HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Agd Pkt 2009-11-18 (2)Summary of communication to staff on cameras - November 2009
SUPPORT CAMERAS
Annette McCormack
Peninsula
Resident
Non-Resident
Residency
Unkno,%vn
x
Marc Gineris
x
Name withheld
x
Bob Benbow
x
Bob Pritchard
x
Cathy Benediktsson
x
Sundra Swanson
x
Frank Jonelis
x
Tracy Jonelis
x
Starrett Delton
x
Debbie Ward
x
Melissa Prentis
x
Carlie Koontz
x
Douglas Davis
x
Mary Buich
x
Aaron Coo erband
x
Margaret Bannerman
x
Alan Holroyde
x
Logan Boles
x
Chuck Heusser
x
Linda Haake
x
Ian Schwartz
x
Andrew Thompson
x
Tim Kelly-Markham
x
Paul Stephens
x
Jennifer Ringwald
x
Bruce Lindgren
x
Linda Warren
x
PJ Jones
x
Gary Runes
x
Patricia Runes
x
Gayle Dunlap
x
Bob Dunlap
x
Curtis Haverty
x
Susanne Pa ovich
x
Al Anolik
x
Kenneth Nemzer
x
TOTALS
28
5
4
OPPOSE CAMERAS
Mindy Canter
Peninsula I
Resident*
X
Non-Resident
Residency
Unknown
Matt Turley
x
Chris Ed ette
x
Cathy Ed ette
X
Steve Ed ette
X
Frieda Ed ette
X
Richard Smith
X
Bill Law
X
Lynn Kanter-Levy
X
Barbara (no last name given)
X
Brendan Schultz
X
Camille Bosworth
X
C. Moore
X
Curtis Horne
X
Chris Vail
X
Geoffrey Sawyer
X
Curtis Carter
X
Roberta Jeffrey
X
Sophia Merrill
X
G.M. Hathaway
x
Richard Ferguson
X
Lorrie Green
X
Jennifer Drake
X
Carol Forell
X
Ann-Eve Hazen
X
Marilyn Kandel
X
Richard Kandel
x
Sue Morris
x
Mark Morris
x
Carol Ollendorff
X
Tom Ollendorff
X
Ruth Rozen
X
Richard Rozen
X
Donald Share
X
Rachel Share
x
Mark Stewart
X
Quentin Hartman
X
Richard Smith
X
Steve Schroeder
X
Sally Schroeder
Mark Swi ert
X
X
Jean Arnold
X
TOTALS
18
13
11
* 15 names in this column were on a single letter of opposition
Alexander and Yami Anolik
RECEIVED
280 Round Hill Road
Tiburon, CA 94920-0531
NOV 17 2009
(415) 435-0404
TOWN MANAGERS OFFICE
November 15, 2009
TOWN OF TIBURON
Via Hand Delivery and
Electronic Mail to Town Manager Peggy Curran
Tiburon City Council
1505 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, CA 94920
Re: Tiburon Council Hearing on License Plate Surveillance Protection
Date: November 18, 2009 at 7:30pm
Our File: 7450-18
Dear Council Members,
Since I cannot be in attendance on the 18th, I wish to briefly add additional comments to those I
presented to the Council on November 4th during the "free speech" portion of your meeting,
since the regular hearing had been postponed. As a security consultant to the travel and tourism
industry in that my legal concentration is travel, tourism and hospitality law, and with books and
seminars dealing with Preventive Legal Care®, the following comments are analogous to all of
us as homeowners in Tiburon and would mirror those offered to my clients and students of the
security protection that I have taught over the last 25 years.
The basics of security protection is to first assess your risks; second to analyze basic safety
precautions; and third to compare the risk management and crisis management protection
available and weigh the costs of such protection with its cost effectiveness in achieving
maximum protection for the risks assessed.
One of our first priorities should be becoming security minded. When we get complacent,
thinking it "can't happen here," or worse that "it can't happen to me," some Tiburon residents
may not be properly assessing our potential risks.
