Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Digest 2016-11-04TOWN COUNCIL WEEKLY DIGEST October 31— November 4, 2016 TIBURON Correspondence 1. Letter — November 3 — *MCCMC: Request for consideration on meeting schedule/voting. 2. Email — November 2 - *RAM: Marijuana Policy. 3. Card — November 2 — Marin Community United Thank you card, Snack Basket Agenda, Minutes 1. Agenda — November 3 — Tiburon Design Review Board regular meeting 2. Agenda — November 9 — Tiburon Planning Commission regular meeting REGIONAL, NOTICES AND AGENDA Announcement 1. Trestle Trail Exhibit - Blackies Pasture, Rain Date Change: Sunday, Nov. 6 Agenda, Minutes 1. November 3,8,22 — MCM-LHMP — Public Workshops: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 2. November 9 — Tiburon Fire Protection District *MCCMC: Marin County Council of Mayors & Councilmembers *RAM: Rethinking Access to Marijuana *MCM-LHMP — Marin County Sheriff's Office of Emergency Services & Marin County Multi - jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan a ./ Town of Tiburon • 1505 Tiburon Boulevard • Tiburon, CA 94920 • P 415.35.7373 F. 415.435.2438 • www.rownofriburon.org Office of the Mayor/ 415.435.7373 November 3, 2016 Via electronic and U.S. Mail Sloan Bailey, President Marin County Council of Mayors & Councilmembers c/o Town of Corte Madera 300 Tamalpais Drive Corte Madera, CA 94925 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION ON MEETING SCHEDULENOTING Dear President Bailey, It has come to the attention of the Tiburon Town Council that the next MCCMC meeting is scheduled on one of our regular meetings nights, November 16, 2016. The Council has asked me to make the following requests to you, and the MCCMC membership: 1. The Tiburon Town Council requests that the vote on positions with multiple candidates be postponed at the November 16 meeting and scheduled to a date certain, in order to avoid being disenfranchised from voting; and 2. The Tiburon Town Council also respectfully requests adherence to the 2004 Executive Committee policy (referenced in the 2011 MCCMC bylaws) which states that the November meeting will be moved to the first Thursday of December, and particularly in the instance when votes are scheduled for any position for which there are multiple candidates. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, c. Erin Tollini, Mayor Town of Tiburon Cc: MCCMC Members Erin Tollini Mayor Jim Fraser Vice Mayor Frank X. Doyle Councilmember Alice Fredericks Councilmember Emmett O'Donnell Councilmember Greg Chanis Town Manager Diane Crane Iacopi rciC From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear City Clerk, LA Country RAM Workgroup <Iacountyram@gmail.com> Wednesday, November 02, 2016 2:28 PM LA County RAM Time -Sensitive Communication RE: Marijuana Policy. / - 2 2016 TOWN CLERK TOWN OF TIBURON Rethinking Access to Marijuana (RAM) is a collection of public health agencies funded by the LA County Department of Public Health and is engaged in a Community Partnership with the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. --L � �(z c_ILe We ask that you distribute this document to all policymakers in your https://drive.gooele.com/file/d/0B5rH04JDkeMGdm51azFFYWhHY2M/view?usp=sharine As public health advocates, we are concerned by the harm associated with marijuana use, particularly as it relates to youth. Youth are vulnerable to marijuana's societal and physiological impacts; the data show it can dramatically impact cognitive development and academic performance. Comprehensive regulation is a crucial strategy to mitigate the negative impacts of marijuana on youth. The RAM Policy Menu provides important information for local legislators concerned with enacting smart marijuana regulation. New medical marijuana laws were established in January 2016, but many areas of regulation are still under development. Local jurisdictions still hold the right and responsibility to define the presence of medical marijuana in their communities. With the additional possibility that legal recreational marijuana use will become a reality in the near future, officials must act now to enact policies that minimize youth exposure. RAM is not for or against the legalization of marijuana for recreational use. We are advocating for solutions that protect youth. For more information about RAM, visit our website at wwwiacountyram.org. Best, The Members of Rethinking Access to Marijuana Link to Policy Menu: haps://drive.aooule.cam/ti]e/d/OB5r1-I0-41DkeMGdm5lazFFYWhI-1Y2M/view4usp=sharine 1 Re: Marijuana arijuar a ' egu ation an Enforcement Priorities for Cities Changes in marijuana policy are gaining momentum throughout Los Angeles County. Yet, little