HomeMy WebLinkAboutTC Min 1993-03-17
TOWN COUNCIL
"
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kuhn called the regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon
to order at 7:35 p.m., Wednesday, March 17, 1993, in Room 5, Del Mar School, Tiburon,
California.
A. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Nygren, Friedman, Thayer, Thompson, Kuhn
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
EX OFFICIO:
Town Manager Kleinert, Town Attorney
Ewing, Town Engineer Bala, Supt. of Public
Works Iacopi, Acting Planning Director Ari-
derson, Associate Planner Catron, Finance
Director Stranzl, Police Captain Lewis, Min-
ute Clerk Kearney.
l'
B. PUBLIC OUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
(A) Don Batten, Belveron, commended Town Officials and citizens who
assisted in procuring funding for the construction of the footbridge
connecting Shoreline Park to the ferry dock.
(B) Mayor Kuhn noted the first edition of the Town Newsletter to be mailed
out on Thursday, March 18, 1993. He stated the intent is to inform
citizens of Town projects and stated the Town would welcome suggestions
and comments.
C. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW BOARD DECISION (A.P. #59-172-27
and 27; 2024 Paradise Drive; Applicant: R. King; Appellant: Tiberio
Lizza; Extension of Approval for Major Remodel - Consider Adoption of
Resolution)
~
Mayor Kuhn reported that the Town Council held a Closed Session on Monday, March
15th at which time all five members of the Council were present, and at which time it
was the consensus to achieve a compromise solution with the Kings on this project; and
stated that Councilmember Thompson and himself were authorized to meet with the
Kings and Kirk Hanson toward this effort.
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
1
~
Mayor Kuhn further added that the issues and concerns regarding the Council's ability
to overrule prior Council decisions and rules governing permit extensions will be
discussed at a future meeting.
Councilmember Thompson stated that discussions to resolve differences included a
proposed carport, in lieu of the garage, that would be open on three sides and allow
view of the water; and that the extension date would commence upon acceptance of the
design. He stated that Mr. King had agreed to this concept and his architect has
prepared design drawings for Council's consideration and approval at this time.
Councilmember Nygren noted that she had spent two hours with the Kings at their home
on Monday, March 8th, at which time she made two suggestions for compromise, of
which neither was acceptable to them. She stated that she had suggested 1) that the
Kings agree to an extension that would apply only to themselves and not be applicable
to any other owner of the home; and 2) that the Kings make a good faith effort to meet
FAR requirements by removing all the walls of the garage and provide an unobstructed
view of the Bay. Further, Councilmember Nygren stated that she was in Puerto Rico the
week she was accused of violating the Brown Act by having discussions with other
Councilmembers regarding this issue. '
Deputy Mayor Friedman stated that most of the Closed Session was spent discussing the
defense of a potential lawsuit and the concept of compromise had been suggested
beforehand.
~.
Councilmember Thayer stated the Kings should be commended for their efforts to find
a solution to this issue. '
Robert King, applicant, reviewed his comments as submitted including the following
points: that 1) the garage door and south and east walls be removed and a wrought iron
gate with an automatic opener be installed to keep out sightseers and prevent cars from
turning around; 2) to accept the existing planned roof; 3) to place wrought iron guard
rails along the east and south elevations; 4) to install a heavy glass windbreak on the
south elevation facing the water; 5) that no further fees be incurred; and 6) that the one
year extension commence with the signing of the agreement to withdraw their lawsuit.
Councilmember Thompson noted that the wrought iron gate and railings need to be
discussed; and clarified that only DRB fees would be waived and the Kings would be
subject to regular building fees.
Mr. King explained that the gate and railings are being requested because previous
safety engineers have indicated that it is important not to provide an opening in the
carport area that would allow cars to turn around and to not allow people to use the
carport as a look out point. Further, he stated the automatic gate is necessary to avoid
blocking traffic by having to get out of the car to unlock a chain.
,
Next, Councilmember Thompson requested discussion regarding the requested glass
windbreak; and Mr. King stated the glass windbreak would not impair the views, but
would shield them from the high winds common in that area.
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
2
Discussion ensued regarding the height of the proposed gate, the wrought iron railing
design, and size of and access to the glass windbreak from the south side.
~
Mr. King stated the wrought iron railing and gate would be 3-1/2 feet high on uphill side
and widening to conform with the contour of the hill.
