HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Agd Pkt 1995-02-15 (2)
l.'-_),,-~;",i,-.)J~,^-.X -.....AC...
TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA
TOWN OF TIBURON
1101 TIBURON BLVD.
REGULAR MEETING
MEETING DATE:
CLOSED SESSION:
MEETING TIME:
FEBRUARY 15, 1995
NONE
7:30 P.M.
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE: In order to give all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and to ensure the presentation of all
points of view, members of the audience should:
(1) Always Address the Chair; (2) State Name and Address; (3) State Views Succinctly; (4) Umit Presentations to 3 minutes; (5)
Speok Directly Inlo Microphone.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact
Town Hall (415) 43>7373. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to
enaure accessibility to this meoting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA TiUe II]
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS, BOARDS. COMMITTEE.s
.,
C. PUBLIC QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Please confine your comments during this portion of the agenda to mailers not already on this agenda,
other than items on the Consent Calendar. The public will be given an opportunity to speak on each
agenda item at the time it is called. Presentations are limited to three (3) minutes. Mat/ers requiring action
will be referred to the appropriate Commission, Board, Commillee or Staff for consitkration and/or placed
on a future Council meeting agenda.
D. COUNCIL. COMMISSION OR COMMITIEE REPORTS
I
I
,
E.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The purpose of the Consent Calendar is to group items together which generally do not require discussion
and which will probably be approved by one motion unless separate action is required on .a particular item.
Any member of the Town Council, Town Staff, or the Public may request removal of an item for
discussion.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES #1042, February 1,1995
2. CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT ACf OF 1989
(Adopt Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal Facility Element for Marin County
and Its Cities - Amend Resolution No. 3073 - Resolution)
3. IRRIGATION WELL (Request for Well Permit at 600 Ridge Road, B.
Breitman, Application - Resolution)
4. BCDC MERGER PROPOSAL (Oppose Governor's Merger Proposal of
BCDC Into Other Agencies-Resolution)
C:\wpSl \u:\2/15aaeDda
F. llNJi]NISHED BUSlNESS
5. TOWN ADMINISTRATION COMPUTER PROGRAM (Authorize Purchase
of Computer Equipment Replacement)
6. MAR WEST PARCEL (Indicate Intention to Transfer by Donation or Long-
Term Lease Town Owned Mar West Property to the New Belvedere-Tiburon
Library JPA - Resolution)
G. PUBLIC HEARING
7. NEW TOWN CENTER FACILmES
1.
Accept Staff Report Regarding Citizens Ballot Initiatives
2.
Consideration of Citizen's Ballot Initiatives/Ordinances
(A) Adopt Citizen's Initiative Ordinances, ill:
(B) Direct Citizen's Initiative Ordinances be Placed on June
6, 1995 Ballot, ill:
(C) Continue Consideration of Citizen's Initiative
Ordinances for up to Ten (10) Days.
..
3.
Further Discussion of Downtown or Ned's Way New Town Center
Proposals, or Town Council Ballot Measures
H. NEW BUSIts:ESS
8. 1993-94 MUNICIPAL AUDIT (Acceptance of Audit Report by Town Council)
I. COMMUNICATIONS
J. STAFF AND TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
9. STATUS OF HIGHLANDS SENIOR HOUSING PROJECf AND
HILARITA PRESERVATION PROGRAM (Oral Report by Town Attorney)
10. ANGEL ISLAND PARKING (Oral Report by Town Attorney Regarding
Meeting with State Representative)
K. ADJOURNMENT
C:\wpSl \IC\2/158gcbda
TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Thompson called the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon to order at 7:31 p.m., Wednesday, February 1, 1995 in Council
Chambers, 1101 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon California.
A ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Ginalski, Thayer, Thompson, Wolf, Nygren
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
..
Town Manager Kleinert, Town Attorney
Ewing, Town Engineer Mohammadi, Police
Chief Herley, Finance Director Stranzl,
Planning Director Anderson, Minutes Clerk
Sherwood
EX OFFICIO:
B. APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS. BOARDS. COMMITfEES
There were none.
Mayor Thompson noted with regret that Diana Bennett turned in her resignation
from the Design Review Board. New member will be sought in future.
C. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Lorraine Alexander, 16 Cecilia Court, thanked Council for volunteering it's times.
Concerned about increase in Mill Valley Refuse bill for street sweeping services;
understood it was because State is taking money out of budget for Town of Tiburon.
Concerned that this was done by the Town Council without notifying residents. She
wanted to know if the Council could also "out source" police, planning, etc. services.
Virginia Brunini, Karen Way questioned lack of public hearing on matter and felt
it was not handled openly at Council meeting.
AI Kuhn, 27 Tara Hill Road expressed concern that the Library committee is being
affected by what are perceived as casual and harmless comments about the new
Town Hall. Negatively impacts Committee's ability to raise funds. He also stated
that UNOCAL station on Blackfield Drive has decided not to be annexed into the
Town of Tiburon. They do not want to be subject to the Town Council and Planning
Commission restrictions
#. I 0 if ;;..
1
D. RECOGNITION OF SERVICES
Mayor Thompson read Resolution of Town Council recognizing Terry Hennessy for
outstanding and dedicated service to the Town of Tiburon. Ms. Hennessy thanked
the Council and members of Town Staff.
E. COUNCIL COMMISSION OR COMMITIEE REPORTS
MARIN COUNTY HAZARDOUS & SOLID WASTE JPA
Councilmember Nygren stated that for expediency the report was in the Council's
agenda packets.
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY meeting on January 26, 1995.
Council member Nygren reported there are plans for major transportation and
improvements including light rail alternative to Highway 101; costs far exceed
funding; need $542 million by year 2010; $69 million now available. County has $474
million shortfall; recommendation for $.01 sales tax which will require a two-thirds
vote by Marin Residents and may come to ballot; other methods of funding are
being explored.
The Countywide planning agency is studying how various transportation and land use
will affect both counties in the future; Draft Scope of Work was presented and a
Research Grant has been applied for to fund this Study.
County Supervisor Gary Giacamini and County Staff raised issue of County's new
Economic Element. Sausalito and Novato are including Economic Elements in their
general plans. Much discussion about how various communities in Marin felt about
including Economic Elements in their general plans. Should Tiburon consider
adopting their own Economic Element? Councilmember Nygren has copy of
Sausalito's Economic Element for reference. -
Mayor Thompson recommended agendizing and reviewing this issue.
Councilmember Thayer requested that this issue be agendized for the workshop in
order to prepare some consensus for the Planning Commission to then make a
recommendation to the Council.
John Forsman, Marinero Circle asked the Mayor to make public the amounts of
money that will be involved in the transportation project prior to a decision being
made.
E. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION was made by Mayor Thompson to move New Business Item No.
2
I into Consent Calendar.
Moved:
Vote:
Ginalski, seconded by Thayer
Unanimous
Councilwoman Nygren stated that she wanted to remove the San Quentin Expansion
Proposal and she has corrections to the minutes from meeting on January 10, 1995,
#1040, and January 18, 1995, #1041.
MOTION: to approve Consent Calendar consisting of the following items:
1. Approval of Minutes #1037 December 5 and #1039 January 4.
2. INVESTMENT SUMMARY REPORT (December 1994)
3. MARIN ACfS OF KINDNESS WEEK (February 12-17, 1995 -
Resolution)
4. MARIN COUNTY CABLE RATE REGULATIONS JPA (Confirm
Towns Representatives to JPA)
8. MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATE PROGRAM (Authorize
Mov d: Thompson, Thayer
vote:\ AYES: Unanimous
\1 NOES: None
G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
6. TIBURON'S RECYCLING PROGRAM (Status Report Regarding
State Mandated Goals)
Town Manager Kleinert summarized the Recycling Program as a mandate from the
State, The law is that in 1995 all public agencies will reduce waste by 25 percent.
Marin is a leader and Tiburon has a 27 percent reduction. The problem will be
meeting the 50 percent requirement by the year 2000. Major points to achieve more
direction:
1. Commercial recycling by the downtown business community.
2. Green waste.
3. Continue to encourage all residents to recycle.
Rick Powell, Manager Mill Valley Refuse Service, stated that 60 - 70 percent of the
Tiburon residents participate in recycling and that is a comparable to other Marin
cities. These figures are based on regular pickup drivers observations.
In response to Mayor Thompson, Mr. Powell mentioned several options are
available. Customer can provide containers, bags can be used, customers can have
option of using their own container or having one furnished, or tipper cans can be
3
provided by Mill Valley Refuse. Mill Valley Refuse is working with Staff to
determine costs of implementing these plans and developing program options to
present to Council.
Councilwoman Nygren noted that the waste figures are looked at by the state for the
entire county, not as individual communities. If goal is not met by year 2000, the
State will charge the community $10,000 per day. She stated that other communities
are working on this now. San Anselmo is holding composting clinics. Parks and
Recreation could and should be offering classes now. Councilmember Nygren
suggested action be taken now.
Councilmember Ginalski requested that a meeting be held between Town Staff and
Mill Valley Refuse. Councilmember Thayer also recommended that a meeting be
held.
Mr. Forsman, Marinero Circle asked the Council what requests and demands have
been requested by the community for this type of service. In response to the Mayor's
explanation that this is a State driven mandate, not a community request, Mr.
Forsman stated that the new governor would be willing to listen to requests for
fewer mandates.
Henry Alexander, Cecilia Way, asked if gardeners would have choice to cart green
waste away or put it in special bags, and would Tiburon still be given credit for
diversion?
Mr. Powell stated that if the green waste is taken to landfill, then there is no credit
for diversion. However, if every homeowner had a gardener and a greencan, there
would be room in that greencan for their green waste and MV Refuse would haul
it away. Currently material is being taken to Contra Costa County facility that has
a state approved composting program.
Frank Brooks, Centro West, stated that he worked for the Town of Tiburonfor 20
years, and the town tried composting three times, and it didn't work.
Councilmember Nygren commented the State Mandate was developed because the
individual towns felt that they could not handle it alone. Perhaps the community
could work along with the subcommittee. She also said that San Anselmo is getting
a subcommittee to work with community towards reaching their goal.
Mayor Thompson commented on the consensus of the Council saying they would
like to direct to Public Services Committee, and meet with appropriate staff.
4
;
communities are working on this now. San Anselmo is holding composting clinics.
Parks and Recreation could and should be offering classes now. Councilmember
Nygren suggested action be taken now.
Councilmember Ginalski requested that a meeting be held between Town Staff
and Mill Valley Refuse. Councilmember Thayer also recommended that a
meeting be held.
