The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTC Agd Pkt 1995-07-05 ~/'J' f,'~ U(rvti .. I' /~~~. yrtt (Jv'lr U TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA TOWN OF TIBURON 1101 TIBURON BLVD. REGULAR MEETING MEETING DATE: CLOSED SESSION: MEETING TIME: JULY 5, 1995 FOLLOWING 7:30P.M. PLEASE NOTE: In order to give all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and to ensure the presentation of all points of view, members of the audience should: (1) Always Address the Chair; (2) State Name and Address; (3) State Views Succinctly; (4) Umit Presentations to 3 minutes; (5) Speak Directly into Microphone. In compliance with the Americans.....-ith Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Town Hall (415) 435-7373. NotifICation 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35,102.35,104 ADA Tille ilJ --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES I. #RA-45-95 June 21, 1995 C. PUBLIC HEARING 2. ADOPTION OF FY95-96 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET (Resolution) D. ADJOURNMENT TOWN COUNCIL A. ROLL CALL B. PUBLIC QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Please confine your COII/II/enls during lhis porlion o/lhe agenda 10 mallers nol already 011 lhis agenda. olher than ifems on the Consent Calendar. The public will be given an opporlUllity 10 speak on each agenda ilem al lhe lime it is called PreSenlQlions are limited 10 Ihree (3) mim/les. Afallers requiring aclion will be refefTed 10 lhe appropriale COII/II/issiun, Board, CVfJJmillee or Slafffur consideralion and/or placed on afulllre meeling agenda. C. COllNCIL. COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE REPORTS D. CONSENT CALENDAR The purpose of the Consent Calendar is to group items together which generally do no/ require discussion and which will probably be approved by one marion unless separate action is required on a particular item. Any member of the Town Council, Town Staff, or the Public may request removal of an item/or discussion. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES #1056, June 12,1995; #1057, June 21,1995 2. RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT TO FORMATION OF OLD LANDING ROAD SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (District NO.2 - Corte Madera) 3. TOWN MONTHLY INVESTMENT SUMMARY (May 31, 1995) E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 4. RESOLUTION - Request that State Stop Logging in Headwaters Forests - Humboldt County (Recommendation by Marin Mayors & Councilmembers) 5. NEW TOWN CENTER - Reports from Committee Chairs/Consider Additional Committee Appointments F. PUBLIC HEARING 6. FRAIGE SUBDIVISION PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT #39502; STEVENS COURT (Resolution) G.. NEW BUSINESS 7. FY95-96 TOWN BUDGET a. Non-Represented Employees Salary Adjustment (Resolution) b. Fund Transfers - Proposed Reallocation among General Fund Designation Reserves H. COMMUNICA nONS 8. LETTER FROM PETER BROOKS REGARDING FORMATION OF AN AD HOC COMMITTEE TO LIST DESIGNATED TREES (6/19/95) I. STAFF & TOWN l\IANAGER REPORTS 9. PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL MICROPHONES IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS (Hal Schmidt) J. ADJOURNMENT DATE OF MEETING: Julv 5.1995 NO. 7-1995 DATE POSTED: June 30. 1995 NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING CLOSED MEETING OF THE TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq., the Town Council will hold a Closed Session. More specific information regarding this meeting is indicated below: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGA TION (Section 54956.9) Name of Case: ZACK v. TIBURON WILLIAMS v. TIBURON KA Tki~#/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES DRAFT CALL TO ORDER Chairman Thompson called the meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the Town of Tiburon to order at 7:34 P.M., Wednesday, June 21,1995 at 1101 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California. A. ROLL CALL PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: Ginalski, Nygren, Wolf, Thayer, Thompson ABSENT: BOARDMEMBES. None EX OFFICIO: Executive Director Kleinert, Finance Director Stranzl, Minute Clerk Crane B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. #RA-43-95 February 1, 1995; #RA-44-95 March I, 1995 MOTION. To approve Minutes #RA-43-95 and #RA-44-95, as submitted. Moved: Vote: Thayer, Seconded by Wolf AYES: Unanimous NOES: None C. PUBLIC HEARING 2. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET a) Recap FY94-95 Budget b) Presentation and Adoption FY95-96 Budget (Resolution) MOTION: To accept general recommendations presented by Finance Director StranzI. Moved: Vote. Nygren, Seconded by Thayer AYES: Unanimous NOES: None Finance Director Stranzl to prepare Resolution adopting FY95-96 Budget. #RA-44-95 June 2], ]995 1 D. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Redevelopment Agency of the Town ofTiburon, Chairman Thompson adjourned the meeting at 7:43 P.M., until July 5,1995. ANDREW THOMPSON, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: ROBERT L. KLEINERT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR #RA-44-95 June 21,1995 2 ~4 I -k- ~1- 1f:;J. TmlJRON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT MEETING OF JULY 5, 1995 TO: FROM: RE: TIBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCE DIRECTOR RESOLUTION ADOPTING REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 Ikm:. This item is for approval of the Resolution Adopting the Redevelopment Agency Budget Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-96. At the Redevelopment Agency meeting of June 21, 1995 Staff presented the Agency pre-audited financial statements for Fiscal Year 1994-95, and a proposed budget plan for Fiscal Year 1995- 96, Town Council (the Agency Board of Directors) accepted the statements and approved the proposed budget. Recommendation: The Board of Directors adopt the Resolution which adopts the Agency budget for 1995-96. Exhibits: I. Resolution Adopting the Agency Budget for Fiscal Year 1995-96. TIBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Budget 1995-96 Page-l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TmURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Tiburon Redevelopment Agency conducted a Public Hearing on June 21, 1995 concerning the Agency's Budget Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-96, and WHEREAS, the Finance Director presented fiscal information concerning actual and estimated revenues, expenditures, and other sources and uses of Agency funds for the Fiscal Year 1994-95, which included information concerning estimated available General Increment and Housing Set-Aside fund resources on July 1,1995, and WHEREAS, the Agency Board of Directors now finds that the proposed Budget Plan provides for all appropriate Agency services and purposes within current fund resources and anticipated revenues for Fiscal Year 1995-96; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: that the Tiburon Redevelopment Agency Budget Plan for Fiscal Year 1995-96 is approved by the Board of Directors at the Agency meeting ofJune 21, 1995, and as indicated in the following section; General Tax Increment Fund Estimated Cash Resources on July 1,1995: Estimated Revenues Estimated Governmental Expenditures Repayment of Advance to Housing Set-Aside Fund Debt Service Payment to Pt. Tiburon CFD Estimated Cash Resources on June 30, 1996 Amount Reserved for Repayment of Advance $ 79,504 511,500 -16,500 -15,000 -472,500 $ 87,004 -30,000 Housing Set-Aside Fund Estimated Cash Resources on July I, 1995: $ 762,547 Estimated Revenues 231,000 Estimated Governmental Expenditures -37,500 Hilarita/TEA Project, carry forward -90,000 Cecilia/EAH Project, continue predevelopment -100,000 Cecilia/EAH Project, begin site improvements -110,000 Cecilia/EAH Project, Sale of Site to Developer 250,000 Cecilia/EAH Project, Construction Loan -180,000 Repayment of Advance, Due From General Fund 15,000 Estimated Cash Resources on June 30, 1996 $ 908,547 Amount Due From General Fund, Repayment of Advance 30,000 -1- and is hereby approved and adopted as the Agency's Budget Plan for Fiscal Year 1994-95, and all revenues expenditures, sources, uses, transfers and appropriations set forth therein are also approved; and, IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED: that the Town Manager (Executive Director) may make adjustments between functions and activities within the budget provided that no expenditure or encumbrance contingent on contract agreement, or other engagement requiring approval of the Board of Directors shall be made until such contract, agreement, or other engagement is first approved by the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Tiburofi Redevelopment Agency on . ] 995 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: ANDREW THOMPSON, CHAIRMAN Tiburon Redevelopment Agency ATTEST: ROBERTL. KLEINERT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR -2- _7l/l~ 40. / TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES Drt' ;: r-r ,,,;qr CALL TO ORDER Mayor Thompson called the adjourned meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon to order at 7:38 p.m., Monday June 12, 1995 in Council Chambers, 1101 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon, California. A. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Nygren, Ginalski, Thayer, Thompson, Wolf ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Kleinert, Town Attorney Ewing, Finance Director Stranzl, Town Engineer Mohammadi, Town Clerk Crane B. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Mayor Thompson reported having dinner with ABAG representatives and Mayor Peter Bryant of Rockdale, Australia, who presented the Mayor and the. Town of Tiburon with a commerative plaque during his recent visit to the Bay Area. C. CONSENT CALENDAR A correction was made to Resolution No. 3094, page 4, certifying the June 6 election results. Councilmember Wolf rnSlVed to adopt the Resolution Certifying the Results of the Municipal Election Held in and for the Town of Tiburon on June 6, 1995, for the Purpose of Deciding Measures "J", "K", & "L", Location and Funding of New Town Hall and Police Facilities, Councilmember Thayer seconded the Motion, All ayes were recorded. D. PUBLIC HEARING 2. FY95-96 TOWN BUDGET a) Capital Improvement Program. Finance Director Stranzl stated that the Capital Improvement portion of the budget consisted of street improvements, drainage improvements, and all other community development projects. Streets. Council reviewed the proposed street improvement program on pp. 86 & TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1056 6/12/95 1 87 of the budget. Town Engineer Mohammadi reviewed the priority list of streets scheduled for repair in the next two years, two to five years, and long-term. Councilmember Nygren asked where the funding would come from if the bond did not pass. Town Manager Kleinert said that staff would come back with a proposal for additional community funding. Town Engineer Moharnmadi said that Belveron was included in the first two-year program, but that work on Lyford Drive would not commence until next Spring. He said that patch work or an overlay was not the best solution and he thought the Town should wait to see if there was additional bond money for that project. Councilmember Ginalski asked whether the Town would get money from Southwest Diversified, who had done construction on the Monterossa [Lyford Drive] project. Sia waid that developers will only pay to return the street to its original condition (prior to commencement of their project). Drainage, Town Manager Kleinert reported that he had rnet with the Greenwood Beach property owners and asked Council to approve the proposed cost-sharing arrangement in which the Town would replace an existing storm drain (cost approximately $26,000), and the property owners would pay for the creation of a drainage system through Blackie's Pasture to Richardson Bay (cost approximately $54,000). Council member Nygren wanted to know how this project would affect the current plans for Blackie's Pasture. Town Attorney Ewing said the Town still had to go through BCDC for permits, Councilrnember Thayer suggested sending the plans to the Planning Departrnent for coordination with Blackie's Brigade and POSC plans. Councilmember Nygren stated that the Greenwood Beach Plan needed public review. Town Manager Kleinert said he would arrange for POSC to see the proposed Greenwood Beach drainage plan at their June 13 meeting. Community Development - Fer!)' Dock. No action taken, Community Development - Blackie's Pasture. Town Engineer Mohammadi said that the County was waiting for all Open Space applicantions to be turned in before allocating grant monies. He will follow up to find out when the monies for Blackie's will be released. The Town had allocated $7,500 toward the project and Blackie's Brigade was seeking donations of time, materials and services. Sia reported that Stan Bala was involved in both (the Greenwood Beach and Blackie's) projects and that each project could be done independent of the other without conflict. He said he would talk to Stan about this. Railroad Marsh Maintenance Plan. Councilmember Nygren asked whether flood plain money could be used to improve the Railroad Marsh. Town Attorney Ewing said TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1056 6/12/95 2 he did not think that was the original intent of the money but that he would raise the issue in the [Ferry Dock] meeting with David Irmer and the Pt. Tiburon Homeowners Association, Councilmember Wolf suggested developing a complete plan for the site of the new Library and Town Hall which adjoins the Railroad Marsh, and to involve the Parks and Open Space Commission and Joint Recreation Departments of Tiburon and Belvedere. Councilmember Thayer asked Town Manager Kleinert to develop more information and to coordinate the project with the Pt. Tiburon Homeowners Association, POSC and Joint Recreation Department. Councilmember Nygren suggested using the EIR prepared by the Tiburon Peninsula Club for reference and to treat the Marsh as a wetland. New Town Center. Finance Director Stranzl said that $1,600,000 was set aside for the project in FY95-96. Shoreline Park Lighting. Mayor Thompson asked whether it was worth maintaining the high definition lights. Councilmember Thayer asked if the Town could get a true waterproof fixture. Senior Housing. Councilmernber Ginalski reported that the Cecilia Place Senior Housing applicaation for federal funding had been approved. Playground Fund. Councilmember Wolf asked if citizen donations were earrnarked and whether the fund was restricted. Finance Director Stranzl said that they were, 2.b) Business License Program. Finance Director Stranzl said that Mary Bowles had approached the Town about a year ago offering her services for fee collection. He reported that in the last year, Accounting Technician Heidi McVeigh had undertaken the task of identifying all businesses through reverse directory and other means. He felt that the Town's business license system was under control and that there was not need to outsource at this time. He also thought the permit fee structure proposed by Ms. Bowles would hurt small businesses. Councilmember Wolf asked whether the Town's fees were high compared to other cities. Finance Director Stranzl said he would come back with a report. Councilmember Ginalski asked that Town staff reply to Mary Bowles in a letter, and Town Manager Kleinert said that he would invite her to come to Town Hall for a meeting. There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1056 6/12/95 3 Mayor Thompson adjourned the meeting at 8:50 p.m., sine die. ANDREW TIIOMPSON, MAYOR ArrEST: DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1056 6/12/95 4 -/ / I ..i-- h/ L-t ;0 ,I . TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES DRAFT CALL TO ORDER Mayor Thompson called the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon to order at 7:44 p.m., Wednesday, June 21, 1995 in Council Chambers, 1101 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California. A. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Nygren, Ginalski, Thayer, Wolf, Thompson ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Kleinert, Town Attorney Ewing, Finance Director Stranzl, Police Chief Herley, Town Engineer Mohammadi, Planning Director Anderson, Town Clerk Crane B. