HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Digest 2008-10-03
~
TOWN COUNCIL WEEKLY DIGEST
Week of September 29 -October 3, 2008
Tiburon
1. Letter - Marin Bd. Of Supervisors - AB32 & Marin Clean Energy
2. Letter of Appreciation - Bruce Abbott - Blackie's Hay Day
3. Appointment to Jt. Recreation Committee - Ms. Erin Tollini
4. Email - Ann Buell- SF Bay Area Water Trail Draft EIR
Agendas & Minutes
5. Minutes - Design Review Board - 9/18/08
6. Action Minutes - Design Review Board -10/2/08
7. Agenda - Planning Commission -10/8/08
Regional
a) ABAG Fall General Assembly - Regional Water/Land Use Plan. *
b) Comcast California - August 2008 *
c) Connections - Fall 2008 *
d) Zero Breast Cancer - Fall 2008 *
e) Notice - Marin County - Title 22 and Title 221
f) Notice - Marin Countywide Plan Amendments
Agendas & Minutes
g) None
* Council Only
1
!
;=
~
~
~
~
~
................... ~
..~~~~;..: ":'" . ":'" ........... :.:-::r.:::..
DIGest/,
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MARIN
September 30, 2008
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
3501 CIVIC CENTER DR., SUITE 329
SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA 94903-4193
TELEPHONE (415) 499-7331
FAX (415) 499-3645
ITY (415) 499-6172
www.co.marin.ca.uslbos
Dear Fellow Elected Representatives,
Weare writing to acknowledge that all of our local governments are making efforts to meet the challenge of climate
change and prepare for implementation of AB32 legislative mandates, soon to be finalized by State and regional
agencies. Under AB32, local governments are required to significantly reduce our current greenhouse gas
emissions. While most of our agencies have already undertaken a number of positive actions to achieve the 30%
reduction target, AB32 will require that substantially more be done. W-ith its significant promise of green house gas
reduction, the Marin County Board of Supervisors stands ready to adopt Marin Clean Energy (MCE) and the
formation of a Joint Powers Authority to carry out MCE and other energy initiatives.
Accelerating the conversion of Marin's energy supply to renewable sources has been identified as having the single
greatest potential benefit of all greenhouse gas reduction initiatives studied to date. For the past three years,
representatives from local governments and special districts have worked closely together with industry experts to
develop MCE. .MCE would implement a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program authorized by State
legislation in 2002. During 2008, there have been numerous public workshops and informational sessions at the
Board of Supervisors, council meetings, and in other venues to explore the potential benefits and risks associated
with taking local control of energy supply decisions and the associated rate setting.
We have reached a point where it is necessary to create a legal framework to permit further consideration ofMCE.
Forming a JP A is a prerequisite for submittal of an application to the California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC), as well as solicitation of proposals from interested third party energy suppliers. Both of these tasks are
essential before a final decision can be reached whether or not to proceed with MCE. The ordinance you will
consider authorizes each jurisdiction to launch the next steps in considering MCE and forming the Marin Energy
Authority (the broader JP A for our energy initiatives).
The draft JP A agreement to form the Marin Energy Authority is structured to allow for a broad array of activities
that can help public agencies meet our AB32 obligations whether MCE is activated or not. Agencies that join the
JP A will retain their full authority to decide whether to participate in the MCE program once energy provider
contract bids have been received. These bids will give all of Marin a clear understanding of how much renewable
power is truly available in the market and at what cost.
The County of Marin has agreed to pay the costs required to set up and administer the Marin Energy Authority until
a final decision is made, subject to reimbursement from the JP A should MCE go forward.
Our Board believes that MCE is a viable policy option that can significantly increase Marin's percentage of
renewable power. We also think that there is a mutual advantage for all of us to have a framework in place to
facilitate our shared actions to comply with AB32. For these reasons, we strongly encourage your Council to join
with us in adopting the attached ordinance and agreement that creates the Marin Energy Authority and continues
our implementation of MCE.
J;~~tIi~-
.
VICE-PRESIDENT
HAROLD C. BROWN
SAN ANSELMO
2ND DISTRICT
PRESIDENT
SUSAN L. ADAMS
SAN RAFAEL
FrDISTRICT
. CHARLES MCGLASHAN .
