HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Res 2017-04-05 RESOLUTION NO. 07-2017
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TIBURON
GRANTING AN APPEAL BY ANDRINA AND KENNETH WELTER
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD'S APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING, WITH VARIANCES FOR
REDUCED FRONT SETBACK, EXCESS LOT COVERAGE AND EXCESS
BUILDING HEIGHT, AND A FLOOR AREA EXCEPTION,
ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 77 EAST VIEW AVENUE
(ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 060-105-92)
WHEREAS, on October 20, 2016 the Design Review Board held a public hearing
on a Site Plan and Architectural Review application (Files # DR2016104, VAR2016033,
VAR2016034, VAR2016035 & FAE2016011) filed by Clinton Yee for the construction of
additions to an existing single-family dwelling, with variances for reduced front and side
setbacks, excess lot coverage and excess building height, on property at 77 East View
Avenue ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, at that hearing,the property owners at 81 East View Avenue,
Andrina and Kenneth Welter ("Appellants"), and neighboring residents at 75 East View
Avenue raised concerns about the Project's view and privacy impacts from the proposed
additions and the overall mass of the Project. The Design Review Board shared these
concerns, stating that the house was too large and too wide, and would have privacy impacts
on the Appellants' home. The Board continued the application to the December 1, 2016
meeting; and
WHEREAS, on December 1, 2016 the Design Review Board held a public
hearing to review revised plans for this Project. At that meeting, the Appellants and
neighboring residents at 75 East View Avenue continued to raise concerns about the Project
design and also questioned the accuracy of the site survey. The Design Review Board
determined that not enough had been done to reduce the size of the house and requested more
articulation to the design and better compliance with the Hillside Design Guidelines. The
Board continued the application to the January 19, 2017 meeting; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2017 the Design Review Board held a public hearing
to review revised plans for this Project, which proposed demolition of more than 50% of the
existing structure, reclassifying the application as construction of a new single-family
dwelling for zoning purposes. The application also included variances for reduced front
setback and excess building height. At that meeting, the Appellants expressed concerns about
loss of privacy and view blockage issues stemming from the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Board determined that the revisions to the
Project design addressed the potential view and privacy issues, and voted 2-1 to conditionally
Town Council Resolution No. 07-2017 04/5/2017 Page 1 of 4
approve the Project, with an added condition of approval reducing the width of the upper
level of the house by two feet by pulling it further away from the Appellants' home; and
WHEREAS, on January 30, 2017, the Appellants filed a timely appeal of the
Design Review Board's decision to the Town Council; and
WHEREAS, the project application consists of Files # DR2016104,
VAR2016033, VAR2016034, VAR2016035 & FAE2016011, on file with the Town of
Tiburon Community Development Department. The official record for this Project
application is hereby incorporated and made part of this resolution. The record includes,
without limitation, the Staff Reports, minutes, application materials, and all comments and
materials received at the public hearings, and
WHEREAS, on March 1, 2017, the Town Council held a duly-noticed public
hearing on the appeal, during which testimony was heard and considered regarding the
Project and the Design Review Board's review of the application; and
WHEREAS, after hearing all testimony and receiving all documents in the
record, the Town Council disagreed with the conclusions of the Design Review Board
regarding this Project, and granted the appeal. The Town Council determined that the
Project would be inconsistent with the guiding principles for Site Plan and Architectural
Review, the Hillside Design Guidelines, and other relevant provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance, as follows:
1. Section 16-52.020 (H[2]) of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance states that
in order to approve a Site Plan and Architectural Review application,
the Town must consider"the location of proposed improvements on
the site in relation to the location of improvements on adjoining sites,
with particular attention to view considerations, privacy, location of
noise-generating exterior mechanical equipment, adequacy of light and
air, and topographic or other constraints on development imposed by
particular site conditions." The Town Council determined that the
project design would create substantial privacy, light and air impacts
on the Appellants' property. The privacy of the Appellants' home
would be significantly impacted by the proposed upper level deck,
which would allow occupants using the deck of the proposed dwelling
to view into the Appellants' master bedroom. The upper floor of the
house would be too large when viewed from the Appellant's home,
resulting in excessive building mass in close proximity to their
residence and potential light and air blockage to south-facing windows
of their home.
2. Goal 1, Principles 1 & 9 of the Tiburon Hillside Design Guidelines,
encourage projects to "cut [the] building into [the] hillside to reduce
effective bulk" and to "excavate underground or below grade rooms to
dramatically reduce effective bulk, provide energy efficient and
Town Council Resolution No. 07-2017 04/5/2017 Page 2 of 4
environmentally desirable spaces." The Town Council determined that
the design of the proposed house did not adequately step into the steep
hillside of the subject property and was not designed to reduce its
effective bulk in accordance with these guidelines.
3. Goal 3 of the Tiburon Hillside Design Guidelines encourages projects
to "preserve existing views as much as possible," and Goal 3, Principle
I encourages applicants to "locate all new dwellings so they interfere
minimally with adjacent buildings." Goal 3, Principle 7 (D) of the
Tiburon Hillside Design Guidelines states that view blockage of
"important objects in the view (Golden Gate Bridge, Belvedere
Lagoon, Sausalito, Angel Island) is more difficult to accept than
blockage of other, less well-known landmarks." The Town Council
determined that the encroachment of the upper level of the proposed
house into the southern viewshed from the living room and master
bedroom of the Appellants' home was inconsistent with these
principles.
4. Section 16-52.030 (E) of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance states that
findings must be made to approve a variance, including the finding
that "the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity." The Town
Council determined that this finding cannot be made, as the Project
design would create substantial privacy impacts which would be
injurious to the Appellants' property.
5. Section 16-52.020 (I[4{a}]) of the Tiburon Zoning Ordinance states
that findings must be made to approve a floor area exception,
including the finding that "the applicant has demonstrated that the
visual size and scale of the proposed structure is compatible with the
predominant pattern established by existing structures in the
surrounding neighborhood." The Town Council determined that this
finding cannot be made, when the applicant has not met its burden
demonstrating that the visual size and scale of the project design as
currently proposed is consistent with the predominant pattern
established by other homes on Corinthian Island.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Council of the Town of
Tiburon hereby grants the appeal of Andrina and Kenneth Welter of the Design Review
Board's approval of the application (Files # DR2016104, VAR2016033, VAR2016034,
VAR2016035 & FAE2016011) for Site Plan and Architectural Review approval for
construction of a new single-family dwelling, with variances for reduced front yard setback,
excess lot coverage and excess building height and a floor area exception, on property
located at 77 East View Avenue, and denies the application.
Town Council Resolution No. 07-2017 04/5/2017 Page 3 of 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Town Council on April 5,
2017, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Doyle, Fraser, Fredericks, O'Donnell, Tollini
NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
01ZI
lalAV
JIM F Ek, M YOR
TO F TIBURON
ATTEST:
� f
LEA STEFA I, TOWN CLERK
Town Council Resolution No. 07-2017 04/5/2017 Page 4 of 4