The Town Council unanimously agreed to approve the 3-1/2 foot gate and railing with
a reasonable scroll design. . ,
Regarding the planned roof, Councilmember Nygren questioned whether the roof line
could be raised to increase the viewing area through the glass windbreak; and Mr. King
responded a larger piece of glass would be non-standard and thus very costly, but he
would agree to expand the glass as much as feasibly possible and in accordance with the
Town codes.
Councilmember Nygren further expressed concern regarding the glass windbreak's
possible reflection, view distortion, strength, needed support structures that might further
close off the view, and whether it is structurally possible to erect such a large piece of
glass. '
Councilmember Thompson responded that the details of the glass windbreak design will
be reviewed by the DRB and will be subject to Town building codes; and Mr. King
stated the glass would be tempered and tinted to avoid reflection and glare, and precise
plans for the structure are forthcoming.
r
The Town Council unanimously agreed to approve the concepts of an automatic wrought
iron gate and wrought iron guard rails with appropriate scroll design; the concept of a
glass windbreak; the concept of the existing planned roof; that no further design review
fees will be charged in connection with this design change; and the one year extension
will commence with signing of the settlement agreement.
Councilmember Nygren requested the agreement include language that approval is given
for one one-year extension only.
2. PROPERlY TRANSFER TAX (Review Proposed Ordinance Amendments
and Status Report of Other Agencies' Interest)
~
The Town Manager reviewed the Staff Report and updated the Council on interest
expressed by other Marin general law cities and towns regarding this issue, stating
Larkspur has expressed interest; Belvedere wants to wait until after pending litigation
has been settled; Corte Madera would prefer to wait until they have commenced their
budget process to better evaluate their revenue situation; Sausalito is not interested in
participating due to inequity, potential litigation, and budget considerations; Fairfax has
expressed some interest; and the other cities have agendized the issue for upcoming
meetings. He stated this matter will be before the MCCMC at its next meeting of
March 24th; recommended continued Town pursuit in obtaining more interest from
Marin cities and towns; and continue monitoring pending litigation.
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
3
~
The Town Attorney reported that Los Angeles just won in a court of appeal decision
based on charter city grounds; and Berkeley won in superior court on a general
demurrer without any written decision, arguing that Proposition 62 is unconstitutional;
and is finishing briefing in the court of appeal of which a ruling will be made within a
year.
Councilmember Nygren questioned whether the League of California Cities had any
statement on this issue, and the Town Attorney responded that League's position has
been to encourage cities to be amicus on these issues. He added that he spoke to
League lobbyists regarding whether they have considered introducing legislation
amending the State Documentary Transfer Tax Act and they felt that as long as the
validity of Proposition 62 is being questioned, there is no point to amend the Transfer
Tax Act unless litigation resolves the constitutionality of Proposition 62.
Mayor Kuhn opened the public hearing.
Bob Holmes, representing the Marin County Realtors Assn., reviewed the positions of
other Marin cities and towns, including Ross which decided the matter be first
considered by the MCCMC; Mill Valley decided to monitor pending litigation before
making a decision; Novato decided not to get involved, but monitor Tiburon's actions;
and stated Corte Madera's mayor has expressed no interest in involvement. He
expressed concern that the draft proposed ordinance is in violation of SB 1977 regarding
public noticing; and stated this action would be inviting litigation.
~
Ralph Hockley, 20 Mara Vista Court and real estate broker, reviewed his comments as
submitted in a letter to the Council; stated an increase in properly tax would result in
litigation and questioned whether it is acceptable to start an action with the threat of a
potential lawsuit;, stated the citizens want positive results with their tax money, not to
finance lawsuits; stated this tax would be inequitable; stated the citizens must first be
informed before the Council takes action; stated the Finance Committee report should
first be considered before making a decision; and he stated a parcel tax would be more
equitable.
Mayor Kuhn stated the Council does not intend to take any precipitous action but to
generate discussion and the proposed ordinance is part of the process in exploring this
issue.
Councilmember Thompson concurred that this is on the agenda only to notify the
community; noted that the State is taking more and more money away from the cities
resulting in a deficit and the cities must either cut services or raise revenue; reminded
that May 1st is the next Council of Homeowners meeting at which time this matter will
be discussed.
Discussion ensued regarding how much revenue would be generated by different parcel
tax formulas.
"
The Town Attorney informed the Council that San Rafael is considering a municipal tax
for their June ballot, but a two-thirds voter approval for a general purpose tax is not
necessary.
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
4
r-
..