MILL V ALLEY
300 DISTRICT
STEVE KINSEY
SAN GERONIMO
4TH DISTRICT
.
JUDY ARNOLD
NOVATO
5TH DISTRICT
.
CLERK
MATIHEW H. HYMEL
DIGEST ~ ·
Bruce Abbott
458 Greenwood Beach Road
Tiburon, CA 94920
September 29,2008
RECEIVED
OCT - 1 2008
Mayor and Council
Town Manager
Chief of Police
Public Works
Town of Tiburon
1555 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE
TOWN OF TIBURON
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
My wife and I express our appreciation for the efforts of town leadership and
staff in providing balance between the interests of the public and
surrounding neighborhoods during Blackie' s Hay Day of last week end.
From our perspective you did a nice job, and we are grateful.
Thank you.
Bruce Abbott
Town of1iburon · 15051iburon Boulevard .1iburon, CA 94920 · P. 415.435.7373 F. 415.435.2438 · www.ci.ciburon.ca.U5
Office of Tiburon Town Clerk! 415.435.7377
DIG~
-.:8-,
October 3, 2008
Ms. Erin Tollini
22 Raccoon Lane, Unit A
Tiburon, CA 94920
SUBJECT:
TOWN COUNCIL APPOINTMENT - JT. RECREATION COMMITTEE
Dear Erin:
It was the pleasure of the Town Council to unanimously appoint you to the
Belvedere-Tiburon Jt. Recreation Committee at its October 1,2008 regular meeting.
Your term of office will commence immediately and run until the end of February,
2010. At that time, you will be eligible for reappointment to another term.
The Jt. Recreation Committee meets monthly, or as needed, at Town Hall.
Recreation staff will contact you to set up an orientation meeting and provide you with
information you will need to prepare for your new role.
Once again, congratulations on your appointment and thank you for your
interest in serving the Tiburon community.
v?Jili~rA.
Diane Crane lacopi
Town Clerk
Cc: Town Manager
Jt. Recreation Director
Belvedere City Clerk
\ ~ '
.-:}<
J~(fjSl~~ifz
[ "':~~Y~~."
,_. ;~- -" , ,~i
. . . '_.''',':.~'''i'',:,.- eo "." .,e . . .
Alib~"~~~ae~icks
Y'id.~~~r.er
. . . i- ~:.:~.,~,...,.-. ~.,. . . .
~::: ':;',-- :~:'~" ?~'
Mil~~1\~tger
Coundlmember
" . ~'1
. . . ?-. ~. \.:. ,-~.-;....-::;_. . . .
. . . ,. ,., . '"'. e. '.. ',. . . .
Tom Gram
Couricilmeniber
MargaretA.. Curran
Town Map.ager
Page 1 of 1
'I.
()/(}~ 8.,.
Scott Anderson
From: Ann Buell [abuell@scc.ca.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 10:35 PM
To: abuell@scc.ca.gov
Cc: abuell@scc.ca.gov
Subject: Recirculation of SF Bay Area Water Trail Draft EIR
Please be advised that the State Coastal Conservancy has decided to circulate a new draft EIR (DEIR)
for the San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail project. Comments received on the June 2008 DEIR will be
carefully considered and incorporated, as appropriate, into the new DEIR as it is developed. The new
DEIR is expected to be completed and distributed for public review and comment in late February or
early March, 2009. A Notice of Availability will be widely distributed with the release of the new draft,
identifying a new public hearing date and location and new comment period.
We appreciate the time you may have invested in reviewing and/or commenting on the June 2008 draft,
and look forward to your continued interest and participation in this proj ect.
Sincerely,
Ann Buell
Project Manager
California State Coastal Conservancy
1330 Broadway, Suite 1300
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 286-0752
Fax: (510) 286-0470
10/2/2008
{.
MINUTES #13
TIBURON DESIGN REVEW BOARD
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 18,2008
The meeting was opened at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Doyle.
A. ROLL CALL
()IG~
~8.,..