is known about the impact these shifts will have on health systems, prevention and treatment of substance abuse, social outcomes such as education and professional achievement, and other disease prevalence. Proliferation of marijuana outlets, whether recreational or medical, has the potential for a serious negative impact on the health and safety of communities, and youth in particular. As public health advocates, we are concerned with preventing health harm associated with marijuana use. The chief priority for protecting the health of LA County residents is preventing use of marijuana during the important developmental periods of childhood and adolescence. Marijuana is particularly risky for young people to use because it can interfere with brain development' and has been shown to cause long- term deficits in cognitive function when use begins in adolescence'. Comprehensive regulation is a crucial strategy for city leaders to prevent negative impacts from marijuana on youth. As ofJanttary 2016, California has new medical marijuana regulations, yet many areas of regulation are still under development.There is also the possibility that legal recreational marijuana use will become a reality in the near future. How can city residents and officials act now to ensure that local policies protect youth and preserve the character of our communities? This document reviews proven strategies to limit youth access to marijuana by regulating medical marijuana dispensaries, personal use cultivation, commercial cultivation, and delivery services; it also outlines the potential impact of various policy options. The following matrix includes important information for local legislators concerned with enacting smart marijuana regulation that adequately protects youth in our communities. Key Domains for Regulation Storefront Marijuana Businesses Restricting and carefully monitoring licenses and licensees: Licensing provisions that are actively enforced through regular random compliance checks in which violators, such as those that sell to minors, are subject to meaningful penalties (including license suspension and revocation) create a culture of compliance among marijuana licensees. 1 = (VoIkow et al.. 2014) 2 = (Meier et al., 2015) Restricting density of marijuana outlets: Decades of research on alcohol and tobacco use demonstrate the need for strong controls on the density of businesses, and research shows the physical availability of medical marijuana dispensaries is similarly related to the prevalence and frequency of marijuana use (Ammerman et al.. 2015). Density restrictions on the number of businesses that can locate in a given area can prevent uneven clustering of marijuana outlets in our neighborhoods. Restricting where marijuana storefronts can be located: Marijuana -related businesses should not be located near areas youth frequent such as schools, parks, and playgrounds. Similarly, locating marijuana businesses in mainstream shopping districts can increase perceptions among youth that marijuana is normal and socially acceptable; which has been shown to have strong associations with underage marijuana use (Ashbridge et al., 2016). Personal Use Cultivation Requiring licensing and inspections for cultivation: Current state laws regulating personal use cultivation lack basic requirements for security and preventing youth access. Ideally, property proposed as a site for personal use marijuana cultivation should be subject to an inspection and approval process, taking into account ways children may be exposed to the crop and other concerns, such as security from theft, visibility, water/electricity usage, the potential for nuisance from drifting odors, and the rights of property owners. Commercial Cultivation Restricting where marijuana storefronts can be located: The current State law is more comprehensive in regulations on commercial cultivation. However, it falls to city leaders to minimize the impacts of commercial cultivation an youth by restricting grow operations to non-residential zones and enforcing state regulations intended to prevent diversion of marijuana products to the black market. Medical Marijuana Policy Decision Matrix: Best Regulatory Practices for Minimizing Youth Harms POLICY DECISION Storefront Marijuana Businesses ALLOW —► FACTORS TO CONSIDER Density • Visibility • BuSlnesspractices • On•site use • Types of products • Potency • Marketing • Security requirements • Dniggeddnwng WHAT THE DATA SHOW BEST PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE YOUTH IMPACTS HOW TO ENFORCE • Limiting den ylimi1nyouIh3cce1 and • Limit the quantityolstorefront marijuana • Require conditional use permits contingent