HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Agd Pkt 1996-06-05
/
I.';
., /...~ /
/
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN OF TIBURON
1101 TIBURON BLVD.
MEETING DATE:
MEETING TIME:
CLOSED SESSION:
JUNE 5, 1996
7:30 P.M.
6:45 P.M.
PLEASE NOTE: In order to give all Interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and to ensure the p<esentatlon 01 all points 01
view, members of the audience should:
(1) Always Address the Chair: (2) State Name and Address: (3) State Views Succinctly; (4) Umtt Presentations to 3 minutes; (5) Speak
Directly into Microphone.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabiilies Act, il you need special assistance to participate in this meeting. please contact Town Hall
(415) 435-7373. Nolification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Town to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to
this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA TRle"]
A. ROLL CALL
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION (If any)
C. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Please confine your comments during this portion of the agenda to matJers not a/ready on this agenda. other
than items on the Consent Calendar. The public will be given an opportunity to speak on each agenda item at
the time it is called Presentations are limited to three (3) minutes. Matters requiring action will be referred to
the appropriate Commission, Board, Committee or Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future meeting
agenda.
D. COUNCIL. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS
I) LAST CHANCE OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE - HARROMAN PROPERTY - (1. Riessen)
2) DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION TASK FORCE - (Mayor Wolf)
E. CONSENT CALENDAR
The purpose of the Consent Calendar is to group items together which generally do not require discussion and
which will probably be approved by one motion unless separate action is required on a particular item. Any
member of the Town Council, Town Staff, or the Public may request removal of an item for discussion.
3) TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES - May 15,1996 (Approval)
4) MONTHLY INVESTMENT SUMMARY - April 30, 1996 (Accept)
5) ANNUAL ADOPTION OF OVERRIDE TAX FOR 1972 OPEN SPACE BONDS -
FY96-97 (Resolution)
6) ANNUAL ADOPTION OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR POINT TIBURON COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT - FY96-97 (Resolution)
7) ANNUAL ADOPTION OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIffi.
OF STATE CONSTITUTION (GANN ACT) - FY 95-96 (Resolution)
8) CREATION OF ''NO PARKING" ZONE BETWEEN REED RANCH ROAD AND
STEWART DRIVE - (Resolution)
9) SUPPORT HAMILTON ARMY AIRFIELD RE-USE PLAN (Resolution)
F. PUBLIC HEARING
10) APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECISION - Construction of Addition Requiring
Variance in Rear Yard Setback and Floor Area Ratio Exception - Applicants, Mr. & Mrs.
Buckerfield, 2305 Centro East - (Assessors' Parcel No. 59-201-43); Appellants, Paradise
Drive Neighbors (Marans, Brown, Drew, Gehrmann, Talbot, Wintersteen)
G. NEW BUSINESS
H. COMMUNICA nONS
I. STAFF & TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
11) BLACKIE'S P ASTURFlTffiURON BOULEVARD UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES
PROJECT - (Status Report)
12) FY96-98 BUDGET HEARINGS SCHEDULE
J. ADJOURNMENT - To June 11, 1996, 5:00 p.nL Town Council/Staff Retreat
Future A~enda Items - June 19, 1996 Regular Meeting
--Green Can Program/Review Cost Proration Rate Structure
--Landmarks Society Appeal (Denyberry Property)
--Community Block Grant Program - City/County Cooperation Agreement
DATE OF MEETING: JUNE 5.1996
NO. 10 -1996
DATE POSTED: MAY 31. 1996
NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING
CLOSED MEETING OF THE TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq., the Town Council will hold a
Closed Session. More specific information regarding this meeting is indicated below:
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LmGA TION
(Section S49S6.9a)
Name of Case:
Morales v. Town of Tibuorn
(Marin County Superior Court No. 164888)
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL LITIGA TION
(Section 549S6.9b)
Name of Case:
Kleiman v. Heirs of Lvford
TOWN COUNCIL
MINUTES
DRA~T
U~;0. 3
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Wolf called the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon to order at
7:37 P.M., Wednesday, May 15, 1996, in Council Chambers, 1101 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon,
California.
A. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Hennessy, Thompson, Thayer, Wolf
Ginalski
EX OFFICIO:
Town Attorney Danforth, Planning Director
Anderson, Finance Director Stranzl, Chief of Police
Herley, Town Engineer Mohammadi, Town Clerk
Crane
B. RECOGNnnONOFCDnCCONTmrnUTIONS
1) Presentation of Heritage & Arts Commission First Annual Preservation Award. Heritage &
Arts Chair Victoria Arnett listed the names of the nominees-- The Angel Island Association,
Maureen Buscher, Dr. David Steinhardt, Larry Smith, and Ed Zelinsky, and announced Mr.
Zelinsky as the winner for his work in preservation of Ark Raw.
Mayor Wolf made some remarks detailing the history of Mr. Zelinksy's family and noted Ed's
interests in history. She said the Zelinsky had been major benefactorsin all ofTiburon's
landmarks.
Dian Ashley, President of the Tiburon Peninsula Chamber of Commerce, said the Board had been
unanimous in its nomination of Ed Zelinsky, who she said "epitomized" the award.
Chair Arnett said that May 12 - May 18 was National Historic Preservation Month.
Ed Zelinsky said he was honed to be named recipient of the first annual Heritage & Arts
Preservation Award, and shared his memories of growing up in the area and various landmarks in
Tiburon. He said his parents, Fred & Juanita Zelinsky, loved the Town and he was continuing to
work hard to preserve it.
Councilmember Thompson also thanked Ed's sister, Barbara Abrams.
2) Conveyance of Downtown New Town Hall Property (Edward & Laleh Zelinsky & Barbara
Abrams). Mr. Zelinsky said the Town Hall used to be located on Ark Row, which was good for
downtown and the community. He said Fred & Juanita wanted the Town Hall on the Mar West
site, and thanked Mayor Nicky Wolffor encouraging him not to give up in the face of the
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1087
May 15, 1996
obstacles he faced in order to give the land to the Town. He also thanked Councilmembers
Thompson, Hennessy, Town Manager Kleinert, and many former dedicated mayors and
councilmembers.
Mayor Wolf said the gift was an "incredible act of generosity." Wolf said the Town intended to
build a public plaza at the Town Hall site in Fred & Juanita's memory. She concluded by saying it
was a "privilege to know people who are so gentle and gracious," and who "define the terms
gentleman and gentlewoman."
In a reference to recent litigation, Mr. Zelinsky thanked his attorney, Chip Nielsen, for his help in
the "harassment" he faced in trying to deed the land to the Town.
Co PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Building Advisory Committee Chair Jim Wilson said the bids for the new Town Hall construction
project had been opened, and that there were two low bidders who would be considered by the
committee. There was a brief discussion about when the groundbreaking ceremony might take
place [in June]. Wilson said it could take place any time after the award of contract.
D. APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS. COMMITTEE S & COMMISSIONS
Mayor Wolf said a consensus had been reached by the Council.
MOTION:
To appoint Maria Lambert to the Heritage & Arts Commission &
Pamela Fyffe to the Design Review Board.
Thayer, Seconded by Thompson
Unanimous
Hennessy (on Fyffe vote) [She had not met the candidate.]
Moved:
Vote:
Abstain:
E. COUNCIL. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS
3) Tiburon Peninsula Recycling Committee. Chair Polly Smith said the committee was working
well and there was a tremendous amount to learn about the issue. She said the committee had
met with Town Manager Kleinert and Councilmember Thompson at their first meeting; Dee
Johnson, Marin County Office of Waste Management at their second meeting; and with a member
of the San Anselmo Recycling Committee at their third meeting.
Smith handed out a list of committee priorities for 1996: Education, Source Reduction,
Recycling, and Recommendations to Council (concerning possible changes in the Town's
franchise Agreement).
Councilmember Thompson said the first priority of the committee should be to work with Mill
Valley Refuse Service in creating a clearer brochure showing what people can and cannot recycle.
Mayor Wolf said she was pleased to see an item recently in a store containing a label which read
"package same size as product."
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1087
May 15, 1996
2
'.
Councilmember Hennessy commended Polly for her work and suggested that the committee "stay
out of the franchise agreement."
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
4) Town Council Minutes #1086 (May I, 1996); #1082 (March 20, 1996--Planning Commission
revisions). Mayor Wolf asked for a word to be changed in the May I minutes.
5) Appointment of Downtown Town Hall Project Management Team (Resolution).
6) Linda Vista Undergrounding Project (Resolutions).
A. Determination of Assessments Remaining Unpaid.
B. Authorization ofIssuance of Bonds.
C. Award of Contract.
7) Monthly Investment Summary (March 31, 1996).
8) Minutes of Traffic Safety Committee Meeting (April 16, 1996).
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To Adopt Consent Calendar, with amended Mayl Minutes per Mayor Wolf.
Thayer, Seconded by Hennessy
AYES: Unanimous
ABSENT: Ginalski
G. PUBLIC HEARING
9) Public Facilities Development Fee Ordinance - ReviselRepeal Portions of Chapter 5 and 14B of
Town Municipal Code - Second Reading and Adoption.
Mayor Wolf opened and closed the public hearing. There was no public comment.
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To Read Public Facilities Development Fee Ordinance by Title Only.
Thompson, Seconded by Hennessy
Unanimous
Mayor Wolf read, "An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon Repealing
Sections 5-9 Through 5-13 of Chapter 5; Repealing Chapter 14B of the Municipal Code; and
Adding a New Chapter 14B of the Tiburon Municipal Code with Respect to Public Facilities
Development Fees."
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To Adopt above Ordinance.
Thompson, Seconded by Hennessy.
AYES: Hennessy, Thompson, Thayer, Wolf
NOES: None
ABSENT: Ginalski
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES # 1 087
May 15, 1996
3
10) Establish Revised Traffic Mitigation Fees for New Development in Tiburon (Resolution).
Planning Director Anderson said the revised fee schedule was an update of studies started in
1986, and was necessary to reflect current traffic conditions and to maintain adequate Levels of
Service (LOS) as established in the [General Plan] Circulation element.
Mayor Wolf asked about the proposed three-way traffic lights at Reed Ranch Road and Cecilia
that would be triggered by future development. Anderson stated the General Plan called for "this
or its functional equivalent," but said the community may not want them [the lights].
During public hearing, Bob Holmes, Marin Association of Realtors, said it was unfair to require
"new developments to solve the ills of the past," and that the increase in fees was too steep for
homebuilders to absorb. He suggested phasing in the new fee schedule.
Planning Director Anderson said the [proposed] resolution did not ride on new development and
that the Town had already taken the past into account with baseline studies to prove it. He said
the development fees would pay only for improving intersections, not building new ones.
Town Attorney Danforth said that, contrary to Mr. Holmes' remarks, the Town had followed
Federal and State standards in determining the pro rata basis for the fees to proportion of
improvements. She said the Town did not know exactly which specific improvements would be
built but that State law required an accounting of the [collected] fees every five years and, if not
used, they would be refunded [to the developer].
Mayor Wolf called for a comprehensive solution to the problems at the Trestle Glen and Tiburon
Boulevard intersection. Town Attorney Danforth said the Town would be "stuck" if the
improvements cost more than the fees collected. Mayor Wolf congratulated the staff and said her
concerns that the Town might be "overcharging" were now allayed.
MOTION:
To adopt Resolution Establishing Traffic Mitigation Fees for Developments within
the Town of Tiburon.
Hennessy, Seconded by Thayer
AYES: Unanimous
ABSENT: Ginalski
Moved:
Vote:
Planning Director Anderson said the fees would go into effect in 60 days.
II) Application to Precise Plan Amendment - 15 Cibrian Drive; Marc Loupe and Annette Harris-
Loupe, Applicants. Planning Director Anderson said the overall building envelope would not
change, and that applicants' improvements in order to accommodate the pool and decking were
actually an improvement. He said the Planning Commission voted unanimously for approval.
Mayor Wolf opened and closed the public hearing. There was no public comment.
Councilmember Thompson said he had waled the property, and all Councilmembers agreed with
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1087
May 15, 1996
4
the Planning Commission's recommendation.
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To Adopt the Planning Commission's Recommendation for Precise Plan
Amendment.
Thayer, Seconded by Thompson
AYES: Unanimous
ABSENT: Ginalski
H. NEW BUSINESS
12) Purchase of Below Market Rate Units (BMR's) at Point Tiburon. Councilmember Hennessy
recused herself and stepped down.
Council discussed Staff Report recommendation to purchase two units that were to come
available at the Marsh Road complex. The one-bedroom unit had been appraised at $94,900, and
the two-bedroom at $126,000. The purchase would bring the number of Town-owned units at
Marsh Road to four.
Mayor Wolf asked if there was any interest among Town Staff in renting the units proposed for
purchase. [Neither of the units currently owned by the Town are rented to Town Staff]
Town Clerk Crane said Staffhad expressed an interest in buying the two-bedroom unit but she
was unaware of any interest in renting either unit.
During public hearing, Terry Hennessy said the Town would get into trouble ifit tried to sell the
units to Town employees.
Planning Director Anderson said he was uncomfortable with the Town's role as a landlord. The
possibility of asking Marin Housing Authority to manage the Town's units was briefly discussed.
Finance Director Stranzl said the Town's BMR Housing Fund would have $800,000 in it at the
end of the year.
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To approve Recommendation to Buy Two BMR units at Marsh Road.
Thayer, Seconded by Thompson
AYES: Unanimous
ABSENT: Ginalski
ABSTAIN: Hennessy
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
13) Town Council RetreatsIWorkshops. Council agreed on the following dates and times: 1)
Town Council/Staff Retreat - 5:00 to 9:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 1 i; 2) EIR Briefing on Martha
Company Property (in conjunction with Planning Commission) on Wednesday, June 12, 7:30
p.m.; 3) Tentative joint meeting with Planning Commission for Senior Housing Advisory
Committee presentation on either May 23 or June 18.
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1087
May IS, 1996
5
Council discussed the proposed Planning Commissiontrown Council retreat. Councilmember
Hennessy asked what the purpose of such a retreat would be. Councilmember Thompson said it
was to give direction to the Planning Commission. Hennessy said the Planning Commission
would not meet with the Town Council without a facilitator. Councilmember Thayer said "we all
know each other" and thought any misapprehensions could be worked out (without a facilitator).
Council directed Staff to try to schedule the retreat on May 23 before the SHAC presentation.
J. COMMUNICA nONS
None.
K. STAFF AND TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
None.
L. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Wolf adjourned the meeting at 9:29 p.m. to Closed Session.
A. ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Ex Officio:
Councilmembers Hennessy, Thayer, Thompson, Wolf
Ginalski
Town Attorney Danforth
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION.
Council authorized Mayor Wolf to sign the Mutual Release of All Claims in the Town of Tiburon
v. Sanborn lawsuit.
C. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon, Mayor Wolf
adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m., to the May 29, 1996 Adjourned Meeting.
NICKY WOLF, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #1087
May 15, 1996
6
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
To:
From:
Subject:
TOWN COUNCIL Meeting:
FINANCE DIRECTOR Item No:
MONTHLY INVESTMENT SUMMARY STATEMENT
AS OF APRL 30,1996
JUNE 5,1996
j'
1. TOWN OF TIBURON
Institution! Agency
Amount
Interest Rate
Maturity
State of California $7,571,901 5.538% Liquid
Local Agency Invesbnent
Fund
Total Invested: . $7,571,901
2. TIBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Institution! Agency
Amount
Interest Rate
Maturity
State of California $1,261,199 5.538% Liquid
Local Agency Invesbnent
Fund
Total Invested: $1,261,199
Notes to tables:
. State of California Local Agency Invesbnent Fund (LAIF) - The interest rate represents the
effective yield for the month referenced above. The State generally distributes data reports in the
third week following the month ended.
. Acknowledgment: This summai)' report accurately reflects all pooled invesbnents of the Town of
Tiburon and the Tiburon Redevelopment Agency, and is in conformity with State laws and the
Invesbnent Policy adopted by the Town Council. The invesbnent program herein summarized
provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet next month's estimated expenditures.
BY:
Richard tranzl, Finance Director
May 14, 1996
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
To:
TOWN COUNCIL
FINANCE DIRECTOR
Meeting:
Item No:
fo"'5"~9~
# ...Z)
From:
Subject:
1972 OPEN SPACE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
OVERRIDE TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
Backl!round:
This item is for annual adoption of the override tax rate on assessed valuation for the 1972 Open
Space General Obligation Bonds of the Town. The Town is required to annually adopt a
resolution which includes the recommended override tax rate and the basis for its calculation. The
resolution is then transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller for implementation in the new
Fiscal Year. The override tax rate is the ratio of (l) total annual debt service and related fiscal
agent cost requirements of the 1972 Open Space Bonds divided by (2) estimated totallocai
secured assessed valuation, or $77,000 / $1,424,178,000 = 0.000054. This equates to $5.40 per
$100,000 of assessed valuation.