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS George Landau, 82 Sugarloaf, asked the Council to reconsider and revise the Town policy pertaining to Town-owned trees, so that they would be trimmed on a regular basis to keep view corridors clear. Joe Keller, 699 Hilary Drive, speaking about the Green Can Trial Program, suggested that the Town license gardeners who haul away yard waste in order for the Town to receive appropriate credit at the land-fill facility, or that the waste be put in a special place that would give credit. C. CONSENT CALENDAR A correction was made by Council member Thayer to the June 7 minutes, changing the word "defendants" to "plaintiffs" (Item 10, ADA, page 8). MOTION: Moved: Vote: To approve Consent Calendar, including Minutes as amended. Thayer, Seconded by Wolf AYES: Unanimous NOES: None ABSTAIN: Nygren & Ginalski, May 31 Minutes D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1057 6/21/95 1 5. New Town Facilities. Town Manager Kleinert gave the staff report outlining a plan of action for the implementation of the New Town Hall, Police Facility, and Senior Housing construction. He stated that the Town staff would take an active leadership role, reporting to Council, and proposed that two separate citizen committees be organized to work on the Town Hall and Senior Housing components. The committees would also report to the Council, and "sunset" after their specific tasks were completed prior to construction. The proposed committees consisted of the following individuals: New Town Hall/Civic Center - Jim Wilson (Chair), Hal Edelstein, Jim Levorsen, Bruce Ross, Evelyn Woo; Senior Housing Advisory - Larry Smith (Chair), Hank Bruce, Tom Gram, Martin Mackey, Paul Schrier. Mayor Thompson reported that Paul Schrier could not serve on the Senior Housing committee, and suggested someone from RUSD, Council member Thayer said that Nat Marans wanted to serve. Councilmember Wolf said the committees should be kept to five individuals to keep them from becoming unwieldy. Town Manager Kleinert said the current proposed committees were composed of interested and supportive individuals, and asked if there was a need to advertise further. Councilmember Nygren said that the committees should have Tiburon residents on them, and proposed Alan Littman instead of Jim Levorsen. Mayor Thompson opened the public hearing. Hal Edelstein, 34 Noche Vista Lane, said that it was critical to have a small committee working during the design and construction phase to act as intermediary and to handle the details of the work as they occur. He also stated that the Town should look into a soil study right away because it could take a long time and delay the process. He said he would be pleased to serve on the Town Hall Committee, if asked. Richard Hinkel, 2 Malvino Court, volunteered to serve and said that the committees as stated were too small and needed "conscientious, hardworking folks," not just lawyers and architects. Hearing returned to Council. Council member Thayer said he did not want to tie the hands of the committee chairs, but thought nine individuals per committee was better than five. Councilmembcr Wolf said thc committees were set up for the purpose of plan implementation and that it was "well past the time of constructing political committees." She said some people were skeptical about the issue of cooperation and said if she saw the process veering in the direction of TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1057 6/21/95 2 politics rather than implementation, it would be a show of bad faith. Councilmember Thayer asked ifhe had used the word "political," and said that he was acting in good faith, based on his experience in working with committees in the past. He asked Councilmember Wolf to withdraw her comment about bad faith. Councilmember Ginalski said he had asked Town Manager Kleinert to open up the process to the public for participation on the committees. Councilmember Nygren concurred that there should be public notice and the number on the committees expanded to nine. Mayor Thompson said that he had placed a letter in The Ark inviting citizen participation in general. He suggested that the committees start out with five members to get them started, and to decide on further action at the next meeting. MOTION: To adopt the two Committees, as named, and to incorporate Hal Edelstein's suggestion of continuing through the construction phase with a small committee. Moved: Vote: Wolf, Seconded by Thayer AYES: Ginalski, Thayer, Wolf, Thompson NOES: None ABSTAIN: Nygren Councilmember Thayer also directed Town staff to follow up on the soil study mentioned by Mr. Edelstein. 6. Blackie's Pasture Marsh Restoration Plan. Town Manager Kleinert reported that the Parks and Open Space Commission had unanimously approved the proposed Marsh Restoration plan and recommended that the Council adopt the plan, subject to the question of future maintenance being resolved, and the plan being coordinated with the other groups and projects currently in the works. Kleinert said the Town had received some adverse comments from some public agencies, and that the Fire Department liked to use the area for staging purposes. He proposed delaying a final decision by Council until all the agencies had seen and commented on the plans. Councilmember Nygren asked whether the Fire District had seen the proposed 140-car parking lot and grass overflow area. Councilmember Thayer asked whether the utility services had been identified in the affected area. Town Manager Kleinert said they had been identified and were located near the berm. TOWN COUNCIL MfNUTES #1057 6/21/95 3 Mayor Thompson asked whether the earth excavated from the Marsh would fit in the proposed relocation area. Mayor Thompson opened the public hearing. Barbara Salzman, Audubon Society, gave a presentation eXplaining the proposed Marsh project. She said the Town Council had approved funding for an alternative plan and the latest plan met the criteria. She said the new Marsh would have benefits for the health of the Bay and would leave a large grassy area open for activities and parking. Ms. Salzman said the total cubic yardage of earth was 7,500, to be kept on the site. Mayor Thompson asked whether the earth from the other project (Blackie's Brigade) had been included. Ms. Salzman said she was not in a position to comment on the Brigade Plan. She said the Audubon Society would seek grants to provide funding for the Marsh, primarily from sources available for wetland and marsh restoration. She stated that tidal marshes do not require a lot of maintenance but that the drainage channel might have to be opened up every 15-20 years. Council asked questions about parking and emergency access. The issue of whether the Town would lose jurisdiction to BCDC was also raised. Councilmember Nygren said the Town would be privileged to have Ms. Salzman's expertise and listed her accomplishments on other Marsh Restoration projects. Councilmember Thayer thought that Blackie's Brigade should be allowed to go forward with their part of the plan if there were no substantial conflicts. Larry Smith said that work would commence within the next 30 days. After a lengthy public hearing, both for and against the Marsh, the matter was continued to allow time to answer some of the questions raised and to receive comments from the public agencies. Council member Thayer also proposed giving the Audubon Society a year in which to raise the necessary funds. 7. Downtown Ferry Dock Realignment. Town Attorney Ewing reported on his meeting with Mr, Irrner and members of the Bayside [pI. Tiburon] Homeowners' Association. He also had further discussions with the engineer about the size of the dock and found the size could be reduced from 132 feet to 100 X 34 feet and still meet ADA and budget requirements. Ewing reiterated his opinion that the public use and construction of the dock would not violate that subdivision agreement with PI. Tiburon, but noted that the residents of PI. Tiburon were still opposed and had indicated they would pursue legal remedies if the Town proceeded with the plan. TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1057 6/21/95 4 Mayor Thompson opened the public hearing. C.J. Key, 108 Paradise Drive, John Y oeman, 107 Paradise Drive, Herb Charles, 114 Paradise Drive, aU spoke against the proposed dock, and said the Homeowners were prepared to take legal action if the dock was approved. Mayor Thompson closed the public hearing. Councilmember Thayer said that emergencies such as the 1982 Golden Gate Bridge closing and 1989 Lorna Prieta Earthquake would require a good dock to handle the public safety and welfare needs of the community, and wondered whether something could be worked out to meet these needs. He said it was not a good idea for the Town to enter into litigation with its residents. Council member Wolf asked whether the dock could be rotated closer to [the Main Street] shore and McDonogh Dock. Councilmember Ginalski asked whether the dock could be built somewhere else and whether the State had plans to build a dock. Councilmember Nygren said the size of the dock and increased traffic was not in keeping with Tiburon's small-town character, and if the Town built in open space it would be setting a bad precedent. Mayor Thompson said the Town had a moral obligation to conform to ADA and the point of building the dock was not to increase traffic, but that the size of the proposed dock was still unacceptable. Town Attorney Ewing said he had looked into a rotating dock or parallel dock and that neither option was viable at this time. He said a smaller dock would not conform to ADA. MOTION: To drop the proposal for a New Downtown Ferry Dock. Moved. Vote: Thayer, Seconded by Nygren AYES: Unanimous NOES: None E. PUBLIC HEARING 8, FY95-96 TOWN BUDGET. Councilmember Nygren asked for a line item to be added for compensation (salary adjustment), and to agendize discussion of various fund transfers. Finance Director Stranzl said he would amend the Resolution accordingly. MOTION: To adopt the FY95-96 Town Budget, as amended. Moved: Vote: Thayer, Seconded by Wolf AYES: Unanimous TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1057 6/21/95 5 NOES: None 9. Leaf Blower Ordinance. Council member Wolf said she thought the ordinance as drafted was almost meaningless and asked that it be sent to the Planning Commission for their review. She suggested that the Commission develop a proposal similar to Ross' ordinance which limits the use of gas leaf blowers. Councilmember Thayer concurred. Mayor Thompson opened the public hearing. George Landau, 82 Sugarloaf, said that leaf blowers were loud and saw no reason for their existence. He thought Belvedere had the right idea in banning (gas) leaf blowers. Joe Keller, 699 Hilary Drive, concurred. Hearing returned to Council. MOTION: To remand the ordinance to the Planning Commission to develop a new ordinance in the direction of Ross' ordinance. Moved: Vote: Wolf, Seconded by Thayer AYES: Unanimous NOES: None F. COMMUNJCA nONS 10. Eighth Annual Chili Festival. Unanimously approved. 11. Letter from Attorney Nielsen to Town Manager. Town Manager Kleinert reported receiving a letter from Mr. Zelinsky's lawyer, Chip Nielsen, suggesting the Town ask the State to remove the lis pendens from the Town-owned portion of the property at the Downtown Town Hall site). Councilmember Thayer said he thought it was an appropriate step. Council directed Town staff to write a letter to the State. G. STAFF & TOWN MANAGER REPORTS Council directed Town staff to set up interviews for openings on the Planning Commission and Design Review Board, Town Manager Kleinert said he had sent letters to the incumbents and was waiting for their replies, TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1057 6/21/95 6 There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town Tiburon, Mayor Thompson adjourned the meeting at 12: 15 a.m., sine die. ANDREW THOMPSON, MAYOR ATTEST: DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1057 6/21/95 7 Ikf.<. A/d. 2- RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON GRANTING CONSENT TO FORMATION OF OLD LANDING ROAD SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF MARIN COUNTY (a subsidiary district of the Town of Corte Madera) The Town Council of the Town of Tiburon resolves: 1. This Council has been requested to grant its consent to the inclusion of certain property within the incorporated limits of the Town in the Old Landing Road Sewer Assessment District of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County pursuant to Sections 10103, 5115-5119, and 10104 of the California Streets and Highways Code. It is conceded in the request that it is tardy, although it is pointed out that none of the public hearings in the proposed assessment district had yet been noticed or held. Copies of the Requests are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2. This Council finds that although it was aware of the assessment district proceedings, and has taken preliminary action with respect to the associated annexation proceedings, the proposed resolution of intention was not submitted to this Council prior to its adoption by Sanitary District No.2. This Council further finds that the requirement for such submittal is for the protection of the Town and the owners of property within the limits of the Town. 3. In light of the Requests attached hereto, this Council, on behalf of itself, the Town, and the owners of property as shown on the attached Requests, namely: Assessor's Parcel Nos. 38-171-42 (Assessment No. 10), 38-171-60 (Assessment SF2-39996.1 No. 11), 38-171-59 (Assessment No. 12) and 38-171-47 (Assessment No. 40) (collectively, the "Parcels"), hereby expressly waives any defect in the proceedings of the Board of Directors of the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) by virtue of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention prior to the consent of this Council. 4. The requested consent, to the extent of the property described in paragraph 3, is hereby granted; with the understanding that the Board of Directors of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) may take every lawful step to complete the improvement, levy and collect assessments to pay the improvement cost, and issue and enforce bonds representing unpaid assessments. 5. This consent is granted on the further understanding that the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) is the "lead agency" as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act for the purpose of complying with that Act in the approval of the project contemplated by Old Landing Road Sewer Assessment District. 6. The Town Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Sanitary District No.2 of Marin County (Corte Madera). * * * SFl-39996.1 2 the Town 1995, by AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: PASSED AND ADOPTED Council of the Town the following vote: Councilmembers at an adjourned regular meeting of of Tiburon on , Councilmembers Councilmembers Town Clerk SF2.39996.t Mayor, Town of Tiburon 3 . .\ ., PROPERTY OWNER REQUEST AND WAIVER OLD LANDING ROAD SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF MARIN COUNTY (a subsidiary district of the Town of Corte Madera) TO: THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON: I, Sr;; A'Y ----I" ~ , declare: I am the owner of the property identified as follows: 38-171-42 (Assessment No. 10) [Assessor's Parcel Number] located within the incorporated limits of the Town of Tiburon. I hereby request inclusion of my property in the Old Landing Road Sewer Assessment District of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera), which, if formed, will. accomplish, among other things, the construction of a sewer system to serve my property. In furtherance of this request, I note that since my property lies within the Town of Tiburon, the law requires that the Town of Tiburon grant consent to the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) to include my property in the Assessment District before adopting the Resolution of Intention for the Assessment District proceedings (Streets and Highways Code Section 10104). I am aware that this was not done, through inadvertence. I understand that I am entitled to mailed notice of two public hearings on the proposed Assessment District, the second of which must take place at least 45 days after notice is mailed to me. I understand that this notice is required to include the proposed amount of the assessment on my property, certain instructions on how to protest against the assessment, and certain other information. I understand that those hearings have not yet been scheduled, and that when they are scheduled I will receive proper notice. Recognizing that the statutory requirement for the consent of the Town of Tiburon was instituted for the benefit and protection of someone in my position, I waive any claim I have to Object to the timeliness of the requested consent. Further, I hereby request the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon to waive any defect in the adoption of the Resolution of Intention without its consent, and to grant its consent to the Board of Directors of the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) to include my property in the referenced SF2~39993.2 .