The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTC Agd Pkt 1998-06-03 (2) ;t{kSr~ TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 TIBURON BLVD. MEETING DATE: MEETING TIME: CLOSED SESSION: JUNE 3, 1998 7:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. PLEASE NOTE: In order to give all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and to ensure the presentation of all points of view, members of the audience should: (1) Always Address the Chair; (2) Slate Name and Address; (3) Slale Views Succinctly; (4) Umn Presentations to 3 minutes; (5) Speak Directly into Microphone. A. ROLL CALL B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION (If any) C. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Please confine your comments during this portion a/the agenda to matters not already on this agenda, other than items on the Consent Colendar, The public will be given an opportunity to speak on each agenda item at the time it is called. Presentations are limited to three (3) minutes. Matters requiring action will be referred to the appropriate Commission, Board, Committee or Staff for consideration and/or ploced on a future meeting agenda, D. COUNCIL. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS 1) TIBURON WATERSHED DRAINAGE MEETING - (Tiburon and Belvedere Councilmembers and BLPOA Representatives) - (Oral Report) 2) BUILDING ADVISORY COMMITTEE - (Update on Status of Tiburon Police Station Project) - ( Oral Report) E. APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMITTEES 3) BEL VEDERE/TIBURON LIBRARY AGENCY BOARD OF TRUSTEES - A) Tiburon Appointment for Term Ending June 30, 1998 B) Ratify RUSD Appointment F. CONSENT CALENDAR The purpose of the Consent Calendar is to group items together which generally do not require discussion and which will probably be approved by one motion unless separate action is required on a particular item. Any member of the Town Council, Town Staff. or the Public may request removal of an item for discussion. 4) TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES - #1138, May 6, 1998 - (Adopt) 5) TOWN MONTHLY INVESTMENT SUMMARY - (As of April 30, 1998) - (Accept) 6) TOWN INVESTMENT POLICY STATEMENT - (Adopt 1998 Revised Statement) 7) AMICUS BRIEF REQUEST: Del Monte Dunes v, City of Monterey, U.S, Supreme Court No, 97- 1235 - (Approve) G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8) MOTOR VEIllCLES LICENSE FEES - (Discussion of Town's Opposition to Proposed Repeal) H. NEW BUSINESS I. PUBLIC HEARING 9) TIBURON'S MUNICIPAL BUDGET - (Introduction and Overview of Preliminary Two-Year Budget Plan) - (Fa be submitted under separate cover) 10) MARIN ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE - Repeal Ordinance No. 426 N.S./Adopt New Ordinance Representing a Correction to Previous Ordinance Pertaining to an Increase in License Fees, Confinement & Quarantine. and Potentially Dangerous and Vicious Dogs - (Second Reading & Adoption) J. COMMUNICATIONS 11) MARIN/SONOMA MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT - (Letter dated May 26, 1998 Re: New Facilities Project in West Cotati) K. STAFF & TOWN MANAGER REPORTS L. ADJOURNMENT - To June 11. 1998, 7:30 p.nt. - Town Operating Budget Hearing, Town HaU Future A venda Items - Downtown Business Task Force Report Downtown/Main Street Traffic Committee Report - (June 17) Round Hill Oaks. Precise Development Plan & FEIR (June 17) 88 Via Los Altos. Appeal of Design Review Board Decision. (June 17) UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING AT BLACKIE'S PASTURE. PG&E Cost Ovemm Issue - (June 17) NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING CLOSED MEETING OF THE TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq" the Town Council will hold a Closed Session, More specific information regarding this meeting is indicated below: DATE OF MEETING: June 3. 1998 No, 11-1998 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Section 54957.6) Agency Negotiator: Austris Rungis A. Employee Organization: MAPE (Marin Association of Public Employees) B. Employee Organization: TPA (Tiburon Police Association) f)vw 3/lqif :T~wft~ 4) 29 April 1998 Mr, Robert Kleinert. Town Manager Town of Tiburon 1505 Tiburon Blvd, Tiburon. Ca, 94920 Re: Application for Appointment to the Belvedere- Tiburon Library Agency Dear Bob and Tiburon Town Council: i would like to apply for appointment to the three-year TIburon seat on the Belvedere- Tiburon Library ~ency which will be vacant this July 1. As you know. I have been a representative of Ti uron on this Agency Board since its formation three years ago. and during that time I have served as Vice-Chair for two years and Chairman for this past year, My interest in our new library goes back many years, I initially served on the original Steering Committee when the concept of an independent community library was in its early formative stages. and have actively participated in our separation from the County. the passage of our parcel tax. our many fund-raising endeavors. and the construction of our building, I am eager to continue my volunteer service to the Library as we enter the 21st century. for the challenges are great. especially in the area of technology, I am truly interested in seeing our Library become a community center in the full sense of the term and one whose special programs are recognized throughout the Bay Area, And of course. it goes without saying that I want our collection to be the best there is, Fortunately. we have an outstanding Library Director to lead us, I am terribly proud of what we have accomplished. and know we can reach even higher goals in the future, I would be glad to come to a Town Meeting if you would like to interview me personally, Sincerely. (J(b~c.~ Carol C. Forell 2299 Spanish Trail Ti bu ron 435-3763 , . OF T'Et,_~ ~~1<O' O~Y~-z. _'~'~ if;' '."!"~ " " ".' ! ~', ': ,- '. .,. ~':.-'. ~ : " '~~f(J <""" '. . .~, c,.." ~'Ol?rvlA \~ . , , ~"""""""~:~;"'l"""""'" ",""",..,.,~(l'''''''-''''' """,,,,~~:,,,,~~~,,,'<."'~Il.'r"" .t.""..~,,'"'" -~~~tf~~1~':~,'~, '. :':.; !~~'., .,".t~.,.,-."...., TOWN OF TIBURON NOTICE OF PENDING VACANCY (Town Commissions, Boards & Committees) 1998 BEL VEDEREffIBURON LIBRARY AGENCY - BOARD OF TRUSTEES (Statutory Authority: Govt. Code Section 6500 et seq, & It. Powers Agreement for Be1vedere!Tiburon Library, PosmON: TERM: TRUSTEE 3 Years - (coinciding with fiscal year beginning July 1) Qualifications: Applicants should be residents of the Town of Tiburon and have the interest, desire, and time available to serve on the Board, including attendance at regular montWy meetings and other activities. Due consideration was given in initial appointments to the selection of individuals who had made significant efforts toward making the new library a reality. There is a pending vacancy on the Board as follows: Aooointee Date Aooointed Date Resifmed Term Exoires 1) Carol Forrell April 19, 1995 N/A June 30, 1998 Ms, Forrell is currently Board Chair and is seeking re-appointment as Tiburon's representative to the Library Agency Board. Interested residents can pick up an application at Tiburon Town Han, 1505 Tiburon Blvd., Tiburon CA 94920, or by calling 435-7373. Deadline for receiot of aoolications: Aoril 30. 1998 Nolice Posted at Office ofTiburon Town Clerk and BelvederelTiburon Library on March 26, 1998, cc: Tiburon Town Council The ArklMarin Independent Journal c ~RJM --I k~"IRN ~RJDJCTI JNS ;::>YU4~ '-10. 415 435 7052 Ma'~. 29 1338 .31: 50P11 P2 ::rk~ *3(6) REED UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT '05,A A,enid. Mho/lor.s Tiberon. CA 94920 (415) 435,7848 FAX (415) 435,7843 May 28, 1998 Harry Matthews, Mayor Town of Tiburon 1505 Tiburon Blvd. Tibruon, CA 94920 Dear Mayor Matthews: Please be advised that at our May 19, 1998 meeting, the Board of Trustees selected Ms, Bonnie Ross as our representative to the Belvedere- Tiburon Library Agency. We would like to request that the Tiburon Town Council ratify our nomination. ( Susan A. Hileman, President RUSD Board of Trustees SupstinrondfKJt Schools Board ()f rTUSts.S Merrill :!oyce S\olsan Hileman OncQ LlvingslO'1 -tarr)' Smith ~obert WeisbcriJ Shc~ Puckett RNd K-2 Bel Air~ 3.& Del :V:., e.a TOWN COUNCn.. MINUTES DR4Fr :r::; CALL TO ORDER Mayor Matthews called the regular meeting of the Town Council of the town of Tiburon to order at 7:35 p,m, on Wednesday, May 6, 1998, at Town Hall Council Chambers, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California, A. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Bach, Gram, Thompson, Matthews Hennessy PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Kleinert, Town Attorney Danforth, Planning Director Anderson, Finance Director Stranzl, Town Engineer Barmand, Town Clerk Crane B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Representatives from Cub Scout Pack No, 48, Dens 5, 7 & 10, were introduced by Vasco Marais, Assistant Cubmaster. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by the scouts. C. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION (If any) Mayor Matthews said there was no action was taken in closed session. D. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS There were no public questions and comments. E. RECOGNITION FOR TOWN SERVICE 1) TffiURON WEB SITE - (Bob & Bonnie Fraik, Owners of Digital Foundry; Dave Cole, Webmaster) Town Clerk Crane introduced and thanked the Fraiks and Dave Cole for creating and maintaining the Tiburon Web Site, Councilmember Thompson presented them with plaques of appreciation, F. COUNCIL. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS 2) NEW TffiURON POLICE STATION - (Building Advisory Committee Status Report) Chair Jim Wilson said the drawings were 90% complete, and that construction was scheduled to start in late June, He estimated the cost at $1.4 million, or $209 per square foot. 3 ) STRAWBERRY ANNEXATION MEETING - (Status Report by Mayor Matthews) Mayor Matthews said he and Town Manager Kleinert had attended a meeting of the Strawberry Recreation District in which the subject of annexation to Tiburon was discussed, Matthews said Town Council Minutes #1138 May 6, 1998 Page 1 the meeting of approximately 250 people was 8 to 1 against annexation. Matthews told the group that the Town Council was not looking to annex the area which would represent a 50% increase in size to the Town, He said the most people wanted Tiburon to retain its "small-town" character, 4) TffiURON PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION WORKSHOP - (Mayor Matthews) Mayor Matthews said a meeting was proposed for June 2, 1998, 5) DOWNTOWN MAIN STREET TASK FORCE - (Vice Mayor Bach) Vice Mayor Bach said the committee was not yet "in sync" with its recommendations, He said there would be a final meeting on May 11 to draft a report to the Councils, G. APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS. COMMISSIONS & COMMlllEES . PARKS & OPEN SPACE COMMISSION - (Fill Current Vacancy) MOTION: Moved: Vote: To appoint Judy Burgin to the Parks & Open Space Commission, Thompson, Seconded by Bach AYES: Unanimous ABSENT: Hennessy H. CONSENT CALENDAR 6) TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES - #1136, April 1, 1998 - (Approve) 7) TOWN MONTHLY INVESTMENT SUMMARY - (March 31, 1998) - (Accept) MOTION: Moved: Vote: To Adopt Consent Calendar, Bach, Seconded by Gram AYES: Unanimous ABSENT: Hennessy I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8) TWO (2) YEAR MUNICIPAL BUDGET - (Finance Director's Recommended Public Hearing Dates) Council accepted the recommended hearing dates of June 3, 11 & 20, 1998, J. NEW BUSINESS 9) MILL V ALLEY REFUSE SERVICE - (Status of Service Rates & Waster Diversion Program), Town Manager Kleinert said that Mill Valley Refuse Service (MVRS) would not be requesting a rate increase for the 1998-98 Fiscal Year, He said that under th. Franchise Agreement, a consultant was supposed to be hired to perform an audit ifthere were no increases in three years, However, Kleinert said the Southern Marin agencies served by MVRS did not think it was necessary to perform an audit. Town Council Minutes #1138 May 6, 1998 Page 2 Kleinert also mentioned that MVRS was now using an "annual generation-based analysis" formula which resulted in higher (46-50%) diversion rates than expected for Mill Valley, Belvedere, and Tiburon. John Kern, member of the Belvedere- Tiburon Recycling Committee, said the method of calculation was being considered for adoption on a County-wide basis by the Solid & Hazardous Waster JPA. K. PUBLIC HEARING 10) APPLICATION TO DESIGNATE NEW PRIVATE ROAD - "High Meadow lane," (for properties currently located at 94 SugarloafDrive); AP Nos, 58-100-54 & 58-281-04 - (David and Janet Taylor, Applicants) Planning Director Anderson said the application requested making the easement between the homes at 92 & 96 Sugarloaf a private street since there was not enough room in the address sequence to accomodate both lots, He said the owners would pay for the signage and maintenance of the private street. Council directed Staff to return with a resolution adopting the proposed action, 11) CONSIDERATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT: Negative Declaration and Settlement Agreement Granting Subdivision of One Parcel into 3 Lots at 885B, C & D Tiburon Boulevard; AP No, 55-26-11 - (Dixon and Sharon Power, Applicants) Planning Director Anderson said the subdivision application filed in 1996 was denied by both the Planning Commission and later on appeal to the Town Council on the basis of excessive density, inadequate access, and privacy and view blockage issues for the owners of 1 Owlswood Road, Anderson said the Powers filed a lawsuit after losing on appeal, and that the Town's Legal Subcommittee had tentatively settled the matter through modifications to the original application, He said the proposed Settlement Agreement was now under consideration by the entire Council. Anderson said the key points to the agreement were to reduce the number of units from the original four to three by converting the existing duplex into a single-family unit. He said vehicular access to Lot 3 would be through Las Palmas Way only until