Recommendation:
Town Council adopt the attached Resolution establishing the override tax rate for the 1972 Open
Space Bonds at 0.000054 for Fiscal Year 1996-97
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution Establishing Override Tax Rate for 1996-97.
(JWle 1996)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING
THE RATE OF TAX LEVY APPLICABLE TO THE
TOWN'S 1972 OPEN SPACE BOND ISSUE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
WHEREAS, in 1972 the voters approved the issuance of Open Space Bonds by the Town
of Tiburon to acquire certain real property; and
WHEREAS, an override tax rate for Fiscal Year 1996-97 is applicable to this bonded
indebtedness; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director estimates that total local secured assessed value for
Fiscal Year 1996-97 will be approximately $1,424,178,000, and Fiscal Year 1996-97 debt service
requirements and associated fiscal agent costs will be $77,000, and has calculated that the
override tax rate per $100.00 of secured assessed valuation should be 0.0054. The override rate,
expressed as a share of total secured assessed valuation, is equal to 0.000054.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon
does hereby approve the rate of 0.0054 per $100.00 oflocal secured assessed valuation as the
override tax levy applicable to the 1972 Open Space General Obligation bond issue for Fiscal
Year 1996-97, and directs the Finance Office to transmit this information to the Marin County
Office of the Auditor-Controller.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon on , 1996 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
BY:
NICKY WOLF, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE 1. CRANE, TOWN CLERK
(June 19%)
TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
To:
TOWN COUNCIL
FINANCE DIRECTOR
Meeting:
Item No:
(,-'S-~h
# (p
From:
Subject:
POINT TffiURON COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 1985-1
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR
FISCAL (& TAX) YEAR 1996-97
Backl!round:
This item is for annual adoption of the Special Tax rates to be levied on the commercial and
residential parcels in the Point Tiburon Community Facilities District.
Discussion:
Prior to 1989-90 Town Council established the Special Tax levy by ordinance. In 1991 the
Government Code was changed and local agencies were exempted from the ordinance process if
they planned to maintain the Special Tax Levy at the same level or at a lower rate than was
provided by the ordinance. As amended, the Government Code requires local agencies to provide
by resolution for the annual levy of the Special Tax, if the rate will be unchanged or reduced from
current levels. Action to levy the Special Tax is required by August 10th of the tax (fiscal) year,
by which time parcel tax data is to be filed with the County Auditor-Controller and Tax Office.
Special Tax proceeds are applied for debt service requirements of the Mello-Roos Bonds of the
Point Tiburon Community Facilities District. The Levy represents the net amount required to fund
debt service of the Mello-Roos Bonds following consideration of other sources of funds (annual
Redevelopment Agency contribution of$472,500.00 to the District, and investment earnings
accruing on the contribution), less uses of funds (debt service requirements, fiscal agent and
financial fees, and allowance for delinquencies.)
The total Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 1996-97 will be $179,087.80, which is unchanged from Fiscal
Year 1995-96. The Special Tax Levy will be applied as follows: residential units at $1,050.48 and
the commercial parcels will in aggregate be assessed $37,273.64.
Recommendation:
Town Council adopt the attached resolution establishing the Special Tax Levy in the Point
Tiburon Community Facilities District for Tax Year 1996-97.
Attachments:
I. Resolution Establishing Special Tax Levy, 1995-96 (Exhibit A. Attached)
(June 1996)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF TmURON LEVYING A SPECIAL TAX RATE
FOR THE PROPERTY TAX YEAR 1996-97
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1985-1
POINT TIBURON DEVELOPMENT
TOWN OF TIBURON, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, Town of Tiburon Ordinance No. 355 N.S., passed and adopted by Town
Council on August 1, 1990, ordained that the Town, pursuant to Government Code Sections
53328 and 53340, levied a Special Tax on the property within Community Facilities District No.
1985-1 for the 1990-1991 tax year and for all subsequent years; and,
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Government Code Section 53340 the Tiburon Town Council
may provide, by resolution, for the levy of the Special Tax in the current tax year or future tax
years at the same rate or at a lower rate than the rate provided by ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the Finance Director has estimated that sources of funds (annual contribution
of the Redevelopment Agency, and investment earnings accruing thereon) less uses of funds
(provision for annual debt service, fiscal agent charges, and reserve for delinquencies) requires a
total Special Tax Levy in the amount of$179,088 (Residential share at $141,814, Commercial at
$37,274) for tax year 1996-97.
THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED, that the Town Council authorizes the tax year 1996-97
Special Tax levy in the amounts shown on Exhibit A attached, and directs the Finance Director to
prepare the Special Tax roll and to provide all necessary information to the Marin County Auditor
and Tax Collector in order to effect the proper billing and collection of the Special Tax referenced
within Exhibit A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon on , 1996, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
BY:
NICKY WOLF, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE 1. CRANE, TOWN CLERK
(June 1996)
EXHmIT A. FOR RESOLUTION NO.
EST ABLISlllNG THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1985-1
- POINT TffiURON DEVELOPMENT -
TAX [& FISCAL YEAR] ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
MARSH:
58-440-01 $1,050.48
58-440-02 $1,050.48
58-440-03 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-04 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-05 $1,050.48
58-440-06 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-07 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-08 $1,050.48
58-440-09 $1,050.48
58-440-10 $1,050.48
58-440-11 $1,050.48
58-440-12 $1,050.48
58-440-13 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-14 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-15 $1,050.48
58-440-16 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-17 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-18 $1,050.48
58-440-19 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-20 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-21 $1,050.48
58-440-22 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-23 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-24 $1,050.48
58-440-25 $1,050.48
58-440-26 $1,050.48
58-440-27 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-28 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-29 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
5 8-440c 30 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-31 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-32 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-33 $ 0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
58-440-34 $_0.00 Below Market Rate Unit
(June 1996)
LAGOON: LAGOON. CT'D BA YSIDE. CT'D
59-390-01 $1,050.48 59-390-48 $1,050.48 59-380-38 $1,050.48
59-390-02 $1,050.48 59-390-49 $1,050.48 59-380-39 $1,050.48
59-390-03 $1,050.48 59-390-50 $1,050.48 59-380-40 $1,050.48
59-390-04 $1,050.48 59-390-51 $1,050.48 59-380-41 $1,050.48
59-390-05 $1,050.48 59-390-52 $1,050.48 59-380-42 $1,050.48
59-390-06 $1,050.48 59-390-53 $1,050.48 59-380-43 $1,050.48
59-390-07 $1,050.48 59-390-54 $1,050.48 59-380-44 $1,050.48
59-390-08 $1,050.48 59-380-45 $1,050.48
59-390-09 $1,050.48 BA YSIDE: 59-380-46 $1,050.48
59-390-10 $1,050.48 59-380-47 $1,050.48
59-390-11 $1,050.48 59-380-01 $1,050.48 59-380-48 $1,050.48
59-390-12 $1,050.48 59-380-02 $1,050.48 59-380-49 $1,050.48
59-390-13 $1,050.48 59-380-03 $1,050.48 59-380-50 $1,050.48
59-390-14 $1,050.48 59-380-04 $1,050.48 59-380-51 $1,050.48
59-390-15 $1,050.48 59-380-05 $1,050.48 59-380-52 $1,050.48
59-390-16 $1,050.48 59-380-06 $1,050.48 59-380-53 $1,050.48
59-390-17 $1,050.48 59-380-07 $1,050.48 59-380-54 $1,050.48
59-390-18 $1,050.48 59-380-08 $1,050.48 59-380-55 $1,050.48
59-390-19 $1,050.48 59-380-09 $1,050.48 59-380-56 $1,050.48
59-390-20 $1,050.48 59-380-10 $1,050.48 59-380-57 $1,050.48
59-390-21 $1,050.48 59-380-11 $1,050.48 59-380-58 $1,050.48
59-390-22 $1,050.48 59-380-12 $1,050.48 59-380-59 $1,050.48
59-390-23 $1,050.48 59-380-13 $1,050.48 59-380-60 $1,050.48
59-390-24 $1,050.48 59-380-14 $1,050.48 59-380-61 $1,050.48
59-390-25 $1,050.48 59-380-15 $1,050.48 59-380-62 $1,050.48
59-390-26 $1,050.48 59-380-16 $1,050.48 59-380-63 $1,050.48
59-390-27 $1,050.48 59-380-17 $1,050.48 59-380-64 $1,050.48
59-390-28 $1,050.48 59-380-18 $1,050.48 59-380-65 $1,050.48
59-390-29 $1,050.48 59-380-19 $1,050.48 59-380-66 $1,050.48
59-390-30 $1,050.48 59-380-20 $1,050.48 59-380-67 $1,050.48
59-390-31 $1,050.48 59-380-21 $1,050.48
59-390-32 $1,050.48 59-380-22 $1,050.48 PLAZA:
59-390-33 $1,050.48 59-380-23 $1,050.48
59-390-34 $1,050.48 59-380-24 $1,050.48 59-161-07 $22,574.28
59-390-35 $1,050.48 59-380-25 $1,050.48 Building 13.
59-390-36 $1,050.48 59-380-26 $1,050.48 59-161-12 $14,699.36
59-390-37 $1,050.48 59-380-27 $1,050.48 Building 14.
59-390-38 $1,050.48 59-380-28 $1,050.48 59-161-10 $_0.00
59-390~39 $1,050.48 59-380-29 $1,050.48 Parking Lot
59-390-40 $1,050.48 59-380-30 $1,050.48
59-390-41 $1,050.48 59-380-31 $1,050.48 TOTAL LEVY:
59-390-42 $1,050.48 59-380-32 $1,050.48
59-390-43 $1,050.48 59-380-33 $1,050.48 Residential $141,814.16
59-390-44 $1,050.48 59-380-34 $1,050.48 Commercial $ 37,273.64
59-390-45 $1,050.48 59-380-35 $1,050.48 S pedal Tax $179,087.80
59-390-46 $1,050.48 59-380-36 $1,050.48
59-390-47 $1,050.48 59-380-37 $1,050.48
(June 1996)
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
To:
TOWN COUNCIL
FINANCE DIRECTOR
Meeting:
Item No:
6- 5'- 7 P
# =;
From:
Subject:
ARTICLE XIII B. APPROPRIATION LIMIT, FISCAL YEAR 1995-96
Backl!:round:
This item is for adoption of the Gann Limit for Fiscal Year 1996-97.
Proposition 4., approved by California voters in November 1979, established and defined annual
revenue appropriation limits on all government entities. Proposition 4. became effective in Fiscal
Year 1980-81, however the calculations to determine the annual limit are carried from a Fiscal
Year 1978-79 base year. Proposition 4. was modified in 1990 with the passage of Proposition
Ill; Modifications included slightly changed annual adjustment factors, further identification of
the types of outlays which are excluded from the limit, and provision for the exclusion of
emergency outlays from the limit. Implementation legislation provides that Town Council shall, at
a regularly scheduled meeting, or a noticed special meeting, establish by resolution the amount of
appropriation subject to limitation. The State is to be provided with informational forms with the
filing of the Annual Statement of Financial Transactions no later than ninety (90) days after the
start of the fiscal year.
Discussion:
The appropriations limit is the calculated dollar amount which limits the Town's ability to receive
and appropriate proceeds of taxes. Such revenues may include: Property Taxes and ERAF
Rebates, Sales Taxes, Real Property Transfer Taxes, Transient Occupancy Taxes, Business
License Taxes, State Motor Vehicle Fees, Off-Highway Taxes, certain Rental Income, Other
Revenues and Rebates (excluding Redevelopment Agency Fees), a share ofInvestment Earnings,
and transfers of funds from other funds into reserves of the General Fund.
The limit is calculated by adjusting the previously adopted limit by factors which include: ( I) the
State of California Per Capita Income Growth, and (ii) the Town's Population Growth. The State
Department of Finance provides figures for both adjustment factors. The limit may be further
adjusted if cities bear the costs oflegislated fees for the transfer of responsibility. The County,
through SB 2557, established fees for the collection of property taxes and for booking prisoners.
Cities may adjust their limit by the estimated amount of these fees.
As indicated previously, the estimated appropriations limit is calculated by adjusting the prior year
limit with the State-provided factors for income and population growth, and including adjustments
for assumed fees and transfers of responsibility. The general calculation is provided in the
following table.
(June 1996)
Table: Gann Limit Adjustment Calculations
Amount
I Previously established limit, July 1, 1995 $3,134,000
2 Adjustment Factors
---per capita personal income 1.0467
---population growth 1.0193
3 Multiplier, for adjustment to limit (1.0521 x 1.0193) 1. 0669
4 Subtotal new limit: (I)x(3) $3,343,669
5 Add: legislated pass-through fees
---County property tax collection 18,000
---County booking fees 8,000
6 New revised limit, July 1, 1996 $3,369,669
Recommendation:
Town Council adopt Town Council adopt the included Resolution accepting the annual
adjustment factors, and establishing the Fiscal Year 1996-97 Town appropriation limit pursuant to
Article XIII B. of the State constitution.
Attachments:
1. State Department of Finance, Per Capital Income Factor.
2. State Department of Finance, Population Data Factor.
3. Resolution Establishing Article XIII B. Limit, 1996-97
(June 1996)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ESTABLISHING
AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE xm B. OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, Article XIII B. of the Constitution of the State of California provides that
total annual appropriations subject to exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government
for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population, except as provided for
in Article XIII B; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XIII B. of the Constitution of the State of California, the
Town Council of the Town of Tiburon deems it to be in the best interests of the Town ofTiburon
to establish an appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 1996-97; and
WHEREAS, the previously established limit for Fiscal Year 1995-96 was $3,134,000, and
the State Department of Finance has determined that the 1996 Per Capita Personal Income Factor
is 4.67%, and the 1996 Population Change Factor is 1.93%; the Finance Director estimates that
legislated pass-through fees of the County will be $26,000; the Finance Director of the Town of
Tiburon has determined that the an appropriations limit in the amount of $3,343,669 shall be
established for Fiscal Year 1996-97.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon
that an appropriations limit in the amount of $3,363,669 is established for Fiscal Year 1996-97
pursuant to Article XIII B. of the Constitution of the State of California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon on , 1996 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
BY:
NICKY WOLF, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE 1. CRANE, TOWN CLERK
(June 1996)
STAT~-()F CALIFORNIA
,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
915 L STREET
SACRAMENTO. CA 95814.3706
PETE WILSON. GOIl&mor
~.
...., ~
',.. ."
May 13, 1996
~fJimJrgnW&1lJJ
MAY 171996'
FINANCE D;:c'.',,,,~, "c"T
..... -. ' 11,IJ"-J\I
I (;,:;r'l OF '/..uR6i;/
REVISED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT DATA FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
This letter is to inform you that the Department of Finance has corrected the Price Factor,
that is, the percentage change in per capita personal income, to be used in setting the
1996 - 1997 appropriation limit.
The revised Price Factor is lower than the Price Factor given in Enclosure I of the letter,
Price and Population Data for Local Jurisdictions sent to you on May 1,1996.
The old Price Factor was 5.21 percent. The new Price Factor is 4.67 percent.
We have revised Enclosure I to reflect the new Price Factor and to show how the new price
factor and population factor are used in computing an appropriations limit.
We apologize for any inconvenience this revision causes. But we do ask that you notify any
affected offices within your jurisdiction of this revision.
If you have any questions, please call us at (916) 323-4086.
Sincerely,
~j" ,;j'TI
Linda Gage, Chief
Demographic Research Unit
915 L Street, 8th Floor
Sacramellto, CA 95814
. . ~ - A't,::~~..v::?:':tr-"'-
;~'+;_/c.'~.
/'. ",
~.c;.., ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN POPULATION MINUS EXCLUSIONS* JANUARY 1, 1995
4It TO JANUARY 1. 1996 ANO TOTAL POPULATION JANUARY 1. 1996.
ENCLOSURE II
DATE PRINTED
04/30/96
'.,:,,'
-,:,' ,~
'-
."
---:;....",;.
~,';. .,eo
~!f*'
.~>, .^'"...
'!!...~..
~~~f
#i;;.
t'..
,
'.
POPULATION MINUS EXCLUSIONS f
.
. '.
POPULATION
ANNUAL TOTAL
COUNTY PERCENT CHANGE POPULATION
CITY 1995 TO 1996 1-1-95 1-1-96 1-1-96
MARIN
BELVEDERE
CORTE MADERA
FAIRFAX
LARKSPUR
MILL VALLEY
NOVATO
ROSS
SAN ANSELMO
SAN RAFAEL
SAUSALITO
TIBURON
UN INCORPORATE 0
1. 17 2.226 ~.252 2.252
1. 43 8.468 8.589 8,589
1. 31 6.942 7.033 7,033
1. 12 11.492 11.621 11,621
1.35 13.570 13.753 13,753
1.58 44.663 45.368 46.505
1.40 2.213 2.244 2.244
1. 16 12.022 12.162 12.162
1. 37 51.644 52.354 52.354
1. 34 7.547 7.648 7.648 ;
1.93 8.238 8.397 8.397 '.
