HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Agd Pkt 1998-09-16
!lAAff<<
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
TOWN OF TIBURON
1505 TIBURON BLVD.
MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16,1998
MEETING TIME: 7:30 P.M.
CLOSED SESSION: 7:15 P.M.
PLEASE NOTE: In order to give all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and to ensure the presentation of all points of view, members
of the audience should:
(1) Always Address the Chair; (2) State Name and Address; (3) State VIeWS Succinctly; (4) Limit Presentations to 3 minutes; (5) Speak DirectlYin!o
Microphone.
TlBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
A. ROLL CALL
B. BUSINESS MEETING
1) APPROVAL OF MINUTES - June 17,1998
2) ANNUAL REPORT & ACCEPTANCE OF AUDIT STATEMENT - FY97-98
C. ADJOURNMENT
TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL
A. ROLL CALL
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION (If any)
C. PUBLIC OUESTlONS AND COMMENTS
Please confine your comments during this portion of the agenda to matters not already on this agenda. other than items on
the Consent Calendar. The public will be given an opportunity to speak on each agenda item at the time it is called.
Presentations are limited to three (3) minutes. Matters requiring action will be referred to the appropriate Commission,
Board, Committee or Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future meeting agenda.
D. INTRODUCTION OF NEW TOWN EMPLOYEE
1) ASSOCIATE PLANNER- EM! THERIAULT
E. COUNCIL. COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
The purpose of the Consent Calendar is to group items together which generally do not require discussion and which will
probably be approved by one motion unless separate action is required on a particular item. Any member of the Town
Council, Town Staff, or the Public may request removal of an item for discussion.
2) MONTHLY POLICE STATISTICS - August, 1998 - (Accept)
3) UPHOLD APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION RE: Application to Amend
Northwestern Pacific Precise Plan for Addition of Approx. 4,852 square feet of Office Space at Pt.
Tiburon Plaza, 1701 - 1751 Tiburon Blvd., AP#S9-161-07 - Stan Cook/Pt. Tiburon Plaza, Inc.,
Applicant! Appellant - & Adoption of Negative Declaration - (Resolution)
4) NEW ADMINlSTRATIVE CITATION ORDINANCE - Establish Schedules ofFines - (Resolution)
5) SUPPORT FOR TRANSPORTATION BALLOT MEASURE - "YES ON MEASURES A & B'l_
November, 1998 - (Resolution)
6) SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUNDS (COPS) - Proposed Utilization for
Fiscal Year 1998-99 - (Resolution)
7) AMICUS BRIEF REQUEST - San Jose Mercury News, Inc. V City of San Jose, Santa Clara Superior
Court Case No. 773524 - (Approve)
8) ENCROACHMENT PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CARPORT WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT -OF WAY;
2440 Spanish Trail Road; Michael Martin, Applicant; AP#S9-201-17 - (Approve)
G. PUBLIC HEARING
9) DOWNTOWN MAIN STREET TRAFFIC CIRCULATION & ADA IMPROVEMENTS - (Consider
Task Force Report & City of Belvedere's Comments)
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10) BELrrffi LffiRARY AGENCY AND TOWN OF TffiURON - (Approve Agreement for Common
Area & Maintenance Costs)
11) TIBURON STREET REPAIR PROGRAM FOR FY 98-99- (Consider Financial Update & Approval
of Contract Alternative for Additional Streets)
12) PG& E COST OVERRUN FOR RULE 20A UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING IN BLACKIE'S
PASTURE AREA - (Authorize Contacting PUC for Assistance)
I. NEW BUSINESS
13) ANGEL ISLAND FERRY SERVICE - (Application to PUC for Rate Increase)
J. STAFF & TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
14) TOWN COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP - (Schedule Date)
15) LANDS & DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE - (Schedule Date)
K. COMMUNICATIONS
16) DEVELOPMENT OF 50-ACRE BANK OF CALIFORNIA PROPERTY - (Letter dated August 27,
1998 from Tom Newton)
17) ART FAIR AT POINT TffiURON PLAZA - (Special Event Permit for October 11, 1998)
18) MARIN FOUNDATION HOUSE TOUR - (Bus & Tour Schedule for September 18,1998)
19) LETTER FROM BAY AREA COUNCIL - Telecommunications Infrastructure Partnership -
(September 10,"1998)
L. ADJOURNMENT
Future A"enda Items -
--DOWNTOWN BUSINESS TASK FORCE REPORT - Special Meeting wI Belvedere City Council- (September 24)
--NEW CHAPTER 3A OF TOWN MUNICIPAL CODE GOVERNING CONTRACTS & PURCHASES - (I st Reading by Title Only
- October 7)
--INTRODUCTION OF NEW POLICE OFFICER - Jamie Scardina - (October 7)
DATE OF MEETING:
September 16. 1998
No. 18. 1998
DATE POSTED:
September 11. 1998
NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING
CLOSED MEETING OF THE TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq., the Town Council will hold a
Closed Session. More specific information regarding this meeting is indicated below:
1. CLAIM AGAINST THE TOWN OF TIBURON
(Section 54956.95)
Claimants: Kent & Vicki Logan
J1JA- # I
DRAi=T
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Matthews called the meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the Town ofTiburon
to order at 7:45 p.m., on Wednesday, June 17,1998 in Council Chambers, 1505 Tiburon
Boulevard, Tiburon, California. (The meeting was held in conjunction with the Tiburon
Town Council for a public hearing on Item No.2 below).
A. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: BOARDMEMBERS: Bach, Gram, Hennessy, Matthews, Thompson
ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: None
EX OFFICIO;
Executive Director Kleinert, Town Attorney
Danforth, Finance Director Stranzl, Planning
Director Anderson, Minute Clerk Crane
B. BUSINESS MEETING
1 ) APPROVAL OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES - (#02-98,
April 1, 1998)
MOTION: To adopt Minutes of April 1, 1998 Meeting.
Moved: Thompson, Seconded by Gram
Vote: AYES: Unanimous
NOES: None
C. PUBLIC HEARING
2) llS5 TIBURONBOULEVARD (NED'S WAY SENIOR HOUSING
PROJECT): Consideration of Disposition and Development Agreement
with Ned's Way Garden Homes, LLC, Regarding Possible Future
Construction ofa 2S-Unit Senior Housing Project; AP#58-1S1-35
Boardmember Gram said the agreement represented several years of work by the
Senior Housing Advisory Committee and the voter's mandate [June 1995 election].
He said it contained a provision recommended by Boardmember Hennessy to allow
the Town an option to buy some of the [low income] units, and also contained
language placing a cap on assets for the purchasers oflow-income units.
Wendy Duke, representing the Commission on Aging, said very low income units
were needed to balance the Town's housing ratio. Addressing her comments,
Boardmember Gram said the Town would continue to be out of balance if buyers
were not found, but that the developer had already started working on a plan to
Redevelopment Agency Minutes #03-98 - June 17, 1998
locate potential [low income] buyers.
MOTION;
To adopt Resolution approving execution of the Disposition
and Development Agreement with Ned's Way Garden
Homes, LLC.
Hennessy, Seconded by Gram
Unanrnious
Moved:
Vote;
3) FY 1998-99 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET - (Approve)
Finance Director Stranzl reviewed the budget and said that approximately
$800,000 in RDA Housing Set-Aside funds would be available at the end of the
fiscal year to develop the Ned's Way Senior Housing Project.
MOTION:
Moved:
Vote:
To adopt Budget for FY 1998-99.
Bach, Seconded by Thompson
Unanimous
D. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Redevelopment Agency of the Town of
Tiburon, Chair Matthews adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m., sine die.
HARRY S. MATTHEWS, CHAIR
ATTEST:
ROBERT L. KLEINERT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Redevelopment Agency Minutes #03-98 - June 17, 1998
2
~#2
TOWN OF TIBURON
MEMORANDUM
Police Department
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Members of the Tiburon Town Council
Peter G. Herley, Chief of Police
Statistical Overview - August 1998
September 11, 1998
Attached is the monthly statistical overview of police activity for the month of August 1998,
comparative statistics for the statistics for the same month last year. Also included is a brief
summary of various interesting incidents requiring police action.
PETER G. HERLEY,
CHIEF OF POLICE
--rt::- A . A~
by: Thomas A. Aiello,
Lieutenant
Tiburon Police Department
Comparative Statistics
August 1998 - August 1997
8/98 Ml 8/98 Ml
Part I Crimes 10 14 ARRESTS
Part II Crimes JL .l2
TOTAL 27 43 Adult - Felony 0 I
Adult - Misdemeanor 5 7
Part I - Cleared 0 5 Juvenile - Felony 0 0
Part II - Cleared -1l Ji Juvenile - Misdemeanor -L ...!
TOTAL 13 19 TOTAL 7 8
Drunk Driving Arrests 3 2
CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS
TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
Assault 0 3
Robbery 0 0 Injury I 0
Rape 0 0 Non-Injury 1. ~
Homicide -L -L TOTAL 4 2
TOTAL 0 3
CITATIONS ISSUED
Moving 156 48
CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY Parking lJl. 424
TOTAL 469 472
Burglary - Residential I 0
Burglary - Commercial I 0 ACTIVITY
Burglary - All Other 1. -1..
TOTAL 3 3 Calls for Service 447 461
Theft - From Auto 0 0 PROPERTY
Theft - Grand 2 5
Theft - Petty 5 2 Property Stolen 11,194 14,803
Theft - GT A -L ..l. Property Recovered 0 1,041
TOTAL 7 8
..... ,.' '.N...,.. .,. .......... .............W,.
TIBURON POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY RECAP
August 1998
A report was taken when a man on Neds Way reported that he had received threats over
the telephone from his sister's boyfriend.
A Tiburon residents vehicle was stopped on Tiburon Blvd. at Cecilia and he was arrested
on a no bail misdemeanor bench warrant being held by the Marin County Sheriff's
Department. He was booked into county jail.
A resident on Centro East reported mail stolen from their mail box. T.P.D. and U.S. Postal
Inspectors are investigating.
No parking signs recently posted on Silverado were removed by unknown subjects. A
police report was taken and public works was notified to replace the signs.
A resident on Midden Ln. reported that someone entered his unlocked Jeep Cherokee and
stole an anti theft computer chip.
A burglar kicked in a front window and stole jewelry from a residence on Stewart Dr. An
investigation is under way.
A Tiburon resident reported that her vehicle was broken into and that cash and credit cards
were taken. The vehicle was parked at Blackies Pasture at the time.
A small fire in the back of Sam's Anchor Cafe filled the dining room with smoke which
required police and firefighters to evacuate the building for about two hours. The fire was
caused by a smoldering cigarette butt that caused a wall to catch fire. There was very little
damage but a lot of smoke.
A traffic stop on Tiburon Blvd. resulted in the arrest of two juveniles for possession of
alcohol and one for public intoxication. They were cited and released to their parents.
A petty theft report was taken when a shop on Tiburon Blvd. reported that a customer had
switched price tags on an item and then purchased it for $100 less than the actual price.
The suspect's identity is known and an investigation is under way.
Between August 20th and August 24th four reports were taken of cell phones being stolen
from unlocked vehicles and residences in town.
A Silverado resident reported that a bag containing miscellaneous items was taken from
!j
L.
.,<<., ..,.."".",."..".....".",."'.'.9'"..'..... . .,. . . .".. . . ...@@.....,.."...,,. ...,..,."".. .."......".11
,;1........ ...,.,..._.....WM.O.
..,w......... ...."........"."',....>>
his unlocked vehicle while it was parked on the street overnight.
A resident on Vista Del Mar requested a police report after he was "charged" by his
neighbors Mexican Chihuahua dog. He was not injured in the attack but he wanted the
incident documented.
A woman received a head injury in a solo bicycle accident on Greenwood Beach Rd. She
was attempting to put on her sweatshirt while riding and lost control.
An officer on patrol saw a vehicle strike a parked car on Main Street and continue driving.
The vehicle was stopped and the driver, a Belvedere resident, was arrested for driving
under the influence of alcohol.
A burglar entered the Baptist church on Greenwood Beach Rd. by removing a widow.
Taken was a coffee grinder and a five dollar bill.
Two reports were taken on the same day for mail boxes that were vandalized on Paradise
Dr. It is believed that the same person is responsible for both crimes.
Prepared by: Sgt. Steve Hahn
TOWN OF TIBURON
MEMORANDUM
Police Department
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Lieutenant Tom Aiello
Sergeant David M. Hutton
August Assist Outside Agency Statistics
September 10, 1998
"
The following is an account of the Assist Outside Agency Statistics for our Department for the
month of August 1998, as requested by the Town Council. The report is divided by watch.
WATCH 1
Assist to Belvedere PD 7
Assist by Belvedere PD 3
Assist Marin County SO 0
Assist All Others 5
WATCH 2
Assist to Belvedere PD 0
Assist by Belvedere PD 0
Assist Marin County SO 0
Assist All Others 0
WATCH 3
Assist to Belvedere PD 9
Assist by Belvedere PD 4
Assist Marin County SO 3
Assist All Others 4
cc: Chief Herley
TOWN OF TIBURON
STAFF REpORT
To:
From:
Subject:
ITEM NO.
MEETING DATE: 9/16/98
TOWN COUNCIL
SCOTT ANDERSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR *
1701-1751 TIBURONBOULEVARD: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE POINT TIBURON
(NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC) PRECISE PLAN TO ALLOW THE ADDITION
OF APPROXIMATELY 4,852 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE WITHIN
THE WALLS OF AN EXISTING BUILDING; AND ADOPTION OF A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SAID PROJECT
SEPTEMBER 9, 1998
3
Date:
BACKGROUND
This item was heard by the Town Council on September 2, 1998. At that meeting the Town
Council directed staff to return with a resolution upholding the appeal and requiring the
imposition of certain conditions at the conditional use permit stage of review.
A draft resolution for the Town Council's review and approval is attached as Exhibit 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution.
EXHIBITS
1. Draft resolution
39805tc2.rpt
Tiburon Town Council
Staff Report
9/16/98
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF TffiURON ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
UPHOLDING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF
AN AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 2818 REGARDING THE
POINT TffiURON (NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC) PRECISE PLAN (PD#42)
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, in 1979, the Town adopted Ordinance No. 219 N.S. approving the
Northwestern Pacific Master Plan, which established a maximum of273,600 square feet of
development on approximately 38 acres ofland owned by the Northwestern Pacific Railroad
Company. The square footage was the maximum allowed at that time under the Tiburon General
Plan In 1980, the Town adopted a Precise Plan for the property by passing Resolution No. 1090;
and
WHEREAS, in 1983, the Town adopted Resolution No. 2168 amending the aforesaid
Precise Plan. This amendment also specified a maximum of273,600 square feet of development
for the total project, now commonly known as, and hereafter referred to, as "Point Tiburon"; and
WHEREAS, in 1989, the Town ofTiburon amended its General Plan such that additional
square footage up to a maximum of281,400 square feet could be allowed within the Point
Tiburon project; and
WHEREAS, in 1991, the Town adopted Resolution No. 2818 amending the aforesaid
Precise Plan by increasing the amount of rentable commercial square footage to 22,647 and
increasing the total allowable square footage to 274,248; and
WHEREAS, Town ofTiburon is in receipt of an application to amend the aforesaid
Precise Plan by allowing an additional 4,852 square feet of office area in the project through
installation of second floor improvements in the existing commercial building located at 1701-
1751 Tiburon Boulevard, said application being contained within File #39805; and
WHEREAS, the project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and in July, 1999, the Tiburon Planning Department Staff prepared an Initial Study for the
project, which determined that there was no potentially significant environmental effects
related to the project; and
WHEREAS, the Tiburon Planning Department determined that based upon the Initial
Study, a Negative Declaration was required for the project pursuant to CEQA; and
Tiburon Town Council
Resolution No.
9/16/98
1
EXHIBIT NO. I
WHEREAS, in July 1998, a Draft Negative Declaration was completed and Notices of
such were posted, mailed, and advertised in the ARK newspaper to announce a 21-day public
review period for review and comment on the Initial Study/Draft Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, a notice of the public hearing on the Draft Negative Declaration and the
project plans was also posted, mailed, and published in the ARK newspaper; and
WHEREAS, following closure of the 21-day public review period on August 5, 1998,
the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 12, 1998 to receive public
testimony on the Draft Negative Declaration and project plans; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following the public hearing, voted 4-0 to deny
the application; and
WHEREAS, applicant filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on
August 20, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council held a public hearing on September 2,1998, heard and
considered all public testimony on the matter, reviewed and considered the information contained
in the Initial Study and the Draft Negative Declaration, any and all comments and responses
thereto, and reviewed and considered the entire record on appeal from the Planning Commission's
decision; and
WHEREAS, following the close of the public hearing, the Town Council voted 4-0
(Thompson recused) to direct Staff to prepare a resolution adopting the negative declaration and
approving the project subject to specified conditions to be imposed at the subsequent conditional
use permit phase of review.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon does hereby make the following findings:
1. Notice of the public review period and hearing on the Negative Declaration was
given as required by law and said hearing was conducted pursuant to Sections
15073 and 15074 of the State CEQA Guidelines and pursuant to provisions of the
Town's Local CEQA Guidelines.
2. All individuals and groups desiring to comment on the Negative Declaration were
given the opportunity to address the Planning Commission and Town Council.
3. The Negative Declaration for the project consists of the Initial Study document
dated July, 1998, the Negative Declaration form, and any supporting information
which may be referenced therein.
Tiburon Town Council
Resolution No.
9/16/98
2
4. The Negative Declaration was completed in compliance with the intent and
requirements ofCEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Town's Local CEQA
Guidelines.
5. The Town Council has found that there is no substantial evidence in the record sufficient
to support a fair argument that the project will have a significant unmitigated impact on
the environment.
6. The Town Council has found that the project is consistent with the goals and policies of
the Tiburon General Plan; is in conformance with standards and regulations of the Tiburon
Zoning Ordinance; and is consistent with other provisions of the Point Tiburon Master
Plan and Point Tiburon Precise Plan, as set forth and documented in the Staff Reports
dated August 6, 1998 and August 26,1998.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council of the
Town of Tiburon does hereby
1. Uphold the appeal of the Planning Commission's denial.
2. Adopt the Negative Declaration for the project.
3. Approve the Point Tiburon (Northwestern Pacific) Precise Plan amendment by
amending Resolution No. 2818 as follows:
A. Section Lb. of Resolution No. 2818 is amended to read as follows:
"A maximum of27, 500 square feet of rentable commercial (Plaza) square
footage, exclusive of public bathroom, garbage collection areas, and
storage. The commercial space shall be available for retail, office, and/or
other commercial community serving use, provided that second floor space
shall be for office use only."
B. Section I.e. of Resolution No. 2818 is amended to read as follows:
"The total square footage of the project shall not exceed the 280,600
square feet estimated by the Town to exist within the Point Tiburon project
area.
4. Direct that the following conditions be imposed on the subsequent conditional use
permit which must be issued prior to installation of the second floor improvements
at 1701-1751 Tiburon Boulevard:
A. The second floor area of the building at 1701-1751 Tiburon Boulevard
shall be limited to low intensity office use, defined as no more than 3
persons per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and requiring a low
volume of client visits.
Tiburon Town Council
Resolution No.
9/16/98
3
B. Applicant (plaza owner) shall reach a reasonable resolution to the Bayside
Condominium entrance problem, including cost-sharing arrangements
associated with physical improvements such as gates or signage. The
physical improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy of the second
floor offices.
C. The current practice of issuing all employees of businesses in the Point
Tiburon Plaza full time parking passes shall continue indefinitely.
D. The above conditions shall be considered as an integral part of said
subsequent conditional use permit, and not an integral part of the Point
Tiburon Precise Plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon on September 16, 1998, by the following vote:
AYES
NOES
ABSENT:
NOT PARTICIPATING:
HARRY S. MATTHEWS, MAYOR
TOWN OF TIBURON
ATTEST
DIANE L CRANE, TOWN CLERK
39805tc.res
Tiburon Town Council
Resolution No.
9116/98
4
IlehA-#L/
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF TIBURON SETIING FORTH THE
VIOLATIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE THAT MAY BE
ENFORCED BY ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 31 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FINES FOR SUCH
VIOLATIONS
WHEREAS, on August 5, 1998, after a duly noticed public hearing, the Town Council held
second reading of; and did adopt, Ordinance No. 439 N.S., which ordinance became effective on
September 4, 1998; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 439 N.S. added Chapter 31 to the Tiburon Municipal Code,
establishing a new Code Enforcement procedure for the Town; and;
WHEREAS, Chapter 31 provides that certain violations of the Town's Municipal Code may
be enforced by the issuance of administrative citations, as provided by resolution of the Council, and
further provides that the amount of fines for such code violations shall be established by resolution
of the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, the Council now intends to set forth the violations of the Municipal Code that
may be punished by administrative citation and establish a schedule of fines for said violations.
