HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Digest 2016-07-29TOWN COUNCIL WEEKLY DIGEST
July 25-29, 2016
TIBURON
Correspondence, Notices and other Information
1. Grand Jury Response — July 21— Web Transparency Report Card
2. Grand Jury Response — July 21— Police Firearm Security
Agenda, Minutes
1. Agenda — August 4 — Tiburon Design Review Board Regular Meeting
REGIONAL, NOTICES AND AGENDA
Correspondence, Notices and other Information
Agenda, Minutes
1. Agenda — August 3 — Marin County Hazardous & Solid Waste Management Joint
Powers Authority
RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT FORM
Town of Tiburon
Report Title: Web Transparency Report Card
Report Date: March 10, 2016
Public Release: March 17, 2016
Response By: Greg Chanis
FINDINGS
• We agree with the findings numbered: F1 -F5
• We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: None
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Recommendations numbered R1, R3, R4 have been implemented.
• Recommendations numbered R2, R5 will not be implemented because they are
not warranted or are not reasonable.
Date:
Number of Pages Attached: 3
Signed:
GRE CHANIS, TOWN MANAGER
Town of -Tiburon • 1505 Tiburon Boulevard • Tiburon, CA 94920 • P. 415.435.7373 E 415.435.2438 • www.townoftiburon.org
Office of the Town Manager / 415.435.7388
July 21, 2016
The Honorable Kelly V. Simmons
Judge of the Marin County Superior Court
Post Office Box 4988
San Rafael, CA 94913-4988
Mr. John Mann, Foreperson
Marin County Grand Jury
3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 275
San Rafael, CA 94903
Re: Response to Grand Jury Report
Marin Web Transparency Report Card
Dear Honorable Judge Simmons and Mr. Mann:
This letter explains in detail the Town of Tiburon's response to the Grand Jury
Report dated March 17, 2016. The Report directs the Town to respond to Findings
Nos. 1-5 and Recommendations Nos. 1-5. The Findings involve conclusions of fact
that the Town has little or no independent basis to evaluate. In responding to these
Findings, the Town assumes that the information in the Report is correct and relies on
that information.
FINDINGS
Finding 1: As of January 4, 2016, 27 Marin local agencies lacked public
websites (and of the 99 agencies that have websites, 65 did not satisfy the
Grand Jury's web transparency criteria as of that date).
Town's Response to Finding 1:
The Town agrees with this finding.
Finding 2: Inspecting the Marin County Clerk's "Roster of Public Agencies,"
the Grand Jury discovered a majority of local agencies out of compliance per
California Government Code §53051 (no filings or outdatedf lings).
Town's Response to Finding 2:
The Town agrees with this finding.
Finding 3: Effective January 1, 2015, Assembly Bill (AB) 2040 requires that if
a public agency "maintains as Internet Web site, it shall post, in a conspicuous
Erin Tollini
Mayor
Jim Fraser
Vice Mayor
Frank X. Doyle
Councilmember
Alice Fredericks
Councilmember
Emmett O'Donnell
Councilmember
Greg Chanis
Town Manager
Page 2 of 3
location on its Internet Web site, information on the annual compensation of its
elected officials, officers, and employees that is submitted to the Controller
under §53891." The Grand Jury discovered a majority of the agencies were out
of compliance (and potentially at -risk for fines and/or audit), per California
Government Code sections 53895, 53895.7 and 53896).
Town's Response to Finding 3:
The Town agrees with this finding.
Finding 4: The County of Marin does not currently publish a definitive list of
all its dependent special districts and JPAs.
Town's Response to Finding 4:
The Town agrees with this finding.
Finding 5: Marin County's "Roster of Public Agencies" is available for
viewing only as hard copy at the office of the Marin County Clerk.
Town's Response to Finding 5:
The Town agrees with this finding.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation 1: The agency should improve its web transparency score to
"B-" (or better), by updating its website and submitting the appropriate self
audit form. The form may be obtained by emailing: grandjury-
audit@marincounoi.org.
