HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Agd Pkt 2004-10-20
.,
"
.
.
.
I
)lAf7:~
TOWN OF TIBURON
Regular Meeting
Town Council Charnbers
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
October 20, 2004
6:00 PM - Closed Session
7:30 PM - Meeting
ASSISTANCE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the Town Clerk at (415) 435-7377. Notification 48
hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure
accessibility to this meeting.
AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
Copies of all agenda reports and supporting data are available for viewing and inspection at Town
Hall and at the Belvedere-Tiburon Library located adjacent to Town Hall. Agendas and minutes
are posted on the Town's website, www.cLtiburon.ca.us.
Upon request, the Town will provide written agenda materials in appropriate alternative fonnats,
or disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to enable
individuals with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Please send a written request,
including your name, mailing address, phone number and brief description of the requested
materials and preferred alternative format or auxiliary aid or service at least 5 days before the
meeting. Requests should be sent to the Office of the Town Clerk at the above address.
PUBLlC'HEARINGS
Public Hearings provide the general public and interested parties an opportunity to provide
testimony on these items. If you challenge any proposed action(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing(s) described later in
this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the Town Council at, or prior to, the Public
Hearing(s).
TIMING OF ITEMS ON AGENDA
While the Town Council attempts to hear all items in order as stated on the agenda, it reserves
the right to take items out of order. No set times are assigned to items appearing on the Town
-Council agenda.
~
,
.
Agenda - Town Council Meeting
October 20, 2004
Page 2 of 4
AGENDA
CLOSED SESSION
Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq., the Town Council will hold a closed session.
More specific information regarding this meeting is indicated below:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Section 54956.9(c))
Initiation of Litigation - Case name withheld because disclosure would jeopardize existing settlement
negotiations
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
(Section 54957)
Title: Town Manager
Town Attorney
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
. Councilmember Gram. Councilmember Slavitz, Councilmember Smith, Vice Mayor Berger, Mayor Fredericks
.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. IF ANY
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the Town Council on any subject not on the agenda may do so now.
Please note however, that the Town Council is not able to undertake extended discussion or action
tonight on items not on the agenda. Matters requiring action will be referred to the appropriate
Commission. Board, Committee or staff for consideration and/or placed on a future Town Council
meeting agenda. Please limit vour comments to no more than three (3) minutes.
PRESENTATION
. Jt. Recreation Department Annual Report - Priscilla Tripp, Committee Chair
1'\
,
.
.
.
Agenda - Town Council Meeting
October 20, 2004
Page 3 of 4
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of Town Council Minutes - October 6, 2004
2. Approval of Town CouncU Minutes - October 9, 2004
3. Recommendation by Chief of Police - COPS Spending Program FY 2004-05
a) A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon
Approving the COPS Spending Program for FY 2004-05
4. Recommendation by Planning Manager - Appeal of Design Review Board Decision to Deny a Site
Plan and Architectural Review Application to Modify Previously Approved Plans to Legalize
Construction of an As-Built Addition to an Existing Single-Family Dwelling
Property Address: 100 Lyford Drive
Applicants/Appellants: Fred and Rhonda Soofer
Assessor Parcel No.: 58-222-14 .
a) A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon
Upholding the Appeal of Fred and Rhonda Soofer
5. Recommendation by Town Manager - Approve Funding for Public Fountain Project Artist Stipends
6.
Recommendation by Town Manager - Budget Authorization and Amendment for alternate MERA
Site Test
REGULAR AGENDA
7. Recommendation by Director of Public WorksfTown Engineer - Proposed Undergrounding of
Utilities District - Accept Petitions and Boundary Map
a) A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon
of Intention to Make Acquisitions and Improvements-
"Hawthorne Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Undergrounding of
Utilities Assessment District"
COUNCIL. COMMITTEE AND COMMISSION REPORTS
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Town Council Weekly Digest - October 8, 2004
Town Council Weekly Digest - October 15, 2004
ADJOURNMENT
.
Agenda - Town Council Meeting
October 20,2004
Page 4 of 4
FUTURE MEETINGS & AGENDA ITEMS - Note: These items are tentative until thev aooear on the final
aoenda
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Precise Plan Amendment - Expansion of Building Envelope at 4 Indian Rock - (November 3)
Design Review Board Appeal of Site Plan and Architectural Reivew for Construction of a Single
Family Dwelling at 79 Round Hill Road - (November 3)
Transfer of Reserves FY 2004-05 - (November 3)
FY 2003-04 Audit Report and Adoption - (November 17)
Lyford Cove Undergrounding District - Public Hearing and Ballot Tabulation - (November 17)
Tiburon Police Association Contract - (November 17)
Election of MayorlVice Mayor - (December 1)
Town Holiday Party - (December 15)
Annual Meeting of Tiburon Redevelopment Agency
3"' Quarter FY Budget Report
Tiburon Glen Precise Development Plan
Soda LLC - Waiver of Annexation Agreement
Revised Street Impact Fee Schedule
Raccoon Lane Undergrounding Project - Reaffirm Resolution of Intention
Proposed Erosion and Siltation Control Ordinance
County-wide Services JPA
Adoption of Updated Personnel Rules and Regulations
Trestle Glen Bike and Pedestrian Path Improvements - Plans and Specifications
.~
.
.
.
IlF~ 4, I
TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Fredenz:c a1fedth~-re~geeting ofthe Tiburon Town Council to order at 7:30 p.m.
on Wednesda ,October 6,200.4; in T wn Council Chambers, ]505 Tiburon Bou]evard, Tiburon,
California. _ __.___
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNC]LMEMBERS:
Berger, Fredericks, Gram, S]avitz, Smith
PRESENT: EX OFF]CIO:
Town Manager McIntyre, Town Attorney Danforth,
Director of C;ornmunity Development Anderson,
Director ofPub]ic WorkslTown Engineer Echo]s,
Administrative/Financial Ana]yst Stott, Town Clerk
Crane Iacopi
CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Section 54956.9(a))
Claim No. E200405A0326-00-se\37 AA404490
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Section 54956.9(c))
Initiation of Litigation - Case name withheld because disclosure would jeopardize existing
settlement negotiations
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. IF ANY
Mayor Fredericks said that no action was taken on the items discussed in closed session.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Betty Girt]er, ]] Linda Vista A venue, asked the Council to consider adopting an ordinance that
would limit the time to complete building projects. She described a project which was a source
of great irritation to the neighborhood (due to traffic, noise, etc.) that had been going on for a
number of years and said that the current permit would not expire until March of 2005.
Town Council Minutes # 19-2004
Page 1
October 6, 2004
~
Vice Mayor Berger asked Mrs. Girtler if she was familiar with the Belvedere ordinance, and also .
if she had a specific time limit in mind. Mrs. Girder said that she thought that no more than two
years should be the limit.
PRESENTATION
Statewide Initiative Proposition IA - Amy O'Gorman, League of California Cities
Ms. O'Gorman asked the Council to adopt a resolution in support ofthe bi-partisan agreement
between the Governor and the League of California Cities that would offer long-term protection
from State "take-aways" in future in exchange for a specific limited contribution (by the cities)
over the next two years. She said that this was an opportunity for true fiscal reform.
Ms. O'Gorman said that the Town of Tiburon had lost $5.6 million to the State since 1992, and
that the County of Marin had lost $266 million in property tax revenues that had been lost to the
State. She said that the success of the proposition would require the State, beginning in 2006, to
fund any shortfalls in the VLF backfill, and would allow the Town (and County) to suspend all
state-mandated programs (if not fully funded by the State). She said that the Town's total
contribution would be $148,000 for two years.
In response to a question form Vice Mayor Berger, Ms. Or'Gorman said that any shortfalls in the
backfill would be paid back with interest, within three years. .
.
Mayor Fredericks adjourned the meeting temporarily and, as citizen Fredericks, presented Ms.
O'Gorman with a check for $1,000 in support of Proposition lA. Ms. Fredericks urged tlie
Council to also contribute to the campaign, stating that she had lobbied for two years with the
League of California Cities in support of the proposition.
Mayor Fredericks then reconvened the meeting.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of Town Council Minutes - September ]5, 2004
2. Approval of Town Council Minutes - September 29,2004
3. Recommendation by Director of Administrative Services - Adopt Town Investment
Summary for AU!,'Ilst 2004
4. Recommendation by Town Clerk - Ratification of Reed Union School District.
Appointment of Library Board Liaison
Town Council Minutes # 19-211114
Octoher 6, 20114
Page 2
.
~'
.
.
.
.
5. Recommendation by Town Manager - Support for Local Government Agreement
Proposition lA
a) A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon
In Support of Statewide Proposition IA
6. Recommendation by Town Manager - Support for Measure A - "Transportation
Authority of Marin Transactions and Use Tax Ordinance"
a) A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon
Supporting Measure A on the November 2, 2004 Ballot-
"Transportation Authority of Marin Transactions and Use
Tax Ordinance"
7. Recommendation by Town Manager - Resolution Commending Belvedere- Tiburon
Joint Recreation Committee Director Barbara Creamer Upon Her Retirement for 15 Years
of Outstanding Service to the Community
8. Recommendation by Planning Manager - Request by Marin County Department of
Public Works for Fee Waiver to Install Fence at Pamela Court Pump Station Site
9. Recommendation by Director of Community Development - Approval of Future
Annexation Al,'Teement
Property Address:
Owners:
Assessor Parcel No.
3535 Paradise Drive
Young & Hartnett Trust
58-032-08
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To adopt Consent Calendar Item Nos. I through 9, above.