WHEREAS, the Uniform Penalty and Bail Schedules published by the Marin County Courts
("Bail Schedule") includes a list of bail amounts for violations of the Tiburon Municipal Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon as follows:
1. Any violation of the Town ofTiburonMunicipal Code for which a bail amount is established
by the applicable Bail Schedule may be enforced by administrative citation pursuant to
Chapter 31 of the Municipal Code in the discretion of the Town Manager. The applicable
Bail Schedule shall be that in effect at the time of the violation.
2. In cases where the Municipal Code establishes a fee, fine or other penalty for a violation, the
fine imposed by administrative citation shall be the greater of the fee, fine or other penalty
established by the Municipal Code or that set forth in the applicable Bail Schedule. In other
cases, unless otherwise provided by resolution of the Council, the amount of fine to be
imposed by administrative citation for a violation of the Municipal Code shall be the amount
of bail set forth in the applicable Bail Schedule.
1
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on
September --' 1998 by the follo~g vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
HARRY S. MATTHEWS, MAYOR
Town of Tiburon
ATTEST:
DIANE CRANE, TOWN CLERK
2
RESOLUTION NO.
I/e,,-,- #s
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF TmURON
ENDORSING
TRANSPORTATION MEASURES A & B
ON THE NOVEMBER 1998 BALLOT
WHEREAS, increasing traffic on Highway 101 and on local streets is adversely
affecting the quality of life in Marin; and
WHEREAS, the people of Marin have made clear their opposition to construction of
new highways or widening of Highway 101 except to eliminate bottlenecks; and
WHEREAS, the people of Marin have showu consistent support for transportation
alternatives to the automobile and for lining transportation improvements to restrictions on
development; and
WHEREAS, the difficulty of predicting future transportation trends underscores
the importance of providing alternative modes of transportation; and
WHEREAS, the allocation offunding in Measure A on the November ballot is
consistent with the expressed desires of the people of Marin to address the bottlenecks
along the Highway 101 corridor and inadequate maintenance oflocal roads while
providing transportation alternatives to the automobile in the form oflocal bus, enhanced
paratransit and commuter rail services, and improved bicycle paths; and
WHEREAS, the allocation offunding in Measure A on the November ballot is
further consistent with the expressed desire of the people of Marin in providing funding for
the protection of environmentally sensitive areas from inappropriate development; and
WHEREAS, the Y, cent sales tax increase for a period not to exceed 20 years in
Measure B on the November ballot is needed to implement the program oftransportation
improvements and environmental protections proposed in Measure A;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council ofthe Town of
Tiburon does hereby endorse Measures A and B on the November, 1998 ballot.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tiburon Town Council on
September 16, 1998, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
HARRY S. MATTHEWS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK
SE? -04 9SFR .0 40 -HE )L.,R~ '; OROLP
~EL 5.0652:%:
P OOj
MeASURE A . Ballot argument
MEASURE A IS NOT A TAX. It is an advi$ory measure thaI sets priorities for how 1M! want
new sales lax dollars spent.
After many years of frustrating, aggravating traffic, we need real relief! Gridlock on 101 and
local roads pollutes our air and keeps uS in our cars instead of at work or home. Potholes,
detericrating streets and unsafe intersections only make malters worse.
Community, environmental and business leaders ask you to Vote Yes on Measure A. Help
create a balanced plan for relieving congestion and improving roadways while prDtecting
Marin's special quality of life
. Vote Yes because it will give Marin County commuter rail service between Healdsburg and
San Rafael.
. Vote Yes because it will improve local bus service, including new community shuttle buses
and other flexible transit services
. Vote Yes because it will reduce transportation demands by acquiring development rights in
environmentally sensitive areas, like Baylands.
. Vote Yes because it directly attacks congestion on Highway 101 by completing carpool
lanes tlelween Novato and Mill Valley
. Vote Yes because it improves maintenance and repair of local streets.
. Vote Yes because it expands Paratransit services for senior citizens and disabled persons
. Vote Yes because it expands pedestrian and bicycle facilities, including a bikeway between
the Golden Gate Bridge and San P.afael.
. Vote Yes because it balances what's good for our environment, our economy, and our
quality of life.
Measure A puts your money to work effectively by limiting administrative expenses to only 2
percent.
Put together all the pieces and we have a balanced approach to Marin's transportation needs.
Join the League of Women Voters, the S,erra Club, chambers of commerce and your friends
and neighbors in voting Yes on Measure A.
Signed by: AI Boro - Mayor, City of San Rafael
Marge Macris - Chair, Executive Committee Marin Group, Sierra Club
Suzanne Dunwell - CEO, Novato Chamber of Commerce
Donna Bjorn - President, League of Women Voters of Marin County
Stan Rowan - Marin County Fire Chief
SEP. -or 98 FR I lO 40 -HE \\.,R-'i GROt'?
~EL 50652:96'
P DO..
"", .'
MEASURE B - Ballot argument
Vote YES ON MEASURES A AND 8 for balanced traffic relief in Marin County.
Congestion is getting worse. commutes take longer, traffic safety is declining. Our quality of life is suffering.
Vote Yes on Measure A Tell our leaders to spend our tax dollars on transportation improvements.
Vote Yes on Measure 8. Provide resources :hrough a 112-cent sales tax to repair pDtho!es and rough
roads throughout the county, unloCk the gridlock that plagues our roadways, and make safely improvements
that protect lives. Measure 8 will provide funds that can be used for county purposes.
With passage of Measure A, veters will indicate that they want these funds used to accomplish the
following purposes:
. Implement Marin County segment of commuter rail service between Healdsburg and San Rafael.
. Improve local bus service, including new community shuttle services ar,d other flexible transit services.
. Reduce future traffic by acquiring land or development rights in environmentally sensitive areas such as
Baylands
. Attack congestion on Highway 101 through completion of carpool lanes between Novato and Mill Valley.
. Improve maintenance and repair of streets and roads throughout Marin,
. Expand Paratransit ser-Aces for senior citi<:ans and disabled persons.
. Improve pedestrian and bicycle facilities, inclllding a bikeway between the Golden Gate Bridge and San
Rafael
. Balance what's good fer our environment and our economy.
Vote Y8S on Measul'es A and 8 to protect yeur tax dollars:
. Umit administrative expenses to 2 percent.
. Qualify Marin for more state and federal dellars.
. Create a sales tax that will end after 20 years.
Vote Yes on Measures A and 8 for accountability, innovative approaches and local control of our tax
dollars.
Join the Marin League of Conservation Voters, the Marin C:1apter of AARP and Marin Coalition for
Balanced Transportation.
Vote Yes on Measures A and 8.
Signed oy: James L Phillips - President, Marin League of Conservation Voters
Elissa Giambastiani - President, San Rafael Chamber of Commerce
Patrick Seidler. Bicycle Advocate, Transportation Altematives for Marin
Norman Gravdahl- President, Chapter 4139 AARP
James Middleton - President, College of Marin
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
MEETING:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 16, 1998
TOWN COUNCIL
RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUNDS (COPS)-
PROPOSED UTILIZATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-99
ITEM:
CONSENT
o
BACKGROUND:
The Town annually receives an allocation of approximately $19,000 in COPS monies, which
funds are to be expended in support of frontline law enforcement activities. In Fiscal Year 1997-
98 Town Coucil approved of the use of COPS monies to annually fund Tiburon Police
Department participation in the Countywide Emergency Communications Equipment Upgrade
Project - at that time estimated at $14,200 per year.
Following this commitment of$14,200 to the Emergency Communications Equipment Upgrade
Project, approximately $5 000 remains available in each year for expenditure on additional law
enforcement pro &ram proiects.
Finance Administration and the Police Department recommend that Town Council approve of the
possible utilization of COPS monies to purchase mobile video camera units for installation in
Police Patrol Units, in Fiscal Years ending June 30th 1999 and 2000. This proposed use of COPS
monies was previously submitted and approved in the approved Capital Outlay Component of the
2 Year Municipal Budget Plan for 1999 & 2000; However, further approval and adoption of the
attached draft resolution is required, in order for the Town to expend these monies.'
RECOMMENDATION:
Town Council adopt the Draft Resolution approving of the possible use of COPS monies to
purchase mobile video camera units in Fiscal Years 1999 and 2000.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Draft Resolution
~
R. SIT .
The Town hopes to secure additional funding for this purpose from ABAG PLAN, which has
previously supported expenditures to equip Patrol Units with video equipment. If ABAG PLAN funds Tiburon's
proposed plan to equip four patrol units with mobile video equipment, it will not be neccessary to use COPS monies for
this purpose.
1
RESOLUTION NO.
>N
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING OF THE UTILIZATION OF
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNDS - "COPS" MONIES -
TO PURCHASE MOBILE VIDEO CAMERA UNITS
FOR INSTALLATION IN PATROL UNIT VEHICLES
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 3229, signed into law as Chapter 134, Statutes of 1996,
establishes the Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) Program; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council, at a public hearing held annually in September, must approve
of a plan for the expenditure of Supplemental Law Enforcement Funds (COPS), and
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, at its regular meeting held on
September 16, 1997, approved the recommendation of the Police Department to utilize available and
uncommitted COPS monies to participate in the Countywide Emergency Telecommunications
Equipment Upgrade, estimated at an annual cost to the Tiburon Police Department of$14,200, and
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, at its regular meeting held on
September 16,1998, approved the recommendation of the Police Department and Finance Director
to further utilize available and uncommitted COPS monies to purchase mobile video camera units for
installation in patrol unit vehicles.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon as
follows: the Finance Director is directed to submit this Resolution - which approves of the
recommended plan for the expenditure of COPS monies - to the Supplemental Law Enforcement
Oversight Committee for their review and consideration.
PASSES AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon
on, , 1998, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
HARRY MATTHEWS, MAYOR
TOWN OF TIBURON
ATTEST:
DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds, Fiscal Year 1998-99, September 16, 1998
Tit AA -# T
CITY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
1S1 WEST MISSION STREET
SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95110
Telephone (408) 277-4454
Facsimile (408) 277-31S9
JOAN R. GALLO
City Attorney
September 1, 1998
All California City Attorneys
Re: Amicus in Support of City of San Jose in
San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. City of San Jose
Santa Clara Superior Court Case No. 773524
Dear City Attorney:
The City of San Jose joins the California League of Cities in seeking your
support for an Appellate Writ to be filed with the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District
in a case which raises questions regarding the scope of the Public Records Act
("PRA"). In its Appellate Writ, the City will seek to overturn the decision of the Superior
Court which has ruled that the Public Records Act requires the City to produce the
names, addresses, and telephone numbers of those citizens who have made
complaints to the City about noise at San Jose International Airport.
We believe this case has broad implications of importance to cities. It is the City
of San Jose's position that the public interest served by not disclosing the information
sought clearly outweighs any public interest served by disclosing the information.
Individuals have a strong right of privacy to their home addresses and telephone
numbers and should not be required to publicly disclose this information merely
because they wish to make a complaint. Furthermore, the City will argue that such
disclosure would discourage citizens from making complaints about airport noise.
The City of San Jose has a very real concern that the airport noise complainants
will be subject to harassment and intimidation by certain groups seeking to minimize the
number of noise complaints, which could discourage people from making complaints in
the future. Over the years, the City of San has received PRA requests for the same
information from at least one interest group that has used the information in other cities
to write letters threatening the complainants with real estate fraud, even if the
complainants had no intention of selling their properties. Because these threats
occurred in communities outside of San Jose, the Superior Court placed little weight on
the evidence of this course of conduct. It is the City's position that such evidence --
coupled with past requests by these same groups for the same information from the I
City of San Jose - sufficiently demonstrates the need for non-disclosure so that citizens
will not be deterred from making legitimate airport noise complaints.
73S73_1.DOC
All City Attorneys
September 1, 1998
Page 2
"
"
Furthermore, the City will argue that the Superior Court's decision could have
repercussions beyond airport noise issues. The decision could lead to the eventual
disclosure of the personal information of anyone who has complained to the City
regarding a whole variety of matters such as staff misconduct, code enforcement
issues, or responsiveness to constituents' concerns. Such a result would undoubtedly
intrude upon the privacy rights of the complainants and have some chilling effect on the
willingness of citizens to voice their concerns.
The City and County of San Francisco has graciously agreed to provide amicus
support for the City's position in two ways. First, San Francisco will be drafting a letter
brief to the Appellate Court urging the Court to hear the City's Writ. Second, assuming
the Writ is heard, it will be filing an amicus brief regarding the broader impact the
Superior Court's decision will have on cities that must respond to similar requests. If
you are interested in joining in the letter brief or the amicus brief, please contact Patty
DeAngelis from the Office of the San Francisco City Attorney at the following address:
Patty DeAngelis, Esq.
San Francisco International Airport
International Terminal, 5th Floor Legal Division
P.O. Box 8097
San Francisco, California 94128
Tel: (650) 794-5058
Fax: (650) 876-8829
The briefing schedule is somewhat uncertain currently. However, we ask that
you contact Ms. DeAngelis by Friday, September 18,1998 to express your interest in
participating in the letter urging appellate review. If you would like to participate in the
amicus brief, you may contact Ms. DeAngelis by Wednesday, September 30,1998.
Also, please contact me should you have any further questions regarding this request.
Sincerely,
JOAN R. GALLO,
City Attorney
By: 72~/I-:-4L
Robert Fabela
Deputy City Attorney
cc: JoAnne Speers
Patty DeAngelis
I
73S73 _1, DOC
T(-enL it cr.
TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO:
TOWN COUNCIL
SCOTT ANDERSON, ~
PLANNING DIRECTOR
MEETING DATE: 9/16/98
ITEM NO.:
FROM:
SUBJECT: ENCROACHMENT PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING CAR DECK
INTO A CARPORT WITHIN THE SPANISH TRAIL PUBLIC RIGHT-
OF-WAY; 2440 SPANISH TRAIL ROAD; MICHAEL MARTIN,
APPLICANT
BACKGROUND
The applicant is remodeling his residential property at 2440
Spanish Trail Road, an unincorporated property which abuts the
Town of Tiburon corporate boundary. Access to parking for the
property has historically been provided from spanish Trail Road,
a Town of Tiburon-maintained street. In the 1970's, the Town
issued an encroachment permit for a car deck within the Spanish
Trail right-of-way for use by this property.
In April, 1998, the Town Council denied an encroachment permit
application to replace the existing car deck with a garage. The
applicant has since revised the plans to provide a carport rather
than a garage. The Design Review Board approved a site Plan &
Architectural Review application for the carport on September 3,
1998.
The applicant now comes before the Town Council for an
encroachment permit for the carport.
ANALYSIS
Chapter 19 of the Tiburon Town Code requires Town Council
approval of any encroachment permit which would involve
construction of buildings, car decks, carports, garages, or other
permanent structures of a substantial nature. The Town Engineer
has authority to approve encroachment permits of a lesser nature.
Chapter 19 $pecifically prohibits the approval of enclosed living
space within the public right-of-way.
Town Staff and the Design Review Board agree that the revised
design is appropriate and preserves views from the vicinity.
All encroachment permits involving structures are issued by the
Town as revocable permits only. This is because, if for any
reason, foreseeable or unforeseeable, there should arise a need
for the encroachment to be removed, the permit may be revoked
TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
9/16/98
1
with notice and the encroachment removed at the permit-holder's
sole expense. The Town Attorney notes that an Agreement was
recorded with respect to the 1972 encroachment permit issued by
the Town, and that a formal amendment to that agreement would be
required should the new encroachment permit be approved. The
Agreement provides the Town with the revocation protection
required by Chapter 19. A draft amended agreement, prepared by
the applicant's attorney, is attached as Exhibit 2. The draft
amended agreement requires some revisions to reflect the carport
now being sought, but these changes can be performed
administratively.
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the Town Council approve the encroachment permit by
minute-action, subject to any reasonable conditions imposed
by the Town Engineer.
2. That the Town Council direct the Town Attorney to finalize
the amended agreement.
3. That the Town Council authorize the Town Manager to execute
and record the amended agreement.
EXHIBITS
1. Design Review Board-approved drawings of proposed carport.
2. Draft amended agreement.
3. Draft Design Review Board minutes of 9/3/98.
\scott\2440spa2.enc
TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
9/16/98
2
Description of Existinl!: Property
. 2440 Spanish Trail Road, Tiburon, California.
. Single family home on a downslope with a detached 3 car uncovered parking deck.
. Parcel is in an unincorporated area of Marin County.
. The parcel fronts Spanish Trial Road, which is within the town limits ofTiburon.
. The public right-of-way is wider than the paved surface of Spanish Trail Road, and
approximately half of the parking deck is in the right-of-way.
. The parking deck was constructed in 1972 under the conditions of an "encroachment
permit" issued by the Tiburon Department of Public Works. The permit is revocable, and
requires the owner of the property to remove the parking deck (at the owner's expense)
should the city decide to make major improvements to the street. A copy of the
agreement is attached.
. Spanish Trial is a short, dead end street which is in good condition. The town has no
plans to widen the street nor make any other major improvements. The subject property
is the third parcel from the end of the street.
. The project consists of a new roof structure addition and alterations to an existing
off-street 3 car detached parking deck which is presently uncovered. The new structure
will provide for a 3 car open carport.
. The size of the existing parking deck (i.e. the "footprint") will not be changed, however,
additional shear walls will be added to the existing unseen understructure for structural
upgrading.
. The project was granted a Use Permit by the Marin County Community Development
Agency on June 11, 1998, and the architectural drawings were unanimously approved by
the Town of Tiburon's Design Review Board at their meeting on September 3, 1998. In
addition, the immediate neighbors have signed a letter in support of the project.
Nature ofProiect
Purpose of this Application
To update the original encroachment agreement (recorded in 1972) to reflect the planned
improvements to the parking deck as described above
Attachments
Property Description (Exhibit "A")
Encroachment Permit as filed March 28, 1972
Assessor's Maps
Letter to the Town of Tiburon Planning Dept. dated August 26,1998
Site Plan & Architect's Drawings of the Proposed Carport
/
~
....
~
,
"- '--
,
, ,
,
CAR DEe K A L T ERA T ION S TO
The MAR TIN RES IDE NeE
2440 SPANISH TRAIL TIBURON. CA 94920
A.P. NO. 59-201-17
GREGORY DEDONA . , ~ ~
ill
<
A R C H I T E C T t ~ ~ Iii
::ii 1 0
:J- z
III
3OSWod<hamome 00
MiIlValley.Ca'14'141 " " 8 ~
. 415.383.7107 t7 0
.
i ~
I
I
. \ ,~
\ .
\-
\'
\
\
\
"
" .
'\ /
. ).;'
. '.
,
\
~
.., .'\."..' '.
'~. ~'~,/.."
, ." ,',,'.;:,'
\, '4 '-,-
'... :,p-
. "-.
\
., A
\.
\
"-
.
..,
'.\
,
,
.,-
'.
\
.'\
,
\
.,
'.,
59-20
,
,
'\
.,
\
......AI..
53-011
53-OOS
" -<>06
&c
~-~~.
l
/--(")"'~1~
~",(f.)
/' U~~~
~l t>e.c.K ,~~)
.
,
7\,
./ \./
.,. .,.-
- 1 h"
.~;./
. r
".. " ~.
'\::$,/;.'/
k,/.
"03
.",
,
~, ,
~>~"
.
~
,-
.~=
SITE PLAN
'\.
v
(e.ll'.l!!"ID~
--
1'i6~''''''
1::
o
..
CO
U
C
G>
o
..
~
c
o
.-
en
..
G>
>
l
c~
faw ~ ~ S
z> I: I 18
~ol z~!l!
Co: fa i5 ~5
~ G1 <"") I 1m
Cija..a:~ s~
~ a.. ~ a: i ig
<(fa ~ ~9""~~
c ~ gj...~~
,J' (!) ~::)!D 0
d - w,lQOo
en .
. .
f-"~:- --
~_."
~~-~:::;..
r.-._o'-:.:....:
1~'
i :~'~~~~~~~
I "----4
I~ 4
L__~
F=~-~,
~:.:.I
,.
b::_' -
~ l .
.-
; : j 1f
~
t
,
I
i
.J
--------r
,
! i I:
(~-"-1
,lgC-~
I, --- .~
" -=:--..:.-..1
I r---c.-:.::- ..~
~-c~.~::.:: ~i-
,-..
t-<
z
o
cC
tr..
'-"
~
or
~ ):-~~
~ oc~ ! ~
~ ~l ~ i
4td;
_ _......0 (\ Ii
u.. -'~ d. ~
~ !i ~ ~
- \l& \l ~
l'L .-
ul -- &--
~ II. ?, L-
lU i ~ ~
t-<
rJJ.
W
~
EXHIBIT NO. f
t--
1
I
,
I
/
:-:--""..~..
. _.~ ::-- ..-- ....._,.~ -,,- ..-
.#~~~ _"C._:"-,....
. --. "~-"~~~I~~~i~~-~ =;:.~~~~~~;:~~~~_. .~~_.~?~~b~~~~:.~-~8:~ ..~.
. ~~.