\ Assessment District proceedings, and to take each and every step required for or suitable for the consummation of the work and the levying, cOllecting and enforcement of the assessments to cover the expenses thereof and the issuance and enforcement of bonds to represent unpaid assessments. Date: ~ I "2....... ''lqS-- SP2-39993.2 Signature: Print name: 2 sr-~ S-rI'Tf'-A. -r 1tBEa.R I ~ ! I ~ l~ . @~ I I . l l I . I I I ~. "" ~ ~ . , I I I ! I I @ ,: II ~N' ';~'I i ~ :::-Lr @,/ ' ~ ~., '. ~ I ~"'''''1 .... ~ '+" o,.~ .... . J :t ~r<t'; I' ~ . ~.... I 01 I ~ .t. ... "'49' '_. p. ~', 'I" ~~... 14'... "' L~ "'. '- = " ~ ."\ " 1"~\!!) 't. '" '. 'to.""((. " '-. ,~ ....... '~'. ", .,..,... C'\......"' klt r ',t &.~ .... ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~t)~ .~ . ~~ @ ~.... ........,.... 'i '. ". " " ". ~ <V~ ~ a c ____.0.__ ___._.1....__... . _ '" ,I PROPERTY OWNER REQUEST AND WAIVER OLD LANDING ROAD SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF MARIN COUNTY (a subsidiary district of the Town of Corte Madera) TO :/-nIE TO~.. C. Of~\F TH I, /!Lf-.'l/Lf ~ TOWN OF TIBURON: , declare: I am the owner of u. .. y 1dent1f1ed as follows: 38-171-60 (Assessment No. 111 [Assessor's Parcel Number] located within the incorporated limits of the Town of Tiburon. I hereby request inclusion of my property in the Old Landing Road Sewer Assessment District of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera), which, if formed, will accomplish, among other things, the construction of a sewer system to serve my property. In furtherance of this request, I note that since my property lies within the Town of Tiburon, the law requires that the Town of Tiburon grant consent to the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) to include my property in the Assessment District before adopting the Resolution of Intention for the Assessment District proceedings (Streets and Highways Code Section 10104). I am aware that this was not done, through inadvertence. I understand that I am entitled to mailed notice of two public hearings on the proposed Assessment District, the second of which must take place at least 45 days after notice is mailed to me. I understand that this notice is required to include the proposed amount of the assessment on my property, certain instructions on how to protest against the assessment, and certain other information. I understand that those hearings have not yet been scheduled, and that when they are scheduled I will receive proper notice. Recognizing that the statutory requirement for the consent of the Town of Tiburon was instituted for the benefit and protection of someone in my position, I waive any claim I have to object to the timeliness of the requested consent. Further, I hereby request the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon to waive any defect in the adoption of the Resolution of Intention without its consent, and to grant its consent to the Board of Directors of the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) to include my property in the referenced SF2-39993.2 r Assessment District proceedings, and to take each and every step required for or suitable for the consummation of the work and the levying, collecting and enforcement of_t~e assessment to cover the expenses thereof and the issuancrand-enforcemen 0 bonds~o represent u a'd assessments. Date: 51 Signature: ~ Print name: 9r /}J2-v~ . d,/ V 04L Iv( SF2-39993.2 2 . . @; ef -, ';~'ll ~ '....... ...8 ]~ @; I I ~ '~~ ..... ~ I ~"" 1", lio I .~ . .. ... +... .... J ~ . -~~~. . ~ .~.... G' ~ . ~ " ,. i ," ... ........ . -. "," . '- ~""", ',,- ~~\~ """ = '..... ~~ ,~... " "t. .~ ~ ~ ... \, .. 't~ ',. 'l!~... C\ '*\.... '," k" "r .."..,''t~ 0 ~ ". ~~ :t '1-'!\.~ .. t)~ @ ~'"'- ...... ~~ " t , ..... ....". '. ~ 0' i c c: l ~ ~ , l~ I @~ I I III . l , l I I ~ ~~ I .t ~ ... ~ ~ _..__.. .1. _"__'.. -"-.-. .n", ._....._ ---..-. ,.-- " .,' PROPERTY OWNER REQUEST AND WAIVER OLD LANDING ROAD SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF MARIN COUNTY (a sUbsidiary district of the Town of Corte Madera) TiO: THE TOWN/COUN. Cn.O.F. THE ~ / ,o) /J / . //}/ '.' , . . (( ~I , /I / A , I\~~e owner of TOWN OF TIBURON: /'\ ,/1 ')1 .' 1)/ ,,/ /, declare: / (. identified as follows: 38-171-59 (Assessm t No. 12) [Assessor's Parcel Number] located within the incorporated limits of the Town of Tiburon. I hereby request inclusion of my property in the Old Landing Road Sewer Assessment District of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera), which, if formed, will accomplish, among other things, the construction of a sewer system to serve my property. In furtherance of this request, I note that since my property lies within the Town of Tiburon, the law requires that the Town of Tiburon grant consent to the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) to include my property in the Assessment District before adopting the Resolution of Intention for the Assessment District proceedings (streets and Highways Code Section 10104). I am aware that this was not done, through inadvertence. I understand that I am entitled to mailed notice of two public hearings on the proposed Assessment District, the second of which must take place at least 45 days after notice is mailed to me. I understand that this notice is required to include the proposed amount of the assessment on my property, certain instructions on how to protest against the assessment, and certain other information. I understand that those hearings have not yet been scheduled, and that when they are scheduled I will receive proper notice. Recognizing that the statutory requirement for the consent of the Town of Tiburon was instituted for the benefit and protection of someone in my position, I waive any claim I have to object to the timeliness of the requested consent. Further, I hereby request the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon to waive any defect in the adoption of the Resolution of Intention without its consent, and to grant its consent to the Board of Directors of the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) to include my property in the referenced SF2-39993.2 ..- Assessment District proceedings, and to take each and every step required for or suitable for the consummation of the work and the levying, COllecting and enforcement of the assessments to cover the expenses thereof and the issuance and enforcement . ends to represent unpaid asse~sments. \:<~~.< >' I Date:(J/(1~t' 7,;1,/1] Signatur: Wk// ,/Z~", 1// / Print nam. .J,e' 1.-, '" :J J. <"'! SF2-39993.2 2 , . . @; If ~no, .;. } 1 ~ ...... ...8 ]1 @; I I ~ ',.- .... ~ I ...~ . ' . ~ I """..1 . Iio . ." ... .... J ~ . .....~~. . I ~. ~... G' ~ , I f . I I ! I I ~ ~ @' ~ ~ 111 ~~ rn ...... --..... --".-- " I I.. " , s @~ ~ , ~ @. 'l ~ , ...,.,..... -. ,." ~~'~ .... ~ ~... ' "'" ~ 0....... = '..... @, . ~ " .~ - 'to, . . " 'to. -.,. \.. o4f ..~ '," '. '~~oti. @ ...... ~t { .~., l; "Ill ..~. .. ~4: @ ..~ ....... ~~ .... "', " '-" ~ ~~ .t ~ "1 ~ ~ l~ f c ~ __,..1.____._ . _., _._. ., PROPERTY OWNER REQUEST AND WAIVER OLD LANDING ROAD SEWER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SANITARY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF MARIN COUNTY (a subsidiary district of the Town of Corte Madera) TO: THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON: I, S~~ , declare: I am the owner of the property identified as follows: 38-171-47 (Assessment No. 40) {Assessor's Parcel Number] located within the incorporated limits of the Town of Tiburon. I hereby request inclusion of my property in the Old Landing Road Sewer Assessment District of Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera), which, if formed, will accomplish, among other things, the construction of a sewer system to serve my property. In furtherance of this request, I note that since my property lies within the Town of Tiburon, the law requires that the Town of Tiburon grant consent to the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin County (Corte Madera) to include my property in the Assessment District before adopting the Resolution of Intention for the Assessment District proceedings (Streets and Highways Code section 10104). I am aware that this was not done, through inadvertence. I understand that I am entitled to mailed notice of two public hearings on the proposed Assessment District, the second of which must take place at least 45 days after notice is mailed to me. I understand that this notice is required to include the proposed amount of the assessment on my property, certain instructions on how to protest against the assessment, and certain other information. I understand that those hearings have not yet been scheduled, and that when they are scheduled I will receive proper notice. Recognizing that the statutory requirement for the consent of the Town of Tiburon was instituted for the benefit and protection of someone in my position, I waive any claim I have to object to the timeliness of the requested consent. Further, I hereby request the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon to waive any defect in the adoption of the Resolution of Intention without its consent, and to grant its consent to the Board of Directors of the Sanitary District No. 2 of Marin county (Corte Madera) to include my property in the referenced SP2-39993.2 Assessment District proceedings, and to take each and every step required for or suitable for the consummation of the work and the levying, collecting and enforcement of the assessments to cover the expenses thereof and the issuance and enforcement of bonds to represent unpaid assessments. Date:~ \ :2.2.II~q5' SF2~39993.2 ~ Signature: I ~ Print name: ~~-l~~ 2 TOWN OF TIBURON 1155 TIBURON BOULEVARD. TIBURON . CALIFORNIA 94920 . (415) 435-7373 FAX (415) 435-2438 TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO. TOWN COUNCIL MEETING. FROM. FINANCE DIRECTOR ITEM NO. JULY 5,1995 r? .:) SUBJECT. MONTHLY INVESTMENT SUMMARY STATEMENT ASOFMAY31,I995 I. TOWN OF TIBURON Institution! Agency Amount Rate Maturity State of California Local Agency Investment Fund $7,448,891 6.008% Liquid L.A.I.F. Federal Agency Issues G.N.M.A $977 12.000% 04-14-2014 Total invested. $7,449,868 2. TIBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Institution! Agency Amount Rate Maturity State of California Local Agency Investment Fund $1,164,304 6.008% Liquid L.A.I.F. Total invested. $1,164,304 Notes to tables: State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) - The interest rate represents the effective yield for the month referenced above. The State distributes the data reports in the third week following the month ended. GNMA - Principal and interest are paid monthly on this government security. Acknowledgment This summary report accurately reflccts all pooled investments of the Town of Tiburon and the Tiburon Redevelopment Agency, and is in conformity with State laws and the Investmcnt Policy adoptcd by the Town Council. The investment program herein summarized provides sufficicnt cash flow liquidity to meet next month's estimated expenditures. BY. AZ? :-- Richard Stranzl, Finance Director June 27, 1995 TOWN OF TIBURON MEMORANDUM TO: TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JULY 5, 1995 FROM: TOWN ATTORNEY ITEM NO. Lj SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CALLING ON THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO STOP LOGGING IN THE HEADWATERS FOREST IN HUMBOLDT COUNTY BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS At the last two meetings of MCCMC, the group has considered adoption of a resolution calling on the Governor to use all efforts to halt logging of the ancient redwoods in the Headwaters Forest in Humboldt County. At the MCCMC meeting of June 28, a majority of towns agreed not to adopt the resolution but instead to take it back to their individual town councils for consideration. All three of the members of the Tiburon Town Council present at the meeting (Mayor Thompson, Council members Thayer and Nygren) requested that this item be placed on tonight's agenda for discussion. Attached to this report is a copy of the resolution presented to MCCMC and some background information presented by Fairfax Councilmember Frank Egger. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council discuss the item and consider adoption of the attached resolution (to be modified to substitute the Town of Tiburon instead of MCCMC), EXHIBITS 1. Resolution RESOLUTION NO. " .. " . " A RESOLUTION OF THE MARIN COUNTY COUNCIL OF MAYORS AND COUNCILMEMBERS CALLING UPON THE GOVERNOR TO DIRECT THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FISH AND GAME TO IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAW ANY PLANS TO LOG THE ANCIENT REDWOODS IN THE HEADWATERS FOREST IN HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO INSTITUTE A PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON LOGGING AT SAID SITE, AND TO ENCOURAGE ALL EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF THE ANCIENT REDWOOD GROVES WHEREAS, ancient redwood groves are an irreplaceable natural resource that is part of California's heritage, as well as an American legacy; and WHEREAS, Headwaters Forest is the last privately owned and unprotected stand of ancient redwoods in the world, and the only habitat to nurture rare birds such as the marbled murriet and the northern spotted own, and to protect streams for dwindling numbers of salmon and steel head; and WHEREAS, we are entering the third millennium and our generation has the duty to save the "last" forest as our legacy to future generations; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Forestry has accepted exemptions to allow Pacific Lumber, subsidiary of Maxxam Corporation, to begin salvage logging operations in the Headwaters Forest area without public notice and review; and WHEREAS, Pacific Lumber, whose corporate headquarters are located in Marin County, should be required to conduct a full biological assessment of endangered species dependent on Headwaters Forest; and WHEREAS, the "Riggs" proposal to trade logging rights in other National Recreation Areas for Headwaters is an unacceptable forest-destroying scheme pitting the proponents of the preservation of one important natural resource against another; and WHEREAS, as stated in the March 19, 1995 San Francisco Chronicle editorial, "whatever environmental and legal roadblocks are necessary, Pacific Lumber must not be allowed to start dismembering 2,000 year-old trees. The virgin tract will be public property. It must not be raped in the meantime," NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Marin County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers calls upon the Governor to direct the California Department of Forestry and Fish and Game to immediately reconsider the withdrawal of any plans to log in the Headwaters Forest and to institute a permanent moratorium on logging in said site; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Council encourages all efforts to obtain public ownership of the ancient redwood groves, including a sufficient buffer zone surrounding the Headwaters Forest. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Marin County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers held on the 28th day of June, 1995, at San Rafael, California. Clerk President I' . .. TOWN FAIRFAX OF 142 SOllNAS ROAD. FAIRfAX. CALIfORNIA 94930 (41S) 4S3-1S84/fAX (41S) 453-1618 DATE: TO: FROM: MCCMC Meeting of June 28,1995 Marin Mayors and Councilmembers Frank Egger, Fairfax Councilmember SUBJECT: Request for approval of "Headwaters Forest Preservation" Resolution Marin County was on the cutting edge of the national environmental movement in the early seventies. Many of the issues we took the lead in, i.e. clean air, clean water, river and bay protection, sustainable forestry practices, protection of endangered species, coastal preservation and offshore oil drilling prohibitions, are all threatened by the new Congress with rollbacks to the laws of the 50's and 60's. The destruction of "Headwaters Forest" in Humboldt County is the tip of the iceberg. This last of the privately held ancient redwood forests is going to be destroyed by Pacific Lumber Company whose corporate headquarters are located right here in Mill Valley. Texas financier Charles Hurwitz and Maxxam Corporation control Pacific Lumber as a result of a 1985 hostile takeover. The taxpayers bailed out Hurwitz on a previous venture, his failed savings and loan business, with over 1.5 billion dollars of our money and not one penny has been paid back. A "debt for nature" trade is one alternative solution whereby the FDIC recoups some losses by receiving Headwaters Forest in trade against the 1.5 billion dollars owed by Hurwitz to the Federal Government Last year Northcoast Congressman Dan Hamburg's legislation to purchase "Headwaters" passed the house but stalled in the Senate. Hamburg was defeated by Frank Riggs in November 1994. Congressman Riggs has taken the lead on Environmental rollback legislation. One of his amendments to the Clean Water Act will allow Santa Rosa's treated industrial and residential sewage discharges into the Russian River to be increased from 1 % to 20 % of the river flow, and we drink that stuff. Proposition 130, the 1990 Forest Acquisition Act of which Headwaters Forest was the centerpiece, came within 1% of winning Statewide. Marin County overwhelmingly passed Prop 130: 57,832 (YES) - 35,431 (NO) See below for city by city totals. San Anselmo Belvedere Corte Madera Fairfax Larkspur Mill Valley Novato Ross Sausalito Tiburon San Rafael Unincorporated YES NO 3,837 1,669 642 579 2,324 1,378 2,414 855 3,097 2,078 4,576 1,693 8,272 7,653 716 472 2,291 1,005 2,112 1,389 10,4877,373 17,064 9,287 "....,~../,... q"r..r(",/ P~rI"" I~( ./-.ft~j.