Mr. Forsman, Marinero Circle asked the Council what requests and demands
have been requested by the community for this type of service. In response to the
Mayor's explanation that this is a State driven mandate, not a community request,
Mr. Forsman stated that the new governor would be willing to listen to requests
for fewer mandates.
Henry Alexander, Cecilia Way, asked if gardeners would have choice to cart
green waste away or put it in special bags, and would Tiburon still be given credit
for diversion?
.
Mr. Powell stated that if the green waste is taken to landfill, then there is no
credit for diversion. However, if every homeowner had a gardener and a
greencan, there would be room in that greencan for their green waste and MV
Refuse would haul it away. Currently material is being taken to Contra Costa
County facility that has a state approved composting program.
Frank Brooks, Centro West, stated that he worked for the Town of Tiburon for
20 years, and the town tried composting three times, and it didn't work.
Councilmember Nygren commented the State Mandate was developed because
the individual towns felt that they could not handle it alone. Perhaps the
community could work along with the subcommittee. She also said that San
Anselmo is getting a subcommittee to work with community towards reaching
their goal.
Mayor Thompson commented on the consensus of the Council saying they would
like to direct to Public Services Committee, and meet with appropriate staff.
7. NEW TOWN HALL FACILITIES
Councilmember Ginalski recommended that public comment be given at the
beginning of the discussion. Councilmember Nygren commented in detail on the
same thing. Council member Thayer agreed that the public should have a full
opportunity to discuss this as early as possible.
He also mentioned concern about the sale of the Mar West Property.
Mayor Thompson said that he agreed with Councilmember Thayer and suggested
that they drop the proposed initiative which mandated that they sell property to
5
the county. Lack of public knowledge of where Council stands on use of that site
is creating a hindrance for Library's fundraising ability as well as creating JPA
agreement on how to fund running the library. $500,000 from this project has not
been included in any Town Hall proposals as money that would be used for
almost 2 years. He suggested sending this issue back to staff to not include the
$500,000 and proceed with giving that land to the Library. He suggested a lease
for $1 so the committee can move forward on the JPA
Councilwoman Nygren commented that Town Manager Kleinert had been
adamant about pursing this funding from the County. Councilwoman Nygren
asserted that she was not on the Council when this agreement was made. She
then asked a question of the Town Manager that was not unclear and the Mayor
asked her to clarify her questions. She wanted an explanation of the history of "a
half a million dollars", that is no longer worth that amount, and is town
assessment money going up to the county. Mayor Thompson asked her to define
her question.
Stewart Hopkins rose to a Point of Order noting this is not on the agenda.
Mayor Thompson said that this Ballot Initiative does relate to the agenda.
Councilmember Ginalski said that he felt it was appropriate to let the Ballot
Amendment Language regarding the Mar West site that was being questioned by
Councilwoman Nygren be allowed to lapse and agendized in the future.
Councilwoman Nygren agreed that would seem appropriate.
Councilwoman Wolf directed Staff to bring a Resolution that at least describes
Councils' intent to lease the land on a long-term $1 per year lease; the Library
committee deserves some sense of security even if all the details have not been
ironed out.
Mayor Thompson stated that Council had direction to bring back a Resolution
stating their position as well as direction to agendize the pros and cons of the
issue again. In response to Councilmember Ginalski, the Town Manager stated
that the Library committee would have a JPA soon; sale with county will be
moot, because County will not be interested in pursuing the acquisition if the
Library is to be taken out of their Library system. Staff can provide background
information that Councilwoman Nygren asked for. His understanding is that the
Library will be local and the taxes will stay in Tiburon; JPA to be available
within 2 weeks.
Mayor Thompson summarized areas that needed to be discussed:
A. Citizens Ballot Initiative Report Outline
B. Town Council Ballot Proposals
C. Ned's Way Only Proposal Status
D. Downtown & Ned's Way Proposal
6
E. Facilitated Community Workshop
Polly Smith, 10 Barner Lane, submitted draft for a ballot measure for June
election. She stated she is 100 percent for library. One of the phases (2) in the
draft includes a community hall adjacent to library downtown, and if the library
committee would like, they will delete "adjacent to the Library site"; the draft
ballot measure incorporates three phases of development. She explained that she
and her group, including Michael Heckman and Ralph Hockley, who are all
Measure I people, were looking for middle ground and some action; they want
voters to have options and they feel that what's currently on the ballot doesn't
give the voters an acceptable choice -- either build downtown or at Ned's Way.
Their proposal allows for building on a pay-as-you-go basis avoiding the necessity
to sell Ned's Way property for high density housing.
Phase I, which includes building an administration building at Ned's Way with
existing funds could begin this summer; Phase II, building a police facility at
Ned's Way, funding would come from existing funds, and possibly further savings
and a leaseback arrangement if necessary; and Phase III, the Community Meeting
Hall downtown, would be built adjacent to the new library site or if infeasible, at
Ned's Way. Design would have to be compatible with library but would be
separate and a town-owned facility. Neither the administration building nor the
police building have to be built on the same site.
She stated that they feel they owe it to the town employees to move "off the
dime" and get the new facilities built. Working conditions are deplorable and a
disgrace. If a decision is made to go with the Downtown plan, it will be another
two years before anything is built. There are problems facing that plan. It could
take longer if there is a lot of opposition. The problems are parking places (she
mentioned possible suit looming because of parking for Angel Island which needs
to be settled). The area to be built on is a flood plain, the TPC is expanding in
the area and there is a much bigger fire building. She also mentioned Mr.
Zelinsky's conditions of parking and said she fully agreed with his first condition,
that of giving land to the Library. The second condition obliquely states that the
town would be responsible for replacing all displaced parking. She said she didn't
think. the town should assume one parking space that is Mr. Zelinsky's
responsibility and that could set a bad precedent. She also sees problems with
dense development on Ned's Way. The development is for seniors, which is fine
but they question what market price in Tiburon will really mean. She stated that
the comment that the Town would have to give the developer every single
advantage in order to receive the $1.4 million needed for downtown town hall
means that the town is "giving away the store".
Mayor Thompson requested that a critique of the other plan be held until later.
Ms. Smith said they were concerned about financial arrangement. They would
like to see it. She stated that revenue could be found by a leaseback
7
arrangement. Mayor Thompson asked her to elaborate. She said the property
could be leased back from private sources like the county jail was. This would
probably be for the Police Building and the town would have to find a way to pay
for that on a purchase arrangement, similar to a mortgage. She also said she
thought the funds could be found. Least expensive would be community meeting
room. Perhaps in the future, an even bigger one could be made than the one that
is proposed. She closed her presentation with the statement that they hoped all 5
Councilmembers will vote for their proposal.
Michael Heckman 99 Lyford Drive, stated that he was there because he felt a
sense of urgency in building town hall. Polly asked him to consider how this
phase-in program might. There would be 2 separate buildings, a two-story
administration building and a separate police building. He determined some very
basic proposal funding information from the downtown proposal, but he has not
worked with a professional company; assumes reasonable accuracy. Total
estimate is $1.3 million for Phase 1; Phase 2 would probably be $1.3 million.
Third phase community meeting room of approximately 1600 sq. ft. would be
approximately $300,000. These are very preliminary figures.
Ralph Hockley, 20 Mar Vista Court, stated that he was originally in favor of
building the town hall at Ned's Way and the library at the Mar West Site. He felt
that Point Tiburon was too dangerous because of litigation. The purpose of Polly
Smith's proposal is to get the work started as soon as possible. Building at Ned's
Way is dubious because of environmental issues. Specifically, 25 units on 1.5
acres is too dense, even more dense than Hilarita. He also felt that many would
be willing to pay a small tax. Qualifying himself as a commercial realtor, he
stated that no developer would commit until the permit process is completed.
Finally, he said that with no guaranteed funds, they were no further than before.
Councilmember Wolf asked Polly Smith if she felt Bradley House was high
density condominium development. Ms. Smith responded that no, but Smith
Ranch Road is, which is what she feels is being proposed in miniature for
Tiburon. Ms. Smith felt this was not good for Tiburon.
Councilmember Wolf also asked if her thinking would be affected if the money
could be explained and if she was aware of leaseback arrangement requires a
funding source that the Council didn't have? Ms. Smith was skeptical about
Councilmember Wolfs explanation of finances and felt a leaseback was like a
mortgage which could be arranged if the Council could find consensus.
Councilmember Wolf suggested that everyone look into this and asked if anyone
had spoken to Mr. Zelinsky about the meeting hall which is contingent on his
donating the land. Councilmember Wolf suggested that Ms. Smith read article in
The Ark published that day about the flood plain.
Mayor Thompson asked for any further comments. Councilmember Nygren stated
that she found it refreshing that residents would participate in developing a plan
8
for a community that works together.
Mayor Thompson asked Michael Heckman specific questions about the finances
he suggested and compared them to Adamson's estimates. He asked if $150 per
square foot was an inclusive figure compared to Adamson's $190 per square foot.
Mr. Heckman stated that his figures were certainly preliminary. The Mayor asked
what the funding would be for the Police building and Mr. Heckman didn't have
one yet. The Mayor asked the Town Manager if after the defeat of Measure I,
the Council had not asked Adamson whether the building could take place in
stages. The Town Manager responded that the savings were not significant. The
Mayor said that their analysis had proved that they could not do this without
another tax.
Councilmember Nygren told Town Manager that she and Councilmember Wolf
had met with Kitchell, the Project Managers of the County Jail, and wanted to
know if there was a report yet. The Town Manager said they had met with
Kitchell that morning and a report was being prepared. Councilmember Nygren
said that Kitchell felt that Adamson's prices were high, and if Kitchell were
allowed to do the entire job, their pricing would be lower.
Alan Littman, Rolling Hills Road, thanked the Council for their support of the
Library committee in letting them have the site. The Mar West site was crucially
important to fundraising from the very beginning. Until the public understood
where the library was going to be and how it would fit into Belvedere and
Tiburon, they couldn't get behind it because it was merely an abstraction. When
it was concrete with a site and plan, fundraising took shape. Same with Town
Hall and Police Station. Division within the community on the site has created
problems. Once a decision reached on where to build, the community will come
to support it. He said this is not a poor community and they could have a parcel
tax. The community will do what is appropriate provided this Council can put
behind it the divisiveness they've had on this issue.
Stewart Hopkins noted the meeting scheduled for Saturday is for information
only and recommended that Bruce Ross chair the meeting. He also spoke about
need for housing for the aging in Tiburon and suggested several individuals who
are expertly familiar with the aging population be consulted.
Henry Alexander, 16 Cecilia Court, asked who owns the existing library facility
and was told by the Council was that it is privately owned by the Belvedere Land
Company.