the lot above it was developed, and then the access would be through Stony Hill Road, In addition, Anderson said, there improvements to be made to the entrance to the property from Las Palmas Way. The agreement also called for a restricted building envelope for the proposed dwelling on Lot 3 with 18 foot height limitations to the front portion of the house, and a IS-foot high garage, The distance from 1 Owlswood would be no less than 145 feet, which represented a change from the original agreement which called for 150 feet, Anderson said that all other improvements would go through the Design Review process, The legal provisions of the proposed agreement called for the action to be dismissed with prejudice, Town Council Minutes #1138 May 6, 1998 Page 3 according to Anderson, and the Town would be indemnified against any future actions. Anderson also pointed out that an initial environmental study and negative declaration had been prepared but were never approved, He asked Council to do so at the conclusion of the hearing, T own Attorney Danforth clarified that entering into the agreement would not authorize the construction of any particular building or structure, She also pointed out that the law allows the Town Council to change its previous decision when litigation has been filed against the Town, and although these matters were usually handled in closed session, the Council had asked to hold a public hearing on the proposed settlement. Mayor Matthews said that he and Councilmember Gram (the Legal Subcommittee) had met with both the Powers and the affected neighbors, the Littles (1 Owlswood Road), in an attempt to come to an agreement. He said the Town did not favor lot splits but was able to grant them under the General Plan if certain criteria were met, Matthews said the Planning Commission had denied the subdivision application in May of 1997 by a 3-2 vote, and that the appeal to the Town Council was denied on a 2-1 vote. He said this denial was based on the fact that four units were proposed, and now the agreement had limited it to three, Matthews said that in an area zoned medium high density, four units were allowed on one acre, and that the property in question was just less than an acre (.95), He said the Subcommittee's view was that the area was already high density for the last 50 years, even though it is surrounded by larger homes and parcels on Owlswood and Stony Hill Road, Councilmember Gram commented that it had been a difficult decision to make, but that the Settlement Agreement would maintain the current levels of density, In addition, he said the duplex would be "cleaned up," and that some of the privacy issues could be mitigated by landscaping, Gram said the Legal Subcommittee had recommended adoption of the agreement to the entire Council but no final decision had yet been made, Mayor Matthews opened the public hearing, David Bowie, attorney for the Powers, spoke on their behalf He said they favored the settlement agreement as a compromise and fair resolution of the matter, and that the only change to be made was the distance of 145 feet (v, 150') from the Littles' home [at 1 OwlswoodJ. He said the Littles' privacy concerns could be addressed by the Design Review Board, and that the only real issue was one of subdivision, Terrel Mason, attorney for the Littles, said the key points for his clients were view and privacy issues, and that the settlement agreement left the impression that the Town Council had approved a two- story house (on Lot 3), Mason said that at previous hearings before the Planning Commission, a one- story house was deemed more appropriate, Mason also said that through settling the matter, the principles of the Town's hillside guidelines were being sidestepped, He said his clients did not approve in general of a settlement that went against the Town Council Minutes #1138 May 6,1998 Page 4 decisions of a previous Council and Planning Commission, and that it gave the impression of the Town being "held up" by litigation. Mason contended that if the agreement represented a new proposal, it should go back through the process, He said it set a bad precedent (for the Town) to enter into the agreement, Betsy Little, 1 Owlswood, said the Council would be taking away their views and giving them to someone else, She said that the Powers refused to compromise on the size and location of their proposed house, and said it was now being memorialized as two-story, Mrs, Little said she and her husband bought their home for privacy, and she submitted a petition signed by neighbors and other residents opposing the action, Roy Little, 1 Owlswood, said he was opposed to settlement because it would pervert decades of process and precedent in the Town, and that converting the duplex was not much of a compromise, He said the footprint of the proposed house on Lot 3 had not changed, and that the contention that the language of the settlement agreement was "restrictive" to the Powers was not so, He said the Powers had never made any mention of compromise to the height of the house, Becky Pringle, 503 Comstock, spoke in favor of the Littles, She said there was room for compromise in the design of the home on Lot 3, and that the garage and deck should be moved to the other side of the house. She also said it was "a travesty" for the new Council to go against the previous decisions of the Town Council and Planning Commission, Nat Marans, Spanish Trail, 50-year resident, said he was furious about a precedent being set, and asked the Council to adhere to the General Plan and stop giving exceptions and variances to applicants, Fred Salinger, 6 Owlswood, said he supported the Littles and was bothered by the process of an applicant suing after being turned down by the Town, He said that indemnification actually represented blackmail and questioned whether applicants had the funds to indemnify the Town against future actions, He suggested that the application be returned to the Planning Commission and/or have the Littles to sign off on the agreement, as well. Devi Barnes-Sankin, Owlswood Road, said the Council should take the Powers up on their offer to settle and go back to the Design Review Board. She said the two-story house jeopardized the Littles' views and that specific design issues had not had a fair hearing, Ms, Barnes-Sankin also said she was disturbed by the precedent and was concerned that Town was avoiding litigation to the detriment and loss of due process to others, Town Attorney Danforth said the Town had added an indemnification clause to all of its agreements at the behest of Council, regardless of whether a party could demonstrate that it had the means to indemnify, Town Council Minutes #1138 May 6. 1998 Page 5 Mary Bowles, Owlswood Lane, read a letter in support of the Littles that was written by a neighbor who could not attend the meeting, Attorney Bowie, in his rebuttal, said his clients would be willing to delete Paragraph IF of the agreement, and noted that they had planned to go through Design Review all along. He said the paragraph in question, if anything, was a detriment to his clients because it set limitations on the proposed dwelling, Bowie said he was puzzled by the concept of precedent, since the case was "fact specific," He said the Powers were within their rights to seek judicial review, and that the proposed settlement agreement was good public policy. He commended the Council for their attempts to reconcile the dispute, Other points made by Bowie were that no variances were being sought by his clients, and that the proposed three-lot subdivision had met the zoning requirements of the Tiburon General Plan, Bowie said the only real objection was the one of view put forth by the Littles, He said that the area would be improved and the duplex, once converted into a single-family dwelling, would be a more attractive home, compatible with Tiburon standards, Finally, Bowie contended that the agreement did involve all the parties, although technically the Littles were not a party to the lawsuit, Mayor Matthews closed the public hearing, Councilmember Gram said he and Mayor Matthews had met both with the Littles and the Powers in an attempt to mediate, rather than arbitrate, the dispute, He said there was only one issue left outstanding which was one of view obstruction and privacy. Gram said that even though the parties could not agree on everything, he and Matthews understood their objectives, and that perhaps something could be worked out around Paragraph IF, Gram was emphatic in his statement that this was not a "back room" deal and concurred with Bowie's assessment that it was "fact driven" and not precedent-setting, He said it would not have been fair to pass it back to the Planning Commission, Vice Mayor Bach said the Town Council had an obligation to keep the Town out oflitigation, He said he agreed with Councilmember Gram that it was a dispute between two neighbors and no one else was affected, He suggested that the Littles review the agreement for themselves, Councilmember Thompson said he was on the previous Council and had voted against the [then] four-unit subdivision because the road was not adequate, among other things, He said this was a different application which resulted in no increase in density and set limitations on the height of the house to be built on Lot 3, He agreed that the agreement was not precedent-setting, although he said he probably would have sent it back through the process. Nevertheless, according to Thompson, the Town Council Minutes #1138 May6,1998 Page 6 proposed method of settlement was well-intended and would probably result in a quicker and more efficient resolution for the parties involved, He proposed a delay to give the Littles time to comment on the agreement. Mayor Matthews said he concurred with Councilmember Gram's summation, although he was troubled by the question of precedent that had been raised. He said that all applications are reviewed on their merits and that each Councilmember had taken an oath to uphold the Town's General Plan. Matthews said he would go along with the majority opinion as to the disposition of Paragraph IF. Council continued the matter to May 20, 1998, 12) MARIN ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE - Amend Chapter 20 of Town Municipal Code to Incorporate Changes to Title 8 of County Code Re: Housing of Wild or Undomesticated Animals in Areas Zoned Residential - (1st Reading by Title Only) MOTION: Moved: Vote: To read Ordinance by Title Only, Thompson, Seconded by Bach AYES: Unanimous ABSENT: Hennessy Mayor Matthews read, "An Ordinance of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon Adopting by Reference the Amended Animal Control Regulations of Title 8 of the Marin County Code Adding Sections 8,04,184, 8,04.184,1, and 98.04,184.2 Pertaining to the Prohibition of the Housing of Any Wild or Undomesticated Animal in an Area Zoned Residential." MOTION: Moved: Vote: To adopt above Marin County Animal Control Ordinance, Hennessy, Seconded by Bach AYES: Bach, Gram, Matthews, Thompson NOES: None ABSENT: Hennessy L. COMMUNICATIONS 13) GOLDEN GATE TRANSIT - Ferry Feeder Bus Service - (Councilmember Thompson) CounciImember Thompson said that the proposed consolidation of Routes 9 & 11 of the Golden Gate Transit Ferry Feeder Bus service would leave out the ridership at Lyford Drive, Thompson said that the bus system was a critical part of making the ferry system a success in ensuring that people would have door-to-door transportation in order to stay out of their cars, Although the Town had already sent a letter to Golden Gate Transit, Councilmember Thompson asked that the situation be monitored closely and that the Town defend keeping both Routes 9 & 11, Town Manager Kleinert said that Blue & Gold Ferry Marketing Manager Koenig told him that a reduction in service could affect 48 or 12% of their ridership, Town Council Minutes #1138 May 6, 1998 Page 7 M. STAFF & TOWN MANAGER REPORTS 14) DOWNTOWN FERRY DOCK REALIGNMENT PROJECT GRANT APPLICATION - (Town Engineer Status Report), Town Engineer Bannand said that funding had been approved in May of 1993, but that the Council had withdrawn its application for funding in 1995, then re-applied a year later after a new design and smaller dock had been proposed. Bannand said that approval was needed now to proceed with the engineering study which would cost approximately $35,000, Council continued item to May 20, 1998. 15) ELEPHANT ROCK REPAIRS - (Town Engineer Status Report), Town Engineer Bannand said that he had started that drawings and expected construction to begin in start in mid-July, N. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Matthews adjourned the meeting at 10:45 P,M" sine die, HARRY S, MATTHEWS, MAYOR ATTEST: DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK Town Council Minutes #1138 May 6, 1998 Page 8 TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSEN{f5' Meeting: To: From: Subject: May 1, 1998 TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS ~CHARDSTRANZL,TINANCEDffiECTOR STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY RESOLUTION OF AOOPTION, 1998 Item: BACKGROUND: This item is for adoption of the Town's Stat......",,! of Investment Policy, as required by the State of California Government Code, Attacbed for review and adoption is the revised Investment Policy Stat......",,! of !be Town. The Town's current, previously adopted Investment Policy is generic and typical of such policy ,tutenlents adopted by a number of small municipalities, The proposed revisions are the result of a March worksbop which included me, Mayor Matthews and Town Treasw-er Bill Osher, A primary goal of our discussions was to bring our Policy Statement up-to-date, and further structure the Stat......""t to include information that is typically provided in similar <tatemer1ts adopted by other public agencies, special districts and entities, RECOMMENDATION: Town Council approve the revised St~Wnent of Investment Policy, adopt the draft resolution "... Adopting a SflItfflt1et1t of Inveslment Policy for Calendar Year 1998." ATTACHMENTS: L Draft Resolution 2. Revised - Investment Policy Stat"""e"t, 2 pages, 1998 3, Current - Investment Policy Stat"""e"t, I page, 1997 ~ by: R. Suanz1, Finance Director I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1998 WHEREAS, State of California Assembly Bil11 073, Cbaptec 1226 amended Government Code Section 53646 (a) to require "The treasurec or chief fiscal offi_ shall annually raider to the legislative body of the 1oca1 agency a st",."".", of investment policy." WHEREAS, State of California Assembly Bill I 073 also requires monthIy reporting of 1oca1 agency investments, Government Code Section 53646 (b) provides that "The treasurec or chief fisca1 offia:r shall raider a monthIy report to the chief executive offi_ and legislative body of the local agency showing the type of investment, institution, date of maturity, amount of deposit, rate of interest, and such data as may be required by the local agency," NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon does hereby adopt a revised Statement of Investment Policy (attached), and the Finance Director is directed to continue to submit a monthly investment summary statement to the Town Council, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on . 