~..,,.;.-.,,. '-.:;::~::l<:.~'':--:'':~,:::.::'': _.-"...-.....""~~:;.-_. _. .-
,.~. ;......~-'.
, ,
'--'''--'' .
'-,- ," .......--------.---...,....."....,.....-. .....
:-:....-,::.;:~..:..-.~. ~~.~~. :;:.:::.-;;:.....::;_~:: - - .... - - . -. . - ~;...'r.:,,;...-::.:..=~:
-,
,.
~l!.N
onN
OP!.N
cnN
SOUTH
(!l
~
rJ1
.,
/'
II! !
! i
~
Ln_
- ~
f~
F!
------r
I. !
_.L....-......._.__
II
"1/
'"
Z.
,.-- !
,
i
i
I
i . Ii
:. -I . i
: ,)
,
,
,.
i.
~
'1J
11
()
.~
f'~~
; : _:~j,:
i:;U,
I 'j"
. : ~i.:I.
\ ~ n ll'
;, ,f!1! '{
"",!"::1
! \".,
;"'" I"
. ,',,' ;,',
I , , ! f <.>" ~
\ , "".t
~ I ? ; ~ ,. \ .~: ;i'
I . .,., LI. i, ,
.1 i?il';;;'-;'
t i ~ i, ( 'j:; i.
: ~ ) ,:;: i :f
",' ,,", (II.,
.1: ", .',
""'/"11
r.. I, "fl
1-',:.'1."
"!'
'.'!! t,:
i.i :,1: <;.
I',.: ;!:; I
~ I I , ;,',;
. !i;' ; ,L 'I,;;
,[".. ,
(.; i I)'
! .: ;~ (
" "'i
,'~!i . ~ .
" 'I!'/,i.
"~" :
'<'J!'. 1,
,k!; " 'tl",
'~lq, , i. ,
" 'J" "',\';"
I;" ",. '; '",' ~'r
:;:; ';:J ;
',liih.:'li;
.;.!1.. ~.,'
ii"')""':
li:i!jli [
1 .jl_il,.
1. ;~!!l
1:.,11.'
, J,I;\.
1,1.: '
J r-h
":.j:,:f1
L
-;~-;._-~'$':--'.'.<"-~.':'~~-:"~. ~~. ---
"-1' ~.,..,
~
. -"--- "~'--- --.-..-.
,,-~<~..:~~:--;:;.<~-~~... ,~-~
-"r"'. ~-__~::......_~~-----=
... -- ,- - ~.- - .........,'l.. ..... .. " ~':...:::'
-"_~;':'-~_'r".__~: '.- _'";'"..:;.:-;.t
'-- '.-.:...-.....-.. 'lc~,..,,-....,~. .~_
.-....... -."~.' -...
--- ..--
,- -::..'!'~~':"
oPE.N
apf.N
.1
! r.rT;T'.., I~ 11
' '" I
' ,
i'l., I
"I;
'.' I. : I'
1i _'"'..... ~:
"1
--------~-----.-
--- ----.-----
OF'I!.N
NORTH
'.-.. .'
._ .,_._ ~_ _..~_.> .._u >_
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into at Tiburon, California,
this
day of
, 1998, by and between MICHAEL J.
MARTIN, hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and TOWN OF TIBURON, a
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Town",
WIT N E SSE T H :
WHEREAS, by deed recorded March 12, 1997, as Instrument
97-012413, Owner acquired title to that certain real property in
the County of Marin, State of California, which is commonly known
as 2440 Spanish Trail, Tiburon, and which is more particularly
described on Exhibit A"hereto attached and made a part hereof;
WHEREAS, by Agreement dated March 15, 1972, and recorded March
28, 1972, as Instrument No. 10664, at Book 2553, Page 320, Official
Records of Marin County, California, a revocable encroachment
permit was granted to construct a parking deck on the public right-
of-way known as Spanish Trail;
WHEREAS, Owner and Town now intend to amend and modify said
March 15, 1972; agreement; and
WHEREAS, Owne"r has made application for an encroachment permit
for the construction of a two-vehicle garage and a one-vehicle
carport on the existing parking deck; and
WHEREAS, on
, 1998, Town granted a revocable
encroachment permit to Owner permitting the construction of the
two-vehicle garage and one-vehicle carport on
the existing parking
EXHIBIT NO. J-
Page 1
.._,_. L_ .-J__" __ _ .___~_.""-""~__~'
deck subject to, among other things, Owner's agreement to remove
said parking deck, garage and carport at Owner's expense upon the
eventuality of Town's plans to improve said right-of-way;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. Upon receipt by Owner of a certified copy of a resolution
of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon evidencing the intention
of Town to improve said right-of-way and requesting Owner to remove
said parking deck, garage and carport, Owner will, exclusively at
Owner's own cost and expense, within forty-five (45) days from
receipt of said resolution, remove or cause to be removed said
parking deck, garage and carport and all fencing and improvements
constructed in connection therewith, all of which said improvements
are located between the westerly property line of the real property
described in Exhibit A and the easterly line of said public right-
of-way.
2. Upon the failure of Owner to comply with any of the
agreements contained herein, Town may declare said improvements to
be a public nuisance, and may take such action as may be authorized
by law to abate said nuisance. The remedy of Town as contained in
this amended agreement shall not be exclusive.
3. If Owner does not remove the parking deck, garage and
carport in accordance with this amended agreement, Town may remove
it and lien Owner's property for all costs of removal in order to
secure payment of said costs.
4. The agreements contained herein are covenants and
servitudes running with the land and shall be binding upon Owner
Page 2
. '-..l. -'--- _._-~.__.-
and his successors, assignees, executors, administrators and
personal representatives.
5. Except as amended by this Agreement, the March 15, 1972
agreement remains in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and
subscribed this Agreement the day and year first above written.
TOWN OF TIBURON,
a Municipal Corporation
By:
Town Manager Michael J. Martin, Owner
Page 3 .,
COUNTY OF
)
) ss.
)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
On , 1998, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to
the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the
same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ss.
COUNTY OF
On , 1998, before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for said state, personally appeared MICHAEL J.
MARTIN, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribe~ to
the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the
same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument the. person, or the entity upon behalf of which the
person acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Public
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
The land referred to is situated in the State of california, County of Marin, in
the unincorporated area, and ia described as follows:
BBGIKRIMG at . point on the Basterly line of Vistazo Bast Street, at the
intersection thereof with the Southwesterly corner of that certain parcel of
land described in the Deed executed by Ida M. Boyla, to Florence FUll..r Couper,
dated Auguet 1, 1940 and recorded August B, 1940 in Book 399 of Official Records
at Page 254, Karin County Records, running thence Southerly and along said
Eallter1y l.ine of Vistazo Baat Street, 110 :..t.to the Northerly line .of the
lands deacribed in the Deed executed by Ida Marie Grose, et aI, to Warren W.
Finke, et ux, dated Karch 17, 1'66 and recorded March 1B, 196' in Book 2034 of
Official Recorda, at Page 116, Marin County Records, running thence Borth 84.
31' East 88.953 feet, acre or less, to the westerly line of the parcel. of land
descri~d in the Deed executed by Roger B. Ryan, et ux, to Joseph A. Johnson, et
ux, dated Septe.oer 2, 1953 and recorded Septeaber 13, 1954 in Book 883 of
Official Records, at Page 15, Marin County aecord., thence North 36. 39' We.t
and along the Westerly line of the 1anda referred to in last ..ntioned Deed, a
distance of 100 feet, acre or lesa, to the Southerly line of the land. referred
to in the Deed executed by Boyle, first bereinabevereferred t07 thence South
85" 46' ...t and along the Southerly line of the Deed last referred to, 105 feet
to the Easterly line of Via taro Ba.t Str.et and the point of beginning.
BEING a portion of Subdivision "AO of Lot 16, in Section l., a. shown upon that
certain ..p entitled, "Map No. 3 of Lyforde Begeia at Tiburon Point", filed for
record August 23, 1894, Marin County Record..
A.P. Ro. 059-201-17
13. 2-l-l0 Spanish Trail Martin, Carport
TIle oW1ler of the property proposes the ~Qnstm~tion of a -l70 square foot partially
enclosed ~arport and 310 square foot open ~arport to repla~e an existing ~ar de~k at 2440
Spanish Trail. 111e proposed materials indude cedar shingle siding, dark green trim to
match the existing h0use. and charcoal gray asphalt shingle roof
:.Iike :.iartin, applicant. said he is building a roof on a car deck. The property borders the
County as well as the Town. He discussed t~proposal with all his immediate neighbors,
who have signed jetters of support. :.Jr. S.iiendorfwithdrew his letter of support but has
onc~ again withdra\\TI his concerns \\'lth the change of the :::.1:ory poles. The propos.l1 is
Ihe fourth version of the plans. Regarding openness of carports, the Town Engineer feds
the strUClur9' needs some means of support. .-\.lso, the immediate neighbors want the
~arport open but had a conc"m about carports in gen.".al be~alls" of ~ bicycl"lI and
other storag" items. Th"refore. they wanted a small wall. which could screen the items.
.u:9J.
Ms. .-\.I!sep stated the leu"r submitted bv the ~"ndort' s indkates that their approval is
~onditiotl2d with the removal of trees. That ho\\'"\'",,. is between the two property OWn"rs
and th" Town has no control over it.
t/
,/
V"
c/.
Chair Howard stated she likes the current design v~. Inu.::h.
Boardmcmber Snow wantd to admowldge the apphc:mts d'forts to make the carport
so open.
:\1 s Howard/Beales and una.I~imuusly passed (4-0). to accept \"ersion ,;L as propOSed.
.__.~
r-'
-- -----
r-~-'\
TlBCRON ORB
~JG:LTES OF 9/3,'1)8
17
'"PYTT~B-''''' NO -3
,.,.,". r', 1 j
_.....l......:_~_~ _ .
TOWN OF TIBURON
STAFF REpORT
ITEM NO. 1-
To: TOWN COUNCIL
From:
TOWN MANAGER
Subject: DOWNTOWN MAIN STREET TASK FORCE REPORT
Date: September 16, 1998
BACKGROUND
For the past two and a half years, the Town of Tiburon has been cooperating with
downtown property owners and plaintiffs in resolving the claim for failure to provide proper
access to the disabled to certain building entrances as required by Federal law.
Initially, the Town Engineer, the Town's ADA consultant, the Town Attorney, and Town
officials and Staff invested numerous hours and considerable cost in considering conceptual
solutions to the access problem.
In May, 1997, following the third community workshop composed of representatives from
the Belvedere and Tiburon Councils, the Planning Commission and Design Review Board, the
two communities authorized an independent traffic engineering study of Tiburon's Main Street.
In August, 1997, DKS Associates of Oakland submitted its Main Street Traffic Study
which recommended a one-way downtown Main Street and a two-way Upper Main Street along
Ark Row. In October, 1997, the Tiburon Town Council adopted the DKS recommendations,
however, the Belvedere City Council subsequently rejected the recommendations.
In December, 1997, a new Tiburon Town Council established a Main Street Task Force
composed of representatives from the Belvedere and Tiburon Councils, downtown merchants,
Corinthian Island residents, and City/Town Staff to further study the problem.
In January, 1991l, certain Belvedere residents residing on Corinthian Island, who are more
directly affected by the Main Street Traffic circulation, retained their own traffic engineering
consultant, Charles Abrams, of Abrams & Associates of Walnut Creek, California. The Abrams'
analysis reflected the existing two-way traffic circulation pattern was superior to the DKS one-
way proposal.
TOWN COUNCIL
Page 2
September 16, 1998
The joint Belvedererriburon Main Street Task Force has now completed its review of
each traffic consultant's comments and recommendations, and have prepared a report which has
been submitted to both the Belvedere and Tiburon Councils. The Belvedere City Council
considered the report on September 8, 1998, and have forwarded their comments to the Town of
Tiburon.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the following procedure be utilized in Council's consideration of
the Main Street Task Force report:
1) That Council accept the Task Force's report;
2) That the Chairman of the Task Force, Vice Mayor Bach, and Councilmember
Gram jointly present and highlight the report's findings;
3) That Council review and consider Belvedere City Council's comments and
conclusions pertaining to the Task Force report;
4) That Council receive public input and comment;
5) That Council determine which traffic circulation plan or option best satisfies the
downtown ADA issues and traffic circulation needs of the community;
6) That Council discuss possible cost-sharing for the proposed Main Street
improvements and implementation schedule.
R.L. Kleinert
EXlllBITS
A. Main Street Task Force Report, dated 8-27-98
B. City of Belvedere Letter, dated 9-10-98
C. DKS Associates Tiburon Main Street Circulation Study, dated 8-20-97 [previously
submitted]
D. Abrams Associates Memorandum, dated 2-23-98 [previously submitted]
E. Town Engineer's Memorandum to Town Manager re: Cost Estimate, dated 7-15-98
TIBURON MAIN STREET TASK FORCE
Summary of Task Force Findings
August 27, 1998
The Task Force was formed at the request of the new Tiburon Town Council in
December of 1997, to take a renewed look at the consequences of transforming lower
Main Street into a one way street.
The Task Force was comprised of Ann Otter, Mayor of Belvedere; Justin Faggioli, Vice
Mayor of Belvedere; Bob Branz, Belvedere Town Engineer; Tom Gram, Council
Member of Tiburon; Mogens Bach (Task Force Chairman), Vice Mayor of Tiburon; Sia
Barmand, Tiburon Town Engineer; George Gnoss representing a group of residents
from Corinthian Island; and Steve Sears, Downtown merchant and President of the
Chamber of Commerce. Also attending meetings were Charlie Abrams, Abrams
Associates; Ed San Diego, Belvedere City Manager; John Lundquist, Belvedere Chief
of Police; and Peter Herley, Tiburon Chief of Police.
In the early fall of 1997, the previous Town Council approved in concept a plan
developed by DKS Associates to transform lower Main Street into a west bound one-
way street and ordered the Town Engineer and Planning Director to proceed with a
partial CEQA study as needed. This action was taken in order to help solve the access
problem to several Main Street stores not conforming to the Americans with Disability
Act's guidelines. A law suit, filed against the non-conforming property owners to make
them correct those deficiencies, the Tiburon Police Chief Herley's often expressed
concerns about the safety of the narrow sidewalks and the delivery trucks double
parking during unloading of supplies and merchandise, gave further cause for the Town
to act on the matter.
However, since strong objections were voiced to the new Council from nearby residents
of Corinthian Island, the Belvedere City Council and some Main Street merchants the
new Town Council agreed that although not opposed to the previous Council's
decision, more information and data should be reviewed before making a final decision.
The charter of the Task Force was therefore to evaluate the objections from the
Corinthian Island residents, Belvedere officials and merchants, and to give them an
opportunity to add new data to substantiate their claim. The Task Force was to review
and re-evaluate the traffic study and proposal developed by DKS Associates,
commissioned jointly by Belvedere and Tiburon, as well as a new traffic study
1
^ ,
~){~f
lIlt "
developed by Abrams Associates. This new study was commissioned by the Corinthian
Island residents objecting to the one-way plan. The task force was to consider the
issue of ADA compliance, safety, the interest of the street merchants, nearby residents,
parking, and general and long-term impact on the Downtown area. The Task Force
was also to look into and consider other plans that may not have been considered at
first. The Task Force would summarize its findings and submit them to the Tiburon
Council.
The remainder of the Task Force's Summary includes the following:
Overview of Options
Traffic Consultants (OKS and Abrams) comments concerning the two
plans
Issues upon which the Task Force reached agreement
Other issues in support of and in opposition to the one way plan
OVERVIEW OF THE OPTIONS:
The Task Force studied drawings with plans of various traffic layouts. The plans were
labeled Option 1 R, 2, 3R, or A, B, C and 0 (see enclosed). Plan A is a OKS Associates
One Way plan originally adopted by the prior Tiburon Town Council, but modified by
the Tiburon Town Engineer with some improvements. Plan B is developed by OKS
Associates for two way traffic. Plan 0 is developed by Abrams Associates for two-way
traffic. It was agreed that Plan 0 was essentially the same plan as Plan B. Plan C is
more of a concept plan developed by Sia Barmand depicting the traffic flow if Main
Street were turned into a no traffic pedestrian Promenade.
The Promenade concept was discussed as an alternative to any traffic plans and there
was some support for the idea. One aspect of the Promenade concept was considered
workable for any of the plans. A Promenade would have the sidewalks and street
surfaces at the same level (except for drainage swales). No curbs. A Promenade
would have to have a street area in the middle delineated and kept clear for emergency
vehicles and general passage. That area would have to be delineated with pavers or
concrete lines in the street surface. It was agreed that this concept would have several
benefits. If the structure of Main Street were to be changed in the future, changing it
would be easier and less costly. The Paver type surface would help slow traffic. And,
the overall street and sidewalk surface could be raised so that ramping of the sidewalks
would be less noticeable and hazardous to tripping. Finally, this approach would lend
itself better to beautification of Main Street.
2
It was generally agreed, though, that the many unknowns of a Promenade plan with a
greater impact on the surrounding areas, combined with a negative response from a
majority of the merchants, made this proposal difficult to consider at this time. In
addition, reports from other cities which have Promenades were not favorable. (Santa
Monica and recent articles on Chicago's experience were mentioned.)
The Task Force therefore concentrated on discussing the pros and cons of plans A)
One-Way and B) Two-Way as well as the objective and subjective differences of the
OKS and Abrams traffic reports. The two reports do not agree with each other. OKS,
who conducted a more thorough study is clearly in favor of the one way plan, but
concedes that two-way traffic would work. The Abrams report recommends two way
traffic and is highly critical of anyone-way plan and of the OKS study. Both Traffic
Engineers are supporting their reports with a lot of general traffic data Le., one way
traffic always moves faster, one way traffic only works if there is a parallel street for
traffic going in the opposite direction, etc.
Even though the Task Force members are perceiving the problems differently, it was
generally agreed that much of the traffic data from both reports used to back up
recommendations do not necessarily apply to Main Street since Lower Main Street is
only a block long. In fact, the block is shorter than the length of a football field. It was
also agreed that both plans provided for sidewalks wide enough to accommodate ADA
approved access to the stores, although the wider the sidewalks the less pronounced
and safer the ramps. Further, on busy weekends, the street did in fact become more of
a Mall than a street, with people walking on, and crossing everywhere on the street. It
is expected that this trend will continue no matter which traffic configuration is selected.
PLAN A: ONE-WAY ON LOWER MAIN STREET:
The OKS Report:
Again this proposal is recommended by OKS Associates in their report of August 20,
1997, and backed up with the follow-up letters dated September 11, 1997, October 30,
1997 and April 6, 1998, responding to the criticism of the Abrams Study. OKS's main
reason for supporting the one-way plan is better and less congested traffic flow and
especially that they consider it a safer plan.
Among the favorable traffic and safety aspects highlighted by OKS are:
Less traffic on lower Main Street. Corinthian Island and Yacht Club will exit via Ark
Row as will the parking lot traffic. (Parking lot traffic is not supposed to exit via
lower Main Street, there is a No Left Turn sign at the exit, which is widely
ignored).
3
Less traffic predicted from Beach Road on to upper Main Street.
Wider north side sidewalks (one-way 8 feet vs. Two-way 6 feet which is 33% wider) for
pedestrians. The wider sidewalks also mean a less undulated walking surface
around the wheel chair ramps to the stores. (The south side sidewalk is 8 feet in
both Plan A and B). The total increase in the north side sidewalk area with the
increased width is about 100 square feet.
A wider traffic lane which then creates a wider buffer zone between cars and
pedestrians. (One way 11.5 feet vs. two-way which is 9 feet for both lanes).
Safer passage for bicyclists due to the wider traffic lane (but only for Westbound traffic
because bicyclists cannot legally travel Eastbound on the one-way street).
Safer conditions for unloading during morning truck delivery.
Among the negative aspects highlighted by OKS are:
Inconvenience for Corinthian Island residents exiting from Alcatraz who must make a U
turn at the roundabout, facing congestion at times and use upper Main Street to
get to Tiburon Blvd.
Parallel parking on the wrong side (south side) of the street. Parking with the existing
two-way traffic is on the north side.
Potential for higher vehicle speed, but can be mitigated with speed calming devices.
Increased northbound traffic on upper Main Street.
OKS believes that the lesser traffic along with the pedestrian enhancement and safety
outweighs the inconvenience to the Corinthian Island residents having to detour
to get to Tiburon Blvd. It is pointed out by OKS that during their study, many
Corinthian Island residents did in fact make a U turn to get to Tiburon Blvd., Post
Office or The Boardwalk, via upper Main Street. This observation was made by
Task Force members as well.
The Abrams Report:
The Abrams report dated February 23, 1998, is critical of the OKS report and one-way
recommendation. It concludes that the OKS study is only a partial report and that the
one-way plan has serious problems that have not been adequately addressed. It states
4
the inconvenience to the Corinthian Island residents and safety problems for
pedestrians and bicyclists. The Task Force noted that the Abrams Report was
prepared without the OKS Supplemental letters of September 11 and October 20, 1997,
which contained crucial traffic counts.
