found in the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agency Association (BASMAA) Post-Construction Manual available at the Planning Division or online at the Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (MCSTOPPP) website at www.mcstoppp.org. Prior to commencement of grading/building work on the site, the applicant shall implement the measures as shown on the construction documents. 25.An Encroachment Permit from DPW is required for any work within the Town’s road right-of way, including, but not limited to, utility trenching, installation of new utility connections, and modifications to the driveway apron. The plans shall clearly identify all proposed work in the right of way and an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained prior to conducting such work. 26.All work shall comply with Best Management Practices to prevent storm water contamination 27. Throughout project construction, all requirements of the Town Engineer shall be met, including, but not limited to, the following, which shall be noted on Building Division drawings submitted for plan check: a.This project is creating and replacing 2,500 square feet or more impervious surface area, the site must implement at least one Post Construction mitigation in accordance with E.12 of the Town’s Municipal Stormwater Permit and the BASMAA Post-Construction Manual Design Guidance for Stormwater Treatment and Control for Projects in Marin, Sonoma, Napa, and Solano Counties. There are two runoff requirements: one Town requirement to reduce the peak flow rate to pre-development conditions which has been met, and a separate BASMAA requirement to reduce the total volume of runoff from the site. Since the project is creating or replacing more than 2,500 sf of impervious area, it will need to do something to reduce the total volume of the runoff (not just reduce the peak flow rate). The acceptable options may include a Bioretention facility or you could also sheet flow the drainage across vegetated areas, but the areas need to have slopes, soil types, and vegetation that are conducive to allowing an inch of rainfall to infiltrate without eroding the soil. A final grading and drainage plan is required prior to building permit issuance implementing the BASMAA requirement. b.Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building permit final sign-off, a licensed land surveyor shall verify that fencing, walls, footings and building foundations are entirely within the subject property. If it is found that any portion of the structure(s) were placed outside of the property, that portion of the structure ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 11 shall be removed and relocated to be entirely within the property boundaries. A certification letter, stamped and signed by the surveyor shall be provided as documentation. The letter is required to state that the licensed professional surveyor located the property boundary of the subject property and “certifies” that all structures, including fencing and foundations are located entirely within the subject property and do not encroach beyond it. The certification letter shall reference the building permit number, provide the date when the surveyor performed their services and must reference the property address and assessor’s parcel number. c.This project involves displacement of over 50 cubic yards of earth (including cut, fill, displacement, import and/or export) and the following are required: Prior to building permit issuance the applicant shall complete the Construction Erosion and Sediment Control Applicant Package that can be found in the helpful forms and documents section of the Town’s website. Link: http://townoftiburon.org/156/Helpful-Forms-Documents. Please note that projects with over 50 cubic yards of earth movement shall also be subject to post-rain-event erosion control inspections. 28. Prior to issuance of a building permit, review and acceptance of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan by the Town Engineer is required. 29. Provide a final grading and drainage plan along with drainage calculations to support the drainage system design prior to building permit issuance. 30. Show sizes, materials, alignment (vertical and horizontal) of all pipes, as well as details of outlets on the plans. All drainpipes shall be SDR.35 minimum. Flex pipe is not permitted. 31.Specify types and sizes of turning structures, catch basins, clean outs and other drainage structures. 32. Drainage structures, cleanouts or "y" connections shall be used as appropriate at storm drain alignment deflections or junctions of intersecting drain lines to facilitate maintenance. 33. Subdrainage must be shown, not only on the structural cross-sections, but also on the plans including alignment and discharge locations. 34. All retaining walls shall be backdrained. ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 2020-xx Draft October 1, 2020 12 35. All paved and unpaved finished surfaces shall be positively drained. Finished slopes and elevations shall be shown on the plans. 36. Steep driveways shall be designed to direct drainage such that water will not flush the pavement of intersecting streets. 37.Show details of dissipater systems. 38. The grade around the perimeter foundation of the home shall be sloped away from the foundation. 39. On hillside foundations, provide underfloor drainage/weep holes (minimum 2") to prevent moisture buildup Tiburon Fire Protection District (TFPD) 40. Throughout the duration of project construction, all requirements of the Tiburon Fire Protection District shall be met. 41.An irrigated greenbelt Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) Fuels Management Plan conforming to the standards of the Tiburon Fire Protection District shall be prepared and implemented at the site. The VMP-Fuels Management Plan shall conform to Marin County Fire Prevention Officer's Standard #220 and Fire Safe Marin principles. The plan shall be incorporated into the landscape plan for the project and submitted to the Fire Marshal for review prior to implementation. A Vegetation Management In non-WUI areas shall be prepared in accordance with TFPD Code Section 435.5 directly to the TFPD. The submission shall be email to mlantier@tiburonfire.org Other Agencies 42. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain required permits from the Sanitary District and comply with applicable Sanitary District regulations. 43.Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building Division, applicant shall submit documentation from the Sanitary District confirming that all applicable requirements of the District have been satisfied for occupancy. 44.Prior to issuance of a building permit, applicant shall submit written documentation that the final landscape and irrigation drawings would comply with current water efficient landscape requirements of Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD). 45.Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy by the Building Division, applicant shall submit documentation from MMWD confirming that all applicable requirements of MMWD have been satisfied for occupancy. --End of Conditions of Approval-- ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING DIVISION TOWN OF TIBURON LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TYPE OF APPLICATION o Conditional Use Permit o Precise Development Plan ;('Design Review (DRB) o Design Review (Staff Level) o Tentative Subdivision Map o Final Subdivision Map o Accessory Dwelling Unit o Variance(s) ___ # o Parcel Map o Zoning Text Amendment o Floor Area Exception o Lot Line Adjustment o Rezoning or Prezoning o Tidela..,.ds Permit o Condominium Use Permit o General Plan Amendment o Sign Permit o Junior Accessory Dwelling o Temporary Use Permit o Tree Permit o Other ------- APPLICAtl\JT REQUIRED Th1FOR1\1ATION /D 1 8vo SF SITE ADDRESS: 5 1./ ~ 5, /vf ✓CtJo PARCEL NUMBER: 0 5 S ..... 0 g 7.., -Z, 3 PROPERTY SIZE: a 'l~ 7q {:,.UU ZONING: R-i , L,, PROPERTY OWNERf_r_i a_n_Pe_e_r _y _a_n _d _s_u _e _T_su_i ______________ _ ~ MAILING ADDRESS: 23 carni usti e Drive Novato, CA 94949 PHONE/FAX NLJMBER: 415 -999 -1 o44 E-MAIL: B ri an@pee ryp rope rti es. com -i;" APPLICANT (Other than Property Owner : fd~v,ly 'j;,,,.f Ave,;/,.,,,,/-, { f;g, c JJv 4. { 11'f9 .~DRESS: S-0 I iv· . , j?G.-d .:/i?o 2-v" L""" ,.--. ARCHITECT/DESIGNER/ENGINEER d°iYtcc{VL av ..... ,1, n ~l1 1 q MAil.,ING ADDRESS : ~fo A. :1 ✓.,-1 · · #Z-olf 1 4 vh v .r V\ L rA q 5"6 o '? PH01\1E/FA_XNUMBER: (y//o ) ,5'71-5q-r r E-MAIL: n c.d ,'g_ tl ±cnJe,,if--de ,{Oh- Please indicate with an asterisk (*) persons to whom Town correspondence should be sent . BRIEF DESCRIJ;">TION OF .PR OPOSED PROJECT (attach separate sheft if needed): er r.\/\ s. h· l2i,,; /cl & n -e 1.v b Oth.L o >i --fl_ <;1t-c -, • ' ' ! ~ ~ P\. DESIGN REVIEW SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATIO ,J F&~~ g 201 ; i~ PLANNING DIVISION Please fill in the information requested below (attach separate sheet as needed): 1. Briefly describe the proposed project: --N.........,e ........ 1A).,_ .... t:f_.,_,,S .... ~1 .... ol"-"-g ..... ff1 ........ C"""2_c _________ _ 2. lot area in square feet (Section 16-100.020(L)): / 0~ 3. Square footage of landscape Area: \-o ~ '-\ 4. Proposed use of site (example: single family residential, commercial, etc.): Existing 5 ~"'.3\ ,e, tk""''~ ''1 Proposed S • "-':} \-e... ..f' -...r--• '7 5. Describe any changes to parking areas including number of parking spaces, turnaround or maneuvering areas. lac\"dec' 5ues-+-~20.r·k.·./\., TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT STAFF USE ONLY ITEM EXISTING PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED CAL-PER ZONE AND/OR ALTERATION CULATED Setbacks from property line Clf>P nl )t .. (Section 16- S.f, l ~ ft. 100.020(Y))* ft. ?, 5. ~ ft. ➔ ft. ft. Front - Rear ft. l, \, ft. ..,_ ft. > 2 1/'rl5ft. '11)1 ft. Right Side ft. L.. -i.. ' ft. ....... ft. 2'-3 rf ft, R' ft. Left Side ft. 19 t <L ft. ....... ft . 'l ft. ><' ft. s 'l"L ll ~ Maximum Height \ ....._ (_s~8'' --is -ft. 30 (Section 16-30.050)* ft ft. ft. ft. Lot Coverage '231o( .... L~sq.tt. 31ti. ~ I- (Section 16-30.120(6))* sq.ft. sq.ft sq.ft. sq.ft. I -. Lot Coverage as ...... -iY.~ -t.rL :J Jo Percent of Lot Area % % % % % Gross Floor Area 3031,,f-~ ~D3L--r 30b .i1 (Section 16-100.020(F))* sq.ft. ·4 4 1o sq.ft. sq.ft. 4q~ sq.ft. ?.nnsq.ft. *Section numbers refer to s ecific revisions or definitions in the Tiburon Munici al Code Cha terio :ronin p p p p ( g) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION -MAJOR ADDITION REV6/2016 DEVELOPER TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING 660 AUBURN -FOLSOM ROAD SUITE 204 AUBURN, CA 95603 (916) 5 7 2 -5955ARCHITECTSTRUCTURAL TI T L E -24 TR U S S M F G . FI R E P R O T E C T I O N LOT COVERAGE DIAGRAM 1,517 SQ -FT 78 SQ -FT GARAGE65 SQ -FT 496 SQ -FT104 SQ -FTLIVING AREA 1ST FLOOR PATIO #1 PATIO #2 PORCH LOT SIZE LOT COVERAGE %10,627 SQ -FT 22.26%TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,365 SQ -FTPROPOSEDBACK YARD PATIO 105 SQ -FTF.A.R.:LOT SIZETOTAL FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO10,627 SQ -FT3,032 SQ -FT 28.53%1,515 SQ -FTLIVING AREA 1ST FLOOR 1,517 SQ -FT LIVING AREA 2ND FLOOR GARAGE 496 SQ -FT THIS PLAN SET IS DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH 20 19, CRC, CBC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CA FIRE CODE AND 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMPLIANCE OF TITLE 24. CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE & 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE BELVEDERE TIBURON CITY OCCUPANCY R -3, U TYPE OF CONST.V -B NO. OF STORIES 2 NO. OF BEDROOMS 4 NO. OF UNITS 1 FIRE SPRINKLERS YESENERGY COMPLIANCE:WALL INSULATION = R21 CEILING INSULATION = R38 AC DUCT = R8 HVAC = 15 SEER WINDOW U VALUE = .32 SHGC = 0.25 HOT WATER SYSTEM = TANKLESS GAS 1. NE W C U S T O M H O M E C O N S T R U C T I O N 2. DR I V E W A Y I N S T A L L A T I O N SC O P E O F W O R K : TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:16:59 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 COVER SHEET RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A1545 SILVERADO DR. PARCEL 42, CA 94920 UNITED STATES APN: 055 -082 -023CUSTOM HOME N VI C I N I T Y M A P T i b u r o n B l v d 54 5 S i l v e r a d o D r i v e S ilv e r a d o D r . C o m s t o c k D r . S t e w a rt D r . S t e w a r t D r . T r e s t l e G l e n B l v d T r e s t l e G l e n B l v d Vi r g i ni a D r.T ibur o n Blvd A v e n d i a M i r a f l o r e s H i l a r y D r. SHEET INDEX A1 COVER SHEET GP1 GRADING PLAN A2 SITE PLAN A3 FLOOR PLAN A3.1 FLOOR PLAN A3.2 2ND FLOOR OVERLAY TO 1ST FLOOR A4 ELEVATIONS A5 ELEVATIONS A6 ROOF/STORY POLE PLAN A7 LANDSCAPE PLAN A8 IRRIGATION PLAN A9 SECTIONS A10 EXTERIOR LIGHTNING PLAN A11 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE A12 VISUALIZATION Se p t e m b e r 1 0 , 2 0 2 0 A TTACHMENT 3 r- - - - -- - - - - - ~ T- - - L - J - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = ~ ~ ~ ' PL A N N I N G DI V I S I O N W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49° 34' E 144.28' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' P L R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 P R O P O S E D H O U S E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 8 ' P R O P O S E D G A R A G E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 . 5 ' GU E S T PA R K I N G P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y P R O P O S E D P A T I O DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . SL O P E 6 " I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M HO U S E MI N . 2 % S L O P E AW A Y DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E MI N . S L O P E 6 " I N T H E F I R S T 10 ' F R O M H O U S E T. O . W . : 1 3 8 . 0 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 7 . 3 ' T. O . W . : 1 3 4 . 0 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 7 . 3 ' T. O . W . : 1 2 6 . 0 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 5 . 5 ' T. O . W . : 1 2 6 . 5 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 3 . 3 ' T. O . W . : 1 2 6 . 7 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 6 . 6 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NE W A C U N I T CA R R I E R I N F I N I T Y 1 9 V S 2 4 V N A 9 (5 6 D E C I B E L S ) TR A S H E N C L O S U R E W I T H O U T R O O F T. O . W . : 1 2 7 . 7 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 7 . 3 ' T. O . W . : 1 3 2 . 0 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 7 . 3 ' EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G WA L L ST A N D A R T D R A I N A G E S W A L E SL O P E D T O S T R E E T J D I T C H D R A I N SL O P E D T O S T R E E T FR E N C H D R A I N P R O P O S E D P A T I O T. O . W . : 1 3 8 . 0 ' B. O . W . : 1 2 7 . 3 ' 3 2 ' - 4 1 / 2 " FR E N C H D R A I N T O C O N N E C T TO D R A I N A G E S W A L E A N D DR A I N S T O W A R D T O S T R E E T WM GP 1 2 P R O P O S E D P A T I O S I T I N G A R E A F . F . : 1 4 1 . 7 LE G E N D MA J O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MA J O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) FI B E R R O L L FI N I S H E D F L O O R RE T A I N I N G W A L L FF RW98 0 ' 99 0 ' TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E DR A I N A G E D I T C H D I R E C T I O N DO W N S P O U T D R A I N SE T B A C K L I N E SW A L E D R A I N FR E N C H D R A I N RE T A I N I N G W A L L ENGINEER NOTES ESTIMATED CUT = 180 C.Y., ESTIMATED FILL = 42 C.Y., EXPORT = 138 C.Y.FOLLOWING SITE CLEARING AND STRIPPING OPERATIONS, ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 INCHES, MOISTURE CONDITIONED AS NECESSARY AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY BASED ON THE ASTM D1557 TEST METHOD. THE FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 6 INCHES. THE FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED AS NECESSARY AND COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTI ON OF NOT LESS THAN 90%. DRIVEWAYS COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTION OF NOT LESS THAN 90%.THE TYPE, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABILITY. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLY ACTUAL EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND UTILITIES. HOWEVER, THE DESIGNER, CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER BURIED OBJECTS OR UTILITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, BUT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E N O T E S : 1. EA C H T R E E O R G R O U P O F T R E E S T O B E P R E S E R V E D S H A L L B E EN C L O S E D W I T H 4 ’HIGH -VISIBILITY FENCING ON 5 ’T -STAKES SET A MA X I M U M O F 1 0 ’APART. INSPECTION BY THE CITY ARBORIST IS RE Q U I R E D P R I O R T O A N Y G R A D I N G , G R U B B I N G , T R E N C H I N G , MO V E M E N T O F H E A V Y E Q U I P M E N T , O R O T H E R C O N S T R U C T I O N AC T I V I T Y . 2. WE A T H E R P R O O F S I G N S 1 1 ”X17 ”SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 50 ’APART SH A L L B E P O S T E D O N A L L S I D E S O F F E N C E S S U R R O U N D I N G E A C H TR E E O R T R E E S S T A T I N G T H A T E N C L O S E D T R E E S A R E T O B E PR E S E R V E D . 3. PA R K I N G O F V E H I C L E S , E Q U I P M E N T , O R S T O R A G E O F M A T E R I A L W I T H I N T H E P R O T E C T E D Z O N E O F T R E E S I S P R O H I B I T E D A T A L L TI M E S . TREE SCHEDULE TREE NUMBER SIZE & DESCRIPTION PRESERVE/REMOVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 912"PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE REMOVE REMOVE18"14"14"19"10"8"13"22"REMOVE REMOVEPRESERVE LO T C O V E R A G E D I A G R A M 1, 5 1 7 S Q -FT 78 S Q -FT GA R A G E 65 S Q -FT 49 6 S Q -FT 10 4 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R PA T I O # 1 PA T I O # 2 PO R C H LO T S I Z E LO T C O V E R A G E % 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 22 . 2 6 % TO T A L B U I L D I N G A R E A 2, 3 6 5 S Q -FT PR O P O S E D BA C K Y A R D P A T I O 10 5 S Q -FT 1. ER O S I O N C O N T R O L B M P ' S S H A L L B E I N PL A C E P R I O R T O A N Y S T O R M E V E N T S . 2. BM P ' S S H A L L B E P R O J E C T S P E C I F I C A N D A R E N O T L I M I T E D T O T H E M I N I M U M RE Q U I R E M E N T S S H O W N I N T H E A B O V E T A B L E . T H E A B O V E B M P ' S S H O U L D B E IN S P E C T E D W E E K L Y , B E F O R E A N D A F T E R S I G N I F I C A N T R A I N F A L L . V E G E T A T I O N MU L C H E S A R E N O T I N T E N D E D T O B E P E R M A N E N T A N D O N C E P L A N T G R O W T H I S ST A B L E , I T D O E S N O T H A V E T O B E M A I N T A I N E D . 1 -PE R I M E T E R P R O T E C T I O N 2 -IN C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H S E C O N D A R Y M E A S U R E A F T E R S E P T E M B E R 1 5 T H NO T E S : CO N S T R U C T I O N P H A S E BM P S C H E D U L E WE T S E A S O N DR Y S E A S O N ON -SI T E E A R T H W O R K FI B E R RO L L S ST O R M D R A I N IM P R O V E M E N T S CU R B A N D G U T T E R PA V E O U T PO S T -CO N S T R U C T I O N HY D R O S E E D I N G ST R A W MU L C H I N G & TA C T I F I E R PE R S E R V A T I O N OF E X I S T I N G VE G I T A T I O N DU S T CO N T R O L SA N D / G R A V E L BA G S BA R R I E R S ST O R M D R A I N IN L E T PR O T E C T I O N SE D I M E N T TR A P S DE W A T E R I N G DI ST E N C I L I N G ST A B I L I Z E D CO N S T R U C T I O N EN T R A N C E MA T E R I A L & WA S T E DI S P O S A L LO C A T I O N 1 - BM P ' S P R O V I D E D O N P L A N M U S T B E U T I L I Z E D A S S H O W N O N P L A N . A D D I TI O N A L B M P ' S L I S T E D I N T H I S S C H E D U L E A R E O P T I O N A L A N D C A N B E U S ED T O F U R T H E R E S T A B L I S H E R O S I O N C O N T R O L . 2 - FO R P A V E D A R E A ' S , U S E G R A V E L BA G S I N S T E A D O F F I B E R R O L L S . 3 - W A T E R T R U C K T O B E A V A I L A B L E O N S I T E D U R I N G G R A D I N G . S I T E T O B E W A T E R E D T O M I N I M I Z E D U S T L E V E L S . TH E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E Q U I R E D T O T A K E D U E P R E C A U T I O N A R Y M E A S U R E S TO P R O T E C T T H E U T I L I T Y L I N E S S H O W N O N T H E S E D R A W I N G S , T H E CO N T R A C T O R F U R T H E R A S S U M E S A L L L I A B I L I T Y A N D R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R TH E U T I L I T Y P I P E S , C O N D U I T S O R S T R U C T U R E S S H O W N O R N O T S H O W N ON T H E S E D R A W I N G S . T H E C O N T R A C T O R A G R E E S T H A T H E S H A L L A S S U M E SO L E A N D C O M P L E T E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R J O B S I T E C O N D I T I O N S D U R I N G TH E C O U R S E O F C O N S T R U C T I O N O F T H I S P R O J E C T . I N C L U D I N G S A F E T Y O F AL L P E R S O N S A N D P R O P E R T Y A N D T H A T T H I S R E Q U I R E M E N T S H A L L A P P L Y CO N T I N U O U S L Y A N D N O T B E L I M I T E D T O N O R M A L W O R K I N G H O U R S ; A N D TH A T T H E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L D E F E N D , I N D E M N I F Y A N D H O L D T H E O W N E R AN D E N G I N E E R H A R M L E S S F R O M A N Y A N D A L L L I A B I L I T Y A R I S I N G F R O M TH E S O L E N E G L I G E N C E O F T H E O W N E R O R E N G I N E E R CO N T R A C T O R ' S R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y N O T E 24" CULVERT GALVANIZEDCLEAN CRUSHED GRAVEL FILL &COMPACTED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY MIN 1'MIN 90% COMPACTIONTDETANGENTDESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:56 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 GRADING PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PZ PZ GP1 N VI C I N I T Y M A P 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N N1/4" = 1'-0"2 Culvert Section View 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 5 Si l ve r a d o Dr i ve ti f! ! a o" ' Gj Ma r i n So c c e r A c ad e m y O> y r 6 o n , a e ; , rn y 6 9 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - .. T ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ -- - - - - - = ~ /l ; / I ,_ \ \ - - • . "- ( .. . . . . . -I ' . ' . . . ' / r . , , . / -· / _ : . / , ' / _ 0 0 0 0 0 ' \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - - - - •• • • • • • • • • • • ~ - - - - - - - - - - - I / V ' v ' v V ' v l I 7 / / 7 ,- _ ] I .. . • 1 . ' \ --=~======-~ IICTES 7 1 rr Tr 7 111 , 1_1rr -rr -7w 1---111 ''-II-I-I ~ NDS, INC 851 NORTH HARVARD Al/£. LINDSAY. CA 93247 TOLL FREE 1-800-726-1994 PHONE: (559) 56Nl888 FAX: (559) 562-4488 www.ndopro.Grni IICSPC·LYO.mt! P0° UP ~RI.INA~r r\'ITr~ ','lnll U.'.'. NHIETOR IICS l.'LECf,[• SE\\'ER I. ltl~T.~LJ.•TIO!i TO ~= '.XlM'L.l:"l:D ll ACC•:JF:DANCC .-,11 I -~;.·icr ;,~-u 0 J:R'$ :,P[Cl,l~.~Tlc-N~ 2 CC ,01 SCil_[ Cf\il'/, IK 3 THIS Df',\'!~IK ISIWENDEJFOR LSC :;y ~RCHITEC-S E'l31flEE'lS C•'CR.~CC-RS. COtlSULTAWS.~flD CEJUl FR·}"'2SIOII'.l_S FOR FLIJ\llltlG PIJRO{)SE2 OI-IL\" ~ ;c NI 0-:M.'.ll~'N L~'lll,~NL~ I L-:L1, ·1,,~ CJHfUI I .',I II L ll'<L 01 ~.\UJ.;~MU. I Ul I l,1U~I Ul fU'IL~,rn ,'/,L\ilf-'1-'RC';LJ PY THF Pf'nn.lCT ·~Mll..lFACTIIP.FP. TC RF GlJflS r."P.Fl ACfllP./, TF DRAINAGE EMITTER @NDS ,:-4""" ~ KJ-Yc·, .. ,,)\-,i ,...,,.j"~·"'"'; G G GWWW E E E S S S CATV CATV CATV W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' 1 0 7 ' 1 0 8 ' 1 0 9 ' 1 1 0 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 2 ' 1 1 3 ' 1 1 4 ' 1 1 5 ' 1 1 6 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 8 ' 1 1 9 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 127' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 13 7' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' LO T C O V E R A G E D I A G R A M 1, 5 1 7 S Q -FT 78 S Q -FT GA R A G E 65 S Q -FT 49 6 S Q -FT 10 4 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R PA T I O # 1 PA T I O # 2 PO R C H LO T S I Z E LO T C O V E R A G E % 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 22 . 2 6 % TO T A L B U I L D I N G A R E A 2, 3 6 5 S Q -FT PR O P O S E D BA C K Y A R D P A T I O 10 5 S Q -FT LEGEND DIMENSION POINT SET -BACK LINE PROPERTY LINE DRIVEWAY WATER LINE GAS LINE ELECTRICAL LINE SEWER LINE PROPOSED FENCE LINEPROPOSED DRIVEWAYPAD LINE M.U.S.D.A.INTERNET AND TV LINE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DIRECTION N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49 ° 3 4 ' E 1 44 .2 8 ' PL N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 P R O P O S E D H O U S E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 8 ' P R O P O S E D G A R A G E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 . 5 ' P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G 3 4 ' - 0 " LO T 4 1 LO T 3 1 LO T 3 0 P R O P O S E D P A T I O F . F . : 1 3 8 . 9 ' TR A S H E N C L O S U R E WI T H O U T R O O F P R O P O S E D P A T I O R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) P R O P O S E D P A T I O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . S L O P E 6" I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M H O U S E MI N . 2 % S L O P E AW A Y DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . S L O P E 6" I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M H O U S E NE W A C U N I T CA R R I E R I N F I N I T Y 1 9 V S 2 4 V N A 9 (5 6 D E C I B E L S ) WM S I T I N G A R E A F . F . : 1 4 1 . 7 0 ' - 3 " 1 ' - 4 " 1' - 2 1 / 2 " 0' - 0 3 / 4 " 3 4 ' - 4 " 6' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 2 1 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " EN G I N E E R N O T E S ES T I M A T E D C U T = 1 8 0 C . Y . , E S T I M A T E D FILL = 42 C.Y., EXPORT = 138 C.Y. FO L L O W I N G S I T E C L E A R I N G A N D S T R I P P I N G O P E R A T I O N S , A L L A R E A S T O R E C E I V E F I L L SH A L L B E S C A R I F I E D T O A M I N I M U M D E P T H O F 8 I N C H E S , M O I S T U R E C O N D I T I O N E D A S NE C E S S A R Y A N D C O M P A C T E D T O A T L E A S T 9 0 % O F T H E M A X I M U M D R Y D E N S I T Y BA S E D O N T H E A S T M D 1 5 5 7 T E S T M E T H O D . T H E F I L L S H A L L B E P L A C E D I N L I F T S N O T EX C E E D I N G 6 I N C H E S . T H E F I L L S H A L L B E M O I S T U R E C O N D I T I O N E D A S N E C E S S A R Y AN D C O M P A C T E D T O A R E L A T I V E C O M P A C T I ON OF NOT LESS THAN 90%. DRIVEWAYS CO M P A C T E D T O A R E L A T I V E C O M P A C T I O N O F N O T L E S S T H A N 9 0 % . TH E T Y P E , L O C A T I O N S , S I Z E S A N D / O R D E P T H S O F E X I S T I N G U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S AS S H O W N O N T H E S E P L A N S W E R E O B T A I N E D F R O M S O U R C E S O F V A R Y I N G RE L I A B I L I T Y . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S C A U T I O N E D T H A T O N L Y A C T U A L E X C A V A T I O N W I L L RE V E A L T H E T Y P E S , E X T E N T , S I Z E S , L O C A T I O N S , A N D U T I L I T I E S . H O W E V E R , T H E DE S I G N E R , C A N A S S U M E N O R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C O M P L E T E N E S S O R AC C U R A C Y O F T H E D E L I N E A T I O N O F S U C H U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S , N O R F O R T H E EX I S T E N C E O F O T H E R B U R I E D O B J E C T S O R U T I L I T I E S W H I C H M A Y B E E N C O U N T E R E D , BU T W H I C H A R E N O T S H O W N O N T H E S E D R A W I N G S . TREE SCHEDULE TREE NUMBER SIZE & DESCRIPTION PRESERVE/REMOVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 912"PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE REMOVE REMOVE18"14"14"19"10"8"13"22"REMOVE REMOVEPRESERVE TREE PROTECTION ZONE NOTES:1.EACH TREE OR GROUP OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BE ENCLOSED WITH 4 ’HIGH -VISIBILITY FENCING ON 5 ’T -STAKES SET A MAXIMUM OF 10 ’APART. INSPECTION BY THE CITY ARBORIST IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING, GRUBBING, TRENCHING,MOVEMENT OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.2.WEATHERPROOF SIGNS 11 ”X17 ”SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 50 ’APART SHALL BE POSTED ON ALL SIDES OF FENCES SURROUNDING EACH TREE OR TREES STATING THAT ENCLOSED TREES ARE TO BE PRESERVED.3.PARKING OF VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, OR STORAGE OF MATERIAL WITHIN THE PROTECTED ZONE OF TREES IS PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES. GR A D I N G L E G E N D MA J O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MA J O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) FI B E R R O L L FI N I S H E D F L O O R RE T A I N I N G W A L L FF RW98 0 ' 99 0 ' TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E DR A I N A G E D I T C H D I R E C T I O N DO W N S P O U T D R A I N F. A . R . : LO T S I Z E TO T A L F L O O R A R E A FL O O R A R E A R A T I O 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 3, 0 3 2 S Q -FT 28 . 5 3 % 1, 5 1 5 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R 1, 5 1 7 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 2 N D F L O O R GA R A G E 49 6 S Q -FT TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:17:01 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 SITE PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A2N CO N S T R U C T I O N N O T E : CO N S T R U C T I O N T R U C K S S H A L L N O T P A R K O N T H E S T R E E T F O R S E C U R I T Y I S S U E S . 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N VE G E T A T I O N M A N A G E M E N T P L A N : ZO N E 1 ( I M M E D I A T E ) Th e I m m e d i a t e Z o n e e x t e n d s 0 - 5 ′ fr o m y o u r h o u s e . It ’ s t h e a r e a c l o s e s t t o y o u r ho u s e , i n c l u d i n g p l a n t s , d e c k s , ou t d o o r f u r n i t u r e , a n d t h e o u ts i d e w a l l s a n d c o v e r i n g s . Th i s a r e a i s m o s t v u l n e r a b l e , an d s h o u l d b e m o s t a g g r e s s i v e l y ma i n t a i n e d f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e . -R e m o v e a n y c o m b u s t i b l e o u t d o o r f u r n i t u r e . -R e p l a c e j u t e o r f i b e r d o o r m a t s w i t h f i r e r e s i s t a n t m a t e r i a l s . -C l e a n a l l f a l l e n l e a v es a n d n e e d l e s r e g u l a r l y . R e p e a t o f t e n du r i n g f i r e s e a s o n . -R e m o v e A L L f i r e - p r o n e p l a n t s , a n d c h o o s e o n l y f i r e - r e s i s t a n t va r i e t i e s . I r r i g a t e r e g u l a r l y . -R e m o v e t r e e l i m b s t h a t e x t e n d i n t o t h i s z o n e . Fi r e - p r o n e t r e e s s h o u l d b e a g g r e s si v e l y p r u n e d o r i d e a l l y , r e m o v e d . -P r o v i d e a d e q u a t e s p a c in g b e t w e e n a l l p l a n t s . -D o n o t s t o r e f i r e w o o d , l u m b e r , o r c o m b u s t i b l e s h e r e , e v en (e s pe c i a l l y ) u n d e r d e c k s o r ov e r h a n g s . M o v e s t or e d co m b u s t i b l e s i n s i d e , o r a t l e a s t 3 0 ′ aw a y f r o m s t r u c t u r e s . -U s e o n l y f i r e r e s i s t a n t m u l c h e s . ‘ G o r i l l a H a i r ” o r si m i l a r s h r e d d e d b a r k s h o u l d be r e m o v e d i n t h i s z o n e . Co m p o s t e d m u l c h a n d l a r g e b a rk a n d c h i p s m a y b e O K . ZO N E 1 ( I N T E R M E D I A T E ) Th e I n t e r m e d i a t e Z o n e f r o m 5 ′ to 3 0 ′ ou t f r o m b u i l d i n g s , s t r u c t u r e s , de c k s , e t c . - R e m o v e a l l d e a d p l a n t s , g r a ss , a n d w e e d s ( v e g e t a t i o n ) . - R e m o v e d e a d o r d r y l e a v e s an d p i n e n e e d l e s f r o m y o u r y a rd , r o o f a n d r a i n g u t t e r s . - T r i m t r e e s r e g u l a r l y t o k e e p b r a n c h e s a m i n i m u m o f 1 0 f e e t f r o m o t h e r t r e e s . - R e m o v e b r a n c h e s t h a t h a n g o v e r y o u r r o o f a n d k e e p de a d b r a n c h e s 1 0 f e e t a w a y f r o m y o u r c h i m n e y . - R e l o c a t e w o o d p il e s i n t o Z o n e 2 . - R e m o v e o r p r u n e f l a m m a b l e p l a n ts a n d s h r u b s n e a r w i n d o w s . - R e m o v e v e g e t a t i o n a n d i t e m s t h a t c o u l d ca t c h f i r e f r o m a r o u n d a n d u n d e r d e c k s . - C r e a t e a d d i t i o n a l s e p a r a ti o n b e t w e e n t r e e s , s h r u bs a n d i t e m s t h a t c o u l d ca t c h f i r e , s u c h a s p a t i o f u r n i t ur e , w o o d p i l e s , s w i n g s e t s , e t c . ZO N E 2 ( E X T E N D E D ) Ex t e n d i n g f r o m 3 0 ′ to 1 0 0 ′ (o r m o r e , i f r e q u i r e d du e t o s t e e p s l o p e s , ne a r b y v e g e t a t i o n c o n d i t i o n s , a n d / or y o u r l o c a l f i r e d e p a r t m e n t ) , th i s z o n e s h o u l d i n c l u d e a t a m i n i m u m : - C u t o r m o w a n n u a l g r a s s d o w n t o a m a x i m u m h e i g h t o f 4 i n c h e s . - C r e a t e h o r i z o n t a l s p a c i n g b e t w e e n sh r u b s a n d t r e e s . ( S e e d i a g r a m ) - C r e a t e v e r t i c a l s p a c i n g b e t w e e n g r a ss , s h r u b s a n d t r e e s . ( S e e d i a g r a m ) - R e m o v e f a l l e n l e a v e s , n e e d l e s , t w i g s , b a r k , c o n e s , a n d s m a l l b r a n c h e s . Ho w e v e r , t h e y m a y b e p e r m i t t e d t o a d e p t h of 3 i n c h e s i f e r o s i o n c o n t r o l i s a n i s s u e . - - - - •• • • • • • • • • • • ► - - - - - - I -- - - - , - - - I I I I I I I I ' - 1-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - + _ .. . , . _ _. , . - -1 - ~ , ~ - .. . , . . _ \ \ \ \ \ \ _. , . __ ,. _ _ 0 ------► I ~~,i \ -~·~> \I \1 ~ t i I I '\ I \ \ " I D W R E F . PA N T R Y DI N I N G R O O M GR E A T R O O M 2 C A R G A R A G E AC 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 1 A9 W. I . C . JR . S U I T E OF F I C E 4' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 2' - 8 3 / 4 " 3' - 2 1 / 2 " BA T H HA L F B A T H C L O S E T PA T I O # 1 PO R C H 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T UN D E R S T A I R S PA T I O # 2 ST O R A G E TA N K L E S S W H T R A S H E N C L O S U R E KI T C H E N 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 1 0 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 9 1 / 4 " WO O D ST O V E F I R E P L A C E 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G FO Y E R 2 A9 2 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " W2 W3 W2 D8 W6 D7 D4 D7 W5 D5 D5D3 D3 D5 D9 D5 D4 D3 D3 D1 D1 0 W9 W9 D2 D6 3' - 0 3 / 4 " 3' - 0 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 22 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1' - 6 " 4' - 6 1 / 2 " 1' - 6 " 6 ' - 0 " 3 2 ' - 3 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 9 " 0 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1' - 9 " 2' - 6 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 1' - 9 " 2' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 7' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 7 " 1' - 7 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 8 " 1 5 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 5' - 0 1 / 4 " 3' - 1 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 20 ' - 1 1 " 14 ' - 9 " 7' - 1 1 / 4 " 48 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 2' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 0 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 1 " 3 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 9 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 5' - 6 " 4' - 2 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 3 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 1 6 ' - 6 " 1 0 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 1 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4 6 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 21 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 9 " 6 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 3 " 1 3 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4' - 0 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 " 5 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 5 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 3 " 9 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 0 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 6' - 1 1 / 4 " 2 ' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " CR A W L S P A C E WALL LEGEND 2" x 4" WALL (MEASURED 3 1/2")2" x 6" WALL (MEASURED 5 1/2")TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:17:03 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 FLOOR PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A3 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 1S T F L O O R Area Schedule Area N a m e 104 SF P A T I O # 2 496 SF G A R A G E 1517 SF 1 S T F L O O R L I V I N G A R E A 65 SF P O R C H 78 SF P A T I O # 1 Window Schedu le 1st Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t W i n d o w T y p e W2 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 F i x e d W3 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 C a s e m e n t W5 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 S l i d e W6 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 S l i d e W9 4 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 9 ' - 0 " 2 Door Schedule 1st Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t D o o r T y p e D1 1 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 6 " 1 G a r a g e D2 3 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 E n t r y D3 3 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 4 F l u s h S w i n g D4 2 ' - 4 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 F l u s h S w i n g D5 2 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 4 Flush Swing D6 2 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Flush Swing D7 5 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g D8 1 0 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Folding Door D9 2 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Flush Swing D10 6 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 1 T r a s h E n c l o s u r e WI N D O W N O T E : AL L W I N D O W S T O B E T E M P E R E D W I N D O W S F- - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - I -'k - - - - - ~ - - - - - 'r - - - - - - - - - - - - - v,, , i - ~ V-< 1 ~ - - I I e - C r . r r . r. " ' " " ~ " " - - .. . . . . . . . . . . . . '- - ' - ' - V ' L _ II 0 0 II 11 I II V ·: II t t l II 0 0 11 II r . I 1 I I ~ II L~ : : 1 -= ¾ - - - + ~-- - - . r--- - - t -- - , , . L ~ - - 1' !! , { " , ,, - ~- d: : : _ l _ - - - v ~ - ,- - - v V r B r, ,1 , · r . r v r r . " , , L C r - ~ j -_. . . . . . , _ . . . . . . I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I 11 I - - -- - - - , , , L / , I r - I , I / I , f - I , I , I , .. r r 0 - - - ~ .. , , I I I II I I I 11 1 1 \ I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I 11 II I I I I I 11 II t\ I I I I I 11 II I I I I I II I I ~ I 1 1 1 I I I 11 II II I I I I I 11 II II I I -= l 1 1 1 I I - ' I I I I I I I I ' -r ' , I' -1 ' ~ - ~ I -U . I \ - - C J - a -r - ~ - I ~ ~ J \ _ ) ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ r 7 r r r r , -1 , r r r. r ' r. r. C " 11 I ' - ' 1 ' C D ~ riF - L - - - = ~ : : _ : : _ __ .,, _ _ _ ~ ~ - - ~ n ; z - ~ - ~ - ~ E : ; . ; : = ~ i t : ~ ~ f i , 1 r- - ~ ; - - - c C V' ' C J ,. r r 0 ' ' r ~- ~ ' . - ., , _ r . r J, _ - r -- "· •-h - i: . . . . . - . . . . . - .. . : . . . . - . . . I I -1 ' _r - - ~ ... I ' ,, r r - I _ J r ·~ ~ , . ' , r - - - I r I 1 r t .. __ , ~ 1 / 0 - - - - - ' - " - - - ... . - I I I ~ ~ J . l ~ J 1- r , r. r r r r , r , r I> V V V r - r r l r v ,. ~ ~ r r ~ r k r r J J ~ r , r - r , - ~ "- ' - - " " - ~ ' ~ I' - D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G 1 A9 BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T 2 A9 DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E 12 ' - 9 " 11 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 5' - 1 " 0' - 7 " 0' - 6 " 1' - 7 1 / 2 " 1' - 7 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 8' - 4 3 / 4 " 3' - 6 " 3' - 6 " 9' - 3 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 4' - 6 " 1 2 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 8 3 / 4 " D1 D1 0 W4 W4 W6 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 W7 W8 W9 D1 1 D1 1 W1 0 D1 W6 D5 D9 W6 D8 D5 0' - 5 1 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 7 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 4 2 ' - 2 " 2 6 ' - 1 1 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 6 " 7' - 8 1 / 2 " 20 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 7 " 8' - 6 1 / 2 " 4' - 6 1 / 4 " 4' - 0 3 / 4 " 50 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 1 0 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 2 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 6 " 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 14 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 19 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 3' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 6 ' - 2 1 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 2 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 1 0 " 2' - 8 1 / 2 " 7' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 7 3 / 4 " 2' - 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 6' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 7' - 7 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 6 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 5' - 1 " 2' - 3 " 1 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 2' - 0 " 13 ' - 5 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 14 ' - 9 " 4' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 5 1 / 4 " BA T H DE C K WALL LEGEND 2" x 4" WALL (MEASURED 3 1/2")2" x 6" WALL (MEASURED 5 1/2")TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:00 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 FLOOR PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A3.1 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R Door Schedule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t D o o r T y p e D1 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 F l u s h S w i n g D2 2 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D3 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g - C l o s e t D5 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g S i n g l e P a n e l D6 2 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 4 Flush Swing D8 2 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Glass Door D9 2 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 Flush Swing D10 5 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g D11 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g Area Schedule 2nd Floor Area Name 105 SF B A C K Y A R D P A T I O 173 SF 2 N D F L O O R D E C K 1515 SF 2 N D F L O O R L I V I N G A R E A Window Sche dule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t W i n d o w T y p e W4 2 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W6 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 3 Slide W7 3 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W8 3 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Fixed W9 4 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W10 4 ' - 6 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 FixedWINDOW NOTE: ALL WINDOWS TO BE TEMPERED WINDOWS ' I ' • ' B ,. r ,. r, r. r. r, r. r, r. r, I , I , r. r. r. I , I , r, r, I / I , ,. r, r I , I , r, I , I , r, I , I / I/ r, I , r. r, I , I , I , r, 0 0 l b .. ' l I , , 0 Q - , " ,. ,, r r , , r, r ' \ ? • '. , . , 1 ~~!,= ... -. /-.-. ,, , - . - .. -_-1 - - - - , ; _ . 1 , _ . 0-, 1 ' , 1 ' - , , '. 1 ~ f; L L ' - - ,. • I, 7 [ - ', ~ 'I 9 ' - 7 [ 7 ' I I I :1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I '1 '1 CJ .I . Q Q :1 :1 ' I :1 :1 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '1 ,, 'I 'I 'I ,, c5 : :1 I I I I I I I I I I I I !1 '1 I I I I I I I I I, ' l • ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I ' 1 l I , '. • ' I , I , ,. I , I , ~ r r I , r I , ,, I , I , r ~ r I , r. I , ' . , . , • k ) ~ - _ _ _ _ J , . , ,. 0 r. 'i s - r, I , L e , I ,~ - , , I , , . , , r ; - - - + - - _ l ~ ,, la 9 r . ', F e - , - - □ = ,- - - - - - - : - - - Q -, f ; r; - - 0 V I , . , , I' ' ~ I , I . I , I , r I , I , I , V, ' I , I , I , I , I , I , I , I , r, I , I , I , I , .