HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgr 1993-11-01 (Semple Apprasails, Inc.)7o~v~/ CoPl~
SEMPLE APPRAISALS, INC.
Charles P. Semple, MAI
Patricia M. Semple, SRA
Siobhan A. Semple
November 17, 1993
Mr. Robert Kleinert
City Manager,
68 Reed Ranch Road
Tiburon, Ca 94920 #93145
Dear Mr. Kleinert:
As you requested„ will estimate the market value of your property located at 68 Reed
Ranch Road, Tiburon as of a current date of value. We are valuing the fee simple interest
of the single family residence.
We did not inspect the interior of the home, and rely upon information from the owner as
to the number of rooms, approximate size of the home , age and condition. Additional
information such as zoning, compliance, sales details, were considered and is retained in
our files. This report is not the complete appraisal process.
The property is legally described as Reedland Woods, R.M. Bk. 13-Pg. 23. parcel 2, and is
known as Marin County's Assessor's Parcel # 38-302-02.. We refer the reader to the
enclosed plat to further define the site.
We were told the home has 9 rooms, 4 bedrooms and 3 baths. The rooms are a living
room, family room, dining room and den, plus the bedrooms and 3 full baths, for an
approximate total living area of 3,000 square feet., constructed in 1984. The site is large,
but typical of those surrounding it, is approximately 14,000 square feet, a "flag" lot, with a
30 foot wide driveway easement fronting on Reed Ranch Rd leading to the site. The rear
of the site backs to open space, which insures more privacy to the home.
In order to value this property, we reviewed sales of properties nearby, comparing them as
to size of home, number of rooms, age, and location.
Suite E 55 Professional Center Parkway San Rafael, Ca. 94903 415/472-7833 FAX 415/472-3047
j"ia
Mr. Robert Kleinert
November 17, 1993
Page Two
Following are sales which we felt were comparable to the subject property:
# Address
SUBJECT
Rooms Square Lot View Sale Sale
Bed/Bths Feet Date Price
94-3.5 3,000 s.f. 13,000 open 11/93
Sales 1.223 are older homes built in 1970/71, nearby the subject, hillside homes with views
of the city of San Francisco and San Francisco bay, and sale #3 of Mt. Tamalpais and the
city. The subject has only views of open space, but it is a newer home constructed in
1984. It is not a hillside site, but has a level area, more usuable but lacking in views.
Sale #2 and Sale #4 both have pools. Sale #4 with both city and mountain views, also has
a separate art studio, a 1971, older home than the subject; another hillside viewsite.
Most of the sales are about the same living area as the subject, two story homes.
Based on these sales, which we feel are most comparable to the subject, we estimate the
market value of the subject property to be within a range of
current estimate of value. We have not inspected the interior of the home, but based our
value on the home in good condition, with only an exterior inspection of the property.
An estimate of the land value for the property at 68 Reed Ranch Road can be
accomplished, by comparing the site, to recent sales of vacant residential lots in Tiburon.
The subject site is approximately 14,000 s.f., level to gently sloping, with open views of
surrounding hillsides. Recent vacant lot sales in Tiburon have ranged in price from
$1621000 to $485,000. Two lots of approximately 20,000 s.f. recently sold on Blackfield
Road, with direct views of Mt. Tamalpais for $255,000. We suggest a value for the
subject site, that has only an open view, slightly lower than that amount, or approximately
$235,000.
Mr. Robert Kleinert
November 17, 1993
Page Three
All value opinions contained in this appraisal and report are made subject to the enclosed
Limiting and other conditions. Market value is as defined on the enclosed page entitled
Purpose of the Appraisal.
Sincerely,
Patricia M. Semple SRA
. PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL
The purpose of this appraisal report is to render an estimate of the Market Value
of the properties herein described.
a
MARKET VALUE
The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to
cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights
should sell after reasonable exposure in a competitive market under all conditions
requisite to fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently,
knowledgeably, and for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under undue
duress.
.I HIGHEST AND BEST USE
A
The most profitable likely use to which a property can be put. The opinion of
such use may be based on the highest and most profitable continuous use to
i which the property is adapted and needed, or likely to be in demand in the
reasonably near future. However, elements affecting value which depend upon
events or a combination of occurrences which, while within the realm of
possibility are not fairly shown to be reasonably probable, should be excluded
from consideration. Also, if the intended use is dependent on an uncertain act of
another person, the intention cannot be considered.
' That use of land which may reasonably be expected to produce the greatest net
return to land over a given period of time. That legal use which will yield to land
the highest present value. Sometimes called optimum use.
