The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTC Digest 2006-06-02 TOWN COUNCIL WEEKL YDIGEST Week of May 29 June 2, 2006 1) T own Calendar - June 2006 2) Thank Yon from Reed Regatta Posse to Heidi Bigall & Diane Crane Iacopi 3) #3 has been removed. If you need to know what it was, call Heidi. Tks. 4) Correspondence from Troy Bassett - re: Construction Upd. - Lyford Undergr. 5) Correspondence from Nicholas Nguyen - re: Contract for Lyford Undergr. 6) Memorandum from Scott Anderson - re: Action on Kol Shofar EIR 7) Email from Jennifer Madden - re: Fountain Construction Update 8) Notice from Bd of Supervisors - re: Amendments To Development Code 9) Monthly Report - Office of Design Review - May 2006 10) Yearly Recap - Design Review Submittals - May 2006 11) Minutes - Design Review Board - April 24, 2006 12) Minutes - Planning Commission - April 26, 2006 13) Minutes - Planning Commission - May 10, 2006 14) Minutes - Design Review Board - May 18, 2006 15) Minutes - Hillhaven Property Owners Assoc. - May 20,2006 16) Action Minutes - Planning Commission - May 31,2006 17) Action Minutes - Design Review Board - June I, 2006 Attached Original Separates (Councilmembers Only) 1a) Correspondence from Walmart - re: Becoming a Better Corporate Citizen 2a) Transactions - Newsletter of MTC - May/June 2006 3a) One to One - Newsletter of Big Brothers, Big Sisters - Spring 2006 ofS en be C .- .. G.I G.I :E ....0 o o M ~ ~ ~ I- en w (!) - C en G.I .- ...... .- > .- ...... U c:c c o I- ::I .J:a .- I- \t- O C ~ o I- M =: Q ac:: =>> !; '" N =: Q ;: LL. =: Q '" ac:: =>> %: ~ =: Q '" w Z Q w ~ =: Q '" w =>> ~ =: Q Z o :E =: Q Z =>> '" l~ ~~ ~~ <:::i~ ~I o~ ~ ~ _c::i. ~s:::. ~~ ~~ = = ,.:..: c a::: -< o CCl ~ ~ a::: :z: ~~ co..: ~ ,.... o~ is ~ o~ .~ ~ oS: ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0. ~ - ~= ....= :E~ >- ,g E -c ni ... = ~~ ..!! :i: = ~ ~ ~ ~ C>.. = ~ 11: :::: !->' ~~~ ~~ ~~~ "i:~J1~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ .... ..0 &on - ~ ~ [.... 0= ~~ c = .... ~ ~ .s Os ~ E o 0 c...... ~ ~ 0..: ~ ,.:..: --' U :z: = o ...... :z: ~ o ...... !:::: '" ~ ~~ ~~ '-"\ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ o~ :::~ ~~ ::2 l~ oS: . ~~ ~~ !->-..;;; ~' o~ ~ ~c::i... ~s:::. ~~ o..O::~ ~ :z: o i= -< = c ~ ~ a::: -< :E --' ..... C ::!: ~ ..0 i: ... ~ o >- ... :E .... .... ~ o >- ... :E !:! i:i ~ [.... 0= ... = ~ci:i c i ~ s Os ~ ~ c...... = = ~ c a::: -< o CCl ~ ~ a::: :z: ~E co..: ~ N ~ I~ ~~ ~~ <:::i~ ~I o~ ~ ~ _c::i. ~s::. ~~ o..O::~ N N N ~ ,.:..: :z: o ~ i: :E o ...... ~ :z: Z 5~ 1:1..0...: C) N 2:: - ~ ~ [.... 0= ~~ c = .... ~ ~ S Os ~ E o 0 c...... !!2 ,.... o~ is ~ o~ .~ ~ oS: ~ ~ 1:: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \.;:; C) M '~ ~~ ~~ <:::i~ ~I o~ ~ ~ _c::i. ~s::. ~~ o..O::~ 0- N ... ~--:- a::: E = ci. ~~ 0-.. ~ :!:= :z: = ~tS ...... - ""-;;S ...... :r: ~o~ ..... ...... co N ~ 0..: ~ ,.:..: --' U :z: = o ...... :z: ~ o ...... .... N ..0 N - :i5 ~ [.... 0= ... = ~cic:i c = .... ~ ~ S Os ~ E o 0 c ...... &on N I. l~ oS: . ~.<:::i... .....~ ~~ !->-....;;. ~' o~ ~ ~c::i... ~s:::. ~~ ~~ ~ z: ~ i: :E o ...... I.=' :!: :z: 5~ 1:1..0..: ~ 0..: = ~~ <: ~~ ~~ I- :E ~:E :r:8 \ . ~ ~~--..........~~-~~--.............~-------~------~~-~----------~-~-~--~-~, l],. . : ~ , . [I ~,' ~.: . .. .~. ~ I] i ". f' [I ( 4- -~~ - · ~ ..... -- ~ t ". I' " :. I. >> Ij I " . /,~: .,..~.... J' ", <.. .: . ' [I ~ l -:- (' ~ ' ^~~ "': ~ I! 'i: / . · ,.., ",.:0, '~jJ,.~,,~,7,../.t!.. ~. . ~I I] . J i~. ~'r-. ' , . [I ~ ".",,/ ~ I] .. [I ~ ~ ~ ~ ,i . ." . .. ... . - - ,_._ _ . [\ ~~------~---------~--------=--~-~-----~. ~ ----' ----- - --- ~ - ~- -~ ~ ~-- ~ - ---- ~ ~ Tha....k You! .-..0... the Reed Regatta Posse [;~a~ (j;~' ot-. 0-La::.c ---7) . ~;ilILZldt_ r ~ ~~wr ~ (lcn pb1.a.1x-u-e u0.dL ..;:&kJ to-f) ~ ~1.+ ~)U1AL"+ / ~ ~ () ~ cA-Uc:uU{f J ~ / ~ ~ Jt)~ /}WtKt-. ~~ai- vbh tlt{ko Yo ~- J-w cJ _ / 'I () YO /; ~. Jij) ~~~~w~ WJ1 /J)] MAY 3 1 2006 IJ!) DIGEST 1/ ~~' tOWN CLERK TOWN OF TlaURON ~ .~ Town ofTiburon · 1505 TIburon Boulevard -liburon, CA 94920. P. 415.435.7373 E 415.435.2438 . www.ci.tiburon.ca.us Department of Public Works 415.435.7354 June 2, 2006 .i)IQ~ ~8,. To Lyford Cove Property Owners Subject: Construction Update Lyford Cove Undergrounding Assessment District The contractor for the utility undergrounding project, Maggiora & Ghilotti, are getting ready to start work. They have already begun preliminary site investigation, as you have probably noticed, crews are marking the street, and the contractor is working with the district engineer to resolve the problems being found in the field regarding the location of equipment and conduit. Beginning June 12, before work on the joint trench itself begins, the contractor will be doing localized digging to determine existing soil conditions; digging for the installation of vaults will follow, starting along Mar East and Centro East. Maggiora & Ghilotti has submitted a preliminary construction schedule to the Town indicating their intention to begin work on the joint trench on Centro East starting at Diviso. The work on the joint trench will probably start around the first week in July. J We will be working with the contractor to minimize as much of the disruption caused by the construction as possible, butplease remember, there will be a significant amount of noise, dust, and inconvenience, as is true with all construction projects. Maggiora & Ghilotti is responsible for the work in the public right-of-way; resident cooperation with Maggiora & Ghilotti is going to be critical in allowing the contractor to finish his work on schedule AND on budget. Please try to avoid areas where the contractor is working as much as is possible; remember to move parked cars where the contractor needs to work. If you have immediate concerns about what the contractor is doing at any particular time, you can contact Harris & Associates field inspector, Jim Villa on his cell phone at (510) 579-1011. I will be sending regular updates to property owners as the project progresses; residents will also be receiving notifications regarding any work that may limit access to their homes. If you have any questions or concerns about the undergrounding project, you can always contact me by telephone at 435.7359, bye-mail at tbassett@cLtiburon.ca.us. I am not always able to respond immediately; however, if you will leave a message, your call will be returned. Troy A. Bassett Project Coordinator Utility Undergrounding Projects (I. Paul Smith Mayor ' . . ..-.-. :it.>.:".- -.-". . . . Tom Gram Vice Mayor . . ...,. -.-;.-. -:.. . . . Miles Berger Councilmember . . .. 'i1 . _.. ,-.. _. . . . AliceFred~ricks Councilmember . . . ..: -j',.'... . . . jeffSJavitz Councilmernber .I) Town ofTiburon - 1505 Tiburon Boulevard. Tiburon, CA 94920. P. 415.435.7373 E 415.435.2438 _ www.ci.tiburon.ca.us Office of the Town Engineer/415.435.73&8 May 26, 2006 Glenn Ghilotti Maggiora & Ghilotti, Inc 555 Dubois Street San Rafael, CA 94901 Subject: Lyford Cove Undergrounding Project ~Q ~8~ Enclosed is your fully executed contract with the Town of Tiburon for the subject project. You are hereby directed to start work withi 0 calendar days fter receipt of this notice. The project shall be completed within 25 . s from the official start of contract. The contract will start with either the first day of construction or the expiration of the above-mentioned 10-day period, which ever comes first. You are reauired to submit BDDroved traffic control clans and construction schedule prior to start of work. These and other submittals must be submitted within 5-calendar days of receipt of this notice. If you have any questions, please Isaac Dee at 925-827- 4900 x139 or me at 415-435-7388. Sincerely, \ ~\ ~~ .. ___ ... \'{J ~ Nicholas T. Nguyen, PE Director of Public Works Cc: ~eidi Bigall Troy Bassett Tony lacopi Rocco Collichia Isaac Dee . L .~ ~ 0 F TIJJv~. .. ~:.- ~~~~ -. t"\~~~.~ 'V\~ ::::::-- ~, " ('.,..-<'~~"o. .'/; o~~~c.' ~. f . {. Paul.. Smith Mayor . . . ... -. . .. . . . Tom Gram Vic~ Mayor . . .. . - . .. -. . . 'II '" '" Miles Berger Councilmember '" '" '" '" -. -.!t - '" '" '" . '" '" '" Alice Fredericks Councilmember '" '" '" '" '" ,.. '" '" '" '" '" '" Jeff Slavitz Councilmember .. ~ .<~ Town of Tiburon MEMORANDUM blQ~ ~8r ................. TO: Town Council FROM: Scott Anderson, Director of Community Developmen~ SUBJECT: Actions at Planning Commission Meeting of May 31, 2006 DATE: June 2, 2006 ........... ................... ....... ........ At its meeting of May 31,2006, the Planning Commission took action on the Kol Shofar EIR and Kol Shofar Conditional Use Permit application. The Commission unanimously voted to certify the EIR after concluding that the EIR was adequate and did not require recirculation. The Commission then voted 4-1 to deny the Kol Shofar Conditional Use Permit application. It is likely that both these actions will be appealed-----the EIR certification by neighbors of the project and the use permit denial by the applicant, Kol Shofar. The Planning Commission also approved a temporary use permit to allow a vacant lot in Old Tiburon (2240 Centro East Street) to be used as a construction staging and materials storage area for the Lyford Cove/Old Tiburon Undergrounding Project. That approval is also likely to be appealed by neighbors. The appeal deadline for all three items is Monday, June 1 ih, at 5:00 PM. It is anticipated that any appeal on the construction staging use permit would be heard by the Town Council on July 5. Any appeal hearing on the Kol Shofar items would be scheduled for a later meeting and the time frame is uncertain at this time. .,.':, .... Page 1 of 1 ..., '. Heidi Sigall From: Jennifer Madden [madden@reedmadden.com] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:03 AM To: Heidi Siga"; Nicholas Nguyen Cc: Tony lacopi blG~ ~.sr Dear Heidi, This is our bimonthly update on "Coming About". As you know, we have demoed the excess area around the fountain periphery as well as our fountain/vault area. We are still on schedule, however, our large concrete pour has been moved back a week. This delay has come from piping installation by our subcontractors. We are making every effort ~o insure that this will not impact things too much, and are working on other aspects of the project off site. This small delay also allows time for the city and PG&E to fix the low drainage problem by the vault. Benches are entirely fabricated in stainless steel, awaiting delivery and installation before final color concrete finishing on top. Sails are awaiting jet-cutting. The shop we employed is behind schedule, but should have them cut by the end of the week. From there, these pieces head to the benders, and then back to our shop for welding. All vault items have been ordered, including a larger vault cover 5'x7' (versus 5'x5') to allow for more room to move in the vault for service. A date of Saturday, September 30th, has been made by the Arts Commission and Ms. Zelinsky to unveil the piece. We do hope that the extra plaza work (outside our scope) will be done by this date. Please keep us posted as to the progress of the plaza work, e.g., who will be doing what and when. If this date is too optimistic, there is still time to change the unveiling to early October. We will be at the June 7th council meeting to answer any questions that may come up. Let us know if you need anything more from us regarding this. Thank you for your continued support. Jennifer Jennifer Madden Reed Madden Designs www.reedmgdclen.com 510.384.0804 6/1/2006 ". .' I I l ~ I ~ . ,- MARIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY /JIG~8r ALEX HINDS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MARIN COUNTY CODE TIT' v .,., m~VELOPMENT CODE) AMENDMENTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Marin County Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing to consider proposed amendments to the Marin County Development Code. The Development Code includes the zoning and subdivision regulations that govern the development and use of private and public land and building and structures located within the unincorporated areas of Marin County. The project includes proposed technical amendments to the Development Code that would clarify, correct, and update applicable sections of the zoning and subdivision regulations in order to improve its readability and ensure that the Development Code meets legal requirements and conforms to State law. The regulations affected by the proposed amendments include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) animal keeping; (2) energy efficiency devices; (3) inclusionary housing; (4) floating homes; (5) native tree protection and preservation; (6) residential second units; (7) Tamalpais Planning Area and Lucas Valley (Eichler) development standards; (8) lot line adjustment standards; (9) pubiic notice and appeals; and (10) definitions. Copie~ of the proposed Development Code amendments may be obtained from the Marin County Community Development Agency Planning Division, 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308, San Rafael, between the hours of8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday (excluding holidays). The proposed amendments are also available for review on-line at http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/CD/mainJindex.cfm. The certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Marin Countywide Plan (CWP) adequately evaluated the Development Code, which functions as an implementing program to the CWP. A subsequent or supplemental EIR is not required because the proposed project does not include substantial changes involving new or more severe significant environmental effects, nor does the proposal involve new information that was not known at the time the EIR for the CWP was certified. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be held at the regular meeting of the MarinCoWlty Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, June 13, 2006, in the Board of Supervisors Chambers (Room #330 - Administration Building), Civic Center, San Rafael, California, at the hour of 1 :30 p.m. Any interested party may appear and be -heard at this time. Please call the Community Development Agency _ Planning Division, at (415) 499-6269 on the Friday before the scheduled meeting to obtain a copy of the staff report, or visit our website at http://www.co.marin.ca.us/efilesIBS/AgMn/cvbaenda.htm. Written material for" the Board of Supervisors should be subnlitted to the Community Development Agency at least 10 days prior to the meeting date so that it can be distributed and considered by the Board of Supervisors with the staff report. Any written material submitted after this date will be distributed to the Board of Supervisors prior to or at the meeting. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that if you challenge the action on this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community Development Agency - Planning Division at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009(b)(2).) - G> ALEX HINDS Thomas Lai Agency Director Principal Planner Cur/tkl/projects/devcode/phase 2/bos-nt. doc OS/25/06 ~rI ---- ..... .... .~. ~ g 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308 - San Rafael, CA 94903-4157 415-499-6269 - Fax 415-499-7880 http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/CD/main/index.cfm AmotIoItn ~n ~ "'_lelS .... _Istrilg............y be nq_ee1 loycdng (.15) .""172 (TtJO) "'(.'5) ......104 ('roD & v....) et.... 72....... ~ _. Cop;os of~... _.. -!b'o -.. ~-. .~ . l-,l C4' t,);' 11. TOWN OF TIBURON b/Q~ . ~tr)- OFFICE OF DESIGN REVIEW MONTHLY REPORT MAY 2006 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATIONS: NUMBER SUBMITTED 2005 ~ NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ~ ~ SECONDARY DWELLING UNITS ~ ~ MAJOR ADDITIONS/ AL TERA TIONS ~ ~ MINOR ADDITIONS/ AL TERA TIONS ~ (not eligible for Staff Review) ~ SIGN PERMITS. ~ ~ V ARIANCE REQUESTS ~ FAR EXCEPTIONS REQUESTS ~ EXTENSION OF TIME 3 2 o o 2 2 3 1 1 o 4 1 o 1 o o STAFF REVIEW APPLICATIONS: Review of minor exterior alterations and additions of less than 500 square feet. 13 11 TREE PERMIT APPEALS: o o APPEALS OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS TO TOWN COUNCIL o 1 REPORT PREPARED BY: Connie Cashman, Planning Secretary DATE OF REPORT: June 1,2006 r . " ..............ii/... ....,........."7i77...,... Ii ....i .... ". ..'i/I. i/....... .'.. .7i) . ...... I...". 17i ....'.'..'../i, /i < ......, i7. '" .'.....'.."....'.,.'..,.. I, Ij .,> ..... ii/ 7 7i i7 \ /, /./7 '., , ('I 0 N - 0 - - - 0 - - ('I') 0 C\I ('I') T- ""'" 0 ('I') 0 0 T- O 0 ('I') T- O ('I') C\I (W') 0 0 T- O 0 C\I C\I 0 T- C\I C\I 0 0 C\I C\I 0 C\I ('I') 0 0 C\I ex> 0 0 }i ii T- T- 7/ i .I.i ......... "/\/,/,i Illce ,',. .7i ,i "....', iii 0 0 CO T- T- ""'" C\I ex> 0 T- .i/,...} ...ii 7 ..."..../ .' ',. ...., i7 .'.. .,'..,.....77 3= rJ) If . Ii...i..i7...'.... ..............,. ..J i, /\ ~ ~ w <( ,'77 ....... I.'.....//.i..... ."..i...... ............,....,.i.../.. ..J ~ ~ i rJ) D. :> W 7' ..J ..J ..J 0:: w w W D. / I ...'..> ...'.',. Ii /i7 0::. W <( <( 0 0 0:: D. rJ) ....,... LL 3= w ..J ,....,..,. > rJ) 0:: 0:: D. Z >< <( <( 1/. i< .................i li.'..i ~t.i,i C 0 <( W LL 3= 0 z it: u.. w W li/ ~.} hi 0 ..., Z C) 0:: <( W D. i >-0.. ...."'. W W <( ~ <( ~ 0:: D. :..., '.,,< ....... /-. .... ...... Z rJ) :E i Ci) LL rJ) t- <( ._,.,'. Jo. ~~ ~~l~t ' "'''U r CD o o N > <( :E ::E: C) =:) o 0:: ::E: t- rJ) ..J ~ o ~ 0:: <( w ~ ::E: t- Z o :E '" .a\ fl. MINUTES NO. 933 PLANNING COMMISSION April 24, 2006 Special Meeting Reed School Multi-Purpose Room '1199 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California ~/Q~ ~8}- CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Present: Chair Kunzweiler, Commissioners Aguirre, Collins, Fraser and O'Donnell Absent: None Staff Present: Interim Town Manager Bigall, Community Development Director Anderson, Planning Manager Watrous, Planning Consultant l'~ewman, Planning Consultant Charles and Meeting Recorder Williams ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING There were none. PUBLIC HEARING 1. 215 BLACKFIELD DRIVE KOL SHOFAR, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Lisa Newman, Planning Consultant discussed the project, conditional use permit application and the Environmental Impact Report. Ms. Newman noted that the Final EIR concludes that that the potential environmental impacts of the project can all be mitigated to a less than significant level with the exception of parking and noise impacts which remain as significant unavoidable impacts. Two Alternatives (#5 and #7) would also meet most project objectives and reduce all environmental impacts to a less than significant level. Ms. Newman stated that Staffs approach in the draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution is to regulate the intensity of the proposed use of the facility rather than limit its physical scale. Chair Kunzweiler asked for a better explanation of the calculations of parking requirements for the facility. Commissioner Collins stated that Kol Shofar could educate the congregation about parking on the street, carpooling and posting "no parking" signage on the street. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2006 MINUTES # 933 Paj!;c 1 ." t Ron Brown, immediate past president of congregation Kol Shofar discussed the project. He said that it has been an exhausting two years working on this application. He stated that this project is not a commercial venture. He stated that the prospects for growth in the congregation are negligible at best, citing a statement from a sociologist who specializes in the demographics of Jewish congregations. Rabbi Lavey Derby, senior Rabbi ofKol Shofar, stated that the mission ofKol Shofar is to go out into the world and make it a better place. He stated that Jews are a people, a family and a faith. He said that the project is a direct outgrowth of the religious mission ofKol Shofar. He described the need for an orthodox congregation to have a "meat and milk" kitchen for preparation of kosher foods. He said that Kol Shofar should not be forced to hold its High Holy Days services "at incorrect times." He stated that this is the way the congregation practices its Judaism, and that they are entitled to practice their religion as they see fit. Rabbi Derby urged the Commission to approve the project as modified in Alternative 7. Scott Hochstrasser, environmental planner for Kol Shofar, presented a Power Point summary of the project and noted that Alternative 7 substantially scales back the project and reduces noise impacts. He stated that this alternative would reduce all potential impacts to less than significant levels. He said that there was no reason why the Planning Commission could not take action on the proj ect at this meeting. Commissioner Kunzweiler asked Mr. Hochstrasser for a printed copy of the power point presentation for the record. Commissioner Kunzweiler also asked for a detailed breakdown of how the multi-purpose room would be used, with information on number of people and times of year. Commissioner Fraser stated that the numbers presented by Mr. Hochstrasser appeared to be different than those presented in the EIR and staff report and asked for an explanation of the calculations. Commissioner Fraser also referred to Exhibit 2 prepared by Leonard Charles and asked for a side-by-side comparison as well as for clarification of the uses for the multipurpose room. Rabbi Derby stated that the room will have dividers and can be used for various activities. Tiffany Wright, attorney for Kol Shofar, discussed the project from a land use perspective, stating that this was really quite a simple project with a lot of environmental review. She said that the process for this project represented CEQA in action, as changes made to the project reduced impacts to less than significant levels. She disagreed with the Staff report's findings regarding the need for improvements at the intersection of Tiburon Boulevard and Blackfield Drive. Joshua Harris, attorney representing Tiburon Neighborhood Coalition which represents 30 families, discussed the project's impact. He stated that the neighbors do not oppose modification and upgrades to the current facility, but opposed the massive expansion TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24. 2006 MINUTES # 933 Page 2 proposed, as it would reduce the quality of life for the neighborhood and create nuisances for the neighbors. He stated that the EIR fails to review impacts of ongoing services at Kol Shofar (existing Saturday and Sunday services). He felt that the EIR inexcusably does not address potential growth impacts that would be caused by the proj ect. He compared the project to building a major league baseball stadium but insisting that it would only be used by little league teams. He stated that the multi-purpose room impacts must be analyzed at full capacity because Conditional Use Permit limits can change. He stated that limits on the use of the facility would not guarantee limited usage in the future. Mr. Harris stated that CEQA requires a clear, stable project description, with all alternatives to be included from the beginning. He felt that the changes proposed require the EIR to be recirculated., He said that the Town has not been adequately informed by the EIR, and that the project would create an inappropriate, excessive use in a residential neighborhood. Jerry Thayer, member of Tiburon Neighborhood Coalition, noted that the numerous letters that have been received from neighborhood residents speak to the opposition for the expansion. He stated that the multi-purpose room would inevitably attract more people to the site. He submitted a set of pictures taken Oct. 16, 2005 during the peak period of High Holy Days showing parking on residential streets as well as a 19-page petition with 175 signatures from neighbors opposing the expansion. He stated that the surrounding neighborhood is saturated, and that this project would irrevocably reduce the quality of life for nearby residents. Mr. Thayer finally noted that the Tiburon Neighborhood Coalition is not against renovation at Kol Shofar, but recommended remodeling within the existing footprint of the buildings on the site. Commissioner O'Donnell asked Mr. Harris to estimate how many residences would be directly adversely impacted by the project. Mr. Harris replied that approximately 100 homes would be affected, adding that moving parking away from Kol Shofar with "no parking" signs would push parking into the surrounding neighborhood and affect other homes. The public hearing was opened. The following people appeared before the Planning Commission and spoke regarding the project: 1. Brad Tardy, architect, stated that he lives in his house 24/7, and that the project would restrict his right to quiet enjoyment of his property. The project would cause a 350% increase in noise and neighbors don't want noise lasting until 11 PM. He felt that the project would result in safety impacts due to an increased risk of accidents, as children use the streets at night to play. 2. Mike Bentivoglio stated that he is generally supportive of the project, but was concerned about late night events on the weekends. He proposed that Alternative 7 be approved with lights out at 9:00 p.m. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24. 2006 MINUTES # 933 Page 3 3. Richard Goldwasser, member ofKol Shofar, stated that noise is still an issue. He felt that the multi-purpose room would be convenient, but is not necessary. He noted that other Jewish congregations still hold split High Holy Days services. He felt that Kol Shofar has not adequately explored alternatives to a big building, and encouraged them to use temporary structures to meet the demand for High Holy Days service. 4. Russell Pratt stated that he frequently travels down Blackfield Drive and felt that there is not going to be a fearful increase in traffic caused by this proj ect. He stated that he serves on the board of directors at Rodef Shalom in San Rafael and noted that attrition of the Jewish population is a challenge. He said that congregations need to improve services, including facilities. He felt that there will not be an explosion of growth associated with this project. 5. Rick Romagosa stated that he was skeptical about putting more cars on Blackfield Drive, resulting in traffic, noise and increased parking in the neighborhood, particularly at late night events. 6. Joe Blum stated that concerns about growth are speculative. He noted that the conditional use permit will be reviewed on annual basis, and encouraged the Commission to give Kol Shofar a chance to be responsible. 7. Ken Gerstman, member of Kol Shofar, stated that Kol Shofar is an integral part of the community, and that the community has changed for the better. He said that Kol Shofar needs to build a facility to meet the existing needs of its community. 8. Aviva Boedecker, member ofKol Shofar, said that not all events in the multi- purpose room would have the maximum number of attendees. She said that people do not need to be stressed out about the maximum numbers and late night events. 9. Lizabeth Light stated that she has found Kol Shofar to be a good neighbor. She added that traffic can be a problem during High Holy Days, but the visitors are quiet and respectful, and the Police are there to regulate traffic. She supports the expanSIon. 10. Virginia Brunini stated that 70 homes in Bel Aire would be directly impacted by the project. She said that Kol Shofar has not offended the sensibilities of the neighborhood, but this project would change the quality of life for residents of Bel Aire, Cypress Hollow, Via Los Altos and Paseo Mirasol. She stated that the parking shortage is a concern and it is not satisfactory to wait a year to evaluate impacts. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24. 2006 MINUTES # 933 Page 4 11. Gail Dorph stated that she does no drive on the Sabbath, and moved to a location so she could walk to Kol Shofar. She noted that there are a lot of churches in Tiburon, which provide religious grounding for the residents. 12. Michael Rubenstein, member ofKol Shofar, stated that the opposition to this project has engaged in a lot of hyperbole. He said that the facilities will not be used to their maximum capacity. He felt that the neighbors do not trust the democratic process in the review of this project. 13. Evelyn Woo said that she strongly objects to the massive size of the expansion which would impact the entire neighborhood. She characterized Blackfield Drive as "a nightmare." She was concerned that people would park next to her house so she would be unable to enjoy the bucolic nature of the area. 14. Margaret Kirby stated that parking is a very intense issue. She said that the Kol Shofar parking lot was not functional, with bad interior circulation, and pushes cars out onto the surrounding streets. She said that members of Kol Shofar regularly park in front of her residence at 230 Blackfield Drive. She asked where the "no parking" signs would begin and end. She added that Kol Shofar members often park close by, then wave down the parking shuttle from the street. 15. 