The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTC Agd Pkt 2000-04-19 /ti1r1Er{ TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA - REGULAR MEETING TOWN OF TIBURON 1505 TIBURON BLVD. MEETING DATE: MEETING TIME: CLOSED SESSION: April 19, 2000 7:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M PLEASE NOTE: In order to give all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, and to ensure the presentation of all points of view, members of the audience should: (1) Always Address the Chair; (2) State Name and Address; (3) State Views Succinctly; (4) Limit Presentations to 3 minutes; (5) Speak Directly into Microphone. A. ROLL CALL B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ACTION (If any) C. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Please confine your comments during this portion of the agenda to matters not already on this agenda. other than items on the Consent Calendar. The public will be given an opportunity to speak on each agenda item at the time it is called. Presentations are limited to three (3) minutes. Matters requiring action will be referred to the appropriate Commission, Board. Committee or Staff for consideration and/or placed on a future meeting agenda. D. RECOGNITION OF PAST TOWN BOARD, COMMISSION, AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS . BUILDING ADVISORY COl\1MITTEE I POLICE STATION PROJECT MANAGERS - (Jim Wilson, John Kern, Mogens Bach, Bruce Ross, John Hoffmire, Tony Guzzardo) . PARKS & OPEN SPACE COl\1MISSIONERS - (Ellen Rony & Kurt Obermeyer) . DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS - (Carla Howard & Larry Doane) . PLANNING COl\1MISSIONERS - (Mohammad Sadrieh & Nancy Knoble, Lisa Klairmont) . RECYCLING COl\1MITTEE MEMBERS - (Polly Smith, John Kern, Romney Fennell, Dan Harris, Ray Truman) . MARIN COl\1MISSION ON AGING - (Tiburon Representative Jim Rice) E. INTRODUCTION OF NEW TOWN EMPLOYEE . Police Sergeant Ed Pigeon F. COUNCIL, COMMISSION & COMMITTEE REPORTS G. CONSENT CALENDAR The purpose of the Consent Calendar is to group items together which generally do not require discussion and which will probably be approved by one motion unless separate action is required on a particular item. Any member of the Town Council, Town Staff, or the Public may request removal of an item for discussion. 1. 2223 & 2227 CENTRO EAST STREET (Parcel Map for Condominium Conversion; Steven & Deborah Wear, Owners; AP# 59-141-14) 2. SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (Environmental Review of Proposed Four Unit Project off Trestle Glen Blvd., Approve) 3. FY 1999-2000 THIRD QUARTER FINAICIAL REPORT (Approve) H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 4. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT & RECOMMENDATIONS a. Centro West Traffic Calming b. Reed Ranch Road/Tiburon Blvd. Intersection 5. ABAG REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS DETERMINATION (Comments) 6. GREENWOOD BEACH ROAD DRAINAGE PROJECT (Approve Funding Agreement) I. PUBLIC HEARING 7. 2024 PARADISE DRIVE - Request to Install Carport Enclosures _ AP#59-1 72-43 _ (Stan & Chong Cook, Applicants) 8. 4850,4900 & 4930 PARADISE DRIVE in the Vicinity of Ranch Road _ Paradise Drive Reorganization No. 10 - Protest Hearing for Annexation of approximately 2 acres of territory to the Town of Tiburon and Sanitary District No.2; AP Nos. 038-053-01; 038-053- 24. 038-052-05 & 038-052-08; (William Bayliss, Owner) - Resolution J. NEW BUSINESS 9. UPPER STEWART DRIVE UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - Appoint District Engineer - (Adopt Resolution) 10. TOWN MANAGER POSITION RECRUITMENT (Retain Executive Search Firm) K. COMMUNICA nONS 11. MEMORANDUM FROM LT. AIELLO TO TOWN MANAGER, dtd 4-14-00 (Grant Award) L. STAFF & TOWN MANAGER ORAL REPORTS 12. DOWNTOWN MAIN STREET llYfPROVEMENTS PROJECT (Oral Report) 13. ZELINSKY PLAZA PROJECT M. ADJOURNMENT - To April 25,2000 - Town CounciI/Heritage & Arts Commission Workshop (tentatively scheduled) Future A <zenda Item -ivIav 3, 2000 --1865 Centro West - Modification of Design Review Approval & Request for Variance for as-build deck and retaining walls -AP #59-061-37 - (Dave & Diane Williams, Applicants) DATE OF MEETING: ADri119. 2000 NO.4. 2000 DATE POSTED: ADri114. 2000 NOTICE OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR HOLDING CLOSED MEETING OF THE TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq., the Town Council will hold a Closed Session. More specific information regarding this meeting is indicated below: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Section 54957.6) H~<>... G...."'.... ~ Mc.,...,b..... Ifburc", ~"".... c...~l 1--,,,,- ~....a.:.la....~ f606 -r.b~ Brvot LATE MAIL =It I.7 sJ~.j-J-: P...,,~(, ~ c.rrot't. c-...J~ ~ .20;24 1.4Z-v .c....e""'.....-....,..s'c........ ~ ~~~c,... I --:r:.:;e. P, ~( ~cj....".d~ --4.....e.- ~- :- '0 f:-~c+l~ J' 'JI~ ~-L ~~ iJ G) @ F?..-""J,5W- ]:::f-.~ ~J.., ........ ~""'J,."'..;,,;]),...'''~ .,J~ "a-h,d"" o,.......--~'~ --tt....(~ .::la....f<!>rI- oN ~ ~ b....J. d) .Joor:.s i..... fl-=e- :j) -:=3,"-4~ ~ r.:ecde,,,A-.f1- ek l-7'51k. f""or-'!-.~ --rr.v,~ le-0se.. w;Jl c"""Il- $J5 <'\.+ =-. lr~,~ ~....r Jf --r;bu,..,...,:.. -CJ.......l...-e. - fh..... V\~ --k ~....( :(.(.....J ""V-.J. il... b~'t 0-.-.... ~oy.o.e( do,ly b.l.~ '^^-e>.."'-1 'nI<-~;.f~ qv-.J --L.v...,,;..ts ",k", ~(~ bIke.. ",J Jh"~ --tL~ ..sc.a:h-':" , .J Pc..."""J,s&.. '"11:4- c.vr,..d :soLd -lookl~ .<''''...r....,+-'' w;.(l h "-e.A.u/, ......".p 6l~ bulky C--",..",... :suffo,..t,. i~ C$~v Vle.-w ';""'f.dt~ 0.",01 ~k .G",~ <>.~ ;]/""90 ~o",u"'L- ",r --t..... s~ CSIJ.... ~(~O a.=-.+r,bk...s ~ --If.....,;.. -r;; ~close- b",JI... --tL.- _I- o.~ \IV~et- e;J~, -v~ voJl-ll 3''''= C:;).....J S."fp--t ~...h~ wovlJ., y--ol~ -1l... vi-.J~ e.,,~-n....k CCe-Mr-,...... -tl;$ c"'''f'<!.>'''+- Nltl ~ or) a.1V"j' J r'\Or."Ic.W- h\..",};~ ""_ ~.-&l__ oo.....ouo-J. ~ bc..'f ~ ~aJ.l ::r~ue.: .. 5bN~ - ~;';j ,,{ ~l.~ c.rl-hc.cJ b~ "k.. ~.,.........",;....'":D'...."c:.. -!-., A"\."-.J~+&- 0.'" o..h:._-hc: cAo""'" ""f-~- c......{..l c.<>..u...... 0... 51~-!y f'""ble--.. A", oF'" Co.vl''''+ -+,..,.,~ ""..",l.,t f""".,c:I.... 'tv;.Jc...... ..........ot::s.J'...... ""CQe.&~. -r.:...~~ .0", -+1...;" ~1",,",- o.P P~...~.e:...... w',1l be.. i"c~.-J. "'^....,.,;LX~b(1 ,y~ 4.... 34- ko"",~ ~r-_ b",;I+ "'" 4...... Mo...t.a Co f'r<:>f-Ay, o s.:ll,~.... Pr>o-~! . 1h:l,,:, /..."'$.".... oN~ ~f""""'~ fV\...."'y \Jeo.y-',,,,,,,,oe... ult...-... hu~ bl.ll~ by ~~ Ki~~ ",,,,ol..!L.. ~~-J.. -R"'""-Ily I=<::\~ N'JL. L l..w", <5f~d:;c..t -t....... ot.z.l-h......... oP 0... T~.....d.CC!>..- o.v-o/ s.,.~ ....~~vJC\.II'l> ~-. --H....a.. .5a.~<<- 7c..'1"o"+ ~lIdo...._. ~-... ~,~,t.3 '" ~~ Rcr""....) .Al{~I~ -\L;-e, 'C"""P"'~I.to "'0"" 6.- '~...-..,.( I -=:...:>....1.,,(. 6~"+ 0... ~..~ pn&4-d __~ -C.r- o-k F"'p...A-.:"-. 6.."",__, ~ 4e- by """'r,O\lIy --l!-. L.I~&J..f'.d ......lj.,..-..t- pra~ :r:: c-<>...d"'6;~.::I: w.ulJ. <)i:.!.~ -k, ~~ 4_ ct....c,~i.......-..~...J by ~ ~.... '2""-'1'....,.) 6-nol ...f.." d-.t -iL.c- rr."~<A1 ~ OArf;',4.~~Ll""'" ",~-4 "'W,.."'"..... ~ ,r..", ..fv.~I~ -".;,( w...J..,l1II ~1 :Jrikce. ~.. .._- 5w;r"""",,~1 .a, A:,.,J,.;U",,.,J ~e-VI;..W c...-,. iI~ tt.J""" 1-., ~ \/io-l- (-1~-o7oi) tATE MAIL 1# S-l RECEIVED APR 1 9 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENr TOWN OF TIBURON February 12, 1996 Design Review Board Planning Commission Town of Tiburon Re: 2024 Paradise Drive To Whom It May Concern: I am the neighbor directly to the north of the Cook's Home at 2024 Paradise Drive and would like to offer my comment on the changes which the Cook's are requesting for their home. I reviewed the drawings and colored elevations and think that the adjustment to the side along the road are a distinct improvement both in Architecture (which I see every day) and the amount of view. The plans which were approved had ornamental iron gates and more interruption of the vista. The Cook's Architect has created a more pleasing solution, an interesting view of the bay and Angel Island. Also there is more room for pedestrians. Please approve the revisions to the Cook's residence. Very truly yours, C- 1. 'r::...v...... Mrs. Anne Kahn 2026 Paradise Drive Tiburon FES 1 2 1996 , , , ,:::J I '-', ::'.11 I ~~,J L__ F~ L4r~ //?/!/ G 11 Fehruary 1996 Design Review Board Town of Tiburon Re: Chong and Stan Cook's Residence 2024 Paradise Drive Dear Committee: 11ive next to the ahove project and want to express my support for the changes which the Cook's Designer is presenting to the Board on Thursday 15, February 1996. 1 think the elimination of the ornamental gate and the changes to the front are an improvement to my neighborhood. I want this approved. Thank you, 1A :vmm /-, vu' Fe lei nJa-7 ..-- FEB 1 4 1996 'r.'l'f-'~-" ';-"-, \. '~:...' .:; '/ -.7. ..,. 1;"'\;:: ~',- , L~-' Un-€ f11rJ II.. F1 - .tc:'b. t$_~_t(l:tb_~u______ - - -.- --------- -._--- ---------- . ---\J- ---:r:\~ - 71- . \0_ .'n~_..1.:_ ~ _~_~~~t"'~ :-~----- - '\~ bec;;~ce\ _'\ --~~~__1_h~-~~- G.:,I<; hor,-~ }~u \O"~~J _ eel \ ~..)\ ~ ~\_ mofC<-\~-u .. \\)c...er:e.~" ____ . .. .____ ~n--- .__ \ v.s -- ---.- . -- ...--- .--- .2CJv2- ~ -=~.;..:; -..: ,\ J -- --;':~,fE~~..i:'~';I- --F E 8- -1- 5 19% -r --- . ~- --~~_.:~::'lJED . -- --t------ -- ---b c'=-:___~..~~_;;.-v I --- !i'f4t8AQ)J~~j)~_~____ ________ TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT To: TOWN COUNCIL From: SCOTT ANDERSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR ~ Subject: PARCEL MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION OF A DUPLEX LOCATED AT 2223 & 2227 CENTRO EAST STREET; STEVEN AND DEBORAH WEAR, OWNERS AND APPLICANTS Date: APRIL 10, 2000 ITEM NO. I MEETING DATE: 4/19/00 BACKGROUND On July 14, 1999 the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit and tentative subdivision map for the subject condominium conversion of an existing duplex building. The applicant has proceeded to fulfill the required conditions of approval on the conditional use permit and tentative subdivision map approvals. The Parcel Map finalizing the condominium conversion is now before the Town Council for approval. ANAL YSIS The Town Engineer and Planning Department Staff have reviewed the parcel map and found it in conformance with the approved tentative map and the approved conditional use permit, as well as and state and local subdivision regulations No dedications are proposed as part of the map. This is a ministerial action and is exempt from CEQA A copy of the parcel map will be on display at the meeting RECOMMENDA nON That the Town Council adopt the Resolution (Exhibit 1) approving the parcel map. EXHIBITS I. Draft Resolution. 2223-2227centro ~ast pm rep. doc TiburoJ/ Town CO/fllcll Sial! Heron ~ 191000 RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING A PARCEL MAP FOR CONDOMINIUMIZATION OF PROPERTY AT 2223 & 2227 CENTRO EAST STREET (ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 59-141-14) RECIT ALS The property owners, Steven and Deborah Wear, have submitted a Parcel Map proposing the condominiumization of property located at 2223-2227 Centro East Street. The Planning Commission approved the Tentative Map for this subdivision on July 14, 1999. The submitted map has been examined by the Town Engineer and returned to the Town Clerk as required in Section 14.36 of the Tiburon Subdivision Ordinance. The Town Engineer and Planning Department Staff have determined that the map is in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map adopted by Resolution No. 99- 12 on July 14, 1999, and that all required conditions of approval have been met. APPROV AL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon does approve the map entitled "Parcel Map, Lands of Wear, A Condominium Project", 3 sheets), prepared by Matteson Engineering and Surveying, and does direct that said map be duly recorded with Marin County. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon on ,2000 by the following vote: AYES COUNCILMEMBERS NOES. COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS. THOMASGRAM,MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST DIANE L CRANE, TOWN CLERK 2223-2227c~ntro "ast pm n:s.do!': Tiburon Town Council Resolution No. h/h/2000 TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT To: From: Subject: ITEM NO. MEETING DATE 4/19/00 TOWN COUNCIL SCOTT ANDERSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR sA-- APPROVAL OF SERVICES CONTRACT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ON A PROPOSED 4-UNIT PROJECT OFF TRESTLE GLEN BOULEVARD APRIL 14,2000 .Q. Date: BACKGROUND The Town is processing a Precise Development Plan application proposing the creation offour single family building sites on 14.5 acres off Trestle Glen Boulevard just east of its intersection with Tiburon Boulevard. Staff has determined that an expanded initial study (CEQA review) will be required for this project, resulting in either a mitigated negative declaration or a focused environmentaf impact report (EIR) The extent of this initial study is beyond the expertise and time constraints of Town Staff and an outside consultant must be retained to perform these services at the applicant's expense. The Town selects the environmental consultant. Staff solicited price quotations from three (3) environmental consultants. The price quotations are as follows: Nichols-Berman John Roberto Associates EDAW $33,000 $37,000 $26,000 RECOMMENDA nON That the Town Council approve a services agreement with EDA W for an amount not to exceed $26,000.00 and authorize the Town Manager to execute the agreement. Env consult s~k<.:1 r<:"rort.do<.: Tihuron Town COllncil Staff lIeport ~,19/]OOO TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Meeting: To: From: Subject: April 19, 2000 TOWN COUNCIL MEMBERS RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR FISCAL YEAR 1999-2000 FINANCIAL REPORT- 3rd QUARlER, AS OF MARCH 3 1,2000 Item: 3 BACKGROUND This Staff Report provides summary narrative and financial infonnation concerning the General Fund Operating Budget, the Capital Improvement Program, and Fund Resources of the Town for Fiscal Year 1999-2000, through the 3rd Fiscal Quarter (ended March 31, 2000), and includes projections to year-end closing on June 30, 2000. SUMMARY Staff currently projects that the General Operating Budge~ including current fund reallocations will be in surplus by fiscal year- end. The estimated year-end General Fund Unallocated Reserve balance will be approximately $1,423,000. It is also estimated that combined General Fund Reserve resources will be $3,042,500, of this amount $1,619,500 will be in Designated Reserve Funds.. A total of$629,000 in Street Improvement Projects and $140,000 in Drainage Improvements are planned. The New Police FacilitylEOC Construction Project is completed, and the associated off-site improvements are also nearing completion. The project to renovate the Downtown Shoreline Lighting System is now complete (at a cost of$30,OOO). Bonds have been issued for the Main Street Improvement Project & Assessment District. The construction project is in progress. SECTION A TI'ACHMENTS L Operating Budget 2. Capital Improvement Program 3. Fund Resources R~~ Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rdQuarter, March 31,2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19,2000 1 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET Appropriation totals for budgeted Revenues, Expenditures, and Transfers incorporate changes that have been approved since initial adoption of the budget in July 1999. The most recent amending actions were approved at the Town Council Meeting of March 1,2000. BUDGET SUMMARY STATUS As projected, general fund operating revenues will exceed expenditures. Budget Budget Y-T-D Projected Variance % Budget Adoated Revised 3/31/2000 6/3012000 (unfav) YTD Revenues 4,037,300 4,147,300 2,932,000 4,398,000 250,700 72.6% Expenditures 3,754,300 3,820,300 2,679,700 3,802,800 17,500 71.4% Operating Net: $ 283,000 $ 327,000 $ 252,300 $ 595,200 $ 312,200 Reallocationffransfers Out Capital Outlay (100,000) (350,000) (350,000) (350,000) Capital Eq Replacement 0 (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) New Public Works Bldg. 0' (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) Empl Comp Leave 0 (30,000) (30,000) (30,000) Park Development (75,000) (125,000) (125,000) (125,000) Self Insurance (50,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) Streets & Drainage (125,000) (375,000) (375,000) (375,000) Tiburon Street Impact 0 (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Reallocations $ (350,000) $ (1,230,000) $ (1,230,000) $ (1,230,000) $ 0 351.4% i RDA Repayment of Advance (Ned's Way Site) $ 225,000 Adjusted Net: $ (67,000) $ (903,000) $ (977,700) $ (409,800) $ 312,200 Fund Balance, Open 1,832,800 1,832,800 1,832,800 1,832,800 Fund Balance, Close $ 1,765,800 $ 929,800 $ 855,100 $ 1,423,000 The current estimated year-end Unallocated Reserve balance of$I,198,000 does not include anticipated repayment of$225,OOO advanced to the Redevelopment Agency in 1998. Including the proceeds of repayment, the estimated Unallocated Reserve Balance is $1,423,000. The projected Unallocated Reserve Balance of $1,423,000 represents a 37% reserve for Operating Expenditures. Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rdQuarter, March 31,2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19, 2000 2 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET OVERVIEW OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES Budget Budget Actual Estimated Variance % Budget Adonted Revised 3/31/00 to Close (WIfav\ Y-T-D REVENUES Property Taxes 1,343,000 1,383,000 791,000 1,408,000 25,000 57.2% Other Taxes 995,000 995,000 640,300 995,000 0 64.4% Franchises 266,000 266,000 98,900 270,000 4,000 37.2% Fines & FOIfeitures 150,100 130,100 79,100 110,000 (20,100) 60.8% Investment Earnings 90,000 110,000 67,600 120,000 10,000 61.5% Intergovernment & Agency 425,400 425,400 348,600 430,000 4,600 81.9% Licenses & Permits 535,600 595,600 665,000 800,000 204,400 111.7% Charges for Service 127,800 137,800 146,000 155,000 17,200 106.0% Other Revenues 104,400 . 104,400 95,500 110,000 5,600 91.5% Total revenues: $4,037,300 $4,147,300 $2,932,000 $4,398,000 $250,700 70.7% EXPENDITURES Town Attorney 170,600 170,600 81,500 170,000 600 47.8% Town Administration 578,800 578,800 453,300 580,000 (1,200) 78.3% Administration Building 35,000 40,000 32,200 40,000 0 80.5% Planning 392,100 395,100 . 238,100 367,000 28,100 60.3% Building Inspection 210,900 216,900 167,400 216,000 900 77.2% Police 1,605,500 1,623,500 1,126,700 1,623,000 500 69.4% Police Building 30,000 30,000 16,100 30,000 0 53.7% PW Streets Maintenance 379,900 386,900 289,100 387,000 (100) 74.7% Town Engineer 54,600 65,600 63,100 80,000 (14,400) 96.2% Street & Signal Light System 46,700 46,700 30,600 47,000 (300) 65.5% PW Parks Maintenance 194,400 207,400 147,700 208,000 (600) 71.2% PW Corporation Yard 30,000 33,000 20,000 33,000 0 60.6% Town Council 18,800 18,800 13,200 18,800 0 70.2% Town Commissions 7,000 7,000 700 3,000 4,000 10.0% Total expenditures $3,754,300 $3,820,300 $2,679,700 $3,802,800 $17,500 70.1% NET REVENUES less $283,000 $327,000 $252,300 $595,200 $233,200 EXPENDITURES I I Transfers/Reallocations (Out) (350,000) (1,230,000) (1,230,000) (1,230,000) 0 100.0% RDA Repayment of Advance 225,000 Fund Balance, July I 1,832,800 1,832,800 1,832,800 1,832,800 Fund Balance, June 30 $1,765,800 $929,800 $855,100 $1,423,000 Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rd Quarter, March 31, 2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19, 2000 3 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET GENERAL REVENUES SUMMARY STATUS Year-to-date revenues are $2,932,000, or 71 % of budget. Total fiscal year revenues are projected to be $4,398,000, or 6% over budget. Property Taxes: Projected ahead of budget by 2%, or $25,000, due to strong real estate activity and supplemental revenues. The 2nd installment of Property Taxes is due in mid-April. Other Taxes: Projected to be as budgeted (revised). Sales Taxes and Transient Occupancy Tax proceeds are equal to the same period a year ago. The delayed opening of the new Inn, wiU be partiaUy offset by increased Real Estate Transfer Tax proceeds. Franchise Fees: Projected ahead of budget by about $4,000. Refuse and Cable revenues are received quarterly, PG&E is received once annuaUy in April. Fines & Forfeitures: Projected less than budget by $20,000. Interest Earnings: Projected ahead of revised budget by $10,000, due to increased interest rates and strong reserve balances. Received quarterly. Other Agency Revenue: Projected ahead of budget by $4,000. Licenses & Permits: Projected ahead of budget by $204,000, Building Permit and related construction permit activity has been strong during the Winter quarters and related revenues are ahead of budget. Regular Business License revenues were realized during the 3rd quarter renewal period.. Charges for Service: Projected ahead of budget by $17,000, as revenues related to building activity are ahead of budget. Other Revenue: Projected to be ahead of budget by over $5,000. Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rdQuarter, March 31,2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19,2000 4 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES SUMMARY STATUS Year-to-date expenditures are $2,679,700 or 70% of budget. Total fiscal year expenditures are projected to be $3,802,800, $17,500 less than planned. Town Attorney: Projected approximately as budgeted. Town Administration: Projected approximately as budgeted. Administration Building: Projected as budgeted. Risk Management: Projected as budgeted. All costs recharged to Departments. Liability, Workers' Compensation and Property Insurance(s) Planning: Budget savings associated with projected carryover (forward) of General Plan and CEQA projects. Building Inspection: Projected as budgeted.. Police Department: Projected as budgeted. There may be salary savings associated with the vacant Sergeant position, that would partially be offset by overtime costs. Police Building: Projected as budgeted. PW Streets Maintenance: Projected as budgeted. Slreet & Signal Light System: Projected as budgeted. PW Parks Maintenance: Projected to be over budget by $15,000, primarily the result oflree maintenance and park landscape maintenance and water supply costs.. PW Corporation Yard: Projected as budgeted. Town Engineer: Projected general engineering costs are estimated to be $14,000 ahead of budget. Town Council: Projected as budgeted. Town Commissions: Projected as budgeted. Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rd Quarter, March 31, 2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19.2000 5 GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): 1. In August 1999, Town Council approved the reallocation of $350,000 from the General Fund Unallocated Reserve to certain Designated Reserves of the General Fund; in March 2000, Town Council authorized the transfer and reallocation of an additional $880,000 to certain Designated Reserves and the Tiburon Street Impact Fund. The total amount transferred/reallocated from the General Unallocated Reserve during Fiscal Year 9912000 is now $1,230,000. Capital Outlay Reserve Capital Equipment Reserve Compensated Leave Reserve New Public Works Building Reserve Park Development Reserve Self Insurance Reserve Streets & Drainage Reserve Tiburon Street Impact Fund $ 350,000 50,000 30,000 50,000 125,000 150,000 375,000 100,000 Total Reallocations: $ 1,230,000 2. A total of $225,000 is owed by the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) to the General Fund Unallocated Reserve Cas advanced from the General Fund to the RDA for the Ned's Way Senior Housing Project.) These Funds will be repaid when the site is sold to the project developer. Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rd Quarter, March 31, 2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19,2000 6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM This section presents sununary information concerning the status of the Town's Capital Improvement Program plan. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: The total amount cWTently allocated for street improvement projects is now $629,000. The planned projects are tentatively scheduled for completion in Spring 2000. Background: A total of$379,000 was initially allocated for planned street improvements in FY2000. These improvements will funded with a State STIP Grant award and Town Streets & Drainage Reserve funds. In December 1998, The Marin County Congestion Management Agency indicated that the Town will receive State Transportation Funding (STIP) in the amount of $245,000 for roadway rehabilitation and overlays for streets recommended by the Town Engineer. STIP-funded projects will be undertaken in FY 1999-2000. In February and March Town Council approved the appropriation of additional funds - $250,000 in total - for streets projects. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS An amended total of $140,000 in drainage improvements is planned for FY2000. The Greenwood Beach Road Easement Project - which requires combined Town, FCZ4 and homeowner funding in the amount of $130,000 is pending. Total drainage improvement costs will exceed budget by at least $17,000, primarily due to contingency repairs. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS: An amended total of $1 ,936,850 in community development projects is planned. These projects are to be funded with a combination of Town Reserve, Restricted Project Funds, Grant Funds, and Special Assessment Bond Issuance Proceeds. Comoleted Proiects: Downtown Shoreline Park Lighting System repairs and replacement. Point Tiburon Railroad Marsh major clearing of reeds and overgrowth. Public Works Corporation Yard Gate System Pendine &/or In Prmrress Main Street Improvement Project, the construction phase is in progress. New Police Facility/EOC Project construction is complete, Off-Site improvements are nearly complete. Richardson Bay Lineal Multi-Use Path Lineal Path maintenance improvements Downtown Feny Dock Realignment Grant-Funded Project is in the planning phase ADA curb cuts in the Avenida Miraflores-Hilary Drive school area. REDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS: Final implementation of the Ned's Way Senior Housing Project will result in the sale of the site to the developer, at which time advances from the General Fund and Low/Moderate Housing Fund will be repaid. This is anticipated in May 2000. Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rd Quarter, March 31, 2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19,2000 7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS Project Funding Source . Budget YTD Estimated 3-31-2000 6-30-2000 State STll' Grant 245,000 Streets Drainage Resv 134,000 Tiburon Street Impact 250,000 1 Centro East (paradise/Solano) STll' Grant 30,000 0 30,000 2 Comstock Drive STll' Grant 33,000 0 33,000 3 Greenwood Beach Road 40,000 0 40,000 4 Irving Court STll' Grant 15,000 0 15,000 5 Jefferson Drive STll' Grant 30,000 0 30,000 6 Silverado Drive STll' Grant 47,000 0 47,000 7 Solano Street STll' Grant 18,000 0 18,000 8 Virginia Drive STll' Grant 23,000 0 23,000 19 Vistazo West STll' Grant 63,000 0 63,000 10 Washinglon Court STll' Grant 15,000 0 15,000 II Sidewalk-Mar WestfTPC 30,000 0 30,000 12 Provision-miscellaneous repair 10,000 2,400 10,000 _~3 Engineering Costs 25,000 3,331 25,000 14 Supplemental Projects Tiburon Street Impact 250,000 0 250,000 D TOTALS: $629,000 I $5,7311 $379,000 I Note: The STll' Grant-funded projects will be accounted for in the General Fund Streets & Drainage Reserve Fund. All planned streets projects will be funded with STll' and Streets & Drainage monies. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Project Funding Source Budget YTD Estimated 3-31-2000 6-30-2000 I Greenwood Beach Road Easement Homeowners, $70,000 130,000 0 130,000 FCl4, $10,000 Streets & Drainage Resv, $50,000 2 Provision-miscellaneous repair Streets-Drainage Resv 10,000 27,700 27,700 D TOTALS: $140,000 I $27,700 I $157,700 I Note I December 1, 1999 - approval of increased appropriation of funds for Greenwood Beach Road Project (additional: Town $24,000, Homeowners $14,000) Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rdQuarter, March 31,2000 Town Council Meeling of April 19,2000 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Project Funding Source Budget YTD Estimated 3-31-2000 2000 Final 1 Richardson Bay Lineal Multi-Use Park Development Reserve 25,200 0 25,200 Path - park repairs, improvements 2 Ferry Dock Realignment - State CTC Grant (71 OK) 710,000 0 710,000 Engineering ($35K) Pr0ectConsuuction($675K) 3 Shoreline Park Light System - Capita! Outlay Reserve 29,900 30,228 30,228 replacement of fixtures 4 ADA Curb Cuts - Avenida Property Development Fund 4,000 0 4,000 MirafloreslHilary Drive 5 Marsh Maintenance - windowing, Marsh Maintenance Fund 33,800 34,204 34,204 clearing 6a Downtown Main Street ADA - Main Street ADA Project Fund 142,050 131.768 142,050 assessment district engineering, planning 6b Main Street Improvement Project - Main Street Assessment District 442,900 6,946 442,900 construction, project Funds administration, contingency 7 New PolicelEOC Facility NPF Resv ($331K) 539,000 459,815 539,000 OES Grant ($84K) Tiburon Blvd ($ 1 24K) 8 Public Works Corp Yard- Property Development Fund 10,000 3,952 5,000 Gate System D TOTALS: $1,936,850 I $666,9131 $1,932,5821 Note 3. October 20, I 999-approval of increased appropriation of $26,000 to fund completion of project Note 5. November 4" I 999-approval of increased appropriation of $8,800 to fund completion of project Note 6a December 8, 1999-approval of issuance of bonds for project Project commenced Jan 17, 2000. Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rd Quarter, March 31,2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19,2000 9 FUND RESOURCES GENERAL FUND RESERVES: It is currently estimated that the JWle 30, 2000 combined balance for all Reserves of the General Fund will be $1,423,000, and the estimated General FWld Unallocated Reserve balance will be $1,423,000. Combined General Fund reserve resources will be approximately $2,817,500. OTIlER RESTRICTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS: Current fund resources of other restricted capital projects funds on March 31, 2000, include: Gas Tax Fund, $107,800 Flood Plain Restoration FWld, $50,800 Housing In-Lieu FWld, $132,000 Main Street Improvement Construction FWld, $409,800 Marsh Restoration Fund, $86,700 Open Space Acquisition Fund, $106,700. Tiburon Traffic Circulation System Fund, $48,700 Tiburon Street Impact Fund,' $263, I 00 · Beginning in July 1999, the Town started receiving impact fees into its Tiburon Street Impact FWld. As indicated in the following table, Staff projects total fiscal year revenue will be $179,000. Town Council has authorized the expenditure of most available fund resources this fiscal year. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS: The Housing Set-Aside FWld has estimated current available resources of $280,000, however as the Ned's Way Senior Housing Project progresses fund totals will be revised. Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rd Quarter, March 31, 2000 Town Council Meeting of April 19,2000 10 FUND RESOURCES STATEMENT OF FUND BALANCES - Estimated to Jtme 30, 2000 Balance Revenue Expenses Transfers In Balance Julv I Estimate Estimate lOuO Jtme 30 GENERAL RESERVES Unallocated 1,832,800 4,398,000 (3,802,800) (1,005,000) 1,423,000 Capital Equip Replacement 204,200 132,800 (122,000) 50,000 265,000 Capital Outlay (5,800) (34,400) 350,000 309,800 Employee Compensated Leave 221,800 (19,800) 30,000 232,000 New Police Facility 348,900 90,700 (439,600) 0 New Public Works Facility 0 50,000 50,000 Park Development 34,700 16,400 (27,600) 125,000 148,500 Self Insurance 177,100 150,000 327,100 Streets & Drainage 133,100 315,000 (536,000) 375,000 287,100 Total reserves: $2,946,800 $4,952,900 ($4,982,200) $125,000 $3,042,500 OTHER FUNDS Flood Plain 49,500 2,500 52,000 Ferry Dock Realignment 0 710,000 (710,000) 0 LowlModerate Housing 88,300 70,000 (25,200) 600,000 733,100 Main Street ADA Imprv 93,000 (90,500) 2,500 Main Street Construction Ftmd 0 (442,900) 442,900 0 Marsh Restoration 118,200 5,000 (34,300) 88,900 Open Space Acquisition 104,100 5,600 109,700 Police Suppl Law Enforcement 50,900 23,000 (21,000) 52,900 Police Asset Forfeiture 6,800 400 (3,300) 3,900 Property Development Tax 11,000 6,000 (4,000) 13,000 State Gas Tax (3,700) 180,500 (20,500) 156,300 Street Frontage Imprv 9,100 500 9,600 Tiburon Boulevard Imprv 126,300 3,500 (129,800) 0 Tiburon Circulation System 38,800 11,300 50,100 Tiburon Planning Area Mtg 91,900 13,100 105,000 Tiburon Heritage & Arts 1.300 400 (200) 1,500 Tiburon Playgrotmd Imprv 8,900 500 9,400 Tiburon Street Impact 0 179,000 (250,000) 100,000 29,000 Total other funds: $794,400 $1,211 ,300 ($1,731,700) $1,142,900 $1,416,900 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY General 36,700 508,500 (502,500) 42,700 Housing Set-Aside 180,700 187,000 23,500 575,000 966,200 '--" Total redevelopment: $217,400 $695,500 ($479,000) $575,000 $1,008,900 Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1999-2000, 3rdQuarter, March 31,2000 Town CounciLHeeting of April 19,2000 11 J+ern: 4 To: From: Subject: Date: Tiburon Town Councilmembers Thomas A. Aiello, Lieutenant Traffic Safety Meeting - April 6th 2000 April 13, 2000 . TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT On April 6th The Traffic Safety Committee met and the following two agenda items were discussed: A) Centro West traffic use - flow, speed and volume of vehicles. B) Tiburon Blvd/Reed Ranch Road - realignment of the lane(s) west of Reed Ranch Road. ITEM A There was a request from the residents of Centro West to review the amount and speed of traffic on their street. The residents believed that the increased amount of traffic and the speed of the vehicles constituted a hazard. Prior to this meeting, Town Engineer Schwartz directed a study be made of the area. Out of that study five possible "traffic calming" measures were determined as possible solutions to the complaints of the Centro West residents. Please refer to the attached report for the traffic calming commendations. Over 300 notices were sent out to the residents of Centro West and the surrounding areas, advising them of the traffic safety meeting. These notices included a copy of the traffic calming report prepared by Town Engineer Schwartz's office, Approximately 60 residents attended the meeting. After hearing from approximately 25 different Centro West residents, neighbors and other concerned citizens, the matter was returned to the committee for discussion, The traffic safety committee is recommending to the Tiburon Town Council to implement three of the five traffic calming measures from the traffic study report. They are: Recommendation 2) Lower the posted speed limit to 15 miles per hour. Recommendation 3) Allow parking opposite 1834 Centro West. Recommendation 4) Apply edge line pavement (commonly called fog lines) markings across from 1828 Centro West. Recommendations I and 5 (one way restrictions and speed humps respectively) were dismissed at this time as unnecessary . Town Engineer Schwartz indicated that these measures could be revisited if the above recommendations did not produce the desired results. ITEM B Councilman Andrew Thompson requested that the traffic safety committee review a possible realignment of east bound (EIB) Tiburon Boulevard between Cecilia and Reed Ranch Road. Councilman Thompson requested that the merge from two (EIB) lanes into one EIB lane, which now occurs just prior to Blackies Pasture Road, be relocated west, to the crest of the hill (west of Reed Ranch Road). Three citizens from the Tiburon Boulevard I Reed Ranch Road I Jefferson Road area also voiced their concerns about traffic in those areas, The matter was returned to the traffic safety commission for discussion. Town Engineer Schwartz infonned Councilman Thompson that directing CalTrans to correct the problem with a specific solution could be counter-productive and get tied up in their channels for an extended period of time. Town Engineer Schwartz recommended that the Town Council prepare a letter, to be sent to CalTrans, advising them of our safety concerns and what our desired outcome was, and let to them engineer the solution. The following motion was made by Engineer Schwartz: " The Trqffic Safety Committee, based on citizen complaints and concerns, and our observations, realize there is a safety problem at the intersection of Reed Ranch Road and Tiburon Boulevard, relating to cars merging on the highway in either the east bound or west bound directions. We request that the Town Council request from CalTrans that when they perform the paving work this spring that they consider striping changes to allow for safer merging of trqffic with a right turn in the west bound direction and left turn in the east bound direction. " The motion made by Town Engineer Schwartz was agreed upon by the Traffic Safety Committee. Respectively submitted, -rt-A A~ Thomas A. Aiello, Lieutenant - Traffic Safety Committee Chainnan TOWN OF TIBURON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REpORT To: From: Subject: Date: The Members of the Tiburon Town Council Acting Chief Tom Aiello, Chairman, Traffic Safety Committee TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING -April 6, 2000 April 12, 2000 On April 6, 2000, a meeting of the Traffic Safety Committee was held. Below is a summary of the meeting and the Traffic Safety Committee's recommendations In attendance were the following: . Acting Chief Tom Aiello, Chairman . lrv Schwartz, Town Engineer . Scott Anderson, Planning Director Tony lacopi,Superintendent of Public Works . Sergeant Steve Hahn, Tiburon P.D . John Hugunin, Deputy Town Engineer Item #1 - Traffic calming measures on Centro West At the January 5, 2000 Town Council meeting, concerns were raised about traffic safety along Centro West Street, particularly with regards to the high traffic speeds and volumes being reported by residents. The roadway is very narrow and contains several blind curves. This location has come under study in the past, namely the 1987 Traffic Study performed by the Town Engineer's office. The report acknowledged the need for hazard reduction, and pointed to several specific measures which might be implemented. Below you will find general traffic calming recommendation for the Council's review and action. Recommendation #1 Designate Centro West Street as one-way (eastbound) between its intersection with Diviso Street and the first driveway west of the intersection, a distance of about 200 feet The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendations are: The Committee felt that the road closure would be too dramatic of a measure, one that could affect additional hazards, for other streets, and neighborhoods. This proposal will be considered as a last resort. Other option would be to periodically send mailers or door hangers to people in the neighborhoods to remind people to drive slowly. Recommendation #2 Replace advisory "15 MPH" speed limit signs with regulatory 15 MPH speed limit signs. The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendations are: The Committee recommends that the speed limit of 25 MPH be reduced to 15 MPH. The 25 MPH speed limit is too fast for Centro West lowering the speed limit is justified. We would like to replace the advisory sign with the regulatory 15 MPH speed limit signs. Note. Sergeant Hahn suggested that a traffic survey needed to be completed in order to legally reduce the speed limit on Centro West. Scott Anderson advised that an E.I. R. Study is being prepared at this time due to the Martha Property, this survey may be all that is needed. Recommendation #3 Allow parking along the wider section of Centro West Street (opposite 1834 Centro West) and stripe spaces accordingly. The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendations are: This is not an issue we aiready allow parking in this vicinity, except by the fire hydrant. Chief Aiello commented that the neighborhood may want to look at 2 hour parking permits, the people can petition the Town (check with your Home Owners Association groups). Recommendation #4 Apply edge line pavement markings across from 1828 Centro West Street. The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendations are: The committee recommends the edge lineslfog lines, this will keep people on a narrow track to slow people down. Recommendation #5 Construct (2) "speed humps" within the block of Centro West Street between Esperanza Street and Raccoon Lane, and install appropriate signage and pavement markings. The Committee recommends that before considering the implementation of this measure we wait until the above recommendations have been applied, to see if it necessary for the Committee to consider the "speed humps." The Traffic Safety Committee will re-visit the issues, after a trial period, if it is needed other measures/recommendations can be put into place, as with the possibility of the speed humps. 2 Item #2 - Request for merging lanes - Reed Ranch RoadlTiburon Boulevard. This issue/proposal should be brought to Cal Trans. The following motion was put down by the Town Engineer; The Traffic Safety Committee based on citizen complaints and concerns and our observations, realize there is a safety problem at the intersection of Reed Ranch Road and Tiburon Boulevard, relating to cars merging on the highway in either east bound or west bound directions.. We request that the Council request from Cal Trans that when they perform their paving work this spring, that they consider striping changes to allow for safer merging of traffic with a right turn in a west bound direction and a leflturn in an east bound direction. 3 <:: 2~ .E <1.) .- ~ E- 8-d <:: 0 ...., o <tl g;' ~~U]~ _ 0 <:: m .9 '1j c ~ <:: 0 cd cd .... ......c:: ;:l ~ I .D Q) ~ .- 0) <1.) E- O)- cd <1.) "0 -- - <:: <1.) cd ;:l 00"0 0 a:> O.D 8 ~ ~ "0 0 <1.) 8 <.> 0 ~ g ~ ._ 0 "00_ <1.) ~ ~ "0"0 cd cd a a 8 ~..o cd - 0) <1.) ;::l <:: .... 0 cd aum~ <:: <:: cd 0.9 "'d <1.)1;;8 ..c:: ~ u ~ ~ <U8 ..9 ~ '"0 ro ~ Q) ~ c::: <1.) <1.) ::: 0"0 <:: to: ..:<: 0. <1.) ,;g :::s ;..... :2 0) J, 0) ~ o.~ -d S.~Q)~sa B8B~~~ ~~~.a~~ _"O"'~o- I ~,. c: J:: ~ >.~ 0 0 ~~tj 0'';:: S bJ)g.:3 ~ ~r9 .S m m cd - E- -+-I 0 <U "'0 .~ c: .8 ....... ~ ~ ~8Q)8~g <tl ;::l 0) <:: <1.) _..0 <:: cd 00..0 't::'- ~ -+-I ;... tl <:: E- b ,~<1.) S cd 0"0 <::"0 ll) ._ c: Q) .... "'d 0 ,t::=:1tUdQ)";::: ",o-Q)+-'~ o .D ~ 'u clj 0 o.......'-<w::::CJ"O lU~ro~:.aro ~<1.)8~~a Tiburon Police Department TRAFFIC SAFETY MEETING April 6, 2000 SIGN IN SHEET - Please Print PAGE 1 NAME . ADDRESS HOME PHONE NUMBER 1)~/jW /\' roe S(-{11Qw-e Vis~ lJ. 4- ~s--552-3 2) .J /h,1,1,e S .7. . ~lo(jc:7e Ce/1;ri(.~Y{f)' 13 s- - '1'J--bS- 3) ~/!44~~ Uti 1ff 1M( 4) c~ P.il-1.k I/>,J /134-> Ce'l+/'i> IN' 5) \)1 L k CA.) i!'J I2-J I q-;; z. c,;::;L." w 6) ,C:e-c( 1~1L/'VAfi~ ~'(o KIOG...(-;;- 7) Vlchv I 4.. DV' i eCtvi-\ 2-2 >~ \/"<;0 8) JEll k. ,62ft IZD< ^' I ~p b ~€.,NjIZ 0 l;J, 9) COjAcZ H6~jJIu4.I ~ 0'17 ~u ~ 10) f)1aN-~ (JUtLJte!b /~f~~ W, t-jJ!J--:<77S" II) /2tc~ YJUt.j)t./eJ (f " ' ( " , , 12) I3/<.LJcC ?-O~ , !r&:J7 CeJvT/D fA.) _ eras - 31/1 13) IfLj,~ )ftL<)~ I ;?J'Jle....J(12..o Io~J / ~5J2-7;7...}- 14) far" (SvallR.r1 Joe ';:;?idF 74: J!.3S - 3qY.~ 15) :::::s-o IV P 0 S-ltJ ~ ~ f t ~G L . 'f- Q~ Q, ~( <?: 16) Cnhi,.,"i (Vlclls 17) ~LE:N LI".lDQ\JlST (\ l" C; k/"clj -<", ((cZ ::3 C"l....~c"..,:....:t2-l~ ~~~.......L. PLEASE PRINT INFORMATION If 3Y--~J!f 1-13 S- - V dC-.3, l{.3\--J7C'i} <f3!)-~ IlL;? lfs~-3Zlcr 'i sf' -y 3 ] S-- 43';'7'16;,- 'I ,,, -;;. '.i'')'c, '(' ('Sf' 0'7c..3 Tiburon Police Department PAGE 2 TRAFFIC SAFETY MEETING April 6, 2000 SIGN IN SHEET - Please Print NAME ADDRESS HOME PHONE NUMBER 18) -r;-I S~~ W (v~ f ~ f/L::v We, t- L{o~ - Nl.:) 19) /auz. Ii /1 V\ ;7 J 70 ( &-0 fro /{~ C; :3 '1- ~ 3 ?- t; () 20)i!nI1I(C75:-) l(p ({ee.d~2HCju{:d 3''6?,-7?.;J,1 /~ uu!.J. /J..vd i) r ,/ l! IJ 0 f} 3, cq-'1/.J-j 21) U(Mct. S (7';,,/VI '-(() (0 v'; f IA"-c I' ,,( Q 22) TZD ,J 8ro ""'.v- ;r ,( (, ,y. \. Q\oC1 Ccn\{c l,,--~ l\ 3S - 0 -::See> 23) ~O\'~,e-' \ <..wn , .'. 3 n ;.,..ugt:" 24) ~ f ~/JM., ,4t:ei ' r-/.;. J;;r1!11';r/;.'fJ EM T' " . . - '. () _ _ ;1 . , ,'_ ('V] , LA"'-> l',~<-<..l(Ql ,lr-<' 4'5 ",.-,3-1.'1 ( 25) ~"TE w ,,(\' -t" '.</"'" 0 l r, 26) YtM./,-l gCN~ (~'l..'" l..~.,"'""- V'-'- (,1.( - 0 I~T- 27) 28) 29) 30) 31) 32) 33) 34) PLEASE PRINT INFORMATION !)i,me Lynch · 1'11 ~olc:mo ~treet · TIburon, euliiorniu 94920 April 4, 2000 ('elf- -l-o 4:) ~- 4 q 0 ~ Mr. Peter Herley Chief of Police Traffic Safety Committee Town of Tiburon Police Department 1155 Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon, CA 94920 RE: Agenda for the Traffic Safety Committee meeting of April 6, 2000 Dear Mr. Herley, Unfortunately I am unable to attend the meeting but am very concerned about the traffic situation in this neighborhood and I enclose a copy of my letter of March 14. I am very opposed to Recommendation No, 1 which would be to the detriment of everyone on Centro East while giving some relief to Centro West. These two streets need to be treated as a unit and whatever is done to improve safety issues should be uniformly applied. When you make any street one way you increase the likelihood of people speeding because it seems that the danger of a head-on collision on these blind curves diminishes. It is unfair and unreasonable to double the traffic burden on residents of Centro East and Solano because some very vocal people live on Centro West. We have a dangerous situation at the stop sign at Centro East and Solano with people coming around that comer without even slowing down, I do, by the way, appreciate the recent police presence at this comer. I would be afraid to walk up the street if the traffic doubles, The logic of Recommendations 2, 3,4 and 5 are sound and should be implemented, but the same should be done for Centro East as there are very narrow areas and blind curves here also, I am in favor of painting legal parking spaces all along these streets. This would make it very clear to people exactly where they should park, Speed humps can be very effective in controlling speed and not at all onerous to the driver who simply obeys the speed limit. Thanking you for considering these suggestions. ~~ Town of Tiburon Town Council Planning commission Town Engineer March 14, 2000 This is in regard to the traffic situation on Centro West. The situation on Centro West and Centro East needs to be considered as a whole. Now the west end is marked 15 mph where it says "road narrows" and the east end is marked 15 mph in places and just after a "road narrows" sign it's marked 25mph. These signs need to be consistent. The whole road should be 15 mph and it should be enforced by the Police Department. If speed bumps are to be used they should be all along both ends of Centro. Enclosed are a couple of recent IJ articles about how effective speed bumps have been in San Rafael neighborhoods. Properly contoured speed bumps can keep traffic moving at exactly the designated speed. I have seen them used very effectively in other cities and wish Tiburon would use them also. If one way streets are to be considered all of centro, both East (to Solano) and west, should be made one way. That makes the traffic burden on Esperanza and Solano equal. Having the traffic run west makes the most sense because the stop sign at Solano and Centro East is largely ignored by the eastbound traffic. people at least have to slow down a bit at Esperanza or risk hitting a car coming down the hill to their right. They turn onto Solano at high speed coming around a blind corner. If Centro were made one way Solano could have parking on both sides of the street because most of the traffic would be going up the hill. We are about to lose a couple of parking places as there is construction of a house in Ms. May's backyard about to begin. This neighborhood should have designated parking spaces painted such as those in Belvedere. The Belvedere system is very clear cut and easy for people to understand. It also gives the police clearly defined authority to ticket cars that are not parked properly. I hope some of these issues will be addressed. Thanking you for your time and cooperation in making the neighborhood safe for all the residents of Centro East and West. ~~ '-/3S-~'-i3S(i I April 4,2000 Town of Tiburon 1505 Tiburon Blvd, Tiburon, CA 94920 Attention: Traffic Safety Commission Reference: Proposed traffic resolutions for Centro West Dear Commission: We all agree that there is an ever increasing traffic problem in all of Old Tiburon. The small, windy roads are part of the charm of the area as well as part of the danger. Those of us who live in the area know first hand of the dangers of speeding cars and agree something must be done immediately. However, this is an area of concern for ail of Old Tiburon, not just Centro West. It would be unfair to shift the traffic problems of one area of town to another area by altering the traffic flow to one-way down Centro West. This would only exasperate the existing problems on Solano and Centro East, not to mention dramatically increasing the flow up Solano which is already overloaded due to uphill construction sites. I am confident there are other solutions that are good for all neighborhoods. Some of my suggestions include low speed bumps, increased Police patrolling and ticketing, removal of certain hazardous on street parking spots, strict vegetation trimming enforcement to enhance pedestrian and motor vehicle visibility. Thank you for the ability to participate in such an important subject for all of us in Old Tiburon. Please do not hesitate to call with any questions. Respectfully submitted, JD & Kristine de Haseth 2201 Centro East Tiburon, Ca 415-215-2548 . A. K. STROTZ + ASSOCIATES Architecture Planning Interior Design Mr, Robert Kleinert, Town Manager TOWN 01 T1BURON 1505 Tiburon Blvd. TIBURON, CA 94920 March 5,2000 (CENWES)-J by Messenger Re: Centro West Traffic Dear Mr. Kleinert, In response to the Memo of 3/8/00 sent to us by Chief Herley we would like to voice our opinion since we are not able to attend your public meeting on 3/6/00 at 9:30 am . John Hugunin recommendation: 1,) To make Centro West one wav would be a disaster because ~ would: a increase the speed because nobody would expect any oncoming traffic, b, Daytime traffic from Hillhaven would increase on Centro East and Solano. This Intersection of Solano and Centro East is already dangerous and traffic on Centro East is above maximum. A 'trade-off' in this direction is not acceptable, 2.) Speed Umit of 15 MPH would be acceptable, 3,) There should be no Darkina on Centro West except off,street or in specially designated areas where the road Is 26 feet or more wide, 4.) Same as No.3 above, Anyone who wants add~ional parking must widen the road at their own cost, same as done on Centro East. Why grant special privileges to one street ? 5.) NO SPEED BUMPS they are deadly for small cars and a hazard for others. These would be the only speed bumps in Tiburon (to our knowledge). A.) No right or no left turn on or off Diviso would have the same effect as #1 above and is not acceptable, You could add warning signs to this effect at the intersection, We assume that there are just a few persons w~h complaints and they should be aware of the consequences, A pet~ion required for the lager affected area is advisable, We suggest that the residents of Centro West circulate the suggested pet~ion first to the affected adjacent street neighbors to obtain their opinion. Secondly, this Town Meeting should not take place at 9:30 where most working persons can NOT attend. We are g!.ateful to Chief Herley to even bring this to our attention. Sincerely, '?Ll_~/ . im( August & M~l:;nn~ 0 2070 Centro East, I uron cc,Chief Herley, IIV Schwartz Town Engineer Ark Newspaper Lyford Cove Home Owner Assoc. A CORPORATION M'mb" AlA Po. Box 1046 Tiburon California 94920 Fax (415) 435-1920 T,1. (4151 435.3800 March 31. 2000 Peter G. Heriey Chief of Police Town of Tiburon 1155 Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon. CA 94920 Dear Chief Peter G. Heriey: SUBJECT: CENTRO WEST TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES Your letter of 28 March maps out an issue that needs attention and a resolution that works for all of " Old Tiburon", not just the residents of lower Centro West. As a Tiburon resident since 1981. I am familiar with the traffic issues within the town as well as in old Tiburon (my first house was on Raccoon lane). Lets be clear on the issue, its traffic volume and speed. As you and others know, this issue is not unique to lower Centro West. Old Tiburon as well as the rest of Tiburon has experienced growth over the past 15+ years, yet our residential roadways have not changed. Traffic volume and speed is an issue for all residents of Tiburon. What do you think the residents of Centro East, Solano and lower Paradise Drive would say about this issue? What do you think they'd say if the problem is transferred to their domain? And what about the potential for more traffic if or when the " Martha " property is developed? Transferring the real issue (traffic volume and speed) to another section of road and the residents who live there isn't the answer, nor is it equitable and fair. Lets deal with the real issue head onl So what's the answer? Perhaps there isn't a single answer but rather a combination of solutions? Maybe it's a regulatory speed limit vs. an advisory limit, speed bumps, an additional stop sign at the comer of Raccoon Lane I Centro West and enforcement? There is an answer to this issue that will benefit everyone, however, the answer isn't to transfer the problem to others. Oh, and while you are looking at traffic issues etc.. perhaps you should look at the parking situation on lower Centro West; I'd submit that allowing both sides of the street parking on such a narrow street needs review. Chief Heriey, I'd attend your meeting on the 6'h, however, employment calls, hence, this letter. I'd ask that my POV be added to the feedback etc. that you'll receive and that you provide all residents impacted a further voice on the recommended solution. This is an issue frail of "Old Tiburon", not just the folks on lower Centro West. I ard, 1786' VISTAZO WEST rlHlJltON, CA 949211 FROf1 :., ICMCO." ENG II"EER I NG DES I GNS PHO'"E NO. 4154359251 Mar. 31 2000 03:57PM P1 131 Esperanza St. Tiburon, CA ~",.,....."".':::' ....., :~~}~}~.~~?:ff~~~~;'~~~~~~f~~~~=l~~:~If.~~~':~~~~~~~~~:::'. , ,- '._"-""---"~'" To: Peter Hertey, Chief of Police Fu; (415) 435-4984 From: RuS$ Heacox 0....: 03/31/00 Re: Centro West Traffic Measures p_: (1) cc: Bob Kleinert, Town Manager C1 Urgont X For_ o P......eommenl C1 _Reply o -RecJdo . . . . . . . . . . I will be unable to attend the meeting on April 6"'. at 9:30 AM regarding the above mentioned subjl3Ct. per your letter of Mar. 28"'. Would like to \IOice my whole hearted support for the measures outlined in your letter, particularty the speed bumps on centro West at Esperanz.a and Raccoon Lane. Would suggest that you consider a speod bump on Esperanza at the Centro West intersection. The stop signs at Centro West. and the one on Esperanza St. at the intersection are not effective. 90% of the drivers completely ignore them. Russ Heacox ~[~:~~~;l~i:]~~~~~~~~~I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V4jl:Jj/ ~Ul") l~.:....~ 41~4j~441j ! W tiUNtlk'.\JHI r'/.:.(;lt. tll TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA 0930 HOURS, APRIL 6, 2000 TIBURON TOWN HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ISO! TIBURON BOULEVARD Allenda Item 1. Centro West Traffic Calming Measures. ~(lt {or We wi \ \ b::- ovt--ot- i::ol4JO ~n Aptn G I -uJ..6-8 Off'\oO~, 0..\\ of t1l? 'recomm..e.n ~$ \ ,'std \~rl't\)'n~f ~~ 00 CUR. ~~ S~i't4~ ~ lto~ lard P;cN&R\~J.J.T 19't~ ~~ ~r- cc: Chief Herley Lt. Tom Aiello Irv SchWlll'lZ, Town Engineer Scott Anderson, Planning Director Tony Iacopi, Superintendent of Public Works Diane CriUlC lilCOpi, Town elerlt Tiburon Fire District Ark Newspaper FRANKLIN J. BUSCHER 1751 Centro West Sh'eet Tiburon, California 94920-1907 415.435.9872 r 30 Mayd ?JO ~!e// 6, }ky&/ did(' &f' f?)c~ J).tl{{/ Ufel' ;-kr1J/ /J1dt1r~eJ1 ~.:T ,t:{ye rY"1f lIe/llnj -h JlIf;j/;"{~, So I N/(/ 1'Jt/$S ~ 7Ya.. .{'.j;c 5~ fl,y m..eL./;z' .. tJf1 ff'pn/ ~ft. iI T 5u/~()rl /l.-II .f7i/f> (~) Y.eco )nJ>>1~ J~~J att..cf a+11 dUJtU"-.p -;:-Jut.'/ ~c &ft1~L~t7~ .# / " , tv;!1 & ar,cf'lcJ/- dq.f" To ~f)h7icif r~/hcqO<J' etJ.lU1. (4L?j ~; /5 Tk S;.ec:.rn.~ 7/burO?f. J;u.J~ E'?J JI1.f~ -/-t? f'.fC~J#,!,~ /1() - I"fJfI- 7ur~ hmv j) fW,sIJ 5"ly~ Th/J' /5.5"ue sMd.{l b.e rLso/i/e4 (;Q fo,r.p -;k -rw~ n~ h 0n41Z5 aYe ~5fY~c..h/ &'1 fk rr 1;.f'. . ~. E~tU-.( LxI'1c.A till' 14 /7~~. LJ/slnJ /f1'ft;r~..f me 'I-M-/ \~ ~~y, t:7YIi/t' ~~ c..e.u./;--o // Wasf If' fk J!h1~rfL7 /.J ~~ C~J-'- N~~I "jl(.e V'eJ L4 /) -roo 114YYO cD ..,t:;r ac:~..-e-.>..s h ,:;:7~ it v..e-tLS. // ". . '.. I ?tnH/Jt wr;ye ~ ~ ~;HN</~ ~r..u... to mOl/.€'. rt?~w~ UP/# #2/ /.s/tt/,A. :5~ /;~/f a--u.P( #~(!,f,,~//-'C(.ch()';, cfJf= =:;~~/ ~~~ tuf~.r/l[f tJfHra:"-.J h--e-':P '(II/~;ij-l"(' /h ()U.y ?rX-€CL r~{oL(cdfJ . ;i'~s . ~~~ TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. 5 MEETING DATE: 4/19/00 To: From: Subject: Date: TOWN COUNCIL SCOTT ANDERSON, PLANNING DIRECTO~ ABAG HOUSING NEEDS DETERMINATIONS: DRAFT COMMENTS Aprill3,2000 BACKGROUND This item was discussed briefly at the Town Council meetings of February 2 and March 1,2000. It was noted that ABAG had re-started the review and comment period, and that the deadline for submitting comments was now pushed back to April 30, 2000. The Town Council was concerned that the Town could potentially lose its right to appeal the number by not commenting within the comment period, and desired that the Town should submit some comments if needed to preserve this right of appeal. Therefore, Staff has prepared some draft comments for review by the Town Council, primarily focusing on the distribution of the affordable housing numbers by income level, rather than the total number which Staff believes is reasonable In addition, Staff has received new correspondence from ABAG (Exhibit 1) indicating that further review of two methodological processes may further delay the release of final numbers and also push back the required date of housing element adoption by up to six months. One areas of further ABAG review that could affect the Town's overall housing needs determination numbers is the "redistribution of allocation between counties and cities regarding sphere of influence areas". Staff's comments to ABAG also address this area of concern. Draft comments to ABAG are attached as Exhibit 2. The report from the March 1 meeting is attached as Exhibit 3. RECOMMENDA nON That the Town Council review and make any desired changes to the draft comments to ABAG and authorize the Town Manager to sign and send the letter. TlEURON TOWN COUNCIL S7>IFF REPORT 4/19100 EXHIBITS I. Memo from ABAG received April 3, 2000. 2. Draft comment letter. 3. Staff report from 3/1/2000 meeting. Housing abag numbers3.doc TlBURON TOWN COUNCIL ST.cJFF REPORT 4/19/00 R9resenring City and County Governments of the San Fmncisco Bay Area ..... .... ABAG ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS MEMO Date: March 28, 2000 ~--- rU;:t.>"'Tr---... C,,-I.... ; To: Regional Housing Needs Determination Contacts City, Town and County Managers and Administrators Community Development and Planning Directors City and Town Mayors County Board of Supervisors Chairs and Presidents APR 0 3 2000 PLANNING :>"":'~fJ'n.~ , TOlli.-, , , , . '~I'iT ,..;.,.., ,,,I" . ""'''''.i,,''! From: Alex Amoroso, Senior Planner Re: ABAG Executive Board Discussions - March 16, 2000 The ABAG E'{ecutive Board teviewed the progtess of the Regional Housing Needs Determination (RHND) process, on March 16. As a result of their direction, we are asking the Housing Methodology Committee (HMC) to reconvene for one meeting (Friday April 14, 9:30-12. ABAG offices, room 171). - In discussions at the Executive Board meeting, staff noted two particular concerns related to the process including: o The RHND methodology jobs/housing weighting ratio (10% jobs/90% housing) significantly burdened those parts of the region that already produce housing, Conversely, the methodology does not place sufficient housing responsibilities on those jurisdictions that are producing significantly more jobs than housing. " 0 The redistribution of allocations between city and county jurisdictions is not progressing, and it is expected that little redistribution of units will occur. The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is concerned that the allocations assigned to the unincorporated spheres of influence (501) of each city would not be appropriately planned for. The Executive Board gave staff the following direction: o Re-evaluate the jobs/housing weighting ratio. o Work with jurisdictions and with the State to resolve the distribution of units identified within unincorporated sphere of influence areas. o Request legislative extension of the RHND process for the Bay Area region. Staff will be acting on the Executive Board direction and returning with an update and recommendations to the Board meering of May 18, 2000. Each of the three issues is described li'Y"LTTBTT NO. I \bling ,\Jdn:ss: P.O. 130x 2050 OJ.khnJ, CJ.liforni:l 94(j04-205U (510) 464-790l) F:1:<: (5lD) 464-7970 info@abag.CJ....::')\' l.,)c:tion: jos<.:ph P. lIun \!ctruC:nt<.;r 101 E:ght Sm:e:t '-'; ()~lkbnJ, C.llit'urni;\IJ4(,lj'7 .4-56 below, along with the expected course of action. We will be presenting optional approaches to both the H~IC and Executive Board for review and commenr. Re-evaluate iobs/housing weighting factor In the current RHND allocation methodology, the jobs and housing factors are weighted (10% jobs and 90% housing). This weighting factor has the affect of focusing housing units predominantly in those communities that project (through Projections 2000) a strong growth in housing. The Executive Board has requested that staff evaluate weighting factors that would focus housing unit growth towards the job crearing jurisdicrions. This could mean a re-weighring of rhe jobs and housing factors, or a re-evaluation of the factors themselves to reflecr exisriing conditions. Resolve Sphere ofInfluence Distriburion Issues Under rhe current RHND allocation, housing allocations wirhin unincorporared spheres of influence (501) have been assigned to the counry jurisdicrion. This has resulred in concerns being raised by both the counry governments and the Srare Department of Housing and Communiry Development, that the units would not be planned for or constructed in the unincorporated counties. ~$ Staff will evaluate several oprions for redisrributing the 501 allocations, including allocating the unirs in the SO Is to cities rather than counties. Request Legislative Extension ~/ Staffis working with State legislators to include ABAG in an existing urgency bill that is in the legislative process. It is expected that an extension will be granted, and move back the overall timeline by six months. If the extension is granted, the RHND process will be extended until December 31,2000. The Housing Element update period would run from]anuary 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. "----.. ------- Please contact Alex Amoroso 510.464.7955 or Kearey Smith 510.464.7994 if you have questions regarding this memo. Additional updates will follow, and these items will be discussed at the E."{ecutive Board meeting, May 18, 2000. 2 .... -l Planning & Building Department April _' 2000 Alex Amoroso, Senior Planner ABAG P O. Box 2050 Oakland, CA 94604-2050 RE: TOWN OF TmURON COMMENTS ON THE ABAG REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS DETERMINA nONS Dear Mr. Amoroso: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the ABAG regional housing needs determinations for the Town ofTiburon. The Town Council of the Town ofTiburon discussed this matter on March 1 and April 19, 2000 and directed that the following comments be forwarded to ABAG. The Town ofTiburon wishes to focus its comments on two particular areas of concern, as follows I. The distribution of assigned units in the very low income (24) category appears to somewhat unbalanced compared with the low income (14) category. As you know, land costs in the Town ofTiburon are very high This factor contributes greatly to the cost of constructing affordable units and makes the creation of very low income units virtually impossible without massive subsidies, either from the Town or from other sources. Please explain how the methodology arrived at such a high figure for very low income units as compared to low income units. The Town believes that there should be some logical gradation from "moderate" to "low" to "very low" income units 2. The Town is very disappointed that the "sphere of influence units" issue is once again being raised, as described in your memo dated March 28, 2000. The concept that units assigned to Marin County unincorporated areas within the Town's sphere of influence should be reassigned to the Town ofTiburon has been addressed by the Town on at least two occasions (see attached letters). For your information, I am enclosing a map of the area that the Town ofTiburon's Housing Element update will address pltrSuant to Government Code Section 65584. This area does not include the Strawberry PeninsulalRing Mountain Nature Preserve unincorporated portion of the Town's sphere of influence. The Town has no signiticant etfect over these areas and it is not anticipated that they will annex to the Town ofTiburon within the foreseeable future. Therefore, the Town would object most strenuously to any regional housing need unit allocations for these areas being assigned to the Town of Tiburon. E2G!!BIT NO. + Please call Scott Anderson, Planning Director, at (415) 435-7392 should you have questions or need clarification. Very truly yours, Robert Kleinert Town Manager Enc. Abag2 letter. doc 2 +l C Q) E Q) "" t:iI tJ' C ..... Ul ::l o :r: c o " ::l ..Q ..... E-< SWWs NllOO:lWI< ..