neighborhood impacts (Freisthler& businesses and prevent outlets from on passing an annual compliance review. Giunnwnld,2014). clustering In specificneighborhoeds. • Impose an annual reer-:valfee for • limiting visibility of outlets and • Restrict location ofmarijuana outlets to conditional use permits t0 fund advertising limitsperceptions of social low visibility areas far from places compliance inspections. norms favoring marijuana useID'Amito, youth frequent. • Implement high vmbiityenforcement like Mlles&Tucker, 2015). • Restrict signage and advertising to drugged driving checkpoints. • Edibles p50entahighernskofoverdose ntinimirevisibility inyouth. • Take quick legal anon against unlicensed and unintentional consumption by small • Limit hours of operation. or non-compliantoullets. children jklr(oun & Mello, 2015). • Cap THE c(ncentralians or allow only low • Fine and hold aauuntable building owners • Strict security protocols limit theft and TH(hgh CBD products. forreming to anunlicensed subsequent diversion to theblackniail:el - Require child safe packaging and dear manjuana outlet. (Sulnrtsky,Pettigrew, 6benton,2016). labding for edibles. • Use aponionofticesingfees tofund • Prohibit onisite use. random inspections andrespuvrlble • Implement security requirements to retailer !raining. prevent robbery and burglary. • Implement and locallyipublideea Ahnor Decoy Program to evaluate compliance with age restricu0ns en marijuana sales 00N•T • Comprehensiveness • States that prohibit retail medical • Ensure the ordinance addresses all relevant • Educate law enfarcementofficers ALLOW • Enforceability marijuana storefront experience lower marijuana activities, including cultivation about the !oral policy and their rale in increases in THE potency and prevalence of and delivery (see-saclions below). enforcement. us=. (PACO etat, 2015)enenifthey allow • Ensure the ordinance it worded to apply to • Edumterebdentsabeuthowtoreport marijuana cultivation for personal use. recreational marijuana should that unlicensed or nem compliant become legal. marijuana outlets. POLICY DECISION Personal Use Cultivation FACTORS TO CONSIDER • tooth exposure • Visibility • Resource Use 0 --ALLOW • Nuisance complaints • Burglary WHAT THE DATA SHOW BEST PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE YOUTH IMPACTS • State law allmssevery medical marijuana • Ensure cultivation sites a re nal visible patient to grow up to 1E0 squa re feet of orattesiblehyyouth. plants (and uptoWO square feet ifthey - Require a cultivation permit with an ate a personal caregiver) (CA Health and annual fee to fund enforcement. Safely Code 11362.769)_ • Require an Inspection of proposed • Stale ngulations dont include any cultivatio n sites for safety and youth requirements to keep personal use exposure prior to issuing perm& cultivation indoors orseared from kids • Enact annual Silo inspections toevaluate or nonpatients. concerns like drifting odors. water and • Marijuana iisaMar and energy lnlensh'e electricity use, and security frnmtheft. "�crop($ivec [e ai.`/01S;AiilIs.161ra- s.. _•.� - HOW TO ENFORCE • Dedicate local enforcement resources to site inspections for permit approvals and on going annual Inspections. • Establish a pmcedureto address nuisance Complaints and disputes between nelghbms. • Require written approval from building owner prier to granting penults for cultivation in rental units. to minimize Iandlordimnarddisputes. DON'T _ • Comprehensiveness • A2016ballot measoretolegalize • Distinguish between personal use • Educateresidentsandlotallaw ALLOW • Entmeeability recreational marijuana use should rewind cultivation and tonne rnalculnvatianin enforcement about the localpoleyon the d9tttvtcilrruand 000011001000001 lull ordinance text. personal use cultivation. hansonpersonal use cultivation (Prop • Ensure personal use cultivation • Establish a procedure for residents to report 64websitel. urdlnance(s)ssdtlapply tore( rem tonal un•permgtedcultivation sites. marijuana If that should harem legal. Commercial Cultivation • VisibilityteYauth • Marijuana is a water anti energy -intensive • Restrict commercialcultivation tonom • look totheCOFA.iheDepartment ofFood • Environmental Impact crop !Bauer et al, 2015; Mills, 2012). residenttal areas to reduceyouth exposure/ andAgncultuieisdenlopingregulations • Resource Use (VJater7Energy • Pesticidesused inmarijuanaCultivation visibility. and licensing requirements for cultivators. 