~ ;&~ . s- TOWN OF TIBURON MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Rob Ewing, Acting Town Manager Diane L. Crane New Town Hall Committees June 28, 1995 On Monday, June 26, Mark Ginalski called me with the name of someone who might be interested in serving on one of the New Town Hall Committees. His name is Lindsay Leveen, and he has a construction firm which also provides architectural and project management services. I passed the information on to Jim Wilson. Mr. Leveen's telephone numbers are: 435-5508 and (work) 408-437-1355. Jim Wilson said he wanted to make a presentation to Council at the July 5 meeting, and I have placed him on the Agenda. Mark also asked whether there was going to be a notice to advertise openings on the committees in The Ark. I was not certain about this, so I called Deirdre McCrohan who said she was making it part of her article on the New Town Hall. That article appears on page 10 of this week's Ark. The only other application I have received is a letter from Richard Hinkel (received Friday, June 23, Town Hall). Copies of his letter have been distributed to Council. PI~~ I~ m, '.ow if yoo _Id Iik, m, <0 do ,"~hin~'I)1 L Diane L. Crane Town Clerk cc: Bob Kleinert Ik"", Mo.S- fRl~~~D~5~[Q) THE LARRY SMITH COMPANY ... helping you discover new directions " TOWN OF TIBURON July 3, 1995 Town Council Town of Tiburon Dear Councilmembers: It is a privilege to serve on the Senior Housing Advisory Committee and to function as its chairman. I must confess, however, that given the task of this comrnittee, my decision to serve revolved importantly around who I'd be serving with. The talent and competence of those candidates made it an easy decision. I was disappointed that Paul Schrier withdrew. Although I would have preferred the smaller committee of five, the increase to seven is tolerable. We will lose participants if we go beyond seven. After your last council meeting, a nurnber of names were suggested to me from a variety of sources. I've approached those who, in the judgment of members already approved, bring expertise and professional experience to the table. I offer the following candidates for appointrnent to this advisory cornmittee: Larry Livingston...retired frorn a distinguished career in city planning. Jerry Riessen...construction project rnanagement. Bill Smith...former Mayor of Belvedere (now a Tiburon resident); career in real estate development. These three are willing to join yours truly, Hank Bruce, Tom Gram and Martin Mackey for a total of seven members. This is a unique collection of talent which you couldn't afford to buy which, quite frankly, is a primary motivating factor for these members' willingness to serve, i.e. teaming up with recognizable talent. 1834 CENTRO WEST T!BURON. CA 9,1920 (410) 435.2641 In my view, this committee will be functioning as a task force. As the chair, I can assure you that consultation with those groups having a stake in the shape of the Ned's Way Senior Housing project will take place at the appropriate times. Such consultation would include the School Board, Child Care Board, Hilarita's Board and Tiburon's Housing Comrnittee. Hopefully, this meets with your approval. I'm planning a "get organized" meeting next week. Richard R. Hinkel 2 Malvino Court Tlburon, CA 94920 ( 415)435-3709 T-kM tfJ(), ) ~ .rc---" ~~, June 22, 1995 ~ fl\l"'t~ obert L. Kleinart & Tiburon Town Council 1155 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, Ca 94920 /n) rt'" If"" IC': n \In rt:::' fR\ U~~~~~~ W~JJ JiJ~ 2 3 1995 TOW:~ r,M\NAGEH'S OFFICE TOWN Or: TIBURON Please accept this as my application for a position on the Senior Housing Advisory Committee. Quite frankly, I am surprised that I, as the Chairman of the Tiburon Housing Committee, was not recommcnded for appointment along with the other five individuals presented to Council. I believe my community activities are evidcnce of a sinccre conccrn and willingness to work for matters of importance to the future of Tiburon. I hope that all Council mcmbers can put aside partisan politics and recognize the need for a person holding my position (Housing Committee Chairman) to be involved in this important advisory role. I believe you and Town Council Members are familiar witho1Jter community service areas with which I have been involved in recent years so I WIll not elabornte upon them. Specifically, they are: I. Member of the Citizens Financial and Operntions Review Committee 2. Chairman, Tiburon Housing Committee (current) 3. Co-chair, Build It Now Committee for a new Town Hall at Neds Way 4. Chairman, NO on J&K, YES on L Committee for a new Town Hall at Neds Way. Also enclosed is a rcsumc of my private industry experience. That opportunity to participate in senior levcl decision making and policy development, I believe, is a valuable asset to bring to the public policy process. Also, at Homestake Mining I had responsibility for facilities and real estate management including site selection, lease and building negotiations and office design. I will appreciate your considerntion. Respectfully submitted, ~f!lJp Richard R. Hinkel RICHARD HINKEL 2 Malvino Court Tiburon, California 94920 Home: (415) 435-3709 Office: (415) 981-0118 HUMAN RESOURCE EXECUTIVE with domestic and international experience. Record of accomplishment includes establishing complete HR function for $400 million company, Experience includes: organization assessment and succession planning; management development and executive compensation; union relations and contract negotiations; mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, and consolidations. Industry experience includes natural resources, consumer products, electrical equipment and steel. M,A" Human Resource Management. EXPERIENCE HOMESTAKE MINING COMPANY, San Francisco, California 1975-1993 Vice President Human Resources Filled newly created position of V.P. Human Resources. Designed and implemented complete human resource organization and programs to service up to 3,000 employees in six states, Canada and Australia. Member of senior management team and active participant in strategic planning process. Substantial interaction with compensation committee of board of directors primarily on executive compensation programs and issues. Developed HR programs to support operating location needs, . Established executive compensation programs including supplemental rctirement, stock option, deferred income, severance agreement plans and a performance based bonus plan which was incorporated into Canadian and Australian operations. · Designed and directed organization assessment, development and succession planning programs covering all management levels, . Conducted successful labor contract negotiations with mining and forest product unions. Directed pre-bargaining analysis and strategy development. Delivered settlements on or under budget while maintaining effective relationship with union membership. · Served as principal architect for compensation packages, retention offers and associated HR programs in connection with mergers, acquisitions and consolidations. . Designed and established corporate mine management training program which provided broadscope training of entry level engineers. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Fairfield, Connecticut 1964-1974 Corporate Staff HR Consultant, Fairfield, Connecticut 1972-1974 Consultant in HR Practices and Programs Department. Provided HR support to opcrations throughout the U.S. . Organizcd and delivcrcd seminars for corporate-wide HR pcrsonnel on state-of-thc-art programs dcveloped throughout company. · Designed self-nomination program for use at union and non-union locations. RICHARD HINKEL Page Two GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (continued) Manager Human Resources, Mebane, North Carolina 1971-1972 Staffed, designed and implemented HR programs for start-up electrical manufacturing facility ultimately employing 1,500 people. Operated union free despite CW A and IUE organizing efforts. · Established successful state supported training program resulting in 60- 70% women employees occupying technical positions formerly considered 'men's jobs'. Manager Personnel Practices & Compensation, Portsmouth, Virginia 1968-1971 Developed and administered personnel practices for TV assembly plant with work force that increased from 2,000 to 4,000. Managed affirmative action program and compensation and employment functions. . Developed Affirmative Action Program that received Corporate Recognition. . Key contributor to very successful union-avoidance programs, Supervisor, Employee & Community Relations, Willoughby, Ohio 1965-1968 Responsible for employee and community relations for volatile unionized manufacturing plant that employed 300 people. · Negotiated numerous work practice changes with union that resulted in significant cost reductions. HR Specialist, Bridgeville, Pennsylvania 1964-1965 Negotiated first local labor agreement for plant that manufactured glass tubing and employed 100 people. WHEELING STEEL CORPORATION, Stubenville, Ohio 1960-1964 Various personnel and labor relations (USW) responsibilities following completion of two year management training program which covered all aspects of steel making at this 6,000 employee facility. UNITED ST A TIS MARINE CORPS 1954-1956 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Chair, California Mining Association, Human Resource Committee Member, Executive Committee, Western Mining HR Association Chair, Salary Survey Group for the U.S. Mining Industry Member, Mayor's Committee, Tiburon Study and make recommendations for financial and organizational structure of town EDUCATION George Washington University M.S.A., Human Resource Management Penn State University B.A., Labor Management Relations TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: TOWN COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 7/5/95 REPORT DATE: 6/29/95 ITEM NO.: G FROM: DAN CATRON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT #39502: STEVENS COURT. REQUEST TO MODIFY PRECISE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A 3-UNIT PROJECT TO ADJUST THE BUILDING ENVELOPE ON PARCEL 2; MODIFY HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS ON PARCELS 1 AND 2; AND INCREASE HOUSE SIZE LIMITS ON ALL THREE PARCELS BACKGROUND Address: Stevens Court (End of Spring Lane at Rolling Hills Road) AP No.: 58-111-25 through 28 File No.: 39502 General Plan: ML (Medium-low density resid. -up to 1.1 du/ac.) Zoning: RPD Property Size: 3 acres Subdivision: Fraige Current Use: vacant (subdivision improvements underway) Owner: Monahan Pacific Date Complete: 6/22/95 Permit streamlining Act Deadline: NA HISTORY A Master Plan, Precise Plan and tentative subdivision map were approved for this property in 1980. The plans expired and were re-approved on September 19, 1984. The Precise Plan limited the gross floor area of future homes to 3,600 sq. ft., including the garage. Revised conditions of approval were adopted by the Planning Commission on January 10, 1990, in conjunction with the granting of a time extension for the tentative subdivision map (Resolution 477-90). A Parcel Map for the subdivision (Lands of Fraige) was recorded on October 19, 1994. Various moratoria (Town and MMWD) extended the life of the project approvals far beyond normal limits. A Precise Plan Amendment for the project was approved by the Town Council on April 19, 1995 (Resolution No. 3087). That amendment adjusted the locations of the building envelopes and imposed a special 15 foot height limitation for certain portions of Parcels 1 and 2. At that meeting it was noted that the 15 foot height TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 7/5/95 1 restriction was highly problematical; and may not be feasible to implement in the field without highly undesirable effects. The Town Council determined that if the 15 foot height limit was unworkable, the owner could apply for another amendment to the Precise Plan. That application has now been filed, in conjunction with other requests for amendment. PROPOSAL The applicant has proposed to amend the approved Precise Plan for the Fraige subdivision as follows: 1) Delete the 15' height restriction imposed by the Planning Commission and Council in April, 1995, and apply instead a more flexible design parameter requiring that all structures have a one story appearance on the uphill side. 2) Modify the building envelope configuration for Lot 2 in order to achieve a more normalized rectangular shape and provide a better interface with the required hammerhead turnaround area. 3) Increase the allowable house sizes on lots 1 and 2 from 3,600 sq. ft. to 4,800 sq. ft. including garage, and on Lot 3 from 3,600 to 4,600 sq. ft., including garage. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ~ Heiqht Restrictions The Planning commission and Town Staff believe that the applicant has adequately demonstrated that the 15 foot height limit is unduly onerous on these hillside lots, and will result in poor design and/or unsightly flat roofs. The commission and applicant reached a mutually acceptable compromise solution for the height limit problem. The proposed solution would read as follows: "All structures, or portions of structures, constructed within those portions of the building envelopes for Parcels 1 and 2, as modified by this amendment, which are outside of the envelopes as originally approved and shown on the recorded parcel map for the SUbdivision, shall be limited to 20 feet in height as measured from existing grade along the uphill edge of the building envelope and extending horizontally across the area of restricted height. At no point shall any structure exceed 30 feet above existing grade. This height limitation is indicated on the attached Exhibit A. No flat roofs shall be permitted within the restricted height area." TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 7/5/95 2 ~ Buildinq Envelope for Parcel 2 The proposed minor modifications to the building envelope for Parcel 2 will provide a more normalized rectangular shape and consistent relationship to the edge of the hammerhead turnaround. The Commission had no objection to this modification. The modification would move the south side of the envelope uphill by six feet, and the north side of the envelope downhill by six feet. The center point of the envelope would not change. ~ House Sizes The Planning commission found that the applicant's request to amend the approved Precise Plan to increase the allowable floor area for future development of the site would tend to have a negative visual impact on adjacent properties by increasing the mass and visible bulk of the structures. The Commission also found that homes in the immediate vicinity were smaller than that being proposed, even the adjacent new residence at 211 Round Hill Road, and that the applicant had not provided any compelling justification for changing the zoning restrictions on the property relative to house size. The Commission recommended that no changes be made to the currently approved house size limits. General Plan Consistencv The proposed amendment would not change the principal residential use of the property. The Planning Commission found the modifications, as recommended by the Commission, represent reasonable limitations on the development of the property, in keeping with the pattern of development in the surrounding neighborhood. Environmental status This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA per section 15305 of the Act. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council take public testimony on this item and adopt the draft resolution recommended by the Planning Commission. TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 7/5jg5 3 EXHIBITS A. Draft Town Council Resolution. B. Planning commission Resolution 95-13, including Exhibit "A" as revised 6/30/95. C. Town Council Resolution No. 3087, adopted April 1995. D. Planning Commission staff Report dated 6/28/95, including attachments. E. Letter from neighbors dated 6/23/95. F. Plans (4 sheets) submitted by Bradley Group dated 6/22/95. \dan\tc39502.rpt TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 7/5/95 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING AN AMENDMENT OF THE FRAIGE PRECISE PLAN (PD #31) TO MODIFY HEIGHT LIMITATIONS AND ADJUST THE BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR PARCEL 2 OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 58-111-25 THROUGH ~ WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows: Section ~ Findinas. A. On September 19, 1984, the Tiburon Town Council approved a Master Plan, Precise Plan and Tentative Map for the Fraige subdivision. The Precise Plan established development parameters (including primary building envelopes and maximum house sizes) for three single family building sites. B. On January 10, 1990, the Planning commission amended the Precise Plan approval in conjunction with a time extension for the tentative map. C. On April 19, 1995, the Tiburon Town Council adopted Resolution No. 3087 approving an amendment to the Precise Plan which modified the building envelope locations and imposed special height restrictions on the portions of the building envelopes which were modified. D. The Town has received and considered an application filed by Monahan Pacific to further amend the Fraige Precise Plan to modify the special height limit imposed in Resolution No. 3087, further modify the building envelope for Parcel 2, and increase the allowable house size for all three parcels. The application consists of the following: 1. Application form received 5/3/95 2. Letter from Monahan Pacific dated 6/21/95 3. site Plan and Sections, Sheets SP, SP-1, and SP-2, prepared by the Bradley Group dated 6/22/95 4. Roadway Grading Plan prepared by J.L Engineering revised 6-19-95 The official record for this project is hereby incorporated and made part of this resolution. The record includes the Staff Reports, minutes, application materials, and all comments and materials received at the public hearings. Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 7/5/95 1 EXHIBIT No.A E. The Planning Commission held a dUly-noticed public hearing on June 28, 1995, and heard and considered testimony from interested persons. The Planning ~ommission adopted Resolution No. 95-13 recommending approval of the requested 'building envelope adjustment for Parcel 2; recommending approval with modifications of the request to adjust the height limits on Parcels 1 and 2; and recommending denial of the requested house size limit increases on all three parcels. F. The Town Council has found the modifications recommended by the Planning Commission represent reasonable limitations on the development of the property, in keeping with the pattern of development in the surrounding neighborhood. The Council further finds that the amendments, as conditioned, will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. G. The Town Council finds that the applicant's request to increase the allowable house size limit for residences in the project would have a negative visual impact on adjacent properties by increasing the mass and visible bulk of the structures. The proposed house sizes are substantially larger than existing houses in the immediate vicinity, including the new residence at 211 Round Hill Road. The Town Council further finds that the applicant has provided no compelling reason to approve larger house sizes for the project, nor demonstrated any benefit to the public health, safety, or general welfare to warrant a change to the zoning restrictions properly placed on the project by the Town. H. The Town Council has found that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section ~ Approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does hereby approve an amendment of the Precise Development Plan for the Fraige subdivision as follows: 1. The Precise Plan for the Fraige subdivision shall be amended to modify the building envelope for Lot 2 as shown on the Site Plan prepared by the Bradley Group (Sheet SP) dated 6- 22-95. This amendment would provide a more regular relationship between the building envelope and the edge of the driveway turnaround. 2. Condition #3 of Town Council Resolution No. 3087 shall be revised to read: "3. All structures, or portions of structures, constructed within those portions of the building envelopes for Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 7/5/95 2 Parcels 1 and 2, as modified by this amendment, which are outside of the envelopes as originally approved and shown on the recorded parcel. map for the subdivision, shall be limited to 20 feet in height as measured from existing grade along the uphill edge of the building envelope and extending horizontally across the area of restricted height. At no point shall any structure exceed 30 feet above existing grade. This height limitation is indicated on the attached Exhibit A. No flat roofs shall be permitted within the restricted height area." 3. References to a 15' height limit contained in Condition #1 of Town Council Resolution No. 3087 shall be changed to reflect a 20' height limit. 4. The building envelope for Parcel 3 is recognized to be that shown on Sheet SP prepared by the Bradley Group dated 6/22/95. This reflects the envelope approved by the Town Council in Resolution No. 3087. No changes to this envelope are contemplated by this amendment. 5. Unless specifically stated in this approval, this amendment does not otherwise affect any specific provisions of the Master Plan, Precise Plan, Parcel Map, Subdivision Improvement Plans, Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Road Maintenance Agreement, Planning Commission Resolution 477- 90, Town Council Resolution No. 3087, or other approved instruments or Town approvals associated with the subdivision project. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tiburon Town Council on ____, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: ANDRElv THOI1PSON, MAYOR TOIVN OF TIBURON DIANE CRANE, TOWN CLERK Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. 7/5/95 3 Ii: Q z~ w ~ ~~ > ~ ~g W- C) ~5 '" 0'" o .. w ~ 2~ a: ...., ~;!; ~~ - n. . :::> [ OW a: Z Cl ~ >- ~ W . ..J . ~ G a: W al t w I I ~ I- ( m ~ ,!! CIl ~ 5 ... ., o ~ N . ~ ri'" .. , X 0: ," < .. C II. ~ ~:ri g ~ q 0> ..:". . ' N ~ ~ ~ I> ~ '" ., ~ :; o ~.Jt..-!.- np,' -'" .J'" UJ 0' Uon a:-<> <o<i 0.." ~~ r0 <+0 z < , ",. .J <:1- "' .J'" 0.. UJ", UJ ~ u" !:: ~ a:'" <'0 en 2 0.." . :; . ~ < ; . ~ 1-' ail ~ .// I. I x' UJ; / , / / / / ( / r -- .. on >!l N Q >!l N on on N Q on N on .., N Q .., N on '" N Q '" N on N N Q N N on N Q N . Q .. LU LU I ~ Il :r . or'i ~ ~ ~~II' w mQ~~~ 8 ~ ~zKJ<O~ w ~ _~ WZ Q+-w:IW "I;. :r>- G f;, ='~>-G~ iil~i" w tel ~":rlp ii'-' ... ill -' ...w "''' G w .. KJI" rdl~'<t1O ...0 z <L -KJlIt ~z Cl ~~!:::<to f= -'-, <L _w ,,0:21-,0:211: +-'<I-I-t- ww ',1 -u+-:r- :r", 1;,,;;;<:11; ...J(t w....l - - - - I--~~:II- :r -10:1 ~Q<( w~ wll!~"'w :r u:r Q~~~Q .<(1Y<J) , :r ~~~~~ Z 0 i= u w en ... W :r I- r0 <:1 en LU :r Q ... c..+- w ...J ~n \ w 0 ..lit U w'" rb Ii'" a: ..ll! <( a. Cl.- . \ <( . w I- ?: co ~ J: X W l - - - - - - - - - - - ,,"-,0'<: -- ',._t >if -- . (j w w & ~i tiel ~ -,3~3w Ql-' ~~ ~"< 0..0.. ~w z~o::UJo ",Ill WW <!> &!~ ~2" "Z UJ <tl----I Oil ~ 'lIzilliii~ ~O wO _~ WZ IZ ~ QI--~i!UJ ~w ww ,,(Zl.,(ZlZ; '" ~~l--zl5 "'" fii<t~ow - - - - - - - - - ~~~~~ I-- oc:I--I 5 w"'"< o::R:~<tro u. -ilI" 1->-"" 0 <tj~<tlL 1--<(-1-1- -ul-:I- !;"3~!; Z C" ...to:: w..J I-~~:rl- 0 :r --JQ:I i= ~ ~Q<tw~ ~~~~~ (,) W Qii1~~~ en ("Y '''1 ill_' QIUOWQ W NI:::rIl", ~ l- I en G- ~ Iii I C\l 0 w -l ~Sj \ W .,l" (,) Ill'" a: .,ilI < w a.. 0 ~ '" . t'; < W . \ , I- -' lD L - - - - - - - - - - :x: X Wi ..0.,0'<: '" ,g N \;l ,g N '" '" N \;l '" N \;l ... N \;l '" N '" ... N '" '" N '" N N - \;l N N !!l N !il N RESOLUTION NO. 95-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FRAIGE SUBDIVISION PRECISE PLAN TO MODIFY HEIGHT LIMITATIONS AND ADJUST THE BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR LOT 2 FOR THE SUBDIVISION NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF SPRING LANE AND ROLLING HILLS ROAD ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 58-111-25 throuqh 28 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows: Section ~ Findinqs. A. On September 19, 1984, the Tiburon Town Council approved a Master Plan, Precise Plan and Tentative Map for the Fraige subdivision. The Precise Plan established development parameters (including primary building envelopes and maximum house sizes) for 3 single family lots. B. On January 10, 1990, the Planning Commission amended the Precise Plan approval in conjunction with a time extension for the tentative map. C. On April 19, 1995, the Tiburon Town Council approved an amendment to the approved Precise Plan which modified the building envelope locations and imposed special height restrictions on the portions of the building envelopes which were modified. D. The Planning Commission has received and considered an application filed by Monahan Pacific to further amend the Fraige Precise Plan to modify the special height limit imposed in April 1995, modify the building envelope for Lot 2, and increase the allowable house size for all three lots. The application consists of the following: 1. Application form received 5/3/95 2. Letter from Monahan Pacific dated 6/21/95 3. Site Plan and Sections, Sheets SP, SP-l, and SP-2, prepared by the Bradley Group dated 6/22/95 4. Roadway Grading Plan prepared by J.L Engineering revised 6-19-95 The official record for this project is hereby incorporated and made part of this resolution. The record includes the Staff Reports, minutes, application materials, and all comments and materials received at the public hearing. Tiburon Planning Commission Resolution No. 95-13 6/28/95 1 EXHIBIT NO. e .. E. The Planning Commission held a dUly-noticed public hearing on June 28, 1995, and heard and considered testimony from interested persons. F. The Planning Commission finds the proposed building envelope and height limit modifications recommended herein represent reasonable limitations on the development of the property, in keeping with the pattern of development in the surrounding neighborhood. The Commission further finds that the building envelope and height limit amendments, as .conditioned, will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. G. The Planning Commission finds that the applicant's request to increase the allowable floor area for homes in the project would have a negative visual impact on adjacent properties by increasing the mass and visible bulk of the structures. The proposed house sizes are substantially larger than existing houses in the immediate vicinity, including the new residence at 211 Round Hill Road. The Commission further finds that the applicant has provided no compelling reason to approve larger house sizes for the project, nor demonstrated any benefit to the public health, safety, or general welfare to warrant a change to the zoning restrictions properly placed on the project by the Town. H. The Planning Commission has found that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. section ~ Approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the Town of Tiburon does hereby recommend to the Town Council approval of an amendment of the Precise Development Plan for the Fraige subdivision as follows: 1. The Precise Plan for the Fraige subdivision shall be amended to modify the building envelope for Lot 2 as shown on the Site Plan prepared by the Bradley Group (Sheet SP) dated 6- 22-95. This amendment would provide a more regular relationship between the building envelope and the edge of the driveway turnaround. 2. Condition #3 of Town Council Resolution #3087 shall be revised to read: "3. All structures, or portions of structures, constructed within those portions of the building envelopes for Parcels 1 and 2, as modified by this amendment, which are outside of the envelopes as originally approved and Tiburon Planning Commission Resolution No. 95-13 6/28/95 2 shown on the recorded parcel map for the subdivision, shall be limited to 20 feet in height as measured from existing grade along the uphill edge of the building envelope and extending horizontally across the area of restricted height. At no point shall any structure exceed 30 feet above existing grade. This height limitation is indicated on the attached Exhibit A. No flat roofs shall be permitted within the restricted height area." 3. References to a 15' height limit contained in Condition #1 'of Town Council Resolution #3087 shall be changed to 20'. 4. The building envelope for Lot 3 is recognized to be that shown on Sheet SP prepared by the Bradley Group dated 6/22/95. This reflects the envelope approved by the Town Council in Resolution #3087. No changes to this envelope are contemplated by this amendment. 5. Unless specifically stated in this approval, this amendment does not otherwise affect any specific provisions of the Master Plan, Precise Plan, Parcel Map, Subdivision Improvement Plans, Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Road Maintenance Agreement, Planning Commission Resolution No. 477-90, Town Council Resolution #3087, or other approved instruments or Town approvals associated with the project. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on June 28, 1995, by the fOllowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Greenberg, Heckmann, Perlmutter, Schrier, Siewert NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None RANDY GREENBERG, CHAIRWO~~N Tiburon Planning Commission ATTEST: SCOTT ANDERSON, SECRETARY Tiburon Planning CommIssion Resolution No. 95-13 6/28/95 3 I c ..... W g: > - - C> w,.,., o z W ~ a: !i: w zO 0'" a:z ffig i=s u... 0.. z", ?:z ~z ~ a. . :J [ o ~ a: z Cl ~ >- . w . ..J . o Ii <( w a: .. III - I W u J: [ f- < , 'r / !I t / 1 /t /1 v .w ...U'" ~'.- -u; ...JoJ) LU 0' Uon a: "'. <"' a." C\I u.: ...JoJ) LU 0' o ~l; a: .., <e, a. I :1, ~ ; , / / / -- ~ r . m S ~ 51 ~ 0. . ~ ; '~ ~ s i~ . . ~ . 93 G~ C' <-J z < < ...J a. LU :i I- 'i Ci5 e , iI ! < ; . ~ t;, i !: i LU, >+ ,.~ 1" "_,,c .-ti'" '~~i . .~;.;'l"~;" ',"- -- on '" N Ii) '" N . tj ~(l i""' ~w "''' Ill:" ~O :IZ ":!W WW :I'" ~ :I <:J iii :I Q w ~~ \ <I" W~ ~~ Q <I ~ ~ 8 w on on N Ii) on N on '" N Ii) ... N on ... N . Ii) '" N Ii) N N on N Ii) N on N N w w IL :I ' o~~~ ..J &...Jw ~~ ILIL ZQ,lr:WO w <(.........1 " ~~IlI;;;~ ~ :I wz 'I;. QI-w:tw ::!W~~& ~ :}QoIlQ "~~ w ~<:J~8~ I- oc:r..J i\ w"'<I ~a:z<t1O z 11. -WIX 0 I-~!::()':~ >= <t..J....J<t +-'4-.....1- U -ul-:t- 1;;:';,;)1; ...Jll w....J l-~~:Il- :t ..Jo"J: ~o"tw~ ~~~0~ . ::J 2 oc ~ ~~it:O:? 2~~~~ z 0 f= 0 W CJ) W I- c-f) Ci5 .... <-.\- ...J W 0 0 r/; a: c( ll. C- . \ c( . 1-, OJ: Ii XI Wi l - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - i \ ..0.,0'0: wl\ (j;<o 'T ~..; ~ > . " ~''f--,' . """- ~~';.. ,.to ,."..';-_~i ij w W ,~ ' II :t . ~(j ()~~~ ~ ...J tS...JW iuJ ~~ ~.. llll :;)QJ wI!! '" Z~(lUJ() ~~ "Z W -:t!:::...J "'- 'J'1Z ilJ'" I!! 00: ~ ~() wO _~ Wz :tz X Qf-w::IW -:lw :t~ ww .".,<2IZ Ul :!W~ij~ :t'" =>0", 1D.<t1- W - - - - - - - - - ~~~8~ f- (t:I...J G w"''' OC[Z<tlD u. -ilJO: ....)-1- Q o:tj~<{LL I-<e.t-I-f- ~g~~~ Z r ...J(l W....J I-~~:tt- 0 :t -IO:I i= , ~O<tW~ , wllI~~w 0 :t u:t o;n~~o W '-1(l<f) . CJ) r QWOWQ W .....r::r~<<\ ~ I- :t CJ) ( -:l w :t C\I 0 w ...J t'I~ \ W ..I" 0 w'" D: o:w ..0: < w a.. n ~ '" . 1> <I '" :"1 \ "' J CD: L - - - - - J:I i XI ! WI "O-.O( ,~\ ~: Clw on >!l N \) >!l N on N N \} on N \} ,. N on on N \} '" N on ,. N on '" N .' -;~~,~~ . '_1\:/" -- . \} N N on N Q N ., I l. L " ( ( , RESOLUTION NO. 3087 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TmURON APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FRAIGE SUBDIVISION PRECISE PLAN TO ADJUST THE BUILDING ENVELOPES FOR 3 LOTS NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF SPRING LANE AND ROLLING HILLS ROAD. ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 58-111-25 throul!h 28 WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows: Section.l. Findiniis. A On September 19, 1984, the Tiburon Town Council approved a Master Plan, Precise Plan and Tentative Map for the Fraige subdivision. The Precise Plan established development parameters (including primary building envelopes) for 3 single family lots. B. On January 10, 1990, the Planning Commission amended the Precise Development Plan approval in conjunction with a time extension for the tentative map. C. The Town of Tiburon has received and considered an application filed by Monahan Pacific to amend the Fraige Precise Development Plan to modify the driveway design and the building envelopes for all three lots. The application consists of the following: 1. Application form received 11/22/94 2. Revised Envelope exhibit dated 3/16/95 3. Envelope detail for Lot 1 dated 3/16/95 D, The Planning Commission has held duly-noticed and advertised public hearings on January 25, February 22, and March 22, 1995, considered all testimony, and recommended conditional approval of a modified Precise Development Plan to the Council. E. The Town Council has found the proposed Precise Developmem l'i:.Jn amendment, as modified by the Pbnning Commission, will improve and simplifv the driveway approaches to the individual lots, The Commission further finds that the amendments, as modified by the Planning Commission, \I ill not adverse Iv affect other properties in the vicinity, EXHIBIT NO. C r t. L ( ( F. The Town Council has found that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 2. Approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does hereby approve an amendment to the Precise Development Plan for the Fraige subdivision as follows: 1. The Precise Plan for the Fraige subdivision is amended to modify the building envelopes for the lots as shown on the Revised Envelope exhibits prepared by Staff on 3-23-95. The amendments, as approved herein, will accomplish the following: -The building envelope for Parcel 1 is moved eastward (uphill) 16 feet, and the west downhill side of the envelope is reconfigured to avoid encroachment into the dripline of the adjacent oak tree. It is intended that the total area of the envelope equal the area of the envelope as originally approved for the subdivision. In addition, a reduced height limit of 15 feet shall be applied to the relocated portions of the envelope as described in Condilion #3 below. -The building envelope for Parcel 2 is moved eastward (uphill) between 17 and 36 feet. The geometry of the envelope is changed from a rectangle to parallelogram as shown on Exhibit A. In addition, a reduced height limit of 15 feet shall be applied to the relocated portions of the envelope as described in Condition #3 below. -The building envelope for Parcel 3 is moved eastward (uphill) 3 feet. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any lot within the subdivision, an appropriate instrument shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office which modifies the configuration of the Public Utilities and Access Easement consistent with this approval. This specifically refers to the easement line across Parcel 2. In addition, the stated purposes of the easement across Parcels 1 and 2 shall be expanded to include landscape scrcening as required by Condition #4 bclow. 3. All structures, or portions of structures, constructed within thosc portions of the building envelopes for Parcels I and 2, as modified by this amendmcnt, which are outside of the envelopes as originally approved and shown on the recorded parcel map for the subdivision, shall be limited to one story (15 feet) in height. This limitation is indicated on the attached Exhibit A. . . .' o' l l. L ( ( 4. In conjunction with the first Site Plan and Architectural Review submittal for the subdivision, a landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Board which provides for an appropriate landscape screen between the roadway and adjacent uphill properties. This screening shall be installed in conjunction with the construction of the first house in the subdivision. The goal of the landscape design shall be to screen views of the access road from the uphill neighbors. The screen shall be designed to use a variety of plant species and forms for the purpose of creating an informal and natural looking screen rather that a formal and monotonous hedge. . Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the subdivision, a monetary security adequate to ensure the installation and maintenance of the landscape screening shall be deposited with the Town. This deposit shall be refunded not less that 3 years after satisfactory completion and successful establishment of the landscaping. 5. No grading or earth movement shall be permitted within the presently existing dripline of the oak tree on Lot 1. Construction fencing shall be installed along the edge of the oak dripline prior the commencement of any grading on lot 1. 6. All requirements and provisions of Resolution 477-90 shall remain in full force and effect for the property, except as modified herein. 7. Unless specifically stated in this approval, this amendment does not otherwise affect any specific provisions of the Master Plan, Precise Plan, Parcel Map, Subdivision Improvement Plans, Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Road Maintenance Agreement, or other approved instruments or Town approvals associated with the subdivision project. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council on April 19, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: COUNCIDIE:\lBERS: Nygren, Thayer, \Volf COUNClDlBll3ERS: Thompson, Ginalsh:i UI~ /J7 (?~~ A~RE\V TlIO\II'SO:\', \IA YO~ Town of Tihuron l{ / ;"' A TrEST: /! /:/ / I I ' , I . / ,I ~(0 'i / ~ ~,. ./1'-'-__ DlAl'\iE Cl{ANE, TOWN CLERK .' . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO: PLANNING COMMISSION -MEETING DATE: 6/28/95 ITEM NO.: a. FROM: DAN CATRON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT #39502: STEVENS COURT. REQUEST TO MODIFY BUILDING ENVELOPES AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS ON 3 LOTS- FRAIGE SUBDIVISION. BACKGROUND Address: Stevens Court (End of Spring Lane at Rolling Hills Road) AP No.: 58-111-25 through 28 File No.: 39502 General Plan: ML (Medium-low density resid. -up to 1.1 du/ac.) Zoning: RPD Property Size: 3 acres Subdivision: Fraige Current Use: vacant (infrastructure under construction) Owner: Monahan Pacific Date Complete: 6/22/95 Permit Streamlining Act Deadline: NA History: A Master Plan, Precise Plan and tentative subdivision map were approved for this property on September 19, 1984. The 1984 Precise Plan limited the gross floor area of future homes to 3,600 sq. ft. including garage. Revised Conditions of Approval were adopted by the Planning Commission on January 10, 1990, in conjunction with the granting of a time extension for the tentative subdivision map (Resolution 477-90). A Parcel Map for the subdivision was recorded on October 19, 1994. A Precise Plan Amendment was approved by the Town Council on April 19, 1995 (Resolution #3087). That amendment adjusted the locations of the building envelopes and imposed a special 15' height limitation for certain portions of lots 1 and 2. PROPOSAL The applicant is proposing to amend the approved Precise Plan for the Fraige subdivision as follows: l) Delete the 15' height restriction imposed by the Planning commission and Council in April, 1995, and apply instead a more flexible design parameter requiring that all structures have a one story appearance on the uphill side. TlBURON PlANNING COMMISSION STAfF REPORT 6/28/9' 1 EXHIBIT NO. o 2) Modify the building envelope configuration for Lot 2 in order to achieve a more normalized rectangular shape. 3) Increase the allowable house sizes on lots 1 and 2 from 3,600 sq. ft. to 4,800 sq. ft. including garage, and on Lot 3 from 3,600 to 4,600 sq. ft. including garage. ANALYSIS ~ Heiqht Restrictions Staff agrees with the applicant that the 15 'foot height limit imposed by the Planning Commission and Council several months ago is unduly onerous on these hillside lots. The 15 foot height limit makes it practically impossible to construct any building whatsoever in the reduced height area, because the slope falls away so dramatically behind the front edge of any building. Staff is recommending a provision that would require that new structures maintain a one story facade on the uphill side. Staff is recommending that Condition #3 of Town Council Resolution #3087 be revised to read: 3. Residences shall be designed so as to present a one-story appearance along the uphill side of the building envelopes. In addition, garage slab and floor elevations shall be kept as low as practically possible while still allowing for acceptable access and appropriate design. The Design Review Board shall endeavor to reduce the visual profile of future residences to the greatest extent possible. At no point shall any structure exceed 30 feet above grade. The purpose of this restriction is to minimize the visual impacts of the development on uphill neighbors, and as compensation for allowing the building envelopes to be moved higher on the site. This is intended to address the intentions of the Commission to limit the visual impacts of future homes as seen from uphill residences. The condition, as Staff has proposed it, would allow the Design Review Board the flexibility to respond to the specific topographical constraints of each lot. ~ Buildinq Envelope for Lot 2 The proposed minor modifications to the building envelope for Lot 2 will provide a more normalized rectangular shape and consistent relationship to the edge of the hammerhead turnaround. Staff has no objection to this modification. The modification would move the south side of the envelope uphill by six feet, and the north side of the envelope downhill by six feet. The center point of the envelope would not change. rlBURON PlANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 15;78/95 2 ~ House Sizes To evaluate the proposed increases in allowable house size, Staff has compared the proposal to other homes in the vicinity. The homes on the immediately adjacent lots are actually fairly modest by Tiburon standards. The following are the lot sizes and house sizes for four lots uphill of the project site: Address Lot size House Size FAR 205 Roundhill 33,590 s.f. 2,029 s.f. .06 211 Roundhill 34,353 s.f. 4,144 s.f. .12 215 Roundhill 27,500 s.f. 3,750 s.f. .13 223 Roundhill 23,250 s.f. 3,750 s.f. .16 2 Rolling Hills 27,470 s.f. NA NA For comparison, the applicant is proposing: Address Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot Size 48,659 s.f. 33,549s.f. 21,166 s.f. Allowed Proposed 3,600 s.f. 4,800 s.f. 3,600 s.f. 4,800 s.f. 3,600 s.f. 4,600 s.f. FAR (proposed) .09 .14 .21 As indicated by the FAR figures, the proposed floor areas for Lots 1 and 2 are comparable to the FARs for other homes in the vicinity. The proposed FAR for Lot 3 (.21) would exceed the typical FAR range for the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends that the Commission consider allowing some minor additional floor area for Lots 1 and 2, if deemed appropriate. Staff recommends that the allowable area for Lot 3 not be increased. General Plan Consistencv The proposed amendment would not change the principal residential use of the property. Staff recommends approval of an amendment which would provide development standards that are consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Zoninq Compliance The Precise Plan amendment should be reviewed with respect to section 4.08.04 of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance. A favorable review by the Planning commission will be forwarded to the Town Council as a recommendation for final action. A denial of this amendment proposal will constitute final action unless appealed to the Town Council (Zoning Ordinance Section 4.08.07). nBURON P/..ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 6/28/9.5 3 Environmental Status This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA per Section 15305 of the Act. BUILDING ENVELOPES Staff notes that there is a discrepancy with respect to the approved building envelope location for Lot 3 as shown on Sheets C-l and Sheet SP. Sheet SP correctly reflects the approved building envelope for Lot 3. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission take public testimony on this item, consider what increases in allowable floor area may be appropriate (if any), and adopt the draft resolution recommending that the Council approve the amendment. EXHIBITS 1. Draft Resolution. 2. Application Form received 5/3/95 3. Letter from applicant dated 6/21/95 4. Town Council Resolution #3087 5. Exhibits submitted 6/22/95 \dan\pc39502.rpt TleURON PLANNING COMMISSION SrAFF F1EPORr o!I/28;'9.5 4 .' RESOLUTION NO. 9S-(draft) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE FRAIGE SUBDIVISION PRECISE PLAN TO MODIFY HEIGHT LIMITATIONS, ADJUST THE BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR LOT 2 AND INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING SIZES FOR THE SUBDIVISION NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF SPRING LANE AND ROLLING HILLS ROAD. ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 58-111-25 throuqh 28 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows: Section ~ Findinqs. A. On September 19, 1984, the Tiburon Town Council approved a Master Plan, Precise Plan and Tentative Map for the Fraige subdivision. The Precise Plan established development parameters (including primary building envelopes and maximum house sizes) for 3 single family lots. B. On January 10, 1990, the Planning commission amended the Precise Plan approval in conjunction with a time extension for the tentative map. C. On April 19~ 1995, the Tiburon Town Council approved an amendment to the approved Precise Plan which modified the building envelope locations and imposed special height restrictions on the portions of the building envelopes which were modified. D. The Planning Commission has received and considered an application filed by Monahan Pacific to further amend the Fraige Precise Plan to modify the special height limit imposed in April 1995, modify the building envelope for Lot 2, and increase the allowable house size for all three lots. The application consists of the following: 1. Application form received 5/3/95 2. Letter from Monahan Pacific dated 6/21/95 3. site Plan and Sections, Sheets SP, SP-l, and SP-2, prepared by the Bradley Group dated 6/22/95 4. Roadway Grading Plan prepared by J.L Engineering revised 6-19-95 E. The Planning Commission has held a dUly-noticed public hearing on June 28, 1995, and has heard and considered testimony from interested persons. Tiburon Planning Commission Resolution No. 9S-(dratt) 6/28/95 1 EXHIBIT NO. ( F. The Planning Commission has found the proposed modifications represent reasonable limitations on the development of the property, in keeping with the pattern of development in the surrounding neighborhood. The Commission further finds that the amendments, as conditioned, will not adversely affect other properties in the vicinity. G. The Planning Commission has found that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. section ~ Approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the Town of Tiburon does hereby recommend to the Town Council approval of an amendment of the Precise Development Plan for the Fraige subdivision as follows: 1. The Precise Plan for the Fraige subdivision shall be amended to modify the building envelope for Lot 2 as shown on the Site Plan prepared by the Bradley Group (Sheet SP) dated 6- 22-95. This amendment would provide a more regular relationship between the building envelope and the edge of the driveway turnaround. 2. Condition #3 of Town Council Resolution #3087 shall be revised to read: 3. Residences shall be designed so as to present a one- story appearance along the uphill side of the building envelopes. In addition, garage slab and floor elevations shall be kept as low as practically possible while still allowing for acceptable access and appropriate design. The Design Review Board shall endeavor to reduce the visual profile of future residences to the greatest extent possible. At no point shall any structure exceed 30 feet above grade. The purpose of this restriction is to minimize the visual impacts of the development on uphill neighbors, and as compensation for allowing the building envelopes to be moved higher on the site. 3. References to a 15' height limit contained in Condition #1 of Town Council Resolution #3087 shall be deleted. Tiburon Planning Commission Resolution No. 9S-(d(att) 6/28/95 2 4. Condition #19 of Planning Commission Resolution 477-90, and any other references to maximum house sizes shown for the subdivision, shall be amended to.allow the following: Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 ( ( ( ) sq. ft. including garage ) sq. ft. including garage ) sq. ft. including garage 5. The building envelope for Lot 3 is recognized to be that shown on Sheet SP prepared by the Bradley Group dated 6/22/95. This reflects the envelope approved by the Town Council in Resolution #3087. No changes to this envelope are contemplated by this amendment. 6. Unless specifically stated in this approval, this amendment does not otherwise affect any specific provisions of the Master Plan, Precise Plan, Parcel Map, Subdivision Improvement Plans, Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Road Maintenance Agreement, Planning Commission Resolution 477- 90, Town Council Resolution #3087, or other approved instruments or Town approvals associated with the sUbdivision project. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on , 1995, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: RANDY GREENBERG, CHAIRWOMAN Tiburon Planning Commission ATTEST: SCOTT ANDERSON, SECRETARY Tiburon Planning Commission Resolution No. 95-(draft) 6/28/95 3 . .' ~ 05/03/1995 15:51 4154352438 TOWN OF T I BURON PAGE (l 4154352438 { - TOWN OF TIBURON ( COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TYPF OF APPLICATION o ClIl'IlUti_l U.",...MU o Concept..-I M,.t",. ,t.., o T..,.cui~ SYbdiwi,ion Ill" o V.r;lnc:e )l ~~~~t PI." o St9" '.......It o 'inal Sl.O:It...iaiOl'l "-0 . 