1998, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: HARRY MATTHEWS, MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST: DIANE L. CRANE TOWN CLERK Replaces Tiburon Resolution No, 3207, February 1997. EXHIBIT NO. J I Town of Tibnron, Investment Policy Statement I L PURPOSE This Policy sets f<X1h the investmfnt guidelines for the prudent manag""'''''' of all surplus funds of the Town of Tiburon, Tiburon Redev~~ and Tiburon Public Facilities Financing Authority, It is the goal of this Policy to establish investment objectives in accordance with the provisions of the Stale of California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq" and inveslmem policy g";rlPl;n",, to ensure that funds UDder its purview are prudently invested to preserve capital, provide necessary liquidity and to achieve a rate of retwn consistent with the Town's needs and objectives, Investments may be made as authorized by this Investment Policy and subsequent revisions, This Statement of Investment Policy sball be reviewed annually by the Tiburon Town Council. The Town is therefore affooled a broad range of investment opportunities if the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable UDder current legislation of the Stale of California. I U. OBJECI1VES The Town's cash management system is designed to accurately monitor and forecast revenues and expenditures, thus enabling the Town to invest these surplus funds to the fullest extent possible, Surplus funds sha1I be invested in accordance with sound treasury management principles, Stale of California Government Code Sections 53600 et. seq. and this Policy, When investing, reinvesting, acquiring, selling and managing Town funds, objectives for selecting investments, in priority of order, are I, .sm The primary objective sball be to safeguard the principa\ of the funds. The Town sball invest only in those investments considered safe, Investment in instruments and with institutions permitted UDder Section 5, Investment Guidelines, are deemed to constitute safe investments within the meaning of this Policy, 2, l.iauiditv The secondary objective shall be to meet the liquidity needs of the Town. It is important that the pmfolio contain investments that provide flexibility and may easily be sold with minima1 risk of loss of principal or interest 3, ~ The third objective sball be to achieve a reasonable rate of return on the portfolio. The investment portfolio sha1I be designed to attain safety and liquidity of principa\ first, and thereafter attain a market rate of retwn that is consistent with portfolio design and Policy principles, I ill PRUDENCE Town Council Members, The Town Manager, Finance Director and Town Treasurer, and any persons authorized to make inveslmem deci.irn. on behalf of the Town, are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the Prudent Investor Standard. When investing, reinvesting, acquiring, selling and managing Town funds, a trustee sha1I act with care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims to safeguard the principal and to maintain the liquidity needs of the Town (Government Code Section 53600,3) The Prudent Investor Standard sha1I be applied in managing an overall pmfolio, Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the Investment Policy and exercising due diligence sha1I be relieved of persona1 responsibility for a particular security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are repOOed in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control developments. I IV. DELEGATION OF AUTIlORITY Authority to manage the Town's investment program is derived from approval of Town Council, Management responsibility for the Town's cash management systems and investments are delegated to the Town Manager and Finance Directa, No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Investment Policy Statement and procedures established by the Town Council, IV. INVESTMENT GUIDELINES Investments are to be made in high quality securities or insIruments as pennitted by the Government Code and subject to the Limitations of this Investment Policy, A Eligible securities for investment sball include the following; 1. U S Treasurv Securities, Uuited States Treasury notes, bonds, strips, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or obligations for which the full faith and credit of the U,S, Government are pledged for the timely payment of principle and interest 2, Federal A2encies and U S Government SDoDsored Fntemrises Obligations, participations. or other instruments of or issued by a federal agency or federal government sponsored enterprise. This includes, and is not restricted to, ob1igatioosofthe; Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC). Federal NatiooaI Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), SmaIl Business Administration (SBA), Export- \mp<rtBankofthe United States, and the U,S, Deparbnent of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), EXHIBIT NO.--6- Town, of Tiburon, Investment Policy Statement 3. State of California and T.neal Aaencv Ohliaations. Registered Stale warrants, Treasury notes, or bonds of the Stale of CaIifumia, and bonds, notes, warrants or other evidence of indebtedness of any local agency of the Stale (including bonds payable solely out of revenues from a revenue producing property or asset owned, controlled, or operated by the Stale or local agency, or by a department, boon!, "8'""'Yor authority of the Stale or local agency,) Such obligations must berated AI, SP-I, its equivalent or higher short term, or "A" or higher long term, by a natiooally recognized rating agency, 4, Commercial Paoer. Commercial paper of "prime" quality rated AIIPI or higher by Moody'. Investor Services, Inc, Or Standard &; Poor'. Corporation. Eligible paper is further limited to issuing corporations that: (a) are organized withing the United States, (b) have total assets in excess of five iJundRd million dollars (SSOO,OOO,OOO), and have a long term debt rating of " A" or higher, 5. Ne\l"'iAhle Certificates of Deoosit Negotiable =tificates of deposit issued by a natiooally or state-<:hartered bank or savings association, or federal association, or a state or federal credit union, or by a stale-licensed branch of a foreign bani:: carrying an individual rating of at least B/C by the Thompson Bank Watch or mCA rating services, a short term debt rating of AIIP I or higher, and a long term debt rating of"A" or higher, 6 Money Market Funds, Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified numAll""""" companies as authorized by California Government Code Section 53635(j), B. Stale Local Agency Investment FlUId (LAIF), The Town may invest all or a portion of its investments, up to the State-mandated maximum. in LAIF pursuant to California Government Section 16429, L C, Diversity and Maturity Guidelines: Maximum Maximum %of % of one Maximum TVDe ofInvesbnent Portfolio issuer Maturitv U,S, Treasury Secwities 100 100 5 years Federal Agencies and 65 20 5 years U.S. GSE. Commercial Paper 15 5 ISO day. Negotiable Certificates 25 5 3 years of Deposit Money Market Funds 15 15 N/A Stale LAIF 100 100 N/A I VL REPORTING Within thirty (30) days following the end of each quarter Staff shall RDder a repc<t to the Town Council, which shall include the following information L A portfolio appraisal that includes the type of investment, issuer.. date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested for all securities and investments of the Town, and shall additionally include a description of any Town monies that are under the management of any outside parties, 2. The current I1l8Iia:t value, as of the report date, of all investments, as well as the source of this same valnation. 3, A "A''''''''''' of the status of the compliance (or non- compliance) of the portfolio to this Investment Policy Statement 4, A ",,~, denoting the ability (or inability)ofthe Town to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six (6) months, For investments placed in LAIF, a bank, or savings and loan A...-.ciAti"'1. the most recent ~S''''''P.nts received by the Town from the institution may suffice in lieu of the requirements listed above, I vu. SAFEKEEPING AND DEliVERY OF SECURITIES All transactions shall be executed on a Deliver versus Payment (OVP) basis. To protect against p"'P.n'iAI fraud or embezzlement, the assets of the Town shall be beld in safekeeping by the Town'. safe keeping agent, or secured through third-party custody and safekeeping procedures pursuant to the limitations set forth in Government Code Section 53608, These procedures will be reviewed annually by an externa1 auditor. All investments are to be beld in the name of the Town of Tibwun, Adopted at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTibwun, . 1998 2 / ;,- , .. -- .........-1" RESOLUTION NO...m!1 A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNcn. OF THE TOWN OFTIrnURONADOYTING A STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POllCY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1997 WHEREAS, State of California Assembly Bill 1073, Chapter 1226 amended Government Code Section 53646 (a) to require "The treasurer or chief fiscal officer shall annually render to the legislative body of the local agency a statement of investment policy." WHEREAS, State of California Assembly Bill 1073 also requires monthly reporting oflocal agency investments, Government Code Section 53646 (b) provides that "The treasurer or chief fiscal officer shall render a monthly report to the chief executive officer and legislative body of the local agency showing the type of investment, institution, date of maturity, amount of deposit, rate of interest, and such data as may be required by the local agency, " NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does hereby adopt a Statement of Investment Policy (attached), and the FInance Director is directed to continue to submit a monthly investment summary statement to the Town Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon on February 5, 1997 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: ~ DIANE L. CRANE TOWN CLERK COUNCILMEMBERS: Hennessy, Ginalski, Thayer, Thompson, Wolf COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: None, None, 9ti.:.e.u ,'ff) ~;r THERESE HENNESSY, MAYOR TOWN OF TffiURON / EXHIBIT NO, :5 TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Subject: June 3, 19988 Item: TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR MONTHLY INVESTMENT SUMMARY REPORT - AS OF THE MONTH ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 CONSENT II (p Meeting: To: From: TOWN OF TIBURON Institution! Agency Invesunent Amount Interest Rate Maturity State of California Local Agency $5,216,890 5.672% liquid Investment Fund (LAIF) Total Invested: $5,216,890 TIBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Institution! Agency Investment Amount Interest Rate Maturity State of California Local Agency $538,266 5.672% Liquid Investment Fund (LAIF) Bank of America Certificate of $250,000 5,150% June 29, 1998 Tiburon Branch Deposit (90 days) Total Invested: $788,266 Notes to table information: State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF): The interest rate represents the effective yield for the mooth referenced above, The State of California generally distributes investment data reports in the third week following the month ended. (As received May 26, 1998,) Acknowlforlgnvm. This summary report accurately reflects all pooled investments of the Town ofTiburon and the Tiburon Redevelopment Agency, and is in conformity with State laws and the Invesunent Policy adopted by the Town Council. The investment program herein summarized provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet next month's estimated expenditures, .-.s~ May 28,1998 cc: Town Treasurer CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO I/e fA- iF 1- OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY .oc"",.,' ..~ 0.. - . ~ .~" ~ .. . " ~ "0 .,<:-. }~.. 