Among Abrams major points of critique are:
The wider sidewalk on the one-way plan is not an issue since the two-way plan will
provide almost the same width of sidewalk. (Note: Plan B two-way has an 8 and
a 6 foot wide sidewalk. Plan 0, by Abrams has an 8 and a 7.5 foot wide
sidewalk. However, the Abram drawing shows the street to be 41 feet wide
instead of 40 feet. The actual Abrams width of sidewalks would likely be 7 and 7
feet wide of 6 and 8.)
Pedestrian Safety, although subjective, the one-way plan is no safer than the two-way
plan. The two-way plan, with its slower traffic, will be safer for pedestrians and
bicyclists.
There are no provisions for bicyclists to travel east. However, they may travel
eastbound in the designated (westbound) bike lane, against the flow of vehicular
traffic.
The one-way plan creates hardship for the Corinthian Island residents having to make
a U turn at the roundabout. This results in misdirection, longer travel distance
and added time.
Greater potential for delays of emergency vehicles heading towards Corinthian Island.
It will be more difficult to exit the parking lot.
There will be added traffic on upper Main Street.
There will be added traffic and congestion on Beach Road and by the Beach
RoadlTiburon Blvd. Intersection.
The report further mentions that issues such as additional energy use and extra air
pollution have not been addressed by the OKS report.
On issues such as street parking, truck loading, solving the ADA requirements and
cost, the Abrams report states that there is not much of a difference in either
plan.
5
The Abrams report does not have anything favorable to say about one-way traffic on
Main Street.
Issues brouaht UP bv opponents of the One-Way plan not in the OKS or Abrams
reports:
The one-way plan does not allow enough space for passage of cars when trucks are
double parked for unloading. This will also block emergency vehicles.
The two-way plan offers more flexibility for the future.
The two-way plan will have less impact on the business district.
The two-way plan will require less of a CEQA study since it is not deviating much from
the current traffic pattern.
A petition has been circulated by a lower Main Street business owner and signed by
most downtown merchants. The result is as follows:
Nine business owners from lower Main Street, representing 18 stores, and 28
business owners from upper Main Street are against the one-way plan.
Three business owners on lower Main Street are in favor of the one-way plan.
Four business owners on lower Main Street, and one business owner on upper
Main Street have expressed no opinion as to which plan they favor.
Issues brouaht UP bv the proponents of the one-way plan and not in the OKS or
Abrams Report:
The wider sidewalks create better opportunities for street beautification and store
advertising.
The wider sidewalks make for a better and safer pedestrian environment benefiting the
store owners.
Street parking can easily be accommodated on either side of the street.
Other Issues:
6
In either plan, the problems with the unloading trucks double parking can be mitigated
by making the street parking areas timed loading zones only.
The issues of the general impact of changing the traffic on Main Street was not
discussed much beyond what has been summarized above.
The issue of the long-term impact to the community was not discussed since it was
agreed that the Task Force members were not in a position to foresee this with the data
available.
Issues upon which the Committee reached aareement:
After reviewing both plans and the traffic reports, the Committee members felt that the
Report should summarize the issues that the Committee agreed upon.
ADA not an issue with either plan.
If the hotel/inn goes in as recently proposed next to Sams (the old Dock
Restaurant), the Committee agreed that to accommodate loading and unloading under
either plan, two spaces directly across Main Street should be marked as loading zones
(white curbs).
The cost of each Plan will not be materially different.
Emergency access: the two-way plan is better because it gives emergency crews more
options and provides better access to Corinthian island.
Bicycle Safety: Although there were some concerns that the narrower lanes in the two-
way plan might create safety problems, the two-way plan is preferable.
Bicyclists will be able to ride legally on both sides of the street. It is illegal in
California for bicyclists to ride against traffic. The one-way plan would prohibit
bicyclists from legally riding east on Main Street. This prohibition would create
an enforcement problem and could lead to safety problems. It should be noted
that there will not be bike lines in the two-way plan. Bikes will travel in the traffic
lanes.
Flexibility: The two-way plan is more flexible. The Town Engineer has suggested
constructing the two-way plan curbless with 18 feet of roadway and striping. If
the Council determines at a later date that the two-way plan is not working, it will
be easier to convert to the one-way plan than vice versa. The Committee
agreed that both the two-way and one-way plans should remain curbless.
7
Implementation: The two-way plan will be easier to implement because minimal CEQA
delays will be encountered since the two-way plan is very similar to the current plan.
Downtown Merchants: The downtown merchants have overwhelmingly endorsed the
two-way plan (the numbers are summarized on the next page). The Committee
believes that they are an important part of our community and will be the group
most directly affected by any changes.
Truck Deliveries: The one-way plan will not allow cars to maneuver around a double-
parked truck. The two-way plan allows cars to maneuver around double-parked
trucks but forces them into oncoming traffic, something close to the existing
situation. A solution is to ban non-commercial parking until 10:30 a.m.
weekdays and Saturday and then ban trucks from making deliveries the rest of
the day. The Committee felt that a solution to the early morning double parking
problem might be to explore with Main Street properties allowing free parking in
the Main Street lot until 10:30 a.m.
Sidewalks: The one-way plan is preferable. The north sidewalk will be 2 feet wider in
most areas; south sidewalk will be the same under both plans.
Parking on Main Street; Although some committee members felt parking should be
liminated to allow for wider sidewalks and traffic lanes, the merchants are
adamantly in favor of retaining the parking on Main Street. It was agreed that
parking could, and should, remain on the north side of the street in both plans.
Attachments: Plans A, 8, C, & D; Alternative Comparison dated 3/9/98 and sketches X
&Y.
8
r-
j
,. J
J
j
I ~
I
r-
.tA
~
, ~ ~
~ I(,
~ ~
1 ~ ~
<l(~Q
V) ~
'- 10
~ ~ ~.
~
.~
~
U )...
. J ~
. I
I
~ ,
<:s
@
I k
I
f
..
.J
\
A
r-
.r-.
'\
I.
I
~
J)
~
1
J
--J
~
.
.....]
~ J
'1 J
.\11
~
~
..
I~
/
I !
I
/
I r
I
I
I l-
I
I
I L
I
~
~"-
r-.i
.tr-
~L
t........:/-.
I
r
~
f-
~
r
CD
I
,
I r
t
$. ~
Jit ~
: l-
I
I
I ~
I
I .
I ~
:~..
I
I
I ..
-.
":"" f-
I
~ )
\
,'--
-;] : I
~J I .:
~ t- , i" 1 ~
1 I ~
.., I
I
I
04 I
\
J \
,
;.;~
.'"
~
)...
<t
~
.
~
..~
@
i
------1
Main Street Task For<:e reoort
July UO, 1998 -
August 27, 1998
I
I
,
..
. '.
B
r
-
,
I
I
!
I
,
,
,
,
Main. Street Task Force ~eport
July 10, 1998 "
August 27, 1998
~~ ,- .(0....
, .
I \ ~
~~~ /;: .. t ~
......... , ~ I
-: ';.N I ..., . ~
....... 11 ,
"cC- ~ ,,~ I
- Cl I -li~ ~
c .. w I
.lOx I ~
... ~~ I I
. I ~
I
I ;
I I ~
I
, ~
,
l ,
\ .'li(:
II ~
I t- \...
. <)
"- II I ""
:0. ~
~ ~
~ ...' ~ ~
~I i2
: ~ <0: '"
e ~I Cl: ~
!:'I
~ II .....
J I ()
I ~
\.
~ . . -', @
,
,
,
,
It ,
,
,
,
,
,
~
r-
'\
Q(
,.
~
'==!i" ....
.t:.c s .'1
".:~ ~\j
:5a."" t..:;:
....
~
....
5E:w
'II
-
lEA'" AoA"
,
~
r
.-
I
c
r
'.:I,I~.-
~t~. .
'I'~
..,,, ~
d~''''.''.
,'c.'~ .
','.,'" ..it...
"}!!,.$
. . : ;.-~j~;~;;]~
..--
~
. ,,:;'.. :'.:'0 ~:"
,~:.....(:':'.:-'
.
.
-
~. -..~
1 I - ~
.t.. I ....] Q
- ~~
h: gJ. ce
,,,".L
tl~ .
j!~ iL
..;~) ~
.lJ I ~
I. L I
J 'f . .'91
Q) I '.~":-.. J
~ ~ t-"{
; I:) : h
::: Kf tf .f II
I. I
i. .."L 1
I
'T'\ ' ,,'I i
U:. r....:..
1J1,... I .'
'J~ .~
J . ~
I I~ i ..
~ -';; ',,"
i:.:t 0
I ~ ~~d">.
II oW....
- -2Z'~ ~~
(Y;."... '~'lJ.:.'"
~
. ~o
\1\ ~o~ ..; .
~
~~
r
-'.._.,.. .......... .~.,.
... ---.,,-.... -: ,- ,
. <,,::~:'. -,.:7-/.' r:" .. .'
-' ".' ..".
\... ,..:..' .:~'..:.: .... .:0.
. :," '>.
;...
, .
Main Street Task 'FOl!ce Repott..:
July 10, 1998 .-.'. . ',.. '.
August 27, 1998,
" ..~...:...".
.~
.t
~
~
a
u
I)
...
'"
<:t
.f
~ .
~ .
':t
'>.
t:!)
<::
.::;
Q.o
C
)0...
~
I
~
~
@I
r
.;
..
..-..
-
"
.1:>. '_..'
.- "
. .
..,....
'.
" .
Main Street Task Force Report
July 10, 1998
August 27, 1998
r '"
u
"--" '€
g OJ OJ OJ :; t .~
~I ., ., ., ~ ~ ~ ., ::?J
'" c c c c '" '"
~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ~ 'S - ~ 8 ~
~
c c c c ~ :5
t<l t<l t<l t<l .~ tIl
c::
.;
::?J
..
3 -
-< Z9~ .::! .::: ~
;: o~ ~ - - go - go - ., ., .,
'" ~ ~ ~ ~ tIl
t:~~ ., <:> c c ~ c::
~ >- ..... ~ .... ~ 0 ~
Z 00 \0 ~ 00 0- 0 Z
O~E- N ~
.&> ~
.-
tIl E-
::>
0 '"
;: .,
.. '€
-< 3 t
> .~~ .::! .::! -
~ &i -5 - ... go - go ~ -
0 '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '"
~ ::l 0- - ~ ~ .,
Z c:: 0 8 8 "1 ~ >-
0 .~ tIl 00 00 00 ..... "'"
lI"l ..... .....
tIl N .... tIl
I""' ;: .&> C
.-
~ E- .;
"--" ::?J
::?J -
0 ~
u ...:.. , -
+ +- 0- ~
tIl -I .... .::! .::! -
t<l A :- '€ ..... - - - "' g ., ., g
2: 0 ~ ~ ~ OJ tIl c:: c.
0 go go t<l
Z ~ - .... ~ ~ 0 ~
~ 0 Z
N 00 lI"l ~ lI"l 8 ..... ~
..... .....
N t! ~
..... ..... ~
~
-< J '"
u -
c::
It .:s
._.
:@ :@ "'
g OJ OJ ~
.- ~ .- ~ ~
~ ~ ~ l:!
Z "' ~ a e a > -E
0 8 if -
'S ::l 'S ~ ~
~ OJ ~ .5
::> "" '" "' c:: a
tIl -5 ~ ~ 0 l:l:l
e3 c:: -5 .-
., OIl "0 .- .- '" .c: ....
"0 c ~ tIl ::?J "0 - - 0 l!l
E-,"", - .- ~ ~ -5 ~ c:: c::
~~ a tIl ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 I '1:: l;> E
.- OIl ., ~ 0 .-
~ c:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ., u u .!:J
0- I :so! .... "" ., .:s .:s a ., -< c:: c::
!Z~ ~ 0 tIl e "0 ..J 0 0 ~
0 .- .- .- a 0
u ~ .. OIl ::l tIl tIl tIl OIl '" "'
j e ..J -< - -
,- ~ ~ - c '€ -5 -5 c ~ ~ ~
-< ., :so! .- ,
.- > ., c::
~ ~ 1il .S ~ ::l ::l ~ ~ ~ ]: e- el
06 ::?J 0 0
.-- tIl ~ tIl tIl l:l:l - t<l
r
"--
, 'i' !'; I; :'
,_LiMatn -st:reet}iiask~f(jrCEi Report
I I I :. I 1..1 ' . ;'1 I
,-h-~Ji1Y;-f~;-:199El-tT1T'-.-. .
!--,._;-- =<:;t:.r4'7:m,-i.-"9~e"--'-'- ., .
, " .r::1""'!..... j ~ ", . . . j I I
;' i-' i - T~J_._J~J:~.~~-~L~~.Cr r~:-;-:.T~ __~'.:~ ~__-:... - -. .
: I I i I !:::: i I
I .r-T ....~C ~,-'..i~..; .~, 'r'_~'"
, , ; i Ii; .
-"-CfTT....-
...L;
PRQ/NEd I)Nt ""'~ wll?1
rItA-PRe,
, 'I I.
!
1
l '~
~ '~ ~'
~ l' ~,
~~~'
.~ ~~~,
'--
~. .,
~~'
~ ~
~ . ~
~ .:. ~
" ~ ~ "
~ I -.
t \.., ~l~ ~
'-ll
~ ~ L... ...~. to
::t ~- ;~.
~ ~ <:Q ~
~ ~ ~
~ i
~ .l:f ~'1
~
" '~f:
~ '- ..
~ ~t
1 ~\:.l , .,",
"- ~
r f. r .1/ '/1.$ ,
'--'
SIt6Tt'H X
,"_ i
Main' Street Task Force Report
--,' July 10, 1998
. August 27, 1998
i.'
r
,-,.
, ,~
1410- k/~ ;1'{l.()f~.f1~ ....
. : i'-r"'i' ;' t I
W / ~ TIl"q;:;e:rC~'
i I
, , . 'H.r ' ,
J !LL ~.
; : ! I i
-: 'I .
I"z i},
~
... '
'"
~ ~,,' .
~ '"
~ '~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ':!<
~,
......... , ... '
~~, "
'--
"" ~~"
-
~
~ ~
~
~
~
'.u r "" ~
'"t ~ ...
~ ... ...
... ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ r
~
'"
, ,
.1. .'I . fj' h. :Y. .,;.
r
'--'
S~e-it" y
CITY of BELVEDERE
450 San Rafael Avenue · Belvedere, CA 94920
Tel: 415/435-3838 · Fax: 415/435-0430
September 11,1998
Honorable Harry Matthews, Mayor
Town of Tiburon
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon CA 94920
RECEIVED
SEP 1 1 1998
TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE
TOWN OF TIBURON
Dear Harry:
At our City Council meeting on Tuesday, September 8, we considered the issue of the Main
Street traffic circulation report prepared by the Main Street Task Force. As a result of our review
of the report, particularly the eleven points that all parties agreed on, the City Council of
Belvedere believes that the best solution to resolving the various issues that have been raised
regarding Main Street traffic is to implement the two-way traffic flow consistent with the
report's Alternate B.
We base our conclusion on many factors including
. Alternate B provides the greatest ingress and egress to Belvedere and does not create safety
concerns at the intersection of Beach Road and Main Street
. The solutions to the ADA and parking issues are independent of the two alternatives
. Alternate A creates a dangerous condition for bicyclists on Lower Main Street
. Alternate B allow cars to go around double parked vehicles while Alternate A does not
. Alternate B allows greater flexibility in the future
. Alternate B allows for better access for emergency vehicles to Main Street and Corinthian
Island.
Consequently, we request that the Town select Alternate B as the preferred alternative for
downtown Tiburon's future.
" .'''D..._",('_....--.-(._''''_'A_._<_~)C
c .-
z ){kv?~i
I' {J ~
Mayor Harry Matthews
September 9, 1998
Page 2
Toward that end, Belvedere will contribute up to $60,000 toward the roadway and sidewalk
improvements if the following conditions are met:
. Alternate B is selected as the approach to traffic flow on Main Street
. The City's contribution would be a dollar-for-dollar match to what the Town contributes to
the project up to a maximum of $60,000.
. The City will pay $30,000 at the commencement of the project and the remainder upon
project completion
. During the first five years after completion of the project, the Town agrees that it will only
abandon Alternate B for compelling public safety, health & welfare or legal reasons. If the
Town chooses to abandon Alternate B within the initial five-year period, the City and the
Town will meet and confer regarding the reason for the change. Following the meet and
confer process, if the City still does not agree with the need for change, the Town shall
reimburse the City for the full amount of wrnitever contribution is made. After the initial
five-year period has elapsed, the Town agrees to meet and confer with the City prior to any
decision to abandon the two-way traffic flow associated with Alternate B; however, no
reimbursement of the City's contribution shall be required.
In developing this structure, we want to make sure that the Town understands that if a truly
compelling reason exists that would necessitate an abandonment of Alternate B, Belvedere will
confer with the Town in an open manner in assessing whether or not it agrees with the Town's
proposed course of action.
I will attend your upcoming Council meeting and will be available to answer any questions you,
the Town Councilor Town staff may have.
Harry, we sincerely appreciate the opportunity the Town has provided us to be a party to the
evaluation of the Main Street alternatives and continue to stand ready to work together with the
Tov.n in addressing problems that confront us, regardless of the jurisdictional boundaries.
Yours truly,
~U )~i t, -P:i~d:., (
uC I ~rc--
Justin Faggioli
Mayor
cc: City Council
MEM
I
N
T
E
R
OFF ICE
Town Manager?
Town Engineer ~
Main Street A.D.A. Improvements
July 15, 1998
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Attached please find copies of a current budget estimate and two other estimates from 1996,
provided by various contractors.
I am also waiting for a written update to Ghilotti Construction's December 1996 estimate. They
have informed me that it would be about 5% to 10% higher which puts them at $220,000.
Given the attached, I suggest we use a project cost estimate of about $250,000.
Please let me know if you need more information or documents.
~ ~ ffc~
Sia Barmand
SB/jp
Attachments
?~~I
(, ~ (,
TOWN OF TIBURON
STAFF REpORT
ITEMNO.! 0
To:
From:
Subject:
TOWN COUNCIL
TOWN MANAGER
COMMON AREA AGREEMENT BETWEEN BEL VEDERE/
TffiURON LffiRARY AGENCY & TOWN OF TffiURON
September 16, 1998
Date:
BACKGROUND
The new Library and Town Hall share certain common areas and costs associated with
each, such as parking, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, etc. The Agency and the Town have
determined that an agreement between the two agencies is essential to define and arrange for
sharing of the ongoing maintenance and capital improvement costs. Town Staffand
representatives of the Library Agency met and discussed the proposed structure and provisions of
such a document. A draft agreement was submitted for Council's consideration and approval in
August, however, the matter was continued to clarifY certain issues.
The total common area construction costs of $242,243 are to be shared equally by the
Library Agency and the Town. However, the Library Agency paid $172,527 and the Town
$69,716, resulting in a $51,406 credit to the Library Agency from the Town. The Town's Public
Works Department recently submitted its 1997-98 record of service hours and materials provided
to the Library which will be applied against the $51,406 credit, and will continue on an annual
basis.
Town Staff is continuing its review of the document with the Library Agency, focusing
primarily upon those sections pertaining to:
1 ) Yard Lights and Electric Meter Costs
2) Electrical/Parking Lot Lighting
3) Irri~ation Water/Parking Lot Landscaping
RECOMMENDATION
The Library Agency Staffand the Town are meeting on Tuesday, September 15, and it is
anticipated that these issues will be mutually resolved at that time. Assuming that occurs, Staff
will then recommend Council's approval of the Common Area Cost Sharing Agreement as
submitted, with possible minor revisions.
R.L. Kleinert
EXHIBIT
--Draft Agreement for Sharing Certain Capital Costs and for Maintenance
AGREEMENT FOR SHARING CERTAIN CAPITAL COSTS
AND FOR MAINTENANCE
. ~~r"n.!
Q..2 ,. .jr
.,"":/11'- _ ~
Li\ i--;.if~ J.
'" ",
This Agreement is made this day of 1998 by and
between the Town of Tiburon ("Tiburon") and the Belvedere- Tiburon Library Agency
("Agency"). Agency is a Joint Powers Agency created by the Town of Tiburon and the
City of Belvedere ("Belvedere"). The purpose of this Agreement is to arrange for the
equal sharing of certain capital costs as defined herein, for the maintenance of common
areas of parking and landsceping, and for the payment of certain lighting and irrigation
costs on and between the sites of the new Library and the new Tiburon Town Hall on
Tiburon Boulevard in Tiburon, Califomia.
RECITALS:
1. Tiburon has ccnstructed a new Town Hall.
2. Agency has constructed a new Library.
3. The new Town Hall and the new Library are immediately adjacent to each other.
They have certain common parking areas and facilities, including entrances and exits,
lighting and landscaping as indicated in Exhibit A attached to this Agreement. The lights
for the ccmmon parking areas are connected to both the Agency's electric meter (6 yard
lights) and Tiburon's electric meter (9 yard lights and flagpole spots). The irrigation for
the common landscaping areas is connected to Agency's utility meters. Also, the
Agency has need for certain other ongoing landscaping and maintenance services.