Recommendation 2: The agency should file and keep updated its Statement of
Facts with the California Secretary of State and the Marin County Clerk as
required by California Code §53051.
Recommendation 3: The agency should update its website to include
information of the annual compensation of its elected officials, officers and
employees; and this information should also be submitted to the Controller, as
required by Sections 12463 and 53909 of the California Government Code.
Page 3 of 3
Recommendation 4: The Marin County Board of Supervisors should create a
comprehensive online "digital directory" with links to all County ofMarin's
dependent special districts and JPAs.
Recommendation 5: To further improve web transparency, the County Clerk
of Marin County should allow public remote Internet access to its "Roster of
Public Agencies."
Town's Response to Recommendations:
Recommendation 1: The Town has implemented this recommendation.
Recommendation 2: The Town will not be implementing this recommendation
because California Government Code section 53050 exempts the Town from following
section 53051.
Recommendation 3: The Town has implemented this recommendation.
Recommendation 4: The Town has implemented this recommendation.
Recommendation 5: The Town has no ability to require the County Clerk of
Marin County to take any action and require public remote access to the
County's "Roster of Public Agencies."
The Tiburon Town Council reviewed and approved this response on July 20,
2016, at a duly noticed and agendized public meeting. If you have further questions on
this matter, please do not hesitate to call.
Very 4 uly, y
GING CHANIS
Twn Manager
cc: Town Council
Town Attorney
RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT FORM
Town of Tiburon
Report Title: Police Firearm Security
Report Date: April 21, 2016
Public Release: April 28, 2016
Response By: Greg Chanis
FINDINGS
• We agree with the findings numbered: F1, F2, F6, F7, and F8
• We disagree wholly or partially with the findings numbered: F3, F4, and F5
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Recommendations numbered R1 -R5 have been implemented.
• Recommendations numbered will not be implemented because they are not
warranted or are not reasonable.
Date:
7A2
Number of Pages Attached: 4
Signed:
GRE'CHANIS, TOWN MANAGER
Town of -Tiburon • 1505 Tiburon Boulevard • Tiburon, CA 94920 • P. 415.435.7373 E 415.435.2438 • www.townoftiburon.org
Office of the Town Manager / 415.435.7388
July 21, 2016
The Honorable Kelly V. Simmons
Judge of the Marin County Superior Court
Post Office Box 4988
San Rafael, CA 94913-4988
Mr. John Mann, Foreperson
Marin County Grand Jury
3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 275
San Rafael, CA 94903
Re: Response to Grand Jury Report April 21, 2016
Police Firearm Security
Dear Honorable Judge Simmons and Mr. Mann:
This letter explains in detail the Town of Tiburon's response to the Grand Jury
Report dated April 21, 2016. The Report directs the Town to respond to Findings Nos.
1-8 and Recommendations Nos. 1-5. The Findings involve conclusions of fact that the
Town has little or no independent basis to evaluate. In responding to these Findings,
the Town assumes that the information in the Report is correct and relies on that
information.
FINDINGS
Finding 1: Firearms left in unattended vehicles are vulnerable to theft and, if
stolen, are in the hands of criminals.
Town's Response to Finding 1:
The Town agrees with the finding. Any item of value left unattended in a
vehicle is vulnerable to theft. Once that item is stolen, the person who stole it is by
definition a criminal.
Finding 2: Firearms belonging to Marin County peace officers have been
stolen from their vehicles, although the incidence is low.
Town's Response to Finding 2:
The Town agrees with this finding. While the Town does not have any
independent knowledge about the rate of firearms being stolen from other jurisdictions,
it is presumed that the rate is low.