10hn Leszczynski stated that the Bel Aire neighborhood has not been considered by the EIR. He said that about 290 of the 490 on-street parking spaces available in Bel Aire are free each night. He assumed with a capacity of 900 for the multi- purpose room that up to 360 cars would be snaking their way through Bel Aire looking for parking. He suggested issuing parking decals for Bel Aire residents because that ensures real enforcement. He asked what would happen if Kol Shofar leaves the site. 16. 10hn Nygren presented photographs to the Commission showing parking on the streets during High Holy Days and the shuttle system does not work. He said that with a single service on High Holy Days on-street parking would double. He said that traffic grows exponentially, and that the Town needs parking enforcement. 17. Kurt Kaull stated that the inconsistencies of the project with the Tiburon General Plan are important. He said that the expansion would be out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. He said that having events until 11 :00 p.m. is a non- starter. 18. Karen Boedecker stated that summer bat mitzvahs are difficult for Orthodox 1 ews who cannot drive on the Sabbath. She said that Kol Shofar youth groups are active and would like to have interfaith activities. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24. 2006 MINUTES # 933 Page 5 19. Mindy Canter stated that High Holy Days traffic is acceptable but other events have become so loud that they can be heard inside her home. She felt that the project will change the quality of life in the neighborhood. 20. Thomas Szymoniak stated that other residential projects have stirred up Bel Aire quite a bit. He is concerned about traffic, noting that young children play in the . streets. He said that he is not impacted by Kol Shofar now, but felt that the project would have no benefit to him and would put the renaissance of Bel Aire at risk. 21. Diane Zack, President of Kol Shofar, gave a breakdown of the square footage of the multi-purpose room, noting that only 4,500 square feet would be usable space. She said that this room would be used for many existing activities, and did not represent a change or a massive expansion. She said that Kol Shofar desperately needs this space for activities they have now. 22. Andrew Rusting explained the decibel system and stated that he is concerned about the noise impacts of the project. 23. Ida Gelbart, member ofKol Shofar, stated that she is a Holocaust survivor and, by coincidence or providence, the next day is Holocaust Remembrance Day. She pleaded with the Commission to save the synagogue, and felt that she was a spokesman for her brethren who did not have the right to speak. She asked the community to put aside its differences and support the project. 24. Karen Nygren stated that the conditional use permit only regulates new uses, and she felt that the use permit can regulate existing uses as well. She said that the Town should be looking at a new cumulative use permit for Kol Shofar. She described the EIR as inadequate, and urged the Commission to look at the history of the site. 25. Tim Metz stated that the only place in Marin County with a larger capacity than the proposed project is the Veterans Memorial Auditorium. He said that the entire membership of Kol Shofar would be unable to fit into the proposed facility. He suggested renting tents to accommodate High Holy Days services or holding services in two different locations. 26. Doris Symonds was pleased that this site was not developed as a high school, as was once considered. She described traffic on Blackfield Drive as "horrendous," and said that the neighborhood is,now saturated with traffic. 27. Christy Seidel stated that traffic studies have not been prepared for Alternative 7. She said that many of the proposed events would occur during peak residential use times, which are weekend evenings. She characterized most of the proposed events as member-sponsored events and parties, not religious services. TlBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24. 2006 MINUTES # 933 Pag!.' 6 28. Wayne Gilbert stated that Kol Shofar is not looking to bring in thousands of new members, but only wants a comfortable home for its existing members. 29. David Holden stated that it was unclear whether Staff feels that noise would a significant unavoidable impact or not. He felt that it is impossible to certify the FEIR with the confusion over the impacts. He stated that temporary noise constitutes a significant impact. He found it hard to believe that 250 people partying in a multi-purpose room will be inaudible. He raised concerns over the duration of peak noise events, and said that it was "quaint" to suggest that neighbors could have the enjoyment of their homes every other weekend. 30. Don Dana stated that he has monitored nighttime events at other locations, and noted that it generally takes about one and one half hours to clear a facility after an event. He said that limits should be established in the CUP to end events at 9:30 p.m. and have lights out at 11 :00 p.m. 31. Susan Schneider spoke about activities at Kol Shofar. She said that Kol Shofar is a second home to her, and a lot of what Kol Shofar does is to bring the Jewish community closer together. She expressed a need to be with a religious community to celebrate and pray. She stated that traffic and noise increases are part of living in Marin. She said that she goes to Kol Shofar three times a week, and never sees undue traffic in the neighborhood. 32. Julie Jacobs, member of Kol Shofar, noted that Bel Aire is an intense shaking area in the event of an earthquake, and that Kol Shofar is a designated facility in the event of a serious earthquake. She added that the multi-purpose room may serve that purpose for the community in case of an earthquake. 33. Paul Yenofsky acknowledged that the current building needs to be remodeled, but said that the community questions the size of the multi-purpose room, which suggests an increase in the size of the congregation. He said that if the net effect of the multi-purpose room is the same as a bar or restaurant, it should not be considered. He suggested limiting the time of events to 9:00 p.m. 34. David Wong said Kol Shofar is a great neighbor but raised concerns about increased traffic, parked cars and near accidents. He felt that the site is not conducive to growth, the parking lot doesn't work, and that the proposed mitigation measures are complicated and unenforceable. 35. Laurie Snow stated that Kol Shofar provides essential support for the community. She said that the old facility is too small for the congregation. She said that Kol Shofar is beneficial for the surrounding community, and that she hopes to be married there one day. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2006 MINUTES # 933 Page 7 36. Marshall lainchill said that it is a shame that people feel that churches are inconsistent with the quiet enjoyment of residential property. 'He said that he would not know 600 people to invite to a single event at Kol Shofar. As a real estate broker, he stated that the project would not affect real estate values in the vicinity . 37. Alan Zimmerman stated that we all live in this community and that houses of worship add a tremendous amount. He said that the project is not about growth, but for providing for existing events. He said that everyone drives in everyone else's neighborhoods, and it is the job of residents to live together and share the neighborhood. 38. Edward Baker stated that the conditional use permit will permit non-residential activities in a residential neighborhood. He said that parties are not religious or educational events. He characterized the architecture of the proposed multi- purpose room as an enormous wart added to an existing carbuncle. He said that better photo simulations are needed showing the new building from his house. He noted that much of Kol Shofar is screened by broom that is to be cut down. He said that the current views of the neighbors may be unattractive, but they like them. 39. Lisa Kasselik invited the Commission to visit the neighborhood on Wednesday afternoons when religious instruction is ending. She said that at those times, people parked in red zones create a logjam. She did not believe that Kol Shofar will police itself to make the proposal work. Gary Ragghianti, attorney for Kol Shofar, stated that a possible continued hearing date on May 1 was not acceptable. He asked if it is possible that all of the people who object to the project are correct and that staff and consultants are uniformly incorrect. He said that the facts of the matter should drive the decision, and encouraged the Planning Commission to approve the project. Bob Herman, architect for Kol Shofar, stated that CEQA only requires recirculation of an EIR if new impacts are identified or severely increased impacts occur. He said that it is counter to the intent of CEQA to punish the applicant by requiring recirculation for reducing the impacts of a project. Scott Hochstrasser stated that independent consultants have found that Alternative 7 will not result in any significant unavoidable impacts. He noted that this application is for an amended conditional use permit, as the existing use permit is the baseline for current uses ofKol Shofar which do not have to be studied any further. He added that the last time the Planning Commission reviewed the existing use permit Kol Shofar was found to be consistent with the Tiburon General Plan. He characterized the proposed expansion as a project the Town really cannot deny. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2006 MINUTES # 933 Page 8 Commissioner Aguirre asked if it would be legitimate for the EIR to address existing uses if the project can result in changes to the existing uses. Mr. Hochstrasser replied that that would be inappropriate. He said that when a change is proposed for a residential project, the homeowner is not expected to tear down the existing house. Joshua Harris responded that CEQA has many requirements that must be strictly followed. He said that the alternatives identified for this project do no think outside the box. He said that facts are in conflict between the DEIR and the FEIR. Mr. Harris also noted that the new parking mitigation introduces a host of substantial impacts on the neighborhood as well as impacting other neighborhoods by pushing parking away from the site. He added that there are no congregational growth studies in the EIR. He said that mitigation measures effect.ively truncate the Town's ability to make an effective decision on the project. He stated that the proposed multi-purpose room is not only for High Holy Days. Commissioner Aguirre asked if CEQA requires looking for even more alternatives when an identified alternative results in no significant unavoidable impacts. Mr. Harris responded that it is important for the DEIR to identify appropriate alternatives. Commissioner O'Donnell referred to Mr. Harris' previous baseball stadium analogy, noting that a new baseball stadium will not attract fans for a bad team. He asked how the Planning Commission can assess growth in hypothetical situations. Mr. Harris replied that there is not enough space for the existing congregation, and with the new facility, more people will come. He said that the congregation numbers will grow in ways that have not been studied in the EIR. He said that the Town cannot think that building a handsome new facility will not attract more people. The public hearing was closed. The Planning Commission discussed the possibility of continuing the hearing to- May 1. Mr. Ragghianti confirmed that his firm would not be available for that evening. Mr. Harris indicated that their lead attorney had been unable to attend this evening's meeting. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that attempts should be made to find a date at which the primary parties could all attend. Chair Kunzweiler warned that this could result in a continuance of several weeks or more. MIS, Collins/Aguirre (passed 5-0), to continue the public hearing to a date uncertain, to be renoticed. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11 :45 p.m. TIB1JRON PLANNING COMMISSION MIN1JTES OF APRIL 24, 2006 MINUTES # 933 Pa~e 9 ATTEST: SCOTT ANDERSON, SECRETARY TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2006 JOHN KUNZWEILER, CHAIRMAN MINUTES # 933 Page ] 0 I~. MINUTES NO. 934 PLANNING COMMISSION April 26, 2006 Regular Meeting Town Council Chambers 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California blQ ~-r~ The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m.. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Kunzweiler, Vice-Chair Fraser, Commissioner O'Donnell Absent: Commissioners Aguirre and Collins Staff Present: Community Development Director Anderson, Planning Manager Watrous and Meeting Recorder Creekmore ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING Community Development Director made the following announcements: . The next Kol Shofar CUP meeting will be scheduled for May 1 O~ . The next Planning Commission meeting is a workshop with the Town Council and is scheduled for May 2; . The Town Council approved the Tiburon Glen Development Project and they approved no tree planting on Gilmartin Drive and instead opted for a combination of other sites on the peninsula~ . The Town Council adopted both Zoning Ordinance text amendments as forwarded by the Commission. Copies have been sent to HCD letting them know that the Town believes the Housing Element is in total compliance and requesting confirmation~ . A summary of the Town Council and Design Review Board workshop will be placed in the Commissioner's mailboxes~ . A list of planning-related materials prepared by the Institute for Local Government has been distributed to the Commission~ please let Staff know of any items you wish to have purchased~ . Staff will hold interviews for the new Assistant Planner position on May 5 and hopes to have the new hire on board by June. Commissioner O'Donnell announced that he has previous relations with the applicants for both items but that he can certainly judge both items fairly. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 26, 2006 MINlJTES # 934 Pa~e 1 ?",," . '\ ~ . ,. \ Planning Manager Watrous stated that it has been determined that there is no legal conflict of interest that would preclude Commissioner O'Donnell from acting on either of the applications. PUBLIC HEARING 1. 