1. 47 60.581 61.472 66.972
1.43 229.606 232.893 239.530
.,....
',~!~~~2'.
...~..,.
''''1
';,. ~
~
""
-' ~
;;t~~
";.:. ":j)j;
~, .' --.'.
.,.
..
.
MARIN COUNTY
-'~:..~\
':-:i~;';.';
.'
PAGE
.
* EXCLUSIONS INCLUDE STATE MENTAL INSTITUTIONS. FEDERAL MILITARY BASES AND STATE
AND FEDERAL PRISONS.
~.Je~ !l/(). , 0 _
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS. lRANSPORIA liON AND HOUSING AGENCY
PETE WILSON. Govemor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BOX 23660
OAKlAND. CA 94623-0660
(510)~
May 14, 1996
Mr. Peter Stoneham, Traffic Officer
Department of Police
Town of Tiburon
1155 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
Dear Mr. Stoneham:
We have reviewed and concurred with your request for the installation of R26
signs -No Parking Any Time- on the eastbound shoulder of Route 131 (Tiburon
Boulevard) from west of Reed Ranch Road to west of Stewart Drive. After we receive
an ordinance or resolution prohibiting parking in this area by the Town"Uf Tiburon, we
will proceed to install the requested signs.
Should you need further information, please contact Mable Suen of my staff at
(510) 286-4585.
Sincerely,
JOE BROWNE
District Director
BY:N~J~~
WILUAM S. MERIWETHER
Senior Transportation Engineer
,.
7.. ..;..""
i)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF TmURON COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TmURON
CREATING A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TmURON BOULEVARD
CST ATE ROUTE 131) BETWEEN REED RANCH AND STEWART DRIVE.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon that it is hereby ordered
as follows:
The following portion of Tiburon Boulevard (State Route 131) is hereby defined and
established as a "NO PARKING" area and shall be governed by the provisions of Section 23-31 of
the Tiburon Town Code:
1. On the South side of Tiburon Boulevard (State Route 131), starting at Reed Ranch
Road to Stewart Drive.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon
on
, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NICKY WOLF, MAYOR, Town ofTiburon
ATTEST:
R. L KLEINERT, TOWN MANAGER
,.:..
900 Sherman A venue
Novato, CA 94945
415/897-4311
FAX 415/897-4354
Mayor
Ernest J. Gray
Mayor Pro Tern
Pat Eklund
Coundlmembers
Michael Di Giorgio
Carole Dillon-Knutson
Cynthia L Mwray
Gty Manager
RoderickJ. Wood
;:t::;k M. L
i-:=;- ;'c ,'J;,t>'/;i""'I'D)
'I '\',"" :",! ',J! ,~~ r,
U'l1 !'::;~ ~ .~~ U IJ ~--~~ LU
w. It..'( -'. I': 'C':', -
,.li,; ~J 'l I J;-o)
May 29. 1995
TO\;V(~ :'~!Ar'~l\C.~(:r-~':~ C-t:~':I(~E
~i~Q;Ni',j Cl: T!~~U~':,'J~j
Nicky Wolf, Mayor
Town of Tiburon
426 Greenwood Beach
Tiburon. CA 94920
Dear Mayor Wolf:
By this letter, I am transmitting a sample resolution that supports the Reuse Plan
for the old Hamilton Army Air Field that was developed through a community
process that best supports the needs of the community and region.
This resolution was suggested at the May 15, 1996 MCCMC meeting by
Mayor John Leonard of Mill Valley, who recommended that each city put the
resolution on their next agenda for their Council's consideration.
Sincerely yours,
~~6~
Shirley Gremmels
City Clerk
Imam
MJ2219
cc: City Managers
City Clerks
,-
I
.-'
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CITY OF
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE REUSE PLAN FOR THE
HAMILTON ARMY AIRFIELD
WHEREAS, in 1930 during the Depression the region taxed itself to purchase the
property for Hamilton Army Airfield and gave the property (for $1) to the United States to meet
the country's need for a west coast air defense facility; and
WHEREAS, the United States has benefitted and enjoyed the use of this property for
64 years and Marin has worked to be a good neighbor to the Base, and the Base, when active,
has been a good neighbor to Marin; and
WHEREAS, the US Air Force no longer needed the Base and vacated it in 1974 and
much of the Base has been allowed to deteriorate and become a blight and danger to the
community; and
WHEREAS, the United States realigned the property after several years of substantial
non-use with a portion to the Army, a portion to the Navy and a portion to the Coast Guard; and
WHEREAS, in 1984 the Army prior to BRAC declared surplus a 420 acre area through
the General Services Administration, and in 1991 the Army under BRAC 1 closed the air field,
and in 1993 the Navy under BRAC 3 closed its housing facility, and in 1996 the Coast Guard
requested to increase it's facilities with a portion of the Navy housing; and
WHEREAS, the community and region have struggled for over 22 years to return
Hamilton to productive reuse and unlike other bases in the country has had to work with four
different branches of the government under three different sets of rules for reuse and conversion;
and
WHEREAS, Congress directed the community to develop a plan for the reuse of the Base
that represented the community's needs and the community has spent nearly two years and over
$2 million mostly at its own expense developing a Reuse Plan that has strong community and
regional support and has been approved by HUD; and
WHEREAS, the community has worked closely with the Navy to develop a disposal
process for the Base that provides the Navy with the fair market value for the property based
on the Reuse Plan, and provides for immediate disposal which avoids substantial disposal and
caretaker cost to the Navy; and which assures the implementation of the Reuse Plan which meets
a broad range of community and regional needs.
RES/
5/28/96
( ,/
,.,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,' the City of strongly urges
the United States Navy and Congress to support the community's and region's plan and end
22 years of effort and struggle to return the property to productive reuse and authorize the sale
of the property to the City of to carry out the successful conversion and
reuse of the Base for the benefit of the United States and the people of Marin who provided the
property when the country needed it.
RES/
5/28/96
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE:
JUNE 5, 1996
AGENDA NO.:
/0
TO:
TOWN COUNCIL
FROM:
ASSISTANT PLANNER BORBA
SUBJECT:
APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECISION TO
APPROVE AN ADDITION AND VARIANCE FOR REAR
YARD SETBACK AND A FLOOR AREA EXCEPTION AT
2305 CENTRO EAST STREET
APPLICANT-MR. AND MRS. BUCKERFIELD
APPELLANTS-MR. AND MRS. MARANS
MR. B.J. TALBOT
MR. J.J. WINTERSTEEN
MS. SHELLY BROWN
MR. AND MRS. DREW
MR. AND MRS. GEHRMANN
BACKGROUND:
ADDRESS: 2305 CENTRO EAST STREET
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: 59-201-43
FILE NUMBER: 296006
ZONING: R-2 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
GENERAL PLAN: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
LOT SIZE: 8,895 SQ.FT.
CURRENT USE: DUPLEX
OWNER: MR. AND MRS. BUCKERFIELD
ARCIDTECT: MR. CHARLES SAUL (CONTRACTOR)
DATE COMPLETE: APRIL 11,1996
CEQA EXEMPTION: APRIL 25, 1996
PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT DEADLINE: JULY 25, 1996
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant is proposing to construct an additional 877 sq.ft., of living space to an existing
duplex. The project requires a variance for encroachment into the rear yard setback ( 12' in lieu
of 15' setback), and a floor area exception (3,823 sq.ft. in lieu of 2,899 sq. ft.). The proposal
includes enlarging the existing master bedroom, garage, living room and dining area. Portions
of the new construction includes popping out of existing walls onto or underneath existing decks
or trellis covered areas. The proposal also includes the addition of a new hot tub and deck area.
REVIEW BY THE BOARD:
The proposed project appeared before the Design Review Board on May 2, 1996. After public
hearing and discussion, the Board approved the project on a 3-1 vote, adopting the variance
findings and the findings for the floor area exception as well as the conditions outlined in the
Staff Report (exhibit 2). Staff would like to note that due to a malfunction in the tape machine
and due to the absence of the minute clerk the night of the meeting, that the minutes from the
May 2, 1996, Design Review Board are not available.
The appeal was filed by Mr. and Mrs. Marans, Mr. B.J. Talbot, Mr. J.J. Wintersteen, Ms. Brown,
Mr. and Mrs. Drew, and Mr. and Mrs. Gehrmann, on May 13, 1996.
BASIS OF THE APPEAL:
The basis of the appeal is that the variance and floor area exception were improperly granted by
the Design Review Board and that neighboring properties were not adequately notified about the
proposed project. Below is a listing of each ground upon which the appeal is based, followed by
Staff s response:
Ground #1: In addition to the setback variance this proposal breeched the floor area
ratio of the General Plan by almost 1,000 sq. ft. The proposal is an
example of overbuilding on small lots, typical of what our Zoning
Ordinance and our Home Owners Association has been trying to prevent
through passage of Ordinance #360 N.S. (4.02.07 guidelines). The
exception would ordinarily require a parcel of over twice the size of the
Buckerfields in order to conform to the FAR.
Staff Response: In approving the project, the Design Review Board
accepted as written the findings necessary for granting the variance and
floor area exception, as set forth in the May 2, 1996, Staff Report. The
findings which the Board adopted are as follows:
Variance Findings
1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property,
including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings,
the strict application of this Ordinance will deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the
vicinity and in the same or similar zones.
Special circumstances exist in that the property is oddly shaped,
located on hilltop, the topography is steep and there is extensive
vegetation helping to screen the property and any proposed
additions that may be proposed. Also because of the proximity of
surrounding properties there could be potential view blockage
issues if a second story were to be proposed. By not proposing a
second story addition they are helping to preserve possible
neighborhood impacts on views and would not create visual
impacts on the mass and bulk of the structure. Also the location of
the proposed addition would take place in areas that are on top of
or underneath existing deck or a covered trellis area.
2. The variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges,
inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the
vicinity and in the same or similar zones.
The variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges in that
the lot is oddly shaped, the residence is located on a steep hilltop,
is extensively screened with existing vegetation and the residence
as-built and proposed is beneficial for the preservation of views.
The existing residence is nonconforming, it already encroaches
into the right side yard setback. Other variances granted in the
vicinity include a front yard variance in 1994 for 2260 Centro East
Street; a lot coverage variance in 1978 for 2295 Centro East Street;
a front yard variance in 1955 for 2140 Centro East Street and in
1971 a front yard variance for 2070 Centro East Street
3. The strict application of this Ordinance would result in practical
difficulty or unnecessary hardship.
The hardship would be that to propose a second story addition it
could create potential view blockage issues for the surrounding
neighbors. The existing residence is nonconforming in the right
side yard setback. The addition as proposed would be in areas on
top of or underneath existing deck or covered trellis areas.
4. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity.
If the applicant were to propose a second story addition that could
be detrimental to the public welfare because of the potential view
blockage issues. The design as proposed would not be detrimental
to other properties in the vicinity. The addition as proposed would
mostly be in areas on top of or underneath existing deck or
covered trellis areas. The addition as proposed should not impact
. .
vIews or pnvacy.
In Staffs opinion, the reasons for granting the 3 foot rear yard encroachment variance are
clearly stated in the findings.
Floor Area Findings
1. The applicant has demonstrated that the visual size and scale of
the proposed structure is compatible with the predominant
pattern established by existing structures in the surrounding
neighborhood; and
The applicant has demonstrated that the visual size and scale of the
proposed structure is compatible with the predominant pattern
established by existing structures in the neighborhood. The
proposed addition is mainly under or on top of existing deck and
covered trellis areas. It does not appear that the proposal would
add to the mass and bulk of the residence as a second story
addition would.
2. The applicant has demonstrated that the visual size and scale of
the proposed structure is compatible with the physical
characteristics of the site. The characteristics include, but are not
limited to, the scale of trees, rock outcroppings, stream courses,
landforms, and the dimensions of the lot.
The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed structure is
compatible with the site. Portions of the proposal includes
enclosing an existing deck areas or is located in a trellis covered
area. The addition as proposed is beneficial for view protection
and does not add to the mass and bulk of the existing residence.
Staff as well as the Board believes that there is sufficient evidence to support the variance
findings and the findings for the floor area exception.
Ground #2: The variance requested as well as the exception should be denied. The
present structure could well serve the needs of the owners with interior
remodeling while conforming to the existing FAR. Most neighbors do not
approve of the plan and some are party to this action.
Staff Response: Once again, in approving the project, the Design
Review Board accepted as written the findings necessary for granting the
variance and floor area exception, as set forth in the May 2, 1996, Staff
Report (findings are noted above).
This proposal was presented to the Design Review Board as a full public
hearing agenda item. Property owners within three hundred feet of the
project were notified by mail and a public notice was published in the
Ark. Except for Mr. Marans, no one from the public voiced any objection
the night of the public hearing. Staff did receive three pieces of late mail
the day of the meeting, which the Design Review Board was able to
review that night. These letters of objection are attached as exhibits 7,
8,9.
Ground #3 Owners of neighboring properties were not adequately notified and not
given enough time for discussion. Filing date 4/18/96 and heard only two
weeks later (512/96). Even Boardmembers of the Home Owners
Association were not aware of the application.
Staff Response: This proposal was presented to the Design Review
Board as a full public hearing agenda item. Property owners within three
hundred feet of the project were notified by mail and a public notice was
published in the Ark. The notices that were mailed and the public notice
in the newspaper were done in the legal amount of time necessary for a
public hearing to take place. Staff did send a referral letter and a set of
the plans to the Lyford Cove Architectural Committee President prior to
the hearing. Staff did not receive any response to the referral.
OTHER
It was made clear at the meeting that the Board concluded that the addition was in scale and
compatible with the neighborhood, and would not unreasonably impact surrounding properties.
Since the minutes of the meeting are not available, Staff has made certain that the Design
Review Board Chairman will be present at the meeting.
The applicants have also provided a detailed written response to the appeal, attached as Exhibit
12.
RECOMMENDA TION
Deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Board. Direct Staff to return at the next meeting
with an appropriate Resolution.
EXHTRITS
1. Appeal application.
2. Design Review Board Staff Report for the May 2, 1996, meeting.
3. Location map.
4. Application for Design Review dated 3/19/96.
5. Application for Variance dated 4/11/96.
6. Variance and FAR findings by applicant dated 4/11196.
7. Letter dated May 2, 1996, from the Lyford Cove/Old Tiburon HOA Vice-President, Pat
Montag.
8. Letter dated May 2, 1996, from Margaret Taylor.
9. Letter dated May 2, 1996, from Nat Marans.
10. Letter dated May 24, 1996, from Pat Montag, Vice-President Lyford Cove/Old Tiburon
HOA.
11. Letter dated May 15, 1996, from Mr. and Mrs. Gehrmann.
12. Letter dated May 28, 1996, from the applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Buckerfield.
13. Letters from neighbors in support of the project dated stamped May 28, 1996.
14. Photos of areas of proposed addition.
15. Plans approved by the Design Review Board on May 2, 1996.
7
/ ) . \'-<~
, ...."''1Jl
'.
('
, .
('
t\. ..
) ....
.
TOWN OF TlBURON
J
NOTICE OF APPEAL
APPELLANT s (NANES
PAf2,4 () /( C
Name:
Address:c/2312 Spanish
AS APPEARING ON ATTACHED CHECKS )
Oe.rvE I1IEr6ft6a~~
Trail Rd. Tiburon 94920
Telephone: 435-1078
(Work)
(Home)
ACTION BEING APPEALED
Body:
Board of Desi~n Review
Date of Action:
f'lav 2nd 19Y6
Name of Applicant:
Mr. / Mrn. Rll....kprfi"l iI (:2305 f"mtrs Ea<:t) APtt 59-201-43
Construction of addition requiring a variance for a
reAr YArd netbRck Rnd Rn exception for ex....en"ive floor
Nature of Application:
GROUNDS FOR APPEAL
(Attach additional pages, if necessary)
In addition to the setback variance this fro~osal breeches the Floor
Area Rat10 of the General Plan by almost ,0 0 sq. ft. The proposal is
an exa~plc of overbuilding on nmall lots, typical of what our Zoning
Ol"'dil'i6.r..c.e: and auy IIen~t: Oun~.r;) .th...30ci~tiOli 110..5 bcthi t..I..)' :u.o t.u 11.1 event
through passage of Ordinance # 36Q N.S. ( 4.02.07 guidclincn).The
'excention' would ordinarilv reauire a pArcel of over twi...." the size
of the Buckerfi....lds in order to,confor~ to the F.A.R.
- Tnt:' V~r;~n~p rpqllPF:lt.pn ~H~ wp'1 n~ th~ 'Ry('tpr+inn ~nn"l" nao "~n;pd! The
pr....sent structure could well s....rve the needs of the owners. with interic
rer:lOdelling vlhile conforming to thel'cxisting F.A.R. Most neighbors do
noT, approve 01 tne pian ana nome are party to th1S act1on.