Mark Lomas, 650 Tiburon Blvd., stated it is unfair to tax people moving out of Town
when they won't benefit from the results of the tax; stated a utility tax is more equitable
in that both homeowners and tenants are the beneficiaries of these taxes; and expressed
concern that some individuals may be taxed doubly because some lots have more than
one parcel.
Robert Holmes stated that San Rafael's ballot measure proposes a municipal services
tax of $70 per residence and includes apartment units; and the Town Council directed
Staff to obtain a copy of this ballot measure.
Virginia Brunini, Karen Way, suggested finding out what the deficit figures will be and
split it equitably throughout the population, and stated a utility tax seems to be more
equitable.
Mayor Kuhn closed the public hearing.
It was agreed this matter will be further discussed at the March 24th MCCMC meeting,
and Councilmember Thayer recommended a subcommittee be established at the
MCCMC level to investigate this issue.
Councilmember Thompson stated that the Town must choose between cutting services
or establishing a utility, parcel, or property transfer tax.
~
4. HAZARDOUS AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT JPA (Review
Previously Approved JPA)
The Council agreed to move this item forward on the agenda for discussion. The
Finance Director stated this matter is being brought back before the Council because
of concerns expressed by the League of Women Voters and requested additional public
comment be received on the proposed JP A and that the Council's comments and
concerns be formulated for forwarding to the County.
~
Polly Smith, 10 Barner Lane and representing the League of W omen Voters, agreed the
lP A is necessary for certain regional issues in meeting the mandates of AB 939 if all the
cities participate; San Rafael has declined to participate; Novato has adopted the JPA
only in concept; stated small Towns should carefully consider all issues before
participating in the JP A because to later make amendments to the JP A, a two-thirds
vote would be required; stated more public input should first be received; stated Marin
County has time to consider these issues because it is so far ahead in meeting the State
mandates for solid waste reduction; stated the League feels it is illegal to move the
operating agency from the County to the Joint Powers Authority and requests this issue
be settled before moving ahead with the JP A; stated that because the JP A would take
over all functions of the Office of Waste Management under their authority, the Office
of Waste Management would have to move out of the County offices and those costs
would have to be met by the JP A; requested clarification of the fee allocations; stated
the specific powers and scope of the JP A need to be clarified; expressed concern about
the vote equality under the JPA since only the County and cities are subject the AB 939
mandates; requested elected officials serve on the JPA board; expressed concern about
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
5
the Advisory Committee's unwillingness to work with the League to resolve these
concerns; and stated it is imperative the San Rafael join the JP A
~.
Councilmember Nygren requested the League of Women Voters write an in-depth
analysis of their concerns for the Council's use in reviewing these issues.
Discussion ensued regarding the need for a JP A with additional refinement and the
additional costs that are now unknown.
Doug Wilson, Fairfax Councilmember and Co-Chair of the Solid Waste Management
Committee, stated that without a JP A meeting the state mandates would be very
expensive for each city; stated the JP A is an attempt to avoid duplication; stated this
issue should not be delayed; stated all concerns of the League can be answered within
the confines of the JP A as now formulated; stated the JP A would address issues of
accountability; stated the LEA issue can be addressed by the JP A; and urged the Town
Council approve the JP A as formulated with direction that details and concerns be
addressed.
Mayor Kuhn stated he would only support elected officials serving on the board;
expressed concern over cost control under the JP A; and questioned the efficiency of a
23 member board.
~
~
Councilmember Nygren questioned whether the County Counsel will be investigating
whether the LEA can legally function under the JPA; and Mr. Wilson responded that
even if it is found the LEA cannot legally function under, the JP A, another agency can
be assigned to function as a LEA
Ed San Diego, Belvedere City Manager, stated the JPA was drafted to allow the 23
agencies to make decisions for themselves; would offer more control over the waste
stream and rates; stated the JP A has been reviewed by the franchisers, haulers, and the
AB 939 advisory committee and their comments and concerns have been addressed;
stated the LEA is a non-issue because if the JPA cannot maintain and LEA functions
as part of its overall function, it will be eliminated as part of its responsibility; stated
extensive public review has already been held on this issue; urged the Council support
the JPA; stated that any agency can pull out of the JPA within the year without any
financial obligation or liability; and stated the two-thirds vote requirement was included
to protect the smaller agencies and the integrity of the operation.
