Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Min 2007-11-07 TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Gram called the regular meeting of the Tiburon Town Council to order at 7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 7,2007, in Town Council Chambers, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Berger, Fredericks, Gram, Slavitz, Smith PRESENT: EX OFFICIO: Town Manager Curran, Town Attorney Danforth, Director of Administrative Services Bigall, Director of Community Development Anderson, Associate Planner Tyler, Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Nguyen, Chief of Police Cronin, Town Clerk Crane Iacopi At 6:00 p.m., the Council convened in closed session to discuss the following items. The item agendized as "Anticipated Litigation" was pulled at the direction of the Town Attorney prior to the commencement of the closed session. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Section 54956.9(a)) Town ofTiburon v. Sylvia; Sylvia v. Town ofTiburon County of Marin v. Martha Company CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Section 54956.9(b)) Significant exposure to litigation ( One Case) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Section 54957) Title: Town Manager Title: Town Attorney Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7, 2007 Page 1 CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT Mayor Gram said that no final action was taken on the matters discussed in closed session. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A man representing Gaia, a non-profit organization, said that they would like to place two additional boxes in public places for clothing donations. He asked for a letter from the town that they could show to businesses and organizations that would allow them to place these boxes on private property. Mayor Gram asked the man to submit his proposal to town staff for further study and a recommendation to the Town Council. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Town Council Minutes - Adopt October 17, 2007 Minutes (Town Clerk Crane Iacopi) 2. Town Investment Summary - Accept September 2007 Report (Director of Administrative Services Bigall) 3. Marin Emergency Radio Authority - Appoint Chief of Police Cronin to replace Town Manager Curran on Board of Directors (Town Manager Curran) 4. Commendation - Adopt Resolution Commending Diane Smith as Citizen of the Year (Town Manager Curran) MOTION: Moved: Vote: To adopt Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 4, as written. Berger, seconded by Slavitz AYES: Unanimous ACTION ITEMS 1. Holiday Tree - Request by Chamber of Commerce for contribution to purchase Holiday Tree (Town Manager Curran) Town Manager Curran said that the Chamber had purchased a reusable holiday tree for $20,000 and were requesting funds from the City of Belvedere and Town of Tiburon to defray half of the one-time cost. Curran said that the Chamber would pay for the maintenance and storage of the tree. Town Manager Curran said that the Belvedere Council had pledged $2,500 and that the Chamber had requested $7,500 from the Town. She said that she had prepared an agreement for the Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7, 2007 Page 2 Council, in the event that it approved the request, which stipulated that the Chamber would not request any more funding in future for holiday decorations. Ms. Curran said that her report included a break-down of Town funding to the Chamber and how it was utilized. She reviewed this information with the Council, noting the long-standing partnership between the Chamber and the Town. The Town Manager said that while it seemed clear that the Chamber could absorb the cost of the purchase of the tree, she said that a contribution in the amount of$5,000 seemed appropriate. She noted that the Council could fund the full $7,500, as well. The Town's contribution, if any, would come from an unallocated general fund reserve, according to the Town Manager. Councilmember Berger said that he had met with Chamber representative Steve Sears earlier in the day concerning the installation of the tree in the downtown fountain plaza. Berger asked how the installation would affect the long-term health of the plaza. Town Manager Curran said that the company wanted to sink six or eight bolts into the brick area of the plaza that would be permanent; she said that this information had just come to light and needed more study. Vice Mayor Slavitz asked whether the bolts would be visible. Ms. Curran said that some sort of cap might be placed over the top to cover the bolts. Councilmember Fredericks asked where the tree would be located. Ms. Curran said that it would be located in the same place in the plaza as last year, between the benches and the fountain. Mayor Gram opened the matter for public comment. Steve Sears said that the Chamber also planned a holiday celebration downtown on December 7. With regard to the installation, Sears said that it would require eight large bolts to be sunk into 3/8-inch holes at each point of the stand in order to anchor the tree to the plaza. He said that another way to do it would be to use sand bags and guy wires but that the installer preferred the first method. Sears said that Mr. Handyman was willing to drill the holes in the plaza, install the bolts and make covers for them at the Chamber's expense. Mr. Sears asked the Town to partner with the Chamber and the City of Belvedere to cover the expense of the tree. He said that the Chamber would purchase the poinsettias and other decorations for downtown. He said that the LED lights on the tree would consume 20% of the electricity used by the lights last year, thereby further reducing the expense to the Town. Town Manager Curran concurred that the Town would provide the electricity and manpower, but at a lower level than last year. Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 3 Mayor Gram closed the public comment portion. Councilmember Fredericks asked what would happen if the plaza was damaged by the installation. Councilmember Smith asked if the Town was indemnified in the agreement. Mayor Gram suggested that language indemnifYing the Town against any damage to "town property" be added to the agreement. Mr. Sears said that the Chamber would replace individual bricks, if damaged. Vice Mayor Slavitz wondered whether replacing bricks might be preferable to leaving bricks with holes in them. Councilmember Berger said that before the Council approved any anchoring device, there should be further study with the Public Works Department and the Chamber. He said that bricks would not support anything. MOTION: To approve the funding request in the amount of$5,000 contingent upon a signed agreement to fund holiday decorations, and further study of the anchoring method. Berger, seconded by Slavitz AYES: Unanimous Moved: Vote: 2. "Late Mail" Policy - Consider Adoption of a Written Town Policy regarding "Late Mail" (Director of Community Development Anderson) Director of Community Development Anderson gave the report. He recommended a cut-off time of 5 :00 p.m. on Monday prior to Town Council and Planning Commission meetings be established to allow the council and commissioners time to review late mail. He said that the Design Review Board would have a 72-hour cut-off time under the proposed policy. Anderson said that for adjourned and special meetings, the Town Manager would establish the deadline, and that for controversial projects, the deadline would be included in the public hearing notice. Council discussed the various types of late mail and how it was received. For instance, if someone brings a letter or document to a meeting, is it part of the record. Councilmember Fredericks asked about the meaning of "distribute" under the policy. Director Anderson said the method of distribution would depend on the volume of the mail. Mayor Gram and Councilmember Smith asked whether a piece of late mail that did not meet the proposed deadlines would be considered part of the record. Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 4 Town Attorney Danforth said that while not all public records were part of the administrative record, the issue could be addressed in the policy, for instance, by adding the language to the effect that if there was insufficient time to review it, it would not be considered part of the administrative record. Councilmember Smith said that most agencies were far more aggressive and did not allow late mail after a certain date. Director Anderson concurred, but noted that packets distributed by the County of Marin, for instance, were distributed much further in advance of the meeting than the Town's materials. The Council concurred, however, that the purpose of the public meetings would not be served unless people were allowed to present their materials or make statements at the podium. Town Attorney Danforth suggested a modification to the policy to state that late mail received after the deadline "may not be a part of the administrative record." Council agreed. MOTION: Moved: Vote: To adopt the late mail policy, as amended. Berger, seconded by Slavitz AYES: Unanimous 3. Reed Ranch Road Acceleration Lane - Award of Contract to Ghilotti Bros. and budget amendment (Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Nguyen) Director of Public Works/Town Engineer Nguyen said that the bids had been opened earlier in the year and that Ghilotti Bros. was the low bidder on the project, at $110,635. The engineer's estimate was $95,159, according to Nguyen. Director Nguyen said the award of contract had been delayed by CAL/TRANS pending further review of the design and issuance of the encroachment permit. He said that further conditions had been placed on the project by CAL/TRANS; this plus other costs would require an additional $57,000 to be appropriated to complete the project. He said that funds were available in the town's State Gas Tax Fund. Mayor Gram asked how the prior budget amount was arrived at. Director Nguyen said staff had budgeted $90,000 in fiscal year 2007-2008 for the project but at that time, the project engineering had not been completed nor bids received. Based on the low bid, plus a 15% contingency to address CAL/TRANS encroachment permit conditions, any approved unforeseen work, and remaining engineering and construction management fees, resulted in the additional $57,000. Mayor Gram asked when the engineer's estimate was completed. Director Nguyen said that the estimate was completed in July, following adoption of the budget. Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 5 Town Manager Curran added that the bids were disappointing but that Town Staffhad learned that public projects were still booming while there was a cool-off in the private sector. Mayor Gram opened the matter for public comment. Ray Truman spoke of the dangers of that intersection and the likelihood of a serious accident taking place. Christopher Wand added that there was no guardrail on the sidewalk west of Jefferson Drive as it proceeded up the hill and suggested that CAL/TRANS should install one in the location. Vice Mayor Slavitz said that he had lived in the Reedlands since 1990 and that this was a much needed improvement. MOTION: Moved: Vote: To award the contract and authorize the budget amendment, as presented. Slavitz, seconded by Berger AYES: Unanimous 4. 275 Diviso Street - Authorize Town Manager to enter into negotiations to obtain public access over a portion of property located 275 Diviso Street owned by Mr. Avi Ron (Town Manager Curran) - adjourn to closed session at end of meeting Mayor Gram opened the item for public comment. Bill Lukens, Lyford's Cove/Old Tiburon resident, said that the public paths were an asset to the community of footpaths and that this path was an important segment connecting old Tiburon to the downtown area. He said that it was also important in the context of an emergency for ingress and egress to the area. He supported obtaining a public easement over the property. Councilmember Berger asked Mr. Lukens whether he thought that it was a plus or a minus to live adjacent to a public path. Mr. Lukens said that 99% of the people who used the path were neighbors and that it was a way to stay in touch with one's neighbors. Mr. Lukens added that a developer could deed the path and retain the underlYing fee while still maintaining his lot size for purposes of FAR. Helen Lindquist, also a resident of Lyford's Cove/Old Tiburon, and one of the original members of the Lanes and Paths Committee, agreed with Mr. Lukens. Mayor Gram closed the public hearing. MOTION: To authorize the Town manager to enter into negotiations regarding the aforementioned property in closed session. Berger, seconded by Fredericks AYES: Unanimous Moved: Vote: Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7, 2007 Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Appeal of Design Review Board Decision - Consider appeal of Design Review Board's decision to deny a request for Site Plan and Architectural Review to construct additions to an existing single-family dwelling, with variances for front yard setback and excess lot coverage (Associate Planner Tyler) Property Address: Assessor Parcel No: Applicant/Appellant: 9 Burrell Court 034-302-05 Firuze Hariri Associate Planner Tyler gave the report and reviewed the grounds of appeal and staff s responses. Councilmember Smith commented that the Design Review Board August 16 minutes said that the variance findings could be made for this application; he asked whether the only issues were those related to the Hillside Guidelines. Mayor Gram opened the appellant's portion of the hearing. Michael Heckmann, project architect, said that while the design of the house contained strong architectural concepts, it was respectful of the neighbors. He said that the project's second story design was the crux of the opposition. He reviewed the changes made by the applicant to address the concerns of the neighbors. He said that the upper level of the home was modest and that it complied with the Hillside Design Guidelines in many ways. He noted that the building was terraced, using the design of the slope, according to Goal 1, Principle 2. He said that it followed the contours of the hill, according to Principle 4; and avoided roof overhangs on the downhill side, according to Principle 6. He said that the vertical elevation gave variety, according to Principle 10, and that the color, texture, and form related to the surrounding neighborhood. Councilmember Berger asked Heckmann about the height of the proposed addition. Mr. Heckman said that it was well below the 30-foot height limit. Mr. Heckmann said that the placement of windows in the second story was done for the privacy of his client, as well as the neighbors; he said that his client had reduced the number of windows in the plans, removed an upper terrace, and had added landscape screening to address these concerns. Mr. Heckmann distributed photos of other homes in the neighborhood and stated that there was a precedent for second stories; he noted in particular the neighboring Beaumont residence which he said was slightly taller and wider than Ms. Hariri's proposal. However, he said that they would consider that changes listed in Mr. Beaumont's letter (dated November 6, 2007 as "Late Mail") if it would satisfy them. Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 7 In conclusion, Mr. Heckmann said that the proposal was a cohesive design and appropriate to the neighborhood. He asked the Council to grant the appeal. Councilmember Fredericks asked Mr. Heckmann ifhe had a photo that showed the proposed addition from the perspective of the Truman residence. Fredericks also asked for the ceiling height in the second story addition. Mr. Heckmann said the . floor-to-plate height was 8 feet, and an additional 2.5 feet in the vault. Vice Mayor Slavitz said that Hillside Guidelines Goal 1, Principle 9 argued against a vaulted ceiling. Mr. Heckmann said that using the profile indicated in the drawing was actually an improvement in the proposed addition and that moving the residence downhill would result in greater loss of light and air to the Truman residence. He said the design was not a "big box." Vice Mayor Slavitz asked if the Beaumonts were requesting that the windows of the second story be made opaque. Mr. Heckman said that the Beaumonts were only concerned with one window (which he said would be made opaque) and that the other windows were not in their view corridor. Mr. Heckmann also offered to increase the tree size from 18-inch to 24-inch boxes to . . Improve screenIng. Councilmember Berger asked Mr. Heckmann to summarize the changes made by the applicant after the initial review by the Design Review Board. Mr. Heckmann said that the upper story had been moved four feet farther back, which resulted in a changed profile relative to grade and to Reed Ranch Road; a modification to the entry canopy so that there would be no ability for people to congregate there; a reduced window size; a reduction in building height by two feet (as well as a reduced plate-line initially). He said that the visual impression from Reed Ranch Road would be good. Mr. Slavitz asked whether the house would be sided with wood or stucco. Mr. Heckmann said that it would be a stucco building with a tile roof. Heckmann said that expanding the house horizontally instead of vertically was not an option for the driveway turnaround, and he added that the Design Review Board had not recommended it. Councilmember Fredericks said that the Design Review Board had stated that they could grant more variances. Mr. Heckmann said that the Board had offered a greater lot coverage variance and not a variance for setbacks. He felt that would create more issues for the Beaumonts. Riley Hurd, an attorney representing the appellant, also spoke. He said that the denial of the appeal was not supported by substantial evidence in the record; he said that the Board had failed to give useable direction to the appellant and that there were different members at each hearing which resulted in different opinion. At the second to last hearing, Hurd said that the Board had Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7, 2007 Page 8 agreed that excavating the homes into the hillside was not a good idea, while at the final meeting, the opposite was true. He said that while the Board relied heavily on neighbor comments, some of the opposition was based on incorrect information rather than fact. He said that Mr. Heckmann had addressed the opposing comments but that he and the applicant had been "pushed aside. " Mr. Hurd said that the proposed plan did fit well into the neighborhood and that in many ways; it was an improvement over some of the big, walled designs. He asked the Council to grant the appeal for both design and legal reasons. Mayor Gram opened the hearing to the public. Spencer Bloch spoke. He said that this was a political issue rather than one of property rights. He said that he and his wife could see the story poles clearly from their living areas. He said that the applicant had received guidance from all five Design Review Boardmembers to move the house downhill, but that she was not interested in doing so. He said that she had previously asked the Blochs to cut some trees to enhance her view, but that her offer of screening was "just throwing us a bone." He said that the design threatened the long-established neighborhood and he said that it would be a bad precedent to reverse the decision of the Design Review Board and the will of the neighbors. Vice Mayor Slavitz asked Mr. Bloch about the suggestion of moving the second story underneath the house and whether that would present a problem for the Blochs. Mr. Bloch said that it would be less of a problem visually and for privacy; he said that most of the neighbors had utilized that design feature. Ray Truman, Reed Ranch Road resident of 38 years, said that the story poles and netting were visible from Tiburon Boulevard and, if the house was built as designed, he would be looking at "a cathedral." He said that he was concerned about the loss of privacy and that he could see the house now from his kitchen and bathroom. Mr. Truman said that he had visited the applicant's home and that the elevation of the story poles was not accurate. Vice Mayor Slavitz asked Mr. Truman about his opinion of moving the second story downhill. Mr. Truman said that the house would not be that much closer to him if they went downhill (instead of up) and that it would not increase the street noise for Mrs. Hariri. Chris Wand, Burrell Court, one house away, said that the proposed second story violated numerous hillside guidelines. He said that the current house enjoyed the best views on the street in its location at the end of the cui de sac, and that the proposed second story was a "carbuncle." He said that each lot on Reed Ranch Road had been carefully sculpted for views, light, air and morning sun. He said that the architect had made a big deal about minor changes to the design and he asked the Council to deny the appeal and ask Mrs. Hariri to build a home that would be an enhancement of the street. Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 9 Mr. Heckmann presented the rebuttal for the applicant, stating that many homes in the neighborhood had been changed over 50 years. He said that the opposition in the neighborhood was not unanimous and that he had talked to everyone. He said that just because someone could see the house did not constitute valid opposition. He said that the opposition was a result of resistance to change in the neighborhood. Mr. Heckmann said that the lot was kind of "naked" now and that the applicant would do a lot of landscaping; he said that the design was the right solution for the house. Vice Mayor Slavitz asked Design Review Boardmember John Corcoran for his comments. Mr. Corcoran said that the Board had thoroughly reviewed the application from the beginning and that the second story really was the "elephant in the room." He said that he had visited other homes in the neighborhood that had been renovated in the past five years; he said that many had wanted to go up by four to six feet but had gone down instead. Mr. Corcoran said that Mr. Truman's home would not have been built today so that there was a consistency issue. He disagreed with Mr. Hurd that the Board had provided no guidance; he said that it was always the policy of the Board to give direction to the applicants, but not design the project. He agreed that there were issues of consistency because of the Beaumont's second story; he noted that the Beaumont home was a split level house, so that it was really one and a half stories. He also said that the proposed additions to the Hariri residence, which is located at the end of a cui de sac, would block views of a more prominent sort. Mayor Gram closed the public hearing. Councilmember Berger said that he was the architect on the remodel of 6 Burrell Court, which went "out not up" because going up would have blocked all of the key views of the neighbors. However, he said that this was a key point; that some of the older homes were every bit as tall, so that it had nothing to do with character of the neighborhood. Berger said that the DRB had responded correctly in its initial meetings and had given direction to modify the second floor. He said that the architect had done so by pulling it back four feet, lowering the roof height by two feet, and taking off the terraces. He said that these were not trivial changes and that they did break up the bulk and mass. Berger said that while the house could be moved downhill, it was not a "must;" he said that it was visible but that it did not block anyone's views. He said that the Blochs had big, distant views and that excavation would not provide quality space to the applicant nor provide a gain to the neighbors. He said that many of the older, two-story houses, were good examples of the undesirable effects. Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 10 Councilmember Berger said that each project should be weighed on its merits and that it would not be a precedent to grant the appeal. He said that there were often good reasons to change a design to one-story but this was not one of them. Councilmember Fredericks said that she had a different point of view. She said that this was not about neighbors' objections or view blockage; rather, she said it was a concern about general visual impact and neighborhood character. She described a neighborhood with flatter houses on the flat land and higher houses on the higher ground. She said that the visual impact of looking uphill at the existing house, which was located on a hill, was that it already looked like a two- story house, and that if you walked around Burrell Court, it looked big. She added that many of the current building and remodels were done before adoption of the Hillside Guidelines, and that this remodel was in-fill. She said that moving it closer to the road would be preferable and could possibly be achieved with fewer bedrooms. She said that she would support the DRB decision. Councilmember Smith said that while he generally supported the decisions of the Design Review Board because they took the time and effort to make the findings in its review of these matters, he felt that in this case he was inclined to vote in favor of the appellant. Smith said that he had driven through the neighborhood to determine what its "character" really was. He said that it contained a variety of home designs, which he described as "eclectic." He said that he felt that the applicant/appellant had made changes to the design in order to accommodate the neighbors and that the other changes that had been suggested might in fact be not as advantageous to the neighbors. Smith said that there was a legal basis for the variance findings, so that the basis of the appeal boiled down to the Hillside Guidelines; he said that architect Heckmann had responded well to these hillside issues and that moving