~ 4-< o c ~ o E-< :>, ..Q '0 Q) Ul Ul Q) " '0 '0 III III Q) " .0:: r i~ ~ ~ j . !, ~ ~ :.li i!l ~ i ~ 0; I COFY Planning & Building Department February 4. 1999 Alex Amoroso, Senior Planner ABAG P O. Box 2050 Oakland, CA 94604-2050 RE: REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS DETERMINA nONS Dear Alex: I understand and offer my congratulations that you will be preparing the regional housing need determinations for ABAG. The purpose of this letter is to inform you, at the earliest possible date, of the boundaries that the Town ofTiburon's subsequent Housing Element will address as "significantly affected" under Government Code Section 65584. In order for the regional housing needs numbers to be realistic, ABAG should use these boundaries to the extent necessary when developing the needs determination for the Town ofTiburon. For reference, I am enclosing an earlier (1995) letter to Janet McBride concerning this subject I have also enclosed a map delineating the boundaries that the Town ofTiburon will use during its housing element update. Please call me at (415) 435-7392 should you have questions. Very truly yours, Scott Anderson Planning Director Enc. Abag letteLdoc COpy Planning & Building Department ~ary 9, 1995~ Janet McBride, Planner Association of Bay Area Governments P. O. Box 2050 Oakland, CA 94604-2050 RE: REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATIONS FOR TOWN OF TIBURON Dear Ms. McBride: It is my understanding that ABAG will be preparing new regional housing needs allocations for the various cities and counties in the Bay Area, with (at last word) a deadline of July 1996. At this early point in time, the Town of Tiburon is informing ABAG as to the physical limits of the Tiburon Sphere of Influence which will be addressed in the Town's next Housing Element revision, due in July, 1997. From ABAG Projections '94, and from ABAG's 1988 Housing Needs. Determinations, it appears that ABAG uses the Town's Sphere of Influence (as determined by LAFCO) to set the physical limits in preparation of the regional housing needs determinations. As you may know, the Tiburon Sphere of Influence covers a very large area, including all of the unincorporated Strawberry Peninsula. In fact, the unincorporated land area within the Town's Sphere of Influence is nearly as large as the Town itself! In reality, however, the Tiburon General Plan has no significant influence over the Strawberry Peninsula/Ring Mountain Open Space Preserve area, and is not likely in the foreseeable future to have such influence. Marin County adopted a Strawberry Community Plan in 1973 which covers this entire area, and the County has approved development consistent with that Plan regardless of what the Tiburon General Plan may say on the subject. The Town believes that inclusion of the Strawberry Peninsula/Ring Mountain area in the 1988 Housing Needs Determinations resulted in ridiculously large housing needs determinations for the Town of Tiburon, with no basis in reality. 1 COFY Therefore, the Town of Tiburon is officially notifying ABAG that for the purposes of its next state-mandated Housing Element revision, the Town does not consider the Strawberry Peninsula/Ring Mountain Nature Preserve area to be "significantly affected" by the Town's General Plan, pursuant to Government Code Section 65584. Those areas, as shown in red on the enclosed map, will not be addressed in the Town's next Housing Element update. It is formally requested that ABAG reflect this determination in developing its next regional housing needs allocations, scheduled for 1996. The Town will not accept as legitimate any regional housing allocations which attempt to include those land areas over which it has been determined that the Town's General Plan has no significant effect, pursuant to Section 65584. The Town is willing to accept into its Housing Element study area those extensive unincorporated lands on the north side of the Tiburon Peninsula. This is because Marin County has no community plan for this area and strongly encourages annexation of these lands to Tiburon prior to development approval. Please make use of the enclosed map during ABAG's next regional housing needs determination study. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (415) 435-7392. Sincerely, Scott Anderson Planning Director cc: Town Manager Housing Committee \scott\abag.ltr 2 TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. MEETING DATE: 3/1/00 To: From: Subject: Date: TOWN COUNCIL SCOTT ANDERSON, PLAt'rnTNG DIRECTOR ABAG HOUSING NEEDS DETERl\i!INA TrONS COl'vll'v1ENT PERIOD February 24, 2000 BACKGROUND This item was discussed briefly at the Town Council meeting of February 2,2000. It was noted That ABAG had re-started the review and comment period, and that the deadline for submitting comments was now pushed back to April 30, 2000 The Town Council was concerned that the Town could potentially lose its right to appeal the number by not commenting within the comment period. Construction Need for Period 1999-2006 A comparison of the current ABAG numbers to the previous (1988) number is found below: Construction Need for Period 1999-2006 INCOME CATEGORY # OF UNITS Very Low Income Units Low Income Units Moderate Income Units 24 14 29 SUBTOTAL AFFORDABLE UNITS 67 Above Moderate Income Units 83 TOTAL UNITS 150 TfBURON TOWN COU.VCIL STAFF REPORT 3/1/00 EYBIB!T No.3 Construction Need for Period 1989-1995 INCOME CATEGORY # OF UNITS Very Low Income Units Low Income Units Moderate Income Units 65 54 65 SUBTOTAL AFFORDABLE UNITS 184 Above Moderate Income Units 201 TOTAL UNITS 394 RECOMMENDA nON If the Town Council is interested in submitting comments, Staff recommends that the comments focus on the proportion of affordable units in the various categories (very low, low, moderate) as opposed to the overall number of units. TIBURON TOWS cou,vcn ST."F/' REPORT 3/1100 TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. f.o To: From: Subject: Date: Town Council Town Manager Greenwood Beach Road Drainage Project (Approve Funding Agreement) April 19, 2000 BACKGROUND At its regular meeting of December I, 1999 Council approved in concept the proposed Greenwood Beach Road Drainage Project and joint participation by the Town and four (4) Greenwood Beach Road property owners. Council further directed the Town Attorney to proceed negotiating the proposed FUNDING AGREEMENT between the property owners and the Town. The Town Attorney has drafted such Agreement which was subsequently reviewed by the Greenwood Beach Road property owners. They have suggested several revisions to the draft Agreement and the Town Attorney has attempted to respond to their concerns and has modified the Agreement accordingly. RECOMMENDATION That the Town Council review the property owners' concerns and recommendations as outlined in the Exhibit correspondence and approve the final revised draft as prepared by the Town Attorney. EXHIBITS 1. Letter w/draft agreement from Town Attorney to Greenwood Beach Road Property owners, dated 4/3/00. 2. Letter to Town Attorney from Bruce Abbot, dated 4/12/00 3. Revised Final Greenwood Beach Road Drainage Project Funding Agreement (JJlct. << E:.i-h , b I + I Office of the Town Attorney 1505 TIBVRON BOULEVARD' TIBURON . CALIFORNIA 94920 . (415) 435-7373 FAX (415) 435.2438 TOWN OF TIBURON April 3, 2000 Bruce Abbott and Sidse1 Moller 458 Greenwood Beach Road Tiburon, CA 94920 Susan Miglioli 448 Greenwood Beach Road Tiburon, CA 94920 Pamela and Simon Snellgrove 442 Greenwood Beach Road Tiburon, CA 94920 Nancy Peterson 444 Greenwood Beach Road Tiburon, CA 94920 Re: Greenwood Beach Drainage Project Ladies and gentlemen: We hope that we are very near agreement regarding the funding of the subject project. I must emphasize that time is of the essence in reaching an agreement ifthe project is to be completed before the next rainy season. In the interest of economy and efficiency, the Town intends to coordinate the contracting and construction of this project together with its annual street maintenance program. This program must be initiated in the very near future. Accordingly, to perform the contract this year, we must have a mutually acceptable funding agreement to put before the Council at their meeting of April 20, 2000. On March 31, 2000, .Mr. Bruce Abbott sent me a proposed redrafted Agreement. I assume that this represents your collective comments. Mr. Abbott's proposed new draft did not identify the changes from the draft that I sent to you on March 14, 2000. Unfortunately, time does not permit an exhaustive line by line comparison of the two drafts or extensive revisions. However, I have attempted to identify the substantive changes from the Town's March 14th draft. I discuss those changes below, together with our response to them: 1. In Paragraph 2, wIr. Abbott has deleted the language that stipulated that the Transferee homeowners would have all future responsibility for the Drainage Easement. That change is not acceptable, as the release of responsibility is an important factor in the Town's willingness to contribute to the cost of the project. I have modified Paragraph 2 (and Recitals B and F) to reflect that the Drainage Easement lies on 444 Greenwood Beach. 2. Also in Paragraph 2, Mr. Abbott's draft provides that the Town shall "surrender" to the respective homeowners any interests it may have in the drainage channel that presently traverses their properties. I have added language to Paragraph 2 of the Town's draft, providing that the Town will quitclaim all interest in that channel to the respective homeowners. Greenwood Beach Homeowners April 3, 2000 Page 2 of2 3. The financial provisions in Mr. Abbott's Paragraph 3 are substantially similar to those in the Town's draft. I have made some changes to our Paragraph 9 to clarify the Homeowners' right to a refund if the project comes in under budget. 4. Paragraph 4 of Mr. Abbott's draft provides that the Town shall not commit the Homeowners to expend more than the sums provided for in the Agreement. We understand your interest in limiting your financial responsibility for the project. Accordingly, I have modified Paragraph 5 to clarifY that if the lowest responsive bid exceeds the $99,758 estimate, the Homeowners shall have the option of increasing their contribution or abandoning the Project and receiving a refund of the Deposit. 5. Paragraph 5 of Mr. Abbott's draft provides that the Homeowners shall deposit their contributions after the Town awards the contract. This is not acceptable. We cannot award the contract until we have the funds on hand. Further, given our time constraints, we cannot wait until bid opening. Per Paragraph 4 of the Town's draft, we must have the Homeowners' contribution on deposit before we go out to bid. If the bids come in too high and the Homeowners decide not to go forward, the Town will refund the deposit pursuant to Paragraph 5. 6. I have deleted the third column of Exhibit C to reflect the probability that the Homeowners will abandon the project if the cost exceeds the estimate. However, I still need the information required for the second column of this exhibit (i.e., the respective responsibilities for paying the Homeowners' share of costs). I also still need parcel numbers for Nos. 444 and 448. I enclose a revised Agreement with the changes outlined above and the information provided in Mr. Abbott's letter of March 3 1,2000. We need your acceptance of this Agreement by April 11,2000, if we are to put the matter on the Council's April 20,2000 agenda. Accordingly, I would appreciate your prompt review and response. Very truly yours, ~~//-- Ann R. Da~ Town Attorney Enclosure cc: Robert Kleinert, Town Manager (w/o enclosure) Irv Schwartz, Town Engineer (wi enclosure) -~ GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TOWN OF TIBURON TIBURON, CALIFORNIA AGREEMENT REGARDING THE GREENWOODBEACHD~AGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT This Agreement is dated , 2000, and is between the TOWN OF TlBURON, a municipal corporation, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, CA 94920, ("Town"), and Bruce Abbott, Sidsel Moller, Pamela Snellgrove, Simon Snellgrove, Nancy Peterson, Greg Moore, and Susan Maglioli (collectively, "Homeowners"). I. Recitals. A. Homeowners are the owners of properties located on Greenwood Beach Road, as listed on Exhibit A. The Town is the owner of Greenwood Beach Road, those open space parcels known as Assessor's Parcels Nos. 055-041-11, 055-041-12, and 055-041-13; and a drainage easement running between said open space parcels and Greenwood Beach Road, which easement is further described in Recital B. B. Homeowners' properties are located proximate to Richardson Bay on the downhill side of a natural watershed. The runoff from this watershed passes down the hill and into Richardson Bay. The Existing Drainage System includes a channel that is located in part on the Homeowners' properties and in part on Town-owned open space ("Existing Channel"). The Existing Drainage System also includes a pipe within a Town-owned easement that runs from Greenwood Beach Road through 444 Greenwood Beach Road to the Existing Channel ("Drainage Easement"). C. The Existing Drainage System is inadequate to satisfactorily convey water runoff into the Bay during periods of heavy rainfall, resulting in occasional flooding of the Homeowners' properties. D. The Homeowners have engaged CSW/Stuber-Stroeh, Engineering Group, Inc., a design engineer, to design a project that would improve the current drainage situation and have obtained all necessary state and federal permits (collectively, GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT I GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT "Agency Permits") required for the construction of the Project. The Project would relocate the drainage facilities currently on the Homeowners' properties onto public land owned and controlled by the Town. E. The Homeowners are prepared to assume primary financial responsibility for the Project. However, because the Project involves a considerable amount of construction on Town property, the HomeOwners have asked the Town to contract for the construction of the Project as a public works project. Further, the Homeowners have asked the Town to make a financial contribution to the cost of the project. F. Because the Existing Drainage System lies both on public and private property and includes a Town-held easement across private land, it poses unusual maintenance problems for the Town and could result in substantial repair costs in the future. The project would ameliorate these problems and allow the Town to reconvey the Drainage Easement to the Homeowners holding title to 444 Greenwood Beach Road. Accordingly, the Town has agreed to contract for the construction of the Project as a public works project and to contribute up to $50,000 (fifty thousand dollars and no cents) to the Project subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. n. Al!:reement. 1. The Project shall be built according to the Plans by CSW/Stuber-Stroeh, Engineering Group, Inc. Sheet No.1 of the Plans is dated June 10, 1998, and Sheet Nos. 2 and 3 are dated September 4, 1997. Copies of the Plans are on file at the Tiburon Town Hall and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Upon completion of the Project, the Town shall quitclaim all right, title and interest in (a) the Drainage Easement and the improvements located therein to the Homeowners owning fee title to 444 Greenwood Beach Road; and (b) the Existing Channel, to those Homeowners whose properties are traversed by said Channel. Thereafter, the Town shall have no further interest in or responsibility for the Existing Channel or the Drainage Easement and the improvements, such interest and responsibilities having been transferred to said Homeowners. GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2 - - GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 3. The Project Budget is set forth in Exhibit C. The Total Project Cost is expected to equal $119,334, plus a Contingency Allowance of$10,000. The Total Project Cost includes $19,576 already expended by the Homeowners for design engineering services. Accordingly, the actual construction of the Project is estimated to cost $99,758 ("Estimate"). The Marin County Flood Control District ("District") has agreed to contribute $10,000 ("District Contribution"). The Town has agreed to contribute $50,000 ("Town Contribution"). All remaining Project costs shall be borne by the Homeowners. The respective responsibilities of the Homeowners for payment of Project Costs as set forth in the Project Budget is set forth in Exhibit C. 4. Within ten days of the date of this Agreement, Homeowners shall deposit with the Town the sum offorty-nine thousand, seven hundred and fifty-eight dollars ($49,758) ("Deposit"), representing the portion of the Estimate not covered by the Town and District Contributions, plus the Contingency Allowance. As soon as practicable after receiving the Deposit, the Town shall advertise for bids to construct the Project. 5. The Town shall select a contractor to construct the Project as required by state law and local ordinance. In the event that the lowest responsive and responsible bid ("Contract Price") exceeds the Estimate, Homeowners must elect whether to abandon the Project or pay the increased cost within ten (10) days of receiving notice from the Town of the actual Contract Price. If the Homeowners elect to proceed with the Project, the Homeowners shall increase the Deposit within said ten day period of receiving notice of the Contract Price. The additional funds to be deposited by Homeowners shall be an amount sufficient to raise the Deposit such that the sum of the Deposit and the District and Town Contributions equals the amount of the Contract Price plus a contingency of $1 0, 000. In the event that the Homeowners do not exercise their election to proceed with the Project by increasing the Deposit as set forth in this Section, the Town shall not award the contract, but shall abandon the Project. In the event of such abandonment, the Town shall refund the Deposit to the Homeowners in the same amounts that they contributed to it. GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 3 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 6. In the event that the Contract Price is less than the Estimate, the Town Contribution shall be reduced by an amount such that the Town Contribution is equal to 39% (thirty-nine percent) of the Contract Price ("Reduction"). However, the Town Contribution may be re-adjusted to a maximum of $50,000 as provided in Paragraph 8. 7. After the Town has received the Deposit required by Paragraphs 4 and 5, the Town shall award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder and issue a Notice to Proceed with construction of the Project. 8. In the event that the Town has reduced the Town Contribution pursuant to Paragraph 6, but the actual cost of constructing the'Project ("Actual Construction Cost") exceeds the Contract Price, the Town shall increase its Contribution by one-half of the overage. However, in no event shall this increase exceed the Reduction. The Town shall not be obliged to continue with the Project if the Actual Construction Cost exceeds the sum of the Town Contribution, the District Contribution and the funds to be contributed by the Homeowners. 9, In the event that the Actual Construction Cost is less than the Contract Price, or the Estimate, the Town shall refund any remaining funds in the Deposit to the Homeowners. in proportion to their respective contributions. Further, in the event that some or all of the Contingency Allowance remains after the completion of construction, the Town shall refund one-half of the remaining allowance to Homeowners, in proportion to their respective contributions. 10. This Agreement applies to, inures to the benefit of and binds all parties hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. In the event that any Homeowner transfers any interest in their property, the rights and duties under this agreement shall pass to said transferee and subsequent transferees, if any, without modification, 11. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. In the event oflitigation between the parties relating to this Agreement, the proper venue therefor is the Marin County Superior Court. GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 4 -..... GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ffi. Exhibits. This Agreement includes the following Exhibits, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C The Homeowners and the Properties Project Budget Homeowner Responsibilities APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOWN OF TIBURON By Town Attorney By Town Manager HOl\l1EOWNERS. Bruce Abbott Simon Snellgrove Sidsel Moller Nancy Peterson Pamela Snellgrove Greg Moore Susan Miglioli GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 5 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT A THEHOMEO~RSANDPROPERTIES Street Address ofProoertv APN# Homeowner Bruce Abbot Sidsel Moller 458 Greenwood Beach 05503125 Pamela Snellgrove Simon Snellgrove 442 Greenwood Beach 05503112 Nancy Peterson Greg Moore 444 Greenwood Beach Susan l\iIiglioli 448 Greenwood Beach GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 6 EXHIBIT B PROJECT BUDGET See attached. GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 7 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXffiBIT C HOMEOWNERS RESPONSIBILITIES Homeowner( s) Bruce Abbot Sidsel Moller Pamela Snellgrove Simon Snellgrove Nancy Peterson Susan Miglioli Subtotal: Engineering Costs (paid) Flood Control Zone 4 Town Contribution: TOTAL: Payment of Initial Deposit per Parag. 4 $50,000 $19,596 $10,000 $50,000 $129,576 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -~ 8 t:;:lt-h I b I + ~ Bruce Abbott and Sidsel Moller 458 Greenwood Beach Road Tiburon, CA 94920 April 12, 200W ~ @ lli ~ W ~ @ Ann Danforth, Tiburon Town Attorney ~ 1505 Tiburon Boulevard APR I 3 2000 Tiburon. CA 94920 Dear Mrs. Danforth.. TOWN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TOWN OF TIBURON Receipt is acknowledged of your April 10th revision of the proposed Agreement between the Town and Homeowners, and duly noting the requirement for acceptance by noon on today, we offer the following comments: There are certain provisions that are essential to us in this agreement and these include an acknowledgement, either in specific words or by implication, that (1) this agreement reflects a joint effort between the Town and the Homeowners. (2) that the contributions of both parties is defined and controlled; not an arrangement in which one is primarily responsible and therefore liable for "all remaining costs", and therefore, (3) we will undertake this obligation only on condition that it provide for a fixed price contract. Our futile efforts to communicate these convictions to you in our recent correspondence cause us to loose some faith in the written word. but they constitute the foundation upon which we believe an agreement can be forged. If they are not shared by the Town we have long labored under misunderstanding, and it is hard to imagine how we can proceed to a satisfactory accord. Additionally, we have lesser but important reservations including: (4) the failure to identify the Town as the agency responsible for oversight of the Project construction, (5) the recital that inaccurately locates our properties as "proximate" to the Bay, (6) the over broad requirement that we grant an easement to run over the easterly side of our property. Further we are concerned that, in our haste, we enter an agreement that does not satisfactorily provide reasonable safeguards, such as: (7) the right of the Homeowners to review the bid package as well as the bids, so as to ensure understanding our obligation, rather than a telephone notification of the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, (8) the identification of a specific date for such notification so that it may be anticipated and arranged for, (9) a provision addressing the issue of significant cost overruns, and (10) an articulation of rights and responsibilities in the event the Project is abandoned after construction has begun. We regret these outstanding concerns, but to proceed without resolving them would compound the problem. We urge the adoption of a more deliberate and thoughtful course so that we might enhance the prospects of this long awaited Project. cc: Bob Kleinert Homeowners ./'7 .yery truly ~'J . au/~~J~"lG Bruce Abbott and Sidsel Moller E'th 1'::>1+ 3 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TOWN OF TIBURON TIBURON, CALIFORNIA AGREEMENT REGARDING THE GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT This Agreement is dated , 2000, and is between the TOWN OF TffiURON, a municipal corporation, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, CA 94920, ("Town"), and Bruce Abbott, Sidsel Moller, Pamela Snellgrove, Simon Snellgrove, Nancy Peterson, Greg Moore, and Susan Miglioli (collectively, "Homeowners"). I. Recitals. A. Homeowners are the owners of properties located on Greenwood Beach Road, as listed on Exhibit A. The Town is the owner of Greenwood Beach Road, those open space parcels known as Assessor's Parcels Nos. 055-041-11, 055-041-12, and 055-041-13; and a drainage easement running between said open space parcels and Greenwood Beach Road, which easement is further described in Recital B. B. Homeowners' properties are located generally between Greenwood Beach Road and the above-described open space parcels, on the downhill side of a natural watershed. The runoff from this watershed passes down the hill and into Richardson Bay. The Existing Drainage System includes a channel that is located in part on the Homeowners' properties and in part on Town-owned open space ("Existing Channel"). The Existing Drainage System also includes a pipe within a Town-owned easement that runs from Greenwood Beach Road through 444 Greenwood Beach Road to the Existing Channel ("Drainage Easement"). C. The Existing Drainage System is inadequate to satisfactorily convey water runoff into the Bay during periods of heavy rainfall, resulting in occasional flooding of the Homeowners' properties. D. The Homeowners have engaged CSW/Stuber-Stroeh, Engineering Group, Inc., a design engineer, to design a project that would improve the current drainage situation and have obtained all necessary state and federal permits (collectively, "Agency Permits") required for the construction of the Project. The Project would seal the existing Drainage Easement pipe, and reroute the water that now passes GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT I GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT through that pipe to a pipe to be constructed on the easterly side of 458 Greenwood Beach Road ("New Drainage Easement"). The Project would relocate the other drainage facilities currently on the Homeowners' properties onto public land owned and controlled by the Town. E. The Project involves a considerable amount of construction on Town property. Accordingly, the Homeowners have asked the Town to arrange for the construction of the Project as a public works project. Further, the Homeowners have asked the Town to make a financial contribution to the cost of the project. The Homeowners have committed to provide $45,000 to the Town for the construction of the Project, plus $5000 to cover potential contingencies. F Because the Existing Drainage System lies both on public and private property and includes a Town-held easement across private land, it poses unusual maintenance problems for the Town and could result in substantial repair costs in the future. The project would ameliorate these problems and allow the Town to reconvey the Drainage Easement to the Homeowners holding title to 444 Greenwood Beach Road. Accordingly, the Town has agreed to contract for the construction of the Project as a public works project and to contribute up to $50,000 (fifty thousand dollars and no cents) to the Project subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Homeowners understand that, in the event that the cost of constructing the Project exceeds the funds available for the Project, they may have to elect between contributing further funds or abandoning the Project. II. Al!reement. 1. The Project shall be built according to the Plans by CSW/Stuber-Stroeh, Engineering Group, Inc. Sheet No.1 of the Plans is dated June 10, 1998, and Sheet Nos. 2 and 3 are dated September 4, 1997 ("Plans"). Copies of the Plans are on file at the Tiburon Town Hall and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Prior to commencement of construction, Homeowners Bruce Abbott and Sidsel Moller, owners of 458 Greenwood Beach Road, shall convey the New Drainage Easement to the Town. The exact location and description of the New Drainage Easement shall be as necessary to allow the Town to install and maintain the new pipe described in Recital D and the Plans. 3. Upon completion of the Project, the Town shall quitclaim all right, title and interest in (a) the Drainage Easement and the improvements located therein to the GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Homeowners owning fee title to 444 Greenwood Beach Road; and (b) the Existing Channel, to those Homeowners whose properties are traversed by said Channel. Thereafter, the Town shall have no further interest in or responsibility for the Existing Channel or the Drainage Easement and the improvements, such interest and responsibilities having been transferred to said Homeowners. The Town shall exclude from said conveyances any area covered by the New Drainage Easement. 4. The Project Budget is set forth in Exhibit C. The Total Project Cost is expected to equal $119,334, plus a Contingency Allowance of$10,000. The Total Project Cost includes $19,576 already expended by the Homeowners for design engineering services. Accordingly, the actual construction of the Project is estimated to cost $99,758 ("Estimate"). The Marin County Flood Control District ("District") has agreed to contribute $10,000 ("District Contribution"). The Town has agreeq to contribute $50,000 ("Town Contribution"). All remaining Project costs shall be borne by the Homeowners. The respective responsibilities of the Homeowners for payment of Project Costs as set forth in the Project Budget is set forth in Exhibit C. 5 As soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement, the Town shall select a contractor to construct the Project as required by state law and local ordinance. The Contract shall be bid as a fixed price contract. The Town shall advise the Homeowners of the date set for bid opening at least 10 days prior to said date. The Homeowners may review the Contract Documents during the period between the Town's advertising for bids and the bid opening and may be present at the bid opening to review the bid packages. As soon as practicable after bid opening, the Town shall advise the Homeowners' designated contact person of the amount of the lowest responsive and responsible bid ("Contract Price"). Such notice may be by telephone. 6. In the event that the Contract Price exceeds the Estimate by $10,000 or less because of the condition ofthe Town-owned Greenwood Beach right of way Town shall increase its Contribution to cover said overage. In the event that the Contract Price exceeds the estimate for any other reason (or in the event that the overage relates to the condition of the Greenwood Beach right of way and exceeds $10,000), Homeowners may elect to abandon the Project rather than pay the increased cost. Homeowners must exercise this election by giving Town written notice thereof within ten (10) calendar days of receiving notice from the Town of the actual Contract Price. If the Homeowners elect to abandon the Project, neither they nor the Town shall have any further obligation to proceed with the project. If GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 3 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT the Homeowners decide that they are willing to proceed with the Project, they shall deposit the Project funds as set forth in Paragraph 8 of this Agreement. 