~ I , r. r. f; ,.. . / / / , ~ 6 ,, ' l • I , , I . " . I I I I I I D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E D1 D1 0 W4 W4 W6 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 W7 W8 W9 D1 1 D1 1 W1 0 D1 W6 D5 D9 W6 D8 D5 BA T H 8 ' - 3 " 9 ' - 2 1 /2 " 8 ' - 0 3 /4 " N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L 50 ' F R O M R E A R P L 3 0 ' F R O M F R O NT PL 1 2 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 2' - 0 " 3' - 3 1 / 2 " 9' - 8 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 9 1 /2 " 1 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 7 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 2 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 1 / 2 " 1 9 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 1 0 " 1 7 ' - 1 " 1 1 ' - 9 " LEGEND 2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM 1ST FLOOR TO 2ND FLOOR WALLS2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM WALLS TO PROPERTY LINE TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:01 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 2ND FLOOR OVERLAY TO 1ST FLOOR RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PZ PZ A3.2 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R O V E R L A Y T O 1 S T F L O O R I I I L I - - - - I - - / - - - - - - - - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I - - - I - - - / -- - - -- - I - - U ,I \ \ I I I I I I I I I I I ,_ - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (/ I I I I I : . . .. .. • .. .. _IJ - • /l If ' .. . I - - - - - -- - - " I - - - . ' Q Q .. ' , . Q ,. I , t, ' ,- - - - - -- - 1 :., _ _ , - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - _ J - -~ f . . . . . _ . / , I . I . I , I , t, I I . ,. I , I , I , I . ,. I , I , 0- r. r , I , I , I , r , r , I , r. I , ,. : I , I ,_ , t ' ' - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - J " L _ _ _ __ y " / j ', . -- - -- - -- I 7 1 1 1 1 1 -if I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 II !I !I II 11 I I , , . \. I _ ~ . ~ - - " - ~ = ,, • : ~ , •.- . • • ~ • ~ • ~ •/; ~ .~ < .. :. - : . •• A • ~ • · , ' • · • _ j ~ -, - •- ~ :: - , · ; . , , , , , • · r, . •• ' , - ,- ' : - - , -- ' .t =-= - = - - = /.+,_- -1 ;,;1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • · =1 · ' ' '• ·'• .. . . . , ·._ < -, ·_ . i "} I , , - , . 1:: \ Q - ·. -' ' . ' .• , r, i ' I . . , ~ - - ~ • -- . , . I t- o y I , , - - - - - - - - - 1 7 I I I I I I I I I ! I =J . . . .- - . - _ J □ - 6 cs G) r , r r. r. r , I , v r r. r , r , I , r. r , ;; ] \ r , r , I , r. r. 8 c ~:; ~ : : .. -i1 ~ ~ -~ ~ : - ~\ • • • • • • •_ I , . - ' ,· -. - ; . . : . ,_ ' - ., ~ (. . . i. c ~- : \ - . .- . ;~- ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ G ,; , , • . . ! - a " . . ' cs T I - -- - -- - -- I I I I I I -- -- - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -- - - - -- -- -- - - - -- - ,/ - ,- . . ,,. _ -- - • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS NOTES: 1.ALL OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MIN. 1/16" AND MAX. 1/8"METAL MESH.VENTILATOR TYPE NET AREA QUANTITY AREA VENTILATED 98.75 SQ -IN 395 SQ -IN 395 SQ -INMODEL LOW PROFILE VENT O'HAGIN FLATAREA VENTILATED VENTILATION RATE REQUIRED AREA (AREA VENTILATED/300) x 144 = SQ.IN.1542 SQ.FT 300 TH 741 SQ.INVENTILATION REQUIRED VENTILATION PROVIDED VENT LOCATION TOTAL 790 SQ -INUPPER HALF LOWER HALF4 4 98.75 SQ -IN LOW PROFILE VENT O'HAGIN FLAT STUCCO WATER RESISTANT BARRIERS(S) LAP OVER SCREED FLANGE BOTTOM OF FLANGE SET BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION AND PLATE LINESHEATHINGFRAMING MEMBER 26 GAGE CORROSION RESISTANT OR PLASTIC WEEP SCREED MIN. ABOVE EARTHMIN. FLANGE 2" ABOVE PAVED AREAS1. M E T A L R O O F B Y M E T A L R O O F I N G C A L I F O R N I A S T A N D I N G S E A M A S K G R E Y ( K Y N A R ) . ROOF PITCH 3:12. OVERHANG: 2'-6'2. S T O N E V E N E E R B Y C U L T U R E D S T O N E ( P R O - F I T M O D E R A L E D G E S T O N E I N T A G L I O ) . INSTALL STONE OVER 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER, METAL LATH ,SCRATCH COAT AND MORTAR SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.3. S I N G L E C O A T S T U C C O ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A , P L Y W O O D S H E A T H I N G U N D E R T W O LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER.4. F A S C I A B O A R D ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 5. G A R A G E D O O R B Y C L O P A Y . D E S I G N R E C 1 4 C O L O N I A L L I F T H A N D L E S (COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4).6. E X T E R I O R W A L L L E D L I G H T I N G ( D A N B U R Y 6 " HIGH BLACK DUSK TO DA WN - S T Y L E # 5 Y 0 8 8 ) . PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.7. F R O N T D O O R B Y I W A N T T H A T D O O R . P R O D U C T I D : T H E B E S T S Q U A R E T O P SINGLE ENTRY IRON DOORS, COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4.8. 1 0 0 S E R I E S W I N D O W S A N D S L I D I N G D O O R S B Y A N D E R S E N ( C O L O R B L A C K ) 9. W I N D O W , D O O R T R I M C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 . 10. A C S C R E E N I N G ( S T U C C O F I N I S H 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G B Y O M E G A ) 11. A C U N I T S H A L L B E L O C A T E D A N D S E C U R E D T O A M I N I M U M 3 - I N C H T H I C K S L A B OR APPROVED PLATFORM.12. G U T T E R ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).13. T H E A P P R O V E D A D D R E S S N U M B E R S S H A L L B E P L A I N L Y L E G I B L E A N D V I S I B L E F R O M THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4"HIGH WITH A MINIMUM ½" WIDE STROKE . CFC 505, CRC R319 , FMCB.36.080 THE NUMBERS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT NIGHT. WHEN EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED THE FACE OF THE SIGN SHALL BE AT A MINI MUM OF 5.0 FOOT CANDLES. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT ILLUMINATION. FMC 8.36.080.14.MODERN HANDRAIL 15. I P E S I D I N G B Y J A M E S H A R D I E C O L O R : P E G A S U S B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 1 .16. D O W N S P O U T ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 17. R O O F V E N T S ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).18. F L U E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 19 . E L E C T R I C A L M E T E R . 20 . W A T E R M E T E R . 21. G A S M E T E R . 22. I N T E R N E T A N D P H O N E O U T L E T . 23.TANKLESS WATER HEATER.24. T R A S H C A N E N C L O S U R E S T U C C O F I N I S H ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A T O B E CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.25. H A R T F O R D L E D O U T D O R P E N D A N T B Y K U Z C O LIGHTING (PRODUCT ID: KUZP266178 )PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET. 26.SOLAR PANEL.27. S O L A R I N V E R T O R . 28. B A N D A C C R O S S T H E T O P B E F O R E T H E S O F F I T A N D G A R A G E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).KEY NOTES 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 3" 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 3" PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 1 8 14 2 5 4 6 7 9 13 12 15 16 17 18 24 25 26 28 MA X H E I G H T 24 ' - 10 1 / 2 " 2 5 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 25 ' - 3 1 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 24 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 23 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " ON L Y A F T E R C L A R I F I C A T I O N W I T H A ST R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R A B O U T T H E CO N S T R U C T A B I L I T Y O F T H I S C O N N E C T I O N . RO O F 20 ' - 3" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 3" 1 3 4 6 8 9 12 16 17 18 24 28 MA X H E I G H T 24 ' - 10 1 / 2 " 25 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 23 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 24 ' - 9 1 / 4 " TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:10 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ELEVATIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A4 1" = 1'-0"3 A_WEEP SCREED 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 Fr o n t E l e v a t i o n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 Re a r E l e v a t i o n I _, , _ '- 1 ' ' - ' - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - + - - - + - - - - - + - - + - - - - - + ! - -- ~ - ~ - ' -- , - -- , . '" " '- J I ' - - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - + " I - - - = - - - = ~ ~ = - - - + - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - i - - - - , - - - ~ UJ: ± ; f : : ' . E : I : : ' = : - r ~ : _ l l : : : : : : : : : ± : : : : : :~:1 ~J-- - -l -~ f ~ · J _ ~1 :: 1 , : : 1 : : : : : : : : J _ - ~ : -- - - - - - - L - - - r- - - - - . . . . ~ = - - , - - - - - - I = - - r _ l -- - - - - - , , ~ . ,· l t s c - - - 7 - - . ~ - - " , - . - . _ - __ .. -__ - . , .. -.. -.. . . . . -. , . ::□:- .. -,:·. - . __ -.•,. ~ : ~ · .... -.... i- - , , - , , -- - - - - - , ~ - . - - - - - - - t - - - - - 8 - . .. . -. . . -. . . __ , _ - - - - - . , - .. . . , - . - .. ·- - - , · /1 / J J . , . • . . . ~ ~ ' ' .. . .. ~ - "- - ' ' - , • ' ., ' - • , , ' ' _, , _ " , - • , ~ ' ' - ' - , I - , • - , , -• •, •, ~ -: ' . . , - . . ., . ' ~ - ' . , - . ' - - . . . . ' , ' '. / -. _, ·- _. ,_ ,: - . ,- • ' . - . ,- .. ' • , . / ·- , - ,. : - ' . . . . -· ·- •. ,, . , / -• . ,- , , - • ~ · · .. ·· . . . . . ' .• - ' ' ,- . , - , ' ;. , ' < . .. .. . . ., . • ' . . , . . ,, / . . . . " .. .. . . .- . _ , ' . . . ' C , _ - - - - - . , , , - : : 1 . : 1 ~ < : ' , I - I I 111 ' 1 .· · · . •... I ~· - II : ' II '. ' . ~. ,. - . - . _ . - . . - . - . -.. . -.. -.. - . - .. - . -- . - 1 · ·: . " : l ·:I II '. : , · 1 , i 1 1 1 ~ ~ · ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ . , , , . , , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 . ~ ~ u : 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 1 1 _ 1 1 1 _ 1 1 _ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ - I I I _ I I I . -- - - - + - . - - ' 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 w - , , , -111 - , I , - 111 1~ 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 ~1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 ~- 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 ~-1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 ~ - 1 1 1 1 _ _ •= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1 = 1 1 1 - - : : :- : : : - I -1 1 1 = 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I =1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 -,> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1+ · . -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - ~ I - - - ~ - - - - -\ ~ 1. M E T A L R O O F B Y M E T A L R O O F I N G C A L I F O R N I A S T A N D I N G S E A M A S K G R E Y ( K Y N A R ) . ROOF PITCH 3:12. OVERHANG: 2'-6'2. S T O N E V E N E E R B Y C U L T U R E D S T O N E ( P R O - F I T M O D E R A L E D G E S T O N E I N T A G L I O ) . INSTALL STONE OVER 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER, METAL LATH ,SCRATCH COAT AND MORTAR SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.3. S I N G L E C O A T S T U C C O ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A , P L Y W O O D S H E A T H I N G U N D E R T W O LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER.4. F A S C I A B O A R D ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 5. G A R A G E D O O R B Y C L O P A Y . D E S I G N R E C 1 4 C O L O N I A L L I F T H A N D L E S (COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4).6. E X T E R I O R W A L L L E D L I G H T I N G ( D A N B U R Y 6 " HIGH BLACK DUSK TO DA WN - S T Y L E # 5 Y 0 8 8 ) . PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.7. F R O N T D O O R B Y I W A N T T H A T D O O R . P R O D U C T I D : T H E B E S T S Q U A R E T O P SINGLE ENTRY IRON DOORS, COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4.8. 1 0 0 S E R I E S W I N D O W S A N D S L I D I N G D O O R S B Y A N D E R S E N ( C O L O R B L A C K ) 9. W I N D O W , D O O R T R I M C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 . 10. A C S C R E E N I N G ( S T U C C O F I N I S H 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G B Y O M E G A ) 11. A C U N I T S H A L L B E L O C A T E D A N D S E C U R E D T O A M I N I M U M 3 - I N C H T H I C K S L A B OR APPROVED PLATFORM.12. G U T T E R ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).13. T H E A P P R O V E D A D D R E S S N U M B E R S S H A L L B E P L A I N L Y L E G I B L E A N D V I S I B L E F R O M THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A MINIMUM ½" WIDE STROKE. CFC 505, CRC R319 , FMCB.36.080 THE NUMBERS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT NIGHT. WHEN EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED THE FACE OF THE SIGN SHALL BE AT A MINI MUM OF 5.0 FOOT CANDLES. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT ILLUMINATION. FMC 8.36.080.14.MODERN HANDRAIL 15. I P E S I D I N G B Y J A M E S H A R D I E C O L O R : P E G A S U S B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 1 .16. D O W N S P O U T ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 17. R O O F V E N T S ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).18. F L U E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 19 . E L E C T R I C A L M E T E R . 20 . W A T E R M E T E R . 21. G A S M E T E R . 22. I N T E R N E T A N D P H O N E O U T L E T . 23.TANKLESS WATER HEATER.24. T R A S H C A N E N C L O S U R E S T U C C O F I N I S H ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A T O B E CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.25. H A R T F O R D L E D O U T D O R P E N D A N T B Y K U Z C O LIGHTING (PRODUCT ID: KUZP266178 )PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.26. S O L A R P A N E L . 27. S O L A R I N V E R T O R . 28. B A N D A C C R O S S T H E T O P B E F O R E T H E S O F F I T A N D G A R A G E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).KEY NOTES 0' - 3 1/2"4' - 0"4' - 0"TOP VIEWHOUSE STRUCTURE 3' PONY WALL WRAPPING UNIT HOUSE STRUCTURE3' - 8 1/2"0' - 3 1/2"AC AC2X4 3' PONY W/STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH THE HOUSESIDE VIEW 0' - 1 1/2"3' - 0"0' - 5 1/2"2x6 CAP4' - 0"3' - 1 1/2"0' - 4"CONCRETE PAD 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 3" 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 3" PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 3 1 4 8 2 6 9 12 17 18 25 28 13 16 MA X H E I G H T 24 ' - 10 1 / 2 " 23 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 25 ' - 3 1 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 3" 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 3" PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 1 8 14 3 2 4 6 9 12 13 10 16 17 18 24 23 26 28 19 22 21 20 27 MA X H E I G H T 24 ' - 10 1 / 2 " 23 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 25 ' - 3 1 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:16 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ELEVATIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A51/2" = 1'-0"3 A- A C S c r e e n D e t a i l 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 Le f t E l e v a t i o n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 Ri g h t E l e v a t o n - ' - - - - - - - - - - + - - - + - - 1 - - v , - - - - + - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - ?' " L- - - - " -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - . . _ _ .- = - - r - - - - 1 - - - - - - - ' ~ ~ -- - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - _ ~ I• • I -i - - - - - - - - _ r- - - - - - - - . . _ - - - - - - ,_ = ~ ~ ; ; ; ; l _ ; ; ; , ~ ± j . . ; ; ; ; _ = : ; ± ; , , _ ; ; ; ; _ , ; ; ; ; ; ; ± , . . . , ; ; ; ; , _ ; ; ; ; ; ; ± ; ; _ ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ; ; j ± ; ; ; ; ; ; . _ ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ± r - - - - - - - _ ; ; ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ; , , , . ; ; ; ± ; ; ; ; - - - - ~ ~ : ~ ~ . , ; ; ; , _ ± = . . j ; : - - r - ~ r - - - - - - - . _ _ = - . ; ; ; ; . : t : = : : , - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - ~ , : -, ' ' " C - • ' -- ·. - ., ,_ , ,, - . . - - . ; .. _· : ,_ • _ " . . ' . . . ,. " •' . - . ~ ', . ' ! _, ' ' , • • - ( ' , - ' • - ' • • ' - ' " ' . ' . - ·. \ ' ' .- ~ ·- - ' ' -, , . ' -- ' - - . •- ' ,- . ,- , .. ' - . • - . ' ' ' - •' ; ' - . ,, . ' . ' - - -• ,_ , - . . ~ - ' - , - ' - ' ' -~ - - - - t - - - - c - - - - - - - - - - I I -~ . ~ _ + - - ' - + - - - - - + - - - ~ - ~ . - - - ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - - ~ - ~ - - , - - + - __ - - + - - - __ ~ ___ - - - - ~ ~ - - - . ~ - - ~ ~ ~ __ c = $ = - r - ~ ~ ; ~ -> • ,- - - ' • • • - •, - . ., , . :- ·- ~ - . ·- ~ ' - . ... . . -- . - . ' . . - . ' . . - - . - , - ,- ' • - ., • • • ; ' . < ' ' . ; -- - ' I I I ' -.7~ I I I/ I I I/ Iv I I ~-~1 '1----------_J I '1------------JJ .I' 1 A9 R O O F V E N T S FL U E S O L AR P AN E L S S T O R Y P O L E # 1 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 1 S T O R Y P O L E #3 S T O R Y P O L E #4 ST OR Y P O L E #5 ST OR Y P O L E #6 ST OR Y P O L E #7 S T OR Y POL E #1 6 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 2 S T OR Y POL E #1 5 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 0 S T O R Y P O L E # 9 50 ' F R O M R E A R P L 3 0 ' F R OM F R ON T P L S T O R Y P O L E # 1 0 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 4 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 3 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 8 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 9 2 A9 8' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 "ST OR Y P O L E #8 S T O R Y POL E #1 7 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 1 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 "4 ' - 0 " S T O R Y P O L E # 2 2 1 3 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1 2 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 2 7 ' - 1 1 /2 "2 ' - 0 " 3 5 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 1 4 ' - 9 " 7 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 3 " 5 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 5 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 6 " 1 0 ' - 9 3 /4 "4 ' - 1 0 1 /2 "5 ' - 4 "2 1 ' - 7 1 /2 "1 7 ' - 0 "8 ' - 6 1 /2 " 5 ' - 6 " 1 7 ' - 1 " 2 0 ' - 2 " 1 1 ' - 9 " 2 ' - 6 " ST O R Y P O L E L E G E N D ST O R E Y P O L E BA S E E L E V A T I O N EX I S T I N G G R A D E FI N I S H E D F L O O R (F F ) E L E V A T I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 7 . 2 5 ' 12 8 ' 10 13 8 . 7 3 ' 13 6 . 9 6 13 2 . 8 3 ' 13 2 . 0 0 ' 12 6 . 8 8 ' 12 6 . 9 0 ' 12 7 . 1 6 ' 12 6 . 8 1 ' 12 7 . 3 9 ' 11 13 0 . 4 1 ' 12 8 ' 12 12 7 . 1 8 ' 12 8 ' 13 12 7 . 2 5 ' 14 12 7 . 0 4 ' 15 12 7 . 9 5 ' 12 8 ' 16 12 7 . 4 3 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' TO 1 S T F L O O R CE I L I N G H E I G H T 10 . 7 5 ' -0. 7 3 ' 1. 0 4 ' 5. 1 7 ' 6. 0 0 ' 11 . 1 2 ' 11 . 1 ' 10 . 8 4 ' 11 . 1 9 ' 10 . 6 1 ' 10 . 6 5 ' 10 . 8 3 ' 10 . 7 5 ' 10 . 9 6 ' 10 . 0 5 ' ST O R Y P O L E HE I G H T 20 . 7 ' 9. 2 2 ' 10 . 9 9 ' 15 . 1 2 ' 15 . 9 5 21 . 0 7 ' 21 . 0 5 ' 20 . 7 9 ' 21 . 1 4 20 . 5 6 ' 21 . 5 2 ' 24 . 2 5 ' 25 . 5 2 ' 25 . 7 3 ' 24 . 8 2 ' 10 . 5 2 ' RO O F E L E V A T I O N 14 7 . 9 5 ' 15 1 . 9 3 ' 15 1 . 4 3 ' 15 2 . 7 7 ' 13 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 14 7 . 9 5 ' 15 2 . 7 7 ' 15 2 . 7 7 ' TO 2 N D F I N I S H E D FL O O R ( F F ) H E I G H T 11 . 9 8 ' 0. 5 ' 2. 2 7 ' 6. 4 ' 7. 2 3 ' 12 . 3 5 ' 12 . 3 3 ' 12 . 0 7 ' 12 . 4 2 ' 11 . 8 4 ' 11 . 8 8 ' 12 . 0 6 ' 11 . 9 8 ' 12 . 1 9 ' 11 . 2 8 ' 17 12 7 . 1 4 ' 12 8 ' 10 . 8 1 ' 13 7 . 9 5 ' 18 12 7 . 2 9 ' 12 8 ' 11 . 6 6 ' 13 8 . 9 5 ' 19 12 7 . 1 0 ' 12 8 ' NA 11 . 8 5 ' 13 8 . 9 5 ' NA 20 12 7 . 3 3 ' 12 8 ' NA 12 . 9 6 ' 14 0 . 2 9 ' NA 21 12 6 . 9 1 ' 12 8 ' NA 10 . 9 2 ' 13 7 . 8 3 ' NA 22 13 5 . 6 6 ' 12 8 ' NA 2. 1 7 ' 13 7 . 8 3 ' NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PL E A S E N O T E , A L L S T O R Y P O L E W E R E U P D A T E D . S T O R Y P O L E H E I G H T 2 0 . 0 8 ' . EG : 1 2 7 . 8 7 ' FF E L E V A T I O N : 1 2 8 ' 1S T F L O O R C E I L I N G EL E V A T I O N : 1 3 8 ' RO O F E L E V A T I O N : 1 4 7 . 9 5 ' H E I G H T T O 1 S T F L O O R C E I L I N G 1 0 . 1 3 ' . ST O R Y P O L E # 1 2N D F I N I S H E D F L O O R EL E V A T I O N : 1 3 9 . 2 3 ' 2 N D F I N I S H E D F L O O R H E I G H T 1 1 . 3 6 ' . TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:18 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ROOF PLAN/STORY POLE RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PZ PK A6 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 RO O F / S T O R Y P O L E P L A N NT S 2 C_ S T O R Y P O L E E X A M P L E I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I -- - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 ¥ - ~ . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - \ \ \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----., ---------\ --------- - - - - - - \ DN DN PARKING NATIVE BRUSHDRIVEWAY IN D I A N H A W T H O R N 3 - 6 F T FU L L S U N , PA R T I A L S U N LO W , AV E R A G E WO R K S WE L L T O FO R M A HE D G E 3 - 6 F T AN Y S O I L B U T PR E F E R S MO I S T W E L L - DR A I N I N G S O I L RH A P H I O L E P I S I N D I C A LO W 0. 2 - 0. 3 PE N N I S E T U M AL O P E C U R O I D E S 'H A M E L N ' DW A R F H A M E L N FO U N T A I N G R A S S 2 - 3 F T 2 - 4 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L LO W SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N E D S O I L 36 " - 48 " L 0. 2 - 0. 3 PI T T O S P O R U M WH E E L E R ' S D W A R F PI T T O S P O R U M 3 - 3 1 / 2 F T 3 - 4 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L MO D E R A T E AV E R A G E - MO I S T / W E L L - DR A I N E D 3 F T A P A R T 1 - 1/ 2 F O R HE D G E M 0. 4 - 0. 6 'H I D C O T E ' L A V E N D E R 1 - 3 F T FU L L S U N LO W CH A L K , L O A M , SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N I N G LA V A N D U L A AN G U S T I F O L I A 36 " 1 - 3 F T L 0. 2 - 0. 3 SI Z E CO M M O N N A M E SC I E N T I F I C N A M E HE I G H T WI D T H MI N I M U M P L A N T I N G DI S T A N C E S WA T E R NE E D S WU C O L S PL A N T FA C T O R SH R U B S QU A N T I T Y 2 2 3 5 8 CO R T A D E R I A SE L L O A N A ' P U M I L A ' 4 - 6 F T 3 - 4 F T FU L L S U N MO D E R A T E SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N E D S O I L 36 " - 48 " M 0. 4 - 0. 6 EX I S T I N G T R E E S LA N D S C A P E A R E A 3 5 9 0 S Q F T LA N D S C A P I N G T Y P E A SH R E D D E D C E D A R B CO B B L E S T O N E C NA T I V E B R U S H & T R E E S 3 ' P L A N T E R 8 -10 F T 6 -8 F T MO D E R A T E 3 M 0. 4 - 0. 6 1. " I N C O R P O R A T E C O M P O S T A T A R A T E O F A T LEAST FOUR CUBIC YARDS PER 1000 SQUARE FE E T T O A D E P T H O F S I X I N C H E S I N T O T H E L A N D S C A P E A R E A E X C E P T W I T H I N T H E D R I P L I N E OF P R O T E C T E D T R E E S ( U N L E S S C O N T R A -IN D I C A T E D B Y A S O I L S T E S T ) . " 2. " A M I N I M I U M T H R E E I N C H L A Y E R O F M U L C H S H A L L B E A P P L I E D O N A L L E X P O S E D SU R F A C E S O F P L A N T I N G A R E A S E X C E P T I N T U R F A R E A S , C R E E P I N G O R R O O T I N G GR O U N D C O V E R S , O R D I R E C T S E E D I N G A P P L I C A T I O N S W H E R E M U L C H I S C O N T R A I N D I C A T E D . " 3. " C L E A R O U T D E A D B R U S H A N D W E E D S F R O M T H E N A T I V E B R U S H A R E A S " LA N D S C A P E N O T E S : P R O P O S E D B U IL D IN G P A T I O P O R C H G A R A G EPATIOAC T R A S H E N C L O S U R E CBA SW E E T O S M A N T H U S OS M A N T H U S FR A G R A N S S I T I N G A R E A P A T I O NA T I V E B R U S H D SO D D 7 ' - 1 0 "TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:28 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 LANDSCAPEPLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PK A7 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N 0 () 0 l r -----I I I I I I I I I I I I ~-/--", I I '-I !---•» ' .1---~ -.J.----- DN I A G R E E T O C O M P L Y W I T H T H E R E Q U I R E M E N T S O F T H E P R E S C R I P T I V E CO M P L I A N C E O P T I O N T O T H E M W E L O . FE B 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 PR E S S U R E R E G U L A T O R S S H A L L B E I N S T A L L E D O N T H E I R R I G A T I O N SY S T E M T O E N S U R E T H E D Y N A M I C PR E S S U R E O F T H E S Y S T E M I S W I T H I N T H E M A N U F A T U R E R S R E C O M M E N D E D P R E S S U R E R A N G E . MA N U A L S H U T -OF F V A L V E S ( S U C H A S A G A T E V A L V E , B A L L V A L V E , OR B U T T E R F L Y V A L V E ) S H A L L B E IN S T A L L E D A S C L O S E A S P O S S I B L E TO T H E P O I N T O F C O N N E C T I O N O F T H E W A T E R S U P P L Y . "U N L E S S C O N T R A D I C T E D B Y A S O I L S T E S T , C O M P O S T A T A R A T E O F A M I N I M U M OF F O U R C U B I C Y A R D S P E R 1 0 0 0 S Q U A R E FE E T O F P E R M E A B L E A R E A S H A L L B E IN C O R P O R A T E D T O A D E P T H O F S I X I N C H E S I N T O T H E S O I L E X C E P T W I T H I N T H E T P Z OF P R O T E C T E D T R E E S , W H I C H S H A L L R E C I E V E 4 -6" O F H A R D W O O D C H I P M U L C H . " "A T T H E T I M E O F F I N A L I N S P E C T I O N , T H E P E R M I T A P P L I C A N T S H A L L PR O V I D E T H E O W N E R O F T H E P R O P E R T Y W I T H A C E R T I F I C A T E O F C O M P L E T I O N , CE R T I F I C A T E O F I N S T A L L A T I O N , I R R I G A T I O N S C H E D U L E O F IR R I G A T I O N N O T E S 1-25-10 XA C Z - 0 7 5 - P R F O p t i o n 1. D W G N. T . S . D XA C Z - 0 7 5 - P R F 3 / 4 " L O W F L O W CO N T R O L Z O N E K I T OPTION 112341011895676-IN MIN. IN S T A L L M I N 6 " AB O V E H I G H E S T P O I N T OF D I S C H A R G E 1. 3 0 -INCH LINEAR LENGTH OF WIRE, COILDED 2. W A T E R P R O O F C O N N E C T I O N : RAIN BIRD DB SERIES (1 OF 2)4. L O W F L O W A N T I -SIPHON VALVE: RAIN BIRD ASV -LF -075 VALVE (INCLUDED IN XACZ -075 -PRF = KIT)8. U V R A D I A T I O N R E S I S T A N T P V C S C H 4 0 P I P E ( 1 O F 2 ) 9. F I N I S H G R A D E / T O P O F M U L C H 11. P V C L A T E R A L P I P E ( 1 O F 2 ) 3. I D T A G 5. P R E S S U R E R E G U L A T I N G F I L T E R : RAIN BIRD PRF -075 -RBY 6. P V C S C H 8 0 U N I O N 7. P V C S C H 4 0 M A L E A D A P T E R 10. P V C S C H 4 0 E L L ( 1 O F 2 ) IR R I G A T I O N L E G E N D LI N E VA L V E # SIZE TYPE 1 -2 1/2"DRIP SYSTEM MA N U F A C T U R E R PR O D U C T M O D E L & I D RAINBIRD STARTKTCS A50853 CO N T R O L L E R M O D E L & I D ST8O -WIFI MA N U A L S H U T -OF F V A L V E MO D E L & I D T -600 203581041B01LYKZOL0 PR E S S U R E R E G U L A T O R S MO D E L & I D #7101 #203716414 RA I N S E N S O R M O D E L & I D A61200 PA R K I N G NA T I V E B R U S H DR I V E W A Y LA N D S C A P E A R E A 1 3 9 0 S Q F T 3 ' P L A N T E R 2 V A L V E S P E R D E T A I L IR R I G A T I O N C O N T R O L L E R 1 I N C H P V C W A T E R SO U R C E F O R I R R I G A T I O N W/ 1 -IN C H S H U T -OF F V A L V E TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:31 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 IRRIGATIONPLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 Designer Author A8N 1. A L L E R O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L M E A S URES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST ED I T I O N O F T H E C I T Y O F F O L S O M D E S I G N S T A N D A R D S A N D T H E C O U N T Y O F S A C R A M E N T O E R O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L GU I D E L I N E S . 2. T E M P O R A R Y E R O S I O N C O N T R O L B E S T M A N A G E M E N T P R A C T I C E S ( B M P S ) S H A L L B E I N S T A L L E D A N D M A I N T A I N E D Y E A R R O U N D AN D A N E F F E C T I V E C O M B I N A T I O N O F E R O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T C O N T ROL BMPS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED DURING THE W E T S E A S O N ( O C T O B E R 1 T H R O U G H A P R I L 3 0 ) AND PRIOR TO THE ONSET OF ANY STORM. 3. A L L S T O R M D R A I N I N L E T S W I T H I N T H E W O R K A R E A , A N D O F F S I T E STORM DRAIN INLETS WITH THE POTENTIAL TO RECEIVE RUNOFF FR O M T H E P R O J E C T S I T E , S H A L L B E A D E Q U A T E L Y P R O T E C T E D WITH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO EFFECTIVELY REMOVE SE D I M E N T F R O M R U N O F F P R I O R T O D I S C H A R G E T O T H E S T O R M D R A I N . 4. A L L S T A B I L I Z E D C O N S T R U C T I O N A C C E S S L O C A T I O N S S H A L L B E C O N S TRUCTED PER THE LATEST EDITIO N OF THE SACRAMENTO COUN TY ST A N D A R D S T O E F F E C T I V E L Y P R E V E N T T R A C KING OF SEDIMENT TO PAVED AREAS. 5. S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L B M P S S H A L L B E P L A C E D A L O N G T H E PROJECT PERIMETER WHEREVER THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR DR A I N A G E T O L E A V E T H E P R O J E C T S I T E . 6. C E M E N T I T I O U S , P A I N T , W A S T E , A N D H A Z A R D O U S M A T E R I A L S H A L L BE HANDLED, COVERED, AND/OR STORED PROPERLY TO AVOID SP I L L S , L E A K A G E , A N D C O N T A C T W I T H R A I N O R S T O R M W A T E R R U N O F F . 7. P U B L I C S T R E E T S A N D S I D E W A L K S S H A L L B E S W EPT DAILY FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES . W A S H I N G T H E S T R E E T S H A L L N O T B E P E R M I T T E D . 8. U P O N C O M P L E T I O N O F T H E P R O J E C T , A L L B M P S S H A L L B E R E M O V E D O N C E L A N D S C A P I N G I S IN S T A L L E D A N D F U N C T I O N I N G T O T H E S A T I S F A C T I O N O F T H E C I T Y . 9. F O R P R O J E C T S I T E S L A R G E R T H A N 1 A C R E , E R O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L M E A S U R E S S H A L L B E I N SU B S T A N T I A L C O M P L I A N C E A T A L L T I M E S W I T H T H E S T O R M WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PREPARED FO R T H E P R O J E C T I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H T H E S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A G E N E R A L C O N S T R U C T I O N P E R M I T . TH I S P E R M I T R E Q U I R E S T H A T S W P P P B E K E P T U P T O D A T E TO REFLECT THE CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS AND THE SWPPP IS AV A I L A B L E O N S I T E A T A L L T I M E S F O R R E V I E W B Y S T A T E A N D L O C A L I N S P E C T O R S . T H E CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET AND FO L L O W A L L N P D E S R E Q U I R E M E N T S I N E F F E C T A T T H E T I M E O F C O N S T R U C T I O N . LA N D S C A P E E R O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T A T I O N C O N T R O L N O T E S : 3/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 4 1- 3 / 4 L O W F L O W C O N T R O L Z O N E K I T 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N -- l 0 I I I 1ST FLOOR 0' -0"ROOF 20' -3"2ND FLOOR 11' -3" EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E PR E -MA N U F A C T U R E T R U S S E S PA N T R Y R -38 BA T H GR E A T R O O M DE C K BE D R O O M LO F T A R E A MAX HEIGHT 24' -10 1/2"MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT 30' - 0" 1 1 ' - 4 " PO R C H 0" -4 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " CL O S E T UN D E R ST A I R S RE T A I N I N G W A L L 1ST FLOOR 0' -0"ROOF 20' -3"1ST FLOOR T.O.P.10' -0"2ND FLOOR 11' -3" PR E -MA N U F A C T U R E D T R U S S E S R -38 BA T H R O O M HA L L W A Y MA S T E R W . I . C KI T C H E N GR E A T R O O M OF F I C E R -21 MAX HEIGHT LIMIT EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E MAX HEIGHT 24' -10 1/2" 9 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:35 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 SECTIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A9 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 SE C T I O N C U T 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 SE C T I O N C U T n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - I - - I / _J I / V ,,. . ~ V I / I / V V V V 1- -1 - - - / / -.. . V ,_ - . . I;: , _, ' v, . , , ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , _ ' ': - . ' ' ' ' II Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l 111 111 111 I I ~ · . . • v - - -· ~ " \ - - c __ _ _ _ _ _ • __ ,•... ~ ~~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ l l l ~ - I I l~ l l l ~ - I I l~ - 1 1 1 ~ - I I l ~ i j ~ ;~ ~ ~ - 1 1 1 : i l l 1 1 1 i l l 1 1 1 i l l - 1 1 1 i l l 1 1 1 i l l - 1 1 :~ 1 1 , ~ I 111 1 111 1 i 1 111 1 i 1 111 11 I 111 1 1 111 111 111 : l J J I I l: l J J I I IU J I 11111 111 : 1 11 1 .. ~1 1 1 11 11 1 : l J l l I l 111 111 111 1 I 1 111 1 1 111 111 111 111 11 111= 11 1 11 =lJ J l 11 ~-=-<=::-_~--~~:--:-~-", [j l I Im ' I Im ' I ff i l l Im ' I IT T ' I Im ' 1 lf f i l l lf f i I Im ' I Im ' 1 lf f i l I Im ' I Im ' 11 ~ 1 I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 1 lj f l 1ff i 1 I Im ' Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I IT T ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 11 f f i 1 I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 11 [ 7 1 I Im ' 1 lf f i I Im ' 1 lj f l I Im ' 1-111:\..lllwl 11, _111_111 :~,~,-- -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1-111-111-111-1 I -111-111-_:_ 11 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 11 I I I 1 11111 111 111 111 I I I 11111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 I 1 111 111 111 1 1 111 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 1 1 111 111 111 111 11111 111 11 111 111 1 1 111 111111 111111 111111 11 I I I 1 11111 111111 11111 I I I I I I 1 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -111-11 -1 - ,, l l l , , , l l l , , , l l ,, , l l l , , , l l ,, , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , ll , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l ,, l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , l l l , , , I I I , , I l, , , l l l , , , l l, , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l ,, , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , ,1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , 11 , , , 1 1 1 , , ll l , , , l l,,,lll,,,111,,,111,,,ll ,,,lll,,,lll,,,III,, 111,,,111,, lll,,,111,,,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - / / ' L , ' / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ~ ~ i i i n n n n i i i n n n n ~ ' i n n n r r i ~ r r i ? I l' - - - - - - - 3 ' ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - - = ' - = - - = = - = - - = = - - - ~ - - = ~ = = - = _ _ __ _ . . . . . ~ - - ~ - - ' " ' - - - - - - ' i l ~ , . l l J L J L J U J L J L J L J L J U _ l l J L J L J L J L L I L J L J L I J L J L J L J L J L I _ L I L J L J U i l l J l l J L J L J L f ~ ' - U - - - - - ' " . . . . L L - - - - - - ~ - ; , / / I .. I '- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '-" --------"'-<::---·-" " S T U C C O F I N I S H E D 5 ' W A L L FR O N T V I E W 5 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " WO O D S T A I N E D DO O R S MA T C H I N G HO U S E C O L O R RI M J O I S T W O O D B L O C K I N G DE C K I N G MA T E R I A L 2 -3/ 8 " S Q U A R E P O S T 5" S Q U A R E BA S E P L A T E CO L O R M A T C H E D VI N Y L C A P S C O N C E A L AT T A C H M E N T H A R D W A R E WALL PER PLAN STEEL PLATE PER STRUCT. -PROVIDE OPENING FOR J -BOX LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS -INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS J -BOX PER ELEC.PLYWOOD BACKING FOR LIGHT FIXTURE PLATE BOLTS SEALANT AND BACKER ROD ALL AROUND AT PLATE STUD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPE STONE VENEER EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER PLYWOOD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPEMAINTAIN CONSISTENT VENEER THICKNESS ALL AROUND AT LIGHT FIXTUREELECTRICAL CONDUIT SEALANT ALL AROUND WALL PER PLAN PLYWOOD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPE WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER CEMENT BOARD FLANGE SET IN SEALANTCASING BEAD STUCCO BY OMEGALIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS -INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS 3/ 4 " - 1" THICK VENEER STONE SET IN T O M O R T A R B E D A T T A C H E D T O DURAROCK BACKER DU R A R O C K A T T A C H E D T O P R E S S U R E TR E A T E D F R A M I N G W I T H S T A I N L E S S STEEL SCREWS SO L D E R E D L E A D C O A T E D C O P P E R FL A S H I N G B E L O W G R A N I T E S I L L SPLIT -FACE GRANITE SILL MITERED AT CORNERS AND SLOPED AWAY FROM COLUMN 3' - 0"10' - 0"2X6 STUD2X4 STUD N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49 ° 3 4 ' E 1 44 .2 8 ' PL N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 .7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 PR O P O S E D H O U S E ON P A D F . F . : 1 2 8 ' PR O P O S E D G A R A G E ON P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 . 5 ' GU E S T PA R K I N G P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y EXISTING BUILDING TR A S H E N C L O S U R E W I T H O U T R O O F P R O P O S E D P A T I O P R O P O S E D P A T I O NE W A C U N I T 4X 4 P R E S S U R E -TR E A T E D PO S T 2X 4 C O N -CO M M O N CA P FE N C E B O A R D S SA N D W I C H E D I N B Y 1X 1 ' S - TO P A N D B O T T O M BO T H S I D E S O F F E N C E BO A R D S 1X 6 C E D A R F E N C E BO A R D S L A P P E D 1 " PO S T H O L E S T O B E 2 ' DE E P X 1 2 " D I A M E T E 1X 8 R E D O O D KI C K E R B O A R D 2X 4 H O R I Z O N T A L CO N -CO M M O N R A I L 6 ' - 0 " 8' - 6 " 1/ 4 " O R 3 / 8 " F U L L Y T E M P E R E D G L A S S PE N C I L P O L I S H F L A T C O R N E R S MA X . 5' - 0 " DE C K B Y O T H E R S 1. 3 7 5 " x 1 . 5 0 " x 0 . 1 2 5 " B O T T O M R A I L 3 ' - 0 " 0 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 2. 3 7 5 " x 2 . 3 7 5 " x 0 . 1 2 5 " A L U M I N U M P O S T 80 0 S E R I E S T O P R A I L 3/ 8 " D O M E D C A P 3/ 8 " T H R U B O L T , 4 " L G 3/ 8 " S C R E W B A S E 3/ 8 " S L E E V E BA S E P L A T E P A D DE C K TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:39 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 EXTERIOR LIGHTINHGPLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A10 1/ 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 3 GA R B A G E E N C L O S U R E 1/ 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 5 A - R A I L I N G 3/4" = 1'-0"8 A - L I G H T F I X T U R E A T S T O N E V E N E E R 3/4" = 1'-0"7 A - T Y P A C A L L I G H T F I X T U R E D E T A I L 3/4" = 1'-0"6 R- P O R C H C O L U M N 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 EX T E R I O R L I G H T I N H G P L A N 1/ 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 A_ F E N C E D E T A I L NT S 4 A - G L A S S G U A R D R A I L / 1 / \ / / / / I 1/ / ½ I / / / I I I ½: / / / I / : / I It I ~ EB / I I I ~ - - I L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ I J l , , . ' I I I ~ 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - I - 1 1 - I 0 LJ "! < - ~ I _. . V v V ~ I V / , ' ,, ~ - p - - - - - - - - - - - - , I \ I \ I \ I \ I \ I r - - - - - - - - - - - - , \ I \ I \ \ \ I \ \ \ I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I - . . - = - - - - : . ·~ ._ , ~ . . .. . . _, . ·.: ,_ ,, \ I I I I I I I I 0 1 µ··. :: :~ ' ( £ - ~ / / . ~ =- - - : . - ~ .: . _ J _ _ _ - - / - - - - ' I · _ - - - - - - - - - - - - .. . . I I I I I \ \ \ ~ , , • 0 N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49 ° 3 4 ' E 1 44 .2 8 ' PL N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 FI R S T F L O O R (1 5 1 7 s f ) N E W G A R A G E ( 4 9 6 s f ) GU E S T P A R K I N G (2 7 9 s f ) NE W D R I V E W A Y (8 5 9 s f ) N E W P A T I O ( 7 8 s f ) N E W P A T I O ( 1 0 4 s f ) R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) E X I S T I N G D R I V E W A Y ( 7 1 8 s f ) TR A S H E N C L O S U R E (3 2 s f ) EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L EX I S T I N G RE T A I N I N G WA L L EX I S T I N G RE T A I N I N G WA L L S NE W A C U N I T (1 6 s f ) AD D I T I O N A L D R I V E W A Y (1 4 0 s f ) N E W P O R C H ( 6 5 s f ) S E C O N D F L O O R L A Y O U T ( 1 4 5 s f ) C R A W L S P A C E B A C K Y A R D P A T I O ( 1 0 5 s f ) N E W S I T I N G A R E A ( 1 0 9 s f ) LO T S I Z E TO T A L I N C R E A S E 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 4. 6 % EX I S T I N G I M P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E C A L C U L A T I O N : 2, 4 2 8 S Q U A R E F E E T ( S F ) PR O P O S E D N E T I N C R E A S E I N I M P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E : 65 8 S F (D R I V E W A Y , S T R U C T U R E S , P A T I O , T R A S H E N C L O S U R E , P A R K I N G ) FI N I S H E D C O N D I T I O N F E E C A L C U L A T I O N : $6 5 8 TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:48 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 IMPERVIOUSSURFACE RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A11 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 IM P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E C A L C U L A T I O N S - - - - - I .6 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I \. . - - - - - - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - I - - - __ _ _ _ _ / I \ \ \ \ ,1 I I I ~ I ~ ~ - ~ --= = =--- - = ~=- ~ - ~- ~ ~ - ~ ~~== = =~~=-= - = - = ~ - - - - 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' 1 0 5 ' 1 0 6 ' 1 0 7 ' 1 0 8 ' 1 0 9 ' 1 1 0 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 2 ' 1 1 3 ' 1 1 4 ' 1 1 5 ' 1 1 6 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 8 ' 1 1 9 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 127' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49 ° 3 4 ' E 1 44 .2 8 ' PL N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' PL S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G LO T 4 1 LO T 3 1 LO T 3 0 R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) 10 0 MO C P 12 0 . 4 2 CP 12 5 . 9 3 CP 13 7 . 8 4 CP 15 1 . 7 9 PC C P 15 0 . 4 4 CP 14 5 . 6 4 FL 14 9 . 6 4 FL 14 6 . 8 5 EG 14 8 . 7 2 EG 14 1 9 5 EG 13 9 . 2 7 EG 13 8 . 0 6 EG 13 7 . 6 1 EG 13 3 . 1 9 EG 13 6 . 1 5 EG 13 8 . 3 8 EG 13 3 . 7 1 EG 13 3 . 5 9 EG 12 6 . 8 EG 12 6 . 4 3 EG 12 7 . 4 LS 12 7 . 5 LS 12 7 . 4 9 LS 12 7 . 4 8 LS 12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 2 3 LS 12 7 . 2 LS12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 3 2 LS 12 7 . 2 5 LS 12 3 . 8 7 EG 12 2 . 7 5 EG 10 7 . 4 EG 12 1 . 4 9 GT T 11 8 . 3 9 DW E 12 0 . 7 1 DW E 12 3 . 5 6 DW E 12 5 . 8 8 DW E 12 6 . 4 9 DW E 11 9 . 9 9 RW B 11 9 . 9 9 RW B 12 3 . 4 6 RW T 12 2 . 9 6 RW T 12 1 . 3 2 RW B 12 4 . 5 3 RW T 12 2 . 5 9 RW B 12 3 . 7 7 RW B 12 5 . 6 3 RW B 12 7 . 7 3 RW T 12 8 . 2 2 RW T 12 6 . 7 RW B 12 8 . 1 4 RW T 12 6 . 6 7 RW B 12 5 . 4 RW T 12 6 . 5 7 RW B 12 7 . 9 6 RW T 12 6 . 9 6 EG 12 6 . 9 3 RW B 12 9 . 6 9 RW T 12 9 . 4 6 EG 12 7 . 1 4 RW B 12 9 . 6 9 RW T 12 7 . 3 EG 12 7 . 5 7 RW B 13 0 . 5 2 RW T 12 8 . 2 2 RW B 13 0 . 2 4 RW T 12 7 . 1 9 RW B 13 0 . 1 5 RW T 12 6 . 8 2 RW B 12 9 . 6 2 RW T 12 7 . 0 1 RW B 13 9 . 0 1 TR 13 8 . 2 9 TR 13 7 . 6 TR 13 7 . 5 4 TR 13 6 . 8 9 TR 14 0 . 6 6 TR 14 5 . 8 3 TR 14 9 . 1 5 TR 14 3 . 6 TR 13 7 . 1 4 SW F L 13 6 . 7 7 SW F L 13 6 . 3 5 SW F L 13 7 . 5 9 RW 13 8 . 1 4 RW 13 8 . 5 RW 11 2 . 2 9 WM 10 8 . 7 5 EB 10 8 . 4 6 EB 12 1 . 5 7 GT B 11 5 . 9 5 GT T 11 3 . 7 GT B 11 2 . 7 3 EG 10 7 . 0 8 GT B 12 7 . 3 6 GS 12 6 . 9 1 GS 12 7 . 4 5 GS LE G E N D EX I S T I N G G R A D E E L E V A T I O N NO T F O U N D P R O P E R T Y C O R N E R CO N T R O L P O I N T W A T E R M E T E R FO U N D P R O P E R T Y M A R K I N G N E E D VE R I F I C A T I O N MO N U M E N T ℄ CE N T E R L I N E FE N C E L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E 11 0 ' 11 1 ' MA J O R C O N T O U R L I N E S MI N O R C O N T O U R L I N E S 12 1 . 0 1 EG SW A L E F L O W L I N E GU T T E R F L O W L I N E ℄ ℄ SI L V E R A D O D R I V E S H R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y 12 6 . 3 4 DW E S H R U B B E R Y EX I S T I N G P A D EX I S T I N G D R I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L 13 1 . 0 1 EG 13 6 . 7 4 EG EX I S T I N G S T A I R S TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:12/20/2019 6:02:11 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE BELVEDERE TIBURON,CA 94920 TOPOGRAPHYMAP RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 A.L.A.L.T1 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N EG TR EB LS WM GSEXISTING GRADE TREE ELECTRICAL BOX LIVING SLAB WATER METER GARAGE SLABABBREVIATIONS CP CONTROL POINT PC PROPERTY CORNER BO U N D A R Y I N F O R M A T I O N BO U N D A R Y ' S S HO W N O N S HE E T A RE S HO W N F R O M MA R I N C O U N T Y , C A S U B D I V I S I O N M A P B O O K 7 P A G E 4 8 . NO B O U N D A R Y S UR V E Y W AS P ER F O M E D AN D T H E P RO P E R T Y L I NE S A ND F E N C E S S HO W N A R E NO T T O B E T AK E N A S R E CO R D . E A SE M E N T S AD D I T I O N A L E A SE M E N T S M AY E X I S T F O R T H IS PA R C E L , A S R E CO R D E D W I T H T HE C O U N T Y. RE F E R E N C E T ITLE RE PO R T F OR A L L P E R T A I N I N G EA S E M E N T S . BU I L D I N G S ET B A C K TO B E C O N F IR M E D B Y C L I EN T . NO T E S 1. TH E P U R P O S E O F T H I S D R A W I N G I S TO P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y F O R S I T E D E S I G N . PR I O R T O A N Y C O N S T R U C T I O N , B O U N D A R Y LI N E S A N D C O R N E R P O I N T S S H O U L D B E VE R I F I E D A N D D O C U M E N T E D . 2. TH E A R E A O F S U R V E Y W A S D E L I N E A T E D B Y CL I E N T . 3. CO N T O U R S A R E C O M P U T E R G E N E R A T E D , F R O M SP O T E L E V A T I O N S . E X A C T S U R F A C E UN D U L A T I O N W A S N O T D E T E R M I N E D , CA L C U L A T E D O R L O C A T E D . 