Polly Smith reiterated that a JP A is beneficial for certain functions, particularly the
composting element; and suggested a separate rate structure committee to negotiate the
most efficient rates for consideration by a decision making body such as Alameda County
has established.
Councilmember Nygren indicated support for the JP A principal, but suggested this issue
be continued until after a response is received from the County Counsel regarding the
LEA issue.
~
Councilmember Thompson stated this is another bureaucracy being forced upon the
cities by the state while the state continues to take funding away; stated the problem is
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
6
~
with the consumer in its purchasing habits; stated consumers are now being charged too
little and if fees were increased the consumers would be more careful and conscious of
their garbage; stated the goal is to create markets for recycling and an industry that can
be self-supportive; and suggested the Town could meet the State's mandates on its own.
Also, Councilmember Thompson stated he does not support the current JP A and its
strategy towards resolving the solid waste problem. However, he stated this does not
mean that he will not support a future JP A that is structured differently.
Councilmember Thayer stated that the JP A has already been adopted and appears to
be the best approach to addressing these issues, and the Town will have a one year
escape clause if it changes its decision; and recommended the Town Council reaffirm its
, approval of the JP A
Deputy Mayor Friedman agreed that a JP A is needed; stated it is what the citizens want;
and would vote to reaffirm the adoption of the JP A
Mayor Kuhn stated that a multi-county solution is needed to address the composting
issue; expressed concern regarding cost control; but stated he would vote to support the
JPA because it is the best solution for now.
Councilmember Nygren reiterated that she is not prepared to reaffirm the JP A at this
time.
~
....
Therefore, it was. the majority decision of the Council to reaffirm their support for the
JPA
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
S. PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (A.P. #38-182-41; 325 Taylor Road
[Parcel H. Ring Mountain]; Request to Establish a Precise Development
Plan to Allow One Single Family Home, Swimming Pool and Incidental
Structures on 5.3 Acres Off the Taylor Road Extension. Resolution)
The Associate Planner reviewed the staff report and stated one single family residence
is proposed for the 5.3 acres instead of four as allowed by the General Plan; stated the
building envelope layout was determined primarily by the topography of the lot;
reviewed the proposed precise plan; and recommended the Town Council adopt the
proposed resolution approving the precise development plan.
Councilmember Nygren questioned whether the riparian corridor could be preserved;
and the Associate Planner responded that this area requires repair. She further
questioned the need for the 12' retaining wall; and the Town Engineer responded that
he saw no technical problems with the proposed wall.
-
Councilmember Thompson questioned whether access would remain to the Ring
Mountain area; and the Associate Planner responded that a fence would only be erected
around the building envelope.
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
7
~.
Val Schaaf, Project Engineer, presented a model of the proposed home; stated the
closest house is 330 feet away; and stated the site selected for the building envelope was
the most geologically suitable.
Discussion ensued regarding the need for a secondary building envelope, which the
applicant responded was for the driveway, landscaping, and fence; and whether a u-
shaped house would be more desirable, which the applicant responded would require
additional grading into the slide area.
Hal Weiss, 4092 Paradise Drive and builder for the project, stated the building envelope
represents 18.2% of the lot area; stated there is no riparian areas on this lot, but an area
where a pipe drains; stated the lot coverage is 3.5% and both the Staff and Planning
Commission concurred that this is reasonable relative to the size of the lot and the
ability to conform to FAR requirements; stated the building height is 28' from the
existing grade and after grading it will be 24' high at its highest point; stated the
Planning Commission concurred that appropriate measures were taken to minimize the
visual impact by grading, landscaping, and general modulating low profile of the
preliminary design of this house; stated further refinement will be made during the
desi~n review process; stated it is consistent with the general plan; stated 68% of the site
will be open space; and stated the project complies with the zoning ordinance and
environmental review requirements.
~
~
Richard Hill, 2655 Paradise Drive, stated he hoped the home would be built to reflect
the country values of the north side of the Peninsula; expressed concern about the
building envelope location because of mass and privacy concerns from his back deck
areas; stated it should be nestled more into the hillside; suggested moving the envelope
back further into the lot and that the bulk of the house be reduced.
Mr. Schaaf stated that additional landscaping will minimize the visual impacts from Mr.
Hill's home and from Paradise Cay; stated the house was designed into the natural
contours of the site; and stated the one-level home is necessary because of health
reasons of the owner.
Mayor Kuhn closed the public hearing.
,
The Council agreed that many of Mr. Hill's concerns can be resolved during the design
review process.