761 Hilary Drive: Review of Conditional Use Permit #19908 granted to expand the facilities for an existing church (81. Hilary Catholic Church) and school; Assessor Parcel Nos. 055-253-20 and 055-221-06 Planning Manager Watrous presented the Staff report. Father James Tarantino, pastor of the Parish ofSt. Hilary, commented on the controversy surrounding CYO activities and the gymnasium and said that not only will the applicant be in compliance but that two-thirds of CYO players are from the local community and that the players have been performing very well. He commented on the Staff report and said that the record should reflect that the community approached the church to request the [previously-granted] modification to the Conditional Use Permit and CYO activities. The public hearing was opened and closed. There were no comments. Commissioner O'Donnell commented that previous contentions between" the church and the community have dissipated and that renovations have served the community fabulously. Vice Chairman Fraser applauded the efforts of the community and the church to work together. Chair Kunzweiler echoed the comments of his fellow commissioners. The Planning Commission agreed by unanimous consent that there are no needed changes to the Conditional Use Permit at this time. 2. 642 Tiburon Boulevard: Conditional Use Permit to Operate a Large Family Day Care Home serving up to 12 children; Lars Bergholdt and Lara Bisserier, owners and applicants; Assessor Parcel No. 055-171-25 Community Development Director Anderson presented the Staff report. Vice Chairman Fraser asked how it is determined that an intersection becomes more dangerous than it already is. Community Development Director Anderson replied that he does not think that there are any simple improvements that could increase the safety of the intersection, other than CalTrans requiring a right-turn-only from Bayshore Terrace. He said that the Staff's approach on this application has been to try to keep the levels of impact from the Large Family Day Care Home to a level where they mimic the existing impacts from the Small TlBlJRON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 26. 2006 MINUTES # 934 Paj!:e 2 Family Day Care Home which is not subject tot Town regulation. In response to a question by Commissioner Fraser, Anderson said he believed the speed limit is 40 miles- per-hour along that part of Tiburon Boulevard. Chairman Kunzweiler referenced Item 7 of the Staff report and asked how vehicles exiting the property would be regulated to avoid forming a queue along Bayshore Terrace. Community Development Director Anderson replied that if a second client vehicle was exiting the subject property, they would have to wait in the parking area of the property until the first vehicle had cleared the intersection, in order to avoid queuing. Chairman Kunzweiler referenced Item 8 and asked if the operator of the center would be required to inform clients that they must make a right turn when exiting the property. Community Development Director Anderson replied that the operator would make it clear that part of the privilege of being a client is to comply with that requirement. Lars Bergholdt, owner and applicant, gave an overview of his application and noted that he has created his own set of conditions in an effort to address noise, traffic, and parking issues. He explained that those conditions include limiting the number of children from 14 to 12 (noting that two children are permanent residents of the property) and requiring that two children would have at least one or more siblings, which would reduce the number of potential cars from 14 to 8. He said that a small day care license, which the center has been operating under, allows for eight children. He said that he monitored traffic for a one-week period and provided the results along with pictures of the parking situation to the Commission. He said that parking has never been an issue at the center and with the additional conditions he has set, he does not foresee any parking issues in the future. He said that he sent correspondence to his clients requesting that they make a right turn onto Tiburon Boulevard followed by a left turn on Rock Hill Drive during peak traffic periods. Mr. Bergholdt said that in terms of noise, he is permitted have up to eight children playing outside from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., seven days a week, but that he will limit the number of children allowed to play outside to six and only during the intervals of 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., weekdays only. He said that he willliave a side fence installed, as required by the State, before children at the large family day care will be permitted to play outside. He noted that there is a large demand for day care centers in Tiburon and that under State law the center is permitted to provide care for more children than what he is proposing to limit the center to. Vice Chairman Fraser asked what are the center's current hours of operation. Mr. Bergholdt replied that it operates from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., weekdays only and reiterated that outside play is limited to the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Chair Kunzweiler said that he likes the idea of having two children with siblings but asked Mr. Bergholdt how he plans to address what will happen when one of the children leaves the center to begin school. Mr. Bergholdt said that he realizes that he may have to drop a client to satisfy this requirement. TlBlJRON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 26, 2006 MINUTES # 934 Page 3 Steve Brady, Tiburon resident, said that his property is adjacent to the center and expressed concerns over traffic safety. He said that as an attorney who specializes in highway design cases, he recommended that the Town retain a safety consultant before making a decision on the application. He noted Town Engineer Bernardi's memo regarding Police Chief Odetto' s traffic safety concerns and said that he has almost been hit by parents dropping off their children at the center. He said that the intersection is one of the most dangerous in Tiburon and that even a slight increase in traffic puts kids and their parents in more danger. He urged the Commission to observe the traffic conditions for themselves at 8 a.m. before making a decision on the application. Mark Lomas, Tiburon resident and property owner adjacent to the center, said that he has been communicating with Mr. Bergholdt and Mrs. Bisserier regarding the sound-proof fence. He asked the Commission if they could provide any information regarding materials or other details about the fence. Community Development Director Anderson replied that he had discussed this matter with a few acoustic consultants and his research indicated that a fence which would cut noise appreciably, approximately 5 to 8 decibels, would typically be at least 6 feet high, with no cracks or gaps even at the bottom, and either 2 layers of I-by overlapping redwood boards or 2 layers of 5/8-inch plywood. Mr. Bergholdt said that it would be in both Mr. Lomas' and his own best interest to build a sound-proof fence. In response to traffic safety concerns, he said that his clients are safe and cautious drivers. He provided the Commission with photographs of ongoing construction work at Mr. Brady's property and said that vehicles related to that construction pose their 'own hazard to traffic on Tiburon Boulevard. He said that he thinks that what he is proposing for the facility is very fair and added that if he is unable to meet the sibling requirement that he will reduce the number of children at the day care. He concluded by stating that the day care provides a much-needed service to the community . Commissioner O'Donnell asked Mr. Bergholdt if he has another business in addition to the day care facility. Mr. Bergholdt replied that he is also a child safety consultant and added that he also writes articles related to child safety. Jay Jacobson, Tiburon resident, said that he has concerns about traffic safety and pointed out on the photographs provided by Mr. Bergholdt that the reason for some of the traffic safety problems is that there is no opportunity for vehicles to slow down before entering Bayshore Terrace. He suggested that if a wider shoulder of Tiburon Boulevard were paved near the Bayshore Terrace intersection, it would give drivers an opportunity to pull off the travel way sooner and get out of the way of through traffic. He also suggested that the speed limit be reduced to 35 miles-per-hour. Chair Kunzweiler informed Mr. Jacobson that the road is under CalTrans jurisdiction and is not under the Commission's purview. In response to concerns raised by Mr. Jacobson regarding parking violations, Chair Kunzweiler recommended that he contact the Tiburon Police Department. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 26, 2006 MINUTES # 934 Page 4 There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner O'Donnell said that he is in support of the application. He said that he recognizes the traffic hazard with the turn on Bayshore Terrace, but that the thinks it is an inherent problem that exists with or without the small increase in traffic associated with the day care. He said that the voluntary restrictions that the applicant has placed on the facility are a benefit, and that he does not know that the Commission has the jurisdiction to require a traffic study. He said that Tiburon is in dire need of day care and that the applicants are doing an adequate job of providing a service to the community. He said that the application is suitable for a day care facility for 12 children. Vice Chair Fraser asked what is the Town's authority as it relates to the impact of day care centers on the surrounding neighborhood. Director of Community Development Anderson replied that for a large family day care home, the Town can require a Conditional Use Permit. He explained that there are a limited number of specific categories that the Town can address through "reasonable" conditions, those being spacing and concentration, noise, traffic, and parking. He said the Town does not have the usual amount of latitude normally associated with Conditional Use Permits. He confirmed that the Town is pre-empted from any discretionary permit process for small family day care homes. Vice Chair Fraser said that he does have concerns with traffic safety. He acknowledged that the intersection is unsafe, but that he is unsure as to how to mitigate it. He said that he is not convinced that a couple of cars will make a significant difference but that he would like to have a shorter use permit review time frame to allow for feedback from neighbors and the applicant. He said that he would like the resolution to be as thorough as possible in regards to the fence issue and that it should be very specific in its requirement to meet acoustical standards. Chair Kunzweiler noted that Commission is in agreement with concerns regarding safety issues. He noted that the voluntary limitations suggested by the applicant essentially take the impact of the application back to those of a small day care home use. He said he sees some challenges with the limitations, particularly the residency restriction. He suggested that the applicant impose an "8-car daily" restriction to address traffic safety concerns. The Commission agreed to modify the review timeframe to six months in order to evaluate any adverse conditions that may arise. Chair Kunzweiler recommended that Item 3 be modified to require that the fence be approved by a town-appointed acoustic engineer. He recommended that Item 5 be modified to limit outdoor use to the hours of 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 3 p.m. to 5 p.m., weekdays. He also recommended that "no more than 8 vehicles or 10 children not living with the applicant" be included as an additional limitation in the resolution, with direction to Staff to finalize the precise condition wording along these lines. MIS O'DonnelllFraser (passed 3-0) to approve the resolution as amended. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 26. 2006 MINUTES # 934 Page 5 MINUTES 3. Planning Commission Minutes -Meeting of April 12, 2006 Amend the following: Page 3, Item 2, paragraph 4, last sentence: Include "without addressing the paving issue. He said that at last year's review, the Commission agreed improvements to the parking lot were needed as such. He believes the condition should remain as previously agreed." Page 4, Item 3, paragraph 4, sentence 1: Correct misspelling of "testimony". M/S Fraser/O'Donnell (passed 3-0) to approve the minutes as amended. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. JOHN KUNZWEILER, CHAIRMAN Tiburon Planning Commission ATTEST: SCOTT ANDERSON, SECRETARY TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 26. 2006 MINUTES # 934 Pa!!!' 6 MINUTES NO. 935 PLANNING COMMISSION May 10,2006 Regular Meeting Main Sail Ballroom, the Lodge at Tiburon 1651 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California i)IQ~ ~8)'- CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Present: Chair Kunzweiler, Commissioner Aguirre, Commissioner Collins, Commissioner Fraser and Commissioner O'Donnell Absent: None Staff Present: Community Development Director Anderson, Planning Manager Watrous, Planning Consultant Newman, and Meeting Recorder Williams ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING Staff Updates: Community Development Director Anderson noted that the May 24 meeting would be cancelled and that the next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for June 14,2006 with the possibility of a special meeting on May 31, 2006. Commission Information Items: There were none. PUBLIC HEARING 1. 4144 PARADISE DRIVE: REQUEST TO MODIFY PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS TO CONSTRUCT A FIXED PIER AND FLOATING DOCK; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #10602; Peter Paul, Owner; Noble Consultants, Applicant; Assessor's Parcel Nos. 038-171-75 and 76 Planning Manager Watrous noted that the current plans were a modification of the plans previously approved on May 16, 2006 that incorrectly showed the pier and dock location outside the Tiburon town limits. The plans have been modified to place the pier and dock within Tiburon. Planning Manager Watrous also noted that the design of the dock has not changed and that there have been no complaints from neighbors. Planning Manager Watrous finally recommended that the Planning Commission take testimony on the item. TlBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10, 2006 MINUTES # 935 Page 1 13. A". f .-' .. '", ' Scott Noble, applicant noted that the plans were modified to place the dock within , Tiburon Town limits and asked if anyone had questions. MIS Commissioner Collins/Commissioner Aguirre (5-5-0) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 2. 