Slavitz, seconded by Gram
AYES: Unanimous
PUBLIC HEARING
10. Report by Planning Manager - Appeal of Design Review Board Decision to Deny a
Site Plan and Architectural Review Application to ModifY Previously Approved Plans to
Legalize Construction of an As-Built Addition to an Existing Single-Family Dwelling
Property Address:
Applicants/Appellants:
Assessor Parcel No.:
100 Lyford Drive
Fred and Rhonda Soofer
58-222-14
Town Council Minutes # 19-2004
October 0, 2(1)4
Page 3
t
Planning Manager Watrous gave the report, stating that five previous applications for .
modifications to thc project had been reviewed and approvcd by thc Town. However, Mr.
Watrous said that in July, the Dcsign Rcvicw Board had denied the application in question, this
time for submittal of "as-built" plans that would have legalized construction of an addition to
the property, with a floor area exception.
Mr. Watrous reviewed the grounds of the timcly appeal that was filed by the
Applicants/Appellants, Fred and Rhonda Soofer, and commented briefly about each item. He
stated that the Board had acted in accordance with the Town's guidelines with regard to floor
area ratios which "discouraged overbuilding of property" in denying the application and he
recommended that the Council deny the appeal.
Prior to opening the appeal hcaring, Mayor Fredericks asked Staff whether any of the additions
had incrcascd the footprint of the house. The Planning Manager answered affirmatively, but
noted that the application on appeal was for a space beneath a dcck that had already expanded
the footprint of the house.
Mayor Fredericks opened the public hearing.
Fred Soofer, Applicant/Appellant, gave the Council a lengthy history of the remodel project at
] 00 Lyford Drive. He stated that he and his family had lived there since 1978. He said that hc
had appeared before the Design Review Board six times since 1999 and that he respectcd thc
process. He admitted that the plans for the arca in qucstion had changed many times since the
remodel project began.
.
In response to a question from Vice Mayor Berger, Mr. Soofer said that the area in question
was originally intended to be for storage and that it was to be enclosed, with no windows.
Vice Mayor Berger asked why the windows now looked different from what appeared in the
approved plans. Mr. Soofer said that they had been placed differently at the recommendation
of the window representative, but with the same total square foot coverage.
Mr. Soofer admitted that once the window was placed in the area in question, a bathroom had
also been built into the space. He said he had spoken with Planner Brian Lynch about the
addition, who was quoted as saying he would "have no problem with" the design if it received
Building Department approval.
Mr. Sooter said that he then contacted the Building Department Official who recommended
that Soofer submit "as-built" plans for the existing room and have them reviewed for approval
through the planning process.
Town Council Minutes # 19-2004
October 6, 2004
Page 4
.
F
.
.
.
Mr. Soofer said that he regretted the "misunderstanding" that had arisen from his as-built
application but he denied that there was any deception involved nor any "flaunting" of the
process on his part.
Furthermore, Mr. Soofer said that [visually] the neighbors liked what he had done to that side
of the house and found it to be attractive,
In response to a question from Council, Planning Manager Watrous said the approved area was
to be fully enclosed, without windows. Couneilmember Slavitz noted that it was also approved
without a floor and would have been an "empty shaft."
Mr. Soofer disagreed, stating that a floor was part of the approved plans; Vice Mayor Berger
looked at the plans and stated that there was no floor. Mr. Soofer stated that his structural
engineer said that a floor would act as a platform to support the house above.
Couneilmember Slavitz asked why Mr. Soofer had not gone to the Design Review Board for
approval ofthis modification to the plans. .
Mr. Soofer said that he had gone before the Board many times but was afraid to keep going
back. He said that he had worked closely with Planning Manager Watrous and that he had
even volunteered to "tear out" the room in question. Mr. Soofer said that Mr. Watrous had
advised him to seek DRB approval instead.
Councilmember Smith asked if the room had been "discovered" during a field inspection by the
Town. Mr. Soofer said no, that he had taken Building Official Bloomquist into the room and
showed it to him; that he could just as easily have kept it "hidden" since it had not been noticed
during previous inspections.
Mr. Soofer asked the Council to approve the as-built room and window, stating that the room
would only increase the floor area of his project by 600 feet, while the Desih'll Review Board
had approved an increase of2,780 square feet (for another project on Lyford Drive) the same
night they had denied his application.
Peter Brekhus, attorney representing the Soofers, and author of the appeal, said that it was not
true that his client had been "warned" by the Board concerning changes to the plans (and stated
that the remark pertained to something on the other side of the building). He said that one
DRB member said "they weren't sure what happened" with all the changes that had occurred.
Mr. Brekhus said that the "as-built" room did not change the visual style or scale ofthe house
and said that it was compatible with the neighborhood,
Town Council Minutes # 19-2004
October 6, 2(1)4
Page .5
t
Mike Figour, Design Review Boardmember, said that the Board had reviewed three or four
iterations of the plans but that he remembered the approvals as being "quite different" from
what was actually built.
.
Figour said that the Board had approved the enclosure of the space beneath thc dcck in ordcr to
avoid a visible beam system (from the hillside) that was "quite unattractive."
In response to a question from Councilmemher Smith, Mr. Figour said that the Board would
not have approved the space ifthey had seen the plans "in their totality," and admitted that they
had "lost control as a Board," so that when the final application came in, it was "the straw that
broke the camel's back."
Councilmember Gram askcd the Planning Manager what would happen if the appcal was
denied. Mr. Watrous said that the floor, windows, and any openings into thc space would havc
to be rcmoved, along with any improvements (such as plumbing).
In response to a question from Mayor Fredericks, Mr. Watrous responded that a common
[ORB] remedy to ensure an area was for "storage only" was to approve a substandard ceiling
height (such as seven feet). However, in this instance, he said that the floor would havc to he
moved up in order to achieve this, and that it could he easily changed back.
Mayor Fredericks closed the public hearing.
.
In its deliberations, thc Council noted the difficulties that arose from approvals of thcsc
enclosed spaces within the framework of existing homes that eventually "turned into" other
uses.
Vice Mayor Berger said there were two warring principles; that the FAR limits were to control
mass and bulk of a structure, hut that once an FAR exception was granted to cnclosc such a
space, it led to a tendency to "build more." He noted the recent approval of the addition of a
room in a housc on Corinthian Island.
The Vice Mayor said that the City of Belvedere actually counted "potential volume" as FAR;
he suggested that Council take up this issue and add it to the Town's FAR guidelines.
With regard to the appeal at hand, Vicc Mayor Berger said that the windows were not
"beaming into anyone's bedroom" and that he would vote to allow the Soofers to keep the
"minimum amount" of [additional] space and the windows, while not waiving any penalties for
an after-the-fact approval.
Mayor Fredericks said that the question in her mind was would the total of six applications
have heen approved by the Board if they had been brought in at the same time.
Town Council Minutes # /9-2()()4
Octoher 6, 2004
Page 6
.
.
.
.
She also stated that there were other issues, such as whether the lot was overbuilt, and the
increased intensity of usc due to the creation of another room and bathroom.
The Mayor noted that the FAR increase was granted not during the original plan approval but
during the remodel process; she said she was not sure that this application should be the "test
case" for what the Vice Mayor was proposing.
Councilmember Smith said that it was "blatantly obvious" what happens with these typcs of
[enclosed space] designs; that the "Lego approach" was just "bad land use planning," but that it
was a reflcction of a problem with thc process which should be remedied.
Smith said that it was too late to get the value [recommended by Berger] out of this project;
that any changes to the application would result in a "worse appearance" to the house and that
he would vote to uphold the appeal and find a way to stop this kind of thing from happcning
again.
Councilmember Slavitz said that he too had agonized over the issues presented in the appeal.
He said that he al,'I'eed that unused but livable space should be measured in the FAR guidelines;
that "incremental permitting" should stop.
Slavitz said that he agreed with Councilmember Smith that the room added by the Soofers was
"not hurting anyone" but noted the danger in approving such an application if it might tie the
hands of future Councils. However, he said it did not make sense to tear out the floor or
remove the improvements at this point.
Councilmember Gram concurred. He said it made no sense to take out a floor. Gram said that
he would like to see this project finished (since it had been in progress since 1999). He also
agreed with his fellow Councilmembers of the need to "fix" the greater problem dealing with
the floor area calculations of storage or unused areas.
Vice Mayor Berger said that it might be possible to mitigate the appearance of thc stucco wall
resulting from the enclosure of the space with additional landscaping that could be reviewed by
Planning Staff.
MOTION:
To uphold the appeal; to direct Staff to return to Council with a resolution
memorializing the proceedings, with the added condition of approval that a
revised landscaping plan be submitted and reviewed by Planning Division Staff to
help screen the addition from below.
Berger, seconded by Smith
AYES: Unanimous
Moved:
Vote:
Town Council Minutes # 19-2004
Octoher 6, 2004
Page 7
11.
Recommendation by Planning Manager - Certification of Final Environmental Impact
Report for Parente Precise Development Plan
.
Property Address:
Applicant:
Owners:
Assessor Parcel No.:
End of Parente Road and End of Antonette Drive
Torn Newton/Planning Advisory Corporation
Amcrippon, Inc.
38-1 I 1-16
Planning Manager Watrous gave the report and recommended certification of the FEIR.
Mayor Fredericks asked why a final environmental impact report was being certified if it was
known that the applicants were planning to modify the project.
The Planning Manager replied that the applicants had expressed an intent to makc changes to
the proposed project that would result in lessened impacts. He said that the EIR certification
was an important point in the process and one where it was important to move forward so that
the project could be reviewed on its merits.