0—ALLOW .. Penland) represent a health risk for youth and • Restrict density. • Seek grant funding:iheHMCRvnll - Indoor versus Outdoor Cultivation families ((arabeta1.,2015), • took to state lawmakers. Environmental establish agrant program for local • toning Restrictions • Data is limited, but outdoor grows have a standards Lobe determined at a state level. lunsdictions to assist with regulation and greater potential for huiglarylnlher crimes enforcement ICA Business and Professions (CA Harcalics Mar Association, 20161. Code 193511. DONT —s • Enforceabiity • tegislatmsmay need torevisit bans as • Distinguish between personal use • Establish apomace for residents toreport ALLOW state regulations on commercial cultivation and commercial cultivation in. suspected commercial cultivation sites or cultivaliendeselap. ordinancetest. any vrotauonofthetaw. • Ensure cultivation ordinances will apply to - Educate lecallaw enforcement and recreational marijuanashould that residents on local/statepolicy for becomelegat. commercial cultivation. Delivery Services • Restrict to dispensaries licensed • Marijuana delivery services have been • Prohibit delivery toOpals and colleges • Establish a procedure for residents to report in yourlumdrton. found tocilcumvent community efforts to attended by youth under 21. violations ofage restrictlons or limits ALLOW—I- 0r, regulate rna'Viand (Frersthlerti: • Rescind conditional use permits ot on quantity. • Restrict to registered collectives Gruenwald. 0014). storefront marijuana businesses for • Use aMinor Decoy Program toevaluate delivering to handicapped deliveries to minors or inquantitie;that delivery servitoicompliancewith. age Cllstomers. exceed stale limits. restrictions or limits on quantity. DON'T • Enforceability ALLOW • Bans on marijuana delivery within city limits maybe challenging m enface. • Implement regulations Mat prohibit sates • Enact hen( stops for suspected deliveues to minors orrestrict quantities (may be within city limits. nearly impossible to enforce for • Issue ritabons fru wilted drlivetiesto delivery services). addresseswllhin city limns. Delivery Services Banning or limiting delivery services: Marijuana delivery services have been found to circumvent community efforts to regulate marijuana (Freisthler & Gruenwald, 2014) and present serious concerns for monitoring and enforcement of laws intended to prevent youth access and diversion to the black market. Accountability The current State law is unclear about what enforcement resources will be made available to local jurisdictions to monitor and enforce medical marijuana regulations- As such, it falls to cities to define how they will monitor and enforce compliance on a local level. High Visibility Enforcement Highly visible enforcement is a deterrent to future violations of medical marijuana regulations. Enforcement techniques could include drugged driving checkpoints and publicizing use of a Minor Decoy Program that evaluates compliance with age restrictions. Community Involvement To date, many local jurisdictions have relied heavily on reports and inquiries from residents to identify non-compliant or unlicensed marijuana businesses. Training Local law enforcement can be trained on local and state regulations regarding medical marijuana, on how to recognize and police drugged driving, and on how to evaluate security standards at commercial cultivation sites and medical marijuana storefronts. About RethinkngAccess to Marijuana Rethinking Access to Marijuana (RAM) is a collaboration of public health professionals •seeking to prevent marijuana -related harms by limiting youth accessto marijuanain the County of Los Angeles. This group was established with the vision of educating communities about the potential harms of marijuana use; implementing and evaluating environmental strategies formulated to limit youth accessto marijuana; and influencing policy actions that support flourishing youth and communities free from marijuana -related harms: RAM neither supports nor opposes any spedfic legislation References LAmmerman, S., Ryan, 5., Adelman, W. P., Levy, 5., Ammerman, S. D., Gonzalez, P. K., ... & Alderman, E. M. (2015). The impact of marijuana policies on youth: clinical, research, and legal update. Pediatrics, 135(3), e769 -e785. Ashridge, M., Valleriani, J., Kwok, J., & Erickson, P. G. (2016). Normalization and denormalization in different legal contexts: Comparing cannabis and tobacco. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 212-223. Bauer, S., Olson, J., Cockrill, A., van Hattem, M., Miller, L.,Tauzer,,M„ &Leppig, G. (2015). Impacts of surface water diversions for marijuana cultivation on aquatic habitat in four northwestern California watersheds. PIoS one, 10(3), e0120016. CA Narcotics Officers Association, 2016. Personal communication viith Sergeant Glen Walsh, April 2016. Carah, J. K.. Howard, J. K., Thompson, 5. E., Gianotti, A. G. S., Bauer, 5. D., Carlson, S. M., ... & Knight, C. A. (2015). High time for conservation: adding the environment to the debate on marijuana liberalization. BioScience, 65(8), 622-829. D'Amico, E. J.. Miles, J. N., & TuckerJ. S. (2015). Gateway to curiosity: Medical marijuana ads and intention and use during middle school. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(3). 613. Freisthler, B., & Gruenewald, P. J. (2014). Examining the relationship between the physical availability of medical marijuana and marijuana use across fifty California cities. Drug and alcohol dependence, 143, 244-250. Paola, R. L., Powell, D., Heaton, P., & Sevigny, E. L. (2015). Assessing the effects of medical marijuana laws an marijuana use: the devil is in the details. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3411), 7-31. Mac[oun, R. J., & Mello, M. M. (2015). Half -baked -the retail promotion of marijuana edibles. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(11), 989-991. Meier, M. H., Caspi, A., Ambler, A., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Keefe, R. 5., ... & Moffitt, T. E. (2012). Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), E2657 -E2664. Mills, E. (2012). The carbon footprint of indoor Cannabis production. Energy Policy, 46, 58-67. Subritzky, T., Pettigrew, S., & Lenton, S. (2016). Issues in the implementation and evolution of the commercial recreational cannabis market in Colorado. International Journal of Drug Policy, 27,1-12. Valkow, 1J. D., Baler, R. 0., Compton, W. M., & Weiss, 5. R. (2014). Adverse health effects of marijuana use. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(23), 2219-2227. 0 Phone Number: (323) 815-7726 Email: LACountyRAM@gmail.com (send inquires and/or join our mailing list) Contact RAM o Website: LACountyRAM.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/LACountyRAM/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/LACountyRAM Made possible through funds from SAPC, the messages, views, or opinions made by any of the publications, speakers, or staff do not reflect the official policy or position of any LA County agency, including SAPC. ae s�ae_tr 641- tarAt D C L i --2 2016 TOWN CLERK TOWN OF TIBURON } tb-ear Maio); COunc, /) aod. i4.00ole-fi ct 1014;. (teff 711 a C sQ m t.(ch, h os tc rig Conirriunily ail/iced on OC1Lo6sPr your solo -0,61y in hnshn5 Pact y,QQ- hc hie p- c1 bu1 LCe cOmrr c uitC a &0 �2. b£'twP .pri, u'C!i COLS; C1. t c �s , tb w nS cu -td 11011 k. ya u for `yow- gr•Oat day- tI-re/ -Th cep and. 00-P15y tlot c d aAd c e - 3 TOWN OF TIBURON Tiburon Town Hall 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 AGENDA TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD A-( Regular Meeting Design Review Board November 3, 2016 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Kricensky, Vice Chair Emberson, Boardmembers Chong, Cousins and Tollini ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Design Review Board on any subject not on the agenda may do so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Design Review Board is not able to undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Design Review Board agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Any communications regarding an item not on the agenda will not be considered part of the administrative record for that item. STAFF BRIEFING PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 85 EAST VIEW AVENUE: File Nos. DR2016091, VAR2016026, VAR2016027, VAR2016028, VAR2016029, VAR2016030 & FAE2016009; David and Tandy Ford, Owners; Site Plan and Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family dwelling, with Variances for reduced front and side yard setbacks, excess lot coverage and excess building height, and a Floor Area Exception. The applicant proposes to construct a new four-story, 1,966 square foot house, which would result in a floor area ratio of 99.9%, which is greater than the 35.0% maximum for a lot of this size. The front yard setback would be zero feet in lieu of the minimum 15 feet. The east side setback would be 3 feet and the west side yard setback would be 3 feet, 4 inches, in lieu of the minimum 8 feet. The lot coverage of the house would be 1,231 square feet (62.5%), which is greater than the 30.0% maximum lot coverage permitted in the R-1 zone. The house would be 42 feet, 11 inches tall, in lieu of the maximum building height of 30 feet. Assessor's Parcel No. 060- 105-67. [DW] 2. 