HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Digest 2010-12-03TOWN COUNCIL WEEKLY DIGEST
November 22 -December 3, 2010
Ti h» rnn
1. Memo - Scott Anderson - Library DEIR Partial Recirculation
2. Application to Serve Town - Kourosh Baradaran
Agendas & Minutes
3. Minutes - Design Review Board - November 18, 2010
4. Agenda- Design Review Board -December 2, 2010
5. Action Minutes -Design Review Board -December 2, 2010
6. Agenda - Planning Commission - December 8, 2010
Regional
a) LexisNexis Offer
b) GovLink Review - Newsletter - Federal Technology Center - Dec/Jan 2011
c) Sutter Health Community Leader Report
d) Change of Venue - Moosefeed - Dec. 10, 2010 - SF Marriot Hotel
Agendas & Minutes
e) None
* Council Only
Town of Tiburon
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Scott Anderson, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Library DEIR Partial Recirculation
DATE: November 19, 2010
This subject was touched upon briefly in the Director's Report at the November 10, 2010
Commission meeting, but could not be discussed since it was not on the agenda. At that
meeting, I announced that earlier in the day, the decision was made that re-circulation of
portions of the Library DEIR would be required after all. The purpose of this memo is to
elaborate on that announcement in a setting allowed by law.
Many of the comments received on the Library Draft EIR, including those from Commissioners,
dealt with biological issues, primarily questioning the adequacy of analysis of the long-term
project impacts on Railroad Marsh given a proposed buffer of only 25 feet from the edge of
wetlands to the proposed parking lot. At the Planning Commission meeting on September 8, at
which it considered immediate reci'rculation,.the staff report (on p. 4) stated as follows:
No new information was submitted during the public comment period that clearly and
convincingly indicated that the severity of the environmental impacts of the project
would be substantially greater than those identified in the DEIR and could not be
mitigated. However, additional information and analysis generated in response to
comments, especially regarding long-term biological impacts on Railroad Marsh, could
result in identification of a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact
of the project. If so, recirculation of the affected parts of the DEIR would be required at.
that time unless mitigation measures are identified that would reduce the impacts to a
less-than-significant level.
This is precisely what occurred during the new EIR consultant's review of the comments and the
additional analysis performed on long-term biological effects on Railroad Marsh. The DEIR
underestimated the long-term biological impacts on the Marsh; an approximately 50-foot buffer
from the wetlands is now being recommended, similar to the buffer recommended in the Town's
Railroad Marsh Maintenance Plan. This enlarged buffer would entail a partial redesign of the
project parking lot and a potential reduction in on-site parking spaces. The site planning
changes are significant enough that a new alternative will be developed to incorporate various
measures to reduce those impacts capable of being reduced or avoided; namely, biological,
parking, and visual (scenic vista blockage) impacts. Air quality plan conformance, noise, and
ground-bome vibration impacts, which were identified as significant and unavoidable in the
DEIR, cannot be avoided with any meaningful Library expansion alternative.
Three major sections of the DEIR will be revised and recirculated. These are:
1. The Biological impact section
2. The Traffic/Parking impact section
Town of Tiburon
MEMORANDUM
3. The Alternatives section
Minor revisions to the following sections will also be made and those sections will also be
recirculated:
1. Executive Summary
2. Summary of Significant Unavoidable Impacts
In addition, a new Introduction for the revised and recirculated sections will be prepared.
It is important to note that pursuant to CEQA, new comments will only be accepted on the
revised and recirculated portions of the DEIR. Prior comments on those sections will NOT be
responded to by the consultant. This fact will be made clear in all notices, including those which
must be sent to all prior commentors. However, all original comments on sections of the DER
that are not being recirculated will be responded to by the consultant.
In terms of scheduling, all dates are somewhat speculative at this point, but I anticipate the re-
circulated portions of the DER will be publicly released for the mandatory 45-day comment
period in January 2011. 1 expect that to be in the mid- to-latter half of the month, given the
intervening holidays.
The Planning Commission will hold a hearing to take comments on the re-circulated sections of
the DER only during that 45-day period. After that, Staff will bring the recirculation issue back
to the Commission right after the close of the comment period that mandatory "is there anything
in the comments that would automatically require recirculation (again)" determination.