215 BLACKFIELD DRIVE: REVIEW OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL . IMPACT REPORT (FEIR) AND CONSIDERA TION ~F CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT MERITS FOR A PROPOSED EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RELIGIOUS FACILITY AND DAY SCH,OOL (CONGREGATION KOL SHOFAR); Congregation Kol Shofar, Owner and Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 038-351-34) (Continued from April 24, 2006) Chair Kunzweiler noted that due to the number of speakers and time limitations only twelve names would randomly be picked by the officer on duty to address the Planning Commission. Lisa Newman touched on two key aspects covered in the Staff Report; Alternative 7 and the Multi-purpose Room. Ms. Newman reported that the draft Conditional Use Permit incorporates the Alternative 7 version of Table 1 which identifies both new and proposed events as the baseline for the new Use permit. Ms. Newman noted that the baseline establishes the maximum numbers of attendees, days and times of "activities" and "events" during the week. Ms. Newman also noted that in order to mitigate traffic and noise impacts identified in the EIR, Condition #5 of the draft CUP limits the total numbers of attendees for any new events to 250 people, and limits the times for new weekend night events to 9:00PM for new Sunday events and 11 :OOPM for new Saturday night events. Wh~n larger, existing events occur, Conditions #4a and #7 in the draft CUP require specific traffic control measures be utilized. Ms. Newman also noted that the proposed 9,733 square foot Multi-purpose Room is a large space that is intended for lifecycle celebrations aild to accommodate the entire congregation during High Holy Days services. Although the space is sized to hold very large gatherings, the staff recommendation to limit the maximum number of attendees at all newly proposed events to 250 means that the facility would be "fully" utilized only on the High Holy Days, three days per year when the proposed combined services would allow up to 1,500 people in attendance at a combined service or 750 people per split service. Ms. Newman also noted that the next largest gatherings, after the High Holy Days, are the existing services on weekend mornings that are currently attended by up to 400 people. Ms. Newman further noted that according to the FEIR Alternative 7 Table 1, the Multi-purpose Room would be used for a number of smaller existing and proposed events each week, even though the room would not be fully utilized. Ms. Newman noted that the list of activities/events proposed for the Multi-purpose room as shown in Table 1 of Alternative 7 overlap. Ms. Newman noted that staff has not made a recommendation about the appropriateness of the proposed size of the Multi-purpose Room, but has focused on use restrictions such as TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MA V 10,2006 MINUTES # 935 Page 2 setting caps on the number of attendees and the frequency and duration of such events, which are linked to providing adequate parking onsite and minimizing noise impacts on adjacent neighbors. Ms. Newman finally noted that if the Planning Commission , concludes that the sheer size of the Multi-purpose Room is not in character or harmony with surrounding development, or is otherwise inappropriate for the residential setting, it could choose to reduce the size on General Plan and Zoning policy grounds. Commissioner Collins asked about two letters received on May 8 from the Tiburon Neighborhood Coalition's traffic engineer and sound consultant that disagree with the traffic and sound conclusions based upon Alternative 7 and whether the Coalition's consultants' conclusions had changed the Town's EIR consultant's conclusions as to the impact of the traffic and noise found in the FEIR. Leonard Charles responded that the conclusions of the FEIR analyses for traffic and noise had not changed. Ron Brown, immediate past President of Congregation Kol Shofar, spoke about traffic measures that were put into place last Saturday during an event that had 700 attendees and triggered CUP traffic control conditions. Mr. Brown noted that shuttle service was provided, letters were sent to neighbors informing them of events, and parking was provided at Tiburon Baptist Church. Mr. Brown presented photographs showing no parking on residential streets. Tiffany Wright, attorney for Kol Shofar, explained that the Conditional Use Permit being considered was for a Multi-purpose Room, four additional classrooms, and twenty-two ' additional parking spaces. Ms. Wright also noted that the current' Conditional Use Permit has no limits on events. She also noted that the only difference between Alternative 7 and the proposed project is that Alternative 7 will have the same impacts to a lesser degree; therefore any suggestion that more review is necessary really misses the mark as far as CEQA is concerned. Ms. Wright fmally noted that Kol Shofar requests the Commission to reconsider mitigation measures regarding the Tiburon Drive and Blackfield Drive intersection as it pertains to occasional back ups due to the project and that the applicant add seven additional parking spaces. Ms. Wright noted that limiting new events to 250 people provides adequate parking. Steven Volker, attorney for the Tiburon Neighborhood Coalition, spoke of the very substantial negative aesthetic impact of the seven hundred guest event and submitted photographs of the tent that was the size of the proposed building. Mr. Volker noted that the'proposed building is very substantial and also submitted photographs taken at 10:53 AM on Vio Los Altos of cars making unsafe turnarounds on adjacent streets which would be a significant safety hazard at night. Mr. Volker also noted that there seems to have been fundamental gaps in analysis of this project and urged the Planning Commis~ion to take a close look at the process. Mr. Volker also noted that one key point missing in the EIR analysis was the availability of alternate sites outside the town of Tiburon. Mr. V olker asked the Commission to ask Kol Shofar to examine off site options. Mr. Volker expressed there was a gap in the analysis with regard to establishing the maximum permitted usage of the existing facility, maximum additional usage that might take place TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,2006 MINUTES # 935 Page 3 in the existing facility, the EIR's failure to project reasonable growth in the congregation size and facility usage in the future, failure of traffic analysis that was presented with Alternative 7 to speak in certain terms about mitigations and the informality of some of the mitigations, the sharp criticism from a noise expert with 20 years of experience who stated that the Town's use of the LDN metric was inappropriate in this case. The public comment period was opened. Margaret Kirby, lives directly across from Kol Shofar, stated that she has been impacted most by parking and noise and feels that the parking issue needs to be resolved in a permanent way; signs are nice but will push the problem down the street. More parking is needed onsite. Ms. Kirby also expressed that during the 700 guest event she could hear specific voices in her backyard, people were walking the streets, and at night events people would be walking through the neighborhood making noise. Satoshi Tanaka, lives near comer of Blackfield Drive and Karen Way, expressed that a lot was done to mitigate parking but there was no parking near his house for guests on Saturday due to the 700 guest event at Kol Shofar. Peak noise is his main concern as well as traffic safety at Karen/Blackfield Drive intersection where people are not observing stop signs. He is not comfortable with the increase in traffic. John Nygren expressed concern about monitoring and enforcement of the CUP. He fmds Alternative 7 confusing. If you are only looking at new events, how do you monitor the existing ones? His big concern is creeping growth year-by-year. Events lasting until 11 :00 p.m. on Saturday nights are later than other facilities in Town and should be limited to 9:00 p.m. Michael Rubenstein, member of Kol Shofar and resident of Tiburon for 28 years, stated that experts agree. Alternative 7 mitigates impacts and gave examples of parking exemptions that San Francisco offers on weekends to support its citizen's religious life. Betsy Rosenberg expressed that she has an environmental radio show and is also a member of the Kol Shofar building committee expressed that the proposed facility will have limited environmental impact. ' Joel Rich, Kent Woodlands, member ofKol Shofar for 14 years noted that comments made by the opposition are not accurate, as there are no homes near Tiburon Baptist Church, the funeral of the husband of the former mayor was occurring at the same time as the 700 guest event which added to the parking demand. Mr. Rich also noted that synagogue has had no congregational growth in the last seven or eight years. Mr. Rich reminded the Commission that Bar Mitzvahs are for 13 year olds and not adult parties. Finally, Mr. Rich noted that the proposed building will be noise-secure and that during evening and later events the windows will be closed as those events are held in the winter. . TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10, 2006 MINUTES # 935 Page 4 Enid Rubin, lives two blocks from Kol Shofar and a member ofKol Shofar, noted that there is not unanimous opposition to the temple in the neighborhood. Ms. Rubin noted that she lives above Bel Air School, which has just expanded and there were no community hearings or opportunity to give input. Finally, Ms. Rubin noted that Bel Aire School has loud speakers that produce noise outside of the building and that there is . lots of traffic and night time events at Bel Aire School and no one complains about it. Virginia Brunini, lives between Bel Aire School and Kol Shofar, noted that she doesn't object to Kol Shofar, it's the size of the expansion and number of cars proposed, not the purpose of the expansion that is her concern. Ms. Bernini stated that she is also the past President of the Neighborhood Homeowners Association. She noted that project would overwhelm Bel Aire and asked the Commission to entertain a project that will contain the parking within the project or provide shuttle to available parking. Larry Duke, former Planning Commissioner, former Town Council member and former mayor, submitted written comments and made points that in 1984 when he was Mayor he clearly told Kol Shofar that the site was not appropriate for expansion. Mr. Duke also noted that the Town worked hard with Kol Shofar fifteen years ago and that neighbors were promised that they would be protected from any expansion. Lee Kranefuss, lives immediately next to Kol Shofar, stated that his family bought the home due to the walking distance of Kol Shofar but left Kol Shofar because of the friction in the neighborhood. Mr. Kranefuss noted that chanting and singing is a positive addition to the neighborhood, but the traffic and sounds of traffic are significant issues He stated that the discipline shown in parking for last weekend's event is rare. Mr. Kranefuss noted that he has offered to work with Kol Shofar on those issues. Finally, Mr. Kranefuss questioned Alternative 7' s effectiveness and encouraged the Commission to think of the area as a residential neighborhood. Samantha Winter, lives across the street from Kol Shofar, stated that she is concerned about the size of the Multi..;purpose Room, suggested High Holy Days remain split or held at an alternate location. Ms. Winter also suggested remodeling the existing square footage and said that the tent was an eyesore. Ms. Winter also feels like parking is an issue as there are Kol Shofar members who park in front of her house. Ms. Winter also stated that there is already a preschool with 100 children rented by Ring Mountain and suggested that Ring,Mountain find a new facility. Finally, Ms. Winter noted that events after 9:00 PM are way too late in a residential area. Susan Goldwasser, member ofKol Shofar, has three children lives in the neighborhood and feels Alternative 7 represents an unnecessary expansion. Ms. Goldwasser noted that events can be held offsite or a portable tent could be set up. Ms. Goldwasser also noted that parties are not religious events and can happen at alternative locations. She stated that the neighborhood has been accommodating and doesn't need new traffic and noise impacts. Finally Ms. Goldwasser noted that eighty percent of Kol Shofar congregants live outside of Tiburon. TlBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,2006 MINUTES # 935 Page 5 The public hearing was closed at 9:00 pm. Commissioner Collins noted that existing facility has 10,000 feet of mechanical rooms, and questioned if 10,000 feet was necessary to house the mechanical equipment. Mr. Brown noted that 6,000 feet of space is in the attic above the ceiling and is only accessible by crawling. . Commissioner Collins also asked about Samantha Winter's comment regarding the new preschool and Mr. Brown noted that the addition was in the original application and the additional fifty students would be a Kol Shofar sponsored school in collaboration with Ring Mountain who has the expertise to run the preschool. Commissioner 0 'Donnell asked about amplified music that might result from evening activities and Mr. Brown noted that they have been assured by architects that it is possible to keep noise inside the building. Commissioner O'Donnell asked ifKol Shofar has made the best effort to optimize parking onsite and Mr. Brown noted that they are willing to do more to help mitigate parking problems. Diane Zack noted that other measures that can be undertaken to improve the shuttle service and educating the congregation. Commissioner O'Donnell asked ifKol Shofar was on its best behavior at the Saturday 700 guest event, or if the effort was in good faith and Mr. Brown noted that the large event was the first time the traffic mitigation had been put into effect. Commissioner 0 'Donnell asked about goals and true plans for Kol Shofar growth five and ten years down the road to which Mr. Brown replied the presented plans were not building for growth. Diane Zack noted that there is no five year plan and that the congregation is not planning for growth. Commissioner O'Donnell asked if the Conditional Use Permit being requested tonight will be satisfactory in five years or will Kol Shofar come back and ask for an amendment, to which Ms. Zack answered yes and that there is the possibility that the Conditional Use Permit will evolve