4. Capital costs for common areas and facilities are set forth in Exhibit B attached to
this Agreement.
5. Tiburon and Agency agree to enter into this Agreement in order to:
(a) allocate the capital costs of the common areas and facilities set forth in Exhibit B.
(b) establish a procedure for the efficient and economical performance of the
maintenance of their common and separate areas and likewise to establish a procedure
for the payment of fees and charges for lighting and irrigation of their common areas.
(c) establish a schedule for the performance of certain other maintenance services.
6. The term of this agreement shall be from July 1, 1998 to June 30,1999. This
Agreement continues yearly thereafter automatically subject to either party's right to give
written nctice of termination to the other. If such notice is given hereunder the
Agreement shall terminate thirty (30) days thereafter.
,.
AGREEMENT:
1. CaDital costs
(a) The capital costs for the common areas and facilities defined in Exhibit B shall be
bome equally by the parties hereto.
(b) Said costs total $242,243, of which Agency has paid $172,527 and Tiburon has
paid $69,716
(c) Agency shall receive a credit from Tiburon in the amount of $51,405.50, which
credit amount shall be applied towards payment of Agency's share of the Maintenance
Costs described in Paragraph 2 of this Agreement and as payment for its share of
services described in Paragraph 5 of this Agreement.
8TLAIT own of Tiburon maint. agreement
03/13/98
Page 1 of3
(d) In the event one of the two parties hereto desire to alter a common area, the
other must give its prior written approval.
(e) Any additional capital expenditures required under this Agreement in the future
will be shared equally by the parties.
2. Common Areas
(a) Landscaoe and Maintenance Services
The parking facilities and landscaping area outlined on the map in attached
Exhibit A (Site Improvement Plan) shall be maintained by the Tiburon Department of
Public Works at the joint cost of Tiburon and Agency, each to contribute one-half of the
total costs. These costs shall be reviewed and adjusted annually and are for regular
maintenance only.
(b) Liohtino and Parl<ino Areas
Agency and Tiburon shall share the monthly cost of lighting the parking areas
and flagpole, said cost to be calculated by the parties by applying the per watt hour
charge on Agency's and Tiburon's respective electricity bills to the number of watts from
lamp ratings multiplied by a reasonable estimate of the hours of parking light fixture .
illumination. The total yearly charges will be shared equally by Tiburon and Agency, and
reconciled on an annual basis. See attached sample calculation of joint sharing formula,
Exhibit E.
(c) Water Use for Irrioation
Agency shall pay the monthly cost of irrigating the common landscaped area,
said cost to be calculated by applying the per cubic foot charge on Agency's water bill to
the number of irrigation devices multiplied by the gallon per minute ratings, and the
number of minutes scheduled during each month. The total yearly charges will be
shared equally by Tiburcn and Agency, with Tiburon's portion being reimbursed to
Agency. See attached sample calculation of joint sharing formula, Exhibit E.
3. Resconsibilitv of Maintenance Generallv
Each owner is to keep, maintain, repair and restore its parcel, excepting such
portion thereof as may be within the common area, and the improvements, landscaping
and paving thereon in a sound, safe, clean and attractive condition. Each owner shall
also keep, maintain, repair and restore its parcel and the improvements, landscaping
and paving thereon in compliance with all valid laws, ordinances, and regulations of any
governmental entity having jurisdiction over the parcel. The combined owners shall not
be respcnsible for maintenance and repair of the common area arising out of or caused
by the willful or negligem act or neglect of a party, its guests, tenants or business
invitees.
4. Maintenance of Librarl Buildino and LandscaDe
Tiburcn shall provide landscepe services and maintenance services to the
Agency as described in Exhibit C. Charges shall be credited by the Agency against the
moneys owed by Tiburcn to Agency as described in Paragraph 1 (c), as part of the
annual accounting, as provided for in this agreement. Tiburon shall provide the services
referred to herein promptly upon request for same by Agency. Tiburon's estimated costs
that will be charged to the Library for the fiscal year 1998-99 are $6,700 for the services
detailed in Exhibit C attached (Maintenance of Library Building and Landscape).
5. Accountino
There shall be a yearly accounting of all costs, prepared at the end of each fiscal
year (June 30) by Tiburon and Agency showing the above charges and resulting in an
adjusted credit figure fcr the start of the following year. When the credit is exhausted, an
BTlA!Town rJf Tiburon maint. agreement
CEJ13198
Page 20f3
amendment to the agreement between the Town and Agency shall be written to cover
joint expenditures and any additional services that Tiburon may provide to the Ubrary.
6. Parkino Lot Insurance
The parties intend to share responsibility for the parking lot on an equal basis.
Exhibit D defines the responsibility of the signatories with regard to insurance
deductibles and claims in excess thereof.
7. Termination Clause
If either party to this Agreement shall fail to fulfill its obligations in a timely and
proper manner, or in the event that any of the provisions or stipulations of this
Agreement are violated by either party to this Agreement, either party reserves the right
to terminate this Agreement with thirty (30) days written notice. Any remaining financial
obligations will be calculated and resolved at that time.
Dated this
day of
,1998.
Town of Tiburon
Belvedere- Tiburon Library Agency
Ann R. Danforth, Town Attorney
BTlAiTown of Tiburon maint. agreement
ca/13~
Page3of3
<n
J-
'"
..,
::>
..,
>
~ 0 '"
];j ~g::5
! Vi:::!e-
'"
o
J-<n
uJ-
:oJ"'..,
","'"
~ 5 ~ i
~ g ~ a
U a a... is.
w[ ,
al,,;
.~,] 1~.i
~'!JII
u ~!~
~ ~ ~ Eo
~, ,
;2 1,
~ ~! iH
....,><"'e-,! i!I
_e::~c::~ .._'"
=rn~ 0 'ld
OJ <:B ~ :.i....
iu
II!!
;~'n
.;1'1
!ill!!
.IU'~
!
, .
!I j/
i' !'
g f~ ~~
~ '" ""
. -
5 I ~
_ i ~
, I f
I ! 1
.....,.". ,......
"",MnOI_
~mffi.
..;
,j;
, "'!~" i ! ljl' i
. I I;; ji t; ,I 1 il I1l 1;\. .il:
I I II Ih! 1111, I~; l!ii' j'i' llil 1111;
. i,:: ;!l' (I 'I'! Ii; Illsl hj 'i.! I~~I
') !' i! l! ilill !l i !Ii IIIH lr!11 m; In:lll
~ d'II;;II'I! ill! Ill!,. ~~:i; ;1; 'Ii. :i!l 5111'l
l ~ ~~:?- ~ ~ Ii 3 ~a!l ~ ~1: 1 .~. .
ffi ill' 1'1'1!I~l ;!11 i "Ii ~l!!; 1,;" illl !1M!
~ : ~5 ~ : ~ ~ .;l ... .. ... , ..
+J
.....
.0
.....
.e-
X
I"iI
, ,
. ,
1 !
1 ! ,;
. .. \I ~
ij Idi1
" \ Ii. I
,. l' - r n
~ ~ ! .. 5 .. ~ ~
g;: 1 ( d ~ I
~::11'1i"
Iii
i.. J i[ ,III
."'\1 'il
I
.:', ~ ,III
. ~ III
"I, 1il , . ~ ,! I gill
'Ili \ III 'l : ~ r]t ~" II ~ Jill
'li~l \\ 1m ; ! )','\ n J!~I' I: e, 11 . . I '\
_'8 . ' ~ 11 ~ j -, r Ii ( I"l. II.'
,ill \~ q ! 1 hI! ! i i r , : jl. lWI' J _ ",1,1 I
I t, :.\''- ! , , j 8,,) " ,,' s !!( '\ 'I~\I'-' ,Ia 'I' 1\ I
l'I!! ' \J:! . ,. ~.}~ ~ ~ \J -' ~ ~ ~l, I II . ,;,1 I
I Ii I, : ',:!' '\ I li\3 !. ~',; ! I j t '1 \ I Pfijlll 'i'., .
\ \~ '. li\ \ ; .;~~' ~I '>~dc'~ "\' '\ ,\ hi, IT <I -.\
,",-,'-" \..\', , I I, c; l.\l\'/' .., " II
',,----....l. "" \C'-::;",,?,~, I.' ~ :I' / ". -'H I.
' l,~ bJ'/ -'--'r" ~.- u:.=: - ~. .... \- ,_- -r'l~l-' _\' ,
! f:' '5 ~,' i-'\. C ';t~i; . I, ^~c.:;':,rL;;:~ '-f:i ~~.~._I 'i!I,\ "\. i II \ \
.-\ I I \ ,\, egl J ; I.. . ~ 'I" I ",.. , " I '1 l'!'
! " I 1 \ --- -- \ ~ I I '1\ III I II-~ --. -_ ~2 ~
,: .', I '" Ij- ,-----~-' , ~ ..J'" ~ l 11.\ \"1'\ ., j,;;f -1'1
" ;-, - \""~ --.-, )'E" ~^ ,,\ II \' '.~'j 1. I'
l,';\\i\"'\~/E])._----,,,. \---f , i, 11\ 1I'II"l'!j~ '~g
~. if.1 I ~1 l' . ?, I; i ~ ~, 1 i\ I \ . .... \J~ C)
.>; -,'... \ \ \ "'1~ ~ _.J.-- r----1 ...' n n. ilf .' - 1\1. \ 1\ III 1: . 11: ., li
! \ l' .. 1 ' ~\ I :c~ U ~I' ll' "'f:~cl~':. l "...:_-,,1\"1 "Il \1 'il.! !
' , r:1O, .\'---, --- P .C'J. ',' K ,11'\ I
1 ,- <:~) I \\'1\' ~ I - ~' ... -4: II'!"':~~"" 1 \ III I .:tfJ
i ,i " \'-L'-',\\~~ Y31;-~h .~r-- I:-:K, '<!F;1F.' ;'~IJ\--'>;\II--I' l~\ !
EWl \.- \ \ " 'Il 1;- \ ,'C::C:j . - ': ~~I I~ " IV, '-'\ II l~ \
~~~, "~~'-"- ~"":;?)~!fl-~--; "~(w'{/ '!fTi III",! I ~ \ j~ II
') \'i ',\r:\\;. :--1--: . .tH~;)1 Hih!,. Il\~j ~+- '~~ r '
\ \i I 1'-\\1 I,.! {l\l ~---- - J!lh'l IiI q'. [" L' :~I\ ~il
')\ ~ i -'l',\\ ~ l' \H . "~(. !J~ '}l'i\.t"'H \ \\ '
',\ 1:1', , \\ ,~;l ::2] ,.q1'.11 Iii: 1--' rl \" I '1111, \ \';\
' III " r>) I I II I I" ,
I { I \ I II {~ -... ,; . .. . L 'I
\,y ",I,'., ~---""I.' ~,I III ,1'1
\\.' ".\.\"\ '\~ '~':." .c..:/_,......II II" '\' . '.i,
I ' '. "\' 'I"-'" I.---"~\';:. ... bj II : , ~f\..
\'" " . \ '.;/ \ l ,"', .-' i I' '\ ' 'I ,_ ~ '.
i . . ...~'.\.. ", I\,'\\>J.,. ':\....d:--:,.'. ' ' '.. ),:/.','1. I I. II 1F'l'. .i\ : !
'. r '\' II '~;.', Q r: ,," \ ".. ."'./1.,'" :l '.1' I: ! ".\ \
~.. I \",. ;.!-.:>\' I [."'Ii :r 'I' "I'
/ \ ,'.\ :) ;. '",",1, 11 ','
'. \ \ ,\" \ 'f--;.N " II. II ' II
,'.\ \\\ I" :G' '" 'll!--'''nt"--I.l:-
\ \\1,,, ':. ~-~rr::AJ.~/ JI: 11 I ,
'I'
"I
,
,
.1
19
'1
i.
1, ,j l.
~ 11'1 ~ ~
I'(!' "
. I, ,'!"
'II I
m II! ill! :!
~ i!i II! lP:
i Ij.' !,11
~ ~ ~..
".'.11; !i
fl~ !1 ~i ~:;
~ ,~rl ~z :~ :~
I
. " i
Z\. ,
~: J I
III i
!i
I'
,1
C.ern conant
Estimated Consrruc~jon C~s;:s
Rcugh Grading
C::nstruct Serm @ Bike .::lath
Berlind L:b. & ?arxu-:g
Storm Drainage
PVC Pi~e
Cate;, Basins
Street iie.ln
Sewer System
Street Tie-In
?3vlng
St~iplng
Cc;r:: & 3utter
Pavers
Cnv2way
Sellards
F:agpcle
Site Lignts
L3r:cscaplng 3. Irngar;::.-:
Streetwcrk.
Cnglnal SG::~e
:'vlicsrate's Ge~. ,qec,"':"'::1:s
1'v1icsiate's Bends. C~ 3. ~rafit
,.l,c::.:ai :hange Cr;::er WC~'<" ::.Jsts
Scec:ficatian en Fia~::::e
Sia-e'les to Future .=c'....,~:a]n
,\t1::::::ify"Turn.L3ne
:.:.-:e:'" :.jge 3and S =a'/ers
C.:;iC:'", Sui:::srrate@ =a',ers
\.i::::fy ~erainil"1g 'IVai: ~ :::iL
~s:ail :-iancicao Var S:.-'cplng
"~eea ~igh(" Sign
A:::..;.2, ~e-Ceslgn Cas.s :: S.:..P
::S.":'R
Total Costs
Share of Total Costs, P~rcantage
Tiburon Town Hall Belvedere-Tiburon Library
Common Area Construction Costs
Quantitv
Library Town Hall
17500 7450;1
o 1'~
i4l
-T;l
55 ~
o ~~~i
O \~
~
'..Y:~
o"ii
6160 :r~
6160["4
335",
9'70:;:.
.... ,::)
0""
6j;
o~f1
9 >'
OJ
43S
11
1
12930
12930
630
4425
280
8
1
6
1
6.J5%
4..J.8%
Library
Unit .or Lumo Sum C"st
Town Hail
51.00
50.00
520.00
S75U.00
51,000.00
55.500.00
51.7S
50.10
515.00
$4.00
$3.50
$425.00
52. :00. 00
52.5CO.00
5-'.000.00
";":c'
o ~,
c;,,'
36.0eo.00
6.45% ,~k~ S~:3.900.50
~1r"
4.48%'_:;:; S~31,S92.08
,...
$1.00~
'iil
"i:.J.
$- --- 00 ..
0,000. ':']
.~-'~
520.00 ;j
S75u.OO ~
$0.00 t!
$0.00 'Ii;
Si.75
50.10
515.00
$4.00
50.00
$425.00
50.00
52.5ee.CO
SO.OO
50.00
$SOA07.JO
$64,303.25
Library
$17.500.00
50.00
,it:
$8,700.00
$8.2=0.00
$1,000.00
Exhibit B
Cast
Town Hail
$7,450.00
S6,666.00
$1.100.00
SO.OO
50.00
50.00
$10.780.00
$6i6.00
55.025.00
$3.720.00
$0.00
$2.550.00
50.00
522. sea. 00
SO.OO
so.oo
53.396.25
S2,8eC79
50.00 $1' 3.JO $0,00
50.00 59C2. JC 50.00
SO.OO $5,07~_JC SO.OO
50.00 S=~.;......C 50_00
52.:32.80 $. - -., ~C S2.532.00
I";,";
SO.VO Sl.i~~JC SO,GO
SO.GO 54.5;;' ~o 50.00
SC.CO $4C:.JC so.oo
5C~0 S8,6':'.':0 SO,OO
$172.527 S69.716 32..l2.2J,3
71.22% 28.78%
55.500.00
$22.62750
$1,293.00
$9,J.5C,OO
$17.700.00
$98C.00
$3,400.00
$2, SeG. 00
$15,OCO.00
$4.0CC,80
F:..;:t.:~=.,~,nric:pate'.: Char;;e5
~.(::anc :>Jrt: ::;Jts S :ii'Je-;n
Sf-'AREDS Licdate-:: 7-23.37
o
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
o Si13.00
0" 5902.00
o t 35,079.00
o :, 5582.00
1 3'3.311.00
1 S', i i700
o 5"581.00
o s..tOO.OO
O'
o
5;;5"'00
se.GO
so.co
C.:nversicn Mar:a~ement .~sscc:ates, Inc.
$6,OCO..JO
S7.SE'! ,58
$S,9C8.77
SC.:C
5000
7/221'::7
M. Si":er:"lJJ
Exhibit C
Maintenance of Library Building and Landscape
1. All building and landscape maintenance will be perfonned on a time and materials
basis. The hourly rate will vary depending on the Public Works personnel involved.
2. Estimated time for regular maintenance and repair does not include special
projects
3. The Public Works Department shall provide services to maintain, repair, replace,
install and improve the building and its systems in a first class manner equal to the
highest standard of urban, mixed use office and retail developments, and in any
event, in a condition consistent with the quality of construction, maintenance and
repair as of the date of the agreement, reasonable wear and tear expected.
4. A daily log will be kept by the Public Works Department, recording personnel and
time spent, work perfonned, and materials used.
5. The library Director will meet monthly with the Town Manager and the Public Works
Superintendent to review and approve the log report.
6. The Town Manager and library Director will review bi-annually the costs and
remaining balance.
Building Maintenance
1. On a weekly basis, usually every Monday, the Tiburon Public Works Department
will inspect the library building and premises and register on the library log/checklist,
noting any specific problems or deficiencies. Estimated time for this inspection
walk-through and minor repairs/maintenance is 1.5 hours per week.
2. The library Director or representative will post work that needs to be dcne and the
Superintendent will perfonn or discuss as appropriate.
3. The Public Works Department shall perfonn maintenance and repair on the
building's systems, including mechanical, electrical, plumbing, irrigation and lighting.
The personnel shall also perfonn routine repairs on the building exteriors, interiors,
walkways, sidewalk and planters.
4. The Public Works Department will also be available to respond to unscheduled
service requests for maintenance work as required. The Public Works Department
perscnnel shall respond within a reasonable period of time to perfonn the work or
advise the library Director as to what course of action should be taken.
5. The library will provide the Public Works Department a list of service providers for
the facility.
6. The Public Works Department will provide a list of local contacts in case of
emergency and the Public Works staff is unavailable
Landscape Maintenance
I. Landscape maintenance will be perfcnned on a weekly basis, usually on MondayS,
by the Assistant Superintendent of the Public Works Department.
2. Weekly landscape maintenance will include inspection, weeding, trash pickup, and
general maintenance. Estimated time for weekly maintenance will average 2.5
hours a week annually, adjusted on a seasonal basis
3. Other landscape services - planting, removing trees - will be done on an as
needed basis and will be discussed with and authorized by the library Director in
advance.
BiLAlTown of Tiburan maint. agr~ment.
08/13198
Exhibit 0
Parking Lot Insurance
The following represents the understanding of the parties to the Agreement of the
responsibilities of the parties under two examples, Qne involving a claim under
$50,000 and the other involving a claim over $50,000.
Claim disposed of for $50,000:
Tiburon - $25,000 - All within deductible. No insurance payment.
Library - $25,000 - All within deductible. No insurance payment.
Claim disposed of for $100,000:
Tiburon - $50,000 - All within deductible. No insurance payment.
Library - $50,000 - $25,000 within deductible. $25,000 paid by insurer.
BTlAJ1'own of Tiburon maint. agreement
CS/13J98
Exhibit E
Utility Cost Sharing Formulas
Electrical:
Six light standards are dedicated to par:~ing lot lighting. Those contain one 50-
watt lamp. The fixtures are turned on an average of four hours a night. The
average electrical charge is 11.1-cents/kilowatt hour (fiscal year '98) which is
subject to annual review and adjustment. The pro-rata share is thererore:
50 (watts) x 4 (hours) x 6 (fixtures) -:- 1,000 = 1.20 (kilowatt hours)
1.20 x 11.1 (cents/kilowatt hour) = 13.32 (cents) per day
13.32 x 365 (days per year) = $48.62 r:er year
Irrigation Water:
The total square footage area or landscaping which is irrigated by the Library is
approximately 12,030 square feet, of wnich 3,455 square feet is directly related
to parking. This equates to approximately 29% of the irrigated area. The water
consumption as measured by the new irrigation meter will be used to develop a
total annual cost for irrigation, as determined by multiplying the number of gallons
consumed by the cost/gallon of a typical water bill from MMWD, which will then
be split 71 % for Library irrigation and 29% shared area irrigation. The shared
area irrigation cost will then be divided amongst the parties.
B7WVTown of Tiburon maint agreement
C8113198
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
August 14, 1998
ROBERT L. KLEINERT, TOWN lVlANAGER
RICHARD STRA..c'lZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FISCAL YEAR 1997/98 COSTS
TO BE RECHARGED TO THE PENINSULA LIBRARY, ACCORDING TO THE
SERVICE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWN AND LIBRARY
,
":-;:,/o!""r/Q .z
~~v~
10~.. 0..