Present: Chair Doyle, Boardmembers Chong and Tollini
Absent: Vice-Chair Glassner
Ex-Officio: Planning Manager Watrous, Associate Planner Tyler and Minutes Clerk Rusting
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
C. STAFF BRIEFING
Planning Manager Watrous reported Grover Wilson was appointed at last night's Town Council
meeting to fill the vacancy on the Design Review Board, and he will begin at the next meeting.
D. OLD BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
1. 96 MT. TIBURON COURT 96 MT. TIBURON LLC, NEW DWELLING
96 MT. TIBURON COURT
LOT SIZE
FLOOR AREA
LOT COVERAGE
BUILDING HEIGHT
SIDE YARDS
FRONT YARD
REAR YARD
V ARIANCES/EXCEPTION
EXISTING
44,040 S.F.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NONE
96 MT. TIBURON LLC
PROPOSED REQUIRED
NA NA
6,403 6,404 MAX
9.5% 15.0% MAX
30' 30' MAX
20' & 37'9" 15'
184' 30'
25'6" 25'
The applicant is requesting Design Review approval for the construction of a new three-level
single-family dwelling and detached garage on property located at 96 Mt. Tiburon Court. The
subject property is currently vacant. This application was first reviewed at the August 21, 2008
Design Review Board meeting. At that meeting, the owners of the adjacent home at 98 Mt.
Tiburon Court raised objections to possible privacy impacts that would be caused by the location
of the proposed swimming pool and the mass of the raised driveway. The Board found that the
Mediterranean style of the proposed house was compatible with the surrounding neighborhood,
but felt that the mass and bulk of the house needed to be reduced. The Board also encouraged the
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #13
9/18/08
applicant to consider an alternative driveway design that would lessen the amount of fill and
height of the retaining walls. The application was continued to the September 18, 2008 Design
Review Board meeting to allow the applicant time to revise the plans to address these issues.
The applicants have now submitted revised plans for the proposed house.
Jack Backus, architect, outlined the changes made to the project based on the Board's
recommendations. He presented a three-dimensional model of the project showing the steepness
of the hill and the complexity of the house on the site and distributed photos from the building
site and from the neighbor's property at 98 Mt. Tiburon Court. He said that they reduced the
mass so that the house is not so close to that neighbor and have lowered the road by 4 feet at its
highest point. To reduce the mass, they pushed the house back 6 feet and moved the pool back
10Y2 feet from the neighbor. He said that the floor area was similar but the overall mass
appearance was very different from the last presentation to the DRB. He said that the stair tower
at the northeast comer was lowered so that it does not project as far above the roofline. He
added that as a result of lowering the road they were able to remove one retaining wall and the
whole project fits into the hillside better than before.
The public hearing was opened.
Bruce Moody said that he wrote a letter before the last DRB meeting stating that he does not like
the design of the house. He felt that the house is too large for the site. He said that he can see
the elevator shaft on top of the building from his property and he thinks it is a "sore thumb" and
superfluous. He suggested rotating the house slightly counter-clockwise to lessen the views into
in the neighbor's house, and better yet, move the house into the rear setback line, thereby
reducing the mass. He also commented on the "fake" stone look of the walls and suggested
making the lines deeper so that the wall appears to be made of whole stones instead of lines on
stucco. He recommended leaving soil around the retaining walls to allow planting to hide the
walls.
Therese Pouliot-Gloger said she received a letter from Mr. Bradley mentioning an easement that
the prior owners had signed and her attorney is reviewing it. She said they have no objections to
the style of the house but are very concerned about privacy. She said they feel the size of the
driveway is massive, and the size of the house on that property is inappropriate. She would like
to see some screening trees and a lowered driveway so that it would not look directly upon their
property. She said that the location of the proposed pool is very close to their pool, and both
pools would be looking onto each other. She characterized the neighborhood as a whole as very
private, citing this as one reason why she moved to Mt. Tiburon. She was concerned that they
will lose the feeling of privacy and openness if a 6,500 square foot home is built on the property.
Evelyn Jaffe voiced concern about the impact of construction on the neighborhood. She
requested that trucks be parked on the property itself and not on the cul-de-sac. She said that in
the past she has had two accidents with construction vehicles parked on the cul-de-sac because of
a blind spot when exiting her driveway. She also requested that construction workers clean up
after themselves to avoid issues with garbage and raccoons.