7. In the event that the Contract Price is less than the Estimate, the Town Contributi,on shall be reduced by an amount such that the Town Contribution is equal to 39% (thirty-nine percent) of the Contract Price ("Reduction"). However, the Town Contribution may be re-adjusted to a maximum of $50,000 as provided in Paragraph 10. 8. Within ten (10) calendar days of receiving notice of the Contract Price through their designated contact person, Homeowners must deposit their share of the anticipated Project costs with the Town, unless the Homeowners have exercised their option to abandon the Project as provided in Paragraph 6. Said Deposit must be in an amount such that the sum of the Deposit and the District and Town Contributions equals the amount of the Contract Price plus a contingency of $10,000. 9. After the Town has received the Deposit required by Paragraph 8, the Town shall award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. As soon as practicable after award, the Town will issue to the successful contractor a Notice to Proceed with construction of the Project as a public works project, under the oversight of the Town that is normal and usual for such projects. 10. In the event that the Town has reduced the Town Contribution pursuant to Paragraph 7, but the actual cost of constructing the Project ("Actual Construction Cost") exceeds the Contract Price, the Town shall increase its Contribution by one-half of the overage. However, in no event shall this increase exceed the Reduction. The Town shall not be obliged to continue with the Project if the Actual Construction Cost exceeds the sum of the Town Contribution, the District Contribution and the funds to be contributed by the Homeowners. 11. In the event that the Actual Construction Cost is less than the Contract Price, the Town shall refund any remaining funds in the Deposit to the Homeowners in proportion to their respective contributions. Further, in the event that some or all of the Contingency Allowance remains after the completion of construction, the Town shall refund one-half ofthe remaining allowance to Homeowners, in proportion to their respective contributions. GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 4 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 12. In the event that, after commencement of construction, circumstances arise that result in the likelihood that the Actual Construction Cost will exceed the funds available pursuant to this Agreement, the Town will have sole discretion to determine whether the overage is the responsibility of the Contractor. If the Town determines that the overage is not the responsibility of the Contractor, the Town will so advise the Homeowners and give them 10 calendar days to elect whether to provide the necessary additional funds or abandon the Project. If the Homeowners do not make such election within 10 calendar days, or having elected to proceed with the project, do not provide the necessary additional funds within 15 calendar days of receiving said notice from the Town, the Project shall be abandoned. In the event of Project abandonment under this Paragraph, the Town shall pay the Contractor all sums due under the Contract with the Town ("Abandonment Cost"). The Town shall then calculate the amount of Deposit refund due the Homeowners, if any, by determining the proportion that the Deposit required under Paragraph 8 of this Agreement bears to the sum of the Contract Price and the $10,000 Contingency Allowance ("Homeowners' Percentage"). The Homeowners Percentage shall be applied to the Abandonment Cost and that amount shall be deducted from the Deposit. The funds remaining in the Deposit, if any, shall be returned to the Homeowners in the same proportions as their Contributions thereto. 13. This Agreement applies to, inures to the benefit of and binds all parties hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. In the event that any Homeowner transfers any interest in their property, the rights and duties under this agreement shall pass to said transferee and subsequent transferees, if any, without modification. 14. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. In the event oflitigation between the parties relating to this Agreement, the proper venue therefor is the Marin County Superior Court. GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 5 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT III. Exhibits. This Agreement includes the following Exhibits, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C The Homeowners and the Properties Project Budget Homeowner Responsibilities APPROVED AS TO FORM: TOWN OF TmURON By Town Attorney By Town Manager HOMEOWNERS. Bruce Abbott Simon Snellgrove Sidsel Moller Nancy Peterson Pamela Snellgrove Greg Moore Susan Miglioli GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 6 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT A THE HOMEOWNERS AND PROPERTIES Homeowner Street Address of Prooerty APN# Bruce Abbot 458 Greenwood Beach 05503125 Sidsel Moller Pamela Snellgrove 442 Greenwood Beach 05503112 Simon Snellgrove Nancy Peterson 444 Greenwood Beach 055 031 29 Greg Moore Susan Miglioli 448 Greenwood Beach 055-031-32 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 7 ~r Greenwood Beach Drainage Budget 11/2/99 Original Today's Estimate Price 1993 1999 COSTS Construction and Landscaping Storm Drain Channel 26,300 28,456 Channel 37,100 50,293 Landscaping 21,009 63,400 99,758 Engineering and Contingency Engineering 9,510 19,576 Contingency 9,510 10,000 19,020 29,576 $ 82,420 $ 129.334 REVENUE Flood Control Zone 4 $ 10,000 8% Property Owners Engineering 19,576 Construction 45,000 Contingency 5,000 $ 69,576 54% Town of Tiburon Project 45,000 Contingency 5,000 $ 50,000 39% Total Revenues $ 129.576 100% 'Property owners are seeking additional estimates for the landscaping. Homeowner( s) Bruce Abbot Sidsel Moller Pamela Snellgrove Simon Snellgrove Nancy Peterson Greg Moore Susan Miglioli Subtotal: Contingency: Moore/Peterson Snellgroves Total Contingency Engineering Costs (paid) GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT C HOMEOWNERS RESPONSffiILITIES Approx. Payment of Deposit per_Paragraph 8 (based on Estimate) $10,000 $13,000 $12,000 $10,000 $45,000 $2000 $3000 $5000 $19,595 Total Homeowner Contribution Flood Control Zone 4 Town Contribution: TOTAL $69,595 $10,000 $50,000 $129,595 GREENWOOD BEACH DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9 /7 ~I /'1 \ / r(E~ ~ lr-. e:.c-d \ l'5 ,~~ ~wrc~ e.:ldcr~e.. _ UQ~ Qu-od\.se~~-e. RECerv1=o C\~--re\ *C5Q-l'7J.- t.t3 APR 1 7 2000 _ . _. . ..11.6 lJ7, Wc...o~_ TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE ~ TOWN OF TIBURON ~. ... . .k.---. .----... -.-. ---. .--..- ---.--------..---~-.. ---~-. _ _u _ '. '_ _____ . -. \u ~_t~-~~~vD\~~. ~~ ~. /" _1- ~ n .~ '~~eXt3"'n~ ~04E'--.---- ~ ~de-L-e-~k. ..L~\+ \2~~_~d-b._ . 6r~\-\0_1.<Q:.~ _ - 'e dc~s~._\::_~;,lL_ nO~ CL \ \V-\\\.C-\rc~JO_:<___x\\0C~_~:_ . \~ce \~'\l- ~ CLu.5 a..;.-d ~e3hl.C~2 \ 0 e" ,\e_r- \\ \ c.. ~a..{'\'E'- O_(lr",~~ tn,,<=:-.-\-o J\L-"'- (!/i)l-+.1nEn~~~\~~ c-b-s ~~ ~.~ kabolDi2______ .~~.'t"~6\cd ~ ~4 -\ , ~~C- '\T1 I') d\\P~O"5, \ il"3\bH:~~a: M.\\~_0:~. ~.. ~...M~<ol~ .o.2d -\v -- \ ~ C~'c-,- Fb~~ I Ucr~ ~"'U- \ "" U. t'-''€-. e,---~('I'.Ji:"". 0. lda= '+\OD ~ ~\d ~~c\~s ~~?~ ~c- ~~e_x,---e~~ ~--c~ dcU\5 - .n __ . S\~\L( I :\J~_1JD LATE MAIL # 7- U{''f'.T71, b",s.2e","e"" &~~ I r~'. ZOZ'J f1:u.,o';1>~ -b,-,ve Sltort" a-, CClCJK lATE MAIL # 1- ;j.M-v~ .a......a~, ..P _ velZ'I ~. 4:t- ~ ~'T ry ~.t. ..t:-., ~jUIJ1U'''''.J ~~ 2:1.......... 'tr"U' ge-' "" '/, . M..../ .,A A .t...v ~ w.... ~ ~ -z:; ~.............. -:d... ~k.I'" '5 .~ ,?,---. ~~~.-,,,:,, 1~~~ ~;zt.ar ,-n;;..4.~, ~- kt-A'1f ~ fl 'v O;J~n-v,t::-J ~ kJG <o.L.#\ c.." is "'""" ~ ,- e...-c.-.... <4 fl"""" <. V.'UU :;l.o;2 7 R~,.-( ....j)-; -r I 'bU1..4V\... ~. 7J~.:JO F. ~ := U let 25 ~.~ t!~~~~ ~~~ ~ C) u:l=:J ~ "" ?:j~ zL,.;t-~~<?~~)..~ !J. co ::;: u. U ~~ ~~f'tuu. V'~~~ __ :2~ V I.J..;j s: zo a: <t ~>- ~'h"-'" ~W<.~~tA.~Z~~ tJ<.<;C J J) ~ k ~ ~ 4c')',-Mf r~~'..1 ~~. ~. ~,.. TooJ"'4r.J,.1:es.~..~B.~.J '??2.; ~ 1 ~ Mot:tiv ~ u"rL '-"<t~ -<. J~.z~~~. '_-J. ;~l--: : ~~: tS,=':: ~ ~;: .+'35 '::Fi]I,',I! -~ I ~- iDiJ::,Tf:' IAL F'AI~=: 02 March 22,2000 € lJ.(fEMAIL # "7 Mr. & Mrs. Cook Phone 41$0789-9661 Fax 41$043$07400 caOWM IM..atRIAL SUP PLY RECEIVED AH-/ 182000 TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE TOWN OF TlBURON RE: Cook Residence 2024 Paradise Dr. Tiburon, Ca. Electrically Operated Sliding Garage Door Revised Quotation Per our inItial conversation and site visit we have prepared a quotation to furnish and instalI an electrically operated 6 leaf sliding garage door 15'-8 W' x 7'.11". The door shall be suspended from an overhead sliding door track system and open by sliding to one side around a curve and stack perpendicular to the street. The doors shalI be store front type (metal frame! glass doors) fabricated out of 14 ga. galvanealed steel with integral glazing stops on the exterior side and removal glazing stops on the interior side. The door leaves shalI be 3" thick with 2 3/4" thick overall width stiles and min. 4" wide top and bottom rails. The overhead hardware shall be Crown model 25/442 specifically designed for curved sliding door applications. The doors shalI be operated by a Crown model 1265/405 DelEC electric door operator. The operator sbalI pulI the door open and closed using a chain drive that is inside and above the sliding door track. The electric operator shall be furnished with a radio control unit to allow for the door to be opened/closed and stopped remotely and a push button station to open/close and stop the door from the garage. Two sets of minibeam safety devices and. safet). edge on each end of the sliding door shall be furnished. These safety devices shall stop the e1ectrit operator any time an objects is within the beam path or comes in contact with the safety edge. The electric operator has a maximum operating speed of 45 fpm and is field adjustable. The unit has a creep speed feature that reduces the operating speed the last 6-8 inchtll of travel to allow the unit to better control the Inertia ofthe sliding door. The operator has an adjustable electric c:lutch to limit the amount of torque the operator exerts. This enables us to field adjust the electric operator torque output to match the needs of your specific application. The operating system shall also inc:1ude a fail safe electric locking system to lock the door in the closed position. The doors shall be furnished with our std. grey prime paint finish, hinges shall have a clear alum. or dull bronze anodized finish and the sliding door hardware shall han our std. beige finish. Head and jamb brush type seals shall be furnished and installed; however due to the existing project conditions the bottom of the garage door shall be 2-3" off the sill and can not be sealed. Z 13 Michelle Court. So San F'ranclsc", CA 94081}.6202 . Phone (650)952.5150 . fax (650)873-1495 website: www.Crown-!ndustrial.com.Frmatl:o:utodor@crowr.aL11dustrial.com ~ .. _.....'- ::~fF7:::J'=~_ I=F:J1,',lr; Ii:I:'!_'3TF'1;:'L F'':::'I~E rJ::; Our proposal includes furnishing and installation of the sliding garage door, electric operater, safety edge safety devices, lock. sliding door hardware and head and jamb brush type seals. Our proposal also includes the minibeam safety devices and push button control station. We shall provide the design and installation drawings illustrating the connection too and location of our material with respect the existing carport structure. Including taxes, freight and installation all for the net sum of $36,000.00 Delivery 8-10 weeks after receipt of approved drawings, Design/submittal drawings require 3-4 weeks Terms: 33% down, 33% upon delivery, 34% net 30 days *The deposit is refundable less de.tign costs if city approval is unobtainable. Exclusions: finish paint, demo or patching of existing stucco, electrical wiring or hookup, soffiting or overhead hardware enclosure, installation of minibeam safety devices and push- button station, glass or glazing. Per our conversation wI Joe Droshin of today we have revised our quotation to include some options for fabricating the doors out of stainless steel, furnishing and installing the glazing in the door panels and providing a keyswitch to operate the door from the exterior side of the garage. Options: 1. Fabricating the doors out of stainless steel, We can fabricate the doors fabricated out of either type 304 or 316 stainless steel. The doors would be furnished with a #4 brushed stainless steel finish. The difference between type 304 and 316 stainless steel, is the Nickel content. Type 304 or 316 will not rust but over time in a salt air atmosphere the surface of 304 stainless may get a fine rust like film caused by minute impurities in the stainless steel corroding. The mm typically can be wiped off and will not cause a structural failure of the material. Type 316 typically is used in salt water marine applications but is typically 50% for expensive. Typically stainless steel is not painted due to the fact that the material would require etching to enable paint to adhere. Add for door fabricated out of 304 stainless steel Add for doors fabricated out of 316 stainless steel S 8,394.00 $13,460,00 213 Michelle Court . So. San Francisco, CA 94080-6202. Phone (650)952-5150 . ;:,,,,, (650)873-1495 _bsil..: wwwCrown-lndustrial.cam . E-ma1l: autadar@crown-induscr:a1.com -,-::::1_, ~::'=:: ~~_J~: i=i=[il.J: H,[U'::,-;-':::,:;;;:_ :-'~'.Jt:. '-'.... 2. Furnishing and Installing the glazing in the door panels. We have prepared 3 separate prices for furnishing either 1/4" or 1/2" Acrolite glazjng material Or 114" tempered clear glass. The Acrolite plexiglass resists impact damage; bowever it can easily be scratched. 1/4" tempered glass is very scratch resistant but is not as resistant to impact as the plexiglass. Including installation and gluing materials Add for 1/4" Acrolite Add for 1/2" Aerolite Add for 1/4" tempered clear glass $ 1,215.00 S 1,941.00 S 1,616.00 3. Exterior Keyswitch. We can furnish a keyswitch assembly that would open the doon from the exterior side of the garage. It can be flush or surface mounted to the garage wall ( by othen) and actuate the door in the same fashion as the push-button station. Add $192,50 Very truly YOUf'! 1r~ ~\) j Mark Payne ~ Project Coordinator Cc. Joe Droshin - Project Architect 213 Michelle Court . So. San francisco. CA 94080-6202 . Phone (650)952.5150 . Fax (650:873. 1495 weboite: www.Crown.lnduslrlaLcom . E-mail: autodor@crown-lndustrial.com TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. 7 To: TOWN COUNCll.. From: EM! THERIAULT, ASSOCIATE PLANNER Subject: Fll..E #799199 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION REQUIRING TOWN COUNCll.. APPROVAL 2024 PARADISE DRIVE; Stan and Chong Cook, owners; Assessor's Parcel No. 059-172-43 Date: April 14, 2000 Address APNo FileNo. General Plan: Zoning Property Size Current Use: Owners: Applicant Date Complete CEQA Exemption: Permit Streamlining Act Deadline: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2024 Paradise Drive 059-172-43 799199 H (High Density Residential) R-2 (Two Family Residential) 7,582 square feet Single-family residential Stan and Chong Cook same December 8, 1999 January 6, 2000 March 6, 2000 (90-day extension granted by property owner. Final deadline is June 5, 2000) The applicant is requesting approval for modifications to a previously approved remodel to an existing residence and carport. The modifications include a request to completely enclose the carport with additional windows and folding glass doors, to install iron safety grills over the windows near the street and to install an iron trellis top at the location of a previously approved stucco trellis with a wood gate. BACKGROUND: On November 12, 1999 the applicant applied for a Staff level review ofa carport enclosure and additional exterior modifications to a residence currently under construction at 2024 Paradise flBUROI'\ TOW>J COt'NCIL STAFF REPORT April 19, 2000 M '..; Drive. Staff determined that the potential controversy related to the safety grill installations and the carport enclosure necessitated a referral to the Design Review Board. Staff subsequently conducted a review of the historical files and discovered that the carport has been at the center of considerable controversy in the past. The Town and the former property owners had disagreed over the rights of other Town residents for public access to Bay views through the carport area and only avoided litigation after much discussion and the signing of a settlement agreement between the Town and the property owners. The Recitals of Fact from the settlement mandated that the garage door would be removed and an activated ( electronic) 3 Yz foot metal gate would be installed in its place is attached as Exhibit 3 in the Staff Report to the Design Review Board, dated January 6, 2000. Please review the entire Staff Report prepared for the Design Review Board for a more thorough analysis of historical records of development on the subject property. (Exhibit B) The current owner received approvals for a remodel of the residence and carport in 1996. At that time, the application was reviewed by both the Design Review Board and the Town Council because the settlement agreement requires that any change to the design approved for the carport requires approval by both the Design Review Board and the Town CounciL On January 6, 2000, the Design Review Board voted to approve the iron grills and trellis installations but to recommend denial of the carport enclosure to the Town CounciL The applicant was scheduled for the next possible Town Council meeting but asked Staff to defer review of the item several times. During the time delay, the applicant has installed some glass panels to the rear of the carport area. Although these glass panels do not enclose the majority of that side of the carport, the structures are over three feet from grade and do require design review No permits or approvals have been issued for these panels. The applicant has submitted a letter regarding these installations. (Exhibit A) DESIGN REVfEW BOARD ANALYSIS: During its consideration of this application, the Design Review Board reviewed the historical information of development on the subject property, the legal settlement regarding the carport structure and the current proposaL The written comments of the Town Building Official were also considered. Building Official Bloomquist has indicated that any type of garage doors on the carport structure must be automated due to safety concerns in this narrow section of Paradise Drive. He also reviewed the submitted plans and determined that the glass doors proposed could not be automated. The applicant told the Board that he understood the proposed doors could be automated, and offered to submit substantiation for the Town to review. Staff has received no additional information from the applicant regarding the automation of the doors since the Board meeting. The Board discussed in detail the issue of the preservation of public access to the views of Angel l'IBCRO'\ TOWN COCNClL STAFF REPORT April 19.2000 2 Island and the Bay through the carport area. The review included discussion regarding whether the glass doors could effectively maintain the public view access. The majority of the Boardmembers voted to deny the carport enclosure because it would be difficult for the Town to enforce the view corridor once more windows and doors had been installed. (Exhibit C). PUBLIC COMMENT At the time the Staff Report to the Design Review Board was written, Staff had not received written comments from the public regarding the current application. However, two residents had phoned Staff to express concerns regarding the precedent set by the safety grills and the view impacts associated with the proposed enclosure ofthe carport. A fax of a letter, dated January 5, 2000, was receive~ as late mail prior to the Board meeting. The letter, from Tiberio Lizza, expressed concern regarding the length of the construction process for the previously approved remodel for the subject property and the potential view impacts associated with the proposed carport enclosure. (Exhibit D). Since that time, Staff has received another letter, dated February IS, 2000 from the adjacent neighbor, Agnes B. Davis, also expressing concerns regarding impacts to public view access to the Bay. (Exhibit E). Staff has also received several phone calls from residents in the Old Tiburon area regarding the application. These residents expressed concern regarding the potential for view blockage associated with the carport enclosure proposal. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This proposal is el\empt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as specified in Section 15303. CONCLUSION: The request to alter the view through the carport area would not be consistent with the intent of the legal settlement the Town entered into regarding the carport. The requested enclosure has the potential of dimini~hing and possible taking away public view access in this area of Paradise Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Town Council hold a public hearing on this item, accept the recommendation qf the Design Review Board to deny the application for carport enclosures and direct Staff to draft a resolution denying the carport enclosure TmURO!\ TOW;\; COUNCIL STAFF REPORT April 19, 2000 3 EXHIBITS A Application form and letter, dated February 16, 1999, from applicant B Staff Report to the Design Review Board dated January 6,2000 C Minutes of the January 6,2000 Design Review Board meeting D. Letter, dated January 5,2000, from Tiberio P. Lizza E. Letter, dated February 15, 2000, from Agnes B. Davis F Proposed plans prepared November 9,1999. TIBURO;-"; TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Apri119,2000 4 TOWN OF TIBURON CC,.iIIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPAR rMEN LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLlCA IT NO. A- TYPE OF APPLICATION o Conditional Use Permit o Conceptual Master Plan o Tentative Subdivision Map o Variance 2. Zoning: o Final Subdivision Map R~ . . o Sign Permit 0 Lot Line Adjustment CEJ11'tJ."- ..: -::::n:e::==n~-'-'-'-':' :::~e:e::t -.... .-'.NOVT2'~~;;'O . Pi.ANNING 0 TOWN OF ~BPARTMi:iVr I URON APPLICANT REQUIRED INFORMATION CO-nu.+ ~p.f"... Parcel(s" ~""'-~" <<a.1lC \:5'L/la 10 General Plan Designation: o Precise Development Plan o Rezoning/Prezoning .-< - '~---J DesTgn-R'e"/{ew-.~-~'-'''--.-'- o General Plan Amendment o Underground Uaiver o Certificate of Compliance o Other 1. Assessor 3. Property Address: 2.=2..1..{ t'6lf\~f'tQ)(~E. D~f u E: Property Owner Name: ST~ ~ CHO<,JS- C~ tC LcOt TIBu~DctJ ~c..VID# "'T I ~rf2.~ c.A. St{9Z0 J Phone Number: 43S-5f{a:::> FAX Number: \435- r<{or:9 Mailing Address: 4. City, state, Zip: 5. Applicant Name: Mailing Address: City, state, Zip: Phone Number: FAX Number: 6. Property Size: 7. Please briefly describe the purpose of the application (what you want to accomplish, attach separate sheets if needed). A"P~t~:)\JAt. ol? A-n-""<:f-U=D \)E~t~:V I c:..t-!p>,V&ES 8. Signat~ Owner ~;.:,':::~~~ - - ____Applicant (must have signed letter from owner) DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE DEPARTMENTAL PROCESSING INFORMATION "-""-...1;""..".*,;...._1\1_ .. .--..cn:;::, LCC. . .-= ~---- :"_n 'l..r)./_~,~_ ..H-.:"I~ <:< c::: __doL_-= _::1_~. February 16, 1999 Ms. Emi Thierault Associate Town Planner Town of Tiburon 1505 Tiburon Blvd. Tiburon, CA 94920 Re: Design Modification - 2024 Paradise Drive Dear Emi: Confirming our conversation, please schedule the council hearing on our final design application for Wednesday, April 5, 2000. Meanwhile, for safety purposes, we have placed a low temporary railing along the waterfront edge because strangers frequently do walk in and lean over or sit on the parapet, (Which has a decidedly uncomfortable drop on the seaward side) Sincerely, :. "..--- Stan Cook TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. 1=,1)* TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD EMI THERIAULT, ASSOCIATE PLANNER 2024 PARADISE DRIVE; FILE #799199 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR GARAGE ENCLOSURE AND OTHER MODIFICATIONS TO AN APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION (FORMER APPLICATION #796003) DATE: JANUARY 6, 2000 APPLICANTS/PROPERTY OWNERS-STAN AND CHONG COOK PROJECT DATA: ADDRESS: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: FILE NUMBER: LOT SIZE: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: 2024 PARADISE DRIVE 059-172-43 799199 7,582 SQUARE FEET R-2 (TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) C (A PORTION OF PROPERTY IS CONSIDERED A-I) DECEMBER 8, 1999 JANUARY 6, 2000 FLOOD ZONE: DATE COMPLETE: CEQA EXEMPTION: PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT DEADLINE: MARCH 6, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as specified in Section 15303(e). TlBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT JANUARY 6, 2000 1 BACKGROUND: On November 12,1999 the applicant applied for a Staff level review ofa carport enclosure and additional exterior modifications to a residence currently under construction at 2024 Paradise Drive. Staff determined that the potential controversy related to the safety grill installations and the carport enclosure necessitated a referral to the Design Review Board. The applicant was sent a Notice of Planning Department Action regarding this administrative decision made on December 8, 1999 (Please see Exhibit 2). Staff has subsequently conducted a review of the historical files and discovered that the carport has been at the center of considerable controversy in the past. Former property owners, Mr. and Mrs. King, conducted a remodel of the residence in 1993 which resulted in the construction of an almost entirely enclosed garage structure. The structure blocked the views to Angel Island that the public had previously enjoyed. In addition, the Kings were using the garage as living area without proper approvals. The Town and the property owners disagreed over the rights of other Town residents for public access to Bay views through the garage area and only avoided litigation after much discussion and the signing of a settlement agreement between the T own and the property owners. Exhibit 3 highlights the Findings of Fact from the settlement which mandated that the garage door would be removed and an activated ( electronic) 3 'h foot metal gate would be installed in its place. In addition, the Kings were required to remove other walls and were allowed to install windows on the south side of the carport structure. The current owner received approvals for a remodel of the residence and carport in 1996. At that time, the application was reviewed by both the Design Review Board and the Town Council because the settlement agreement requires that any change to the design approved for the carport (in the Findings of Fact) requires approval by both the Design Review Board and the Town Council. The applicant originally requested an activated garage door which would consist of an electronic 3 'h foot high gate with glass panels above, suspended by metal bars from a track in the carport ceiling. The Board chose to approve the activated gate but required modifications involving the removal of all of the glass above the gate and a reduction of the number of metal bars. The specific design was referred to and approved by the Administrative Panel. The Town Council ratified the Board's decision. (Please see Exhibit 4) PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval for modifications to the remodel proposal approved in 1996. The modifications include a request to completely enclose the carport with additional windows and folding glass doors, to install iron safety grills over the windows near the street and to install an iron trellis top at the location of a previously approved stucco trellis with a wood gate. Plans, prepared November 9, 1999, are attached. ANALYSIS: Design Issues TfBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT JANUARY 6, 2000 2 Due to recent concerns Staff has developed regarding glass garage door installations, The Building Official was involved in the review of the proposed doors. Building Official Bloomquist has determined that public safety in this section of the Paradise Drive roadway necessitates either an open carport or an activated garage door (one that opens by remote control). He recommends denial of the current garage door request. He also reviewed the specifications for the doors and suggests that they cannot be converted to an automatic opening system. (Please see Exhibit 5) Staff does not foresee any other design issues with this project. Zoning Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds it to be in confonnance with the development standards for the R-2 zone. Public Comment Staff has not received written comments from the public regarding the current application. However, two residents have phoned Staff to express concerns regarding the precedent set by the safety grills and the view impacts associated with the proposed enclosure of the carport. RECOMMENDATION: The Board should review this project with respect to Zoning Ordinance Section 4.02.07 (Guiding Principles). If the Board finds the design to be acceptable and in confonnance with the Town's Design Guidelines, then Staff recommends that the application be approved subject to the attached conditions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Conditions of approval 2. Notice of Planning Department Action for Staff level review of current application, dated December 8, 1999 3. Excerpt from "Recitals of Fact" settlement agreement Town of Tiburon/King, May 1993 4. Staff Report to Town Council with Staff Report to Design Review Board and Design Review Board minutes attached, April 1996 5. Memo, dated December 28, 1999, from Building Official Bloomquist to Design Review Board reo current application 6. Submitted plans prepared November 9, 1999. TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD STAFF REPORT JANUARY 6, 2000 3 T:1~'LTTT> '-1' .c,'<U.L.L.uIT 1\TO ,. 4-.J .~_ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 2024 Paradise Drive FILE #799199 1. The development of this project shall conform to the application received by the Town of Tiburon on November 12,1999 as amended by these conditions of approval. 2. The development of this project shall conform with the application dated by the Town of Tiburon on November 12,1999, or as amended by these conditions of approval. Any modifications to the building plans prepared November 9, 1999 must be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Board. 3. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall be identical to those approved by the Design Review Board. If any changes are made to the approved Design Review plans, the permit holder is responsible for clearly identifying all such changes when submitted to the Building Department for plan check. Such changes must be clearly highlighted (with a "bubble" or "cloud") on the submitted plans. A list describing in detail all such changes shall be submitted and attached to the building plans, with a signature block to be signed by the Design Review Staff member indicating that these changes have been reviewed and are approved, or require additional Design Review. All changes that have not been explicitly approved by Staff as part of the Building Plan Check process are not approved. Construction that does not have Design Review approval is not valid and shall be subject to stop work orders and may require removal. 4. A garage door design acceptable to the Building Official shall be submitted with the application for a building permit. The garage door must be constructed in a manner which does not prohibit the future use of the carport as a credible parking structure for automobiles. 5. This approval shall be used within three (3) years of the approval date, and shall become null and void unless a building permit has been issued. TIBURON DESIGN REV7EW BOARD STAFF REPORT JANUARY 6, 2000 4 TOWN OF TIBURON .,~o, "o,~~" ~ C o < . . -:,. \ ,~:... 5 r r~t, , . '........ .. ~ '-''<;>'''11 \ . 'r.1V'J'';'~'"'' ~TO 2- .J.:.I""U~.L"""'.I,. ~ .. ~ . . !- 1505 TIBURON BOULEVARD. TIBURON . CALIFORNIA 94920 . (415) 435.7373 FAX (415) 435-2438 PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTION ON ApPLICATION FOR SITE PLAL'I AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 1Vlr. and Mrs. Cook 2024 Paradise Drive Tiburon. CA 94920 On December 8, 1999 Town ofTiburon Planning Department took the following action regarding property located at: ADDRESS. 