0 ll'IOI'Ilno/'~uo''l1'''' o lilt li,.......dj~t_t O. 0.,111" 1II....Ift! o "I" p.r..lt o Tr.. Pc""lt o 'MCrIL PI.., ~t o ZoniPWj '''.0;1 ~nt o ~rceL MlP o UrwMr,rOU"ld W.i...... o C.rtifiuu af C~Li~. o Ot/'l~ APPLICANT REQUIRED INFORMATION 1. Assessor Parcel(s): 513-III-,-b 2. Zoninq:~ General Plan Designation: 3. Property Address: 9r!;"VE1\)':> COUn:r (SP\2.1N<e. lANe) ffiiZCEL. 2- 4. Property Owner Name: l\\CN~'I PAc..~ , , Mailing Address: ItlkC eo '5T: ~ 300 City, State, Zip: ~ ~ c::A. Phone Number: 4s"G,. 0':'00 FAX Number: SA-Me. A-S A-"-OVE. / T1ic""", I 4~(O. .2414 MeN ~ f'I>-eS, 5. Applicant Name: Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: Phone Number: FAX Nunber: 6. Property Size: A.i?20x:. \ AeIZe- 7. Please briefly describe the purpose of the application (what you w, to accomplish, attach separate sheets if needed). "'t>JuST^\~ It> &llL-OIN c;. l;;,W~PE. 8. ~ JC1rw , ~owner lett.er (r-om o....r Signature: _Applicant (must have signed DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE DEPAH H..1tN r AL ,LJHOCCSS1~~G 1~~F'CR~.1A II(;~~ Application No ' 39 ")(; Z- Dare Aecol\led: 5/3/1) ~('e O'~OOS,1 .- -; r ..:":- RC>Cl'I."'O B. Oaro O\lemod Compte,. Hy Acting BOdy AChon Condlflons Of .Approvol or Commenls He901ulIon or Ordinance' \min\opplicl trm EXHIBIT NO. z. 10/15/91 .' a5/22/95 ll3: .J; EVE~,:';REEN PHCIFIC 415-456-2414 -i' 4154J52433 ~~J. 144 "J2 I. MONAHAN PACIFIC D,E'V'ElOPMEN.T, CORP~ RECEiVED JUN 2. 2. \995 June 21,1995 Mr. Dan Catron Town of Tiburon Planning Dept. 11 SS Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon, CA 94920 TOWN OF TIBURON .pLANNING & BUll-DING DEPT, RE: STEVENS CTfSPRING LANE PRECISE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLJCA TJON Dear Dan: This letter is 10 follow up on our Precise Plan Am~ndmenl Application for the above referenced project. As you had previously indicated, we are trying to ~fine tune" certain aspeClS of the underlying approval of the project. As you know, we bave spent considerable time ,,'orking with the neighbors surrounding the project as well a.' with staff to tine tune the building envelope adjustments. The following is in response to your suggested clan ticaticns. 1. The building envelope locations have been previously approved. Parcels 111 and #3 remain unchanged and are consistent with the positioning and shape that was previ(JUslyapproved. Parcel 112 has been slightly adjusted to rotate the building envelope to. a less severe angle. The position of the building envelope al Parcellt2 was pr:viously approved to slide uphill and be rotated. The language of the approved Pre:ise Plan indicates a trapezoidal shape from 17' to 36', This rOI:;tion has produced a severe tr:;pelOid which the neighbors have objeetod to. We have adjustod the shape and shown this re,ised building envelope to be 23' and 30' from the original p"sition. This revised envelope strikes an aver.ge between the previously appro\'ed limits and we believe responds to the neighhors' concerns and orients the huilding envelope more parallel to the site [Opography, 2, The height limit imposed on the adjuSted envelopes is overly restrictive. We sugge't that the proposed building envelopes be conditioned wit'! general wording th~t would provide for a cne-story appearance along the from side of the building envelere. This would apply to Parcel #1 and #2, Parcel1f3 would remain unchOl1ged. [would suggest atraching the ,ile ,ettlur. for PJ.:cel #1 and 112 as a guidelIne r~feren:e iJ: futllle consider;ttlon, Please refer to the attached Exhibits A and 8. 3, With respect to the floor area, we are propusing an Incre:!.';e of L~e :JJbwable r.ocr area a.s shown On the chart below. We feel that this prcrosal is ju!tlfled since the increased size would be :onsistent With the existing neighboring structures aN is below t~e a1lowJble IlOur area "stablished by the zuning code, 1040BS!fe~l. Suile300. SaI'\~.'.8',Calolornl.a. 9490' . 415.45e'OeOO. F"')('15.4~6.2414. L1Cen.seNo4:11!.42 ,..". EXHIBIT NO. ::> J6/'2~>95 J3:J6 ~,)t::~3.~~="l ;:).:r=IFI.= 415-45S-2414 -+ 415435243.3 'IJ.144 ~J3 Mr. Dan Catron June 21, 1995 Page Two Lot lot Size Allow.llle ner Zone Aooroved A rea Pronosed Area 1 48,659 s.t. 7,365.9s.f. 3,600s.f. 4,800 s.f. 2 33.549 s. f. 5,854.9 s.f. 3,600 s.f. 4,800 s.f. 3 21,166 s.t. 4,616.6 s.f, 3,000 s.f. 4,600 s. f. We believe that ~le amendments listed above respond to the concerns of the neighbors and at the same time .Iarify the site issues so that the proja:t can be completed. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. F!! om Monahan President Monahan P.cific Development Corporation TMM/csf Ene!. 216,-22/35 \. ~1/e51J994 2e:47 03:J7 415-924-6377 =.JE,~'3~E::}1 ~'CjCIFI: 415-456-2414 -lo 415435243.3 ~I ( ~ ~ l) w \.'J o W ~ ... ~~ O~ ~~ g 9 ~.... u..1Ii .a'J-,~I' ',.. -"",. r - - - - _ \ ERADLEY 8 AlFRESCO ~'" -~ ~<( '" Ill;) 1,).. III ~~ -q.... 0<11 ':. i~ fl~~ : ~ III -:. '" ~I .., "I,J.144 PAGE e2 :;>.J4 ~I ~I ~l ~I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~I \ I \ W~ i~ g,: 8 "oJ) it ~ .... j Q( \ "l >:l .:l ~ ~ .... ~ - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - -J ,,(,!I-,C:X; ~~~ ~I ~~~ ~ o~i :1 ~~d ~<(il :I!~~ ....l-~ z <to/!\J l~~ Wi '" e '" ~I ~i~ ~ Ifi l , ,. , z o ;:: ~ ..J o en o UJ en o a.. o ~< ,,; ~,~ 0, _ ~I ::. ~, )t en: 4U wi 1-, C/J, I, .-' ....JI W, el! 0::' (\j <10.. Q..IC/) , as/ 22/ 95 ]3: 87 E'JEF~\_l~=:=}-f r:'ACI;-r,: 415-4SS-2~14 -+ 4154352433 61/e5/193~ 26.47 BRADLEY & AlFRESCO ~15-924-b377 an >&l "'I ('l -0 '" ~ '" ~ .... Q an '" ~ .... an an '" an ">t .... .'-D.140.1 PAGE 83' "as III ... ... Q ... .... Il\ r; ~ ... ~ ~~~ Z ;;: ::lG )- Ill'" 0 ~u: ~~ a", ~-t~ , j:: aQ) ~~ ~~ ~ ~~i5 ::> ~~ ,,-' ...J III rh 0 ",Q en ~1lI .n !~9 w! Il.~ ~(Zl..;. . "'d .~'._ ~.qa! Q. \ - ----- ri~ 0 ...J UJ z ~~~ > \ ih5~ ffi I ~ii 0 ~I I/l~~ ~ .. ll. 10 \ 0 , "L a: Cl..... " \ I )- , . - llJ cO ( . , \ ~~ Z ~ 0 ~ I- ~~ 0 <:I'" III llJ w ~ (/)1 i \ w ~ =1 I:l C/), \ ~ I ~ I' .. C\I! L ----- - - - - ----- ..I, i f\ WI 0: ,0._"( I 0:1(') I <,n. Q.iU) i:~ I~ ,'" IJ ;111 ~ . . < ~~ .> June 23, 1995 , Planning Commission Town of Tiburon Tiburon, CA 94920 RECEIVED JUN 2 3 1995 Re: Stevens Court Plan Amendment TOWN OF TIBURON PLANNING & BUILDING DEPT. Dear Members of the Planning Commission, . We are the owners of the four homes immediately to the East and North of the Stevens Court Development. Following the final approval of the Stevens Court Precise Plan by the City Council on April 19, we learned that Monahan Pacific intended to reopen the issue and request further modifications to the plan. Three of us met with Tom Monahan and his architect, Stephen Murch, in late May. At that time, only their proposal for parcel 2 was available for discussion. As a result of our request that evening that any request for further changes should consider all three parcels, a letter dated May 30 with accompanying site plans was prepared and mailed to each of us. A copy went to Mr. Catron and should be in the Planning Department files. In early June we met among ourselves and made several calls to the applicant requesting clarification of dimensions, measurements etc. On June 8th and 9th Mr. McCartin called Mr. Murch and Mr. Monahan with our comments and suggestions. On the evening of June 21 we receive a revised set of plans and a copy of a letter to Mr. Catron. There is some confusion as to what is being requested since Parcel 3 was included in the letter and drawings of May 30. but is omitted from the June 21 package except for a request for an increase in approved floor area. Following are our comments on the new proposal as we understand it: PARCEL 1 - Sheet SP2. First, please note that there is a "drafting error "on this sheet and the cross hatched area labeled "AREA OF RESTRICTED HEIGHT" is much larger than shown. It should be 16' wide rather than 7.5' as shown on the attachment. EXHIBIT NO. c , We can not accept the applicants solution as proposed. Please note that within the area in which the Commission restricted the height to 15 feet above grade, the height of the "solution" varies from a low of approximately 19 feet to a high of 27 feet above grade. Beginning measurements from a garage floor already more than eight feet above grade creates the "problem" portrayed. Many (most) other lots in the area have the same hillside problem and have drives / garages at grade. More importantly, the Car Deck, aside from being completely out of character with the neighborhood where sloped driveways are the norm, contributes to the visual mass created by the road and house. If the drivewav/aaraae entrance were at arade level. we would have '* no oroblem with a slooina roof line beina moderatelv above fifteen feet in the sixteen foot uohill extension of the oriainal buildina envelooe. PARCEL 2. Our comments regarding the Car Deck and the driveway being at grade on Parcel 1 apply as well to Parcel 2. Our principle concern regarding Parcel 2, which has been expressed verbally and in writing at the Commission meetings of January 25, February 22, and March 22, is the total visual mass of the Hammerhead driveway and adjacent house. It is very difficult to comment on the current proposal since what is to be done is so poorly defined. Drawings associated with the May 30 and June 21 letters, and a discussion with Mr. Monahan on June 5, would indicate the distance between the Hammerhead driveway and a future house could vary from 7 feet to 22 feet. At the March 22 meeting one of the Commissioners assured Mr. McCartin that the setback would be addressed in the Plan Review process. If we had some assurance that the minim un distance between the Hammerhead and the house were 18 feet. we would have no oroblem. '* PARCEL 3 We are not clear if any change other than an increase in allowed floor area is being proposed for Parcel 3. However, the May 30 letter proposed changes to the building envelope. Following are our comments regarding that proposal: We concur,(1) if the house is sited on the building envelope as indicated, i.e.; on the uphill half. This siting is very important as it preserves the view corridor from Dr. Alexander's home. And (2), if the thirty foot ordinance-based height limitation is used rather than an approximately thirty-five foot at back of property measurement to line of grade. INCREASE IN APPROVED FLOOR AREAS We strongly disagree with the statement in the applicants letter of June 21 that "the increase in size would be consistent with existing neighboring structures". None of our houses, which are all adjacent, is as large as 3600 sq. feet. and very few, if any, other houses in the area are that large. 4800 sq. ft. houses would be completely out of place. ~ We have used three assumptions in developing our comments First -A property owner should have maximum flexibility to develop his or her property within communitv norms. Second-The natural beauty of the area should be preserved as much as possible by minimizina the imoact of visual mass. Third- There is enough room here for everybody to live well and get along if this development is done in the spirit of the First and Second assumptions Sincerely d~~///Z'c?'~' /J. Fe" James McCartin 205 Round Hill Rd. Ralph Alexander 211 Round Hill Road Larry Shapiro 215 Round Hill Road Allan Martini 223 Round Hill Road . . ."",-" ,"0(. ;;:lij . . "".", :-;~. "\," " .~..\ , .,"~. . ......'. '. "'~ '&l\"~ .'.in." ~ ,;\\} ':. II) . ',,1', , ."tt'f' r.., C"t C't ~.' "N il) , ,,",' '" ~ . . i...... , ,. 0,:.., . ,',' . '., .....;. -:'.,: .' ". ,";, 'V .' ~. .~ . .'.~ . :. '\", ..' ".,:,' , , 'Q ...... . .~.,..\:.g;~..:.; ':..",;" . .,f_. ' _, _ ". . . - .'. .:. . ' . . . .~ & '. '-,: .W" '~'.: :.:i. ',' "~ {io m.,'" , ;~~ " 'oal ' - , ....,.. '. < .::' .....".r:.. . . '.' . t.. . ~. '\.,. ,I..' 1'-' \j 1.:)' .~ .~ V .... -....,. '. '" . '. , ,.... . ':'lli~'. ~~. .l~ . ~. ~ <ll .~ .';, I \ ;~ . l~.',~ '\. i < .' ...<<0 '<t'.' \. . ~~t. . "~~'~ ~~ b~ .", ;~~ .' <ll &! 1'\" \ \ .\ .\. 't. \ Q ',,", N 11\ , Q !t.l 9 '" '" N '" N '" .... , j' ~ ~ !!! -' . ~:/ . " ""' .~ LU .;.J I:D .0 a: a.. .'~ ~.~, . .'.w < . . :a..' . o. ':..J .. .~. 2 W C' JU .:> a: ;,,;.8:: < '.....' " :::.-;t.. :t:. .' I. . '0 . . z o ,i= o UJ CI) LU t- CI) ...., , .~'. '. .,.. ..J LU o a: ~ TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: TOWN COUNCIL MEETING: FINANCE DIRECTOR ITEM NO: SALARY & COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENTS NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES JULY 5,1995 ?--( @ ) Background: This item is for Town Council approval of salary and compensation adjustments for non- represented employees of the Town of Tiburon for the period January I, 1995 to June 30, 1996. An increase of 1.5 percent is proposed for the period January I, 1995 to June 30, 1995; a 3.0 percent increase is requested for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Staff has met and conferred with the Town Council Finance Committee in consideration of the proposed compensation adjustment, and of the timing of subsequent compensation adjustments for non-represented employees. Other issues concerning employee compensation are currently under advisement and consideration of the Council Finance Committee. Non-Represented Employees: Non-represented employees of the Town include the following management and mid-management positions: Management Town Manager Town Attorney Chief of Police Planning Director Finance Director Superintendent Public Works Mid-Management Town Clerk Associate Planner Assistant Planner Building Official Police Secretary Assistant Superintendent Recent Status: Since the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1992 non-represented employees have received one (1) general adjustment for salary compensation. During the 1992-93 fiscal year a general freeze on hiring and employee compensation was implemented and salaries were frozen until the salary and equity adjustments of January 1994, at which time non-represented employees received a 2.5 percent salary adjustment. Some non-represented employees have received one (1) salary adjustment since the 1991-92 fiscal year. TOWN OF TlBURON, Non-Represented Staff, 1995-96 Page-l Adoption of the January 1994 adjustment effectively moved the Town from adjusting management and mid-management salaries individually (in conjunction with anniversary of dates- of-hire) to a general adjustment on a calendar year basis. Adoption of the general adjustments proposed herein would move consideration of compensation adjustments for non-represented employees to a fiscal year basis, which would be consistent with negotiated labor contracts with the Police Association and MAPE-represented miscellaneous employees. Proposed Salal)' Adjustments: 1. January I, 1995 to June 30, 1995 A 1.5 percent adjustment, effective for the preceding six month period, is proposed for all positions except Town Clerk (which was adjusted in March 1995.) This adjustment results in incremental compensation costs of $5,200 (salary $4,400 and retirement $800) to the 1994-95 budget. 2. July 1,1995 to June 30, 1996 A 3.0 percent adjustment, effective for the fiscal year, results in additional compensation costs of $22,400 ($19,200 salary and 3,200 retirement). Cost estimates assume full staffing for the fiscal year. The Assistant Planner position is currently vacated for leave purposes, however will be staffed later in 1995-96. Recommendations: 1, Council approve the general compensation adjustments proposed above, for the following periods: January 1, 1995 to June 30, 1995, and July 1,1995 to June 30,1996. 2. Council move consideration of annual compensation adjustments for non-represented employees from a calendar year to a fiscal year basis. 