0"'" LOUISE H, RENNE City Attorney ANDREW W. SCHWARTZ Deputy City Attorney DIRECT DIAL: (415) 554-3906 May 7,1998 TO ALL CALIFORNIA CITY ATTORNEYS AND COUNTY COUNSEL Re: Amicus Support for City of Monterey in Del Monte Dunes v. City of Monterey, U,S. Supreme Court No, 97-1235 Dear City Attorney/County Counsel: In January 1998, I wrote requesting that your city or county join in an amicus ~ brief in support of the City of Monterey's petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court in the above case. On March 30, 1998, the Supreme Court granted the petition, I write again asking you to join with San Francisco in an amicus ~ brief on the merits in support of the City of Monterey at no cost to your client This case could result in the most far-reaching decision in land use regulation since Euclid v, Ambler Realty, In view of the significance of this case to local governments, the Legal Advocacy Committee of the City Attorneys' Division of the League of California Cities recommends that all California local government agencies join in the brief In the decision below, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals discarded the traditional deference extended by the courts to the decisions of administrative agencies on land use matters, (Del Monte Dunes at Monterey. Inc v City of Monterey (9th CiL 1996) 95 F 3d 1422, reaff dun ~ (9th CiL 1997) 127 F3d 1149,) In addition, the Court of Appeals found that the question ofa city's liability for a taking may be tried to ajury, This decision threatens the very foundation of your clients' power to regulate land use within its borders, In our brief, we will request that the Supreme Court reverse the Ninth Circuit decision on both issues. In this case, the City of Monterey had limited development on property in order to protect sensitive natural habitat A district court jury assessed $1.5 million in damages against the City for a regulatory taking. The Ninth Circuit affirmed, holding that the finder of fact could reweigh the evidence presented to the Monterey City Council and decide whether the action of the City of Monterey was "reasonable" under NoHan v, Cal. Coastal Comm, (1987) 483 U,S, 825 and.!2llli!!! v, City of Tiiard (1994) 512 U,S. 374, However, the heightened scrutiny ofNollanID.....cllm is limited to discretionary exactions. The decisions in Nollan and llillllIl do not allow courts to jettison traditional deference to legislative and administrative decisions regarding land use, (See, e,g" Ehrlich v, City of Culver City (1996) 12 Cal.4th 854, 876.) The Ninth Circuit also held, for the first time, that a jury is the appropriate decision- maker to determine liability for a taking under the Seventh Amendment to the U.S, Constitution. The Seventh Amendment provides a right to a jury trial for "suits at common law." (U,S. Const, Fox PLAZA' 1390 MARKET STREET, SIXTH FLOOR' SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 94102-5408 RECEPTION: (415) 554-3800. FACSIMILE: (415) 554-3808 CiTY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CiTY ATTORNEY Letter to City Attorneys and County Counsel Page 2 May 7, 1998 amend. VII.) This decision conflicts with the rule prevailing in the California courts, where liability for a taking of property is tried to a judge, (See Hensler v City of Glendale (1994) 8 CaL4th 1,15.) The decision in Del Monte Dunes also conflicts with the rule in the 11th Circuit (See New Port Larie. Inc, v, Monroe County (11th Cir. 1996) 95 F.3d 1084.) If your city or county agrees to join ~n the amicus brief, please complete the enclosed form and return it to our office by May 29, 1998, Very truly yours, LOUISE H. RENNE Shr Atto~ey \' . ,/ t, 'A I \ /' ", _ t _ X /\...,.,v-- ..I '_/VV""J '~. -'ANDREWW~SCHWARTZ .~ Deputy City Attorney TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. L To: From: Subject: Date: TOWN COUNCIL TOWN MANAGER MOTOR VEIDCLE LICENSE FEE REPEAL PROPOSAL June 3, 1998 BACKGROUND Assembly member McClintock's AB 1776 proposes a five-year phase-out of motor vehicle license fees with a general fund back-fill for the loss to local government (cities/counties) coming from sales tax revenue, Many legislators and the Governor have subsequently "jumped on board" and support such repeal, however, the Republicans, the Democrats and the Governor each have a different idea of how this should be accomplished, The potential loss to cities/counties is major. Motor vehicle in-lieu fees are a significant revenue source for all municipalities, In Tiburon, it represents approximately 10% of the Town's General Fund Operating Budget ($340,000), and is only exceeded by property tax and sales tax in annual revenues. The Governor's proposal reduces the vehicle fee revenue by 75% and proposes a statutory back-fill for the projected revenue loss to cities and counties, The McClintock proposed ballot measure eliminates vehicle license fees ("VLF ") entirely, and the measure would not replace all of the lost revenue, BASIC ISSUES 1) Should local government (cities/counties) take on the State and fight the primary issue of the proposed appeal of motor vehicle in-lieu fees; or 2) Should local government (cities/counties) accept the fact that the VLF repeal in some form will probably occur, and local government should attempt to "cut" the best deal it can and somehow ensure full replacement of the lost revenues, BASIC CONCERNS A) Can or should local government trust the State to back-fill any revenue loss; TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Page 2 June 3, 1998 B) Will the State put "strings" on any replacement or back-fill funding, Le, ear-mark it for public safety supplement funding only; C) The State proposal to further reduce local governmental revenues comes at a time when the State is sitting on a $4 billion budget surolus, D) Even the State Legislative Analyst's Office does not support the proposed VLF tax repeal, and further indicates that the State cannot afford to replace such revenues, RECOMMENDATIONS Tiburon and other local governmental agencies should continue to vigorously oppose the basic VLF repeal proposal, However, the Town should concurrently support and explore replacement funding, If such VLF repeal occurs in any form, the back-fill or replacement revenues should be both 100% and guaranteed annually by statute, R.L. Kleinert TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO, 10 To: From: Subject: Date: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL ANN R DANFORTH, TOWN ATTORNEY ADOPTIONOFAMENDMENTTOA~LCONTROLORDrnANCE ~~' 1998 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The Town ofTiburon adopts by reference the County of Marin's animal control ordinances in their entirety, as have all other cities and Towns in Marin County, On February 15, 1997, the Town adopted amendments to the County's ordinance which (I) increased dog license fees and penalties; (ii) a stipulation that quarantine fees be paid within 60 days or be subject to penalties; and (iii) an expansion of certain procedures applicable to vicious dogs to dogs found to be dangerous, Unfortunately, the Town's ordinance was incorrectly titled contained the wrong County Code references, To rectifY this error, the Town must adopt a new ordinance, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council: 1) conduct a public hearing on this matter; 2) by motion read the ordinance by title only; and 3) pass iPs+oreading of the ordinance by roll call vote, ~ EXHffiITS L Draft Town Ordinance 2. Memorandum from the Marin County Administrator's Office 3, County Ordinance ORDINANCE NO, N,S, AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TffiURON REPEALING ORDINANCE NO, 426 N,S. AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE AMENDED ANIMAL CONTROL REGULATIONS OF TITLE 8 OF THE MARIN COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO AN INCREASE IN LICENSE FEES, CONFINEMENT & QUARANTINE, AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS DOGS The Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinance No, 426 N,S" previously adopted on February 15, 1997, is hereby repealed, SECTION 2, Section 20-1 of the Tiburon Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 20-1 Adoption of Countv Code Pursuant to Government Code Section 50022,9, the Marin County Animal Control Regulations set forth in Title 8 of the Marin County Code as Chapters 8,04, including amendments to Sections 8,04,050, 8,04,060, 8,04,070, 8.04,150 and 8,04,181, pertaining to an increase in license fees, confinement and quarantine, and potentially dangerous and vicious dogs, are adopted by reference and shall be in full force and effect within the Town of Tiburon, SECTION 3, SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance, The Town Council of the Town of Tiburon hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4, EFFECTIVE DATE, This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days after the date of passage, and before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after passage by the Town Council, a copy of Town Council Ordinance No. NS, - Animal Control-Effective .1998 1 the ordinance shall be published with the names of the members voting for and against it at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published in the Town of Tiburon, This ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on , 1998, and was adopted at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on , 1998, which was noticed pursuant to Government Code Section 50022.3, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: HARRY S, MATTHEWS, MAYOR Town of Tiburon ATTEST: DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK drafted 12/5/96 2 --.---'.,,", ; , , , . ~ ~ ~ CXlUMY OF -'v-'" MEMORANDUM .... '-'"'I'.,.""~'_)"'"_''' MARIN COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE October 10, 1996 ~ TO: City Manage!S ' Sr.:fJJ FROM: Suki senn~inistrative Analyst fD)Q ~ ~ ~ n 'i\/71l:= ;).~'" I n \:;:7 U \!/ '---. :' ! LJ ILl flC'Y 1 l" 1'-, 1.-. li :).. ~-'r TOV'Jr.I MANA(,i~H':.:i c/'c::; TOWN OF r18URm: RE: Animal Control Ordinance Amendments Attached for your information is a copy of the amendments to sections of Chapter 8,04 (Animal Control) which were adopted by the Marin County Board of Supervisors on October 8, 1996, If you have not yet agendized this matter it is recommended that you do so as soon as possible because implementation of the increased license fees for dogs will be delayed until all the jurisdictions are aboard. (For the newer managers' information, the l\ilN1A supports the increase in dog license fees.) Please let me know when you have adopted the amendments so that I can let Animal Control services know when to implement the increased fees. Mill Valley and Larkspur have already begun the process, Thanks, I~,_ ILl Animal Control Chapter 8.04 ORDINANCE 3236 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MARIN AMENDING SECTIONS 8.04.050, 8.04.060, 8.04.070, 8.04.150, 8.04.181, OF THE MARIN COUNTY CODE PERTAINING TO CONFINEMENT " QUARANTINE FEE PAYMENT, INCREASE IN LICENSE FEES FOR DOGS, DELINQUENT LICENSE FEES PENALTY, INCREASED FEES FOR REDEMPTION, PLACEMENT OR SURRENDER, POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND VICIOUS DOGS SERVICE AND CLASSIFICATION. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Marin does hereby ordain as follows: Section I. Sec':ion 8.04,050 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.050 Confinement " Quarantine. (a) Unlicensed dogs under the age of four months shall be confined in the property of the owner, and all dogs shall be so confined for thirty days after receiving the initial rabies vacation, (b) The owner of a quarantined animal shall pay a fee of thirty dollars toward an animal control officer's costs in providing and insuring that the animal is quarantined at the animal owner's property. If any person fails or refuses to obey any lawful order for the quarantine of an animal for observation of rabies, any animal control officer may impound the animal for such quarantine at the additional expense of the owner at the rate of twelve dollars per day for each dog, and nine dollars for each cat, (c) Ouarantine fees are cavable within 30 days of issuance of an invoice. Payment is delinauent if not received within 60 davs. In the event that oavment is not received within 60 davs, a deli~rr~encv charce eauallina the amount or t~e i~vcice shall De 3.ss-:=:ssec.. :;'or '=:3.c~ addit::..onal month of delinauenc.r anoc.~e!:" :::'.oJe~c.v neyc:e!lt '8er:altv shall be assessed. Section II. Section 8,04,060 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.060 License fee. (a) The dog license fee shall be imposed on all dogs. The license fee for dogs ',..,hich have not ~een neuc.e.:-ed or spayed shall be t::'lY':~1 dollars for .3. one year license, fcrtv-:ive dollars for a tOdO year license a~d sixt"J dollars fDr 3. t~ree year lice!lse. {oj T~e lice!1se fee :or dogs .,..,hich ha~.re cee!1 neut.ered or spayed shall be ten dollars for a one year license, fift.een dollars for a two year license and twen~v dollars for a three " '''-''~'''''','Q,i.,.'',,~ tlU! ""..,.......,.~'"""-,year of a .':11". .tf..i>.~.~,.).\~.> license. The fee is due and payable with the license as required in Section 8.04.030. '-"~:_""'''''''i",..:" ._r-'..-...~"'"',.,,...,"" issuance ,..~_.V' " Section III. Section 8,04,070 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows, 8.04.070 Delinquent license penalty. Any owner failing to procure and pay for such a license within the period allowed in Section 8.04.30 shall Dav a delinauent Denaltv in the amount of twentv dollars. The delinquent penalty may be waived where failure to pay is due to reasonable cause and circumstances beyond the control of the dog owner which shall be determined by the poundkeeper or the county tax collector. Any person dissatisfied with a determination denying waiver of the delinquent penalty shall be entitled to a hearing which shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Section 8.04.122. Every owner of a dog which is over the age of four months and which is kept in the county shall procure a license for each such dog, for each year, commencing within thirty days of vaccination and ending one year following the date of issue of such license, Such license shall be procured not later than thirty days after the day upon which the dog is four mcnths old, or within thirty days after the day upon which the dog, if over the age of four months, is first owned by a resident of the county and thereafter shall be maintained on a current basis from year to year. Section IV. Section 8,04,150 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.150 Fees for redemption, placement, surrender. (a) Redemption Fees. No dog or other animal may be released by the poundkeeper to the owner until all charges, cost of redemption and the current year's license charge have been paid. The charges and cost of redemption of the impounded animal shall be a fee of thirty-five dollars for the first impoundment in any fiscal year, a f-:E of :i::t~/ 'iol2.a.rs for the second impoundment in any fiscal year, a fce of seventy-five dollars for the third impoundment in any fiscal year, a fee of one hundred dollars for the fourth impoundment in any fiscal year, and a fee of one hundred twenty-five dollars for each additional impoundmenc in any fiscal year plus in each impoundment a charge of ten dollars per day for keeping of any dog, and a charge of eiaht dollars per day for the keeping of any c~t or ot~er animal, except as to the keeping of such animals specified in Section 8,04,220, o.f which the keeping charges shall be specified in Section 8,04.220, (b) Placemenc of Animals. When a dog or other animal is sold by the poundkeeper, pursuant to this chapter, the price shall not be less than ten dollars for dogs and two dallars for cacs and other small animals, (c) Surrender, The surrender of an animal by owner to the poundkeeper subsequenc to impoundment for a violation of this 2 .",,~.,.,...t"y" chapter or any provisions of state law shall not relieve the owner of the obligation to pay such charges as set forth in this section, prior to such surrender, plus the accumulated boarding charge or those applicable charges set forth in Section 8,04.220, (Ord. 3068 S 3, 1991; Ord, 2901 S 2, 1986; Ord, 2640 S 2, 1981; Ord. 2570 S 2, 1980; Ord. 2424 S 3, 1979; Ord. 2289 S 3, 1977; Ord, 1963 S 1, 1973; Ord. 1712 S 9, 1969; Ord. 1333 S 4.4, 1964) i",l,;.