Councilmember Nygren suggested that the resolution including wording requiring that
any retaining walls or drainage ditches be earth tone colors or screened with landscap-
ing; that all greenhouse lighting be directed downward; and that the landscape plan be
approved and bonded prior to issuance of a building permit to guarantee to the
neighbors that the home will be screened.
Council concurred to include the proposed amendments in the resolution.
J
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
8
Motion:
I"'"
-
Moved:
Vote:
To adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF TIBURON APPROVING A PRECISE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR RING MOUNTAIN PARCEL "H" (PD#6) ASSESSOR
PARCEL NO. 38-182-41, as amended.
Thayer, Seconded by Nygren
AYES: Unanimous
3. TIBURON BLVD. SIGNAGE (Traffic Safety Committee's Report &
Recommendations)
After discussion, it was agreed to continue this item until after specific installation and
purchase costs are received.
Deputy Mayor Friedman requested a survey be conducted to determine what signs can
be removed.
CouncilmemberThompson left the meeting at 11:30 p.m.
E. NEW BUSINESS
6. COMPENSATION/BENEFITS STUDY (Authorize Review of Manage-
ment, Mid-Management and Professional Employees Salary & Benefit
Compensation)
,,..,
'-'
The Finance Director reported that Richard Hinkel of the Citizens Committee has
agreed to work with Staff to provide final scope to the proposed compensation/benefits
study.
The Council discussed the need for this study and including other East Bay cities for
comparisons such as Alamo.
Motion:
Moved:
Vote:
To authorize the appropriation of $4,000 for a Compensation Study as
proposed.
Thayer, Seconded by Nygren
AYES: Unanimous
7.
1993-94 TOWN BUDGET PROGRAM (Consider Revised Budget Calendar
and Public Hearing Dates)
The Town Council approved the proposed amended budget calendar hearing dates.
8. DOWNTOWN MAINTENANCE STRIP LANDSCAPING (Approve Public
Works Recommendation)
Councilmember Nygren requested the plants be selected carefully.
JI
The Town Council approved the proposed replacement of lawns with low growing shrubs
and the installation of a drop system as proposed.
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
9
r
9. CORPORATION YARD RESURFACING (Authorize Non-Budgeted
Overlay Project)
I
The Town Council authorized the overlay project as proposed by Staff.
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion:
Moved:
Vote:
To approve the Consent Calendar consisting of the following item:
10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES #967, February 17, 1993.
Thayer, Seconded by Nygren,
AYES: Unanimous
ABSENT: Thompson
EMERGENCY ITEM - TALDAN
The Town Attorney requested this matter be placed on the agenda as an emergency
item.
Motion:
Moved:
Vote:
,~
~
To place this issue on the agenda as an emergency item.
Friedman, Seconded by Thayer
AYES: Friedman, Thayer, Kuhn
ABSTAINED: Nygren
ABSENT: Thompson
The Town Attorney reported that Taldan representatives have stated four offers are
pending on the property and they intend to make it a condition of escrow that the fees
plus interest be paid to the Town prior to the close of escrow, but an additional six
months is required; therefore, they are requesting a six-month extension to the
development fee payment be approved by the Council.
Motion:
Moved: .
Vote:
To approve the extension of the Taldan payment schedule six months with
the requirement that the interest rate remain at 10%.
Friedman, Seconded by Thayer
AYES: Friedman, Thayer, Kuhn
ABSTAINED: Nygren
ABSENT: Thompson
G. COUNCIL. COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE REPORTS
None.
H. COMMUNICATIONS
None.
JI
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
10
I. STAFF AND TOWN MANAGER REPORTS
r
I
11. New Town Center (Staff Proceeding with Environmental Impact Process
RFP)
The Council agreed to'direct Staff to pursue a negative declaration on the New Town
Center project and pursue cost estimates for the retention of technical experts necessary
to support a finding of negative declaration.
A The Acting Planning Director reported that Jim Leverson of the Library
Committee has requested the Library plans be reviewed by the DRB as a
courtesy on April 8th. He further requested a Council decision regarding whether
story poles should be erected; and the, Town Council agreed this would be
appropriate.
.T. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Town Council of the Town of Tiburon,
Mayor Kuhn adjourned the meeting at 11:45 p.m., to Wednesday, March 31, 1993.
-",..
~
ALVIN R. KUHN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
~~f./oWN CLERK
~
TOWN COUNCIL MINUTES #969 3/17/93
11