Nat Marans, Spanish Trail, stated he was glad to see people agreed with him on
Ned's Way's being best for the Town Hall. He mentioned that the area is built
on rock and safe. He said an engineer's report should be obtained prior to
placing any site on the ballot. He also asked whether testing had been done to
show whether toxic waste existed on the site. He also mentioned that Downtown
9
;
is built on landfill while Ned's Way is on rock. He finished with "Let's get
started".
Ken Nernzer, 664 Hillary, suggested that the Police building be built on Ned's
Way first because no one had any arguments against it. He felt that if you build
it, the money will come. Upper Ned's Way could produce the resources needed
to build. Start by building the Police building, turn the property to cash, and go
ahead with the downtown plan. Perhaps another revenue source will be found.
Jim Burke, Park Ranger, stated that Mr. Leigh, District Supt. of State Parks, sent
lease agreement for Angel Island parking with Mr. Zelinsky to Sacramento
attorney to find what the department's position would be. Their legal counsel
responded that:
The Department has an agreement with Main Street Properties for the use of
Mar West Parking Lot for 200 spaces. The agreement provides for Main Street
Properties to supply 100 spaces as an alternate location should the Mar West
location become unusable for parking. Since there are not 100 spaces in town,
one might wonder who will be dispossessed to provide for this Department.
However, this Department's position is that Main Street Properties cannot
voluntarily make the Mar West parking unusable for parking, and this
Department will litigate to enforce its contract. Also should the town deprive this
Department of its 200 parking spaces through town action, this Department
would consider that in the nature of a taking which must be shown to be for a
public purpose which is a more necessary public use than the present use for
State Park system purposes and subject to the Public Park Resource Act of 1971.
In addition the good faith of the town is questionable since the town opposed
ferry service from the Larkspur Ferry Terminal to Angel Island on the basis that
Tiburon was a well established and more suitable alternative; stated would like to
work with the Town of Tiburon and a meeting has been tentatively set up
between Town Council, Department representatives and a member of the AG's
office. -
Councilmember Wolf questioned whether the number of parking spaces should
be 100 or 200. No determination was decided.
Ellen Levinson, Department of Justice, Attorney General's Office, representing
State Parks in this matter should litigation become necessary, said she was hoping
litigation would not become necessary.
Peter Logan, 10 Felipa Court, said that he has stated publicly and privately that
the only way a town hall can be built is if a suitable location can be found and a
way to finance it. He had reservations about making a proposal to the voters that
does not mention financing.
Dian Ashley, President of Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber
10
supports the downtown location strongly. Polly Smith's plan to put community
center downtown conflicts.
Carolyn Hockley, 20 Mar Vista, responded to Councilmember Wolfs question to
Polly Smith about the acceptability of the cost of housing at Ned's Way and feels
that the cost still doesn't address the high density question.
John Forsman, 28 Marinero Circle, commented that people on the Council need
to get together and then they could solve the problems.
Larry Smith, Owlswood Lane, stated that the key to the downtown plan is to
gamer the money from the sale of the Ned's Way property; urged the council to
attend the workshop on Saturday; explained that the traffic impact from 25-units
at Ned's Way will generate less traffic than the town hall at Ned's Way along
with many other details that will be discussed. Senior housing will be great
service to the town. Stated that he had become convinced that generating $1.4
million will be easy to raise because of the attractiveness of the plan.
Councilmembet Ginalski asked Mr. Ross whether there would be time for
citizens to make comments who responded that he had not planned for that.
Councilmember Nygren discussed wording of the flier announcing the workshop,
whether they had seen the flier, been invited, etc. She asked the Town Manager
to read the flier to see if the wording was the same as she thought she had heard.
After the flier was read, there was discussion about whether the proposal that
had been made earlier in the evening by Polly Smith, the Phased Proposal, would
be included in Saturday's workshop.
Councilmember Thayer stated that if Bruce Ross's group which is strongly in
favor of the downtown site is going to have time to discuss their options, surely
Polly Smith's plan should have equal time. Councilmember Wolf explained that
the proposal being examined on Saturday had a very high level of detail in
planning and finance planning. The Polly Smith plan does not have that level of
detail yet.
Bruce Ross, El Centro West, Chairman of Committee who have put together
comparison of downtown option as compared and contrasted to the previous
proposition, Measure I. Information has been published about workshop; they
will follow agenda that is established; at conclusion of agenda, Polly and
whomever she wants to bring can bring can make a presentation. The most
important thing is reaching consensus and bringing some civility into this process.
The Mayor stated that using Measure I in a comparison will be helpful.
Kirk Hanson mentioned that this process began months ago when the Council
appointed Bruce Ross as head of the committee and asked for a timeline, certain
information on certain days and certain weeks, and at that time the Committee
told the Council that there would be a meeting on February 4 to discuss 2
11
different propositions, downtown and Measure I. A lot of effort has been put into
this process, and it seems to the committee that they have tried to answer as
accurately timely as possible.
Larry Smith, Owlswood Lane, noted that it's legitimate to compare everything to
Measure I because it's fIxed in space.
Nat Marans asked if Bruce Ross would respond to the writer of the letter in the
Ark and whether agreement had been reached about what could be produced on
Ned's Way. Bruce Ross responded by saying that Nick Ferrell, a prominent
structural engineer in San Francisco was preparing an answer to the letter in the
paper. The Mayor responded to the portion of the question about toxics by
suggesting the report that had been prepared for the new Library.
Mr. Ross was questioned about whether a buyer had made an offer on the 25
units at Ned's Way and he told the Council that no offer had been made; two
developers had been contacted, given a program developed by an ad hoc citizen's
group and thaUs where the number $1.4 million came from. Redevelopment
Agency issues would be included in conditions of sale determined by the Council.
Councilmember Nygren wanted to know if the Library site had been studied for
toxics and geology. Request made of Town Manager for Gene Miller's Soils
Engineering Report. She also asked whether School Board had given approval to
release easement.
Mr. Ross stated he had sent information requested to School Board and is
awaiting their reply. Councilmember Nygren wanted an answer about the school
board and Park Services parking issues which Mr. Ross could not respond to.
Responding to Councilmember Nygren's question of whether he was to guarantee
that this would be a no-cost proposal, Mr. Ross noted that this was a no-tax
proposal, not no-cost.
Polly Smith spoke about the need for compromise and to fInd a way to make it
work.
Bruce Ross' presentation began with an amended and updated pro forma and
explanation of the committee's process for reaching their recommendations. He
explained in detail the items included and how they were arrived at; then showed
a time line for financing, senior housing, town hall and police station. Funds to
be generated by sale of Ned's Way for senior housing; town can set pre-sale
zoning requirements by estimating the requirements for the property prior to
putting it for sale. Timeline would begin in June and estimate is for 1 year.
Essentially the developer and the Town become partners. Town Hall would take
a year to develop plans, 14 months for construction and the Police Building
construction would take a year. It will probably take 2 years for any plan. He
12
~
then briefly discussed parking.
Councilmember Nygren mentioned again the Park Systems intention to sue to
which Mr. Ross had no comment.
Councilmember Ginalski asked about negative declaration and was told that
detailed data is available depending upon what is requested. He questioned
whether information obtained from an EIR after a contract is made with a
developer could recommend a change in density. Mr. Ross explained that the
town would do an EIR up front to avoid that type of surprise. However if a
problem arises that no one foresaw, by mutual agreement the Town and the
developer could adjust the contract.
The Town Attorney explained that there are several contingencies included in
contract and what they are. Bruce Ross stated that every scenario will have
surprises but risk is inherent in everything.
Councilmember Nygren questioned whether the estimate was inclusive and Mr.
Ross stated it was and he explained in detail how figures were calculated.
Alan Littman stated that the entire real estate tax on the housing development
would probably go directly back to the town.
Joe Keller, Hillary Drive, commented that if the article in the Ark is correct, the
land being discussed is not safe. However, if one person on the Council tonight
would agree with the downtown plan, then the consensus is reached and
construction could begin.
Virginia Brunini thanked the people who put together the proposal and
information to be discussed at the workshop. She noted on their good will and
hard work.
Councilmember Nygren asked the Town Attorney if the Park Service sued, how
long would that tie up the project. Town Attorney said the question was too
speculative to answer. She stressed how important this issue was. She was told
the town cannot pre-zone without a negative declaration.
Council members discussed ballot proposal wording. Note was made that changes
were being made in concert with the Town Attorney. Decision was made to
continue discussion on Town Hall proposal on February 9..
COMMUNICATIONS
There were none.
9. Regulation of Leaf Blowers (Planning Commission Recommendation to
13
Town Council)
Council reviewed the Planning Commission recommendations; noted the Public
Works Departments concerns about prohibiting leaf blowers and the adverse
impact on their services. Several members of the Council were of the opinion
that this was not a major problem and the Town didn't need to regulate it at this
time. Consensus was Staff should review what some of the other cities have done
and return to Council with information and draft ordinance which does not
prohibit but regulates use of leaf blowers to certain hours.
10. fpresent Town Hall & Police Facilities Repairs (Review of Repair Costs
'-/ 3-95 and 1994-95)
The own Manager indicated this was informational only and no action required.
CONSENT CALENDAR.
#1041, Janual)l18, 1995 were continued to the next meeting.
Motion:
items:
To approve the Consent Calendar consisting of the following
!>
1. PROV AL OF MINUTES #1037, December 5, 1994; #1039, January 4,
1995; 1040, January 10, 1995
2. NVESTMENT SUMMARY REPORT (December 1994)
3. MARIN ACTS OF KINDNESS WEEK (February 12-17, 1995-
Resol ion)
4. MARIN COUNTY CABLE RATE REGULATIONS JPA (Confirm
Town' Representatives to JPA - Resolution)
Move
Vote:
5. SAN QUENTIN EXPANSION PROPOSAL (Recommend Opposing
Expansion Plans)
The Council noted in the past the Town has expressed its concerns about the
expansion of San Quentin and recommended additional public hearings. In
regard to the recent proposed San Quentin expansion program, Council did not
feel they had sufficient information and directed the matter be tabled at this
time.
New Town Hall Facilities (Continued)
Councilmembers Nygren and Ginalski asked for clarification of the Citizens
Ballot Initiatives Report.
14
Kitchell is analyzing the proposals and reviewing project costs. They anticipate
having their report and finding to the Council prior to the February 15 meeting.
CLOSED SESSION
Council adjourned to Closed Session at 11:50 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, etc. council adjourned at 12 Midnight to 7:00
p.m. February 9, 1995.
.
15
~
..~..~.~~.,~~:_~:~:'--~~:... .....
~c?..
". "'
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Dee Johnson
Depuly Counly Administrotor
"
, February I, 1995
, ,.7
. '.'
.
, Mr. Bob Kleinert
T 0\\11 Manager
TO\\1l ofTiburon
1155 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, CA 94920.