2024 Paradise Drive APPLlCAL'IT/OW1'<'ER.: Cook FILE NO. 799199 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modifications to an existing design review approval. Installation of window, door and archway grills (ironwork), installation of window, construction of a gate trellis and conversion of existing carport into a garage (folding glass doors proposed). o Approved as submitted o Referred to the Design Review Board. This item has been tentatively scheduled for the January 6,1999 Board meeting. The following items must be submitted in order for the Board to perform a meaningful review of this application: 1. 6 full size and 14 reduced sets of plans which include a site plan indicating the area of modifications; 2. The fee required for items referred to the Board is $400. Since a $200 fee has already been paid, the $200 remainder is required; 3. A materials/colors board. Note: These items must be submitted by 5 p.m. on December 20, 1999 in order to avoid a continuance of this item to a later date. o Approved with the following conditions: o Denied ~~~ u ,= ~ (f ()yy-, ~~) public hearing on the application, or any alleged ~------~Brown Act violations involving the Town's actions on 1";'\L.Yff)'l'Tf1"'-1'O~. this application. ..L:.IX1L.l.IJ.L.L ..." . 2. . In consideration of the Kings'. agreeme,nt not to sue described in Paragraph I, the Town agrees to permit the Kings to proceed with construction in compliance with the site plan and architectural approval of December 19, 1990, provided it incorporates the following modifications to the Kings' previous design approval of December 9, 1990: ~ (a) The garage door, south and east walls of the two-car garage shall be deleted. ::;> (b) In place of the garage door on the west wall, there will be a wrought iron gate with automatic opener. The gate height shall start at 3-1/2 feet at the north end and shall increase as necessary to match the change in elevation towards the southern end of the parking area. The gate may contain the scroll work shown on the drawings attached as Exhibit A. (c) The existing planned roof of the garage shall nct be changed. (d) Wrought iron guard rails, matching the previously approved wrought iron rails for the project and no~ exceeding 3-1/2 feet in height, shall be substituted for the east and south walls of the garage. ~ (e) A clear non-tinted transparent glass windbreak shall be installed on the south elevation. The glass area of the windbreak shall be as large as possible with as little framing as possible in order to preserve the view to the maximum extent feasible. ( 3. The plans and drawings attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, contain all of the changes described in Paragraph 2 above. Any change to the carport which does not substantially conform to these plans and drawings shall not be made without review and approval of the Town Council. Any changes to the project other than the carport shall be governed by the applicable ordinances and rules of the Town. l 4. The revisions to the project listed in Paragraph 2 and attached as Exhibit A have been plan checked and approved by the Town's Building Department as being in conformance with all adopted and applicable building codes. -2- I ! ~~----_.._. ~.. 't;1VT_TIT.>1TTl NTO ~.(U.~""'''''.i.''' . ia- TC 4-v~ TffiURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: TOWN COUNCIL ITEM NO.: MEETING DATE: 4/17/96 r REPORT DATE: 4/10/96 FROM: ASSIST ANT PLANNER, IRENE BORBA SUBJECT: RA TIFICA TION OF APPROVED DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATIONS TO THE CARPORT AT 2024 PARADISE DRIVE (ASSESSOR'S PARCELS 59-172-27 & 28) APPLICANT-HOWARD FIELDS AND ASSOCIATES PROPERTY OWNER- MR. AND MRS. COOK BACKGROUND: In 1993, the Town of Tiburon entered into a Settlement Agreement. (Resolution #2918; Exhibit 6), with the then-property owners at 2024 Paradise Drive, Mr. and Mrs King, relative to a controversial addition/remodel of their residence. Resolution # 2918 (in paragraph 3 on page 2 of the agreement) sets forth the process by which amendments to this project must be reviewed. As indicated in the agreement, any changes to the carport (garage) must be reviewed and approved by the Town Council after the Design Review Board has acted. All other changes need only be reviewed by the Board pursuant to applicable ordinances and rules of the Town. The current property owners filed a Design Review application for modifications to approved plans which does include modifications to the carport (garage). The item was heard at the February IS, 1996, and the March 21, 1996, Design Review Board meeting. The Design Review Board conditionally approved the modifications at its March 21, 1996, meeting. Minutes from the March 21, 1996, Design Review Board meeting are attached (Exhibit 2). As no appeal was filed, the Board's approval of the amendments is final with the exception of the carport changes, which must be ratified by the Town Council. PROPOSAL: The proposal before the Design Review Board included numerous exterior modifications the to approved plans for the existing residence at 2024 Paradise Drive. . Only exterior modifications to the facade of the approved plans were proposed. In no way would the proposal alter the siting or height of the approved structure. ANALYSIS: Design Issues Below is a summary of currently proposed modifications to the carport (garage) approved in 1993: . South ~levation Approved in 1993 Three and a half foot high wrought iron guardrail with a glass windbreak above (Exhibit 11). . Change Requested The south elevation of the carport would be replaced with a sliding glass door and above there would be a green metal and clear glass facia at the top portion of the structure as shown in Exhibit 8. . East elevation Approved in 1993 A three and a half foot wrought iron guardrail which is open above (Exhibit 10). . Change Requested The guardrail would be replaced with a three and a half foot green metal guardrail, which is open above and would include a green metal and clear glass facia at the top portion of the structure as shown in Exhibit 9. . West elevation Approved in 1993 Four foot high wrought iron gate which is open above (Exhibit 9). . Change Requested The wrought iron gate would be replaced with a three and a half foot high overhead activated metal gate dark green in color and open above with a green metal and clear glass facia at the top of the structure as shown in Exhibit 7. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council ratify the modifications to the carport as approved by the Design Review Board. Minute action will suffice; no resolution is necessary. EXHIBITS: 1. Staff report from the March 21, 1996, Design Review Board meeting. 2. Minutes from the March 21, 1996, Design Review Board meeting. 3. Staff report from the February 15, 1996, Design Review Board meeting. 4. Location map. 5. Minutes from the February 15, 1996, Design Review Board meeting. 6. Town Council Resolution No. 2918 and the Settlement Agreement dated April 21, 1993. 7. West elevation of approved plans dated March 21, 1996. 8. South elevation of approved plans dated March 21,1996. Page 2 9. East elevation of approved plans dated March 21, 1996. 10. East elevation of plans dated October 21,1993. 11. South elevation of plans dated October 21,1993. , Page 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ST AFF REPORT TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AGENDA NO.: E4 FROM: IRENE BORBA, ASSISTANT PLANNER , MEETING DATE: MARCH 21, 1996 SUBJECT: 2024 PARADISE DRIVE; FILE #796003 SITE PLAN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR EXTERIOR MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED PLANS APPLICANT-HOWARD FIELDS AND ASSOCIATES OWNERS-MR. AND MRS. COOK PROJECT DATA: ADDRESS: 2024 PARADISE DRIVE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 59-172-27 & 59-172-28 FILE NUMBER: 796003 LOT SIZE: TOTAL LOT SIZE 7,582 SQUARE FEET ZONING: R-2 (TWO FAMll..Y RESIDENTIAL) GE~'ERAL PLA.~: H (mGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) CURRENT USE: SINGLE FAMll..Y RESIDENCE LOT SIZE: 7,582 SQUARE FEET FLOOD ZONE: C AND A-I DATE COMPLETE: JANUARY 24, 1996 CEQA EXEMPTION: FEBRUARY 7, 1996 PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT DEADLINE: MAY 7,1996 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as specified in Section 15301. mSTORY: The Board should also refer to the Staff Repon of February 15, 1996, and its exhibits which provided the Board with a detailed account of this projects past history and included previous Resolutions and an Agreement between the Town and the previous property owners. EXillBIT NO.~ '. This item was presented to the Design Review Board on February 15, 1996. The item was continued in order to allow the applicant time to respond to concerns of the Board and neighbors. Minutes from the February 15, 1996, Design Review Board meeting are attached. The Board's main concerns were with the proposed changes to the carport and the amount of glass that had been added to the carport as well as to the rear elevation. The Board also had concerns with the proposed colors and wanted to see something darker proposed. , PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing exterior modifications to approved plans for an addition/remodel of the existing residence at 2024 Paradise Drive. The applicant is proposing only exterior modifications to the facade of the approved plans and is in no way altering the siting or height of the approved addition. Changes from the previous proposal are outlined in a letter from the architect dated March 11, 1996, (attached). The changes include: · over-head activated metal gate on the west elevation of the carport, approximately 3 II., feet in height, open on top and painted dark green in color. On the east elevation a 3 'h feet metal guardrail, open on top and painted dark green in color. These changes help to provide clear views to the bay. . glass stair tower on the rear elevation has been articulated by a steel support frame and large curved glass panels added. The top of the tower is opaque. . the color has been changed to match the existing residence and would be highlighted in an off-white trim. Door and window sashes and accents would be in a dark green. · chimneys have been modified by using a circular metal flue which would be painted dark green. . glazing has been reduced on the east elevation of the addition. ANALYSIS: General Resolution No. 2918 (in paragraph 3 on page 2 of the agreement) sets forth the process by which these amendments must be reviewed. Any changes to the carport (garage) must be reviewed and approved by the Town CouncilJlfter the Board has acted. All other changes to the project need only be reviewed by the Board pursuant to applicable ordinances and rules of the Town. Development Standards .-'-~ . Staff has reviewed the proposed modifications and finds them to be in conformance with the development standards for the R-2 zone (with the exception of the front yard setbacks and the height limit). Variances for these items were granted in September 1990, by the Design Review Board, and no further variances are required, Design Issues The most controversial items from the 1993 hearings are listed in paragraph 2 of the agreement and are included below, along with a description of how the current proposal changes those items: Below is a summary of proposed design changes from the 1993 approval: . Item 2(a) . Change . Item 2 (b) . Change . Item 2(c) . Change . Item 2 (d) . Change . Item 2(e) The garage door, south and east walls of the two-car garage shall be deleted. The south elevation of the carport would be replaced with an overhead activated metal gate, approximately 3 1/2 feet in height, open above and painted dark green. The east elevation would be replaced with a 3 1h foot green metal guardrail and open above. In place of the garage door on the west wall, there will be a wrought iron gate with automatic opener. The gate height shall start at 3 Ih feet at the north end and shall increase as necessary to match the change in elevation towards the southern end of the parking area. The gate may contain the scroll work shown on the drawings attached as exhibit. The gate would be replaced with a 3 1/2 foot overhead activated metal gate dark green in color which is open above. The existing planned roof of the garage shall not be changed. No proposed garage roof change. Wrought iron guard rails, matching the previously approved wrought iron rails for the project and not exceeding 3 lh feet in height, shall be substituted for the east and south walls of the garage. The south elevation of the garage would be replaced with sliding glass door and the east elevation would be replaced with a 3 Ih metal railing, painted dark green in color and open above. A clear non-tinted transparent glass windbreak shall be installed on the south elevation. The glass area of the windbreak shall be as large as t ~ possible in order to preserve the view to the maximum extent feasible. . Change A sliding glass door is proposed in lieu of the glass windbreak. Public Comments To date, Staff has not received any public comments regarding the revised changes. , FURTHER ACTION REOUIRED: Pursuant to the terms of Resolution No. 2918 the Town Council must review and approve any changes to the carport (garage). RECOMMENDA TION: The Board should review the proposed modifications pursuant to Section 4.02.00 of the Towns Zoning Ordinance, and with consideration of applicable portions of Resolution No. 2918. Should the Board choose to approve the application, suggested conditions of approval are attached. EXHTRITS: 1. Conditions of approval. 2. Minutes from 2/15/96 Design Review Board meeting. 3. Letter dated march 11, 1996, from David Brodsley. 4. Plans date stamped march 14, 1996. CONDnITONSOFAPPROVAL L. 2024 PARADISE DRIVE FILE # 796003 1. The development of the project shall conform with the application dated by the Town of Tiburon on January 12, 1996, or as amended by these conditions of approval. Any modifications to the plans of March 14, 1996, must be reviewed and approved by the Board. 2. The applicant must meet all requirements of other agencies prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The skylights must be bronzed or tinted and no lights in the wells. 4. That per the settlement agreement that the proposed changes for the carport be reviewed and approved by the Town Council. (.,. 4. 2024 Paradise Drive Cook, Modifications, to Approved Plans This item was presented to the Design Review board on February 15, 1996. the item was continued in order to allow the applicant time to respond to concerns of the Board and the neighbors. The Board's main concerns were with the proposed changes to the carport and the amount of glass that had been added to the carport as well as to the rear elevation. The board also had concerns with the proposed colors and wanted to see something darker proposed. Howard Fields, Architect, discussed the changes. They have darkened the colors, eliminated the glazing on the garage, and the metal bars are to be the same color as the trim and will open upwards to allow cars to enter. They kept the glazing on the south elevation but have e1iminated some of the glazing on the east elevation; the stlirway tower has been divided and articulated by a steel support frame and large curved glass panels. No outdoor lighting is proposed except for a few sconces. There are some low voltage light boxes on the west elevation. Boardmembers' Parhomenko and Shadan supported the project with the revisions. Boardmember Sadrieh felt the colors were a big improvement but because of the prominent location could be a little richer and darker. He suggest e1iminating every other bar on the proposed overhead metal gate. He was not completely satisfied with the amount of glazing but it was acceptable. Chair Berger supported the way the garage now operates and agrees with the elimination of some of the verticals. He wanted the lighting removed from the west elevation and could live with the proposed color. Mr. Fields objected to the removal of some of the bars on the garage because he did not want it to be square. Boardmember Sadrieh responded that his intent was not to have it be square. Mis BergerlSadrieh, and unanimously passed, to approve the application with the following modifications: The color be darker; 1/2 of vertical steel members are to be removed from the gate and lights are to be removed from the planters. The changes are to go to the Administrative Panel. EXHIBIT NO.~ DRB 3/21/96 6 .z. Cif J... .'-.J . vc~~i~ . i--ii. "'." _:::4 ~ >\ L I \.... ~ ~ . I \\_ ~ '-'~ ~ 7.. - ... ~\o- k' ~ ~}' i\ \.t , 1\ \ \ I, f \ \ '\ \ i \ \1" , , lib-,' '" II ..... - i~ I . ' \ . , ' f/ ~ e.'t ~ Uv ~-- ~4 -'66 \--4-u " ~ -{t; ~ .., . (. ~ ~~ ~ 1>> ~C'...-(') 6 6 ... ""fJ. \\ <y - ~ ~..., ~ p'~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~\ \~ Q --I ~t1 . - ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~l-\) I ~ :z. '~. ~ lJ I. . . 'II . .. ~ ., '" .., _..- ';'li.l;;~~. 'tr_"';:';::. . ;:~i~,[;:' . " \\J 1u'-' .,j ~~ lI\~ ~J 'V ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~'0 V) .1\\ ' '\l :::E7 I , , I ~ i I , I , I i I I I I I I I . i ct..'t.,-. I .~ I .... , ,~ ~ .~ , I " , , . - ~ ~'l~ m .. ..... ~ Il..::. ?,$' "'"() S "'- ~ ' , - ~ , I <::. \ ~ II C~ 'k i' I ^ ,I '~ <:. ~ i ~ - ~ /~ i I 'c::.. Q..;. \\ , -<- I I I , I ' J ~ i !UI/ i 7~, I r .11\ il I, .lL , (jIJ I :1 :/ ' ,.2. I , , I il II j ! r - 'i 1/ I I I II iDi 7. I " Q , G . , .. . " -;) 0 ~ I ::z , . S .. . . -... :z '- . '" -~. . '-' . . I I \(: , I .-~. .. I if TOWN OF TIBURON BUILDING DEPARTMENT i '".;.~~ 0' r,.o ~ 10.... _J>_ .~ I'., :.".:.... .........,I.~ -.".' " .,' (" - .-'","' ~"'o~ .'.' <' ",I'" ,...... ~ r 1505 TIBURON BLVD., TIBURON, CA 94920 (415) 435-7380 FAX (415) 435-7395 -----... -~ To: Emi Theriault D --- -~ EX1-Il::B:I'l' NO. 5 From: Dean Bloomquist Subject: 2024 Paradise-proposal to install sliding glass doors in lieu of roll-up garage doors. Date: December 28, 1999 This is a high traffic area, with limited line of sight, and all garages in this area should have roll- up doors activated by remote control, so that a car can quickly get off the street and enter the garage without obstructing traffic. The potential for accidents in this area is already high, and any unnecessary obstruction of traffic should be avoided. The proposal to install sliding glass doors at this location should be rejected. TOWN OF TIBURON -.IMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT OEPAh fMEN', LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TYPE OF APPLICATION o Conditional Use Permit o Conceptual Master Ptan o Tentative Subdivision Map o Variance o Precise Developllent Ptan 2. Zoning: o Final Subdivision Map Al:Cl:J1 ,~ No . ..1) VV 1 2 1999 PlANNING Df? TOI1'NOF T/8'ARTMtiVr URON APPLICANT REQUIRED INFORMATION CO~+ ",<p.V'-.- ~::J ~""?-4 ;J.2>C ID'1 Il ~ '"i 0 General Plan Designation: o "elL Permit o Tree Panni t o Retonlng/Prezoning '" Design Review o Sign Permit o Lot Line Adjustment o Genenl Plan Amendnent o Zoning Text Amerdnent o Parcel Map o Underground Waiver o Certificate of C~llance o Other 1. Assessor Parcel(s): City, state, Zip: zc:>z.l.( PO\~ '" 11)'5'1" :t>i\!.' Vb 5T A,rJ .:. C HC:>~.JS- c= {("' V,Ot 1't Bu,,,,1:'<tJ ~c. VI/). \' I !B0lt:c~J cA St{')2Q ) l.{35-5'{oO FAX Number: '-135- ('-(c)(9 3. Property Address: 4. Property Owner Name: Mailing Address: Phone Number: 5. Applicant Name: Mailing Address: city, state, zip: Phone Number: FAX Number: 6. Property Size: , 7. Please briefly describe the purpose af theapplicatian (what you want to accomplish, attach separate sheets if needed). A"PQ.Dt/AL e>''F A~it''.cHcD 0E.'5lfrU' c..HI"IIJ&E'S 0:,----:.:....., J"--,. 8. Signature;..' -~"::::"':};.",,:;:!';...~... ~owner ____Applicant (must have signed letter from owner) DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE DEPARTMENTAL PROCESSING INFORMATION Fee Deposit: d. GQ- f) :Jt POI'6S Application No.: 7c/C] I ~cl Date Received: II 1\ 21 '1<1 Received By: Date Deemed Complete: By, Acting Body: Action: Condltlons of Approval or Comments: ResolutIon or Ordinance #: \min\applic2.frm 10/'5/91 D~PJ1A C;LAS Ol. 0 cl <--I /;'-0.../1 ~'"L--d&G.J:Z "",,-,'J'J.. ~" .- - .... .r -NCO:Bl-1959 14:01 P.02/02 -110"). · t:y'~ '''lb~ tAP ~~~ g;O~ . 1~ og5 7' e p.,..oe ;:1>- .- ze 7/16 --.----.......... 13/16 L 1/4 lea 31 1/8-1-31 118+31 118-\-31 118-1-31 1/6+31 118 O,1570-j- 0.1:570-!- 0,1570+ 0,1570-1- 0.1570-1- 1/4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / I / / / I / lN3Wd013^30 AlINn~lI'lOO ::I01N3Wll:lVd3G . 6661 g 1 ^ON NOl::lnSll:10 NMOl 03^1303l:1 5UOINC HSW STYLE C-'50, C8:I CR5S0,g CRS TA:' I CLASS THICKNESS 3/8', 0 1/2': ~ n.IS ELEVATION IS VlEWEO FROM ,""E INTERIOR TO SHOW LOCK FUNCTIONS REF.' COOl< RES t R . ; n SCAlE: J/e'~,' DATE' '0.27.99 TOTAL p.e2 ~ i-;- I I , ~~ DORMA DORMA-Glas 4.1 DORM 'MtG · DORMA'FSW DORMA HSW-C' ~ r I \ j ',CD , , , , ,':'-' . " ., f='.1 ~ . i I 12 T Fl(jgelausfiihrungen und Funktionen CD End/lugel Nicht vertahr:ar, mlt unterem Riegelschlcl3 und ocerem Fest- steller oder seillich schliel3en- dem RiegefschloB, Ausfuhrung wahlweise als . ;Jencel-cncflugel r:ll! Boden- lager. . Fendel-Encf!ugel mil Boden- It.;rsc:lllel3er, . Oreh-Endfj,jgel mlt Boden- lager, . Dreh-Endflugel mil Boden- lager und ObenturschlieBer. ~' SchiebeflUgel Verlahrbar, ingeschlossenem Z:..:stand fes!s:ehend, mil unte- re~ F"eststelle,. @ Dreh-SchiebeflUgel Verfahroar, mit Gleilschlenen-Tur- schlleBer, unterem R1egelschlo13 scwie unterem und oberem Fest- steller. @ Pendel-SchiebeflGgel Verfahrcar. m:tJnlerem Riegel- sC.'1lcB, ~ntereri1 und oberem Feststeller und RahmenlLir. SG:iieBer (RTSi, ,A.llernativ auch ml: 8oderILJrsc:lief3e (BTS) liererbar " Uchte Ourchgangshohen bei geschlossenp- Ii ...Iagen DORMA HSW-G 75: Gesamth6he in mm - 60 mm DORMA HSW-G 75 mit RahmenturschlieBern : Gesamth6he in mm -166 mm DORMA HSW-G 150: Gesamth6he in mm -75 mm DORMA HSW-G 150 mit Rahmenti.JrschlieBern: Gesamth6he in mm -181 mm Glashohenma6e DORMA HSW-G 75: Gesamthohe in mm - 270 mm DORMA HSW.G 75 mlt RahmenturschlieBern : Gesamlh6he in mm - 292 mm DORMA HSW.G 150: Gesamth6he in mm - 303 mm DORMA HSW-G 150 mil Rahmenlurschliel3ern: Gesamth6he in mm - 307 mm Abstandsma13e Oberkante Ful3boden - Unter- kante untere Turschiene: 7 mm Schlebe!1ugel - SChiebeflugel: 4mm Endflugel- Schlebeflugel: 4mm Endflugel - Wand: 2 mm Panel designs and functions CD End panel Non-sliding, with floor lock and top bolt or side-locking, available as . double action panel with floor pivot . double action panel with floor spring . single action panel with floor pivot . single action panel with overhead door closer. @ Sliding panel Movable, fixed when the system is closed, with noor bolt. @ Single action sliding panel Movable, with earn-action door closer, floor lock, floor and lop bolt @) Double action panel Movable, with floor lock, floor and tap bolt, and transom closer (RTS). Also available with floor spring. I' ,I . eo. .' Clear opening heigt.t (with panels pushed back) DORMA HSW-G 75: Total height in mm - 60 mm DORMA HSW-G 75 with transom closers: Total height in mm -166 mm DORMA HSW.G 150: Total height in mm -75 mm DORMA HSW-G 150 with transom closers: Total height in mm -181 mm . Glass height DORMA HSW.G 75: Tolal height in mm - 270 mm DORMA HSW-G 75 with transom closers: TOfal height in mm - 292 mm DORMA HSW-G 150: Tolal height in mm - 303 mm DORMA HSW-G 150 wilh transom closers: Total height in mm - 307 mm Clearances Finished floor level- bottom edge of bottom door rail: 7 mm Sliding panel- sliding panel: 4mm End panel - sliding panel: 4mm End panel - wall: 2 mm , () " 4.12/9': DORMA HSW-G Glas-Schiebefronten ideal filr Geschiifte und Gastronomiebetriebe i\,,1;! den van DORMA-Glas ent- w'ckelten Svstemen fur Glas- Sc.1Iebe!ronten lassen slch SC:laufenSlec und Emgange so aL.:sfuhren, dal3 SIB buchstabllch Zt.,; Luft wereen kdnnen, wann Ir:-.'lier es der Betrelber wunsch!. Einfache Planung, problemloser Betrieb Bls Ins Delail durchdacht und sQllde ausgeluhrt, zelchnen sich G ias- Sdliebefronlsystem e CORM.': -iSW-G durch zahl- re!che Vcrteile aus: . JerVerlaui der Schiebefronlen ,a;3t slch orcolemlos den verschiedensten Grundnssen anpassen. . Die Schiebeflugel brauchen kelne zusalzliche Fuhrung am Fuf3boden. . :\Jahezu jeder Schlebeflugel kann als Tur - wahlwelse mit Pendel- oCer Oreh-$chlebe- Ilugel- ausgefuhrt werden. . Die Parkpos.tlonen lassen sich an praktlsch Jeder gewunschten Steile anordnen. . Spezlel!e Laufwerke sorgen fur 81rl8 5Ic~e:e Fuhrung und re!chlen Laul cer SchleCeflu\,;jel. . Jeder Schleoerluge! wrrd im geschlassenen ZUSland durch Feststeller ader SchlaG geslche;:. .':"lIe Bedlenlede bestehen aus korrOSlonSOestandlgem Edel. stahl. Die 8e!allgung der oeeren \jer-:egelungen ~rfolgt t:equem :.;r,d slcher durch Gelenkkurceln . w'..Jlfer an den Turschlenen gewahrlelSlen minimale Abslande zWIschen den SChleoeffugein und verhlndern zuglerch, dai3 ihre" Glaskanten aneinanderS10Ben. Fur Schiebeflugel- gewichte bis max. 75 und 150 kg Gia s. Sch I e Celro n Isystem e DC.~MA HS'/..-G Sind In Z\';81 Al.;s~I..;...,runge'l 'leferbcH . :'::Rr..;IA :-JS',N-G 75 :ur =;0gel :-:'375 kg . :'"JRMA I-S/J-G 150 'u{ ::'ld- ~d Scr,lec5ilugei bls -::Okg, I...;' ]reh-t.."d Pende:sc:--ebe- I~';:el ::1530 ).(9 Leichtes Justieren und Nachrichten Ole Aulhangungen Sind verslell- bar, so daB die Sch1ebellugel schnell und einfach Justiert wer- den k6nnen. Oa die Verschraubung derTur- schienen nur von den Sellen her erfolgt und die VerkJeidungen lediglich aufgeclipst und von selt- lichen Abdeckungen gesichen werden, lassen slch die unteren TOrschlenen auch nach dem Einbau der SchlebellOgel ProM blemlos Ibsen und neu ausrichten. PatentierterVorsprung durch integrierte RahmentUrschlieBer Die speziell fOr Pende!-Sehiebe- flOge! enlwlckelle, patentierte Trag profil-TO rschie nen4Einhell mlt Inlegriertem RahmentOr4 schlieBer DORMA RTS ermbg- lieht besonders montage- und bedienungsfreundllche sowie oplisch ansprechenrlp 16sungen. So erObrigen sieh YluUe AusnehM mungen im Fu13boden, wie sie fur BcdenlOrschlieGer erfarder- Iieh Sind. Ebenso entfallt die oft sl6rende Oeckplane im Ourch- gangsberelch. Und mil der zuge- hbrigen, ebenfalls palentlerlen Vemegelungs-Emhell geht die Umstellung van Turbetriebl Pendeln auf Schieben und umgekehrl besonders einfach und schnell vanstaUen. Freie Oberllachen- und Farbwahl Ole aus Lelchlmelall bestehenden Lautschienen, Turschlenen und Tragprotile werden wahlweise e)axlert ader farbbeschlchte! gelle!ert. Ole zu den Turschlenen gehbrenden, aufcfipsbaren und jederzeil auswechselbaren Verkleidungen k6nnen auGer- dem auch aus Edelslahl und Messing hergeslellt werden, wobel der Eloxallan der Schlenen und Profile auf dl€sC Werksloffe abgesllmml wlrd. Zuverlassige G eb ra uchseigenschaften Mlt Ihrer dlJrchdachlen Konstruk- lion, den qualllatlv hochwertlgen Materlalien und der sollden Aus. fuhrung entsprechen ScrlJebe- frontsysteme DORMA HSW.G hohen Antorderungen an die Gebrauchselgensch alten. 0- -..--- ~-. \ \ , .' -' r (;,:' .\ ., , . I I , " o ~ ~ +t M M . ~ . r '" . "1 t':tC[:il 0 I ~!i(~ "I k:"~U ~i-~I o Praxisgerechter Systemaufbau Glas-Schiebefrontsysteme DORMA HSW-G bestehen im wesentJichen aus . Laufsehienen @, die mit einer an der Decke anzu- bringenden Stahlunter- konstruktion <D zu verschrauben sind . oberen und unteren Tur- schienen'@,@, die jeweils Grundprofile, aufclipsbare Verkleidungen sowie seitliche Abdeckungen umfassen und durch Aufklemmen mit Sicherheitsglas-Scheiben C!> verbunden werden . Laufwagen @,Aufhangun- gen @ und Tragprofilen lID, die zusammen'mitden Scheiben Jeichtverlahrbare Schiebeflugel bllden . Parkpositionen, in die sich die SchiebeflOget platzM sparend und unauffaJlig eintahren lassen, wenn die Glasfront ge6ffnet wird. ~:#i'~i.~~r~~i;!;;,~~ .t 1 2, 9~ I .-G OORMA.-Glas 4.1 I , , Gloss sliding shopfronts - ideal for boutiques and bistros DORMA'S development at the HSW sliding glass wall system has created a method of making shopfronts and swing doors literally disappear into thin air, simply and without fuss, whenever you want. Easy to adjust and commission The hangers are adjustable, making it quick and easy to align the sliding panels. The door rails are clamped onto the glass by securing screws on alternate sides. Covers eHp on over the top of the base rail, and are secured by end caps. This means that the bottom rails can easily be adjusted on the glass. even after Ibe panel has been hung. Patented transom closer option A special carrier profile has been developed and patented to accomodate DORMA RTS transom closers for swing doors. This is a fixer- and user.friendly system which provides an interesting and attractive option. The main advan.tage is that there is no nee..,j Ie" dig out the floor to take Hoar sprmgs. Likewise, the intrusion of floor spring coverplates in the pedestrian area is avoided. And with its own patented locking system, the switch from swing door to sliding panel- and vice versa - is easily and quickly accomplished, Wide choice of colours and finishes The aluminium track, door rails and carrier profiles can be supplied anodised or polyester powder coated in a wide range of colours. The interchangeable, clip-on door rail covers can also be fabricated in stainless steel and brass. In this case, the track and carrier profiles are anodised in a toning finish. Typical installation DORMA HSW-G sliding shoplront systems are made up 01 the following components: . Track ~ for direct bolting to a steel girder ,(!)or'similaron the . ceiHng~' . top@and bottom @ . ',rails composed of base'i' 'rail, c1ip~n covers . ,.< . and end caps; which are Clamped onto the'toughened glass' paneis <!J . . rollers iJ), carriers@, and carrier profiles ~ which ensure that the panels slide easily with :-,_,m_ini,:!u~e~ort ,.,' . stackIng areas. in which - the Sliding panels are . . neatly and compactly stacked when the shopfront is opened. " ~ Simple to specify Easy to operate Attention to detail and robust construction are behind the many advantages to be found in DORMA's HSW-G sliding glass wall system: . The tracks can be laid out in an infinite variety of configurations - no problem! . Sliding panels can be moved with no need for guides or channels in the floor. . Every sliding panel can be fitted out to act additionally as a single or double action door. . The stacking areas can be positioned anywhere along the track. . The special track section and high quality rollers ensure smooth operation and excellent stability. . Each sliding panel is secured in its closed position by bolts or loCks. . All operating parts are made from corrosion resistant stainless steel. The upper locks are easily operated with the crank key. . Protective buffers on the door rails ensure minimal gaps between the sliding panels, whilst at the same time preventing clashing of glass edges. ~ +i ~ ~ ~ ~ . N " 6 7 . For sliding panel weights up to 75 and 150 kg max. The DORMA HSW-G sliding glass wall system is available in two types: . DORMA HSW.G 75 for panels weighing up to 75 kg. . DORMA HSW.G 150 for end and sliding panels weighing up 10 150 kg; lor single and double action swing doors up 10 '90 kg. Reliable and durable product quality DORMA HSW-G has been carefully engineered from quality materials to provide a robust sliding wall system that meets the highest standards of reliability and durability. 8 ~ o ,:~~s.;~~::-~~:.~ ~~. ,~r '~~~,\,.":~~'~t~:" ,':' ,':" , ",. . ..::2:9..: 3 ~ _. ". Max. SchiebeflUgelgr6Ben und -gewichte Max. sliding panel sizes and weights Flugel- max. max. -ax ausfuhrung Gesamt- Flugel. FluYt::lyewlchl kg hOhe brelte HSW.G HSW.G mm mm 75 150 PenGel- E'ldflugel 3000 1200 100 150 Oreh- Endflugel 3000 1200 100 150 Schlebe. flugel 3000 1200 75 150 Pencel- 3000 Schlebe. mltRTS' 950 75 90 flugel 2500 mitBTS. - Oreh-Schlebe- f1ugel 3000 950 75 90 (J . BTS = BOdenturschlleBer, RTS= RahmenturschlieBer -----.--- OORMA-Glas 4.1 Panel max. max. max. type total panel panel weight kg height width HSW-G HSW-G mm mm 75 . 150 Double action end panel 3000 1200 100 150 Single aellon end panel 3000 1200 100 150 Sliding panel 3000 1200 75 150 Double action 3000 slidmg panel with RTS' 950 75 90 2500 with BTS' - Single action sliding panel 3000 950 75 90 . BTS = floor spring, RTS = transom closer Ideal panel size lor maximum ease of operation: approx. 800 x 2500 mm. The individual panels can also be designed with different widths, the largest being max. 15 % wider than the smallest. The arrangement of the sliding panels in the stacking area will be geared to requirements dictated by the smallest panel width. ~ -"f~ ~I!IIo1I!Y' -; @ . S!.g Seals The seals which have been developed lor the DORMA HSW-G sliding shopfronl system have been designed to ensure that wintry draughts, aircon or heating losses are prevented throughout the year. CD Top seal Aluminium profile with brUSh strip to suit carrier profile on DORMA HSW-G 75. @ Bottom seal Aluminium profile with brush strip to suit bottom rails (not continuous over working parts e.g..locks). Side seals @Alumlnlum profile with brush stnp for pushing onto the Sides of the glass slidIng panels. @)Clearplastlc profile lor pushing onto the sides of glass sliding and pIvoting panels. @)Alumlnium prolile with brush strip channels on three sides. Brush stripS can be inserted as required to suit conditions. For pUShing onto the ,sides of glass sliding and pivoting panelS. Fur die Handhabung Ideale Flugel- groBe: ca. 800 x 2500 mm. Die elnzefnen FIGgel kbnnen auch unterschiedlich breit ausgefuhrt werden. wobei der graBte max. 15 % GroBer als der kleinste seln so lite. Fur die Auslegung der Parkpasi- tlon ist die geringste Flugelbreite maBgebend /i!) - \.;:,1 Dichtungen Die fur Glas-Schlebelront- systeme DORMA HSW-G entwickerten Dichtungen verhin- dern, daB es in den ubergangs- jahreszeiten und im Winter zu Warmeverlusten und Zugluft kOr.1ml. ...., i CD n .