We all utilize basic safeguards at our homes, starting with proper locks, lighting and alarm
systems. Simple protections such as Tiburon's program to have our home addresses visible from
the street were appreciated when instituted, and we do this as a way of helping our fire and
police protection better protect us. Saving and implementing the material the City made
available to us as residents in case of natural emergencies was likewise something we could
relate to, urging residents to stockpile appropriate water, first aid, an emergency radio device and
sufficient food and rations that we might need for our families and needy neighbors in case of a
natural emergency. Protecting our home environments should even include measures designed
to address risks associated with communicable-disease plans in the event of, for example, a
terrorist-inspired outbreak of smallpox or other like disease, and perhaps on a much lesser level
potential H 1 N 1 outbreaks. These measures are urged and implemented in an attempt to adjust
the attitude of the community to one of cautious awareness and prevention, an awareness that
requires evaluating the costs associated with various means of protection and measures one can
take to protect our families. None of us should even consider standing by and not seeking and
implementing the maximum cost effective protection for ourselves and our families. Electronic
technology now makes this available, with cost effectiveness further increased by the fact that
CalTrans is benevolently assisting us in Tiburon to lower the costs by allowing us to use the
existing poles. Tiburon's natural location on a peninsula make such measures even more
practical and cost effective.
In my security protection classes to the San Francisco Mounted Sheriff's Unit, of which I am the
Commander, we learn first of deterrence in an effort to try and minimize problems facing the
community. When "the bad guys" know that they are being filmed in our community and not in
others, unless they are already driving a stolen vehicle, they are certainly more likely to avoid the
increased risks present in Tiburon when they can just as easy rip off one of our neighboring
communities. For those outside of the community and across the United States who may not be
informed of this increased security protection in Tiburon, their realization of the affluence of this
community and its perception as an easy target for various crimes is a sufficient reason to
immediately begin installing the protection your Council has the power to implement.
When an incident occurs like the unfortunate homicide that we recently had to deal with, socially
for those who knew the victim and morally as part of the community, until we find out what
happened we are all simply hoping that it was a random shooting by a crazy individual who is no
longer in our community. However, we don't know this, and we must do all that we can to try
and follow up all potential leads when such an incident occurs. If something happens to one of
our children, an Amber alert helps bring others on the highways awareness of the incident and
provides police with valuable leads when a known vehicle is spotted. A citing of a specific type
of vehicle at a precise time but without an available license plate number provided from
somebody who witnessed a crime can be matched up with our new sophisticated surveillance
equipment, instantly allowing thousands of people on the roads to possibly assist law
enforcement for an immediate resolution to a crime that could only get worse. Serious crimes
that are thought out and planned usually involve surveillance conducted over a period of time,
and the ability to put patterns together of license plate numbers that have no connection to our
community could be a potential lead in any serious crime.
A perpetrator being examined by law enforcement who might have been fortuitously
apprehended in some other crime, such as the crazy who blew up the federal building and was
apprehended by a state trooper because of a license plate violation, could at least be placed in a
crime scene zone in Tiburon where they initially might have denied having even been to
Tiburon, and when confronted with a picture of his or her license plate might realize that
although circumstantial evidence, when you have enough circumstantial evidence it assists the
district attorney in the prosecution of the case. The arguments that I have heard in opposition to
the rest of us citizens who want additional protection were over simplistic, often to the extent of,
for example, information being used in domestic relation cases to identify where somebody is.
Our state has been a no fault dissolution state for many years, and looking at the additional
arguments presented, none of them outweigh my right to be protected in my city by the most cost
effective means available.
Assisting law enforcement throughout California and throughout the country is something that
we in law enforcement appreciate as an obligation. We share information, and we expect others
to share with us. A heinous crime elsewhere with a lead that the perpetrator was in the Marin
County area could immediately be electronically verified, and showing this kind of cooperation
allows our police force to live up to their code of protection to both this community and the
profession. A recent California Court of Appeals case that I have been asked to comment on
internationally and by numerous media involves the ability of Homeland Security to take any
electronic devise of a person requesting entry into the country, whether it be a laptop, PDA, or
telephone, and completely download and even hold them until inspected, over the outcries of
numeroi.ls alleged civil rights protectors. This includes attorneys screaming confidential attorney
client communications located in the laptops, drug dealers not interested in sharing their business
contacts throughout the world, and in the case brought before the Court of Appeals a pedophile
with obvious inappropriate photos on his laptop. In ruling, our most liberal California 91h Circuit
of Appeals recognized that we are today facing increased threats including the threat of
international terrorism and domestically, with economic issues, we are facing a rise in both drug
and economic related crimes. People have a right to protect themselves, a fact that the Supreme
Court has recently held in upholding our Second Amendment right to bear arms. If these liberal
courts can weigh the cost effectiveness of certain types of electronic surveillance against the
protections afforded by our great Constitution and conclude that people must and need be
protected, I would ask you the Council to help us protect ourselves and our community by
immediately voting to install all appropriate surveillance.