:-i
, '....,
Dear Bob:
Recently your council adopted the Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal Facility Element for Marin
County and Its Cities. This formal adoption by all the cities and the county is required prior to
submittal of the element to the California Integrated Waste Management Board.
Unfortunately in our haste in getting this information out to you, we neglected to publish the
required public notice 10 days in advance of your council's adoption. We initially thought that the
public agenda notification would be sufficient but the California Integrated Waste Management
Board's counsel is requiring that we stick to the 10 day notification.
I apologize for the inconvenience this may cause you. We will publish the attached public notice in
the Independent Journal on 2/2, 2/3, and 2/4. You will need to set this item as a public hearing at
your council meeting and readopt the resolution, at that time. Please send me a copy of the
resolution, following its adoption.
Once again thank you for your patience and understanding. If you have any further questions
please do not hesitate to contact me or Michael Frost at 499-6647.
10 N. San Pedro Rd., Suite 1022. San Mad, Ca 94903-4155. (415) 499-6647. (415) 499-6910 FAX
'.
~
,
.
~~~CC~il~[E[g
NOTICE OF COUNTY AND CITY PUBLIC HEARINGS f~e 2 1995
on the TOWN MANAGER'S OFFICE
MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL NON-DISPOSAL FACILlT'{OWN OF TIBURON
ELEMENT FOR MARIN COUNTY AND ITS CITIES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Marin County Board of Supervisors and each city council
in Marin County will hold a public hearing to consider the Final Draft of the "Multi-Jurisdictional
Non-Disposal Facility Element (NDFE) for Belvedere, Corte Madera, Fairfax, Larkspur, Mill
Valley, Novato, Ross, San Anselmo, San Rafael, Sausalito, Tiburon, and the Unincorporated Area
of Marin County".
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that each city and the Board of Supervisors will individually act
on the portions of the Element that apply to its jurisdiction.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that hearings will be scheduled during the regular meetings of the
City Councils and the Board of Supervisors on the following dates.
.
Jurisdiction
Belvedere
Fairfax
Mill Valley
Novato
Ross
San Anselmo
Tiburon
County
Date
3/6
2/13
3/6
2/28
3/8
2/14
2/15
3/14
Time
7:30 pm
8:00 pm
8:00 pm
7:00 pm
7:00 pm
8:00 pm
7:30 pm
9:30 am
Location
City Hall, 450 San Rafael Ave., Belvedere
Town Hall, 142 Bolinas Ave., Fairfax
City Hall, 26 Corte Madera Ave., Mill Valley
City Hall, 900 Sherman Ave., Novato
Town Hall, 31 Sir Frances Drake Blvd, Ross
Town Hall, 525 San Anselmo Ave., San Anselmo
Town Hall, 1157 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon
Board of Supervisors Chambers, 3501 Civic Center Dr.,
San Rafael
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that reference copies of the Element are available at
the Marin County Office of Waste Management, 10 North San Pedro Road, Suite 1022; San
Rafael, CA. For more information, call (415) 499-6647.
###
Please print this notice on 2/2, 2/3, and 2/4. Please send the bill to Marin County Office of Waste
Management, 10 North San Pedro Road, Suite 1022, San Rafael, CA 94903. If you have any
questions please call Michael Frost at 499-6647.
c:\frost\planning\ciwrnp\ndfe\pubntc. doc
I
,
~
;:
~
, ~
-........--. ~
......,..,.~_..,',.,... .......~.>-...
.~U;TY -;F~RI~ .\/"
!'~ . " '. .;'l
,rp00
,i
e
"..::
.;.,';.
'.,
.... ,"
~
.)",
, '
~
b,
WASTE MANAGEMENT
October 10, 1994
~~~~O\W~[Q)
DEe 2 2 1994
TOWN MANAGER'S OFFICE
TOWN OF TIBURON
Dee Johnson
Deputy County Adminislrolor
Mr. Bob Kleinert
Town Manager
Town ofTiburon i
1155 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, CA 94920
,",:
Re: The Final Draft of the Non-Disposal Facility Element - Request for Council '
Adoption
Dear Bob:
,
': .,
':!
"
In 1992 AB 3001 amended AB 939 to include a more complete description of the
nondisposal facilities that each jurisdiction will utilize to reach their diversion mandates. '
AB 3001 requires each city, town, and county to prepare and adopt Non-Disposal Facility"
Elements which describe the non-disDosal facilities an agency will use to comply with the
Integrated Waste Management Act.
At the September 26, 1994, meeting of the AB939 Local Task Force, the Final Draft
Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal Facility Element was adopted and requested to be
forwarded to the cities, towns, and county for adoption. This final draft has preliminary
approval from the California Integrated Waste Management Board. However, it is .
required that each city, town, and the county adopt the Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal
Facility Element, before the California Integrated Waste Management Board will give us
final approval. '
"". ~.
,
, ,',.. ,~:
:'-'
'..,' ~ ,,~
,: ~ ~
C',""
",:-- .'
As a result of the recent reorganization of the Local Task Force and the formative
organization of the Marin County Hazardous and Solid Waste Joint Powers Authority, the
Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal Facility Element is behind schedule in submittal to the
California Integrated Waste Management Board.
'-;....
, "~ .
..'\ .,
,,'
10 N. San Pedro Rd., Suite 1022. San Rafael, Ca 94903-4155. (415) 499-6647. (415) 499-6910 FAX
,.' 1.<' "\...'
," '. ,~~ .
; , ~,
@
., .
\
.~)
.
,
.-'
,.'
Enclosed is the Final Draft Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal Facility Element and a draft
resolution for your use in adopting the Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal Facility Element,
Over the next several days we will be in contact with you to provide any assistance you
may need with this item. Either myself or Michael Frost, our waste management planner,
will be available to attend your council meeting and make a brief presentation of the
element, if you desire.
It is important that this Non-Disposal Facility Element, now adopted by the Local Task
Force, move along as rapidly as possible through the city, town, and county adoption
process.
.,
......,..
'c' . . ~.....
If you have any questions, or if I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact .
me or Michael at 499-6647. Thanks, as always, for your assistance.
,.'
-',.' \'
<1>:;:"';,~. .
::~:~/t~:\,;,> .
"'~'~~;i<
;:.:i....',..
~::;-l:.~(' .
',. ':~.': _ ,! ~::-:~t~,',,:."..
.' :. ;.:,..:.~~;- .~
.:..."
.>.~.
.;',
DJ/mf
".:
l .
'.
"...'
".'<
.,..'.f,
", ',;' ~ ...
...
'"."
<.
. ','
[I
RESOLUTION NO. ~
A RESOLUTION OF lHE TOWN COUNCIL OF lHE
TOWN OF TIBURON ADOPTING lHE MULTI-
JURISDICTIONAL NON-DISPOSAL FACILITY
ELEMENT FOR MARIN COUNTY AND ITS CITIES
. . WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (Act)
requires each city to prepare, adopt and submit to the county in which it is located,
a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous
Waste Element (HHWE) (Public Resources Code Sections 41000 and 41500); and
WHEREAS, in 1992, the California legislature enacted Assembly Bill 3001
which amended the Act to require each city to prepare, adopt and submit to the
county in which it is located, a Non-Disposal Facility element (NDFE)1 and
... .
WHEREAS, each city council in Marin County, including this city council,
sanitary district and the County Board of Supervisors entered into a Joint Powers
Agreement in 1993 to jointly prepare, administer, and implement the Marin County
Multi-Jurisdictional Integrated Waste management Plan, and
[
WHEREAS, the attached Final Draft ofthe Multi-Jurisdictional Non-Disposal
Facility element for Marin County and its cities was adopted by the AB939 Local
Task Force at their meeting on September 26, 1994.
NOW, lHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Council of the
Town of Tiburon hereby:
(1) Adopts the section of the Final Multi-jurisdictional Non-Disposal
Facility Element for Belvedere, Corte Madera, Fairfax, Larkspur, Mill
Valley, Novato, Ross, San Anselmo, San Rafael, Sausalito, Tiburon
and the unincorporated area of Marin County that are applicable to
this Town; and
(2) Authorizes submittal of these adopted Elements to the California
Integrated Waste Management Board.
Li
~.
.,
r
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the
Town of Tiburon on JanuaI)' 4. 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: Ginalski, Thayer, Nygren,
Wolf, Thompson
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ANDREW TIlOMPSON, MAYOR
Town of Tiburon
ATTEST:
H
=rtMM '&4. ~'~
TIlERESE M. ENNESSY, T CLERK
l
[
.'
~~
I'
TOWN COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
TO:
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: 2/15/95
ITEM NO.: '3
FROM:
IRENE BORBA,
ASSISTANT PLANNER
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR AN IRRIGATION WELL AT
600 RIDGE ROAD
**********************************.*************-***********************
BACKGROUND
Address:
Assessor's Parcel:
File Nwnber:
General Plan:
Zoning:
Current Use:
Owner:
Date Complete:
CEQA Exemption:
Permit Streamlining Act
600 Ridge Road
59-023-19
W95-00
M (Medium Density Residential)
RO-2 (Residential Open Zone)
Single Family Residence
Bruce Breitman
January 26, 1995
February 6, 1995
Deadline: May 6, 1995
PROPOSAL
The Town has received a request for approval of an irrigation well at
600 Ridge Road. The proposed depth of the well is 200' - 300'.
ANALYSIS
The drilling of wells in Tiburon is regulated by Chapter 13F of the
Municipal Code. Section 13F-5 lists several findings and conditions
which are applied to the approval of a well permit. As conditioned,
this application would meet all the required findings.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution approving the well.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is categorically exempt from the prOV1S1ons of the
California Environmental Quality Act as specified in Section 15303(d),
Class 3.
EXHIBITS
1. Resolution.
2. Well Permit Application.
3. Letter from MMWD, dated January 17, 1995.
4. Engineers Report, dated January 11, 1995.
5. Plot Plan.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF
THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING THE DRILLING OF A WELL FOR
IRRIGATION PURPOSES AT 600 RIDGE ROAD
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 059-023-19
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows:
Section 1.
Findin~s.
A. An application for drilling of an irrigation water well has been submitted by
the property owner of 600 Ridge Road:
B. The Town Council has reviewed the application and determined that the
project is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 13F of the Municipal
Code concerning water wells and is consistent with the Tiburon General Plan.
C. The Town Council has determined that the project is categorically exempt
from the requirements of CEQA per Section 15303(d) of the CEQA
Guidelines.
D. The Town Council finds that the project, as conditioned, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare nor injurious to
other properties in the vicinity.
E. The Town Council finds that the owner has provided a written report from
a registered civil engineer stating that the water well is unlikely to produce
harmful impacts on neighboring properties or result in subsidence.