:,ate
SEMPLE APPRAISALS, INC.
~ii~'.iU~+cllii?':~a c~~ . do "7"
LIMITING CONDITIONS
= S/W k W7r1:-`JY ~ ~x►L~i W • .r 1 i ~.i.Lr:Y'1nD~Y~ A~r.:.a~'F ~J ~•`a7S ~
The values herein reported are made expressly subject
coedit ions and stipulations:
to the following
No survey has been made. The maps are approximated, and together with the
photographs, are intended to assist the reader in visualizing the property.
The values are reported without regard to questions of title, boundaries,
encumbrances and encroachments unless specifically stated otherwise in this
report.
No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character, nor is any opinion
rendered as to the title, which is assumed to be good.
I believe to be reliable the information identified in this report as being
furnished by others, but assume no responsibility for its accuracy.
No right to expert testimony is included with possession or ownership of this
appraisal report, but the appraiser is prepared and available to testify in court if
necessary.
No one other than the person signing this report, prepared the analyses,
conclusions and opinions concerning real estate set forth in this report.
Disclosure of the contents of this report is governed by the By-Laws and
Regulations of the Appraisal Institute.
Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any
conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he is
connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or to the MAI designation),
shall be disseminated to the public through advertising media, public relations ia,
news media, sales media or any other public means of communication, without the
prior written consent and approval of the author.
s~~:`~SCl'Z-R,,~,L~.Q~,P,i.~ 1. 7 .~e..w~~.r,.!-L.r=i....~.,r n..•~•
"d' elf J
SEMPLE APPRAISALS, INC.
T ~1+F3f:l.iilYT~i
.`3L ~ ~~..~8 L~l'c`~.4~t~x -~~•°=~:iit~Fiz:i4"~~'::lL'~f~~~-"r'"~i.'~~t~r
CERTIFICATION
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
- the statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
- the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions
and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and
conclusions.
- I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and
I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved.
7A
- my compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses,
opinion, or conclusions in, or the use of, this report.
- my medanalysis, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been
prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the
Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute and the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice 1987.
- the use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to
review by its duly authorized representatives.
- as of the date of this report, I, Patricia M. Semple, have completed the requirements under
the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute.
- I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report.
- no one provided significant professional assistance to the person signing this report.
- I have no direct or indirect interest in the property; no stake of any sort in the outcome of
the decision affecting the property that may be based on this appraisal, and I have not been
influenced by any interested party in determining the estimate of market value.
PATRICIA M. SEMPLE, SRA
SEMPLE APPRAISALS, INC.
~wla'J~~r~'wr+~i..'• Ll.~k ~.qw
QUALIFICATIONS
PATRICIA M. SEMPLE
EDUCATION
B.A. Degree, Lone Mountain College, San Francisco 1954
California Elementary Teaching Credential 1955
Real Estate Courses/Seminars/Conferences 1972-present
American Right-of-Way Association
American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers
Society of Real Estate Appraisers
University of California
Marin Community Colleges
Appraisal Institute -
Certified Residential Real Estate Appraiser 1993
by the State of California # AR 014441
j The Appraisal Institute conducts a voluntary program of continuing education for its designated
A
members. MAI's and SRA's who meet the minimum standards of this program are awarded
periodic educational certifications. I am certified under this program.
7
A
° INSTRUCTOR - California Community College System
AFFILIATIONS
Member, National Association of Realtors 1973
Member, Appraisal Institute, SRA designation 1978
Member, Marin County Board of Realtors 1973
Real Estate Broker 1977
EXPERIENCE
Have appraised property in all cities of Marin County, and Petaluma, Vallejo, Rohnert Park
Pittsburg, Fremont, Napa, Santa Rosa and San Francisco. Have done multi-residential
appraisals, commercial appraisals and condemnation assignments.
Work with employee relocation companies, financial institutions, corporations, attorneys and
governmental agencies including Marin Municipal Water District, Mill Valley Community
Services District, County of Marin, Department of Public Works.
SEMPLE APPRAISALS, INC
•
ROAD
It , s«
N ~s ~o
'y O '11 Inn 4
O t
CD
bc ®R) '
Am" 40' ^ ~ ~ J
N .~~g M J
Qe -Ord
• • O J.b ♦ • s,, 4
~ Y O
,
~C ~ -~•ar ^I M
~v c ao o ,o
- F•4
~ • s F,r,F M
0 Ali
~ O ~ • .,ter., ti r
S~ 'S OTC . •.~s' . ` aE
J ? O N
e► It 2.. i~ 0 3 * Z~b cs ys g2 s ~p O
w
o w ~C~ A^ } JO ^ r~•tJr a C3
9 0 ~
LLJ 2
® at.~. mod, 5~ O
A
. IIIIf , t
O ~ ~ 0 w r~ cc 24
44
CL
~
a
z w a o
-17
ap~
t n. ti p• `
w
n •
IL O ti~
ss s•. t ! .
s
z -
~ rz
Cc f~
O Y c
m
~ C 1
O ~ .