4. SU B J E C T T O A L L E A S E M E N T S , R E C O R D E D O R NO T . T H I S S U R V E Y I S N O T A B O U N D A R Y SU R V E Y A N D D O E S N O T R E F L E C T T H O S E I T E M S TH A T M A Y B E L I S T E D I N A T I T L E R E P O R T , IN C L U D I N G C O V E N A N T S A N D R E S T R I C T I O N S . BENCHMARK INFORMATION UTILIZED TWO MONUMENTS ON STEWART DRIVE, REF E RENCING MARIN COUNTY, CA SUBDIVISION MAP BOOK 7 PAGE 48.ASSUMED EL EVATION AT M ONUMENT CONTROL PO INT O NE SET AT 1 00 F EET.RWT RWB DWE GTE GTFL SWFL RW FL FENCE LINERETAINING WALLSWAIL FLOW LINEGUTTER FLOW LINEGUTTER EDGEDRIVE WAY EDGERETAINING WALL BOTTOMRETAINING WALL TOP MO MONUMENT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / / / / / / / / / I / / / _ / / / / / / / - - ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ; - 7 ~ / __ _ , ,_ _ ___ , _ - \ - - ~ - \ \ \ f:: : , , . \ \ \ \ \ I / \ I - - ,, , ,, , _ /c_ _ _ _. : , . _ s f y c_ - - - - - - ' ' y - -< / _ _ _ I I \ \ I I \ I I I I - ·-, - _ L . -- - 1 - - - I - 7 - - I - - 'i - - , - \ I I I I / I I I I / I I I I I \ \ \ / / \ \ \ I I I -$ - f: : : , , . ~ t> < ] 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/10/2020 12:23:51 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 VISUALIZATION RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK RM A12 1 545 Silverado Tiburon Color and Material Selections 2 Index Entry Door -3 Garage Door -4 Exterior Lighting - 5 Stucco Acrylic Finish - 6 Stone Veneer -6 Metal Roof - 7 Accent Color - 7 Retaining Wall - 8 9-10 - 11 Gutter - 8 Window/Sliding Door - Drive & Sidewalk Finish Exterior Wall Siding -4 3 Product Placement: Entry Door Product By: IWANTTHATDOOR Product ID: The Beast Square Top Single Entry Iron Doors 4 Product Placement: Single & Double Car Garage Door Product By: Clopay Product ID: Design Rec 14 Colonial Lift Handles (Color: Stepping Stone) Product Placement: Exterior Wall Siding Product By: James Hardie Product ID: Color Pegasus 0 0 Pegasus PPG1010-1 5 Product Placement: Exterior Lighting Product By: Denbury Product ID: Style #5Y088 I 6 Product Placement: Exterior Stucco Color Product By: Omega Product ID: 9205 Iceberg Product Placement: Exterior Stone Veneer Product By: Cultured Stone Product ID: Pro-Fit Modera Ledgestone (Intaglio) 9205 ICEBERG Pro-Fit® Modera™ Ledgestone Pro-Fit Modern Ledgestone is classic contemporary. Create a tailored look w ith easily insta lled. meti:u!ously bundled modular components of equal height. Dimensions (approx): 4" H x a· L 4" H x 12· L. and 4· H x 20" L 7 Product Placement: Roof Product By: Metal Roofing California Product ID: Standing Seam Ash Gray (Kynar) Product Placement: Doors, Garage Door (PPG1010-4) Product Placement: Trims, Fascia, Gutter, Downspout, Band before the soffit (PPG1010-6) Product By: PPG Paints Product ID: Stepping Stone (PPG1010-4), Up In Smoke (PPG1010-6) STANDING SEAM -ASH GRAY (KYNAR) Stepping Stone PPG1010-4 Up In Smoke PPG1010-6 8 Product Placement: Retaining Walls Product ID: RockWall Large 17.5” x 7” x 6” (Pecan Color) Product Placement: Roof Gutter Product ID: K-Style Gutter 9 Product Placement: Windows Product By: Anderson Product Description: Anderson 100 series (Black) CHOOSE THE WINDOWS, DOORS & OPTIONS THAT ARE RIGHT FOR YOU . WINDOW & DOOR TYPES ..... _,, ...... , _____ "_ ....... ...................... _ . ._ ...... _ .. _ I, .. ,. .... ,._I n. ....... -.---........... --·-........ l"W._ ·-- -t!MW..N ......... N"M,- ........... i...,W,,., ........ ......... ""--·----··--,..""" ..... _,,.,_,.,,_ ... ......................... .,.. ..... ,--·· ... ........... ~ .. ..... ,._, ... ... ...,_ ..... ""_ ..., ... _ .. . -- . -... -'~ ... ----.................... ................. -,w _,.,._....,. ... .... ..,..,...,. .... ............ ..,._..., __ _ __ .. .......... _ ·-·---------..,,.,.. GLASS ~, ........ ,. ......... ........... .,.. ______ ..,, ............... -~ ,.,., ______ _ ..... .,,. ...... ; .... _ ....... 1a,,-... ....................... ........ .-..... .... ....... _...., ..... _____ ..,._..,... ........ ,1 .. 1,- Or, ..... alflC.---...--.. ....... --........... , ....... .. ...... , ___ ,. Wlll..fl ..... _. .... .............. 11,.--u.111111•-·----'GI'--... 0.-... .-... 111--.,.. ___ _ -i-....-~-··"'-·-----i-• _,. .. (1,1 ............. ..... ...,..,.._. ..... __ ,._i_.,...,_ ... _ ....... _ . ..,.._ ·~ ......... . .., .. ._. ..... l,llt,( -- GRILLES COLOR o.... ... ,,.,.___ ... ~ .. ..,.,, .... _ ..... ..... ~ ..._ ---· ... ..-4-... ... ,,. .,. __ ...,...... ___ .... ,.. .. ... ~r~~-J ■I■ ■■I @-~-... ~ ... -~---~--___ ,.. :...;.~ - ~: ~:-:! ~ ~~DWA!E ___ ,. ' .................. ~ =:..? ~:::~----·------·---~·--· -~--IIM ..... ::--=..:..-=. _,.., __ _ ___ .. ..,. ---- ... _,.. __ .., ..-.. " ... -· .-~------·----• ---~1 -.. 1 -:.-M--== --------:..=-:.:.::.:=:::..:== , ....-..--.... -_ .. __ 10 Product Placement: Sliding Door Product By: Allside __ Sliding and Hinged Patio Doors _______ _ With their pristh,e appeara11u, Slidi11g a,ul Hhzged Patio nnnr:f mill ~,u, " stylish entry far your home. ____.j-- A ,...,IU,uil, patio de.or inVTW tbt-bnu,y of ouidoon inside, ~ik pn,viding .,n mcrgy-dttci,:nt b..nic r .ag.tin:A i..dcmcnl -..,1,n. Sliding Patio Door • 1-"usion....ddnl 01H1JlruC1ion ddiva:s lcng-1:a>Ung Hn::ngth .and d..,-.,b.lit)" • Smrdy41d fnnxd.pd,andl"wid.- intc:i;~ n.ai1ing tin with I~" SCI bad.. for added strucnm.l imcgriry. • Srnuo lin orion is al.o ;w.oil.i,bl.,_ • I" thid. in.,,J.md glu.,wi,h w:i.rm.....dg,: ,.,,du,ology. • Adjwubl<' du.J undem roller >p<O'rn onast:'inka.,,.,.lu.ad:. .. ruu...,.C'a'}' op,,r·ar,on • Anibbk in whi, .. , "-lmo..d o r ~ day; a brorw, ntuior with~ whii .. inrnior alsoisoK.:rul.. • K.cyal bndk loclr. ~ fuo, lode op1ions. • Two,1hn:r,and"'1r-p.,nda.,Jigumioru ani~c. a I ~ ---- n,,, & ... Ii. ~W l,,11vfW' aa,f PJM""-s lllill i,{i- ,_., ,,._ .,;,J, W ...mruh.,.,J M>UJl!f" iunual Jid,,. Hi11ged Patio Door • Fwion-...:ldcd c:omuuakH'I ddinn long-U.ting ,1 f1'ngi.h anJ durabi.l:i,y. • cJ..oc,..,from4'M'o.-6""4" fumc: dqnh, both with l" wick in,q:nl nailini; fln for ad.k.J struaur::J intq;,,il}·• . !:a::.~-:;;:1.;. with • liavy-d,uy ,,i/fai,cr in .JI fnnx utd pand mc,mlxn,_ • Thn:t:?>irit locking sptan fur a tii;hl .. J a..d ..ddc:d wmfon. • 8...,.. ha,dw,u-i: ...id. ..dj,uublce whil<'hing<"". • Anil..bk in ..inr;k, doubk or fund,..yl,doon , ...... wdalmond. 11 Product Placement: Concrete Color Finish Product By: Davis Colors Product ID: Dune 6058 Number: 6058 Nam e: Dune Hex: 8d8o6b Description: Li g uid Dose Ra te: 0.61 lbs per 94 lb sack of cement Powder Dose Rate: 0.5 l bs per 94 lb sack of cement To view or order an actual concrete sampl e. cLick here. D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G 1 A9 BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T 2 A9 DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E 12 ' - 9 " 11 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 5' - 1 " 0' - 7 " 0' - 6 " 1' - 7 1 / 2 " 1' - 7 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 8' - 4 3 / 4 " 3' - 6 " 3' - 6 " 9' - 3 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 4' - 6 " 1 2 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 8 3 / 4 " D1 D1 0 W4 W4 W6 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 W7 W8 W9 D1 1 D1 1 W1 0 D1 W6 D5 D9 W6 D8 D5 0' - 5 1 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 7 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4 2 ' - 6 " 2 6 ' - 1 1 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 0 " 7' - 8 1 / 2 " 20 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 7 " 8' - 6 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 50 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 1 0 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 2 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 14 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 19 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 2 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 1 0 " 2' - 8 1 / 2 " 7' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 7 3 / 4 " 2' - 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 6' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 7' - 7 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 6 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 5' - 1 " 2' - 3 " 1 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 2' - 0 " 13 ' - 5 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 14 ' - 9 " 4' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 5 1 / 4 " BA T H 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 6 " 3' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1 5 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 1 / 4 " HO R I Z O N T A L W O O D E N SL A T S 9' - 5 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 2 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 1 / 4 " WALL LEGEND 2" x 4" WALL (MEASURED 3 1/2")2" x 6" WALL (MEASURED 5 1/2")TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/23/2020 10:40:36 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 FLOOR PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A3.1 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R Door Schedule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t D o o r T y p e D1 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 F l u s h S w i n g D2 2 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D3 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g - C l o s e t D5 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g S i n g l e P a n e l D6 2 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 4 Flush Swing D8 2 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Glass Door D9 2 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 Flush Swing D10 5 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g D11 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g Area Schedule 2nd Floor Area Name 105 SF B A C K Y A R D P A T I O 173 SF 2 N D F L O O R D E C K 1530 SF 2 N D F L O O R L I V I N G A R E A Window Sche dule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t W i n d o w T y p e W4 2 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W6 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 3 Slide W7 3 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W8 3 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Fixed W9 4 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W10 4 ' - 6 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 FixedWINDOW NOTE: ALL WINDOWS TO BE TEMPERED WINDOWSATTACHMENT 4 ' I ' ' ' B C • ,. r ,. r, r. r. r, r. r, r. r, I , I , r. r. r. I , I , r, r, I / I , ,. r, r I , I , r, I , I , r, I , I / I/ r, I , r. r, I , I , I , r, I I . 0 0 l b .. ' l " " ~> • '. ,. , 1 .I . I , , 0 ~~!,= ... -. /-.-. ,, , - . - .. -_-1 - - - - , ; _ . 1 , _ . 0-, 1 ' , 1 ' - , , Q - '. ', Q 1 ~ ~ 'I Q " f J "- - ' c-- ; - i ~ ' - l , ,. • 7 [ 7 ' I I I :1 :1 :1 ' I :1 :1 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - , rh I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I '1 '1 '1 I I I ,, 'I I 'I 'I ,, " ~ ,. ,. r. t ~ , / 7T 7 " 7 7 " ' 7 0 I ' I . - I, I • , ' I I • , : I I I I I I !1 I , ,, :1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I '1 I ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I / 7 7 7 " " I , • ' 1 l I , '. • 7 I , I , ,. I , I , ~ r r I , I , I , r ~ r r. r. • I • . , ' . , . , k ) ~ - _ _ _ _ J , . , ,. 0 r. 'i s - r, I , L e , I ,~ - , , ,, la C? r F e - , - - □ = ,- - - - - - - : - - - Q ,. I I I I I I I ' ,, ' ' -· " -, f ; , / / • I , , . , , r ; - - - + - - _ l I' ~ r; ' ~ I , I . I , I , I' . I , I , I , V, ' I , I , I , I , I , I , I , I , r, I , I , I , I , .~ I , r. r. f; ' o , , , , I . . , , . / " - - 0 ,. 0 , I I • - , I , 6 ' l '. , . • I , • . I I I . I I I D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E D1 D1 0 W4 W4 W6 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 W7 W8 W9 D1 1 D1 1 W1 0 D1 W6 D5 D9 W6 D8 D5 BA T H 8 ' - 3 " 9 ' - 2 1 /2 " 8 ' - 0 3 /4 " N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L 50 ' F R O M R E A R P L 3 0 ' F R O M F RO NT PL 2' - 0 " 3' - 3 1 / 2 " 9' - 8 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 9 1 /2 " 1 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 9 ' - 6 1 / 4 " 7 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 1 / 2 " 1 9 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 0 " 1 7 ' - 1 " 1 1 ' - 9 " LEGEND 2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM 1ST FLOOR TO 2ND FLOOR WALLS2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM WALLS TO PROPERTY LINE TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/23/2020 10:40:37 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 2ND FLOOR OVERLAY TO 1ST FLOOR RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PZ PZ A3.2 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R O V E R L A Y T O 1 S T F L O O R (/ I I I I I L I - - - - I - - / - - - - - - - ' -- -- I - I I u lj • 1 / / / / / / / / / / I / / Q Q - . ' ' . - - - - - - - - - - - J Q Q Q I I -1 - - r - - - - , - - - - - - - - - =: J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'-- - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I ,_ - -- - I I ' - . ' ,- - . _IJ - • I - - I - - - I I I I I I I I -- - .. : ,IJ ~ • · I / , ' I , . r , r , / I , [ ; I / [ 0 r , ,, / [;0 r , , o I , / I , I , r , r , / - n I , I , ~ c - / I / ~ o ,, ~ , _ - , / " ~ ) / / 0 - ~ / / 7 / / ' ' / .7 7 7 / / 7 T 7 , f ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ¥ - - - - Y ,, - -- - -- - -- - ' _'n L - ' - - - - - - " - - " / - ~ ': \ _ u · -- - I ,,- ,' ,,- i' I I I i' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I !1 'I ,, !1 'I I I !1 \ u - - - - - - - I I I I i ' 1' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'I !, I !, ,, ,, • . - - -- I - -- 0 / V V V V / V V V v ~ / -- (_ I ) - y 6 -- - - G) . / / / / 7 ' / / / r Y ? / ,: : : : / / / 7 / / 7 7 7 ' V , ( L / / / ~ / / / / / ; / / / / / ; 0 ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -, -C) \ \ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ) - r .. -- - 1. M E T A L R O O F B Y M E T A L R O O F I N G C A L I F O R N I A S T A N D I N G S E A M A S K G R E Y ( K Y N A R ) . ROOF PITCH 3:12. OVERHANG: 2'-6'2. S T O N E V E N E E R B Y C U L T U R E D S T O N E ( P R O - F I T M O D E R A L E D G E S T O N E I N T A G L I O ) . INSTALL STONE OVER 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER, METAL LATH ,SCRATCH COAT AND MORTAR SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.3. S I N G L E C O A T S T U C C O ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A , P L Y W O O D S H E A T H I N G U N D E R T W O LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER.4. F A S C I A B O A R D ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 5. G A R A G E D O O R B Y C L O P A Y . D E S I G N R E C 1 4 C O L O N I A L L I F T H A N D L E S (COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4).6. E X T E R I O R W A L L L E D L I G H T I N G ( D A N B U R Y 6 " HIGH BLACK DUSK TO DA WN - S T Y L E # 5 Y 0 8 8 ) . PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.7. F R O N T D O O R B Y I W A N T T H A T D O O R . P R O D U C T I D : T H E B E S T S Q U A R E T O P SINGLE ENTRY IRON DOORS, COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4.8. 1 0 0 S E R I E S W I N D O W S A N D S L I D I N G D O O R S B Y A N D E R S E N ( C O L O R B L A C K ) 9. W I N D O W , D O O R T R I M C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 . 10. A C S C R E E N I N G ( S T U C C O F I N I S H 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G B Y O M E G A ) 11. A C U N I T S H A L L B E L O C A T E D A N D S E C U R E D T O A M I N I M U M 3 - I N C H T H I C K S L A B OR APPROVED PLATFORM.12. G U T T E R ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).13. T H E A P P R O V E D A D D R E S S N U M B E R S S H A L L B E P L A I N L Y L E G I B L E A N D V I S I B L E F R O M THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A MINIMUM ½" WIDE STROKE. CFC 505, CRC R319 , FMCB.36.080 THE NUMBERS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT NIGHT. WHEN EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED THE FACE OF THE SIGN SHALL BE AT A MINI MUM OF 5.0 FOOT CANDLES. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT ILLUMINATION. FMC 8.36.080.14.MODERN HANDRAIL 15. I P E S I D I N G B Y J A M E S H A R D I E C O L O R : P E G A S U S B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 1 .16. D O W N S P O U T ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 17. R O O F V E N T S ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).18. F L U E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 19 . E L E C T R I C A L M E T E R . 20. W A T E R M E T E R . 21. G A S M E T E R . 22. I N T E R N E T A N D P H O N E O U T L E T . 23.TANKLESS WATER HEATER.24. T R A S H C A N E N C L O S U R E S T U C C O F I N I S H ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A T O B E CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.25. H A R T F O R D L E D O U T D O R P E N D A N T B Y K U Z C O LIGHTING (PRODUCT ID: KUZP266178 )PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.26. S O L A R P A N E L . 27. S O L A R I N V E R T O R . 28. B A N D A C C R O S S T H E T O P B E F O R E T H E S O F F I T A N D G A R A G E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).29. W O O D E N H O R I Z O N T A L S L A T S ( C O L O R : J A R R A H B R O W N B Y C A B O T ) . KEY NOTES 0' - 3 1/2"4' - 0"4' - 0"TOP VIEWHOUSE STRUCTURE 3' PONY WALL WRAPPING UNIT HOUSE STRUCTURE3' - 8 1/2"0' - 3 1/2"AC AC2X4 3' PONY W/STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH THE HOUSESIDE VIEW 0' - 1 1/2"3' - 0"0' - 5 1/2"2x6 CAP4' - 0"3' - 1 1/2"0' - 4"CONCRETE PAD 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 3 1 4 8 2 6 9 12 17 18 25 28 13 16 MA X H E I G H T 24 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 23 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 25 ' - 3 1 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 29 EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 5 ' - 9 " 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 1 8 14 3 2 4 6 9 12 13 10 16 17 18 24 23 26 28 19 22 21 20 27 MA X H E I G H T 24 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 23 ' - 1 1 1 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 25 ' - 3 1 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 5 ' - 9 " TYP.0' - 6"4 5 °DECKINGSUPPORT BLOCK2X6 TOP FRAME 2X6 BOTTOM FRAMEBEAM ABOVE 2X6 WOODEN SLAT SET INTO VERTICAL FRAME PRESSURE -TREATED TIMBER.EXTERIOR PATIO MIN.0' - 4"TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/23/2020 2:06:57 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ELEVATIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A51/2" = 1'-0"3 A- A C S c r e e n D e t a i l 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 Le f t E l e v a t i o n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 Ri g h t E l e v a t o n 1" = 1'-0"4 A - W O O D E N S L A T S S E C T I O N : -, ' ' C " , C - • ' -- ·. - ., ,_ , ,, , ' " . ,. • ' . - . ' - . ' - . - . - ' - . ; .. _· : . - . . . . ' ', -· " ' . - ' . ~ . ! _, ' ' • • • - ( • ' - ' " ' . ' . - ·. \ ' ' .- ~ ·- - ' ' -, , . ' .. -- ' - - . •- ' ' ,- . ,- , .. - . . • - . ' ' ' _, "I " - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - + - - - - + - - - - - - - t - - + - - + - - - - + - ~ - l e : : - - - ¾ i - - - - + - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - . . r- - - - - - ~ r- - - - - . . - - , _ ~ - - - + - - - - - + - - f - - - - - - - - - ' ,, V " ~ - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - = -- J - - - . J ~ - - - - - J - - - - - r 1- - -- - - - - - r- - - - - . . . __ _ _ , - ~ v - f -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' -- - - - - - - - - -._ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- - - - - - - - ~ ' I ' - - - - - - - - + - - I - - - + - - I ~ f - - - - - - - c - _ + - _ - , _ - + - - - - + - s - - + - - __ ~ : + - _ - _ - _ - - - - , __ . f - - r - + , - - _ ~ _ - - + _ .. - . • + - __ ~ - . . - . . -- + - _ . - - - - ~ , + - - - , - - - , - h t : - ' : [ _ ~ = - , : - ~ , _ -- , i ;: < , , _ - , - . ' , . ' ., • ' ,- - • ,· - : -, ! . . . . . . . - . . . . ' . - . L ' • ; C O • ' - ,_ - , ,. -· ,_ - - ' -· ·- -, , - -. . , - •, - ; . . - •- ~ ' - . -, •, _ , _, , , - . . ' ' - . - ~ : ·. • ' _ , ' . _, " .. -, _, ,. -• ' . - - . -· ~ ' - ' ' ,• •, - _, - ' - , •' . •' - , " - ' ,- -, . ' .- ' . -. . . -- - - - - ·- ' - ,• -· .. -- -- -- , _ ' - -, . . , - , ' ' ·- -. -- - - • . , - ' -- .. .. / / -- .. . . . - - r ' • • " ' ., • • •• - ' ' ' _, ,' c ,- •' '- ,, " '• - • ~ / V ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ b I ~ ~ ~ ~ q h -- ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ . ~ . I 1 • • . . .. • . • • • • · •• . : ~ ' :::: : , r " " - ~ - = 1 J A I ✓ --" ' I h ,; ; ~i i - · _. ·_ - , ·-.- _ · - · · .·· ·· · · -- · - ,· .. , ·: · : ·_- · - -- · _ i = __ = _ ~ - = · • = · - - - .· -n .. -~ - ·- - ~ - · .- ~. ~ _1 1 1 _ · '1 1 1 - 1 • - ~ ~ : . · --· - ·. · .· -· .. · ._· ·•· · . ·. _ · \ \ · , · · - ·. - · -- - · · · · - . - - : Il l Il k "7 " · • t1 ' 1 1_. II = I 1~1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 - i ~ -· - · -- -. · : - --· ·.- - -· - . : -· \, - - · - - - · · - - - · ~; ~ ~ . -. -- , - : · ·: 1 -1 1 1 m -1 1 1 -1 1 -: ~ ~ . ,, , ' '• , , : s .[ 9 : : : :: . , '. • L i = __ =;= _ = ' - ~ - ~ . - cw <1 ' . , 2 - _ 4 ' ' 1 - · ;r n ; ..-. · 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 -1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 ~ !! -.. ,' '· : - ~~ _ - ~ : ,, , ·· · -_ · · _ _ - _ . □. ~ - - _ i, '; J ' , - r ; : 11 111 : ;· : U _I I il l _11 1 ~~ , - - · .. , .. ,_ ,, , ' / ·•· -. : · : ,, / _ - : 4 · : - -. - . _ ,: ' , : ; : 1 1 ( 11 111 111 J1 11 11 1 l l l : · . , : : n i l l 1 1 i l l 1 1 1 i l l f T I ~ - _ ~ ,: : + : : , - ' I - - · · ~ , -·· - . T ~ I - • • • · ' · - . ~ - -. . •. " 111 I 11 I ~: ~ 1 . ~--- _ .. S I G $ l-l - 1 =l E l l ;'. ~ =L l J = l - J 1 = - i l l = 1 1 - ' k - ." - U-1 1 li l l - l 1 -11 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 -111 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 11 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 T1 1 = 1 1 = 1 1 ri l l m i l l m l g m - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 11 -1 1 -111 -1 1 1 - 11 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 1 - 111 -1 1 11 111 11 111 111 I I 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 1 1 1 - 1 , 1 - 1 1 1 - I I 111 111 111 111 111 11 111 11 1 1 1 I I 111 111 -1 I 1- 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 ~ ~ . I' I I I ' -£, ~ I I V I I Iv I I ~-~1 '1,.----------_J I 'k--- - - - - - --- _ Jj ',, ======== -~ x ____ _ I _hi :~-~I---------------------- TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:9/23/2020 10:41:35 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 VISUALIZATION RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK RM A12 To: Design Review Board September 25, 2020 Town of Tiburon Re: proposed new house at 545 Silverado As a 44 year resident of our neighborhood and former homeowners' association board member, I take an interest in new construction/remodels in our neighborhood. I found a couple of things on the drawings: Sheet A-1: "Lightning Plan" good luck planning where lightning will strike.... Sheet GP-1: On the map in the corner, there is no "Marin Soccer Academy" on Virginia Drive. Someone who lives there may be affiliated, but that's all. Sheet A-2: "Construction trucks shall not park on the street for security reasons" Hmmm, where do you think they will park? Also, where will the porta potty be located? Silverado is a really narrow street. Sheet A-4: Front elevation, can't find #27 "solar invertor" Sheet A-6: The highest point of the roof is 24 10", which exceeds the max height of most of the surrounding homes which are 22 feet, even the ones with a second story. New construction should be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Sheet A-7: Landscaping. We are in Sunset's Zone 17 and plants that do well in Sacramento are not necessarily going to do well here. Cortaderia Selloana: According to the Sunset book, these plants are to be avoided because they "send seeds to germinate and grow wherever they land", i.e. open space, where they crowd out native vegetation. Sunset says "horticulturalists recommend against landscaping with C. Selloana and suggest removing it from gardens..." Also, the existing plantings along the street side are unsightly and overgrown. Sheet A-8: "Erosion control is in accordance with City of Folsom and County of Sacramento " The Town on Tiburon has Hillside Guidelines, they should be followed. Also, if excavation is planned for the toe of the steep slope at the back of the property, that portion of the neighborhood will be at risk for mudslides. Drainage is a huge issue off that steep bare hill. The existing trees should be retained to stabilize the slope. A-10: Again, reference to “lightning”... Lights should be down only, not shine out. There is no reason to have outdoor lighting that blazes all night, they should be on a timer or motion- activated. Were low-voltage lights on the ground rather than hanging off the house considered? A-11: The driveway, which is not proposed to be changed, is so awkward that I wonder who would want to pay $3 million for a house where you have to hang a u-turn just to get into your steep driveway. Sincerely, Lee Darby 543 Comstock Drive, Tiburon, CA 94920 Late Mail #1 for 10/1/2020 DRB To: Members of the Design Review Board From: Christopher and Lyndsey Child, 546 Silverado Drive Subject: 545 Silverado Drive, Design Review Board Meeting October 1, 2020 Date: September 25, 2020 To Whom it May Concern: We have lived at 546 Silverado Drive for the past 4 years. We are excited to see the empty lot directly across the street from us developed, and to eventually see a new family join our wonderful neighborhood. In general, we're supportive of the plans that we've seen. We do have several concerns that we'd like the board to consider. The first is the overall height and bulk of the house. Give the steep hillside on which the house will be constructed, there's a chance that the house will tower over the street (and thereby our house). We haven't been able to get a good sense of how much it will do so from the plans, but the height of 25' 9" when looking at the already very steep grade to the house from the street will likely feel much taller than that. Relatedly, out house is currently well shielded from the site by the natural vegetation at the front, street-side of the lot. The plans discuss keeping the trees and vegtation intact, but the site plan renderings show all new vegetation. We would prefer that the trees and large shrubs that currently fill the front of the site remain. One of our favorite parts of the neighborhood is how much it feels like you are surrounded by vegetation and greenery, and we would prefer to keep that character. Finally, our neighborhood has almost no nighttime artifical lighting, which makes for a very calm and rural feeling. This is due to both very few external lights, and also most homes not having large windows that pollute light. We'd also like to keep that part of the neighborhood character intact to the extent possible by minimizing both external lighting that may not be necessary, and also make sure there aren't large interior lighting fixtures that will shine directly into our home. Thank you for your consideration. Chris and Lyndsey Late Mail #2 for 10/1/2020 DRB To: Tiburon Design Review Board From: Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Residents and owners of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004 Date: September 28, 2020 RE: Concerns regarding proposed development at 545 Silverado Drive SUMMARY Our primary issue with the 545 Silverado Drive project is its massing impact on our everyday living spaces. We appreciate the desire of the developer to try and maximize profits and build on a property that has been an eyesore for years. In addition, we recognize that the property needs to be developed. As such, we have been supportive of past redevelopment attempts that were less intrusive. We want to improve the neighborhood, but no redevelopment should be at the expense of long-term community members, nor one that creates housing inconsistent with the neighborhood where homes work in concert with each other rather than in conflict. Also, the change from the September 10th submission to replace a second-floor wall with a 7-foot-wide/9-foot-high, 50% screen may create privacy and light intrusion issues directly into our dining room, kitchen, and living room from the deck area. The impact, while difficult to assess from the drawings, could be significant. SOLUTIONS We believe there are many ways to address our concerns that would, importantly, not materially change the overall design. For example: 1)The first-floor clear height is 10’ across the whole space. This is generous, especially for a dense neighborhood such as ours, and could be reduced to 9’. 2)The second-floor clear height is 9’. As with the first-floor height, this is generous, and could be reduced to 8’. 3)Reduce the roof pitch from 3:12 to 1:12. This still allows for water drainage but reduces the project’s height. Of note, on prior occasions the developer stated that he was reducing the slope from 3:12. 4)With some slope to the roof, the second floor could take advantage of the natural vaulting to create more volume with reduced slide walls. 5)2.5’ eves are substantial, adding to the project’s protrusion past the setback and adding to the massing. 18” eves still provide balance to the house but would reduce its intrusion by a full foot. 6)Finally, protect our privacy and light intrusion by putting back the solid wall on the deck, or assure that it will block light and keep privacy. In addition, mandate that it is a “permanent” part of the house. RESULT The above would bring the project’s height down, create massing more in-line with what had been previously approved by the town, be more consistent with the neighborhood, and keep the project from impeding on our family privacy. The current design has more massing impact than prior designs that were unanimously rejected by the Design Review Board. Late Mail #3 for 10/1/2020 DRB ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS/CONCERNS ABOUT THE PROJECT In addition to our primary concerns, there are additional items that we believe should be addressed prior to the project moving forward: Characterization of project as “utilizing the similar footprint of the demolished residence” is very misleading: Per the plans, the existing pad from the demolished house is 1,328 sf. The total lot coverage of the current planned house (not included patio and driveway, etc.) is 2,013 sf, or an increase of 51%. The plan also moves the house wall facing us approximately 6 ½ feet closer to our property than has ever existed previously on the property, and certainly since we purchased the property in 2004. With the old house having approximate 6” roof overhang on the sides, the total shift including eves is 8 ½ feet closer to us. Tenor of the Project: This is a dense, modest neighborhood. With the prospect of many older homes needing redevelopment over the next decade, this development changes the tone and character of the neighborhood, giving runway to others to build “big boxes” without long-term consideration on neighborhood impact. As one developer said when reviewing the project, “It is built to minimize development costs and maximize views, rather than built for the site.” In addition, as a prominent real estate agent commented when we asked them to physically assess the proposed development on our property’s value, “Wow. That’s a big impact.” Lighting: The plans call for “dusk to dawn” photovoltaic lighting that automatically go on at night and stay on throughout the night. This is inconsistent with our neighborhood and would create additional light pollution marring our views. Perimeter Fence: There is mention of a new perimeter fence, but it is unclear which portions of the plan are new fence. We need clarification where the new fence is proposed and that our current fence is not impacted. Protection of Privacy Hedge: With the construction of a drainage swale so close to our current privacy hedge, what are the methods that will be taken to ensure those are not damaged. CONTEXT AND PRECEDENT We, and the neighborhood, have been wanting this property to be redeveloped since Dorothy Gallot, a long-time community owner and advocate, sold the property in 2013 due to ill health. Unfortunately, the prior owner had a conflict with his contractor which led to the site sitting vacant for several years. The vacancy, and subsequent lack of structure, on the site may be viewed as a reason for our opposition to the current proposal, but this is far from the truth. We were on-record as supportive of the prior design, where we worked with the prior owner to create a development more consistent with the neighborhood and, of course, less impactful to our house. To give the Design Review Board a sense of this history, the enclosed attachment (and apologies to our limited tech prowess) attempts to compare the current design to the design that was UNANMOUSLY VOTED AGAINST by the Design Review Board in 2013. As you can see from the photos in the embedded PDF, the current proposal has much more massing impact to our property than a past proposal which was rejected unanimously. We would ask that the current Board take into account past official actions when contemplating the current proposal, especially when there are a number of ways in which the proposed development could be adapted without significant impact. Further, there have been similar sized windows on the south side of our house taking advantage of water and hill views since our property (and the original house located at 545 Silverado) was originally developed in the mid-1950s, and since we purchased the property in 2004. Section 15.1 of the Town Code covers Tree Obstruction Guidelines and contends that there is an established right to preserve views and sunlight that have been in existence since the ownership of the property. Specifically, 15 (a) 1. states that the purpose of the chapter is to “Establish the right of persons to preserve views or sunlight which existed at any time since they purchased or occupied a property from unreasonable obstruction by the growth of trees .” So, why wouldn’t a permanent obstruction (in this case the proposed development) be viewed in the same context? If not, would this view not be in contradiction to the town code and therefore question which perspective is superior? We welcome the discussion of this with the Design Review Board and the Town, if needed. WHY All THIS MATTERS TO US For context, we have been living at 541 Silverado since January 2004 when we purchased the home from the original owners. The ability to move to Marin was fantastic, especially since Jennifer grew up in Kentfield, graduated from Redwood, and is a fifth generation Californian. Since moving here, we have been Soccer, Baseball, and Lacrosse coaches, members of the PTA, on the planning committees of community fundraising events such as Blackie’s Hay Day and St. Stephen’s Art Angels, worked for the Tiburon-Belvedere Landmarks Society, and have been leaders in local Cub Scouts and Boy Scouts. Our boys have been in the Reed School District since Kindergarten, with one now in 8th grade at DelMar and our oldest a Sophomore at Redwood. Our perspective is long-term, not short-term. THANK YOU FOR THE CONSIDERATION Thank you for listening to our perspective on this project. While we have commented on several points, we reiterate that we want a house at 545 Silverado that not only upgrades the neighborhood, but Tiburon as well. We believe the proposed project can achieve that goal if it slightly moderates in size to limit its massing impact on our property, to protect our privacy, and to conform more to our neighborhood. Current Proposal View from Front Door Entry Late Mail #4 for 10/1/2020 DRB Current Proposal View from Front Door Entry – Shaded Prior Design Proposal June 2013 View from Kitchen Sink RESULT: Unanimous 5-0 DRB Vote Against Proposal Current Proposal View from Kitchen Sink Current Proposal View from Kitchen Sink -Shaded Prior Design Proposal June 2013 View from End of Dining Table RESULT: Unanimous 5-0 DRB Vote Against Proposal Current Proposal View from End of Dining Table Current Proposal View from End of Dining Table -Shaded From:rebecca pringle To:Christy Fong; dinatasani@townoftiburon.org; Kris Bernard Cc:jkhartung@gmail.com; margarita.perry@rbc.com; chrishartung@hotmail.com; rebecca pringle Subject:Proposed House Plans at 545 Silverado Drive Date:Monday, September 28, 2020 3:41:39 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. TO:TIburon Design Review Board staff: Christy Fong, Dina Tasani, Kris Bernard and Design Review Board Members RE: Proposed plans for new house at 545 Silverado Drive, Tiburon FROM: Rebecca Pringle, 530 Comstock Drive, Tiburon DATE: September 28, 2020 Dear Staff and Board members: I had noticed the story poles for the new residence at 545 Silverado because they are just around the corner from my home on Comstock Drive. I was able to review the plans. I was struck by the following simple thought: THE HOUSE IS OUT OF CHARACTER FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD: In several ways. -the house plan ignores the up-stepping plot plan for the Little Reed Heights hillside neighborhood. The walls and roof of this house rise up to the same height of the house ABOVE it at 541 Silverado. The walls and roof should be below those of the uphill neighbor. - the block shape and bulk of the house affect both the house above and below it, with huge walls, and eaves that stretch out. - although planned for one of the largest lots on this street, it is jammed as close as possible to the house next to it (541), which is on possibly the smallest lot on the street. This is called “neighbor jamming”, which should be avoided where possible. It looks bad, and in this case it just looks crowded. -the square and blocky design combined with charmless building materials (iceberg white stucco with gray corrugated metal roof) make this house perfect for a mass home development on the flat in Sacramento, but not for the hills in Tiburon. - the plans call for “dawn to dusk” lighting. This is absolutely impossible in this area of hills and gullies where anyone who leaves anything but the smallest down light on all night is basically shining a floodlight out on a great many neighbors. SUGGESTIONS for improving the design: - reduce the square footage a bit so the walls can be pulled back from the edge of the property, especially on the uphill side. - reduce the height of the roof, at least down to 22’. - reduce the eaves on the north side...the non-weather side. - reduce the second floor or set it back farther into the uphill side of the property so there is a step feeling to the house that fits with the hillside. - eliminate the dawn to dusk lighting...this is unfair to whole neighborhood. -ask for a composition roof, more in keeping with the neighborhood. -ask for a colored window trim treatment to give some warmth and character to the house, so the whole thing is not iceberg white. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Pringle 530 Comstock Drive Late Mail #5 for 10/1/2020 DRB Late Mail #6 for 10/1/2020 DRB Kris Bernard From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Perry, Margarita < margarita_perry@rbc.com > Monday, September 28, 2020 7:11 PM Christy Fong; Dina Tasini; Kris Bernard Christopher Hartung Proposed development of 545 Silverado Drive H PSCAN _20200929011631109_2020-09-29_011805489 .pdf; IMG_6078.jpg; IMG_ 6080jpg Ci\Ul JON : This email originated from outside of-the organization_ Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe_ Dear Design Review Board_ My name is Margarita Perry and I reside at 549 Silverado Drive for the las! 24 yems_ l am the do\.vnhill neighbor to the proposed project. I look forward to a new house built at 545 Silverado Drive , the vacant lot nexl door l1as been neglected for many years. J have had a couple of meetings with the developer and I look fonvard to con1im1ing to work with him and !he Town on this project. 1 encourzige the DRB members to review the previous plans for this property zincl look at DRB members comments on past designs. Previous Board members were in unanimous agreement in denying the 2013 plans clue to the mass and scale of the past project which were much less intrusive than this current design. Since 2013_ my neighbors and I have been to DRB several times regarding this properly_ in 2014 the plans were approved on this lot which all neighbors supported_ At no time was this house a two story home, the original l 950's Kott home that was demolished in 2013 was a parti,1I two story home with the master bedroom on the second floor on the uphill side, on the southern side - my side of the property it was only one story (see enclosure l )-At the time the DRB members were very concerned about the mass and bulk of the design. It blocked vieYvs on the uphill side and the mass. privacy and lighting issues on my side, this ,:vas without a full second story_ Per the staff report_ it stales that'-1hc main structure is designed utilizing the similc1r footprint of the demolished n::-sidcncc--this is 1101 accurall' there wc1s never a 11-ill two story building_ See enclosed photos_ Unfortum1tely_ I did not hzive the pleasure of lrnving Dena or Christy come to 111) home to see first hc1ncl the chalkngcs 1ha1 I foce with the proposed nC\.\ build_ We did have a phone convers;nion \\·here I expressed my concerns_ I) The current proposed pl:111s call for a massive two story structure right on the 8 foot set back line: -This structure will be approxinrntely 26 feel high c1!ld 34 lee! long ,vith a blank \\all looming over the majority of 111) property_ I am 5 feet below grade which will exacerbate the ma s s of this building lo over 31 leet_ -The l\\ o story structure is not stepped bc1ck from the first story on the southern side ( 111} side) as i he srnff report suggcs1s. -The structure is not in keeping with the Hillside Design Guidelines. The house does not step back into the hillside. It is a two story box house, not situated towards the rear of the property, not stair stepped into the contours of the hillside to minimize mass and bulk. The back corner line is 57.9 feet from the rear property line and 42 feet from the front corner line -the house is closer to front of the house than the back . If it \\ as recessed back into the hillside -it ,vmild reduce the mass and the impact for the entire neighborhood. See enclosed renderings. -The massive blank wall on my side ,vill impact the light and sun on my shrubs, trees and garden due to the south west positioning of my home and the sun patterns. The hedge that I have along the fence line is starting to fail and needs direct sun. This is the founh time in 24 years that I have had to replant along the fence. Screening with plants sounds great but in reality plants grow slow and have a limited life span. Trying to mask a permanent 31 foot wall can take decades and may never happen with limitations on what ,vill be able to grow here. -In addition to the lack of light on my property, the massive water and drainage issues from the entire hillside has been an ongoing problem for 545 Silverado as well as my property which has impacted the gro,,1h of many shrubs along the fence line. The water issues on the hillside has been well documented with the town ( see attached letter from the tovl°l1). On an average year four million gallons of water comes off the abow hillside and neighboring properties dO\vn to the storm drain on my property. Traditional french drains cannot handle the capacity. -All homes in Reed heights per our CC& R · s are 22 feet, this proposed build is not in keeping with the integrity of the neighborhood. 2) Expanded driveway and headlight impact: -The location of the drive·way pad and the \\ idening of the area will add a tremendous amount of light pollution to my home. My home is angled south west -the headlights coming up the driveway will shine directly into my main living area. The original home had a garage where the proposed driveway site currently is located. This has been addressed with DRB in previous plans and the recommendation from the board was to build a 5 foot retaining wall to mitigate some the light pollution. 3) Outdoor stairs : -The proposed stairs are right on the fence line, inside the 8 foot setback which cause me great concern. l have major privacy and safety issues as well as Cl1ncerns that the deer will now have an easy passage into my yard with the removal of all of the existing trees. The current plans call for an 11 foot retaining wall at the rear of the property next to the stairs -\Vhich is a massi, e ,val] 15 feet long. This is higher than the first floor ceiling of the house. What is not shown on the plans is how are they going to address the 15 feet railing over the retaining wall? With the trees removed. 1 will see the railing all the way across and anyone standing in the rear yard will look right into my property. ls there railings on both sides of the stairs? This retaining wall will create a very dark and shaded area outside the do\vnstairs office/bedroom . This patio area may become unusable and will be at risk for flooding and pooling of water. 