Mayor Fredericks opened and closed the public hearing. There was no public comment.
Councilmember Smith agreed that the applicants had done a good job in addressing the issues
of soil stability and acccss since he had rcviewed thc project while sitting on the Planning
Commission.
.
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To adopt Resolution Certifying Parente Project FElR
Berger, seconded by Slavitz
AYES: Unanimous
REGULAR AGENDA
12. Recommendation by Director of Public Worksrrown Engineer - Proposed Solar
Panels at Town Hall
Dircctor Echols said that Staff was looking for direction from Council on whether it wished to
proceed with the installation of solar panels at Town Hall and whether to finance such a project
or pay it back over time.
He reviewed the latest proposals submitted by Cooperative Community Energy (CCE) and said
that based upon the feedback received at the April 7, 2004 Council meeting, a 30 kilowatt systcm
was still not recommended hut that further analysis and design of a 23 kilowatt system seemed to
be warranted.
Town Council Minutes # 19-2004
Octoher 6. 2004
Page 8
.
.
.
.
Council heard a brief presentation by representatives of CCE and discussed issues of design,
costs and rebate proh'fams.
Mayor Fredericks commented that although the panels were not "beautiful," it was not a reason
not to install them.
Chris Neider, CCE Field Representative, said that unlike other projects undertaken by the Town,
this project would actually "put money in the Town's pocket."
Councilmembers Slavitz and Gram expressed discomfort at the long "pay pack" period before
costs were actually recouped; CCE representatives said that with rising energy costs there really
wa.~ no good alternative. They also said the projections presented were "conservative" estimates,
in their opinion.
In a discussion of warranty and maintenance, Dan Pelligrini, CCE President, said that the panels
had a 2S-year warranty but would last for 40 years, and that they would need to be cleaned on a
regular basis, which required leaving an 8-inch space along the roofline for someone to walk.
Vice Mayor Berger said it would be visually preferable to have the panels come to the edge of the
roofline but he understood the reason for leaving a space.
Councilmember Slavitz said that it would be nice to see examples of other installations.
Councilmcmber Gram asked if any other public agencies in Marin County had similar
installations and were told that they did not.
Director Echols referred to an exhibit to the Staff report which listed other public agencies
throughout the state that had installed solar systems on public buildings.
Mayor Fredericks opened the public hearing.
John Kern, Stewart Drive, and Hclen Lindqvist, Cazadero Lane, referenced other solar systems in
Town, such as the Romberg Center, and asked some additional questions.
Mayor Fredericks closed the public hearing.
MOTION:
To proceed with the design drawings for a 23Kilowatl Solar Panel System for
Town Hall (for final approval by Council) and to authorize funding for such
project
Berger, seconded by Smith
AYES: Unanimous
Moved:
Vote:
Town Council Minutes # 19-2004
October 6, 2(1)4
Page 9
,
"
13. Recommendation by Dircctor of Public Works/Town Engineer - Desil,,'l1 for
Pcrmancnt Restroom Facility at South Knoll Park
.
Council waived the Staff report.
Mayor Frcdcricks opened the public hearing.
Helen Lindqvist, POSC member, asked if there would be replacement seating for thc benches
and tables that would be removed to make way for the new facility.
Dircctor of Public Works/Town Engineer said that thc matter would be discussed and considered
at an upcoming Parks and Open Space Commission meeting.
Mayor Fredericks closed the public hcaring.
MOTION:
To approve the design depicted in Exhibit No.5 (without the "trim
enhanccmcnts" on the roof)
Smith, seconded by Berger
AYES: Unanimous
Moved:
Vote:
] 4. Rccommendation by Dircctor of Community Development - Revised Landslide
Mitigation Policy
.
Council waived the Staff report, noting that most of the information had been presented at a
previous hearing.
Mayor Fredericks opened and elosed thc public hcaring.
The was no public comment.
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To adopt the revised policy, as presented.
Berger, seconded by Gram
AYES: Unanimous
15. Report by Town Manager - Discussions with thc Tiburon Peninsula Club
Representatives Concerning Potential Use of Property
Town Manager McIntyre gave a briefreport, stating that he had met with TPC General Manager
Chris Horn to discuss potential joint uses of a portion ofTPC land (approximately onc acrc)
nearcst Mar West Street and the library.
One of the suggestions offered by the TPC was for a l,,')'l11nasium; Mr. McIntyre said that it could
be "programmable space for a Joint Recreation Department."
Town Council Minu.les # /9-2()()4
Octoher 6, 2IJIJ4
Page JIJ
.
. McIntyre also said that the joint use could be tied to the library expansion program for additional
CIVIC uses.
Councilmember Smith said that he would "love to try to do a deal," and that the opportunity
should be explored.
Vice Mayor Berger said that he would like to see a soils test.
Councilmember Slavitz wondered whether the joint use would be have to be that particular
corner (of the property) but said that some sort of joint use agreement should be explored.
Mayor Fredericks said that while the library was developing its "wish list" for its expansion plan,
some of the ideas that arose were for a gym with pro/,'Tammable space, a community room whcre
people could "hang out," and a coffee bar.
Tiburon Peninsula Club General Manager Chris Horn said that he was "intrigued by the
possibility" of increasing recreation on the Tiburon Peninsula without duplicating services. He
highlighted the fact that there was a Joint Recreation Department (on the peninsula) but no
recreation center.
.
Mr. Horn that his Board would be hearing a similar report in future and most likely form a
subcommittee to meet with Town representatives for further discussions.
Mayor Fredericks opened the public hearing and agreed that it was an "extraordinary
opportunity."
During the public hearing, Helen Lindqvist also asked if improvcments could be made to the Mar
West Street at the same time.
Mayor Fredericks closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Gram and Vice Mayor Berger agreed to serve on a Council subcommittee to
study the matter further with the Tiburon Peninsula Club.
l6. Report and Recommendation from MERA Sub-Committee - Authorize Continued
Negotiation and Terms of Proposed Agreement for Substitute Site for Mt. Tiburon
.
After hearing a presentation from Mt. Tiburon representative/negotiator Barry Lemieux, in which
the Town was asked to state its commitment to a cost-sharing arrangement with MERA and the
Mt. Tiburon neighbors to relocate the Mt. Tiburon facilities, there was a general consensus that
the Town's share might be in the range of $200,000, depending on possible cost savings, such as
the re-sale of the Mt. Tiburon equipment to another party, but that other issues, such as
indemnification, had to first be resolved prior to entering into a three-party agreement.
Town Council Minutes 11/9-2004
October 6, 2004
Page 11
At the suggestion of Co unci 1m em her Slavitz, Council considered the idea of paying the fee for .
Motorola to test its facilities at the alternate site, Wolfback Ridge, as a show of support ofthc
Town's commitment to work with the other parties to reach an a/,'feemcnt for an alternate site
outside of the Town's residential neighborhoods.
The neighbors, through their appointed representative, Barry Lemieux, indicated their approval
of this idea, with the understanding that they would hire the consultants and manage the work
[test].
The negotiating team, consisting of Mayor Fredericks and Vice Mayor Berger, also were given
direction to continue to work towards an appropriate a/,'feemcnt with MERA and the Mt. Tiburon
neighhors that would address the Town's concerns about cost and liability in relocating the
facilities.
MOTION:
To return to Council with a budget appropriation in an amount not to exceed
$25,000 in order to reimhursc the Mt. Tihuron neighbors for moving forward with
the test of the Wolfback Ridge site facilities.
Fredericks, seconded by Berger
AYES: Unanimous
Moved:
Vote:
COUNCIL. COMMITTEE AND COMMISSION REPORTS
Town Manager McIntyre reminded the Council of the Homeowner's Summit on October 9 at
Town Hall.
.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Town Council Weekly Digest - September 17,2004
Town Council Weekly Digest - Septemher 24, 2004
ADJOURNMENT
There hcing no further business before the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon, Mayor
Fredericks adjourned the regular meeting at II :26 p.m., in memory of Tiburon resident and
henefactor, Ed Zelinsky.
ALlCE FREDERICKS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE CRANE IACOPI, TOWN CLERK
Town Council Minutes # 1 Y-2()()4
()eloher 6. 2004
Page /2
.
If
.
.
.
I~ ;U"Z-
TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES
Mayor Frederic letkhe..sI!cc'al meeting of the Tiburon Town Council to order at 10:10 a.m,
on Saturda, ctober 9, 2004,'i Town Council Chambers, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon,
California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Berger, Fredericks, Slavitz, Smith
Gram
PRESENT:
EX OFFICIO:
Town Manager McIntyre
WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS - HOMEOWNER'S SUMMIT
. Mayor Alice Fredericks
REPORT FROM TOWN COUNCIL/ST AFF
Mayor Fredericks, Vice Mayor Berger, and Town Manager McIntyre briefly reviewed the status
following items:
. Downtown RevitalizationlFriday Nights on Main
. Downtown Fountain Project
. State Proposition lA (Local Revenue Protection)
. Marin Transportation Sales Tax (Measure A)
. New Solar Panel Policy
. MERA - Questions and Answers
. General Plan Update
. Tiburon Peninsula Club Expansion Plan
. Neighborhood Undergrounding of Utilities Projects
SOUTH KNOLL PLAYGROUND IMPROVEMENTS
Parks and Open Space Commission fundraising subcommittee members Pamela Bonnie and
Derice Tao gave the Council and the public an overview of their efforts to raise enough money to
install new playground equipment at South Knoll Park.
Town Council Minutes # 20-2004
October 9, 2004
Page 1
"
.
.
.