O h
N C
m
- N
N
Q
C W
c
o ~
H o
~ C
c~
E
2 -
w co
a~
w ~
~r
Q Q
W
2
. y
California Land Title Company of Marin
650 EAST BLITHEDALE AVENUE
MILL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 94941
(415) 383-8410 • FAX (415) 388-5233
Town of Tiburon
1155 Tiburon Blvd.
Tiburon, CA 94920
Attention: Mr. Robert Ewing
Legal Department
Dear Mr. Ewing:
November 1, 1993
RE: Escrow No. 513862-LD
Property: 68 Reed Ranch Road, Tiburon
Borrower: KLEINERT, Robert L. & Trudy G.
In connection with the above, we enclose the following document for
signature.
1. Subordination Agreement.
We have not been informed as to the name of the ultimate lender nor received
documents as of this date. The refinance amount for Mr. and Mrs. Kleinert will
be approximately $90,000.00. The enclosed document needs to be signed before
a Notary Public and returned to our office, envelope provided.
Please give me a call with any questions. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Linda Dowdell
Escrow Officer (CSEO)
LD
Encls:
December 1, 1993
Mr.And Mrs. Kleinert
68 Reed Ranch Road
Tiburon, CA. 94920
Dear Mr. Kleinert,
M-Pest Mortgage
CORPORATION
As per our conversation on Tuesday I am writing you in regard to your application
for refinancing of your property in Tiburon.
As I mentioned to you previously on Tuesday, your request for the subordination
of the mortgage held in Agreement through the Town of Tiburon, was denied. The
following was the basis for that decision: All secondary financing must meet
FHNM/FHMC (the Federal Home National Mortgage Association and the
Federal Home Mortgage Corporation) guidelines. These are the companies who
buy our loans in the secondary market. These guidelines state that the loan must
provide for regular payments that cover at least the interest due and should
generally require interest at the market rate. If the loan does not fully amortize
under a level monthly payment plan, it cannot have a call option of less than rive
years.
I have enclosed a copy of our guidelines for your information. I hope this clears
up any confusion regarding this matter. Please don't hesitate to call me if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
Mia Isey
Mortgage Banker
Encl./MK
655 Redwood Highway, Suite 162, Mill Valley, California 94941 3 (415) 381-4400 FAX (415) 381-2420
Subordinate financing
When calculating LTV ratios, you sometimes need to take "subordinate
financing" - a mortgage or other lien on the property that has
priority lower than that of the first mortgage - into account. In such
cases, you need to add the subordinate financing to the amount of the
first mortgage before you calculate the LTV. The result is referred to
as the "combined loan-to-value ratio," or CLTV.
Eligible types of subordinate financing
Fannie Mae will purchase a mortgage with subordinate financing if it
meets the following requirements.
• The lien must be recorded and must be clearly subordinate to the
first mortgage.
• The loan must provide for regular payments that cover at least the
interest due and should generally require interest at the market
rate.
• If the loan does not fully amortize under a level monthly payment
plan, it cannot have a call option of less than five years.
• The loan must permit prepayment at any time without penalty.
If the first mortgage is an adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM), a
graduated-payment mortgage (GPM), or a fixed-rate mortgage (FRM)
with a buydown, the payment on the subordinate loan must be for a
fixed amount. In other instances, variable payments are acceptable,
provided that the monthly payment remains constant for each 12-
month period and that each yearly interest rate change is limited to a
one percent increase (not applicable to home equity lines of credit).
Home equity lines of credit. If the borrower has a home equity line
of credit, use the maximum home equity line of credit amount when
you calculate the CLTV. This is permitted on owner-occupied proper-
ties only.
Variable payments are acceptable except when the CLTV is greater
than 80 percent, the first mortgage is an ARM, and the credit line is
used to help finance the purchase of the property.
Ineligible types of subordinate financing
The following types of subordinate financing are not eligible for sale
to hannie Mae.
• A loan that does not provide for regular payments of principal and
interest, or of interest only.
• A loan that allows negative amortization.
9 A loan that has wraparound terms.