- Ovmers of neighboring pr~perti....s were not adequatel r ng,tified and. no't
gIven enoug 1me or 1ncUSS10n. 1 1ng a e (and ear only
hlo vlP.eks latf'r (5/2/96). EV(!rl Board Members of the Home O~mers Assn
i:eye: net fli,.ELYf: of the: Ell"plicatien. ( 'PnO l~.tt(:r:3 ...C:\1J.~.3~":"1~f~ ~nforce~n~
of f,uidelines of },.A.R. fro!:l individual membern are enclooed. (PD./W 2;
Last Day to File: MRY 13 1 qgh Date Received: S 11-C.~
' I I
Fee ($300.00) Paid: to (A tl cLs Date ofH~aring: ~ ~ :r _~
January 1996
EXHm
..~,.'......,,,,--..
-...... .r""'~"~\~"'i";
\
Lo{
. \y
", / . . Page 2
r
o
The application of Ordinance 4,02.07 of the General Plan will not deprive
the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity.
The variance will constitute a special privileg~, inconsistant to limit-
ations on other properties in the area since formulation of the new Gener1
Plan in 1990(7)
Application of the ordinance will NOT result in unnecessary hardships on
the Owners but will moderate excessive plans for the property.
Granting Variances and exceptions in an arbitrary manner will be detrimen1
and injurious to other properties. It would be a bad example of developmer
on a small lot and may cause other property owners to follow the example.
This applicant has not demonstrated that a 4,400 sq.ft structure on a smaj
9,000 sq ft parcel is compatable with structures built after the new Genel
Plan.... although the visual imp~ct may not be iornediately apparent becau<
of tree or trellis coverage.
Two of the contiguous property owners are not residing on their property
and had not been notified ( Wachters ... to the left,and Gehrmans to the
north. ) Mr Gehrman has become a party to this action.
The existing duplex consists of a 2,174 sq. ft. UPPER FLOOR
892 sq. ft. Lower floor
462 sq. ft. Upper floor deck
380 sq. ft. Garage
The Buckerfields want an additional 399 sq. ft Upper floor
478 sq. ft. Lower floor
180 sq. ft. added Decking
133 sq. ft. additional Garage
which would total 4,585 sq. ft. plus the Garage.
NOTE*a)Mathematical errors in Design Review Board Staff Report for total
proposed square footage. ( 2nd page, paragraph 2 )...... way of!!
b)Last paragraph pg.2...is misleading. This building is cresentlv
a two story structure. Were they considering a third level? ....
and this property is not on a hilltop as represented.
. -\9;:~~':,_:_
"':';--:<'-..0"
Ji'O "':"'t-..
. ,
~ ". - , .
.........F\.
(-
d!1at;Ja<d fJayfo<
2201 (!.nho Ca.t
fJi&uwn, (!atifo<nia 94920
_ _~ 2/;Cf~r::,
~ ~ ~ ~r:::~';'~::i:.~:_~rh_
/~(~~. MAY 21895
T"""'7"-'.-_."1'.--:-~
~~, lL2T:~
- ~. :3
~J' ~~PZ'7~
tk.. ~~ ~.~
d ::2ags.-~~~~~d
'10-0~..,;.t-.-hcZ . .- ~ ~
PI- i!..u..d!!.:.. ~ F /t . ,f. - jv:.5' _ '-"-
~(~.,J,~~~~
~~~~~~~).
~~~~~ . :
c:l-d-a.J ~ ~ 7~ ' 1-0 ~
~~ ~~
~vf. . ~~~~~
~.L ~ ~ dL( f"~. ~f'-'t
~ ~~ f-ed A-<J~~-!-7~
~~~~~4C.,bz,v_
th~~~~~~~
tJ-:!: -r. ~. ,g~Z--::t;, ~:::t-<~ ~-
..:~:'~t:.-.:.::; .
.; '.--~~~,;,~..
_.~~=:r.-,
~.
( I
Lyford's Cove - Old Tiburon
Homeowners Association
II
May 2, 1996
To: Town Of Tiburon Design Review Board, Town Council
FROM: Pat Montag, Vice-President LCOTHA
It has come to our attention that an applica~ion has been
filed for an addition to the property at 2305 Centro East.
It is of the utmost importance, especially in the Old Tiburon/
Lyford's Hygeia area that you uphold the Tiburon General Plan
as regards ~o the Floor Area ratios and setbacKs.
This organization has continually supported the guidelines
of the General Plan and calls on you to take the plan into
consideration upon application of additions and remodels as
well as new construction.
r'
I I
Board of Design h_Jiew
Tiburon TOIm Hall
Tiburon
r
4/30/'36
Meeting May 2 1996
Th~ application for further expansion of a property at 2305 Centro Eas
( agenda ite~ f-12 ) should be denied.
Thin prop~rty, recently purchased fro~ the De Borba estate by the
current owners is a well built duplex on a sloped lot of slightly lese
than 9,000 sq ft. The duplex presently has more square footage than
would be allo;red by our current zoning ordinance, (3,070 Sq ft + garag
The applicant is requesting another 900 SQ. ft to be added to the
structure in defiance of the F.A.R. constraints established in the
Guidelines ( 4.02.07. of the zoning ordinance # 360 N.S.).
Lyford Cove Old Tiburon has the problem of being a duplex zone with
mainly small parcels. Everyone seems to have the idea that bigger is
better, but this premise must be tempered ;rith reason. We have estab _
lished the Floor Area Ratio to protect properties from being overbuilt
This Ordinance ~ruST be adhered to, especially in Old Tiburon.
Staff has taken a lack-a-dazical attitude to;rard these applications.
They should be directed to discourage unnecessary expansions and help
enforce our ordinances, Not give tacit approval to any application.
The Plans submitted would necessitate a 20,000 sq. ft. lot which is
not the case.
Approval of this type of application sets in motion a series of simila
requests to breech the terms of the F.A.R. guidelines. Other property
owners may well take this for an example of the new possibilities on
their own properties... to the detriment of the Old Tiburon areas.
This well kept property needs no variances or exceptions. The present
owners knew exactly what it was when they purchased the duplex a shor-t
time ago.
Nat Har~ns
Spanish Trai
P.S. many 0
were unawar
c;~.
L..io--\ 1-:"
~~ ~... / '--~
the home owners were not notified of this project and
of this meeting.
'1::"'
(
,
.,
i
i NATHANIEL MARANS
I VIOLET MARANS
I 2312 SPAIN ISH TRAIL
TIBUAON, CA 94920
PAYTO THE .~ ( at c:-;-'( t7
I ORDER OF . ',V _ ~LO'""'1.--..
I .
! ~M'f~s .
. OF AMERICA ~
M'Mof=;37io~(!-W""~~, k~__~ 2,---..--.;
1:3 uao 7BOI:001, HO 2qa~. 0 :loo
4-192k
300
90-8078/3211
I $.:::ic~
DOLLARS
DOLLARS
3223 1
90-402111211 ~
511 :J
.
I
f
~
'~
I
,
,
;:;....,_~_tsa.
. cc
.
'~
!
"
.~
~
,
~
i: PAYTO THE
I ~", ORDER OF
~
1 ~ ;; ..df::z,
~ ,. I /
! ~ X(-/!!~!t.'!,~i~~NK
I l;: ,11Q PO BOX ~91.12D4 STRAWBERRY VILLAGE
I ; MIU ~ALUY CA !M941 /-~' /
Ii ~ /,2-. . ~ ",tJ!-./r---
~ /,.,/ , ---Lf:::::..~__
;;' FOR _ _-L__"""""- -~4 _
t - . -
I ~ 1:lonlol,onBI::l22:l"'051o1,5202aOIl' v
, 'l6......
, ~~--
I
B. J. TALBOT
BOX 651
TIBUAON, CA 94920
/'111 f 1/
19.!iL
r 0 {...V IV Ct /=
r'::Ju1h0 VO!Or:;;
"-'"'"~ /
/ I Eli/i';:: oJ..)
$ S'cJ
J.J. WINTERSTEEN-/~
2315 PAAAOISsPR"'"~625 Ht', ',_
~IBURON ~4810 " ',,',
~~~ ... ,',
~~--::::: ;-. .
~DfR F .
"
:s::- /0
1.5?5
0754
11-35/1210
294
,.,
$515. ~._
0<:>
...
'-.....',-
DOllARS
m Sa 01 America :[- . .~.)
Geary-Masonic 8rancI'l 0294 .... '..' .--..... -".. '.' k
2835 Geaoy BI'd ","....- Q: d
San F'""~,,,o. CA 94118 '-. r <.. . ',4
MEMO ..< - A :r,~'~ '.
I: 1, 2 WOO:l 58,:!J 7 5','''0 2ql,l,"'Lj :l2/{ 2i;> .
, .r I
/
-
--
~
o.
<
1
1.
., I!
., , !
~
~
SHELLEY NAOENE BROWN CDl NlS69060 . .
2]00 VISTA DEL MAR LANE (415) 435-8435 .--- /
TIBLJRON, CA 94920-1208 a- / ! 0
1m ~J
11.
'lJ."/~..(~if~J~
/A..__~~ ~ CCa:iL07I!~
BANK OF AME. CA - -......-:a-t: ...:Y
'.~_.#>
neURON 9RANCH 1071 (.15) 81$-<4700 -:;1
1601 TlBURON BOULEVARD ~_ : __" .
nSURON, CA lM920 :; - ~.
~ .LV ./~ /(frr /JUA ~..
..I: I. 2 .000:1 581:0 2 SO'" .07.5"'00 I. '1 '111" t!
,~
(
('
250
/.91'k-
11-35/1210
!$aD-
Q'"~...
ANNE S. OR W. LAWRENCE DREW
2345 SPANISH TRAil RD., 435-3978
TleURON, CA 94920
r/;/
,
.
.
,
<
I~
Ji
l"
l
------
-;;~ ::;:!~~: ',--' '. ....~';. Yo.- -::~-..: . J'-. ~-'...~. ~ .<,;;'J_-~_ _-r -' ~~: _ .~- 7~ < _.; _
-
I
l
.
1
;
1
j
Pay to the I'" ,--'/ I . I. .
Order of _ L~'-J- . ~LL Il.'-.
'-c-'~- . ........j G ^
. - t!"'-'-~ . It:'.. j-rd/
; I i. ~
m of AmMca
Tiburon Branch 1071
1601 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920 (4151 615-4700
V~llftd Customer
~
8233
11-3511210
197j,
$ SC /111.
Dollars [tl~_-::
---
(L~J(~~/ ..
..~
$ "5"0.00
For
I: lo 2 loGOO 3 581: 8233..,1.07 lo 3..,0 lo lo 1.011"
or
J
.
I
.
.
1
I
1
.~
JAMES E. GEHRMANN
ROBERTA GEHRMANN
'...' ,.,,~___T.Q.IJ :.., ,i] Bl 108 _.LJ
:JZu- o~/J~~';..,/i.i -, JJIIIC... ' ", .
~"'U"'''''',~" ~
PAY l~ &.C;t.&a.
~ ~l""OQ
m Bank of America
Camous C;;.TrocnS Ot'iII\Ch 0d.22
9Parl<.C.ef9:", Or....
Saaamef\fO_'?A95li25 (S116) 373-6920
11-35/1210
879
COLLARS
C mt.;me~ "5inct
1 9 7 0
Ml!:"fO
SIGN...TUAt:
I: ~ 2 ~OOO 3 581:08 7g",08 2 2 7"'0 81,011'
--
[J!
.......___.'A
--
.c_'~",
r:",.
I ',J
c;
FI2..
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT
TO:
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
AGENDA NO.: FIt.
FROM:
IRENE BORBA, ASSISTANT PLANNER
MEETING DATE:
MA Y 2, 1996
SUBJECT:
2305 CENTRO WEST STREET; FILE # 296006
SITE PLAN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW TO
CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION REQUIRING A VARIANCE
FOR REAR YARD SETBACK AND AN EXCEPTION FOR
FLOOR AREA
APPLICANT-CHARLES SAUL (CONTRACTOR)
OWNER- MR. AND MRS.BUCKERFlELD
PROJECT DATA:
ADDRESS: 2305 CENTRO EAST
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 59-201-43
FILE NUMBER: 296006
LOT SIZE: 8,985 SQUARE FEET
CURRENT USE: DUPLEX
ZONING: R-2 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
GENERAL PLAN: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
FLOOD ZONE: C
DATE COMPLETE: APRIL 11,1996
CEQA EXEMPTION: APRIL 25, 1996
PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT DEADLINE: JULY 25, 1996
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) as specified in Section 15301.
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is proposing to construct an addition which would require a variance for
encroachment into the rear yard setback and a floor area exception at the existing residence at
2305 Centro East Street. The addition includes enlarging the existing master bedroom, garage,
living room and dining area. The proposal also includes the addition of a new hot tub and deck
EXHIBIT NO. 2-
-
'.
(0
(,
I "
area.
A great deal of the proposed new construction includes popping out existing walls onto or
underneath existing deck or trellis covered areas.
The proposal would add 597 square feet to the existing lot coverage bringing the total to 3,002
square feet (33.4%). The maximum allowed for this zone is 35%. The proposal would add 877
square feet to the existing floor area bringing the total to :; ,2383 square feet. The maximum
allowed for this property is 2,899 square feet. "3,~~
The siding of the addition would match the existing residence but the color would change to a
"driftwood grey". A sample will be present at the meeting for your review.
ANALYSIS:
Zoning
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds it to be in conformance with the development
standards for the R-2 zone, with the exception of the encroachment into the rear yard setback
and floor area, for which a variance and floor area exception are being requested. The existing
residence is legal nonconforming on the right side yard setback. Since no work is being
proposed in this area a variance is not necessary.
The proposal requires a variance for encroachment into the rear yard setback. The Ordinance
requires 20 % to a 25 foot setback for rear yards in the R-2 zone. This proposal is at 12 feet.
The variance request is for a 3 foot encroachment into the rear yard setback.
Variance Findings
In order to grant the requested variance, the Board must make the findings as required by
Section 4.03.05 of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance. Staff suggests that the following findings
may be made in support of the requested variance:
1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property,
including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings,
the strict application of this Ordinance will deprive the applicant
of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in the
same or similar wnes.
Special circumstances exist in that the property is oddly shaped, located on
hilltop, the topography is steep and there is extensive vegetation helping to screen
the property and any proposed additions that may be proposed. Also because of
the proximity of surrounding properties there could be potential view blockage
issues if a second story were to be proposed. By not proposing a second story
addition they are helping to preserve possible neighborhood impacts on views and
(~
r.
\. ,
would not create visual impacts on the mass and bulk of the structure. Also the
location of the proposed addition would take place in areas that are on top of or
underneath existing deck or a covered trellis area.
2. The variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges,
inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity
and in the same or similar wnes.
The variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges in that the lot is
oddly shaped, the residence is located on a steep hilltop, is extensively screened
with existing vegetation and the residence as-built and proposed is beneficial for
the preservation of views. The existing residence is nonconforming, it already
encroaches into the right side yard setback. Other variances granted in the vicinity
include a front yard and in 1994 for 2260 Centro East Street; a lot coverage
variance in 1978 for 2295 Centro East Street; a front yard variance in 1955 for
2140 Centro East Street and in 1971 a front yard variance for 2070 Centro East
Street.
3. The strict application of this Ordinance would result in practical
difficulty or unnecessary hardship.
The hardship would be that to propose a second story addition it could create
potential view blockage issues for the surrounding neighbors. The existing
residence is nonconforming in the right side yard setback. The addition as
proposed would be in areas on top of or underneath existing deck or covered
trellis areas.
4. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity.
If the applicant were to propose a second story addition that could
be detrimental to the public welfare because of the potential view
blockage issues. The design as proposed would not be detrimental
to other properties in the vicinity. The addition as proposed would
mostly be in areas on top of or underneath existing deck or covered trellis areas.
The addition as proposed should not impact views or privacy.
The proposal also requires an exception to the floor area guidelines. The Ordinance allows for
this property 2,899 square feet. This proposal is at 3,823 square feet. The exception is for 924
square feet in excess of the maximum allowed floor area. The existing residence already exceeds
the maximum allowed floor area by 47 square feet.
Floor Area Exception
In order to grant the requested floor area exception, the Board must make the findings as
,-_/'-',
( \
r.
required by Section 4.02.07 of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance. Staff suggests that the following
findings may be made in support of the requested floor area exception:
1. The applicant has demonstrated that the visual size and scale of the proposed
structure is compatible with the predominant pattern established by existing
structures in the surrounding neighborhood; and
The applicant has demonstrated that the visual size and scale of the proposed
structure is compatible with the predominant pattern established by existing
structures in the neighborhood. The proposed addition is mainly under or on
top of existing deck and covered trellis areas. It does not appear that the
proposal would add to the mass and bulk of the residence as a second story
addition would.