~",4.";,,'io..o.,.-, ''''''I..{Ill. ~ ~"'*"_......... Section V. Section 8.04.181 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.04.181 Potentially dangerous and vicious dogs. (a) Except as otherwise provided under the provisions of subsections (b) through (m) of this section, the provisions of Chapter 9, Articles 1 through 5, Sections 31601 through 31683 and any amendments thereto exclusive of Sections 31602, 31603, 31606 and 31644 of the Food and Agricultural Code are adopted and incorporated by reference herein. (b) "Potentially dangerous dog" means any of the following: (1) Any dog which, when unprovoked on two separate occasions within the prior thirty-six month period, engages in any behavior that requires a defensive action by any person to prevent bodily injury when the person and the dog are off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog; (2) Any dog which when unprovoked bites a person causing a less severe injury than as defined in Section 31604 of the Food and Agricultural Code; (3) Any dog which when unprovoked has killed, seriously bitten, inflicted injury or otherwise caused injury attacking a domestic animal off the property of the owner or keeper of the dog. (c) "vicious dog" means any of the following: (1) Any dog seized under Section 599aa of the Penal Code and upon the sustaining of a conviction of the owner or keeper under subdivision (a) of Section 597,5 of the Penal Code; (2) Any dog which, when unprovoked, in an aggressive manner, inflicts severe injury on or kills a human being; (3) Any dog previously determined to be and currently listed as a potentially dangerous dog which, after its owner or keeper has been notified of this determination, continues the behavior described in Section 8,04,181(b) or. is maintained in violation of Section 31641, 31642 or 31643 of the California Food and Agricultural Code, (d) "Animal control department" means that agency appointed as poundkeeper for the County of Marin under the provisions of Section 8.04,110, (e) !IDirectorll means executive director of Marin County animal ser/ices or any person authorized to act on his/her behalf, If) A hearing on whether a dcg shall be declared potentially dangerous or vicious shall be conducted in the following manner: (1) If t:he director has invest:igated and determined that there exists probable cause to believe that a dog is potentially 3 '.. I . ._,-.......dangerous or vicious as defined by this section, a hearing shall be conducted, The director shall prepare a petition specifying ".','" ... ,,,.,,,"",, ,,,.'.. the basis as to "why 'the dog is potentially dangerous or vicious. "."",^,.,,,,,,.,,, (2) Whenever possible, any complaint received from a member of the public which serves as the evidentiary basis for the direc~or to find probable cause shall be sworn to and verified by the complainant and shall be attached to the petition, (3) Prior to commencement of the hearing and if the allegations of the petition indicate that the dog is potentially dangerous as defined under Section 8,04,181(b), the county administrator or his designee may offer in writing mediation services as an alternative to a hearing provided both the complainant and the owner agree in writing to mediation, Mediation must be concluded within thirty days of the offer to mediate, If mediation is refused or is unsuccessful, then the matter shall be referred to a hearing unde:::- subsection (f) (1) of this section. (4) The county administrator or his designee shall designate a hearing officer from a panel of up to five persons whose membership shall be designated by the board of super,isors. Hearing officer applicants shall have had a minimum of five years' experience as a practicing attorney and prior experience in administrati ve, arbitration or mediation hea:::-ings. Prior experience in care and control of animals shall also be considered but is not necessary. The hearing officer shall conduct a hearing on whether a dog shall be declared potentially dangerous or vicious. The hearing officer shall be compensated for the actual hours devoted to the hearing and its determination at the existing hourly rate or fraction thereof allowed a traffic referee of the Marin County municipal court. (5) (i) The county adm~nistrator or his designee shall provide written notice to the owner of the specific behavior of the animal alleged in the petition and the date upon which a hearing will be held to consider the petition. The hearinq shall be held within the time limits set forth bv the Food and Aqricultural Code Section 31621 or anv amendments thereto. The notice shall advise the owne:::- of the consequences of a finding of pot~~tially dangerous or vicious and the owner's ~ight to present evidence as to why the dog should not be declared potentially dangerous or vicious. Serdce of t:'le notice shall be made in accordance with Section 1,04,190, 'ilhere the owner or address of any affected owner is unknown, notice of the hearing shall be gi ven by posting the same in the office of the director and by publication in a newspape:::- of general circulation, Notice shall then be deemed given on publication of the notice. (iil A hearing may be continued if the hearing officer deems it necessary and proper or upon a showing of good cause:- (iii) The time for hearing and the ~earing :9=ovisicns of subsection (d) (5) (i) of this sect::..on shall be stayed if mediation serrices are offered pursuanr: 'Co the provisions of subsection (i) (3) of this secr:ion. The ::ime of hearin..g and the hearing provisions of this subsection shall recommence at the date the ~ ~1'1t county administrator or his designee has determined in writing ..r..!"""'...........~-,..." , that mediation has not been accepted or has been unsuccessful. "~'^"""'"'''' " (6) In cases where complaint (s) from the public serve as the evidentiary basis for the director to prepare a petition, at least one of the complainants or his or her designee in the matter must appear and testify at the hearing or the complaifit shall be dismissed. (7) If the owner fails to appear at the hearing, the hearing shall nevertheless proceed and an appropriate order shall be issued. (8) The hearing officer shall consider all responsible evidence without regard to the formal evidence, including circumstances of mitigation, and the any prior violations by the owner, (9) All witnesses shall testify under oath or affirmation. The oath shall be administered by the hearing officer. The hearing officer may, when appropriate, request the production of oral or documentary evidence which is reasonably necessary and relevant to conduct a hearing. All proceedings shall be tape recorded, (10) The hearing officer shall issue a written determination based upon a preponderance of the evidence, which shall be mailed to the owner within seven days after the hearing is completed. (11) If an animal is found to be potentially dangerous or vicious by a preponderance of the evidence, the animal shall be so designated on the records of Marin County animal services. Such a designation shall be considered in future determinations involving the animal and/or owner. (12) The owner of a dog for which a potentially dangerous petition has been issued may irrevocably waive his or her right to a hearing and any further appeal under Food and Agricul ture Code Section 31622 and accept all conditions, sanctions and penalties set forth in Food and Agriculture Code Sections 31641, 31642 and 61643, and Section 8,04,181 (k). The County Administrator or his Desianee will mail a waiver form to the doc owner, The waiver must be sianed bv the doc owner and received bv the Countv Desianee within thirty days from the date of aoreement to waive or a hear~TIq will be scheduled within thirty (30) days of the relevant rules of record of acreemenc to waive. (g) In accordance, with the Agricultural Code Section 31641, the dangerous dog shall in addition to the to the animal cont~ol agency an annual to provide for the increased costs of the dog. (h) The owner of a dog det:ermined to be vicious shall, in addition to the regular licensing fee, pay to the animal control agency an annual fee of fifty dollars to provide for the increased costs of maintaining the records of the dog. (i) The owner or a dog det:ermined vicious shall, at his/her own expense, have the vicious animal regist~ation number assigned to ~he dog tat~oae~ upon the dog'S left ear or, if the left ear is not available, on the left ir~er thigh, by a licensed veterinarian provisions of Food and owner or a potentially regular licensing fee, pay fee of twenty-five dollars maintaining the records of . or a person trained, authorized and licensed to do business as a ~'--_."""tattooist. As an alternative to tattooing, an owner may have a '''T,..,. ..'., ,""'.'~"" .,' microchip injected beneath the skin,.and between the shoulder ,'..."... blades of the animal by a licensed veterinarian. The owner shall provide proof satisfactory to Marin County animal services of such tattooing or microchipping within thirty days of the vicious determination. (j) An owner of a vicious dog shall, within ten days of such determination, present said animal at the Marin County animal services and allow photographs and measurements of the animal to be taken for purposes of identification, (k) An owner of a dog found potentially dangerous under Section 8.04.181 (b), who has no additional violations of any of the provisions of Title 8 of the Marin County Code, within a thirty-six month period from the date of designation as potentially dangerous, shall be removed from the list of potentially dangerous dogs by the director. The dog may be, but is not required to be, removed from the list of potentially dangerous dogs prior to the expiration of the thirty-six month period if the owner or keeper of the dog demonstrates to the director that changes in circumstances or measures taken by the owner or keeper, such as training of the dog, have mitigated the risk to public safety. (1) An owner of a dog found vicious under Section 8.04.181(c} (3), or dancerous under the orovisions of former Section 8,04.181(c) (3) (Marin County Ordinance 3138), who has no additional violations of any of the provisions of Title 8 of the Marin County Code, after a thirty-six month period from the date of designation as vicious, or dancerous, may apply to the director to remove the animal from the list of vicious animals, The director shall have the discretion to remove the animal from the list of vicious or dancerous aniwals upon proof of the successful completion of at least eight weeks of training, or other rehabilitative efforts designed to mitigate the risk to public safety, (m) All sancticns imposed on dogs determined potentially dangerous or dangerous prior to the enactment of the ordinance codified in this section shall remain in effect I except that any violations subsequent to t:'le enact:nent of this section shall be governed by this section, In determining subsequent violations the following provisions shall apply: Any dog previously determined potentially dangerous prior to the enactment of this section, shall be considered potentially dangerous as defined under the provisions of this section and subject to all of its provisions governing the regulation and disposltion of potentially dangerous dogs; any dog previously determined dangerous prior to the enactment of the ordinance codified in this section shall be considered vicious as defined under the provisions governing the regulation and disposition of vicious dogs. (Ord. 3138 !i 3, 1993; Ord. 3041 !i 3, 1990; Ord. 3031 I 3, 1990; Ord. 2969 !i 3, 1988) r o . Section VI.Publication. ~_~""""""'""':'r "~lI.J~'-"''''; This, ordinance shall be and is in full ,force and effect as of thirty, (30) days from and after the date of its passage and shall be published once before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, with the names of the supervisors voting for and against the same in the MARIN INDEPENDENT JOURNAL, a newspaper of general circulation published in Marin County. '.,;f, ',.~.<=,;W,;. . PASSED AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Marin, State of California, held on the 8th day of October, 1996, by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS Harry J. Moore, Annette Rose, John B. Kress NOES: NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISORS Gary Giacomini, Har~~ C~~Br ~~r. 4P,-{_-r~~ CHAIRMAN PRO Board of Supervisors ATTEST: ~"'_':""l,,,,~ ...... ,1" ,,:~~.., , ~ /jF,,;)-'" ,,' / l'i/ J/ ,/1 Ok 4' _r v /1 ...:J' ,,:' L ".,~ iI"'''~'''''' 7 BOARD OF TRUSTEES PRESIDENT ROGER SMITH TfBURON VICE PRESIDENT STEVE AYAl.J4. PETALUMA SECRETARY TOM MILLER SONOM). COUNTY AT LARGE JOHN BERG FAIRFAX CHARLES BOUEY SONOMA LOU BRUNINI MARIN COUNTY AT l.J4.RGE HENRY FUHS COTATI HERMAN Z'vVART NOVATO JOHN "JACK" HEALY SANTA ROSA KEVIN OSTROM SAN RAFAEL JOHN BORBA ROHNEAT PARK EVAN PUGH BELVEDERE JOAN JACOBSON SAN ANSELMO LEONARD STAFFORD ROSS KEN FOLEY SEBASTOPOL PHil GIOIA CORTE MADERA MARTHA (MARTY) WEISSENSEE LARKSPUR ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF MANAGER CHARLES H. DILL JAMES A. WANDERSCHEID RONALD KEITH VICKI HAUSKNECHT CHUCK KRAuse JOHN WALKER CHRrs CANTERBURY ED MEEHAN .