The EIR consultant will then need to respond to the comments as described above. Once the
FEIR is released, the PC will hold a public hearing on the merits of the applications before it,
while considering the FEIR in the process. Those applications are:
1. A General Plan Amendment and Rezoning for the change from Open Space to Public
(for a portion of Zelinsky Park).
2. A General Plan Amendment to Policy OSC-20 regarding wetland buffers.
3. A Point Tiburon Master Plan Amendment for the change from Open Space to Public.
4. A Point Tiburon Precise Plan Amendment for the change from Open Space to Public.
This. project is somewhat unusual in that the applications the Planning Commission will be
recommending forward to the Tov/n Council do not actually approve any particular site plan or a
specific structure. The applications are essentially "paper changes" that could accommodate a
range of site plans and projects, set forth in the EIR as the project, its alternatives, and almost
anything within the "range" estaLshed by the project and the alternatives.
The Town Council has previously adopted an ordinance that will vest the decision-making on
any final Library expansion project design with the Council.
Please don't hesitate to contact ;.,e at 435-7392 if you have any questions or need clarification.
November 19,2010'
Page 2of2
I E C E ~ V E I qat
NOV 3 0 2010
TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF TIBURON
Instructions and Application to Serve on a Town Board,
Commission or Committee
The Town Council considers appointments to various Town boards,
commissions and committees throughout the year due to term expirations and
unforeseen vacancies. In an effort to broaden participation by local residents in
Tiburon's governmental process and activities, the Council needs to know your
interest in serving the Town in some capacity.
Please indicate your specific areas of interest and special skills or experience
which would be beneficial to the Town, by completing both pages of this form and
returning it to Town Hall, 1505 Tiburon Blvd, Tiburon CA 94920, or fax it to
(415)435-2438.
Copies of the application will be forwarded to the Town Council and an
informal interview will be scheduled when a vacancy occurs. Your application will
remain on file at Town Hall for a period of one (1) year.
Thank you for your willingness to serve the Tiburon community.
Diane Crane Iacopi
Town Clerk
AREAS OF INTEREST
Please Indicate Your Area(s) of Interest in Numerical Order
(#1 Being the Greatest Interest)
2 PLANNING # PARKS & OPEN SPACE
1 DESIGN REVIEW # -RECREATION
HERITAGE & ARTS DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
# LIBRARY MARIN COMMISSION ON AGING
BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
1
PERSONAL DATA
Only computer-generated or typewritten copy will be accepted;
Attach separate pages, including resumes and cover letters, if necessary.
NAME: KOUROSH BARADARAN architect
MAILING ADDRESS: 1550 TIBURON BLVD. STE. H BELVEDERE, CA 94920
TELEPHONE: Home: 389-0983 Work:789-9222 Fax No. 888-789-1819
PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOC. (If appucableOwn a home in Bel Aire neighborhood
TIBURON RESIDENT: (Vears)5.5 YRS . DATE SUBMITTED: 11/30/10
REASONS FOR SELECTING
YOUR AREAS OF INTEREST
am an architect working here in Tiburon and feel that I can further
contribute to my home Town by becoming more involved in the planning and
design review processes. I have lived in Marin most of my life and currently
live with my wife, nine year old son, and little puppy on Claire Way.
APPLICABLE QUALIFICATIONS
AND EXPERIENCE
I am a licensed architect with experience in both commercial and residential
architecture of all scales. I have worked in very large offices as well as
smaller ones and am currently a sole proprietor. My office is located in the
Boardwalk Shopping Center and much of my work focuses on single-family
residential additions and remodels.
I also serve as the secretary of the-Belvedere-Tiburon Landmark Society and am
a member of the local Chamber of Commerce.
Please see attached resume.