2. The applicant has demonstrated that the visual size and scale of the proposed
structure is compatible with the physical characteristics of the site. The
characteristics include, but are not limited to, the scale of trees, rock
outcroppings, stream courses, land forms, and the dimensions of the lot.
The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed structure is compatible with the
site. Portions of the proposal includes enclosing an existing deck areas or is
located in a trellis covered area. The addition as proposed is beneficial for view
protection and does not add to the mass and bulk of the existing residence.
From the evidence provided, Staff believes that there is sufficient evidence to support the
variance findings and the findings for the floor area exception.
Public Comments
To date, Staff has not received any public comments.
RECOMMENDA TION:
If the Board finds the design acceptable and in conformance with the Town's Design Guidelines,
and if the Board makes the required findings for the requested variance and floor area exception,
then Staff recommends the attached conditions of approval be applied:
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Conditions of approval.
2. Location map.
3. Application for design review and variance dated March 19, 1996.
4. Letter and variance findings by contractor Charles Saul dated April 11, 1996.
5. Plans dated April 8, 1996.
(
r'.
1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
2305 CENTRO EAST STREET
FILE # 296006
1. This approval shall be used within (2) years of the approval date, and shall become null
and void unless a building permit has been issued or an extension granted.
2. The development of the project shall conform with the application dated by the Town of
Tiburon on March 19, 1996, or as amended by these conditions of approval. Any
modifications to the plans of April 8, 1996, must be reviewed and approved by the
Board.
3. The applicant must meet all requirements of other agencies prior to issuance of a building
permit.
4. The variance hereby granted shall apply to the specific project included with this
application. The variance for rear yard setback is not applicable to future projects or
designs.
5. The floor area exception hereby granted shall apply to the specific project included with
this application. The exception for floor area is not applicable to future projects or
designs.
c)
..
.~
(,
"
\'
~c .
~r.)
..
Q ';&,~
~
~
.!
E
"
:z:
....
I ~
Iii.
..
'\-'
.0
tl
l
I
w
....
o
:z:
t\ r.'.
1\1.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
c:,'\
~.~
2305 CENTRO EAST STREET
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 59-201-43
c,'\. .
(
-<..~1;
4'C,
\.:::
....
!J ~
.:U -=
,t) ... (
ct:Q~
A .!:
/f)~-
-'
~.!'
EXHIBIT NO. 3.
I .
, '14{
;,~" ;'",
I ,\;.' I
.~~
_"t.J"
! ..
~...J.:".
:1
/'.M..}.i.'~
..0 l
, '
.
.~."'.
".,'''l.
. ....'
~' ".
..;~~ -'
'\
1
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND DESIGN REVIEW
TOWN OF TIBURON
1155 TIBURON BLVD., TIBURON, CA 94920
(415) 43S-"l3'l7
. 'C'IR STAFF USE
DATE RECEIVED: ?:I, '1/q Y
RECEIVED BY: .JJ..-z..utP
FEES RECEIVED:.$"tOO
RECEIPT NO: 885~
CASE NO.: :::J "lwW
~ 't,"CO,"
SITE ADDRESS: 2~ot5 ~ ~-r
Please indiClte with an asterisk (*) persons to .....om correspondence shonld be sent..
OWNER OF ~
PROPERlY: ",tic:. ~...lp~ ~"'~I"1tA.tJ
.
MAILING ADDRESS: 130~ ~ >n2o ~r
APPLIC~~~ c~A\A-
(Other Than er)
ADDRESS:--ll ~ ~,..ttet.~ ~ YJ(L.
ARCHITECT:
DESIGNER:
ENGINEER:~ ~
~~ evltoOta.
PHONE:
PHONE: ~e1-~ 1/2J q
IJ%'~ C1'1 . q eM 'IS/
I
PHONE: Z3 Q7-.!j q-3Cj
ADDRESS:
PARCEL NO~-5:J - 2c /- I./~
ZONING: 1< - 'L
..
" BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
- :l:1oM~
.J/~
1lt1vf'IotJ&.M~ . A.OOrn~.
1:>€d' /,#Dr n:.a
I
{
"
I, the undersigned owner (or authorized agent) oC the property herein described, bereby make application
Cor design review oC the plans submitted and made a part oC this application in accordance with the
provisions oC the Town Ordinance and I hereby certifY that the inConnation given is true and correct to the
best oC my knowledge and belieC.
~4f:
..
MAR 1 8 1996
r"'t:,"..,..~~,._ ._
~..:.; ~~':......'" .
.
l [)E:~J~.~~'
"t4..pt.-c.x
-:-~t +i;i:~;.~,1:.~.-..:
- 111/1l./~{l?~
,~';
. .
,
-'r!
~IT NO,::,~t
':'-J.~~"~4te~,.1~~~~~~,,;;~~~#j:,:~
/
,
,it .
C.
4:'1
i
t; ,
l
..~-~~..
.
~ . .
Pl~se provide the(f~?wing information:
1. Briefly, reason for proposed. project:
/'-...r-'
(
Existing
Proposed
SAME:.
Pi (J"f-f/-
4. .Individual and total square feet of living areas and accessory buildings.
Existing
~t?t,~ d
Proposed
b11 ~. {;r .
'\.i"'..-."
; 993 d
.
5. Percentage of total site to be
PARKING:
'/b2
~ ?>~.t;f.
Covered by:
~~~.tJI~r"
10 Propos.ed
ON GRADE BUILDING:
Existing
~~%. ~f.
01""-; ~
Existinq
Proposed
. -OTHER PAVED AREAS (ACCESS TO PARKING, TURNAROUNDS, .ETC.)
Existinq
Proposed
LANDSCAPING:
Existing
Proposed
6. Building height and number of stories:
Existing
/9 I /2-SnnZ1~S
I
IhA)(. Lar Ccv. ~% 31<f5~..ar.
.zeerq 55.(+ pge i
Proposed
.:;-:;:;::::-:---- /9!- b /I-;~/-~s
~#5U~ €J~) I
mAx.PAR
;;'.t~,;~1*:~~"':-,,:,';'
. . i~.
.o.,_.;~,~~ '. . . .' ..:,.i.~~.
.~~.it;~..>,-,-,\,,~~ '. "".'-, ~...u:;~.~'~ .-
".- -,...... .~~, . - ":";>F-:~~$!,,_!,r:-.fh~
I
,
i.
Nurnoer or ort-street parKlng spaces:
,-..-J"--'"
! .
r'-"-,'
V ',:fh
COVERED
Existinq
Proposed
v
:5,4.1 €.-
OPEN
'.
Existinq
.... .,~,_.
Proposed
;
.54..t..o
8. Surrounding land use: North ~~~J
South ~~.&, 1 ()/Ji(/c,w4A1
East ~JtnJ "lAllA
West ~~ lo~
9. Project scheduling and phasing: _/~"
10. If residential: total number of living units
range of sale prices or rents
- 1.-'"
11. If commercial or industrial:
net rentable floor area
number of occupants
estimated employment per shift
12. If applicable, describe provisions for:
water service
fire protection
storm drainage
sewage disposal
other utilities
13. Any other pertinent information:
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
:'"
.:<~*:~~;
..... ".
;.""0.
;'t'
_.'.,.~".:.;.t~,:~ ..... .... ~-~._ '';~':~j.i~_'.~)i~.''~,_", ,
.....~.~....~_~:2"'.~..:;;.....;. -....;'.. .::'
. ..
.: ~':~'~~~~~::'
. :":Ji'H<"""~~~~
"
~
..;.....
:-... ;,"'..;.. ""'-{ ~;,;~... -.~.
'~ .
((\
(r:
COMPLETB TRB FOLLOWING PROJECT DATA LISTI
TO BE COIIPLETED BY lIPPLIC1JIT
I I STArr USE ONLY
" PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED
ITEX EXISTING AND/OR ALTERATION TOTAL Aatual R.quir-.~
,,-
Parcel (Sec. 10. 201)/ ~s~.:tt./ sq. ft. '7~ II sq. ft. sq. tt
Area sq. ft.
'No. or Dwelling Uni ts ~ I ~~€- II
Parcel Area/Dwelling N/lI I I
Yards ~CZoN T" ~6 .
'V2--' .f-,- r
(Sec. 10.202) . . 1~'. .(~
. . 1"-"1
------------------------- -
Rear I~ rt. ft. ~1lI.'f ft. ft. ft.
... I hI {t./ I 5AMf.> II I
Right Side ft. ft. ft. ft.
Left Side I ~-; ft. rt. t'J ft. II ft. I ft.
Height (Sec. 10.203) I " I 19 ~~ II I
Building Coverage 2--'/0 e, 5tJ1 J 00 1-
(Sec. 10.203)
-------------------------
Area Covered sq.!t. sq.!t. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.
Percent or Parcel Vb t HIli I 33 \ \ \
-
Floor Area 1:H c"
(Sec. 10.203) 'J '1'1 b 8~o
-------------------------
Net Floor Area sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. Ct.
Floor Area Ratio H/lI I
(FAR)
Parking Spaces Z . .~A"-~
(Sec. 10.210) ~ . .. .. .;~~
-------------------------
HUl:Lber Provided ~O,.;~
-
Dimensions at Spaces
II
Planning lIpplic. Ho.:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lOa aT"'!' ca8 OIlLY
PlAn Cheek 110.:
Bldg. Permit 110.:
..;:~~:P~~..~ _ . ~
- .~.,---;:
':" .
(" r\
(.. .
((~:
COMPLETB TRB FOLLOWING PROJECT DATA LISTI
TO BS COMPLETED BY l\PPLI~
I STArr USE ONLY
~ PROPOaED ADDITION PROPOaED
ITEX EXISTING I AND/OR ALTERATION TOTAL Aotual R-quir.d
.A /
Parcel (Sec. 10.201) r71s~.:tt.1 sq. ft. -7/}r11Jt. II sq. ft. sq. tt
Area sq. ft.
'HO. or Dwelling Uni ts ~ I ~~€- II
Parcel Area/Dwelling I H/A I I
.
Yards ~CZoNT" 2--6
(Sec. 10.202) f--: 'V2--' .f-,- r -f....
. . 1"';',
------------------------- 1"--1 -
Rear I~ !t. !t. op ~~1 ft. ft. ft.
." I hI {t.1 I " I
Right Side rt. 5AMf.> ft. ft. ft.
Left Side I ~-; !t. !t. I t'J ft. II ft. I ft.
Height (Sec. 10.203) I " 19 ~~ II I
Building Coverage 2--'/0 e, 5tJ1 J 00 1-
(Sec. 10.203)
-------------------------
Area Covered sq.!t. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.
Percent of Parcel
vb
\
H/A
33
\
\
\
Floor Area
(Sec. 10.203)
-------------------------
Het Floor Area.
'J '1'1 b
sq. ft.
8<30
133("
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. Ct. sq. ft.
I
I
II I
Floor Area Ratio
(FAR)
II/A
-------------------------
HUl:Lber Provided
:.;;t
I I
.;~~
Parking Spaces
(Sec. 10.210)
Dimensions at Spaces
Planning APPlic. No.:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~-------------.-
FOa STA7!' CS8 OIlLY
Plan Check No.:
Bldg. Permit 110.:
, "
.;~ ..~-:il.~~..~ _ _ .. _. . .
- --:....< -..
~,/,,"\
/- ;c ';
.r--..J"-"',
( _oJ l ,I
TOWN OF TIBURON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH RECORDED COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
PURPOSE
Many properties in the Town of Tiburon are affected by
Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) or by other
recorded documents which limit various aspects of a
property's use or appearance. This form is designed to
ensure that applicants are aware of any CC&R's or other
documents recorded against their property, and that they
have reviewed these documents for conformity prior to the
submittal of entitlement applications to the Town of
Tiburon. This procedure is intended for the benefit and
protection of both the property owner and the Town of
Tiburon.
I, __~~___~~________ do hereby affirm that I
(owner or authorized agent)
or the plan preparer (architect, engineer, ~uilding
designer, etc.) have read any and all Covenants, Conditions,
and Restrictions (CC&R's) and other documents recorded
against my property which could affect this application and
that the prepared plans conform to said CC&R's and
documents.
I further acknowledge that if the Town of Tiburon is not a
party to the CC&R's or other documents, it is not
responsible for any failure on my part or on the part of my
plan preparer to ensure that submitted plans conform tci
provisions of the CC&R's or other documents.
I, ___~~__~~~___ do hereby affirm that there
(owner or authorized agent)
are no CC&R's or other documents recorded against my
property which may conflict with submitted plans.
------------------------------------------------------------
Staff Use Only
Project Address:___________________________
BAR F i I e No.:
Date Received;------------------~----------
Received BY:__=============================
(OVER
PLEASE)
~~~,..~.~~.lI~\,l-:",__ '..,.-.,,~. " ,:;'~'l~'?'~:~:
, ''7BP~t.,~~r>\'S",-,:,''I;.:,'''~'~,
C~'
NOTE: IF THERE IS A HOMEOWNER'S OR PROPERTY OWNER'S GROUP
ASSOCIATED WITH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, PLEASE COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING:
Name of Homeowner's Association (if any):
-----------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Association contact person and phone number:
------------------------------ -----------------
I, ---_________________________ hereby affirm that I am not
(owner or authorized agent)
required to secure approval from a Homeowner's or property
owner's group for the project for which I am applying to the
Town.
I, ____________________________ hereby affirm that I have
(owner or authorized agent)
secured the required approval from a Homeowner's or property
owner's group for the project for which I am applying to the
Town.
Signature of owner or agent:
Date: ~_L1___L~1~~__.
CC&R's.frm
5/10/89
.......-~~~;.~:
~,.~.'''...
~, ...~-i .,....-,.."... ~._~~_.~,
, -- - -... . ~-- .
'.~'~;;..':::'t.
-f". .'~
..----:----.---..,.
(.
-
TOWN OF TIBURON
11" TIBURON BOULEVARD.. TIBURQN . CALIFORNIA 94920 .. (41') 4]'.'137.3
FAX (41'> 4]'.2438
PPPUCATION FOR VARIANCE
For Staff Use
Date:
Rec. by:
Fee:
App. ' If
Rec't. JI
APPliCANT REQUIRED INFORMATION
1. Assessor's P:ucel No(s). ;7.:?~ M/ - ~
2. Propeny'sAddress '2-309 ~ M~J -nev)ZL7tJ
3. Property Owner a) Name 1!>i2r.AJ1/J} f O/ac... 1?t)1'-P'~~~/J PhQ"e ~ - 2-z.~~
b) Address 2-?10t;;, C<r:.rJ-tt:o f:A<;i
4. Applicant (if different than owner) a) Name ~/l1Zu;;.~ ,4. .shVL
('#s] $CJ7-tJ4~1
Existing Zoning
S. Name of Project (if applicable)
e1f%.6t
f~~k-:;s~,:Sr
I ~ ~~ I
General Contractor
116 Atherton Oaks Drive
Novato, CA 94945
b) Address
6. Property size:
II.",'" If... t': II .
7. Type of use proposed (office; residential, etc.) ~~v"t!!'.'2~
8. Square footage of each use or nwnber of units if residential: ~~n,jb) o.}f/)~>( j -nA-rJ llAl~
1?'1,3 6 I~ ~ UJJn ~ It '101lYL. &- MUg 0JIi.-PlrI; J
9. Purpose of application (brief statement of what you want to accomplish) 11-h-s 'f'Wf.IZir<1 ~ISIS1S
~ rIM? 1~c.At--a/Zf-.AJ11k/l t/NlffJ. M~ UA}!1n l,fIl4h IrJ ~ trY 1JJy~ IAJrT?)WftM5
, I . ,A/7JJ Il, I
10 ~Jq'u 'THt. /JIJTva 01=-11/f... -rp/JuJltJty 10 A- '(1e1ft11/1J"I- ~';/(~~_.(,IIIJ! ~,
!1-~H-EO ~~- 11z,M~ u<',~...y.h, /.J.huJ:H./ t4JodJ.. ~~~-'~/'fbICJ
10. s_ Cc!-t-/12"--.'''"'OO' .' m 1.1 ~~5 .
Owner V Applicant (Note: IffPPlicant signs, an authoriz.:ltion
. signed Y the owner must be attached)
EXHIBIT NO. 5
,',
I :'1
rn
-"-' ".--
~:~ :::::;:;,~.;:t~:8::.
":' ; ":"":~~ ::~~? ."
1fllAT VARIANCES ARE YOU REQUESTING?