_!~'~_,?,_. ',' .'i:\,...._
~ tr;,' ~ .,: <_, _,"~~! )
\~;:L~_ '>"i \~~::j~~:/
~"'o".;"~;':ofi~":':"..
.,
TOWN OF TIBURON
MEMORANDUM
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the service agreement between the Town and the Library Agency, the Town is permitted
to recharge certain time and materials costs to the Library. The Pubic Works Department has submitted
memoranda wherein data concerning billable Department hours and appropriate supplies and materials costs
is provided.
Finance Department review of the docwnents show that the Library Agency should be recharged for Town
costs, as follows:
1. Billable labor hours
1997, July to December
1998, January to June
70.00 hours
62.50 hours
$ 2,108
$ 1,964
2. Supplies & Materials
Air system filters
Light fixture replacement
$ 230
$ 4
3. Construction
Driveway Entrance Modification
(50% of cost shared)
$ 3,445
TOTAL COST RECHARGE;
$ 7,751
ATTACHMENTS
1. Finance Department calculation oflaborhours recharge, 12997, 1998
2. Public Works memoranda, June 1998, July 1998
---~
R S tranzl
Service. for the Peninsula Library
Tiburon Public Works Department
1997 Billable Hours
Assistant
Superintendent Superintendent Foreman Maintenance 2 Maintenance I TOTALS
Labor Rate (hourly $35.86 $28.80 $27.25 $21.98 $21.69
1997 HOURS 6.00 6.00
July 1997 to
December 1997 1.00
1.00
1.00
2.50 1.00
1.00
0.50
2.00
1.50 1.00
0.50
3.50
2.00 1.00
1.00 2.50
1.00 1.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 2.00 2.00
1.00
1.00
3.00 3.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
I 1.00 1.00
!
0.50
I 1.00
! 1.00
,
,
I
I Total Labor Hours 27.50 21.50 8.00 8.00 5.00 70.00
ITotal Labor Costs: $986.15 $619.20 $218.00 $175.84 $108.45 $2,107.64
I
BTLACOST. WK4\08/14/98\Page-1
Service for the Peninsula Library
Tiburon Public Works Department
1998 Billable Hours
Assistant
Superintendent Superintendent Foreman Maintenance 2 Maintenance I TOTALS
Labor Rate (hourly $35.86 $28.80 $27.25 $21.98 $21.69
1998 HOURS LOa 1.00
January 1998 to 1.00 1.00
June 1998 1.00 1.00
1.00 LOa
1.00 1.00
LOa LOa
LOa LOa
LOa 1.00
LOa 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 LOa
LOa 1.00
LOa 1.00
1.00 LOa
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
LOa LOa
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0.50
2.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
Total Labor Hours 28.00 26.50 4.00 4.00 0.00 62.50
Total Labor Costs: $1,004.08 $763.20 $109.00 $87.92 $0.00 $1,964.20
BTLACOST. WK~\08114/98\Page-2
TOWN OF TIBURON
STAFF REpORT
ITEM NO. 11-"
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
TOWN COUNCIL
TOWN MANAGER
BLACKIE'S PASTURE UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT
September 16, 1998
BACKGROUND
This Rule 20A utility undergrounding project cost overrun issue is now approaching one
year of meetings, correspondence and discussions between the Town and PG&E representatives
without being resolved.
In August, the Town Council considered and rejected a proposal by PG&E for the
reallocation of costs relating to the project, and directed Staff to pursue the matter further with
PG&E and/or the PUC.
The Town Manager wrote to PG&E's CEO on August 13, with a copy to the Vice
President of Technical Services who oversees the Rule 20A programs. The purpose of this letter
was to appeal the decision by the local PG&E Rule 20A Project Management Staff concerning the
project overrun and the proposed cost reallocation.
RECOMMENDATION
As the Town has received no response from PG&E as of this date, it is recommended that
the Mayor, on behalf of the Town Council, be authorized to request in writing to the State Public
Utilities Commission for their assistance and direction concerning the Town's Rule 20A dispute
with PG&E.
RL. Kleinert
EXHIBIT
--Letter to PG&E CEO Gordon R. Smith, dated 8-13-98
TOWN OF TIBURON
.
."~O. r'"0,
.',/. .. o~"i~
:..: .:)~
~ 0",..,,, \
z
ISOS TIBURON BOULEVARD. TIBURON . CALIFORNIA 94920. (415) 435-7383
FAX (415) 435-2438
August 13, 1998
OFFICE OF THE TOWN MANAGER
Robert L Kleinert
Gordon R. Smith, CEO
Pacific Gas & Electric
77 Beale Street
Mail Code B32
San Francisco, CA 94105
SUBJECT:
TffiURON RULE 20A PROJECT - Blackie's Pasture Cost Overruns
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Town of Tiburon would like to formally appeal a recent decision by PG&E's Rule 20
Project Management Staff concerning the subject project. In essence, the Rule 20A Utility
Undergrounding Project in Tiburon along Tiburon Boulevard, between the Stewart Drive and
Jefferson Drive intersections, was originally estimated in 1996 to cost $260,000. The project was
completed in 1997 at an actual cost of $428,000, resulting in a $168,000, or 63%, cost overrun.
PG&E representatives, R.J. Colicchia, Senior Project Manager, Dsbn, Service Planning,
and M. Gaynor-Murphy, Community and Local Government Relations, have been very responsive
and cooperative in their efforts to investigate the cause of the project overrun. Through their
efforts, adjustments in the amount of $48,000 and $27,000 are being proposed for crediting the
Town's Rule 20A allocation fund balance. However, the $27,000 credit proposed to the Town
merely shifts the cost burden to certain local residents, if and when they pursue a Rule 20B utility
undergrounding project in their neighborhood. That project was part of the Town's original
estimate and provides the connection to the work along Tiburon Boulevard.
The Town's three (3) primary issues or concerns relating to this cost overrun issue are:
1) $27,412 being charged to a "future" Rule 20B project in the Stewart Drive
neighborhood which will likely scuttle the neighborhood project.
2) $93,253, or 36%, of the remaining project cost overrun being debited to the
Town's Rule 20A allocation fund balance.
3) PG&E's lack of justification to assess the Town for PG&E-generated overages
resulting from project estimating errors, mismanagement/supervision, and
construction negligence.
Letter to Gordon R. Smith
August 13, 1998
Page 2
We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you or representatives of your office to
consider this appeal. Please indicate what our next step should be to hopefully resolve this
matter.
Attached for your information and consideration is a portion of the past correspondence
and reports pertaining to the project and the Town specific concerns.
Robert L. Kleinert
Town Manager
RLK/dlc
Attachments
cc: Tiburon Town Council
Robert G. Gross, Vice President -Technical Services
Pacific Gas & Electric
123 Mission Street, Mail Code H16E
San Francisco, CA 94105
TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
MEETING:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 16, 1998 ITEM: #13
TOWN COUNCIL
RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
ANGEL ISLAND FERRY SERVICE - APPLICATION FOR INCREASE IN
PASSENGER FARES.
BACKGROUND:
This item is for Town Council approval of the Angel Island Ferry Service application for an increase
in passenger fares. The Angel Island Ferry Service has applied to the State Public Utilities
Commission for authorization to increase their service fares. Angel Island Ferry Service last applied
for, and received approval of, an increase in their fare structure in June 1987 (eleven years ago).
DISCUSSION
PROPOSED FARE INCREASE
The proposed fare increases - as described in Application Page 2, Section 4 -
are summarized in the following table:
Adult -
Child (5-11)-
Child (under 5) -
PRESENT FARES
$3.00
$2.00
Free
Round Trip
Round Trip
Round Trip
PROPOSED FARES
$4.00
$3.00
Free
Children under the age of 5 will continue to ride free. Other fares will be increased as indicated
above. It should be noted that current and proposed fares include State Park Admission ($280,500)
and Commission Fees ($58,500) which represents approximately 60% offare revenues, and are an
expense to the applicant.
The Applicants' Projected Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for 1998 (Application Appendix
4), is summarized, as follows:
Projected Revenue
Projected Expense
Project Income (Loss)
CURRENT FARES
$573,450
$614,999
($41,549)
PROPOSED FARES
$675,058
$626,118
$48,940
The Applicants show that based on current fares they will operate in deficit by $41,549 (expenditures
at 107% of revenues). Using the proposed fares it is estimated that the operation will be in surplus
by $48,940 (expenditures at 93% of revenues). The applicants base their revenue projections on a
projected ridership of 100,000 passengers. As previously noted, revenues also include Angel Island
State Park Admission Fees and Park Commission Fees, which are collected by the applicant and
passed-through to the State (the current amount, approximately $340,000, represents nearly 60% of
the revenue collected)
1
RECOMMENDATION
Town Council approve of the application of the Angel Island Ferry Service for an increase in
passenger fares, and direct Staff to take appropriate administrative actions to inform governments
agencies of this action.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Rate Application, received 9.2.98
~.-/
:--.... =---
R. Stranzl
2
RECEIVED
!SEP 2 1998
TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE
TOWN OF TIBURON
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application of )
MILTON McDONOGH, dba ANGEL ISLAND )
FERRY, for Authorization to Increase) Application
Passenger Fares. )
APPLICATION FOR INCREASE IN PASSENGER FARES
The application of MILTON McDONOGH, doing business as ANGEL
ISLAND FERRY, respectfully shows that:
1. Applicant is an individual, doing business under the
name of ANGEL ISLAND FERRY, with principal address at 1956 Centro
West, Tiburon, California 94920 and telephone at (415) 435-2131.
2. Correspondence or other communication with regard to
this application should be addressed to:
Edward J. Hegarty
LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD J. HEGARTY
P.O. Box 699
Orinda, CA 94563-0805
Tel: (925) 254-9075
FAX: )925) 254-8176
Attorney for Applicant
3. Applicant is engaged in business as a common carrier by
vessel in the transportation of passengers between Tiburon and
Angel Island under a certificate of public convenience and
necessity granted in Decision Nos. 60037, dated May 3, 1960, and
60801, dated September 27, 1960, both in Application 40945. A
copy of Applicant's certificate is attached hereto as Appendix 1.
The fares charged for the transportation of passengers are
contained in Applicant's passenger tariff Cal. P.U.C. No.1 on
file with the Commission.
4. Pursuant to Section 454 of the California Public
Utilities Code, Applicant requests authorization to increase its
per passenger fares for the Tiburon - Angel Island service it
provides as follows:
PRESENT FARES
Adult Round Trip -
Child Round Trip (5-11)
Child (under 5)
$3.00
$2.00
Free
PROPOSED FARES
$4.00
$3.00
Free
NOTE: These fares are exclusive of and in addition to admission
fees collected by applicant and paid to the California Department
of Parks and Recreation. The admission fees are currently $3.00
for adults and $2.00 for children.
Applicant's present passenger fares were approved by the
Commission pursuant to Resolution M.4742 and those fares became
effective on June 6, 1987.
5. Attached hereto a Appendix 2 is a Statement of Assets,
Liabilities and Equity of Milton S. McDonogh dba Angel Island
Ferry, a sole proprietorship.
6. Attached as Appendix 3 is a copy of Schedule C to Form
1040 of the 1997 income tax return of Milton S. McDonogh dba
Angel Island Ferry. It should be noted that the Schedule C
profit shown for 1997 does not include compensation for Mr.
McDonogh who is the owner, a licensed Captain of the passenger.
vessels used for service, and as a very active manager in the
2
operation of the business. Applicant is informed and believes,
and therefore asserts, that the present compensation for Captains
holding the same U.S. Coast Guard license as Mr. McDonogh and
operating similar vessels on San Francisco Bay exceeds $60,575.
per year. If such compensation were to be added to the cost of
Applicant's operations, the ferry business would be operating at
a loss.
7. Attached as Appendix 4 is a Projected Statement of
Revenue and Expense for the year to end December 31, 1998 at the
current and proposed passenger fares. Included in revenue for
both the current and proposed fares is approximately $280,500. in
Angel Island State Park admission fees which is collected by the
Applicant but then paid to the State as a expense item. Also
included as an expense is a projected $58,549. at current fares
and $69,668 at proposed fares as a required percentage of gross
revenue commission fee also payable to the State for the
privilege of operating the service. In Appendix 5, approximately
$60,000. has been included as compensation for Mr. McDonogh as
owner, Captain and manager of the Angel Island Ferry.
As this appendix shows, at current fares, the Angel Island
Ferry is projected to operate at a loss of $42,549. in 1998 which
equates to an operating ratio of 107%. Had the proposed fares
been in effect for the entire year of 1998, the ferry service
3
would have produced a profit of $48,940. for an operating ratio
of 93%.
8. Attached as Appendix 5 is a computation of projected
revenue for the Angel Island Ferry and showing a breakdown of
projected adult, children and bicycle revenue at both the current
and proposed fares. This appendix also shows that the additional
annual revenue projected from the fare increase is $101,608.
This is the additional revenue which is needed to operate the
Angel Island Ferry profitably.
9. Attached as Appendix 6 is a one-page showing of actual
passenger transported on the Angel Island Ferry from 1990 to 1997
and the projected passengers for 1998. This appendix also shows
the current and proposed fares, including the Angel Island State
Park admission fee which is collected as revenue from the
passengers by Applicant and then paid to the State as expense.
Finally, Appendix 6 shows the percentage commission amounts
payable to the State for the privilege of providing the service.
In addition to being served by this Applicant from Tiburon,
Angel Island State Park is also served by other passenger vessel
carriers from San Francisco, Alameda/Oakland and Vallejo. The
attached Appendix 7 shows the current fares from these other
points, all of which are significantly higher than the fares
proposed by this application.
4
10. Commission rules which became effective on January I,
1998 require a "scoping memo" with a concise summary of the
issues the Commission is being asked to resolve and including (1)
category, (2) need for hearing, (3) issues, and (4) estimated
schedule. It is the purpose of this paragraph to provide that
information.
This is a Ratesettinq proceeding in which the Commission is
being asked to set rates for this Applicant on a cost-of-service
basis with a Section 454 showing of justification.
Hearinqs on this application are not believed to be
necessary. It has been over ten years since fares for
Applicant's Angel Island Ferry Service have been increased.
Unless the fares are increased, the service will produce an
operating loss. For the same reason, public witness hearings are
not believed necessary.
The primary issues in the application are:
a. Whether Applicant has made the requisite showing in
its application that the requested fare increases are justified
to enable a Commission finding of justification as is required by
Section 454 of the Public Utilities ("PU") Code;
b. Whether good cause has been shown in the
application to allow the requested fare increases to become
effective on less than 30 days' notice to the Commission and the
5
public as the Commission is authorized to approve pursuant to
Section 491 of the PU Code; and
c. Whether the application is sufficiently complete
and clear to be granted on an ex parte basis as quickly as
possible to avoid operating losses.
While Applicant does not anticipate need for hearings,
should the Commission decide hearings are necessary, Applicant
requests a Commission decision as quickly as possible and
completes the Schedule section of the "scoping memo" as follows:
Prehearinq Conference - 40 days after date of notice of the
application in the Daily Calendar;
Hearinqs - 30 days after prehearing conference;
Submission - At the completion of any hearing;
Proposed Decision - 30 days after submission; and
Final Decision - First Commission agenda after any comments
and replies to a Proposed Decision.
11. In accordance with the requirements of Rule 24 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a copy of this
application has been mailed to the following parties concurrently
with its filing with the Commission:
Clerk, Town of Tiburon
1605 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, CA 94920
Department of Parks and
Recreation
Marin District
7665 Redwood Blvd. * 150
Novato, CA 94945
6
County Clerk
Marin County
Civic Center
San Rafael, CA 94903
Robert Kleinert
Town Manager
Town of Tiburon
1605 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, CA 94920
County Counsel
Marin County
Civic Center
San Rafael, CA 94903
12. It can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the fare increase requested herein will have any
adverse effect on the environment.
13. Short notice authority of five days is requested under
Section 491 of the PU Code so that the proposed rates can be
published as soon as possible upon authorization.
14. Applicant has verified the information contained in
this application and it is believed the facts are set forth with
sufficient detail and clarity so that the application may be
granted on an ex parte basis. If additional information should
be required, it will be submitted in verified form.
WHEREFORE, Applicant prays that the Commission issue its ex
parte order,
1. Authorizing Applicant to increase its rates as herein
proposed;
2. Authorizing Applicant to make such increased rates
effective on short notice to the Commission and the public; and
7
3. For such other and further relief which is just and
proper.
_ LA...
Dated this)1rday of August, 1998 at Tiburon, California.
%!- ~Q f
By: I /~ . / '" "~A
Milton McDonogh dba'
ANGEL ISLAND FERRY
LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD J. HEGARTY
P.O. Box 699
Orinda, CA 94563-0805
(925) 254-9075
Attorney for' Applicant
8
VERIFICATION
I, Milton McDonogh, declare as follows:
That I am the Applicant in the foregoing application; that I have
read said application and that all of the statements therein are
true to the best of my knowledge and belief, except as to matter
therein stated on information and belief and as to those matters, I
believe them to be true.
I state that
the foregoing is true and correct under penalty of
~~~day of August, 1998.
perjury this
Executed at Tiburon, Cali.fornia.
-?l?~ VJt~,!
Mllton McDonogh -
.. ~'~.
"
.... .
\" 1')'
.1
:-Ji-.'\
',;' '''1
",.,j, ,t , I
. ,1,.[.' '. . "
:>:;, ~ :~::,'J r .~ ,;.,
j "J. I ;'!;. ~ "J" :',
I j~,: '41 . ' I
'I' " ti,">',:i'.' , '
,
}
"
ill-. i
I 'r".':~'I:I.)."::
.,
"
"I
'11, ",.
.; "
1
:' ,
,
, ".
"'.
" "
'j . ',,'
. ,
. ',:.;~:, ',i.
. ,.
"j"
It'
. ,
.:1
'::\'
, .
" ...;. , ~ 'r'
"I ,'j\::"; 0.1" .. ;
MILTON MCDONOGH
, "
.J'
, r' ,'.~'
Original Page I
.. >.,;.
MiltOn. McDonogh, ,by the certificate granted by the
j i'
r',,, 'j
is authorized to transport persons
,.
'r} 1\;;.(
:""
one hand, 'and Angel Island State
park'On'the other hand.
i
2.1 Milton McDonogh shall provide in his ,timetable for at
I ' .
. least /?tjIe trip per day in each direction on Saturdays, Sundays
, ' I , .'
I , .
and holidays from May I through.September 30 of each year.
. ,
3. Before applicant commences operations under the certif-
ieate herein granted, he shall procure,~nsurance issued by a
. I
company licensed to write such insurance in this state in the amount
of not less than $50,000 against liability imposed by law upon him
for the payment of damages for personal bodily injury, including
death resulting therefrom, on account of bodily injuries to, or for
the death of one person; and provide for protection in the amount
O~ not less than $500,000 against a total liability of applicant on
accounC of bodily injuries to, or death of, more than one person,
as a result of anyone accident. Applicant shall keep said
insurance in etfect during the life of this certificate.
-
Issued by California Public Utilities Commission.
Decision No. 6080.1 , Application No. 40945.
Appendix 1
MILTON S. MCDONOGH, dba
ANGEL ISLAND FERRY
A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES , EQUITY
DECEMBER 31, 1997
ASSETS
TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
BERTHING FACILITIES
LESS: ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES' OWNERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
OWNER'S EQUITY
BEGINNING CAPITAL
ADD: NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997
LESS: .WITHDRAWALS
TOTAL OWNERS' EQUITY
$ 40,525.00
*
84.825.00
125,350.00
92.875.00
TOTAL LIABILITIES & OWNERS' EQUITY
$ 248,208.00
15,814.00
10,000'-00
274,022.00
241.547.00
$ 32.475.00
$
0.00
32.475.00
$
32.475.00
* I ncludes net income not related to operation of the Angel Island Ferry- Tibu ran
service.
Appendix 2
..-..It (;
. -. t04Clt
Profit or Loss From
Business
5
OMS No. 1545-0074
- It... YrNIWy
--. ......... Setvlce 1991
......t pt.'ltOf
1501, Propriltorshipl
.. '"tnlnhipl. joint unturu, etc., must file form 1065.
....... AlIUhlll'1I1
.... Attach to Form 104001 Form 1041. .... Su Instruchons for Schedule C (Form 10401. S.qUIIIU "0. 09
SociJI ucurity number ISSNJ
H
A Principaf bwsiness or profession. including product Of service Isee page C-lJ .
P R
1997
I Enter principal business code
(see plgl C-61 ~
D Employ., ID number fEINJ, it Iny
C Business Mme. If no seplflte business n.me, leave blenk..
Business address (include suite or loom no.) ....
E City, town. or post office. st.te. and ZIP code
PO BOX 901
=~~~~~~~=~~=~{~~~==============================
F Accounting method: 111[iJ Cosh (210 AccruI' 131 0 Other (specify) ~
G Did you "materi,lIy participate" in the operation of this business during 19977 If "No," see page C-2 fa; iimit~;I;s~e; - - - - - - - ooy;.- tJ No _.