TffiURON D.R.B. MINUTES #13
9/18/08
2
Vernon Bradley, applicant, said they have done construction all over Tiburon and are adamant
about cleaning up the site. He also agreed to park construction vehicles on the site and not on the
cul-de-sac. Regarding the concerns of Ms. Pouliot-Gloger, he said that he has discussed the
issue of appropriate replacement trees with Tiburon Fire District and has mailed wants many of
the pine trees removed because they are a fire hazard. He said that the come in 42-inch
containers and start at 15 feet high and if went those were planted he did not think the neighbors
would be able to see the house. He said that the landscape plan does not include those additional
trees. He suggested that the additional trees be planted in a staggered position prior to
construction to create a green screen high enough so that the neighbors can retain their privacy
during construction.
Jack Backus addressed the suggestion to rotate the house, but noted that this may create issues
with the slope. He said that it might help a little bit to rotate the house counter-clockwise,
especially if helps to preserve the pine trees. He said they would have to rotate the house 15
degrees to get any substantial benefit, but that could cause other problems such as a very high
retaining wall.
Chair Doyle asked about the elevator enclosure on top of the house. Mr. Backus said it could be
reduced in size if they used a different elevator design. Chair Doyle noted that because of the
slope and shape of the lot, only half an acre of land is usable, but the house is sized for a one acre
lot.
Boardmember Chong asked if they can shift the house over instead of rotating it. Mr. Backus
said it would be right on the setback if they did that.
Boardmember Chong asked if the Fire District provided any insight as to why certain trees had to
go. Mr. Backus said he thinks it was to break up the path of potential fires on the hillside. Chair
Doyle acknowledged the tough situation as the pine tree right now provide a good screen but the
Board has little to say about their removal for safety purposes. Planning Manager Watrous noted
that the Board has the ability to specify replacement landscaping if the pine trees are removed.
Chair Doyle questioned and confirmed that the area in front of the bedrooms is a planter area for
shrubs, and he suggested breaking up the mass by planting a tree in that location. Mr. Backus
said they could make areas adjacent to the building deeper to allow for tree-size plantings.
The public hearing was closed.
Boardmember Chong said he appreciated the extra money and effort put forward by the applicant
to build the model and said that he was comfortable with the general design and the materials.
He said that he visited the property at 98 Mt. Tiburon Court and his biggest concern is where the
house is located on the lot because it is so close to the neighbors' home. He noted that in the
broader neighborhood most of the houses are more separated from each other and he thought that
shifting the proposed house away from the neighbors' home would help. He was unsure that a
15-foot tree would suffice, as the neighbors would still see the entire house above the trees. He
said that there was more work to be done and thought shifting the house might make the Fire
District more comfortable with leaving the pine trees.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #13
9/18/08
3
Boardmember Tollini said that substantial work was done to address many of the Board's prior
concerns. He said that he would like to see a different elevator to eliminate the elevator shaft on
top of the house. He said that the current landscaping plan currently does not do much to shield
the project from 98 Mt. Tiburon Court and the plan needs to be revised to reflect more
substantial planting. He suggested planting trees in the area between the driveway turnout and
the pool.
Chair Doyle said that the design was a big improvement but the most important factor in this
project is going to be the landscaping to help hide the house. He suggested thinning the lower
branches of the pine trees and leaving the higher parts of the trees if the Fire District will accept
that. He suggested that a variance could be granted to move the house over into the side yard
setback to create more space between neighbors and room for trees. He said that he was unsure
about the roof deck, but noted that the lot has little usable yard area. He said he was fine with
the house design but wanted to see if there is a way to tuck it in a little.
Boardmember Tollini said that rotating the house would address some privacy issues and said
that he would like the applicant to explore moving the house. He said that it was still quite a
massive house, although a lot of the structure is buried into the hillside, and he would like to
make the house a little less imposing.
Boardmember Chong stated that the size and style of the house was not a concern, but he wanted
to avoid the felling that it sits right next to another home.