Section 2.
ADDroval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council approves the
application for an irrigation water well at 600 Ridge Road subject to the following
conditions.
1. The well shall meet all applicable well standards adopted by Chapter 7.28 of
the Marin County Code, as may be amended from time to time, and any other
regulations adopted by the County pursuant thereto.
('(1-11 BIT
I
2. The well shall meet all applicable requirements of the Marin Municipal
Water District.
3. Hours of well drilling and any associated construction work shall be limited
to 7:30 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.
on Saturday.
4. Site Plan and Architectural Review approval shall be required for any
structures associated with the well, such as water storage containers, which
require such approval.
5. That landscaping be used to cover up any part of the well which will be
visible.
6. This approval may be suspended or revoked for just cause, pursuant to
Section 13F-6 of the Tiburon Municipal Code.
7. This approval shall expire and become null and void six months after
Council approval. One extension of up to six months may be granted by the
Town Manager for good cause.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the
Town of Tiburon on February 15, 1995, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNClLMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ANDREW THOMPSON, MAYOR
Town of Tiburon
ATIEST:
ROBERT L. KLEINERT, ACTING TOWN CLERK
FOR STAFF USE
DATE RECEIVED: Jj7/~S"
RECEIVED BY: Lb.,
FEES RECEIVED' Z"i"
RECEIPT #:
#:
TOWN OF TIBURON
APPLICATION FOR WELL PERMIT
1.
2.
60tJ k7b&t I&I'7-D
Stf-b23 - /'1
e R<.l.LE /Y. g~F""r-'r~
6DO a"D6~ !<.d.
(f..s C""-4-S0b
~~~~~~~.,
c M~J7'6jtJ
~/)r=~'Telf? /Wtt"ti- C'l\.l5r"'~~ /~.
n CJ)tX>(JlA-01~ A-<le. JMI</tMf;L m~1
<f-/s/~~-,+??t)
I
Site Address:
Assessors Parcel No.:
3.
Property OWner:
Name
Address
Phone
4.
Applicant: fM C
(other than owner)
Name
Address
Phone
5.
Well Driller:
Name
Address
Phone
.
6.
Proposed Use of Well:
/RfCl~I1I/tJN WeLt..-
7.
2.00'- x>o /
Proposed Depth of Well:
Submittal Requirements for IRRIGATION WELL:
A) Application accompanied by filing fee.
B) Report prepared by geologist, hydrologist or other
qualified person regarding possible effects, if any, on
adjoining properties.
C) Plot Plan (2 full sets and 8 reduced copies 11 "x 17")
Plot plan must show show location of proposed well and
the following items within a IOO-foot radius: property
lines, major structures, sewage disposal systems, all
intern it tent or perennial natural or artifical water
bodies of water courses, the general drainage pattern
and exisitng wells.
D) A letter of approval from Marin Municipal Water District.
E) Copy of license from contractor who will be performing
the work plus verification or their Workers
Compensation Certificate.
Submittal Requirements for POTABLE WATER WELL:
All of the requirements listed above plus:
F) A letter of approval from the appropriate Fire District.
TOWN OF TlBURON
D;:PARTME~~e<WMUNlTY
- nC\Da~!;:"T
\ DE;'
:::rtfyf/. I
JAN 1 8 1995
EXHIBIT NO. 1-
~~,.. .' ':....~.,..:": ..-
1
JHN-. -~~ ut .~,UO
n fl W U nti;N ur~
r 111, tic!. 4. ~~G '4:jO.j
c, u:
~ l\iAIuN Ml'N!CIPAL
~ WATER DISTRICT
!;.C Nellen ,~')elilJ~
f: C Bex 994
Co", ~oct"".l;' 94916.0994
4;;.;24.4600
FA\ 415.921495)
January 17, 1995
File No 201.0
Mr. Bruce M. Breitman
600 Ridge Road
Tiburon, CA 94920
Re: Proposed Auxiliary Water Source Review
AP. No. 059-042-08
RECEIVED
JAN 1 7 1995
TOWN OF TIBURON
PLANNING & BUILDING DEPT.
Dear Mr. Breitman:
Tne District acknowledges receipt of information regarding the proposed auxiliary water
source planned at the subject property,
Your attention is directed to the following conditions. exceptions and requirements'
.
~ Backflow protection must be installed at all domestic water services to this property
as mandated by Title 17, California Administrative Code. The backflow assembly
must be tested by a certified tester upon installation. Results of such test shall be
forwarded to the Backflow Section et Marin Municipal Water District.
If the auxiliary water Source he'ein referenced is intended as the potable water
supply to the subject property and a water service is not arranged for, MMWD is
under no obligation to proVide such service should your auxiliary source diminish in
water quality or cease to produce,
-L Auxiliary water sources must not be used to serve any property other than that
property on which the auxiliary source is located,
Information is insufficient. Please resubmit with additional Information as noted.
-L Your request to develop an auxiliary water source on the subject property is
acceptable to MMWD as noted.
~ Applicants are responsible for contacting their local Building Departments regarding
additional requirements or permits.
_.x.... State law requires any person developing an auxiliary water source to file a report
with the County Health offlcor. ____.n
TOWN OFi\BCOUR~~UNtN
: RiMENl" OF
'\DEPf>i DEVELOPMENT
1 B 1995
All E.Jllll~J-~JiI1'Ut'llAfflT'tMnW; :\c:'JO:'. E~"lo'J
RECEiVED
DE.sr;~\'-\ qe:\1\FW
Post.lt'" brand fax transmlttal memo 7&"1 lofpage, to
F~ll .- ,(
r" (\..,. "'.' rei
~"-'11 cor {;! ro f';I\ ,IV". '.....i t
pl..... ~f
t"'la.......\o"'\i....... IS qZ~-LJ.1000)f.2..4
.~.. 4- -- Zlf-JS ~i;- ~ 2 -~9-S:3
EXHIBIT NO...a.
~
JAN-. '-8~JE :2:06
M M W D MA,N ore
FAX NO. 4:59274953
P. 02
Mr. Bruce M. Breitman
January 17, 1995
Page 2
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, I can be contacted at 924-4600.
extension 243.
Very tnJly yourli,
r~l~
Kenneth F. Feil
Senior Engineering Aide
KFjs (E:Fl:PropAux)
cc: Irene T. Borba
Town of Tiburon
1155 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
I
FQI~E~
PUMP &
Ell4illEEI'Ilint inc.
WalE:!' SystEIllS. WElls' Tanks. D,'aina!!:(
January 11, 1995
Town of Tiburon
1155 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
Attention: Town Clerk
Re: Application to drill a water well for irrigation only at
600 Ridge Rd., Tiburon
To whom it may concern,
We prop~se to drill a water well 200'-300' deep at this
location. Our review of the geologic map for Marin County shows
that the predominant rock formations in this area are serpintine,
chert and greenstone. These formations are of sufficient strength
to support a drilled water well without having subsidence to
adjoining properties caused by pumping of the groundwater. We
have been drilling and maintaining water wells in Marin County
for eighteen years and have not seen any cases where a drilled
water well in this type of rock has had any effect on neighboring
properties. It is expected that the proposed well will yield
approx. 1-5 gallons per minute based on records for nearby wells.
In our opinion the proposed well will have no impact on
adjoining properties.
Sincerely,
FORSTER PUMP & ENGINEERING, INC.
--
L-A-
----'
Roy Forster
Engineering Dept.
TOWN OF T!6U'K'"
I DEPARTMENT OF [;"",::
nJ:'I,Ir;:' --
.
JAN 1 E
IT NO.
iI
56 Woodland AY~. San Rafad, Ca. 9q901 (q151 Q59-Q770
Lie. 1'12 Q26152
~
I
,
i
,
!
I
-.~
!~
~.f'
I",~
"
f
""-
""- "'
",,~"N'l, I/-s, ~
""- ~,. '?~
~. 'll,
...... "",;...~
, ......" '"
""-
""-
""-
.ill ~ ','
\: \ €:
t\ It
1I1
I~ Ii.. '
'~ 0....
11 "
,-"':"'____-----1
. \
~
11\ i
...
li J
'.. ~
;\ ~
~- i'
\ --.. ~
, ' .
::t ..
r @
,-I'
~ ~
,-
I- e f \
- ,~
~ 't'
('
-"~
J~
Ii<
It
J
~ I
~ I
J
! I
/
z Iii:
UI II
...
!! / : I
1: 1
.. '
1/
""."
"
a
~
-
fI
.
41\
Jt
J
o
II
~
"0
:c
0 l~,
C>
~l z:
.. rr-.
!ll! cr.
.:.1 CF;
.. "i:i
~9
:Ii :x,1
-.
z:
h ...
ui
~~
,__ ,41."1'
.
.
1111! I'LAII
~
I ~ ..
.~! ~l
,I, :
t :l
r-61
J
J
- JllDQI ~
IADOITIOM a RE
MR:. MOOEL 'OR
TONY La RUFFA
~OA.
E!1
$ .
.-
$
~~ i
;\. t
B
,
I~
l
J
..:
$
~+'
-i-Col-o'
~
"'-
,-
f'_:" t l;V
~ ~ ~,'
,..., ~ "";t .i"
j. r; ~\ !~~
1;;1 ... t ~
]_ Ii' ,~
~~ - s'-
r
..
'"
.
.-
~ @
-
~
~
r
~
~
~
It"
f
\
I
i
\
\
\
c
1_
--i;-'-~--l:::--""-
_ ~__~ i _--r- \
---->t . '\
ij J ... ' ~T.~''''''''
% ," ~l
l' ,t.~
" ':::i,"3-
"i-~,iI
;...
(,....,....
~.~.
~\
i \
i \
I
,
,
I
I
_......-
,. ~""P
.."-;11
"~"II
!1 jjj1 ~~~ ~~l!
. :; i1 ts J l' ~
, ~ ~!~ -'(
. t ) H
J Jo '"tIl
+ I" ;: --
~ . ..
iii ~.. I
. _ pop _ IIoJ,
~I"'''' ''''1''0 ...t
,,:~I~t::~!~
I: :; 1:)< I.,
.:. ;.;. t !'
,:'-1-1 I ~
~
@
~
, J
-.If'" ~
!...~- \
..",
l~k
j
I,
~."3;
-- i
r ~
~ ~
5 Ii
.-.. i
~ ,
J: ""
;;' ~
i i
s........
,
~ I
~
.- I
~
.