H If you started or acquired this business during 1997. check here. ................ ..................._....... .....:::::::::::::............... 0
Income
1
Gross receipts or slles.C.ution: If this income WaS reported to vou on Form W-2and the "Statutory
employee" box on th.t form WaS checked, see page C-2 and check here
Returns and .1Iow..ces
2
3
4
5
.
7
Subtract line 2 from line 1 .................. ....... ...................... ................................
Cost a' goods sold (from line 42 on plgo 2) ..................... ... ...............................................
Grall profit. Subtnct line 4 from line 3 ........................ ............. . .................................. .................
Other income. inCluding Federal and state gasoline or fuel tax credit or refund (see page C-21 ..............................
GrOll incDme. Add lines 5 and 6. . . ........... ........... ....... ... ................................ ...
....................... ............... ..............
.
9
Ex enses Enter ex enses for business use of
Advertising 8
B.d debts from s.les or services
Is.. plgo C-31 9
c. Ind truck expenses (see plge C-3J 10
Commissions and fees 11
Depletion 12
22
our home only on line 30.
19 Pension and profit-Sharing plans
20 Rent or le.se: (see p.ge C-4' :
I Vehicles. tnlchinery Ind equipment ............
b Other business property
21 Repairs and m.intenance
22 Supplies (not included in Part III)
23 Tues and licenses
13 Depreciation and section 179 expense 24 Travel, meals, and entertainment
deduction {not included in Part IIll
(see plgo C-3) 13 8 050. I Trovel . ................... ...........................
14 Employee benefit programs (other b Meals and
than on line 19) .. ......... . ..... entertainment
Insurance (other than health) cEnter 50% of line 24b
subject to limit.tions
Interest: Isee page C-4J .........
I Mortgage (paid to bank.s, etc.) d Subtract line 24c from line 24b ...............
bOther ....... ....... 25 Utilities .............. ..................
17 legal and professional services.. 26 Wages (less employment credits)
18 Office ex ense 27 Other expenses (from line 48 on page 21
28 TotaleJCpenses before expenses for business use of home. Add lines 8 through 27 in columns
29 Tentative profit Uossl. Subtract line 28 from line 7
30 Expenses for business use of your home. Attach Form 8829
31 Net profit or flossl. Subtract line 30 from line 29.
· If I profit, anter on Form 1040, line 12, and ALSO on Schedule SE,line 2 {Statutory employees,
See page C-5t. Estates and trusts. enter on Form 1041, line 3.
· If I loss. you MUST go on to line 32
32 If you h.ve I loss. check the box that describes your investment in this activity (se page C-5)
· If you checked 32a. enter the loss on Form 1040,lin. 12, and ALSO on Schedul. SE, lin. 2
(sfltutory employees. see page C-5). Est.tes end trusts. enter on Form 1041. line 3.
· If you checked 32b. YOU MUST attach Form ~
For 'ap.rwork R.duction Act Notie., II. Form 1(
10
1T
12
2
15
16
~D
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
:1
19
j
i
.
24.
~
24d
25
26
27
28
29
30
All I.welt...,
Is.'flat.
h.",weI'...,
l...tII rlLt.
7~CHC I DlIlJIIR7
Appendix 3
S,hldull C IForm 10401 1997
}
}
31
32.0
32bO
Schedule C IForm 10401 1997
Iil!IiIHI G09t of Goods Sold lsee page C-51
33 Methodl,) used to
velue closing inventory: I D Cost b D Lower of cost or mark.et c [X] Other (attach explanation)
34 Was there lIny change in determining quantities. costs. or valuations between opening and closing inventory? If "Yes," attach explanation. Dyes [X]No
35 Inventory at beginning of year. If different from last yellr's closing inventory. attach explanation 35
36 Purchases less cost of items withdrawn for personal use ............... ................................... 36
37 Cost of r.bor. 00 not include salary paid to yourself ........................ 37
38 Materials and supplies .................................... ..... .... 38
39 Other costs 39
40 Add lines 35 through 39 40
41 Inventory at end of year. 41
4Z Cost of oods sold. Subtract line 41 from line 40. Enter the result here and on a e 1. line 4 42
Information on Your Vehicle. Complete this part ONLY if you are claiming car or truck expenses on line 10 and are not required to
file Form 4562 for this business.
43 When did you place your vehicle in service for business purposes? (month. day, year) ..
44 Of the total number of miles you drove your vehicle during 1997. enter the number of miles you used your vehicle for:
. Business b Commuting c Other
4S Do you (or your spousel have another vehicle available for personal use?
46 Was your vehicle available for use during off-duty hours? .....................................
47. 00 you hIVe evidence to support your deduction?
6
Paq! 2
Dyes
Dyes
Dyes
DNa
DNo
DNa
.... ............................ IIYes II No
b If "Yes." is the evidence written?
. Other Expenses. list below business exoenses not included on lines 8~ 26 or line 30.
FUEL R 038.
PUC FEES 1 034
LICEN!':E 578.
MISCELLANEOUS 3 741.
DUES 1 941.
TELEPHnNE 1 780.
PARK FEES 245 251.
CAL PARK !I, 28 528.
REST ROOM!': 300.
DRYDOCtr 8 513.
DRUG TESTING 640.
..
PUBLICATIONS 75.
P. O. BOX RENTAL 58.
ACCOUNTINCl 1 168.
UNIFORMS 1 201.
PAYROLL TAXES 9 151.
48 To hi other expenses. Enter here and on aaqe 1, line 27
I
I 48 I
311.997.
7SCHCZ l0117/S7
". , ..
MILTON McDONOGH, dba ANGEL ISLAND FERRY
PROJECTED STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENSE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
BASED ON CURRENT AND PROPOSED FERRY FARES
PROJECTED REVENUE
Ferry Revenue
PROJECTED EXPENSE
Advertising $
Drug Testing
Drydocking
State Park Admis. Fee
State Park Commission
Depreciation
Dues & Subscriptions
Fuel
Insurance
Legal & Accounting
Licenses
Repair & Maintenance
Miscellaneous
Office Supplies & Exp.
Other Supplies
Salaries-Captains & Mgr.
Salaries-Deckhands
Taxes-Payroll
PUC Fee
Taxes-Other
Telephone
Uniforms & Maintenance
Vehicle Expense
Total Expe~se
CURRENT
FERRY FARES
PROPOSED
FERRY FARES
$
573,450.
$
675,058.
10,200.
650.
8,500.
280,500.
58,549.
6,500.
2,050.
8,050
24,500.
4,700.
600.
10,500.
3,750.
3,650.
8,600.
120,000.
40,000.
14,500.
1,050.
2,600.
1,800.
1,200.
2,550.
10,200.
650.
8,500.
280,500.
69,668.
6,500.
2,050.
8,050.
24,500.
4,700.
600.
10,500.
3,750.
3,650.
8,600.
120,000.
40,000.
14,500.
1,050.
2,600.
1,800.
1,200.
2,550.
$ 614,999.
$ 626,118.
$ 48,940.
Projected (Loss)Income $ (41,549.)
Projected Operating Ratio - 107%
93%
Appendix 4
MILTON McDONOGH, dba
ANGEL ISLAND FERRY
ADDITIONAL REVENUE PROJECTED
FROM PROPOSED FARE INCREASE
COMPUTATION OF PROJECTED REVENUE
PRESENT FARES
Adult Passengers
Children Passengers
Bicycles
$463,428.
97,480.
12,542.
Total
$573,450.
PROPOSED FARES
Adult passengers
Children Passengers
Bicycles
$540,666.
121,850.
12,542.
Total
$675,058.
The revenue shown above includes Angel Island State Park
admission $3.00 per adult and $2.00 per child which admission fees are
paid to the Department of Parks and Recreation after collection.
The additional revenue projected to be generated from the
proposed fare increase on an annual basis is $101,608.00.
Appendix 5
Angel Island- Tiburon Ferry
Passengers carried:
1990 78173
1991 78,533
1992 76,970
1993 81,735
1994 88,172
1995 109,676
1996 n/a
1997 100,408
1998 100,000 (projected)
Current fare structure (Tiburon-Angel Island):
Adults
Children (5-11)
Children (under 5)
$3.00 round trip + $3.00 State Park entry fee* = $6.00
$2.00 round trip + $2.00 State Park entry fee* = $4.00
Free
Proposed fare structure ( Tiburon-Angel Island):
Adults
Children (5-11)
Children (under 5)
$4.00 round trip + $3.00 State Park entry fee* = $7.00
$3.00 round trip + $2.00 State Park entry fee* = $5.00
Free
* Angel Island State Park is also paid 9% of our first $20,000 gross per month
and 11 % of our gross per month above $20,000.
Appendix 6
Current fares charged by other carriers to Angel Island:
San Francisco-Angel Island
Adult
Junior (12-18)
Children( 5 -11 )
$7.00 round trip + $3.00 State park entry fee* = $10.00
$6.00 round trip + $3.00 State park entry fee* = $9.00
$3.50 round trip + $2.00 State park entry fee* = $5.50
Oakland! Alameda-Angel Island
Adult
Senior (62+)
Junior (12-18)
Child (5-12)
Vallejo-Angel Island
Adult
Senior
Child
$10.00 round trip + $3.00 State park entry fee* = $13.00
$6.00 round trip + $3.00 State park entry fee* = $9.00
$6.00 round trip + $3.00 State park entry fee* = $9.00
$4.00 round trip + $2.00 State park entry fee* = $6.00
$10.00 round trip + $3.00 State park entry fee* = $13.00
$6.50 round trip + $3.00 State park entry fee* = $9.50
$7.50 round trip + $2.00 State park entry fee* = $9.50
* All carriers to Angel Island other than Angel lsland- Tiburon Ferry
pay only 2% of their gross per month to Angel Island State Park.
Appendix 7
pa.c
Ik~ #-/r
planning advisory corporation
RECEiVED
AUG 3 1 1998
tom w newton, president
715 sun lane
novato, ca 94947
4158980962
fax 41 5 898 0963
PLANNING DEP'\ P~I'J' V'h.
TO'W'" no, ,'I.C.;I
I~ OF TiBUFlON
land development planning
and consulting services
August 27, 1998
Mr. Scott Anderson, Planning Director
Town of Tiburon
1155 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, CA 94920
Re: Marin County Precise Development Plan - Tiburon Bay Estates
Paradise Drive, Tiburon
AlP #058-100-09
Dear Scott:
On August 3, 1998, I submitted an application for a Precise Development Plan and Tentative Map
proposing a S-lot single-family residential development ofthe 50-acre above-referenced property.
Enclosed is a copy of the application cover letter. I call your attention to the last paragraph which
addresses the issue of annexation of the property to the Town ofTiburon. The paragraph
summarizes my client's position that the dual annexation policy does not apply to this project and
that they do not want to annex to the Town ofTiburon. I have been informed by the County
Planning Staff that pursuant to the Community Facilities element of the Marin Countywide Plan,
prior to development within the Urban Service Area, the owner of the subject property should
seek annexation to the Town of Tiburon unless the Town signifies that it does not desire to annex
the lands at this time. Furthermore, the issue regarding possible annexation of the property must
be addressed prior to the Application for a Precise Development Plan being deemed complete.
The purpose of this letter is to request a review by the Town's Land Development Committee of
my client's position that they do not wish to annex to the Town ofTiburon and that such
annexation cannot be forced because the dual annexation policy does not apply. Specifically, my
client requests that the Town signifY that it does not desire to annex the property at this time and
that the Precise Development Plan be processed through the County Planning Commission by the
Marin County Community Development Agency.
I look forward to your scheduling a meeting at your earliest convenience.
Cordially,
~~
Tom W. Newton
TWN :nf
Enclosure
~
pac
planning advisory corporation
:;;:-C;:-I\,.;:-I< ;:; 'i
"_.... ....~ ~ I
tom w newton, president
715 sun lane
novato, ca 94947
4158980962
fax 415 898 0963
. Iqqa AGG J3 P 3: 00
land development planning
and consulting services
":1'/
. ~-/ ;~~/~LC;:-~::~.!T
August 2, 1998
Mr. Scott Davidson
Planning Services Coordinator
Marin County Community Development Agency
3501 Civic Center Drive, #308
San Rafael, CA 94903 - 4157
Re: Tiburon Bay Estates - Precise Development Plan / Tentative Map
MCAP # 058-100-09'
Dear Scott:
Submitted herewith is an application for a Precise Development Plan and Tentative Map
which proposes a five lot single-family residential development entitled Tiburon Bay
Estates. This application consists of the following plans and documents:
I) ZONINGIDEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM.
2) SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM.
3) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION FORM.
4) PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN / TENTATIVE MAP PLAN SHEETS
5) PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC and GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
prepared by:
Jensen - Van Lienden Associates, Inc.
Geotecnical Engineering Consultants
6) PRELIMINARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL FEASffiILITY STUDY
prepared by:
Questa Engineering Corporation
Civil, Environmental and Water Resource Engineers
7) BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
prepared by:
Golden Bear Biostudies
Marco Waaland, Ecologist
8) CULTURAL RESOURCES IONVESTIGATION
prepared by:
David Chavez & Associates
David Chavez, Archaeologist
.
9) ACCESS ISSUES REPORT
prepared by:
George Nickelson, P.E.
10) TREEEVALUATIONREPORT
prepared by:
MacNair & Associates
Consulting Arborists and Horticulturists
11) CONCEPTUAL ARCillTECTURAL PLANS &
BUILDING SITE LOCATION PHOTO
prepared by:
Donald Henderson, Architect
12) FILING FEE - $15,475
Together with this application, I am specifically requesting a waiver of the Master Plan
requirement for the following reasons:
1. The proposed project involves a division ofland which complies with the
permitted density established by the zoning district and the Countywide Plan land use
designation;
2. The project, as proposed, would exhaust future development potential on the
subject property; and
3. Any potential issues related to division of the subject property and. future
residential development may be adequately addressed through the Precise Development
Plan and Tentative Map. . ;
This property appears to be located within the Urban Service Area and Sphere of
Influence of the Town of Tiburon which raises the issue of annexation. The duel
annexation policy would call for annexation to Tiburon if it were necessary to annex the
property to any special district for providing services. In this case the subject property is
not in a sanitary sewer district. However, the property is beyond the 400 foot distance for
mandatory sewer connection and therefore the project is proposing septic systems which
do not require annexation to the sewer district. As such, the duel annexation policy does
not apply to this I?.foject and annexation to Tiburon cannot be accomplished without the
property owners consent. The owners of the Tiburon Bay Estates project do not want to
annex to the Town of Tiburon and therefore annexation is not part of this proposal.
Cordially,
~.~
Tom W. Newton
TffiURON BAY ESTATES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This Precise Development Plan application proposes to divide a 50.3 8 acre parcel into five
single-family homesites. Three of these homesites will receive access via two private
driveways connecting to Paradise Drive. '. Lot 3 will be served by one driveway while Lots
4 and 5 will share the second driveway. Lot 2 will be accessed from the existing Teaberry
Lane while Lot 1 will be served by a private driveway off the end of T eaberry Lane. All
Lots will be served by Marin Municipal Water District water. Sewerage disposal will be
by private septic systems.
Lot sizes vary from 3.11 acres to 15.58 acres with overall density at IO,:)8 acres per
dwelling unit. Proposed building envelopes vary from 10,500 sq.ft. to 22,000 sq. ft. with
maximum home sizes ranging from 8,500 sq.ft. to 13,500 sq. ft. .
This application also proposes public trail easements as shown on the Precise
Development Plan pursuant to the Marin Countywide Plan Trails Element and Plan
Policies.
o Pi t-<
1-11::l0
P-rt
tr
10 PJ Z
f-'. '0 10
,.... '0 E3
P-'1tr
f-'. 0 (1)
::l X'1
.0 f-'.
E3
(1) Pi
::l rt
<: (1)
(1)
,....,....
o 0
'0 0
(1) Pi
rt
f-'.
o
::l
*'
I
.
I
,'1\
f-'.>-3 <:
::l 0 f-'.
1-11:;:0
O::l f-'.
'1 ::l
E3 CIl f-'.
Pirtrt
rtPi'<:
f-'.1-11
01-11:;:
::l Pi
1-11'0
'00
10'1'0
'1 '1
'0.0 (1)
0(1)'0
{lJ ::l Pi
(1) (1) '1
{lJ '1 (1)
PJ CL
0"'"
::l tr
,.... '<:
'<:
~.
D~t(
I
.
I
'tJ
'1
o
'0
(1)
'1
rt
'<:
tll
o
10
::l
CL
Pi
'1
'<:
t-<
t'l
Gl
trI
Z
o
TOWN OF TIBURON
S EVENT PERMIT
rle~# 17--
-7
DATE OF EVEN :
TIME:(Startto Finish) IIAJIo.. - 5 l' M
'-'it\-' W;V'\e.. <I- c,.hase -t",-
TYPE OF EVENT:
o-.ir
Number of People anticipated: es.-h"",,,, -k. J. pv\ 3. 0 0 +. 5 00
LOCATION: -:P0;11 -1- \;\:>\.1,0"" PI c:; cA...
l=t-o \ T;\"\),o", 'P,\vcl.
Pu+- O() 'o~: De\ellS~ S~el.s/Seue.+
NAME & ADDRESS OF INDIVIDUAL <5>-CtIO- en s "-v\ d o-+l-1e'i""" i nd~vl AAlvolv\'1-1ec-
OR SPONSORING ORGANI~TION: ~ (~e<:. ",-\\^cr.ed I ~V\d lor cl "'\.;'OVA.I)
-tv be V\ efi -\- -tv\C- b~. hG'l2(2 'i 5'?oo \?(L nEf't 10 FUND" .
Home Phone: <::II 5') ~ 3> 2. - S YQ..2 Work Phone: t T / T h) (~W) )'..(2_ - z. ,,~ ~
Fax Number: Coo(c\.illcA-l-tN"-: Lis ~ D vnC",,,,
Please describe YOUR PLAN for the following: (Attach separate sheets if necessary)
PARKING: "We- 0-9 e. C+ \'VIostly W?\ \ "'.vp +01.)( \.5T ?'\:tte",ciAV1ce
Street Blockage or Closure: yJ/-I<; . ~\Jeh.+ nY\ f'r;\}....+~ froper-l1
1'0\.-1-\0
"5i-k.
FIRST AID:
Do you anticipate using sound amplification equipment?
If so, please describe:
NO - ()f"\ \'i t^-. .$1"\01\ \0<\
f t:\ C C 0"-0.;' 0.....-'
Your Permit will be approved onlv after receipt of documentation showing that the Town of Tiburon has
been added as an additional named insured to your insurance policy for this event. This normally requires
an endorsement. A certificate showing only that you have insurance is not sufficient. Special Event
Insurance can be purchased through the Jt. Recreation Departme~~5~355, (ask for Dana Thor).
For other questions pertaining to this permit, contact Tiburon Town Clerk Diane Crane at 435-7377. You
can fax or mail your completed form to Town Hall at 435-2438, 1 05 Tiburon Blvd. 94920. Thank you.
Date 9/1.(/ '1:2. .. ~
. pplicant tlH'"'"td,i-,~)
/ 5-'~
~PP~BJ\ ~ Lt;.1.Jn:w~ o;/q/ca
Chief 0 Police I ~
9-9 -9..?
Date
Town Manager
q ~1--1!
Date
1/1/fl
ate
ffi~P~-
,. 9-4-98 ,..
lJo l-w~~ re~
bf TOUJn .
{1us if Z- pnv~ ~ M
Point Tiburon Plaza
1701 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, Calif. 94920
September 2, 1998
Alcoholic Beverage Control
50 D STreets, #400
Santa Rosa, Calif. 95404
Dear Sirs:
I hereby grant permission for the Tiburon Windsor
Winery to serve wine for tasting purposes only
at Point Tiburon Plaza for the Art & Wine
Festival Fund raiser on October 11, 1998.
I am the owner & manager of the Point Tiburon
Plaza.
Respectfully,
r:c...::..:" 0")
Stanley Cook
Owner! Manager
01il1/19?5 05:21
4154741S89
'1C1:',jA A~_ ISiJH
PAGE 01
II
FAC~[1: *.H~~ftAf~6*ll~HEET
FAX:
PHONE:
DIRECT LINE:
TO;
Di:.ln~ Cr;!n~ - TihhrCln rhv J..t:.lll ~ 4'Vi-7"Jj7
FM< TO:
435-2438
FROM.
Barh~H.a White S~ni(}r Al!l'tJllnl MaMI!~r
IlATL:
S~"t~mht!r:2 1998
THIS TRANSMITr AL CONT AINS -L PAGElS) INCLUDING THIS COYER PAGE
RF Mar,n Homes Tour - Friday. Ser',,"'he.r 18, 1998
I(),[)'l;; In. - I:()() r.m.