GENERAL CONCERNS OF THE COMMUNITY
Karen Nygren, Paseo Mirasol, asked for information on traffic control plans for the Kol Shofar
expansion and made some suggestions regarding expanded shuttle service for special events at
that location.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon, Mayor
Fredericks adjourned the special meeting at 12:30 p.m., to the next regular meeting scheduled for
October 20, 2004.
ALICE FREDERICKS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE CRANE IACOPI, TOWN CLERK
Town Council Minules # 20-2004
October 9, 2004
Page 2
~
.
.
.
..
.
I
.~ ~J?-.LI!'~.J.I ^ ..'
l/.' "?.,.
.. .., 0
.("" ~.
~~~
("O\-;:;;,~~
'7\'L~~J...,.
~,,-:;:.~J'O
/,(-Q:~"
.J'. R"';,A:\tic" '.
,
.
Town of Tiburon
STAFF REPORT
:;
AGENDA ITEM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...........
TO:
MAYOR & MEMBERS OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
FROM:
MATTHEW C. ODETTO, CHIEF OF POLICE
BRIAN M. STOTT, ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL ANALYST
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND (COPS)
- PROPOSED UTILIZATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-05 ~ .
October 20,2004 REVIEWED BY:~
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE:
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BACKGROUND
In 1996, the State of California established the Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS)
Program, In July 2001, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 2885, which extended the COPS
Program through January 1, 2005, The COPS program provides local government law
enforcement jurisdictions with annual baseline funding in the amount of $100,000 for frontline
law enforcement personnel and other related equipment. The COPS program requires the Town
Council to adopt a resolution approving its COPS spending plan,
On July, 1, 2004, the fund balance in the Tiburon COPS fund was $0 and we anticipate receiving
$100,000 in revenues during the fiscal year. The adopted Fiscal Year 2004/05 Budget for the
Police COPS program was $106,770, however $6,770 is being funded through the PERS
Surplus Asset Fund, while the other $100,000 is being funded with COPS monies.
The COPS Program is scheduled to continue through the 2004/05 fiscal year, but due to the
uncertainty of the State economy, it is uncertain whether the COPS Program will continue to be
fully funded, partially unfunded, or eliminated entirely. Town staff will monitor the COPS funding
to determine the likelihood of receiving these funds in the future. Through the budget process
next year, staff will present various expenditure scenarios reflecting these alternatives,
STAFF REPORT
Town of Tiburon
. . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .
The chart below illustrates the Town's Planned FY 2004/05 COPS Operating Program:
Town of Tiburon's Planned FY 2004/05 Ooeratina Proaram
Beainnina Fund Balance (Julv 1. 2004) $0
.
Revenues
- Anticioated SLESF/COPS Allocation $100,000
- PERS Surolus Asset Fund $6,770
Proiected FY 2004/05 Exnenditures
- Investiaator's Salaries & Benefits 1$106,770\
Anticioated Endina Fund Balance (June 30. 2005) ($0\
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Town Council approve the COPS spending program and adopt the .
attached resolution memorializing these changes.
Attachment
.
October 12, 201
Page 2 of 2
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON
APPROVING AN EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR THE UTILIZATION OF
SUPPLEMENT AL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNDS
("COPS") MONIES RECEIVED FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 3229, signed into law as Chapter] 34, Statutes of
] 996, establishcd the Citizen's Option for Public Safcty Program (COPS); and
WHEREAS, on July 1,2001, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 2885, that
extends thc COPS program to January], 2005 and provides local govcrnmentlaw
enforcement jurisdictions with an annual baseline funding in the amount of$100,000, for
frontline law enforccment personnel and othcr related equipment; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council, at a public hearing held annually in October,
must approve of a spending plan for the expenditure of COPS; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, at its rcgular meeting
held on June 16,2004, adopted the recommended Police Dcpartment Budgct that
included authorization of a COPS-fundcd frontlinc position of Investigator.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon approves the proposed and recommendcd use of the COPS funds, and furthcr,
that the action to employ additional frontline personnel shall be contingent upon receipt
and continuation of baseline funding in the amounts referred to above, This Resolution,
which approvcs the recommended plan for the expcnditure of COPS monies, is to be
submitted to the County Supplemcntal Law Enforcement Oversight Committee.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting ofthc Town Council of the Town
ofTiburon on October 20,2004 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ALICE FREDERICKS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE CRANE IACOPI
TOWN CLERK
:f
.
.
.
Town of Tiburon
o
I
." ~,9L..LI#,!J ...
0- ~::.~~~: _
r>'\~~<~~.'
1';;ig;~~;
.... ~ivIA-M(.' ....
,
o
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM L
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TO:
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
FROM:
DANIEL M. WATROUS, PLANNING MANAGER
1 00 LYFORD DRIVE
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING THE GRANTING OF AN
APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW. BOARD DECISION TO DENY A SITE
PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR THE
MODIFICATION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANS TO LEGALIZE
CONSTRUCTION OF AN AS-BUILT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING, WITH A FLOOR AREA EXC~N ,
OCTOBER 20, 2004 REVIEWED BY:~
SUBJECT:
MEETING DATE:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SUMMARY
On October 6,2004, the Town Council held a public hearing on the appeal of the Design
Review Board's decision to deny a Site Plan and Architectural Review application to modify
previously approved plans to legalize construction of an as-built addition to an existing single-
family dwelling on property located at 100 Lyford Drive, with a floor area exception, At that
meeting, the Town Council voted (5-0) to direct Staff to prepare a resolution granting the appeal,
subject to conditions of approval, The draft resolution has been prepared and is attached,
RECOMMENDA nON
Adopt the attached resolution granting the appeal.
EXHIBITS
1, Draft resolution
H: dwatrouslreports/TC703121, appeal2, doc
RESOLUTION NO.
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON
GRANTING AN APPEAL BY FRED AND RHONDA SOOFER
OF THE DENIAL OF SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 100 LYFORD DRIVE
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2004, the Design Review Board held a public hearing to consider
the approval of a Site Plan and Architectural Review application to modify previously approved
plans to legalize construction of an as-built addition to an existing single-family dwelling, with a
Floor Area Exception, on property located at 100 Lyford Drive, submitted by Fred and Rhonda
Soofer ("Applicants"); and;
WHEREAS, after receiving public testimony at that hearing, the Design Review Board
determined that the stated justification for the requested floor area was not supported by the
facts, as other design solutions are available to provide the necessary structural support for the
floor above without creating new or potential floor area, The Design Review Board further
determined that the gradual increases in floor area represented by this and the five previous Site
Plan and Architectural Review applications associated with this project mask a much larger
overall increase in floor area as a series of smaller residential addition. The Design Review
Board therefore directed Staff to prepare a resolution denying this application; and
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2004, the Design Review Board voted (4-0-1) to adopt
Resolution No, 2004-04 denying the Site Plan and Architectural Review application and Floor
. Area Exception; and .
WHEREAS, on August 16, 2004, the Applicants filed an appeal of the Board's decision;
and
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2004, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon held a duly-
noticed public hearing on the appeal; during which public testimony was heard regarding the
project and the Design Review Board's review of the application; and
WHEREAS, after hearing all testimony and reviewing all documents in the record, the
Town Council determined that the proposed addition would not result in unwanted visual impacts
on any nearby properties; that the additional floor area would be an appropriate utilization of this
enclosed area; and that the visual mass and bulk of the subject addition may be lessened by the
installation of adequate landscaping below the building,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon,
based on the above findings, grants the appeal and approves the Site Plan and Architectural
Review application and Floor Area Exception subject to the following conditions of approval:
1 , This approval shall be used within three (3) years of the approval date, and shall
become null and void unless a building permit has been issued,
2, The development of this project shall conform with the application dated by the
Town of Tiburon on May 28, 2004, or as amended by these conditions of
.
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO,
10120/04
I
approval. Any modifications to the plans of May 28, 2004, must be reviewed and
approved by the Design Review Board, .
3, Plans submitted to the Building Division for plan check shall be identical to those
approved by the Design Review Board. If any changes are made to the approved
Design Review plans, the permit holder is responsible for clearly identifying all
such changes when submitted to the Building Division for plan check. Such
changes must be clearly highlighted (with a "bubble" or "cloud") on the submitted
plans, A list describing in detail all such changes shall be submitted and attached
to the building plans, with a signature block to be signed by the Planning Division
Staff member indicating that these changes have been reviewed and are
approved, or require additional Design Review. All changes that have not been
explicitly approved by Staff as part of the Building Plan Check process are not
approved, Construction that does not have Planning Division approval is not valid
and shall be subject to stop work orders and may require removal,
4, The applicant must meet all requirements of other agencies prior to the issuance
of a building permit for this project.
5, All exterior lighting fixtures must be down light type fixtures,
6, . A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted for review by Planning Division
Staff. The plan shall include landscaping that will provide appropriate screening
of the visual mass and bulk of the house when viewed from below. The approved
landscaping shall be installed prior to issuance of final occupancy approval by the
Building Division,
.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council on October 20, 2004,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ALICE FREDERICKS, MAYOR
TOWN OF TIBURON
ATTEST:
DIANE CRANE IACOPI, TOWN CLERK
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO.
10/20/04
2
.
.
.
.
Town of Tiburon
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM
,Z;-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TO: Mayor and Members of the Town Council
FROM: Alex D. Mcintyre, Town Manager ~/
SUBJECT: Funding for Public Fountain Project
MEETING DATE: October 20, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The Town Council formed a sub-committee (Gram and Berger) to design and facilitate the
selection and installation of a fountain on the planter site at the corner of Main Street and
Tiburon Boulevard.