----------------------------------------------Town Hall Use
Date Application Received: / 3() „ 10, Interview Date:
Appointed to:
(Commission, Board or Committee)
Date Term Expires:
(Date)
Length of Term:
2
KOUROSH BARADARAN
1550 Tiburon Blvd. Suite H
Belvedere, CA 94920
Tel: (415) 789-9222
KB@ KBarchitect.com
www.KBarchitect.com
EDUCATION
1994 Master of Architecture
University of California, Berkeley
1990 Bachelor of Architecture
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
1989 Ecoles d'Art Americaines
D
Ecole des Beaux-Arts, Fontainebleau, France
Brodie Prize recipient
NOV 4 a 2010
1987-88 Denmark International Study Program
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
TOWN CLERK
"SOWN OF TIBURON
EXPERIENCE
2007-Present Owner
Kourosh Baradaran Architect, Belvedere-Tiburon, CA
2002-2007 Design Director/ Architect
Polsky Perlstein Architects, Larkspur, CA
1994-2002 Senior Associate: Senior Designer, Project Architect, Project Manager
Gensler, San Francisco
1991-94 Architectural Consultant:
Collins Henderson Architects, San Francisco
Raker Architects, Mill Valley, CA
Jared Polsky & Associates, Larkspur, CA
Design/ Build Services
Residential Projects in Marin County and San Francisco
1990-91 Designer/ Renderer/ Computer Modeler
Annand Burton-Brown Architects, Vancouver, Canada
1988 Industrial Designer
Lars Lundquist Design Firm, Copenhagen, Denmark
TEACHING
2002-2004 Adjunct Professor:
California College of the Arts, Interior Architecture and Design, San Francisco
1995-2001 Instructor: Academy of Art College Interior Architecture and Design, San Francisco
1989-90 Teaching Assistant: Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo,
LICENSES / AFFILLIATIONS / LANGUAGES
Secretary: Belvedere-Tiburon Landmarks Society
Member: Tiburon Peninsula Chamber of Commerce
Licensed Architect 1996, California
Proficient in English, French, Farsi
3.
MINUTES #18
TIBURON DESIGN REVEW BOARD
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 2010
The meeting was opened at 7:00 p.m. by Chair Tollini.
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Tollini, Vice-Chair Kricensky, Boardmembers Chong, Emberson and Weller
Absent: None
Ex-Officio: Planning Manager Watrous and Minutes Clerk Rusting
B. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
C. STAFF BRIEFING
Planning Manager Watrous announced that the application for 680 Hawthorne Drive had been withdrawn.
D. OLD BUSINESS
680 HAWTHORNE DRIVE: File No. 709044; Colleen Mahoney, Owner; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single-family dwelling. The
applicants propose to construct a 1,072 square foot second story addition to add a larger master
bedroom suite, two bedrooms, one bathroom, a laundry room, and a guest suite for the existing
dwelling. Four new skylights would be installed. APN: 055-191-18 Application Withdrawn
E. NEW BUSINESS
2. 191 BLACKFIELD DRIVE; File No. 710119; Matthew and Jennifer Powell, Owners; Site Plan
and Architectural Review for construction of additions to an existing single-family dwelling. The
applicants propose to construct a 940 square foot addition to the rear of the house to add a master
bedroom suite family room and expand an existing dining room and kitchen. APN: 034-111-02
The applicant is submitting a request to construct additions to an existing single-family dwelling on
property located at 191 Blackfield Drive. The existing dwelling is a one-story structure. The proposal
would expand the rear of the house to add a master bedroom suite family room and expand an existing
dining room and kitchen. An existing chimney would be removed.
Matthew Powell, owner, said they would like to add an addition to the rear of their home. It is currently a
single story home and will remain single story. They would like to add a master bedroom, bath, family
room, and expand the existing dining room and kitchen.
There were no public comments.
Boardmember Emberson said that she visited the site and this was a modest proposal that fits with the
neighborhood.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #18
11/18/10
Boardmember Chong stated that he visited the site and found the proposal to be similar to many others in
the neighborhood that have added on to the rear of the properties.
Vice-Chair Kricensky, Boardmember Weller, and Chair Tollini agreed with the other Boardinembers.
ACTION: It was M/S (Weller/Chong) that the request for 191 Blackfield Drive is exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act and approving the request, subject to the attached conditions of
approval. Vote: 5-0.
3. 118 LYFORD DRIVE; File No. 21019; Sam Huang and Cindy Cao, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of a new single-family dwelling, with Variances for
reduced side yard setback, excess lot coverage and excess building height. The applicants propose
to demolish an existing single-family dwelling on the site and construct a new 4,515 square foot
house. The house would extend to within 6 feet of the eastern side property line, which is less
than the 15 foot side yard setback required in the RO-2 zone, necessitating a Variance for reduced
side yard setback. As the maximum lot coverage in the RO-2 zone is fifteen percent (15.0%), a
Variance is required in order to construct addition that would expand the lot coverage on the site
to 16.9%. The house would have a maximum height of 32 feet, 6 inches, which is taller than the
maximum building height of 30 feet, necessitating a Variance for excess building height. APN:
058-272-07
The applicant is submitting a request to construct a new single-family dwelling, with variances for
reduced front yard setback, excess lot coverage and excess building height, on property located at 118
Lyford Drive. The upper level of the proposed house would include a living room, family room, dining
room, kitchen, guest bedroom and one bathroom. The lower level would include a master bedroom suite,
three additional bedrooms, two more bathrooms, and a den and laundry room. A "basement" level would
include a storage area and bathroom adjacent to a swimming pool and spa. A two-car garage would be
situated adjacent to the upper level. Exterior decks would extend around the north, south and east sides of
the house. The proposed house would have a total floor area of 4,040 square feet, which is less than the
floor area ratio for a lot of this size.