due to needs of neighborhood. Commissioner Fraser asked if High Holy Days have ever been held at other locations and Mr. Brown noted no as Kol Shofar is unable to fmd a location in Marin. Mr. Brown noted that the only available place is the Veterans Auditorium which is used by R. Shalom. He also noted that Kol Shofar has looked very carefully at other alternatives. Commissioner Fraser asked about the original Conditional Use Permit mentioned by former Mayor Duke and Mr. Brown replied that there are no restrictions in the original TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10, 2006 MINUTES # 935 Page 6 Conditi.onal Use Permit and that available d.ocumentation doesn.ot mention any restricti.ons mentioned by Mr. Duke. . , . , 'C.ommissioner Aguirre asked ,about the impact .oftraftic 'With the addition .of a new , preschool and'fifty new'cbildren,requested capa.cityofthe MUlti purposero.oin 'being that there is no .option to .open up !'be room ta .one large space and for clarification about events being held .only seven months .of the year. Rabbi Derby explained the Jewish Law regarding the Sabbath. In response ta Cammissioner Aguirre's inquiry as t.o why Kal Shofar hasn't found ways ta h.old events accarding t.o Jewish Law prior, Rabbi Derby n.oted that far the last twelve to f.ourteen years a task fame bas been assigned to l.ocatespace to no avail. Chair Kunzweiler asked from CEQAstandpoint what .other alternatives were considered and Tiffany Wright responded the availability .of offsite alteritatives was researched. Mr. ' Brown also neted that a three year Peri.od was spent lo.oking at altema;tives.; ChSJi, KUtlZWeiler askedab.out proposed site and size .of themulti-putpOse room and ' lobby and Mr. Brown noted that the assembly space is4S00 square feet due to the High Holiday and sit dawnditltler events and that the large lobby is aga-theling point and will be the lobby far the sanctuary as well. Rabbi Derby noted that the driving need is t.o be able to seat 750 pe.ople theater style and that the roam enables the space to be divided into three parts. Chair Kunzweiler asked about the f.ouradditi.onal classro.oms which is a net mcreaseaf abaut 3600 square feet and Ms. Zack noted that the f.our classro.oms will replace f.our to be eliminated in the remodel that are currently.under a balcony and have no windaws or natural light. Chair Kunzweiler asked about plans for the annex building and Mr. Brown nated that the existing building used as teen lounge, Ring M.ountain, and a stare room, and will cantinue t.o be 'used far the same things. Chair Kunzweiler asked about the c.onstructi.on plan far the project and where services will be held during construction .of the synag.ogue and Ms. Zack .noted that sites have been identified far rental during constructi.on. Chair Kunzweiler asked the size of tent erected last week, ta which Ms. Zack noted 50' x 130' . Commissioner Fraser asked if a facility could be built with some degree .of flexibility within the existing 43,000 square footage. Diane Zack repliedna. TlBURONPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,2006 MINUTES 1# 935 Page 7 9 Bob Herman, architect, noted that even if reconfigured into the existing shell, the number of people and parking issues w~uld be the same. Chair Kunzweiler asked Tiffany Wright is she agreed that Table 1 is complete and Ms. Wright replied that Table 1 is the best representation~ Chair Kunzweiler noted that the Table needs to be correct. Gary Ragghianti, attorney noted that Table 1 is a comprehensive list of what is being proposed and that he does not believe that what the congregation chooses to do in the practice of its religion is the subject of the Conditional Use Permit. Chair Kunzweiler replied that Table 1 appeared, to be a mix of both religious 'and non-religious uses. . Commi,ssioner Collins as~ed Rabbi Derby about finding a place in Marin County that would accommodate the needs of Kol Shofar and replied that they have looked l?ut would p~fer to pray in their own synagogue. Commissioner O'Donnell asked Mr. Volker about the six different neighborhoo~ organizations he represents and that comprise the Coalition and Mr. Volker responded that the coalition is a group of thirty neighborS and that under the First .Amendment membership lists can't be questioned~ Commissioner O'Donnell asked .Mr. V oIker 'who is paying his bill and Mr. Volker noted that the Tiburon Neighborhood Coalition is paying his bill~ Tim Metz noted that' all nC(jghbors in the Coalition have sent in letters of opposition. Kurt Kau1l noted that the Coalition is comprised of a group of interested citizens pulling together. Commissioner O'Donnell asked who created thewebsite and Edward Baker noted that he created the website. Commissioner O'Donnell asked Mr. Baker if he put the American Flag on the website and Mr. Baker responded he did. Commissioner O'Donnell ~ked ifhe put tefere~ces about not being able to hear the birds, children not being able to sell lemonade and the quote that also mentions that , "Town ofTiburon realtors have said that property values may go down" and Mr. Baker responded yes. David Holden noted that the group came together after the project was delivered to the Town, decided to fonn a group, picked a name, opened bank account and that is how group was developed. Mr. Holden noted. that the group is comprised of thirty homeowners and collected 175 signatures on the petition submitted on April 24, 2006. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,1006 MINUTES # 935 \ Page 8 Commissioner O'Donnell asked Mr. V olkerabout the accep~ility of a tent. Mr. Volker noted th~photographs were taken of the tent to show a dramatic impact and to strongly encourage the' J"own to consider the alternative of the tent as there' wouldn't be large events every day of the year. Commissioner O'Donnell asked ifMr~Carm.en the sound engineer visited the affected homes in preparing his analysis and Mr. Volker noted that it is the Town's. function to perform the .anal.ysis of the affected homes; Mr. Carmen prepared a peer review of this .' - . .- analysis. , Mr. Holden noted that both the Draft and Final EIR used peer revi~w, as well as Kol Shofar. Leonard Charles noted that EIRnoise measurements were done on the site. Commissioner Fraser noted that local residents welcome the syrtagogQ.e; welcome the environment created and asked the Coalition for their ideal.recommendation. Brad Tartly, architect responded that proj.eet doesn't make sense and noted. that he could design. a faCility that could meet their needs within the existing footprint. Kurt Kaull noted project bas whittled down over time, but expressedconcem about the hours of usage and the multi-purposel"Qom. Mr. Volker stated tha~the utmostconcem of the Coalition is that the Town. stopped short o(examin'"g l~cations beyond it's boundaries for alternate sites. Mr. .Volkeralso 110ted that if there are better locations in ,other communities that will not create such intense conflict they should be examined. Mr. Volker finally noted that it is essential tQ look at all alternative loc~tions and suggested the possibility of splitting the annual events into two or three different venues. Chai.r Kunzweiler asked about the noise. analysis methodology. Lee Kranefuss responded that there have been a number of studies, by different consultants regarding the range of impact and the weighting of noise. Mr. Kranefuss explained about ambi~nt nighttime noise levels and noted that in regards to the weighing of noise the problem would only become worse. . Commissioner O'Donnell asked the Coalition if they were willing to grant allowances for parking, noise and traffic on High Holy Days and the response was yes. . Commissioner Aguirre asked Mr. Charle~ to comment on the noise measurement, Ldn. Mr. Charles responded that the Ldn is the standard way noise is measured in Tiburon and found that noise increases in the parking lot would be insignificant. TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,1006 , MINUTES II 935 Page 9 ... Commissioner Aguirre asked about addressing the neighborhood concerns that building the facility and subjecting it to the certain requirements under the Conditional Use Permit will not be sufficient over time to guard against ,increased uses in that facility, to which Ms. Newman responded that the faCilities haven't changed but the congregation has grown over time. She noted that the use permit has been examined periodically and the conditions of approval have evolved oyer time. Finally, Ms. Newman noted thatsbUf has tried topre~entsome'th.iJ.1g that could work and have reviewed the c9nditions that have been in place, augmented those and put tQgether a comprehensive set of conditions that adwess the impacts, as well as building in a monitoring program. Ms. Newman finally noted that an annual review is required ando provides the Town the opportunity to measure the success of conditions of approval. Community Development Director Anderson noted that it has been the Town's. experience that other project's proposed uses and buildings that were perceived to cause terrible impacts never.materialized, but the monitoring and annual reviews are critical. Mr. Anderson also noted. that it has been the Town's approach to deal with use intensity versus the size of b~ding. " ; Commissioner Aguirre asked about enforcing the Conditioll81 Use Permit and Mr. Anderson noted that a detailed monitoring program would require detailed infonnation to. be submitted. Commissioner Aguirre asked if the ,Conditional Use Permit were to be approved and there are m.ore events and traffic impacts are more significant than anticipated what is the help for neighbors and lvI,r. Anderson noted that the Conditional Use Permit could be reviewed and modified at aily time. ' . Commissioner Aguirre asked for the threshold for calling for the review and Mr. Anderson noted 1:\1,at the Town typically doesn't have those types of situations. Commissioner Collins stated that this project is about two homes - the religious home for Kol Shofar and the homes for those people who live in the neighborhood. He felt that the project is too ambitious for the neighborhood. He said that the proJ~t would be . inconsistent wi~ the zoning ordinance and the general plan and that he cannot make the findings needed to approve the project as submitted Commissioner Collins noted that he has no difficulty with High Holy Days; however traffic safety, parking, nighttime events on Saturdays and sUndays and noise are the main impact problems and the proposed new activities are not in character with the neighborhood. He said that the problems with cars turning around in the street and backing out of private driveways and. the stacking at the turn lane on Tiburon Boulevard are also important safety issues. He noted that the project would increase the size of the Kol Shofar buildings by 30%. Commissioner ~ollins noted that he would be able to support the remodeling aspects of the project, the new classrooms, and the modifications to the parking lot, but not the addition of the multi- purpose room. TlBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,2006 MINUTES II 935 Page 10 Commissioner O'Donnell tha.nked all involved with the proposed project but noted that he! disagreed with Commissiol'lcr Collins. Commissioner O'Donnell characterized.the- lengthening of the left ,turn lane at Tiburon Boulevard and Blaeldield Drive as foolish when teclmolQgy exists to accommodate the additional traffic with changes to . the ti11'ing ofthesipflls.. Hestated-tba.t the notion that alllC.olShofar membeJ;s would arrive at events at the same time was ridiculous. ,Conuni~sionerO'Donnelln0ted that the btrllding wiIlbe madcDoise secure and did D.ot think that noise from people exitingorenterjng religious activities would be overly loud as peoplc.approaehieligiousactivities with respeet. He noted that theapplicatioD for a gytn..at St. Hilary raisedeoncems about Doise, but now that facility is a great exampleofhowareligiousfaeility can fit in with the neighborhood. Comm.issi~ner O'Donnell noted that with the exception of High Holy Days all the ears would fit in theparldng lot and there would only be a small overage on Saturday and .slUldaysemces. He acknowledged tbat there might be a traffic mess on High Holy Pays, hut he. said t.hat even the neighbors recognize that that isan.exception. .ConnmssionerO'DottneU stated that neighborhoods must learn to accept that these events areI'm of theeomrnunity. -He stated that parking is, al\\18.Ys a proble~ in Bel Aire, because people do not park in their' garages. He sta-.t that the project would not ebaJ'lse thatsituatiOft dramatieally" andthat.theowytimes parking will be an'issue tberewill be 1'.l'dtigation measures to deal with it.. He felt that the revised circulation plan is a ;great improvemellt He noted that the event on the previous weekend was a good-example for the multi...purposeroom, as he felt that the tent was not an eyesore at all. He supported " I ' ,,' .' the preschool expansion and felt tbattecirculation. oftDe EIRwas not necessary "as the Cotntnission has enoUgh inform.atlon'mmake its decision..COtl1lmissioner O'Donnell also noted.that requiring a recirculation of the BIR.for the purposeofexplfdl1tng additional alternatives was unfair' whC11tb.e appliqtDt bas a site tbatmeets their needs. He stated that the use pemdt would allow fora srnallexpansion of aetivities,but would . contain them. Finally, Commissioner O'Donnell noted that he thinks religious institutions are as impotta;bt as schools and downtown in main.tai."inga viable, active and successfu1colDtl1\11lity. Commissioner F:raser noted that he agrees with Commissioner Collins and that the ' proposal is an ambitious project. He stated that 43,000 square feet represents a substantial ~ility" and that loolcing at the buildings as a clean sheet of paper might allow Kol Shofar to come up with a better solution. Commissioner Fraser noted that he 'recognizes the needs of the synagogue and community, but that the overriding goal is to strike a proper balance between both. As presented, be felt that the projectcontlicts with 'the general.plan policies. He felt that the issues are solvable" but need. to be looked at differently. He found it telling tbBt Kol Shofar could. not find a facilitY in the entire county tbatcan support their High Holy Days services; he felt that if there is no such facility now, then. :m.aybe such a facility should not be built at this location. Commissioner Fraser noted that he believes the EIR. has sufficient information to be certified, but that he is not in favor of the traffic mitigation plan to put up signs that