The process includes the payment of a $5,000 stipend to the three "finalist" artists for their
designs. The stipend is paid $2,500 in advance and $2,500 once the final model is submitted.
While the Town Council has authorized the Town Manager to enter into personal services
agreements not exceeding $10,000, it appeared appropriate to have the Town Council ratify
these expenditures,
The project was budgeted in the 2004-2005 Capital Improvement Program and these stipends
would be appropriated from the Downtown Art Project fund which presently has a balance over
$21,000.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the Town Council ratify the appropriation from the Downtown Art Project
fund to pay the stipends for the three successful artists competing in the Fountain Project.
.
Town of Tiburon
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM
w
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Members of the Town ~i1,
Alex D. Mcintyre, Town Manager~
MERA Reimbursement Authorization and Budget Amendment
TO:
FROM:
MEETING DATE:
October 20, 2004
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At its last meeting, the Town Council decided to fund the cost of testing for the proposed
alternate MERA Mt. Tiburon site, Specifically, the Town Council agreed to reimburse the Mt.
Tiburon neighbors up to $25,000 in costs related to testing of the Wolfback Ridge site,
Costs will be reimbursed upon the submission of bona fide paid receipts paid by the Mt. Tiburon
neighbors for the testing process, The Town will not be liable for any costs that exceed $25,000
and that are not supported by paid written invoices,
The Town Council will need to appropriate $25,000 from the Town's Unallocated General Fund
Reserves and amend its 2004-2005 Operating Budget accordingly.
. Recommendation
It is recommended that the Town Council authorize the Town Manager to reimburse up to
$25,000 to the Mt. Tiburon neighbors for costs associated with the testing of Wolfback Ridge as
an alternate to the Mt. Tiburon MERA site.
It is further recommended that the Town Council appropriate $25,000 from the Town's
Unallocated General Fund Reserves and amend its 2004-2005 Operating Budget.'
.
;.
R).. r' ...: "Ie:' ,....
, i::~"t:",,_d
CleT 'I '" "'IJO,;
"'" U L, r
Tina & Jay Jacobsen
10 Bayshore Terrace
Tiburon, CA 94920
r-'L!V--II'.J!:\iU j):\lISiC)hj
.i'OI.I\J!\IOf:TIf.',\..Ji"U(.J
19 October 2004
Tiburon Town Council
1505 Tiburon Blvd..
Tiburon, CA 94920
fD) ~~~~W~ rm
IIll 0 CT 2 0 2004 ~
RE: Undergrounding of Utilities
'tOWN CLERK
:TOWN OF TIBURON
Dear Council Members:
We reside at 10 Bayshore Terrace. The utility pole at the entrance to Bayshore Terrace
serves our home and four others. Power lines extend east from our pole along Tiburon
Blvd to Palmer Court and west over our property to McCart Court. Additional lines from
our pole cross Tiburon Blvd to another utility pole up the hill. Our pole is an eyesore to
all who drive on Tiburon Blvd..
All of the residents on the south side of Tiburon Blvd support the undergrounding of
utilities and want to be part an Undergrounding District. Last year we thought we had
done so by giving petitions & checks to Kathleen Bailey, Neighborhood Captain for
Hawthorne Drive. We recently learned that Kathleen Bailey's group joined the Del Mar
Undergrounding District. Our petitions & checks were never turned in and our homes
were not included in her group.. '
Last night, our neighbors at 30 Bayshore Terrace gave me their petition & check. When
combined with the petitions & checks previously given to Kathleen Bailey, 80% of
Bayshore Terrace homeowners have petitioned to join the Undergrounding District. We
now have petitions & checks from 50% of the residents served by the four power poles
we want removed. A list of those residents and addresses is attached.. We are confident
we can bring the number of petitioners above the 60% threshold if given a bit more time.
f"
We were unfairly dropped from the process which is in the best interest of all Tiburon
residents.. Please honor our request that the utility poles and power lines serving
Bayshore Terrace, Palmer Court and Sommers Court be included in the "Hawthorne
Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Undergrounding of Utilities Assessment District", and allow us
an additional 60 days to meet the Town's requirements. We pledge to fulfill all
requirements within the shortest possible amount of time.
TOWN COUNCIL
LA TEMAIL #..L
MEETING DATE /0- to -iJ ~.
Sincerely yours,
Undergrounding of Tiburon Blvd. Utility Poles
19-0ct-04
(Bolded names have written check and signed petition)
Homeowners:
Tina & Jay Jacobsen
Janelle & Steve Brady
Mary Jane & Scott Wentz
Dr. David Blend
Sharlene & Svend Hansen
Mark Danforth Lomas
Florence & Art Kenney
Pat & Dick Collins
Olivia & Tom Kress
Judy Bell
D. McVicker
Lynn Sommers
Address:
10 Bayshore Terrace
20 Bayshore Terrace
30 Bayshore Terrace
15 Bayshore Terrace
642 Tiburon Blvd
650 Tiburon Blvd
654 Tiburon Blvd
660 Tiburon Blvd
3 Palmer Court
5 Palmer Court
2 Palmer Court
10 Sommers Court
"
Comment:
(Formerly 636 Tiburon Blvd)
(Formerly 638 Tiburon Blvd)
(Formerly 640 Tiburon Blvd)
(Formerly 644 Tiburon Blvd)
(Presently For Sale) .
.. -----
;
PETITION FOR UNDERGROUNDlNG ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Proposed Undergrounding of all Ulility Services and Elimination of All EXI:~ling Utility Poles
and Overhead Wires
To: The Tiburon Town Council
I, IIWe, the undersigned, arc owners of a property located on Rock Hill Drive, Del Mar
Drive, Maravista Court, Hilary Drive, Hawthorne Drive or Tiburon Boulevard,
2, IIWe petition you to undertake special assessment proceedings for a public improvement
project, to wit: the proposed undcrgrounding of all utility service in our neighborhood.
3, I/we understand that ifl/we sign this p~lition and do not file a writtcn protest prior to the
initial pub'.ic hearing initiating the formal assessment proccss, it will be assumed 'it the
time that.i./wc stil~ favor the project, for purposcs of forming the Undergrounding,
District.
. e
_ i\~'~:l:"''1_''.'.:;. ;;:.I:.~:f"'II.""I:I.'j::l"III'I".:l:::r""I'I""
.'.....
" .
. ,
Fo,d
Financ:!.?!.:.-.._ Ford Money Market Account
oA:i 9 OCri)8c~ o~ .
;...J 7D-23821719
I $I~, OOCliii51
_1 _~,.,~....., h<:l~ hpp.n initiated:
,t of project
s, " dctailed cost
;t properties.
1002
JAMES H JACOBSeN &
,,___.TINAM...JACoaS~~j JT TEN
'IV a^TSHD~~,TER
TIBURON C^ '4'20
-,'j
::::fr"Yji/ir I D W;.1 0 F 7;-5 lAl2iJ JJ
U'N. ':zI.M~~/t:!;;
TIlE NORTHERNT1lUST COMPANY 0710
ir~or~Ue'l,~~~anhe," Trust aenklOu Peg.
A ~UO'52 (tor ACH and Wire Transfersl
M'MO U iJiJep.6-A-tJ ~IJ /):r: IJ ~
1:07 loCJ 2:l8 281: CJO 7 lo :lE.E.8
-COLLARS
llliOi?J'."::'"
)r in opposition to
determined; and that
lOts must vote in thc
rcsponsible for
cc to the new
unOergruullu ::'>1;;;1 v 1<....'-' 'H ..._ I~. _ ,.
NAME:0AMLS}! ~ Y;AJAMACOi3SftJ DATE:nOC--i26<J3
ADDRESS;O J3A'f5HdRJ~. ]f{RA-Ir0& . PI-lONE: _tt3s - (; I"J.. Z
E-MAIL ADDRESS (If' DESIRED): ~H './ fl c b B$G:.AJ (J} Jf/)TI1I't~-4-~COM
Ple~se return lo your neighborhood c~ptain,
Rod, Hill J),.;vc/l)e! Mar Dri",,: John Kern (435-1 R45) Laul'i1 Rousseau (435-0527)
Hilary Drive: Joe Kelkr (435-0444) Don Ring ('I 35-?.ii72)
Mara Visla Court: Carol Weiss (435-3099) .
Hawthorne Drive/Tihuron Blvd,: Kathleen Baiky (435-0399) Laura Rousseau (435-0527)
.~ ,-~,
,j,
N
,l1l
,
PETITION FOR UNDERGROUNDlNG ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Proposed Undergrounding of all Utility Services and Eliminalion of All Existing Utility Poles
and Overhead Wires
To: The Tiburon Town Council
I, IlWe, the undersigned, are owners of a property located on Rock Hill Drive, Del Mar
Drive, Maravista Court, Hilary Drive, Hawthorne Drive or Tiburon Boulevard,
2. I/We petition you to undertake special assessment proceedings for a public improvement
project, to wit: the proposed undergrounding of all utility service in our neighborhood.
3. I/we understand that ifI/we sign this petition and do not file a written protest prior to the
initial, public hearing initiating the formal assessment process, it will be assunlt:d at the
time that Ilwe still favor the project, for purpos,.~ of forming the Undergrounding
District.