Boardmember Chong questioned the variance process. Planning Manager Watrous said that staff
would need to prepare an appropriate a notice for the variance. He said that the Board could not
indicate tonight that it would approve a reduced setback, but it can encourage exploring requests
where it helps to resolve design issues.
It was the consensus of the Board that the following specific issues should be explored and
addressed:
~ An elevator design that reduces the size of the roof structure;
~ A revised landscaping plan that includes location and type of trees to increase the
neighbors' privacy, including landscaping along the driveway; and
~ The possibility of a variance to move the house further from the neighbors' house.
ACTION: It was M/S (Tollini/Chong) to continue the application for 96 Mt. Tiburon Court to the
October 16,2008 meeting. Vote: 3-0.
E. NEW BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
2. 430 RIDGE ROAD HANNAHS/GARAY, MINOR ALTERATIONS/APPEAL
On August 11, 2008, the Tiburon Planning Division approved a Site Plan and Architectural
Review application for modifications to the previously approved mailbox, trash enclosure and
TffiURON D.R.B. MINUTES #13
9/18/08
4
monument sign for the single-family dwelling currently under construction on property located at
430 Ridge Road. The owner of the neighboring property at 440 Ridge Road has now appealed
this decision to the Design Review Board.
Ruben Becker, attorney for the appellant, said they are withdrawing the appeal because they have
reached a settlement with the owners of 430 Ridge Road. Mr. Becker thanked the staff for their
work preparing the reports.
Fred Hannahs, appellant, said he wanted to go on record stating that Ms. Tyler's report was very
good.
F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES #12 OF THE 9/4/08 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
MEETING
No changes were requested by the Board.
ACTION: It was MIS (Chong/Tollini) to approve the minutes of the September 4,2008 meeting
as written. Vote: 3-0.
G. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
TffiURON D.R.B. MINUTES #13
9/18/08
5
,.
ACTION MINUTES #14
/)1 GJ:!!.
~8.,.
TffiURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2,2008
1505 TIBURON BOULEVARD
A. ROLL CALL: Present - Chair Doyle, Boardmembers Chong, Tollini and Wilson
Absent - Boardmember Glassner
Ex-Officio - Planning Manager Watrous, Assistant Planner Phillips and
Minutes Clerk Rusting
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS (FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA)
C. STAFF BRIEFING
D. NEW BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD
5.
325 Taylor Road
Gause/Kuhn
Additions APPROVED
AdditionIV ariance APPROVED
New Single-Family Dwelling
CONTINUED TO 11/06/08
New Single-Family DwellinglVariance/Floor Area
Exception CONTINUED TO 11/20/08
AdditionIV ariance CONTINUED TO 10/16/08
1.
2.
3.
11 Via Capistrano Tam
1762 Vistazo West Zedlitz
1865 Mountain View Drive Pearce/Grant
4.
55 Mt. Tiburon Road
Faidi
.E. MINUTES OF THE 9/18/08 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING - APPROVED
F. ADJOURNMENT - 7:30 P.M.
"7
.
TOWN OF TIBURON
Tiburon Town Hall
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
Regular Meeting
Tiburon Planning Commission
October 8, 2008 - 7 :30 PM
AGENDA
OIG~~...,..
~UI
TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chairman O'Donnell, Vice Chairman Kunzweiler, Commissioner Corcoran, Commissioner
Fraser, Commissioner Frymier
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission on any subject not on the agenda may do
so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Planning Commission is not able to
undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda.
Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a
future Planning Commission agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3)
minutes. Testimony regarding matters not on the agenda will not be considered part of the
administrative record.
COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING
Commission and Committee Reports
Director's Report
PUBLIC HEARING
1. 114-A MAIN STREET: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; PROPOSAL TO
ESTABLISH A MASSAGE THERAPY BUSINESS; FILE #10810; Zelinsky
Properties, Owner; Dawn Lundberg, Applicant; Assessor's Parcel Number.