would push parking elsewhere. Commissioner Fraser also noted that he doesn't think detailed and complicated monitoring programs are a wise approach because impQ.Cts TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OFMA V 10.2006 MINUTES ## 935 Pqe 11 ~, ~ should be solved onsite. He encouraged Kol Shofar to' go back to drawing board to come up with a plan that balances the needs of the synagogue and the community. Commissioner Aguirre stated that he respects the needs of Kol Shofar and tries to put himself in the shQes of the neighbors and their need to preserve the ~hatacter' of the neighborhood. He stated'that not much from. the St. Hillary.proJect ls relevant to the Kol Shofar proposal, as the nature of a gym and its impacts on the neighbors is not , comparable. He a,greed that there is no need to recirculate the EIR, stating that it is absurd to think that providing an alternative that mitigates impacts requires additional review. Coll1l11issioner Aguirre also noted that the two main goals of the project were to host large evening celebrations and have space for High Holy Days. He said that the initial request for 30 to 40 additional events clearly indicates that these events are part of the purpose for the expansion. Commissioner Aguirre stated that these events are fundamentally i.ncompatible with the cha;racter of the neighborhood an.q contrary to the general plan policy callingofor harmony with the neighborhood. Commissioner Aguirre stated that he .catl1lotsupport the project. Chair Kunzweilernoted that he went back to the 1984 resolution for Kol Shofar. He added that things charige over time. and although he had. no question about the sincerity ofKol Shofar to live up to their conditions of approval., he waseoncemed that.a large facility is requested that will morph.into something else over time. He was concerned with a ~reepofincreased usage,noting',that use permits often change for very good reasons. Chair Kunzweiler noted. that there has never been. a question that .Kol ,Shofar does not belong, but he felt that the project as proposed is out of character with the neighborhood. He said that noise outside of buildings .on weeken~ nights is an issue. He said that if park111gspreads into the surrounding 'neighborhood it will ;be a problem. Chair Kunzweiler also noted that he supports the school expansion, and felt that the EIR. did not need to be recirculated. He felt nervous about projects with long lists of mitigation measures. Chair J{.unzweiler noted that the size of the multi-purpose room is the issue, .and that he would like to see the size adjusted, within reason. Chair Kunzweiler proposed schequling a May 31 or June 14 meeting to discuss the findings of an ad hoc subcommittee of the Planning Commission who will come up with a plan that the Commission as a whole could support. Chair Kunzweiler suggested that the ad hoc subcommittee be comprised of himself and Commissioner Collins. Commissioner Aguirre stated that a plan that might be acceptable to the Planning Commission. might not be acceptable to Kol Shofar. Commissioner Collins asked whether Kol Shofar preferred. a continuance or a yes or ,no vote on Alternative 7. Gary Ragghianti stated that Kol Shofar is interested in returning on May 3l., and asked that the resolutions be prepared for that date and that there be no more public hearing or TIBlJRON PLANNING COMMISSION MINlJ'rES OF MAY 10,2006 MINUTES 1# 935 Page 12 debate. Mr. Ragghiantialso asked that Commissioner O'Donnell be part of the ad hoc subcommittee. Mr. Volker noted that it is contrary to the law to prevent-the public from commenting and that it is appropriate that Chair KU1lZWei1~r proceed with the ad hoc subcommittee that has been appointed. Chair Kunzweiler agreed that C;ommissioner O'Donnell would serve on the ad hoc subcommittee in place of Commissioner Collins. MIS, Commissioner Collins/Commissioner Fraser (passed 5-0) to~olJ.tinue the hearing to a special meeting on May 31, 2006. MINUTES, 3. Special Meeting of April 24, 2006 4. Regular meeting of April 26, 2006 Due to the lateness of the hour, the Commission carried these items over to its next meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11 :45 p.m. JOHN KUNZWEILER, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SCOTT ANDERSON, SECRETARY TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 10,2006 MINUTES ## 935 :Page 13 ,~ j'll j 1'1. MINUTES #8 TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF MAY 18, 2006 i)IQ~. ~8,. The meeting was opened at 7 :00 p.m. by Vice-Chair Doyle A. ROLL CALL Present: Boardmembers Beales, Doyle, Frymier and Teiser Absent: Chair Bird Ex-Officio: Planning Manager Watrous and Associate Planner Krasnove B. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were none. C. STAFF BRIEFING Planning Manager Watrous welcomed new Boardmember Frymier to the Design Review Board. He also noted that this was the last meeting for Associate Planner Krasnove, who is taking a position with Marin County. He and the Board thanked her for her service to the Town. D. NEW BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD 1. 81 PASEO MIRASOL BARRY, ADDITIONIFLOOR AREA EXCEPTION 81 PASEO MIRASOL DOUG AND LESLIE BARRY EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED 18,878 S.P. NA NA 4,381 5,371 3,888 MAX 23.0% 25.0% N.A. 25' 25' 30' MAX 10' & 10' 10' & 10' 10' 15' 15' 15' 50' 50' 50' FLOOR AREA EXCEPTION LOT SIZE FLOOR AREA LOT COVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT SIDE YARDS FRONT YARD REAR YARD V ARIANCESIEXCEPTION The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for the construction of an addition to an existing two-story single-family dwelling on property located at 81 Paseo Mirasol. Existing crawl space on the lower level of the house would be converted into a play room, media room and powder room. The lot coverage on the site would be increased by 363 square feet by this project, as most of the proposed addition would be within the TmURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 1 t, ." .,.1 .. ~ \ footprint of the existing house. The proposed addition would add 990 square feet of floor area to the existing house, resulting in a total floor area for the house of 5,371 square feet, which is 1,483 square feet greater than the floor area ratio for a lot of this size. Therefore a floor area exception is requested. Joe McGuire, designer, explained the design of the project. There was no public comment. Boardmember Beales stated that this was a straightforward project. He said that the area requested by the floor area exception was within the footprint of the existing house and that no one would see it. Boardmember Teiser noted that the recent changes to the zoning ordinance will include this space in the gross floor area of the house. He said that he would have approved this addition if it had been requested when the house was built. Boardmember Frymier stated that she visited the site and that her only concern was with potential tree removal on the property. Boardmember Doyle noted that the project was simply an infill addition going down into the site and thought that this would be a great project. MIS BealeslFrymier (4-0), to determine that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA and approve the application subject to the conditions of approval as set forth in the Staff report. 2. 294 CECILIA WAY BONSTEEL, ADDITIONS 294 CECILIA WAY LOT SIZE ' FLOOR AREA LOT COVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT SIDE YARDS FRONT YARD REAR YARD V ARIANCESIEXCEPTION EXISTING 8,625 S.P. 1,297 15.0% 17' 6' & 6' 25' 35' NONE ALAN BONSTEEL PROPOSED REQUIRED NA NA 2,288 2,863 MAX 26.5% 30.0% MAX 17' 30' MAX 6' & 6' 6' 20' 20' 28' 25' The applicant is approval to make an addition to an existing single-family dwelling located at 294 Cecilia Way. The applicant is requesting to substantially increase the size of the existing residence. The subject residence is a 1,275 square foot one-story structure with 3 bedrooms, one bathroom, family room, and kitchen. The project would include the addition of 2 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, a laundry room, and an expanded kitchenlliving TIBURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 2 room area. A portico over the front door would also be added to the front elevation. Four new skylights would be installed over the kitchen, great room, and master bathroom. A spa would also be located in the rear yard. The three existing bedrooms and bathroom would remain unchanged. The proposed addition would also increase the floor area of the house by 991 square feet, and would result in a total floor area of 2,288 square feet, which is less than the maximum floor area permitted for a lot of this size. Rich Rifkin, designer, explained the proposed project and showed additional renderings of the design. Boardmember Teiser stated that he visited the neighbor on the side of the proposed addition who had questioned whether shrubs along that side property line would be removed. Mr. Rifkin stated that the shrubs would not be damaged during construction. Boardmember Beales asked if Staff had confirmed that a permit had been obtained for the garage conversion for this house. Associate Planner Krasnove confirmed that the conversion had been permitted. Roger Grant stated that he had nothing negative to say about the project, and that he had found the applicant and his crew to be very respectful and cooperative. Boardmember Teiser stated that the applicant has been developing projects in a very responsible way, and that his projects enhance this neighborhood. He recommended that a condition of approval be imposed requiring the shrubs along the side property line of the expansion be replaced if damaged during construction. Boardmember Beales noted that that a condition of approval had been imposed to increase the height of the building to deal with the flood zone. Boardmember Frymier stated that she visited the site and could support the project. Boardmember Doyle stated that he was glad to see the neighborhood in support of the project. MIS Teiser/Beales( 4-0) to determine that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA and approve the application subject to the conditions of approval as set forth in the Staff report, with the additional condition of approval requiring that the shrubs along the side property line of the expansion be replaced if damaged during construction. TffiURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 3 3. 700 TffiURON BOULEVARD BELVEDERE TENNIS CLUB, MODIFICA TIONS TO EXPANSION PLANSN ARIANCE LOT SIZE 700 TIBURON BOULEVARD BELVEDERE TENNIS CLUB EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED 147,669 NA NA S.P. 3,700 4,699 2.9% 4.0% 22' 22' 160' & 29' 148' & 29' 27' 27' 165' 146' EXCESS FENCE HEIGHT 8,000 MAX NA 30' MAX NA NA NA FLOOR AREA LOT COVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT SIDE YARDS FRONT YARD REAR YARD V ARIANCESIEXCEPTION On April 15, 2004, the Design Review Board reviewed an application to upgrade and expand an existing private recreational facility (the Belvedere Tennis Club, or BTC) located at 700 Tiburon Boulevard. The applicant is now requesting Design Review approval to modify the previously approved plans. Following more intensive examination of the physical condition of the existing facilities on the site, BTC is requesting to modify its renovation plan. Changes would be made to the previously approved plans, including demolition of the existing clubhouse building and replacement with a new building that would house the clubhouse, a new fitness center, locker rooms, office, kitchen bar and lounge area; expansion of the swimming pool; moving the spa; elimination of the children's pool; and modification of the parking lot design. The subject application would decrease the building floor area for the facility from the 4,899 square feet permitted under the 2004 use permit to a total of 4,699 square feet. A combination wall and fence is ,proposed to be constructed between the pool and lawn area of the site and the homes at 8 & 9 Palmer A venue to help mitigate noise from club activities. This sound fence and wall would have a maximum height of 14 feet, 6 inches. As the maximum height for fences and walls within required setbacks is 6 feet, a variance is requested for excess wall and fence height. Richard Konecky, President of the Belvedere Tennis Club, explained the reasons for the changes to the renovation plans. He said that as the club got further into designing the project, it became more efficient to completely demolish the buildings and come up with a better design. He noted that the revised floor area was smaller than that of the previously approved application. He stated that the roofline had been changed to a pitched roof to reduce visual impacts on the neighbors. He acknowledged that there are concerns with the height of the fitness center. He said that the previous fitness center design was an afterthought, and that the roofline had been increased to meet the height, light and air needs of a fitness center. He felt that the roofline would have a slight impact on the views from several homes on Hawthorne Drive, but that their more expansive views would be unaffected. He added that the revised clubhouse design would open up other views for these neighbors. TIBURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 4 Jim Bradanini, landscape architect, described the improvement plans and sound fencing plans. In response to questions from the Board, he stated that low level lighting would be used for the parking lot and walkways. He explained the changes from the existing buildings and the previously approved plans. He stated that the pool would be expanded and the spa would be moved. He said that the existing vegetation on the side of the club would remain. He said that the existing fence would be replaced by the sound fence, and that the pool equipment enclosure would be built into the sound fence. He stated that the club worked with the sound consultant and the neighbors at 8 & 9 Palmer A venue to address the noise concerns. He described the design, materials and effects of the sound fence. Boardmember Beales asked if the tall Birch tree in front of the clubhouse would be removed. Mr. Bradanini confirmed that the tree would be removed. Jerry Winges, architect, explained the new floor plan and the program needs of the club that have driven the design. He noted that the Planning Commission had determined that the location of the uses on the site was appropriate. He said that the club has given up the existing second floor of the clubhouse and that most of the new clubhouse