4. I/We fUl1her understand that once the formal process has been initiated:
" ' ^ - o_,,:_oor' r~n()rt will be Drepared on the project at the cost of project
irJ~~::~:>C:-'~_L_~~~__~''''~=-=-~-~=>L~'='-~''i~1 :; ;r~:~~li:~,cost
.,.,1 ,1() SA YSHORE TERRACE' I / !,~I
..,~...JI' T1BURON, CA 'I4Y20 Date (~I /6 I () L/ ;'~~fi~26~ ,,::,~i;.i
~ Pavtflf'h," ~, -r, ~ ----r-- ~'
~ Urderot_, / cJ.-...i'\. ~r /r:' 6lAro-.... $ :;'11.. .
'I ~!.J I t7 (7 0 "0 "j, or 10 OppositIOn to
~ e j,'f-\ "'~<;('~l) + CJ )/00 ' .~'I determined; and that
li' Dollars I'D ;:;;:~::.::' ", mts must vote in the
\'1 \~ FII~~:'.I' !{U'UHLlC BANr.: '!
.4 "~"""'"''''''"'''''' ':Jj
"I 'S'''I'''n'''co.CA~IUi 1.
~ Td(41~)J91'JOIe~ _...... "'_ /'~'
li For '--- '--....:....---/ -.~ ""'111 responsible for
j ~-- /.. L.----y/" . ... ;p."! Ice to the new
:i ._ /' :/ .. ._-"., Il'
l..".;...~J.~=Il~~,~gv't;.:i.~~DgJD.Q !'1Sll' l.1.B'1 ' ~
,-."".","'".'"" --:~ .- '-'"""~"""'M'-'1~"""'-='''IW;~''~:i:,~''';~~''''__-~,!'~---;t>tiJl'"",'_:x~."..cr;.~$"~:::~'iiib::,Ail
L.UA>IOI^,'~nA<F.T'{ IJLU~ I)F<F101 ---
NAME: S<.,,-(-f Ue,,+7
ADDRESS \0 f: f:iIS/rv.-.-L 'Te,'r",-c~
E-MAIL ADDRESS (I DESIRED):
/
DATE /0 /r8/tJ~
PHONE 'i3~ -(:A4c\ '.
:s:.dwe..t~ <2. MS" , C<'>M
. Ple3se return to your neighborhood captain,
Rock Hill Driveillel Mar Drive: John Kern (435-1845) Laura Rousseau (435-0527)
Hih'1' DJ'ive: Joe Keller (435-0444) Don Ping (435-2672)
M:iJ'a Vista Cllllrt: Carol Weiss (435-309~)
Hawthorne Drive/Ti[)uron Blvd.: Kathleen Bailey (435-0399) Laura Rousseau (435-0527)
';'\
,
PETITION FOR UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Proposed Undergrounding of all Utility Services and Elimination of All Existing Utilily Poles
and Overhead Wires
To: The Tibllron Town Council
I. IIWe, the undersigned, are owners ofa property located on Rock Hill Drive, Del Mar
Drive, Maravista Court, Hilary Drive, Hawthorne Drive or Tihuron Boulevard,
2, I/We petition you to undcrtakc special assessment proceedings for a public improvement
project, to wit: the proposed undergrounding of all utility servicc in our neighhorhood,
.
"''''''"'''':I''''''''''~'''",.." '" I."..........'.. -''',..,.,,, ...."", ,.". ""."''',,,.~.
:Zi,
LAW OFFICES OF' STEVEN J. BRADY
GENEI' AL ACCOUNT
lOt5 V /If:! STREET
SAN HAY.\E.'L. CA 94901
(41;' 459-7:mo
BANK OF AMERICA
50 BON AlA CENTER
GAEENBRAE, CA 94904
13574
11-35/1210
1 0/14/2003
t-";.~ TO THE
~ ORDEH a~
"
~
~
Town Of Tiburon
$"1,000,00
~I d and 00/100.............**.**.*"'.....................**............................*..........*.......*.................................
DOLLARS
MEMO 20 Bayshore, Tiburon
- /IZ ~~
'-,
""
II' 0 l.':l 5 7 L, II' I: lo 2 lo 0 0 0 :I 58 I: lo b '1 lo '1'" 0 '1 lo L, b II'
6j SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED. DETAILS ON BACK. [fJ
llndergrounding the service connection from his/her residence to the new
underground service at the property line,
Please return to your neighborhood captain,
Rock Hill Drivcrncl Mar I),-i"e: .1ohn Kern (4l5-1 R45) J.,~lllr" ROllsscau (4l5,0527)
"'1 I')' , }' 'I ('1'- '411'" I" (I"'. -'("'))
nl :IT')' nvc: .Ioe \.(;1 (;;.,' .<I-l)',~ l j i)Ol1 \.liJg.., _~J-,_'>! .
M:II'a Visla COlli-I: Carol Weiss (435-3099)
Hawthorne Drive/Tihuroll B1"d..: Kathleen Bailey(435-0399) Laura Rousseau (435-0527)
,
-r,,^- 'f ou.v- \e \-\.ev ~~ yov.- \.....( 'w.c\.lleQ..
'''~ ..VUO'''1 ,,,"U ,,""Uvu '{:)P\~~~\e~1 \i)\..Q~ T.. h~ \:,u.~ ~\~-t~ iT~'r"l2
], IIWe, the undersigned, are owners ofa property located on Rock Hill Drive, Del Ma~
Drive, Maravista Court Hilary Drive, l-Iawthome Drive or Tiburon Boulevard,
390 l.AIJRCL 51",I:I;T, 5UITE 310
SAN FIl.ANt..::'5CO. CA 941 18
TEL 41 ~;.~',r,3.":',F.l
rAX 415.563.101"/(.
EMAIL .......'L@OIl.OL".:NUI':.(;:OM
WEB WWW.DRBLENOE.COM
'y Services and Elilllinatial1 (ij'/111 E\i.l'/ing Utility Poles
2, llWc petition you to undertake special assessment procccdings for a public improvement
project, to wit: the proposed undcrgrounding of all utility service in our neighborhood,
3, l/we understand that if IIwc sign this petition and do not Jile a written protest prior 10 the
Blende Dental Group
390 Laurel Street, Suite #310
San Francisco, CA 94118-1953
(415) 563.4261
WELLS FARGO BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCJA TION
CAMPBELL, CA 95008-2365
11-4288/1210
19295
ID .,;)~- 03
PAYTOTH~ ~:::r:=b
ORDER OF ()t 11 fQ (\
Q,t'\ I +-nO\lril\.na (),[\O-Orxxx
I $ 1000.00
DOLLARS I'D $'
M71vtO
~ r
, ----:~
'I )
\/
-:-
~
~-
~,::.-
.:~
11'0 log 2'1511' ":.2.01, 2BB 21:0.. '12 5..b:;II'
.r
unoergrounCl servIce at HIt: r-:~UJJellY llue.
NAME:'b ~\J \ 1) '6\e.,^-~
, ADDRESS: \ ~ ~ M{5.\M>re Ie."....... PHONE:
E-MAIL ADDRESS (If DESIRED):
DATE: q- t 1,~
S"~~~s- 27D-D"\17
Please return to your neighborhood captain,
Rock Hill Drive/Del Mar Drive: John Kern (435-J 845) Laura Rousseau (435-0527)
HilalJ'Drive: Joe Keller (435-0444) Don Ring (435-2672)
Mara Vista Court: Carol Weiss (435-3099)
Hawthorne DrivelTihuron Blvd.: Kathleen Bailey (435-0399) Laura Rousseau (435-0527)
PETITION FOR UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Proposed Undergraunding a/all Utility Services and Elimination of All Existing Utility Poles
and Overhead Wires
To: The Tiburdn Town Council
1. IIWe, the undersigned, are owners of a property located on Rock Hill Drive, Del Mar
Drive, Maravista Court, Hilary Drive, Hawthorne Drive or Tiburon Boulevard.
I--'-"""'~_"-_m",==-,,_,:._- , , " ..--lArlol", <n"cial assessment proceedings, for a public improvement
r, - ._........"l~~-......
,.,.. UiT"---"_~i:i:'_ ~_ . . 0_ --:-.-t..hrorh()()o
. ,-"'_' '----- -~.~~~
-_.,~
12 58 ~
/ / / . / 11-35/12!1) """
7"'::',:<.-,! 0 ;'- '-r' ., DATE ' //tb/ IJj;
-"'"'-~~./,)l.-)/:.C:.-Ci
(~ ,( , ~,-,' I $ "
---:-::'~:::. /LfY:'r.', :j4L/.j' ~ k"~ C CJ ' ',:' CO(:.) ~)eo ~'
,~~nkOfAmeriCa~ '-:- "--'-"==-~------ DOLLARS Iil '=2:~' ;,'
r,~,IUl""~11O ~~* II
1 ~~~~)~~~5 ~ l , ~I
FOR G..jv~.-r:'~;?-~"-';:~ .: ;';:6~ ~ /' /" ,
II 00". 2 5BII'~:--. 2 .~' a~ 7'--..:---....---~-L~~ ' 11
'-'--'"~""==.._"~..c,:_=:.....='''''~'_.."':~''' O~.!~~': w:.~ 7 ..~~~~~!.:..,-_. ,----------"="-' _.-..~ i
my/our hnal assessment 1[1 tllC jJl\'J.........- .....~. _. . _........~'I~~~~'"2.......:;;:,~{!;;:.~~_..jf
homeowners responsible for over 50'Yo of the assessed amounts must vote In me -,
affirmative for the assessment to pass,
RICHARD B. COLLINS
, LIe. 81847482
660 F'ldRON BLVD. PH. 415-7139-5205
T1BURON, CA 94920
TO THE
ORDER OF
'd, Each rroperty owner will, in addition to the assessment, be responsihle Cor
undergrounding the service connection from his/her residence to the new
underground service at the property line,
..7 _"
NAME: ) /C'JI/i/i'/J ;0 - cc-:~//, l-_~.