3. Council adopt draft resolution authorizing implementation of compensation adjustments, and moving consideration of subsequent adjustments to a fiscal year basis. Exhibits: 1. Table, Proposed Adjustments 2. Draft Resolution, Compensation Adjustments TOWN OF TIBURON, Non-Represented Staff, 1995-96 Page-2 TABLE I. PROPOSED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENTS NON REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES Current Elf 1/1/95 Elf 7/1/95 Salary PERS Salary PERS Salary PERS (1.5% adjustment) (3.0% adjustment) Town Manager 6,934 1,081 7,038 1,097 7,249 1,130 Chief of Police (a) 6,093 1,618 6,184 1,642 6,370 1,692 Town Attorney 6,314 984 6,409 999 6,601 1,029 Planning Director 4,961 773 5,035 785 5,186 808 Superintendent 4,520 704 4,588 715 4,725 736 Finance Director 4,279 667 4,343 677 4,473 697 Building Official 3,905 609 3,%4 618 4,082 636 Ass!. Superintendent 3,588 559 3,642 568 3,751 585 Town Clerk 3,375 526 3,375 526 3,476 542 Associate Planner 3,175 495 3,223 502 3,319 517 Police Secretary 2,796 436 2,838 442 2,923 456 Assistant Planner 2,677 417 2,717 423 2,799 436 Monthly $52,617 $8,868 $53,356 $8,993 $54,956 $9,263 Annual $631,404 $106,415 $640,268 $107,916 $659,476 $111,154 Change v. prior year $8,864 $1,502 $19,208 $3,237 Change, 6 months $4,432 $751 Notes to table: PERS factor for regular employees. PERS factor public safety employees <a 0,15583 0.26556 6123/95 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TffiURON ADOPTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENTS FOR NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY I, 1995 TO JUNE 30, 1996 WHEREAS, Non-Represented positions of the Town ofTiburon are comprised as follows: Town Manager Town Attorney Chief of Police Planning Director Finance Director Supt of Public Works Assistant Superintendent Building Official Town Clerk Associate Planner Assistant Planner Police Secretary WHEREAS, compensation levels for Non-Represented employees were most recently adjusted effective for the period January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Town Council Finance Committee met June 1995 in consideration of compensation adjustments and timing of subsequent adjustments for Non-Represented employees, and, WHEREAS, the Finance Director estimates that the combined fiscal impact of the proposed compensation adjustments - 1.5 percent for the six month period beginning January 1, 1995, and 3.0 percent for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 1995 - is approximately $27,600, NOW THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Salary: base salary adjustments for Non-Represented positions are to be implemented accordingly: effective January 1,1995, a 1.5 percent increase for all positions except that of Town Clerk. effective July 1, 1995, a 3.0 percent increase for all positions. Timing: subsequent consideration of regular compensation adjustments for Non-Represented positions shall be on a fiscal year basis. PASSED AND ADOPTED, at as regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon on , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: BY: ANDREW THOMPSON, MAYOR ATTEST DIANE L. CRANE TOWN CLERK TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT TOWN COUNCIL MEETING: FINANCE DIRECTOR ITEM NO: :; (b) FUND TRANSFERS - FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 REALLOCATIONS AMONG RESERVES OF THE GENERAL FUND Background: This item is for continued discussion and consideration of proposed reallocation of funds, from the General Fund Unallocated Reserve, to various Designated Reserves of the General Fund. The Town Manager proposed in the 1995-96 Preliminary Budget a reallocation of$290,000 from the General Fund Unallocated Reserve to other Designated Reserves, as follows From: 1. Unallocated Reserve -$290,000 To Designated Reserve: 2. Capital Equipment Replacement 3. Capital Outlay 4. Drainage 5. Employee Compensated Leave 6. New Town Center 7. Park Development 8. SelfInsurance 50,000 70,000 50,000 30,000 o 40,000 50,000 As stated in the Preliminary Budget, the purpose of the proposed transfers (reallocations) is to recapitalize the above-referenced Reserves to within policy minimum and maximum guidelines which were adopted by Council in November 1993. UnalIocated & Designated Reserves of the General Fund: This section is intended to provide a brief description of the basic purpose and financial status of the Unallocated and Designated Reserves of the General Fund. Summarily, the use of all General Fund resources is a matter of policy concern and direction of the Town Manager and Town Council. This is in contrast to certain Special Revenue and Capital Projects Funds - such as Redevelopment Agency, State Gas Tax, Assessment District Debt Service and other funds - which are subject to legal or contractual stipulations concerning use of fund resources. TOWN OF TIBURON, Fund Transfers, 1995-96 Page- I General Fund Un allocated Reserve - Is intended to reserve fund resources in the range of20% to 25% of planned operating budget expenditures. This reserve fund balance represents a contingency which allows the Town to mitigate the impact of adverse financial conditions. The estimated reserve balance on June 30, 1995 is $1,165,000. The planned 1995-96 Operating Budget is $3,255,000, in accordance with recent budgetary practices, 25% would require a reserve of$814,000. The proposed reallocation of$290,000 to other designated reserves would leave a balance of $875,000 which provides adequate coverage for unanticipated fiscal impacts Employee Compensated Leave Reserve - To provide reserve funding for employee compensated leave costs. The audited financial statements for 1993-94 indicate that the total liability for compensated leave was $232,000, the estimated reserve balance on June 30, 1995 is 216,000. The proposed reallocation of $30,000 provides for adequate funding of the liability. New Town Center Construction Reserve - For acquiring, constructing or improving new Town facilities. Fund established Fiscal Year 1993-94, following 1994 Measure M. Ballot. The reserve received a transfer of funds in 1994-95, the current estimated balance on June 30th is $1,350,000. No reallocations are proposed. Self Insurance Reserve - To provide reserve funding for coverage of Town's general liability and workers' compensation insurance programs. It has been suggested by our liability program risk manager that a reserve equivalent to three (3) occurrences, or $150,000, is an adequate minimum level. Current resources are approximately $154,000. A reallocation of $50,000 is proposed, this is within recommended range of$150,000 to $250,000. Capital Equipment Replacement Reserve (CERR)- To provide funding for General Fund departmental capital outlay expenditures. Reserve receives an annual depreciation allowance from each operating department of the General Fund. The allowance is currently estimated to be approximately $110,000, planned expenditures are about $98,000. Current reserve resources are estimated to be $133,000, a reallocation of 50,000 is proposed, This would result in reserve of slightly less than two (2) years for operating equipment, which is within the recommended range of$150,000 to $200,000. The estimated total amount required for replacement of department operating equipment is approximately $400,000 to $425,000. Park Development Reserve - To provide resources for the improvement or maintenance of park facilities, not accounted for in the General Operating Budget. The preliminary estimated June 30, 1995 balance is $85,000, the revised estimate is about $60,000 (due to abandonment of the Ferry Realignment and Reconstruction Project nearly $25,000 in engineering costs are not reimbursable and therefore are a cost to this reserve. A reallocation of $40,000 is proposed. The resulting balance is nearly $100,000 which is the minimum recommended balance. Drainage Reserve - To provide resources for construction of improvements to the curb and storm drain collection system. Estimated total resources are $87,000, a reallocation of $50,000 is TOWN OF TIBURON, Fund Transfers, 1995-96 Page-2 proposed. The result is a balance which is within the recommended range of $100,000 to $150,000. Capital Outlay Reserve - For acquisition, construction or improvement of public property and facilities. This reserve has recently been used for Town facilities' - Administration, Police, Public Works, Council Chambers - improvements. Current estimated resources are $52,000, the recommended range is $100,000 to $150,000. A reallocation of$70,000 is proposed, which would result in a balance within the range. Recommendation: Town Council conduct Public Hearings concerning proposed reallocations among reserves of the General Fund, and adopt a schedule of reallocations to certain designated reserves, to be effective for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 1995. Exhibits: 1. Fiscal Year 1995-96 Preliminary Budget, Page 8. 2. Reserve Ranges, November 3, 1993 TOWN OF TIBURON, Fund Transfers, 1995-96 Page-3 I I I I I J f I 1 ] 1 J J 1 ~ ~ I' Ii t One of the beneficiaries of the PERS surplus is the Town's Unallocated General Fund Reserve which should reflect an approximate fund balance of $1,165,000 at the close of FY94-95. Based upon the Town's 25% policy maximum for this reserve, the following fund transfers are recommended in conjunction with the adoption of the FY 1995- 96 budget: GENERAL FUND RESERVES Estimated 7-1-95 Balance Fund Transfer Recommended 7-1-95 I Balance , , , I I I (290.000~ , 1. General Unallocated I 1,165,000 875,000 2. Capital Equipment Replacement 130,000 50,000 180,000 3. Capital Outlay 52,000 70,000 122,000 4. Drainage 87,000 50,000 137,000 5. Employee Compensated Leave 216,000 30,000 246,000 6. New Town Hall Improvement 1,350,000 0 1,350,000 7. Park Development 85,000 40,000 125,000 8. Self Insurance I 154,000 50,000 204,000 TOTALS: $3,239,000 $0 $3,239,000 The primary purpose of these recommended fund transfers is to recapitalize certain restricted funds and bring their fund balances to within the policy maximum and minimum guidelines. . In addition to the current need for New Town facilities, the other major issue confronting the Town is the need for an overall upgrading of the Town's street system. A "Short Term" improvement plan is being recommended which will address those streets requiring immediate attention. These street repairs and improvements \vill be accomplished over the next two (2) fiscal years at an estimated cost of $440,000. Within this same time 8 ExmBIT NO. I , j . . . '\ \ .j . New Town Center Program $ ..0- $ ..0- $ ..0- $ 677 (Establish New Designated , Reserve Fnnd) ~~ In conjunction with the above proposed fund transfers, Staff also recommends that Council approve the following General Fund "Minimum and Maximum" ranges for each of the specific reserve funds: FUND RESERVE NAME RESERVE MINIMUM RESERVE MAXIMUM General. Unallocated $700 $900 Capital Equip. 150 200 Replacement Capital Outlay 100 150 Drainage 100 150 Emp. Compensated Leave 200 . 300 New Town Hall Impr. 350 750 Park Development 100 150 Revenue Sharing ..0- ..0- Self Ins. Reserve 150 250 New Town Center 1,000 1,500 Construction (FIGURES IN OOO's) The above Reserve Fund limits are based primarily upon past experience and needs of the Town. They are not intended as precise projections and in some cases they may prove to be either insufficient or overfunded. However, the reserve ranges will provide the Town with the ability and flexibility in funding certain non-budgeted needs of the Town and emergency costs which arise from time to time. . -"-. - '-- 1/ -:J,- q.2:, SJ:aFP 02.~A::>a:'1 EXHIBIT NO. ~I .;3 c .2 -5i$' i"E ~"O .. C . . ~ E ~ ~ ~ u u. ~ " c .. . . E .. E:J. e :; ." - -. . ~ 2: ~ '" ~ ~ ~ g ~... >..5 a e ..c c: u = (Q::l "O~c.c ~'6 ~::J~~ ~ ~ c ce..Jg .2 -. ~ -g &,V] .~ e; g ~ -S::l (OJ et.. ..z ;.5~ e~~Bi 0.5.,g>ooo E-<c-St-<Z< ~ ~ ~ C -ij ,!2 U .. o ~2 ::; ::;~ ~ ~ . z-o ~cg _ u . -eo oC ,,; ~ ~ . o 0: .c ~ . ::; o N U ~ .c ~ , ~ !: z :> ~ ~ ~ ~ g Ul 00 Z o 0: ~- _ c i= .5 ~~ o~ ",0: ::i ~~(; .c-- !: 8. ~ ~ ~ .. f'o-~ ~.SO~ - ~ - ~~ e .00 , cue .g oS U :s .. c f! ~ 0 -=:a ~ . ~ ~.~ .... ':;j t~ E Q..S &.41';:: ~ c. r:l ~ ~. c ~ ~.S g ci5~...~ ~ ,,:; 0 ....:.c.o u "Q 0 u-5 ~ ;. ~ ~ u c - .~ ~ ~ in ...0:1'1").... ~-S~ 3 c l:: 0\ ..., o.g .~ ~.~] ;:; c c..--g 5.5 ~ E E-< :1 E u ~ .g 0 ~~~~ =~ . . - ;; u- -5 :; u 0 .c~ ~ . ",::; u u .~~ g ti 0"'<: ~ . 0= ~:: u ~F ::; u .~ 1:: . &. ~ >. . - , _ Co.c :::::.9"0 g"Q:i '" . 0 > u .Mfl~ -..c -c,o- ~:s! "2 .~ 6 ::I ~-5i ~ t~ ij ~5"O C ~ . . ~'" ::g.S ~ .. c ~ g c o.c . E-<~~ u'- ~:S.s u.c c ~ o. ~::; 00 N u- .. C . 0 .c _ ~:S "'f-o CO.: .5 0 .~= o. c .c _ 0 :;'2 R ~ <:> Eo o E =5 F="cuc .g.~ l;'gS-3 ,3"S "O;:JZ~ ~ 0 U u~ ~ ~ 5 B _u u g.e u: ~ ~ 0 _.... z ClSO::CuVlv.lt.!.l .t; (Q i;'UJUl(,I'J o.o,c>ooo f-oltl"i-<(Z< = .5 5 ::; oij u .. > u 0- ::;;; ~~~ g S ~ :g.~ ~ ~:g~ v ~ ~'>.'5 .5 :BOO ~ ~ ~ 80;::,.8- C"C ..: 0... e ;g 1i i: .,; 0 oS :s: "O'~... u o~ a"O':::~ ; ~~~"g ~ e.2;~~'~ 8.a.-.- ~~,.g ~. o~ c.. v"O"O V"l :5 g.o~~~- -~~~c;::: '3E.2~.gCQ Vl v 0 t>.S "O,..I(>uu"5 ~oouV]'O u~e.ouu .~ug~QJ~ ~ -5 ~ E':> " .9 ~~@ S.S ~~.voB~.g ~ oS -5 ~og 15.. _"':loa'" l.) .... r::- O:......s ~ c og ~ -g -5 ~ E ~:g ~:i:::; E .~ ~ i ~ ~ 8 "':l 9 v .....::i '- ~",~~g-.B .0 a:a......... v ~'S; '-.:: ~ gf:-::: v v Li ~;..:::.,g g ~~f5~v~5 <t:"'v~-5u.Ju .J '"' .J :s 0. ~ " . V5 u -5 ~ u . ~ . c . " Ot -5 " ~ _ C o. t u .~ 0= ~ Q E ~o c- 'i:; 0 ; r:: 2i:~ . . ~~ . . 75 c :E .. 9 u ~ i5 '0 1: . S o .5 ;; .~ ..( ~ j ~ u g- o':: o~ ~~ .~ .c_ Sa ::- ~ .t o " 8 of .~ ~ '6 ~ .~ .E . - u :1 ~ o ~ - !J . ~ . o ~ .3 <; o .~ ;; E .s: .5 - .s: . o " 0: u Co . ~ ~ o d Q ~ ::;; ::; e o .:: E " ~ o E o E u ::; :d ~ Ul ::; Ul ~ ~ ~ <( ~ Q ::; o '" Q ~ '" :> o Q- ~~ N~ <(~ _ u - ~~ zO: :> ~ 8~ ~~ 0:- <(<( ::;:2; - 0 ~ e >" ~s ",'" .2~ c o , ~'" ~u ZoS 0: c i;'8 ::; e , u u_ u- >'e E " ~ o 0 0." U 0. -- " 0 ~ ::l "'u u~ .c u - c ~ 0 vO= .~ ~ c ;.. :::T.::: u - ...:::: O? u g E if5.g ::; U.= :::E"g-;; " c c .0 ~ g ~ l-'s; ~ u u_ ~ g.~ g <; o ..9 ;; E ~ ...; I.. z - o .~ 1i ,g <; u 0: '" c . ~ .,!! ~ . ~ '0 C " '" U N o~ .c 75 $ '" Ul > 0: Ul '" Ul 0: Q- z'; :> c '" ' ..J'" <( ~ 0: - Ul ~ ffi" 0'0 '" ~ * &. ~ -g j -5 .~ ~ c '6 u 8 o 0':: .l2 ~ ." :E " ~ . E u E u ~~ a.o~ .si! ....9 - . . u "'0: ~'O . 0 o. 0: ~ "5oa . 0. U u 000: ~ o .5 " E ~ ~ . .. u ~~-5 ~ ~.8 :g~~ s.- ~ ~ 8 ~ "E~~ -g i2 5 E~:~ E.5 E o "~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ E u . , :.2=5 ~ -g'~ 0: ~ E o.c"" ~.g.= u.c ",,2E Vi~~ .0" .cU. --~ ~-u ~ ==-g u . .- C E f ~ E u ~ 8 :.0 3: ~ ~z~ ::E 8 ~ c~ ~ ~ -g.2 ~...= o~ U3:-: ~~9 '" it ~ ~ ;: -- S , ..... , I 1 , M\t~L~ )1-3"'~ ~IT~:Q.,.'9-.-~ , 8 u u E ~ ~ c- o ..9 ~ .a 0: il: o ~ ~ "" ~ z i ..J o z :> 8 ~ ~ ..) '0 ;: -- S o '" '" "" '" ..J f-o :> ~ ::;: ..J o z :> o U z ~ g I/PI-vt Ai. ? iO)~e~O'W~[Q) uti ""I'J '1)')<; 0ur~ t.. \- j..J ll;; ':s II',!: C:'ril TOWj\1 UANJ\GER'S OFFICE 1("'\1" "uO::: TIBURON ) 'I. IV. \- 54 Claire Way Tlburon California 94920 4153881232 June 19, 1995 To: Mayor, Andrew Thompson & Tiburon Town Council. From: Peter Brooks, certified Arborist 54 Claire Way, Tiburon. RE; Dedicated Trees Dear Council Members, I am requesting your approval to chair an ad hoc comittee to establish a listing of the town's most sinificant trees, in order to recognize them as Dedicated Trees. This commitee would request public imput for nomination of dedicated trees on pUblic and private properties. It would provide the council with a list of nominated trees and an arborist report on the trees with information pertinant to the establishment of dedicated status. This information would include, location, species, condition, historical significance if applicable, and with private property trees signed acknowledgement of intent from tree owner. The town tree ordinance has verbiage to allow for dedicated tree status, but to my understanding does not have any dedicated trees. The purpose of the dedicated tree status is to provide an extra layer of protection for trees of exceptional value in the on going battle of view vs tree. A dedicated tree directory would also be valuable in securing federal grants from the Tree City U.S.A. program and other funding sources. Dedicated tree status would not prevent the town or owner from maintaining or removing the tree if safety issues arise, but would insure the future generations of this community that the present stewards understand the value of its trees and wished to share that heritage with them. Sincerely, Peter Brooks 1~4j,..., #-,;y /"?~ u~ U a: Y41 v,' -{jiJ - Quality you can hear. . DESK TOP MICROPHONE THE DAVIS DM-l he Davis DM-l microphone has been T designed to meet the specific requirements of desk-top voice paging. Maximum speech intelligibility is achieved by enhancing fre- quency response in the voice range, and eliminating feedback. Natural voice sounds are preserved by using a gooseneck stand which allows the user close proximity to the microphone. Reproduction of foom noise is reduced due to the microphone's unidirectional pickup pattern. Small base size uses minimum desk space, while the con- temporary styling enhances appearance. The talk and lock down switch provides added convenience for the user. The DM-! is especially recommended for office paging, restaurants, dispatch centers, warehouses and radio communications. SPECIFICATIONS ModeL DM.! Type: Dynamic Pattern: Unidirectional Frequency Response: !50-IOK Hz Impedance: 600 Ohm Sensitivity: -72 :t 3 dB Cable: 9'8", 4 conductor (2 shielded), Mic End: Wired in Amp End: Unterminated Finish: Matte black ABS Dimensions: 5.9"L x 4.3"W x 14.3"H Net Weight: 2 lbs. 1 oz. Shipping Weight: 3 lbs. Always look for the J' it's the "mark" only through prof. If M. i I0.S + t'\/vi... It iQ/f $ 5'Ot) ~ J. W. Davis & Company !B5~ - rkM M, I c . . Maximum Speech Intelligibllity Frequency response emphasizes voice range MInimum Desk Space Required Small but stable hase Easily Adjustable Gooseneck flexibility ~- ,1zt S'dlxAdf AVTEK 98 r,MIN STREET ti219 T:9UF~O:'J, CA 94Cl20 t ~- 1089C 214.651-7341 (Dallas) . Toll free 1-800-442.1564 (Texas) . Toll free 1.800.527-5705 (Outside Texas) . Fax 214-939.0328 3030 Canton Street . P.O. Box 26177 . Dallas, Texas 75226