~..'~i~L ;: ! i~/ :~J ", V{!6fi.\1 /'i i :~/~ ji~1 ~' .11-"0,10 : i.L'~~.L 11- .:j) Obere Dichtung Lelchtmetal1profil mlt Dichtburste wm Einbau In das Tragprofil zum System DORMA HSW-G 75 und HSW-G 150. ex Untere Oichtung Lelchtme!allprotil mil Olchtburste :''';~ E;nbau in die unteren Tur- schlenen (nlcht ,m 3erelch der Bedlenteilel (\ Seitliche Dichtungen 'di Le!chtmetallprorii :-nIt Dlchl- burs:e zum Autse:ze:1 aut die seilllcnen Glaskanten der Sc.""lleceflugel. @ Klarslchl-Kunststoflprolll zum Aufsetze:: auf die seltllchen Glaskanten von Schiebe- und Oreh- Schlebeflugeln :~ lelchlmetallorofli (;lIt 8ursten- kanal an drel Sel!E'l und belieblg embauba'er Dlcht. CUfste ZUr.1 Aufse!zen auf die seltllc,""le Glaskar~e van Schlebe- und Oren- SC:1lebe- flugel" ---,,----:i~l- l (J;':' '! [(f~; @ ~L: u "J,...; , ~ js.[jg @ @ "~~~i";'01.~" ~~'~~'~~';;;:;~1~~0,:: :!f<:: , l:'A"f;.~'."}"';'\'i1,,';;(ct';.(~;i <...' ~~E.f'~ ~,,~';~f..~.~~~~'1~n:;~';-;_~: ~. 5 DORMA HSW-G r ir--I 'I . , " 1 " l':=.o2! 11') [1~~1 ~l1i; iTi : I': L ..J 1- rl " , I " I l I -b-: T Ty R P 100 100 . --+-- - I III I III " J III .. 6060 X 100 Planung SChienenverlauf, Platzbedar1 und Plazierung der Park position fur G las- Schiebefrontsysteme DORMA HS'N-G wercen einfach mit Hille einer Grundril3skizze ermittelt. Dabei k6nnen die viel. faltigsten Ancrdnungen verwirk- lieht werden. Die Gesamtlange is! writer Ben,icksichtigung der max. Fiugelbreiten unc der ertorder- lichen Abstande (siehe Tabelle und Daten Seiie 5) in FIGgel- breiten aufzulellen. Uber der Laufschiene ist in gan- zer ~ange und einschileBlich der ParkpcsitIon eine ausgerichlele Slahl-Unterkonstruktlon anzu- brlngen, mil oer die Laufschlene verschraubt wlrd. 8er der Olmen- slonierung der Stahl-Unter- konstruktion ist ein Gewicht von 30 kg/m2 Glas je Schrebellugel zugrunde zu legen. Durch Anbnngen und Ausrichten elnes Hohlprcfils auf dem Roh- fur3boden (A.bo. ot:en) kann datur gesorgt werden, daB exakt die vorgesehene Anlagenhbhe erreicht wlrd (siehe auch FuB- bodenausrustung, Selte 7). CD Stahl~Unterkonstruktlon an/in der Decke @ausgerichtetes i-Ichlprofil im FuBboden H Aniagen/",bhe F OKFF Beispiel 1 Gerade Laufschiene mit Parkposition quer zur Laufrichtung 8 Sreite der Parkposition: 8=FJugeJbreite in mm minus 130 mm minus 0,1 x Ty in mm L Laufwegbegrenzer P Laufschienenbefestigungs- punkte - an den geraden TeilstUcken ca. <...,_ _";,0 :TIf~, R Revisionsstuck - !eicht ausbaubar, so daB die Laufwagen problemlos und leicht gewartet und falls erforderlich ausgetauscht werden k6nnen T Tiele der Park position : abhangig von der Anzahl der Flugel und derriefe der Griffe an den Pende!- und Dreh-Schiebellugeln X je nach Grifftiefe Beispiel 2 Abgewinkelte Laufschiene mit Parkposition quer zur Laufrichtung I .. . , .~ -;,1' .-",. " -",-'. .. ""'- < '. . Example 1 Straight track run with stacking area -at right angles to direction of travel B Width of slacking area: .8=panel width in mm , minus 130 mm minus 0,1 x Ty inmm L end stop P fixing points - approx. every 300 mm along a straight run R inspection section - easily removable, allows for inspection and maintenance of the railers, and if necessary, their . replacement T depth of stacking area: depending on number of sliding panels and the projection of handles on double and single action panels X as per handle projection Example 2 Angled track run with stacking area at right angles to direction of travel ~ \.:.51' 6 4.12/94 , Planning A plan will make positioning the track runs and stacking areas for the DORMA HSW-G shoplronl system straightforward, This way you can play around with all the options, The total length must be divided up into panel widths, bearing in mind the maximum panel width and necessary gaps (see table and data page 5). A steel box section must be provided for the whole length of the track run and the stacking area, The track is bolted to this. When calculating the dimensions of the steel member, allow for a weight of 30 kg/m2 per sllding panel. In arderlQ ensure an exact depth and alignment of the floor under Ihe top track, introduce a hollow metal section under the finished floor level. If floor springs are 10 be used. it can accomo- date them, otherwise it need only be large enough to take holes for bolts. (See also Floor preparation, page 7). CD Steel member above or below the ceiling @ Hollow metal section provided in the floor H Total height of system F Finished floor level ~. 100 100 . == ./ ~ .// . 11 ~.~ lx 0- j , ,0 ::G:l .~ ( " ,,' a x /' a 100 100 Beiapiel 3 Example 3 ., Beispiel 4 Example 4 Example 3 Straight track rail with stacking area parallel to dIrection ollravel (90") B Width of stacking area: 8= Panel width in mm minus 126mm T Depth of stacking area: depending on number of sliding panels and the projection of handles on double and single action sliding panels X as per handle projektion r0 I. DORMA-Glas 4.7 Example 4 Straight track rail with stacking area parallel to dlrecllon of Iravel (135') B Width of stacking area: 8= Panel width in mm minus 126mm. o. T Depth of stacking area:. depending on number of sliding panels and the projection 0: t .andles on double and single action sliding panels X as per handle projektion CD Bohrung fOr SchloBriege' @ Bohrung fOr Feststellerbolzen @SchlieBb'ech fOr SchloBnegel @)SchlieBblech fOr Feststeller- bolzen @ Buchse fOr Feststellerbolzen CD Hole for 1I00r lock @ Hole for floor boll @ Floor lock plate @) Floor bolt plate @ Floor bolt socket As an alternative, appropriate floor plates and sockets must be screwed to the floor to receive the bolts. Where floor springs are to be used, additional pockets must be provided in the floor. .~ 'V Beispiel 3 Gerade Laufschiene mit Parkposition parallel zur Laufrichtung (900) 8 Sreite der Parkposition: 6 = Flugelbreite in mm minus 126 mm T Tiefe der Parkposition: abhangig van der Anzahl der Schiebeflugel und derTiefe der Griffe an den Pendel- und Dreh-SchiebeflOgeln X je nach Grlfftiefe It Beispiel 4 Gerade Laufschiene mil Parkposition parallel zur Laufrichtung (1350) S Sreite der Parkposition: B = Flugelbreite in mm minus 126 mm T Tiefe der Parkposition: abhangig van der Anzahl der Schiebeflugel und derTiefe der Griffe an den PendeJ- und Dreh-SchiebeflOgeln X je nach Grifftiefe ~ j - -->-" ~ -~- - ---<)- . 1___--aL ---1 -1---~L ~ FuBbodenausriistung Ga n zglas - Sch I ebefro n tsysteme OCRMA HSW-G bendtlgen kelne Bodenluhrung fur die Schlebeflugel, es Sind jedoch Ausnehmungen fur die Riegel der Schlosser und die Bolzen der Feststeller vorzusehen. Die bewahneste Ldsung besteht darin, ein Rchr oder ein recht. eckiges Hohlprofll (Edelstahl oder Lelc.l1tmelall e!oxlert) lotrecht unter der Lau/schiene :n den FuGboden elnzulassen und mit 4:2.194 den ertorderlichen Ausnehmun- gen und Bohrungen lU versehen (slehe auch Planung, Selle 6). Alternatlv konnen auch SchlieB- bleche auf den FuBboden aufgeschraubt bzw. fUr die Feststeller Bodenbuchsen elnge~ lassen werden. Fur den Einbau van Bodentur. schlie Bern Sind zusatzfiche Aus- nehmungen vorzusehen. Floor preparation DORMA HSW.G glass sliding shop fronts do not require floor channels or guides for their opera- lion. However, recesses must be provided for the bolts at the locks and door holders. Expsnence shows the best method to be a square tube - stainless steel or anodised aluminium - installed in the floor, plumb under the track rail. ThiS can then be drilled to receive the lock bolts. (See also Planning. page 6). 7 DORMA HSW-f= I .1 e .DOR.MA' . S ... S. ''G''~j I . ~F=i_t:/ .j .'- I V/ .........1 I '<;1' j%/ 8-:;=::==::::}- . ~ ..' -.-- - - -- -- J . i. '_~:_;___h_ I . - '- ~ - - - - -.:. G.-.-.--.c----:-.-;-l ! I I 63 Dreh-EndflUgel Aus~ustung wahlweise: . hbr.enverSlellbares Boden- lager mit RundaChse HSW-G 75 und Anschlag. Strrnabdeckung am Flugel . Boden lager mil Flachachse HSW.G 150 und Anschlag- Stlrnabdeckung am FIOgel . BTS 84/80 ~It Anschlag- Sllrnacdeckung am Flugel HSW-G 75/150 TurschlieBer DCRMA TS 73 mit Rastfeststellarm zum Feststellen derTur bei 900 Anstelle der Bodenlager kbnnen auch BodenturschlieBer DORMA BTS 80 oder BTS 84 erngebaut werden (sieMe Seite 9). Die TurschlieBer geh6ren nlcht zum lielerumfang der Schiebe- frontsysteme DORMA HSW-G. ffl . 1 : _ _ . ~ _ _ _'I ~!~t4~tji . . .~" Single action end panel . EqUipment alternatives: . height-adjustable floor bearing wIth round pivot for HSW.G 75 and its corresponding coverplate for the door leaf . floor bearing with flat tapered spindle for HSW.G 150 and its corresponding coverplate ror the door leaf . BTS 84/80 with corresponding coverplate for the door leaf HSW-G 75/150 DORMA TS 73 overhead door closer with hold.open arm to hold door at gOO. Instead of floor bearings, OOAMA floor springs BTS 84 or BTS 80 can be used (see page 9). , 3 J ~ 2 i') 4 :-JO .,',";-, ,;,,'~' ..,~;,;~ ,,,,.'~~c. ,<,:",~"",~~~~,~,,;~,~"., ,;;~~: ~~!i:j~~~~;" t 't ;:' . >.:, '. <'/', " >.: ! :'::~;I I Pendel-EndfHigel . h6henverstellbares Boden- lager mil Rundachse HSW.G 75 . Bodenlager mil Flachachse HSW.G 150 Anstelle des Bodenlagers k6nnen auch BodentOrschlieBer DORMA BTS 80 ader BTS 84 eingebaut werden. BadenturschlieBer DORMA BTS 80 serienmaBig mit Feststellvorrich- tung zum Feststellen der Tur bei 900, BTS 84 ohne und mit Fest. stellung 900 lieferbar. q{j Einbauma13e fUr BodenttirschlieBer DORMA BTS Typ B-S 80 B-S 84 b 60 40 c d 341 51 -57 306 51 -5a Flugefgewicrt 100 - t50 kg bls 100 kg ',', , ...-- '1:- c '" Double action end panel . heighl.adjustable floor bearing with round pivot for H5W-G 75 . floor bearing with flat tapered spindle for HSW.G 150 OORMA-Glas 4.1 .~II~ Instead of floor bearings, DORMA floor springs BTS 80 or BTS 84 can be used. BTS 80 is supplied as standard with an optional hold-open facility enabling the door to be held al 900. BTS 84 is availab'e with or without hold-open. Cement box installation dimensions for DORMA BTS floor springs Type BTS 80 BTS 84 a 78 108 b 60 40 Panel weight 100 - 150 kg up 10 100 kg a 78 108 c d 341 51-57 306 51 -58 J.' ?'9.. 9 DORMA HSW-G CORMA RTS 85 Pendel-Schiebeflugel mit integriertem RahmenturschlieBer DORMARTS Pendel.Schlebeffugel mil integriertem RahmentUrschlieBer DORMA RTS (Ausfuhrung paten- liert) z8!chnen sich durch auBer- ordentfiche ~ontage. und Bedien~ngslreundlichkeit aus. GroBe ,.\usnehmungen im FuB- boden, 'Nie sie fur BodentUr. schliel3er erforderllch sind, erUbrrgen sleh. Ebenso enlfallt die oft s:orende Oeckplalte im Ourchgangsbereich. 1m Ful3boden 1St ledigllch eine Bohrung mlt SchlieBtlech oder elne 3uchse, 25 mm 0,10 mm lief, fur den ::eststeilervorzusehen, Zum Umstellen van TGrbelrieb/ Pendeln auf Schieben und umge~ kehrt mGssen nur zwei Arretierun- gen an der zugehdrigen, eben- falls patentierten Vernegelungs- Einheit und der Feststeller an der unteren Lagerung betatigt werden. Um belm System DORMA HSW-G 75 elne durchlaufende Beschlaglinie zu erzielen, weraen die ubrigen Schiebellugel mlt der h6heren oberen TUrschlene des Systems DORMA HSW.G 150 aus- gerustet. RTS 85 wird serienmaBig ohne Feststellung geliefert. SonderauS4 fuhrung mlt Feststellung 900 'G,( -f....."f """"""'~'><1il;:'"'''' r:?'~>~i::':;';;I,~~:.;~i~.. I I' fE Double action sliding panel with integral DORMA RTS transom closer Double action sliding panels with integral DORMA RTS transom closers (a patented application) have been designed to be especially fixer- and user-friendly. The main advantage is that there is no need to dig out the floor to take noor springs. likewise, the Intrusion of floor spring coverplates in the pedestrian area is avoided. All that is required in the floor is a hole with a floor plate, or a socket, 25 mm 0,10 mm deep, to accommodate the door holder. .~- .. ';. ~ 65 . With its own patented locking system, the switch from swing door to sliding panel- and vice versa - is easily and quickly accomplished. Simply operate the two locking devices and raise the door holder from its floor bearing. When using transom closers With DORMA HSW-G 75, the non self-closing panels will be supplied with DORMA HSW-G 150 top rails, in order to create an uninterrupted rail line depth at the top of the door. RTS 85 IS supplied as standard without hold-open. Hold-open at 900 to special order. I ;0 4.:2/94 I . , i " i . ~ "'.':'-~'k' Sl~~7 .' "_~~.:':ii.\ '._", . '.~ C'_ ."--,~;, :~'/:'T,: I~C" .""""~~,*i I -f~~~~~~~~~ : ~- -r'it " ;jtr~:t~ . '~'"'''''''"'''''~'~~~''' . _""..._.,.,r,..,.,.",_,. -.~'!'t, ',. ';':~';~"ni~~~~ -..~~ '" <;;:iYii~~;~~&t~~!~J~~1 {f ~ Pendel-SchiebeflUgel mit BodenturschlieBer . DORMABTS Die Ausrustung der Pen del. SchiebeflUge! mit Bodentur~ seh/ieBem OORMA BTS 80 oder BTS 84 ist die inzwischen klassj. sehe Ldsung fOr den praktisch unsichtbaren TurschlieBer.Einbau. BOdenturschliel3er DORMA BTS 80 serienmaBig mit Feststell. vorrichtung zum zelt\verligen Fest- stellen der TiJr. BTS 84 serrenmal3lg ohne Fest. srellung. Sonderausfuhrung mit Feststellung 900, Double action sliding panel with DORMA BTS floor springs Fitting pivoting, self-closing panels with DORMA BTS 80 or BTS 84 floor springs is still the classic solution for fully concealed door control. BTS 80 is supplied as standard with an optional hold-open facWty enabling the door to be held at 900. BTS 84 is available with or without hold-open. @ Einbaumaf3e fur BodentUrschlie8er CORMA BTS Typ BTS 80 B TS 84 Cement box installation dimensions for CORMA BTS floor springs a 78 118 b 60 40 c 341 306 d 51 - 57 51 - 58 Type BTS 80 BTS 84 a b 60 40 c 341 306 , d 51 - 57 51 -58 78 108 ..126.. 11 UURMA H5W-G I e Oreh-Schiebefliigel mit Gleitschienen-Tiir- schlieSer OORMA TS 92 Oreh-Scrltet:eflugel mlt Gielt- sc,1ienen-TurschlleGer DORMA TS 92 werden vor alJem dann 8lngesetzt. wenn Turen nur nach einer Selle gedffnet werden sollen (z. B. zum Schutz von FuB- gangern in Eirokaulszenlren oder fur Rec~tsverkehr). Die Montage des Gleitschienen- turschlieBers kann sowohl auGen als auch lnnen erfolgen, so daB sich die Oreh-Schiebe- flugel wahlweise r~ -,. "'uRen oder innen dffnend auslGhren lassen. 1m FuBboden ist lediglich eine Bohrung mit Schliel3blech oder eine Buchse, 25 mm 0,10 mm lief, fur den Feststeller vorzusehen. , , -~- ,. '4fmf'T' "..... "-~.~ -".\ W "7.. :,.....,.... -. ' ) ;. ::::I"~ ;f~I'~~; . , .;~ -'- ,-. -,'.". '-'_.'. ,. - - "~. -. ..... ",,- .... IM-~ . "::';.'i.,;'?Q~'I~1{~t:f~~:~;:5~f.!;~~7TI~~1'$~~J:';~:-' II " I ! 65 . I I I I.;"'" I I~~; . I 1'> , I t' I I. I I Single action sliding panel with OOR MA TS 92 cam-action door closer Single action sliding panels with DOAMA TS 92 cam-action door closers are particularly useful for doors which must only open one way (e.g. to protect pasSing pedestrians in shopping matis, Or for "one way" tralfic.) .' This cam-action door closer can be fixed to the in::;ide or outside of the door. as required lor inward or outward opening. All that is required in the floor is a hole with a floor plate, or a socket, 25 mm0, 10 mm deep, 10 accommodate the door holder. '" ,":}I 12 4,12/94 :........ ft @ /. DORMA-Glas 4.1 '. ~ i~ Im'~ :..., I, j I Ii IN I Ii ~ I ' f~'< ::~~~; ~:r ~:<:; > ~> ;' "', . e,,' ~:, :: '. ---L .......:. .1:'.:~:'-:f...k.~~}':6l.-,.t,,.:-'._~ ~ ~ ~.-;. I. ~.." \' _~~-t I:.,- SChiebeflOgel Sliding panel N ~ ;(1) - ('. !; ~. N ~ :!" N ~ AnschlOsse bei Anlagen mit abgewinkelten Lauf- schienen CD AnschluB SchiebeflOgel - SchiebeflOgel @AnschluB SchrebeflGgel- Pendel-SchiebeflGge! @AnschluB SchrebeflGgel- Pendel-SchiebeflGgel mit RahmentOrschlieBer DORMA RTS Verfahrbar, in geschlossenem Zustand feststehend, mil unterem Feststeller. Movable. fixed when the system is closed, with floor bolt. "2;94 Butt angles in systems with angled track rails CD Sliding panel- sliding panel @Sliding panel- double action sliding panel @ Sliding panel- double action sliding panel with DORMA RTS Iransom closer 13 DORMA HSW-G Bedienungshinweise Pflege,lnstandhaltung Schlosser und Feststeller gangbar halten, ggf. leicht bien. Aus- nehmungen, Bohrungen und Buchsen im FuBboden sauber haHen, ggl. reinlgen. 1m laule der Zeit unansehnJich gewordene oder beschadigte Tur. sch1enen-Verkleidungen lassen sic!' mil geringem Aufwand und ZU QLinsligen Kosten jederzeit erneuern. Voraussetzungen fur elne uber Jahre gLt funkiionierende HSW~ Anlage sind: 1. mcntagegerechter Einbau 2. sac.f1gerechI8 Bedienung 3. regelmaBige Wartung, moglic,""ISl mlt Wartungsvertrag. Bewegen der SchiebeflUgel 018 Le1chlganglgkelt der Schiebe- flGgel komml cotimal lur Gellung, wenn die Sc,~iebeflugel nur mil elner Hand. ziehend oder schle- ber'd. bewegl werden. 8elm Schlief3er. der Schleberront << slets die plazlerten FIOgel verriegeln, bevor die nachsten herangefahren werden. Betatigen von Pendel- und Dreh-SchiebeflUgeln mitTUrschlieBern DORMA RTS undTS 92 Umstellen von Pendeln auf Schieben . Verriegelung CD eindrehen- Je nach HoMe de' !I ~r"'ge mit Inn ensechskant - SCh I ussel oder GelenkkurbeL . Knopf des unteren Feststellers @ nach oben zieMen. . Obere Verriegelung @ heraus- drehen - mit dem Innensechs- kanl-Schlussel oder der Gelenkkurbel. Umstellen von Schieben auf Pendeln . Obere Vernegelung @ hlneln- drehen. . Knopf des unleren Feststellers @ nach unten drucken. . Schraube CD herausdrehen. Operating instructions Care and maintenance Ensure that rocks and floor bolts are always in good operating condition, lightly oiling where necessary. Keep slots, recesses and holes in the floor clean and Iree of debris. In the course of time, door rail covers may become shabby or damaged. They can be replaced with the minimum of fuss and financial oullay. The following points will ensure troubre-free operation of the HSW-G system, year aher year; 1 correct installation 2 correct operation 3 regular mamtenance - preferably through a maintenance contract. Sliding the panels Sliding of panels is best performed uSing one hand, applYing either a pl.Illing or a pushing action. When erasing the system, always . . ensure that each successive panel is locked in position before the next is moved up against it. Operating of double and single action sliding panels with DORMA RTS and TS 92 door closers Changing from swin~ to sliding action . Wind lock upwards CD - using either Allen key or crank (depending on panel hei.2ht). . Pull front floor bolt knob (2) up. . Unwind lock@-uslngeither Allen key or crank (depending on panel height). Changing from sliding to swing action . Wind lock upwards @). . Pull frant floor bolt knob @ down. . Unwind lock CD. ~ \...J' 1~ 4;2/94 It <t $. !~.:;'D - . ~_J:' - '..: "~," . i .,," ~~. ."- _ ..,..: . ;,~ ~;F~S{.~~?"'", ..~~ .:, "" '?;..,'~, -' ~::~~" . . ,-,:' '....-~ -;'- "':"; ." .,->., ';;'~: ,.-,-, ~'- :;.,--:, .;,. .:,- '", ... .:~ ;: jli"_j~: ~::'f-""::':",:,. ;'~~"'''- ." :/";,.: '~'~7.,:J#',~;;t :' ',{; '.:;'~ . -'.. ~.~ . ~_ C,'h -.~~;- -- ... -' ,. .,-'-, ~ -:~ ". - ~~'~_'.C,-~ '~;...~:: :.' . Abkoppel.n des, Pendel....., .,.it"ver~l.ncJe~j:I,es~~Qd~I:J~~t::f:i '::':f~,~L ? :,7>.'. ~chle~eflug~!sY~rrl8.o~en-:-,;:;~~~pr~~~.eff~g~J.~;T_~'8r=rrt8~.s~rt..> .~ ....~ .torschlleB., er ~_f::" :",.,:::: ,,:,,_;,;,;..,::;-~_-_:.~-~~'-:~itU.,rschlr,eBer.).~..'f;.'~itrl;:&.--":':~i. ~1.' ." _,,:, .;' "t> - -;.--:- :'-'::-,-;.:,"--;. -~~, ':';~-;::::;:{3;.;~.t.~i;~~~ii"~~~~1r';;~~~_~~~';.?};;~~~j . ; ",," . "~::.: To"disengag~{siI4iiig pa~;~-(_~1:i;;~~io6onri~tsifdlr~a-pan'Mto~f16ot. '.." ..1 from floor spring (for sliding' ;:*'f1",sprli'ig'(fO(" .', a'cli9J1l:r.=;f1',.-'1~ -,,':; actioo). . ~~. "~,~~]~~;t:J~,~::r~~~~ -.::;Lt_:~~?;S::'/' :',~.; ;>:~ " - .~-,,'.- ~ '~~~.te '- ... ~ '.O::,~~l;g~;:;~;}~i,)~\",..,.:::..i.,:.,..,.::..,:.".t,$~.:.~..;-...;,:~~.',i~,'~,.,l:,t,.~..~.t;o~;{!'.;; "", ,,""~.rt~ ,;..:;'.:;:':&:;i':-:;'r'.~!~:,!:\,:~ ~""., <;M!,' t.-;:;.;... ,c I I UUIt.IVIH -.....~..\. ;,,, DORMA-Glos 4.1 .~-' --;. -"o):,"_~~::--' ~~~~-;P ':> }:'~~t~ -~L'. .. ;__... ;;i. ~":.-~. @t ':; 'Betatigen von Pendel-Schiebefliigeln mit BodentiirschlieBern Umstellen yon Pendeln auf Schieben . Verriegelung ill eindrehen - je nach Hohe der Anlage mlt In nensechskant -Sch I usse! oder Gelenkkurbel. . Schiebeflugel durch Losen des Adapters ca> Yom Boden. furschlieBer atkoppeln. . Obere \/erriegelung @ heraus- drehen - mlt dem Innensechs- kant-Schlussel oder der Gelenkkurbel. Operating of double action sliding panels with DORMA BTS floor springs Changing from swing to sliding action . Wind lock upwards CD - using eHher Allen key or crank (depending on panel height). . Reiease adapter@ to disengage panel from door closer. . Unwind lock @-using either Allen key or crank (depending on panel height). Umstellen von Schieben auf Pendeln . Obere Verriegelung @ hinein- drehsn. . Schiebeflu!Jel mit Hilfe des Adapters (2) mlt dem Boden. turschlieBer verbinden. .Verrlegelung ill herausdrehen. Falls versehentlich die Verriege- lung ill zuerst geldst wird, senkt sich der SchiebeflGgel ab. Er ist anzuheben, so dal3 die Verriege- lung CD zunachst wieder hinein- gedreht werden kann. Changing from sliding to -swing action . Wind lock upwards @. . Connect panel to floor spring by engaging adapter@. . Unwind lock CD. If lock CD is accidentally released first, the sliding panel will drop to the floor. In such cases, raise the panel and re-connect it to the carner by engaging lock CD again. 412/9.; 15 DORMA FSW I' . I , 1"gj'";; ~ttrS:-:j~t~::;;~~-:':5;~~ -~" .." '~,.-.', "'.''''I:t~..,. .,~.~"_." ';l<;."1~''''J '._ .. '. ~____.ri:"'f"'.':iI;":,>~"~ 3 >;":t.S;:, 1 ~ ." Glas-Falt-Schiebewande - die idealen Raumteiler Oas G!as-Fall~Schlebewand. system OORMA FSW eignet sich fur alle Ourchgange mil geraden Seltenwanden. Es laBt sich pro- blemlos plan en, sc:inelJ und eln- fac." montieren sQwie muMelos und sieher bedienen. Ole Fall-Schleceffugel Sind in Technrk Jnd Cptik wertgehend mil den Sch1ebeflugeln des Systems JORMA ~SW-G 75 Identlscr. Damit :sl aewahrleistet. dai'3 Bin harmonlsch-er Gesamt- erndruck enls:eht, 'Nenn Glas- Schreceironlen und -Fall-Schie- bewande 'n unmltteibarer Nahe zue!nanC8: ern~ese!Z1 werden. , .~. 1m wesentlichen besteht das G las- Falt.Schiebewandsyslem OORMA FSW aus Laufschiene <D, Faltflugeln @ mlt Laufwagen @. Aufhangung, Tragprofil sowie oberen und unteren Turschienen @, Endflugeln @ mil Orehtager@, Faltbandern @sowieoberen CV und unteren Verriegelungen @. Folding sliding glass wall system -the ideal partition wall OOR MA FSW folding sliding glass wall system is suitable for all openings requiring a straight track run. I! is simple to plan, easy to fit and works smoothly and safely. The folding sliding panels are similar in design to the OORMA HSW.G 75 system. ThiS means that when they are used in the same area, their appearan- ces blend together harmoniously. OOR MA FSW system features the following components: track cD, folding panels@with rollers @, hangers, carrier profifes and top and bottom door rails @, end panel @with pivol bearing @, hinges @ and lop (j) and bollom @ locks. . o 16 4;2.94 ,-Le OORMA-Glas 4.1 @ . eEl Schnitt !::'1dflugel mil Fait. bandern @) Schnitt Faltflu<;;el mil Verriegelungen @ Draufslchl2flugelige Falt-Schlebewand CD Laulschiene C2) Glas :1) Drehlager des Endllugels (~) Glas '2:' Faltbar.c .~ Laufwagen ':z:, abere lJemegelung @ untere Verriegelung rgi Turschlene ~(' ,;{.'. .....:,. Lichte Durchgangshohen bei geoffneter Anlage Gesamlhohe in mm minus 60mm GlashohenmaB Gesamthbhe in mm minus 270 mm AbstandsmaBe Oberkante FuBboden - Unter- kanle untere Turschlene: 7 mm Faltflugel- Faltflugel: 4 mm Max. FaltflUgelgroBen und -gewichte max. Gesamth6he: max. Flugelgewicht: 2500 mm 70 kg (6) Section: End panel with hinges @ SeGlton: Folding panel with locks @ Plan View: Two panel folding unit Q) Track @ Glass @ Pivot point for end panel @ Glass @ Hinge @ Roller (fJ Top lock @ Soltom lock @ Door rails Clear opening height (with panels folded back) Total height in mm minus 60 mm Glass height Total height in mm minus 270 mm Clearances Finished lloor level to underside of bottom rail = 7 mm Between folding panels = 4 mm Max. panel sizes and weights Max.tOlal height: 2500 mm Max. panel weight: 70 kg ~ 1~ 17 ~ l!:XHrBIT NO. C!..- F. NEW BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD 5. 2024 Paradise Drive Cook, AdditionslRemodel On November 12, 1999 the applicant applied for a Staff level review of a carport enclosure and additional exterior modifications to a residence currently under construction at 2024 Paradise Drive. Staff determined that the potential controversy related to the safety grill installations and the carport enclosure necessitated a referral to the Design Review Board. The applicant is requesting approval for modifications to the plans approved in' 1996. The modifications include a request to completely enclose the carport with additional windows and folding glass doors, to install iron safety grills over the windows near the street and to install an iron trellis top at the location of a previously approved stucco trellis with a wood gate. Boardmember Howard recused herself from this hearing. Stanley Cook, applicant, said this request is to simplify the exterior and to provide partial grillwork for the garage. The doors would have an automatic opener. The changes add completeness to the house. The house was a very difficult one to build with all its site constraints He would like to ask for a final inspection by March, noting that the interior is virtually finished. Chair Beales asked Mr. Cook if he has found someone who could build the door with an automatic door opener. Mr. Cook responded that his contractor has assured him that it . can be done. Boardmember McLaughlin said there were exterior building elements, specifically some lighting fixtures, that were initially approved but are not on the house now. Mr. Cook responded that they were eliminated during construction. In response to Chair Beales, Mr. Cook said he wants to enclose the carport because in the winter it is terribly cold and windy. Boardmember McLaughlin stated that he is happy to see some contrast in the front of the building. Mary Feldman, 2027 Paradise Drive, said if the glass were to remain clear, the doors would be beautiful. She was concerned about the future owners covering the glass with blinds, drapes or tinting. She wanted to protect the views from the street and was also concerned about setting a precedent. TIBURON ORB 1/6/00 APPROVED 8 ~ Ann Kahn, 2026 Paradise Drive, said this house has taken almost her entire Golden Gate Bridge view. She is not opposed to the current proposal but was opposed to the house itself Jim Huffman, was concerned about the length of time the project is taking. In response to Boardmember McLaughlin, Mr. Cook said the trellis was done in response to the neighbor's concerns and so the appearance is softened up a little. Boardmember McLaughlin said that the glass doors would solve a design problem. He was concerned with the potential for future owners to add drapes, blinds or tinting. He asked if a restriction on such improvements could be imposed. !\IIr. Watrous said there is no other method to prevent improvements that do not require building permits unless a restriction is recorded on the deed and then it could be a code enforcement issue. Mr. Cook said the whole idea is to keep the glass clear and he would be willing to enter into an agreement with the Town. Boardmember McLaughlin said that he wanted the Town Council to understand the Board's concerns about not covering the glass doors. He was also concerned about what was originally approved but is not on the building. Also, the trellis entrance on the side does not appear to be appropriate from a design standpoint. Boardmember Snow said he could see the reason for glass doors but he is concerned about the long-term potential for covering the glass. He wanted to make sure that the view would be retained. Boardmember Smith said that he does not have a problem with a glass garage door. Unfortunately there is so much history on this project, and he is reluctant to second-guess the previous Board decision to reject glass garage doors. He is reluctant to modify the project unless there is a really good reason. If the request is approved, there should be a mechanism, such as a deed restriction, to retain the view. He could accept installing glass on the seaward side and leaving the rest of the carport open. Boardmember McLaughlin added that he is not here to simply ratify the decisions of previous Boards. Sometimes situations change during construction. From a design statement, glass doors make an interesting statement. While there is a history, only one neighbor objects to this request, and the objection has more to do with the length of time construction has taken than with wanting to keep the carport open. Chair Beales suggested an alternative to have glass on the water side and leave the carport the same as it currently is. If he could be assured that the glass would not be TIBURON ORB 1/6/00 APPROVED 9 ~ covered, he could approve it. He would like to see a manufacturer that can certify that an automatic door opener can work with these doors. Boardmember Smith was concerned about setting a precedent, as other properties in Old Tiburon could ask for similar improvements, requiring the Town to potentially have to enforce numerous deed restrictions. Boardmember McLaughlin said that each application has to be reviewed on its own merits and he did not believe that this application would set a precedent. Chair Beales said that other carports that are similarly enclosed are often used for storage of other materials besides vehicles, and end up blocking views. Boardmember Snow said he cannot see how the glass doors could be monitored to make sure they remain clear, and he does not want to put the Town in that position. lVIIs Beales/Smith, and passed (3-1 McLaughlin voting no), to recommend to the Town Council that the grill work on the windows and the iron trellis top be approved, but to deny the glass garage doors and glass at the back of the carport, based on the findings and conditions as set forth in the Staff report. Boardmember Howard returned to the meeting. TIBURON ORB 1/6/00 APPROVED 10 01 OS/2088 10:44 4154:3.5~688 TIK-Z Pi\G:: 81 RECEWEO J ~t-l 6 ?QQQ PL~~~\~Go~~~~~~~N1 tJ4TEMAIL , F6 EXHIBITNO. [) . -- t"t1-~ 71~-: 'lJ~....;) (JP ~/cn'~ - T!BERIO P. LIZZA "'T'TOFlNE"Y AT ...AW . BEL'/eoeRE. C.AlIFORNI..... tl4920 TEI..E"'..O~~ ,~d'!\l "3S-ii!'SS8 /)~I9JT m~(W JII}./ S, 1'()() 718"44,4) /JUlIN 13Qf171t) 9- TI t3t(M# 13ult 1)1";'1 IJUhT /1rTAI: el1l T/Jr.RMI./LT ~ $~11J1J1"'9 .I)n1JifT vl/g,JRT,' Jf'A.lf1~ tJA1fk/ZS ~ pkJ /fT b:;t/ ~oJ#' /JIt -9 a"'I/dl~AJ eJ/- ~1JeT -V /lcf'tPlMwr ~f' /JI&.; I"'M';~Qll j'~~ f 9 ~~'(/'/~^'f ~/T: IfrS- - .J,~'/ //IJVft)/~ ;lJ4 Ct'Jf/~ .' 7;;.J i~ N /J;~,6/I.' J ?/Ie ~ wEt/E ~(/j;~ /fl1tqa; //IjldHtLt#J /1?Vd ~J'Ud~ II() 1<113-9'6.,f;vr /I;'~IJ/nM77,w h 7i$}f..f J"kil/J ,(/IT kf'A1f1t)'lt1 w,vld.s ~ /fJJ1'/I~r CAN S MW EX~ /l7ttLtlJiA,fJ. ~ TJF ~ k k('A) ,,~ &"'~~ON h~ .j" ~ /1'1 PE1!"1f4 /fM6 7 /tIE ~Ir~ td,~ ~ 0/ /fI;7/'()~ 7/t.N ?~ .Mn /.tI6/~ 1M-/CJtf7/J~1f4 ~ IT jJ ~~7bJ & /I gJ,1()/;.fI€ J..Itx/// k ~~_ /A/ 7JzF" ~ /i;/V~ IPA/ tJ~pk/?()AJ ,,(d{t. /~ ~ )j ~ ~ e~ /,J 7M' /fT.-/ivlVaf$tJ ?~) 3) /'tJ /'~ of lh6 ~~~ /4J {?tJ.s- ~~ ~ 61' All> ~~ t)AJ 'Af ~A- ~A.JJ ~ w~ 1M1- /;Jw/I ~ 7k ;J~ t~tb~4 l/eM ~IkY ( (!o~ 77NUItdJ ) ,~I~ ,s. ....>~.fJ~:! ...J. 4~ ..H5435~S88 TIEI.....L..: :=>c;Si:: 02 ~J#rP TIBERIO P. LIZZA f~ b~,f~ ~;,,~ ~ Jm; ci,.y lUke A AlII r t1,(.1/j 6/Dtr A tJ/&u 111/ t:1///J q/lNtJr?; f~. /Alt!Lt/!--r/o,,), 7u/tr.f ~ ~ ~&1Jv;;- 7D r;, 'wt fh..,j ?~o/~, /!oJ d,Ndl.lJlo,.J J .:z ,m., rJ,JA;1JI'''IJ~ Jk,- ~ f?~'Jf,- _. ~1'1!flrl11t1fJ7 w/I! fUVJ1V7 5 ~ ~ ~A) 7A/1.fh &tt-.7 N~ /HIt &,t1'<<H'1'4~'i7oiJ will bltJAIf ~~~~#tu""3 * '-I~ 1t1te.i/1~. /;.1i fi~ a~ J"'-m k- 'lP.-j k /lFf"/~ " ~m W!/; J-. .7-1"....;, ~ 3 ~ ~ t11~ 1M: f'/ 9/ffl- lJlf,Il1!~ jl'J Ifg'9 ! !1~T 4:pd7vIL1 .d / 77 ~F.lI() / Ar114 JJF1fJ /:'tt. - MIJGf)/ Qe:t\:.~&t(P.~~~:>\,~~C"~~I~. ._' :)DJ~~~0e\U. ~ITNO._F=J .. .-----~ ~'\ IS; ~ ------_~~__~1\6~c>~=L ~~C6_,,_._c\ \ (~~~: . 1\ '-1 \. \ \ \ . _______. . 1. ~rr;\ =:c.~. "p ~r-\~~ ~ ~ ')n~Lf-~~~\3E'-U <...-A-JOL=:> ~U]+ed n.________ ~ ~~<l \ \ e-_'o:e~);:> \ + ~_ \e4 _~--:::L~ . .. Clv\~\n3~~ \'~ ~?#.'n\\~.. \0 dlc...~ ---~~~:-;\~::t~~~;j,dJ~o _______ _.. .~A ~ A\ ~__c..\rN~l~..Y_:..~l~ --\Or__~ .--~.~~b~ . -.~-.._.