ADDRESS:b--, C ~/,/5i',:'-{'C~A" ~..-;t'HONE:
[-MAIL ADDRESS (IF DES[RED):-
DATE /W6'~ 's
4/c 7f9.5?:<'~-
Please return to your neighborhood captain.
Rnek Hill I>rivc/I}cl Mal' Drive: John Kcm (415-1845) Laura Rousseau (415-0527)
Hila,.y Dri,.,,: Joe Keller (435-04'H) non [(jog (<1:,5-7(,72)
Mara Vista Court: Carol Weiss (435-30~~)
HawthnrIlc DrivcITiburnn Blvd.: Kathleen Bailey (435-0399) Laura Rousseau (435-0527)
'\.
PETITION FOR UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Proposed Undergrounding of all Utility Services and Eliminalion ofAf! Exisling Utility Poles
and Overhead Wires '
To: The Tiburoll Town Council
I, II We, the undersigned, arc owners of a property located on Rock Hill Drive, Del Mar
Drive, Maravista Court, Hilary Drive, Hawthorne Drive or Tiburon Boulevard,
2, I/We petition you to undertake special assessment proceedings for a public improvement
project, to wit: the proposed undergrounding of all utility service in our neighhorhood,
3. I/we understand that if IIwc sign this petition and do not file a written protest prior to the
initia'! ~lllhlic hearing initiating the formal assessment process, it will be assum~ J at the
time that [/wc ,r,ill favor the project, for purposes of forming the Undcrgrounding
District,
~~~~:m~it!rn.~~*=!i"";:,;,!~~=":", ~':"""~~-:;:~!~"'~~"""''-''~-F.:;<'=:.:.:~~<:i-;:''-~~--1l',:,;,c,,~_~~+~.,,"
THOMAS G. KRESS 1609 ',I
3/PALMER AVE. :1:1
eEL TIBURON CA 94920 ~ 'I:';
.- ' 90.7118/3211261 :q
t( l (. 6 'J :',
~ 0 ~ -,. OME ',I
:j~YDmJ.!' ~~~~ $ l/<SlJ()c;5tI:
~ (~~.........--".. DOI,I..\lIS &I :~;:;,'::.
embank. :1:
?.i'lt..~~\;1~rrRneR';>ol' d b~ :~~
>>AN.I08F,C"lIb1l3
"
f(W .-.,.--,-...-J-- ~_. _.___._,.___": jl
".',:, :I..:,.: .~~;~~~,~.:.,,~~oo :.: 1,:1 :,~~~21~'~.=_b?~~_",,_.__=~~_' responsible f{lr
""A'<IANtl^I)I1' - ~- ---"..--~~,.......I.&.:.O.:_.___~~_c,:;""-'--.':'-'-1,l;;"-'<';;>=,I__....~_
unuergnJUllulllg lilt:: :SCl v Il.:C \..-UIUI1.;\,...lIV11 J I VIII 111.:',11'-1 1.....lI\..'-.',CC to the nc\v
underground se7c at the property line.
NAME ~:-L DATE;, flY:;
ADDRESS ~ ~"'1~ e-I- PHONE: 1[-1- ;.,:.C; ,
[-MAIL ADDRESS (IF D[SIRED): 'TO ""'-<:L PVV/iC.fISN7 - tV-=--r '
/
lll:d:
lst of projeci
lS. a detaikd cost
ict properties"
or in opposition to
determined: and that
lIlts must vote in the
Please return to your neighborhood captain,
Rock 1'1 ill Dri""IDcJ l\1al' Drive: John Kern ('135-18!15) Llu,,, rZOIlSSC[\U (435-0527)
Hila,-y Drive: Joe Kdkr (435-0444) DOli Rillg (435-2(,72)
M'lnl Vista Court: Carol Weiss (435-3099)
Hawthorne Dri"crrihuron HI"d,: Kathleen Bailey (435-0399) Laura Rousseau (43,5-0527)
... ." . .. ,..-... .. .. --'....
LA TEMAIL IL
MEETING DATE i'D--LL'-.OY
III
...
a
'&
if:
a.
"
or
9:
~
3:
ll>
::I,
::>
n
o
c
::>
~
n
!!!.
~
3
0;'
'&
~
a
;:t
tT
C'
a
"
1/~ \j1i,''''',!il,
/"/ '" ,. ''l;''''-
"I' "I~rr~,;;'f
~~7:"~7'i/f'
A,~. !'J--:;'
~J _ 'j)i
- ~'l.:
/,
j'll
"I'r.
c:
~~ ::r:
if:~ 31"
.. c:li5' I
~:J :I. a
CDfr3;a
aca if ~
0'" _lD
_OlD :J
ell C ::r oS
:rs.;ro
o -. il
-"
lD
F
.
.
A.
. B.
Town of Tiburon
STAFF REPORT
1
AGENDA ITEM
TO:
Mayor and Town Councilmembers
FROM:
Pat Echols, Director of Public WorksITown Engineer
SUBJECT: Proposed Hawthorne Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Utility
Undergrounding Assessment District ~
MEETING DATE: October 20, 2004 REVIEWED BY: ~
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Residents of the Hawthome Terrace/Pilgrim Heights neighborhood have been
interested in undergrounding utilities for a long time. During the last several months,
the resident proponents have worked with Harris & Associates (proposed district
engineering consultants), Town staff and the utility companies to develop a boundary
map for a proposed utility undergrounding assessment district (Exhibit A),
To formally begin the process of forming the proposed assessment district, the Town
Council must adopt a resolution of intention (Exhibit B). Town policy requires that
district proponents gather petitions of support from at least 60 percent of the affected
property owners within the proposed district and collect subscription deposits
sufficient to cover advance costs required to retain the District Engineer, secure
utility company design support, and legal advisory services. The proponents of the
proposed district have submitted 54 signed petitions of support (approximately 62
percent of the 87 parcels within the proposed district boundary) and $51,000 in
subscription deposits. Proponents also paid $3,000 for PG&E to attend a boundary
walk on August 25, The Town Clerk has certified that the petitions and boundary
map are in order. Harris & Associates have indicated that the subscription deposits
collected should be sufficient to cover the advance costs.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Town Council take the following actions:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Receive a presentation by proponents and proposed District Engineer,
Receive any public comment.
Accept the proposed District Boundary Map (Exhibit A), petitions of
support and subscription deposits,
Adopt the resolution of intention (Exhibit B),
EXHIBITS
Proposed District Boundary Map
Resolution of Intention
.
,
._/~~"{_.
r",. ' : ",
v '_'"
.......... . ' .: '~'"
." Ofj>/vIA ;tlf... ".
October 13, 2004
1 of 1
Z
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I
i'-',~
/ ,,', .''-.
.
/
.
"
.~" ,/
/
/
,/
.
/,,/
//
//
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
:;
i'
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON OF INTENTION TO
MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS
TOWN OF TIBURON
Hawthorne Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Utility Undergrounding Assessment District
RESOLVED by the Town Council (the "Council") of the Town of Tiburon (the "Town"),
County of Marin (the "County"), State of California, as follows:
1. Intention, The public interest, convenience and necessity require, and that it
intends to order the making of the acquisitions and improvements described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof in and for the Town's proposed Hawthorne
Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Utility Undergrounding Assessment District (the "Assessment District"),
2. Law Applicable. Except as herein otherwise provided for the issuance of
bonds, all of the work shall be done as provided in the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913,
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of California (the "Act").
3. Nature and Location of and Grades for Improvements, All of the work and
improvements are to be constructed at the places and in the particular locations, of the forms,
sizes, dimensions and materials, and at the lines, grades and elevations, as shown and
delineated upon the plans, profiles and specifications to be made therefor, as hereinafter
provided. There is to be excepted from the work above described any of such work already
done to line and grade and marked excepted or shown not to be done on the plans, profiles
and specifications, Whenever any public way is herein referred to as running between two
public ways, or from or to any public way, the intersections of the public ways referred to are
included to the extent that work is shown on the plans to be done therein, The streets and
highways are or will be more particularly shown in the records in the office of the County
Recorder of the County and shall be shown upon the plans,
4. Change of Grade, Notice is hereby given of the fact that in many cases the
work and improvements will bring the finished work to a grade different from that formerly
existing, and that to the extent the grades are hereby changed and that the work will be done
to the changed grades,
5. Work on Private Property, In cases where there is any disparity in level or size
between the improvements proposed to be made herein and private property and where it is
more economical to eliminate such disparity by work on the private property than by
adjustment of the work on public property, it is hereby determined that it is in the publiC interest
and more economical to do such work on private property to eliminate such disparity, In such
cases, the work on private property shall, with the written consent of the owner of the property,
be done and the actual cost thereof may be added to the proposed assessment of the lot on
which the work is to be done,
6. Official Grades, This Council does hereby adopt and establish as the official
grades for the work the grades and elevations to be shown upon the plans, profiles and
specifications, All such grades and elevations are to be in feet and decimals thereof with
reference to the datum plane of this Town,
"
7. Descriptions - General, The descriptions of the acquisitions and improvements .
and the termini of the work contained in this Resolution are general in nature, All items of work
do not necessarily extend for the full length of the description thereof, The plans and profiles of
the work and maps and descriptions as contained in the Engineer's Report, hereinafter
directed to be made and filed, shall be controlling as to the correct and detailed description
thereof,
8. Special Benefit and Boundary Map, The contemplated acquisitions and
improvements, in the opinion of this Council, are of more than general or ordinary public
benefit, and the costs and expenses thereof are made chargeable upon the Assessment
District, the exterior boundaries of which are shown on a map thereof on file in the office of the
Town Clerk, to which reference is hereby made for further particulars. The map indicates by a
boundary line the extent of the territory proposed to be included in Assessment District and
shall govern for all details as to the extent of the Assessment District.