059-102-20 [L T]
MINUTES
2. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - Regular Meeting of September 24, 2008
ADJOURNMENT
alO/08/08
Future Agenda Items
200 Paradise Drive: Caprice Restaurant Expansion CUP(TBD)
T iburon Planning Commission
October 8, 2008
Page 1
DIGEST
I
~
~
I
~
_~ . COMMUNITY Dt;\/f;LOPMf;NT AQ;NCY
~. . ~~ AU;X~INDS. DIRJ;CTOR
MARIN COUNTY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RECEIVED
SEP 3 0 200B
MARIN COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 22) AND
INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 221)
TEXT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS
TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE
TOWN OF TlBURON
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Marin County Board of Supervisors will conduct a public hearing
to consider County-initiated proposed text and zoning map amendments to the Marin County
Development Code (Title 22) and the Interim Development Code (Title 221) intended to reclassify those
parcels within the unincorporated areas of San Rafael and Mill Valley currently governed by the historic
C-2 (General Commercial Districts), the M-1 (Light Industrial Districts) and the M-2 (Heavy Industrial
Districts) zoning districts and the -H (Highway) Combining District and rezone parcels currently
governed by these zoning districts to the governing RMPC (Residential/Commercial Multiple, Planned
District) zoning district and the governing IP (Industrial, Planned) zoning district, respectively. The
project also includes the reclassification of: (a) Assessor's Parcel 030-351-11 in the unincorporated
area Mill Valley from R3-G4 (Multiple Residence District, minimum of 3,500 square feet per unit, or
12.45 units/acre maximum density) to the RMP-12.45 (Residential, Multiple-family, Planned District,
12.45 units/acre maximum density) zoning district; and (b) the eastern portion of Assessor's Parcel 013-
162-22 located in the unincorporated area of San Rafael from R3-G1 (Multiple Residence District,
minimum 1,500 square feet per unit, or 29.04 units per acre maximum density) zoning district to the
RMP-29.04 (Residential, Multiple-family, Planned District, 29.04 units/acre maximum density) zoning
district. The proposed zoning districts reflect the allowed uses and development standards of the
current 2003 Development Code and would be consistent with the relevant governing Countywide Plan
(CWP) land use designation of each parcel. The proposed project intends to eliminate Chapters 22.341,
22.361, 22.381, and 22.421 of the Interim Development Code (Title 221).
The Marin County Environmental Coordinator has determined that this project qualifies for a Notice of
Determination and that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to Section 1516~ of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines because the proposed text and zoning map
amendments to the 2003 Development Code (Title 22) and the Interim Development Code (Title 221)
are consistent with, and within the scope of, the Marin County Development Code Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR), certified by the Board of Supervisors in 2003 (Board of
Supervisors Resolution No. 2003-89). The FSEIR anticipated the text and zoning map amendments and
zoning reclassifications, which are the subject of this project.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be held at the regular meeting of
the Marin County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, October 7, 2008, in the Board of Supervisors
Chambers (Room #330 - Administration Building), 3501 Civic Center Drive, San Rafael, California, at
the hour of 11 :00 AM., at which time any interested party may appear and be heard.
A copy of the staff report with the proposed Development Code text and zoning map amendments may
be obtained on the Friday before the scheduled meeting from the Marin County Community
Development Agency Planning Division, 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308, San Rafael, between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday (excluding holidays), by calling 499-6269, or
by visiting our website at htto:/lwww.co.marin.ca.us/efiles/BS/AaMn/cvbaanda.htm. Written material for
the Board of Supervisors should be submitted to the Community Development Agency at least 10 days
prior to the meeting date so that it can be distributed and considered by the Board of Supervisors with
the staff report. Any written material submitted after this date will be distributed to the Board of
Supervisors prior to or at the meeting.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that if you challenge the action on this project in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community Development Agency - Planning
Division at, or prior to. the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009(b) (2));/) .
~~/~a- /'.a. ~
Alex Hinds Johanna Patri, AICP
Agency Director Consulting Senior Planner
Cur/jp/rezoning /bos /bos-nt-1O_07_08.doc
9/16/08
3501 Civic Cenw. ~ve, Room 308 - San Rafael. CA 04903-4157
415-40Q-6260 - +=ax 415-400-7880
hHpj /_.co.marin.ca.us/ deph/CD/ main/index.c:fm
.L
DIG~sr
DIGEST
i
~ MARIN COUNTY
~S2:;:J COMMUNITY D~V~LOPM~NT AQ;;NCY
. , .....f ALf;XWINDS, DI~CWvED
SEP 3 0 2008
NOTICE' OF PUBLIC HEARING(S)
AMENDMENTS TO THE MARIN COUNTYWIDE PLAN (CWP)
WHO:
TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE
TOWN OF TIBURON
Any and all interested persons.