1 ,, otdd like to know what the full impact would be of the stairs and retaining wall. -To reduce some of my concerns_ moving tht stairs away from my fence line into the unusable patio area would make more sense. My safety concerns are a hig issue -properties on both sides of me have had attempted burglaries over the last few years. this is an t.'asy passage for someone to enter my property. 4) Air conditioning unit: 2 -The Developer told me twice that he \\,ould move the AC unit to the back or the house.\\ hich he did not do ,1cco1·ding lo the plans. The AC unit will be right in the rniclclle of my main outdoor living area. As past President 01· the Homeowners association this was one of the main complaints I heard from neighbors of the noise from the AC units. l have looked up the specs on the proposed unit and it says that it has 5 levels. lf you c1rc on level one. the lowest level it could be at is 56 decibels. to cool ,m entire home, the website says you will need to have it at level 5, which is significantly louder. Having ,l p,trti,11 ,val! around the unit will have mininwl impact since sound travels up and this unit is so close to Ill) main living ,irea. l'v1o\ ing it the exterior of the house, as was discussed ,vith the developer. \;,,,.,ill dampen the ll()isc especially \\ith the l l x l 5 foot retaining '"il I. .'i) Jncompletc l:1ndsc:1ping plans: -The proposed project calls for the removal of several trees in the back. It states that the front and rear yards will be kept in its native state. I \Vas told by the developer that the l"ront ,1rea of the house'" 1th all of the brush ,md overgrown plants would be removed. This is not shO\vn on the plans. The area is severL'ly overgrO\vn -I am hard pressed to imagine the Develpers flipping a multi million dollar home with such an l1gly curb appeal. In the staff report it states "the new residence \vill not be highly visible from the strL'et level as the front yard is sloped upvvard vv·ith naturalized landscape". The main living area and patio of this house overlooks this overgrown brush , which blocks their main view of tl1e water. if this remains any new homeowner \\'ill immediately landscape and terrace the front and the house, which will make the house highly visible and i111p,1ctful to the ncighborl1ood. See enclosed renderings . -With the expanded driveway, some of the shrubs along our sl1ared frnce line will have to go because of a retaining wall to support the driveway clue to the steep slope and drop off of the hill. 1 noticed that there was no mention of a retaining wall on the plans. -As mentioned above. the removal of the shrubs will exacerbate the light pollution from the headlights up the driveway. Some possible solutions: l) Stair step the entire second story of the house back into the hillside 2) Relocate the Jaundr) room to the bottom floor behind the kitchen in the unused cr~l\\ l S/Jcll'C below bedroom 3) Move the waik-in cioset to where the laundry room \\as ,mci 1110,c the master b~ith lo \,h.:re the walk-in closet w,1s located . This will set the house back from my fence line ~md 1educc the 111c1ss on rny sicle. Jn addition. it will reduce the mass on the front exterior and balance the front focacle \\ ith then, >rth side elevation . 4) Bring the roof line clown -ancl height of floors. Is it neccsscir) to ht1, e 9 J'oot CL'il ings in ,1 \\J.lk in closet and laundr1 room'? 5) Put a 5 foot retaini11g wall on the backside of the clriH'.\\Zl) to rnitig:11c the light pollution 1:110 my property (this was approved b~ DRL3 on the last plans). 6) J\ilovc the outdoor ---wirs O\Tr in the unusable patio area or allcrn an 8 root fence . 7) Move the ;\C unit 10 the back l1fthe house where the 11 x 1.5 foot n't,1ini11g \\all is luc~lle,: tn mute the AC noise for all neighbor,, .. 3 I am looking forward to having the DRB board over to my home to view these plans from my perspective. I am totally flexible on the timing of your visit I ask that you give me a heads up so I can be at home. I have enclosed some renderings of the proposed plans to show the impact to my home, the Hartung·s and the neighborhood for your review. In closing, I would like to say that I welcome a ne\\i home next door and I feel that significantly reducing the mass and height of the original design will bring the house more in line \,Vith the neighborhood and \,Viii allow the developer to build a beautiful home and still maximize their profits. Sincerely. Margarita Perry 549 Silverado Dr Tiburon. Ca. 94920 415-515-5709 cell RBC Wealth Management was ranked "Highest in Investor Satisfaction with Full-Service Brokerage Firms" in the J.D. Power 2020 Full-Service Investor Satisfaction Study. We believe this achievement reflects our firm's strong commitment to putting client interests first and carefully managing the wealth that clients entrust to our care. For more information, view the LD . Puwer pn•ss re.lcnsc. RBC Wealth Management does not accept buy, sell, or cancel orders by email, or any instructions by email that would require your signature. Please visit l~BC w .. alrl , \1,11w r;cme nr Em:.11I Di sclo sure's for material details about our products and accounts, as well as for other important information. Investment and insurance products offered through RBC Wealth Management are not insured by the FDIC or any other federal government agency, are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank or any bank affiliate, and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal amount invested. Disclosure information regarding potential conflicts of interest on the part of RBC Capital Markets, LLC in connection with companies that are the subject of any third-party research report included in this email message may be found at T hircl-P.ir rv Rt•s~J 1·c li IJ 1s rl ogm~:;. RBC Wealth Management, a division of RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Member NYSE/FINRA/SIPC. 4 From:Fr. Phillip Ellsworth To:Lea Stefani Cc:Kris Bernard Subject:Re: For the Design Review Board, 545 Silverado Date:Thursday, October 01, 2020 8:06:14 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Lea. And I apologize for using your last name as if it were your first! Get Outlook for iOS From: Lea Stefani <lstefani@townoftiburon.org> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 8:05:09 AM To: Fr. Phillip Ellsworth <Fr.Ellsworth@StStephensChurch.org> Cc: Kris Bernard <kbernard@townoftiburon.org> Subject: RE: For the Design Review Board, 545 Silverado Hi Phil, I am forwarding your message on to Kris in Planning for distribution to the Design Review Board. Lea Stefani Town Clerk | Town of Tiburon (415)435-7377 lstefani@townoftiburon.org From: Fr. Phillip Ellsworth <Fr.Ellsworth@StStephensChurch.org> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 7:44 AM To: Lea Stefani <lstefani@townoftiburon.org> Subject: For the Design Review Board, 545 Silverado CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Stefani, I am the Rector of St Stephen’s Church, Belvedere, and I live in the home (it’s called a Rectory) which St Stephen’s provides me at 7 Sierra Court, Tiburon. I write because 545 Silverado is a home not directly below us (549 Silverado is directly below us) but on the lot adjacent to that just below us. I’ve looked at the site plan provided on the Town Council’s web site and I’ve looked at the story poles. I’m concerned that the home planned for 545 Silverado seems rather outsized for the neighborhood. I write not so much to protect the church’s interest but Late Mail #7 for 10/1/2020 DRB because I share my neighbor Margarette’s concern—Margarette is the owner of 549 Silverado—that the design plans for the home planned for 545 might cause it to loom a bit large over the 549 Silverado property. Also, trees number 7 and 8. What kind of trees are they and have they reached mature height? If not, they might eventually reach a height tall enough to obstruct the views from the Rectory toward Mt Tam. Stefani, Do I need to hand deliver a hard copy of the above at the Town Hall this morning, or can you make this message available to Design Review Board for me? Please let me know. Thank you, Phil The Rev’d Phillip C Ellsworth, Jr Rector St Stephen’s Church Belvedere, CA 94920 Occupant of 7 Sierra Court, Tiburon. 545 SILVERADO; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-33; File No. DR2019-119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, fence, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,032 square feet of floor area and cover 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot. Get Outlook for iOS From:Christy Fong To:Kris Bernard; Dina Tasini Subject:RE: Date:Thursday, October 01, 2020 3:54:12 PM Hi Kris. Please include below correspondence as late mail. Thanks. Regards, Christy From: salvador barajas <maringreenland@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 3:52 PM To: Christy Fong <cfong@townoftiburon.org> Subject: Fwd: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Perry, Margarita" <margarita.perry@rbc.com> Date: October 1, 2020 at 12:28:53 PM PDT To: "maringreenland@gmail.com" <maringreenland@gmail.com> Dear Design Review Board, My name is Sal Barajas. I am the Owner of Sal Barajas Landscaping . I have been a landscaper and consultant for many homeowners in the Tiburon and Belvedere area for the last 27 years. I was responsible for the landscaping plan for Margarita and my crew and I have maintained her garden for over 20 Years. I am very familiar with the challenges of Margarita’s garden with the significant amount of water coming off the hillside and how it has impacted her plants. Especially along the shared fence line with the next door Neighbor. We have planted a variety of shrubs along the fence line 4 times over the last 20 years. Unfortunately, the plants along the fence line have not Late Mail #8 for 10/1/2020 DRB lasted very long. That is why Margarita is so concerned about how massive the proposed house is and how it will look with very little screening - it will be a huge 26 foot blank wall, shading her property. Margarita and I have had soil tests done and have consulted with several specialist to figure out the problem of why plants keep dying on her fence line. Too much water seems to be only part of the issue. Soil contamination may be an issue as well. Plants don’t live forever and are greatly impacted by their location to the sun. The plants that are currently located on the fence line require direct sun. The laurels are already showing signs of stress and are starting to fail. I am very concerned by the two story house going up next door and the loss of direct sunlight and their growth. Margarita’s house is facing southwest so the house will block the majority of the afternoon sun on her shrubs, trees and garden. According to the plans - the removal of the trees In the rear of the property will greatly affect Margarita’s privacy. Anyone standing on the new stairs - right on the fence line - will look right into her yard and home, and have easy access into her property as well. The deer are all over - the removal of the trees will allow the deer to easily hop into Margarita’s garden. We have worked hard to protect her garden from the deer. Plants that grow in Sacramento, do not necessarily work here with the climate in Tiburon. I am very familiar with what will grow on Margarita’s property and next door. I went up to a Sebastopol farm to see what trees were available and what the cost of an 8 foot mature tree would be as a proper screen. Margarita shared this information with the developer. But, when I saw the landscaping plans I noticed that none of my recommendations were listed. The landscaping plans look very incomplete. There is no landscaping plan for the front of the house which I am sure has to be addressed before this property can be sold. Once the overgrown brush in the front is removed it will show how large this house is in comparison to the neighborhood. I would be more than happy to work with the developer and the town to come up with some landscaping suggestions and solutions. Sincerely, Sal Barajas 415-602-9304 Sent from my iPad RBC Wealth Management was ranked “Highest in Investor Satisfaction with Full-Service Brokerage Firms” in the J.D. Power 2020 Full-Service Investor Satisfaction Study. We believe this achievement reflects our firm’s strong commitment to putting client interests first and carefully managing the wealth that clients entrust to our care. For more information, view the J.D. Power press release. <https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2020-us-full-service-investor- satisfaction-study> RBC Wealth Management does not accept buy, sell, or cancel orders by email, or any instructions by email that would require your signature. Please visit RBC Wealth Management Email Disclosures <https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/usa/legal/cid-277586.html> for material details about our products and accounts, as well as for other important information. Investment and insurance products offered through RBC Wealth Management are not insured by the FDIC or any other federal government agency, are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, a bank or any bank affiliate, and are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of the principal amount invested. Disclosure information regarding potential conflicts of interest on the part of RBC Capital Markets, LLC in connection with companies that are the subject of any third- party research report included in this email message may be found at Third-Party Research Disclosures <https://www.rbccm.com/GLDisclosure/PublicWeb/DisclosureLookup.aspx? EntityID=2>. RBC Wealth Management, a division of RBC Capital Markets, LLC, Member NYSE/FINRA/SIPC. EXHIBIT 5 TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 1 11/5/20 MINUTES #12 (EXCERPT) TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 2020 On May 18, 2020, the Marin County Public Health Officer issued a legal order directing residents to shelter at home until further notice. The order limits activity, travel and business functions to only the most essential needs. Additional information is available at https://coronavirus.marinhhs.org/ Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and No. N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California, the Design Review Board meeting will not be physically open to the public and all Board members will be teleconferencing into the meeting. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can access the meeting by following the meeting live at: Please click the link below to join the webinar: Audio/Video Webinar: https://zoom.us/j/99794471941 Webinar ID: 997 9447 1941 Call-in Number: +1 669 900 6833 Access Code: 997 9447 1941 Instructions for providing public comment live during the meeting are available on the Town’s website. Members of the public may provide public comment by sending comments to the Town Clerk by email at comments@townoftiburon.org. Comments received prior to the start of the Board meeting will be distributed electronically to the Board and posted on the Town’s website. Comments received after the start time of the Board meeting, but prior to the close of public comment period for an item, will then be read into the record, with a maximum allowance of 3 minutes per individual comment, subject to the Chair’s discretion. All comments read into the record should be a maximum of 500 words, which corresponds to approximately 3 minutes of speaking time. If a comment is received after the agenda item is heard but before the close of the meeting, the comment will still be included as a part of the record of the meeting but will not be read into the record. Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email or call the Town Clerk who will use their best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the Town’s procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. All reasonable accommodations offered will be listed on the Town’s website at www.townoftiburon.org. The meeting was opened at 6:00 p.m. by Chair Cedric Barringer. A. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Cedric Barringer, Vice Chair Bryan Chong; Boardmember Miles Berger, Paolo Crescini and Suzanne Kim Absent: None Staff: Director of Community Development Dina Tasini; Town Attorney Eli Flushman; Senior Planner Christy Fong, and Community Development Aide Kris Bernard ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None Exhibit 5 TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 2 11/5/20 STAFF BRIEFING – None MINUTES Consider adoption of minutes of meeting of October 15, 2020 It was M/S (Berger/Chong) to approve the DRB minutes of October 15, 2020, as submitted. Roll Call Vote: 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS PH-1 545 SILVERADO DRIVE; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-23; File No. DR2019-119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,043 square feet of floor area and cover 2,354 square feet (22.2%) of the lot. Continued from October 15, 2020 Eric Nuttall, Applicant, gave a PowerPoint presentation, stating that over the last month his team has put forth a great deal of effort revising the project and working with neighbors on both sides to come to compromises. He gave a slide presentation and described the property restrictions, story pole locations, usable backyard space, overview of neighborhood meetings held, the relocation of the structure further back in the lot in an effort to maintain the views to the water, several examples of homes in the neighborhood illustrating that the majority of the existing homes do not step much into the hillside, and the separation of the proposed the first and second floors illustrating how the how does step back from the neighboring homes and this is accomplished by shifting the house forward producing a one foot reveal between the entry and the garage and a 5 to 18 foot step back on the left side. Boardmember Berger referred to the slide displayed where it states, “Push out main level by one foot to create greater step back at the northwest corner”. He asked Mr. Nuttall to point to the area, describe how much of it was pushed back and where the additional step back was created. Mr. Nuttall pointed to and explained that the lower floor dining room and living room came out one foot further. He then displayed slides showing the changes made to sconce lighting, change of colors, dropping the entry roof line down to maintain consistency across the whole first floor, and changing the roof height from the 3:12 pitch to a 2:12 pitch. He said by popping the first floor out, the gutter line continues from the front entry to the garage all the way through where previously it did not. He said the Board also wanted more articulation on the sides of the home. He then displayed changes made which includes greater screening on the left side, addition of clerestory windows to the back of the house and added brick stone veneer that carries along the side elevation to the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 3 11/5/20 back on the first floor. On the right side of the home they added some clerestory windows, added the veneer stone around to the back, and they tried their best to protect neighbors’ privacy. They added a trellis and plants along the right side of the stairway for additional screening, went from a 3 foot sound wall to a 6 foot sound wall, added more trees, and made significant landscape design changes. At the bottom of the hill they have a 3 foot retaining wall to create some separation off of the street as well as groundcover, and they will manicure the native brush to beautify the property. Over the last 48 hours, the neighbor on the right was concerned about the AC unit and noise impacts. They agreed to move it to the back patio where it will be blocked by two large retaining walls, which they both have agreed will resolve the noise issue. Another concern by the neighbor are car lights when traveling up the driveway. They added an additional fence to the existing fence, along with plants providing screening. Along the stairway and driveway, they want to put on record that they are agreement to meet with the neighbor’s landscaper to ensure the distances of the fence along the driveway, the trellis and plants used are acceptable to her and will satisfy privacy and headlight concerns. Mr. Nuttall then described further changes which include the bellyband around the sides which will be painted to match the trim color, removal of the clerestory windows and movement of the AC unit to the back on the southern side of the residence. One concern for the neighbor to the left (northside) is still the height of the roof even after the roof has been reduced by 1 ½ feet. Two days ago, after speaking with the property owners to the north the applicant agreed to propose a flat roof; however, because of Title 24 and insulation requirements, the finished height of the roof would then be 22 feet. But on the edge, the gutter height would increase to 21’8” and it would increase the overall massing of the sides of the building which the neighbors are not happy with. Therefore, they are at a sticking point with the lowered pitched roof as well as the flat roof and are open to Board suggestions. Lastly, he emphasized that they have made significant changes from their first rendition and this will be a much more expensive home to build which they are willing to do. At this time, he is hoping to get conditional approval versus going back to another DRB meeting. Chair Barringer asked Mr. Nuttall to describe the trellis along the stairs. Mr. Nuttall said they have landscaping along the trellis and plan to plant Sweet Ausmentis which will grow along the trellis. Chair Barringer confirmed Boardmembers had no questions for Mr. Nuttall and he opened the public comment period. Christopher Hartung gave a slide presentation and said after he consulted his lawyers, they recommended he reach out to Mr. Nuttall to find middle ground and appreciates Mr. Nuttall taking the time to look through options. They have not found compromise around the roof pitch but appreciate the additional fencing. They still have the primary issue of the massing impact. Since the Board has not been able to see it from his home’s vantage point, he displayed photos TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 4 11/5/20 and said some issues have been addressed. The main issue is that the step back of the upper level mass has not happened and the mass breakup is minimal. There are little differences from their viewpoint, and this is a hillside community where every house is looking down and over their neighbors, and most hillside guidelines refer to tiering. He presented the original house that conformed to the neighborhood for over 50 years. In comparing the proposed structure, he will be looking into and not at, down and over. While he thinks they have come to an agreement on the privacy wall, it is still very dramatic massing on their main living spaces where they spend daytime hours. Looking from the kitchen window is almost in the middle of their great room and he presented the reduction in the roof pitch which is still a lot. If the design proposed a step back, it would help, and this is why they were trying to work with Mr. Nuttall on the roofline. Lastly, they recognize views will change from when they bought the house and are on record of being supportive of other projects that had massing impact on them, but their issue here is the massing impact is not similar to other proposals and the proposal looks at and into and not down and over which is inconsistent and dramatically changes what the house has had for over 50 years and for them while owning their home for over 15 years. Margarita Perry said she appreciates Mr. Nuttall working with them after she approached him from the suggestion of their attorneys. They want a house built next door and a nice home for him, as well as the neighborhood and have come to some understanding on a number of issues. She voiced support of movement of the AC unit, moving the high windows that would push glare and light on her property, and said she sent a late email this afternoon regarding details about the headlight issue. They have come to an understanding of building a 6 foot wall which she would like the Board to consider making it a deed-restricted item, so it is not removed in the future. Her landscaper, Sal Barajas will come up with good solutions for plants and trees that are mature trees that will grow in this area since they have a lot of water and other issues. Regarding massing, it is an issue. They thought with a flat roof this would solve the problem and would bring the height of the roof down to 20 feet, but she is not at all in favor of going up another 1 ½ feet, as there is not a way that shrubs or anything will be able to shield that. She noted that she is 5 feet below grade and has trees and shrubs on her side that will not last forever and are already showing signs of fatigue and are dying. She asked that the Board consider reducing the heights of the ceilings of the rooms to 9-foot ceiling heights which are still high and would solve the roof problem and also help with the massing. She said Mr. Nuttall does not want to go back into the hillside which would be preferable for all, and he cites the limited space in the back. He has agreed to work with Mr. Barajas on the stairway’s trellis and plants and lastly, she still has concerns about the massing and height of the roof. Rebuttal – Applicant Mr. Nuttall stated he sympathizes with neighbor’s concerns which is why they have made so many changes. In the second to the last slide there is an inconsistency he sees from the window. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 5 11/5/20 In the 2014 version Mr. Hartung was supportive of, there are less trees visible than in the current version he is proposing, so it seems like they have more screening. He reiterated that on the second story, they are anywhere from 16 feet to 10 feet away from the property line, are further away than nearly every house on the street in trying to create the separation on the second story in particular for the Hartung’s. Again, they have made significant changes at significant costs to try and create that separation. Regarding Ms. Perry’s comments about going to a 9 and 9 foot first and second floor, this will remove the entire feel of the home. People building today do not look to shrink things and he did not want to reduce the ceiling heights of his home. They have made every other concession to appease the neighbors on both sides regarding massing, and he thinks this is something the neighbors cannot agree on. Chair Barringer closed the public comment period and moved to DRB deliberation. Commissioner Kim said she can see there have been some changes here and there but did not see the big moves she was hoping for, especially in the massing. She visited the Hartung’s house and did not see much of a change. In looking at the elevation on Sheet A-5.1; left elevation, there is a large window proposed which will look right into the Hartung’s home. She also referred to Sheet A-3.1 and thinks the issue here is there is a building that is a lot taller than what was there previously and really close to the Hartung’s house. The massing of it really impacted her and she asked if there was a way to take the hallway and shift it over one bay. This way, the laundry can come off of that and it pushes the entire massing against another area, and the bathroom wall would be the back wall of the stairwell. They can still have the access which is U-shaped, but this would be significant to produce a bit of relief. Also, she wondered if there is a way to notch the location of the loft area, balcony and deck and shift it over. She knows the idea is to capture the bay views but wondered if there could be a compromise between the two because it is just really close to the Hartung’s and this would move it about 5 feet over. This is a pretty big move but simple and she thinks it could help. She agreed the massing needs to be reduced and suggested the loft area also be reduced a little. In summary, she thinks there is no relief between the buildings now and the structure is pretty close to the neighbor’s living spaces so she shares the Hartung’s issues with that area. However, she voiced support of the other compromises done in the last 48 hours which were building the wall by the driveway and moving the AC unit. Boardmember Berger asked if that in addition to moving the two bedrooms into the space that would be released by moving the hallway, that the bathroom and the bedroom would all shift over. Chair Barringer pointed out that on the left side is the top of the stairs and not the bottom. He said he had the same idea and the door into the laundry could be the access point to the rear yard, and it would just be an overhang to the downstairs. It is not quite enough space to shift the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 6 11/5/20 bathroom into the space gained, but as far as the access to the yard he was not sure it solves anything or not. Boardmember Kim apologized and said she misread the plans and it is the top of the stairs. Boardmember Berger thought this would still break up the massing at the top. Chair Barringer said in looking at the second floor plan, if the applicant was to move the hallway over, it is an awkward laundry room anyway, it could maximize the bedrooms. Also, it is a 4’6” wide hallway and if it moved over and was a 4’ or 3’6” wide hallway, that would provide more room. The bathroom is 7’5 ½” wide bathroom which is very wide, and he suggested a 6’ wide bathroom which is still pretty luxurious, and this is a bit of a concession without any real loss. In reading the letters, the Hartung’s issues are more of the deck spaces than the bathroom and other things and this is 18’6” or more. Boardmember Kim said she thinks adding the screening, going all the way up and having a roofline touch is what creates this massing. She asked if there was a way to pull back the roofline, so it is at the corner of the building rather than at the edge of the decking. This would definitely help with massing. Also, she knows screening is supposed to provide a barrier between the neighbors, but she wondered if the screening was actually causing the problem because it is a huge mass now. By making it a guardrail height deck, this minimizes things, as well as pulling the roofline back. This could help a lot to the building line in the loft area versus over the deck area, and she provided and described a sketch of her ideas. Boardmember Crescini asked and confirmed Boardmember Kim was looking at Sheet A-5. Boardmember Berger agreed with Boardmember Kim’s suggestion and also noted that the retractable screens would cost less than building the roof over the deck and would allow sun on the deck and sunlight coming into the room. Chair Barringer said most people who live on the westward facing side of Tiburon are always commenting on the blazing afternoon sun, and therefore, the overhang would help with that. He appreciates the many changes that the applicant has made. He thinks in comparison to some of the other homes on the street, this project is pretty fair in how far it is pulled back. Also, it is worth noting that the Hartung’s are 4 feet from the property line and most of the pictures are from out of their side windows. In all fairness, when turning 30 degrees, they would still have the entire view. Obviously, there would be some massing effects from the house, but he just thinks it is notable the way the house is situated from the street and also 16 feet from the Hartung’s which is double the setback. Vice Chair Chong stated the Hartung’s house goes from the front to all the way to the back of the house 4 feet into an 8 foot setback. The whole reason for the 8 foot setback is so in theory, if everyone respects it then they end up with 16 feet between properties. On that side, there has been placement of dining room windows and kitchen windows, and it is proposing the front left TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 7 11/5/20 corner to be 6’10” from the setback, and this is a significant amount of space. If the front left corner of the Hartung’s house had been placed that exact same distance, they would end up with 30 feet between houses, but it was not. He said it feels like the condition that has been created is not the condition by the applicant but the condition of someone clearly building and putting windows in. To say they will only be allowed to have two clerestory windows in the very back of the house and remove the one large window on that floor when the neighbor does not have that same condition. He also thinks it definitely stinks being the last person developing a house in a pretty developed neighborhood but having a patio that is 15 feet from the property line and 6’11” from the setback feels far enough away. The way to make that further away is for the neighbor to move their house back out of the setback is how he feels. Boardmember Berger added that one other notion that used to always come up when he served on the Board the last time was the notion of “borrowed views”. These are views that people take as their own, but they are actually borrowed over the legitimate property rights of the neighbor. He is very sympathetic to is. He has been in the Hartung’s house, has looked out those windows even though some of the photographs taken were not looking at the view but angled back towards the applicant’s house. He thinks Boardmember Kim’s two ideas of pushing back of the bedrooms even if the bathroom stays where it is and taking the roof off of the deck would be relatively painless and a wonderful suggestion. He would like to see both of those done but he is also sympathetic that this house is backed into that corner between the property lines in a way that this is their envelope to build in. He thinks the aerial photograph showing the line and the other houses along the street and the applicant’s property set as far back as it is was pretty convincing that they are doing what they can do. There were many modest changes, but they actually will have collectively a rather large and positive impact, including moving the AC unit and the wall along the driveway. He would like to see Boardmember Kim’s changes implemented which would be a terrific change for the Hartung’s with little pain for the applicant. He referred to the planting plan and Pampas Grass should be removed because it is a horrible plant. It sends seeds everywhere and propagates space and people spend a lot of money trying to eradicate it in Tiburon. He suggested finding something else for the 7 or 8 plants going up along the side. Boardmember Kim agreed and in the front was also Pride of Madeira as the native species which also needs to be removed. Vice Chair Chong said one thing not addressed is the mention of different slopes of the roof, different insulation, and he asked if something could be done with the roof that would be an easy win/win such as lowering it or not. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 8 11/5/20 Boardmember Berger said he thinks the 2:12 roof is as gentle a slope is as feasible. It still means there must be a completely waterproof membrane up there. He thinks that in order to do the new mandated insulation, there needs to be a certain amount of cavity in which to place it. Otherwise, they are talking about using a board-type of insulation which is stacked on top of the beam structure and it would raise the roof up a bit. The applicant is willing to do it both ways but there are trade-off’s to not having a ceiling cavity. Boardmember Crescini agreed with all Boardmembers’ comments even though there are differing opinions. On one side, he understands tweaking the hallway and rooms. He sees a square inside a triangle and possibly scaling down the house, finding a way for it to be wider in the front and narrower in the back, but there are many possibilities and the applicant could go on and on with a project forever. He agrees with Boardmember Berger when he said overall the small changes here and there are actually helping. He thinks the applicant has done due diligence in trying to comply with concerns of the neighbors, but on the other end, the applicant is designing the house for himself and not for the neighbors. So, he thinks there has been enough efforts to address concerns of the neighbors to preserve as much as they can of their side views. One of the slides in the applicant’s presentation showed the alignment of their house compared to all of the other homes, and it is significantly already inside the hill. So, at this time, he was just concerned a bit with the large picture window but on the other hand he did not think they should tell the applicant not to put a window there when the neighbor has a window. Therefore, it is up to the neighbors as to whether they want to see each other, a wall, and he did not believe they should have to remove the window even though neighbors could look at each other. Boardmember Berger asked how Boardmember Crescini felt about notching the back without any loss of square footage by moving the hallway and pulling back the roof on the deck in the front. Boardmember Crescini said he thinks it means going back to the drawing board, redesigning the house and like he said, they could go on forever doing this but the fact is that the neighbor’s window looks right at the applicant’s property so the applicant should build something there. Also, when he visited the site, he was not particularly offended by the story pole. He thought it was aligned with the other homes, and it is also very far away from the street. So, he did not think he had a concern about the massing of the building except for the visibility from the street. He could work more about breaking up the masses, but at that point it does not matter because the building is right there and has screening with landscaping. So, he did not see this as a problem. Senior Planner Christy Fong clarified that in looking at Sheet A-3.1, this window is W-10 which is a frosted window. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 9 11/5/20 Boardmember Crescini said he still sees a shallow exterior light and since one can see the house from down below, this should be a bit more elongated. Chair Barringer said it seems like the light fixture is 8 feet high and these could be brought down which would reduce this. Boardmember Crescini said he would like to see a deeper cone for the light fixture because the fixture shown in the materials board is very shallow. Boardmember Berger stated there is a soffit over every one of the light locations. A deeper fixture could be put in the soffit it seems to answer the question; however, they would lose the detail of the fixture though. Chair Barringer said he appreciates the concessions and back and forth of the applicant with Ms. Perry but it seems there are many things discussed and suggested having these written down in a plan with more details if the Board is going to approve this. Boardmember Berger said he could make a motion to incorporate these things and determine if there is a second. He moved to continue the project, direct the applicant to 1) move the two bedrooms over; 2) remove the roof over the front deck; 3) reduce the large window facing the Hartung’s; 4) remove the Pampas Grass and Pride of Madeira; 5) provide more details on items agreed to between neighbors over the last 48 hours which included movement of the AC unit to the back patio and adding a wall along the driveway to shield lights, description of plantings and thinning out of native landscaping in the front, the bellyband, and other changes proposed by the applicant. Boardmember Kim seconded the motion but said she also would like to see the project one more time as a clean version with all changes made. It was M/S (Berger/Kim) to continue the project and direct the applicant to revise the project to show the following: 1) move the two bedrooms over; 2) remove the roof over the front deck; 3) reduce the large window facing the Hartung’s; 4) remove the Pampas Grass; 5) provide more details on items agreed to between neighbors over the last 48 hours. Roll Call Vote: 2-3 (Barringer, Crescini and Chong voted no). Town Attorney Flushman clarified Boardmember Berger’s motion which was to continue the matter with changes suggested by Boardmembers Kim and Berger, which did not pass, by a vote of 2-3. Chair Barringer commented that Boardmember Berger’s motion was a bit restrictive. He said the windows could be frosted and the overhang could be reduced, but personally he did not think the overhang should be completely removed. Boardmember Kim said the only reason she would like the application to be continued is because there are many changes that occurred that are not memorialized in these sets of plans. In past applications, she has seen that changes are not captured and then there are disputes. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 10 11/5/20 She referred to the roof pitch and was not sure the 2:12 was reflected on the plans, thinks the Board should be specific as to changes, such as the 6 foot fence, the AC unit move which is not on the plans, removal of the two clerestory windows on the top and on the right elevation are not reflected, as well as pushing the bank of hallways and bedrooms to the right is also not reflected. Also, moving the eave of the balcony is moving the entire roofline back so the eave is over the loft space and not over the balcony and this requires removal of the screen. There is also the Pampas Grass and Pride of Madeira so if the Board could capture all of these, the application might not need to be continued. Chair Barringer said he was not sure if it was in the Board’s purview to necessarily to give specific access to the yard. He agrees they could reduce the overhang, but he did not think it needs to be taken out completely. Boardmember Berger suggested stating “along the lines of” or “with the suggestion of” and see how far they can get it. Boardmember Kim said she is not saying to reduce the overhang. Right now, the overhang is capturing the screen on the left elevation. Chair Barringer agreed and said it is the 8 foot deck plus the 30”, and Boardmember Kim said this is what creates massing. She also knows Vice Chair Chong and Boardmember Crescini are not in favor of this, but this could help mitigate the impact of the building. She also recognized the Hartung’s have created a problem and it seems the Board is trying to solve their problem which affects the new building. Chair Barringer suggested the overhang be reduced by 6 feet in total including the eave, and this would still solve the issue of providing some sun screening and pull things back 3 or 4 feet from the neighbor’s perspective. He would rather see that personally than forcing a total renovation of the spaces. There are aspects of the architecture he finds a little undeveloped, but this is for them and their architect to figure out. Boardmember Kim stated she wants to eliminate the screen and does not think it is doing what it is supposed to do. More than privacy, she thinks the neighbors are concerned about the massing being right in their face. She asked if the Board was supportive of the 2:12 roof and said she still wants to move the bank of the bedrooms which can provide some relief. Boardmember Berger said in addition, by moving the bedrooms to the right it now takes what is a completely dark windowless bathroom and gives it a window looking out towards the backyard if they want to put one in that wall. But, what Chair Barringer is saying is rather than say “do what the Board says exactly”, he is saying “along the lines of” such as moving the bedrooms to the right, refiguring the hallway, re-examining the extent of the roof over the balcony, and all of the other specifics and get them in the plans so that there is no dispute later on as to what was actually agreed to and not agreed to. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 11 11/5/20 Boardmember Berger asked if the other three members are willing to have staff review the plans and ensure the applicant follows up with all changes. Chair Barringer said he would like to see the landscape changes return for sure. Vice Chair Chong thinks the Board in the past has specifically asked what the landscape plan should encompass, and then for it to be approved by staff. Therefore, in order for the plan to come back to the Board, a continuance would be needed versus approval with conditions. Chair Barringer said he thinks there are a few too many items in the landscape plan to cover as conditions. He thinks the application could return in two weeks unless the Board wants to consider some of the other changes. Vice Chair Chong said he took notes and was using the letter from Ms. Perry as the punch list. The Board should ensure the fence is included, as well as the AC unit move, and there are details that have been presented to the Board they can use as locations, such as the Pampas Grass to be replaced with something equivalent in size to be approved by staff, the roof change of 2:12, the bellyband, and it comes down to the landscape plan. He asked if the Board would be comfortable with the revisions in the landscape plan that would be approved by staff. Boardmember Kim said she would like to see another iteration of the architecture because this would capture the belly band, the removal of the windows, the removal of the screen, pulling back the potential roofline, articulating the left elevation more, and so she would like to see the landscape plan and revised architectural plans. Boardmember Berger agreed. It is a very good change and benefit for the neighbors with not much pain for the applicant. Ms. Tasini interjected that she knows the Board’s frustration and staff wants to ensure that when the motion is made it is clear. In looking at the floor plans for movement of the bedrooms, when the Board does that it may then affect the backyard in the only outdoor space they have at this time because they have pushed it so far back behind. She suggested the Board consider the impact of this change on the use of the property in the rear. Boardmember Berger clarified that there would be a tiny roof over a piece of the lower floor that would now be open to the sky, but basically the rest of the back will get narrower and shift over. Boardmember Kim said on the bottom floor, there is a door coming out to the patio and that would be protected underneath so this is a good thing. Chair Barringer said with a detailed list of items on the landscape plan, he understands Boardmember Kim’s request, but he is trying to be fair to the applicant which has had a lot of back and forth. The potential issue there is that they reduce the screen and roof and the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #12 12 11/5/20 Hartung’s then are not happy because they like the screen. So, he thinks they are going in circles a bit. Vice Chair Chong said he wants to be careful in not designing people’s houses. He thinks it is the Board’s job of identifying what the impact is for neighbors or addressing general concerns versus juggling this here and there. They have a concern that this piece of the house is too close or too looming or does not step back enough, and then leave it to the architect to decide and to bring forth a different version for approval or denial. For conditions of approval in moving around pieces of the house it is as simple as asking the applicant to reduce the overhang to 6 feet is clearly defined and will not be argued in the future versus something that involves doors and other implications for the project. Boardmember Kim agreed, but she sees her suggestions as guidance. What the shift in the back bank of bedrooms does is because the site is pinching in the back, it actually sets more relief back there. So, because the building is on an angle, it allows for more breathing room, and that is what that move would do. It is not a terrible amount to move back. Regardless, she asked if the screening is what the Hartung’s wanted or was it suggested by the Board as something they would want because of privacy. She wants to be clear on this because the massing of the screen she found to be a problem. Chair Barringer recalled that the screen was added by the applicant to maintain privacy and make it open on two sides when they removed the wall. Boardmember Crescini agrees that if the roof is pulled back above the deck, this accomplishes a lot in breaking up the masses. But on the other hand, he does not feel like the Board should tell the applicant he cannot have a roof over a porch. He does not think the porch in that location is bad. It is away from the neighbors, away from the street, so again, he thinks the Board can approve the project with conditions that are related to the lighting, landscaping and reduction of windows because it is their house and they are designing it for themselves. He thinks they have done enough to respect the neighbors’ concerns. It was M/S/C (Chong/Barringer) to determine that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); approve the application as submitted and adopt the attached resolution with conditions of approval, and additional conditions to: 1) move AC unit to the location under the stairs on Patio 2 as detailed in the slide presented this evening; 2) make a permanent 6 foot fence to be located at the end of the driveway that would be solid with no slats and would be the same length as detailed in the plan as presented by the applicant tonight; 3) the belly band to be placed and wrapped on the south side to be the same color as the trim; 4) reduce the overhang to 6 feet; 5) implement the roof pitch to 2:12 as presented; 6) exterior down lighting to be a more shielded source than presented, as approved by staff; 7) removal of the Pampas Grass and Pride of Madeira and replaced with a non-invasive species as approved by staff; 8) include 2, 24-gallon mature trees along the fence line for screening and to add an initial height of 8 feet by the rear side of the property. Roll Call Vote: 4-1 (Kim voted no). EXHIBIT 6 TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 1 10/1/20 MINUTES #10 (EXCERPT) TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF OCTOBER 1, 2020 On May 18, 2020, the Marin County Public Health Officer issued a legal order directing residents to shelter at home until further notice. The order limits activity, travel and business functions to only the most essential needs. Additional information is available at https://coronavirus.marinhhs.org/ Consistent with Executive Orders No. N-25-20 and No. N-29-20 from the Executive Department of the State of California, the Design Review Board meeting will not be physically open to the public and all Board members will be teleconferencing into the meeting. To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can access the meeting by following the meeting live at: Please click the link below to join the webinar: Audio/Video Webinar: https://zoom.us/j/92125666504 Webinar ID: 921 2566 6504 Call-in Number: +1 669 900 6833 Access Code: 921 2566 6504 Instructions for providing public comment live during the meeting are available on the Town’s website. Members of the public may provide public comment by sending comments to the Town Clerk by email at comments@townoftiburon.org. Comments received prior to the start of the Board meeting will be distributed electronically to the Board and posted on the Town’s website. Comments received after the start time of the Board meeting, but prior to the close of public comment period for an item, will then be read into the record, with a maximum allowance of 3 minutes per individual comment, subject to the Chair’s discretion. All comments read into the record should be a maximum of 500 words, which corresponds to approximately 3 minutes of speaking time. If a comment is received after the agenda item is heard but before the close of the meeting, the comment will still be included as a part of the record of the meeting but will not be read into the record. Any member of the public who needs accommodations should email or call the Town Clerk who will use their best efforts to provide reasonable accommodations to provide as much accessibility as possible while also maintaining public safety in accordance with the Town’s procedure for resolving reasonable accommodation requests. All reasonable accommodations offered will be listed on the Town’s website at www.townoftiburon.org. The meeting was opened at 6:00 p.m. by Chair Cedric Barringer. A. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Cedric Barringer, Vice Chair Bryan Chong; Boardmember Miles Berger, Paolo Crescini and Suzanne Kim Absent: None Staff: Director of Community Development Dina Tasini; Senior Planner Christy Fong, and Community Development Aid Kris Bernard ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None Exhibit 6 TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 2 10/1/20 ACTION ITEMS AI-1 545 SILVERADO; Assessor’s Parcel No. 055-082-23; File No. DR2019-119; Equity Smart Investments LP, Owner; Consideration of Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family residence with two-car attached garage on a vacant property in the R-1 zone. The project includes new retaining walls, fence, exterior stairs and landing, patios and landscape improvement. The proposed house and improvements would contain approximately 3,032 square feet of floor area and cover 2,365 square feet (22.3%) of the lot. Director of Community Development Dina Tasini introduced the item and announced that staff knows there was a history of this site and they look at this as a separate project regardless of what was approved in the past. They must review the development standards and how they review a project as seen today in 2020. Ms Fong was asked to provide a brief synopsis of the history at the site since 2013. Senior Planner Christy Fong stated in 2013 the DRB reviewed and approved a design review application for construction of additions to the existing home and the project made it to the building permit stage. During construction, it was found that more than 50% of the existing structure had been demolished. Since the zoning code would classify demolitions of more than 50% of an existing home as a new home, the project went back to the DRB in 2014. The DRB reviewed the project at that time as a new two-story single-family home at a height of 21’6” with a total floor area of approximately 1,800 s.f. and lot coverage of 14.5%. The project was never fully constructed due to a dispute between the property owner at that time and the contractor. The incomplete structure was demolished due to safety concerns. Therefore, the site has been vacant since 2016 and a new application was submitted in 2020 which is now presented before the Board. Boardmember Berger disclosed for the record that after the previous work he was asked to review the site in 2014 and prepare some sketches for what might be constructed there. He also met with some of the neighbors, but he did not believe an application was ever made, and the owners at the time decided to hold off. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 3 10/1/20 Ms. Tasini added that since 2014 the property was sold and the owner is now the current applicant. Eric Nuttall, Applicant, gave a PowerPoint presentation which displayed the pie-shaped lot, which has restrictions as to where to place a house, as well as the hillside and amount of water coming down. He spoke of how they designed the house to accommodate the views of the water as much as possible, presented the owners’ vision of the future home and said they tried to minimize windows on the sides of the house and especially on the second floor. Mr. Nuttall then presented the entrance of the home, views, and backyard. They met with the neighbors who were not excited about the style of the project. In going through the street relating to setbacks and other design considerations, every house, with exception to the proposed project, is built right on the 8 foot setback. He presented photos showing every house which looks down on the other house in attempts to capture views of the water. The other concern that was brought up was how large their plan was. In looking at the rest of the neighborhood, he presented two homes down from the proposed project that is a somewhat block building with lots of glazing and close to the street. The neighbor next door built his home as close to the street as they could get with many windows and not much variation. He then presented a photo of their story poles which show how far away they are from the neighbor’s property as compared to other homes built next to each other and believes there is already a lot of blocking and mass in the neighborhood. After talking with the neighbors, they came up with a second rendition. To create privacy for 549 Silverado Drive they removed the corner deck and moved it just in front of the mass. It is setback far into the house so there will be walls there. To ensure they did not block views of the water from the neighbor to the left they re-arranged the house. They replaced the bedroom with a deck so they could still capitalize on the views, but they would not block views from their home. They moved the loft from the back of the house to the front of the house and in the backyard they put a door to get to it around the bedrooms as they re-arranged those as well. He then presented the new second story floor plan and side view with the deck, views to the water, and addition of one window which is in the middle of the house for the hallway to let light in. He displayed the new floor plan with the former bedroom in the corner, moving it to the back, said they rearranged the bathrooms to create more space on the corner, removed the deck in the front right and minimized it to just a master bedroom slider, and then created the loft area in the front. There is still an open area below to create the entry they were looking for initially but they minimized that dramatically. The neighbors still had concerns with this plan and they again went back to revise it but really liked rendition #2 of all renditions. They then revised the plan and believe they have come up with a solid compromise on the next rendition #3 wherein they eliminated the deck off of the master entirely, eliminated the deck entirely on the left hand side and pushed it to the middle TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 4 10/1/20 given the privacy concerns of both neighbors, took the left side which steps in 3 ½ feet and on the right side it steps in 2 ½ feet. They took the entire house and pushed it all the way into the hillside, citing added building costs in doing this. They also would lose a lot of usable backyard space by doing this and therefore were not thrilled with this rendition but were willing to make many compromises. He then presented the house pushed all the way back into the hillside. They no longer have a deck and they would walk out on grade. They added a window in the loft but after speaking with Ms. Fong they would glaze the window to ensure there are no privacy concerns. He then presented their final rendition #4 which was developed after they identified a small issue with the deck. He pointed to the stairway going up to the backyard which will begin at grade. The railing exists here because of the retaining wall on the other side. There is a patio in the back corner they will be able to come out onto from their office on the first floor. Mr. Nuttall then presented their new floor plan and said they put both bedrooms into the back to allow them to step the house in on the second story as much as they could, created the deck off of the middle, and squeezed over the master bedroom over 2 feet which really shrinks a lot of the upstairs living space. They think it is still a usable floor plan and something that will show and do well. They also have the reduced backyard in terms of usable space. He noted there are only a couple of spots where they are actually touching the 8-foot setback. Because of the way they have the home positioned on the lot the structure is more than 8 feet on both sides almost entirely. They are just less than 14 feet on the front corner from the property line to the front of the house and are roughly 13 feet to the front right corner of their property off of the property. So, in terms of setbacks and comparing it to the rest of the neighborhood they have made a significant effort to stay off of the property line as much as they can in what is a pie-shaped lot. Mr. Nuttall then presented a photo showing the story poles and said they are as far back as they can get the house, are further back than both of their neighbors to the right and left, and are doing the best they can to accommodate everyone knowing they will not please everyone 100%. He then pointed to the right front corner and neighbor’s house to show they have a lot of hedging and said they plan to add more hedging at the front of the property to allow for privacy. However, they are pretty far off of the property line for most of the house except the back-right corner at 8 feet. He then presented a photo showing the distance from the street and the comparison to many other homes in the neighborhood. They will maintain as many trees in the back as they can to provide privacy to neighbors behind them. Lastly, Ms. Fong told them that the deck with the three solid walls and the roof covering would be considered potential living space and would count against their square feet. Knowing the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 5 10/1/20 neighbors want privacy, they removed the wall and have added a screen. They also moved the gas fireplace to the master bedroom side of the house. He then presented a rendition of what the home will look like, said they are proud of what they have put together and was anxious for the Board’s comments. Boardmember Berger said the drawing showed a 50-foot line to the back of the property. He asked if this responds to any easement or setback or was it just to show the Board what the space would look like. Mr. Nuttall said he drew it in simply as a distance marker. Chair Barringer questioned fencing, noting there is a fence detail, but it is not clear and the site plan does not show fences on it. Mr. Nuttall deferred to Paul Khochay, their architect. Paul Khochay, Tangent Design and Engineering, stated the fence detail was put in there and there was nothing determined yet as to whether any of the fencing would be replaced until they determine if it is damaged or needs replacement. The detail was there just to provide that, and further discussion will be needed for this. Chair Barringer said on the materials board on page 8 shows a pre-fab retaining wall large block in a pecan color but he did not see the call out of where the walls might be. Mr. Khochay stated he does not have the material board in front of him. He asked for a moment to look at the plan set and respond. Mr. Nuttall explained that typically on other projects they use a keystone retaining wall. Much of it will be concrete as construction retaining walls but those visible will be more aesthetically pleasing. Chair Barringer referred to Sheet A-3.2 and said he assumes for the Building Code there is a railing on top of the retaining wall from the yard. He thinks it is helpful to show the rooflines below on a second-floor plan to give context on where there is mass below the volume. He asked if the railing was glass or other material. Mr. Khochay said they will probably do the same thing they do for the right-side stairs to move across the back which is a powder coated steel. Chair Barringer asked for a description of the landscape plan in the front. Shown is a smattering of shrubs on the north side and remaining natural vegetation on the street side to the right of the driveway. He asked if this is the intention to keep the forest. Mr. Khochay said they will definitely maintain, trim and beautify the existing landscaping on the right side of the driveway but they like it as a screening from the street as well as lighting TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 6 10/1/20 screening. If they come in and trim that they will use bark or another groundcover. The idea is to ensure it remains. In talking to some of the neighbors, they really like having the screening there as well so they plan to maintain it. Chair Barringer opened the public comment period. Christopher Hartung presented a series of slides showing their perspective from their house. He introduced his wife, Jennifer and said they have been residents of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004. They completely understand that Eric Nuttall wants to build something more than what was there before. They publicly voiced support of other projects that would impair their view more than they had when the prior house was there, so they are focusing on two primary issues— the massing impact on their everyday living space which is their living room, dining room, kitchen and family room area, as well as getting clarity on the privacy screen to the deck. It is a 50% screen which can mean a lot of things and it would look right into their dining room, kitchen and living area. There are also secondary concerns but the primary concern would be the tenor of the house. He stated Mr. Nuttall mentioned that every house in the neighborhood is looking down on the other. Except if this project is approved they would be looking into their house and therefore the only house in the neighborhood where houses are looking into each other from primary living spaces. He then presented views from inside their home, from the front door entry, a line drawn from the story poles showing the representation of what a 50% screen could look like from the deck giving them complete views into the deck, light and the fireplace there. He presented a view when walking through their primary living space into the dining room, what it looks like from a massing perspective, what they see from the sole window in the kitchen, additional perspectives of the project which they had a graphic artist draw showing the upper right hand side and representation of the grey which is the massing and blockage from their main windows. This house has existed since the mid-1950’s. The glazing on the side of the house is very similar to what the house was when it was originally built and the wall is exactly at the same point at the property line where it was originally built in the 1950’s. When he did his development, they did not expand any of the side walls. Lastly, he believes there are good solutions to reduce the massing. Margarita Perry said she lives at 549 Silverado Drive and is next door to the proposed project. She wanted to focus on pictures on slides 3, 4, 6, 8, 11 and 12 and presented slide 3 which is the original house on the upper left which was there since the 1950’s. It was torn down in 2013 and is 1 ½ stories. There was never a second story on her side of the property but just a master bedroom on the uphill side. On the right-hand top corner, it shows her hedge and story poles and these hedges are starting to fail. She said a couple of Boardmembers came to her home and this is the fourth time she has had to replant in 24 years. There is a tremendous amount of water and contamination that has been on that side of the hill. They have had numerous specialists, horticulturalists out to identify the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 7 10/1/20 problems. With this house going up which is massive and 26 feet high, 34 feet wide, it will loom over her house. While plants sound great, they grow slow and have a lifespan, but the building is permanent. The new house will loom over her property because she is 5 feet below grade and has major privacy and safety concerns regarding this structure. The Board will see the stairs going up along the fence line. At the top of the stairs all of the trees on the upper right-hand corner are all going to be removed. The owners will be able to see right into her main bedroom, kitchen, living room and family room. It will be easy access for anyone to jump into her property and deer are all over the neighborhood. She presented Slide 4 which is a letter to the Town wherein water and drainage issues have been well documented and has impacted plants on her property for years. She presented Slide 6 showing the driveway, and the location of where the expanded driveway pad is to be is where there was a garage. She never had any light or headlights coming into her living space. Her home has not changed other than filling in the front of her deck. The previous approved plans called for a 5-foot retaining wall with shrubs above it to try and mitigate some of the light impacts. Ms. Perry then displayed Slide 8 which shows the massive retaining wall and stairs which are right on the 8-foot setback. This retaining wall is 11 feet tall and 15 feet long. Anyone standing on the stairs or rear garden will view right into her home. The AC unit is right in the middle of her main outdoor living space where she spends most of her time. She then displayed Slide 11 and said Mr. Nuttall said he would be removing the shrubs in the front and anyone who purchases this home will no doubt remove all of the shrubs and put something else there. The homes in the neighborhood are 22 feet in height per the CC&Rs. There are houses that look bigger but even the house next door is not over 22 feet. So, the mass and size of this home is not in keeping with the neighborhood. Sal Verahas said he has been the landscaper of the property of Ms. Perry for over 20 years and over this time they have replaced plants along the wall 4 times. There is a drainage issue along the property line and they wind up doing a retaining wall to get the water runoff and are still having problems. Therefore, he asked that the Board take this under consideration and work with them in planting something on the applicant’s side that will screen the property better than the laurels that currently exist. Boardmember Berger asked what solution or suggestion he had to remedy drainage along the property line. Mr. Verahas said they did a retaining wall and raised the roots of the trees. Boardmember Berger asked for suggestions for a remedy from the subject property the Board is reviewing tonight. Mr. Verahas said he believes they can be individual boxes with 24” trees or hedges that will grow from top to bottom instead of individuals. Then, they get together along their sides at some point. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 8 10/1/20 Boardmember Berger asked for his comments from a drainage point of view. Mr. Verahas said they have done what they could at this time without ruining their property, but he asked the Board to consider requiring double privacy for the applicant as well as for them of something that will not die off in 2-3 years. Rebuttal – Applicant Mr. Nuttall asked to review the slides from Ms. Perry, stating he did not think the renderings were fair or accurate. First, he never wanted to take away the front trees and never said he would. The project will be made to look very nice and he will take the risk on whether he can sell the house based on the existing hedges. But, he thinks the screening adds a lot to the property and is important. He asked staff to display Slide 3 and stated the neighbor will never see the stairs because they are at grade and the fence is built on top of that same grade. There are currently stairs there and these will follow the same exact path. They are also not removing all of the trees in the back but just a couple of them. The large tree on the right will remain and the one closest to the house will be removed as it impedes on the home. There will still be a lot of privacy there. They will not even see the window shown in the rendering because there will be a fence and Ms. Perry is 5 feet below grade. He also noted that her rendering is not accurate. They have pushed the home as far back and away as they can. He is further off the property line and further back from the street than almost every other home in the neighborhood. They have less windows and glazing than any other home. In terms of privacy on Mr. and Mrs. Hartung’s side, they are doing their best to respect that and are open to other screening ideas. But, frustrating is being the last house. He feels they are being forced to build to an extremely high standard than every other house in the neighborhood. They all get to enjoy views and have windows on the sides of their homes and now he is being forced not to have this. This does not seem fair. They are also not asking for any exceptions on the project and everything they are doing fits within the Town’s guidelines. He recognized there are privacy concerns but are doing their best to maintain privacy, are happy to plant screening along Ms. Perry’s side, would plant on the Hartung’s side but it will block water views for them, and they are open to other suggestions. They have spent countless hours, money, care and cost to try to get to this stage. They have made reasonable concessions and think they should not be required to give more if asked. Chair Barringer returned to the Board for deliberation. Boardmember Kim said she does not feel this property respects the site. It is like a tract home that was plopped onto the site. The hillside guidelines refer to tiered building, and in terms of the height, when going up the street it steps down. The massing of buildings respects the line of the TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 9 10/1/20 hillside and this one does not do that, so there is a grade change yet it is about the same height as the adjacent neighbors to the left. The character also does not seem to fit in with what exists in the neighborhood and she said she was struggling with this plan. The way the building is in the site is like taking a building and trying to maneuver the edges but not really looking at how the site works. She agreed it is a triangular site but there are plenty in Tiburon where they have a smaller backyard and a larger front yard and the Board has seen effective ways of massing buildings in a site like this. She was not necessarily having issues with the square footage but was having major issues with the character and massing of the building. She was not sure changing the eaves from 2 ½ to 1 ½ or moving down a foot here or there on the ceiling heights is not the issue. She just does not see it stepping, so she was not inclined to approve the project. Boardmember Berger said the applicant has done a good job in most cases, but the Board’s job is to look at compatibility with the neighborhood more than style, per se. It is a 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s style neighborhood and this is reasonably within the same style. He agrees that the stepping back would be helpful with this design because the only thing that strikes him as an issue is the corner where the screening is. It seems if the back was to move back more or that corner were to get shaved back and another method used besides blocking it off with a screen is used, it would improve the views out for the Hartungs. At the same time, this is a view from someone’s back kitchen window across another person’s property. This is not a view everybody is entitled to such that they must be pushed back. The Hartungs have spectacular views out their front windows. Normally, he would not make this request but in this case, a relatively modest change or revisit to do a stepping even if the far side does not, this side could step and it would have terrific benefits for the neighbors without really losing anything for the applicant. Therefore, he would suggest this be done if it returns for further review. Regarding drainage, the applicant is going to plant additional screening which is a good idea, but he asked if there is water infusion coming in from the other side. This should be specifically addressed through design of the drainage. Chair Barringer said the standards from the Building Department on civil engineering on a sloped site are pretty stringent, so it will be much better drainage. Boardmember Berger agreed and thought the DRB should indicate that attention should be paid in the development so there will be no drainage from this site to the adjacent site. He thinks the height of the house vis-a-vis the eastern home is pretty good. As long as he has seen the property it has always had these large hedges and with additional planting there, the massing will be in good shape. That does not worry him except for the question of the corner nearest to the Hartungs which could be modified and improved without a major detriment to the applicant. It would be to take the plan as is and take the side next to the Hartungs and push the bedroom back further to open that corner up so they have a better view across it, and try to do it in a way that will not require a screen. But, he would say it is not realistic to assume a house can be built TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 10 10/1/20 on a site with absolute blank walls on either side and to provide views across this property in all cases at all times where neighbors’ views are not towards the side but out. He said he thinks the AC unit should be moved to the back yard or implement better sound and screening because they can be annoying if not handled properly. Ms. Perry might be in her backyard when the AC starts and this would be disturbing. He stated he likes the eaves the way they are and would not reduce them at all. A one foot eave on this house would make them appear more boxy and all the more cube-like. He would like to see it return with revisions by the architect to improve the southwest corner so it does not have the barbecue there, screen and quite the projection out towards the view that it does. Boardmember Kim clarified that her objection from the Hartungs residence is not the view issue but the light quality because the windows would be in front of a tunnel. This is why she felt the massing needs to address that in a major way. Boardmember Berger said he agreed and said pushing it back and stepping will give the opportunity to take care of both of them, but homes that have only their windows on the front and then blank on the sides is extremely odd. Hopefully, there can be some windows on the sides of the house possibly higher as well as additional planting which will improve that aspect. Vice Chair Chong said when he first saw the plans you do not get the real perspective until you go out and see the story poles. His first reaction was not necessarily the height of the house itself but how high it was in comparison to the neighbor to the left. There are almost the same roof lines and on a steep hill like that the proper way to develop it would be to tier everything down, but that is not what happened here. He thinks it is because the existing pad is set up higher on the hill. But, then he looks at the existing pad as a bit of an existing condition. He then questions whether the applicant is entitled to build a two-story house in a neighborhood of many two-story houses, and he believes they are. In going to Sheet A-2, most telling was the neighbor to the left where the house goes front to back. Assuming the existing building is correctly located it looks like it is within 4 feet of the property line and built windows all along that side. So, he looks at the designs and believes the applicant has been more than accommodating as far as the location, the distance they chose, and the applicant could have built from the same distance 4 feet off of the property line and do the house front to back and put the same amount of glazing as his next door neighbor, and it would be a legitimate argument. Therefore, he thinks it is a very reasonable proposal. He agrees there could be some work on the corner that could provide privacy and be some changes so it does not negatively impact the applicant’s desire to have the patio there. He also agrees the AC unit should be relocated or enclosed to address sound impacts. To say to fix it would be to drop the pad 4 or 5 feet. He does not know by doing that it would improve anything for anybody as the house is still there. It still looks out a kitchen window and sees a house but maybe just a different part of the house. So, he did not think by fixing the pad they would really fix the fact that a house is going to go into what is clearly an empty lot now. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 11 10/1/20 He also agrees it is very hard going in as a last house in a neighborhood especially after everyone has gotten used to looking across an empty lot or much smaller house. He would not support the project tonight, but with some minor modifications and a continuance, he could support it. Boardmember Berger said he would concur. Boardmember Crescini said he tends to agree with Boardmember Kim. It is basically a big box with some appendixes going out left and right. He really would like to see a design where the house steps back more in the first and second level. He thinks it would be beneficial because this would create a line that contributes towards perceiving the house as less than towering. Also, he thinks there could be some improvement in placing the house on the lot. He suggested rotating the house a bit to see if they can gain some space in the back. He thought the applicant could rotate the house more than where the garage is and open up the view from the living room of the neighbor. Or, if they pulled back the second floor, it is mostly what is important. In reality, on the front of the lot there is room for development, and any volume there would not be a problem for neighbors. He also was not thrilled with the materials and the colors. He referred to the metal roof and asked for something more residential as a material. If they put a metal roof they probably cannot lower the roof, but if they choose another kind of roofing, they might get away with a lower slope. Boardmember Berger said it is the opposite—a metal roof can sustain a much lower pitch than is recommended for an asphalt shingle or other roof. Boardmember Crescini questioned if aesthetically this would be compatible with the neighbors, and Boardmember Berger stated yes. Chair Barringer said the elevations show a 3 foot wide seam on the roof and he believes an 18” or 24” seam is much more residential in scale. Boardmember Crescini then referred to the color and suggested a darker color while blending the house and landscaping. He also said the lighting fixtures they chose should provide more screening when looking from down below. He also thinks there should be more discussion about screening on the two sides and especially on the back. They are removing two trees and he agrees with the suggestion from staff about having to replace them, and possibly those could be the ones that screen their backyard area from the neighbors to the left and downhill. He also agrees with Boardmember Berger about the eaves as proposed. He asked to lower the entry, and lastly, he thinks putting a deck next to the living room of the neighbors is not a good idea. He suggested reshuffling the layout and put the master bedroom back in a more centralized position so it does not bother either of the neighbors. Chair Barringer said he is a little surprised that no one has mentioned the landscaping which is very undeveloped. He appreciates the process and communications the applicant has had with TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 12 10/1/20 the neighbors, agrees with Boardmembers that a 3,000 square foot house on a 10,000 square foot site is appropriate for today’s family needs. He thinks concessions have been made which have resulted in a fair proposal, such as the lack of windows on either side. On Ms. Perry’s side, it is a bit of a blank wall but also not a wall of windows which is on the other side and looking down on this property. He thinks the design could step back a bit on Ms. Perry’s side. He does not love the color and thinks it could be toned down as a light grey or just less glaring. He agreed with Boardmember Crescini’s point about the light fixtures was also good, and a condition of not putting can lights in the upper deck would help the view from below. But, if they had a couple of wall scones pointing down, this would provide plenty of light hanging out on the deck and would also be much less intrusive for neighbors and those on the street. He referred to the front landscaping on the downhill side that currently exists and asked to see a more developed landscape plan. Personally, he did not like the landscaping there which he thinks is sloppy and nothing prevents a future owner from tearing everything out and putting in some lavender. He would prefer to see a more developed landscape plan where the applicant would remove all of the existing planting and plant something that screens and provides a more design-minded plan. He would like to see the landscape walls remain where they are and fences where they are being proposed, did not see any reason why the concrete staircase could not be pulled off from the property line and providing a room for a planter or screening shrubs that could be maintained on the applicant’s side of the fence. Vice Chair Chong said he would support landscaping on the front hillside in front of the driveway and also planting from a more developed landscape plan by the applicant on their property side. Boardmember Berger said it seems to him that because the house is up and one drives up to it, some substantial trees and other things could be planted in the front which would make an interesting impact on the street without blocking views. Chair Barringer said the only other architectural comment is that the front entry being a foot or so higher than the roof next to it does not add to the design. In general, while the house has a presence, he feels that in comparison to some of the houses on the street, it has been pushed back fairly considerably. The question about the second floor is a good one as well. Boardmember Berger said it seems to him that there was more variety of materials used on the front elevation but the side elevations were scarce with one kind of material used. Adding more materials on the sides could soften the sense of the massing. Boardmember Kim said she did not think it was just material. It could be hodgepodge which concerns her. There was only articulation of the massing on one place on the right side. Her objection was not where the line of the garage or entry was. It is the second floor. By pushing that back could solve a number of issues while providing the desired square footage. This would address the blank wall issue and break up the volume in such a way that on the left and right hand sides there is not a towering wall above. She thinks it will solve a number of issues. TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #10 13 10/1/20 In terms of the roof pitch, she did not like it and asked to soften it. This could help in making the structure not feel so large on a number of different levels. She thinks the eaves are a design decision for the architect, but she cannot get behind the massing. She also thinks the articulation and description of landscaping needs to be better defined and sensitive from preventing future owners from removing it all. Regarding the materials, hardy board is great and lasts forever, but it might be the color that is off. It does not seem like it is the right set or not in the family in the existing neighborhood. Boardmember Crescini said the material board besides the stone, concrete and veneer below is all very light. There is light grey metal, light gutters and light stucco. He suggested the applicant create a little contrast or use a lighter fascia for the trim and gutters and use a different palette for the house. He commented that no one spoke about the height of the building which was an issue that came from the neighbors. Usually, the ceilings are 8 feet and now there are 9 and 10 foot ceiling heights. Vice Chair Chong said in going back to comments made by Boardmembers, he thinks the application is very accommodating as far as the height. He does not think it needs to be pushed back any more. Realistically, the application that could have come through could have been one that pushed the front setbacks as far as possible or minimally in line with the corners of the left and right neighbor and they could have even pushed the height further. He thinks 10 foot ceilings are typical now and he thinks given the relationship to the house next door and what is in the neighborhood, he just does not think this is overdevelopment of the project. Anything to push back is asking the applicant for more than needed. Boardmember Kim clarified that she was not talking about pushing back the entire building. She would like the second floor pushed back to create a massing which is more in line with the design guidelines; where the contours of the hill is more respected. Vice Chair Chong said they could look at it two ways—push the top floor back or the bottom floor forward. There is plenty of room to move the bottom floor, and he does not think it is fair to ask an applicant to push their top floor so much further back than all the other top floors along the street. Everybody wants to capture views as best as possible. He agrees they could offset the top and the bottom level to break up the front mass, but they could also do this by pushing the bottom floor forward. Boardmember Crescini said the neighbors cannot keep the views across the property given something must be built. He recommended the applicant consider pushing back the corner where the impact on the living room is and thinks there is more room below on the south side. He thought the garage could move forward. Additionally, for the back big blank wall he suggested going 10 to 12 feet and then scaling it down. If the house is a corner with a setback, he asked to scale it down which allows them to have more room without the sensation of a corridor. Chair Barringer cited the good feedback given to the applicant and sensed the Board was leaning towards continuance. He summarized the main points as reviewing some of the massing, stepping back of the first and second floor, landscape development with some actual developed plans and legend, potential lighting considerations and potential color considerations. Boardmember Berger noted he wrote down the comments as they were said, as follows: 1.No drainage onto the adjacent site. 2.Request to increase the stepping or the back southwest corner or stepping in general to improve massing breakup to conform to the hillside guidelines. 