Mohamad Sadrieh, architect, made some corrections on the Staff report. He said they would not be
demolishing the building and would not exceed the current maximum height of 32.5 feet, and in some
areas they would be lowering that height. He said that the project involves adding to the upper floor of the
house, connecting the existing garage to the rest of the house, squaring off the existing living room on the
upper floor, adding a master bedroom suite and child's bedroom on the lower floor, and changing the roof
to a combination of low pitch and high pitch roofs. He said that they would use stucco and stone instead
of the existing board and batten siding, replace the aluminum windows, and install glass railings to
replace the existing wood rails.
Mr. Sadrieh stated that they are requesting 1.9% additional coverage because the existing home is not
directly accessible to the backyard. He said that the main public areas of the building, which occur on the
upper level, were in need of a reasonably sized deck in order to enjoy views, and the creation of these
decks would result in the additional coverage they are requesting. He stated that the hillside guidelines
suggest they should step the building down the hillside, and that would also result in additional coverage.
He stated that reducing the height of the roof would require flat ceilings throughout the house. He said
that they would like to reinvigorate existing vegetation and add a few plants. He said that they would keep
the existing buffer of trees and bushes that separates the property from uphill neighbors to insure privacy.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #18
11/18/10
Planning Manager Watrous clarified that this was a substantial remodel and not a complete demolition,
However, enough of the house would be removed that it was considered to be new construction for the
design review process.
Chair Tollini asked if the Fire District required anything additional turnaround area. Mr. Sadrieh said that
he reviewed the proposal with the Fire District and their main concern was providing windows in the
continuous brush on the lower side of the building. Mr. Sadrieh stated that that was also one of the
reasons they did not propose to heavily landscape that area.
The public hearing was opened.
Shirley Mydland asked about the exterior color of the house, and Mr. Sadrieh explained that it would be a
brown tone.
John Kauffman said that he would be probably most impacted by the proposal because his home is
directly above the site. He said that right now he looks down at what appears to be two swimming pools
because of standing water on the flat roofs. He said that he was not concerned with anything on the other
side of the house but he was mostly concerned about noise and did not want a deck full of people right
below him. He asked about the location of the deck on the side of the house that would face his house.
Chair Tollini explained that most of the decks would face the open space or the city. Mr. Kauffman asked
whether the deck near the chimney would wrap around to face his property.
Ms. Myland said that she lives above and to the west of the project. She said that the owners will have a
lovely home and have been very open, and she was delighted to have new neighbors. She was concerned
about the trees at the end of the property and requested some commitment that those trees would not be
taken down because they provide a sound buffer.
Edna Griffith said that the neighborhood is very careful about trees because they provide privacy in the
area. She had no objection to the deck, but she said that she would like some reassurance that the existing
trees would remain in place and if a tree were to die in the future she would like a commitment that there
would be some sort of screening so that privacy is maintained.
In response to questions of speakers, Mr. Sadrieh said that most of the roof would be slate and the other
roof area would be flat and tar and gravel. He stated that there would be no standing water on the flat
roof. He said that the owners would do anything needed to maintain the trees and keep them in good
health because it was to everyone's benefit to keep screening in place.
Ms. Griffith said that she would like more trees to be planted if the addition requires them. Mr. Sadrieh
said that they would add a few trees and are not removing any trees, but if more landscaping becomes
necessary due to the construction, they would be glad to add them. Ms. Griffith asked if this was a
commitment. Chair Tollini said that this type of discussion could be continued between neighbors.
Chair Tollini asked Mr. Sadrieh to address the public's questions about the deck. Mr. Sadrieh said that the
decks face away from uphill neighbors and that if there were no landscaping or trees a portion of the deck
would be seen by the uphill neighbors.