Condition
Ordinance
Requirement
Your
Application
variance
Requested
Front Yard
z,-ta';F1I,.Jro ~f/(l- / Co~ or- 4MrJ ~S
'lrJ% IPr rk.JnI Iffif..tJ ~ &~-rI~f7tIIth / tJf--,o -:;' IMV fUM.t'ft{bP
~ Rear Yard
Left Side Yard
Right Side Yard
Lot Coverage
Height
Area Per Unit
Requirements
Usable Open Space
Sign Requirements
Parking
Expand
NonconforlIlity
Other (Please describe): e)(In-J~ fh/;1/A:.y ~ 4-7 trt 1Ji/<i.it... FfHe-.
-FAiL (. 'i vE-.PT7 (' 10 1?-o7T OJ=- i1/E.. Aa:Jfl.. IkZ1HI- /ttlr?f7JC1'h ~
t/.A }P;L 0(,$17'4 L../JpI- /l;Jr/A., hJf" . t/J/iJlU.. hfa/$<C. tI~e. P~$.
I ,
-rIlE- 4'-1-/2 t6 Ii /?/1Uk;J A7J:7mw ( -90 0 ) I!> (;41hUf1~) I ow P),!Of7I-i:.OtII~swq
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
TOWN OF TIBURON
5/24/91
2
"'-"
"
7CW;V ~ /lt7~
NOVATO. CA
94945 $,4/i- 9 /996
03 -20/-9'3
j/MIlJv'~) ~3t7S ~ e'-%r
- jZ..6:.G2-VI/'2-€..t:7 r-/tVt:7ltV~$-
IV;;. ~/L 7#r ~v 9~ 77Ie A&:~/7$/M1 ~~ct(s) IQZ-
1$ tJ4I/'7/lt1q7~ d)? ~ ~~ Ah4? h?P/~ ~J~
dN ~ P""v5/&;;J.P~ t:lP #~l..~.6 /~&-S f'l ~ ~ .
IV~ c:?~ /Y??r M- 17__V'/~.s ,M~ 8t; h&r ~&;
:*1/)-e..H~#T I/- /
7Jl;s ~/~ tW/hC# ~~s /1- ~t:?(;7~ .fUJF'~ ,M/17P/71fn
?~6 It!j~' /f,eM'S P//ht-[... f77t<.- ,PflJow,t?//'4; ~/Ur 11#-
5~r f"~. t'Ms U?W P',I(:LJ"u- ?v,f!?kEjJC ~ I5v/tr Tzij/;/r
7l? 7JH, 6~r S"'IP&. y~ .&#~/"""'9 /1 ~f; PV~1";fV~
.5/~?~, ,7;YcZ. ~v~E:.>C ~'&SI4.J /s ~r= 1E,)C77Z.IE,M& e#7~to/.
// IS 77hS ~/Cf~0 pIm- 1'4.#Pt- ~ /T P'&5/~p fifref7Cv'~
7'lI /IIvkT7 -I/;V!r P'{:-5/~;u AJt? ~ F;th/o;e~ #5;1}. /,.e;H~
,
%5/~a. ~ ~.........e.as (MIo U""i-ItV' ~ W€-$r VMr)
It//fJ./lS ~ ~~ f- /7If- Rt&"P-t'} t!JJC iWt: dWU1/~ /.-0'D ~/.e.
~,..,~ IU-S/~?6 prm- /#5 .#,..,~ ~,Pb~pt./ v......~~t3
~PUW dw? /I .5~/4/1r'Z'o/ ~~ (7Z-AJ) ~~.
~S ~J{.. ~ ~ HtJ;IU ~P- ~ 5V..e..e"'MI~4 ~fS",'
~MI1~ #-S/~ 77M7 o~ ~ ~f:,:? ~.
S~ ~.;z..
//..W"~ n; vS ~ ~ ~C5 /,/1/ e>e/.;e ~
o.-.)tJt? ~ ~ve~7{;. 6F ~~/..J? M'~ ~/4 ~~
;?~1'7~ . ~e. or 17I&S-e.. ,lUH4?u.s- H.?'? 8€. -? A!?&S<A--r
~ ~5~ ~;9,/zs '" F~ Hi1'?r ~lO Be- ~~
~ ~"S r4t1P ,uC-v'I/C-CrHG;V7$ /,J ~.s U~. .
~ /i'tr7'U#?7P11.1S ~ .$',.a.~ 77bfr p/~ /,#/2J5{... ~ ~
~"'s1/9T(. ntt!- ,.v-;~ IN ~ U~ A?c.e? ~ ~U 'PMr
tv€, ~~ a/.? ~f. fO 11-;.<<..,-.
CHARlIES A. SAUL. GENIERAl BUILDING CONTEEDa
STATE lICIE~1E 30'\1069 '.0.'...
:}
ft)
~"~~-. .
"
':'. -
j~,~,~t, ,:, c-:J~'
w""~"'" .
~~{~:':~4'.
~.~;,'';''''I.I "~t'~~~,'
:, ".t:'
...r~ ....
"
, "
'0.-"....
....".
. < '-~.'
:,'>,;j"
,
(.. UtT{jY)rJl L
FI2.
---
Lyford's Cove - Old Tiburon
Homeowners Association
If
May 2, 1996
To: Town Of Tiburon Design Review Board, Town Council
FROM: Pat Montag, Vice-President LCOTHA
It has come to our attention that an application has been
filed for an addition to the property at 2305 Centro East.
It is of the utmost importance, especially in the Old Tiburon/
Lyford's Hygeia area that you uphold the Tiburon General Plan
as regards to the Floor Area ratios and setbacks.
This organization has continually supported the guidelines
of the General Plan and calls on you to take the plan into
consideration upon application of additions and remodels as
well as new construction.
EXHIBIT NO..l
.', r
.,-.
:'~.'"
:-'F /2-
cM.a'5a,dClayfo, ~ MA'L
220 I C!..nho Cait LA-1l:-
Clibu,on, C!.aUfo,nia 94920
..--'_~ 2//'1'1&
/(JA~~ _ /J ~ ::,"o:.~{;~:::."
~r- ~ -" "'=\'::~Oh.._
J~{~~, M~Y 21996
r"""r~ ,...-:~~ ~~D 1
,/1 . "y,. _ .I . , ,_ ~ _. . _ _. "
~/~/ ~,_.:..,
1~~ .. L ~_)~~
~ /"z.€.~..t ~~,~
d :::za&::,.- ~ ~ ~ ~ cz..dJ
qO-O:JL-~~ . .'~~
~(~5t~J~
~~~~~~~).
9~~--'i.o~
~aJ~ 7~ Ic~
/J"/v'~.. ?Z:..e.~ -a-.. ~
~j7. _ ~~
'A.L~~~r~h~~
~~,fd~~:
~~-~~ .
~z~. ~~~-1~-
,. -.
/
',_,_.. . - __'u_.'.----'-'_ ..:...'_._
,
f--.
(',
4/30/96
Lnrr::.- fYJlI1 L,
FIZ-
Board of Design h 'iew
Tiburon TOIm Hall
Tiburon
Meeting May 2 1996
-
Thp application for further expansion of a property at 2305 Centro East
( agenda ite~ f-12 ) should be denied.
This property, recently purchased from the De Borba estate by the
current owners is a well built duplex on a sloped lot of slightly less
than 9,000 sq ft. The duplex presently has more square footage than
would be allowed by our current zoning ordinance, (3,070 Sq ft + garage
The applicant is requesting another 900 SQ. ft to be added to the
structure in defiance of the F.A.R. constraints eetablished in the
Guidelines ( 4.02.07. of the zoning ordinance # 360 N.S.).
Lyford Cove Old Tiburon has the problem of being a duplex zone with
mainly small parcels. Everyone seems to have the idea that bigger is
better, but this premise must be tempered with reason. We have estab -
lished the Floor Area Ratio to protect properties from being overbuilt.
This Ordinance MUST be adhered to, especially in Old Tiburon.
Staff has taken a lack-a-dazical attitude toward these applications.
They should be directed to discourage unnecessary expansions and help
enforce our ordinances, li2! give tacit approval to any application.
The Plans submitted would necessitate a 20,000 sq. ft. lot which is
not the case.
Approval of this type of application sets in motion a series of similar
requests to breech the terms of the F.A.R. guidelines. Other property
o~mers may \lell take this for an example of the new possi bili ties on
their own properties... to the detriment of the Old Tiburon areas.
This well kept property needs no variances or exceptions. The present
owners knew exactly what it was when they purchased the duplex a short
time ago.
<-~f-.
~""'-~
Nat r'lar..ns
Spanish Trai
P.S. many 0
were una~lar
the home owners were not notified of this project and
of this meeting.
MAY 2 1995
. ;::.~-: ~,:.Il/'::";
I PJ:;::c.:.;:: ~-- 'Q
~ITNO.--J-
---
~ :t'.-
~'. . ~ ~...............:-
-'.-'- .-." - ",., -' "
Lyford's Cove - Old Tiburon
Homeowners Association
J
rRi~~~O'W~[Qj
MAY 2 2 1990
TOWN MANAGER'S OFFICE
TOWN OF TIBURON
TO: TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
FROM: Pat Montag, Vice-President
Lyford's Cove-Old Tiburon Homeowners Association
RE: 2305 Centro East Street
Dear Council Members:
*
The homeowners of Old Tiburon take pride in the unique
quality and ambiance of their community. Unfortunately,
each year the quality is diminished by filling lots and
streets to excess.
We want to reiterate the importance of the town's
adhereance to the General Plan and F.A.R guidelines
which were laboriously put together to furnish
homeowners a basis for their property.
*
* An acceptable solution should be held within a
reasonable interpretation of the General Plan.
RECF~VED
MAY 2 4 1996
TOWN OF TI8URON
PLANNING & BUILDING DEFT.
EXHIBIT NO.12-
,~-~
"...,~'. ,.!.... ,'.~'
Town Council
Town of Tiburon
Tiburon, CA 94920
Dear Town Council Members:
r CC 2-/0
l
James and Roberta Gehrmann -t L1-, J.LQ ?:_~ F-h
~~~~::'~~~:~;g ~~ (C~ n\\Di ~ (T~~
May 12, 1996 \b!J
MAY \ S \99b
10WN MANAGER'S OffICE
,OWN Or T\6URON
RECEIVED
MAY 1 5 1996
TOWN OF TIBURON
PLANNING & BUILDING DEPT.
We would like to add our names to the list of appellants for the May 2, 1996 decision by the Design
Review Board that would allow Mr. and Mrs. Buckerfield of 2305 Centro East a variance for rear yard
setback and an exception for excessive floor area. We believe that in all cases the Tiburon General
Plan, including matters of floDr area ratios and setbacks, should be upheld,
Sincerely,
}-~~
- .- :~ . ..'
James and Roberta Gehrmann
~ - ...._-,~..-..
EXHIBIT NO. \ f
'.f:,;:>-:-"
. ,',', " ,-' "~i
: '=-~~"-:-':~ ~~i"'.'~ .........~~(~,;~,~~~~~~.~.~~~..~~~2{-f'"~., .
,-_'_~.__., L.~"'~__._'''':'_.~
.. ..'" . ~_~___'_,,_'u~_'"#
RESPONSE FROM APPLICANT TO APPELLANTS' APPEAL
2305 CENTRO EAST AP# 59-201-43
THE APPELLANTS: " In addition to the setback variance this proposal breeches the
FAR of the General Plan by almost 1,000 sq.ft.
THE APPUCANT'S RESPONSE: We are requesting an increase of approximately 900
sq.ft.. Approximately 50 sq.ft. of this request already exists. When this duplex was built,
the General Plan was not in effect. We are requesting this variance so we can turn our
modestly constructed spec duplex into a home for ourselves and retain the rental unit. (we
will not be absentee landlords), We want to say in our home, because, we like the
character of Old Tiburon with the small lots and older homes. Working with our
designer/contractor we have come up with a plan which maintains the same outward
appearance by adding square footage under our existing eves and structure (subterranean
space), As a homeowner and member of the Board of the Lyford Cove Homeowner's
Association, we agree there must be guidelines to prevent massive, bulky, structures that
take away the appeal of "Old Tiburon" houses; however, these constraints must be
tempered with reason,
THE APPELLANTS: "The Variance requested as well as the Exception should be
denied., The present structure could well serve the needs of the owners with internal
remodeling while confonning to the existing FAR, Most neighbors do not approve of
the plan and some are party to this action.
THE APPUCANT'S RESPONSE: The present structure was built as a spec duplex for
rentals in the 50's. We purchased this duplex four years ago with the intent of making one
side of it our permanent home, with some improvements, The kitchen is 9' x 7', the
guest room is 10' x. 10' and, there is no dining room. We are actively involved in
volunteer and other community activities and enjoy entertaining in our home. At present it
is totally inadequate to sit more than four people for dinner. Our children are grown and
come to visit us from Florida and California and we would like to have a comfortable
guest room for them to stay in. We have been developing ideas and plans over the past
four years which would fit with the old Tiburon character and still allow us to have a
home we can retire in and enjoy the rest of our lives,
,THE APPEbLANTS: Most of neighboring properties do not approve of the plan and
'., .lSOme~party,t!> the action,
. '''iT c:: c~,.. "~..,,, \
", 'c =--:-;'~L':~::t/;E.NT
, M A'( 2 B 1~96 \
\ PSC~lVED " EXHIBIT NO. 1'2...
'( - -"', .....-",-=..~f 1
fi"'\~"...J'~, I'" "') ,-,. t
.:..v....-........~ ..- ,
APPLICANTS RESPONSE: This is NOT TRUE, Our neighbor to the East, Jeff
Bellinger, has signed a letter approving our addition; Our neighbor to the West, Mrs.
Wachter, does not live in her home, it has been vacant for four years, We contacted Mrs.
Wachter at the Aha Mira Hotel where she lives, and, we have had several conversations
with her. Mrs. Wachter does not have any problem with our addition, as long as it did
not obstruct her views, which it does not. She has even driven by to look at the poles,
Our neighbor to the South, Wendy Wayne, has signed a letter approving our addition
(Wendy is also a member of the Board of the Lyford Cove Homeowner's Association;
Our neighbor to the North, Sharon Bass, has signed a letter approving our addition. We
also have 31 other signed approval letters from our neighbors in the close proximity of
our area who are all home owners and have no problem with our addition and think it will
enhance old Tiburon's character. Most of these homeowners, who have given us approval
letters, are BoardlMembers of the Lyford Cove Homeowner's Association.
THE APPELLANTS: "Owners of neighboring properties were not adequately notified
and not given enough time for discussion, Filing date 4/18/96 and heard only two weeks
later (5/2/96) Even Board Members of the Home Owners Assn. were not aware of the
application, (Two letters requesting enforcement of guidelines ofF AR from individual
members are enclosed.)
THE APPLICANTS RESPONSE: Ms, Irene Borba advised us that all of our
neighboring properties were notified, and, of course, it was published in the Ark. There
was even a second mail out due to an error in the first mailing. In effect, the neighbors
were notified three times, Irene Borba advised us that she did notifY the Lyford Cove
Homeowner's Assn. Board member who nonna1ly receives the mail for these type of
Issues,
THE APPELLANTS: "The application ofOrd 4.02.07 of the General Plan will not
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity, The
variance will constitute a special privilege, inconsistent to limitations on other properties in
the area since formulation of the new General Plan in 1990,
THE APPLICANTS RESPONSE: We do not consider the variance a special privilege,
as stated by the Appellants, as in researching the files for neighboring properties
requesting variancesIFAR's, we found a total of 18 variancesIFAR's which were
approved since 1993, We noticed numerous other variancesIFAR's granted in other
neighborhoods as well, but concentrated on those in OUR IMMEDIATE area in Old
Tiburon, Weare not adding to the Bulk and Mass of our property in Old Tiburon.
THE APPELLANTS: Application of the ordinance will NOT result in unnecessary
hardships on the Owners but will moderate excessive plans for the property.
THE APPLICANTS RESPONSE: The plans for our addition are not excessive and
were given careful consideration so we would fit in with the existing character of Old
Tiburon, We are not going UP or building OUT with Mass and Bulk. Most of our
addition will be under existing eves and decks, under existing lath roof structure in the
rear, and underneath the house in currently unexcavated areas,
THE APPELLANTS: "Granting variances and exceptions in an arbitrary manner will be
detrimental and injurious to other properties, It would be a bad example of development
on a sma1llot and may cause other property owners to follow this example. This applicant
has not demonstrated that a 4,400 sq.ft, structure on a small 9,000 sq ft, parcel is
compatible with structures built after the new General Plan although the visual impact
may not be immediately apparent because of tree or trellis coverage.
THE APPLICANTS' RESPONSE: The attached drawing & photographs illustrate that
the variance/F AR we are requesting is very much compatible with structures built after
the new General Plan - as, most of the proposed addition is being added under existing
eves, trellis or subterranean, In addition, the siding, windows and landscaping will be
much the same as is exhibited on the house today, There is no change in the roofline,
bulk or mass, and the house will continue to enhance the character of Old Tiburon.