3. Move the AC unit. 4.Do not necessarily make smaller eaves. 5.Replace the trees for screening as mentioned by staff. 6.Re-evaluate the location of the grill and the screen both to improve views from the Hartungs and privacy. 7. Move the deck to the center for more privacy. 8.Implement a better screened light fixture for those attached to the wall and consider not using cans on the second floor eave. 9.More specific developed landscape plans with species and sizes of trees to be identified. 10. Revise roof pitch. 11.Add more articulation in mass and materials on the elevations. 12.Chair Barringer added the request to pull the staircase away from the property line to allow some planting. Ms. Tasini said if the Board was leaning towards a continuance, she suggested asking the applicant if they would be prepared to be ready with changes for the next meeting on October 5th or the meeting thereafter on November 5th. Vice Chair Chong recommended continuing the project to the October 15th meeting, and if the applicant is not ready, they could work with staff to meet on November 5th. It was M/S (Chong/Berger) to continue the application to October 15, 2020 DRB meeting. Roll Call Vote: 5-0. EXHIBIT 7 EXHIBIT 6 Exhibit 7 RESOLUTION NO. 17-2010 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ADOPTING AN AMENDED POLICY FOR THE PROCESSING, SCHEDULING, RECONSIDERATION, AND STORY POLE REPRESENTATION OF APPEALS, AND SUPERSEDING EXISTING POLICIES WHEREAS, the Town receives and hears appeals from decisions of various commissions, boards and administrative officials from time to time, and WHEREAS, the Town Council has adopted various policies over the years with respect to appeal procedures, scheduling, and reconsideration, including Resolutions Nos. 2878 and 3218 and Town Council Policy Nos. 95-01 and 2002-01; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that it is timely and appropriate to update and consolidate these policies regarding appeals; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has held a public meeting on this matter on March 1 7, 2010 and has heard and considered any public testimony and correspondence; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Town Council Resolution No. 2878, Town Council Resolution No. 3218, Town Council Policy 95-01, and Town Council Policy 2002-01 are hereby superseded by this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does hereby adopt the following general policy with respect to processing, scheduling, and reconsideration of appeals and for story pole installation for appeals. APPEAL PROCEDURE 1. The Municipal Code sets forth instances when persons may appeal a decision by a review authority ( e.g. Town official, Design Review Board or Planning Commission) to the Town Council. Any person making such an appeal must file a completed Town of Tiburon Notice of Appeal form, available on the Town's web site and at Town Hall, with the Town Clerk not more than ten (10) calendar days following the date of the decision being appealed. Shorter time frames for filing an appeal apply to certain types of permits. If the final day to appeal occurs on a day when Town Hall is closed for public business, the final day to appeal shall be extended to the next day at which Town Hall is open for public business. Appeals may not be revised or amended in writing after the appeal period filing date has passed. Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 17-2010 03/17/2010 1 2. The appellant must submit filing fees with the Notice of Appeal form. Filing fees are set forth in the Town's current adopted Fee Schedule. (a) If the applicant is the appellant, the remainder of the filing fee (if any) will be refunded following completion of the appeal process. Additional staff time or costs to process an applicant's appeal is the financial responsibility of the applicant and will be billed per the Town's current hourly rate schedule and/or at actual cost if outside consulting is required. (b) If the appellant is not the applicant, then a fixed amount filing fee is required with no refund or additional billing required. 3. In the appeal form, the appellant shall state specifically either of the following: (a) The reasons why the decision is inconsistent with the Tiburon Municipal Code or other applicable regulations; or (b) The appellant's other basis for claiming that the decision was an error or abuse of discretion, including, without limitation, the claim that the decision is not supported by evidence in the record or is otherwise improper. If the appellant is not the applicant, the Town Council need only consider on appeal issues that that the appellant or other interested party raised prior to the time that the review authority whose decision is being appealed made its decision. 4. The appellant must state all grounds on which the appeal is based in the Notice of Appeal form filed with the Town Clerk. Neither Town staff nor the Town Council need address grounds introduced at a later time that were not raised in the Notice of Appeal form. 5. The procedure for presentation of the appeal at the Town Council meeting is as described below. In cases where the applicant is the appellant, paragraphs (c) and (f) below would not apply. (a) Town Staff may make a brief(approximately 10 minute) presentation of the matter and then respond to Town Council questions. (b) Appellant and/or appellant's representative(s) may make a presentation ofno more than twenty (20) minutes and then respond to Town Council questions. Appellant may divide up the twenty (20) minutes between various speakers or have only one speaker, provided that the time limit is observed. Time devoted to responding to Town Council questions shall not be included as part of the twenty (20) minute time limit. (c) Applicant and/or applicant's representative(s) may make a presentation ofno more than twenty (20) minutes and then respond to Town Council questions. Applicant may divide up the twenty (20) minutes between various speakers or have only one speaker, provided that the time limit is observed. Time devoted to responding to Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 17-2010 03/17/2010 2 Town Council questions shall not be included as part of the twenty (20) minute time limit. ( d) Any interested member of the public may speak on the item for no more than three (3) minutes. A speaker representing multiple persons ( e.g., homeowner's association, advocacy group or official organization, etc.) may speak on the item for no more than five (5) minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor. ( e) Appellant is entitled to an up to three (3) minute rebuttal, if desired, of any comments previously made at the hearing. (f) Applicant is entitled to an up to three (3) minute rebuttal, if desired, of any comments previously made at the hearing. 7. The testimony portion of the appeal hearing is closed and the Town Council will begin deliberations on the appeal. There will be no more applicant, appellant, or public testimony accepted unless requested by the Town Council. 8. If, following deliberation, the Town Council is prepared to make a decision on the appeal, it will direct Town staff to return with a draft resolution setting forth the decision, and the findings upon which it is based, for consideration at a future Town Council meeting. The decision of the Town Council is not final until the resolution is adopted. Alternatively, if the Town Council is not prepared to make a decision on the appeal, it may: (a) Continue the appeal to a future date; (b) Remand the item to the review authority from which it was appealed for further hearing, review and action, with a specific description of the outstanding and unresolved issues and appropriate direction thereon; or ( c) Refer the item to another review authority for its review and recommendations prior to further Town Council consideration. 9. Following a final decision by the Town Council, Town staff will promptly mail a Notice of Decision to the applicant and appellant. RECONSIDERATION If, after the Town Council has voted to direct staff to prepare a resolution of decision, significant new information comes to light, which information was previously unknown or could not have been presented at the appeal hearing due to circumstances beyond the parties' control and not due to a lack of diligence, the Town Council may entertain a motion to reconsider its direction to prepare a resolution of decision. Any such motion to reconsider must be made prior to adoption of the resolution of decision, and the motion must be made by a Councilmember who voted on the prevailing side in the vote sought to be reconsidered. Any Councilmember may second the motion. The Town Council may consider and vote on the motion to reconsider at that time, and if the motion carries, the matter shall be placed on a future agenda for further notice and hearing. Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 17-2010 03/17/2010 3 SCHEDULING OF APPEALS 1. The Town's policy is to schedule and hear appeals in an expeditious manner. Appeals will generally be heard at the first regular Town Council meeting that is at least fifteen (15) days after close of the appeal period. At the sole discretion of the Town Manager, the Town may schedule the appeal for a subsequent Town Council meeting based on the complexity of the matter, availability of key Town staff members and Councilmembers, agenda availability, or unusual circumstances. Town staff will make reasonable efforts to establish the hearing date for the appeal within three (3) working days of the close of the appeal period. The Town Clerk, in coordination with appropriate Town staff, will promptly advise all parties to the appeal of the selected hearing date. 2. The Town Manager will grant requests for continuances from the date established above in the event that all parties to the appeal agree in writing to a date specific for the continuance and that date is deemed acceptable by the Town Manager. 3. Attendance of parties to an appeal at the hearing is desired, but not required. The Town Council will consider written comments or representation by others in lieu of personal appearance. STORY POLES For appeals where story poles were erected for review of the original decision being appealed, a story pole representation shall be required for the Town Council's appeal review process, as follows: 1. A story pole plan showing the poles to be connected, including location and elevations of poles and connections, shall be submitted, reviewed, and accepted as adequate by Planning Division Staff prior to installation of the poles and connections. 2. Critical story poles, as determined by Staff, must be connected by means of ribbons, caution tape, rope or other similar and highly visible materials clearly discemable from a distance of at least three-hundred (300) feet in clear weather, to illustrate the dimensions and configurations of the proposed construction. 3. Story poles and connecting materials must be installed at least ten (l 0) days prior to the date of the appeal hearing before the Town Council. 4. Failure to install the poles and materials in a timely manner may result in continuance of the public hearing date. Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 17-2010 03/17/2010 4 5. Story poles must be removed no later than fourteen (14) days after the date of final decision by the Town Council. APPLICABILITY This policy, while primarily written for use by the Town Council, is intended to apply to the extent practicable to Town decision-making bodies, other than the Town Council, which may hear appeals from time to time. Be advised that certain types of appeals, such as appeals of staff- level design review application decisions to the Design Review Board, may have different deadlines for filing of the appeal than the ten (10) calendar days specified above. PASS ED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on March 17, 2010, by the following vote: A YES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Collins, Fraser, Fredericks & O'Donnell NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Slavitz DIANE CRANE Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 17-2010 03/17/2010 5 EXHIBIT 8 To: Tiburon Town Council From: Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Residents and owners of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004 Date: January 15, 2021 RE: Summary of Appeal Points and Reference to November 2020 DRB Presentation Thank you for taking the time to review our appeal. While the detail of our appeal points can be seen in the Appendix, we would summarize those into three categories: 1)The process up to, and through, the Design Review Board meeting disadvantaged us. By example, through the unequal application of project due diligence by the DRB or the lack of distribution of presentation materials to the DRB outside of visually looking at our presentation during our three-minute public commentary period. In addition, the application of DRB recommendations from the first meeting to the second was inconsistent. This was especially true as only one DRB member chose to visit our property to assess any change in the project’s impact to us between the first and second DRB meeting. And in fact, while at least 4 of 5 DRB members visited 545 Silverado, only two visited our home to visually see the impact on our primary living spaces. 2)The vote/resolution by the DRB on the 545 Silverado Drive project did not, by either mistake or intent, include items (and clarification of those items) critically important to us. Primarily, changes to the upper-level deck “privacy screen” we believe should have been noted. Including the need for full overlap between the panels, the requirement that it would be a permanent fixture to the house, and that it will extend the full width of the deck, even with the change in roof overhang at the deck. Secondarily, the removal of the small windows added to both sides of the house. The lack of inclusion of these stipulations was unfortunate, as we felt there was a good working relationship with the developer and these items (along with more discovery about the true impact of a flat roof to the visual impact) could have been remedied with another “turn” of the plans to be reviewed at the next DRB meeting. Instead, the DRB chose to expedite the process by trying to incorporate all the changes discussed in its resolution. Through this, we believe they did not fully detail the needed, or discussed changes. 3)The DRB recommendations to both step back the massing and break-up the massing to more conform to the town’s hillside guidelines are still of issue. We believe the DRB’s vote/resolution to limit the roof overhang on the upper-level deck does help this issue somewhat, but we still believe changes to the roof (as referenced above) and bringing in the upper level side wall somewhat (which is consistent in direction with Board member Kim’s suggestion during the November 2020 DRB meeting) would help resolve this. As we have stated from the beginning of this process, we want to see a new home on this sight, have never stated that we were due to keep the entirety of our view compared to where it stood with the original house at 545 Silverado, and are on record of supporting projects that have impacted our view more than the original house from the early 1960s. It is a question of how much. January 15, 2021 Exhibit 8 PLANN ING DIVISION Commentary on our concerns and slides presented at the November 2020 DRB Meeting We highlighted our primary concerns over the project below during the November 2020 DRB meeting (the slides included below), with an emphasis on the project’s massing impact and privacy intrusion. The privacy intrusion comes from the second level deck. This deck looks directly into our living spaces and down our main hallway off which three bedrooms and two bathrooms are directly situated. Even a 30% open screen (which is an improvement on the 50% open in the prior plan) allows direct viewing. In addition, the reduction in the roof pitch from a 3:12 to 2:12 slope only has a modest impact. Just prior to the November 2020 meeting, the developer did look at a flat roof option and presented it at the meeting. Changes regarding the privacy screen were also discussed with the developer, but those changes were not incorporated into the DRB’s resolution. We were hoping for an opportunity to work further with the developer on these items as we believe we were building to agreement with the developer. The DRB made many recommendations at the October 1st meeting. While the developer has leaned into the recommendations per the staff report, they were minimal. Most importantly, they did not address the recommendations in principle and practically have little to no material change in the project’s impact on us. Some items were addressed at the DRB meeting such as improvement to the landscaping plan, relocating the AC unit, and reducing the roof overhang of the upper-level deck. We believe the roof overhand change is helpful to us, but did not have the opportunity to see a revised plan to determine if the impact of the roof overhang change would make a material difference. Additionally, no mention was made how the privacy screen will integrate into the eave, and whether moving the privacy screen to be “plumb” with the eave point would therefore create unobstructed views from the deck into our primary living areas and into our main hallway. CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROJECT REMAIN L • Project massing impact on our everyday living spaces: living room, dining area, and kitchen • Privacy and light intrusion from 7'x9' 30% screen directly into living s paces • Tenor -Inconsistent vertical massi ng relative to hillside and neighborhood • Lighting • Substantial increase from prior property footprint.and dramatic shift in wall proximity From the front elevation view, the roof pitch change had a minimal impact and there was virtually no change in breaking up the mass or stepping back the 2nd level. Looking at the left elevation (side facing our house), any change to create a setback is virtually unnoticeable. Most importantly, there is NO stepping back of the upper level or addressing the front corner per DRB member suggestions. A BARE MINIMUM OF CHANGES NEGLECTS RECOM M ENDATIONS IN PRINC IPLE AND PRACTICE ORB Recommendations* Step back upper-leve l mass Ma ss break up for Hi ll side gu ideline conformance Relocate the AC unit Re-eva luate roof pi tch Improve pri va cy/fireplace i mpact from upper dec k Reduce view Impact from upper dec k Move dec k to center for more privacy Re-cons ider materia l and mass on side elevations C hange lighting t o reduce glare pot entia ls Improve land scape plan • P Pt • D S ffR N b 51.0lO Action NO NO ~ change.and not i n pri nciple. NO Minor -3: 12 to 2: 12 pitch Mi no r -O nly a 50% to 30% privacy screen NO NO NO, not w h ere visib le. Actuall y added glazi ng and l ight. Minor -O nly changed recessed lighting o n deck Minor -added S shrubs and 2 trees THE BARE MIN IMUM -IMPERCEPTIBLE DIFFERENCES FRONT ELEVATION 9.10 .20 SUBMITTAL I 0.27 .20 SUBMITTAL Relating to the nature of the development and its impact to our property, we think the developer summarized our neighborhood character quite well below. The neighborhood was originally developed considering the topography and other houses. Therefore, each uphill neighbor looks down and/or over their downhill neighbor thereby protecting views, light, AND privacy. Why? Because where there are two-stories in the neighborhood, they exist primarily on the downhill side of the lot. For example, only our garage and storage is on the lower level, with most of our house single story and consistent with the natural topography. THE BARE MINIMUM -IMPERCEPTIBLE DIFFERENCES LEFT ELEVATION (FACING 541 SILVERADO) 9.10 .20 SUBMITTAL I 0.27 .20 SUBMITTAL "IT (THE NE IGHBORHOOD) IS A HILLSIDE COMMUN ITY, SO EVERY HOUSE IS LOOKING D N ON THE OTHER HOUSE " "THE HOMES ARE LOOKING OUT OVER THEIR NEIGHBORS" -Eric Nuttall , DRS Pr esentation on 545 Silverado Pro ject, O ctober I, 2020 In addition, as we have brought up (and as Board member Kim does below in negative reference to the project), since the neighborhood houses work with the topography, the essence of the Hillside Design Guidelines are intact. This is the case even though the neighborhood was developed prior to the creation of the town, its code, or the hillside guidelines. We believe with some additional modifications such as actually setting back the second level slightly further into the hillside, these guidelines would be better respected. "THE HILLSIDE GUIDELINES REFER TO TIERED BUILDING ... THE MASSING OF BUILDINGS RESPECTS THE LINE OF THE HILLS IDE AND THIS ONE DOES NOT DO THAT .. .'' -Boardmember Kim .T iburon DRB Minutes # I 0 , October I , 2020 In respect for this interplay between the houses in the neighborhood, the below is the original house at 545 Silverado relative to our house. As owners of 541 Silverado since the beginning of 2004, we looked out on this house until it was torn down in approximately 2016. (Note: this view of the house at 545 Silverado is from our kitchen window) The views below compare the original proposal to the current one. While the color has changed and the privacy screen is denser, it still has a massive impact as you enter our home. ORIGINAL HOUSE AT 545 SILVERADO GENERALLY "DOWN" AND "OVER" FOR >50YEARS LOOKING "INTO" AND "AT", NOT "DOWN" AND "OVER" MASSING IMPACT AND PRIVACY MINIMALLY ADDRESSED VIEW FROM FRONT DOOR ENTRY 9.10 .20 SUBMITTAL I 0.27 .20 SUBMITTAL Looking at the impact from our dining area, the impact remains dramatic including the privacy concerns. Normally, an angled slat screen would provide more privacy, but because we are looking at the screen directly on, the angling does not help. We believe some of this has been addressed in conversations with the developer, but since those changes were not mentioned in the DRB’s resolution on the project, we do not have protection that those changes will be “attached to the property”. While the kitchen window was referred to as a “back window”, it is not a back window, but rather very central within our main living areas and the view out is visible from almost every angle in our great room. The reduction of the roof’s slope has helped, but very marginally. LOOKING "INTO" AND "AT", NOT "DOWN" AND "OVER " MASSING IMPACT AND PRIVACY MINIMALLY ADDRESSED VIEW FROM DINING ROOM 9.10 .20 SUBMITTAL I 0.27 .20 SUBMITTAL LOOKING "INTO" AND "AT ", NOT "DOWN" AND "OVER " MASSING IMPACT MINIMALLY ADDRESSED VIEW FROM KITCHEN 9.10 .20 SUBMITTAL I 0.27.20 SUBMITTAL It seemed that there was an assumption by the DRB that we felt we were warranted these views across an open lot forever. We have recognized that the neighboring property was under-developed and that more mass impact to us was inevitable. As such, we are on the record as being supportive of past projects that have reduced our views and light, but at more reasonable levels. WE RECOGNIZE SOME OF OUR VIEWS WILL CHANGE RECORD OF SUPPORT FOR LESS INTRUSIVE DESIGNS APRIL 2014 DESIGN -SUPPORTED I 0.27 .20 SUBMITTAL WE RECOGNIZE SOME OF OUR VIEWS WILL CHANGE RECORD OF SUPPORT FOR LESS INTRUSIVE DESIGNS APRIL 2014 DESIGN -SUPPORTED I 0.27 .20 SUBMITTAL APPENDIX To: Town of Tiburon From: Christopher and Jennifer Hartung Owners of 541 Silverado Drive since 2004 Date: November 16, 2020 Re: Notice of Appeal on the action by the Design Review Board on November 5, 2020 concerning the development at 545 Silverado Drive Per the actions of the Tiburon Design Review Board (DRB) on November 5, 2020 concerning the development at 545 Silverado Drive and applicant Eric Nuttall/Equity Smart Investments LP, we are appealing the decision on multiple grounds: 1) Appeal on Error/Abuse of discretion Town code, 16-52.020, Section E, Part 2: “…The review authority shall determine from the reports and data submitted, supplemented by public comment and on-site inspections as the review authority may deem appropriate…” • It is an abuse of discretion to base judgement of the development’s impact when there was an unequal application of diligence. Four of the five DRB members have publicly stated they visited the development property during the application time. Yet only two DRB members visited our property, and only one of those two visited our property to assess the massing impact change on the reduced roof slope from the first DRB meeting to the second DRB meeting. Therefore, a majority of the DRB board members did NOT choose to visit our property at 541 Silverado Drive to assess the proposed development’s impact on our property. By negation therefore, two of the four that publicly visited the development property did not give equal time to the parties concerned with the development. • The unequal application of diligence is not due to limitations imposed by us. To help facilitate viewing of the proposed development from our property, we offered six different “open house” times (for one to 1 ½ hours each time) and offered up the ability for additional scheduling. Mindful of health guidelines based on Covid-19, we offered these visitations with a touchless environment, masking, and the restriction of our family members presence in the main living area during the “open house” times. 2) Appeal on Error/Claims that the decision is not supported by evidence in the record or is otherwise improper • Since the majority of DRB members did NOT visit our property while the story poles were erected, they therefore had no direct physical assessment of massing impact from our perspective. As such, any decision based on statements on the project’s impact on our property is improper and not based on direct observation. In addition, while we presented views from our property to try and capture the massing impact, DRB members were not provided the presentation prior to the meeting, nor did they have the opportunity to “study” the presented material due to the strict three-minute time limitations for public comment using Zoom. • The DRB mentioned that our property is “four feet from the property line”, not within the setback, and noted that windows or views were created “when we developed.” The proximity of our South elevation wall to the property line has existed since it was originally built in the 1950s and is NOT four feet. The property was also developed before Town setback requirements existed. In addition, the subsequent original house at 545 Silverado (which was built after 541 Silverado) was built in relation to the then original house at 541 Silverado. To suggest that somehow our house was pushing the boundaries does not appreciate the historical context of the neighborhood nor that we inherited the house footprint which is therefore a legacy condition, as well as the setback. Lastly, the general position of our windows on that Southern wall is consistent with many of the houses in the neighborhood and, as with the proximity to the property line, has existed since the house was built in the early 1950s, unlike the comments made by some DRB members. • One DRB member judged the “impact” of the development on our property based on a prior visit to our home a number of years ago and therefore was not judging based on current “facts”. He did not visit our property with the current story poles in place. • During the November 5th meeting, another DRB member commented “Our job is to state what we feel is the impact for neighbors.” This member did not visit our property. Therefore, how can he properly fulfill his role per his description? • The planning department mentioned that “we’ve come here 4 to 5 times with this project”, suggesting that the project was well hashed out. This is incorrect, as the November 5th meeting was only the second time the project was presented to the DRB. • Since there were so many changes to digest during the discussion period, the DRB began using neighbor Margarita Perry’s email (which was included in late mail) as a “punch list” (as described by one DRB member). Ms. Perry’s “punch list” was from her perspective and was not meant to address our concerns. As an example, the added windows facing her side were addressed by the DRB, but not commented on regarding the wall on our side even though we brought up that concern in our presentation. We believe that since our presentation was not included in materials to the DRB, and our comments on such a significant project were limited to three minutes with no questions or clarification points asked by the DRB, we were at a structural disadvantage to have our concerns addressed, especially in a virtual Zoom environment. 3) Appeal on Inconsistenc y with applicable provisions of this chapter or of other applicable provisions of the Municipal Code or other laws or regulations • Town Code 16-52.020, Section H, Part 2: Site layout in relation to adjoining sites. The location of proposed improvements on the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites, with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by particular site conditions. The DRB neglected to address the privacy intrusion from the second level deck. Only our garage, laundry room and storage are located on our “1st floor”. Therefore, ALL our living space is orientated to the main floor, and this looks directly into our living spaces and down our main hallway off which three bedrooms and two bathrooms are directly situated. Even a 30% open screen (which is an improvement on the 50% open in the prior plan) allows direct viewing. We believe the applicant is changing this, but due to the hasty wrap-up of the DRB meeting, this privacy issue was not addressed, nor was making it a permanent and required condition of the development to protect our privacy. In addition, we like the reduction of some massing at the front corner of the property, but we have not had the opportunity to understand the privacy impact of the conditions set by the DRB, especially if the deck width remains the same as in the plans. Due to this, we believe our privacy concerns could become more acute due to a mis-match between the requirement of a 6’ roof line over the second floor deck as compared to a 7’ wide deck that ultimately widens further to 10’. This could potentially allow 4’ of unobstructed deck looking directly (at approximately waist height) into our primary living space and down our main hallway referenced above. On both the above, because we have not had a chance to see if these items were addressed prior to the appeal period, we feel no choice but to appeal to insure our privacy. • Town Code 16-52.020, Section H, Part 3: Neighborhood character. The height, size, and/or bulk of the proposed project bears a reasonable relationship to the character of existing buildings in the vicinity. A good relationship of a building to its surroundings is important. For example, in neighborhoods consisting primarily of one-story homes, second-story additions shall be discouraged, or permitted with increased setbacks or other design features to minimize the intrusion on the neighborhood. As mentioned in our materials presented at the meetings, the proposed house is the only exception to the neighborhood around visual massing impact on its uphill neighbor. The DRB’s primary focus was around the setback of the development, which while important, should not be the only determinant. Of importance, the DRB members that were focused on setback rather than the visual impact of the massing were the ones that did NOT visit our property thereby denying the us the opportunity to show our perspective. However, the majority of DRB members DID choose to visit the applicant’s property. Our neighborhood consists of houses where, according to the applicant, “every house is looking down on the other house” and “the homes are looking out over their neighbors”. As such, where there are two stories to a house, it is set back substantially from the first level, exist primarily on the downhill side of the lot, and does not look directly into uphill neighbor primary living areas. As commented on by a few DRB members, this project does not maintain the visual “stepping down” of the neighborhood. This can specifically be seen in the relationship of our house to our uphill neighbor at 539 Silverado, 539 Silverado’s relationship to 535 Silverado, 535 Silverado’s relationship to 533 Silverado, 533 Silverado’s relationship to 531 Silverado. This relationship also extends to the other side of our street (546 Silverado, 544 Silverado, 540 Silverado, 538 Silverado, 534 Silverado, and 532 Silverado). • Town Code 16-52.020, Section J: Design review guidelines. In reviewing applications for site plan and architectural review, the review authority shall also apply goals and principles, as appropriate to the project, set forth in the Hillside Design Guidelines, Downtown Tiburon Design Handbook, and any other guidelines adopted by council, copies of which are available from the planning division. As one DRB member stated, “the hillside guidelines refer to tiered building…the massing of buildings respects the line of the hillside and this one does not do that…” In addition, the DRB recognized the need to adhere to the Hillside Design Guidelines by instructed the applicant to come back with 1) a step back in the upper-level mass and 2) a further breaking up of the mass for Hillside Design Guidelines conformance. When viewed side-by-side, there is little noticeable change between the original submitted plan and the October 27th plan. 4) Appeal on Application Completeness Per one DRB member, “There’s a lot of changes that happen that have not been memorialized in the plans.” The Conditional approval of the project at 545 Silverado was made with incomplete designs and with inadequate advance time for the DRB to process and opine on the project changes. Further, this limited the ability of neighbors to properly assess the change’s impact. To our knowledge, the first visual communication of some of the changes were only presented in the applicant’s presentation which is not available as a document for review outside of the Zoom presentation. As of Monday, November 16th (the last day for an appeal), there were no revised plans posted to the Planning or DRB websites to allow for review. Hence why, again, we feel compelled to appeal. 5) Appeal on Due Process Partially because of the need to conduct proceedings via Zoom, the process disadvantages neighbors relative to in-person meetings where physical copies of plans would have been made available. a) The only time to see applicant’s late proposed changes was in the presentation on-screen. b) The DRB was not given our presentation prior to the meeting, thereby the only time they had to visually assess our concerns was during our three-minute presentation. c) There is no ability to see actual items integrated into the plans prior to the end of the appeal period, so our only avenue to protect our interests is to appeal. 6) Appeal on Past Precedence/Inconsistency of Code and Guideline Application We believe the DRB is applying its judgement and power inconsistently: a) As stated in our remarks at the November 5th meeting, there were numerous (and very consequential) recommendations voted on unanimously by the DRB that were not incorporated in the November 5th changes yet the DRB chose to approve the project with conditions even though many of the original recommendations were not addressed. b) In a prior application for a new house at 545 Silverado (with another owner in 2014), the DRB voted unanimously against a proposal with less massing impact on our property. The DRB subsequently approved (and we also supported) a design which reduced that impact. DEVELOPER TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING 660 AUBURN -FOLSOM ROAD SUITE 204 AUBURN, CA 95603 (916) 5 7 2 -5955ARCHITECTSTRUCTURAL TI T L E -24 TR U S S M F G . FI R E P R O T E C T I O N LOT COVERAGE DIAGRAM 1,513 SQ -FT 65 SQ -FT GARAGE64 SQ -FT 496 SQ -FT111 SQ -FTLIVING AREA 1ST FLOOR PATIO #1 PATIO #2 PORCH LOT SIZE LOT COVERAGE %10,627 SQ -FT 22.15%TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,354 SQ -FTPROPOSEDBACK YARD PATIO 105 SQ -FTF.A.R.:LOT SIZETOTAL FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO10,627 SQ -FT3,043 SQ -FT 28.63%1,530 SQ -FTLIVING AREA 1ST FLOOR 1,513 SQ -FT LIVING AREA 2ND FLOOR GARAGE 496 SQ -FT THIS PLAN SET IS DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH 20 19, CRC, CBC, CMC, CPC, CEC, CA FIRE CODE AND 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMPLIANCE OF TITLE 24. CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE & 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE BELVEDERE TIBURON CITY OCCUPANCY R -3, U TYPE OF CONST.V -B NO. OF STORIES 2 NO. OF BEDROOMS 4 NO. OF UNITS 1 FIRE SPRINKLERS YESENERGY COMPLIANCE:WALL INSULATION = R21 CEILING INSULATION = R38 AC DUCT = R8 HVAC = 15 SEER WINDOW U VALUE = .32 SHGC = 0.25 HOT WATER SYSTEM = TANKLESS GAS 1. NE W C U S T O M H O M E C O N S T R U C T I O N 2. DR I V E W A Y I N S T A L L A T I O N SC O P E O F W O R K : TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:05 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 COVER SHEET RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A1545 SILVERADO DR. PARCEL 42, CA 94920 UNITED STATES APN: 055 -082 -023CUSTOM HOME N VI C I N I T Y M A P T i b u r o n B l v d 54 5 S i l v e r a d o D r i v e S ilv e r a d o D r . C o m s t o c k D r . S t e w a rt D r . S t e w a r t D r . T r e s t l e G l e n B l v d T r e s t l e G l e n B l v d Vi r g i ni a D r.T ibur o n Blvd A v e n d i a M i r a f l o r e s H i l a r y D r. SHEET INDEX A1 COVER SHEET GP1 GRADING PLAN A2 SITE PLAN A3 FLOOR PLAN A3.1 FLOOR PLAN A3.2 2ND FLOOR OVERLAY TO 1ST FLOOR A4 ELEVATIONS A5 ELEVATIONS A6 ROOF/STORY POLE PLAN A7 LANDSCAPE PLAN A8 IRRIGATION PLAN A9 SECTIONS A10 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN A11 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE A12 VISUALIZATION T1 TOPOGRAPHY MAPOctober 2 7 , 2020Exhibit 9 -~ -'= ' 1 r n 1 · / .· . ·· . ·; 5 . ,· -5 . . ,• .. . □ : . . .. . . -. , ' - . ,_ - , : ,, · .. .. . .. ,. - • . ,- . ' . . ,· ' - ' - . , - ,- , _ . . - . . - : c . . . . .. .. , . . - " , _ ·, . ' . . . . . . - ' - ' . . , . . .. ,, •- . . - - ' . •, . , . , • . • - . , ' ' .. . •, . . ' . . - , ' , . • · . . . . . . ,, .. . • - ' .. , _ ' ' •· , , .. ' C • ~ ~ ,. . . . .. ·> .. .. . . . , .. ., .. . , , - . , , . . , . . . ' . . . , ' " \ - ,, .. .. . ·. . , • ·, · , , ·. ' . , 0 . , . . . ' - ' 0 ' ' . . . . ., . , ' ? J - _ $ ~ .. 0 0 •· ;1 / , . ·. .. . . . .. . ·. . . 21 . . , . ' . , , · ,- , - ' , , - ·- <" , ; / '. , . , . , •, , • , , . .. . , .. .. . .. . .. .. , .. : .. ; f .. . . . . . ' • · . . .. ·- ' ' ' . ·. .. .. .. - . -· ' r ~ -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - , . .. . '' · , . .. ·1 ~ -- - - '- - J . . . _ _ _ _ _ -- - - - - - - , _ ~ . . ' w .. ' ' .. ' . L J , .. ' ~ - . -~ ~ - · ~, -, -' ·> - , . ; .. I ,✓] .- ' ' · \ , ., . , ' .. I I I I I I 11 I I I I I 11 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I . . : µ " • , . ; ~- ~ <.: · ' ' . . • , I / I . 54 5 : .. . , . , , , . . ; p• , ; . ·, , : , \ . - . / ' • - . 1 . ' • / DO D D D O D D DO D D DO D D - t: } ( { i • , r I . , , ' , .. - - . ' ' ' , , ~ ' ~ . er: . : : : : : . I' .... , 1· • • . , , . .. ,, ' ' ' DO D D DO D D DO D D D O D D . . . .. . . I I 1 ·· , ·. · :} i i . \ }, i { I ', J . . , ' . ·- "" : " ' . _ - '- - " - ' :: ' , I I. } , ; : ' : : , ) •. , , ' ~ .· _ ·: - ·, : . ' ' _. · .. - : lo . ' ,. .. 1:· , • > , -" , . . - ... . . ·, ~1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - : 1 I 1 - : 1 1 1 - : 1 I 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1- : 1 1 1 - I - 11 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - : 1 1 1 - : 1 I 1 - - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - : I 11 - : 1 I 1- : 1 I 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 _: 1 1 1 - : 1 I _: 1 -1 1 1 - ll l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l ll l l 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I II I I I I II I I I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ll l l l l 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 11 1 1 - I I II I I_ I I II I I_ I I I 111 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 i' I 11- 1 1 1 1 1 i' I I I 1_1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 I :1 11-1 1 1 : 1 1_11 1 : 1 I 1_1 1 1 1 1 _1 1 1 1 1 1 _ 1 I I I I _I I I I I I_ I I I 111 - 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 :1 11- 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 I I I_ I I II I I_ I I I I I I_ I I I 111 - 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 I I_ I I l: 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 111 1 1 1 1 11_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 : 1 11_ 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 I_ I I l1 1 1 L J PLANNING DIVISION W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' P L R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 P R O P O S E D H O U S E O N P A D P A D . : 1 2 7 ' - 4 " F . F . : 1 2 8 ' - 0 " P R O P O S E D G A R A G E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 ' - 6 " P A D . : 1 2 6 ' - 1 0 " GU E S T PA R K I N G P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y P R O P O S E D P A T I O DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . SL O P E 6 " I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M HO U S E M I N . 2 % S L O P E A W A Y DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E MI N . S L O P E 6 " I N T H E F I R S T 10 ' F R O M H O U S E T. O . W . : 1 3 8 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 3 4 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 5 ' -6" T. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -6" B. O . W . : 1 2 3 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -9" B. O . W . : 1 2 6 ' -6" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NE W A C U N I T CA R R I E R I N F I N I T Y 1 9 V S 2 4 V N A 9 (5 6 D E C I B E L S ) TR A S H E N C L O S U R E W I T H O U T R O O F T. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -5" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 3 0 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G WA L L ST A N D A R T D R A I N A G E S W A L E SL O P E D T O S T R E E T J D I T C H D R A I N SL O P E D T O S T R E E T FR E N C H D R A I N P R O P O S E D P A T I O T. O . W . : 1 3 8 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" FR E N C H D R A I N T O C O N N E C T TO D R A I N A G E S W A L E A N D DR A I N S T O W A R D T O S T R E E T WM GP 1 2 P R O P O S E D P A T I O MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L 3 ' - 0 " FR E N C H D R A I N MA X . 1 0 . 7 5 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L MA X . 7 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L MA X . 7 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L T. O . W . : 1 3 2 ' -0" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" T. O . W . : 1 3 0 ' -9" B. O . W . : 1 2 8 ' -0" T. O . W . : 1 3 7 ' -6" B. O . W . : 1 3 6 ' -0" T. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -6" B. O . W . : 1 2 7 ' -4" MA X . 1 0 . 7 5 ' CO N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G WA L L MA X . 3 . 5 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L LE G E N D MA J O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MA J O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) FI B E R R O L L FI N I S H E D F L O O R RE T A I N I N G W A L L FF RW98 0 ' 99 0 ' TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E DR A I N A G E D I T C H D I R E C T I O N DO W N S P O U T D R A I N SE T B A C K L I N E SW A L E D R A I N FR E N C H D R A I N PR O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L ENGINEER NOTES ESTIMATED CUT = 164 C.Y., ESTIMATED FILL = 41 C.Y., EXPORT = 123 C.Y.FOLLOWING SITE CLEARING AND STRIPPING OPERATIONS, ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 INCHES, MOISTURE CONDITIONED AS NECESSARY AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY BASED ON THE ASTM D1557 TEST METHOD. THE FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 6 INCHES. THE FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED AS NECESSARY AND COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTI ON OF NOT LESS THAN 90%. DRIVEWAYS COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTION OF NOT LESS THAN 90%.THE TYPE, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABILITY. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLY ACTUAL EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND UTILITIES. HOWEVER, THE DESIGNER, CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF THE DELINEATION OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER BURIED OBJECTS OR UTILITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, BUT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E N O T E S : 1. EA C H T R E E O R G R O U P O F T R E E S T O B E P R E S E R V E D S H A L L B E EN C L O S E D W I T H 4 ’HIGH -VISIBILITY FENCING ON 5 ’T -STAKES SET A MA X I M U M O F 1 0 ’APART. INSPECTION BY THE CITY ARBORIST IS RE Q U I R E D P R I O R T O A N Y G R A D I N G , G R U B B I N G , T R E N C H I N G , MO V E M E N T O F H E A V Y E Q U I P M E N T , O R O T H E R C O N S T R U C T I O N AC T I V I T Y . 2. WE A T H E R P R O O F S I G N S 1 1 ”X17 ”SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 50 ’APART SH A L L B E P O S T E D O N A L L S I D E S O F F E N C E S S U R R O U N D I N G E A C H TR E E O R T R E E S S T A T I N G T H A T E N C L O S E D T R E E S A R E T O B E PR E S E R V E D . 3. PA R K I N G O F V E H I C L E S , E Q U I P M E N T , O R S T O R A G E O F M A T E R I A L W I T H I N T H E P R O T E C T E D Z O N E O F T R E E S I S P R O H I B I T E D A T A L L TI M E S . TREE SCHEDULE TREE NUMBER SIZE & DESCRIPTION PRESERVE/REMOVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 912"PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE REMOVE REMOVE18"14"14"19"10"8"13"22"REMOVE REMOVEPRESERVE LO T C O V E R A G E D I A G R A M 1, 5 1 3 S Q -FT 65 S Q -FT GA R A G E 64 S Q -FT 49 6 S Q -FT 11 1 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R PA T I O # 1 PA T I O # 2 PO R C H LO T S I Z E LO T C O V E R A G E % 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 22 . 1 5 % TO T A L B U I L D I N G A R E A 2, 3 5 4 S Q -FT PR O P O S E D BA C K Y A R D P A T I O 10 5 S Q -FT 1. ER O S I O N C O N T R O L B M P ' S S H A L L B E I N P L A C E P R I O R T O A N Y S T O R M E V E N T S . 2. BM P ' S S H A L L B E P R O J E C T S P E C I F I C A N D A R E N O T L I M I T E D T O T H E M I N I M U M RE Q U I R E M E N T S S H O W N I N T H E A B O V E T A B L E . T H E A B O V E B M P ' S S H O U L D B E IN S P E C T E D W E E K L Y , B E F O R E A N D A F T E R S I G N I F I C A N T R A I N F A L L . V E G E T A T I O N MU L C H E S A R E N O T I N T E N D E D T O B E P E R M A N E N T A N D O N C E P L A N T G R O W T H I S ST A B L E , I T D O E S N O T H A V E T O B E M A I N T A I N E D . 1 -PE R I M E T E R P R O T E C T I O N 2 -IN C O N J U N C T I O N W I T H S E C O N D A R Y M E A S U R E A F T E R S E P T E M B E R 1 5 T H NO T E S : CO N S T R U C T I O N P H A S E BM P S C H E D U L E W E T S E A S O N DR Y S E A S O N ON -SI T E E A R T H W O R K FI B E R RO L L S ST O R M D R A I N IM P R O V E M E N T S CU R B A N D G U T T E R PA V E O U T PO S T -CO N S T R U C T I O N HY D R O S E E D I N G ST R A W MU L C H I N G & TA C T I F I E R PE R S E R V A T I O N OF E X I S T I N G VE G I T A T I O N DU S T CO N T R O L SA N D / G R A V E L BA G S BA R R I E R S ST O R M D R A I N IN L E T PR O T E C T I O N SE D I M E N T TR A P S DE W A T E R I N G DI ST E N C I L I N G ST A B I L I Z E D CO N S T R U C T I O N EN T R A N C E MA T E R I A L & WA S T E DI S P O S A L LO C A T I O N 1 - BM P ' S P R O V I D E D O N P L A N M U S T B E U T I L I Z E D A S S H O W N O N P L A N . A D D I TI O N A L B M P ' S L I S T E D I N T H I S S CH E D U L E A R E O P T I O N A L A N D C A N B E U S ED T O F U R T H E R E S T A B L I S H E R O S I O N C O N T R O L . 2 - FO R P A V E D A R E A ' S , U S E G R A V E L B A G S I N S T E A D O F F I B E R R O L L S . 3 - W A T E R T R U C K T O B E A V A I L A B L E O N S I T E D U R I N G G R A D I N G . S I T E T O B E W A T E R E D T O M I N I M I Z E D U S T L E V E L S . TH E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E Q U I R E D T O T A K E D U E P R E C A U T I O N A R Y M E A S U R E S TO P R O T E C T T H E U T I L I T Y L I N E S S H O W N O N T H E S E D R A W I N G S , T H E CO N T R A C T O R F U R T H E R A S S U M E S A L L L I A B I L I T Y A N D R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R TH E U T I L I T Y P I P E S , C O N D U I T S O R S T R U C T U R E S S H O W N O R N O T S H O W N ON T H E S E D R A W I N G S . T H E C O N T R A C T O R A G R E E S T H A T H E S H A L L A S S U M E SO L E A N D C O M P L E T E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R J O B S I T E C O N D I T I O N S D U R I N G TH E C O U R S E O F C O N S T R U C T I O N O F T H I S P R O J E C T . I N C L U D I N G S A F E T Y O F AL L P E R S O N S A N D P R O P E R T Y A N D T H A T T H I S R E Q U I R E M E N T S H A L L A P P L Y CO N T I N U O U S L Y A N D N O T B E L I M I T E D T O N O R M A L W O R K I N G H O U R S ; A N D TH A T T H E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L D E F E N D , I N D E M N I F Y A N D H O L D T H E O W N E R AN D E N G I N E E R H A R M L E S S F R O M A N Y A N D A L L L I A B I L I T Y A R I S I N G F R O M TH E S O L E N E G L I G E N C E O F T H E O W N E R O R E N G I N E E R CO N T R A C T O R ' S R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y N O T E 24" CULVERT GALVANIZEDCLEAN CRUSHED GRAVEL FILL &COMPACTED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY MIN 1'MIN 90% COMPACTIONTDETANGENTDESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:43:41 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 GRADING PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PZ PZ GP1 N VI C I N I T Y M A P 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N N1/4" = 1'-0"2 Culvert Section View 54 5 S I L V E R A D O D R I V E 2 2 2 2 0 0 Ma t i n So c c e r Ac a d e m y Te m p o r . - , l y c l o ~ ~ f t ', - .. . . ~0 ", 4 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A I • I 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - .. T ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - = ~ /l ; / \ \ - \/ -. ' . . . ' / r . , , / . ,. . . , . ·- 0 0 0 0 0 ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ / I , =,i: : : , , ' I -- - 4 - \ '- - . ' / / / / \ / \ v ¢ " "~ ..__ _~ . J . - \ /__ _ > - , - - - I I - - - - - - - - •• • • • • • • • • • • ~ - - - - - - - - - - - I / V ' v ' v V ' v l I 7 / / 7 , ' ] I .. . . 1 . [' . 1 / _ § ., 0 - " _ § ./ 2 ' . J \ - - , - - - , / - . . - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -" ~ .- : : 9 ~ ~ ; - ~ - . ; ; ; _ . ~ ~ ~ ; . , . . . ; ~ ~ f - = - - : : . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ IICTES 7 1 rr Tr 7 111 •· 1_1rr -rr -7w 1---111 ''-II-I-I ~ NDS, INC 851 NORTH HARVARD Al/£. LINDSAY. CA 93247 TOLL FREE 1-800-726-1994 PHONE: (559) 56Nl888 FAX: (559) 562-4488 www.ndopro.Grni IICSPC·LYO.mt! P0° UP ~RI.INA~r r\'ITr~ ','lnll U.'.'. NHIETOR IICS l.'LECf,[• SE\\'ER I. ltl~T.~LJ.•TIO!i TO ~= '.XlM'L.l:"l:D ll ACC•:JF:DANCC .-,11 I -~;.·icr ;,~-u 0 J:R'$ :,P[Cl,l~.~Tlc-N~ 2 CC ,01 SCil_[ Cf\il'/, IK 3 THIS Df',\'!~IK ISIWENDEJFOR LSC :;y ~RCHITEC-S E'l31flEE'lS C•'CR.~CC-RS. COtlSULTAWS.~flD CEJUl FR·}"'2SIOII'.l_S FOR FLIJ\llltlG PIJRO{)SE2 OI-IL\" ~ ;c NI 0-:M.'.ll~'N L~'lll,~NL~ I L-,LI~ ·1,,~ CJHfUI I .',I II L ll'<L (!I ~-\UJ.;~MU. I UL I l,1U~I UL fU'IL~,rn ,'/,L\ilf'l-'HC';LJ PY THF Pf'nn.lCT ·~Mll..lFACTIIP.FP. TC RF GlJflS r."P.Fl ACfllP./, TF DRAINAGE EMITTER @NDS ,:-4""" ~ KJ-Yc·, .. ,,)\-,i ,...,,.j"~·"'"'; G G GWWW E E E S S S CATV CATV CATV W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' 1 0 7 ' 1 0 8 ' 1 0 9 ' 1 1 0 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 2 ' 1 1 3 ' 1 1 4 ' 1 1 5 ' 1 1 6 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 8 ' 1 1 9 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 127' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 13 7' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' LO T C O V E R A G E D I A G R A M 1, 5 1 3 S Q -FT 65 S Q -FT GA R A G E 64 S Q -FT 49 6 S Q -FT 11 1 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R PA T I O # 1 PA T I O # 2 PO R C H LO T S I Z E LO T C O V E R A G E % 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 22 . 1 5 % TO T A L B U I L D I N G A R E A 2, 3 5 4 S Q -FT PR O P O S E D BA C K Y A R D P A T I O 10 5 S Q -FT LEGEND DIMENSION POINT SET -BACK LINE PROPERTY LINE DRIVEWAY WATER LINE GAS LINE ELECTRICAL LINE SEWER LINE PROPOSED FENCE LINEPROPOSED DRIVEWAYPAD LINE M.U.S.D.A.INTERNET AND TV LINE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DIRECTIONEWXISTING RETAINING WALL N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49 ° 3 4 ' E 1 44 .2 8 ' PL N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 .7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 P R O P O S E D H O U S E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 8 ' P R O P O S E D G A R A G E O N P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 . 5 ' P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G 3 4 ' - 0 " LO T 4 1 LO T 3 1 LO T 3 0 P R O P O S E D P A T I O F . F . : 1 3 8 . 9 ' TR A S H E N C L O S U R E WI T H O U T R O O F P R O P O S E D P A T I O R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) P R O P O S E D P A T I O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . S L O P E 6" I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M H O U S E MI N . 2 % S L O P E AW A Y DR A I N A W A Y F R O M H O U S E M I N . S L O P E 6" I N T H E F I R S T 1 0 ' F R O M H O U S E NE W A C U N I T CA R R I E R I N F I N I T Y 1 9 V S 2 4 V N A 9 UP T O 1 9 S E E R (5 6 D E C I B E L S ) WM 0 ' - 3 " 1 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1' - 2 1 / 2 " 0' - 0 3 / 4 " 3 4 ' - 4 " 6' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 2 1 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 2 ' - 6 " EX I S T I N G F E N C E (5 ' H E I G H T ) MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L EN G I N E E R N O T E S ES T I M A T E D C U T = 1 6 4 C . Y . , E S T I M A T E D FILL = 41 C.Y., EXPORT = 123 C.Y. FO L L O W I N G S I T E C L E A R I N G A N D S T R I P P I N G O P E R A T I O N S , A L L A R E A S T O R E C E I V E F I L L SH A L L B E S C A R I F I E D T O A M I N I M U M D E P T H O F 8 I N C H E S , M O I S T U R E C O N D I T I O N E D A S NE C E S S A R Y A N D C O M P A C T E D T O A T L E A S T 9 0 % O F T H E M A X I M U M D R Y D E N S I T Y BA S E D O N T H E A S T M D 1 5 5 7 T E S T M E T H O D . T H E F I L L S H A L L B E P L A C E D I N L I F T S N O T EX C E E D I N G 6 I N C H E S . T H E F I L L S H A L L B E M O I S T U R E C O N D I T I O N E D A S N E C E S S A R Y AN D C O M P A C T E D T O A R E L A T I V E C O M P A C T I ON OF NOT LESS THAN 90%. DRIVEWAYS CO M P A C T E D T O A R E L A T I V E C O M P A C T I O N O F N O T L E S S T H A N 9 0 % . TH E T Y P E , L O C A T I O N S , S I Z E S A N D / O R D E P T H S O F E X I S T I N G U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S AS S H O W N O N T H E S E P L A N S W E R E O B T A I N E D F R O M S O U R C E S O F V A R Y I N G RE L I A B I L I T Y . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S C A U T I O N E D T H A T O N L Y A C T U A L E X C A V A T I O N W I L L RE V E A L T H E T Y P E S , E X T E N T , S I Z E S , L O C A T I O N S , A N D U T I L I T I E S . H O W E V E R , T H E DE S I G N E R , C A N A S S U M E N O R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R T H E C O M P L E T E N E S S O R AC C U R A C Y O F T H E D E L I N E A T I O N O F S U C H U N D E R G R O U N D U T I L I T I E S , N O R F O R T H E EX I S T E N C E O F O T H E R B U R I E D O B J E C T S O R U T I L I T I E S W H I C H M A Y B E E N C O U N T E R E D , BU T W H I C H A R E N O T S H O W N O N T H E S E D R A W I N G S . TREE SCHEDULE TREE NUMBER SIZE & DESCRIPTION PRESERVE/REMOVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 912"PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE PRESERVE REMOVE REMOVE18"14"14"19"10"8"13"22"REMOVE REMOVEPRESERVE TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E N O T E S : 1. EA C H T R E E O R G R O U P O F T R E E S T O B E P R E S E R V E D S H A L L B E EN C L O S E D W I T H 4 ’HIGH -VISIBILITY FENCING ON 5 ’T -STAKES SET A MA X I M U M O F 1 0 ’APART. INSPECTION BY THE CITY ARBORIST IS RE Q U I R E D P R I O R T O A N Y G R A D I N G , G R U B B I N G , T R E N C H I N G , MO V E M E N T O F H E A V Y E Q U I P M E N T , O R O T H E R C O N S T R U C T I O N AC T I V I T Y . 2. WE A T H E R P R O O F S I G N S 1 1 ”X17 ”SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 50 ’APART SH A L L B E P O S T E D O N A L L S I D E S O F F E N C E S S U R R O U N D I N G E A C H TR E E O R T R E E S S T A T I N G T H A T E N C L O S E D T R E E S A R E T O B E PR E S E R V E D . 3. PA R K I N G O F V E H I C L E S , E Q U I P M E N T , O R S T O R A G E O F M A T E R I A L W I T H I N T H E P R O T E C T E D Z O N E O F T R E E S I S P R O H I B I T E D A T A L L TI M E S . GR A D I N G L E G E N D MA J O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( E X I S T I N G ) MA J O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) MI N O R C O N T O U R ( N E W ) FI B E R R O L L FI N I S H E D F L O O R RE T A I N I N G W A L L FF RW98 0 ' 99 0 ' TR E E P R O T E C T I O N Z O N E DR A I N A G E D I T C H D I R E C T I O N DO W N S P O U T D R A I N F. A . R . : LO T S I Z E TO T A L F L O O R A R E A FL O O R A R E A R A T I O 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 3, 0 4 3 S Q -FT 28 . 6 3 % 1, 5 3 0 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 1 S T F L O O R 1, 5 1 3 S Q -FT LI V I N G A R E A 2 N D F L O O R GA R A G E 49 6 S Q -FT D1' - 0"WHORIZONTAL TOE REINFORCEMENT (T)OPTIONAL CONST JOINT. ROUGHEN SURFACTE TO 1/4" AMPLITUDEHORIZONTAL HEEL REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)HORIZONTAL FOOTING REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)MIN. 3" COVERNATIVE SOIL COMPACTED TO 90%"FILTER FABRIC" LAYER WRAPPED AROUND DRAIN MATERIAL (MIRAFI 140 N OR EQUIVALENT)4" MIN.4" MIN.4" MIN.4" ABS PERFORATED PIPE MIN 2% SLOPE TOWARD OUTLET DIAMETER 4"VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)6" CONCRETE WALL (MAX 3' HEIGHT)HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT (PER STRUCTURAL)COMPACTED FILL OR UNDISTURBED SOIL3' MAX.STUCCO FINISH TO BE CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.CONCRETE RETAINING WALL CAP BY OTHER.12" MIN.0' - 9"0' - 6"TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:07 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 SITE PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A2 N 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N VE G E T A T I O N M A N A G E M E N T P L A N : ZO N E 1 ( I M M E D I A T E ) Th e I m m e d i a t e Z o n e e x t e n d s 0 - 5 ′ fr o m y o u r h o u s e . It ’ s t h e a r e a c l o s e s t t o y o u r ho u s e , i n c l u d i n g p l a n t s , d e c k s , ou t d o o r f u r n i t u r e , a n d t h e o u t s i d e w a l l s a n d c o v e r i n g s . Th i s a r e a i s m o s t v u l n e r a b l e , a n d s h o u l d b e m o s t a g g r e s s i v e l y ma i n t a i n e d f o r f i r e r e s i s t a n c e . -R e m o v e a n y c o m b u s t i b l e o u t d o o r f u r n i t u r e . -R e p l a c e j u t e o r f i b e r d o o r m a t s w i t h f i r e r e s i s t a n t m a t e r i a l s . -C l e a n a l l f a l l e n l e a v e s a n d n ee d l e s r e g u l a r l y . R e p e a t o f t e n du r i ng f i r e s e a s o n . -R e m o v e A L L f i r e - p r o n e p l a n t s , a n d c h o o s e o n l y f i r e - r e s i s t a n t va r i e t i e s . I r r i g a t e r e g u l a r l y . -R e m o v e t r e e l i m b s t h a t e x t e n d i n t o t h i s z o n e . F ir e - p r o n e t r e e s s h o u l d b e a g g r e s si v e l y p r u n e d o r i d e a l l y , r e m o v e d . -P r o v i d e a d e q u a t e s p a c in g b e t w e e n a l l p l a n t s . -D o n o t s t o r e f i r e w o o d , l u m b e r , o r c o m b u s t i b l e s h e r e , e v en (e s pe c i a l l y ) u n d e r d e c k s o r o v e r h a n g s . M o v e s t or e d c om b u s t i b l e s i n s i d e , o r a t l e a s t 3 0 ′ aw a y f r o m s t r u c t u r e s . -U s e o n l y f i r e r e s i s t a n t m u l c h e s . ‘ G o r i l l a H a i r ” o r si m i l a r s h r e d d e d b a r k s h o u l d b e r e m o v e d i n t h i s z o n e . Co m p o s t e d m u l c h a n d l a r g e b a rk a n d c h i p s m a y b e O K . ZO N E 1 ( I N T E R M E D I A T E ) Th e I n t e r m e d i a t e Z o n e f r o m 5 ′ to 3 0 ′ ou t f r o m b u i l d i n g s , s t r u c t u r e s , de c k s , e t c . - R e m o v e a l l d e a d p l a n t s , g r a ss , a n d w e e d s ( v e g e t a t i o n ) . - R e m o v e d e a d o r d r y l e a v e s an d p i n e n e e d l e s f r o m y o u r y a rd , r o o f a n d r a i n g u t t e r s . - T r i m t r e e s r e g u l a r l y t o k e e p b r a n c h e s a m i n i m u m o f 1 0 f e e t f r o m o t h e r t r e e s . - R e m o v e b r a n c h e s t h a t h a n g o v e r y o u r r o o f a n d k e ep de a d b r a n c he s 1 0 f e e t a w a y f r o m y o u r c h i m n e y . - R e l o c a t e w o o d p il e s i n t o Z o n e 2 . - R e m o v e o r p r u n e f l a m m a b l e p l a n ts a n d s h r u b s n e a r w i n d o w s . - R e m o v e v e g e t a t i o n a n d i t e m s t h a t c o u l d c a t c h f i r e f r o m a r o u n d a n d u n d e r d e c k s . - C r e a t e a d d i t i o n a l s e p a r a ti o n b e t w e e n t r e e s , s h r u bs a n d i t e m s t h a t c o u l d ca tc h f i r e , s u c h a s p a t i o f u r n i t ur e , w o o d p i l e s , s w i n g s e t s , e t c . ZO N E 2 ( E X T E N D E D ) Ex t e n d i n g f r o m 3 0 ′ to 1 0 0 ′ (o r m o r e , i f r e q u i r e d du e t o s t e e p s l o p e s , ne a r b y v e g e t a t i o n c o n d i t i o n s , a n d / or y o u r l o c a l f i r e d e p a r t m e n t ) , th i s z o n e s h o u l d i n cl u d e a t a m i n i m u m : - C u t o r m o w a n n u a l g r a s s d o w n t o a m a x i m u m h e i g h t o f 4 i n c h e s . - C r e a t e h o r i z o n t a l s p a c i n g b e t w e e n sh r u b s a n d t r e e s . ( S e e d i a g r a m ) - C r e a t e v e r t i c a l s p a c i n g b e t w e e n g r a s s, s h r u b s a n d t r e e s . ( S e e d i a g r a m ) - R e m o v e f a l l e n l e a v e s , n e e d l e s , t w i g s , b a r k , c o n e s , a n d s m a l l b r a n c h e s . Ho w e v e r , t h e y m a y b e p e r m i t t e d t o a d e p t h of 3 i n c h e s i f e r o s i o n c o n t r o l i s a n i s s u e . 3/4" = 1'-0"2 RETAINING WALL AT FRONT YARD •• • •• • • • • • • • ► - - - - - - - - , I I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - ~ - - - \ \ \ ~ I I / 1 ~ X ~~ J ~ + , I ·, ~ ~ ~ I ' . I ' / \ / I \ I r " . I \ ii t >; i ; ; , ~ · : - - 1 !1 '. , . I \ ,I ,,_ ' 1 - - £/ Y , ' I I \ \ ""· -', , ~~~ "' - \ " A ~ 1 / A • ~~ , L , , " ' ' ~ , - - - - - - \ ' - , •, . .. . . . . , _ _'. _ ~ - -, I \ - - , - - 7 I I I I I - - - - r - I =I I I I I _Ill : I I I 11 -, ' 'I,· -,,,-, L 1 -1 =Ill= 111-1 0 )E )E ► D W R E F . PA N T R Y DI N I N G R O O M GR E A T R O O M 2 C A R G A R A G E AC 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 1 A9 W. I . C . JR . S U I T E OF F I C E 4' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 2' - 8 3 / 4 " 3' - 2 1 / 2 " BA T H HA L F B A T H C L O S E T PA T I O # 1 PO R C H 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T UN D E R S T A I R S PA T I O # 2 ST O R A G E TA N K L E S S W H T R A S H E N C L O S U R E KI T C H E N 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G 1 0 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 9 1 / 4 " WO O D ST O V E F I R E P L A C E 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G FO Y E R 2 A9 2 ' - 0 " 2' - 0 " W2 W3 W2 D8 W6 D4 D7 W5 D5 D5D3 D3 D5 D9 D5 D3 D3 D1 D1 0 W9 W9 D2 D6 3' - 0 3 / 4 " 3' - 0 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 22 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 6 " 3 ' - 6 " 13 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1' - 6 " 4' - 6 1 / 2 " 1' - 6 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 3 ' - 3 " 2 ' - 9 " 0 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1' - 9 " 2' - 6 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 1' - 9 " 2' - 6 " 12 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 7' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 12 ' - 7 " 1' - 7 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 2 " 1 3 ' - 7 1 / 4 " 13 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 20 ' - 1 1 " 14 ' - 9 " 7' - 1 1 / 4 " 48 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 6' - 9 1 / 2 " 2' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 9 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 1 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 0 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 5' - 6 " 4' - 2 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 3 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 5 1 / 2 " 1 6 ' - 6 " 1 0 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 0 1 / 2 " 21 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 5 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 9 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 3 " 1 3 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4' - 1 " 4' - 1 " 4 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 0 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 6' - 1 1 / 4 " 3 ' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 6 " CR A W L S P A C E 3' - 0 " 5' - 2 " 0 ' - 6 " 0 ' - 1 1 " PO N Y W A L L 6 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 6 " 5 ' - 0 " D1 2W1 1 33 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 3 2 ' - 5 " 10 ' -0" C E I L I N G PR O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L PR O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L P R O P O S E D R E T A I N I N G W A L L WALL LEGEND 2" x 4" WALL (MEASURED 3 1/2")2" x 6" WALL (MEASURED 5 1/2")TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:08 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 FLOOR PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A3 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 1S T F L O O R Area Schedule Area N a m e 111 SF P A T I O # 2 496 SF G A R A G E 1513 SF 1 S T F L O O R L I V I N G A R E A 64 SF P O R C H 65 SF P A T I O # 1 Window Schedu le 1st Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t W i n d o w T y p e W2 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W3 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Casement W5 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W6 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W9 4 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 9 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W11 1 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 Door Schedule 1st Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t D o o r T y p e D1 1 6 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 6 " 1 G a r a g e D2 3 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 E n t r y D3 3 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 4 F l u s h S w i n g D4 2 ' - 4 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D5 2 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 4 F l u s h S w i n g D6 2 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D7 5 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g D8 1 0 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F o l d i n g D o o r D9 2 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D10 6 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 1 T r a s h E n c l o s u r e D12 2 ' - 8 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g G l a s s WINDOW NOTE: ALL WINDOWS TO BE TEMPERED WINDOWS 2Fixed . I ' • ' , . . '; 0 0 ~ oo v , , - - - I ( I / , , r - - - / V -, V I' - - ' I ' -C ~ c-~ c- ., ' ' I ' . V V V il ,, v V / L / ,. l ., ~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' . z . . I - - 1 - - I - - = - L _ ) • '. . II l . ' ' I • , '. ,, . ·- -- .. ~-v ,, , . . , , . , , L . , , , , . . , , L _ . , , / / / L / / L \: ' . I r - - .. \ l . ) 0 '. ' i I I L 1 • 1 11 II I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 \ . _ _ _ _ J - - - - - . 11 II II '/ 1 1 1 1 1 II 11 L ~ II ' " LI -I I - II J, , • C J ., l I • ' l g ~ "' . . l ' ii II II II II " ~ ' i, II II II II II II " I , ·1 V f' - : L . / / L L II I ii i II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I . ' q - ~ : , ] . · ~ - q ' i .. . . "/ _ L _ . . , ; _ . L _ / / / / / / / / _ £ _ / / / ii ! ! \ : !' :: :: DJ ~ :1 II I I II I II I I II jl 1 1 jl I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,1 1 , . ., I • ., . 0 - < 1 , " V t: V ' ., , . , , , , L L , • l' ~-= - - u -1 ' uz z - , , . / / ~ . / . . . , £ Q V V V V V V I' - I I I I I I I I J V V V V V V V V V V V V " V V V V V V V V V V V . ' I • -- o \ F , = / / / / L. . . . £ . . . / ' ,, / / . -~ - - ~ · c - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 · , . ,. r ' . V r _. f- 0 • I • 11 1 1 _, fU _ J v . ' V ' V , - V . '. V r- .. V V V " ' V A " . 0 / 0 ' ' ' 6 " L , u ,, , , , , , , _ . , L , . I • , . r V / V V , . V V L / / , / / . _. ' . . I ~ I ~ D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G 1 A9 BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T 2 A9 DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E 12 ' - 9 " 11 ' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 4' - 4 " 5' - 1 1 / 2 " 0' - 6 " 0' - 6 " 1' - 7 1 / 2 " 1' - 7 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 8' - 4 3 / 4 " 3' - 6 " 3' - 6 " 9' - 3 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 0 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 4' - 6 " 1 2 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 0 " 1 ' - 8 3 / 4 " D1 D1 0 W4 W4 W6 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 W7 W8 W9 D1 1 D1 1 W1 0 D1 W6 D5 D9 W1 3 D8 D5 0' - 5 1 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 6' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 7 ' - 0 " 1 6 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4 2 ' - 6 " 2 6 ' - 1 1 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1' - 9 1 / 4 " 1 ' - 0 " 7' - 8 1 / 2 " 20 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 13 ' - 7 " 8' - 6 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 50 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 1 0 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 2 0 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 6' - 9 3 / 4 " 14 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 3 / 4 " 7' - 5 1 / 2 " 19 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 6 3 / 4 " 1 2 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 4' - 3 1 / 2 " 2 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 10 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 1 0 " 2' - 8 1 / 2 " 7' - 3 1 / 2 " 0' - 7 3 / 4 " 2' - 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 1 0 1 / 4 " 6' - 3 1 / 2 " 1 ' - 9 1 / 4 " 0' - 4 1 / 2 " 6' - 5 1 / 2 " 13 ' - 3 1 / 2 " 7' - 7 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 6 ' - 1 3 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 5' - 1 " 2' - 3 " 1 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 2' - 0 " 13 ' - 5 1 / 4 " 2' - 0 " 14 ' - 9 " 4' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 5 1 / 4 " BA T H 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 6 " 3' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1 5 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 7 ' - 0 " HO R I Z O N T A L W O O D E N S L A T S . RE F E R T O D E T A I L 4 / A 5 9' - 5 1 / 2 " 11 ' - 0 1 / 4 " 2 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 " 9 ' - 6 " W1 2 W1 2 1 ' - 4 1 / 4 " 0 ' - 6 " 1 7 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 1 1 ' - 6 " 1 ' - 6 " W1 2 W1 2 1 ' - 8 " 1 1 ' - 3 3 / 4 " WALL LEGEND 2" x 4" WALL (MEASURED 3 1/2")2" x 6" WALL (MEASURED 5 1/2")TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:09 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 FLOOR PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A3.1 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R Door Schedule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t D o o r T y p e D1 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 F l u s h S w i n g D2 2 ' - 6 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D3 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g - C l o s e t D5 3 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 S l i d i n g S i n g l e P a n e l D6 2 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 4 F l u s h S w i n g D8 2 ' - 6 " 8 ' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 1 G l a s s D o o r D9 2 ' - 4 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 F l u s h S w i n g D10 5 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 1 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g D11 6 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 8 " 6 ' - 8 " 2 D o u b l e - S l i d i n g Area Schedule 2nd Floor Area N a m e 105 SF B A C K Y A R D P A T I O 173 SF 2 N D F L O O R D E C K 1530 SF 2 N D F L O O R L I V I N G A R E A Window Sche dule 2nd Floor Type Mark W i d t h H e i g h t H e a d Height C o u n t W i n d o w T y p e W4 2 ' - 0 " 6 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 2 Fixed W6 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 2 Slide W7 3 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W8 3 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Fixed W9 4 ' - 0 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide W10 4 ' - 6 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 F r o s t e d / P r i v a c y W12 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 4 C l e a r S t o r y W i n d o w W13 5 ' - 0 " 4 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 Slide Privacy on the bottom and clear on the top halfWINDOW NOTE: ALL WINDOWS TO BE TEMPERED WINDOWS 2 2 ~> • ,. '. ,. ' , 1 " ' .I . " ' 0 ?_ l , r : : : : , .- . / - . - . , , , - . - • • -_- 1 - - - - - , f J l • 0- - r r .. Q - 0 ~ '. '. Q 1 ~ ~ ·1 Q ' 1 - - ,, I / I , f J "- - ' c-- ; - i " " ~ ' - ,. r, r I . 0 I , r, I , I , ,. , . • • B r, I , 0 I / I/ r, " 7 [ 7 ' I I I :1 :1 :1 ' I I I I :1 :1 ! I I I I I : :1 ' - , I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I rh I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I '1 '1 '1 I I I I I I I ,, 'I I I I I 'I 'I ,, I I I !1 '1 I I I 'I I , l b I . , . I . I , " ~ I , r, ,. r , 0 ~ I I , I , , , I , ' . 0 ' 1 l I , , I . I , ,. ,. ,. ~ ' I I . I , I , I- ' ~ r I . I , • ' . , . , k ) r. . 'i s - r, I , L e , I ,~ - . , ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ J , . - ,. y ,, r, r. ~ ' r. . ~ ' ? 'I < " \, - la C? r I ) .. . , 6 I , ,, • r , r ; r ; • • Q I I I I I I I ,, ' ,, ' ' -· " -, f ; . / / r; - - 0 I , • ', • I , , . r ; " ~ I. • - - ' ~ f- 0 I , -' ' I - ,. V, ' I . I , I , I , I . I I . I , I , r, I . I , I , I , .~ I . r. I. f; . . ' n • . , .. / " I I I ~ ' - I . _., , _ 1 / I , 1/ . ' . . 0 " " " " '1 . I , ' I l D W UP MA S T E R B E D R O O M LO F T A R E A 9' -0" C E I L I N G 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 2 9' -0" C E I L I N G BE D R O O M # 3 BA T H BE C K Y A R D P A T I O LA U N D R Y W. I . C . GL A S S CABINETS SH E L V E S 9' -0" C E I L I N G CL O S E T CL O S E T DE C K 9' -0" C E I L I N G GA S FI R E P L A C E D1 D1 0 D3 D6 D6 D3 D6 D1 1 D1 1 D1 D5 D9 D8 D5 BA T H 8 ' - 3 " 9 ' - 2 1 /2 " 8 ' - 0 3 /4 " N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L 50 ' F R O M R E A R P L 3 0 ' F R O M F R O N T P L 2' - 0 " 3' - 3 1 / 2 " 9' - 8 3 / 4 " 10 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 1 3 ' - 1 1 3 /4 " 1 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 6 " 7 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 1 / 2 " 1 9 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 6 ' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 1 " 1 1 ' - 9 " 1 ' - 0 " LEGEND 2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM 1ST FLOOR TO 2ND FLOOR WALLS2' - 10"DIMENSION FROM WALLS TO PROPERTY LINE TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:11 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 2ND FLOOR OVERLAY TO 1ST FLOOR RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PZ PZ A3.2 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 2N D F L O O R O V E R L A Y T O 1 S T F L O O R I I I L I - - - - I - - / - - - - - - - - I - - - I - - - / -- - - -- - I I I (/ I I I I I : I u /l If ' I I I I I I I I I I I I ,_ - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. _IJ - • I - - - - - - - I - - - ' - -- -- - -- I , r , ,, - ,. : I , CJ 0 / - I - - - ' -- CJ I i r, -- Q I E ~ 1-.i : - [ I , I , I , I , '" L // 7'• ~ I . -- I , r , I • - - - - cs - - - " \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I - - -- \ - - - - \ ' - -, .. . . . G) r . r. r . r , r , , - - - - - - - - - 1 7 I I I I I I , L f ~ ] L ] r . I I I I ;; ] ! I =J . . . ,- - . - _ J □ - r . r , r , I , I , 8 / / / T T T / / ' / T T ; \ ~,. . r , . / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 '\ . ·_ - . :' .. _ , -· .- -~ \ .. . , .· - ~ ,~ · - - -~ - . : - ~ , : ~ - - . .. . 1i \ . ' . ~ - \I _, , - · - ~ - ,. ,. , 7 , , ,, . . ' cs T \ \ \ \ \ \ I I ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I - - - - - I - - - ' - -- / - -- - -- -- - - - -- -- -- - - - -- - ,/ - ,- . . , __ _ -- - \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ATTIC VENTILATION CALCULATIONS NOTES: 1.ALL OPENINGS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MIN. 1/16" AND MAX. 1/8" METAL MESH.VENTILATOR TYPE NET AREA QUANTITY AREA VENTILATED 98.75 SQ -IN 395 SQ -IN 395 SQ -INMODEL LOW PROFILE VENT O'HAGIN FLATAREA VENTILATED VENTILATION RATE REQUIRED AREA (AREA VENTILATED/300) x 144 = SQ.IN.1542 SQ.FT 300 TH 741 SQ.INVENTILATION REQUIRED VENTILATION PROVIDED VENT LOCATION TOTAL 790 SQ -INUPPER HALF LOWER HALF4 4 98.75 SQ -IN LOW PROFILE VENT O'HAGIN FLAT ST U C C O W A T E R R E S I S T A N T BA R R I E R S ( S ) L A P O V E R SC R E E D F L A N G E BO T T O M O F F L A N G E SE T B E L O W T O P O F FO U N D A T I O N A N D PL A T E L I N E SH E A T H I N G FR A M I N G M E M B E R 26 G A G E C O R R O S I O N R E S I S T A N T OR P L A S T I C W E E P S C R E E D M I N . A B O V E E A R T H M I N . F L A N G E 2" A B O V E P A V E D A R E A S 1. M E T A L R O O F B Y M E T A L R O O F I N G C A L I F O R N I A S T A N D I N G S E A M A S K G R E Y ( K Y N A R ) . ROOF PITCH 3:12. OVERHANG: 2'-6'2. S T O N E V E N E E R B Y C U L T U R E D S T O N E ( P R O - F I T M O D E R A L E D G E S T O N E I N T A G L I O ) . INSTALL STONE OVER 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER, METAL LATH, SCRATCH COAT AND MORTAR SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.3. S I N G L E C O A T S T U C C O ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A , P L Y W O O D S H E A T H I N G U N D E R T W O LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER.4. F A S C I A B O A R D ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).5. G A R A G E D O O R B Y C L O P A Y . D E S I G N R E C 1 4 C O L O N I A L L I F T H A N D L E S (COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4).6. E X T E R I O R W A L L L E D L I G H T I N G ( D A N B U R Y 6 " HIGH BLACK DUSK TO DAWN - S T Y L E # 5 Y 0 8 8 ) . WALL SCONE LIGHT. PLEASE REFER TO SP EC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.7. F R O N T D O O R B Y I W A N T T H A T D O O R . P R O D U C T I D : T H E B E S T S Q U A R E T O P SINGLE ENTRY IRON DOORS, COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4. 8. 1 0 0 S E R I E S W I N D O W S A N D S L I D I N G D O O R S B Y A N D E R S E N ( C O L O R B L A C K ) 9. W I N D O W , D O O R T R I M C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 . 10. A C S C R E E N I N G ( S T U C C O F I N I S H 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G B Y O M E G A ) 11. A C U N I T S H A L L B E L O C A T E D A N D S E C U RED TO A MINIMUM 3-INCH THICK SLAB OR APPROVED PLATFORM.12. G U T T E R ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).13. T H E A P P R O V E D A D D R E S S N U M B E R S S H A L L B E P L A I N L Y L E G I B L E A N D V I S I B L E F R O M THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A MINIMUM ½" WIDE STROKE. CFC 505, CRC R319 , FMCB.36.080 THE NUMBERS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT NIGHT. WHEN EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED THE FACE OF THE SIGN SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 5.0 FOOT CANDLES. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT ILLUMINATION. FMC 8.36.080.14. MODERN HANDRAIL 15. I P E S I D I N G B Y J A M E S H A R D I E C O L O R : P E G A S U S B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 1 .16. D O W N S P O U T ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 17. ROOF VENTS (COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).18. F L U E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 19. ELECTRICAL METER.20. WATER METER.21. G A S M E T E R . 22. INTERNET AND PHONE OUTLET.23. TANKLESS WATER HEATER.24. TRASH CAN ENCLOSURE STUCCO FINISH (9205 ICEBERG) BY OMEGA TO BE CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.25. H A R T F O R D L E D O U T D O R P E N D A N T B Y K U Z C O LIGHTING (PRODUCT ID: KUZP266178) PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET. 26. SOLAR PANEL.27. S O L A R I N V E R T O R . 28. BAND ACCROSS THE TOP BEFORE THE SOFFIT AND GARAGE ( COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).29. WOODEN HORIZONTAL SLATS (COLOR: JARRAH BROWN BY CABOT).30. M E T A L R A I L I N G - B L A C K P O W D E R C O A T . 31. C O N C R E T E R E T A I N I N G W A L L W I T H S T U C C O F I N I S H ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A T O B E CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.KEY NOTES 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 1 8 14 2 5 4 6 7 9 13 12 15 16 17 18 24 26 28 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 24 ' - 9 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " ON L Y A F T E R C L A R I F I C A T I O N W I T H A ST R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R A B O U T T H E CO N S T R U C T A B I L I T Y O F T H I S C O N N E C T I O N . EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 3 31 25 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1 3 4 6 8 9 12 16 17 18 24 28 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 30 CENTER TO CENTER POST SPACING HEIGHT POST BASE PLATE4' - 0"4' - 0"0' - 2 1/2"3' - 6"0' - 1"0' - 4"0' - 4"BLACK POWDER COATTDETANGENTDESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:14 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ELEVATIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A4 1" = 1 ' - 0 " 3 A_ W E E P S C R E E D 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 Fr o n t E l e v a t i o n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 Re a r E l e v a t i o n NTS 4 GUARDRAIL - - - - - - - - - - - t - - I I ,. V - - ' - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - j - - - - - - - ' ! < - - - ' I ' - - - - - - - - ~ ' , - - - - - - - - t - - - ' r l - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - t - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - t - t - - - - - - t - - - ~ ! - - - - - - - t - - - - - M - - t - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - / ~ - - - " .· □ . . = _ c j = = = = l . . ~ . -. -.· e .. ,. , . . . ' . .. •, ' . . :- •. - . - . ' . - .. ·; . - ·- ~. - . . ~ ,- .. ~ .. . . - . . ' •" - ~ - - - - - - 1 1 1 .. .. ~ '• .. •,-',~ t- - ;• : : ••, _;_:_ ' • r , , ; • • • ; ~ . - ' . : . . . - . . • , . . . . .. . . -· ·- ;; ; 0 ;: : ;: : . ~ ~ _ , - - - 'I " ~ I I : \ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - s I ' . I ' . I - - - ' ' , ~ I l ' ' I JJ ~ _. , . ; , .. . . _ . . . . .. . . _ •, . . . . . LJ ·• ~~ ·~ , . - . .. . . . . / . .. -. . . ' ' . . '· .. . .. ' ' . .. ., .. . • ' ·. . . . ·' . - .. , . ·- . ' .. . . . , · .. ,. . • ·- · . . ' • " .. .. . . . , . . . .. ' ' '• . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . -. . ' ' . . -· .. •, . .. • < < .. . . . ' , . . .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ~ • . .. .. ' . .. . ,i : . . .. ' . - .. . / ; -. . . . . . ._ . ' . . . . / . . _, _ ·. 1 1 _ ' / ' . . . . . -. . . . " . .. . . . -. .. -· •- =· / .. •. .- ' - - - . .. = / .. . . . ' . .- . = . _- _ · · a > .. . $ . / . .- .. - . , • .. -. . • . .. / •. ' , . -.· . . ' .- . . ' . .. . . . < .. . . •· .. .. / .. . .. .. ' = .. .. ·• .. - .. . . .. • .. - ~ ·. -.• = , .. - . - -• .. - - _· . .. - ·- •- . 1 : . . ·_ - . . . • . . . . -- . . -· .. -· _· .. I . : .. - . - . _- . . . , I .' 1 - 1 . ·-i ---1 I -I _:_ _ - -I I I . . -I I . I I· .- ,- . . - ,- . -. - , . _, - - , .; ~ . . - . . - · , . . . .. _ _:._ , ·- -1 • ' : I I 1· _ 1 _ J J · 1 I I l l l ' ' ' I l l , , · I I I l l ' ' , I l l I l l 11 1 ~ 1 1 1 Il l II Il l II Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l I l l I l l Il l Il l Il l Il l 11 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ - 11 ~ - 111 f +1 l 1 ~ ~ l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ I T l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l ~ l l l ~ l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ l l l ~ I I I ! =1 I 1= I 1= 1 I 1= I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1 = 1 1 1 - - : : :- : : :- : I -1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I =1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 I 1= 1 11 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 11 II 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 11 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 11 1 I i ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i ' 1 1 1 1 1 II I II 111 Ii ' 111 I II I 11 i' 111 I II 111 Ii ' 111 I II 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 Ii ' 111 I II 111 Ii ' -1 1 1 111 -1 1 1 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 i' 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 I I l- 1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 I i-1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 11 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 i' 1 1 -1 1 1 111 -1 1 i' - - -3 1 1 = 1 E l 11 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 c u 1 = 1 1 E l 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 c u 1 = 1 1 E l 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 EU l = l l E l 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 IE U l = f - - - - - - + - - ~ I nl 7r 1 1 m 7 1 wr r r r t i 1 1 n r 1 nl Wfi r 1 1 m W f f i 1 wr r r r t i l lf f i W - 1 nl Wfi r 1 nW f f i l wr r r r y i 1 1 f i r 1 nl Wfi r 1 1 m W f f i 1 wr r r r t i l 1f i r 1 nl T 11 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I - 1 I 1 - 1 I - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1 - 1 I 1- - - ~ I - ~ - -\ ~ , ( ~ I, I, ' I '1 '1 I' I I I I I I I ' : ' • ·_ 4 ·s : - . ·: • • _. , _ C _ 4 " - - - . . . _ I ' \ ~i --' I ' . . . . . _ .< I · . . . . - ~ :} : i , 11 I I ~ -; -~ 111 11 ~ ,~ I I 1 11 11 1i ' 11 11 i ' 11 11 i ' 1 11 I I I I ,. I I I 1. M E T A L R O O F B Y M E T A L R O O F I N G C A L I F O R N I A S T A N D I N G S E A M A S K G R E Y ( K Y N A R ) . ROOF PITCH 3:12. OVERHANG: 2'-6'2. S T O N E V E N E E R B Y C U L T U R E D S T O N E ( P R O - F I T M O D E R A L E D G E S T O N E I N T A G L I O ) . INSTALL STONE OVER 2 LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER, METAL LATH, SCRATCH COAT AND MORTAR SEE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION.3. S I N G L E C O A T S T U C C O ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A , P L Y W O O D S H E A T H I N G U N D E R T W O LAYERS OF GRADE D PAPER.4. F A S C I A B O A R D ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).5. G A R A G E D O O R B Y C L O P A Y . D E S I G N R E C 1 4 C O L O N I A L L I F T H A N D L E S (COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4).6. E X T E R I O R W A L L L E D L I G H T I N G ( D A N B U R Y 6 " HIGH BLACK DUSK TO DA WN - S T Y L E # 5 Y 0 8 8 ) . WALL SCONE LIGHT. PLEASE REFER TO SP EC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET.7. F R O N T D O O R B Y I W A N T T H A T D O O R . P R O D U C T I D : T H E B E S T S Q U A R E T O P SINGLE ENTRY IRON DOORS, COLOR: STEPPING STONE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID:PPG1010-4. 8. 1 0 0 S E R I E S W I N D O W S A N D S L I D I N G D O O R S B Y A N D E R S E N ( C O L O R B L A C K ) 9. W I N D O W , D O O R T R I M C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 . 10. A C S C R E E N I N G ( S T U C C O F I N I S H 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G B Y O M E G A ) 11. A C U N I T S H A L L B E L O C A T E D A N D S E C U RED TO A MINIMUM 3-INCH THICK SLAB OR APPROVED PLATFORM.12. G U T T E R ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 13. T H E A P P R O V E D A D D R E S S N U M B E R S S H A L L B E P L A I N L Y L E G I B L E A N D V I S I B L E F R O M THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4" HIGH WITH A MINIMUM ½" WIDE STROKE. CFC 505, CRC R319 , FMCB.36.080 THE NUMBERS SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT NIGHT. WHEN EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED THE FACE OF THE SIGN SHALL BE AT A MINI MUM OF 5.0 FOOT CANDLES. INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS SHALL PROVIDE EQUIVALENT ILLUMINATION. FMC 8.36.080.14. MODERN HANDRAIL 15. I P E S I D I N G B Y J A M E S H A R D I E C O L O R : P E G A S U S B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 1 .16. D O W N S P O U T ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 17. ROOF VENTS (COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).18. F L U E ( C O L O R : U P I N S M O K E B Y P P G , P R O D U C T I D : P P G 1 0 1 0 - 6 ) . 