6 VIA CAPISTRANO: File Nos. DR2016105/VAR2016036; Top Tier Group, Inc., Owner; Site Plan and Architecture Review for construction of additions to an existing single-family dwelling, with a Variance for reduced side setback. The project would increase the floor area of the house by 661 square feet to a total of 4,026 square feet and would increase the lot coverage on the site by 108 square feet to a total of 2,281 square feet (11.1%). A portion of one addition would extend to within 10 feet, 1 inch of the west (left) side property line, in lieu of the minimum side setback of 15 feet. Assessor's Parcel No. 038-312-02. [DW] WITHDRAWN Design Review Board Agenda November 3, 2016 Page I ACTION ITEMS 3. 150 AVENIDA MIRAFLORES: File Nos. TREE2016001/TREE2016017; Edwin and Nancy Clock, Owners/Applicants/Appellants; Firuze Hariri, Applicant; Appeal of Planning staff approval of Tree Permit to permit the removal of one (1) Italian Stone Pine Tree and one (1) Cajeput tree, and appeal of Planning staff denial of Tree Permit to permit the after -the -fact planting of one (1) Italian Stone Pine Tree, one (1) Cajeput Tree, one (1) Cotoneaster Tree and one (1) Privet Tree; Assessor's Parcel Number: 039-111- 09. [DW] 4. 22 RACCOON LANE: File Nos. DR2016119/FAE2016013; Michael and Erin Tollini, Owners; Site Plan and Architecture Review for construction of additions to an existing single-family dwelling, with a Floor Area Exception. The project would convert 1,089 square foot of existing crawlspace into living space on the lower level. The total floor area of 3,523 square feet would be greater than the 2,829 square foot floor area ratio for this site. Assessor's Parcel No. 059-071-35. [KO] 5. MINUTES: Consider adoption of minutes of meeting of October 20, 2016 ADJOURNMENT Design Review Board Agenda November 3, 2016 Page 2 TOWN OF TIBURON Tiburon Town Hall 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 4- 2 - Regular Meeting Tiburon Planning Commission November 9, 2016 — 7:30 PM AGENDA TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Williams, Vice Chair Corcoran, Commissioners Kulik, Weller and Welner ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission on any subject not on the agenda may do so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Planning Commission is not able to undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Planning Commission agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3) minutes. Testimony regarding matters not on the agenda will not be considered part of the administrative record. COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING Commission and Committee Reports/Director's Report PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 215 BLACKFIELD DRIVE: Periodic review of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a synagogue and appurtenant day school; File #10404; Congregation Kol Shofar, Owner and Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 038-351-34 [DW] 2. 1 BLACKFIELD DRIVE SUITES N & 0: Consider approval of a Conditional Use Permit to operate a pizza parlor in a Neighborhood Commercial zone; File #CUP2016006; The Cove Shopping Center, Inc., Owner; California Round Table Pizza Group, Inc., Applicant; Assessor Parcel 034-212-18 [SA] ACTION ITEMS 1. 27 MAIN STREET: Review of Conditional Use Permit to install a canopy on a portion of an exterior deck for an existing restaurant (Sam's Anchor Cafe); File # CUP2015002; 27 Main Street LLC, Owner/Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 059-151-35 [KO] 2. Planning Commission Minutes —Meeting of October 26, 2016 ADJOURNMENT Tiburon Planning Commission Agenda November 9, 2016 Page 1 le/A -w TRE`TLE T , ILS PROJECT CQNIIUIITTEE INVITES YOU AND VOW' FRIENDS T "A PICNIC FOR THE PLAQUES" Two Bronze plaques for the Donor Ties have arrived and are now at the Historic Rail Exhibit in Blackie's Pasture YOU BRING YOUR OWN PICNIC! Sunday,- i'`40��� Noon until two in the afternoon. Classical Music, Adult Beverages and Picnic Tables will be provided in Blackie's Pasture. RSVP to Michelyn at 415.435.1853. Tell her how many friends you'll be bringing. Wear hats (maybe a Halloween theme) and consider walking or biking there. YOU BRING YOUR OWN PICNIC! Sunday, October 30th Noon until two in the afternoon RSVP to Michelyn at 415.435.1853 Diane Crane Iacopi itIA 0 2 - From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Townsend, Kishanna <KTownsend@marincounty.org> Monday, October 31, 2016 1:40 PM Townsend, Kishanna Marin County Multi -jurisdiction Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Community Engagement Link and Upcoming Community Workshop Events MCM LHMP Workshop Flyer 2016.pdf Dear Watershed and Flood Control Zone stakeholder: Marin County Sheriffs Office of Emergency Services in conjunction with the Marin County Multi -jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan (MCM LHMP) team is hosting three public workshops