<
ILlE fS~I' ~R
<>45, Fou rln SC"lTECT/AIA
Sonlo 11050 I. Suilq 211
(107) 575 .99'9c50'ito r n,o
...,' ,95404
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF TIBURON OPPOSING THE PROPOSED MERGER
OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BA Y CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION (BCDC) INTO OTHER STATE AGENCIES
WHEREAS, The Governor's budget for fiscal year 1995-96 proposes to abolish the San
Francisco Bay Conservation Development Commission and transfer its Staff and duties to the
California Coastal Commission and Regional Water Quality Control Board; and
WHEREAS, since its creation the San Francisco Bay Conservation Development
Commission has been widely acknowledged and praised for its continued successful efforts to
balance the conservation of the Bay's natural resources with economic development; and
WHEREAS, The Bay Conservation Development Commission has very efficiently
performed its State mandated duties and responsibilities since its inception and continues to serve
the public in an effectiwe, responsible and professional manner; and
WHEREAS, eliminating the Bay Conservation Development Commission and transferring
its duties to the California Coastal Commission and Regional Water Quality Control Board would
result in increased permit costs, reduced local representation in the Bay decision making process,
and provide little if any costs savings.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon
does hereby urge Governor Wilson to withdraw the proposal to merge the San Francisco Bay
Conservation and Development Commission with the California Coastal Commission and/or the
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does
request the State Legislature not to approve any such measure.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon on February IS. 1995, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ANDREW THOMPSON, MAYOR
TOWN OF TIBURON
TOWN OF TIBURON
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO:
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING: FEBRUARY IS, 1995
ITEM NO: 5
FROM:
FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TOWN ADMINISTRATIVE COMPUTER PROGRAM
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PROPOSED INST ALLA TION OF NETWORK
Background:
This item is for acceptance of a proposal to install a computer network in the Town
Administration Building, which will serve the Administration, Planning, Design Review and
Building Inspection Departments.
General Discussion:
Staff is recommending the installation of a computer network in the Administration Building to
replace the existing computer system. Primary purposes for the installation of a PC-Network in
the Administration Building include:
(1) Replacement of aging and deteriorating personal computers with equipment, software and
a system which will enable the Town and Staff to function in a modem computing environment.
The current system is a mixture offfiM-type PC 286 and 386 equipment, purchased in the period
1987-1991, are equipped with 30-40 megabytes of hard disk storage, and are setup with different
DOS operating system versions.
(2) To provide Staff with a standard or basic computing environment in which general tasks,
such as word processing or data organization may be accomplished.
Most workstation computers have WordPerfect as their word processor, however there are two
different versions of this software in use. The Finance Director's PC is a 486-type with Windows
and DOS operating environments, as well as a different word processor (Microsoft Works) from
all others. Two (2) stations are setup with spreadsheet programs (Lotus 123), however the
versions are different- DOS and Windows.
The proposed network would provide (serve) two general applications to Staff - WordPerfect and
Lotus 123. Although at this time spreadsheets are utilized by the Finance Department only, with
Network Proposal
Page 1
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
availability the Planning, Design Review, and Building Inspection Departments would make use of
the application.
Updates to software are easily obtained, loaded, and provided to all users at the same time, in
contrast to the current process ofloading the software updates at each computer workstation.
(3) To provide Staff with the ability to easily share or transfer information within a
Department or with employees of other Departments.
At this time, because of the lack of standardization in the operating system versions and word
processing versions it is often a problem for a Staff member to provide to another Staff person a
diskette with information that is readily transferred or easily used by that person.
Network advantages may be realized in a number of areas which may include: electronic transfer
of Staff reports to the Town Clerk for assembly of Agenda Packets, transfer of Staff-produced
resolutions and ordinances to the Town Clerk for final publication, electronic circulation of those
reports and documents which require the comment/input of others.
.
(4) To provide Staff with a base from which software applications may added to meet specific
needs - such as Building Inspection Permit Tracking, Land Use Database Information, Geo-
Mapping, etc. - and this information may easily be made available to Staff where there is a need.
In making information more freely available Staff will more efficiently use resources, and reduce
interruptions and delays involved with obtaining information which is maintained by one person at
one station.
(5) To provide the Town the ability to systematically and centrally preserve information
produced - correspondence, memoranda, reports, resolutions, ordinances, etc. through regular
automated data back-up(s) .
At this time information is backed-up by individual Staff members on a periodic basis. The current
process is time-consuming as many diskettes may be needed to back-up 5, 10, 15 or 20
megabytes of information. A centralized, automated process would better serve Town needs.
Network Proposals:
Staff requested cost proposals from four (4) firms - for the general purpose of installing a network
with twelve (12) personal computing workstations and serving two (2) general applications. The
PC workstations would be connected to a File Server which included automated data back-up
equipment The firms were asked to bid hardware and software costs, the cost to provide training
and orientation for Staff., and was specifically directed to bid the cost of a Compaq, Hewlett-
Packard or ffiM File Server.
Network Proposal
Page 2
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
The Companies and their respective cost proposal bids are provided below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
PCS Networks
L YC Electronics
CSI
Sausalito Networking
not submitted
$ 52,773
$ 61,282
$ 40,215
Each firm bid workstation equipment, although the Town may elect to purchase other appropriate
workstation equipment at lower costs. The CSI proposal included higher per unit workstation
costs as well as relatively higher labor and training costs. The CSI bid could be adjusted
downward by nearly $8,000 if PC workstation costs are lowered. The L YC bid could also be
adjusted downward by $4,000 if workstation costs are reduced.
The Town may realize further cost savings if ten (10) workstations are networked, and if two (2)
fewer PC workstations were purchased (10 rather than 12). Project cost savings could be in the
amount of$2,800. The project may well be undertaken for between $37,000 and $38,000.
"
Recommendations:
1. Accept the bid of Sausalito Networking to install a computer network in the
Administration Building, incorporating any further changes to reduce contract costs.
2. Authorize appropriation up to $40,215 for this project, with the understanding that the
final appropriation amount will incorporate changes to reduce costs.
Exhibits:
1. Bid of Sausalito Networking, Inc., dated 2/6/95
Network Proposal
Page 3
I
I
I
~.
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
1
I.
I
..
~
~
Sausalito Networking, Inc.
I... .1..
. .,
Local Area Network Installations' LAN Design, Upgrades. Maintenance' Network Trouble Shooting
Technical Support. DOS. Windows. OS/2, Applications' Computer Services
Proposal for Local Area Network Installation
I
for the
Town of Tiburon
February 6, 1995
EXHIBIT NO. I.
30 Hotaling Place. Suite 201
12 Kendell Court
San Francisco, CA 941 I I
Sausalito. CA 94965
1415) 398-7620. Fax 1415) 398-5569
(415) 332-6221, Fax (415) 332-2376
I
I
I
Executive Summary
I
I
We propose to install a NetWare 4.1 file server on a Compaq Prosignia VS 486DX2I66
computer, provide word-processing, Spreadsheet and Fax applications for use by 12 PCs.
We propose to install industry standard lOBaseT, Category 5, Unshielded Twisted Pair
cable system for your network.
I
The hardware costs are approximately $23,005. The software costs are approximately
$8,309. The cable costs are approximately $1,361 including cable, parts and installation.
The services (labor) costs are from a low of $2,990 to a high of $5,980. The services costs
vary with the amount of unforeseen situations that may arise. We anticipate completing the
project at or near the low service cost. If you elect to have training from us with 3 half-day
classes, the training costs are approximately $780 to $1,560. This brings the project costs
to a low of about $36,445 to a high of about $40,215 plus tax and shipping, where
applicable. I
I
I
I
Requirements
I
The Town ofTiburon wishes to install a Local Area Network in the Town Hall building,
connecting 12 PCs and a file server. There are several printers that the Town Hall plans to
use by connecting them locally to PCs via printer sharing devices. In addition, the Town
Hall wishes to install 12 new PCs and provide them with a Windows desktop with word-
processing and spreadsheet capability. In addition, the network at Town Hall should be able
to adapt to a UNIX or similar system if it is added in the future and also to communicate
easily with the network at the Police Department if the decision to make that connection is
made.
I
,
I
Our Approach
I
Our Electrical Engineer inspected the 1st and 2nd floors of the Town Hall on January 31 for
the network cable installation. We propose to install industry standard, high quality (100
Megabit per second spec.) cabling for Ethernet - 10BaseT, Category 5 Unshielded Twisted
Pair cable. We propose to originate the cable from the telephone wiring area on the 1st floor
and route it to each of the locations on the 1st and 2nd floor either along the baseboard or in
the wooden conduit. The installation will be neat and professional. We will install Category
5 (100 MBitslSec) surface-mount jacks or cable connectors at the user's desk area.
,
~
il
We propose to install a file server running Novell N etW are version 4.1 to support 25 users.
NetWare 4.1 is the latest file server software from Novell based on their previous 4.02
software which has been on the market for several years.
I
1
If you prefer to install the previous Novell Version 3.12, we will install that at the exact
same cost.
4
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
We will install and setup all hardware and software necessary to communicate on your
Local Area Network. We will install applications software on each PC based on an "ideal"
client PC which we will build and then copy its file to the file server for distribution to the
other workstations. This reduces time and helps assure a consistent setup This software
includes word-processing and spreadsheet.
We offer two types of training each of which can be selected in any combination of each. We
can provide a group training session of a series of half-day classes on Windows, the word-
processing program, the spreadsheet program. In addition, we can provide personal
training for one, two or three individuals at our normal hourly rate of $65 per hour. The
personal training is often more effective as users who know one product can attend the
training they need and can skip the training they don't need. In addition, users can ask
questions based on their specific job rather than hear a generalized training.
In addition, you should consider classes offered at the College of Marin. These classes cost
very little and provide excellent instruction. One idea is to have the staff attend Windows
and word-processing classes at College of Marin and have our company provide
individualized training as you feel it is required. This would be the most cost effective
training method. I
Recommendations
1. For the File Server, use the Compaq Prosignia VS.
2.
For the desktop software, use the Microsoft; Office Suite.
3.
Include electronic mail in your network.
4.
Run a cable from Town Hall File Server to the Police Department File Server. No
need to connect it now.
5.
For training, attend classes at College of Marin and also have us provide one-on-one
training at the user's desk.
6.
Consider post-installation support. We offer it at a per incident rate of$50. Ifwe
need to come on-site, we charge our normal rate of$65ihr. Ifa call to Novell is
necessary (for a software bug, for example), we can make this for you and you will be
charged half the normal Novell charge. ($100 versus $200).
7.
Elect one of your staff to be the Network Administrator and let us train her/him on
some aspects of networks - such as adding users and providing security.
8.
Consider getting an American On-line account (about $10 a month) to give yourself
e-mail access to us and to give yourself access to the Internet and an Internet ill.
9.