9. Public Property, This Council declares that all public streets, highways, lanes
and alleys, and properties owned by any public agency or department of the United States of
America, the State of California, the County, any city or special district, within the Assessment
District and in use in the performance of a public function shall be omitted from the
assessment hereafter to be made; provided, however that to the extent found to be speCially
benefited, such lands shall be subject to assessment.
10. Engineer's Report. The acquisitions and improvements are hereby referred to
Harris & Associates, being a competent firm employed for the purpose hereof as Engineer of
Work for the Assessment District (the "Engineer of Work"), and the Engineer of Work is hereby .
directed to make and file with the Town Clerk a report in writing (the "Engineer's Report"),
presenting the following:
(a) Maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, if
any;
(b) Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements if the
improvements are not already installed, The plans and speCifications do not need to be
detailed and are sufficient if they show or describe the general nature, location, and
extent of the improvements. If the Assessment District is divided into zones, the plans
and specifications shall indicate the class and the type of improvements to be provided
for each zone. The plans or specifications may be prepared as separate documents, or
either or both may be incorporated in the Engineer's Report as a combined document.
(c) A general description of works or appliances already installed and any
other property necessary or convenient for the operation of the improvements, if the
works, appliances, or property are to be acquired as part of the improvements,
(d) An estimate of the cost of the improvements and of the cost of lands,
rights-of-way, easements, and incidental expenses in connection with the
improvements, including any cost of issuing and registering bonds.
(e) A diagram showing, as they existed at the time of the passage of this
Resolution, all of the following:
.
- 2-
~
.
.
.
.
(1 )
(2)
The exterior boundaries of the Assessment District.
The boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District.
(3) The lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within the
Assessment District.
Each subdivision shall be given a separate number upon the diagram, The
diagram may refer to the county assessor's maps for a detailed description of
the lines and dimensions of any parcels, in which case those maps shall govern
for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of the parcels,
(f) A proposed assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of
the proposed improvement upon the several subdivisions of land in the Assessment
District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each subdivision,
respectively, from the improvement. The assessment shall refer to the subdivisions by
their respective numbers as assigned pursuant to subdivision (e).
When any portion or percentage of the costs and expenses of the acquisitions and
improvements is to be paid from sources other than assessments, the amount of such portion
or percentage shall first be deducted from the total estimated cost and expenses of the
acquisitions and improvements, and the assessment shall include only the remainder of the
estimated cost and expenses.
11. Use of Surplus, If any excess shall be realized from the assessment it shall be
used, in such amounts as this Council may determine, in accordance with the provisions of the
Act, for one or more of the following purposes:
(a) Transfer to the general fund of this Town, provided that the amount of
any such transfer shall not exceed the lesser of $1,000 or 5% of the total amount
expended from the improvement fund;
(b) As a credit upon the assessment and any supplemental assessment or
for the redemption of bonds, or both; or
(c) For the maintenance of the improvements,
12. Contact Person, Patrick Echols, Town Engineer, is hereby designated as the
person to answer inquiries regarding any protest proceedings to be had herein, and may be
contacted during regular office hours at Town Hall, 1505 Tiburon Blvd" Tiburon, California
94920, or by calling telephone number (415) 435-7388.
13. Contracts with Others, To the extent that any of the work., rights,
improvements and acquisitions indicated in the Engineer's Report, to be made as provided
herein, are shown to be connected to the facilities, works or systems of, or are to be owned,
managed and controlled by, any public agency other than this Town, or of any pUblic utility, it is
the intention of this Council to enter into an agreement with such public agency or public utility
pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10100) of the Act, which agreement may
provide for, among other matters, the ownership, operation and maintenance by such agency
or utility of the works, rights, improvements and acquisitions, and may provide for the
installation of all or a portion of such improvements by the agency or utility and for the
- 3-
'.
providing of service to the properties in the area benefiting from the work, rights, improvements .
and acquisitions by such agency or utility in accordance with its rates, rules and regulations,
and that such agreement shall become effective after proceedings have been taken for the
levy of the assessments and sale of bonds and funds are available to carry out the terms of
any such agreement.
14. Improvement Bonds. Notice is hereby given that serial andlor term
improvement bonds (the "Bonds") to represent unpaid assessments, and bear interest at the
rate of not to exceed such rate of interest as may be authorized by applicable law a the time of
sale of such bonds, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the Improvement Bond
Act of 1915, Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"), the
last installment of which bonds shall mature not to exceed thirty (30) years from the second
day of September next succeeding their date. The bonds shall be issued in such series and
shall mature in such principal amounts at such times as shall be determined by this Council at
the time of the issuance of such bonds. The provisions of Part 11,1 of the Bond Law, providing
an alternative procedure for the advance payment and calling of bonds, shall apply to the
bonds issued in these proceedings. It is the intention of this Council to create a special reserve
fund pursuant to and as authorized by Part 16 of the Bond Law, It is the intention of the Town
that the Town will not obligate itself to advance available funds from the treasury of the Town
to cure any deficiency in the redemption fund to be created with respect to the bonds;
provided, however, that a determination not to obligate itself shall not prevent the Town from,
in its sole discretion, so advancing funds.
15. Refunding of Bonds, The bonds may be refunded pursuant to the provisions of
Division 11.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code upon the determination of the
Council of the Town that the public interest or necessity requires such refunding, Such
refunding may be undertaken by the Council when, in its opinion, lower prevailing interest rates
may allow reduction in the amount of the installments of principal and interest upon the
assessments given to owners of property assessed for the works herein described, The
refunding bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed that which is stated in the resolution
of the Council expressing its intention to issue the refunding bonds, which resolution of
intention shall also set forth the maximum term of years of the refunding bonds, The refunding
shall be accomplished pursuant to Division 11,5 (commencing with Section 9500) of the
California Streets and Highways Code, except that, if, following the filing of the report specified
in Section 9523 and any subsequent modifications of the report, the Council finds that each of
the conditions specified in the resolution of intention to issue the refunding bonds is satisfied
and that adjustments to the assessments are on a pro-rata basis, the Council may approve
and confirm the report and may, without further proceedings, authorize, issue and sell the
refunding bonds pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 9600) of Division 11,5 of the
California Streets and Highways Code,
16. Division 4, Reference is hereby made to proceedings had pursuant to Division
4 of the Streets and Highways Code of California which are on file in the office of the Town
Clerk, It is the intention of this Council to comply with Division 4 of the Streets and Highways
Code of California by proceeding under Part 7.5 thereof, To that end, the Engineer of Work is
hereby directed to include in the Engineer's Report all of the material specified by such Part
7,5 and for which the total true value shall be estimated as the full cash value of the parcels of
land in the Assessment District as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County,
or alternatively, by means of a current appraisal on such terms as may be prescribed by this
Council.
-4-
.
.
.
.
.
17. No Private Contract. Notice is hereby given that, in the opinion of this Council,
the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners to take the contract for
the construction of the improvements and therefore that, pursuant to Section 20487 of the
California Public Contract Code, no notice of award of contract shall be published,
18. Reimbursement Declaration, The Town intends to issue the Bonds, which are
"Obligations" under United States Income Tax Regulations section 1.150-2 (the "Regulations"),
to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Improvements. The Council hereby declares that
the Town reasonably expects to use a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds for reimbursement
of expenditures for the Improvements that are paid before the date of issuance of the Bonds.
This section of this resolution shall be solely for the purpose of complying with the provisions
of the Regulations and shall not be deemed an approval of all or any part of the Assessment
District or a commitment on the part of this Council to issue any or all of the Bonds or
otherwise provide for financing,
19. Professionals Appointed. The Town hereby appoints Jones Hall, A
Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, as bond counsel, and Wulff, Hansen
& Co" San Francisco, California, as underwriter. The Town Manager andlor Town Attorney are
hereby authorized and directed to enter into agreements with such firms for their services to
the Town for the Assessment District and the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds,
20. Effective, This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption by the Council.
************
PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon, State of California, on this day of , 2004, by the following vote
to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
, MAYOR
TOWN OF T1BURON
ATTEST:
DIANE CRANE IACOPI, TOWN CLERK
- 5 -
EXHIBIT A
TOWN OF TIBURON
Hawthorne Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Utility Undergrounding Assessment District
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Within the Town of Tiburon, (the 'Town") County of Marin, State of California, the
construction and acquisition of the following public improvements, including the acquisition of
all lands, easements, rights-of-way, licenses, franchises, and permits and the construction of
all auxiliary work necessary and/or convenient to the accomplishment thereof in accordance
with plans and specifications to be approved by the Town:
Within the area of the Hawthorne Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Utility Undergrounding
Assessment District and in and along all or portions of Del Mar Drive, Hawthorne Terrace,
Hillary Drive, Mara Vista Court, and Rock Hill Road, as more particularly shown on the
proposed Boundary Map of the Hawthorne Terrace/Pilgrim Heights Utility Undergrounding
Assessment District on file in the office of the Town Clerk, the installation of new, underground
facilities to replace such utility lines, including all required removal of pavement, trenching,
backfilling, repaving, installation of substructures, conduits, pull boxes, vaults and
appurtenances and the removal of existing overhead electric, telephone and CATV utility lines,
including existing, transformers and other overhead structures.
-6-
'.
.
.
.