THE APPELLANTS: quote the existing duplex square footage and references it as
Upper Floor and Lower floor and Garage,
THE APPLICANTS RESPONSE: The County Tax Assessor's office appraised our
house as a single story with basement/garage. In fact, the 892 sq ft. that the Appellants'
called lower floor is referenced in our Residential Property Appraisal Record as "Finished
Basement",
THE APPELLANTS: NOTES at the bottom of the appeal: "a) Mathematical errors in
Design Review Board Staff Report for total proposed square footage. (2nd page,
paragraph 2) ....way off"
THE APPLICANTS RESPONSE: We discussed this with Irene Borba and she said it
was a typo and that this has been corrected,
THE APPELLANTS: NOTES at the bottom of the appeal "b) Last paragraph page 2
.. is misleading. This building is presently a two story structure, Were they considering a
third level? and this property is Not on a hilltop as represented,"
THE APPLICANTS RESPONSE: This appears to be a non-issue, WE are not putting
on a Third story. With this addition, we are continuing to take advantage of the SLOPE
of our lot by excavating underground or below grade rooms to dramatically reduce
effective bulk, provide energy, efficient and environmentally desirable spaces, as outlined
in the Tiburon Design Guidelines for Hillside Dwellings, Goal I, Reduce Effective Bulk;
Principle 9,
IN SUMMARY, we are requesting approval for this varianceIF AR as we have
demonstrated that the visual size and scale of our proposed addition is compatible with the
predominant pattern established by existing structures in the surrounding neighborhood;
and, we have demonstrated that the proposed addition is compatible with the physical
characteristics of the site,
If you need any additional information, please give us a call.
Dick and Brenda Buckertield
435-2254
f\Je,ghbor d,vl:'dl') /-M FI2<.J7lyr(SOUT:;h
D-f hoos ~
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at 2305
Centro East and approve ofthis addition,
I understand that most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing
covered areas and will'not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
~LJ~ ~~~ ,
2.~'ln ~ I)~
t;'~_ CI4- 71(5)-0
.5-/7-9"
WQt'\d)i LC:u..yne Ecy/ (flJe../:ihbo'r to the. '~ut~')
LoO!\'':; UP. Ar QUI-- hOU.8r;:.-I's
Dilce.c..r/') -t:)elolA.J Cor- hotH e.....-,FflOiUT
~Af2 f) me Vh be I- - Ly fo~' J Coue.,-
OU') ""'r I fS u eON ... I 1\
NUme.6l.UYJe.... s t-tr~'1
MAY 28 1885
L__ EXHIBIT NO.-12..
rJe,g h bo,," tot;; he C-on r~:t u (}v S
.
}.) De iH "
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
5/d,d./Qc.."
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfie!d's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition.
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas and
will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
~~
SHPrRorU 't5A-S<;-
d. '300 S PA-~f;; r+ 17zA-1 L
AJ e '3 h bo r t. 0 -ch p \\f0t:e7I-1
C 12.'4hl heJ)/I\JJ -L A bov~
OUr hoose., - CnnTI1uouc; )
,
MAY 28 1886
/3
$XHIBITNO...
""--,
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
NeIghbor To the ~onT'1uvvs EftSr
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckertield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition.
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
Very truly yours,
ifm
..5-/(,-9~
-;]Jq5 ~ ~J
~H l3ell'Y1Qer. - /lJeJc,L b " "
J .In 01- O^-.J EItST Side.
of HOUSE
CKI'jh I beSIJ~ oU\r nOUSfJ
Q.oY\ j I~ lJ ou ~ )
MAY 28 lS90
\ EXHIBIT NO; 1'3
~ '
Mrs. Feme Wachter
(2261 Centro East)
The Aha Mira Hotel
P. O. Box 706
Sausalito, California 94666
rJelCj h bot to t:.he.. ,y,Jes,i
C-ONT)~volJ ",
Dear Mrs. Wachter,
I enjoyed talking with you today, to explain the remodeling we are doing to our home next
door to you.
We appreciate your approval of our plans as I explained them to you and that it will not
interfere with your views.
If you ever need me to do anything over at your home or check on anything, please do
not hesitate to call me, Our phone number is 435-2254.
Thank you again, and hopefully we will get to meet you one day, My husband and I met
in Tiburon and spent the first night of our honeymoon four years ago in your wonderful
btel.
Sincerely,
~~
Brenda Buckerfield
2305 Centro East
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
May 16, 1996
MAY ~ 8 lSSG
brnmIT NO. I ~'
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at 2305
Centro East and approve of this addition.
I understand that most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing
covered areas and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
~4vro ~~r"'A/~~/,,?;219 (p
d;).. 7'0 'PM,., DIS ~
Neigh bOI-- to 1: h e. 'SOUth-
LOOks Up at OU~ hocJ~e.
MAY 2 8 l~~
EXHIBIT NO.J?-
! -"-' - .
L-...",~.,_...,
,
.~,_J
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield' s property located at 2305
Centro East and approve of this addition,
I understand that most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing
covered areas and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
;zIJJs, dJv
;<;) {O C~ &s1 ~
J\ b \if\!'" I Cd1'
5-IQ-9[,
Kobe.rt:
"
S. C/sberJ - f\Jel3hbo!- -t 0 t::he. Souf;J,"
'0"
MAY 2 8 l'Jo.)
\
l~XHIBITNO.~
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at 2305
Centro East and approve of this addition.
I understand that most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing
covered areas and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours, . ' /\
~, /rLLt~ -~0s- ~Jjy,
~J<, 4~/~
5-lct-Q("
UICLne.. muro.-r(a...m,'
C-ho..r Ie s Vra...!< e.
_AJelghbor<:> -1:.0 --t:he.
Loof("s UP 4+-
"
Sout-/...,"'
() u r- lJous e
8 10'''''
MAY 2 ;'v,",
- . /
EXHlBITNO.~J
__ .n'h .'-'. -'
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition.
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
V rry truly yours,
1~ tJ. [/ ~Iw\
2200 ~-re.o Elt-D1
-r:!3ueoAJ C4
I 11-7)..0
/1;/411 J, lYLe,
John uJ. Yeo(YI(~n - flJe/Cjhbo/r 1::.0 t:h~ "5;ou-t" J/
Look;c; up At" au... hou.s 0
MAY 28 l':SS
EXHIBlTNO. 13
\
L_
S'I/rohra
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve oftbis addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
JdW/~
~17.s- C~-o F-AS~
Jh.$"_ '1f78
r-:pete..1-- JOrren-tc::. - AJe.J9hbo'r t.O -t.h€- wesT-
(Sees OUv- house. -e:t,;r)
MAY 28 lSSS
EXHIBIT NO.-L2
f 0~"
L-.-- -
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at 2305
Centro East and approve of this addition.
I understand that most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing
covered areas and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
Very truly yours,
~ Ut-
~-/l-q(p
dJ35 ~
c~
0/20- Veri: I
0' I'
rU0 9 A bo I-- 1::. 0 -t:. '-1 e. uJe S T
MAY 28 lSS3
, cy EXIllBITNO. /3
~v -
L-- - . _'.
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition.
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas and
will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
Very truly yours,
~ &JV-f (Arthur 13o..r"t.Qn)
/tJr ~ vJ~
5-,;)") - 9(,
OLD IJ 5ua.oAJ VEl &1+ BoR..
MAY 2 8 lS~J
. /3
f";EXHIBIT NO.
f !.J,.".," ". - - \
L...-;-,_.~,~,- -. _.",-,...---
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas and
will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
Very truly yours,
~\\~" .~~
"'l.. 'IU Q/
- ':7' /t?
! L/il...-k:..A bPEfi/UAiU
I ~ 73 b CFrL/710 iC(~/
'i-1 (I. if' . ' I
\ \ :::,.....'-' '.:..\... 'L'
OL 0 T! I3Uf2..0ttJ rVE"1 Gr l-f 730~
t30Fte I) me 'h b e h
l.y+ord' ~ CO~ - OLf)
+-J.-o rn €. 0 \-Uf) e \0-' S
(/ /?; u tZo r0
ASSOe./4110~
MAV 28 Fer:
I _,.;...,,J
~..) _ EXHrnIT NO.--12-
L.
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
sj/~H~
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield' s property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
J?; ~.i j)~ -.Cd~ h(
.7Yf / frr~-;:;J
'H:Li. o..nd UQue. ~udde.ndo'r-f - neiShboh to -the NOH-I,
MAY 28 ESj
f
L-
EXIDBIT NO. I~
.-.'-.--.",-....
6ft~ /7 v
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
-;J~ ~ (/~~A- ~ Po/'?~
~ C1lOd' ~A-a) ~o/.96
Very truly yours,
2357 5?r?;C//~P 7i&f/L- - Ne.lgh bar to the.. A)oe;/f/
MAY 28 lSSS
.... "
_.:
l~EXHrnIT NO.' - )3
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at 2305
Centro East and approve ofthis addition,
I understand that most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing
covered areas and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
~~~~ J1~
c9/;f/ "1 (.
~ Ct.nd bob Uo.9/e;; - n&<jhbor to t;he f'Jor7-~
Mi',': 28 LJS
....i r1'
'" -'~J
\' ,', . ...- ~.-~.
L ,'--'-"'- _...'_..~
EXIDBIT NO.
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
Very truly yours,
{YUctt ~ Ro~t~ fuS50\;\
Ow- ~~, Vfv ~vV-'
'T\'ovru'N I cp. C14 Lf..2-o
01\.~ca~
-...5-/G -? (..
A.J e../3 h bo r
Sees.
-t. 0 i:..h e. LUeST ~
Ou rhO <.J S:, e... -& 0 the c:.A s, (
8 l,er
MAY 2. ~C)~
. ' EXHIBrr~NO. '\ I '3
L~- .
. "~.-'
'.-.
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
~ A1M-
M~
'222-31 22).;1- C.en+rO 10ts.f
~j;&lq?
~,
UeborCL.h o.nd ST('uellJ ~r. - Ne.Fjhbol- -t. 0 t:he..
~PrRD member-
WesT .
I....y+ordl S Co'''''' 0t.1) ""- J:<
" ~ - y (,~ U.ed1\l
rrof"r)e ow '
YiE'r S A'i;,rOCi~""'.~
MAY 2 8 lSSG
. - ",~-'.== 13
~ITNO. .;
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at 2305
Centro East and approve of this addition.
I understand that most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing
covered areas and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
~ ~ AQ
L"lf\1J \eG ~~ (U.
'f/v \D~ [1'11/
\~ Y} {{)\ ;P~2;
t\lOt?5':,.,,_q y
6
rl-0..("\\, l)eSIf'l'lorJ€- -
bOAR/) mel"hbek
L 'J +OY' cl' s c'oue - Of.... /) T I ~ !.I0J,u
Home. 0 U)1VE'v') A~ SI0
(0€'19 h bo r- -1::;; t::f" e. Wes T
MAY 28 lJSS
l:ExmB~~o: 0_
.
"
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
5 -;). 75 - q (..
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield' s property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas
and will not affect the character of Old Tiburon,
Very truly yours,
9o:k~~ ~~~
~\~ ~~c. \)",
J)rrec.T lJ I evJ 0-+ ~y.On T 0+ h 6uS. '€.., - {;AST
f\Je'Shbo..s 1:.0 -the Soucl-; we,s,/
{.lA T and :::.John Uonne II
MAY 2 8 lSSG
I
',; \'
. ,:::,~} J "3
- - EXHIBIT N(\'-" ...'
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
5-;J,'5-Q(,
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition.
,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas and
will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
Very truly yours,
~~&nvJL
--reB, UJ.,. qLfq 2-0
tf Au &
of-- 00 V
A- dire c...T 1) Ie. (0
h00S ~ -<:SA ST
(;;=- -t:he -Prorrt
1'Y\1 c..ha.e I And Tel-eS4 Toepe..L - J0e/9hholr$. -t D
f:.. h e.. s.out:;~ we ~ r
M/,v ? 8 1<'("
\ I ~ v'~ <J
L:E,~f!NO.
--.~ ,..-----
13
-
.
.
-5 -0; c... - 9 (,...
Town Council
Tiburon Town Hall
Tiburon, Ca, 94920
I have reviewed the plans for an addition to the Buckerfield's property located at
2305 Centro East and approve of this addition,
Most of the proposed new construction will come underneath existing covered areas and
will not affect the character of Old Tiburon.
Very truly yours,
;2.0Cf7 ~~
r;~ I~
C A (20 L H D S /('t N S
rJe/ Sf, bo r -L 0 -tht:.. wes T
M A \I ~ 8 1""'~
'I:. '''''-tV
EXHiBrr NO~ " '?:
'"--- -
.....-...J
..--....,-~
A.... e a.. Un cJ e..... c~ 1st, f1 ~ CQ. ves
~/ / 0 ~:~ J.~,\
EXHIBIT NO.-tt-
............
Area. Unde~ c:.~1 ~ t, f'l f1 Dee k
and A.....ea.."to he c.'SlcQ..lJa-'iec!
. /~~HIi""I.~ i
r,~_L 111111111,,' '
V'''''''''' ,1'
-. . ". " I ~
"I'"
'oil.!! _:11 :
". ,
-'~--
,,:,.Rt'~'l': ". ~.._-
...,,\p~., /'
- ...:& ----A. ,~:
. Ii ,r .. ,,..K-: f ~--
",,1 I ' I I
Area. Whic.J, w,,, fflo.tc.h -the-
E.x 1st Inq Low Profile. I OnE..
st o~::J A rea.. of Hot,) S e-
---.A....... ,--^---
-
Ar-e Q. Under()e.CA..-l.h -the. ~~, st"nj
La..th Roo~ St'~CJc:tfJre in
-the Re.a.r YO-t-c/
Gs l"'eel'\ Sp..e& S........ou"'ci.. Ou,,"-
ho\)se. a.nd i:he..e. ,'S NO c.h.",..
'1\ "f:h-. ~ull( o~ mass
( S e.e. AU AC.heJ )
1)h o'E:o
Proposed Rddtifon I S cOt'nP(j~/"e..
fUt't... ~".. Pt"e dowun..te- PCl tt e....'"
of "0 I d 'I 0&1 1"'0,," s-L ... u ~ "t u.... S ,,, -elt to.
.sur~ou,..d ,~, 1'\&191, IJc~hooJ Q.",tJ 1$
eorn pa 6; i 1,'''' 14.,) Ie ~ 't II .. ph!J 51 Co.. I
(!.hcu-.c. ~ ...../1 t leis o.f i:1\e. s"""e..
,
( S ""'!;! Ati. Q. c.h eel )
a1. ~h o't: 0 ~
I",
~ - ?-'o..3-X:;-a-";',)ouT"0c;-i? 7.J;"9 (71:t-s:~~P-<;,:;;::;5i;;-'j ~q"c.f..?;"'Tac~;'c.i,";;-5,'5'?Ci
t'-
al
';~f.l" ,
.A'",
4~,;j','." '~
"'
..~...~~ ~~...__.............. It,
"
II t
~ '!l'fJ ~
~) <'1"U~d
~ In ~ ~ <J) U.
:G' \~ '~<:1'1, -!)
\ .. J '" ~
q ~ tv ~
~~, ~ tu~
, (:I .. 1?
\, 1\; ~i ~ I>.l ~
\J " 9:" '1;
....) ::) ~, ,fj-
"-------~--------._-
(;';')
,~\
,
\
(';\
'-",
,
6<\..
~Ld. \
"~~~
/lc
1:>
'>,
"'
- -~..--,....... .~\"...,...
'"
"
" '"
'i 11
o \S\ I!\
~ "11tI
,~ ~i~
,
'" ...
t~
i\ ~\"
~\/
ti!
'IF''
\
\
~ <I
';'" ~~
~ ~\t,
~ ~
" ,
fK~ ;?
~l1~
\\).1:1,.--.. "
'OR \: <
til<v c:
'I ~ ~
~ iti II
q
>
l
'il
"
)
/
/
C~-' '~'~,"l"'r7' .,'') 'C ;n /~C.l'-:>'r-'
, .::? ~ :::l Q.:;.I"", /r f l7 ..? .... ~ ~ ;.J--/ l~ , ;:; u 'l';7
l'lVcl7~'': <~"5(;'.7 Oa~,1:"~..7 f;)Jt' <:;0<;;;:;;
~ ~ ~
~t.J l
,~ 'i' R\~ "
t~ - '" it; '"
"'" '"
It- - 'I .-
, U <- ,,~
k - ~ .J +
'3 ~ ..] If ~
~I~> ~'
&~~~ ~l
~!t~~ i)~
. c::I -::::J (t,~)
, ~.-!
..-----r --
, T
~,
!
[~~jlIlliI '
I (~)
(~)
\
'I)
<'
::) w. rI ~
' ; R ~
R ~' ~\
q ~ ~ ~
Ell< >~
~ [~~~
~L~;/.;:;:~
\ ~
\
\
~
\
\
'"
\
I
~ I)
\..1 )
";-1"
1.1)
----
C)
rv
'"
.,
t
,
I ,)
J
~-~
,'!....,
'"
'I
~.i
C)
~,J i
> I
,Ci ~,\ i
;.... ()!