with an opportunity to review identified hazards and mitigation strategies and provide input on prioritization. Attached is the meeting flyer. Two meeting events, running from either 3pm to Spm or from 6pm to 8pm, will be held on each of three proposed meeting dates to allow those who are either available in the afternoon or in the evening to attend. The workshop dates and locations are as follows: • Thursday 11/3/16 in City of Novato Council Chambers (922 Machin Ave, Novato, CA 94945) • Tuesday 11/8/16 in Mill Valley Community Center (180 Camino Alto, Mill Valley, CA 94941) • Tuesday 11/22/16 in Point Reyes Dance Palace (503 B St, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956) Start today by participating in the Virtual Engagement Session series at the link below: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/VES Sessionl Please direct any questions about either the virtual engagement event and/or the upcoming public workshops to Tom Jordan (tiordan@marinsheriff.org). Thank you, Your Local Hazard Mitigation Plan team COUNTY OF MARIN Kishanna Townsend Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Department of Public Works 3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 304 San Rafael, CA 94903 415 473 6072 T 415 473 3799 F CRS Dial 711 1 The Marin County Multi -jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MCM LHMP) team invites you to participate in the planning process. Please attend to review iden- tified hazards and mitigation strategies and provide your input on prioritization. Start today by participating in the Virtual Engagement Session series: (https:/iwww.surveymonkey.comi'r1VESSession i ) Marin County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Public Workshops The MCM LHMP Team is comprised of County staff and staff from each of the municipalities and participating Special Districts in the County of Marin. For more information, email Tom Jordan (tjordan@marinsheriff.org) Workshops: North Marin City of Novato Council Chambers 11/3/16 3-5pm or 6-8pm Southern Marin Mill Valley Community Center 11/8/16, 3-5pm or 6-8pm West Marin Point Reyes Dance Palace 11/22/16 3-5pm or 6-8pm TIBURON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER WEDNESDAY, NOV. 9, 2016 6:30 P.M., HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION 1679 TIBURON BLVD. 414 3 2. CONSENT CALENDAR All items under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and may be approved by one motion of the Board of Directors unless a request is made by a member of the Board, public or staff to remove an item for separate discussion and consideration. If you wish to speak on a Consent Calendar item, please seek recognition by the Board and do so at this time. A. Approval of Minutes, October 12, 2016 (Action) 3. COMMUNICATIONS 4. PUBLIC OPEN TIME for items not on the agenda This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons who want to address the Agency on any matter not listed on the agenda. The Ralph M. Brown Act prohibits discussion of items that are not duly placed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Please Note: the Chair will allow time for public comment on each agenda item. 5. CHIEF'S REPORT A. Monthly Report (Discussion) 6. PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCE #128 A. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance #128, an Ordinance of the Tiburon Fire Protection District adopting the California Fire Code, International Fire Code, and Appendix A of the 2015 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion; providing for the issuance of permits for hazardous uses or operations; and establishing a Community Risk Reduction Bureau and Fire Prevention Division and providing Officers therefore and defining their powers and duties (DiscussionlAction) 7. TREASURER'S REPORT A. Finance Committee — Directors Sears and O'Neill (Discussion) Finance Committee Meeting — Wednesday, November 9, 2016, 1800 hrs. Headquarters Fire Station, 1679 Tiburon Blvd. B. Approve Warrants and Payroll (Action) 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. MERA — Chief Pearce (Discussion) B. SMEMPS — Director O'Neill (Discussion) C. PERSONNEL — President Kirchhoff and Director O'Neill (Discussion) 9. BOARD COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT NEXT REGULAR TFPD BOARD MEETING: December 14, 2016, 6:30 P.M. A complete agenda package is available for viewing at 1679 Tiburon Blvd. Copies of past TFPD minutes are available for viewing at the same location. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the District office at 435-7200. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the District to make reasonable arrangements.