the house downhill was not necessarily preferable or the best design for the neighbors. He said that it could result in a "lose-lose" situation for both the applicant and the neighbors. Smith said that he thought the current design was not "looming" nor was it a "box." He said that it was below the height limit and did not present a significant view obstruction issue; therefore, he said that it was consistent with the Hillside Design Guidelines. Vice Mayor Slavitz agreed that moving the house addition downhill would make it a lot closer to the Truman home and that he did not think they would like the result. However, Slavitz agreed with the Trumans that the house looked very big and "very grand," especially located on a naked hill. He said that he understood the applicant's need for space but that if there was a way to minimize the house's presence to the street, it should be sought. He asked whether there was a flat roof alternative. Slavitz said that the Design Review Board was right and that while the current design was "close," it could be made better. Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7, 2007 Page 11 Councilmember Berger said that the roof already had a low pitch. He said that he thought it was the horizontal sides that created the "presence" described by Vice Mayor Slavitz. Mayor Gram said that design was not his forte; he asked the Council whether it wished to define a design or remand it to the Board. Vice Mayor Slavitz suggested remanding it with Council direction; Councilmember Smith said that the Board had already conducted three meetings to review the application. Councilmember Fredericks commented that the roofline should be more articulated in conformance with the Hillside Design Guidelines because from the street (Reed Ranch Road) it appeared that the house was sitting on top of a hill. Councilmember Smith disagreed; he said that the house was located on the "sweet spot" of the hill and that moving it downhill would create unintended impacts and a worse solution. Vice Mayor Slavitz also said that the stucco material made the house seem bigger. Councilmember Berger said that the color should be earth tone; Councilmember Smith wondered if a darker color might be better. Architect Heckmann said that he would be happy to darken the color. Vice Mayor Slavitz agreed with the direction of a darker color and a reduction in the roofline; Councilmember Berger suggested the possibility of a partial dormer on the roofline; Councilmember Fredericks suggested consideration of a reduction in square footage of the house. Mayor Gram said that he did not find the second story visually offensive and that there was already a precedent for second stories in the neighborhood. He usually operates under the presumption that the DRB had made the correct decision. However, in this case he said that if the application was remanded to the DRB it should be with strong direction. He said that while the house was "imposing" from Reed Ranch Road, it was not a cathedral. He agreed that the impact could be lessened by color choice; he said that the second story could be retained in some semblance but he recommended that the house not be moved downhill. The Council asked for the Town Attorney to comment on the idea of remanding the application. She said that if the Council denied the appeal outright, there could be no new application for one year; however, she said that if the Council denied the appeal without prejudice, the applicant could resubmit plans and that the Council had the ability to waive the fees, if it chose to do so. MOTION: To partially grant the appeal with the proviso that the application be returned to the DRB for additional review of the second story; to consider a reduction in square footage and other architectural treatments to address the apparent mass and bulk of the roof and the walls; to study exterior materials to appear less vivid; to make the Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 12 second-story bathroom window opaque, as recommended by architect Heckmann, along with increasing the size of the two trees to 24-inch boxes. Moved: Vote: Berger, seconded by Fredericks AYES: Unanimous TOWN COUNCIL REPORTS None. TOWN MANAGER'S REPORT . Recommendation regarding cancellation of November 21 and December 19,2007 regular meetings WEEKLY DIGESTS . Town Council Weekly Digest - October 19,2007 . Town Council Weekly Digest - October 26,2007 . Town Council Weekly Digest - November 2,2007 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Gram adjourned the meeting at 10:20 p.m., to closed session. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Section 54956.8) Property: Portion of275 Diviso Street APN #059-071-51 Agency negotiator: T own Manager Negotiating Parties: Town of Tiburon and Avi Ron Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7,2007 Page 13 CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the TEW 6uJlcil of the Town of Tiburon, Mayor Gram adjourned the meeting at 10:50 p.m., to the n t regUla~.r....'.~..\',.ee.t.in. g SCh,e...d uled for December 5, 2007.". ,.' /""'"." ,.,~ '-"..,~' "'. ,/', "'". /./' '/. / ,d7r/ g;?: '- / TOM GRAM, MAYOR -- Town Council Minutes # 22-2007 November 7, 2007 Page 14