You might consider installing a redundant hard disk and hard disk controller in
your File Server. This allows you to "duplex" (i.e. duplicate) all of your data. Ifa
disk failure occurs, you will not lose any data or down time. Without the duplexed
setup, a disk failure can lose data. It can require a complete system re-build so you
5
I
I
I
have a new system to restore your tape to. With no system, the tape cannot restore.
We recommend all our clients duplex their data.
10.
We recommend you use Windows for Workgroups in lieu of Windows. This is the
same as Windows, but faster and with some other features such as a complete
scheduling program and some peer-to-peer and e-mail functions which are quite
useful. The cost difference is minimal.
I
J
Comments
I
We include herein the bid for your specific hardware and software as indicated on your spec
sheet - Appendix A. We offer the suggestion that in lieu of WordPerfect for Windows and
Lotus for Windows, you consider the Microsoft Office Suite which we priced out in Appendix
B.
I
I
This software Package includes:
1. a word-processer - Word for Windows (very much similar to WordPerfect for
Windows),
2. a spreadsheet - Excel (similar to Lotus for Window),
3. a presentation program - PowerPoint,
4. an electronic mail license,
5. and (optionally) a powerful and easy to use data base program - Access.
I
.
I
The price of this software package is similar to the price for just WordPerfect and Lotus. In
addition, the Microsoft Office Suite integrates smoothly in both the file server and at the
workstations since all the product is from the same vendor - Microsoft. Whichever package
you chose makes no difference to us, but we feel the Microsoft package offers more
functions, works better, and is more cost effective.
I
This document and the spreadsheets were composed using the Microsoft products. The
prices in the Executive Summary are "hot linked" to the appropriate places in the Totals
spreadsheet. Changes in the spreadsheet are transferred in the Executive Summary
document. This is probably not possible with WordPerfect and Lotus.
il
I
In addition, we have also included pricing for a lower priced file server from a local company
called illQ in San Rafael. We have installed their product in locations in the Bay area with
good results. While we prefer the Compaq for quality and reliability, the illQ hardware cost
less than the Compaq. This is included in Appendix C.
I
I
Assumptions
I
1. We have included hardware which will meet or exceed your requirements.
However, you should note that we do NOT mark up PC hardware at all. In addition,
we recommend you purchase from wherever you get the best hardware prices,
assuming the quality and warranty are satisfactory to you. Weare happy to act as
your liaison if you decide to purchase hardware from another vender.
I
I
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.
You will arrange to have a phone line installed for the Fax server. The Fax server is
actually one of your 12 desktop PCs, not the file server. The phone line should be
near the desk of the person who will have the modem for the Fax server.
3.
The printers will not be LAN connected, but will be attached to local PCs via printer
. sharing devices. You have or will purchase the cables necessary for these devices..
4.
You will acquire a DatalFax modem for the Fax server, preferably an external
14,400 version. We can assist you with that if you like.
5.
You will either pay for the hardware and software directly or if we purchase it on
your behalf, you will provide us with a check covering the total cost prior to
purchase.
6.
Prior to cable installation, you will provide us a check for half of the cabling costs to
allow us to purchase material. The balance of the cabling costs will be billed upon
completion of the cabling.
7.
For services, we will bill on the 15th and 30th of the month with payment expected
within 30 days:
Cabling Plan
Our electrical engineer will install the industry certified lOBaseT Category 5 Unshielded
Twisted Pair cable. He will also install Category 5 surface mount jacks. These look like the
jack you plug your phone into. We will also provide "patch cables' which go from the wall
jacks to the computer. These cables will be either 7 or 14 feet as needed to reach the
computer.
Hardware
We are supplying two hardware quotes: Compaq and illQ - a locally produced computer.
For the File Server we recommend a 486DX2/66 Mhz computer (A Pentium is not necessary
for your sytem, even if you had 40 users on the network) with a 1 Gigabyte (= 1,000
Megabytes) of hard disk. We recommend 16 Megabytes of RAM (32 Megabytes is not
necessary for your LAN. Most of your work will be on your desk as you do word-processing
and spreadsheets, the file server will NOT be computing, the desk PCs will be) and a fast
Ethernet adapter.
As per the discussion with Richard, we feel that a Pentium processor is overkill. On a file
server, the majority of the processing is providing files to users. The actual processing of
data is done on the user's desktop. If you have large spreadsheets, you would do better to
put a Pentium processor in your desktop computer as the File Server just won't use it
effectively.
7
I
I
We recommend the Compaq Prosignia VS for your Network. This computer is desiPned to
be a file server and is lllltjust another 486 computer with File Server software on it. This
means that it is optimized for network performance and reliability. In addition, we are
including a three year on-site warranty which is an upgrade from the regular three year
carry-in warranty. We feel this is the best hardware for your File Server. However, as the
price quote will show, it is more expensive that clone computers.
I
I
I
We are also supplying pricing on a IDQ 486 computer suitable for a File Server. This
computer is made locally. We have installed two of these computers as file servers recently
(one is at the College of Marin computer lab where it gets a working over) and have been
satisfied with their performance. They cost considerably less and have a one-year parts and
labor and two year labor-only warranty. This would be your lowest cost File Server.
I
Our philosophy on File Server Hardware is to have it as reliable as possible so that it will
never be an issue for you or for us. In that light, the warranty and brand name reputation
is often the deciding factor. We favor the Compaq. We are strictly providing you quotes on
hardware and do not mark up the suppliers prices.
I
I
.
Software
I
For the File Server we recommend N etW are 4.1 software. This software is the latest from
Novell and provides features not found on their version 3.12 version, which is the same
price.
I
I
On the desktop, we have priced out WordPerfect for Windows and Lotus for Windows.
However, we recommend you consider looking at the Microsoft Office Suite. This software
package includes a word-processor (Word for Windows), a spreadsheet (Excel), presentation
software (PowerPoint) and a license for e-mail (Microsoft Mail). In addition, the
'professional" Suite also includes an easy to use and powerful data base (Microsoft Access).
I
These products are all from the same vendor (Microsoft) and work very smoothly together.
They are recommended over using a Windows Version of Word Perfect and Lotus 123 due to
their ease of use both on the desktop and on the network. All the Microsoft products allow
smooth installation and use via the network. This is not always the case with other
.
I
As you are aware, the Windows version of WordPerfect is nothing like the DOS version. In
any case, the Microsoft Word for Windows has a WordPerfect help facility to assist the
transition to the Windows environment including a demo.
I
I
I
I
J
8
I
I
II
Tr . .
,unlng
I
We propose several options for training. Any or all may be selected in any combination
which suits your needs and budget.
I
College of Marin - Attending classes at the College of Marin is the lowest cost to you and
the method which causes you the least disruption at work. The college has classes on
Windows, word-processing, spreadsheets. If you elect this option, we can put you in
touch with the folks at College of Marin, but then we bow out of the picture as you would be
dealing directly with the College. There is, of course, no charge to connect you up with the
College of Marin folks.
.
.
Classroom Training - We can offer classroom training for your staff. We recommend not
more than half a day at a time. Depending on the level of detail you wish, we can offer
classes in Windows, Word-processing, Spreadsheets and e-mail. As we have no classroom
facility at our location: we would refer to use a conference room at your location and bring in
three or four of your computers.
.
I
Personal Training. We especially like to offer and do one-on-one or one-on-two training.
This method allows us to move at the rate of the individual student and to cater to the
student's particular needs.
I
Our Recommendation - Have those Town Hall staff members who are not yet familiar
with Windows, word-processing on Windows, spreadsheet on Windows either take a College
of Marin class or our half-day classroom training. Then have us contact each individual for
a 1 to 3 hour training session at her or his desk.
I
I
Optional Hardware and Software
I
1.
Anti-Virus Software
I
Open Items
(
I
1.
2.
3.
4.
Whether to install an e-mail program or not.
Whether to include a data base program or not.
Remote E-Mail from home or another location.
Cabling the town hall LAN to the Police Department LAN.
(
1
I
9
Disclaimer
The hardware and software prices in this proposal are based on the quotes from our
suppliers. They are in effect for 30 days as we have no control over the suppliers' costs.
However, usually hardware prices tend to decrease, the software prices may go up or down.
The service prices are under our control and remain in effect for 60 days.
Cost Breakdown
Appendix A - Costs per your spec sheet.
Appendix B - Costs based on the Microsoft Office Suite Software, with and without the
Access data base.
Appendix C - Cost of the illQ PC as a possible File Server.
10
I
Totals
I
Item Low Hi!lh
Item Costs Total Total
Hardware
Rle Server Hardware 6,182
12 Workstations 16,823 $23,005 $23,005
Software
File Server Software 2,922
Workstation Software 5,387 $8,309 $8,309
Network
Cablin!l 1,140
Hub 221 $1,361 $1,361
Labor
Services 2,990 $2,990 $5,980
Training and Orientation 780 $780 $1,560
"
------- -------
------- -------
Total (Before tax and shiooina, ~ any) $36,445 $40,215
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 1
Appendix A (Spec. Version)
i
i
~
I
I
.
.
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
)
Hardware
Item Nr. Item Qty Cost Ext.
1 Compaq Prosignia VS File Server 1 3,858 3,858
Includes the fOllowing:
1.05 GioabVle Hard Disk
16 Megabytes of RAM
Hioh Soeed Ethernet Adapter
2 32 bn Fast SCSI-2 Controller 1 395 395
314' Color Monitor 1 280 280
4 HP Jetstore 50001lnl. 2-5GB DAT Taoe Drive Subsystem 1 1,208 1,208
5 American Power SmartUPS 600 1 366 366
6 PowerChute Software for UPS 1 75 75
Rle Server Hardware Total 6,182
Workstation Hardware
1 HIQ 486DX2/66 12 1,259 15,108
Includes: ,
8 Meg RAM
340Mea Disk
14' SVGA Color Monitor
MS DOS 6.22
Windows
Mouse
1 01-key Keyboard
1.44Meo Floppy Drive
2 3COM 3C509B- TPO Ethernet Adapters 12 110 1,320
3 Printer Sharing Adapters 5 79 395
-- -
-------
Workstation Hardware Total 16,823 I
Page 2
Appendix A (Spec. Version)
I
I
I
.
I
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
,
I.
I~
g'
]
,
t
~
Software
ltemNr. Item Qty Cost Ext.
File Server Software
1 NetWare 4.1, 25-User 1 2,100 2,100
2 Cheyenne ARCServe Taoe Backuo 20-25 user 1 822 822
2,922
Workstation Software
1 WordPerfect for Windows 1 315 315
2 WordPerfect for Windows, License Only 11 187 2,057
3 Lotus for Windows 1 265 265
4 Lotus for Window, License OnlY 11 250 2,750
5 DOS 6.22 (Inc. in PC Cost) 12 0 -
6 Windows (Inc. in PC Costl 12 0 -
7 Delrina Fax Server Starter K~ (& 2 users) 1 279 279
8 Delrina WinFaxPro Add'l Licenses 10 79 790
I -------
-------
5,387
Page 3
Appendix A (Spec. Version)
;
I
Network
-
I
ltemNr. Item atv Cost Ext.