WHA T: The Marin County Planning Commission will hold public hearing(s) to consider recommending the
Board of Supervisors adopt technical and clerical corrections to certain Marin Countywide Plan (CWP)
policies and maps to correct and improve their readability and clarity. The technical corrections range
from out of sequence program numbering and grammatical mistakes to minor text revisions to provide
additional clarification and consistent use of terminology regarding the lowest end of the Countywide
Plan density range for land use designations. Another amendment calls for incorporating the Marin
County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan by reference into the CWP's Environmental Hazards
element.
In addition, amendments to the Nicasio Land Use Policy Map 7.9, Tamalpais Land Use Policy Map
6.2.1, and the Baylands Corridor Maps 2.5a and b are proposed. A revision to Map 7.9 is needed to
change a land use designation incorrectly applied to a parcel, from PF -AG 1 to AG 1, while Map 6.2.1 is
updated to reflect annexation of land to the City of Mill Valley. Minor changes to the location of the
Baylands Corridor boundary are proposed at the San Rafael Rock Quarry and San Quentin State Prison
sites to more accurately reflect existing physical conditions.
WHERE: The public hearing(s) will be held in the Planning Commission Chambers (Room #328 -
Administration Building), Civic Center, San Rafael, California.
WHEN:
Monday, October 13, 2008 at 1 :00 p.m. *
Monday, October 27,2008 at 10:00 a.m. (ifneeded)*
*Please note the proposed times are estimates only and may be subject to change. Specific times will be set for
each continued hearing as revised and confirmed at each previous hearing.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Please VISIt our website at
http://www.co.marin.ca.us/deptslbs/members/mcbdslBrdpage.cfm?BrdID=62 in order to be informed of the place
on the agenda and the approximate time of the hearing or to obtain a copy of the staff report, or call the Community
Development Agency - Planning Division at (415) 499-6269 on or after Monday, October 6,2008. Written material
should not be mailed or delivered directly to Commissioners because it will not be accepted or considered as part of
the administrative record for the project. Written material for the Planning Commission should be submitted to the
.Community Development Agency at least 10 days prior to the meeting date so that it can be distributed and
considered by the Planning Commission with the staff report. Any written material submitted after this date will be
distributed to the Planning Commission prior to or at the meeting.
Prior to considering their recommendation on the merits of the CWP amendments, the Planning Commission will
consider their recommendaLon to the Board of Supervisors for adoption of an addendum to the 2007 certified
Marin Countywide Plan Final Environmental Impact Report pursuant to sections 15162 and 15164 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Addendum finds that the proposed CWP Amendments comprise minor
and technical changes to the CWP Policies evaluated in the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (ErR) and
that no new or more severe impacts not addressed in the Final EIR would result from the adoption of the CWP
Amendments.
If you challenge the decision of this project in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Community
Development Agency - Planning Division at, or prior to the public hearing. (Government Code Section
65009(b)(2).)
HOW TO OBTAIN THE PLAN: The Countywide Plan and the Addendum to the Certified Final EIR are
available at public libraries, on the website (www.future-marin.org), and in disc format for free. Paper copies are
$50 for both documents. Please call Sharon Silver at 415-499-7874 to arrange for pickup of the Plan and
Addendum to the Final EIR. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed project please call
Kristin Drumm at (415) 499-6290.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the proposed project, or want to be notified of the decision, please
contact me at (415) 499-6290.
ALEX HINDS
Agency Director
KRlSTIN DRUMM
Senior Planner
3501 CiVIC CI;NTf;R DRIVI;. ROOM 308- SAN RA,t=A;L CA Q4Q03-4157 - 415-4QQ-6?6Q-+=AX 415-4QQ-7880
1)
OIG€sr