~~--;- , J/.. ~ .- . MARIN / SONOMA ~rk~ M. MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT First Organized District in Cali/omiD. 556 No. McDOWELL BLVD" PETALUMA. CALIFORNIA 94954 TELEPHONE (707) 762.2236 FACSIMILE (707) 762.0606 " RECEIVED MAY 2 a 1998 May 26, 1998 TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE TOWN OF neURON To: City and Town Councils and County Board of Supervisors From: The Board of Trustees of the Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District. Subject: New Facilities Project Dear Ladies and Gentlemen. This message explains our current project to build a new facilities center in west Cotati, This project is the end result of a long review of the District's programs and future needs, We looked at staffing and facility requirements needed to provide the effective services residents of the District have come to expect, Additionally the, proposed facility will enable us to address local aspects of the emerging diseases associated with ticks (Lyme borelliosis, ehrliciolsis and babesiosis) and rodents (hantavirus and leptospirosis), At our District headquarters in Petaluma we are working on cooperative research programs with a post-doctoral student from U,C, Berkeley testing the effectiveness of new biological control agents and other studies with researchers from U,c, Davis, the State Department of Health Services and the Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia on tick- borne diseases that are increasingly affecting the daily lives of District residents, Helping or participating in these research projects helps keep our staff on the cutting edge of knowledge on the most effective method of mosquito and vector control. Our Petaluma headquarters were built in 1981 when the District had nine employees; we now have twenty, These facilities are too small and outdated for the type of work we are now called on to do, Originally the facility was located in rural fields, but now they are nearly surrounded by homes and businesses, Safety upgrades alone require a change, but most important is that all District departments need more space to insure the best service to residents, Our programs and their current full-time staffing are as follows: Administration (4): District Manager, Office Director, Finance/Data Coordinator and Secretary /Receptionist Laboratory (2): Lab Director and Yellow Jacket Program Coordinator. Field Operations (12) Field Director, Field Supervisor and ten (10) Certified Technicians Education (1): Community Education Coordinator ~ ShoplFacilities (1): Shop/Facilities Coordinator The District recently purchased an eleven acre site in Cotati. The new facilities project, including architectural services, should cost approximately 7.5 million dollars when completed, The District's property tax revenue will be used to payoff the Certificates of Participation that will be the funding mechanism for the project, and the daily operational programs will be funded through the Benefit Assessment District established prior to the passage of Proposition 218. The project debt will be retired in seven years to minimize the cost of financing, Annual assessment for a single parcel unit should not exceed $9,75 for the life of the project. The building project is necessary to increase our effectiveness and efficiency; provide up-to-date facilities for the study and control of vector borne diseases in our District, allow for the necessary expansion of our educational program from the elementary schools (7600 students annually) into the junior and senior high schools and community colleges, increase significantly our natural control programs including the production and distribution of mosquito fish and to be better prepared to add those additional regions of Marin and Sonoma counties which want to be included in the District or contract with the District for the services we provide. If at any time you would like someone from our staff to appear before you or one of your committees to discuss or explain our new headquarters project, please let me know, We look forward to continuing to serve the residents of Marin and Sonoma counties and, in so doing, to make this area one of the most desirable ones for both living and recreati Chari ill ManagerlBiologist for The Board of Trustees ..--~--- 1."",:'- TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: To: From: Subject: June 3, 1998 TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR TIBURON MUNICIPAL BUDGET PLAN _ INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW OF PRELIMINARY TWO YEAR PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDING JUNE 30TH 1999 & 2000 Item: #9 OVERVIEW & SUMMARY ATTACHMENTS: General Fund Overview Operating Revenue Department Expenditure Summaries Fund Balance Resources Capital Improvement Program A bound and complete Budget Plan will be submitted for the adjourned Town Council Meeting of Thursday, June 11, 1998, ~ by: R. Stranzl, Finance Director General Fund Overview BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating Revenues, Expenditures & Changes in Fund Balance Overview of Revenues & Expenditures 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actua1 actual actua1 estimated planned planned REVENUE Taxes 1,803,578 1,869,744 1,940,568 1,917,000 2,019,000 2,102,000 Franchise Fees 240,572 241,207 243,470 249,000 257,000 262,000 Fines & Penalties 11 5,634 105,694 87,688 86,500 99,500 99,500 Investment Earnings 174,884 189,472 149,207 90,000 80,000 80,000 Other Agency Revenue 329,906 341,043 355,143 373,000 396,100 391,100 Licenses & Permits 384,550 395,980 425,913 379,700 366,700 371,700 Charges for CllITent Service 218,795 243,026 256,455 205,300 194,500 194,500 Other Revenue 258,492 73,497 124,658 149,500 98,900 102,900 Total Revenues $3,526,412 $3,459,663 $3,583,102 $3,450,000 $3,511,700 $3,603,700 EXPENDITURES Town Attorney 203,118 189,645 192,543 109,600 163,400 165,600 Town Administration 534,415 588,810 591,154 614,000 539,800 551,000 Administration Building 31,800 31,800 Planning & Design Review 287,667 328,370 293,731 283,500 295,000 299,800 Building Inspection 203,764 178,770 177,094 145,100 149,700 152,400 Police Department 1,456,766 \,487,474 \,443,29\ \,474,700 \,608,800 \,65\,000 Police Building 17,800 20,400 Town Engineer 37,811 36,000 45,456 45,000 45,000 47,000 Public Works Streets 343,122 359,410 340,414 373.500 326,400 331,100 Public Works Parks \02,72\ \ 50,094 \66,858 162,900 \86,600 \89,600 Street & Signal Light System 45,500 45,500 Public Works Facility 26,800 26,800 Town Council 9,878 16,570 15,101 14,800 \6,000 \6,000 Town Commissions 5,763 2,540 5,994 5,500 4,000 7,000 Total Expenditures $3,185,025 $3,337,683 $3,271.636 $3,228,600 $3,456,600 $3,535,000 OPERATING NET Revenues less Expenditures $341,387 $\2\,98\ $311,466 $221,400 $55,100 $68,700 OTIffiR SOURCES (USES) PERS Surplus Assets 259,032 13\,525 j23,788 Sales Taxes GASB-22 adj 75,63\ Advance to RDA, Sale ofNeds Way (225,000) 225,000 Transfers In (Out) (99,621) (548,309) (104,000) (400,000) Total Other Sources (Uses) $159,410 ($34\,153) $19,788 ($625,000) $225,000 $0 FUND BALANCE Opening, July \ st $857,703 $\,358,500 $\,\39,328 $1,467,682 $1,064,082 $1,344,\82 Closing, June 30th $\,358,500 $1,\39,328 $1,467,682 $\,064,082 $\,344,\82 $1,4\2,882 5/3\/98, Page_ General Revenues BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 General Fund 01 General Fund Operating Revenues Fiscal Years 1995 to 2000 Revenue Summary 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 9912000 actua1 actual actua1 budget estimated planned planned 010 TAXES 1,803,578 1,869,744 1,940,568 1,897,000 1,917,000 2,019,000 2,102,000 011 FRANCHISE FEES 240,572 241,207 243,470 251,700 249,000 257,000 262,000 012 FINES &: PENALTIES 115,634 105,694 87,688 106,000 86,500 99,500 99,500 014 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 174,884 189,472 149,207 70,000 90,000 80,000 80,000 015 FROM OTIIER AGENCIES 329,906 341,043 355,143 373,100 373,000 396,100 391,100 022 UCENSES &: PERMITS 384,550 395,980 425,913 366,300 379,700 366.700 371,700 026 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 218,795 243,026 256,455 200,800 205,300 194,500 194,500 027 OTIIER REVENUE &: FEES 159,367 73,497 124,658 126.500 149,500 98,900 102,900 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $3,427,286 $3,459,663 $3,583,102 $3,391,400 $3,450,000 $3,511,700 $3,603,700 5130/98, Page General Revenues BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 General Fund 0 I Revenue Detail 1994/95 1995/% 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 9912000 actual actuaI actuaI budget estimated planned planned TAXES 0001 Property Tax 956,860 1,015,264 1,051,471 1,075,600 1,080,000 1,150,000 1,207,000 0007 Property Tax ERAF Rebate 116,602 54,636 36,780 - - - , 0002 Sales Tax (Prop. 172,0.5%) 52,165 49,076 51,m 56,700 57,000 59,000 61,000 0003 Sales Tax (1%) 373,548 415,279 416,322 409,700 415,000 430,000 440,000 0004 Transient Ocalpancy Tax 228,300 249,107 2%,105 275,000 280,000 290,000 300,000 0005 Real Estate Transfer Tax 76,103 86,382 88,113 80,000 85,000 90,000 94,000 Total Taxes $1,803,578 $1,869,744 $1,940,568 $1,897,000 $1,917,000 $2,019,000 $2,102,000 FRANCHISE FEES 0031 PG&E 74,274 68,332 64,825 68,000 65,000 68,000 69,000 0032 Mill Valley Refuse Semce 117,226 119,704 125,016 129,900 130,000 133,000 136,000 0033 TCI Cable 49,072 53,171 53,629 53,800 54,000 56,000 57,000 Total Franchise Fees $240,572 $241,207 $243,470 $251,700 $249,000 $257,000 $262,000 FINES & PENALTIES 0040 Vehicle Code 16,668 16,931 lI,m 15,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 0041 Parking Code 69,295 72,982 66,849 75,000 66,000 75,000 75,000 0042 False Alarm Fines 29,671 15,781 9,046 15,000 10,000 12,000 12,000 0043 Other Fines & Penalties , - 16 1,000 500 500 500 Total Fines & Penalties $115,634 $105,694 $87,688 $106,000 $86,500 $99,500 $99,500 INVESlMENT EARNINGS 0044 Interest Earnings 174,884 189,472 149,207 70,000 90,000 80,000 80,000 Total Investment Earnings $174,884 $189,472 $149,207 $70,000 $90,000 $80,000 $80,000 FROM OlliER AGENCIES 0057 State Motor Vehicle In-Lieu 288,061 313,981 330,655 337,000 337,000 347,000 357,000 State Vehicle License Fees (AB2373) , - , , , , - 0058 State Off-Highway 133 135 134 100 100 100 100 State Cigarette Tax - - - - - - - 0061 State POST 16,%5 7,195 4,524 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0062 Abandoned Vehicle Program (JPA) 5,175 1,119 1,437 1,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 0063 Tiburon Sanitary District 3,343 4,804 5,159 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 5/30/98, Page General Revenues BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 General Fund 01 Revenue Detail 1994/95 1995196 1996197 1997/98 1998199 9912000 actua1 actua1 actua1 budget estimated planned planned 0071 City of Belvedere 2,684 996 661 1,500 1,200 1,500 1,500 0072 Reed Union School District 4,056 3,006 2,620 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 0073 Tiburon Fire District 4,297 4,529 4,828 4,500 4,000 4,000 4,000 0630 Richardson Bay SaniIaIy 2,192 2,278 2,125 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 0775 Child Care Center 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 0064 State FEMA Stann Damage - - , - - 15,000 - BTJRC Joint Recreation - , - - 1,200 2,000 2,000 Total Other Agency $329,906 $341,043 $355,143 $373,100 $373,000 $396,100 $391,100 UCENSES &; PERMITS 0720 Business Licenses regular 138,611 119,037 122,152 119,700 120,000 125,000 130,000 0719 Business Licenses construction 36,200 37,108 37,260 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 0721 Building Permits 145,271 168,977 189,670 145,000 154,000 140,000 140,000 0722 Other Building Permits 52,861 53,876 58,469 52,000 54,000 50,000 50,000 0723 Mar West Parking Permits 1,532 1,790 2,242 1,600 3,000 2,500 2,500 0724 Alann System Permits 4,950 8,280 4,895 8,000 7,000 7,500 7,500 Park Usage Permit , - 1,825 , 1,700 1,700 1,700 0725 Use Tree &; Other Planning Permits 5,125 6,912 9,400 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Total Licenses &; Permits $384,550 $395,980 $425,913 $366,300 $379,700 $366,700 $371,700 CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 0078 Design Review Research &; Investigation 243 - , 500 500 500 500 0079 Design Review 84,336 113,213 92,550 80,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 0080 Master &; Precise Plan 5,250 2,750 4,200 1,000 6,800 2,000 2,000 0081 Subdivision 5,600 7,025 12,575 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0082 ElR Processing CEQA Application 1,075 2,125 2,300 3,000 7,500 3,000 3,000 0083 Variances 6,225 7,100 7,550 5,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 0084 Appeals 1,800 2,100 4,500 3,000 2,400 3,000 3,000 0085 Zoning &; Zone Changes 1,000 1,100 175 1,000 100 1,000 1,000 0086 Plan Checking 55,755 59,046 78,205 56,000 56,000 55,000 55,000 0088 Residential Building Reports 25,500 23,500 25,660 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 0089 Encroaclunent Permits 1,835 2,700 2,950 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 0090 Building Research &; Investigation 8,623 8,402 5,536 5,000 3,500 4,000 4,000 0091 Planning - Miscellaneous Saies 5,018 853 2,253 3,000 4,000 3,000 3,000 0092 Planning - Storage, Notice 6,786 7,152 8,243 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 0093 Police - Miscellaneous 9,749 5,960 4,576 2,000 3,000 2,000 2,000 5/30/98, Page General Revenues BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 General Fund 01 Revenue Detail 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 9912000 actuaJ actuaJ actuaJ bud8et P-!dlrnJlt~ planned planned 0096 Police - Booking Cost Recovery - , 5,182 7,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 0094 