roof would be lower than that of the existing building. He added that the proposed application would result in smaller floor area and less mass and bulk than the previously approved application. He stated that there would be no skylights or building openings facing uphill. He said that the club met with the neighbors regarding the view issue, but felt that the fitness center needed the extra height for using exercise equipment and to provide a more airy feeling in the room. He said that lowering the roof by one foot would make the clerestory windows smaller, and that lowering it two feet would eliminate those windows altogether. He described the view impact on the homes at 682 & 684 Hawthorne Drive as minimally disrupted. He noted that the fitness center roof would also hide the HV AC equipment. Alex Mast stated that he supports the project and felt that it would be great for the community. He said that the club has worked well with him regarding visual and sound issues. He said that he would like to see downlighting on the site, an attractive sound fence fa~ade, and landscaping to buffer noise bouncing off the sound fence. Frank van Ligten noted that he had previously submitted a letter describing his concerns with the project. He noted that several Boardmembers and Staff had visited his house, and requested that the fitness center roofline be lowered two feet to preserve his views of the water and Sausalito. John Hermansky stated that he was told by Staff that his mature trees and shrubs obscure the views of the club. However, he felt that if this vegetation was removed in the future and a sound wall built, he would be looking straight at the clubhouse and lose views of the Marin Headlands. He said that he could accept the proposed design with some reservations. He felt that the new design did not accomplish much of a height reduction. He raised concerns about the location of mechanical equipment, as he did not want to TIBURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 5 hear noise. He said that anything that could be done to hide the equipment would be appreciated, as noise from Tiburon Boulevard decreases after 8:00 p.m., and noise from the club becomes more audible. He recommended reducing the height of the fitness center to protect the views of the neighbors. He said that views can be whittled away over time when buildings are changed in increments. Boardmember Teiser asked Mr. Hermansky that if his trees were removed, what the difference would be between the existing buildings and the project as proposed. Mr. Hermansky replied that the impacts would be pretty much the same, as the two-story clubhouse blocks views now. Judy Bell described the history of events held at the club and changes that have occurred over time. She said that the expanded pool would increase the likelihood of parties on the site, and that the veranda would move parties and noise outside. She said that the project design should contain the uses for the club, and felt that the project has been deliberately designed to push activities outside. She questioned the consistency of the plans for doors and windows. She was concerned that the sound fence ends too early and that the glass roof over the veranda would bounce sound. Boardmember Doyle noted that issues with interior improvements and events are part of the approved conditional use permit for this project. Douglas Mc Vickar stated that he can now hear noise from the tennis courts. He applauded the club's efforts to appease the neighbors' concerns regarding views. He said that the sound fence would not cut down noise from amplified music. He suggested turning the building around to face the bay and put the pool on the other side of the building, which would result in noise from the club heading toward the bay. Alice Cannistraci stated that fitness centers often have loud music. She said that moving the clubhouse building out would affect her view. She'wanted to make sure that landscaping and lighting levels were kept low. Boardmember Prymier asked if most of the neighbors the club met with lived on Hawthorne Drive and if neighbors on Hilary Drive were contacted. Mr. Winges replied that the only comments received by the club were from neighbors on Hawthorne Drive. Boardmember Teiser stated that he went to the van Ligten's house. Their view angle to the fitness center is not straight on, and the fitness center roofline would interfere with their primary view. He said that the views from 684 & 686 Hawthorne Drive would not be significantly i:t,npacted. He said that there needs to be some lowering of the fitness center roof, and thought that a two foot height reduction might be feasible. He stated that the new clubhouse design would not significantly change views. Boardmember Beales agreed that the fitness center roof should be lowered. He said that he appreciates that the applicant would like the additional height, but the roofline does affect some neighbors. He thought that the roof could be reduced by more than one or two feet. He said that the Board has no control over sound, and noted that the Planning TIBURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 6 Commission will conduct periodic reviews of the use permit after construction. He was concerned about the reflectivity of the metal roofing, and thought that Staff should review this. He noted that the zone on which the property is located does not require setbacks from the front property line. He said that he could support the project with some changes. Boardmember Frymier asked about the purpose of the cupola. Mr. Winges stated that the cupola was intended to bring light into the clubhouse, but he thought that the height of the clubhouse was not an issue. Boardmember Frymier acknowledged that sound is more of an issue for the Planning Commission. Boardmember Doyle stated that the proposed building would be beautiful. He said that the only issues for the neighbors are the height of the fitness center and noise. He stated that the roof height of the fitness center would affect the main view of some neighbors in a significant way, and that he would like to see something done to help out the neighbors. He noted that the sound fence design cannot exceed the height approved by the variance. He characterized the project as a great improvement for the club and the community. Boardmember Teiser stated that the application should be continued to allow the applicant time to revise the height of the fitness center and to show specific dimensions of the sound fence. Mr. Bradanini indicated on the plans that the sound fence would not wrap around the lawn area, but said that some landscaping would be planted along that line. He noted that the pool was being pushed further from the home at 8 Palmer A venue. Planning Manager Watrous noted that specific changes to the roof height and an extension of the sound fence could be reviewed by Staff. MIS TeiserlBeales (4-0) to determine that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA and approve the application subject to the conditions of approval as set forth in the Staff report, with additional conditions of approval requiring that the fitness center roofline be lowered by two feet, and that the sound fence be extended to shield noise from the clubhouse and pool area for the home at 8 Palmer A venue, with the alignment to be determined by Planning Division Staff. E. APPROV AL OF MINUTES #7 OF THE 4/20/06 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING Amendments include: Page 2, 8th Paragraph, last sentence, add "the plan." Page 3, 7th Paragraph, last sentence, add "to be planted." MIS, Bealesrreiser (passed 4-0) to approve the minutes as amended. TIBURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 7 G. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. TffiURON D.R.B. 5/18/06 8 RECEIVED MAY 302006 , I~. DIGEST '---. .~ :.::? 1~~~ ~~~.,~.;~ l . -:;;1'" ; <~_~,-:'j)""#l::;:~'Ti,-' TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE TOWN OF TIBURON Minutes of the General Membership Annual Spring Business Meeting Held at the home of Edith and Hal Hobbs on Lagoon View Drive Sunday, May 20 2006 4:00 P.M. Attendina: All Officers and Board of Directors listed in paragraph 1 below except for Jim Horan, Elizabeth Moffett, Dr. Lynn Spitler and Trudy Taich. Treasurer's Re~ort: Genevieve Roberto reported that, 46 of the 82 members (56.1%) paid their 2006 dues and the bank balance is now $2,475.92. Unpaid members are requested to send their $10.00 check made payable to Hill Haven Propertv Owners' Association to Genevieve Roberto, P.O. Box 293, Tiburon, CA 92940. 1. Election of Officers and Directors: The following slate of Officers and Directors for 2006 was presented and all were elected unanimously: Officers Directors President: Vice President: Secretary: Treasurer: Jerry Riessen Hal Freemon Hal Hobbs Genevieve Roberto Joan Dt-acott Fred Hannahs Jim Horan Charles Laurenson Elizabeth Moffet Dr. Lynn Spitler Trudy Taich Arnie Tearce 2. New Owners: Arnie Tearce the new owner at 1865 Mountain View Drive was introduced and welcomed to the association. other new residents on Mountain View Drive who were unable to attend the meeting were Emmett and Cynthia O'Donnell at 1885 and Patrick Beaudan and Mari Kawawa with children Jinsuke [16], Julien [II], Aya [10], Camille [8], Maxime [6] and dog Charlie [2] living at the corner house at 1896. Also Scott and Anne Woods are now living at 623 Ridge Road opposite from Jerry Riessen's house. " \, . )i \,.Ir 3. Sanitary District No. 5 (Sewaqe System) Fred Hannahs reported that on June 21st the Tiburon Town Council will review a proposal to pump sewage from about 100 homes on the north side of the peninsula over the hill and through Tiburon Open Space, attaching it to our No.5 Sanitary System at Gilmartin Drive (it is currently being dumped into the bay). This is a good plan but complications arrive as to who is to pay for this and as Jerry pointed out there there are requirements that local governments should not pay for having future lots being tied into the system. Also existing septic tank owners could be connected in the future. See the front page of the May 24th issue of ~rr~ ~~FC newspaper. 4. Martha Property Jerry reviewed the history (original plan for 44 homes reduced to 34 mostly accessed through Hill Haven). There are now several lawsuits that have to be settled before decisions can be made. A new development has been that several property owners have sued the county because during the 1976 judgement in the case when it was agreed that 44 homes could be built, none of the adjacent property owners were notified of the discussion. We will keep you posted as to the various developments as they occur. 5. GE~ ~E~DY-~~~~rrc>u~FC~ P~~P~R.~TIC>NS Jerry reminded us that in the event of a future disaster (earthquakes, fires, storms, etc.) all residents should plan to take care of themselves for about 3 or more days since the police and fire departments will be overburdened helping those with the biggest problems (this includes gas and electrical connections, food, water, etc.) Roads may be destroyed. He and David Barker recommended that one resident in each household attend the 2 hour classes that are being held throughout the peninsula. David said that this class can be held in Hill Haven, if desired. The class will be scheduled at Paula Little's home 420 Ridge Road, Tiburon DATE: TIME: J "\..1 n. e 7 PM 21, to 2006, 9 PM W~DNESDAY It is desirable that at least 1 member of every household attend this class. Please call David Barker at 415-435-0157 and leave your name for reservations together with your E-mail number (he is compiling a list). The meeting was then adjourned for conversations with wines, coffee, cheeses and cookies furnished by Edith Hobbs. .~~ Hal Hobbs, Secretary ...--__ __.____~___-____~_____----=-=-c.----~.-.-._'=< cc: J!~.i.d.i...J~j.9~ll, ..~-~!?_'?_~_~~--.'r-QWn~~Man~ge2 Lyford Cov-e'=-51d Tiburon Home Owners Association (LCOTHOA) 2 (iJ. TOWN OF TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 Action Minutes May 31,2006 -7:30 PM l>/Q ~8~ ACTION MINUTES CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 7:30 PM Chairman Kunzweiler, Vice Chairman Fraser, Commissioner Aguirre, Commissioner Collins, Commissioner O'Donnell All Commissioners Present ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission on any subject not on the agenda may do so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Planning Commission is not able to undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Planning Commission agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. There Were None COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING Staff Update Commission Information Items UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. 215 BLACKFIELD DRIVE: REVIEW OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR) AND CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROJECT MERITS FOR A PROPOSED EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING RELIGIOIUS FACILITY AND DAY SCHOOL (CONGREGATION KOL SHOFAR); Congregation Kol Shofar, Owner and Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 038-351- 34 Final EIR Certified (5- OJ: Conditional Use Permit Denied (4-1J PUBLIC HEARING 2. 2240 CENTRO EAST: REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (FILE #10603) TO OPERATE A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA ON A CURRENTLY VACANT LOT; Rolf Eiselin, Owner; Maggiora & Ghilotti, Inc., Applicant; Assessor's Parcel Number 059-1442-02 ADDroved 5-0 MINUTES 4\ Action Minutes - Planning Commission Special Meeting May 31, 2006 Page 2 3. Planning Commission Minutes - Special Meeting of April 24, 2006 AlJDrOved as Amended 4. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting of April 26, 2006 AlJDrOved as Amended 5. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting of May 10, 2006 AlJDrOved as Amended ADJOURNMENT 11:55 PM ,). ACTION MINUTES #9 l)IQ~ ,8,. TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD THURSDAY, JUNE 1,2006 1505 TIBURON BOULEVARD A. ROLL CALL: Present - Absent - Ex-Officio - Chair Bird, Boardrnernbers Doyle, Fryrnier and Teiser Boardrnernber Beales Planning Manager Watrous and Minutes Clerk Williams B. PUBLIC COMMENTS (FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA) C. STAFF BRIEFING D. NEW BUSINESS BEFORE THE ROAD 1. 2. 64 Rancho Drive 140 Porto Marino 36 Terrace Court Arnrikhas Huehne Arce WallNariance APPROVED Addition/V ariance APPROVED AdditionsN ariance APPROVED ., .). E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE 5/18/06 D.R.B. MEETING - APPROVED AS AMENDED F. ADJOURNMENT - 7:25 P.M. f'\ ."