"
~\
" 11
Cl
Vl "i
\II
~
\)
\)
~
~
, ;
")
~
..J
s:i
Ii
'l:
(:5
-)
Q
to)
(\
(\,
"I:
(
(J
;,
~ ..:
.J
S:>
-\
~d
_J
'I:
- )
Cl.
\1}
\ )
,
VJ
..
/
llJ
U
~
<;v6v6 V'J 'OreAoN
aApo S>1BO U01J94lV 9 ~ ~
JOPBJIU08 IBJeU88
~.
I ?Jt)1JIJEl11Y().7 'ixl;~ l~~ '11J1tS ''''S77tYt'h? W (7S.1:iI'tY(? iP t77/)'/)1S3(1
i (J'7;Jld7i1;l?/;J;'iq )y?/d' f? b'a13a~
/y02t/J~/2 r ...L~C73 (7aI..lIY;?;;; 90<E:J
~
~
! ..l.. I
\ ~) -..\ i
,.... U,
L--.-- :
I -...
i ; [:i
~-,-
~ )-
- l-
i .J
I 5 [Ii J
I
, ._,:.-:\jl
I
-
.
! 't---.
. I
Ii ( \ ._-----~, .-..-
j 4 tlr
> -..., !
,
,
I
~ ~
I :::>
(
"- I
~
!
__ _.___n ..
f\
~
4
:>
~
;il
L
~
-
..-.... . ..
i
~
~
r;\
i
)-
!
7
&'t
- J'.-"-::'1 .
- ,
~it
1l
~
~
2
~
a
,,-
Xl
7-
~
ii
r
C:;v6v6 '18 'OI"AON
"A!JO s>jeo uOjJ84lV 9 ~ ~
~~
I ~.1;m'JIY"-' '~g tN3~ ' 7IJflS .6' ~;7,y1/H/ W (7; .1:t'I'lJt7 i' 03/J'#JIS;a
i
07;;i;;lo-;;::t::J/??? ~.?/C7 ..p;? 1/c7/Y3d'~
"
/)tZYI'7e'U 25't7E? Oa'L/Y;7..? 9C?~?
t'...
{(\
~~
~~
11"1
-
.s:
-:2.. j Q l
:0,/..--'" 7
.' r-
L ,.,. -1 ,r.,
( \
[ \.,,/
I , i
," ..- ,
"
r .........
\ \ ( .J '-..-) t-
.......... -- L
t ., --.....
d I
nb / ~ ~+-_." - - ..'-
~ - ....
I \l) St-z
,
,. i
..,tl-
t-+- r-h-
1'>1 ..
,- - '2
/ a.
( , ~
~ , , ~ ~y
i
, ..~--... i;t
l 2
>
:J
~
~ ~
~ -~
, .' -_._- ~"
.. -..,-- ... ----.--..- ,. .------.--
- .. ~~
5
LJ z
~ h= .. ~
---. ~
I~ d_ '-J .. . -"
~ 2 ti
-
z
Iwf; r --}o
- ~ ~---
/~
I . -..
~~i ~ ".q
-
JJ
-2
Il.l Ii)
~\-
&
\--
z
~
IW
l
-r-
I
~.D81M::1.7'~ l~ ' 1I11J'S 0" S77tJ't'h? W Q; .2#I'W " Oi/"~~IS';a
S~6~6 '9'::> 'O)B^ON
a^JJO S>tBO uopa4lV 9 ~ ~
JOIOBJIUOO IBJ8U8n
~~~:~F~
I
~
]
~
~~'i- ~
',....-..,..1 '-
:~rFP
,.--..
I :,i:i ...~..,='-,"-
,__ 11;1 _=.....~_ ,~
F,i-~, i 1'- W.
I ' ~l: ~
, ..
L__,=::~ I h.
'-,j-.~ ~
-I! 1
: ],1
-..\ ~
[~]","~
,.. ~
::s
t=1
.1_
-rr ~
_:..--++_; E
~' ,f.ll
~~ .:t I
_.=:n:'
-:n::' _ _.J
I
I
I
(\: 1'"-~
I ~""-F-"
I I .. 1. I
L' ~r:---.....I
__J , I ~ ...,
L- _....I
]1 ---" L~1
~
h:
~
~
C773/:;:/d';;';;t:?/l<iI /1::;/ c7 ~ !/c:J IY 3' 21f.:1
,/'/t?;iiI/J'Zl/2 ~5"C73 OClJJYiil;? 570r;- Z
i
c-
:~,-~
~
'-
- ~
- ~
_ i
-~. 1 ..~ (~"\)
~ -'
[n, : '1'-- ~ ,II
C \/)_
,~
"
~T ~
--~- K:
\I)
.....
@
..~(
'-"'j
..~
..-JJ"
~ .
v\ ~ \l
-..; ... .
{J-. ~\ ~~
~ lJ. ,tll
~ ~~)
:t' ';:f\
~~~
III ~
'X~~
1.\..\ \' ~
,"-J
\.fJ'
"t ~
k ~
~ \/l
;:s '..
~
t.... l4
I' -"J
, ll..i
-J k
~
c-=:-:=]
[J
L:J
r- ,..- ....
I fi I
~" I
...._, I ~
I I ' J
I '
L -~ J---Y 1
,__ ~c ...
t=-l
C-"J ~
[~] ~
L -1 ~
Yl
~~
t:~
~~
"",It)
~
~~
.. J
4.j\l\
~
~~
"
~ .....
~~
\-...j ~
V)~
x~
~J
r.tr,1 f". ','" . ';"^~rJ
"'.'il' ""111
V.l II' "';\')
~\~J;;; '~,"'J~~
~
,
?rO~?(72Y.J,1O;:; '!/c?n? 7,,1'79 ';'/Jt7'S' "17 ~;;7C1/;T;".J r;'tl O;;.2;>t>'O'C;:P a;;'y!?,S;;'O
O---;E7l:o''3rl':?l7fl '?!'XO 1)J (1O,V;'O'fl
/H?O'a9/2 'S5'{f;J O;:YJ,V;;;J 9";P(7 SOf'?
...)~
~S1\
~' '---'1:""
.-...-... ,
--- ..-
':'; )
d
:, c1'1 I
, I
,_J_ .L ..J
",; I
<1'\
J
(fil~
~ '-)
.
--~~--------,_. -------------
i
1
t
d
j ld.
oN
n!--
-!
D
2
o
" f'0$'
f--) R-
, I;jr.
):'
- ft
~.~
,=tL
(;1
l
...
t<)
(;
2 ~
9~
~
~
l"J
I
!I
III
ll'
l'
r!
~~ "
~ '~
~ ,~
~
~--
"".
.'.,. ..-.
~
.
,.
, i 1
'&
l~~
j
\
I~
I 2<11
I Rf
I...t ,';I ~
I ,~~
~k
I ,~
-:,~ p
\)
, ,
"
, .,
~. ~
~
';,
\') ~)
-i
--'
~
~~
~
R
~..
I.
"i
'J)
-'
SJ
\ )
'i.
cy
III
\ l
. )
"l:
. )
II)
"-
"l
. I
.~0!
I\j
:::-.:
~
'J
-...t)1
''.f
.
': '..f , 'i '''\ '~I
"1' 'I'
. "n,,"
~F.di. ... ..;J~
oJ
~--"~r53t~ ;;"-6Y"~ci;'g ,?/y .;'9 ~'7;?t"'5' 't-' S'?7c>'(;T If,} ?fg 07~ .7'(;'0'0 iJ'
~
Ii)'
~
C;?,yt;J;S?O
C;;?,'.7'c/~;>'//7g ;>/:;,'G ;p 170'1/~og
I}Ool1g/2 ~ 5'(7] OO'...7IV';:J 9 ;D!f SO>.'?
----~----
-"-... .-.".'--..'...'......'[
b
.
::::,:.;;",' . 1'\"'.
'H"" " .
',.,'"
1 ~
, ~~
\t.
~ '~ ~
! :j ~.:.
~" "=-
n~
1
~
j
'iI'
'"
B
~
__,_J
1___"
l I
1
i
"
'(
z
i'i
!J
;;
1
ll~
~.._. ,
I j ~J=;Il+. !rj r--
_.. II~\.I' ill
H
"-' - ,1 ~
~-;Jtr'lt' I"
1-"1'" \;~,ijJ
."'~"'I
~
LJ
I..
L
::)
~
~
11.
I'l
~
-:r
z
>
::i
1-
~
f
,J "
J
.:>
.1:
D ~
D
D
31, ''l
'1. j
H '!1;:; $/
>j
~'.:'..~,:", :1-. ._,...........: ..__....=--=--=-=ll~._. ..
,
i
Ii
,I
i'
,
oJ.
"
t~
';1~
"
I::-,
...'
,"
~ 1
~
.
"
\i) \!l
--' ..(
~
I ;
c)
(j
"I
~\
\ )
,
~
\ J
c:-;-
('v
\ 1 ~
I,
. )
I "t
1
1 ' I
j ~li
\'1
. ,
, '~:l Iy
l'i
, C)
'" (y
N t ,
. '( .::::;
roo ;..
I~ '. :
0
~
~ ' ,
if
. -- ,/]f- iU
"
,I
If
/' I'
/ '~ I
. , : jJ
~ ' r..
~
,,' I II
~ "Z.
I 1:->1
"
~
,
J"
. -.-., '_ _,_ _, ,_w__ ___"-1(
--..--- .-- ...-., -.-. ....--,-... '.___,.,,__._'__.n _._._
;~, "11 "': "
;ciA", 1 "~I I' ',j" ." I 'II,
1')1:'1..11" ."
',.'. . ,.," i~
~y.I,,"rlj ""f
f
~ l 1
~ 1 "
.' .;
~ I .
l ~ @ ''"
~'!)
5 g , \ 1
. ii,
,
il "
~
,.
fi ~
oo;:::;te:r.2ll'O,.) Wig ~/)I;'9 '7Ilt/s;- '/7' 9;-lol7/;:J?iqc]j~'~a:(j~"c';,,:Y~S-?O
m
~
".
~
~
">-
~
to
t-..
G-;;?/:705~/l7g :;)''//C ;:P b'o,v5a'g
/~Od?7G'/.1 '.2 5'(;~- oa:J/Li.? b ~ & 50~2
:::!~"
~.~
4
~
~
-i
f
~
...
A
1
~i
"-..
L_
.ik
<(:
\::
LJ5
\,
Z
o
rOt",,:; ~
O~,i]
1QJ.1l~
Q;W
Y]Jj~
~crSJ
""
~
. liil] . i
r ~i~
I ~~\
*, ~~.
mil JI' ~H
, !f
9 .
-_ t..__ ..
." 1
.J
e
i".~ :
.., ~ ~ ~
iq ~
ci
;x.
jl
n
~~
~
[.._u
,.
~~._--- ,
~i ...,'." u,
't ... ~ ~ ~ .
..-'t(\l-"..... ...m
~...~ ,,~., ,
li~~ " '---
-~--- .... .... ...r-
t=/
r L___... (
I :-IT--
,
I" ,
., I
l.~ril
~ .._u~1
~ I
p ~,
i ~v
~ "LJ
t
,,-.....---..
I <f
I::
1'1.:., ~
b,L.. I
li~ ~ 1
. ~-"\-"I
,-
~l_~~
'')1 ~-
~~
'(}i;'
~~ U
\1 It,
$ ,~~
s
~,-
~ll.J
'^ ~
YJ ~~
-.J \.."
';) ~~
\) 'I,
lit }
2i III
, J ~l
"l: ,
'\3 ~r
II\~
~~
~ ~~
'0 ~n
~ J
'l:
cy
llj ~
~ ) '"
'I ..J:
'l:
" \1
~~
.
~ h ,;,
~ s~ ..
~~ "
~
, ~
P 0 ~)
c~~ ~ ~ ' 2
!i~ ~ ~! J
i, ~ ~ ~, ,~
... /.. om -. ",=-=-t-
---- .- ..-.
'2
o
i=
~
./
u)
...1
III
.'1
~I ~
~
i 7'
ti~
~!
~:I
1
I
I
I
Tim i~
..--..-
B
,~=;~
UllJ
r-i Ui 5
~-
g
uJ
..I
III
,,~
ri
<(
III
Ci
\
'4)':
1
.__ I
'1
f 1 \ /
~l" \ p
o
'- \ III
~ ~ lr \ ii:
~ ......l
~~ \ ~
~ \ UI
~ IL_u I I
I
, l--.1
D
G. OT"".
P _ -'f=; 2
!! / i i ~
[ " I! I i I
rll!~: i I : ~
, ! 11 - - . l
I 'I' j ~,
\i'
C ,L '. /1 IIJ
?
r '''J- .
:: f~
~ J3~L
: :~
-.
~l:.
rilL
-
,
t
--- :~.-' 11:--- -~~
J
~ i
' ,
'- ~
~ '" d
"
~
R
,I
;~6~6 '0'::1 'Ole^oN
8^PO s~eo U0l19tjl'o' 9 t t
JL pBJjUO::, IBJeUa8
~-+
I
m ~.1JfBJIYO./ '~g llYZ~ <717"'$ '6' S77~"'H/ W (7; .231'b'Q " O!l/)'/)/s5l(7
s:: 07 :lId (?J' ,g;;t?/X?
~ ;Y..?/d iP tTo/Y.?df?
/YOd/lfi'/L ~SV? O~/V~J 5"~?
~" -..
~I -
U'
J 0 , I~~
CJ ~ -i ~ t~
i l t J\j
r=~.. ~~
r:::::.=-
i~
~
~
_1
\
_~-Ll
\
\
! (
~
~
< 0
,
- ,
- Of
; LJ l ~
,
~ ,
.....
~ I
t:t.
,
Xl'- cs I
~1 <; uj I
~ JIl I
- - - -
lQ ~
~
~
l..-- I
r--t
U-r
L__ ' I
1
..' --
TOWN OF TIBURON
STAFF REpORT
TOWN COUNCIL
TOWN MANAGER
BLACKIE'S PASTUREfTffiURON BOULEVARD - UNDERGROUNDING OF
UTILITIES PROJECT
JUNE 5,1996
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
ITEM NO, 1/
The Rule 20A Undergrounding of Utilities Project at Blackie's Pasture along Tiburon
Boulevard is scheduled to commence mid-June and be completed by mid-November.
A pre-construction meeting was held on site Tuesday, May 28, 1996, and included
representatives from PG&E, Pacific Bell, Viacom and the Town ofTiburon.
There is only one (1) Tiburon property owner directly affected by the proposed
undergrounding, That property owner has agreed to the conversion at the appropriate time.
The following is the project schedule:
Task
Customer Notification of
Const, Start, Conversion Req
Start Date
Pre-Construction Meeting
Sub-Structure Construction
Start 6/17/96
Overhead Construction
Start 6/17/96
Cable Pulling & Splicing
Start 7/22/96
Customer Cut-overs
Start 9/2/96
Facilities Removal
Start 9/6/96
Start 1/4/96
Start 10/4/96
This is an informational item only--no action required
ComDletion Date ResD.
Complete 5/3/96 City
Complete 5/28/96 All
Complete 7/19/96 All
Complete 10/4/96 PG&E
Complete 8/30/95 Utils.
Complete 9/6/96 PG&E
Complete 10/4/96 PG&E
Complete 11/8/96 P,Bell
Complete 11/8/96 CATV
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL MEMORANDUM
Date:
May 29,1996
TOWN COUNCIL
RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
PROPOSED TWO YEAR MUNlCIP AL BUDGET
FISCAL YEARS 1997 & 1998
Item No:
# /;2..
(P-~-1 ~
To:
From:
Subject:
The Preliminary two (2) year Town Budget proposal will be distributed to Council on Friday,
June 14, Town Council has indicated that it would be preferable to schedule Public Hearings on
the proposed 2 Year Budget Plan for regular Council Meeting dates. Therefore, Staff proposes
that two (2) Public Hearings on the Budget be scheduled as follows:
I. Wednesday. June 19. 1996
a, Convene as Redevelopment Agency
Redevelopment Agency Budget Plan (Convene Meeting of Agency)
Agency Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Plan
b. Convene as Town Council
Present Preliminary Budget Plan
Overview of Fund Balances
Overview of General Operating Revenues
Department Operating Budgets
Planned Department Capital Outlay Expenditures
II. Wednesday. July 3. 1996
Overview of Current and Proposed Capital Improvement Program
Streets Improvements
Drainage Improvements
Community Development Improvements
Review of Open Space Program
Review of Debt Service Program
III. Wednesday. July 17. 1996
a, Convene as Redevelopment Agency -
Adopt Resolution approving 2 Year Agency Budget Plan
b. Adopt Resolution approving 2 Year Town Municipal Budget Plan