Vice-Chair Kricensky noted that the color and materials board listed concrete for the roof materials and
not slate. Mr. Sadrieh noted that this was incorrect and that it should be identified as slate.
The public hearing was closed.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #18 3
11/18/10
Vice-Chair Kricensky said that this is a difficult site because the access corridor takes up a lot of the
buildable area. He said that the lot has excessive setbacks on the sides and the corner toward the
neighbors. He understood the need for the decks and said there seemed to be a fairly modest amount of
addition to the building. He thought that the neighbors would be pleased with the roof and the architecture
would look nicer than the existing building.
Boardmember Chong noted that the project would keep a large portion of the house and he agreed with
the Staff analysis of the variance findings.
Boardmember Emberson thanked the neighbors and applicant for being peaceful and cooperative about
this application. She agreed that the existing building would be significantly improved by the proposed
additions. She said that the variances were necessary due to the difficult situation created by the flag lot.
Boardmember Weller agreed with the other Boardmembers and thought that the proposal was a
reasonable and sensitive solution for this site. He felt that the Staff report properly addressed the required
variance findings.
Chair Tollini stated that that he was enamored with the location near open space and views. He said that
the existing house would be greatly improved by the design of the proposed project. He noted that the
house would also be a lot nicer to look at from the open space. He complimented the architect for coming
up with a design solution that works well for the neighbors. He agreed that this is a very difficult site and
that the large decks were a necessity due to a lack of usable outdoor space. He stated that the existing
house dimensions and the location of the site bordering open space help justify the requested variances.
ACTION: It was M/S (Chong/Kricensky) that the request for 118 Lyford Drive is exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and approving the request, subject to the attached
conditions of approval. Vote: 5-0.
F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES #18 OF THE 11/4/10 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING
ACTION: It was M/S (Weller/Emberson) to approve the minutes of the November 4, 2010 meeting as
written. Vote: 5-0.
G. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
TIBURON D.R.B. MINUTES #18 4
11/18/10
TOWN OF TIBURON
Tiburon Town Hall
1505 Tiburon Boulevard
Tiburon, CA 94920
AGENDA
TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Regular Meeting
Design Review Board
December 2, 2010
7:00 P.M.
Y-0
D ;d 14
IG41ro
Chairman Tollini, Vice Chairman Kricensky, Boardmembers Chong, Emberson & Weller
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the Design Review Board on any subject not on the agenda may do
so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Design Review Board is not able to
undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda.
Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a
future Design Review Board agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3)
minutes. Any communications regarding an item not on the agenda will not be considered part
of the administrative record for that item.
STAFF BRIEFING (if any)
OLD BUSINESS
1. 2312 SPANISH TRAIL: File No. 21017; Bill and Joy Norris, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of a detached two-family dwelling, with a detached
two-family dwelling exception and a variance for reduced front yard setback. The
applicants propose to construct a 1,180 square foot detached dwelling below the existing
house on the site, along with a new parking deck. The parking deck would extend
beyond the front property line into the Spanish Trail right-of-way, which would not
comply with the 15 foot minimum front yard setback in the R-2 zone. APN: 059-201-32
[DW]
MINUTES
2. Regular Meeting of November 18, 2010
ADJOURNMENT
Design Review Board
December 2, 2010
Page 1
TOWN OF TIBURON LATE MAIL POLICY
(Adopted and Effective 11/7/2007)
The following policy shall be used by the Town Council and its standing boards and commissions, and by
staff of the Town of Tiburon, in the identification, distribution and consideration of late mail.
DEFINITION
"Late Mail" is defined as correspondence or other materials that are received by the Town after
completion of the written staff report on an agenda item, in such a manner as to preclude such
correspondence or other materials from being addressed in or attached to the staff report as an exhibit.
IDENTIFICATION OF LATE MAIL
All late mail received by Town Staff in advance of a meeting shall be marked "Late Mail" and shall be
date-stamped or marked with the date of receipt by the Town. Late mail received at a meeting shall be
marked as "Received at Meeting" with a date-stamp or handwritten note.
POLICY
For regular meetings of the Town Council and its standing boards and commissions:
(1) All late mail that is received on an agenda item prior to distribution of the agenda packet to the
reviewing authority shall be stamped or marked as "Late Mail" and shall be distributed to the
reviewing authority with the agenda packet.