Belvedere - Tiburon Joint Recreation - , - 300 1,500 2,000 2,000 Total Current Service Charges $218,795 $243,026 $256,455 $200,800 $205,300 $194,500 $194,500 OTIlER REVENUE 0700 Sale of Property 9,604 5,838 16,721 5,000 15,000 12,000 12,000 0701 General Refunds & Rebates - 4,154 1,188 2,500 11,000 2,500 2,500 0702 Other Revenues 62,977 1,638 5,436 5,000 2,000 5,000 5,000 0703 Assessment District Fees - 1,272 41,250 - - 2,000 2,000 0705 ABAG PLAN Equity Rebate 51,786 23,977 27,960 55,000 55,100 21,000 25,000 0730 Redevelopment Agency Administration 35,000 36,618 32,103 35,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 0740 Rent, Antenna Location - , - 24,000 26,400 26,400 26,400 0741 Rent, Other - - , , 5,000 - - Total Other Revenue $159,367 $73,497 $124,658 $126,500 $149,500 $98,900 $102,900 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $3,427,286 $3,459,663 $3,583,102 $3,391,400 $3,450,000 $3,511,700 53,603,700 OTIlER FINANCING SOURCES 0830 PER Smp1us assets 259,030 I31,525 123,788 - - , - Sales Tax GASB,22 Adjustment - 75,631 - - - - - Total Other Financing Sources 5259,030 $207,156 $123,788 $0 $0 $0 50 TOTAL REVENUE & SOURCES $3,686,316 53,666,819 $3,706,890 53,391,400 $3,450,000 53,SJJ,700 $3,603,700 5130/98, Page General Revenues BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 General Operating Fund Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1999 Sources of Revenues Total Planned Revenue = $3,511,700 5130/98, Page All Operating Departments BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 All Operating Department/Divisions Summary of Expenditures by Department Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned TOWN MANAGER & ADMINISTRATION Town Attorney 203,118 189,645 192,543 186,400 109,600 163,400 165,600 Town Administration 534,415 588,810 591,154 608,000 614,000 539,800 551,000 Administration Building 31,800 31,800 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning & Design Review 287,667 328,370 293,731 282,500 283,500 295,000 299,800 Building Inspection 203,764 178,770 177,094 192,800 145,100 149,700 152,400 POLICE SERVICES Police 1,456,766 1,487,474 1,443,291 1,537,500 1,474,700 1,608,800 1,651,000 Police Building 17,800 20,400 PUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEERING Town Engineer 37,811 36,000 45,456 36,000 45,000 45,000 47,000 Public Works Streets 343,122 359,410 340,414 352,100 373,500 326,400 331,100 Public Works Parks 102,721 150,094 166,858 172,200 162,900 186,600 189,600 Street & Signal Light System 45,500 45,500 Public Works Building & Corpomtion Yard 26,800 26,800 LEGISLATIVE Town Council 9,878 16,570 15,101 12,700 14,800 16,000 16,000 Town Boards & Conurussions 5,763 2,540 5,994 7,000 5,500 4,000 7,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,185,025 $3,337,683 $3,271,636 $3,387,200 $3,228,600 $3,456,600 $3,535,000 06/01/98, Page_ All Operating Departments BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 All Operating DepartmentIDivisions Summary of Expenditures by Object Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $1,599,484 $I,639,l74 $1,669,143 $1,834,900 $1,723,100 $1,854,400 $1,907,100 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $490,989 $478,642 $420,189 $358,200 $320,800 $349,700 $355,000 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 1,008,401 1,109,032 1,058,287 1,072,300 1,063,000 Department Supplies & Expenses 68,200 65,300 Conferences, Memberships & Training 49,800 50,300 Contractual Services 184,300 181,300 Insurance 113,200 114,000 Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency 336,700 350,500 Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 243,800 241,000 Utility & Communication 115,800 115,800 Special Departmental & Administrative 34,000 45,700 Allocated Costs (15,300 (13,000 Total Supplies & Services $1,008,401 $1,109,032 $1,058,287 $1,072,300 $1,063,000 $1,130,500 $1,150,900 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE $86,151 $110,835 $124,017 $121,800 $121,700 $122,000 $122,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,185,025 $3,337,683 $3,271,636 $3,387,200 $3,228,600 $3,456,600 $3,535,000 06/01/98, Page_ All Operating Departments BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 General Operating Fund Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1999 Sources of Expenditures by Object Total Planned Expenditures = $3,456,600 06/02/98, Page _ Town Council BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 110 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES - - - - - - - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - - - - - - SUPPLIES & SERVICES 9,878 15,870 14,401 12,000 14,100 Department Supplies & Expenses 4,000 4,000 Conferences, Memberships & Training 6,000 6,000 Contractual Services 500 500 Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 2,500 2,500 Utili1y & Communication - - Special Departmental & Administrative 2,000 2,000 Allocated Insurance Costs - - Total Supplies & Services $9,878 $15,870 $14,401 $12,000 $14,100 $15,000 $15,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE - $700 $700 $700 $700 $1,000 $1,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $9,878 $ I 6,570 $15,101 $12,700 $14,800 $16,000 $16,000 05/31/98, Page Town Attorney BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 130 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 199912000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $77 ,668 $41,245 $81,627 $59,100 $46,500 $67,900 $69,900 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $19,175 $8,418 $16,748 $9,600 $10,000 $11,600 $11,800 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 104,301 13 9,082 93,268 116,800 52,200 D~mmrotS~~s&E~~es 4,900 4,900 Conferroces, Memberships & Training 1,600 1,600 Contractual Services 75,000 75,000 Insurance - - Intergovernmrota! JP A, MOU, & Agrocy - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & R~air - - Utility & Communication 1,000 1,000 Special D~mmrota! & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 400 400 T ota! Supplies & Services $104,301 $139,082 $93,268 $116,800 $52,200 $82,900 $82,900 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE $1,974 $900 $900 $900 $900 $1,000 $1,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $203,118 $189,645 $192,543 $186,400 $109,600 $163,400 $165,600 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 authorized authorized authorized authorized planned planned Town Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,75 0,75 TOTAL POSITIONS: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,75 0,75 05/31/98, Page Town Administration BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 150 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $236,500 $244,740 $252,173 $268,700 $268,700 $277,400 $285,500 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $62,465 $62,363 $55,326 $49,200 $49,200 $49,700 $50,300 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 234,731 271,607 273,555 280,000 286,100 Department Supplies & Expenses 19,000 16,000 Conferences, Memberships & Training 9,500 9,500 Contractual Services 31,000 32,000 Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A. MOU, & Agency 90,000 92,000 Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 28,000 23,000 Utili1y & Communication 6,000 6,000 Special Departmental & Administrative 17,000 24,500 Allocated Insurance Costs 2,200 2,200 Total Supplies & Services $234,731 $271,607 $273,555 $280,000 $286,100 $202,700 $205,200 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE $719 $10,100 $10,100 $10,100 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $534,415 $588,810 $591,154 $608,000 $614,0001 $539,800 $551,000 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 authorized authorized authorized authorized planned planned Town Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Town Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AccountingIPersonnel Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 5,00 06/01/98, Page Risk Management BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartrnentIDivision 160 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES - - - - - - - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - - - - - - SUPPLIES & SERVICES - - - - - Department Supplies & Expenses - - Conferences, Memberships & Training . - Contractual Services - - Insurance 113,200 114,000 Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair - - Utility & Commwrication - - Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs (113,200 (114,000 Total Supplies & Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE - - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 05/31/98, Page _ Administration Building BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating Departrnent/Division 190 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES - - - - - - - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - - - - - - SUPPLIES & SERVICES - - - - - Department Supplies & Expenses - - Couferences, Memberships & Training - - Contractual Services - - Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 14,600 14,600 Utility & Communication 16,400 16,400 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 1,600 1,600 Total Supplies & Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,600 $32,600 CAPITALOUTIAY AllOWANCE - - - - - - - TOTALEXPENDrnJRES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,600 $32,600 05/31/98, Page Planning & Design Review BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating Department/Division 210 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $159,419 $161,957 $170,219 $202,800 $193,100 $206,700 $212,800 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $42,383 $40,740 $36,276 $35,800 $31,000 $37,000 $37,500 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 85,322 119,473 81,036 37,700 53,200 Department Supplies & Expenses 11,900 11,900 Conferences, Memberships & Training 1,700 1,700 Contractual Services 5,000 1,000 Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency 12,000 13,000 Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 3,100 3,100 Utility & Communication 2,900 2,900 Special Departmental & Administrative 7,000 8,200 Allocated Insurance Costs 1,500 1,500 Total Supplies & Services $85,322 $119,473 $81,036 $37,700 $53,200 $45,100 $43,300 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE $543 $6,200 $6,200 $6,200 $6,200 $6,200 $6,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $287,667 $328,370 $293,731 $282,500 $283,500 $295,000 $299,800 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 authorized authorized authorized authorized planned planned Planning Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Planner - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Associate Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Assistant Planner 1.00 1.00 - - - - Planning Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS: 4,00 4,00 4,001 4,00 4,00 4,00 06/01/98, Page_ Building Inspection BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 230 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 199912000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $82.350 $121.513 $118.696 $139.200 $94,900 $94,100 $96,900 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $22,611 $31,342 $25,666 $24,600 $16,800 $16.800 $17,100 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 83,301 17,315 24,132 20,400 24,800 Department Supplies & Expenses 3,300 3,300 Conferences, Memberships & Training 1,700 1.700 Contractual Services 10.000 10,000 Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A. MOU. & Agency - - Property, Supplies. Maintenance & Repair 3,400 3.000 Utility & Communication 2.500 2,500 Special Departmental & Administrative 8.000 8.000 Allocated Insurance Costs 1.300 1,300 Total Supplies & Services $83,30 I $17,315 $24,132 $20,400 $24,800 $30.200 $29,800 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE $15,502 $8,600 $8,600 $8,600 $8,600 $8,600 $8,600 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $203,764 $178,770 $177,094 $192.800 $145.100 $149,700 $152,400 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 199912000 authorized authorized authorized authorized planned planned Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Building Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - Building Permits Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS: 3,00 3,00 3,00 3,001 2,00 2,00 06/01/98, Page_ Police Department BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating Department/Division 310 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $818,603 $847,659 $826,181 $927,500 $894,300 $960,000 $986,800 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $289,879 $283,915 $243,169 $196,900 $179,100 $192,700 $195,900 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 285,518 299,865 307,524 348,100 336,300 Department Supplies & Expenses 22,800 22,900 Conferences, Memberships & Training 24,500 25,000 Contractual Services 2,300 2,300 Insurance - - Intergovernmental JPA, MOU, & Agency 211,000 221,800 Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 47,900 48,200 Utility & Commwrication 16,000 16,000 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 66,600 67,100 Total Supplies & Services $285,518 $299,865 $307,524 $348,100 $336,300 $391,100 $403,300 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE $62,766 $56,035 $66,417 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,456,7661$1,487,474 $1,443,291 $1,537,500 $1,474,700 $1,608,800 $1,651,000 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 Authorized Authorized Authorized Authorized Plan Plan Chief of Police 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Captain - - - - - - Lieutenant - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Sergeant 4,00 4,00 3,00 3,00 3,00 3,00 Patrol Officers 9,00 9,00 9,00 9,00 9,00 9,00 Commwrity Service Officers 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Safety Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS: 17,20 17.40 17.40 17,40 17,40 17.40 05/31/98, Page Police Building BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 390 