1 Install 1 OBaseT Cat 5 UTP Cable 12 95 1,140
1 SynOotics 2800A 16 Port Hub 510
or
Boca Research BEN220 16-port Hub 1 221 221
or
Accton EN2041 16-port Hub 302
Hub Total 221
~ .
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
il
I
I
j
t
I
I
I
Page 4
Appendix A (Spec. Version)
.
II
..
II
..
,
,
II
~
IJ
II
~
~
11
~
~
:1
.~
I
Labor
Low High
ltemNr. Item Hrs Rate Ext. Hrs Rate Ext.
1 Setup File Server 4 65 260 8 65 520
2 Design Internal Netware Directories 2 65 130 4 65 260
3 Install NetWare 4.1 3 65 195 6 65 390
4 Add USERIDs, Groups, Security 3 65 195 6 65 390
.
5 Setup Cheyenne ARCServe Tape Backup 4 65 260 8 65 520
6 Setup 'Ideal' Client Workstation 8 65 520 16 65 1,040
Includes:
MS DOS 6.22
Windows
Novell 001 Client Files
WordProcessor
Spreadsheet .
Copy 'ideal' Client files to File Server
7 Setup 11 More PCs 22 65 1,430 44 65 2,860
Totals 2,990 5,980
Page 5
Appendix A (Spec. Version)
.
I
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
.
.
.
.
.
t
t
(
Training
Low Hiah
Item Nr. Item Hrs Rate Ext. Hrs Rate Ext.
1 Half Day Class on Windows 4 65 260 8 65 520
2 Half Day Class on Wordrocessor 4 65 260 8 65 520
3 HaW Day Class on Spreadsheet 4 65 260 8 65 520
Totals 780 1,560
Note: Assumes traininQ on-sne at a location
provided by Town of Tiburon such as a conference
room or class room in the school next door.
.
Page 6
Appendix A (Spec. Version)
TOWN OF TIBURON
MEMORANDUM
TO:
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1995
ITEM NO. "
FROM:
TOWN ATTORNEY
SUBJECf: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION EXPRESSING INTENT OF
COUNCIL TO DONATE OR LEASE LIBRARY SITE RATHER THAN
SELL THE PROPERTY TO THE COUNTY OF MARIN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BACKGROUND
On January 18, 199s.,. the Council agreed to agendize an proposed ballot ordinance which
would have required the Town to sell the Mar West library site rather than donate it or
lease it for a nominal sum. This item was prompted by one of the conditions Mr. Zelinsky
has proposed for his gift of a parcel for construction of a downtown Town Hall.
The item was agendized for February 1, 1995. At that meeting the Council unanimously
agreed not to put such a proposition on the ballot. Several Councilmembers also requested
that at the next meeting staff present a resolution expressing the intent of the Council to
donate or lease the property rather than sell it.
ANALYSIS
To briefly restate the background on this issue, the Town acquired the land at the corner
of Mar West Street and Tiburon Boulevard through two separate gifts from Ed Zelinsky and
Barbara Abrams. These gifts do not prohibit the Town from selling or otherwise conveying
the property but do restrict the use of the property to civic purposes.
In 1992 the Town negotiated a sale of the property to the County of Marin at an agreed
upon price of $500,000. That 1992 agreement expired, by its own terms, in June 1993,
meaning that there is no currently binding agreement to sell the property. In meetings
during the fall of 1994, the County expressed their willingness to go forward with a purchase
of the property, but only if the new library were truly a county library. It is staffs
understanding that negotiations are still ongoing between the County and the Library
Committee as to the final organizational structure of the library.
Without going into great detail, there are several conclusions which may be made regarding
the value of the property and the ability of the Town to actually realize that value:
1) The 1992 agreement did not absolutely guarantee the Town $500,000 in net
present value because it was based on certain assumptions regarding growth in assessed
value and the number of years remaining in the life of the Tiburon Redevelopment Agency.
If the Town and the County were to enter into a new sales agreement, the ability of the
County to pay $500,000 would depend on the number of years left in the Redevelopment
Agency, growth in assessed value and any state financial take backs. The Town would have
to closely examine all of these factors at the time of such an agreement.
2) The County's willingness to purchase the property in 1992 was based on the
assumption that the new library would be part of the County library system. Depending on
the outcome of the discussions between the library committee and the county regarding the
governance of the library, the County may not be interested in purchasing the property.
3) Even if the County is willing to purchase the property, their position has always
been that they do not wish to start paying until they know that construction funding is in
place. Thus, depending on how much longer it takes the Library Committee to secure all
necessary funding, either through donations or an assessment, that period of time will reduce
the amount of time, and therefore the ability, for the County to pay the purchase price for
the property.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council accept public testimony, review the attached resolution
and make determine whether to make this commitment at this time. It should be noted that
the resolution merely expresses an intent to donate or lease the property, and that Council's
adoption of this resolution would be in memory of Rex Fink, local community leader and
an active member of the New Tiburon Peninsula library Committee. Should Council
support this policy, my recommendation is to wait on any actual conveyance until the JPA
is actually created.
EXHIBITS
1. Draft Resolution
MEMORANDUM
TO:
TOWN COUNCIL
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1995
ITEM: 1
FROM:
TOWN MANAGER
SUBJECf: NEW TOWN CENTER FACIUTIES
BACKGROUND
In January, two Citizen's petitions were submitted to the Town and certified by the Town
Council. These initiatives concerned (1) selecting locations for new Town administrative
and police buildings; (2) requiring the disposition of and regulating future use of the current
Town Hall site at Nc:p's Way. Proceeds from the sale of a portion of the Ned's Way
property for senior housing would provide funding for the new Town facilities. Essentially
the initiatives seek Town Council approval of new Town administrative and Council
Chamber facilities in the downtown area and a new police building to be constructed at the
intersection of Ned's Way and Tiburon Boulevard.
At the time the Citizen's initiatives were certified by the Town Council, Council requested
a report by Staff which would address the various impacts of the ballot initiatives and
respond to specific questions and concerns of the Town Council.
At this meeting the Town Council should accept Town Staffs report regarding the Citizen's
ballot initiatives. Council should also determine whether they need 'additional time (not to
exceed 10 days) to consider the report and more importantly determine whether to either
(1) enact the Citizen's initiative Ordinances as presented, or (2) direct that the Citizen's
initiatives ordinances be placed on the June 6, 1995 municipal ballot.
If Council elects to place the Citizen's initiative ordinances on the June 6 ballot or any other
ballot proposals, then Staff should be directed to prepare Resolutions ordering and calling
for the June 6 election and requesting assistance from the Marin County Registrar to
conduct such election for Town Council's March 1 regular meeting. The Town's estimated
cost for the June election is approximately $12,000. The actual cost will be determined by
how many other ballot measures are on the June election.
EXHIBITS
1. Staff Report and Analysis Pertaining to the Citizen's Ballot Initiatives.
2. June 6, 1995 Election Calendar.
/' l - 1 ':" - '3 4 rUE 1 C. : ...;: :::;: I..:. L I::. l~ I 1 U t~ '=. 1..11:=- 1-' I .
1.1 - .
--+ 1 ::..--+ '=.":o"j--+--+ ,
t-',- _J
.ll
-
;-\
r.l::.1L
"
,
HALL OF JUSTICE
CIVIC CENTER. SAN RAFAel, CALli'ORNIA 84913
P. O. BOX ~
HOWARD HANSON
COUNT"< CLERK. REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
COURT ADMINISTRATOR. JURY COMMISSIONER
BASIC DATA FOR LCULA TlNG DEADLINES
E.QfLMEASUBES TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT
JUNE 6, 1995
(Eleotion)
Number of d<lYs
Drior to Election
E- 123 2-3-95
"
Deadline For
LAST day for a school district to deliver a
resolution to the County Superintendent of
Scho~ls. (Ed. Code 5322)
Preliminary notification and wording of ballot
measure submitted to City/County Clerk, it
available.
Resolutions of Consolidation and exact form of
ballot measures mus~be submitted to Board of
Supervisors and County Clerk. (EC 23301.5, 23302)
Last day by law to sUbmit any measure.
BO<lrd of Supervisors to act on elections to be
consolidated. (Ee 23302)
LAST day to withdraw a measure from the ballot
(EC 5354, 5455)
Ballot arguments to be received by City/County
Clerk. (Ee 3784, 5015, 5157.2, 5323)
Rebuttal arguments to be received by City/county
Clerk.
Ten (10) day public examination period.
(Ee 3795, 5025, 5215, 5330)
Printer to receive all materials for the
Election.
E- 102 2-24-95
E- 88
3- 10-9!j
E- 84 3-14-95
E- 83 3-15-95
E- 78 3-20-95
E- 68 3-30-95
E- 67 3-31-95
E- 57 4-10-95
E- 55 ~-12-95
NOTE: 1.
2,
All resolutions calling an election should specify if arguments will call for rebuttals.
It is the decision of the governing body to determine at that time If the County Clerk
should publishin the newspaper that rebuttals will be accepted.
When ballot wording is submitted to our office, please request verification forms whid
must be completed and returned to our office with ALL ARGUMENTS AND REBUTTAL~
to measures.
CITIES MUST SUBMIT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS ON THE SAME DATE OF BAlLOl
ARGUMENTS. (Ee 5011)
PLEASE SPECIFY IF ORDINANCE IS TO BE PUBLISHED IN SAMPLE BALLOT.
3.
4.
THIS CALENDAR MA Y NOT INCLUDE ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR YOUR DISTRICT. PLEASl
CONTACT YOUR DISTRICT'S LEGAL COUNSEL FOR ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
COJt".sTY ClE~K
T,.ie,cl--OI"le
1<115J 4<;<;><>007
SUPERC~ COURT
Telep;.,o'l1t:
141514<;<;><<''61
BENA.N.r.... O. STOlGH
A:\:lt. Co,,"1y C e.V:es ~"or
JJRV CQIINJ"ON"
Te'epi-Ot'.e:
1<1151<99<<)63
REGISTlAR
T~i~r'llt:
1<1151499<>156
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO:
TOWN COUNCIL
MEETING: FEBRUARY 15, 1995
FROM:
FINANCE DIRECTOR
ITEM NO:
RE: ACCEPT AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE TOWN
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1994
This item has been continued to the meeting of March 1, 1994 pending the auditor's receipt and
incorporation of financial data concerning the Marin County Risk Management Authority
Workers' Compensation Pool, in which the Town is a participant.
.
;