Ik,tr Di;uw:
(415) 474-1989
(415) 474-2266
(415) 447-&lJ2
~.
'Wt" hoWl: tx;!.;n .u.!visl:d by the Marin Foun<.lflti(ln to inform you that Mana, Allison & A:-isodatl~s ;1041 :h,: FIHlildation w111 h.
l'lIJlllu":III~J: it Mario H(lmt",~ tour (It' tive uifter~nt homes in Tihur\)l'l and Belveden~. W~ will hav~ auth~lri7..lti(ln fnllll hlHh the
TihHnln .1I1d tht': Iklv~dere PoliL~ Departments. They will have' knowledge of the hOl1le!'i WI:! will vi:.dt iUH.1 tht:.: timl.: ,..,dll:dllk"
A.... " ClluI'tc,:;y to )'ou, I ~m pnwiuing you with ~ time ~chedllle for your information,
IJk:tx~ l';,dl me if YUlI Iu.ve any tlliet'itilm~ Of ..\mc~rns_ Tllank you.
\'dl I <:llltn:s
flOME HI
H3 Rcllevu.
Rd\1cclcrC! hl...nd
';~ii'..i:~;'O:~~i,.i;:
':~l..~ 'd.:,I!!""t.,
......~~lr~"i!':K!j:;i.
J2:1~p.12,JSp
HOME 1/2
1/47 We,. Sh"re
8(dvud,,"
r ::~~n.: i h.ll1 (')lang.
IO:4S. . 11,115.
IU to Hctme Nl
i~~!~'.l;'f~l~5.~::,,:':::
!\h:l'~' Mmy .lohn~.n
ii,
! 1\.kr..; iJilV,d ()Iivll.:r
In
11:45..12:85p
12: 15p-12,351'
i\okl', htila I<~p;dl
11.1
11:1~.. 11,3~.
II ,45. - J 2,851'
tvl,'!\: Kalhll'~ll
/1": Ar"....'l<llllt
I ",.~. - 11,05.
11:15.-11:35.
HOM.: I/J
1/6 Hilarit.
Belvedere
ItOME 1/4
hiD..! t~'''utd
Tihurcln
HOME ~5
#145 Gilmtlrtin
Till,nun
11:15. - II:J5..
11:4511- 12:U5p
12:151'-12,351\
18:4511- 11,05.
1I:I~1l-11:35"
II :.5" - 12:051'
10:4~a - 11,05;,
II:I~" -lI:J~"
1U:..s~... - J I :U~:I
II :4511 . J2,U5p
12:15p-12:351'
It/: 1311 .' J1J:J5.
I
j
I
I
XX LtlJ;OMt 1lI~'d.
It VII\! dn not re\.'~jv~ all th~ i"'agc.'i, rl~a~ l~i-lll buck as soon as pnssihle. (415) 474.2266 Transmitrt'd Ry:hlw
Il~~ SUTTER STREET. SUITE 525 SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94109 (415) 474.221>6 F." (415) 474.\,l89
IZeL-e ~ hv--
w:r o/~v1'
>:"... .....1.'... .J:J'_i t.1~; .:J.~
41 ~4 ,'4J..:F:i:l
'1w,1'1'.2, LlL_l.=,J.J
i-'C;bc Ij~
TD.
;::-r:
13 ?;--h~
()U_.-(
WLle
~
((i~()
~ j;v0Vc&e(
iN-
.-/0
This" 0 nolice that we hov'e been advIsed thot there will be no lIlore than five (5) 40 foo~ 10llr bllses in Ihe
to\\ns of Belvedere and Tibllron between the hours of J 0:00 a.m. and 1 :00 pm. on Fridny. Septelllher I K. I 'J'n
They \\-'ill tnJ\..d olllhc following streets only'
Tih\lfOn BOlllcvlIrd
S~ll1 Rafocl A "'Clllle
West Shore Rond
Bench Rond
Lyford Drive
Li'lgoon Boulcvnrd
Gilmartin Drive
These live (~) IOllf huses will be condlletins n hOllse tour of 5 homes as a fundraiser 10 henelil Morin
FOllndntioll, Dnfiwood Unil
This fOlllUl;Hl()1l is more: ll1i'l1l 40 years old. It is a volunteer or~n"iZi1lion ofwomcll residing III He" l~ocrc and
T,huron. The Foundation raises funds and gives grants to !he needy elderly in Marin.
/\11 pil~SCl1gcrs on thiS home tOllr tire cOllvcmion visitors Lo the Bay Area tll1U will spend some tim..; shopping III
'tIT' Tihllr:;;;d thC!f;/::J,.jpa;/pllkr /)c)~ot1/
S,~n~I"rc I L 4- A4
J....f. TOM ~ IC/..LO
Dale _ ~'1k
o
UW f"t.-y./ A<-.rr
C I TV lO ~ 13 ~L.c.A€ KJI5:,eE'
Tille:
-7
Signature
DIlle: _'__._
Till.
.200 Pine Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 981-6600
Fax (415) 981-6408
. http://www.bayareacouncil.org
. EXECl:TrVE COMMITIEE
Chairman
T. GARY ROGERS
Ct.~im"\ll 11.: ,.:EO
D'~H'r-, (;"",,11,... Crc',ull II"
GILBERT ~'. .un:uo
Immedialc P",[(:,hainn~!l
8.\\'_\rea COllneil
MARY G. F. BITTERMAN
Pre_,iet..,,! ,,,CEIl
KQED, r"c
STEVEN A. BtiRD
Pre_,idell! &CEO
Sakwal'lnr
DAVID A. COLLTER
Chairm'lll ",CE()
Ba"k.-\mnira Corporal.lon
KE:>oINETH T. DERR
Chairm;lIO ,\.; CEO
Che\'ron (':',rpo..."i""
DO"l'AU) G. FISHER
Chairman
(;_\P_Ir"
TED W. lLU.L
Dirnto,
\-1(K;n,,"\ ",Con'I'''"\', r,"
JAY T, HARRIS
Cha,rmall and Pllhlishe!
SdnJo'~ \-lenHr, \iew,
PAL'L HAZEN
Chairmall.ioC!::<l
WdL, Fargo R.",~
K. :\-f1CHAEL HL..,SHAW
Pr~"d"nT
Lo,-khct'd '>Iani" \-li"il,.,.iL Sp"re
FRANK C. HERRINGER
ChairnLllL ," CEll
rr'\Il'arn.'ri,-a Corpol-al;"l'
RICHARD A. KASHNOW
Ch;\irrnall, CI::O ,md PIT,j,kllt
R.,\',-lwm(:"rp"Luioll
DAVID M. LAWRENCE, .'d.D.
(:hainnan.'t:{:E(l
Kil"crF'H""btic.", H,,;.lilh Plan
A.\1Y McCOMBS
Prnidcnt.'-' CEO
Chronic-I<- !\]'fl,,,k,,,till~( ')jllP'lll\
J. TRACY O'ROl'RKE
Chainn"n.<.: C[()
\'al'iall.L,,()('i~h". Ine
ROBERT T. PARRY
1',(',id"llt,\.;:lTl)
F,'d..,.~1 R,'""y<, fI.i1lk "I
S'lllFr,-""",.tl
PHILIP J. Ql~ICLEY
Cln,...CLlif.llll",w"R. ""dtahk
SflCCQmlllllll,,;<llOOS
:"<ELSO~ C. RISING
Preside1l! ,'-'CEO
Catt'llu.'P'"I'c!nprlleml:, I'llOr;l:ton
STEPHE:'oi C. SClIOTT
\-LlII;ll.;inliPannn.()a~L,ndYs
I'I'"",-I("lll (.i\;ninll.'-.-\W.li"-j Hom,.,
CORDaro.; R. SMITH
I'r<.,id"",.\: C!::(l
r~cili,- {;." ~I"l FI,,,'(]';, 1 ,,(1\1"''''
G. CRAIG Sl'tUVAN
Chairm~ll ,\.;: eEl)
n".u",-"xC"n'l"lIW
E"Ofl1ci.)
SIJ~NE WRICHT McPL-\K
l'r~sld""1 ,{; CEO
!\~\' .\f<'" (:()LL<,,'il
. Founded HI '9-1-5. ih, Ha~ ..1,," (:aunt'll
is " b,,,in"'-'P""SII,,d Qr~""'JlliDn
Ih<l/(l(I5'mpubli(p",/iry i.'.'"(:\'4ftrlin,~
Ih, ,,"onQmv and'lu<lill)'Qfbji <nth.
Bav.lrea. /:Ire CJUn,ilal", ':0 'f,on.wn
Ih,&,,'..lrr.-" f:",,,,,,,,,":Fo,",,,
BAY AREA ~COUNaL
I/3t- # /1
September 10, 1998
Mr. Robert 1. Kleinert
Town Manager
Town of Tiburon
Town Hall
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
REcelveo
SEP 1 I 1998
TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE
TOWN OF T1BURON
Dear Mr. Kleinert:
We recently sent you and your Town Council a packet of information
regarding Smart Communities and the Telecommunications Infrastructure
Partnership (TIP). The correspondence encouraged your jurisdiction to take
the lead in becoming a "Smart Community" by adopting the enclosed model
resolution (or a similar document) and completing the Progress Report.
We are writing now to ask your cooperation especially in completing the
Progress Report. Enclosed for your convenience is another copy and a return
envelope. We ask that you personally complete the Progress Report as the
formal response from your community.
The Progress Reports from all the local jurisdictions in the region will
provide an overview of the Bay Area as a whole. This information will also
be reported at the Bay Area Summit on Friday, December II, 1998 during the
5th Annual Cities of the Future Conference in San Francisco (please note the
change of date for the Summit from December 10 to December II).
We also will share the results of the Progress Reports with state officials_
And, we are pleased to share with you that there is a growing list (see enclosed)
of Smart Communities champions among the Bay Area delegation.
Thank you for taking the time to complete the Progress Report. We appreciate
your cooperation and look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
~
Sunne Wright McPeak
President & CEO
vs
enclosures
RESOLUTION FOR COLLABORATIVE DEVELOPMENT AND RAPID
DEPLOYMENT OF ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS
INFRASTRUCTURE
FOR TilE PURPOSE OF ACHIEVING ACCELERATED DEPLOYMENT or ADVANCED
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE AND APPLICATIONS TO BENEFIT THE
COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE. IT WILL BE THE POLlCY or THE <CITY/COUNTY
NAME'> TO PURSUE COLLABORATIVE PLANNING AMONG ALL STAKEHOLDERS
TO STRENGTHEN THE LINKAGES AMONG GOVERNMENT, SCHOOLS, LIBRARIES,
COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS AND THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY,
ENI lANCE AND COORDINATE PUBLIClPRIV ATE PARTNERSHIPS, AND TO SUPPORT
A CITYWIDE AND COUN1YWIDE PROCESS OF lNI'RASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT TO PRODUCE THE BEST BUSINESS, EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATIONAL,
CULTURAL, HEALTH AND ENRICHMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
WHEREAS, the environment for community life in virtually every dimension is being shaped,
reshaped and molded by the development and deployment of advanced communications and
information technologies of the digital age; and
WHEREAS, advanced technologies have the capacity 10 enhance the well-being of everyone,
empowering "marginalized" communities and people with disabilities, while providing more
equitable opportunities for the community-at-large; and
WHEREAS, it is the proper role oflhe <CITY/COUNTY NAME.> to facilitate the provision of
infrastructure and to ensure access to that infrastructure by businesses, schools, libraries,
community organizations and all citizens equally, and
WHEREAS, collaborative policy-making involving both our public and private sectors in a
structured process for defining needs and negotiating the availability of public resources is the
most effeclive tool for decision-making at the local and regional level, and
WHEREAS, The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has expanded the range of
telecommunications service options available to businesses and communities, and
WHEREAS, the effective use of information infrastructure makes companies more competitive,
improves delivery of government services, and promotes growth in jobs and job readiness which
are tied to knowledge of the new information tools, access to high bandwidth networks and a
technology rich environment, and
WHEREAS, the Bay Area is leading the nation in the development and use of advanced
information infrastructure technologies providing a unique resource of expertise, experience and
tools, but 'there is a danger of becoming less attra,::tive to business and citizens over time if the
infrastructure fails to meet the requirements of our changing society, and
WHEREAS, community connectivity is the key to access to community information and
delivery of government services in the coming decades, and
WlIEREAS, Federal and State government have initiated programs to help schools, libraries and
public hea1Lh facilities install and operate advanced information infrastructure and it is
incumbent upon the community to provide free and equal access to knowledge and infonnation
tools through schools, libraries and other public service agencies, and
WHEREAS, the <CITY/COUNTY NAME.> seeks to encourage the community, policy makers
and leaders 10 create useful applications and replicable models of the emerging technologies to
enhance and improve the well being of the community and its citizens, now therefore be it
RESOL VED. That it will be the policy of the <CITY/COUNTY NAME.> to pursue
collaborative planning for the development of advanced telecommunications infrastructure
between and among all the stakeholders including business, government, schools, libraries and
community based organizations and undertake an initiative to assess needs and develop goals for
the purpose of creating advanced telecommunications infrastructure and applications to benefit
the community as a whole.
Nole: <CITYICOUNTY NAME*> Ihnmrhout Ihis document wiff be repfllced by the nllnlt of tile city or COllllty jurisdiction.
Tt'/eco>"""miclII!onS !nfmslmclure PlIrlrlership (TIP),'
do I.i,tdn Perry. TIP Project M(/1Il/ger
1201 !hvm/wn)',Sw'leJOJ
O"k/mu( ell 946/1
Ph: (5/0)618-8330
F(IT' (JfO)618.IIJJ8
Eutflil blldclll@l}f!(lcatorg
IJ'ebs!le: Itflp.-lkl!d"'_cll_go~/lmdcall J Slip. ',1m
Tiburon Redevelopment Agency
Staff Report
Meeting:
To:
September 16,1998 Item: tfJA #l,A. & 1.B.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
ANNUAL REPORT OF TlBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
l.a. Financial Report for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 1998
l.b. Accept Audited Financial Statements, Fiscal Year 1996-97
From:
Subject:
BACKGROUND:
The Tiburon Redevelopment Agency regularly schedules its Annual Meeting in September. The primary
purposes of this meeting are:
(1) To provide updated information concerning the fmancial status of the Agency for the fiscal year most
recently completed (June 30, 1998), and
(2) To accept audited fmancial statements for fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 (previously submitted to
Town Council)
The Agency's fmancial assets, liabilities, and fund equity are allocated in accordance with the purposes of the
Agency as described in the Fiscal Agreement, and the requirements of state community redevelopment laws. The
following sections include fmancial statements and narrative information concerning the resources of the
Agency's General and Housing Set-Aside Funds, as well as summaIy information concerning tax increment
allocations to the Agency and debt service payments due to the Point Tiburon Community Facilities District..
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:
l.a. Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1998
Board of Directors accept report.
l.b. Audited Financial Statements, Fiscal Year 1996-97.
Board of Directors accept previously submitted audited financial statements of the Agency. for the
fiscalyearendedJune 30,1997.
I
SECTION 1.A.
FINANCIAL REPORT, FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,1997
1.A.1. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GENERAL FUND
This fund is used to account for those fInancial resources which are used for regular operating expenses of the
Agency, and to make the annual payment to the Point Tiburon Community Facilities District (CFD) for debt
service on the improvement bonds of the CFD.
Fund fmancia1 information for fIscal year 1997-98 is presented in the following table.
TIBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY GENERAL FUND
FY1997-98 Balance Sheet
Statement of Assets, Liabilities
& Fund Equity
FY1997-98 Income Statement
Revenues, Expenditures &
Changes in Fund Equity
Amount
Amount
ASSETS
Cash & Investments
Tax Increment Receivable
Interest Receivable
281,808
251,250
3,784
REVENUES
Tax Increment
Interest Earnings
502,500
9,990
Total assets:
$536.842
Total revenues:
$512.490
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable
Payable to PI.. Tiburon CFD
29,176
472,500
EXPENDITURES
Administration
Financial Audit
Legal
Payment to PI. Tiburon CFD
29,176
1,450
472,500
T otalliabilities
$501.676
Total expenditures:
$503.126
FUND EQUITY
Unreserved and undesignated
Reserved for affordable housing
$35 166
FUND EQUITY
Opening, July I, 1997
Closing, June 30, 1998
$25.802
$35 166
The Fund began the fiscal year with available fund equity of $25,802 and ends the fIscal year with available fund
equity of$35,166. The Agency received an allocation of $502,500 in tax increment revenue from the County,
and subsequently made a full payment of $472,500 to the PI. Tiburon CFD. Regular operating costs totaled
$30,626, and were associated with administration and the annual fmancial audit
2
l.A_2. REDEVELOPMENT HOUSING SET-ASIDE FUND
This fund is used to account for tax increment revenues which are to be used for low & moderate, or affordable,
housing. Twenty percent (20%) of total tax increment revenue collected is designated for affordable housing
purposes.
Fund financial information for fiscal year 1997-98 is presented in the following table.
TIBURON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HOUSING SET-ASIDE FUND
FY1997-98 Balance Sheet FY1997-98 Income Statement
Statement of Assets, Liabilities Revenues, Expenditures &
& Fund Equity Changes in Fund Equity
Amount Amount
ASSETS REVENUES
Cash & Investments 2,170 Tax Increment 157,274
Tax Increment Receivable 67,998 Interest Earnings 24,810
Loan Receivable 669,543 From EAR, Loan Rebate 81,979
Interest Receivable 5,569 Advance from Town 825,000
Total assets: $745,280 Total revenues: $1.089.063
LIABILITIES EXPENDITURES
Accounts Payable 7,662 Administration 7,662
Special Deposit EAH 15,000 Financial Audit 3,510
Legal 25,339
TEA/Hi1arita Project
Purchase Ned's Way Site 1,400,000
Neds Way Project 4,295
T otalliabi1ities $22,662 Total expenditures: $1,440,806
FUND EQUITY FUND EQUITY
Reserved for Loan Receivable $669,543 Opening, July I, 1997 $404,818
Reserved for affordable housing $53_075 Closing, June 30, 1998 $53 075
The Housing Set-Aside Flll1d began fiscal year 1997-98 with total fund equity of $404,818. On Jlll1e 30, 1998
total fund equity was $53,075. During the fiscal year the Agency received an allocation of $157,274 in tax
increment set-aside revenue from the County, and the fund earned $24,810 in investment earnings.. Regular
operating costs totaled $36,511, and were associated with administration, the annual financial audit, and special
redevelopment legal counsel costs.
The Agency authorized and incurred expenditures associated with initial study and predeve10pment planning costs
of the proposed Ned's Way Senior Housing Project ($4,295 expended). The Agency received an advance of
$825,000 form the Town Housing and General Unallocated Funds, and spent $1.4 million to acquire the Ned's
Way site for senior housing purposes.
3
1.A.3. TAX INCREMENT REVENUES ALLOCATED. 1996-97
During 1996-97 the County collected $783,675 in tax increment revenue from the Tiburon Redevelopment
Agency area. These monies were allocated to the Agency and other taxing entities as specified in the Fiscal
Agreement, and as estimated in the following table:
ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT REVENUE ALLOCATION, FY1997-98
Amount ~ % of Total
Tiburon Redevelopment Agency
General Increment 502,500 64.3%
Housing Set-Aside 157,275 20.1%
Total Agency: $659,775 84.4%
Annual Assistance to Taxing Entities
County General 40,114
County Tax Collection Fees 14,170
Community College District 8,533
County School Fund 2,927
Reed School District 20,500
T amalpais School District 16,039
Tiburon Fire District 13,879
Tiburon Sanitary District 6,016
Total Assistance: $122,178 15.6%
TOTAL ALLOCA nON: $781,953 100.0%
l.A.4. DEBT SERVICE FA YMENT TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICf
According to the Fiscal Agreement, the Agency is required to pay a maximum of $7,087,500 to the Pt., Tiburon
Community Facilities District. All of the fiscal year just ended, the Agency has paid $5,290,137 to the District-
a total of$I,797,363 remains owed to the District. Assuming sufficient annual tax increment proceeds, annual
debt service payments will be made through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002.
1.A.5. TAX INCREMENT REVENUE LIMIT .
The Fiscal Agreement provides that the Agency will receive tax increment revenue until a total of $7,687,500
is allocated to the Agency's General Tax Increment Fund At the close of fiscal year 1997-98 the Agency General
Fund has received a clunulative total of $5,795,849 - a total of$I,891,651 remains to be allocated from July 1,
1998 forward. It is estimated that the Agency will reach the general tax increment revenue limit during fiscal year
2001-02.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Board of Directors accept the 1998 Annual Report of the Tiburon Redevelopment Agency.
4
SECTION 1.B.
ACCEPT AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR 1996-97
- ~." ...
BACKGROUND:
This item is to accept the audited financial statements of the Agency, for Fiscal Year 1996-97, which were
previously submitted to Council at the meeting of August 19.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Board of Directors accept previously submitted audited financial statements of the Agency, for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1997.
by: R. Stranz!, Finance Director
5