(2) All late mail received on an agenda item before 5:00 PM on the Monday prior to the meeting
shall be date-stamped and marked as "Late Mail" and distributed to the reviewing authority as
soon as practicable. Such mail shall be read and considered by the reviewing authority whenever
possible. If the Monday, or Monday and Tuesday, prior to the meeting are a Town-recognized
holiday, the deadline shall be extended to the following day at Noon.
(3) Any late mail received on an agenda item after the deadline established in paragraph (2) above
shall be date-stamped, marked as "Late Mail" and distributed to the reviewing authority as soon
as reasonably possible, but may not be read or considered by the reviewing authority. There
should be no expectation of, nor shall the reviewing authority have any obligation to, read or
consider any such late mail, and therefore such late mail may not become part of the
administrative record for the item before the reviewing authority.
These provisions shall also apply to special and adjourned meetings when sufficient lead time exists to
implement these provisions. If sufficient lead time does not exist, the Town Manager shall exercise
discretion in establishing a reasonable cut-off time for late mail. For controversial items or at any
meeting where a high volume of correspondence is anticipated, Town staff shall have the option to
require an earlier late mail deadline, provided that the written public notice for any such item clearly
communicates the specifics of the early late mail deadline, and the deadline corresponds appropriately to
any earlier availability of the agenda packet.
Pursuant to state law, copies of all late mail shall be available in a timely fashion for public inspection at
Tiburon Town Hall, 1505 Tiburon Boulevard, Tiburon.
Design Review Board December 2, 2010 Page 3
TOWN OF TIBURON Action Minutes - Regular Meeting
Tiburon Town Hall Design Review Board
1505 Tiburon Boulevard December 2, 2010
Tiburon, CA 94920 7:00 P.M.
ACTION MINUTES # 19
TIBURON DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL At 7:00 PM
Present: Chair Tollini, Vice Chainnan Kricensky, Boardmembers Chong, Emberson &
Weller
Absent: None
Ex-Officio: Planning Manager Watrous and Minutes Clerk Rusting
OLD BUSINESS
1. 2312 SPANISH TRAIL: File No. 21017; Bill and Joy Norris, Owners; Site Plan and
Architectural Review for construction of a detached two-family dwelling, with a detached
two-family dwelling exception and a variance for reduced front yard setback. The
applicants propose to construct a 1,180 square foot detached dwelling below the existing
house on the site, along with a new parking deck. The parking deck would extend
beyond the front property line into the Spanish Trail right-of-way, which would not
comply with the 15 foot minimum front yard setback in the R-2 zone. APN: 059-201-32
Approved 5-0
11 MINUTES
2. Regular Meeting of November 18, 2010 Approved as amended 5-0
ADJOURNMENT At 8:20 PM
Action Minutes #19 12/2/10 Design Review Board Meeting Page 1
(pi
TOWN OF TIBURON Regular Meeting
Tiburon Town Hall Tiburon Planning Commission
1505 Tiburon Boulevard December 8, 2010 - 7:30 PM
Tiburon, CA 94920
Jflv
AGENDA 3 4,°
TIBURON PLANNING COMMISSION
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chairman Fryinier, Vice Chair Corcoran, Commissioner Doyle, Commissioner Kunzweiler,
Commissioner Tollini
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Persons wishing to address the Planning Commission on any subject not on the agenda may do
so under this portion of the agenda. Please note that the Planning Commission is not able to
undertake extended discussion, or take action on, items that do not appear on this agenda.
Matters requiring action will be referred to Town Staff for consideration and/or placed on a
future Planning Commission agenda. Please limit your comments to no more than three (3)
minutes. Testimony regarding matters not on the agenda will not be considered part of the
administrative record.
COMMISSION AND STAFF BRIEFING
Commission and Committee Reports
Director's Report
PUBLIC HEARING
1. ONE BLACKIE'S PASTURE ROAD: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A PERMANENT PUBLIC RESTROOM
BUILDING NEAR BLACKIE' S PASTURE; FILE #11004, Town of Tiburon, Owner
and Applicant; Assessor's Parcel No. 055-041-19 [DW]
MINUTES
2. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES -Regular Meeting of November 10, 2010
ADJOURNMENT
Future A-enda Items
Alta Robles Project (TBD)
Parente Vista Tentative Map (TBD)
Draft Housing Element (January)
a120810
Tiburon Planning Commission Agenda December 8, 2010 Page 1