__~_'I'~ =~..iiS;u~d~ b e&::-l~O:;=~ i+ b:p,.-~ ~ ___n_ . ___ a. ~-\bJ~ ___ \j-~~~--~\~i ~~-n_~ -- - - \~--Gs::) e:;>. h\ll\~rerl ~ __\ ~.~__ --- .-k.-q<"C',\~-~-ck:.~.\r~ ,,,,-~.,, -.---- - --- cl~~, A\~CC21~~~~t-o-<:--.--'-.. ___~..____ . __'.n..__... ~___'__"_~ ___...__.____/.._~.______._.__~_.._... ..________.... . -- .... . ------~- ""~~.. dL1rdD-"b- ----~~- --------------.-.-.. --------------___ -..___..______ _._ _. .____.__n__.__.___._...._______.___...___.~..._..__~______ _n ~_ _____..BECI;I'{ERm..______n_ n..______ HBl 5-znno-------. PLANNING DEPARTMENT TOWN OFTIBUROT\r n TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. MEETING DATE: 4/19/2000 g> To: TOWN COUNCIL From: SCOTT ANDERSON, PLANNING DIRECTOR ~ Subject: PARADISE DRIVE REORGANIZATION NO. 10 ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.0 ACRES OF TERRITORY TO THE TOWN OF TIBURON AND SANITARY DISTRICT NO.2; 4850, 4900, and 4930 Paradise Drive (Resolution) Date: MARCH 30, 2000 BACKGROUND In February 2000, the Marin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) approved the annexation of territory to the Town ofTiburon and Sanitary District No.2 (see Exhibit 1) The LAFCO staff report containing extensive information on the proposed reorganization is attached as Exhibit 2. In taking its action, Marin LAFCO designated the Town of Tiburon as the conducting authority to either complete or terminate the reorganization in compliance with applicable provisions of State law. These provisions include holding a properly noticed public hearing at which protests are tallied and a decision made regarding the annexation based on whether owners of more than or less than 50% of the assessed valuation ofland either favor or protest the annexation. ANALYSIS The Town Council's role as conducting authority is defined by State law at Government Code Sections 56000 el seq. The Council's role is to hold a public "protest" hearing at which landowners in the affected territory have the opportunity to protest the annexation. Iflandowners owning more than 50% of the assessed valuation ofland in the affected territory protest the annexation proceedings, then the proceedings are terminated. If landowners owning less than 50% of the assessed valuation of land in the affected territory protest the annexation proceedings, then the Town Council is obligated to order the annexations As of the date of this report, Staffis expecting (but has not yet received) written protest from one landowner (4930 Paradise Drive) that holds 27.2% of the assessed value ofland in the subject territory. Written protests may be received prior to or during the public hearing. Tiburo!1 Town Council Staff fiel'ort ~i 19/2000 The primary purpose of the public hearing is to receive any and all written protests and to review the LAFCO resolution attached as Exhibit 1. At the conclusion of the public hearing, Staff will tabulate the value of the written protests in terms of assessed valuation ofland, and advise the Town Council as to whether the protest has failed. In the event of failure of the protest, the Town Council will be asked to adopt the draft resolution (Exhibit 3) ordering annexation of the territory to the Town ofTiburon and Sanitary District No.2. RECOMMENDA nON . That the Town Council hold a public hearing for the purpose of collecting written protests from land owners within the affected territory. . Following closure of the public hearing, that the Town Council direct Staff to tabulate the value of written protests and report the results to the Town Council. Depending on the value of written protests, that the Town Council move to order annexation of the subject territory (adopt Exhibit 3) or terminate the proceedings. Staff will advise the Town Council of the appropriate course of action once the value of written protests has been tabulated. EXHIBITS I LAFCO Resolution No. 00-6. LAFCO Staff Report from the February 10, 2000 meeting. Draft Town Council Resolution ordering annexation. ~ 3. \scott\conducting authority rcporl.uOl.: Tiburof/ T(ywn COIfl/cil Staj! fleport ,/;/9/2000 2 MARIN LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-6 RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING REORGANIZATION TO THE TOWN OF TmURON AND SANITARY DISTRICT #2 INCLUDING NOTICE, HEARING AND ELECTION "Paradise Drive Reorganization #10 Including Annexation to the Town of Tiburon and Sanitary District #2 (File #1161)'; WHEREAS, an application for the proposed reorganization of certain territory including annexation to the Town and Tiburon and Sanitary District #2, in the County of Marin has been frIed with the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Title 5, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, said proposal was made in the form of a petition, filed by property owners; and WHEREAS, at the time and in the form and manner prescribed by law, the Executive Officer has given notice of public hearing by this Commission upon said proposal; and WHEREAS, the public hearing on said proposal was held by this Commission upon the date and at the time and place specified in said notice of public hearing, and all interested persons present were afforded an opportunity to speak and be heard on this matter. WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has reviewed the application and prepared a report, including a recommendation thereon, the application and report having been presented to and considered by this Commission. NOW THEREFORE, the Marin Local Agency Formation Commission DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows: Section 1. Subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter specified, the application is approved. Section 2. The boundaries, as set forth in the application, are hereby approved as submitted and are as described in Exhibits "A-I", "A-2", "B-1" and "B-2" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The approved boundaries for annexation to the Town of Tiburon (Exhibits A-I and B-1) include Assessor Parcel Nos. 038-053-01, 038-053-24, 038-052-05 and 038-052-08. The approved boundaries for annexation to Sanitary District #2 (Exhibits A-2 and B-2) include Assessor Parcel Nos. 038-053-01, 038-053-24, and 038-052-05. TI,t: forf'going instrument is 3 ("urn'n "Drv 01 thf' original on r~'Cord in th., offin' of thf' Local Agency Formation Commission of tl'le COUnty of Marin, State of California. EXBIBIT 1\10. f Jiy ])~~ Resolution 00-6 -2- Section 3. The territory to be annexed to the Town of Tiburon includes 1.88 acres and the territory to be annexed to Sanitary District #2 includes 1.61 acres. The reorganization area is found to be uninhabited, and is assigned the following distinctive short form designation: "Paradise Drive Reorganization #10 Including Annexation to the Town of Tiburon and Sanitary District #2 (File #1161)". Section 4. The application is consistent with the adopted spheres of influence for the Town of Tiburon and Sanitary District #2. Section 5. Any resolution authorizing the reorganization approved by this resolution shall impose the following terms and conditions pertaining to Sanitary District #2: 1. In the event that pursuant to the rules, regulations, resolutions or ordinances of the District, as now or hereafter amended, the District shall require any payment of a fixed or determinable amount of money, either as a lump sum or in installments, for the acquisition, transfer, use or right of use of all or any part of the existing property, real or personal, of the District, such payment will be made to the district in the manner and at the time as provided by the rules, regulations, resolutions or ordinances of the District, as now or hereafter amended. 2. Upon and after the effective date of said reorganization, the Territory, all inhabitants within such Territory, and all persons entitled to vote by reason of residing or owning land within the Territory, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the District; shall have the same rights and duties as if the Territory had been a part of the District upon its original formation; shall be liable for the payment of principal, interest, and any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding or then authorized but thereafter issued bonds, including revenue bonds, or other contracts or obligations of the District; shall be subject to the levying or fixing and collection of any and all taxes, assessments, service charges, rentals or rates as may be necessary to provide for such payment; and shall be subject to all of the rates, rules, regulations, resolutions and ordinances of the District, as now or hereafter amended. Section 6. The Town of Tiburon is designated as the conducting authority for further proceedings and the Town Council is hereby directed to initiate proceedings in compliance with this Resolution, and is authorized to take further proceedings upon said reorganization in compliance with applicable provisions of State law. Section 7. The project is categorically exempt pursuant to ~15319 of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution 00-6 -3- Section 8. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of the resolution in the manner prescribed by Section 56853 of the Government Code.. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Marin Local Agency Formation Commission on this lOlh day of February, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: Connnissioners Blanchfield, Chapman, Heller, Hennessy, Murray, Kress and Ware NOES: None. ABSENT: None (jj40;Li;LJ/ JEFFRY BLANCHFIELD, Chairperson ATTEST: Officer Exhibit A-I PARADISE DRIVE REORGANIZATION No. 10 TO TOWN OF TIBURON AND SANITARY DISTRICT No. 2 Description for Town of Tiburon Mapping No. 15/99 COMMENCING at a point on the southeasterly right of way line of Ranch Road and existing boundary of the Town of Tiburon said point being distant North 34049' East, 45.00 feet from the northwesterly corner of Lot 32 as said lot is shown upon that certain map entitled" Map of Paradise Cove, Sub'd. No. Two, Marin County, Cal." filed for record April 18, 1941 in Volume 5 of Maps, at Page 90, Marin County Records. Said point being common-with.-the southwesterly corner of lot 30 as shown on said map. Thence from the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT North 34049' East, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve; thence leaving said Town boundary and said right of way along said curve to the right, the center of which bears South 55011' East, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 55055', an arc length of 39.04 feet; thence South 89016' East, 45.63 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 0044' West, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 54041'30", an arc length of 38.18 feet; thence South 34034'30" East, 50.00 feet to the northeasterly corner of Lot 30; thence South 55052'50" West, 70.00 feet; South 34034'30" East, 102.00 feet; South 13048'38" West, 67.42 feet, South 4024'13" East, 58.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of way line of Paradise Drive, thence along said right of way line South 72018' West, 29.21 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears North 17042' West, with a radius of 112.00 feet, through a central angle of 86008'03", an arc length of 168.37 feet; thence North 21034' West, 55.94 feet, North 47027' West, 365.814 feet to a point on the existing boundary of the Town of Tiburon; thence leaving said right of way, along said Town boundary North 46001' East, 103.64 feet, South 42029'22" East, 119.93 feet, South 43058'50" East, 133.31 feet to a point on the northwesterly right of way line of Ranch Rd.; thence along said right of way line North 34049' East, 55.993 feet to a point on a curve to the left the center of which bears North 55011' West, with a radius of 58.083 feet, through a central angle of 16022'12", an arc length of 16.59 feet; thence leaving said right of way line South 55011' East, 42.35 feet to the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. Containing 1.88 acres, more or less. / Z 0 Z ~ ~ C\I ~ PrJf i ~~ N Z Z 0 ::l(l) ~~ I <( ~ Z lOll? ~ ~ il~ ~ ~ a2 t> 1=\0 .... ::l \1...- .., a;~ , :::;: 00 10 ~ o. ~~ld ~ z gz-ol=oll) ~~ .... 0 .- ~ ~ IUOI-\1...~- ~ . .::> ~ iU: .- .c: 9~ > 0 0 00 ~ _Z r. I-z ~ Z ~ o :;: <( allL ~ i iii OlL IU 0 I- \1...<( lI) I- z ~:::!: -.- ""lIol\"," - <( a:l~ ] o lI) ~ :::!: ~ I~ "" ~ \\ , h I~ , L" ) 't ~~ ~" \\ ~ ~~ / / I ~ -$- 001-.1 :1lV:>6 / / / .~~'L.~ \'0 <1' ~:<,' ~:~...4" 'Iill i' ~i\~.J :.'i ~1S . ~ ~~ ~~ & ~~N ifi ~..,...w ,~ I lj., :.'i ~.3~,;:t ~.. ~ ~9 gi! ',00 ,J" i on ,,p.etS',.' ~~~ ,'\"'~.... f~;- ~ g i ~ i ~ nl t . I t d ~- I'; ~~ ~: ll~ :; B ~ pa ail !i~ !i:j I'!II !" ~ llll G'iV'! ,,~ ~ ~Il~ ~~ g~ "" ;,;" !:t; ,,- ~g ul) ~~ I z ~ ~ 'l! ~ L Q ~ ~ Exhibit A-2 PARADISE DRIVE REORGANIZATION No. 10 TO TOWN OF TIBURON AND SANITARY DISTRICT No. 2 Description for Sanitary District No. 2 Mapping No. 15/99 COMMENCING at a point on the southeasterly right of way line of Ranch Road and existing boundary of the Sanitary District No. 2 said point being distant North 34049' East, 45.00 feet from the northwesterly corner of Lot 32 as said lot is shown upon that certain map entitled " Map of Paradise Cove, Sub'd. No. Two, Marin county, Cal." filed for record April 18, 1941 in Volume 5 of Maps, at Page 90, Marin County Records. Said point-bein~common-withthe southwesterly corner of lot 30 as shown on said map. Thence from the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT North 34049' East, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve; thence leaving said District boundary and said right of way along said curve to the right, the center of which bears South 55011' East, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 55055', an arc length of 39.04 feet; thence South 89016' East, 45.63 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 0044' West, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 54041'30", an arc length of 38.18 feet; thence South 34034'30" East, 50.00 feet to the northeasterly corner of Lot 30; thence South 55052'50" West, 70.00 feet; South 34034'30" East, 102.00 feet; South 13048'38" West, 67.42 feet, South 4024'13" East, 58.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of way line of Paradise Drive, thence along said right of way line South 72018' West, 29.21 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears North 17042' West, with a radius of 112.00 feet, through a central angle of 86008'03", an arc length of 168.37 feet; thence North 21034' West, 55.94 feet, North 47027' West, 245.814 feet to a point on the existing boundary of Sanitary District No.2; thence leaving said right of way, along said District boundary North 46005' East, 96.26 feet, South 43058'50" East, 133.31 feet to a point on the northwesterly right of way line of Ranch Rd.; thence along said right of way line North 34049' East, 55.993 feet to a point on a curve to the left the center of which bears North 55011' West, with a radius of 58.083 feet, through a central angle of 16022'12", an arc length of 16.59 feet; thence leaving said right of way line South 55011' East, 42.35 feet to the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. Containing 1.61 acres, more or less. / z (\J 0 0 i~ ~ (\J z ti:lz: I N 0 Gcn ~ ~ I Z Z <{ ~ z iiZQ? ~ ~ ~I: ~ ... ~ G ln~ <( ::l N ::> 00 10 iiZ o. cId ] !llJ . ~ z ~-Oi=Oln ~~ .... 0 .- ~ 8 \Uol-~~D ~ - .c ~(.!) ~ j Ii: :E 9~ >z >, -z ~ Cl! ~ il! z- r.1 o <{ <{tL o .. oi~ \U 0 t: I/)~ ~u= I/) l- Z Cl!::2; ~ CllIliOl.("l - <{ f2 ~ .. ---- o I/) to u .s- ii2 ~ <{ tL ~ ~ "'" \\ , I~ ~~ , ,'t!. L" ) 'i L~ 8~ i'5~ \\ ~~ ~ / / , .. / / ~ -$- DOI-.I :71Y.); ~ II P / / / ~ u // . pa ail ~~ ~~ Iii ~~ j -~ ~~ ! ~~~ ll~ !/- ~~ ~ ~- !g ill! ll~ "* ~ "! I " ~ z I ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ -a ~ ~,~ L h 0 ~ g !i Sen: By: M~?:~ L~~C:i 4.~3J..j.c<l":'~Cj F~c-7-CC : 51 '=~:1; P3<;S 2 RECE1VED DATE: F~br.laIY 3. 20CO FE8 7 2000 TO Memcer" Lc.;al Age::cJ For::uati'm Co=ission PL~i'JNING DEi'ARTMENT TOWN OF TJEURCN FROM: P:~e: Earning, E~e::"..ltive Oticer S"LtlJECT' Exer..utive Off1c~:'s Repot1 and R;;;ll=endation: Pr"Jt;(n;e~ Paradise Driye Reo,gani2ation #IQ l'1cluding Anne:utions to Sanita.')' District #'7. and the TOWl1 of Tieuron (File #1161) Summarv Tills appik:lricn ;:; submitted by a petition ot prope:~y owr.e:s reql.:esl:ng a re"Jr6aniution indw.Eng L'1c anne;<~ticns of sli2hdv diffe:er-J areas to the Town of Tiburon and Sanil.lrv District Ir... Tnr:: ~ - - r:sic:nc:s on four parr;"ls ar..rl a per-ion of the R.1nJ;.J Road nght-.Jf-way are LrlVclved in the J"ear2aniz:i.con: 7wo of me thre~ resid:~~s :J.r~ prQPos~d far anr~;;'ii[k:n to Sanitar:.. Disrri<:t #"2; a.ll fcur pu.r:::l~ a~ proposed for a...-:rre:f:atlcn to the Town of Tib-u:c:c. The purpose of the proposal is to ubtain ~ani'(a.rj s~we:" se:vice for two. existing smg!e f~ily r::side::ces. The third resider-.;;:: has be~::: added to :he proposal in crder to avoid cTe2ting all isia.."ld of ilriJlCOQoTa,ed ter:-itcr'j. N,,' :.dditional deve!oprr..e::t is asscci:uec with the proposed Jililex:lticn. T:"1e prcposal is consistent with L'le adopted sphe:es of in:1J.:.e~ce of the Town of Trcu=~Jn ;ind San.iu....~J DisL.-1c:: Ii: and ~;..:im othe!" applic:lb!e policies of :he Conurjssicr., The pr~Gs~ d.Jes ;let have th~ conser;;: of all pro?erty o'ol,.:'~ers in t...t'le ar~~, Sun ~;;onunends J.ppr')V:ll. Bodo::!!'cund ~[ap 1 shows 'J.niZ1Corporate~ te-r:itO(' in white, the exist:r:.g incorpcrare~ ar~.3. of L'-"': TDwn vf Tiburon is shcw~ ir. lighl gra~ a.."'ld the r~mmr; propose~ for ar.nexauon to the Town is shewn in d.1rk .gray. The :u-e:l in lb~ curr~nt boundades of Sar.itlry DlsU:ct !f2 is shown in diagonal 5tl"ip<: and the are3 proposed fer anne~tion tc me District is shawn in crosshatch pa~ern. 1\5 5.l~own on tl:e map, three parcels are proposed fer ;L""Ul<::-.alion Ie; the Distric:; four parcels ar-e pr':JJ:cse::! for IL-'~"'!~::ation ~u tht: Town. This prc~csal WJS originally submitted em be!-..alf of William Baylis. p.0perty ow..;:r of part;el numb~r~ 03.3-,)53-01 and 038-0.:53-24. The appliClnt is r~buiJding a single,fa..'Jlil.y residence riar cc:upies bot.'l parcels. ~deve!oplIlent of the site requires r:placemeru of the on-site wastewater tre:lt:n~nt 3ysrem wcth public se".ver ser"lce. At apprcJxL-r:ste:y the same time that L.",FCO luff CtltJirp'!!,-!(;I~' !c;=~. Bt.::..:~c!~rlc!d ,HcmM....... J'..ldy ChacI:il1o, O;Uu;u::l:!.-;:ler. Ter.-; !TC:"l::1.:..3:iY. In.om K."t::ls. :":i'nth~ '.lurm.... D::".'j~.', ')./are IrkNt.;;:C:; ?i.I.' Cklt..:...,d. Sr;'.'c :"insey, C'n;ofS'= '::. QUo:!ls:w3, ::I,lCMlU"'".i Rubin F.."":~~....tjVI!' C.::nC!i'I" Peltr \. 13anni.'1g: Marin Local Agency Formation Cort1nlission t65~. R~.!"""xj Sr:;ve, s!:~. 16-J. SuJl ~f=:.e!, C.1Ji:~iJ. 9...1,(,)4).) . T';::::pr.''':::<: (~I ~>"-1.6-":'J09 . FJ.C.simil<: (J~~~I1-.w.liJ EX1-IIBIT NO. c:1. :;!A.~ :,\j .....~;.:.:c; .....:.cJ...li C; Fec.7.CC 2:5iFw. Pd.ge 3/1(; ~ ',,- \\ \ )\ ~ ;; '- '" "- c "- 2 ;> '-, '",- "- '~~." '\, ". '-. '-, '':' -", ',. ",I . """,-"."., '. ""',',', '. "'\."" '". " " ." ''''''~'' "." "'. '\.. "', ",,',...... " "0:: ""~';":: ~" ,."."",~" . . '''-'-'''', ' "~~' '~" "'-. ,.~,..'o.':;~" "] ,......, " " '~~'~,~ ,-' , . "-,'," " '" c '" ,., , . . . , . . . N e ~ 3 ~ t li " i:: c: 3 C ~ .:! ~ 'c I ~N ~ g..; g '-i'- i- -a :; - ~ w lot ~~.s~; ,3 e ~ e..., o ,., - '" s ;;; c " ", , o '" or a '" ,.., c S2~: 8':1 :\j1t..~ :;.j :_AFC::; .l:5<l":'c.l~1'J; F~t:-7.G, 2:5.3F;',1; Fage 01:'10 PJIadis.e 'iJri'\'e A:1ne,;;nic.a. .1:/10 .]- Februa....y 3. 20CO re:;:i ved ~jr. Baylis' s appJiClcion, staff re;:;ved appi.ication inquires from the neighboring landowner. ~I-:. Eisc:J.off, who owns parc:! number 038-052-05. Mr, Bischoff and Mr. Baylis agreed ,0 c:Jmbi.ne their applications for anne;tation of their property te Sacitary District .!12 and the Tow:: cf T~buron, LAJ'CO staff pointee out t<J the appli-;ants :hat anne"aticn of t.'1eir properties co the Town of T!buron wou;d result in isolating par;elllUmber 038-052,05 as an islar:d of unincorporated ~ reriror:', LA.FCO i:; proltibitci fi'om approving atme:>ations that create unincorpcr:ltec islands ur.der GoVer:::lmenl Code Sedon 56109. In or..er to avoid submitting a proposal th::It or:::a!es an uni::-,<:or;:'cnted island, me applicant:! submitled revised maps and legal descriptions chat inc!u.de parc:! rru:llcer 033-0:52-08 in :he area propcscd for anne::acion to the Tow::! of Tibur:m. LAFCO staff contacted Ms. Rizzo, the owner ('.f APN 038-052-08 and discus5ed the derails of the LAFCO applIcation proc:ss whit:h allow appJica!1l:s to submit proposals for :U:e:!s beyolld their vi- o'Nr:erstip.(See Auachment 1, lette: of Nove:r.c.e:2~, 1999.) Ms. Ri='s j:'rcperty is alr;;ady ~ within L~e bcuncur:es of Saniurf Distric: ;; 2 and the;efo:~ does net have the sane inre~est in gJ.in.:..ug ::aWl.dry s~we: st:="ic~ ~ the aFFlicant. :'vIs. Riz:o does nor COn5~.nt tc '=l-~~exaticn :0 th~ TO"il of Tiburon. G<!nera! Information Propes;),! Desc:iption; Re::-rg'lniz~ticn cunsisting of annexaticn 0f three parceLs (t11e lanes of R,ylis [:wo par::ls], Bischcff and Rizzo) to the TOWIl of Tlburor J.'1d the anne.~ation or L'1:e: par;~15 (Iaues of B~y1is and 3ischcff. to SarJtary Disrrk: #2. Proposal Location; Ar d:e inre:"sectlon of Par:icise Drive and R:mch Radd. !'io, of Parcels: Fol.:: (C38,G53-.Jl. 038,053-24, 0::;3-05:,05 &. 038-05:008). Acres: 1.88 acres W rr.: T0wn of Tiburon, 161 acres :0 Slnirar;: District:;:, Deyelopment Potential: None. Applic=t: W,lliam Ba;ili,. 43.5iJ P:iradise Drive. Titurcn, 9..920. C ansa-'lt or Property O....ne!"(s): 68,4 % of te,:!! :l;;es5d value. Pubiic Hearing R"quircd: YeS, No:i:: of Public Ee:lring published J:mu~!y 25. :OCO. Nwnber of Registered Voters: 4. City or County: Cuunl;'. :-;:',..8.;1: :.1A'=:::1 \--~. -.-,-.--.... , .1~5.J...:.c.:...:.~Cj ~.;c-7-GG .....- < . ~\'i ; P_'gs 5: ~ G Ps.:::.cis,: IJr:'Ye An:;::.::tatiou #10 .4. Fecr-"'lj' J. 2CCD Assessed Value: SL8i51i67. Prope~ Ta.'l: E;K.'1ang~= $1,7C1 Current a:ld Pl"oOOS<!d Provision of Serrices Cur~nt: If AUDrov~d: Fire: Water: MM'WD Tl)wn of TIeuron No Change No Clang~ Police: Coun!"! of :.\Iarin Tib"ron F'ire P:cte;tion District Sew6': On-site wa:stewater tre:ltment Sanitary Dist:ict it: (Tne lar.ds at Rizzo are already within Sanitar"j D!stric: it:) St:c~~: COUO,! of :.iar;n County of Marin No ChaI'.ge Town of Tiburon Planning: Disenssion & A1lalvsis The p\L-pose of this proposal is LO ooum 3e-,,<:r service for exisLing reside:J.C;:s aL ..8:0 and 4900 P3.radise Drive through anI'..ex::uion to Sa::itar/ Disliict #2. A,,'1nexation to the Dis(rict in r..i.rn require" arwe:\aLion to tlle Town of Tiburon uncie: L"':CO's Du;!l A.l1J1c::.l!ion Policy. App]k:J.:l~s ha'/e obtained prezoning from the Town ar.d have flied applic:ltion for a recrganizatlcn that :neets LA2CO resu1rement5 incluc;"g the prohibition agaiDS! It.1.e creation of uni!~c~Qor:J.ted i::lands. The Ccrnmission would hn';e rr...e fcl1ow1r~!2 'Jct:cns for action at ;i n.oticed out.lic hearing;: .... . .- . T~e C(Jmmi~~ion could de::lY tt:e prop",a!. . The Commission could approv~ the proposal as suhmitted. . T:1e Co=ission could modify fr.e proposal to include annexaticr. to Sanitarj District II: only. 1:1C appEcation of the Dual ,A.l:r;e;13r:on Policy would be waived ullder L'lis alternative. Give:1 the provisions of SC:Iion 561109 prohlbiting the approval of boundaries that would create ucincc-rpcr~[ed islands. mocification of me proposal boundar! to ddere A?N 03:s-D52-08 is not a viable "pticr. for rhe Commis.ie!n, in the cp.nion of L"-FCO suff. StreeL right-of-way associated with areas a=xing to cities is gC:le:ally included in tt:e boundar.es of the <1!llle:<:.rrg city. In this case. L'le stal: of the Town and the Couney Department .of Public Wor:<3 have requestec that :he associateu por~iol'. ;::f tt:e R..;:ch Read right,of'WlY be inc;udec ill the Sant..::y: :VIt.::::'\J L;:.F':J; .:.L~5..L":'6J.':'~Q; Fec -7 .c__. 2 :5<1F:.'11; P3;e en c P:ir:idi:e DC'-Ie AJl..'1e:~.::;:jon .iI ~:J ", F~=r,J:U:' :>. 'ZCCO recrpnLution. but mat th~ right-of-way for P~r:llii,e Deiv: not be inc!udd. Shifting maintenar= respon.;;biiity frr)m .he County to r.he Town of Titurou for a segment of ~ppro:tim:ltl:ly 600 f~t would result in disconrinl.:v\J.S mai..:te=c~ of tb.e road surface. The Town and the COl.:nl.j' have ~gr:d to retain Paradise Drive as a Cou!lty-mainr~ined road '.llltil a sigr..irlcant portion of P:u:adise Dri'lie c:)uld b: ilI'.n::ted (0 tb: Town. The 3.!1...r:ex~tion to the Tow~ am.: to Sanitary District 51 would not result in additiooal development beyond improve:nent> co existing strUc=. T;1" prczoning designation applied by the Town of Tiburcn to the are:l could be ccnstI".Ied [0 pe:-:niJ. om; additional housing unit. Howe",,:, th" ccnrlguralion of th" parcel t:ol:ndarie~ at:d rhe locatj'1;"l of tb.e existing structure precluCe additional dc:yelcpmC::lc. EnvirryumemaJ "Reyiew This pr'Jj~-: is e~err:Ft frcIn tt~ pr\1visi0l15 cf the CJLfor~ia E:lviriJnm~~r;)l Quality Ac~ (CEQA; 1 f ... ,...,.....;, 'I C:""':]9 ..,.t...... 5.,::" C~Q.l, G".c...J;...... 11' ... .....; ... . -J""._ yo_ t'--- I.' Ul.~t:.. ..............L,n .1.___ ot ;,.~~...... l....l.e .c ., ...1 ......~e.J. filS ....e.....,or:. }I!OV1U....... ~...........p k.n .or ar...ne~.ltion te a ,:it:, or special di~h_~C~ C'f ar:3S canuirJng c~isting str"Jctures dev~loped. tc the de~i[y ll1o"\/ed :,y current zcn'ing RKomrnel1datiofJ The territ:Jr:l propcsec for reSr33I:i-:.ltion is Icc~:ed in. an :lrea of .j,iscc.:ted city jurisdic:::icr:. g~r:er:tlly as J. resi.llt of exr.r:r:ce!y iriegular hcur:d.a:ies :ldo-pred ac the tune of incorporation of r...~e Town llf TicuCOll. The use of the Dual A;:nexatlcn Policy is intended to improve those boundaries on a long-te.'":!! basis. Tlle proFosal is consis,e~.1 witi: the spheres of ir.:1uence c-f the T,:w:l af Tiburofl and Sani:ary Dis:r;c: it: Staff r~;orr.un""J" apFoval of ,1::: proposal as submitted. Re:.0I!1.i.7:e::ded Action. tv R~~c t!-!ticn: 1. Appreve th~ prcpC'sec ParaJisc Drive Reorg;,:,niuticn .11.'), 2. [)esipate the Town of Tihun:r. as ccnductir.g authcr:r;:, anrl aU!..1crize the Town iC -:or.duc! s\lbsequ'::1l proceedings pursuant to Govet:t.'llem Ccce ~57()C-O, including provision of a noticed public he:lr\ng for the pUi'?ose of receiving and e-ra;uating wri"en protest. Respectfully submitted. ~. ---J1 t ,-V uY";r ~/ I r.AJw,<./'J P~1c:" V Ean...;mu ~ E;(C~lltl','e Of-fic::: ~,~ v/ 2~r1"t."3j': 1;1;::.,::::::) L":.=::::; d.~~.1..l.et.l..l.to; :=21: - 7' .c;n. 3,=~,'1 ; F2~a ,; 10 . Ncv=c.,c 2.1. 1999 J~nc~ Riz.::o 4930 ?mdise Drive Tieuron, CA 9492C SU~ECT: P:opose::! AnneX:ltiorl o( Neighl:oring P;ope:"ties co Town of Til:urcn De<.r Ms. Riz:o: As ycu k..'C1,1/, your ne:ghb<Jrs NIT. Baylis and 1tir. Bi.schcffhave lppEed for ar;ex:ltlon to Sar-i::ir'j Distric: No.2 3...'1d t..'".~ To~;r.c. of Tiburcn. T~e:r prope;ties ar= shown 00 the a:';;('~ed sk~~h m.1p whic!l also shows j'ocr prope~ tt its re!;tionship to the cistL.-:g bcur:d.a..r..-j of tt~ Town of Titumn. The Marin Lx:al Ager-.;;;; r=cr::-...ticn Cor.r-issicIl will hold ~ pu!::Ec he:tring en the a=~ticn proposal. p:cbably in Januarf. Th.e e:.do5e'J brochur: ex.plain: in ge::e:al te:-ms the purpcses a."lC sc~r-e of LA..:=CQ's role in !..~e pr::<::es.) cf changing loc~j g'Jve-:7J::le:lt bcundar:es. T:'lJt role is de:ive::. fr'Jm Sote law, Sec~icr: 5CCCO of ~~e Gcverr:.l!"..e~c Coee1 abo :C:cwn as t..~~ COrt.:~-K...'1c:;: Act. One cf (.he mane.ates ir.. L~e CCr-!.e~-Kncx Act re~u:r~s LAFCO to pursue t.l:e log:c;!! fcrrr2~Icn ar.d ~ooif:c.:;tion of 10<::11 gove=er.~ oou~ar:es. Or.:: of the mo.t well establish~ pri:r:e;p!~s of the C;J~.ese-~;.ox Ac! is :.he prohibition on the C:e.o.tiCfi 0f urunc.....--rpcraced "islancs" or isc:ared ~ccXe~ 0: uL.inccrpor:ited (Ccunt)'J territcry surrcu::ced by a c:~y'sjuri~diction. As yeu can se:: from the m.ap, if the Ccn~nls.sicc. J.?proves ycur neig::.c~rs' proposal. yeui:' prq:<!::y ....ould lxccm~ such an lslaud, Fcr this r=~, it would b::: prcble=tic (or the Commiss:on ~o apfrove tr~ prcposal in its pres~nt rcl'8. L.AJ=CO bas the ".1uthcriry to approve, dell)' cr f1'.od~ry the boundar! of proposals brought before it. Tile Commission wculd have the fol:owing cptions for action 3l the public he.;ring: C:'u::t,.pe~~.:m.' JC1Try Btar.::~idd M~ntco/,..r.' Jl1dy Ch~?md.n, B~an lieiler, re~ 4e:-~, Jor...r. K;~. C)nthis ~d\.l:ny, D.3..,.ic. J. Wa.~ Air~~te.:: P:n S~junC. SL~"1~ Kinsey, G~rg~ C. Que~<L Ri...::3l"d Rue::!. ~r.';.Lt;w: Uf!ic~:- F<e:z: V, :9anri::g Alarin Local Agency F orrr1ation c f2 165 N. R:::::'wr)QC 'Jriy~, See l6e p Sac. R..1f:Je!, C;l.Iif.:::r.-1iJ. 9-49C~ . Td~rr.~~e ~.tl:r.!<::-4409 ATTAC}I_"IE)c, 1 P'lg~ 1 of ~ 10 .\'1'::;';~ ::~ ,_;.,:::.::; ,J. . - , ",..". -c"'-"''''J FdC-7-CC 2:5SF~; F2CJ:= 8.10 M!.. l~ne Rizzo . '.' Neve:nber 24. 1999 . Tne Ccmznis3ion ;ould de:lY t..'le proposal. . The COIr.mi~si()n could modify me praposal to drop city al"~'1e.~alien and approve :ml".e.~tion of YOU!' neighbor;' property. to Sa:uurj Dis~ic: No.2 only. · The Commission could modify the bc-undacies of the propes::l area to include your prope:1y in a=xation to the Town of Tiburon. Y cu have ;ed me to believe that yeu may be opposed to the third alte=tive in the absC'"..c~ of 3- specir:e 'ce:-.eflt to be gair..ed from illlIlCxation to Ti1;u.-on. If the Commission approved tl:= third alte:::ative, you would bave the right to tesllfy at the public hearing acd to reguest that the Commission reconsider its approval. You would al30 hz'J:: the right to me a pretesl petition a..c see!:: to te=i1".ate the proc...'"eCings. 1-f:r purpc.se :n ";.lridng this letter is CO Worn: you abJut the pr.:.c~ss ir. Iigir of the fa.c: t!".at annexations to the Town of T:tur::n have ~n ccoLroversial in the past. J'-lthollgh it is not :ny pUQ<Jse or function to . sell you' on the be::er.ts of a=;;at:on to the Town, ycu should know L1at anne~~tion to the Town would not result in ir..c.~~se.: pro~erty t.s.;:;.=s. Howeve::-. ct.1e: uxas and :~S rr..ay 've affec:e~. If a:-..::exe;: to Tibu:cr.. y~u w,:)uld be subject _:0 the felk/wing fees or ta~es thz.t you 111.1Y not be. subje::t La pre~~::tly: . A cor:ur:'..l::.i~:! s.e:vk..es district fee for lier-ar)' se:vic.: af $66 ~er ye::r. . An oFellSpa.:: acquisition bond payments of S': pe:- S1oo,00) of assessee value. (This a3sessme:o! ex?ir:s in 2(02 when the lxlnd is paid off.) . A hcC"~e--oc~upa:iorr pe:=:ll! or busi.."':ess licer-sz f~~ of approxi..rnate:y $120 pc:- S tOO,OCO of grcs~ r=i~t.3. Tne pr1m4Ij' ct-..ange in munic-ipal-type se:'Vi~s unc.er Tiburcn's ]~r1sdic::ou would be in police service. I wculc:! e:cpe:::: tl-.at the frequency of polie: patrol and the call response time for the poii~ service weulC be impr:;)ved ur:de:- the Town's juriseic::on, A more orderly city boundary (I.e., a boundarj without ur.bcorporated isl:u:ds) would also serve to Ir1inirni.,." the cha.~ of any ccnfusion over jurisdictional respcn.sibi1ities bet7.'e~:l the Town lnd the Couney Sl:e:df in resc-cr.rli..~g ~c an emerge:lCY. Fire aT'~ pawme~lc ser....ic~s wou~d nct ~ affected by anne~ation to lhe Town. For fi..lr..hcr information OG ei:'~e!' taxes .Jr fees chargee by the To\\T:. of rieur-on Oc' ser"lic....*S provieed jy the Tcwn. I suggest tl-..at you contact Richard Slram:l, the Town's Fil",:mce Directcr. A TTACIDfE:--T 1 Pag" 2 of ~ S2n: Ey: ,v1A,:: :.'1 l;l,=::; <l'=":'J..cJ.':'~O; M$. 1== ~ -3- F=b-7-~~ 2:3cF~; Fa<;e 9.'~ 0 Nov=bc: 24, 1999 I hc~ you find this !nfoc:r.zr:cn usefui and r look. forward to answering your questions when we me:: on De;emc---:- r at 9:30 a.m. Y curs ve::'j truly. Pete:" Y. BaDning a.~;:Iti 'Ie Office:- P'lBiada Enc~osures cc: Dirk Bischoff. P:cperty Owner Will.iam Baylis, Property Owner Ric:Jard S:rar..z!, Tcwn of TibeTon A.-mette Ros"" Marin County Beard of Supervisors JelJ,! Blanchfleid, Marin LAFCO Chai::~:soa ATTACHl\-1E:'I"T 1 p;,ge 3 of ~ ....c.,...~ '- -, , ~ s;: '. '2: :;7;=\:; ;".'1~;-: :~. ~=-~. ..'-' ~.... J .:.' S_...l.,~':":"::: ,....2-:: - 7 - ~ '-" \ \ ../ ...!!'!~~ ~\ . - ~) ~ z c ~ - E E- J:;:. o t - ~ " ~ ~;:; C,,::c,; 1:/1 C " C) U - - ..., ; r-- .() s= , .~ "" ~, ~ f~",J, - '~ tR., , ".. / / ~ ;""'; . / .... ~ , '/ ., I 1,4 ,/ '" , ~, ,. >r " , / ~ . '. '\. -..>.,. .. " r.:.\ '" ',- > / "- , \.:.... .....',.. , Z , C , - - 4 ';J 8 .... / '!y >- ./ 4 C ,,/ Z / ~ 0 ., .... -, / &' /' ATTACtLvlE:-iT 1 P:lge 4 of .: RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE TOWN OF TIBURON AND SANITARY DISTRICT NO, 2 (PARADISE DRIVE REORGANIZATION NO, 10) The Town Council of the Town ofTiburon does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission has delivered Resolution No. 00-6 of said Commission to this Town Council, which resolution designates the Tiburon Town Council as the conducting authority for this project, and which resolution has been reviewed. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED by the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon as follows: Section I. This action involves the annexation to the Town of Tiburon of 1.88 acres of territory and annexation to Sanitary District NO.2 of 1.61 acres of territory located along Paradise Drive. This action is being taken pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Re- Organization Act of 1985. Notice of hearing has been provided pursuant to that Act. A public hearing was held on April 19, 2000 at which protests were filed and not withdrawn by landowners owning less than 50 percent of the assessed value ofland within the territory. Section II. The project is categorically exempt from requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15319 of the CEQA Guidelines. The reason for the annexation, filed by owners of the land within the affected territory, is for the purpose of obtaining sanitary sewer service to two existing residences. Section III The territory includes 1.88 acres, and is found to be uninhabited, the boundaries of which are described in Exhibits A-I, B-1, A-2, and B-2 attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. The short form designation is "Paradise Drive Reorganization No. 10 including Annexation to the Town ofTiburon and Sanitary District No 2". Section IV. of this annexation. The regular county assessment roll shall be utilized for the purposes Section V. The affected territory will be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of the Town ofTiburon and Sanitary District NO.2. Section VI. Annexation of the subject territory to the Town ofTiburon and to Sanitary District NO.2 of the subject territory is hereby ordered, subject to the following TiburoJ/ Town CeJ/fflci! Resolution ..Vo. I EJCFEBITNO. ~ conditions pertaining to Sanitary District NO.2: 1. In the event that pursuant to rules, regulations, or ordinances of the District, as now or hereafter amended, the District shall require any payment of a fixed or determinable amount of money, either as a lump sum or in installments, for the acquisition, transfer, use or right of use of all or any part of the existing property, real or personal, of the District; such payment will be made to the District in the manner and at the time as provided by the rules, regulations, or ordinances of the District, as now or hereafter amended. 2. Upon and after the effective date of said annexation, the territory, all inhabitants within such territory, and all persons entitled to vote by reason of residing or owning land within the territory, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the District; shall have the same rights and duties as if the territory had been a part of the District upon its original formation; shall be liable for the amount of principal, interest, and any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding or then authorized but thereafter issued bonds, including revenue bonds, or other contracts or obligations of the District; shall be subject to the levying or fixing and collection of any and all taxes, assessments, service charges, rentals, or rates as may be necessary to provide for such payment; and shall be subject to any and all of the rates, rules, regulations and ordinances of the District, as now or hereafter amended. Section VI!. The Town Clerk is hereby ordered to file three (3) certified copies of this Resolution with the executive officer of the Marin County Local Agency Formation Commission and do all other acts necessary in accordance with law to complete the annexation. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon, State of California, held this _ day of 2000, by the following vote: AYES NOES ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS: THOMAS GRAM, MAYOR TOWN OF TIBURON ATTEST DIANE L. CRANE, TOWN CLERK Conducting authority reso.doc Tiburon Town COl/flcil Resolution .Vo. 2 Exhibit A-I PARADISE DRIVE REORGANIZATION No. 10 TO TOWN OF TIBURON AND SANITARY DISTRICT No. 2 Description for Town of Tiburon Mapping No. 15/99 COMMENCING at a point on the southeasterly right of way line of Ranch Road and existing boundary of the Town of Tiburon said point being distant North 34049' East, 45.00 feet from the northwesterly corner of Lot 32 as said lot is shown upon that certain map entitled" Map of Paradise Cove, Sub'd. No. Two, Marin County, Cal." filed for record April 18, 1941 in Volume 5 of Maps, at Page 90, Marin County Records. Said point being common with the southwesterly corner of lot 30 as shown on said map. Thence from the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT North 34049' East, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve; thence leaving said Town boundary and said right of way along said curve to the right, the center of which bears South 55011' East, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 55055', an arc length of 39.04 feet; thence South 89016' East, 45.63 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 0044' West, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 54041'30", an arc length of 38.18 feet; thence South 34034'30" East, 50.00 feet to the northeasterly corner of Lot 30; thence South 55052'50" West, 70.00 feet; South 34034'30" East, 102.00 feet; South 13048'38" West, 67.42 feet, South 4024'13" East, 58.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of way line of Paradise Drive, thence along said right of way line South 72018' West, 29.21 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears North 17042' West, with a radius of 112.00 feet, through a central angle of 86008'03", an arc length of 168.37 feet; thence North 21034' West, 55.94 feet, North 47027' West, 365.814 feet to a point on the existing boundary of the Town of Tiburon; thence leaving said right of way, along said Town boundary North 46001' East, 103.64 feet, South 42029'22" East, 119.93 feet, South 43058'50" East, 133.31 feet to a point on the northwesterly right of way line of Ranch Rd.; thence along said right of way line North 34049' East, 55.993 feet to a point on a curve to the left the center of which bears North 55011' West, with a radius of 58.083 feet, through a central angle of 16022'12", an arc length of 16.59 feet; thence leaving said right of way line South 55011' East, 42.35 feet to the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. Containing 1.88 acres, more or less. / ~ ~~~. 4i1' ,'t>. ....-1' 'Ooi~,.,. > 0 ~:}:.. ""d'J,''<J' i'5J~~';~ G,., g~ 'l"""G' 8~;}~1O ~~ ~~ 9~ ~~~&;~ " L5 . !< " ..~<>- O~ . ~ .''19 .~ ~ ~ .8 ~~ N~ ~M.Z"404W' 'I g ~~. '8:::" ;s..~...~ -\ S 9 .' . '. ~9 gil ',.0' ,;' ~ ~ ,J)'" ry" OC".:o" ltl ,fi !l ....,\ I ~ ~ .. '/1 \(/J. Nt. ~ 0 "'.., ~.~ ..\....~.... "P4-<ftS g ~ '\i~''':><'' "?' · ii~ <<;"'~... -; ~ ~ ~ ~,~~ ~,t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.; a~~ 71;1 ~ t ~~~ ~ 13~~ .... ~ ~ . ~~ or'.. II '!J I ,~p" ~ t ~ i'5 ~ g ~ ~~ ~ z o ~ C\I N Z Z 0 <{ 0 Z ~ gs G 00 10 ~ gz-ol-Ol/) \Uo'I-lL.~- > 0 0 Q!Z ;z ~ o 3 <{ \U 0 l- I/) I- Z - <{ ~ I/) 0: ... <( ::> z u 0 ii 6 g~ ---- CllI~"," ~ "'" , ~g) ~~ , L" ) ~'" 1;~ i'5~ 13" !l~ ~ ~ / / $ 001-,1 '7l"9':lG / / / ~88 88 h~ ~~ ~b" ~~ -.. ~ ~:t ~~ ~ ~~ll ll~ !/~1: ~.. !:~ ~~ ~- ~g ill! ll~ ~. 'I' / ./ Z ~ ti:lz: I ::l0) ~~ , 100) ~ ~ ~!: - -- 1-\C1 .... lL.- . "" .~ ~ 0' cId ~ lll~ ~~ .... .. ~ . .c ~ j jj~ .. .c O(.!) ~ I-Z r.1 Q!IL otL o "oi~ lL.<{ ~Ui tL::2: i! " <{ jJ:lC:; .s ::2: \\ ,'2. \\ ,\ \ ~ \ d i'I n Exhibit A-2 PARADISE DRIVE REORGANIZATION No. 10 TO TOWN OF TIBURON AND SANITARY DISTRICT No. 2 Description for Sanitary District No. 2 Mapping No. 15/99 COMMENCING at a point on the southeasterly right of way line of Ranch Road and existing boundary of the Sanitary District No. 2 said point being distant North 34049' East, 45.00 feet from the northwesterly corner of Lot 32 as said lot is shown upon that certain map entitled" Map of Paradise Cove, Sub'd. No. Two, Marin County, Cal." filed for record April 18, 1941 in Volume 5 of Maps, at Page 90, Marin County Records. Said point being common with the southwesterly corner of lot 30 as shown on said map. Thence from the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT North 34049' East, 10.00 feet to the beginning of a curve; thence leaving said District boundary and said right of way along said curve to the right, the center of which bears South 55011' East, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 55055', an arc length of 39.04 feet; thence South 89016' East, 45.63 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 0044' West, with a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 54041'30", an arc length of 38.18 feet; thence South 34034'30" East, 50.00 feet to the northeasterly corner of Lot 30; thence South 55052'50" West, 70.00 feet; South 34034'30" East, 102.00 feet; South 13048'38" West, 67.42 feet, South 4024'13" East, 58.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of way line of Paradise Drive, thence along said right of way line South 72018' West, 29.21 feet; thence along a curve to the right, the center of which bears North 17042' West, wi th a radius of 112.00 feet, through a central angle of 86008'03", an arc length of 168.37 feet; thence North 21034' West, 55.94 feet, North 47027' West, 245.814 feet to a point on the existing boundary of Sanitary District No.2; thence leaving said right of way, along said District boundary North 46005' East, 96.26 feet, South 43058'50" East, 133.31 feet to a point on the northwesterly right of way line of Ranch Rd.; thence along said right of way line North 34049' East, 55.993 feet to a point on a curve to the left the center of which bears North 55011' West, with a radius of 58.083 feet, through a central angle of 16022'12", an arc length of 16.59 feet; thence leaving said right of way line South 55011' East, 42.35 feet to the POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. Containing 1.61 acres, more or less. / z (\J 0 0 ~ ~ C\l z ti:lz: I ~~ N 0 Gcn ~ ~ I Z Z Z -en ~ ~ ~~: <{ ~ Cl!..... ~ ~ ~ G ln~ N " ::l '8 :~ . :::;; 00 lD iiZ 0, cId s illJ ~ z ~-oi=oln 0 .... ~ g \Uol-~~o ~z ~ . :E ~(.!) ~ itH .. ~~ .c: >z >, -z ~ Cl! ~ il! z- co.i~ r.1 o <{ <{c- ~i~ ~ \U 0 I- I/)~ I/) I- Z Cl!~ ~ CllIliOl.(,," - <{ f2 to~ ~ ---- o I/) .s' ii2 ~ 0: ::2: ~ "'" \\ , ~1l ,'a. ~':: , L" ) i5", ''tc L~ 8~ 1;~ \\ ~~ ~ / , " , ~ / / -$- 001"., :71V:)c; ~ - - ~ p ~ / / ; ~ ~ / / / ~ ;;~ j!", .// pa ail ~~ ~li ~~; ~~ .~ j ~~ ! ~~ll ll~ !/"c ~" Cl: ~~ ~- !g ill! ll~ :;, ~ ~ I 0 Z z ! ~ t; ~ ~~ " ~ ~ ~,! L h 0 ~ ~= g $ - ~~ TIBURON TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 19, 2000 ITEM: ~ TOWN COUNCIL RICHARD STRANZL, FINANCE DIRECTOR UPPER STEW ART DRIVE UNDERGROUNDING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS - APPOINTMENT OF ENGINEER OF WORK BACKGROUND: This item is for approval of the appointment of the firm 001- TETRAD as Engineer of Work for the proposed Upper Stewart Drive Undergrounding Assessment District. Staff has discussed this item of business with Upper Stewart Drive Undergrounding Committee Representative Victor Zsufika and District Counsel Stephen Casaleggio; both agree that it is appropriate and timely to formalize this appointment now. This proposed Undergrounding Assessment District now encompasses approximately 7S homeowners. Since accepting the petition of the Upper Stewart Drive area (about 50 homes), a group of homeowners in the contiguous Comstock/Lower Silverado area (approximately 25 homes) has recently organized support for the undergrounding of utilities in their adjacent neighborhood in order to join with the Upper Stewart Drive group. Fifteen (15) homeowners in this contiguous area have deposited a combined total of$10,500 with the Town for the purpose of funding a portion of the initial/preliminary engineering costs of the proposed district. DISCUSSION The following District proceedings have taken place to date: At the regular Council Meeting of January 19, 2000, Council adopted Resolution No 3390 which accepted the petition and initiated special assessment proceedings for residents in the proposed Upper Stewart Dive area. This action began the formal process to establish a special assessment district for the purpose of undergrounding utilities in the area At the regular Council Meeting of March 1, 2000, Council adopted Resolution No. 3404 appointing the law firm of Jones Hall, San Francisco, California to perform bond counsel services for the proposed Upper Stewart Drive Undergrounding Assessment District. Pending proceedings include: Appointment of District UnderwriterIFinancial Advisor I Upper Stewart Drive Undergrounding Assessment District Proceedings Appointment of District Engineer Town Council Meeting of April 19, 2000 Page 2. RECOMMENDATION: Town Council adopt the draft resolution appointing the engineering firm ofUDI- TETRAD of Pacheco, California, to be the Engineer of Work for the proposed Upper Stewart Drive Undergrounding Assessment District. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Letter - V. Zsuflka, Committee Chair to Town Manager, dated April 5, 2000 ..~ R. Stranzl 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON APPOINTING ENGINEER OF WORK Upper Stewart Drive Undergroundine Assessment District. Tiburon California WHEREAS, the Town Council wishes to undertake proceedings pursuant to appropriate assessment and assessment bond acts in and for the proposed Upper Stewart Drive Undergrounding District (the "District") for the acquisition and construction of public improvements; WHEREAS, the public interest will be served by appointing and employing certain professional consultants, as specified herein, for the preparation and conduct of said proceedings; and NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows: The firm ofUDI- TETRAD, Consulting Engineers, Inc., Pacheco, California is appointed and employed to do and perform all engineering work I\ecessary in and for the proceedings, including preparation of the requisite maps and description of easements, estimate of costs, diagrams and assessments. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town ofTiburon held on Wednesday, April 19, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINING: ABSENT: Council members: Council members: Council members: Council members: TOM GRAM, MAYOR TOWN OF TffiURON ATTEST: DIANE CRANE IACOPI TOWN CLERK RECEIVED APR 7 2000 April 5,2000 Tiburon Town Council 1505 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE TOWN OF TIBURON Attention: Mr. Robert L. Kleinert Town Manager Re: Upper Stewart Drive Assessment District Agenda Item for April 19, 2000 I Engineer appoinment Dear Mr. Kleinert, Our committee has studied the proposals from several engineers and we have chosen to nominate 001- TETRAD, Mr. Roger Poynts, as the "engineer of work" for our district. Please prepare and adopt a resolution, for the April 19th meeting, appointing this firm as the engineer for the Upper Stewart Drive Assessment District so that we may proceed with our project. As 1 understand it, the next step will be a pre-engineering meeting with 001- TETRAD, PG&E, PacBell, and A TT to discuss the base maps and coordinate the planning. Also, thank you for appointing Steve Cassaleggio from Jones Hall as our Bond Council. We, the members of our committee, would like to meet with you sometime next week to discuss the project. Please let us know a time that may be convenient for you. Thanks for all your help 0.~ /.. /-.;/ /. / . ~~.-/ 'tic~orZsu~/-=- committee chair 435-1678 victorz@earthlink.net TOWN OF TIBURON STAFF REpORT ITEM NO. 10 To: From: Subject: Date: Town Council Town Manager Town Manager Recruitment Process April 19,2000 BACKGROUND At the April 5, 2000 regular meeting, the Town Council appointed an ad-hoc subcommittee of Mayor Gram and Councilmember Matthews to direct in the recruitment process for the Town Manager's position. Council also determined that an executive search firm should be retained by the Town and authorized the subcommittee to screen proposals, conduct interviews, and proceed to retain the most appropriate search firm for the recruitment process. Five (5) proposals were received by the Town from various Northern California Executive Search Firms and each reviewed extensively by the subcommittee Copies of these proposals were also distributed to each Town Councilmember for their information and consideration. Interviews were then conducted by the subcommittee of the more suitable and appropriately qualified executive search firms for the Tiburon process. The subcommittee ultimately selected the executive search firm of Hughes, Perry & Associates of Sea Ranch, California to conduct the recruitment process for Tiburon's new Town Manager. RECOMNIENDTlONS That the Town Council confirm the subcommittee's retention of Hughes, Perry & Associates to conduct the Town Manager's recruitment process and authorize the Mayor to execute the Exhibit Agreement between the Town and Hughes, Perry & Associates. EXHIBIT 1. Draft Agreement between Hughes, Perry & Associates and the Town of Tiburon to conduct Town Manager recruitment process. AGREEMENT NO, RECRUITMENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT was made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between THE TOWN OF TIBURON, hereinafter referred to as TOWN, and HUGHES~ PERRY & ASSOCIATES, a California corporation, whose business address is P.O, Box 384, 35590 Verdant View Street, The Sea Ranch, California 95497, hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT. RECITAL TOWN desires to engage the services of CONSULTANT to conduct a recruitment for a Town Manager, and to provide the services described in CONSULTANT'S proposal, dated March 30, 2000, and incorporated into this agreement by reference as Exhibit "A," AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises hereinafter contained, TOWN hereby engages CONSULTANT to provide, and CONSULTANT agrees to provide the services described below. 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES, CONSULTANT shall conduct the recruitment in accordance with Exhibit "A," (March 30, 2000 Consultant Proposal) 2 . PERSONNEL; COMPENSATION; PAYMENT, A, Consulting services shall be performed only by CONSULTANT'S employees, Such services shall be compensated at the rate set out in the proposal, B. CONSULTANT shall bill monthly for services rendered and expenses specified in Exhibit "A" for materials provided by CONSULTANT, c. The total payment to CONSULTANT for services and expenses for services defined herein shall not exceed Eighteen-Thousand, Five-Hundred dollars ($18,500,00). 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this agreement shall begin on the date of its execution and shall continue until completed. 4. COMPLETION OF WORK. CONSULTANT shall start work as soon as this agreement is executed, and shall complete the work program in accordance with the schedule established in Exhibit "A," 5, OTHER SERVICES. TOWN may wish CONSULTANT to perform services In addition to those described herein, If so, CONSULTANT shall be compensated for any such services performed, which are authorized in writing in advance by TOWN at rates agreed upon in writing in advance for the additional work, 6. INSPECTION. CONSULTANT shall furnish TOWN every reasonable opportunity to ascertain that the services of CONSULTANT are being performed in accordance with the requirements and intentions of this agreement, All work done and materials furnished, if any, shall be subject to the TOWN inspection and approval. The inspection CONSULTANT of any of its agreement as prescribed. of such work shall not relieve obligations to fulfill its 7. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT. Failure of TOWN to agree with CONSULTANT'S independent findings, conclusions or recommendations, if the same are called for under this agreement, on the basis of differences in matters of judgment, shall not be construed as a failure on the part of CONSULTANT to satisfy the requirements of this agreement. 8, ASSIGNMENT; SUBCONTRACTORS; EMPLOYEES, A, Assignment, Both parties shall give their personal attention to the faithful performance of this agreement and shall not assign, transfer, convey, or otherwise dispose of this agreement or any right, title or interest in or to the same or any part thereof without prior written consent to the other party, and then only sUbject to such terms and conditions as the other party may require, A consent to one assignment shall not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignment, Any assignment without such approval shall be void and, at the option of the other parties, shall be cause to terminate immediately this agreement and any license or privilege granted herein, This agreement and any interest herein shall not be assignable by operation of law without the prior written consent of the other party. B, Subcontractors; Employees. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services of CONSULTANT hereunder. No subcontractor of CONSULTANT shall be recognized by TOWN as such; rather, all subcontractors shall be deemed employees of CONSULTANT, and CONSULTANT shall be responsible for their performance. CONSULTANT shall give its personal attention to the fulfillment of the provisions of this agreement by all of its employees and subcontractors, if any, and shall keep the work under its control. If any employee or subcontractor of CONSULTANT fails or refuses to carry out the provisions of this agreement or appears to be incompetent or to act in a disorderly or improper manner, CONSULTANT shall discharge it or him from the work under this agreement on demand of TOWN. 9, INTEREST OF CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT represents that it presently has no interest, and covenants that it shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the services hereunder. CONSULTANT further covenants that, in the performance of this agreement, no subcontractor or person having such an interest, shall be employed. CONSULTANT certifies that no one who has or will have any financial interest under this agreement is an officer or employee of TOWN, In the performance of the services hereunder, CONSULTANT shall at all times be deemed an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of TOWN, 10, INDEMNITY, CONSULTANT shall defend, TOWN, its officers, agents and indemnify, and save harmless employees of and from: A. Any and all claims and demands which may be made against TOWN, its officers, agents or employees by reason of any injury to or damage suffered or sustained by any person or corporation caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, any act or omission, negligent or otherwise, of CONSULTANT or any employee of CONSULTANT, including any subcontractors of CONSULTANT, or their employees, or employee of CONSULTANT, including subcontractors of CONSULTANT or their employees, B, Any and all damage to or destruction of the property of TOWN, its officers, agents or employees, occupied or used by or in the care, custody, or control of CONSULTANT, or in proximity to the site of CONSULTANT'S work, caused by an act or omission, negligent or otherwise, of CONSULTANT, or any person deemed to be an employee of CONSULTANT, including subcontractors under this agreement or of CONSULTANT'S or any subcontractor's employees or agents. C. Any and all claims or demands which may be made against TOWN, its officers, agents or employees by reason of any injury to or death or damage suffered or s\lstained by any employee or agent of CONSULTANT or any subcontractor under this agreement, however caused, excepting, however, any such claims and demands which are not the result of the negligence or willful misconduct of TOWN, its officers, agents or employees. 11 , INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS, CONSULTANT shall obtain, and maintain in effect continuously, comprehensive general liability insurance necessary to protect the public, with limits of liability not less than $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury and Property Damage and appropriate coverage endorsements to include broad-form property damage, auto and non-owned auto, and personal injury. Such insurance shall name TOWN, its elected officials and its other officers, and employees, as additional insureds, and shall not be reduced or canceled without thirty (30) days written prior notice certain to TOWN. The insurance shall contain a "Cross-Liability" endorsement, which shall read as follows: "The inclusion of more than one insured under this policy shall not affect the rights of any insured as respects any claim, suit or judgment made or brought by or for any other insured, or by or for any employee of any other insured, This policy shall protect each insured in the same manner as though a separate policy had been issued to each, except that nothing herein shall operate to increase the company's liability beyond the amount or amounts for which the insurer would have been liable had only one insured been named", CONSULTANT shall provide TOWN a Certificate of Insurance, upon written request of TOWN, If further requested, a certified copy of the policy, as evidence of insurance protection shall be provided, Any policy or any certificate of insurance protection provided by any insurance company or underwriter which contains the language "endeavor to" and "but failing to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company," or similar language, shall be unacceptable, The certificate shall be approved by the TOWN prior to this agreement becoming effective. CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain continuously worker's compensation insurance to all CONSULTANT'S employees to the extent required by law. 12, AGREEMENT BINDING, The terms, covenants and conditions of this agreement shall apply to, and shall bind, the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, assigns and subcontractors of both parties, 13. WAIVERS . The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any term, covenant, or condition of this agreement, or of any provision, ordinance or law, shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant, condition, ordinance or law, or if any other term, covenant, condition, ordinance or law, The subsequent acceptance by either party of any fee or other money which may become due hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach or violation by the other party of any term, covenant, or condition of this agreement or of any applicable law or ordinance, 14, NON-DISCRIMINATION, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any person under any circumstance on account of race, sex, marital status, national origin, religious belief, age, or condition of handicap, 15, COMPLIANCE WITH LAW, CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, especially those pertaining to the issue of confidentiality, IN AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION, This agreement may be modified or amended only with prior written consent of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be fully executed as of the day and year first above written. By: Title: HUGHES, PERRY & ASSOCIATES, INC. A Corporation By: Title: TOWN OF TIBURON I +-er'r\ : II To: From: Subject: Date: Robert L. Kleinert, Town Manager Thomas A. Aiello, Lieutenant Grant Award April 14, 2000 TOWN OF TIBURON MEMORANDUM The Tiburon Police Department, as part of a countywide effort, applied for and received, a $30,000 dollar grant from the Office of Criminal Justice Planning. This grant is funded under the California Law Enforcement Technology Equipment Purchase (CLETEP), What is special about this particular grant is the funds received under this grant do not require any matching funds on our part. Our grant proposal became part of a multi-agency, countywide effort. Each participating agency receiving these monies will be installing mobile data terminals (MDT's) in some (or all) of their patrol vehicles. MDT's will allow officers to run vehicles and persons for warrants and driver license checks, directly from their patrol car - rather than taxing our dispatchers with extra radio traffic. Sergeant Dave Hulton wrote this comprehensive grant, with all the clerical work being completed by Secretary Cindy Rodriguez. Without their assistance the Town most likely would not have been in line for, and awarded, the $30,000 dollars! cc: Sergeant Hutton Secretary Rodriguez attachment: Grant award letter STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRA Y DAVIS. Governor GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING 1130 K STR!:ET, SUITE 300 SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 (916) 323-2280 April 11,2000 Peter G. Her\ey, Chief of Police Town of Tiburon 1155 Tiburon Boulevard Tiburon, CA 94920 RE: California Law Enforcement Technology Equipment Purchase (CLETEP) Program Dear ChiefHerely: Congratulations! Your project has been selected to receive funding by the California Law Enforcement Technology Equipment Purchase (CLETEP) Program of the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (OCJP). Provided that there are no successful appeals during the next ten (10) calendar days, you will be awarded $30,000 for the grant award period beginning on May 1, 2000 and ending on October 31,2000. As stated in the Request for Proposal, the last two months of the grant period will be dedicated to closing the grants. The close-out procedure will include the tracking of all purchases; verification of invoiced purchases within the grant award period; and a report regarding these purchases and the overall benefits of this program. We look forward to the successful implementation of this project. If you have any questions concerning this process, please contact Robert Spradling, Crime Suppression Branch, at (916) 323-7426. Sincerely, ~dr Chief, Public Safety Division RECEnf~iO APR 1 9 2000 TOWN MANAGERS OFFICF TOWN OF TIBURON D (ME:" ~ 5TM COote:.... U(2.0)>Peu lHCSE dFF FbI2..- TH F 4: Coz),NC-IC ;MCJV1~:S AT ItN lU-m hQ/}~6. )W ~~J #1- tATE MAIL # r-1 RECEIVED APR 1 9 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF TIBURON February 12, 1996 Design Review Board Planning Commission Town of Tiburon Re: 2024 Paradise Drive To Whom It May Concern: I am the neighbor directly to the north of the Cook's Home at 2024 Paradise Drive and would like to offer my comment on the changes which the Cook's are requesting for their home. I reviewed the drawings and colored elevations and think that the adjustment to the side along the road are a distinct improvement both in Architecture (Which I see every day) and the amount of view. The plans which were approved had ornamental iron gates and more interruption of the vista. The Cook's Architect has created a more pleasing solution, an interesting view of the bay and Angel Island. Also there is more room for pedestrians. Please approve the revisions to the Cook's residence. Very truly yours, C- 1. ):}...t.__ Mrs. Anne Kahn 2026 Paradise Drive Tiburon FEa 1 2 1996 I L_ _~ , ,::J I ., :::'.~I ! ._,J j ..----.........J F~ LArt: //?/!/ G 11 February 1996 Design Review Board Town of Tiburon Re: Chong and Stan Cook's Residence 2024 Paradise Drive Dear Committee: I live next to the above project and want to express my support for the changes which the Cook's Designer is presenting to the Board on Thursday 15, February 1996. I think the elimination of the ornamental gate and the changes to the front are an improvement to my neighborhood, I want this approved. Thank you, ------D ~~/ '/~;"'7 f~7A -- I :vmm 1/ ~/j L vu' Fe/Jm~7 ~ - FE8 14 1996 F~..~ ~~"l~<:: r;>'\,= - '.- . L::~-- LATif. fr'-.11 (. F1 ----~-m-f"c:b.~m~ \-9-i~_~__~___ -_.__._~-_. - .----- ------ ---------- - -~~-----_._- m_~_ J~~~~J.4 -tf,,\ Gr:c~~~ :~~-- _ _._m\ -~~_c~~~~\ mJ~--~;;-~~-=- -Ceo\<.; _boo-'_.e_~..:>_ \o~~\. u~J___ \ \ ' \ c..e, I ~r, ~\ no ~(""r-!y _ _ oto.... _ - - - ----~5n~P:m~~~-~ m ~-------- --. ___"m ---~~- 'U:;-- -~-- - - --- - - - . - n_____ . _'_ V'~m -. "--------------- ""'1---.- - ..:~~,~,~'.\ J - '=.-~~,."'..'4 _nn , _ :-;..lE~;i""'~" I --- - - -FE 8--1- 5 -1996 nl__~ - -- .~-~~::..JED-------t_----- L.-=-----2 ,"'E,"/d _ _2:_C::Lc)-2...._ ~A13.B~..J..::5.~__PR_I_~--- i': RECEIVED APR 1 9 2000 PARTMENT PL~~~I~GO~~IBURON ~----- L .~ f . . . to-., I ~--..........-..- '--..,,- ..:'1 ~ . -c- E:~. ",. - I ~ . .. ~ ... ~ " ..... .;;~.~ \:Yt~." ;,.: ',: ',~ . 'e ... .",j~. 1. 'l..' ,~, \. O' I 't. ~. ":,) "~3. ,~" , , I';h~- ~ " "l ",:.~-;: . .Ci'l t " ~" }.J.l" 'l';"~"~ '[ i' ,it (}, : ~\ ,I 'J f1!! .' ,,; I~.:..,: ......,!: . ." ;. , ! , c .' fi" ,...= . :':!. == ~ - t '~- ~ -.._.Jill i =. I '. ..-' ~ -' ~ ...... :.i .1...... ~,i... '., '~."f"" r ~ .. ....' \ t~' '.... ~ " . . ~ [~~ ~... '-'fl"it -'~.- - - ~ ~ :;:- ,}~J;;,~ ,',~' ,..: "-.:- - -'iJ~:r, .:,-Ail!i: ,~,. ..:;'''*~ ~.-f'-"/i" ~::,c:: r' \ , ;,' \ 1--.' /'_' \ . J"P" F.!:OS "r"~ t .... , 'i&'i< *~. ~- . '" . .,' < f~.. ~ , ...;--- ~r~_~,!"o c-: ' .., , ,-.... ::l.t.. ,,.~>:' .'.....' ' .~. , .,. . ~ .- ,.. .,' ''''__~ .-.."'4 "