19. ELECTRICAL METER.20. WATER METER.21. G A S M E T E R . 22. INTERNET AND PHONE OUTLET.23. TANKLESS WATER HEATER.24. TRASH CAN ENCLOSURE STUCCO FINISH (9205 ICEBERG) BY OMEGA TO BE CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.25. H A R T F O R D L E D O U T D O R P E N D A N T B Y K U Z C O LIGHTING (PRODUCT ID: KUZP266178) PLEASE REFER TO SPEC. SHEET ATTACHED TO SUBMISSION SET. 26. SOLAR PANEL.27. S O L A R I N V E R T O R . 28. BAND ACCROSS THE TOP BEFORE THE SOFFIT AND GARAGE ( COLOR: UP IN SMOKE BY PPG, PRODUCT ID: PPG1010-6).29. WOODEN HORIZONTAL SLATS (COLOR: JARRAH BROWN BY CABOT).30. M E T A L R A I L I N G - B L A C K P O W D E R C O A T . 31. C O N C R E T E R E T A I N I N G W A L L W I T H S T U C C O F I N I S H ( 9 2 0 5 I C E B E R G ) B Y O M E G A T O B E CONSISTENT WITH HOUSE STRUCTURE.KEY NOTES 0' - 3 1/2"4' - 0"4' - 0"TOP VIEWHOUSE STRUCTURE 3' PONY WALL WRAPPING UNIT HOUSE STRUCTURE3' - 8 1/2"0' - 3 1/2"AC AC2X4 3' PONY W/STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH THE HOUSESIDE VIEW 0' - 1 1/2"3' - 0"0' - 5 1/2"2x6 CAP4' - 0"3' - 1 1/2"0' - 4"CONCRETE PAD 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 3 1 4 8 2 6 9 12 17 18 28 13 16 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E 29 EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 31 25 1S T F L O O R 0' - 0" RO O F 20 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 1S T F L O O R T . O . P . 10 ' - 0" 2N D F L O O R 11 ' - 2 3 / 4 " PO R C H 11 ' - 0" 1 8 14 3 2 4 6 9 12 13 10 16 17 18 24 23 26 28 19 22 21 20 27 MA X H E I G H T 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 22 ' - 9 3 / 4 " 23 ' - 4 3 / 4 " 24 ' - 9 " EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E EX I S T . G R A D E -0' - 11 1 / 4 " 2 4 ' - 4 " 30 M I N . 6 ' - 0 " 31 TYP.0' - 7"DECKINGSUPPORT BLOCK2X6 TOP FRAME 2X6 BOTTOM FRAMEBEAM ABOVE 2X6 WOODEN SLAT SET INTO VERTICAL FRAME PRESSURE -TREATED TIMBER.EXTERIOR PATIO MIN.0' - 4"0' - 2"0' - 2"0' - 2"4 5 °TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:18 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ELEVATIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A51/2" = 1'-0"3 A- A C S c r e e n D e t a i l 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 Le f t E l e v a t i o n 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 Ri g h t E l e v a t o n 1" = 1'-0"4 A - W O O D E N S L A T S S E C T I O N - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I -' '- I " ' . - - - - - + - ~ - - - - + - - 0 - - + - - - - - - - + - - I . - . . - . . - '. ' ~ '_ • . + - - + - - 1 - - - - + - - - - - ~ -- = - - - - ~ - j - - - - - " " ~ . ,, I I I ' .~~ I I V I I Iv I I ~-~I ~---------_J I ~ - - - - - - - --- _ Jj ·,, ' " x•.+----- - - - -= - - - - - l~I I I ~ ~:1 I l~I ~ I I 1 A9 R O O F V E N T S FL U E S O L A R P A N E L S S T O R Y P O L E # 1 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 1 S T O R Y P O L E #3 S T O R Y P O L E #4 S T O R Y P O L E #5 S T O R Y P O L E #6 S T O R Y P O L E #7 S T O R Y P O L E #1 6 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 2 S T O R Y P O L E #1 5 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 0 S T O R Y P O L E # 9 5 0 ' F R O M R E A R P L 3 0 ' F R OM F R ON T P L S T O R Y P O L E # 1 0 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 4 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 3 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 8 S T O R Y P O L E # 1 9 2 A9 8' - 0 " 8 ' - 0 "S T O R Y P O L E #8 S T O R Y P O L E #1 7 S T O R Y P O L E # 2 1 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 2 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 3 " / 1 2 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 "2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 6 "3 ' - 6 " S T O R Y P O L E # 2 2 1 3 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 1 2 ' - 6 1 / 2 " 7 ' - 8 3 / 4 " 2 7 ' - 1 1 /2 "2 ' - 0 " 3 5 ' - 7 3 / 4 " 1 4 ' - 9 " 7 ' - 8 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 3 " 5 ' - 8 1 / 4 " 5 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 0 3 / 4 " 8 ' - 6 " 1 0 ' - 9 3 /4 "4 ' - 1 0 1 /2 "5 ' - 4 "2 1 ' - 7 1 /2 "1 7 ' - 0 "8 ' - 6 1 /2 " 4 ' - 6 " 1 8 ' - 1 " 2 0 ' - 2 " 1 1 ' - 9 " 2 ' - 6 " 3 " / 1 2 " 2 2 2 2 2 2 ST O R Y P O L E L E G E N D ST O R E Y P O L E BA S E E L E V A T I O N EX I S T I N G G R A D E FI N I S H E D F L O O R (F F ) E L E V A T I O N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 7 . 2 5 ' 12 8 ' 10 13 8 . 7 3 ' 13 6 . 9 6 13 2 . 8 3 ' 13 2 . 0 0 ' 12 6 . 8 8 ' 12 6 . 9 0 ' 12 7 . 1 6 ' 12 6 . 8 1 ' 12 7 . 3 9 ' 11 13 0 . 4 1 ' 12 8 ' 12 12 7 . 1 8 ' 12 8 ' 13 12 7 . 2 5 ' 14 12 7 . 0 4 ' 15 12 7 . 9 5 ' 12 8 ' 16 12 7 . 4 3 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' 12 8 ' TO 1 S T F L O O R CE I L I N G H E I G H T 10 . 7 5 ' -0. 7 3 ' 1. 0 4 ' 5. 1 7 ' 6. 0 0 ' 11 . 1 2 ' 11 . 1 ' 10 . 8 4 ' 11 . 1 9 ' 10 . 6 1 ' 10 . 6 5 ' 10 . 8 3 ' 10 . 7 5 ' 10 . 9 6 ' 10 . 0 5 ' ST O R Y P O L E HE I G H T 20 . 9 ' 9. 4 2 ' 11 . 1 9 ' 15 . 3 2 ' 16 . 1 5 21 . 2 7 ' 21 . 2 5 ' 20 . 9 9 ' 21 . 3 4 20 . 7 6 ' 20 . 4 0 ' 23 . 3 0 ' 24 . 1 5 ' 24 . 3 6 ' 22 . 0 3 ' 10 . 2 9 ' RO O F E L E V A T I O N 14 8 . 1 5 ' 15 0 . 8 1 ' 15 0 . 4 8 ' 14 9 . 9 8 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 14 8 . 1 5 ' 15 1 . 4 0 ' 15 1 . 4 0 ' TO 2 N D F I N I S H E D FL O O R ( F F ) H E I G H T 11 . 9 8 ' 0. 5 ' 2. 2 7 ' 6. 4 ' 7. 2 3 ' 12 . 3 5 ' 12 . 3 3 ' 12 . 0 7 ' 12 . 4 2 ' 11 . 8 4 ' 11 . 8 8 ' 12 . 0 6 ' 11 . 9 8 ' 12 . 1 9 ' 11 . 2 8 ' 17 12 7 . 1 4 ' 12 8 ' 10 . 5 8 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' 18 12 7 . 2 9 ' 12 8 ' 10 . 4 3 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' 19 12 7 . 1 0 ' 12 8 ' NA 10 . 6 2 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' NA 20 12 7 . 3 3 ' 12 8 ' NA 11 . 9 6 ' 13 9 . 2 9 ' NA 21 12 6 . 9 1 ' 12 8 ' NA 10 . 8 1 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' NA 22 13 5 . 6 6 ' 12 8 ' NA 2. 0 6 ' 13 7 . 7 2 ' NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PL E A S E N O T E , A L L S T O R Y P O L E W E R E U P D A T E D . 22 S T O R Y P O L E H E I G H T 2 0 . 0 8 ' . EG : 1 2 7 . 8 7 ' FF E L E V A T I O N : 1 2 8 ' 1S T F L O O R C E I L I N G EL E V A T I O N : 1 3 8 ' RO O F E L E V A T I O N : 1 4 7 . 9 5 ' H E I G H T T O 1 S T F L O O R C E I L I N G 1 0 . 1 3 ' . ST O R Y P O L E # 1 2N D F I N I S H E D F L O O R EL E V A T I O N : 1 3 9 . 2 3 ' 2 N D F I N I S H E D F L O O R H E I G H T 1 1 . 3 6 ' . TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:19 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 ROOF PLAN/STORY POLE RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PZ PK A6 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 RO O F / S T O R Y P O L E P L A N NT S 2 C_ S T O R Y P O L E E X A M P L E I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - \ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - \ 0 " - - 0 - j \\ \ \ \ l \ \ 1 1 1 1 \\ l l l l l l \ \ 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ----?\\11 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ -----\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------, \ \ \ UP PARKING NATIVE BRUSH TO BE TRIMMED AND CLEAN OUT OVERGROWTHDRIVEWAY IN D I A N H A W T H O R N 3 - 6 F T FU L L S U N , PA R T I A L S U N LO W , AV E R A G E W O R K S WE L L T O FO R M A HE D G E 3 - 6 F T AN Y S O I L B U T PR E F E R S MO I S T W E L L - DR A I N I N G S O I L RH A P H I O L E P I S IN D I C A LO W 0. 2 - 0. 3 PE N N I S E T U M AL O P E C U R O I D E S 'H A M E L N ' DW A R F H A M E L N FO U N T A I N G R A S S 2 - 3 F T 2 - 4 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L LO W SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N E D S O I L 36 " - 48 " L 0. 2 - 0. 3 PI T T O S P O R U M WH E E L E R ' S D W A R F PI T T O S P O R U M 3 - 3 1 / 2 F T 3 - 4 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L MO D E R A T E AV E R A G E - MO I S T / W E L L - DR A I N E D 3 F T A P A R T 1 - 1/ 2 F O R HE D G E M 0. 4 - 0. 6 'H I D C O T E ' L A V E N D E R 1 - 3 F T FU L L S U N LO W CH A L K , L O A M , SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N I N G LA V A N D U L A AN G U S T I F O L I A 36 " 1 - 3 F T L 0. 2 - 0. 3 CO M M O N N A M E SC I E N T I F I C NA M E HE I G H T WI D T H MI N I M U M P L A N T I N G DI S T A N C E S / S O I L C O N D . WA T E R NE E D S WU C O L S PL A N T F A C T O R QU A N T I T Y 2 7 3 6 8 CO R T A D E R I A SE L L O A N A ' P U M I L A ' 4 - 6 F T 3 - 4 F T FU L L S U N MO D E R A T E SA N D , W E L L - DR A I N E D S O I L 36 " - 48 " M 0. 4 - 0. 6 EX I S T I N G T R E E S LA N D S C A P E A R E A 3 5 9 0 S Q F T LA N D S C A P I N G T Y P E A SH R E D D E D C E D A R B CO B B L E S T O N E C NA T I V E B R U S H & T R E E S 3 ' P L A N T E R 8 -10 F T 6 -8 F T MO D E R A T E 5 M 0. 4 - 0. 6 1. " I N C O R P O R A T E C O M P O S T A T A R A T E O F A T L E A S T F O U R C U B I C Y A R D S P E R 1 0 0 0 S Q U A R E FE E T T O A D E P T H O F S I X I N C H E S I N T O T H E L A N D S C A P E A R E A E X C E P T W I T H I N T H E D R I P L I N E OF P R O T E C T E D T R E E S ( U N L E S S C O N T R A -IN D I C A T E D B Y A S O I L S T E S T ) . " 2. " A M I N I M I U M T H R E E I N C H L A Y E R O F M U LC H S H A L L B E A P P L I E D O N A L L E X P O S E D SU R F A C E S O F P L A N T I N G A R E A S E X C E P T I N T U R F A R E A S , C R E E P I N G O R R O O T I N G GR O U N D C O V E R S , O R D I R E C T S E E D I N G A P P L I C A T I O N S W H E R E M U L C H I S C O N T R A I N D I C A T E D . " 3. " C L E A R O U T D E A D B R U S H A N D W E E D S F R O M T H E N A T I V E B R U S H A R E A S " LA N D S C A P E N O T E S : P R O P O S E D B U I L D I N G P A T I O P O R C H G A R A G E P A T I O AC T R A S H E N C L O S U R E C B A SW E E T O S M A N T H U S OS M A N T H U S FR A G R A N S P A T I O NA T I V E B R U S H TO B E T R I M M E D AN D C L E A N O U T O V E R G R O W T H D GR A S S D 7 ' - 1 0 " ST R E L I T Z I A RE G I N A E BI R D O F P A R A D I S E 3 - 5 F T 3 - 5 F T FU L L S U N - PA R T I A L MO D E R A T E AV E R A G E - MO I S T / W E L L - DR A I N E D 3 F T A P A R T 1 - 1/ 2 F O R HE D G E M 0. 4 - 0. 6 3 3 ' - 0 " EXISTING FENCE (5' HEIGHT)EE E JA S M I N E PROVIDE 6FT TALL TRELLIS THE ENTIRE LENGHT OF THE STAIRS TOP TO BOTTOM.MAX. 3' CONCRETE RETAINING WALLGUARDRAIL REFER TO DETAIL 4/S4 SU N EX P O S U R E PA M P A S G R A S S FU L L S U N , PA R T I A L S U N PR O V I D E EN R I C H E D , M O I S T , WE L L -DR A I N E D SO I L . C3" ROUND OR SQUARE STEEL POST WITH POST CAP, TYP.3" THICK GREENSCREEN #5104 CHANNEL TRIM OR #5105 STEEL EDGE TRIM, RECOMMENDED AT THE TOP EDGE OF PANEL, TYP.3" THINK GREENSCREEN PANEL, TYP.#5133X SNAP CLIPS WITH STEEL SCREW, TYP.#5133X SNAP CLIPS WITH STAINLESS STAINLESS STEEL SCREW, TYP.#5131 FLEX "C" RINGS AT PANEL TO PANEL SEAM AT 12" O.C.#5105 STEEL EDGE TRIM OPTIONAL AT THE BOTTOM EDGE OF PANEL FINISH GRADE POST EMBED DEPTH AND FOOTING SIZE SHOULD BE VERIFIED BASED ON OVERALL HEIGHT, WIND LOAD AND SOIL CONDITIONS. SITE SPECIFIC ENGINEERING MAY BE REQUIRED.VERIFY V.I.F.APPROX. 6 INCH.MAX. HEIGHT 6' - 0"(WHEN USING 3" POSTS)POST TO POST CENTERS = PANEL LENGHT + 4", TYP.POST TO POST CLEAR =PANEL LENGHT + 1", TYP.HORIZONTAL PANEL 96" MAX IN 2" INCREMENTS PANEL HEIGHT UP TO 48" IN 2" INCREMENTSPANEL HEIGHT UP TO 48" IN 2" INCREMENTSCLCLPLAN VIEW TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:51 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 LANDSCAPEPLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PK A7 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N NTS 2 TRELLIS I 1 1 = I 1 1 0 0 f l ~ () r - -- - - ' I I I I I I I I I I I - - . ;, , , i l ) l ;; . \ s . _ ~ •. . · · . ; ; I ,t / • i , ··•. •·• Y$.f '~ ... ~ - · . ~ - :'\ 1 . ! - r . . ; - . •· \ , S. E , r : • ·. : . 1 · . • . ·. . - - - '. \ ' .' \ \ -, - o' \ l g ' oo ~ -") f _ - - -· · - - , ;: c . . - , -_, -,,,-, i ~ - - " - ' .. . _ :- ,:: ' _, ,l ! ,- . - \, ; 1 /. ' - '. '! : } ~ /. \1 ·1--,--. \ L -:~ •-__ _.__ --...: ---r◊OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~ 00000001 I A G R E E T O C O M P L Y W I T H T H E R E Q U I R E M E N T S O F T H E P R E S C R I P T I V E CO M P L I A N C E O P T I O N T O T H E M W E L O . FE B 2 1 , 2 0 2 0 PR E S S U R E R E G U L A T O R S S H A L L B E I N S T A L L E D O N T H E I R R I G A T I O N SY S T E M T O E N S U R E T H E D Y N A M I C PR E S S U R E O F T H E S Y S T E M I S W I T H I N T H E M A N U F A T U R E R S R E C O M M E N D E D P R E S S U R E R A N G E . MA N U A L S H U T -OF F V A L V E S ( S U C H A S A G A T E V A L V E , B A L L V A L V E , OR B U T T E R F L Y V A L V E ) S H A L L B E IN S T A L L E D A S C L O S E A S P O S S I B L E TO T H E P O I N T O F C O N N E C T I O N O F T H E W A T E R S U P P L Y . "U N L E S S C O N T R A D I C T E D B Y A S O I L S T E S T , C O M P O S T A T A R A T E O F A MI N I M U M O F F O U R C U B I C Y A R D S P E R 1 0 0 0 S Q U A R E F E E T O F PE R M E A B L E A R E A S H A L L B E I N C O RP O R A T E D T O A D E P T H O F S I X IN C H E S I N T O T H E S O I L E X C E P T W I T H I N T H E T P Z O F P R O T E C T E D TR E E S , W H I C H S H A L L R E C I E V E 4 -6" O F H A R D W O O D C H I P M U L C H . " "A T T H E T I M E O F F I N A L I N S P E C T I O N , T H E P E R M I T A P P L I C A N T S H A L L PR O V I D E T H E O W N E R O F T H E P R O P E R T Y W I T H A C E R T I F I C A T E O F CO M P L E T I O N , C E R T I F I C A T E O F I N S T A L L A T I O N , I R R I G A T I O N S C H E D U L E " IR R I G A T I O N N O T E S 1- 2 5 - 1 0 XA C Z - 0 7 5 - P R F O p t i o n 1. D W G N. T . S . D XA C Z - 0 7 5 - P R F 3 / 4 " L O W F L O W CO N T R O L Z O N E K I T OP T I O N 1 12 3 4 10 1189567 6- I N MI N . IN S T A L L M I N 6 " AB O V E H I G H E S T P O I N T OF D I S C H A R G E 1. 3 0 -IN C H L I N E A R L E N G T H O F W I R E , C O I L D E D 2. W A T E R P R O O F C O N N E C T I O N : RA I N B I R D D B S E R I E S ( 1 O F 2 ) 4. L O W F L O W A N T I -SI P H O N V A L V E : RA I N B I R D A S V - LF - 07 5 V A L V E (I N C L U D E D I N X A C Z -07 5 -PR F = K I T ) 8. U V R A D I A T I O N R E S I S T A N T P V C S C H 4 0 P I P E ( 1 O F 2 ) 9. F I N I S H G R A D E / T O P O F M U L C H 11 . P V C L A T E R A L P I P E ( 1 O F 2 ) 3. I D T A G 5. P R E S S U R E R E G U L A T I N G F I L T E R : RA I N B I R D P R F -07 5 -RB Y 6. P V C S C H 8 0 U N I O N 7. P V C S C H 4 0 M A L E A D A P T E R 10 . P V C S C H 4 0 E L L ( 1 O F 2 ) IR R I G A T I O N L E G E N D LI N E VA L V E # SI Z E TY P E 1 -2 1/ 2 " DR I P S Y S T E M MA N U F A C T U R E R PR O D U C T M O D E L & I D RA I N B I R D ST A R T K T C S A5 0 8 5 3 CO N T R O L L E R M O D E L & I D ST 8 O -WI F I MA N U A L S H U T -OF F V A L V E MO D E L & I D T -60 0 20 3 5 8 1 0 4 1 B0 1 L Y K Z O L 0 PR E S S U R E R E G U L A T O R S MO D E L & I D #7 1 0 1 #2 0 3 7 1 6 4 1 4 RA I N S E N S O R M O D E L & I D A6 1 2 0 0 PA R K I N G NA T I V E B R U S H TO B E T R I M M E D AN D C L E A N O U T O V E R G R O W T H DR I V E W A Y LA N D S C A P E A R E A 1 3 9 0 S Q F T 3 ' P L A N T E R 3 V A L V E S P E R D E T A I L IR R I G A T I O N C O N T R O L L E R 1 I N C H P V C W A T E R SO U R C E F O R I R R I G A T I O N W/ 1 -IN C H S H U T -OF F V A L V E EX I S T I N G F E N C E (5 ' H E I G H T ) NA T I V E B R U S H TO B E T R I M M E D AN D C L E A N O U T O V E R G R O W T H MA X . 3 ' C O N C R E T E RE T A I N I N G W A L L TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:35:54 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 IRRIGATIONPLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 Designer Author A8 N ER O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T A T I O N C O N T R O L N O T E S : 3/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 4 1- 3 / 4 L O W F L O W C O N T R O L Z O N E K I T 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N ER O S I O N C O N T R O L B M P s BM P GENEREAL DISCRIPTION SC H E D U L I N G A PLAN THE PROJECT AND DEVELOP A SCHEDULE SHOWING EACH PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO REDUCE EROSION POTENTIAL, SUCH AS SCHEDULING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES DURING THE SUMMER AND PHASING PROJECTS TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF AREA DISTURBED. CASQA: EC-1; OR CALTRANS: SS-1 PR E S E R V E E X I S T I N G VE G E T A T I O N A N D C R E E K SE T B A C K S B PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION TO THE EX TENT POSSIBLE, ESPE CIALLY ALONG CREEK BUFFERS. SHOW CREEK BUFFERS ON MAPS AND IDENTIFY AREAS TO BE PRESERVED IN THE FIELD WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. CHECK WITH THE LOCAL PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS FOR SPECIFIC CREEK SET BACK REQUIREMENTS.CASQA: EC-2; OR CALTRANS: SS-2. SO I L C O V E R C O V E R C ALL EXPOSED SOIL WITH STRAW MULCH AND TACK IFIER (OR EQUIVALENT). CASQA: EC-3, EC-5, EC-6, EC-7, EC-8, EC-14, AND EC-16. CALT RANS: SS-2, SS-4, SS-5, SS-6, SS-7, SS-8. SO I L P R E P A R A T I O N / RO U G H E N I N G D SOIL PREPARATION IS ESSENTIAL TO VEGETATI ON ESTABLISHMENT AND BMP INSTALLATION. IT INCLUDES SOIL TESTING AND AMENDMENTS TO PROMOTE VEGETATION GROWTH AS WELL AS ROUGHENING SURFACE SOILS BY MECHANICAL METHODS (DECOMPACTING, SCARIFYING, STAIR STEPPING, ETC.).CASQA: EC-15. ER O S I O N C O N T R O L B L A N K E T S E INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS (OR EQUIVALENT) ON ANY DISTURBED SITE WITH 3:1 SLOPES OR STEEPER, KEYED INTO THE GROUND AT LEAST 3 INCHES. USE WILDLIFE-FRIENDLY BLANKETS MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE NATURAL MATERIALS. AVOID USING BLANKETS MADE WITH PLASTIC NETTING OR FIXED APERTURE NETTING. RE V E G E T A T I O N F RE-VEGETATE AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL ORVEGE TATION AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. CASQA: EC-4. CALTRANS: SS-4. SE D I M E N T C O N T R O L B M P s TR A C K I N G C O N T R O L S G STABILIZE SITE ENTRANCE TO PREVENT TRACKING SOIL OFFSITE. INSPECT STREETS DAILY AND SWEEP STREET AS NEEDED. REQUIRE VE HICLES AND WORKERS TO USE STABILIZED ENTRANCE. PLACE CRUSHED ROCK 12-INCHES DEEP OVER A GEOTEXTILE, USING ANGULAR ROCK BETWEEN 4 AND 6-IN. MAKE THE ENTRAN CE AS LONG AS CAN BE ACCOMMODATED ON THE SITE, IDEALLY LONG ENOUGH FOR 2 REVOLUTI ONS OF THE MAXIMUM TIRE SIZE (16-20 FEET LONG FOR MOST LIGHT TRUCKS). MAKE THE ENTRANCE WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE LARGEST VEHICLE THAT WILL ACCESS THE SITE, IDEALLY 10 FEET WIDE WITH SUFFICIENT RADII FOR TURNING IN AND OUT OF THE SITE. RUMBLE PADS OR RUMBLE RACKS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH ROCK ENTRANCES. WHEEL WASHES MAY BE NEEDED WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED OR WHERE THE SITE ENTRANCE AND SWEEPING IS NOT EFFECTIVE. CASQA: TC-1; TC-3; OR CALTRANS: TC-1; TC-3. FI B E R R O L L S H USE FIBER ROLLS AS A PERIMETER CONTROL MEASURE, ALONG CONTOURS OF SLOPES, AND AROUND SOIL STOCKPILES. ON SLOPES SPACE RO LLS 10 TO 20 FEET APART (USING CLOSER SPACING ON STEEPER SLOPES). INSTALL PARALLEL TO CONTOUR. IF MORE THAN ONE ROLL IS USED IN A ROW OVERLAP ROLL DO NOT ABUT. J-HOOK END OF ROLL UPSLOPE. INSTALL ROLLS PER EITHER TYPE 1 (STAKE ROLLS INTO SMALL TRENCHES) OR TYPE 2 (STAKE IN FRONT AND BEHIND ROLL AND LASH WITH ROPE). USE WILDLIFE-FRIENDLY FIBER ROLLS MADE OF BIODEGRADABLE NATURAL MATERIALS. AVOID USING FIBER ROLLS MADE WITH PLASTIC NETTING OR FIXED APERTURE NETTING. SEE: HTTP://WWW.COASTAL.CA.GOV/NPS/WILDLIFE-FRIENDLY_PRODUCTS.PDF. MANUFACTURED LINEAR SEDIMENT CONTROL OR COMPOST SOCKS CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF FIBER ROLLS. CASQA: SE-5 (TYPE 1); SE-12, SE-1 3; OR CALTRANS: SC-5 (TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2). SI L T F E N C E I USE SILT FENCE AS A PERIMETER CONTROL MEASURE, AND AROUND SOIL STOCKPILES. INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG CONTOURS. KEY SILT FENCE INTO THE SOIL AND STAKE. DO NOT USE SILT FENCE FOR CONCENTRATED WATER FLOWS. INSTALL FENCE AT LEAST 3 FEET BACK FROM THE SLOPE TO ALLOW FOR SEDIMENT STORAGE. WIRE BACKED FENCE CAN BE USED FOR EXTRA STRENGTH. AVOID INSTALLING SILT FENCE ON SLOPES BECAUSE THEY ARE HARD TO MAINTAIN. MANUFACTURED LINEAR SEDIMENT CONTROL CAN BE USED IN LIEU OF SILT FENCES. CASQA: SE-1; SE-12; OR CALTRANS: SC-1. DR A I N I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N J USE GRAVEL BAGS, (OR SIMILAR PRODUCT) AROUND DRAIN INLETS LOCATED BOTH ONSITE AND IN GUTTER AS A LAST LINE OF DEFENSE. BAGS SHOULD BE MADE OF A WOVEN FABRIC RESISTANT TO PHOTO-DEGRADATION FILLED WITH 0.5-1-IN WASHED CRUSHED ROCK. DO NOT USE SAND BAGS OR SILT FENCE FABRIC FOR DRAIN INLET PROTECTION. CASQA: SE-10; OR. CALTRANS: SC-10. TR E N C H D E W A T E R I N G K FOLLOW MCSTOPPP BMPS FOR TRENCH DEWATERING.HTTP://WWW.MARINCOUNTY.ORG/DEPTS/PW/DIVISIONS/MCSTOPPP/DEVELOPMENT/~/MEDIA/FILES/DEPARTMENTS/PW/MCSTOPPP/DEVELOPMENT/TRENCHINGSWREQMCSTOPPPFI NA L6_09.PDF. CASQA: NS-2. CALTRANS: NS-2. GO O D H O U S E K E E P I N G B M P s CO N C R E T E W A S H O U T L CONSTRUCT A LINED CONCRETE WASHOUT SITE AWAY FROM STORM DRAINS, WATERBODIES, OR OTHER DRAINAGES. IDEALLY, PLACE ADJACE NT TO STABILIZED ENTRANCE. CLEAN AS NEEDED AND REMOVE AT END OF PROJECT. CASQA: WM-8. CALTRANS: WM-8. ST O C K P I L E M A N A G E M E N T M COVER ALL STOCKPILES AND LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND BERM PROPERLY WITH FIBER ROLLS OR SAND BAGS. KEEP BEHIND THE SITE PERIMETER CONTROL AND AWAY FROM WATERBODIES.CASQA: WM-3. CALTRANS: WM-3. HA Z A R D O U S M A T E R I A L MA N A G E M E N T N HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE KEPT IN CL OSED CONTAINERS THAT ARE COVERED AND WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, DO NOT PLACE CONTAINERS DIRECTLY ON SOIL.CASQA: WM-6. CALTRANS: WM-6. SA N I T A R Y W A S T E MA N A G E M E N T O PLACE PORTABLE TOILETS NEAR STABILIZED SITE ENTRANCE, BEHIND THE CURB AND AWAY FROM GUTTERS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND WATE RBODIES. TIE OR STAKE PORTABLE TOILETS TO PREVENT TIPPING AND EQUIP UNITS WITH OVERFLOW PAN/TRAY (MOST VENDORS PROVIDE THESE).CASQA: WM-9. CALTRANS: WM-9. P PREVENT EQUIPMENT FLUID LEAKS ONTO GROUND BY PLACING DRIP PANS OR PLASTIC TARPS UNDER EQUIPMENT. IMMEDIATELY CLEAN UP ANY SPILLS OR DRIPS.CASQA: NS-8, NS-9, AND NS-10. CALTRANS: NS-8, NS-9, AND NS-10. EQ U I P M E N T A N D V E H I C L E MA I N T E N A N C E Q DESIGNATE WASTE COLLECTION AREAS ON SITE. USE WATERTIGHT DUMPSTERS AND TRASH CANS; INSPECT FOR LEAKS. COVER AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY AND WHEN IT IS RAINING OR WINDY. ARRANGE FOR REGULAR WASTE COLLECTION. PICK UP SITE LITTER DAILY. CASQA: WM-5; OR CALTRANS: WM-5. LI T T E R A N D W A S T E MA N A G E M E N T -- - - - - - _,, , , . - - I __ _ ... -- - ' -- - ' I -- - - - - - -- - r - - I I I I I I I I I I I I ... -- ' I ' 1 . . . - - \ .J - - - - -- - - - .a . - - - 0 - - - .. . . . / ' ' I I a5 _ 1 - - - - - - - - I 1ST FLOOR 0' -0"ROOF 20' -2 3/4"2ND FLOOR 11' -2 3/4" EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E PR E -MA N U F A C T U R E T R U S S E S PA N T R Y R -38 BA T H GR E A T R O O M DE C K BE D R O O M LO F T A R E A MAX HEIGHT 23' -4 3/4"MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT 30' - 0" PO R C H 0" -4 " 2 ' - 0 " 7 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " CL O S E T UN D E R ST A I R S RE T A I N I N G W A L L EXIST. GRADE -0' -11 1/4" 9 ' - 4 " 1 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 4 " 9 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 1ST FLOOR 0' -0"ROOF 20' -2 3/4"1ST FLOOR T.O.P.10' -0"2ND FLOOR 11' -2 3/4" PR E -MA N U F A C T U R E D T R U S S E S R -38 BA T H R O O M HA L L W A Y MA S T E R W . I . C KI T C H E N GR E A T R O O M OF F I C E R -21 MAX. HEIGHT LIMIT 30' - 0" EX I S T I N G G R A D E PR O P O S E D G R A D E MAX HEIGHT 23' -4 3/4" 9 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " EXIST. GRADE -0' -11 1/4"TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:36:00 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 SECTIONS RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A9 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1 SE C T I O N C U T 1/ 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 SE C T I O N C U T - - - - - - - - - ~ I / _J I / I / V ,,. . ~ V I / I / V V V V I I - - -- - .- - . ' , . , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ 1 1~ 1 i 1 11 i" ' 1 11 T 1 : im 1 11 -11 11 1 m 1 1 1 n i u 1 n i 1 1 1 11 11 1 n i 1 1 ~ 1 i i - 11 i' 11 m ~ :: : - f :- : _ ~ = = ; l ~=J - - -= = - __,= : ~ = ; 1 - - - - ; --- - • - - - - • 1 1\ ·~·- ~ ~ ~ - II Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l Il l ll l = l l l = l l f ~ I = .:- -:~ ~~- , I ~ r, ~ = = = : I ~ -- - - .. - - - - - - - - ~ rr ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m ~ m = m ~ · ~ / [ -----_-__ \, \ ~ --.-_ \, \ : - _ i :1 =1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 =1 1 1 = 1 1 =1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 11 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 = m ~ _-: ~ \ r: •. _ ___ _ _ _ _ \ --- = ~ ~m w m w n = w m w n = w m w m w m w = n w m k - 1 1 1 1 : : L : L - 1 1 1 ~ m l l i r r ·'.; . ~ I ~ i - _ - ,,, . : • - ~ II I I i' II I I I I II I I I II I I i' II I I I II I I i' I I I I I I I I I I i' II 111 1 I I I II II i i I I I I 11 i' I lr r i ½ m ~-· ~ ~ _. i ; /, / , • ~ , ,r ; ~ , ~ - ~ . 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 1 = _ 1 I l= _ I I I - _I I 1 - _1 1 1 - _ I I 1- - ~ . - : ~ -_ - -- -- _ - · · -_ - - _ , ___ --_ ~ -~ - - ·- ·_ - - ·, _ - - ~ _-- · · _ _ -- - - _- _-- ._ - _ "_ -f= t - 11 · _ · _ - _ - - -_ , _ , . _ _ _ _ - - ___: : : _ - -= - - . --//"• ... _ ~ TT ~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - I I l~ - 1 1 1 ~ m ~ - 1 1 1 ~ m ~ ~ m ~ ~ I I = · = I 1J J m l l i m i l l m i l l m i l l m i l l r r k 1 I dm k J m ~ - 1 1 1 ~ m ~ - 1 1 1 ~ m i l l m i l l m l l i m i l l m i l l m l l : 1 ~m l l i m i l l - 1 1 1 M : - 1 1 1 ~ - I I l~ - I l~ - I I l~ - 1 1 1 ~ m i l l - 1 1 :~ m ~ ---. ~~,~ [j l I Im ' I Im ' I ff i l l Im ' I IT T ' I Im ' 1 lf f i l l lf f i I Im ' I Im ' 1 lf f i l I Im ' I Im ' 11 ~ 1 I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 1 lj f l 1ff i 1 I Im ' Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I IT T ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 11 f f i 1 I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' I Im ' 11 [ 7 1 I Im ' 1 lf f i I Im ' 1 lj f l I Im ' 1-111:\..lllwl 11, _111_111 :~,~,-- -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1-111-111-111-1 I -111-111-___:___ 11 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 I I I 11111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 11 I 1 111 111 111 1 1 111 111 111 111 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 1 1 111 111 111 111 11111 111 11 111 111 1 1 111 111111 111111 111111 11 111 111111 111111 11111 I I I I I I 1 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 11 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1- 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 I -111-11 -1 - ,, l l l , , , l l l , , , l l ,, , l l l , , , l l ,, , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , ll , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l ,, l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , I I I , , I l, , , l l l , , , l l, , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l ,, , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , l l l , , , 1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , ,1 1 1 , , , 1 1 1 , , , 11 , , , 1 1 1 , , ll l , , , l l,,,111,,,111,,,lll,,,ll ,,,lll,,,lll,,,III,, 111,,,111,, lll,,,111,,,- / / / / / / / ~ ~ i i i n n n n i i i n n n n ~ ' i n n n r r i ~ r r i ? I ' '-. --------"'-<::-----'-. '-. S T U C C O F I N I S H E D 5 ' W A L L FR O N T V I E W 5 ' - 0 " 8' - 0 " WO O D S T A I N E D DO O R S MA T C H I N G HO U S E C O L O R RI M J O I S T W O O D B L O C K I N G DE C K I N G MA T E R I A L 2 -3/ 8 " S Q U A R E P O S T 5" S Q U A R E BA S E P L A T E CO L O R M A T C H E D VI N Y L C A P S C O N C E A L AT T A C H M E N T H A R D W A R E WALL PER PLAN STEEL PLATE PER STRUCT. -PROVIDE OPENING FOR J -BOX LIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS -INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS J -BOX PER ELEC.PLYWOOD BACKING FOR LIGHT FIXTURE PLATE BOLTS SEALANT AND BACKER ROD ALL AROUND AT PLATE STUD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPE STONE VENEER EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER PLYWOOD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPEMAINTAIN CONSISTENT VENEER THICKNESS ALL AROUND AT LIGHT FIXTUREELECTRICAL CONDUIT SEALANT ALL AROUND WALL PER PLAN PLYWOOD AS REQUIRED PER WALL TYPE WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER CEMENT BOARD FLANGE SET IN SEALANTCASING BEAD STUCCO BY OMEGALIGHT FIXTURE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS -INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS 3/ 4 " - 1" THICK VENEER STONE SET IN T O M O R T A R B E D A T T A C H E D T O DURAROCK BACKER DU R A R O C K A T T A C H E D T O P R E S S U R E TR E A T E D F R A M I N G W I T H S T A I N L E S S STEEL SCREWS SO L D E R E D L E A D C O A T E D C O P P E R FL A S H I N G B E L O W G R A N I T E S I L L SPLIT -FACE GRANITE SILL MITERED AT CORNERS AND SLOPED AWAY FROM COLUMN 3' - 0"10' - 0"2X6 STUD2X4 STUD N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 PR O P O S E D H O U S E ON P A D F . F . : 1 2 8 ' PR O P O S E D G A R A G E ON P A D F . F . : 1 2 7 . 5 ' GU E S T PA R K I N G P R O P O S E D D R I V E W A Y EXISTING BUILDING TR A S H E N C L O S U R E W I T H O U T R O O F P R O P O S E D P A T I O P R O P O S E D P A T I O NE W A C U N I T 2N D F L O O R LA Y O U T 1/ 4 " O R 3 / 8 " F U L L Y T E M P E R E D G L A S S PE N C I L P O L I S H F L A T C O R N E R S MA X . 5' - 0 " DE C K B Y O T H E R S 1. 3 7 5 " x 1 . 5 0 " x 0 . 1 2 5 " B O T T O M R A I L 3 ' - 0 " 0 ' - 1 1 / 4 " 2. 3 7 5 " x 2 . 3 7 5 " x 0 . 1 2 5 " A L U M I N U M P O S T 80 0 S E R I E S T O P R A I L 3/ 8 " D O M E D C A P 3/ 8 " T H R U B O L T , 4 " L G 3/ 8 " S C R E W B A S E 3/ 8 " S L E E V E BA S E P L A T E P A D DE C K TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:36:00 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A10 1/ 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2 GA R B A G E E N C L O S U R E 1/ 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " 4 A - R A I L I N G 3/4" = 1'-0"7 A - L I G H T F I X T U R E A T S T O N E V E N E E R 3/4" = 1'-0"6 A - T Y P A C A L L I G H T F I X T U R E D E T A I L 3/4" = 1'-0"5 R- P O R C H C O L U M N 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 EX T E R I O R L I G H T I N H G P L A N NT S 3 A - G L A S S G U A R D R A I L 'i ' / 1/ / ½ / I / I I I L _ _ _ _ _ I' - . . r I I -" s - - J J ~ i / / I ½ I / I I I / / : I / : / / J I \= ~ ~ r I J j - I J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · · · · / ' ~;. , < : .. . . . . . . . / . · · ' - , ' ,. - ( , - - ' ' '7 , : .. . -- / ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - / I I - .. . . I / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ / I \ I \ ~ , , I I I ·. _·•,, ~ ·-,-, ~ ·,; _,,,_ .. ', ~ ~ .,, , , ' 'LJ ( -'----' ,1,------1W.ll..L...l---=----~-0 N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 4 9 ° 3 4 ' E 1 4 4 .2 8 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 .7 9 ' PL R = 1 9 ' S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 FI R S T F L O O R (1 5 1 3 s f ) N E W G A R A G E ( 4 9 6 s f ) GU E S T P A R K I N G (2 7 9 s f ) NE W D R I V E W A Y (8 5 9 s f ) N E W P A T I O ( 6 5 s f ) N E W P A T I O ( 1 1 1 s f ) R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) E X I S T I N G D R I V E W A Y ( 7 1 8 s f ) TR A S H E N C L O S U R E (3 2 s f ) EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L EX I S T I N G RE T A I N I N G WA L L EX I S T I N G RE T A I N I N G WA L L S NE W A C U N I T (1 6 s f ) AD D I T I O N A L D R I V E W A Y (1 4 0 s f ) N E W P O R C H ( 6 4 s f ) S E C O N D F L O O R L A Y O U T ( 1 4 5 s f ) C R A W L S P A C E B A C K Y A R D P A T I O ( 1 0 5 s f ) LO T S I Z E TO T A L I N C R E A S E 10 , 6 2 7 S Q -FT 5. 1 % EX I S T I N G I M P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E C A L C U L A T I O N : 2, 4 3 5 S Q U A R E F E E T ( S F ) PR O P O S E D N E T I N C R E A S E I N I M P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E : 53 8 S F (D R I V E W A Y , S T R U C T U R E S , P A T I O , T R A S H E N C L O S U R E , P A R K I N G ) FI N I S H E D C O N D I T I O N F E E C A L C U L A T I O N : $5 3 8 TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:10/27/2020 10:36:01 AM545 SILVERADO DRIVE TIBURON, CA 94920 IMPERVIOUSSURFACE RYAN BRADFORD (916) 230 -5325 1 -396 PK PZ A11 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 IM P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E C A L C U L A T I O N S - - - - - I .6 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cu - - - - - - 1 0 I I I I I I L I I I \. . - - - - - - .6 . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - I - - - __ _ _ _ _ / I \ \ \ \ ,1 I I I ~ I ~ ~ - ~ --= = = - - - - = ~=- ~ - ~- ~ ~ - ~ ~~== = =~~=-= - = - = ~ - - - - 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 4 3 ' 1 4 4 ' 1 4 5 ' 1 4 6 ' 1 4 7 ' 1 4 8 ' 1 4 9 ' 1 0 5 ' 1 0 6 ' 1 0 7 ' 1 0 8 ' 1 0 9 ' 1 1 0 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 2 ' 1 1 3 ' 1 1 4 ' 1 1 5 ' 1 1 6 ' 1 1 7 ' 1 1 8 ' 1 1 9 ' 1 2 0 ' 1 2 1 ' 1 2 2 ' 1 2 3 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' 1 2 7 ' 127' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 7 ' 1 2 8 ' 1 2 9 ' 1 3 0 ' 1 3 1 ' 1 3 2 ' 1 3 3 ' 1 3 4 ' 1 3 5 ' 1 3 6 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 7 ' 1 3 8 ' 1 3 9 ' 1 4 0 ' 1 4 1 ' 1 4 2 ' 1 2 4 ' 1 2 5 ' 1 2 6 ' N 7 2 ° 4 9 ' E 1 5 0 ' P L N 1 7 ° 1 0 '1 0 " W 4 0 ' P L N 49 ° 3 4 ' E 1 44 .2 8 ' PL N 1 7 ° 1 0 ' 1 0 " W 8 5 . 7 9 ' PL S E T B A C K 1 5 ' - 0 " SE T B A C K 8' - 0 " S E T B A C K 8 ' - 0 " S E T B A C K 2 0 ' - 0 " LO T 4 2 AP N : 0 5 5 -08 2 -02 3 EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G LO T 4 1 LO T 3 1 LO T 3 0 R = 1 9 ' E X I S T I N G P A D ( 1 , 3 2 8 s f ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 E X I S T I N G G A R A G E ( 3 8 2 s f ) 10 0 MO C P 12 0 . 4 2 CP 12 5 . 9 3 CP 13 7 . 8 4 CP 15 1 . 7 9 PC C P 15 0 . 4 4 CP 14 5 . 6 4 FL 14 9 . 6 4 FL 14 6 . 8 5 EG 14 8 . 7 2 EG 14 1 9 5 EG 13 9 . 2 7 EG 13 8 . 0 6 EG 13 7 . 6 1 EG 13 3 . 1 9 EG 13 6 . 1 5 EG 13 8 . 3 8 EG 13 3 . 7 1 EG 13 3 . 5 9 EG 12 6 . 8 EG 12 6 . 4 3 EG 12 7 . 4 LS 12 7 . 5 LS 12 7 . 4 9 LS 12 7 . 4 8 LS 12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 2 3 LS 12 7 . 2 LS12 7 . 3 LS 12 7 . 3 2 LS 12 7 . 2 5 LS 12 3 . 8 7 EG 12 2 . 7 5 EG 10 7 . 4 EG 12 1 . 4 9 GT T 11 8 . 3 9 DW E 12 0 . 7 1 DW E 12 3 . 5 6 DW E 12 5 . 8 8 DW E 12 6 . 4 9 DW E 11 9 . 9 9 RW B 11 9 . 9 9 RW B 12 3 . 4 6 RW T 12 2 . 9 6 RW T 12 1 . 3 2 RW B 12 4 . 5 3 RW T 12 2 . 5 9 RW B 12 3 . 7 7 RW B 12 5 . 6 3 RW B 12 7 . 7 3 RW T 12 8 . 2 2 RW T 12 6 . 7 RW B 12 8 . 1 4 RW T 12 6 . 6 7 RW B 12 5 . 4 RW T 12 6 . 5 7 RW B 12 7 . 9 6 RW T 12 6 . 9 6 EG 12 6 . 9 3 RW B 12 9 . 6 9 RW T 12 9 . 4 6 EG 12 7 . 1 4 RW B 12 9 . 6 9 RW T 12 7 . 3 EG 12 7 . 5 7 RW B 13 0 . 5 2 RW T 12 8 . 2 2 RW B 13 0 . 2 4 RW T 12 7 . 1 9 RW B 13 0 . 1 5 RW T 12 6 . 8 2 RW B 12 9 . 6 2 RW T 12 7 . 0 1 RW B 13 9 . 0 1 TR 13 8 . 2 9 TR 13 7 . 6 TR 13 7 . 5 4 TR 13 6 . 8 9 TR 14 0 . 6 6 TR 14 5 . 8 3 TR 14 9 . 1 5 TR 14 3 . 6 TR 13 7 . 1 4 SW F L 13 6 . 7 7 SW F L 13 6 . 3 5 SW F L 13 7 . 5 9 RW 13 8 . 1 4 RW 13 8 . 5 RW 11 2 . 2 9 WM 10 8 . 7 5 EB 10 8 . 4 6 EB 12 1 . 5 7 GT B 11 5 . 9 5 GT T 11 3 . 7 GT B 11 2 . 7 3 EG 10 7 . 0 8 GT B 12 7 . 3 6 GS 12 6 . 9 1 GS 12 7 . 4 5 GS LE G E N D EX I S T I N G G R A D E E L E V A T I O N NO T F O U N D P R O P E R T Y C O R N E R CO N T R O L P O I N T W A T E R M E T E R FO U N D P R O P E R T Y M A R K I N G N E E D VE R I F I C A T I O N MO N U M E N T ℄ CE N T E R L I N E FE N C E L I N E SE T B A C K L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E 11 0 ' 11 1 ' MA J O R C O N T O U R L I N E S MI N O R C O N T O U R L I N E S 12 1 . 0 1 EG SW A L E F L O W L I N E GU T T E R F L O W L I N E ℄ ℄ SI L V E R A D O D R I V E S H R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y SH R U B B E R Y 12 6 . 3 4 DW E S H R U B B E R Y EX I S T I N G P A D EX I S T I N G D R I V E W A Y EX I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L 13 1 . 0 1 EG 13 6 . 7 4 EG EX I S T I N G S T A I R S TDE TANGENT DESIGN & ENGINEERING PHONE: (916) 572-5955 mary@tangentde.com PROJECT NAME:OWNER CONTACT:660 AUBURN FOLSOM RD #204 AUBURN, CA 95603 PROJECT:DESIGNED:DRAWN:DATE:DATE:DESCRIPTION:REV #SHEET TITLE:SHEET:12/20/2019 6:02:11 PM545 SILVERADO DRIVE BELVEDERE TIBURON,CA 94920 TOPOGRAPHYMAP RYAN BRADFORD (916) 2 3 0 -5325 1 -396 A.L.A.L.T1 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 SI T E P L A N EG TR EB LS WM GSEXISTING GRADE TREE ELECTRICAL BOX LIVING SLAB WATER METER GARAGE SLABABBREVIATIONS CP CONTROL POINT PC PROPERTY CORNER BO U N D A R Y I N F O R M A T I O N BO U N D A R Y ' S S HO W N O N S HE E T A RE S HO W N F R O M MA R I N C O U N T Y , C A S U B D I V I S I O N M A P B O O K 7 P A G E 4 8 . NO B O U N D A R Y S UR V E Y W AS P ER F O M E D AN D T H E P RO P E R T Y L I NE S A ND F E N C E S S HO W N A R E NO T T O B E T AK E N A S R E CO R D . E A SE M E N T S AD D I T I O N A L E A SE M E N T S M AY E X I S T F O R T H IS PA R C E L , A S R E CO R D E D W I T H T HE C O U N T Y. RE F E R E N C E T ITLE RE PO R T F OR A L L P E R T A I N I N G EA S E M E N T S . BU I L D I N G S ET B A C K TO B E C O N F IR M E D B Y C L I EN T . NO T E S 1. TH E P U R P O S E O F T H I S D R A W I N G I S TO P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y F O R S I T E D E S I G N . PR I O R T O A N Y C O N S T R U C T I O N , B O U N D A R Y LI N E S A N D C O R N E R P O I N T S S H O U L D B E VE R I F I E D A N D D O C U M E N T E D . 2. TH E A R E A O F S U R V E Y W A S D E L I N E A T E D B Y CL I E N T . 3. CO N T O U R S A R E C O M P U T E R G E N E R A T E D , F R O M SP O T E L E V A T I O N S . E X A C T S U R F A C E UN D U L A T I O N W A S N O T D E T E R M I N E D , CA L C U L A T E D O R L O C A T E D . 4. SU B J E C T T O A L L E A S E M E N T S , R E C O R D E D O R NO T . T H I S S U R V E Y I S N O T A B O U N D A R Y SU R V E Y A N D D O E S N O T R E F L E C T T H O S E I T E M S TH A T M A Y B E L I S T E D I N A T I T L E R E P O R T , IN C L U D I N G C O V E N A N T S A N D R E S T R I C T I O N S . BENCHMARK INFORMATION UTILIZED TWO MONUMENTS ON STEWART DRIVE, REF E RENCING MARIN COUNTY, CA SUBDIVISION MAP BOOK 7 PAGE 48.ASSUMED EL EVATION AT M ONUMENT CONTROL PO INT O NE SET AT 1 00 F EET.RWT RWB DWE GTE GTFL SWFL RW FL FENCE LINERETAINING WALLSWAIL FLOW LINEGUTTER FLOW LINEGUTTER EDGEDRIVE WAY EDGERETAINING WALL BOTTOMRETAINING WALL TOP MO MONUMENT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / / / / / / / / / I / / / _ / / / / / / / - - ~ ~ ~ / ~ / ; - 7 ~ / __ _ , ,_ _ ___ , _ - \ - - ~ - \ \ \ f:: : , , . \ \ \ \ \ I / \ I - - ,, , ,, , _ /c_ _ _ _. : , . _ s f y c_ - - - - - - ' ' y - -< / _ _ _ I I \ \ I I \ I I I I - ·-, - _ L . -- - 1 - - - I - 7 - - I - - 'i - - , - \ I I I I / I I I I / I I I I I \ \ \ / / \ \ \ I I I -$ - f: : : , , . ~ t> < ] 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 545 Silverado Tiburon Color and Material Selections 2 Index Entry Door -3 Garage Door -4 Exterior Lighting - 5 Stucco Acrylic Finish - 6 Stone Veneer -6 Metal Roof - 7 Accent Color - 7 9-10 - 11 Gutter - 8 Window/Sliding Door - Drive & Sidewalk Finish Exterior Wall Siding -4 3 Product Placement: Entry Door Product By: IWANTTHATDOOR Product ID: The Beast Square Top Single Entry Iron Doors 4 Product Placement: Single & Double Car Garage Door Product By: Clopay Product ID: Design Rec 14 Colonial Lift Handles (Color: Stepping Stone) Product Placement: Exterior Wall Siding Product By: James Hardie Product ID: Color Pegasus 0 0 Pegasus PPG1010-1 5 Product Placement: Exterior Lighting Product By: JohnTimberland Product ID: Danbury 6" High Black Dusk To Dawn - Style # 5y088 6 Product Placement: Exterior Stucco Color Product By: Omega Product ID: 9228 Stone Age Product Placement: Exterior Stone Veneer Product By: Cultured Stone Product ID: Pro-Fit Modera Ledgestone (Intaglio) Pro-Fit® Modera™ Ledgestone Pro-Fit Modern Ledgestone is classic contemporary. Create a tailored look w ith easily insta lled. meti:u!ously bundled modular components of equal height. Dimensions (approx): 4" H x a· L 4" H x 12· L. and 4· H x 20" L 7 Product Placement: Roof Product By: Metal Roofing California Product ID: Standing Seam Ash Gray (Kynar) Product Placement: Doors, Garage Door (PPG1010-4) Product Placement: Trims, Fascia, Gutter, Downspout, Band before the soffit (PPG1010-6) Product By: PPG Paints Product ID: Stepping Stone (PPG1010-4), Up In Smoke (PPG1010-6) STANDING SEAM -ASH GRAY (KYNAR) Stepping Stone PPG1010-4 Up In Smoke PPG1010-6 8 Product Placement: Roof Gutter Product ID: K-Style Gutter 9 Product Placement: Windows Product By: Anderson Product Description: Anderson 100 series (Black) CHOOSE THE WINDOWS, DOORS & OPTIONS THAT ARE RIGHT FOR YOU . WINDOW & DOOR TYPES ..... _,, ...... , _____ "_ ....... ...................... _ . ._ ...... _ .. _ I, .. ,. .... ,._I n. ....... -.---........... --·-........ l"W._ ·-- -t!MW..N ......... N"M,- ........... i...,W,,., ........ ......... ""--·----··--,..""" ..... _,,.,_,.,,_ ... ......................... .,.. ..... ,--·· ... ........... ~ .. ..... ,._, ... ... ...,_ ..... ""_ ..., ... _ .. . -- . -... -'~ ... ----.................... ................. -,w _,.,._....,. ... .... ..,..,...,. .... ............ ..,._..., __ _ __ .. .......... _ ·-·---------..,,.,.. GLASS ~, ........ ,. ......... ........... .,.. ______ ..,, ............... -~ ,.,., ______ _ ..... .,,. ...... ; .... _ ....... 1a,,-... ....................... ........ .-..... .... ....... _...., ..... _____ ..,._..,... ........ ,1 .. 1,- Or, ..... alflC.---...--.. ....... --........... , ....... .. ...... , ___ ,. Wlll..fl ..... _. .... .............. 11,.--u.111111•-·----'GI'--... 0.-... .-... 111--.,.. ___ _ -i-....-~-··"'-·-----i-• _,. .. (1,1 ............. ..... ...,..,.._. ..... __ ,._i_.,...,_ ... _ ....... _ . ..,.._ ·~ ......... . .., .. ._. ..... l,llt,( -- GRILLES COLOR o.... ... ,,.,.___ ... ~ .. ..,.,, .... _ ..... ..... ~ ..._ ---· ... ..-4-... ... ,,. .,. __ ...,...... ___ .... ,.. .. ... ~r~~-J ■I■ ■■I @-~-... ~ ... -~---~--___ ,.. :...;.~ - ~: ~:-:! ~ ~~DWA!E ___ ,. ' .................. ~ =:..? ~:::~----·------·---~·--· -~--IIM ..... ::--=..:..-=. _,.., __ _ ___ .. ..,. ---- ... _,.. __ .., ..-.. " ... -· .-~------·----• ---~1 -.. 1 -:.-M--== --------:..=-:.:.::.:=:::..:== , ....-..--.... -_ .. __ 10 Product Placement: Sliding Door Product By: Allside __ Sliding and Hinged Patio Doors _______ _ With their pristh,e appeara11u, Slidi11g a,ul Hhzged Patio nnnr:f mill ~,u, " stylish entry far your home. ____.j-- A ,...,IU,uil, patio de.or inVTW tbt-bnu,y of ouidoon inside, ~ik pn,viding .,n mcrgy-dttci,:nt b..nic r .ag.tin:A i..dcmcnl -..,1,n. Sliding Patio Door • 1-"usion....ddnl 01H1JlruC1ion ddiva:s lcng-1:a>Ung Hn::ngth .and d..,-.,b.lit)" • Smrdy41d fnnxd.pd,andl"wid.- intc:i;~ n.ai1ing tin with I~" SCI bad.. for added strucnm.l imcgriry. • Srnuo lin orion is al.o ;w.oil.i,bl.,_ • I" thid. in.,,J.md glu.,wi,h w:i.rm.....dg,: ,.,,du,ology. • Adjwubl<' du.J undem roller >p<O'rn onast:'inka.,,.,.lu.ad:. .. ruu...,.C'a'}' op,,r·ar,on • Anibbk in whi, .. , "-lmo..d o r ~ day; a brorw, ntuior with~ whii .. inrnior alsoisoK.:rul.. • K.cyal bndk loclr. ~ fuo, lode op1ions. • Two,1hn:r,and"'1r-p.,nda.,Jigumioru ani~c. a I ~ ---- n,,, & ... Ii. ~W l,,11vfW' aa,f PJM""-s lllill i,{i- ,_., ,,._ .,;,J, W ...mruh.,.,J M>UJl!f" iunual Jid,,. Hi11ged Patio Door • Fwion-...:ldcd c:omuuakH'I ddinn long-U.ting ,1 f1'ngi.h anJ durabi.l:i,y. • cJ..oc,..,from4'M'o.-6""4" fumc: dqnh, both with l" wick in,q:nl nailini; fln for ad.k.J struaur::J intq;,,il}·• . !:a::.~-:;;:1.;. with • liavy-d,uy ,,i/fai,cr in .JI fnnx utd pand mc,mlxn,_ • Thn:t:?>irit locking sptan fur a tii;hl .. J a..d ..ddc:d wmfon. • 8...,.. ha,dw,u-i: ...id. ..dj,uublce whil<'hing<"". • Anil..bk in ..inr;k, doubk or fund,..yl,doon , ...... wdalmond. 11 Product Placement: Concrete Color Finish Product By: Davis Colors Product ID: Dune 6058 Number: 6058 Nam e: Dune Hex: 8d8o6b Description: Li g uid Dose Ra te: 0.61 lbs per 94 lb sack of cement Powder Dose Rate: 0.5 l bs per 94 lb sack of cement To view or order an actual concrete sampl e. cLick here.