Respectfully Yours,
Alexander Anolik
280 Round Hill Road
Page 1 of 1
Peggy Curran
From: Martin Pflughoeft [martybroker@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 1:51 PM
To: Peggy Curran
Subject: License plate cameras
Dear Peggy:
I am a concerned citizen of Tiburon and I want to express that I hope that Tiburon decides to install the cameras
that you are discussing.
I am not alone in my feelings since I have discussed this issue with a number of other Tiburon residents and they
all agree that this is a good thing to install these cameras.
The only people who would disagree are organizations such as the ACLU and persons who are guilty of
something.
I am sure that if this was put to a vote that it would pass by an overwhelming majority of Tiburon residents.
I look forward to this happening.
Martin A. Pflughoeft
121 Taylor Rd.
Tiburon, Ca. 94920
(415) 435-5097
.1 11 0 i11 nnn
Page 1 of 1
Peggy Curran
From: R & M Park [rmpark162@att.net]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 1:02 AM
To: Peggy Curran
Subject: Surveillance Cameras
Dear Ms. Curran,
At this time our schedule precludes our attendance at the Council meeting Wednesday evening.
Therefore, we respectfully request that you distribute copies of this email to Mayor Fredericks and
Council members Berger, Collins, Gram, and Slavitz prior to the meeting.
We are strongly opposed to the installation of surveillance cameras at entry points to the Town of
Tiburon. We believe that to do so would be an egregious invasion of our privacy, and that the cost of
installation and subsequent maintenance would divert funds from other needs in our community. We are
also concerned about the potential negative impact the program might have on our local merchants and
businesses. The number of tourists and out-of-town customers would be reduced by people who react
negatively to the "big brother" atmospher of our town.
If an individual was really intent on committing a crime in Tiburon, he would find ways of avoiding the
camera detection, by entering on a bus, or stolen vehicle, or vehicle of a Tiburon resident, etc. We do not
believe that the cost of the program warrants its establishment, and we value our privacy to highly to
consider supporting this proposal. We therefore respectfully urge you, as our elected representative to
reject the proposal to install the surveillance cameras.
Sincerely,
Richard Park
Mar ories H. Park
261 Karen Way
i1 '7i1nno
Peggy Curran
From: Roberta R. Jeffrey [mediate@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 9:36 AM
To: Peggy Curran
Subject: Cameras
Dear Ms. Curran,
I write as a follow up to my earlier letter to the Council, regarding the proposed camera installation.
I would like to reiterate my concerns about such a system, and trust that you will convey these to the
Council.
I am quite concerned about the proposal for several reasons.
1. Invasion of privacy is a major issue on public streets.
This means our own community will be under constant surveillance.
The cameras will be filming our own residents, primarily, as they go about their business. It is clear
that the surveillance of our own
community will comprise the majority of film footage. This
not only smacks of "Big Brother" but is economically unwise.
2. This is an unnecessary expenditure in these economic times, and one that is economically
open=ended, and thus financially unwise.
However, the greater concern is the privacy issue itself, and the danger of misuse of such a
system, despite good intentions.
3. A better way to stop the crimes that occur in Tiburon, which are committed by non residents, is to
educate our citizens about locking
car and house doors, and about removing valuables from their
cars. This will eliminate the "bait" and make Tiburon a less desirable target.
An education campaign on the Peninsula, similar to "Get Ready,"
regarding these issues is money better spent.
Again, the initial and ongoing expense of such a system is not justified by the loss of privacy that
will ensue.
The odds of finding potential thieves, etc. is small compared to the privacy and potential misuse
possibilities of such a system.
I urge the Council to vote against installing these cameras.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Roberta Jeffrey