Erin Tollini
Mayor
Jim Fraser
Vice Mayor
Frank X. Doyle
Councilmember
Alice Fredericks
Councilmember
Emmett O'Donnell
Councilmember
Greg Chanis
Town Manager
Page 2 of 4
Finding 3: There is currently no public tracking of lost or stolen firearms from
Marin County peace officers, making the number offirearms missing difficult to
determine.
Town's Response to Finding 3:
The Town disagrees with this finding. Stolen firearms are tracked in the
Federal Automated Firearms System, which is accessible to law enforcement agencies.
Finding 4: With the exception the Fairfax Police Department, Marin County
Police Departments and the Sheriff's Office have not amended or updated their policies
in response to high profile reports of law enforcement guns being stolen from vehicles.
Town's Response to Finding 4:
The Town disagrees with this finding. The Town amended its firearm policy to
require that all officers adequately secure unattended firearms in any vehicle.
Finding 5: Most Marin County Police and Sheriff's Departments do not have a
clear-cut policy and/or procedure specifying how firearms are to be secured if left in an
unattended vehicle.
Town's Response to Finding 5:
The Town disagrees with this finding. The Town does have a clear-cut
procedure specifying how firearms are to be secured if left in an unattended vehicle.
Each officer is required to secure any firearm in a gun vault secured to the vehicle.
However, the Town is not in a position to comment on other public entities policies.
Finding 6: Neither the general topic of firearm security nor a specific letter
from the SF Chief has been discussed at Marin County Police Chief's Association
meetings. The view commonly expressed by the law enforcement executives is that it is
a "common sense" responsibility and understood as such by deputies and officers.
Town's Response to Finding 6:
The Town agrees with this finding. However, the Marin County Police Chief's
Association did discuss this matter at their May 2016 meeting.
Page 3 of 4
Finding 7: Concern for public safety has led to proposed State and some
recent local legislation (in San Francisco and Oakland) requiring that firearms be
secured in all unattended vehicles.
Town's Response to Finding 7:
The Town agrees with this finding.
Finding 8: Specifically designed lock boxes are readily available for safely
securing firearms inside a vehicle, should a gun and vehicle need to be left unattended.
Town's Response to Finding 8:
The Town agrees with this finding.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation 1: Marin County Sheriff's Office and Police Departments
should track and record all firearms that have been lost or stolen from law
enforcement and personal vehicles.
Recommendation 2: Marin County Sheriff's Office and Police Departments
should make public the number and circumstances of all firearms that have
been lost or stolen from law enforcement and personal vehicles.
Recommendation 3: Marin County Sheriff's Office and Police Departments
should update their policies and procedures regarding firearm security,
particularly with regard to firearms left in unattended vehicles (departmental
and personal) and if a firearm is left in a vehicle, how it is to be secured.
Recommendation 4: The Marin County Sheriff and all Police Chiefs should
discuss the issue of firearm security including storage, tracking and reporting of
lost or stolen firearms at Marin County Police Chief Association meetings and
make a recommendation as to whether there should be a standard county policy
for leaving a law enforcement firearm in a vehicle.
Recommendation 5: Marin County Sheriff's Office and Police Departments
should install lock boxes in all department vehicles and require that in the event
it is necessary to leave a firearm in a vehicle, the firearm be secured in the lock
box.
Page 4 of 4
Town's Response to Recommendations:
Recommendation 1: The Town has implemented this recommendation. This
recommendation has always been the practice of the Town.
Recommendation 2: The Town has implemented this recommendation. Town
Police Officers are required to report any lost department owned weapons and such
instances are made public. The Town has no records indicating that any firearm has
been stolen from the Town, so there is no data to make public. To the extent this
recommendation seeks disclosure of officers who have had their privately -owned
weapons stolen, that information is protected by crime victim privacy laws.
Recommendation 3: The Town has implemented this recommendation. As
referenced above, the Town updated its policy to require officers to secure any firearm
in a gun vault secured to the vehicle.