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES - - - - - - - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - - - - - - SUPPLIES & SERVICES - - , - . Department Supplies & Expenses - - Conferences, Memberships & Training - - Contractual Services - - Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 11,300 13,600 Utility & Communication 6,000 6,000 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 500 800 Total Supplies & Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,800 $20,400 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE - - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,800 $20,400 05/3 I/98, Page _ Public Works Streets BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 410 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $170,995 $143,354 $141,191 $142,400 $144,400 $155,500 $159,600 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $39,295 $32,187 $25,498 $24,400 $21,200 $25,200 $25,600 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 128,185 159,769 146,825 159,200 181,800 Department Supplies & Expenses 1,300 \,300 Conferences, Memberships & Training 800 800 Contractual Services - - Insurance - - Intergoverrnnental JPA, MOU, & Agency 22,700 22,700 Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 63,100 63,100 Utility & Communication 12,000 12,000 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 19,800 20,000 Total Supplies & Services $128,185 $159,769 $146,825 $159,200 $181,800 $119,700 $119,900 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE $4,647 $24,100 $26,900 $26,100 $26,100 $26,000 $26,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $343,122 $359,410 $340,414 $352,100 $373,500 $326,400 $331,100 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 authorized authorized authorized authorized planned planned Superintendent of Public Works 1.00 0,80 0,80 0,80 0,80 0,80 Assistant Superintendent 0,50 0,20 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,10 Foreman 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Worker II 0,50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Maintenance Worker I 1.00 - - - - - TOTAL POSITIONS: 4,00 3,00 2,90 2,90 2,901 2,90 06/01/98, Page Public Works Parks BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 450 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES S53,949 S78,706 S79,056 S95,200 S81,200 S92,800 S95,6oo EMPLOYEE BENEFITS S15,181 S19,677 SI7,506 S17,700 SI3,500 S16,700 SI6,800 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 33,591 47,511 66,096 55,100 64,000 Department Supplies & Expenses - - Conferences, Memberships & Training 500 500 Contractual Services 500 500 Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 26,200 26,200 Utility & Conununication 27,000 27,000 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 18,700 18,800 Total Supplies & Services S33,591 S47,511 S66,096 S55,100 S64,OOO S72,900 S73,OOO CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE SO S4,200 $4,200 $4,200 $4,200 S4,200 $4,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES S102,72 I S150,094 S166,858 SI72,200 S162,900 S186,600 SI89,600 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 Authorized Authorized Authorized Authorized Plan Plan Superintendent of Public Works - 0,20 0,20 0,20 0,20 0,20 Assistant Superintendent 0.50 0,80 0,90 0,90 0,90 0,90 Foreman - . , - - - Maintenance Worker II 0,50 . - - - - Maintenance Worker I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS: 2,00 2,00 2.10 2,10 2,10 2.10 06/01/98, Page Public Works Parks BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating Department/Division 450 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES $53,949 $78,706 $79,056 $95,200 $81,200 $92,800 $95,600 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $15,181 $19,677 $17,506 $17,700 $13,500 $16,700 $16,800 SUPPLIES & SERVICES 33,591 47,511 66,096 55,100 64,000 Department Supplies & Expenses - - Conferences, Memberships & Training 500 500 Contractual Services 500 500 h1surance - - Intergovernmental JPA, MOU, & Agency - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 26,200 26,200 Utility & Communication 27,000 27,000 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 18,700 18,800 Total Supplies & Services $33,591 $47,511 $66,096 $55,100 $64,000 $72,900 $73,000 CAPITALOUTIAY ALLOWANCE $0 $4,200 $4,200 $4,200 $4,200 $4,200 $4,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES I $102,721 $150,094 $166,858 $172,200 $162,900 $186,600 $189,600 Regular Positions Positions 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 Authorized Authorized Authorized Authorized Plan Plan Superintendent of Public Works . 0,20 0,20 0.20 0,20 0,20 Assistant Superintendent 0.50 0,80 0,90 0,90 0,90 0,90 Foreman - - - - - - Maintenance Worker II 0.50 - - - - - Maintenance Worker I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TOTAL POSITIONS: 2,00 2,00 2,10 2,10 2,10 2,10 06/01/98, Page Street & Signal Light System BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating DepartmentIDivision 440 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES - - - - - - - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - - - - - - SUPPLIES & SERVICES - - - - - Department Supplies & Expenses - - Conferences, Memberships & Training 500 500 Contractual Services - - Insurance - - Intergovernmental JP A, MOU, & Agency 1,000 1,000 Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 26,000 26,000 Utility & Communication 18,000 18,000 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs - - Total Supplies & Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,500 $45,500 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE - - . - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,500 $45,500 05/31/98, Page Public Works Facility BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating Department/Division 490 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES - - - - - - - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - - - - - - - SUPPLIES & SERVICES - - - - - Department Supplies & Expenses - - Conferences, Memberships & Training - - Contractual Services - - Insurance - - Intergovernmental JPA, MOU, & Agency - - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair 16,500 16,500 Utility & Communication 10,000 10,000 Special Departmental & Administrative - - Allocated Insurance Costs 300 300 Total Supplies & Services $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,800 $26,800 CAPITAL OUILA Y ALLOWANCE - - - - - - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,800 $26,800 05/31/98, Page Town Commissions & Boards BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Operating Department/Division 610 Summary of Expenditures Description 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 199912000 actual actual actual budget estimated planned planned SALARY & WAGES . . - . - . . EMPLOYEE BENEFITS . . . - . . . SUPPLIES & SERVICES 5,763 2,540 5,994 7,000 5,500 Department Supplies & Expenses 1,000 1,000 Conferences, Memberships & Training 3,000 3,000 Contractual Services . . Insurance . . Intergovernmental JP A. MOU, & Agency . - Property, Supplies, Maintenance & Repair . . Utility & Communication . . Special Departmental & Administrative . 3,000 Allocated Insurance Costs - . Total Supplies & Services $5,763 $2,540 $5,994 $7,000 $5,500 $4,000 $7,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY ALLOWANCE . . - . - . . TOTAL EXPENDITURES $5,763 $2,540 $5,994 $7,000 $5,500 $4,000 $7,000 05/31/98, Page Fund Balance Resources BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Overview Statement of Fiscal Year-End Fund Balances Statement of Fund Balances General, Reserve, Restricted & Redevelopment 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 199912000 actual actual actual estimated planned planned GENERAL FUND Unreserved, unallocated: $1,358,500 $1,141,197 $1,467,682 $1,064,100 $1,344,200 $1,412,900 Unreserved, designated for: Capital Equipment Replacement 131,576 272,898 242,314 215,200 185,000 200,000 Capital Outlay 50,740 19,281 37,776 54,000 10,500 10,500 Employee Compensated Leave 211,312 223,832 211,980 254,300 254,300 254,300 New Town Center Construction 1,347,302 1,437,843 (126,280) New Police Facility (166) 1,400,000 0 Park Development 76,704 7,138 5,580 44,000 28,100 28,100 Revenue Sharing Self Insurance 160,892 166,511 146,511 150,500 150,500 150,500 Streets & Drainage 87,391 231,413 206,495 204,000 117,100 107,100 Total general fund $3,424,417 $3,500,113 $2,191,892 $3,386,100 $2,089,700 $2,163,400 01BER RES1RIClED FUNDS Flood Plain RestOIation 259,906 275,035 291,715 48,615 51,000 53,600 Heritage & Arts Donation Food 842 942 1,000 1,100 LowlModerate in-lieu Housing 1,072,747 1,139,629 647,161 27,900 688,600 753,200 Marsh Restoration 121,347 100,123 105,815 111,000 11 6,600 96,000 Open Space Acquisition 476,772 504,395 104,197 95,000 99,800 104,800 Police Asset Forfeiture 7,591 9,875 6,034 6,134 6,400 6,700 Police Supplemental Law Enforcement 20,329 21,800 27,800 33,300 Property Development Tax 152,633 25,528 44,694 31,000 10,000 14,000 State Gas Tax 172,235 304,504 460,243 337,000 90,000 111,000 Street Frontage Improvement 8,167 7,652 8,085 8,500 8,900 9,300 Tiburon Boulevard Improvement 125,115 138,736 143,921 144,000 151,200 158,800 Tiburon Circulation System Improvement 14,099 23,500 24,700 25,900 Tiburon Planning Area Mitigation 65,770 69,593 73,093 81,900 86,000 90,300 Tiburon Playground Improvement 6,974 7,943 8,400 8,800 9,200 Total other government funds $2,462.283 $2,582,044 $1,928,171 $945,691 $1,370,800 $1,467,200 REDEVELOPMENf AGENCY Redevelopment - General Irn:rement 40,220 16,092 25,802 33,600 39,600 45,600 Redevelopment. Housing Set-Aside 1,178,258 1,169,963 404,818 76,700 781,200 160,700 Total redevelopment agency $1,218,478 $1.186,055 $430,620 $110,300 $820,800 $206,300 5/31/98, Page _ Capital Improvement Program. BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Street & Sidewalk Improvement Projects Project Funding Source Carry Forward Proposed Proposed FY 1997198 FY 1998/99 FY 1999/00 Engineering-allocated cost State Gas Tax 15,000 13,000 Provision-miscellaneous repair State Gas Tax 10,000 10,000 Karen Way (Blackfield-Lellllld) State Gas Tax 30,000 Greenwood Beach Road State Gas Tax 40,000 Cecilia Way (lower) State Gas Tax 35,000 Juno Road State Gas Tax 43,000 Mercury Road State Gas Tax 63,000 Apollo Road State Gas Tax 36,000 Claire Way State Gas Tax 46,000 Leland Way State Gas Tax 30,000 Karen Way (Leland-E-end) State Gas Tax 28,000 Centro West State Gas Tax 33,000 Racoon Lane (Seal) State Gas Tax 8,000 Beach Road State Gas Tax 15,000 Corte Palos Verdes State Gas Tax 16,000 Corte Las Casas State Gas Tax 10,000 Cayford Drive State Gas Tax 12,000 Southridge West State Gas Tax 23,000 Reed Ranch Road State Gas Tax 20,000 Sidewalk-Mar West (to TPC) State Gas Tax 30,000 Sidewalk-Hilary Drive @Del Streets & Drainage Reserve 15,000 Mar School Sidewalk Repair -Pine Terrace Streets & Drainage Reserve 900 COLUMN TOTALS: $ 247,000 $ 185,900 $ 149,000 5111/98, Page _ Capital Improvement Program BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Drainage Improvement Projects Project Funding Source Cony Forward Proposed Proposed FYI 997198 FY 1998/99 FY 199912000 Provision-mi"""lI"","""" repair Slreets & Drainage 10,000 10,000 Greenwood Beach Road - Slreets & Drainage (26K) 92,000 Drainage Eo""tll"'" Repairs Property owners (56K) Marin County FCZ (IOK. r'd) Pasco Mirasol - Drop Inlet Slreets & Drainage 5,000 Greenwood Beach Road - Culvert Slreets & Drainage 15,000 Reed Rauch Road - Creek Bank Slreets & Drainage 5,000 Repair COLUMN TOTALS: $ 92,000 $ 35,000 $ 10,000 5/11198, Page Capital Improvement Program BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 Community Development Improvements Project Funding Source Carry Forward Proposed Proposed FYI 997/98 FY 1998/99 FY 199912000 Elephant Rock Repairs - Pade Development Reserve carry forward, 120,000 Construction (11OK) (lOK) grant funding Engineering (IOK) Grant - BUD (SOK) PrivatelLoc:al Grants (30K) Ferry Dock Realignment - State CTC Grant (71 OK) 35,000 675,000 Construction (685K) Engineering (35K) Marsh Maintenance - Major Marsh Restoration Fund 25,000 windowing, clearing New Police Facility & EOC NPF Reserve (1,784,000) 1,800,000 Architect State Grant (l66K) Predevelopment Site Preparation YTD - Architect + study + site Construction preparation, approximately Contingency SI50K Blaclrie's Pasture, PadeRestroom Capital Outlay Reserve (57K) 34,000 Facility YTD - approximately 23K Downtown Main Street - Replace State Grant - CA Energy 20,000 Street Light Fixtures Commission (20K) Tiburon Historical District - Capital Outlay Reserve (l6K) 8,000 ~h, Workshops, Report YTD - approximately S8K Belveron Mini,Pade - minor Pade Development Reserve 1,000 landscape improvements Town Administration Building - Capital Outlay Reserve 1,500 Trellis Conslruction Town .Adminiotration Building - Property Development 25,000 Air Conditioning Public Areas - Placement of Pade Development Reserve 4,900 Recycling Receptacles (Sea) COLUMN TOTALS; S 43,000 S 2,006,400 $ 700,000 5/11/98, Page_ Capital Improvement Program Capital Project Funding Overview FundlReserve, Soun:e Year L Revenues, Year 2, Revenues, Resources Balance Transfers, Resources Transfen, Balance 7/1/98 Grants 7/1/99 Grants 613012000 State Gas Tax 337,000 170,000 90,000 170,000 111,000 State CTC Grant 0 35,000 0 675,000 0 Prop. 116 State Energy 0 20,000 0 Commission Grant Property Development 31,000 4,000 10,000 4,000 14,000 Marsh Restoration 111,000 5,000 116,000 5,000 96,000 Reserve- 54,000 0 10,500 10,500 Capital 0ut1ay Reserve- 0 1,800,000 0 0 New Police Building Reserve- 44,000 110,000 28,100 28,100 Park Development Reserve- 204,000 56,000 117,100 0 107,100 Streets & Drainage BUDGET PLANNING, FISCAL YEARS 1999 & 2000 PROJECT TOTALS: State CTC Prop 116 Grant Stale Energy Commission Grant New Police Facility Reserve Park Development Reserve Ferry Dock Realignment Project Downtown Main Street Light Fixtures Includes Slate EOC Seismic Grant (166K) Includes Elephant Rock Project, and the following grants - HUD 80K, Local 30K 5/11/98, Page_