Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Res 1998-10-21 (5) ! I""" RESOLUTION NO. 3305 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON REGARDING POSSmLE FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS TO MAIN STREET TO FACILITATE PROVIDING WHEELCHAIR ACCESS TO DOWNTOWN PRIVATE BUSINESSES WHEREAS, in 1995, several property owners and business owners (collectively, "Defendants") in downtown Tiburon were sued for alleged failure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, in an action entitled Connally v. Main Street Properties et al., ; and WHEREAS, the basis of the Connally litigation was the plaintiffs' allegation that the Defendants' properties were not accessible to persons in wheelchairs as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, in an attempt to settle the Connally litigation, the Defendants applied to the Town for encroachment permits for several properties located on Main Street and one property located on Tiburon Boulevard, to allow the construction of wheelchair ramps on the Town's sidewalks; and r WHEREAS, after a duly noticed public hearing, the Town Council approved one of the requested permits, for the property located on Tiburon Boulevard, but rejected the other applications; and WHEREAS, the Town Council rejected the Main Street applications because the record demonstrated that the proposed wheelchair ramps on Main Street were infeasible for the following reasons, without limitation: 1. The Main Street sidewalks are only five feet wide and the proposed ramps would be four feet wide. Accordingly, the ramps would leave insufficient room on the sidewalks for able-bodied pedestrian traffic and for mobility-impaired persons not seeking access to the Defendants' properties. 2. The ramps would extend beyond the frontage of the Defendants' properties. This could impede access to alleyways and would preclude similarly situated neighboring properties from installing ramps. WHEREAS, the Defendants whose applications were denied contended that they could not practically construct wheelchair ramps on their own properties and requested that the Town select some manner of improvements to the Town's right of way that would accommodate accessibility improvements for the Defendants' properties; and I"'" 1 r- I"'"' - --- ..-;:c-:~------ WHEREAS, because of the importance of the financial health of the Town's business community and because of the public policy ofmaxirnizing accessibility, the Town agreed to consider the type of modifications that it might allow to downtown Main Street in order to facilitate improved accessibility of Defendants' properties and devoted substantial resources in the form of staff hours and retention of accessibility and traffic consultants in the process of responding to the Defendants' request; and WHEREAS, the Town decided to consider possible accessibility modifications through a joint task force formed with the City of Belvedere, because downtown Main Street is located in close proximity to the City of Belvedere and is an important thoroughfare for many Belvedere residents; and WHEREAS, the joint task force held multiple public hearings between 1997 and 1998 and prepared a final report dated August 27, 1998; and WHEREAS, as a result of this process, the City of Belvedere offered up to $60,000 in matching funds contingent on the Town's selecting a modification alternative that retained two-way traffic flow on Main Street; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 1998, at a properly noticed public hearing, the Town Council considered the final report of the joint task force and heard public testimony regarding various alternative accessibility modifications and determined by a vote of three to two that it would prefer the two-way alternative described in the report (Mayor Matthews, Vice Mayor Bach and Councilmember Gram voting aye for the two-way alternative and Councilmembers Hennessy and Thomas voting no, the latter preferring a one-way alternative). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon to direct staff as follows: 1. Staff shall assist the Defendants and any other interested property and/or business owners in further developing the two-way alternative described in the final report so that it may be considered for final approval. This will involve preparation of a project description and plans and drawings and completion of the environmental review process required by the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Public Resources Code ~~ 21000 et seq. 2. The proposed project is for the benefit of Defendants' properties and the Council intends that the Defendants shall remain primarily responsible for the proposed project. However, although the Town has already made substantial contributions to the project in the form of staff time and retention of consultants, the Council is willing to consider further assistance. Accordingly, staff shall return to the Council with financing alternatives for the project that may include Town contributions to the overall cost of the project. These options will include pursuit of the City of Belvedere's offer to contribute up to $60,000. 2 ." r. r. r. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon on October 21, 1998 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bach, Gram, Matthews NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Hennessy ABSENT: Thompson COUNCIL MEMBERS: 7/.'1 s 711..ttfo..$ HARRY S. MATTHEWS, MAYOR Town of Tiburon DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK 3