Recommendation 4: The Town has implemented this recommendation. The
issue of firearm security was discussed at the May 2016 Marin County Police Chiefs
Association meeting. At the meeting, it was decided that the issue of setting a policy
should be done by the Chief of each department.
Recommendation 5: The Town has implemented this recommendation.
The Tiburon Town Council reviewed and approved this response on July 20,
2016, at a duly noticed and agendized public meeting. If you have further questions on
this matter, please do not hesitate to call.
Very tgtilyyours,
GREG CHANIS
To n Manager
cc: Town Council
Town Attorney
TOWN OF TIBURON
Tiburon Town Hall
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
AGENDA
TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Regular Meeting
Design Review Board
August 4, 2016
7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Kricensky, Vice Chair Emberson, Boardmembers Chong, Cousins and Tollini
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the Design Review Board on any subject not on the agenda may do so under
this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Design Review Board is not able to undertake extended
discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring action will be
referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Design Review Board agenda. Please
limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Any communications regarding an item not on
the agenda will not be considered part of the administrative record for that item.
STAFF BRIEFING (if anv)
OLD BUSINESS
1. 65 HARRIET WAY: File No. DR2016032; J.R. Begg, Owner; Site Plan and Architectural
Review for construction of additions to an existing single-family dwelling. The floor area
of the proposed house would be 2,181 square feet and the house would cover 2,650 square
feet (29.2%) of the site. Assessor's Parcel No. 034-212-12. [KO]
NEW BUSINESS
2. 2051 VISTAZO EAST STREET: File No. DR2016046; David Godfrey, Owner; Site Plan
and Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single-family
dwelling. The project would add a one-story wing to the upper level of the existing house,
including a family room, guest bedroom, office, bathroom and powder room. The floor area
of the house would be increased by 1,190 square feet to a total of 4,412 square feet and the
lot coverage would be increased by 1,310 square feet to a total of 3,913 square feet (9.1%).
Assessor's Parcel No. 059-082-26. [DW]
3. 8 APOLLO ROAD: File Nos. DR2016080 & VAR2016021; Cedric Barringer, Owner;
Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single-
family dwelling, with a Variance for excess lot coverage. The floor area and the lot
coverage of the house would be increased by 726 square feet for a lot coverage of 35.3%,
which is greater than the 30.0% maximum lot coverage allowed in the R-1 zone. Assessor's
Parcel No. 038-301-14. [DW] CONTINUED TO AUGUST 18, 2016
Design Review Board Agenda
August 4, 2016 Page 1
MINUTES
4. Regular Meeting of July 21, 2016
ADJOURNMENT
Design Review Board Agenda
August 4, 2016 Page 2
MARIN COUNTY HAZARDOUS & SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
AB 939 LOCAL TASK FORCE
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
1600 Los Gamos, Suite 211
San Rafael, CA
8:30 — 10:00 AM
AGENDA
DIGEST
i2/A -(
Call to Order.
1) Open Time for Public Comment
2) Approval of the March 2, 2016 JPA Local Task Force Minutes (Action)
3) Program Updates (Information)
• Overview
• Focused:
i) School Zero Waste Programs.
ii) Zero Waste Grants.
iii) Household Hazardous Waste Programs (HHW, bulb & battery, used oil, marine
flares).
4) Local Task Force Subcommittees (Information)
5) Open Time for Member Comments (Information)
The full agenda including staff reports can be viewed at:
http://zerowastemarin.org/Agenda
F.•l WasfelJPA1LTFIAGENDA! 16-07-06.doc
--E,
IR
III IIIIW
III MEM
IN ■i■
All public meetings and events sponsored or conducted by the County of Marin are held in accessible
sites. Requests for accommodations may be requested by calling (415) 473-4381 (voice) (415) 473-3232
(TTY) at least four work days in advance of the event. Copies of documents are available in alternative
formats, upon written request.
Contact the County's Waste Management Division, at 473-6647 for more information
03 August 2016 LTF
Page 1